Dishman-Mica S 3415 Circle K Corp - Canopy
/ ✓~tj ~ ~J ( j ~
~
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION WORKSNEET
PLEASE PRINT AND COMPLETE ONLY THOSE PARTS OF THE FORM YOD UNOERSTAND
(Please return ihis original and your builOing plans to the Depertmeni of Buildtng and Satety)
/ I oivna►'s Narne . li~tJ (fi~t) (m) T1;8" ment useOnty'
~ , ~1~ir POep - - - ~ 1 Comm
2 ProJect Addre ss not Meit Ing Addtess) a Roed erng Sp3+¢e 2ip
s I►~ w~ ~.wo- - M'l (A ~ o
3 acyfconun,unrty state sucdivraronrP+ar Name ' %5 O G 'l
, 4 A P8rog1 No Lci BloClc
- 32S l ~ O I~; 4*• OEPARTMENT USE ONLY w tr •
I 1
S Zone Acl 0 Zorte PrOleN No
8 Owe11 t No, ol9ulldings Sq Ft Iqae Oapth Frontase
i
7 Se! 6aek-Fron1 (L)8-1 (R)S2 Rear Onsus Trect Modute No Inttt818
S V N rYI
• 18 Arthltett Flrm Name Stree! Addresa +
Zlp City Stete Hhone
( )
Gbntect Pason Phone It diffenent Ihan abore
1 )
Oontrectot Flrm Name 8treet Addreea
_s? ! C~QF A" /rD
Lp Gty 8tete Phone
75(yol 1 vJ4~,~'~' (9/8 ) ~09 ~-loBG ~
Oontm fteOn Uceiiw No Phone II diltelefflithan above
~ `9. 11 M /44T/W , I
8 OwnerlApent (It dlfferenl then et above) Buslrteas Addrese
9 Zlp Clty State Phone
( )
12 Revlew Required Plan CAeclc (Y!N) ~ Other (YlN) BEPA Exempt (44) pat~ -
16 Type Wortc 'Bidg O MH JQ Nsw p,Replaoe ;K QtAer
O Flre O pemo :1 Add/Aller O Move
14 OasCrIb8lAlWk 7~
~~o ~ V P
10 Applic8nt Name Slreet Addrese
11 Zip Glty Stato Phone
4 Lender - - " - ' - ~ 'SJreet Address ~
Dp Gty Slate Pnone
I 1
Contect Pprson Phpne If dlfterent tnan aDove
Ad01t fafial I r fotmat lon
- - '
^t0
~
DEPARTiVIENT APPROVALS
This is not a Permit
Appllcation Type
(Standard unless (Indicafed approvals required In eilher "reteaee" or "release wlth condltlons" °
otherwlse Indtcated) spaoe prior to permit Isauance )
❑ Fast Track '
Eerly Start Releasa ~
Release w/cond 1 Mold 2 ~
,
Envlronmenfel Health D Comme►cial, I'l Residential
W 1101 Cotiege p New Construction. 1--i Bldg alterationladditlon '
Room 200, Ci Additionel atructure.
APPLICATION p -
,
Conaltions/Comments ~S
_ r
.
- , ~
~ Planning/Zoning• O Commerclal, ❑ Cert of Enemptlon, ❑ Frontage,
N 721 Jefferson U Setbacks, 0 lot w4d, 0 lot aite. O use/zone,
O CU, variance, zons chenge, shorellne. O fence,
O Other
Ccndltione/Comments
i _
h ~
Engirteero• D Commercial, D Residentlal; 0 Flood plaln.
N'811 Jefferson O dralnage CI newaccess/approscA, O fence,
cLl road improvements
~ Conditlone/Comments
U
, e
1 • - I ❑ uNiIt16$.
e
N 811 Je(terson
Can0ltlons/Comments
, - -
,
: - v
Other.
Plan Exam
Flre Prev.
ConditlonelComments
a
~
_Q
ProJect Representatlve Telephone
~ Agenclea Performing Speclal Inspectton
y C
.W a _
~
r ~ 2- -
~ °
~ c
3 -
1 Indkete above or ef tech condlUona reletive to /lnel ae bullt approvel
2 Indlcete above or ellach reasone for Rotd
l r
A
•
,
P • ~
MINUTES
Octobet 2 6, 1967
ZONE C HANGE
ZE-15-60 -AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS: REDLIN AND PRING
(This matter was postponed from the Planning Commission's
September 28th meeting to allow the applicant time to prepare a
revised Traffic and Development Plan and provide opportunity for
site inspection. )
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approve r subject to development
substantially as indicated in the applicant's revised Traffic and DevelopmenL Plan
dated Octobar 18 r 19 67 { which includes three statements of intent as follows:
1) Architectural deaign of the building shall be natural in character incorporating
split cedat shake roof, qlass, brick or stone and dark stained wood trlm, similar
to that shown an the drawing; 2) Perimeter landscaping and sprinkltng system
shall be provided in areas as indicated on the Site Plan Sheet No. 1; and 3)
Exterior lighting on the building and in parking lot areas shall be low intensity,
similar in design to that shown in the schematic drawinga - Sheet No. 2. There
shall be no advertising signs other than those on the building. The property
should be posted with a siqn stating the zoriing and proposed davelopment.
Backqround;
Oa March 31, 1960, the Planning Commission recommended aFproval
for change in zoninq from Aqricultural to Local Business subject to the
following conditions: 1) That the zone change shall not become effective
until such time that the applicant 6ubmits a Traffic and Development Plan
to the Planning Commission for review, assuring that adequate steps have
been taken Co lessan traffic congestioa, and 2} That no access or egress
to the Dishman-Mica Road from the property in question be permitted. The
Hoard of County Commissioners concurred vvith the Planning Commission's
recommendation and postponed final action until a Traffic and Development
• Plan was received and approved by the Planning Commission.
r a ~ r~..~
P ,
Reasons:
.
M l. Ob)ectors alleqe that this proposal, if epproved, would constitute
spot zoning. The Flarlning Commissian does not consider this
. proposal as a"spot zone" because this business location was worked
i • , out as a part of the entire Chester Hills Heights plat; approved as a
r.r < i part of the plat; and subsequently incorporated into the Comprehen-
sive Plan. Naiqhborhood shopping facilities are characteristically
small in area and characteristically surrounded by residential devel-
opme-ut. They are not nece a sarily therefor spot zone s.
_ 2 - (contd. )
~
~
~ i
ZE-is-so - AGRICvLTvRAL To LoCAL sUszrrEss (contd.)
~
' Z. The appiicant has submitted a revised 15raffic and DevelQpment Plan
incorporating I} Parkfng lot Iighting Iocations wtth type of fixture;
2) Six-foot (si,ght-obscuring) cedar fencing aloriq the north praperty
line; 3) Six-foot randscaped plan#inq s#rips,, with installed sprinkler
systems, alang the east,, we9t, north, and sauth property lines
(north plantfng strip to ba ten (10) feet wide); and 4) 5tatements of
intent dsscribing the architectural style, Iighting, and signs to be
utflized. The buiiding floor space has been reduced from 11, Z04
sq.f t. to 9, 000 sq .#t. in order to prov►ide ropm for 73 aff-street
parkirig spaces; a rat,fo of agproximately 1 sq.ft, of floor area to
2 sq.ft. of aff.-straet parking area.
, In summ►axy, it ts our apdnian that the developrnent would be
' compatible with surraunc€ing resident3al developrnent expected in the
future,
~
I
3. The Spokane County Engineer's Office has been consultsd an the new
Alot plan and has appxvved the locatian of ingress and egress gofnts
alang both Unfversity and D#shman-lV[ica Roads,,
4. The property in questivn is bordered on the west by the Dishman-
Mica arterial road and an the east by Lfrliaersity Road, acallector
arteria.l. The property is trianguiar in shape as formed by the two
intersecting arteri,als and is bordered on the r,orth by Lats 6, 7,, and
I 8, of Chester Hills Heights piat filed vrrith the Spvkane Gounty
~'.uditor on iVtarch 22, 1961, It is noted on the plat that the subject
prvperty (Lot 9, 81vck was reserved for local business establish-
ments by the plattors evert #,hough the px°operty was not zoned "7oca1
Business".
In general, the irnmediate surroundinq area has not beert developed
residentially; however, five residentfal bufldin+q permits have been
issued far lots wlthfn the pxat since 19 61 . New residential deve].op-
ment is expected to continue in the Chester Hills Heights plat and
surrounding a3-ea wh#ch should be adequate to suppart the praposed
local business development within the next three to four years.
- 3 - (cantd.)
►
~
ZE-15-60 - AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS (contd.)
General Data:
l. Locagon: Section 32,Townshtp 25 N.,Range 44,EWM.
Lot 9, Block 7 of Chester Hills Heiqhts.
2. Applicants: Kenneth Redlin
Route # 7
Spokane, Washington
John Pring
East 6500 Sprague Avenue
Spokane 4, VJashinqton
3. S1te Size: Approxi mately 1. 5 acre s
4. Existing Zoninq: Agricultural, established january 6, 1952
5. Propo sed Zoninq: Loc al Bu si ne a s
On March 31, 1960, the Planninq Commission
recommended to the Bosrd of County Commis-
sioners approval of the zone change to Local
Busine s s. The Board concurred with the
Planninq Commission's recocnmendation, but
postponed action until a Traffic and Develop-
irtent Plan was received and approved by the
Planning Commission.
6. Proposed Use of Property; Shopping Center
7. A,pplication of Zoning
Provision: Chapter 4.21
_4 -
s
I1'
FINOINGS May 19, 1978
RECONSIDERATION'OF CONDI7IONS OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION
ZE-156-60 - AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS: PRING (Tupper)
1. PR4POSED ACTION
The applicant is requesting that Condition No. 1 of the approved plot plan
be amended.
Condition No. 1 now reads: "Architectural Oesign of the building
shall be natural in character, incorporating hand split cedar
shake roof, glass, brick or stone and dark stained wood trim
The applicant is requesting Condition No. 1 to read:
"The proposed building to be constructed on the site will be
approxi mately 3,500 squa re feet on the ma i n f 1 oor, and wi 11 be used
for general offices and local business. The building will be two-
stories, with aluminum siding, a brick facing, and aluminum shake
roof and located on the property as shown on the revjsed p~ot plan."
II. SPECIAI INFORMATION
A. Staff Environmental Review:
Concluded that this request is exempt from the SEPA requirements under
WAC 197-10-170 (5) (i).
B. Conditions:
If this request is approved,all previous conditions attached to
ZE-15-60 will be attached. -
C
1-
•
~
MAY 19 1918
~ r
Mr. Main moved, Mr. Kennedy seconded, that the requested item
be placed on the July agenda. Messrs. Main, Kennedy, and
McCoury voted "Yes". Mrs. Rawlings and Mrs. $yrne voted "No".
Mr. Quigley abstained from voting. The motion was lost for lack
of a quorum.
2) Mr. Robert Bonucelli requested that the Commission place zone
change, ZE-24-78, Multiple Family Suburban to Residential Office,
on property located at the northeast corner of Broadway and E11a
Roads in the Valley.
Mr. 6onucelli, North 4828 Northwood Orive, explained that the
property would accommodate a 7-unit apartment at the present
time; hawever, the applicant proposed to construct a residential
office on the site.
Mr. Kennedy suggested that either the Policy Committee or Long-
Range Planning Committee set criteria for accepting requests
similar to the two presented at this hearing, and present the
results of the study to the Commission at their June hearing.
Mr. McCoury anrounced that he would assign the project t o the
Policy Committee for consideration.
Mr. Kennedy moved, Mrs. 6yrne seconded, that the request of
Mr. 6onucelli and all future requests that come to the staff be
deferred until after the Commission has adopted some criteria for
consideration of items to be placed on the agenda other than the
61% of required signatures. Mr. Quigley asked that there be a
time table on which the applicant should work this out, with the
assistance of the staff and Prosecuting Attorney's Office.
Mrs. Rawlings, Chairperson of the Policv Comnittee, stated that
she believed the Palicy Comittee could respond to the request
within thirty days, and the propo5ed policy would appear on the
June agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
~ 3. ZE-158-60, AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS: PRING (Tupper)
That the change in conditions of the ione reClassification request
(ZE-15B-60) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings,
as the Planning Comission's Findings of fact as well as the issuance of a
Oeclaration of Non-Significance. (Mr. Kennedy moved, Mrs. Rawlings
seconded. Vote was unanimous. Mr. Main did not participate in the
discussion or voting on this item.)
4. ZE-149A-73, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: GUTHRIE (0'Connell)
That the change in conditions of the zone retlassification request
(ZE-I49A-73) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings,
as the Planning Commission's Findings of fact as well as the added condition
that 65% of the land is to be kep in open space. (Mrs. Rawlings moved,
Mr. Main seconded. Yote was unanimous.)
-2-
~ , .
~
,
MINUTES OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CQMMISSION HEARING OF
MAY 19 v 1918
WNEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Comission did hold a public
meeting on May 19, 1978, to consider the testimony and requests af several
applicants, obJectors, and other interested parties concerning the below-
referenced zone cl ass i fi cati ons and other i tems of busi ness , and
WHEREAS, At said hearfng opportunity was afforded those favoring and
those opposing all items of business, and
WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Rawlings, Mrs. Byrne, and the Messrs.
Kennedy, Main, and Quigley, were in attendance and constituted a quorum, and
WHEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Comission fully considered the
testimony given, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented,
recommends to the Board of County Commissioners the following:
1. Discussion Items
a) Report on Comnissioners' Actions:
Tom Davis of the staff reported that the Board of County Commissioners
had accepted the Planning Commission's Minutes of April 21, 1978;
however, that two items from this agenda had been appealed:
1) The proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would
delete beauty parlors as a prohibited use for home occupations
in the Two-Family Zone and recommended by the Planning
Commission for denial, has been appealed.
The 6oard has set June 1, 1978, at 1:30 P.M. for the time and
date of the appeal hearing.
2) The zone change proposal, ZN-39-78, Agricultural to Restricted
Industrial - Griffith, on property located at Freya, north of
Franci s, was recomrnended for deni al by the Comni ss i on and has
been appealed.
The Board of County Cortmissioners has set June 1, 19789 at
3:00 P.M. for the appeal hearing.
b) Mr. Davis reported that the staff had received two citizen requests
to have zone reclassifications placed on the Commission's agenda
without the benefit of obtaining sufficient property owners'
signatures on the petition circulated by the proposed applicant.
i) Mr. J. Pat 0'Neill, ZE-41-78, requested to be placed on the
next availabie agenda for property located at the northeast
corner of Fourth Avenue and Sullivan Road. Ray Riccardi,
representing Mr. 0'Neill, announced that only about 55% of the
reauired signatures had been obtained.
- 1