Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ordinance 09-008 Amending Comprehensive Plan for 2009
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 09-008 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 06-010 ADOPTING THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE, PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, through Spokane Valley Ordinance 06-010, the City of Spokane Valley adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows comprehensive plans to be amended annually(RCW 36.70A130); and WHEREAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council) or by the Community Development Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of property consistent with land use map designations; and WHEREAS, consistent with the GMA, City of Spokane Valley adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code provides that amendment applications shall be received until November 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; and WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, staff issued Determinations of Nonsignif cance (DNS) on December 19, 2008 for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald on December 19, 2008, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development was notified on February 27, 2009 pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 providing a 60- day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 1 of 6 WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a briefing on February 26, 2009, to review the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald on February 20, 2009; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2009, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties ; and WHEREAS, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009 at which time the Commission received evidence, information, public testimony and a staff report and recommendation; and WHEREAS, the Commission, at the conclusion of the public hearing and after deliberating on the proposed amendments and information presented during the course of the hearing developed recommendations on site-specific map amendments CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09. Further research was requested on site-specific map amendment CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. The Commission made recommendations on text amendments CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. The Commission requested minor changes to the Public/Quasi-Public provisions in CPA-05-09. The Commission continued the public hearing to March 26, 2009 for CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09; and WHEREAS, the Commission deliberated on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09 on March 26, 2009; the Commission recommended approval of all amendment proposals; and WHEREAS, on March 31, 2009, Council reviewed the Commission's recommendations on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2009, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2009, Council considered a second ordinance reading at which time Council approved written findings of fact setting forth their basis for approval of the proposed amendments. WHEREAS, on May 12, 2009, Council removed CPA-01-09 for further consideration at a later date. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive Plan adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010. Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 2 of 6 Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, and approves the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and text. The City Council hereby adopts the Commission's findings, specifically that: 1. Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 20.2009 and each site was posted with a`Notice of Public Hearing" sign,with a description of the proposal. 2. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA--RCW 43.21C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendment. 4. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Non-significance (DNS)were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on December 19,2008. 5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on December 19, 2008 consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance. 6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12,2009,to consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public testimony,the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. excluding CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. 7. The Commission continued the public hearing for CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09 to March 26, 2009. 8. On March 26, 2009, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. 9. The planning goals of the Growth Management Act (GMA) were considered and the proposed amendments are consistent with the GMA. 10. The goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan were considered and the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 11. The proposed land use and zoning designations are consistent with the current use of the properties. 12. Findings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria contained in Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan amendment and area-wide rezones) of.the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC). 13. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and text amendments will not adversely affect the public's general health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment "A." Section 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan as adopted through Ordinance 'No. 06-010, is hereby amended as set forth in Attachments "A" and "B". The Comprehensive Plan Amendments are generally described as follows: Land Use Map Amendments (Attachment A) Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 3 of 6 File No. CPA-02-09: Application/Description of Proposal: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006 from High Density Residential(HDR)to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The northeast corner of 4h Avenue and Sullivan Road,parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006,addressed as 315 and 325 South Sullivan Road; further located in the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 24,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington. Counsel Decision: Change to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) File No. CPA-03-09: Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Office(0)to Community Commercial(CC)on six(6)parcels composing approximately 3.5 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located between Mullan Road and Argonne Road from the north side of Boone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; specifically located in the SE 1/4 of Section 17,Township 25 North,Range 44,East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley,Washington Council Decision: Change to Community Commercial (C) File No. CPA-04-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from Community Commercial (CC)to Low Density Residential(LDR)on approximately .47 acres of land. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Amendment Location: The proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet north of Sprague Avenue on the east side of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 25 North,Range 44 East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington. Council Decision: Change to Low Density Residential (LDR) Comprehensive Plan Chapter Amendments (Attachment B). Chapter 2 —Land Use; Chapter 3 — Transportation; Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities Plan & Public Services; and Chapter 8 — Natural Environment.) File No. CPA-05-09: Application/Description of Proposal: A City initiated text amendment to Chapter 2—Land Use. The amendment updates Table 2.1 with new land quantity analysis information;updates/adds annexation goals,policies and text. The amendment also evaluates all properties designated public/quasi-public and proposes an appropriate land use designation and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the property. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2—Land Use will have city-wide implications. Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city. Council Decision: Adopt Text amendments to Chapter 2—Land Use; eliminate the public/quasi public land use designation and change to land use designations consistent with surrounding designations. File No. CPA-06-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 3—Transportation:Add text for new bike classification; add new bike lanes that are complete or will be by the end of the construction season: -Montgomery from Woodruff to University Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 4 of 6 -Wellesley from Evergreen to Progress •Mansfield from Montgomery to SR 27 Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave,Ste 106, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 3—Transportation will have city-wide implications. Council Decision: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 3—Transportation. File No. CPA-07-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 4—Capital Facilities Plan(CFP)and Public Services: Update the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan(TIP);update Water Districts& Wellheads map; update Parks&Recreation map;update 6-year Sewer map;add annexation area level of service language: Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 4—CFP,&.Public Services will have city-wide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 4—CFP & Public Services. File No. CPA-08-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 8—Natural Environment: update Wetlands map;update Fish& Wildlife Habitat map. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 8—Natural Environment will have city-wide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 8—Natural Environment. Section 5. Comprehensive Plan - Copies on File-Administrative Action. The Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well, as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Comprehensive Plan in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 6. Liability. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 7. Severability. if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of May 2009 Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 5 of 6 Mayor, • 'chard Munson AT 'r S/. 'ify`Clerk, Christine ainbridge 1 Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorne Date of Publication: _3 -02„2 -6,9 Effective Date: 3% -d Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 6 of 6 Strikethrough Pages Chapter 2: Land Use Chapter 4: Capital Facilities Attachment B Chapter 2 - Land Use R City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I CHAPTER 2 — LAND USE 2.0 Introduction The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) by providing a framework for Spokane Valley's future physical development and by setting forth policy direction for Spokane Valley's current and future land uses. Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed in this chapter, should result in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land use policies are supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Map (Map 2.1) that provides a visual illustration of the proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map allocates a supply of land for such uses as retail, office, manufacturing, public facilities, services, employment7 parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand. 2.1 Planning Context State and county land use policies provide a statutory framework for the development of City land use policies. It is important to briefly review state and county level policies to better understand historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter. 2.1.1 Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act(GMA)acknowledges that, "...a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state'." The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of local comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 14 goals to be, "...used exclusively for the purpose of guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations." GMA goals pertaining to land use include: • Urban Growth — Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. • Reduce Sprawl—Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low density development. • Housing—Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. • Open Space and Recreation— Encourage the retention of open space and development of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks. • Environment — Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality and the availability of water. • Public Facilities and Services—Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. • Historic Preservation — Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance. 1 RCW 36.70A.010 Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 1 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Idaho. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Post Falls and Coeur d'Alene and the City of Spokane, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Spokane Valley's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy would achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and support the City's desired quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: 1. A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. 2. Redevelopment and development of the Sprague Avenue/Appleway Boulevard corridor into an area of quality commercial and Mixed-use development. 3. Establishment of design standards. 4. Preservation of existing single family neighborhoods. The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 2.1). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. 2.3.2 Capital Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be financed by impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), money from the City's general fund or voter approved bonds. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Annexation of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs)_ to the City of Spokane Valley may be a logical progression to ensure centralized planning and prevention of urban sprawl. A major goal of the GMA is to reduce urban sprawl by encouraging development in urban areas where adequate public facilities exist. GMA further states,that cities are the logical provider of urban government services. Prior to annexation, the City of Spokane Valley will consider the economic impacts of providing municipal services at a level consistent with other areas within the City. The City will not provide a lower level of service in areas being considered for annexation that were in existence in the proposed areas at the time immediately preceding the annexation process. The City will consider PAAs'topography, land utilization, and population density when determining service levels. Water Availability— Potable water is provided to residents of Spokane Valley by thirteen water and irrigation districts. All drinking water used by residents in Spokane Valley is drawn from the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. Water Quality - Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water and continued health of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining the health of the aquifer that relies on surface water for recharge. Contamination of an aquifer by contaminated surface water can lead to serious health concerns and/or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concern and impacts of new development, the City has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to ensure water, quality including the development of detention/retention facilities to control rate and Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 8 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan state's eighth largest city. The 2004 population estimate reflects an annual increase of approximately 2.4 percent over the city's 2003 population estimate. The most recent OFM estimate for Spokane Valley is 88, 0-920 as of April 1, 20072008. This figure represents an annual growth rate of approximately 1.5 percent. The average annual growth rate is approximately 1.91% over I the 4 year period from 2003 to 2007. Future population growth is forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population growth was distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a methodology prepared by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO). The City of Spokane Valley was not allocated population growth originally because the City had not been incorporated when this action took place. However, the County did allocate population to the "Spokane Valley IUGA", which includes the new cities of Spokane Valley and Liberty Lake. This process resulted in a population growth allocation of 39,431 to the Spokane Valley IUGA. This IUGA also includes areas within the UGA that are still in unincorporated Spokane County. The graph above indicates Spokane Valley's 20 year population using a 1.5% and 2.5% annual growth rate. Using the 1.5% annual growth rate, which is consistent with past estimated growth rates in the Spokane Valley area, the estimated 2025 population of Spokane Valley is 114,765 or an increase of 30,815 persons. The 2.5% annual growth rate results in a 2025 population of 141,011, an increase of 57,061. Spokane Valley proposed a population allocation of 20,666 to the SCEO based on the regional land capacity methodology. This request was proposed as an "interim" request based on the land/population capacity within the existing corporate boundaries of Spokane Valley. The reason for this request was based on the significant issues related to waste water treatment capacity. Once the waste water issues have been resolved, Spokane Valley will prepare a revision to the population allocation and present this information to the SCEO. This issue is discussed in more detail below. The Spokane County Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) approved this population allocation in November 2004. The City has continued to refine the population projections based on the preceding information. At a City Council retreat held on February 11, 2006, the City Council directed staff to utilize a 1.89% annual growth rate for purposes of population forecasting. This resulted in a 20 year population forecast of 38,614 persons. This information was presented to the SCEO on February 15, 2006 when the City officially requested a 20 year population allocation of 38,614 for planning purposes. In 2006 the BoCC approved via Resolution 06-0438 a population allocation of 33,125 for Spokane Valley for planning purposes. 2.4.2 Land Capacity Analysis The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population growth. The GMA also requires a Land Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate the population growth is shaped. Countywide population forecasts are identified by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in developing a regional methodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County. The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3, 1995. The adopted methodology is patterned after the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled Issues in Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 10 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Designating Urban Growth Areas Part 1-Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1 (Urban Growth Areas Policy#3). However, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane Courty. The following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the land capacity analysis: 1. Identify lands that are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant, partially-used and under-utilized land (in other words. subtract all parcels committed to other uses). 2. Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical limitation. 3 Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes. 4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development for social and economic reasons. 5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for development within the community plan's 20-year time frame. 6. Build in a safety factor. 7. Determine total capacity. Spokane Valley prepared a land capacity analysis of the city and surrounding UGAs based on the above regional methodology. -- - - - - _ _ - _. -- • __ .e.- - --"e_ __, - _• has been deleted from the information below. The results of this analysis were presented to the p4r-peses- The results of the land capacity analysis are contained in the table below: Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis (updated July 200412/05/08) Vacant and Net Developable Potential New Population Area Partially Used Acres Dwelling Units Capacity Land Spokane Valley 4,399 (Incorporated Area) 12 Northeast _ 4,� 22 22 22 Northwood 1.367 1418 East -^` 99 427 Southeast 487 238 f5 2281 South 564 2Z2 1.089 _ 2122 Ponderosa I� _ lag EdgeclifilDlshman--_ 10 122 §2Z 1.319 TOTAL 6 458 2.481 12.575 38.433 Spokane Valley recommended to the Steering Committee that both the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Liberty Lake receive an interim population allocation that could be accommodated within the existing city limits of each city. The rationale for this recommendation was based on the situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region. It is estimated that the Spokane County treatment plant will run out of capacity in 2009, and the Liberty Lake Water & Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capacity. Permits to expand the Spokane County and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt. Given the potential constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to allocate Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 11 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the sanitary sewer issues are resolved. 2.4.3 Potential Annexation Areas The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise potential annexation areas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs) for the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete examination of urban services was required at the time the County established the UGA. moreover, Spokane County was obligated to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of Spokane Valley. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA. When Liberty Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much of the "Valley UGA" was included as part of the newly created cities. but not all. In 2003 and again in 2006, Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA. These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6 square miles) in land area for Liberty Lake. As Table 2.1 indicates there are a number of unincorporated UGAs adjacent to Spokane Valley. Several of these UGAs are only contiguous to Spokane Valley (south, southeast, and northeast) and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County and the metro cities of Spokane Valley. Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have begun the process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs). Through this process. the City of Spokane Valley will identify areas needed to accommodate allocated population growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery. 2.4.4 Development of Goals, Policies, and Actions for Annexation The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties to designate Urban Growth Area (UGAs) within which urban growth shall be encouraged RCW 36.70A.110 (1). UGAs are to include sufficient land to accommodate the twenty-year population growth projected for the county. The GMA imposes planning requirements to influence the ability of a city to annex UGAs. A city is required by GMA to adopt policies for land use. housing, capital facilities. utilities, and transportation within the city's UGA. In order to meet this requirement the City of Spokane Valley has developed policies and goals to provide policy guidance for annexation of territory within UGAs. Annexation will have financial impacts on the city; it may be positive or negative. The City may need to develop an annexation study to assess the financial impacts especially for larger annexations. - The Capital Facilities chapter identifies current service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas LPAAs) as a starting point for the detailed analysis that may be needed prior to annexation. 2.5 Land Use Designations The land use designations in the SVCP recognize the F Apr�.' • relationships between broad patterns of land uses. - , The designations set forth locational criteria for each specific class of uses consistent with the long-term { ; objectives of the SVCP. These designations provide - the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts - a c �. ' V* The location of the comprehensive plan land use �"�` �_ ii • A - designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan 1: ��'=�' - Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Adopted April 25. 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2 -Land Use Page 12 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan operations. Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding areas. Commercial. residential and most recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry, except for small-scale ancillary uses serving the industrial area. The conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be limited. Limiting incompatible uses ensures a competitive advantage in business recruitment by providing adequate industrial land supply, reducing land use conflicts and preventing inflation of land prices. Moreover, allowing a wide variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the Industrial areas would be in conflict with other portions of this Plan related to concentrating major commercial growth in nodes at the intersection of major streets. Light Industry The Light Industry designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and internal and community compatibility. Uses may include high technology and other low-impact industries. Light Industry areas may incorporate office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. Non-industrial uses should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses. The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. 2.5.7 Parks/Open Space The Public/Quasi PublicParks and Open Space -;; designation is intended to s 4. • •1-- of the City devoted to civic, cultural, educational, and • needs of the community 36 those needs relate to public cervices, open space and institutions whether - they are publicly or privately sponsored or operated. f�/t Moreover, this dosignation provides for and protects BI) , parks, open space, and other natural physical assets �� of the community. - - •- •- - - --- • - -- ]' (( in depth discussion of Essential Public Facilities, 2.6 Development Review Process The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation for implementing zoning and development regulations. In developing policy concerning future land use regulations, or revisions to existing regulations, every effort has been made to instill certainty and efficiency in the development process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely permit processing. Through the goals and policies of this Plan, the City will continue to strive to provide an efficient and timely review system. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 20 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Historic and Cultural Resources Goals & Policies Goal LUG-15 Identify and protect archeological and historic sites and structures. Policies LUP-15.1 Continually identify and evaluate archaeological and historic sites to determine which should be preserved. LUP-15.2 Link cultural resource preservation with local economic development strategies. LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the preservation of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties. Land Use/Transportation Connection Goals & Policies Goal LUG-16 Provide a street system that connects neighborhoods. Policies LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus or car. LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new development or redevelopment. Joint Planning Goals and Policies Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley should continue to coordinate with Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth areas. Policies LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interiocal agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County to: • Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA mitigation; and • Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and County should ensure that planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake. LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County, appropriate fire districts, school districts, and water service providers to assure managed growth in urban growth areas. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 34 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Potential Annexation Area Goals and Policies Goal LUG-18 Identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valley that are consistent with the Spokane County regional urban growth area boundary. Policies LUP-18.1 Within the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are contiguous to the city limits and not assigned to another city. LUP-18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the regional urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and ROW 36.70. LUP-18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to accommodate Spokane Valley's 20 year population allocation. LUP-18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located outside the designated urban growth area. LUP 18.5 PurEuo intoclocal-agrocmonts with- Spokane County that viie-414 provide for LUP-18.g5 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for any newly proposed urban growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies. Goal LUG-19 Collaborate with adiacent cities, Spokane County and affected residents Policies LUP-19.1 Pursue interlocal agreements with Spokane County to support col aborative joint planning within potential annexation areas to ensure consistent development. LUP-19.2 Inform affected residents arosert owners and businesses in the annexation process. LUP-19 3 Include language in an interlocal agreement utilizing the tool of annexation, prior to urban development, to control the type. quality, and location of development in potential annexation areas. LUP-19.4 Coordinate with Spokane County to work with affected neighborhoods upon annexation to provide a smooth transition from Spokane County to the City of Spokane Valley administration. Goal LUG-20 Promote order! •rowth within gotential annexation areas Policies LUP-2011 Perform a fiscal analysis and provide a service plan for all areas proposed for annexation. Lup-20.2 Incorporate potential annexation areas in the Capital Facilities Plan including proposed locations for new capital facilities. LUP-20.3 Strive to retain neighborhood integrity_in adjusting potential annexation areas boundaries. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2-Land Use Page 35 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal LUG-21 Develop an annexation process for potential annexation areas Policies LUP-21.1 Evaluate annexations within the potential annexation areas based on the following criteria: • The City's ability, either in house. by contract. or by special purpose district. to provide public services at the City's adopted level of service • The annexation boundary should provide a contiguous and regular boundary with current City limits • The annexation boundary, where appropriate should use physical boundaries, including but not limited to. bodies of water, existing or future right-of-way, roads, and topography • Assessment of staff time and expense involved in processing the annexation request • Review right-of-way issues prior to defining boundaries of individual annexations to determine logical inclusions or exclusions • The annexation boundary. where appropriate, should adjust any impractical or irregular boundaries • When the proposed annexation is located in the vicinity of a public facility, the City should evaluate the feasibility of modifying the annexation boundary to include the public facility LUP-21.2 Process annexations in accordance with State annexation laws in a timely and efficient manner. LUP-21.3 Generally, the City of Spokane Valley prefers the Petition Method of Annexation. LUP-21.4 Ensure that newly annexed territory accepts its equitable share of the City's bonded indebtedness. Adopted April 25. 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 36 of 36 Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Essential Public Facilities Goal CFG-11 Collaborate with all Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. Policies CFP-11.1 Follow the process for siting essential public facilities as set forth in the Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Potential Annexation Areas Goal CFG-12 Provide capital facilities to serve and direct future growth within the City of Spokane Valley Potential Annexation Areas Policies CFP-12.1 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in the potential annexation areas CFP-12.2 Considering. in advance, property acquisition opportunities for future facilities including but not limited to parks, police facilities, stormwater facilities. greenbelts, open space, and street connections CFP-12.3 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in developing capital improvement programs and studies addressing multi jurisdictional issues 4.4 Capital Facilities Plan 4.4.1 Introduction The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides an analysis of the facilities and services required to support the future land use and growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes a six year capital projects and a financing plan for facilities provided by the City. The finance plan identifies specific revenue sources that the City reasonably anticipates will be available in the year the project is scheduled to be constructed. The CFP includes Level of Service (LOS) standards for each public facility or service and requires that new development be served by adequate facilities. The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities consistent with the land use element and concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of development. 4.4.2 Growth Assumption On November 30, 2004, the Spokane County Board of Commissioners approved Spokane Valley's requested population allocation of 20,666 people. The allocation is the amount of people the City can accommodate within its current boundary. Spokane Valley considers this an "interim" allocation until wastewater treatment capacity issues are resolved. Because Spokane Valley did not request an allocation outside of its City limits, facilities required to serve Urban Growth Areas adjacent to the City are not analyzed in this plan. These areas are under the jurisdiction of Spokane County; therefore, capital facilities planning activities within UGAs will continue to be the County's responsibility. The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes: Table 4.4 Population Projection Year 20062008 2012 2025 Population 86,01088 920 92.243 105,676 4.4.3 Level of Service Adopted April 25. 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 11 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). State Assistance The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the Sidewalk Program (SP). City Funds Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds for transportation projects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel Tax. 20 3 2008 Item P ro j c c t Erefp TO Primary I City-A veer Source ($) Amount 3 ,83 57263 6 7 - }s 1.2+2 4,202 s University Evergreen -."_ 2 gvereyeen Park ), �.. 4-9 B•{ er 4-2 Par4c-Road—griekjiog-t4e Valley/BNS=-Grade ref-•ed Separation 13 894 Carnahan 1.._. .__ S A 44 44 44th-AVe-Pathway—Sande-to kneed ►#t Sands L"+Joodru# STP(E) z 3.7 Rf.S UAP F•1 $3449 41,664 Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financinci Plan 2009-2014 (dollars in thousands) 2009 112m Protect From To Primary City Amount Total Annual Source Amount Q Broadway Avenue Safety Pines Rd(SR-27) Park Road UAP 187 933 Proiect - I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 49 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1 Pines/Mansfield TPP 206 1.796 2 Barker Road Bridge BR 204 4,159 Appleway/Sprague/Dishman- Interstate 90 Dishman-Mica CMAQ 50 373 Mica ITS 4 STEP Paveback City 1,291 1500 5 Street Preservation Project— City 1,224 1,293 Various Streets Broadway Avenue 180 ft east of Moore Flora Road UAP 12 60 1 Appleway Blvd University Evergreen SIP 121 937 $ WSDOT Urban Ramp Proiect- City 300 300 Broadway,Araonne.Freya I/C 9 Pines/Sprague Intersection STA 152 742 PCC 12 44th Ave Pathway—Sands to Sands Woodruff STP(E) 44 328 Woodruff 11 Broadway Avenue Rehab#2 Fancher Road Thierman Road STP(U) 82 608 12 Park Road#2(PE only) Broadway Avenue Indiana STP(U) 48 352 16 Sprague Avenue Resurfacing University Evergreen City 2,856 2,856 17 Evergreen/Sprague STA 233 1.133 Intersection PCC 18 McDonald/Sprague STA 219 1.069 Intersection PCC Annual Total $7,229 18.439 20009 NOIR Project •FeRI Te Pfifoacy City Ted # Source Amount 3 Barker--Road-Bridge @spolkane-River #5&03 €.R 2f 0 6 STEP Paveback City 4--1-00 61ty ;2'12 1292 PFejeGt 8 Appleway-Blvd University Evergreen STP 4f,4 1111 “ vague ST/`, 152 W-42 42 Valley wed 4:1 2-4-60 4-3 Carnahan Havana STA 271 4 44 Sands Woodruff STP(E) 46 840 4.6 Broadway-Ave42 €aesbef Theirfmaa STS) 82 4-6 1•-90 Pack ST-PM 499 4-7 Rafk-F4ead#2-(P-E-Goly) Broadway Indiana STP(U) 48 862 4-8 •era-Read Sprague Mission IJAP 89 44- I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 50 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2999 I:�:;; P ro; e t - To Primacy City Seufee A4 e4R4-{$3 Amount An—n—al Total $-3454 4384(1 2010 Item Project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual # Source ill Amount 4 STEP Paveback City 1.204 1.399 5 Street Preservation Project City 1,224 1,293 § Broadway Ave 180 ft east of Flora Road UAP 342 1,708 Moore 7 Appleway Extension University Evergreen Other 206 2,859 Sullivan/Soraaue Intersection 12 STP(U1 116 861 14 Mansfield Extension Pines(SR-27) Mirabeau Prkwy UAP 207 1.036 15 Flora Road Sprague Mission UAP 89 447 Park Road(Bridging the Other Valley1 Federal 31 7E 20 Sprague Resurfacing#2 Evergreen Sullivan City 2856 2.856 21 Sullivan Rd(PE Only1 Euclid Wellesley STP(U) $Q , Indiana/Sullivan Intersection 23 PCC STA 275 1,342 Broadway/Sullivan Intersection 24 PCC STA 253 1.230 25 Argonne Road Interstate 90 Trent CMAQ 77 576 E Sullivan Road West Bridge BR Q 735 28 Broadway Avenue Flora Barker UCP 63 314 29 Appleway-Theirman EB Lane CMAQ 3 26 Annual Total IILM 18.027 2010 Item Project Prom To Primary City Amount Total-Annual I Source f$4 Amount 6 S+ty 890 4-4.8A — E+ty 1282 1282 8 Appleway 4niversity Evergreen Other 234 /1201 *2 y Other Fed 6809 Vaile 43 Carnahan STA 4908 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 51 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Item Project Ffem Te 1:1-Fimafy City- mou Tea; # Sourco ($3 Amount 4-8 Flora-Rd vague 444s&sier+ rJAP 2-98 14.87 4S PGG S342( 145 8€,=, 20 Argo ne 1-90 Tront GMAQ 7-7 -67-6 24 Bigelow-Gulch G+ty 55 55 22 6.144 kNel4e64ey STP(LI) 40 298 23 BR 0 7-36 24 M eDerla}d Sprague STA 2_'_;.7.. 4 lntereection PCC 2b - - - - - - TA 250 1-230 Annual Total $4974 207-22 2011 Item project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual # Source j$1 Amount 4 STEP Paveback City 1.204 1,399 5 Street Preservation Project City 1.224 1,293 7 Appleway Blvd University Evergreen UCP 448 7,734 14 Mansfield Extension Pines Rd(SR-27) Mirabeau Pkwv UAP 290 1,448 15 Flora Road Sprague Mission UAP 298 1,487 Park Road—Bridging the Other Federal 90 2.150 12 Valley 25 Argonne Road Interstate 90 Trent CMAQ 101 713 27 Sullivan Rd West Bridge BR 0 735 28 Broadway Avenue Flora Barker UCP 50 250 29 Appleway-Thierman EB lane CMAQ 22 161 30 Mission Avenue Flora Barker UAP 99 495 .le Schafer 31 Dishman-Mica Rehab STP(P) 202 1,500 Bowdish City Limits 22 Saltese/Sullivan Signal Other 104 414 34 Pines Corridor ITS Sprague Trent CMAQ 280 2.081 35 Barker Road Appleway Broadway UAP 156 778 Annual Total $4,568 $22,638 1 2o44 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 52 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan tteen Pfeteet Ffert Te Primary # Set►fee 4$) Amount 6 si4y 890 400 G4ty 12 03 4.282 8 Appleway Bird -Univefs+ty evergreen UGP 364 -64-47 4-2 Other Federal 286 X90 Vat ley 4-8 Ftefa-Road Sprague +seiee IJAP 264 1337 28 rgonne-Road 4--80 -Trent GMAQ -96 7-4-2 24 -St 4IIivan-P44-IPC--QPIy -44444 44e44e64ayr STP(4J) -40 -288 23 844 -0 735 26 Sprague Trent GMAQ -280 2-044 2-7 -Sa4tese444.4vaR-.144gRal BtAer 484 -44-4 $-34324 $2808.6 2012 Item projgct project From To Primary City Total Annual # Source Amount($) Amount 5 Street Preservation Projects City 2.261, 2,392 15 Flora Road Sprague Mssion UAP 268 1,337 12 Park Road-Bridging the Other 286 6,809 Valley Federal 27 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 4056 28 Broadway Flora Barker P 565 2 826 30 Mission Flora Barker UAP 340 1,701 35 Barker Road Appleway Broadway UAP 289 1,445 36 Park Road-#2(ON only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) 270 2,000 2Z 32"°Avenue Evergreen Best STP(U) 21 153 Evergreen/32"d 16:r ' 32" 2.$ STP(U) 108 526 Evergreen SR-27 22 Barker Road C Appleway UCP 74 371 Annual Total $4,482 $23,616 I 204-2 Item Project Pfefe To Primall City Total-Annual Source Amount{$) Amount _ -- - -- - :• : - Gity 1283 1282 23 444404R-R446/est-gri4ie BR -0 -4066 29 Park-Proad42-(GN-0414y) -Broadway I ndiana STP(U) -2-7-0 -2008 I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 53 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Il 2A42 Item Proieot Ffera To Primary City Annual # Source Amount($) Amount 30 -Broadway Ave Flora I IAR -67 285 34 -33'Avenue -Eger een -gent STP(U) 24 15-3 32 Barker-Rd Appieway Broadway UAP -46 -7-7.5 33 -Sprague-Ave -University -Evergreen STP(P) 231- -34 Evergreee132a° -1 42"dESP-2 7 STP( -1-9g -626 Aneual-Total 5 1,960 S-9424 2013 m Project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual # Source i$1 Amount ¢ Street Preservation Proiect City 2.260 2,391 Park Road-Bridging the Other 286 6,809 12 Valley Federal Sullivan Road Extension Bigelow Gulch City 55 55 27 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 4056 30 Mission Avenue Flora Barker UAP 31Q 1,551 35 Barker Road Appleway Broadway UAP 188 942 21 Park Road-#2(CN only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) 314 2.326 ,37 32nd Avenue Evergreen ' Best STP(U) 24 175 16" 32od 38 Evergreen/32ne STP(U) 755 3,681 Evergreen SR-27 a Barker Road 8"' Aoolewav UCP 80 400 44 Sullivan Road(RW/CN only) Euclid Wellesley STP(U1 160 800 42 Pines Corridor ITS Sprague 16' CMAQ 106 785 43 Sullivan Road Rehab Indiana Euclide STP(P) 22 165 4S 32nd Avenue Rehab Dishman-Mica SR-27 STP(P) 29 212 Annual Total $4,589 $24,348 2013 Item Project Fri To Primary City- mount # Set+fsa ($) Amount City 1140 -1; 24 -S414ivaR-i4431-kNest-liFitiske I -0 4056 39 -Dark-Road42 -Broadway -4144aRa Ste) -344 232€ I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 54 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2-043 }teen Project Rem Te F ary City-Amennt T-etal-ARRea4 # Sourco ft-) Amount 180 ft east of -Plata 30 -Bfeedway 34 -32"-AVOnue Evergreen -Best - (U) -24 4;6 32 Barker-Read •le a may WAR -289 -4448 33 rague-Ave ersity Evergreen P} -6 2625 p 34 Evergree n/32' c r�' eI E"' 'gfeef4 COY U -Broadway Flora Barker 63 -244 -3$ -&uslid Wellesley STP(U) 160 499 38 iversity/Sprague -UPc 94 -887 49 Pines Corridor ITS Sprague - CMAQ 486 IAral Total $4628 $18684 2014 Item Project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual # Source j$1 Amount 5 Street Preservation Project City 2.260 2,391 32. 32'd Avenue Evergreen Best STP(U) 95 703 39 Barker Road 87 Appleway UCP 490 2.449 40 Sullivan Road(RW/CN only) Euclid Wellsley STP(U) 545 2.725 43 Sullivan Road Rehab Indiana Euclid STP(P), 126 935 45 32'd Avenue Rehab Dishman-Mica SR-27 STP(P1 162 1.198 4¢ Carnahan Truck Lane 8°i City Limits STP(U) 32 234 4Z Appleway Extension Evergreen Tshirley STP 113 834 4$ University Road Inlay—2 157' 47' STP(P) 60 441 49 University Road Inlay—1 Dishman-Mica 15'r STP(P) 20 99 52 Park Road-#3 Sprague Broadway STP(U) 12 141 53 Barker Road Spokane River Trent STP(U) 41 303 Flora Euclid Euclid 54 Euclid Ave/Flora Road STP(U) 51 379 Euclid Flora Barker Annual Total $4.007 S 12.832 Table 4.39 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Summary 2009 Through 2014(in$1,000) Secured Proiects Planned Projects TOTALS Year Federal State Other Cy Total Federal Sate C:"nrr _ Total Federal State Otter C•, -'r' I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 55 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan _ . . . 2009 5,531 1 522 3 063 4 230 14 345 469 4 403 3 277 4 093 5 940 1_526 3 465 7 507 18 439 MO 1.759 1 366 2.044 3, a5 9 N4 2.162 1.759 1.647 3,455 9 023 3 921 3.125 3.991 7 290 16 027 2011 2 49 0 0 3 073 5A86 5 643 9 136 414 1759 17152 8 256 9 136 414 4 832 22 638 2012 0 0 0 21 2 392 9 544 5 955 404 2 221 21 224 9 544 8 955 404 4 613 23,616 2013 0 0 0 2.391 2.391 14.098 5.120 410 2 329 21 957 14.098 5 120 410 4 720 24 348 2014 0 0 0 2 391 2 391 6 728 1,469 497 1 747 10 441 6.728 1,465 497 4 138 12 832 . . - TOTALS L702 2 888 5 107 18 312 36,010 38.884 25 443 3 775 14 788 83,890 48 587 29 331 8 8V 33 100 119 90C Year Federal State Other C-Ity Total 2-Go6 $-670721 $1,077 $462 -$3,7149 2OGO *-6,744 $1,478 $2,1 4$ $3,464 i 2444 6-6473 $44 44 1 $.4496.9 $47617-4 $20,722 2011 $8,82-0 67442 ' $440 $47624 $2.0966 2-0-1-2 $6,521 WO SO 1-17050 60,321 2013 $42444 $2,141 $-G $442-$ $18,58, Total $47,g34 $10,532 67,010 $49479 $94,064 Table 4.40 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2009 Through 2014(in$1,0001 Projects Without Local Match Within Existing Resources Project Name Project Description Total Cost - - 8th Avenue Phase 1 -Carnahan to Havana Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three lane section with curb, $2,615 'utter sidewalks and bike lanes. 8th Avenue Phase 2-Park to Dickey Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three lane section with curb, $3,156 gutter,sidewalks and bike lanes _ _ _ _ _ _ - 8th Avenue Phase 3-Dickey to Carnahan Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three land section with curb, $3.81 1 - — gutter,sidewalks and bike lanes _ — - Barker Road Reconstruction-32nd to 1 eth Spokane County Project: reconstruct Barker to 3 land $40 section, City partner match Bowdish Road Rehab-32nd to 8th $4,593 _ _ _ _ .. Reconstruct and widen roadway to three lanes _ _ ,_ Bowdish Road Rehab-Dishmah-Mica to $270 32nd 2 inch grind and inlay existing= _ _ BR-27/Pines/16th Intersection $3,132 - p_ _ - improvements to intersection(dual lane roundaroundabout?) _ _ _ = University/Sprague Intersection PCC Replace asphalt pavement with portland cement concrete $997 pavement_ , _ _ - p - - TOTAL: $18,614 - I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 56 of 58 1 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Potential Annexation Areas/Urban Services The Growth Management Act requires that counties designate urban growth areas (UGAs.). The City of Spokane Valley identified lands adjacent to the City within existing UGAs that would likely be developed for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities. the City has identified existing service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This assessment should help identify the effects a potential annexation area will have on existing levels of service. Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs1 PAM Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff Domestic Water Pasadena Park Consolidated Consolidated Vera Vera S.C.W.D.No.3 East Spokane Hutton Settlement Consolidated, S.C.W.D.No.3 Fire&Em gency Services F.D.No.1&9 F.D.No.1 F.D No 1 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.1&8 F.D No.8 F.D.No.1&8 Law Enforcement Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County T Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Libraries S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist~ S.C.Library Dist Parks&Open Space Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Public Schools W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 E V.S.D C.V.S.D. C V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 Public Transit Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Sanitary Sewer Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Not Sewered Spokane County Solid Waste/Recycle Waste Molt. Waste Mgmt Waste Mamt Waste Mamt Waste Mgmt, Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt Storm water Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Street Cleaning Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County ^ Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Transportation Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane Ccunty Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County The City of Spokane Valley has adopted Levels of Service (LOS)to measure a public facility or service's operational characteristics to gauge its performance. The following analysis will assess current levels of service in the PAAs to provide a context of how annexation could affect the City's LOS and provide guidance for phasing of annexations. Additionally, the analysis will provide City staff and elected officials information to assist in the planning and budgeting of public service delivery as a result of annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. The following study includes LOS analysis for sanitary sewer and parks and open space. Analysis is not provided for services where the City has adopted the minimum regional LOS. Services excluded from this analysis are domestic water, fire protection, law enforcement. libraries. public schools, public transit. sanitary sewer, solid waste/recycle, storm water, street cleaning, and transportation. If a level of service is measured on a per capita basis, the population assumptions are based on Table 2.1(Land Capacity Analysis) in the Land Use chapter and Spokane County's estimated current population in the Metropolitan Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The City of Spokane Valley's land capacity analysis is based on the adopted regional methodology. Sanitary Sewer The City of Spokane Valley does not provide sanitary sewer service at this time. Spokane County provides wastewater collection and transport systems within the City of Spokane Valley. Incorporated areas must have wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the adopted sewer concurrency requirements. The table below provides a sewer assessment within the PAAs. Level of service is categorized as sewered. within the 6-year sewer plan, or not planned for sewer. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 57 of 58 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.42 Sewer assessment within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs)in Acres PAAs Total Sewered Within 6-year Sewer not Percentage CIP available Sewered Northwood 1820 1,397 0 423 77% Northeast 48 5 0 43 11% East 380 64 207 109 17% Southeast 791 443 0 347 56% South 1,041 669 , Q 371 64% Ponderosa 47 0 12 35 0% Edgecliff 298 21 Q 276 7% Currently, Spokane County owns a capacity allocation of 10 million gallons per day (mgd) in the Spokane Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant(SAWTP). By the year 2020. the County's flow is projected to reach 21 mqd. In 1999. Spokane County began a Wastewater Facilities Plan process to evaluate long- term regional wastewater needs. and to determine alternatives to meet those needs. The result was a decision by the Board of County Commissioners to build a new Spokane County Regional Water Reclamation Facility (SCRWRF). Spokane County is proposing to construct a new regional wastewater treatment plant at the Stockyards site in the City of Spokane. The new treatment plant and associated facilities will provide additional capacity for increased wastewater flows generated by the County's Septic Elimination Program and for projected growth in the County's service area. Many of the PAAs have sewer services, however new development will continue to add demand for new sewer services. The City should evaluate existing sewer treatment capacity and infrastructure prior to annexation. Parks and Open Space The City of Spokane Valley has an adopted level of service of 1.92 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. In 2007. Spokane County commissioned a fiscal study of the Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The report focuses on the services provided by Spokane County to the metropolitan UGAs and the revenue generated for Spokane County in these areas. The report established a base population in the metropolitan UGAs using 2000 Census data and building permits. The estimated population for the UGAs adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley was determined to be 7,294. The City of Spokane Valley 2007 Land Quantity Analysis (LQA) estimated the land capacity in the PAAs could potentially add 13,406 additional residents. Using the population estimate from Spokane County's fiscal study and the City of Spokane Valley's estimated land capacity there is the potential of 20;700 residents at build out in the PAAs. Currently there are no parks in the PAAs. If the City annexed all the PAAs 40 acres of parkland would be needed to meet the current level of service of 1.92 acres. According to the City's Park Master Plan, many residents in the City of Spokane Valley are not conveniently located near a park. The City's Park Master Plan states that parks should be one of the highest priorities for the City. The plan also states that meeting Park needs can be a challenge in neighborhoods where little vacant land exists. Many residents expressed a desire for sports fields (complexes), these facilities generally require large vacant properties. The City should consider purchasing parkland prior to annexation to ensure adequate facilities will be available to serve neighborhoods in Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). I Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 58 of 58 Attachment A Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map :.::: : .' ' •.: Lo , De s' ._... 'tleitium Density : Keside*atiA Residential r I"t ...: ... ..._ .. ... _ tf -Vt sa • 11' , -I^1'- r' I t •• .. w • l v t j- 0._J'+y�y1 :: : .. :. . • - . .. --_.. ...- .+ar 4i�:.- '44'of ,ITZ;:. Viii' .;;___________,... . ... .. . .. " . :::. ".. .:_______ ... .; _ Alt IIII a:-..** . 1::::..:::,:::.. Ili.: . ::... . .. .. 4%141C, voorridor gm . ... .. .... •.....,:. .:... . . . . .. • lixed.l se Public/Quasi-Public Public/Quasi-Public �� II LI4 � 1 CPA-02-09 Mrd�� Ne gh o..-: ci Commercial Densit f - Residential ;rd j � High Dens ty Residential II ■ UtTice ._ __ Tj 01.11 -: 4,A0 ...;,. lth ;111 , , 4th ii ii a�� i�i mtimmm IUIIIUI ..titM otrhood- r ■/►.ommerctal MI MIMI F1I'A / .,,; lis = Ill -....,.. ■ Low Density Residential _E' �: !1....11111111_1111111 til 6th • tamori■0,2,„....,,, r_. • , ia : pp t ;I,\ Public.'Qua_si- r ti's Public A L X UFA'4:\i'. Ilki ____1 III ` � . J Public/Quasi-Public t Sth Central i Valley Senior High i ImInti ' , 1 • . ._ _______ r , CPA-02-09 City of Spokane Valley Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation Community Development Department from HDR to NC; change zoning from MF-2 to NC. Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map • I : :s _.. . '_. . .. .. - '__•., E INN III .. .�_ F �. Nora I III Nora in _ ,,,6-1-0 t3.....-----'. —___ _,,, --. -•... •'- L A .,,_.: '. , .. :,::::: I ��� -•(*om cirri ,� ;, ra-o :- . - '. - :: / Law::: i • ••, ........:_.. . ......................„..„.,,,,„w .: .. 1 r._ _ , INN miummiri Iiii...111111= ,,, ...__. ..,. -, 1 i 1 -, _..... _.._-.1i. . ._.;... .•.;:., L 1 ----' --, i ; . � • ... , .•. . , , i 11 CPA-03-09 . .{....:_. . i -r inr� t UU• NI =I . 1 1E61"lip %�-= viii%-siiIi.'__ ■ �-.,-lu _U i, , . ,/,,• "lip ow sh.u.„, .,..:i I i l l l;ow-Densit'b Residential / III.. 1 7 MI ..,• :: :, , .,. ..„..„....__ .. /•, _ 1. 1111 i�� :j --:,;. , _ I Nom"—I I mullp HuIP !r"__II ,,� PubadQuasrPuhiik MP' 1 .,;,,,- .- 4.- dill" ill. 1 IIIiiiiiii'tiIIL IIII MN —I ■ :ice Irr 11111 .....iiiiir High,Den qty Resides �I � 1111111���/ / �� Mletlium-UensitN.Residential II 1 F. ..._. __......_ li limo. •IguilE. ;'' limusr-.---31-5..-- „sr ..,--1 ....:-.-.-..---,..., . • I. CPA-03-09 City of Spokane Vallee Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation Community Development Department from 0 to CC;change zoning from 0 to C. . - Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map _U Public/Quasi-Public Medium Density Residential '' `•• •*-•, .1x.. 1 3 .. ,r. Office .==.7.1:.: ,.•: ,,•.•ti,.. .."HiiY .:i ' . - Val ieNuar t II ;i:.::E:. :.:.:..' 1.1•...iif..l'-' '4,.-:. fi...•%.l,.:..:•..2 •:•::" Low Density Residential 1.-•-•ti:. ,_;. ii' Sri.•..:• izg: :�. ice.«.f►: .•s •. . .-•.•:...r..:.i,.. 1 p kr.ri:...;;;i:ill..1:I::i:::i.i..i..:;:1::::i..4..::.....:„...:..z.r....:...:::;,:...:.zaili.i.i...171 CPA-04-09 :::,...i.„...>. .......n..J.::. . ... . • • . 4 4,5 s. Is ; ..... .. : -'•„ ��mar►omme re''I ••_ .... •: -...... ._ Is s. ►orridor,Alixed ....... ........... :: :. :• - - .,. ......... :.. ;.- . .: S. CPA-04-09 Request: Change the Comprehensi designation Plan map designation City of Spokane Valle from CC to LDR;change zoning from C to Community Development Department . Attachment B Chapter 2 - Land Use City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 2— LAND USE 2.0 Introduction The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) by providing a framework for Spokane Valley's future physical development and by setting forth policy direction for Spokane Valley's current and future land uses. Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed in this chapter, should result in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land use policies are supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Map (Map 2.1) that provides a visual illustration of the proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map allocates a supply of land for such uses as retail, office, manufacturing, public facilities, services, parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand. 2.1 Planning Context State and county land use policies provide a statutory framework for the development of City land use policies. It is important to briefly review state and county level policies to better understand historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter. 2.1.1 Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act(GMA)acknowledges that, "...a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state'." The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of local comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 14 goals to be, "...used exclusively for the purpose of guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations." GMA goals pertaining to land use include: • Urban Growth — Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. • Reduce Sprawl— Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low density development. • Housing— Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. • Open Space and Recreation—Encourage the retention of open space and development of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks. • Environment — Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality and the availability of water. • Public Facilities and Services—Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. • Historic Preservation — Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance. 1 RCW 36.70A.010 Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 1 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Property Rights — Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions pursuant to state and federal law. The GMA requires that Comprehensive Plan land use elements include the following: • Designate the proposed general distribution, location and extent of the uses of land for housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, public utilities, public facilities, and other appropriate land uses; • Population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth; • Provide for protection of the quality and quantity of ground water use for public water supplies; • Review drainage, flooding, and stormwater runoff in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute water of the state. 2.1.2 County Wide Planning Policies The County Wide Planning Policies (CWPPs) required by GMA2 provide a regional framework to achieve the goals of the GMA. The CWPPs are a refinement of policy direction contained in the GMA and are a result of a collaborative process between Spokane County and the cities and towns within the County. The CWPPs provide a policy framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence to these policies ensures that plans within the county are consistent with one another. These policies address such issues as the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing, provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly development. The following are specific CWPPs that relate to the Land Use Element3: Policy Topic 1 -Urban Growth Areas Policies 1. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) are areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county for the succeeding 20-year period4. "Urban growth" refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of buildings, structures and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with the primary use of such land for the production of food, other agricultural products or fiber, or the extraction of mineral resources5. Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services, and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas6. Rural government services may be provided in rural areas. However, Urban Growth Areas may be established independent of incorporated areas. Within these independent Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), urban governmental services may 2 RCW 36.70A.210 3 Note to reader: The following policies are numbered according to the policy number in the CWPPs, resulting in non-sequential numbering in this document. 4 RCW 36.70A.110 5 RCW 36.70A.030(17) 6 RCW 36.70A.110(3) Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 2 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan be provided by other than cities. Some cities may rely on contracts from Spokane County for provision of urban services. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas. 9. Within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), lands that fall within planned high-capacity transportation corridors should be designated for sufficient intensity of land use to support the economic provision of multimodal transportation. 11. Where applicable, comprehensive plans should contain land use policies which provide protection for the continued viability of Fairchild Air Force Base, Spokane International Airport, Felts Field, Deer Park Airport and other publicly owned airports within Spokane County. 12. Jurisdictions should work together to protect critical areas and open space within Urban Growth Areas(UGAs). Policy Topic 2-Joint Planning within UGAs Policies 1. The joint planning process should: a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of governmental services; b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities; c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging communities; d. Ensure the ability to expand urban governmental services and avoid land use barriers to expansion; and e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in designated joint planning areas will be coordinated. 2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into between and/or among jurisdictions and/or special purpose districts. Policy Topic 3— Promotion of Contiguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban Services Policies 5. All jurisdictions shall coordinate plans that classify, designate and protect natural resource lands and critical areas. 7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to address adequate fire protection: a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate limits of a city providing its own fire department. b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for residents, fire department or district ingress/egress, and water supply for fire protection. c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and adjacent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used. 10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for equitable distribution of essential public facilities. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 3 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within UGAs which uses land efficiently, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban governmental services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate growth areas (six to ten year increments) within its UGA or establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans. Policy Topic 4—Parks and Open Space Policies 2. All jurisdictions should cooperate to identify and protect regional open space lands, natural areas and corridors of environmental, recreational and aesthetic significance to form a functionally and physically connected system which balances passive and active recreational uses. Each jurisdiction shall identify open space corridors within and between urban growth areas. All jurisdictions shall identify implementation, management, preservation and conservation strategies through both regulatory and non-regulatory techniques, to protect identified lands and corridors to sustain their open space benefits and functions. Implementation and management strategies should include collaboration and coordination with land trusts and other land preservation organizations. 3. Each jurisdiction shall require the development of parks and open space as a means to balance the impacts associated with higher-density development. 5. Each jurisdiction shall make appropriate provisions for parks and recreation areas. Policy Topic 5-Transportation Policies 5. Local jurisdictions shall develop and adopt land use plans that have been coordinated through the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) to ensure that they preserve and enhance the regional transportation system. These plans may include high-capacity transportation corridors and shall fulfill air quality conformity and financial requirements of Federal Transportation Laws and Regulations, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and the GMA. 6. Local jurisdictions shall designate within land use plans areas that can support public transportation services. These areas shall include existing as well as new development. Each jurisdiction's land use plan, the regional transportation plan and the Spokane Transit Authority's (STA) Long Range Transit Plan shall support, complement and be consistent with each other. 11. Each jurisdiction shall address land use designations and site design requirements that are supportive of and compatible with public transportation, for example: a. pedestrian-scale neighborhoods and activity centers; b. mixed-use development; and c. pedestrian friendly and non-motorized design. Policy Topic 7—Affordable Housing Policies 2. Each jurisdiction's development policies, regulations and standards should provide for the opportunity to create affordable housing in its community. Such policies may include regulatory tools, such as inclusionary zoning, performance/impact zoning, mixed-use development and incentives for increasing density to promote greater choice and affordable housing in its community. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 4 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 6. In conjunction with other policy topics, coordinate housing, transportation and economic development strategies to ensure that sufficient land and densities for affordable housing are provided in locations readily accessible to employment centers. 2.2 Land Use Plan Spokane Valley's land use pattern (the physical location of uses) exists as a result of development administered by Spokane County until incorporation of Spokane Valley on March 31, 2003 and to a far lesser extent the subsequent development under Spokane Valley's jurisdiction. As shown in Figure 2.1 below, the majority of land is designated residential (57%) under this Plan. Of the land designated residential, 50% is designated as Low Density Residential with densities up to six dwelling units per acre. Nearly 20% of the land area is designated as Heavy and Light Industrial. The remaining land is designated as commercial, office, or public/quasi public. Comprehensive Plan Designations - Land Area Public/Quasi-Pubic Park/Open Space 7% City Center Community Commercial 3% Regional Commercial 1% 2% Neighborhood once 3% Corridor Mixed Use Cormieroa3 2% • 3% 0°6 Heavy Industrial 14% Mixed Use 3% HDR MDR 3% 4% Light Indusiial LDR 5% 50% Figure 2.1: Land Use by Comprehensive Plan Category 2.2.1 City Center Plan This scenario presents concepts and strategies for creating a definable and vibrant"City Center" for the City of Spokane Valley. The purposes of creating a Spokane Valley City Center are: 1. Create an identifiable city center that is a social and economic focus of the City; 2. Strengthen the City overall by providing for long-term growth in employment and housing; 3. Promote housing opportunities close to employment and services: 4. Develop land use patterns that support the development of a more extensive regional transportation system,whatever the ultimate configuration may be; 5. Reduce dependency on automobiles: 6. Consume less land with urban development; 7. Maximize the public investment in infrastructure and services; 8. Provide a central gathering place for the community; and 9. Improve the quality of design for development throughout the City. There are several reasons why a definable, vital City Center is important to Spokane Valley's future. These include: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 5 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 1. The development of a more intensive, multi-use city center is a natural step in Spokane Valley's evolution. Most new urban areas start out as bedroom communities. Retail and commercial uses then develop to serve the new residential population. Office and industrial activities next begin to locate at key transportation crossroads, adding jobs and strengthening the employment base. Spokane Valley has experienced these evolutionary phases and is now ready for a defined City Center. 2. Economic Development — Spokane Valley has an opportunity to transform itself from an essentially residential community with retail and service based economy to a sub-regional economic center with an expanded, more diverse employment base. 3. Community Support — A survey of Spokane Valley area citizens prior to incorporation overwhelmingly indicated that the lack of identifiable "downtown" and a community gathering place was of concern to a majority of respondents. Community support was tested again when the city conducted a statistically valid survey in the spring of 2004. The support to create a City Center was reiterated throughout the community meetings held during the development of the comprehensive plan and the city's informal community survey. A discussion of the results of the city's survey is included in Section 2.10. The following could be components of the City Center: 1. Location: Generally located along the Sprague/Appleway corridor. 2. Size: Between 300 and 400 acres in size. 3. Streets: New streets could be added at every 200 to 400 feet to create an internal grid street system to provide an urban atmosphere. 4. On-street parking would be provided on internal grid streets. 5. Ground floor retail on both sides of streets. 6. Building out to the edge of the right-of-way and include wide sidewalks to encourage a lively street scene. 7. Office/Employment uses provided in high visibility locations with adequate parking and adjacent to pleasant surroundings such as open space, retail shops and services. 8. Multi family housing that is safe, secure, and located so that it is buffered from traffic noise and provides a pedestrian friendly streetscape with connections to parks, schools, shopping, services and transit. 9. Civic/public uses such as city hall, community library, performing arts center, city center park, green space or other public uses that would attract people to downtown over an extended portion of the day. Other characteristics of this land use scenario include the following: 1. Neighborhood/community retail centers - current land use patterns dictate that residents travel to the Sprague Avenue corridor to access some of the most basic goods and services. This scenario would provide for smaller scale, less intensive retail/commercial centers in the south end and northeast portions of the city. Potential locations for these centers would be focused at intersections of arterials at the periphery of the city, such as Highway 27/32nd Avenue, Dishman Mica Road/Bowdish Road and Barker Road/Boone Avenue. 2. Office zoning districts—currently, there is no specific zoning district or comprehensive plan designation for professional office uses. The county has used the UR-22, Multi-family zoning district as its office district, which has resulted in a number of issues related to rezones and appropriate development standards. Areas that are currently developed in predominantly office uses would be re-designated to an "Office" comprehensive plan designation and zoning districts developed to implement this plan designation would include development standards to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 6 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Specific areas in the city include the Evergreen corridor north of Sprague Avenue; Mission east of Pines Road in the Valley Hospital/medical office area; near the intersection of Pines Road and Broadway; and other areas identified through the land use inventory process. 3. "Auto-Row" Overlay — The city has several new auto dealerships located along Sprague Avenue. The majority of these dealerships are located between Argonne Road and Thierman Road. Two dealerships are located just west of Dartmouth Road, near the U-City Mall. New car dealerships provide the city with substantial sales tax revenue on one hand, on the other hand auto dealerships can have a significant visual impact on a community and have somewhat unique needs related to development standards, such as signage and street frontage landscaping. This scenario recognizes these circumstances and designates the areas identified above appropriately, and provides policy direction for the implementing development regulations. 4. Mixed-use —this scenario suggests reducing the strip commercial on Sprague Avenue by maintaining Community Commercial zoning only at major intersections such as Pines, Evergreen and Sullivan Roads. Areas in between these commercial "nodes" would be designated as Corridor Mixed-use or some other appropriate designation, which would encourage conversion of these vacant and/or dilapidated commercial areas into areas of office/employment, residential and specialty retail. 5. Industrial areas would not be significantly changed or altered under this or any other scenario. Permitted uses and development standards would be reviewed for appropriateness and changes proposed based on policy direction of the comprehensive plan. 6. The majority of land in the City of Spokane Valley is dedicated to single family residential zoning and land use. The majority of the single family residential areas are designated Low Density Residential under the interim comprehensive plan. This plan designation allows for residential densities from one to six dwelling units per acre. Under this scenario, the existing single family residential zoning districts would be evaluated, and a series of single family districts with minimum lot sizes ranging from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet would be considered. Reducing overall lot sizes would enable the city to maintain its existing single family character, and minimize land needed for multi-family zoning to accommodate the city's 20 year population growth projection. 7. Areas previously platted in 1+/-acre lots—There are areas in the City that were platted as approximately one acre lots. These areas would be rezoned to an R-1 zoning designation with the intent to preserve the original intent of the zoning for these areas. Moreover, these areas would be allowed to maintain a small number of livestock such as horses, cows, or llamas in keeping with the rural character of these neighborhoods. 2.3 Relationship to Other Comprehensive Plan Chapters The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all SVCP chapters. Internal consistency among the chapters of the SVCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the other chapters of the SVCP. 2.3.1 Economic Development Spokane Valley's economy is disproportionately divided. Dr. Grant Forsyth, Assistant Professor of Economics at Eastern Washington University prepared a report based on year 2000 Census information for the Spokane Valley area. This report, "A Demographic and Economic Analysis for the City of Spokane Valley" indicates that there were nearly 3,000 employer firms employing approximately 43,305 people in the year 2000 with an average annual payroll per employee of approximately$29,000(in 2000 dollars). Dependence on retail trade and service occupations stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for eastern and southern Spokane County and counties in northern Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 7 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Idaho. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Post Falls and Coeur d'Alene and the City of Spokane, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Spokane Valley's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy would achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and support the City's desired quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: 1. A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. 2. Redevelopment and development of the Sprague Avenue/Appleway Boulevard corridor into an area of quality commercial and Mixed-use development. 3. Establishment of design standards. 4. Preservation of existing single family neighborhoods. The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 2.1). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. 2.3.2 Capital Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be financed by impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), money from the City's general fund or voter approved bonds. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Annexation of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) to the City of Spokane Valley may be a logical progression to ensure centralized planning and prevention of urban sprawl. A major goal of the GMA is to reduce urban sprawl by encouraging development in urban areas where adequate public facilities exist. GMA further states, that cities are the logical provider of urban government services. Prior to annexation, the City of Spokane Valley will consider the economic impacts of providing municipal services at a level consistent with other areas within the City. The City will not provide a lower level of service in areas being considered for annexation that were in existence in the proposed areas at the time immediately preceding the annexation process. The City will consider PAAs'topography, land utilization, and population density when determining service levels. Water Availability— Potable water is provided to residents of Spokane Valley by thirteen water and irrigation districts. All drinking water used by residents in Spokane Valley is drawn from the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. Water Quality - Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water and continued health of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining the health of the aquifer that relies on surface water for recharge. Contamination of an aquifer by contaminated surface water can lead to serious health concerns and/or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concern and impacts of new development, the City has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to ensure water, quality including the development of detention/retention facilities to control rate and Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 8 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan quality of water runoff. Furthermore, development of a wellhead protection program with the various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination. Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion of water resources and water purveyors in the City of Spokane Valley, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter. 2.3.3 Parks and Open Space One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties; provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City. 2.3.4 Natural Environment Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountains and the Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation for the citizens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's unique natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future generations. The Natural Environment chapter also includes a discussion of critical areas as defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter. 2.3.5 Housing Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families. An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is provided primarily in single-family subdivisions. This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing. A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter. 2.4 Potential Annexation Areas 2.4.1 Projected Growth - In October 2003, the City of Spokane CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Valley received a 2000 population POPULATION ESTIMATES certification from the U.S. Census 150,000 Bureau that indicated 80,927 people called Spokane Valley home on April 140,000 - 1, 2000. As of April 1, 2003 the 130,000 population had grown to 82,005 120,000 (based on the Washington State 10,000 - — _ Office of Financial Management (OFM) population estimates). Upon 100,000 - incorporation on March 31, 2003, the 90,000 City of Spokane Valley became the 80,000 _ , , r-t state's ninth largest city and second 2 2 2 largest in Spokane County. 000 002 004 006 00�oo 012 0'4 0'6 08 00 022 04 Spokane Valley received an OFM – --- population estimate for April 1, 2004 Population:Actual/Estimate of 83,950. This new population -Population Estimate:1.5%Growth Rate estimate moved Spokane Valley from -Population Estimate:2.5%Growth Rate the state's ninth largest city to the , Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2–Land Use Page 9 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan state's eighth largest city. The 2004 population estimate reflects an annual increase of approximately 2.4 percent over the city's 2003 population estimate. The most recent OFM estimate for Spokane Valley is 88,920 as of April 1, 2008. This figure represents an annual growth rate of approximately 1.5 percent. The average annual growth rate is approximately 1.91%over the 4 year period from 2003 to 2007. Future population growth is forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population growth was distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a methodology prepared by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO). The City of Spokane Valley was not allocated population growth originally because the City had not been incorporated when this action took place. However, the County did allocate population to the "Spokane Valley IUGA", which includes the new cities of Spokane Valley and Liberty Lake. This process resulted in a population growth allocation of 39,431 to the Spokane Valley IUGA. This IUGA also includes areas within the UGA that are still in unincorporated Spokane County. The graph above indicates Spokane Valley's 20 year population using a 1.5% and 2.5% annual growth rate. Using the 1.5% annual growth rate, which is consistent with past estimated growth rates in the Spokane Valley area, the estimated 2025 population of Spokane Valley is 114,765 or an increase of 30,815 persons. The 2.5% annual growth rate results in a 2025 population of 141,011, an increase of 57,061. Spokane Valley proposed a population allocation of 20,666 to the SCEO based on the regional land capacity methodology. This request was proposed as an "interim" request based on the land/population capacity within the existing corporate boundaries of Spokane Valley. The reason for this request was based on the significant issues related to waste water treatment capacity. Once the waste water issues have been resolved, Spokane Valley will prepare a revision to the population allocation and present this information to the SCEO. This issue is discussed in more detail below. The Spokane County Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) approved this population allocation in November 2004. The City has continued to refine the population projections based on the preceding information. At a City Council retreat held on February 11, 2006, the City Council directed staff to utilize a 1.89% annual growth rate for purposes of population forecasting. This resulted in a 20 year population forecast of 38,614 persons. This information was presented to the SCEO on February 15, 2006 when the City officially requested a 20 year population allocation of 38,614 for planning purposes. In 2006 the BoCC approved via Resolution 06-0438 a population allocation of 33,125 for Spokane Valley for planning purposes. 2.4.2 Land Capacity Analysis The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population growth. The GMA also requires a Land Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate the population growth is shaped. Countywide population forecasts are identified by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in developing a regional methodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County. The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3, 1995. The adopted methodology is patterned after the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook.entitled Issues in Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 10 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Designating Urban Growth Areas Part I- Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1 (Urban Growth Areas Policy#3). However, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County. The following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the land capacity analysis: 1. Identify lands that are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant, partially-used and under-utilized land (in other words, subtract all parcels committed to other uses). 2. Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical limitation. 3. Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes. 4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development for social and economic reasons. 5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for development within the community plan's 20-year time frame. 6. Build in a safety factor. 7. Determine total capacity. Spokane Valley prepared a land capacity analysis of the city and surrounding UGAs based on the above regional methodology. The results of the land capacity analysis are contained in the table below: Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis (updated 12/05/08) Vacant and Net Developable Potential New Population Area Partially Used Acres Dwelling Units Capacity Land Spokane Valley 4,399 1,293 7,933 17,280 (Incorporated Area) }. Northeast f 43 _ 23 92 229 Northwood 723 342 1,367 3,416 - East 99 107 427 1,068 Southeast 487 238 952 _ 2,381 South _564 272 1,089 2,722 Ponderosa 35 75 188 19 Edgecliff/Dishman 109 132 527 1,319 __. TOTAL 6,458 2,481 12,575 28.433 Spokane Valley recommended to the Steering Committee that both the City of Spokane Valley and the City of Liberty Lake receive an interim population allocation that could be accommodated within the existing city limits of each city. The rationale for this recommendation was based on the situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region. It is estimated that the Spokane County treatment plant will run out of capacity in 2009, and the Liberty Lake Water& Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capacity. Permits to expand the Spokane County and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt. Given the potential constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to allocate only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the sanitary sewer issues are resolved. 2.4.3 Potential Annexation Areas _ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 11 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise potential annexation areas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs; for the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete examination of urban services was required at the time the County established the UGA, moreover, Spokane County was obligated to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of Spokane Valley. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA. When Liberty Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much of the "Valley UGA" was included as part of the newly created cities, but not all. In 2003 and again in 2006. Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA. These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6 square miles) in land area for Liberty Lake. As Table 2.1 indicates there are a number of unincorporated UGAs adjacent to Spokane Valley. Several of these UGAs are only contiguous to Spokane Valley (south, southeast, and northeast) and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County and the metro cities of Spokane Valley, Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have begun the process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs). Through this process, the City of Spokane Valley will identify areas needed to accommodate allocated population growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery. 2.4.4 Development of Goals, Policies, and Actions for Annexation The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties to designate Urban Growth Area (UGAs) within which urban growth shall be encouraged RCW 36.70A 110 (1). UGAs are to include sufficient land to accommodate the twenty-year population growth projected for the county. The GMA imposes planning requirements to influence the ability of a city to annex UGAs. A city is required by GMA to adopt policies for land use. housing, capital facilities, utilities, and transportation within the city's UGA. In order to meet this requirement the City of Spokane Valley has developed policies and goals to provide policy guidance for annexation of territory within UGAs. Annexation will have financial impacts on the city; it may be positive or negative. The City may need to develop an annexation study to assess the financial impacts especially for larger annexations. The Capital Facilities chapter identifies current service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) as a starting point for the detailed analysis that may be needed prior to annexation. a, �-- a`r ,1 =• 2.5 Land Use Designations . The land use designations in the SVCP recognize the relationships between ,:.,.;] - �•broad patterns of land uses. The •-= 4 ` �' " .f designations set forth locational criteria ,:: .^... 4 � for each specific class of uses consistent ;r ' '" :y '4 V �T with the long-term objectives of the i ;,-- s.ti,.y6c SVCP. These designations provide the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. The location of the comprehensive plan land use designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1) 2.5.1 Residential Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 12 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The demand for and development of single-family housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single-family development will occur as in-fill development of vacant or under developed lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods, and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single-family housing. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, lot size averaging, zero lot line development, accessory dwelling units and special needs housing. Low Density Residential The Low Density Residential (LDR) Comprehensive Plan designation addresses a range of single family residential densities from one dwelling unit per acre up to and including six dwelling units per acre. This designation would be implemented through a series of zoning designations as described below. Implementing zoning for the LDR designation will include a series of zones allowing a range of minimum lot sizes. Existing lot sizes and community character will be strongly considered when . ' /� developing the City's zoning map. For A —- _ . example, areas such as Rotchford Acres ' �' 1^i, ' ;T and Ponderosa will likely require minimum - . ., - - 4-. " . lot sizes close to an acre in size. These 34 . • Jr- large lot developments currently allow for """—" ' . .. g •, 4— :7.:-. ... � - - horses and other large animals and have a _ " - distinct character that should be preserved to the greatest extent possible. The majority of the LDR designation will . provide for densities ranging from four to c. .-..:;- six dwelling units per acre. Typical lot ` . �. `• sizes will range from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet Some areas designated as LDR still lack necessary urban services and infrastructure, mainly sanitary sewer facilities. Upon provision of urban services. such as water and sewer, and transit services, an increase in density in some areas may be warranted. However, the City will adopt strict criteria to evaluate zone changes to ensure that future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Medium Density Residential The Medium Density Residential designation represents an opportunity to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, decline in average family size, and increased cost of single-family homes have created increased demand for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such as duplexes. townhouses, and condominiums in existing multi-family areas and within mixed-use development in commercial areas. Multi-family uses, in large part, are in areas currently zoned for multiple-family development. Zoning will allow densities up to 12 dwelling units per acre in the Medium Density Residential designation. Opportunities for new development will occur through redevelopment and build-out of remaining parcels. Multi-family residential zones should be used as transitional zoning between higher intensity land uses such as commercial and office, to lower density single family neighborhoods. Additionally, Medium Density Residential areas should be located near services and high capacity transit facilities or transit routes. Residential design guidelines that address design and appearance of multiple-family developments should be considered. The primary goal of residential design guidelines is to develop multiple-family housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance. High Density Residential Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 13 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan This designation provides for existing multi-family residential development developed at a density in excess of 12 units per acre. Additionally, High Density Residential (HDR) designated areas are also located in areas near higher intensity development, such as a City Center. HDR provides housing opportunities for younger, lower income households in the City who may not yet be able to afford a home of their own. Moreover, this designation provides housing options for people looking to "downsize" from a single family dwelling on an individual lot. or for those known as "empty- nesters" whose children have moved out of the household and a large single family home is no longer needed. Generally, this designation is appropriate for land which is located adjacent to the arterial street system served by public transit, and is in close proximity to business and commercial centers. 2.5.2 Commercial Designations Existing commercial areas are auto-oriented and characterized by one-story low intensity development. In the future, these areas will become more intensively developed and pedestrian oriented, and in some designations, accommodate housing. Transforming existing areas into places where people want to live, shop, and work requires changes. Commercial areas should contain street furniture, trees, pedestrian shelters, well marked crosswalks, and buildings oriented to and along the street to provide interest and allow easy pedestrian access Regional Commercial The Regional Commercial designation encompasses two major _ retail areas of the City. It covers the "strip" retail areas along Sprague r'r •' r4 Avenue which includes the automobile dealerships located along the western end of the Sprague - �.. Avenue corridor and the "big box" _�yy.° retail area found in the Sullivan Road 2 "-. - - area from Sprague Avenue north to - l j # ►�- the Interstate 90 interchange, and includes the Valley Mall and Wal- Mart. Regional Commercial allows a — large range of uses. A wide range of rL development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along Sprague Avenue. Older, single-story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards should be applied through Regional Commercial zoning, along with the adoption of Community Design Guidelines which address design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. Community Commercial -- r .4-4L7-n The community commercial classification - designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development. Community Commercial centers may be designated through the adoption of the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or Adopted April 25. 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2-Land Use Page 14 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan through sub-area planning. Residences in conjunction with business andlor multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. In addition. light assembly or other unobtrusive uses not traditionally located in commercial zones may be allowed with appropriate performance standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses or zoning districts. Neighborhood Commercial The neighborhood commercial classification designates areas for small-scale neighborhoods serving retail and office uses. Neighborhood business areas should not be larger than two acres in size, and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial developments. Neighborhood business centers may be designated through the adoption of the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or through neighborhood plans. Auto-Row Overlay The City of Spokane Valley is home to several major new automobile dealerships. While these land uses provide a positive economic impact on the community, they can also have less positive impacts on the aesthetics of the community. Auto dealerships typically have vast areas of pavement to store new and used vehicles for sale, These land uses also have unique requirements for landscaping and signage. Unlike many commercial uses whose stock in trade is contained within a building, it is necessary for auto dealerships to have their vehicles clearly visible from the street. This makes traditional street side landscaping (consisting of low growing shrubs and bushes. and trees) not viable for these uses. An overlay designation is being suggested rather than a zoning district because the negative affects on the non-auto dealer uses in the area will be minimized or eliminated. 2.5.3 City Center The intent of establishing a City Center in Spokane Valley is to create a higher density. mixed-use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. The City Center will also be located at one of the major hubs of the region's high capacity transit (HCT) system. The City Center encourages higher intensity land uses. Traditional city centers are places where diverse office, retail, and government uses are concentrated. as well as cultural and civic facilities, community services and housing. Nationally. many cities are advocating mixed-use development in city center core areas for a number of reasons, including: • Providing new housing, increasing the range of housing choices, and •r ;. . rr� reducing dependency _ _ `-r------ -- • on the automobile by ..-�. bringing work places - ,- _ Erg 11.11111 and residences into _- _. close proximity; MEW • Providing retail and service needs in close proximity to residential •..' ' and employment centers: _ • Improving feasibility of a development project. - 9v The proximity of urban _ • services makes housing projects more Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 15 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan desirable and a nearby source of consumers help make a commercial project more viable. Residents choose to live in higher density housing for a variety of reasons. First, higher density housing is more affordable than traditional single family housing. Second, the convenience and proximity to work, needed services and cultural activities is very desirable for many people. Finally, many people find that they do not need a large, single family detached house. Given their lifestyle, they appreciate the low ,-_--. • • • maintenance and security of higher density • — . living. There is a mutually supportive ''_" - - . ,, relationship between higher density 'r�=�— .•�- -= residential uses and commercial and retail � "��'-`" --'� ` '_ activities. The presence of housing the core •a` '- •• ( „ ,•_, area also activates the streets in the city ,,+ „�� ■„ ,■ center, day and night. ♦ • ,t • . . .. •. , Concentrating growth in a specific area also •if- �. - . supports investment in public infrastructure • including the regional HCT system. Existing i•low density development does not generate - y rte"_- sufficient levels of demand to optimize the .`�•"'„n ' • A return on investment in transit. Promoting . higher density uses within walking distance of ' transit facilities will improve the viability of this significant infrastructure investment. Moreover, concentrating the highest density of development in the City Center, where a significant number of jobs and residences will be within walking distance of a transit station, helps reduce the dependency on the automobile and improves pedestrian mobility. The City Center emphasizes pedestrian, bicycle, and transit mobility but will not be unfriendly to the use of automobiles. The City Center area will also be the central gathering 6.1% il '- - place for the community — a place where the whole b Ir. ,_�% community can congregate and celebrate. Accordingly, ,b.::11,0,--.-___. % ;;t, the City Center should include an outdoor square, park, or • - -, i! commons with amenities such as fountains, sculptures, I /� and unique landscaping. Other civic amenities or , ,� ,— buildings including city hall or a performing arts center - � . 10.2 ,soma. , could be grouped around the core area square or park. ' The City currently holds an annual Christmas Tree — Lighting Ceremony in the area designated as the City r�--.. ! �r�� r /�I'1 Center. Additional such events throughout the year will• t`+r' �'',I' 'L, 14.. 'r ; enhance the feeling of community in Spokane Valley. r_��I -” :� i� �;�� -�'' An appropriate street network is a critical component of - _ the City Center. The current network of collector streets "�' and arterials, the disjointed grid, and large block sizes contribute to a lack of identity in the City. The solution is not necessarily to construct wider streets. Streets become less efficient as the number of lanes increases. Building new streets versus widening existing streets can be more cost effective, yields greater capacity, and will have a more positive impact on the City Center. Automobiles are likely to continue as a dominant mode of transportation for the foreseeable future. A comprehensive network of streets must be developed to distribute this traffic and create more driving choices. To the extent possible, the City should connect streets and construct new streets to form a tighter grid system within the City Center, especially in the core area, by negotiating new public rights-of-way and building new streets. This "interconnectivity" serves to shorten and disperse trips, and consequently reduce travel on existing congested arterials. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 16 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Pedestrian and bicycle mobility is a vital part of the future City Center transportation system. Improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists should support increases in transit services ,_ , •, U�� •• and promote the development of the 1_2 ' I City Center. As the street system is Y Y developed to better accommodate the �� • needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, a -1_x.7 network of facilities for people on foot ,+,r and bikes should be established. . - _,Cntsrr _ Reducing the size of the street grid, improving auto circulation and creating pedestrian linkages through largers parcels is critical to establish walking , rZ C.r"'"Nd patterns that reduce dependency on the auto. As individual sites are designed and developed to be more pedestrian friendly and improved pedestrian linkages are provided, the pedestrian system will handle an increasing share of trips. Special street design standards should be developed for the City Center. Special standards for extra-wide sidewalks (12 to 20 feet in width), pedestrian-scale street lighting, and additional amenities including benches, trash receptacles, and landscaped corner treatments should be included. Transforming the existing commercial core area into the proposed City Center is an ambitious task. It requires a significant transformation from a low-density, automobile oriented. largely retail area, to a higher intensity, more pedestrian oriented Mixed-use area. The City Center section of the Plan acknowledges that the City Center will take some time to develop. The City can facilitate these changes through a series of small steps taken over time. This is especially true if the steps are consistent with emerging economic, social and demographic trends. As is the intent of this Plan, the phasing scenario presented here accounts for the timing of market projections and future actions. As noted above, the implementation strategy is keyed to projected trends and regional planning goals. Its form and character, as envisioned in this (,,r,� � ? ` Plan, are dramatically different from 4,. anything that now exists in the , . — - proposed City Center area. It will take some time for the development community to redirect its energy and investments to produce development _ ; ?T� • - I . i _ that responds to the direction of the J Plan. The demand for more intense development opportunities in the City j_ Center is not forecasted within the next few years. In the meantime, the City should discourage continued low- / scale investment in this area since new development will take several years to be amortized, and will delay the accomplishment of preferred development. As regulations are applied to modest renovations, it should be possible to gain some basic improvements. However, the City should not expect full implementation of the vision for the City Center until major property owners in the area are ready to install long-term, major development projects. The figures (computer generated as part of the TOD Study) at the beginning of this section first show the existing conditions of the City Center; the second figure illustrating potential redevelopment of the area over time. The pictures are taken from approximately Farr Road looking Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 17 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan east toward the U-City Mall area. The photos do not necessarily indicate specific recommendations for the area, but are merely an illustration of how a viable City Center could evolve through several coordinated, incremental steps taken over time. 2.5.4 Office Designation Spokane Valley has areas of quality office development. Several developments within the Argonne/Mullan Couplet, Pines Road, '111:f—/111111 and Evergreen Road corridors 1 •„ - r embody good design and are :" ; - - - �,�,.+, representative of desired future office >� - r:-SI,.,�; r development. Office development '- •° y� ► will provide new job opportunities �- ' T"' • L-, within the t t e ' This comprehensive plan designation is intended primarily for office development with limited retail or commercial uses. Retail and commercial uses are limited to those that are clearly subordinate to the primary office use, or the retail function primarily serves the office uses in close proximity to the retail or commercial use. Primary uses which are representative of this comprehensive plan category. include medical and dental facilities, education services, insurance, real estate, financial institutions, design firms, and legal services, Areas designated as Office can serve a variety of functions. They can stand alone as major employment centers. They can also act as buffers or transition areas between higher intensity land uses and lower intensity land uses. For example, Office areas can provide a transition between industrial or commercial uses and residential areas. Office uses work well for this because they tend to generate less traffic and noise, operate shorter hours and are often smaller in scale then industrial or commercial areas. The Office comprehensive plan designation will be implemented through a series of office zoning districts Residence jillT 2.5.5 Mixed-use The concept of "Mixed-use" has been 3 :i 11 around for centuries. Prior to the �` r advent of the automobile and the , • �� proliferation of the road and highway ,- •_ ;' " ' �$+I. _ •_tom;,'. "•'-system, Mixed-use was a --.•_ ""' • �- .• predominant urban form. The - "rediscovery" of this development type may be due in part to the negative impacts of sprawl, which t •, - . have resulted in traffic congestion, ---- decline in air quality, and inefficient use of resources and infrastructure. Mixed-use development has several potential benefits: • Land and infrastructure resources are used more efficiently: • Pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods: • Jobs are located near housing; • Opportunities to revitalize commercial corridors: Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 18 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Opportunities for infill residential development (primarily in corridors); • Encourage new housing and innovative retail that is less auto dependent; and • Compatibility with existing transit access along local corridors. Mixed-use may be either "horizontal Mixed-use" or "vertical Mixed-use." Horizontal Mixed-use means that residential, commercial, office and other uses are adjacent to each other typically as part of an overall master plan for a site However, not all projects within a "Mixed-use" designated area must be Mixed-use to achieve the goals of this plan. For example, a new residential-only project that is appropriately designed and located adjacent to an older existing commercial building may help stimulate renovation and reuse. This would be a more likely scenario in the Corridor Mixed-use area rather than the Mixed-use area. Vertical Mixed-use means that residential and nonresidential uses are stacked over each other. Typically, residential uses are placed over ground level retail, offices and/or restaurant uses. This development type would be more likely to occur in the City Center or in the areas designated as Mixed-use. Corridor Mixed-Use Corridor Mixed-use is intended to enhance travel options, encourage development of locally serving commercial uses, multi-family apartments, lodging and offices along major transportation corridors identified on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Corridor Mixed-use recognizes the historical low-intensity, auto-dependent development pattern, and focuses on a pedestrian orientation with an emphasis on aesthetics and design. The Corridor Mixed-use designation is primarily used along Sprague Avenue in order to space the areas designated commercial. Mixed-Use Center The Mixed-use Center designation would allow for two or more different land uses within developments under this designation. As described above, Mixed-use developments can be either vertical or horizontally mixed, and would include employment uses such as office, retail and/or lodging along with higher density residential uses, and in some cases community or cultural facilities. Mixed-use developments in this designation are characterized by differing land uses which are developed pursuant to a coherent, approved plan of development. Compatibility between uses is achieved through design which integrates certain �� ,,� •,rya physical and functional features such as N. I. a, -.0 transportation systems, pedestrian ways, open Q11 ,.. •areas or court yards, and common focal points or `i'. 'ib.4 A amenities. -- - 2.5.6 Industrial Designations r P..\1,1; Providing for industrial land is important for the .. • economic health of Spokane Valley Industrial businesses help drive the local economy and create an economic multiplier effect throughout the region. Providing an adequate supply of usable land with . minimal environmental constraints and infrastructure in place helps ensure that Spokane Valley will be an attractive place for industrial businesses to locate and prosper. (See Chapter 7, Economic Development, for additional policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial business.) Heavy Industry Heavy industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly/disassembly, freight-handling and similar Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 19 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan operations Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding areas. Commercial, residential and most recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry, except for small-scale ancillary uses serving the industrial area. The conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be limited. Limiting incompatible uses ensures a competitive advantage in business recruitment by providing adequate industrial land supply, reducing land use conflicts and preventing inflation of land prices. Moreover, allowing a wide variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the Industrial areas would be in conflict with other portions of this Plan related to concentrating major commercial growth in nodes at the intersection of major streets. Light Industry The Light Industry designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and internal and community compatibility. Uses may include high technology and other low-impact industries. Light Industry areas may incorporate office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. Non-industrial uses should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses. The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. 2.5.7 Parks!Open Space The Parks and Open Space designation is intended to protect parks, open space, and other natural physical assets of the community. fit ' 2.6 Development Review Process The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation = for implementing zoning and development A , DCY Y regulations. In developing policy concerning future • land use regulations, or revisions to existing _ regulations, every effort has been made to instill 's ` certainty and efficiency in the development process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely permit processing. Through the goals and policies of this Plan, the City will continue to strive to provide an efficient and timely review system. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 20 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2.7 Urban Design and Form In addition to guiding development, the Land Use chapter also guides the quality and character of the City's future development pattern through goals and policies related to the form, function, and appearance of the built environment. These priorities and implementation strategies, related to quality development, serve and will continue to serve as a basis from which to develop appropriate implementation measures. The design of our urban environment has a significant effect on community identity. Well designed communities contribute to a healthful, safe and sustainable environment that offers a variety of opportunities for housing and employment. An attractive and well planned community is invaluable when recruiting new business and industry to an area. Some of the concepts considered include: • Community appearance, including signs and placement of utilities; • Neighborhood considerations in the review of development projects; • Integration and linking of neighborhoods including bicycle and pedestrian facilities; • The effect of traffic patterns and parking on neighborhood character; • Encouragement of high quality development through the appropriate use of planned unit developments; and • Consideration for public art. 2.7.1 Aesthetic Corridors Aesthetic corridors are intended to protect the visual appeal of Spokane Valley along major transportation routes entering and exiting the city. Aesthetic corridors provide special design standards for aesthetics along major transportation routes to help create a quality image of Spokane Valley. Another component of aesthetic corridors is the "gateways" into the city. There are several entrances into the City of Spokane Valley along major transportation corridors, including Sprague Avenue, Trent Avenue, State Route 27 and a number of interchanges on Interstate 90. Design elements and landscaping treatments should denote a sense of arrival into the City, a neighborhood or special area such as the city center. 2.7.2 Planned Unit Developments Building flexibility into the subdivision process is important to allow for new concepts and creative site design. Planned unit developments (PUDs) provide the city a tool for allowing flexibility, while ensuring a design meets overall health and safety standards, and is consistent with neighborhood character. PUDs allow for deviations from the typical zoning standards in exchange for designs that protect the environment, provide usable open space, and exhibit exceptional quality and design. 2.8 Historical and Cultural Resources 2.8.1 Background In many ways, Spokane Valley's historic and cultural resources are similar to our rich natural resources. Like wetlands, rivers, lakes, streams and other natural resources, historic properties are a finite and endangered resource. Also like our natural resources, once an historic or archaeological property is destroyed, it is lost forever. Cultural resources such as historic buildings, monuments of historic events and archaeological sites are statements of Spokane Valley's identity. People especially value our authentic, homegrown cultural resources that set us apart from other areas of the state. Spokane Valley is the location of several "Firsts" to occur in the Spokane Region. The first permanent settler in the Spokane area was Antoine Plante, a retired French-Canadian trapper. Plante built a cabin near the Spokane River in 1849, from which he operated a small Hudson's Bay Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 21 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Company trading post. Plante also constructed and operated the first ferry on the Spokane River. Other settlers began arriving in this area between 1865 and 1882. "Firsts" to occur in Spokane Valley include the first settler in 1849, first business and ferry in 1850, the first store and bridge in 1862, the first house in 1866 and the first post office in 1867. All of these "firsts" occurred before the arrival in 1873 of James Glover who was considered the"Father of Spokane." A large part of Spokane Valley's identity is derived from its heritage. From the Native Americans who first established trading centers to the continuing waves of newcomers from around the world, all have left their mark. Cultural resources include historic structures and landscapes engineered and built by man: a. Historic buildings - houses, barns, commercial buildings, churches, schools. b. Historic structures -bridges, dams, stone fences. c. Historic districts -a grouping of buildings with related historic character. d. Historic objects -statues, monuments, sculpture. e. Landscapes—gardens, parks, urban and rural. Cultural resources include properties that were held in spiritual or ceremonial honor or by a cultural group or tribe. Cultural resources include properties which may no longer show evidence of man- made structures, but retain an historical association with an event or period. Arcnaeology sites include such areas as battlefields, campsites, cemeteries, burial sites, rock carvings, pictographs, trails, village sites, fishing sites, trading sites, religious and ceremonial sites. 2.8.2 Cultural and Historical Resource Issues Documenting Cultural Resources Many historic homes, farms and sites exemplify the history and culture of the Spokane Valley area, but proportionally few have been written in historic register nominations. Designation requires owner consent, does not pose undue restrictions to the I ' property owner, and can be a planning tool for government by identifying significant properties. .f- ' • Archaeological Sites and Security • to&, PeOrt State laws require the protection of archaeological sites on both and private land by directing that the locations of sites be kept confidential within the assigned office because , archaeological sites are highly susceptible to "treasure hunters t •;_�� ; and grave robbers." Existing lists need to be checked to confirm _ , that evidence of the site/building remains, and a better means to 4., identify and preserve evidence of significant archaeological sites is needed. Cultural resources are deemed important when they are over 50 years old, so identification and evaluation of them is a constant, ongoing process. Moreover, cultural resources are perceived as less important than other immediate, short-term City programs; therefore, funding and support for the preservation program is provided on an annual rather than an ongoing basis 2.8.3 Spokane Valley Historic and Cultural Resources The Spokane Valley developed as irrigated agricultural tracts in five and ten-acre lots. The apple orchards of Otis Orchards were supported by warehouses, packing plants, and box manufacturers. The apple industry which thrived in the early century was destroyed by killing frost of the 1950s. Newman Lake supplied the water that irrigated these orchards via the Spokane Canal Company. The flow control gate at Newman Lake (a great fishing spot) remains as a ruin with its story only in fading memory. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 22 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Open canal ditches, concrete flues, cultivated fields and apple orchards were part of growing up in the valley until the late 1950s. A canal ran behind Otis Orchards High School, neither of which now exists. The picture on page 25 shows an Otis Orchards irrigation canal. The Opportunity Township Hall was designed by Opportunity resident and noted Spokane architect C. Harvey Smith and constructed in 1912 by Opportunity builder and businessman C.E Johnson. Built as Opportunity's government seat, the Opportunity Township Hall also , served as the area's community hall and - 14\ a meeting place for various philanthropic and other organizations including the Opportunity Moose Lodge. Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, church groups, dance studios. and wedding parties. The Opportunity Township Hall is significant as a rare local example of Spanish- Mediterranean style architecture and for its association with the early settlement and development of the Spokane Valley and the town of Opportunity. 2.9 The Land Use/Transportation Connection 2.9.1 Street Connectivity Street design can have a significant impact on community development. It is important that neighborhoods be connected is such a manner that cars, bicycles and pedestrians can pass with ease from one neighborhood to an adjacent neighborhood via collectors and arterials. Such a pattern promotes a sense of community. All new developments should give special consideration to emergency access routes. 2.9.2 Traffic Calming Traffic calming can be defined as measures that physically alter the operational characteristics of the roadway in an attempt to slow down traffic and reduce the negative effects of the automobile. The theory behind traffic calming is that roads should be multiuse spaces encouraging social links within a community and the harmonious interaction of various modes of travel (i.e.. walking, cycling. auto. transit) 2.10 Citizen Participation The City of Spokane Valley adopted a Public Participation Program for the preparation of the comprehensive plan. This program identified actions the city would take to meet the GMA requirements of "early and continuous" public participation in the development of the city's plan. Two of the public participation techniques identified in the Public Participation Program is citizen survey and a series of public meetings hosted by the city's planning commission. In the spring of 2004, the City hired Clearwater Research to conduct a statistically valid survey of Spokane Valley residents on a number of issues. Clearwater Research conducted a telephone survey with a random sample of 400 Spokane Valley adults. Survey data was collected from March 18 to April 7, 2004. The majority of respondents (83%) indicated they thought Spokane Valley was headed in the right direction. However, respondents did identify a number of important issues facing Spokane Valley. Concerns about the economy and planning related matters were among the top issues respondents identified as facing the City. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 23 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2.1 0.1 City Center/Community Identity City Center. Sixty-one percent of respondents indicated that having a recognizable downtown or city center was 100% - important to the future of Spokane Valley 800/ ■n=395 (figure right). Female respondents, respondents at lower income levels, and 60% - respondents residing in one or two 35% person households were most likely to 40% 26% report that having a recognizable 20% 0 17% downtown was important to the future of o Spokane Valley. There was strong 0% support among respondents for spending Very Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Very public money to create a city center. unimportant unimportant important important Seventy-four percent of respondents either somewhat or strongly supported Spokane Valley officials using public money to develop a city center. Only two percent strongly opposed the use of other — public money to create a city center. ■n=233 Most Ideal Location for a City Center Everygreen and Sprague Over half of the respondents (52%) felt Pines and Sprague 15% the University City area would be the most ideal Spokane Valley location for a Mirabeau Point 18% city center. Other areas considered appropriate for the City Center included University City area 52% Mirabeau Point, Pines and Sprague, and - Evergreen and Sprague. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Importance of Spokane Valley Having Community Identity Community Identity. Only 26% of respondents thought Spokane Valley had 100% a distinct identity or something that made +I II n=396 it unique. Interestingly, almost the same 80% - - - _ 4--- percentage of respondents who said Spokane Valley does not have a 60% o community identity (74%), indicated that 41�a 35% having a community identity was 40% important to the future of Spokane Valley 20% 7,� 10°/6 T% (76%). 0% Very Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Very unimportant unimportant Important Important Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2–Land Use Page 24 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Development of Community Identity Best Accomplished Through 100% _ Physical or Social Changes 80'/0 _ •n=289 While many respondents (47%) felt 60% 47°I° community identity could be developed through social changes, others 40% 2©% ° believed physical changes (28%) or a 20% combination of both physical and social changes (25%) were the best 0% -- i • - means for accomplishing the Physical changes Social changes Both Important development of community identity. 2.10.2 Community Aesthetics The typical pattern of development along the major streets of Spokane Valley did not appear to be of great concern to respondents. Just 22% expressed dissatisfaction with the current type of development along major streets. Further underscoring the general lack of concern about the typical pattern of development along major streets, only 23% of respondents indicated adding street trees and landscaping to major streets should be a high priority for City officials. Lower income respondents were more apt than higher income respondents to report that making streets pedestrian-friendly should be a high priority for City officials. Support/Opposition to Development of Small Commercial Centers Close to Residential Neighborhoods - Respondents' opinions (graph right) 100% •n=396 regarding the development of small 80% — commercial centers close to residential neighborhoods, were also 60% - - sharply divided. Just under half of the respondents (46%) were supportive 40% 21% 22% 34% 15° of developing small commercial 20% ° centers close to residential neighborhoods. 0% Strongly Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Strongly oppose oppose support support Priority Level: Stronger Controls on Signs and Billboards in Spokane Valley Opinions regarding the priority City officials should place on stronger sign 100% - -and billboard controls were very •n=398 mixed. However, 67% of respondents 80% indicated that Spokane Valley officials should place a medium or high 60% priority on stronger sign and billboard 40% 33% % 33% control and as such, it is probable that the majority of residents would be 20% supportive of stronger billboard control and sign regulations. 0% Low priority Medium priority High priority 2.10.3 Results of"Unscientific" Survey During the community meetings held on the comprehensive plan, city staff made available the survey questions contained in the city's community survey. Meeting attendees were asked to complete the survey and either return it before the end of the meeting, or to complete the survey at Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 25 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan home and mail it to the city. In many cases the responses to the questions were similar to the responses of the formal survey conducted by Clearwater Research. These question numbers are right of the survey itself. The following are the results of the 'unscientific" survey: How important to the future of Spokane Valley is having an area of the City that is recognized as the "downtown"? Would you say...? The responses to this question are very similar to those received during the formal community goo°i° n=177 survey. The results above reflect 80% ■ that out of the total responses of 177 on this issue, 102 or nearly 60% 58 percent felt that Spokane 40% 33% Valley having an identifiable 26% 1$°%° 19% downtown or city center was 20% either somewhat important or 4% , very important. This is compared 0% to 40 responses or 22% indicating Very Somewhat Neither Somewhat Very that an identifiable city center was important important important unimportant unimportant either somewhat or very nor unimportant. unimportant If you feel a developing a "downtown" is important, which of the following areas of Spokane Valley would be the most ideal location for a downtown? Those respondents who indicated that having an identifiable city center overwhelming (73%) felt that the University City area was the most appropriate location for establishing a city center for Spokane Valley. 9% 4% 10% 4% 73% ■University City area •Mirabeau Point area ❑ Pines&Sprague •Evergreen &Sprague •Other Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 26 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan In your opinion, does Spokane Valley have an identity or something that makes it unique? The result of this survey question is somewhat different from the results of the formal community survey. In the formal survey only 26% of the respondents felt that the City of Spokane Valley has an identity or something that makes it unique. The results in the graph at the right indicate that a majority of those surveyed at the community meetings (52%)felt there was something unique about Spokane Valley. 100% - ■ n=1701 80% 60% 39% 34% 40% 13% 200/0 5°/a 9% 0% Very Somewhat Neither Somewhat Very important important important nor unimportant unimportant unimportant How important to the future of Spokane Valley is having a "community identity? Would you say...? When asked how important to the future of 100% -- Spokane Valley is having a distinct - •n=155 community identity, an overwhelming ao% majority of the respondents (73%) felt it is 60% either somewhat important or very important , 48% 62% that Spokane Valley have a distinct identity. ,,°°i° This is consistent with the results of the formal community survey where 76% of 20%-- respondents felt it is important for the city to have a community identity. °°%° No Yes Would development of a "community identity" best be accomplished through physical changes, such as the development of a city center or the building of gateways at the major points of entry into the city, or through social changes, such as more community events like Valleyfest? 100% When asked what types of changes [•n=151 would be needed to develop a community 80% identity, a majority (57%) felt that both 57% 60% social and physical changes would be necessary to accomplish developing an ao°/° identity for the city. This is somewhat 2s°%° 15% than the formal survey where 20 20% °%° only 26% of the respondents felt that both 0% physical and social changes were equally Physical Changes Social Changes Both Changes important to develop the city's identity. Equally Important Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2- Land Use Page 27 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Do you consider adding street trees and landscaping to major streets in Spokane Valley a high, medium, or low priority for city officials? In terms of community aesthetics, a majority of the respondents (59%) felt 100% -- that adding street trees and ■n=1661 landscaping to the major streets in 80% the city should be either a medium or 80% high priority for city officials. This 41% 41% result was identical to the result of the city's formal community survey where 18/0 zo�o 59% of respondents felt this should be either a medium or high priority for 0%111--- the city. Low Priority Medium Priority High Priority 2.11 Goals and Policies Residential Goals & Policies Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development. LUP-1 4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to the size of the development. LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. LUP-1 7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity). • Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2— Land Use Page 28 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal LUG-2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Policies LUP-2.1 Allow and encourage a variety of housing types in designated Mixed-use areas, especially in the City Center area. LUP-2.2 Use design and performance standards for residential developments to achieve integration in commercial and Mixed-use developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Encourage variations in facades and rooflines to add character and interest to multi-family developments. LUP-2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking and transit uses. LUP-2.4 Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the residential development. LUP-2.5 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. Commercial Goals &Policies Goal LUG-3 Transform various commercial business areas into vital, attractive, easily accessible mixed use areas that appeal to investors, consumers and residents and enhance the community image and economic vitality. Policies LUP-3.1 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue Regional/Community Commercial corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at arterial intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. LUP-3.2 Encourage large bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial nodes around arterial intersections. Goal LUG-4 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Policies LUP-4.1 Integrate retail developments into surrounding residential areas with attention to quality design and function. LUP-4.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. LUP-4.3 Encourage retail and personal services to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. LUP-4.4 Encourage Mixed-use residential and commercial and office development in Neighborhood Commercial designations where compatibility with nearby uses can be demonstrated. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 29 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. LUP-4.6 Develop community design guidelines to promote common open space, public art, and plazas in commercial and office developments. LUP-4.7 Develop design guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicle circulation in commercial, office and Mixed-use developments. LUP-4.8 Develop design guidelines to encourage commercial development to locate along the street edge(where deemed appropriate)to provide pedestrian street access. LUP-4.9 Identify and designate streets where on-street parking can be safely provided without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety. LUP-4.10 May provide incentives to encourage developers to include housing in mixed-use projects. Goal LUG-5 Identify appropriate locations for the Auto Row Overlay designation. Policies LUP-5.1 Identify other appropriate automobile related uses within the Auto Row Overlay designation that are complementary to automobile dealerships. LUP-5.2 Develop appropriate development standards for permitted uses within the Auto Row Overlay designated area. City Center Goal LUG-6 Create an identifiable City Center that serves as the social, cultural, and economic focus of the City of Spokane Valley. Policies LUP-6.1 Define a City Center with distinct boundaries, unique building types, and special features. LUP-6.2 Strengthen existing connections of the City Center area to the region's high capacity transit system. LUP-6.3 Focus on improving the existing character and image of the City Center area through appropriate development regulations and design standards. LUP-6.4 Develop land use regulations that allow higher intensity development in the City Center including, but not limited to, taller buildings, increased floor area ratios (FAR)and permitted uses. LUP-6.5 Coordinate with urban service providers to ensure sufficient capacity is available for anticipated development. LUP-6.6 Allow for a variety of uses and mixed-use development within buildings or complexes. Ensure that mixed-use development complements and enhances the character of the surrounding residential and commercial area. LUP-6.7 The City should always consider City Center sites regarding potential civic and cultural uses the City develops, such as a City Hall. LUP-6.8 Provide incentives to attract cultural and civic uses to the City Center over which the City does not have direct control, such as libraries or recreation facilities. LUP-6.9 Develop land use regulations that encourage higher density residential uses on the periphery of the City Center area in close proximity to high capacity transit. High density housing should be accompanied by residentially oriented retail and service uses. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 30 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-6.10 Provide amenities such as community services, parks and public spaces to meet the residential needs in the City Center. LUP-6.11 Provide an effective transition between the periphery of the City Center and nearby lower density residential development. Goal LUG-7 Provide a balanced transportation network that accommodates public transportation, high occupancy vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, automobiles and integrated parking. Policies LUP-7.1 Improve traffic circulation around and through the City Center by extending the street network and creating smaller blocks. LUP-7.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle circulation by providing public sidewalks, street trees, street furniture and other amenities. LUP-7.3 Require clear and safe pedestrian paths to enhance the pedestrian network. LUP-7.4 Connect the main entry of buildings to public sidewalks by an identifiable walkway. LUP-7.5 Allow for on-street parking on the internal City Center street network. LUP-7.6 Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian and bicycle linkages to the existing and future transit system. Office Goals & Policies Goal LUG-8 Create appropriate development standards for Office designated areas. Policies LUP-8.1 Allow commercial, residential and recreational uses in conjunction with permitted uses in Office designated areas. LUP-8.2 Integrate sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to provide a safe and attractive working environment. Mixed-use Goals & Policies Goal LUG-9 Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle and regional transit. Policies LUP-9.1 The characteristics of a Mixed-use area should include: • Housing and employment densities to support regional transit service; • Public transit connections; • Safe, attractive transit stops and pedestrian and bicycle ways; • Buildings that front on wide sidewalks with attractive landscaping, benches and frequent bus stops; • Multi-story buildings oriented to the street rather than parking lots; and • Parking space located behind or to the side of buildings or in parking structures. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 31 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-9.2 The mix of land uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use Center designation should include: • A variety of housing types including apartments, condominiums, town houses, two-family and single family dwellings on small lots; • A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores, theaters/entertainment, restaurants, personal services and specialty shops; • Public/quasi-public uses and/or open space; • Professional Office and other employment oriented uses; and • Commercial uses that require large land areas but have low employment density and are auto-dependant, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses, and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mixed- use category. Industrial Goals & Policies Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses. Policies LUP-10.1 Plan capital facility expenditures to assist the development of lands designated for industrial uses. LUP-10.2 Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley. LUP-10.3 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. Goal LUG-11 A variety of strategically located heavy industrial areas should be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. Policies LUP-11.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in areas designated for industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area. LUP-11.2 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited to ensure an adequate land supply. LUP-11.3 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas. LUP-11.4 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or assemble products on-site. Goal LUG-12 Designate and protect a variety of strategically located light industry areas. Policies LUP-12.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area. LUP-12.2 Light industry areas shall include lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive working environment. Adopted April 25,2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 32 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-12.3 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or assemble products on-site. Development Review Goals & Policies Goal LUG-13 Develop and maintain an efficient and timely development review process. Policies LUP-13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate. LUP-13.2 Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer pre-application meetings in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently. Urban Design and Form Goals & Policies Goals LUG-14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. Policies LUP-14.1 Use performance and community design standards to maintain neighborhood character, achieve a greater range of housing options, and to create attractive and desirable commercial and office developments. LUP-14.2 Adopt specific regulations for designated aesthetic corridors that: • Provide incentives for aesthetic design; • Require landscaping buffers adjacent to roadways; • Limit sign height and size; • Provide performance standards to adequately screen intensive land uses that have exterior clutter such as outdoor storage, exterior heavy equipment and/or exterior fabrication/assembly. • Prohibit off-premise signage and billboards. LUP-14.3 Establish standards for the scale and intensity of commercial, retail and industrial signage that protect views and minimize signage clutter while allowing adequate business identification. LUP-14.4 Establish a"cap and replace" system for billboards. LUP-14.5 Designate aesthetic corridors along major transportation routes to provide a positive image of Spokane Valley. Aesthetic corridors shall be located along the following routes: • State Route 27 from 16`h south to 32nd and Mansfield to Trent; • Appleway Boulevard (south side from Park to Dishman Mica); • Mirabeau Parkway from Pines to Indiana; • Dishman Mica Road from 8th Avenue, south to City limits • 32nd Ave.within the City limits • Appleway Blvd. from Barker to Hodges Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 33 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Historic and Cultural Resources Goals & Policies Goal LUG-15 Identify and protect archeological and historic sites and structures. Policies LUP-15.1 Continually identify and evaluate archaeological and historic sites to determine which should be preserved. LUP-15.2 Link cultural resource preservation with local economic development strategies. LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the preservation of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties. Land Use/Transportation Connection Goals & Policies Goal LUG-16 Provide a street system that connects neighborhoods. Policies LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus or car. LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new development or redevelopment. Joint Planning Goals and Policies Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley should continue to coordinate with Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth areas. Policies LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County to: • Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA mitigation; and • Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and County should ensure that planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake. LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County, appropriate fire districts, school districts, and water service providers to assure managed growth in urban growth areas. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 34 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Potential Annexation Area Goals and Policies Goal LUG-18 Identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valley that are consistent with the Spokane County regional urban growth area boundary. Policies LUP-18.1 Within the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are contiguous to the city limits and not assigned to another city. LUP-18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the regional urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and RCW 36.70. LUP-18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to accommodate Spokane Valley's 20 year population allocation. LUP-18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located outside the designated urban growth area. LUP-18.5 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for any newly proposed urban growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies. Goal LUG-19 Collaborate with adjacent cities, Spokane County, and affected residents Policies LUP-19.1 Pursue interlocal agreements with Spokane County to support collaborative joint planning within potential annexation areas to ensure consistent development. LUP-19.2 Inform affected residents, property owners, and businesses in the annexation process. LUP-19.3 Include language in an interlocal agreement utilizing the tool of annexation, prior to urban development, to control the type, quality, and location of development in potential annexation areas. LUP-19.4 Coordinate with Spokane County to work with affected neighborhoods upon annexation to provide a smooth transition from Spokane County to the City of Spokane Valley administration. Goal LUG-20 Promote orderly growth within potential annexation areas Policies LUP-20.1 Perform a fiscal analysis and provide a service plan for all areas proposed for annexation. Lup-20.2 Incorporate potential annexation areas in the Capital Facilities Plan including proposed locations for new capital facilities. LUP-20.3 Strive to retain neighborhood integrity in adjusting potential annexation areas boundaries. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 35 of 36 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Goal LUG-21 Develop an annexation process for potential annexation areas Policies LUP-21.1 Evaluate annexations within the potential annexation areas based on the following criteria: • The City's ability, either in house, by contract, or by special purpose district, to provide public services at the City's adopted level of service • The annexation boundary should provide a contiguous and regular boundary with current City limits • The annexation boundary, where appropriate should use physical boundaries, including but not limited to, bodies of water, existing or future right-of-way, roads, and topography • Assessment of staff time and expense involved in processing the annexation request • Review right-of-way issues prior to defining boundaries of individual annexations to determine logical inclusions or exclusions • The annexation boundary, where appropriate, should adjust any impractical or irregular boundaries • When the proposed annexation is located in the vicinity of a public facility, the City should evaluate the feasibility of modifying the annexation boundary to include the public facility LUP-21.2 Process annexations in accordance with State annexation laws in a timely and efficient manner. LUP-21.3 Generally, the City of Spokane Valley prefers the Petition Method of Annexation. LUP-21.4 Ensure that newly annexed territory accepts its equitable share of the City's bonded indebtedness. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 5-27-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 36 of 36 Public/Quasi-Public Analysis Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning WS-1 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) WS-2 Low Density Residential SF Residential Urban District(R-4) WS-3 Medium Density Residential Multifamily Medium Density Residential District(MF-1) WS-4 High Density Residential Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2) WS-5 Community Commercial Community Commercial District(C) WS-6 Regional Commercial Regional Commercial (RC) WS-7 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space(P/OS) Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning WN-1 Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial (1-2) WN-2 Regional Commercial Regional Commercial (RC) WN-3 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) WN-4 Low Density Residential SF Residential Urban District(R-4) WN-5 Office Office(0) WN-6 Office Garden Office(GO) WN-7 Light Industrial Light Industrial (I-1) WN-8 Low Density Residential SF Residential Suburban District(R-2) WN-9 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space(P/OS) Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning WCS-1 Low Density Residential SF Residential Estate District(R-1) WCS-2 Low Density Residential SF Residential Suburban District(R-2) WCS-3 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) WCS-4 Community Commercial Community Commercial District(C) WCS-5 Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Commercial (NC) WCS-6 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space(P/OS) Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning WC-1 Low Density Residential SF Residential Suburban District(R-2) WC-2 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) WC-3 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) WC-4 High Density Residential Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2) Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning WCN-1 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) WCN-2 Medium Density Residential Multifamily Medium Density Residential District(MF-1) WCN-3 Office Office(0) WCN-4 Community Commercial Community Commercial District(C) WCN-5 Light Industrial Light Industrial (I-1) WCN-6 High Density Residential Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2) WCN-7 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) WCN-8 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District(MUC) WCN-9 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space(P/OS) 1 of 2 Public/Quasi-Public Analysis Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning ECN-1 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District(MUC) ECN-2 High Density Residential Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2) ECN-3 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space(P/OS) ECN-4 Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial (1-2) ECN-5 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) ECN-6 Low Density Residential SF Residential Urban District(R-4) Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning EC-1 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) EC-2 Office Garden Office(GO) EC-3 High Density Residential Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2) EC-4 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) EC-5 Office Office(0) EC-6 Regional Commercial Regional Commercial (RC) Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning ECS-1 Low Density Residential SF Residential Suburban District(R-2) ECS-2 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space(P/OS) ECS-3 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) ECS-4 High Density Residential Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2) ECS-5 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) ECS-6 Medium Density Residential Multifamily Medium Density Residential District(MF-1) Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning ES-1 Low Density Residential SF Residential Suburban District(R-2) ES-2 Low Density Residential SF Residential Urban District(R-4) ES-3 Low Density Residential SF Residential Estate District(R-1) ES-4 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) ES-5 Community Commercial Community Commercial District(C) ES-6 Medium Density Residential Multifamily Medium Density Residential District(MF-1) ES-7 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) ES-8 Office Garden Office(GO) Section No. CP Designation Subsequent Zoning EN-1 Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space(P/OS) EN-2 Medium Density Residential Multifamily Medium Density Residential District(MF-1) EN-3 Low Density Residential SF Residential District(R-3) EN-4 Low Density Residential SF Residential Urban District(R-4) EN-5 Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial (1-2) EN-6 Light Industrial Light Industrial (I-1) 2 of 2 Public/Quasi-Public Property MI I LIA . illnigan I.1 Lewd =1142-P a.c+e+same:». J ,� '�• . rith I. .- •st Central North' U � Ill ' III ^$ 1 a:i desigrfigijkl,. \ 7ti afolunr-41:=lel „„„ .7.--, I nor. :31 111 ii•-lrtrr I mr. ..,.._,,..!,, ' ..ellfir:k.--;-**.. �" ''y„ „..• .. ..41 ,,/r..........r' Eli': �. • 1 suer----elm�t ._.*di ME iv;tramp El mg worm 32%.r IIMAIMIIIIII JIM'»•.i■:�Y.I' 1111 1. 0 •1� ...... . _ -- - . Y Gi l; 1,i��_7t'P ■ `! `r. ........,T MiTama." ;Ilia',i. 11351112 Bil laeliM 11131 P.M"'"Ilog■ all ET' ..iii.,,,j,_•- ■.Tim ���M ar ` �\ �� R _ llii.f i� L .1 Q _: ...''".- rte; /11� 1.7 r -0 ��; .. \� �' 65 -.tt - .. inert-I x_-_-41. �t�_11:� < - •--3 a r ;� LN� �,/[ s>a'" Iw ..►ate LiJE'p:/.0%el* :'�� _ �., .�,`iii- =:* ii iii � T l 1 •; Fe S•uth ♦ _ Sri ar a if '� mar—= -� "�, ii. OE Rt,. > o-'m ti's.' tN=i L ',1 44 :t �tA i;.; i 1�. 'i�N a r �^i11! t 1....1,..,. ..iii. 1 ..- ��� r-+r lam..lull im\,s. .....„ , ..4141 1 >yy ra r im tr ■ 011vo R u W c valley vaupyw,y i I J Way ; .YAlieyweY .__ m Nixon J . Main a ,4arrin j,pn _.....)......... 1 O a 5cir O Rivarsido ir c A J/11//Hf11/1/1/1111 111//1 /111111//11111//%1111111/1f111/t1 111/t/1111111/1/11-1 16/11/N111 1 111////1/1iM01M11/1/1/11//1�11// 1st 841st _ 8 '�` II- 2nd \°'�0 2nd WS-5._... . 4�ni�,w,�y 1>EI ti • i C WS.4 of/�WS-6 s�=�sII t +- — -t9o- I30W285ON 4th HDR. . I r11�r RC �t ..• Y111/r • 8t e c z , .5th_ "/►71111 r'• v 4'p�, 0 Q = _Gth I r I S '.. PlOS 4 4Li i _ :oe- Y 4,o°a 11111 f7 Er.►` tea - t___ I Legend I '_, v 9th h WS•1 1 �■ , `! �� WSJ 1110 WSPOP - — — G a. WS- LDR pan�: _ MDR � 1 POPIO • 111th - w r so LDR i �i x ,• [�ws, „th 0 WS-2 A ,VIII __12th J11111111111/11111111�1 \ • 'WS-3 f 1 o • � a, X111,, • WS4 11.11 • c ___ _ 14tt1 L I;IIw.+ WS-5 ;N.lath �QJ _ Z1+ U lfttlili.1111 iit�, — �-- 1�th J 111 f� '� •� _N!S b— CP r11tt111� 1111.1 /t� ///I/ . !J,...,,,, -1811, -vS-7 ■ a • • o io�y _ 18th: i -44) ,,j1 i • LI 73 E . sip 1/111/1111111/11/1///(/L 1$th • Legend 3IiVtf�/1�T c lir •Liberty 1 WNPQP :. _ Al �: '� II.. ' WN-8 POPID �I1�� MI •r Ai , ■ �:. k":LDR -.„-------- wri3 / E ,.�.. uck•� mm . j 1 WN.s ���`r _WN S ,10 . _ I on = 1��1�'' -VMH E SS%', t' �-, A - •; 8 161S` 7 '��`� Montgomery ®WN- --� M,�nfiatd l ~_:t. Yt Manstie d .E «• E A tro?d Knoa<. . - - S i IM eta-f. ° p m R?! Shan-non _ • _.a. W Michieili • i_ v Trent Nndi �_-_ � 1 '� : 00 199 3 aaraw 20, 1 Ot �Zet o1-t,E____21. }, i Nord �N • WN 7 At,�ugta_ - . Mlsalon L) Missi°.. S _ t Into I �_ ,121 : ugHi O ,,',''t�1�� Boone u. m Sharp @ �ti `I Sharp `one el ��i'�SiStI r ;voamvt .WN-4 ---_ rtes e T L ataldo N t - LDR l WN-5t N Ii - WN-1 z �_ I WN-9 � - p- h Dean t`�OFtt i c' Mallon y41 ! P/OS 0 • :• ��9adwa 1 / .. 0rMk*ay F ■ AIM `6( -N 4 LDR, a Olive a .i p 0 ■ er Nixon Vsiieyway - •- up .Nixon Main ,. o ;►r ,� Main_ -IVeraide 9� �, ton 1 3Ift iseitin 1>Emt 1 1111su �puotvionast #eumjs��I� mIllumspwa11i lsmsins, 1emiovu1i�- }St _ ∎,Z. 1St •7 Q, /tn7�� is,•G7 v •.f...n. ■. ■. ._.... i c ,, Legend '� '•���� WCSPOP • I .g 1 el _ 114111111:: •PoPio � 4)'LT ...A. .' mr7.1.- I=1 ViCs-. W C S �F th 4 -i-'3105. III '__ �- r�C� 31101111001 �\\\ 1!010 ri CS• _ S ` : '7n • jC 6 -1 3a wcsa �,,, We'S-6 � =1 1- 1/6W--i - 9 -, 41 � stn � I. , At me \\;:st �� 1— Vi38;j ``b� ims ►cY '�i e toy L� t to %,,.. 0th_ IL_J' C� WCS44 41$ CS-3 \ LDR • o+j � oaa o 004� y' %•Ii. — --`, ! WCS-2 1 ,. 0 ( v) LDR E r 2 .c.; isilithini 450 4 f. .. wes� ral h _ - ,anfi , _ ,r •ii, • „i n t i m:1i` ii, Ha _ ♦�`_ qi, Its. c , ,F - - r♦ WCs-5 . > .r NC I ”. WC S-1"'Plitt . �. I South LDR i + 10. .Ltilliiiiiiiiiiiiii.111111111111iiiIIIPf . 1111111111113/1111,1111111111111111iIIIIIIIIIiiiiifilillifigillig.tb i I' — ipittlifilifitt-k/WiWe't3 3rd _ t 3rd ec il:tf.1 r--, u. i 401 VCNIU _d 1 4th "s1 -.3 it it.Sce P t „.. I : - 5jh go c z •ui g ::-- I ppl •ft. • .):. ,,, .- ..r. c; 8 i ,- 0 NI 61111 MI 6th 416- .." , 5tti eL 1 . 14.. 11, , IR ...., i _ ■ 7th — ilh ■ u_ rl i .-- . . _ern 6th .1, ,til -- - , 51111111 --- 4. go rhorLuA et 1 . , —• .7 !Cm ph 111 I .1 —• • is] • ', , 1 p sp ti". \--- _ 0 ,1514111,--- 1 al VVC-ZI il . A • tith . f. 1 LDR ' - 13' - — • , -.-A -t... - ink _ im :111.1" 14th . ' gn, , . .6. ..;_tailt_42, El * i14 ea ,.. , —, C LI' .: 0 4 31k1 01. el 0 ••I Elroy E ....E 4_14111._LD_ i• lsta =I .4,- 1111 ° 4 , --_ 15th i 77 — _ — —4 1 ; " 1 1 5t h ial ',F,": op ,s:-, 1 r: Centre toth llinurcilit — - — - ' . MI ----7 :1 4 I It w-- I 1 . 06 Legend • lath ,;.: : \ 64 I. 0 , , ilium , , MP WCPQP # a Ls, IV ._ :r--- le..1. POP1D 0 .11 0 0 iiir 0 it._ h 9 - ,eee, C-2 W • 21st IJ w c-3 no vic4 122rkti--P 1M 0 0 ili Vri ° 22nd 1 23rd 1 WC- 23rd _ S C P . _„0 2.44ti LDR ac tittiVil 111111111 1111 51111.14-a11-111111“1141.411,111 watt tit - Y \ z I I — i 1 — 1 Legend WCN-9 1e lit P/OS 4� i 05:1117; ;:a wru WCNPOP l.«,,,,b f m P�P1D VV ,, 0 w ^1 WCN.t , MUC%w, y,, vo,Aw.Rive,._ W C N .... WCri•2 isnan South *b oc SA)*,io �� au . .. Ell wc►�� — ... _ WCN-7 p,° C. «LDR ir • clr'‘‘ i *.l■F.0_.r ea. o.111 WCN-6 ,� o WCN-7 40114116�.N f e airy 1e,�m d r :��.'' o ao -WCN-8 ,tuc . Aso 1 7 , ad". , ,WCN-6.._. co .s**• -WCN-9 j ' , .r • .,. - W J. kso6.4(ilb z „ • anis,. H DR G , ---- �� 6 : rL M0 m►ha a mi,r 1 ry u 0-1-gg u - Mar_1 F.' lDo9h� E Mnnsfleld .v� CE J ox c '5 a Knox a WCN-9 ' WCN-g ,lK sn�p> ,; `� o m il,E ,� _ I`JO 5h4nnn� ndi,in:r rn 111111 1 94 l 19�' BAtrt_n i'9°off og Nora . 1 Idwfn P/OS vv2-_ LI tta us/or+ Eno o• Nora -- , .f,.7 -:"? ; ---— - 190 •u �-, :WCN-4 u -,- l�su's* .,° ".' �_: =�'3 F>4�14!'!— ---: 1 Mlsston _ ,� MissiAr � 71" i F11111 isin —...1.- dXW81�__.ar. �re . f �- 1ii �BClofl _�A j;�!-. +eta o-� a, 'licit — LL WCN-3 :�.,,, ' E Bros., , , ...,..:i _sr ?... _F. j t 'x prolosl4 c; AIk1 a ' Or �' �� iJWCN2 �tive- > !' Valle w ,_• u. c �_ 0 Vallt?Y�!ltr I MDR—. H i y Pi .— WCN-9 >K� I a,� . `l . N► «, sot" - IMaI _ t Wit ir .►� �Mn� ! s q ers'•e w �'^ of► LL P/OS Rlvarslda 1 s ,� a 1 m a _ Sprague ___� se Sprague : >a n� q o _ . 1, WC N-1 r: -'-1at.° - 8 6 1 2nd . _,2nd 001aw3Y f8�!!!lilr�rrll1111' �•t ♦� rfrtr� lr11/l1�M!*r�7/OS ., '� t-3rd 1 5, 3rd '� !ltlf>t CIYIU � ,i > to 4th d 4th c - ' _. • Legend Zt ettWIIIIIIIlI111111I • . Everett • ECNPaP � ; C- i �, POPID ` �'� ECN-zjoi �; MI l+:N-t Wabash u, �nst ValIeY Wal)a, - ECk•2 : - ,. . w ' '.s LDR Schaal OBroadth v. East la eltesle ellealey_a E C N _ ECt4•3 y - F •��` Hero '- �► - EC14.4 = — upinraf o0 1.4nflrol�oYV�. t j' nEcns t : - �' 1 • ,we Rich __Rich__ Mie Kti-e • 4 la '4$1 ! okwen ECN-6 - 3,,i, Oft Trent • • LaCss A• a LDR_ • �� . .4 • MINK ;� ECN-4 : zF parkA . Go�ocr' '4 allitsdritisBtrial 1 Q` Ica 9 ° g E tt`p nd• �C° we 7 x Industrial tfi r pot‘l : • i c g° Paris c 0 cwt\ Industrial • 1t� C • 3 t s /� P —Park D y w _ fj 1111 InciAafrial a w ~ r; -- � : t x : Park E .i °c a a N ,xrosd : v 4 -*- Euclid - - E..rc n rederick . , M -Fairview • �� -3 ° '� IrUrview c ti ti a Grace a — iluckeyC it.-.N.11 7 t n m S A •1 Marietta K : 'i Msc1e�W ,Mu,C le 0n T. : ECN-2 -• w 12 11 -' ; �r HDR •4� o �., ------ �. Cirri 1 C3 J .� � `o �.. Ermine a, a e'Y 8 ge - Mansfield-e . um le Shannon tttrlfb - G se Indiana t lliallic190 g0 le go 190 190 m 8.sc E2s7 OFF n. Nora t _ . 290 ON$ u r _ se Z August'? 3 a' oo . . o 190 1Missionr , -__ _ — r- Mission 'cm ��in -V . 9oonarvije°§W l i iii�A'1111111111111II11�q�11/1111//111111111111Mitstrt'` wzN a Legend n d ? o m e ° �� Y EC-6 41/10 . EC-5 ECPQP �•t I syiO PLPID mission RC Ci EC Ec•t, ♦ IM EC,. Maxwell o ON Ea -c-c.3 INel t SiL�St_� m - �S1nto m sI/1 EC-4 y--- " Mission Sharp Sl1ar EC-5 a i ----Thi ' N.s. BOOM �- BQ0t1e 11.1 EC-6 sw - - f -i . ir. Desmet ,pf5ttte�t I. ��ta1�4 /'_" s. kt, Corey o AN EC-2 � a• Ill O Y - EC-3 : IN NO [Meilen� ei IN > II HDR ` '� Bros wey BroadwaZ I. - •iot ■' Alkl- � _ t-5 IF c4F: - i J . alv�_._ L D R Witaystay .o C M_—Valleyway so or __. Nixon_ IN ve Q e Riverside c - 1 i w5 El Main • I 1,Wlit - 2Q . '� . n RiY�rsitle� :Riverside a .> am lo lin Sprague prague – — Sprague -a to EC-1 • _t se 1st o c iaaImtlItoll lla1iatmittuttteI1111bis11/ ae2 M2IJsaesianNaaaaiitaattmtaiiurt is 2nd -- 3rd w 3rd z — to '� z r 4th 4th --1 il 4th 'm ti se -L = 2nd - 1st al ynd ECS-6 1' E S-5.,, ._ti 1 ItIIt//`11itlItssr6tt11 t 11 ,, 4 3ed. - -11 6_ 't1 .MDR E t �►.",,��wy , -4th. Legend • ��a rtth 3_ j & . a 4th 0tH s■,.K�sic o 5th i . o Gryst�� u "� t/4 ' ''�.6th ECSPQP I = �— 6th _ .'1_,is > POPID 7 �' � � pE3 ECS.t • J .li I IF NI " n• a n 1 v- u- IE _ 14th va l-— ' ' ' -7 • :: - it MI ' I . 1■.- 4 16th "1_san i J x'17 � "i 0.____.. • t >>� t "14114. •th : i �� . i+� — ago 4 19th ', 40 �tvr,� o ` ELO m� 3unv,G/p, J!- -- �'' '', },�F = a .�°�'es 21-. i_ii II ;7'' lik I ' .,, MENEM •..•, cry=�M ,_ I 1 �' -tea a� � ,.'•. _ MIIIIIMIIMMI--" - v • tZrx Q �. gyro , �' 4th�' _ �. _ 26th '�' \' t3un� 11/11111/1/11 6th......",,, ..,. �_- _ •Hors _ ...16., •, • I limo 93. •fikial . 1_ . • imp ..,, : _. 111111M1111111111 ' Iiirrlir 11 .g441��� c° :.,...„.,,el; /asp •- Mil: CP thfi"' 8 ..38th to al MI �� zoo ,i ECS • ,. v;-- . • ,E 5i,1 /1/. ii it LDR 1 -.,00441,8 Desmet G N c PAtatha- 0n t t t ( Cat<ildp 1 90 iE — "'� ttt1111IN11i igus1E11t:i1111i1iiHIiis11/i ii111111 tsm. i ' WAOn E ES-8 Legend Q w " 0. Broadway _1❑ ii I Broadway ESPOP o n gnetd Aoki --i Sptt ld E Alki- o Alkt • PQPID _° u - . ES _i_s__________., E o go, ° 'n ° m = 0�1W I v. t ileyway GOVAaY1 te'e' ES-: �, . ill!o ES 7 1.VnIIeywa}� - 0 �11x4� Nixon ES•s I CMU -Riverside .1. �,.,�ES-6j�YM#I n E.5 a :ES-5 i._t R�i�r Id� - Sprague - - ------ • --- .. . ,., ( MDR r�P�9Ue ES-5 � � 0 .mot e A o�� - Q��h 1._... 2nd_ 2nd • vr,• ❑ -- I _ L a 1m ES-8 ail • 4th. L= 1 _. _ 4th �+ 6► i Z- ES-4 l 5th 5th, u f -!i I` 1..!• LDR 6th , 7th' • l vt�td9� ��. t la an 8th_ N q. 8th stn i � ES-3 J1t�� Mit , '� _ � LDR � _12th >>t►, 1 ' �r �- 1 1 ° � r � '1 � i 4, i • I�lt1iia ��•-110 �I� 1.---- 1Jth` ES21 14,h o � -ES 2 g! i . tatlt__i._ . LDR .11.119i1m111i111111111/; �. r N , 17 Lc__ • o m 22nd,E » E S a 24th 1 0 1 1iii 111111 El�. �r�t`*j-6 nth- 7th i• 5' s, , , •1 _ ___h__ �yen1 EN-3 oI a m• Jam Legend —*math � ,' LD' fat V.1, ��� � lo c— .�J hoot �� _rood_ m : ' ttttti t E elt1 E N P a P POMO t. t 00 UM PE III• i.,�up� He", � a Wks; .t ltlt EM-2 — �— � ' 0 angfellow .-. "4. B�� i f_ ___ 4kwe Q f Trent e. � • I l6111111111111 G • ®ENS = Park n a! as - ENS Industrial 4 ... -ENS Kiernan Park_B_ g I. Industrial U. m - - Park C = Courtlanid r EN-6 Industrial c - M W Gi a�N, ,.r�� LI - w Industrial lz a a - f - : "a_a Park E =a C a Dalton •rid s lN E -4G � - PEriewv ko 1�. EN=S v o R.- � 1 @uc 0111 ■ i Mar, MpriEtA rout,'E N-1 i '✓Q. Lie....„ P/O" _ ery i„,Mansfield ' �8 ribr ..e,...... c Indiana tCno ! hs��t1 als ar Indiana ��tr�Q _ - `or o.. BAidwi 2- .Y �a ta au Nora U I� ON a al n_ . a n 1 90 1 90 I SO III WA t orr • �11_ s n — $lntoy; '��aron /gyp - EIU. i--Boo . K •go f E to I&—__ 0 •r,Il Ealt/I11..1011/11tV '� vii uOii11i1Hui!llli4 itia 1 I t�ildo • Awes' ,3 a � {i LS'1 l l l!r _ ii .Broadway Broadway —j 3-pringfieid . Chapter 3 - Transportation I.X1111 'twit 4I(�n...sr►wr.lr.xrl.../� 1 ow11.1I6(ry,0 awidl.Ya W ammo a ,11...41.'41 j,...).-‘09 Is p,_? i.rrrara•i'.MJI'.1 r'.4//'GI)MO WOW 4.luott v awe,•,ni i "r y�1 >: 1 .ir......w Mr 1am.i1.T1•p train a�i n:M1i1•alrq.ti yroMrta / .AJ V !};- pia, J y pm 4•.....•JN.t•u•tta,tlp pomp aupaun4J1 AI //g�_ •uuy.•..LP.VO Wa*MAi .,w••arutry,..rpaa.rL * "� ....Lau••y(prlalia°.r•,411.try;L.A..,.40 it$ a•An AU a•INW - �•� j • ti 1 �I � : - _ r 1 r --, - „,..,..., • , ,., ____ \(..... „,„..,‘..,, _ • •ET' , ....4..... ---ii\--i: - * 7 ?,,,.... 1-:,,.. .. %,..,, I ft/el\I '" � i ,f i t r, l 1 ."\-\11 -1u. 1,---- fre:?c; : ro:=:.i.,,,,:slir •T ' ..);_, regm■Afik ,iiir(-r--J•4 vie c) -f.yl .:�. ��lJa.t r r .��y��4..,,,W01J=Pa - u.. a , { 1-Li .+f'' 1}'.L.14:.( , 1 , �' fir';. aai o 1 wa111d u,yr r A i_ �w, ),6.1 /a t i . ,i ' '' tJ'i ',1 S1 J I y. aa11 1JAC1 a f; •o{w • a�• ♦�� e a A 7 !:I' . • a < 4� 11 m1(1 I ' x j - } i ICIENI (yc,J14srJW1 — — �_•'�. a s`` r d,q.rr 411 U. - iawrjlrtj 1 uo •1}p41t011 m ,.,. ^`,,,� '°'"'b . _+ --_.., f a .,r ,, .^, r L . am; = ti�' rS . ° 6 1 u•u du •••• __ • fir` •-•111. - •• ....a, . ` r'r •r`I, 1} " al t• s ..�•'�G.d 441 �PJd 1 tit 'OP - -- • J ,- i A • ,..,} y '-r ,w a,-. . .t• -46 toy,"uttusaj>l,j •� air! .-u »dr a+ajli^ '�y C .:11 —, 1 - 1 t� R t.1. ._�' ?�. e:y:' - _. • .Kit•J • „ 11 Jam` 1 (`"""^ _ 1 „� _ - +en+PeU11 h11a4ti •� 111 >(1) -� "1 M .. :1 T� �i • ♦ ... 4— Jill •na.ntpocry(pare+{y pau7lr� f r 1 - -ter W -l.,�Tl`1� T • - . ,,,.../ Jul Jj1(1 F>JCUJuyl .... ,, WI•S .< ?'I i ..r M- ,,, auri aim Buu.ug 7 _.�r - ti'_. '. ya ` •J `I r tiny.riP1.45pat ad •..- •... - i ..... - 1 —� A1LU&% . .•- 44,N: .. 1/111)11 JIJ)0r1111111I• • -.-✓' r - .4.rf •1/1d - tl 4 - . v ✓), e.l luapuu nYl.,baaati.uu,i.., w.11ry(la$U suaua J U8J I •• a iae .� �' r 1JrA VI•.6 4 - \ ra r r M aun u11 *-,• ` 1, r1 e 1 L f' r e. > -# cwt•,x••1,1; waIsAs - . . . +N.: 1! _. " ueia.JsapaJ put! a'tig r% (�` � , Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 4- CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES 4.0 Introduction The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires new development to be directed to areas that either currently have adequate public facilities and services, or to areas where facilities and services can be delivered within the 20-year time frame of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP). Facilities and services that are required for new development must be adequate and available at adopted levels of service (LOS). Locally established LOSs help to define and contribute to Spokane Valley's quality of life. 4.1 Planning Context This section provides a review of the policy directives included in the State's Growth Management Act(GMA)and the Countywide Planning Policies relating to capital facilities planning. 4.1.1 Growth Management Act The GMA refers to capital facilities planning in two (2) of the thirteen (13) statewide planning goals. The two relevant goals are: • Urban Growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. • Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. More specifically, the GMA mandates that the City prepare a capital facilities plan which contains the following components: • An inventory of existing facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the facilities. • A forecast of the future needs for such facilities. • The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new facilities. • At least a six-year financing plan that will finance such facilities and clearly identify sources of public money for such purposes, • A requirement to reassess the Land Use chapter if probable funding falls short. 4.1.2 Countywide Planning Policies The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP), originally adopted in 1994, contain a number of goals and policies regarding capital facilities and the provision of urban services. Those CWPP relevant to capital facilities planning are as follows:1 Policy Topic 1 —Urban Growth Areas(UGAs) Urban Growth Area Designation Process for New Incorporated Cities: 1. The Steering Committee of Elected Officials will assign new incorporated cities an interim population allocation based on the Office of Financial Management population forecasts and previous allocations to the former unincorporated area. 1 Note to reader: The following policies are numbered according to the policy number in the DWPPs, resulting in non-sequential numbering in this document, Adopted April 25,2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 1 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2. The new city will conduct a land capacity analysis using the Land Quantity Methodology adopted by the Steering Committee, a. The city will first determine land capacity inside its limits and then will examine the capacity of unincorporated UGAs adjoining the jurisdiction's boundary, 3. The new city will develop the Urban Growth Area proposal as part of its comprehensive planning process. a. The proposed UGA shall be presented to the Steering Committee at a public meeting. The new city must justify its UGA proposal, showing how the interim population allocation will be accommodated. b. The city must show how the area will be providing a full range of urban services within the 20-year tirneframe of the comprehensive plan. c. All Urban Growth Areas lying adjacent to the new city should be analyzed and either proposed as the jurisdiction's UGA, a Joint Planning Area (JPA), or proposed to be removed from the UGA and converted to rural land, d. The city will show its work by presenting its land capacity analysis, urban service analysis and other information as appropriate. 4. The Steering Committee will conduct a public hearing on the population allocation and the Urban Growth Area and/or the (or Joint Planning Area) proposal. The Steering Committee will vote on the proposal and will forward a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners via minutes from the public hearing. 5. The Board of County Commissioners may conduct a public hearing on the proposed Urban Growth Area, and/or the proposed Joint Planning Area, and population allocation. After the hearing, the Board will approve and adopt, modify or return the proposal to the city for revision and/or adoption. a, The new city shall include the approved or modified UGA and/or the JPA in its comprehensive plan. b. The new UGA or JPA will become an amendment to the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan by incorporation. Policies 1. Urban Growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas. Urban Growth Areas(UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas. 2. The determination and proposal of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) outside existing incorporated limits shall be based on a jurisdiction's ability to provide urban governmental services at the minimum level of service specified by the Steering Committee. Jurisdictions may establish higher level of service standards in their respective comprehensive plans. S. Each jurisdiction shall submit proposed interim and final Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries to the Steering Committee, including: a. Justification in the form of its land capacity analysis and the ability to provide urban governmental services and public facilities; b. The amount of population growth which could be accommodated and the analytical basis by which this growth figure was derived; and Adopted April 25,2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 2 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan c. How much unincorporated land is required to accommodate growth, including maps indicating the additional areas? 8. Each municipality must document its ability to provide urban governmental services within its existing city limits prior to the designation of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation outside of existing city limits. To propose an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation outside of their existing city limits, municipalities must provide a full range of urban governmental services based on each municipality's capital facilities element of their Comprehensive Plan. 11. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall, at a minimum, demonstrate the ability to provide necessary domestic water, sanitary sewer and transportation improvements concurrent with development. Small municipalities (those with a population of 1,000 or less) may utilize approved interim ground disposal methods inside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) until such time as full sanitary sewer services can be made available. Each jurisdiction should consider long-term service and maintenance requirements when delineating Urban Growth Areas (UGAs)and making future land use decisions. 12. Within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), new developments should be responsible for infrastructure improvements attributable to those developments. 18. Extension of urban governmental services outside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) should only be provided to maintain existing levels of service in existing urban like areas or for health and safety reasons, provided that such extensions are not an inducement to growth. Policy Topic 2—Joint Planning within Urban Growth Areas Policies 1. The joint planning process should: a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of governmental services. b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities. c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging communities. d. Ensure the ability to expand urban governmental services and avoid land use barriers to expansion; and e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in designated joint planning areas will be coordinated. 2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into between and/or among jurisdictions and/or special purpose districts. Policy Topic 3— Promotion of Contiguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban Services Policies 1. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to address how urban development will be managed to promote efficiency in the use of land and the provision of urban governmental services and public facilities. The Steering Committee shall specify regional minimum level of service standards (see Table 4.1) for urban governmental services with the exception of police protection within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Local jurisdictions may choose higher standards. In its comprehensive plan, each jurisdiction shall include, but not be limited to, level of service standards for: Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 3 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan a. fire protection; b. police protection; c. parks and libraries d. libraries; e. public sewer; f. public water; g. solid waste disposal and recycling; h. transportation; i. schools. Table 4.1 Regional Level of Service Standards FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD(LOS) Domestic Water Supply - Minimum Levels of Service for storage capacity and flow shall be consistent with the Washington State Department of Health requirements and the Spokane County Coordinated Water System Plan requirements(where applicable). System Design — Minimum Levels of Service for pipe sizing, flow rate, and systematic grid Domestic Water development shall be consistent with the Washington State Department of Health requirements and the Coordinated Water System Plan requirements(where applicable). Fire Flow—Fire flow rate and duration as well as fire hydrant specifications and spacing shall be consistent with local fire authority requirements or the Fire Code,which ever is more stringent. Incorporated areas will be provided with wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the adopted sewer concurrency requirements of the jurisdiction. Unincorporated urban growth areas will be provided with wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the requirements for sewer concurrency as set forth in Spokane County's Development Regulations. Collection systems and transport systems will be designed for peak flow conditions so that overflows, backups, and discharges from the system do not occur under normal operating situations. Specific design criteria shall conform to the requirements of the Washington State Department of Ecology and local regulations. Wastewater collection and transport systems will convey wastewater to centralized wastewater treatment facilities. Centralized wastewater treatment and effluent disposal facilities will be planned, designed, and Sanitary Sewer constructed to provide effluent that does not adversely impact the quality of surface or ground water of the State of Washington. Planning and design for wastewater treatment and effluent disposal facilities will be based on 20 year projections of population growth and current water quality criteria as established by the Washington State Department of Ecology. (Centralized wastewater treatment facilities shall be a part of a sewage system owned or operated by a city, town, municipal corporation, county, political subdivision of the state or other approved ownership consisting of a collection system and necessary trunks,pumping facilities and means of final treatment and disposal and approved or under permit from the Washington State Department of Ecology.) Transportation Maintain travel corridor time as established by Spokane Regional Transportation Council. Flooding of property outside designated drainage-ways.de-facto drainage-ways,easements,flood zones or other approved drainage facilities, during the design precipitation or runoff event prescribed in the standards of the governing local agency or jurisdiction, shall be prevented within the reasonable probability afforded by such standards. Impact to buildings and accessory Stormwater structures shall be avoided to the maximum extent practicable by evaluating the effects of a 100- year rain event, and implementing measures to ensure that the runoff attendant to such event is directed away from such buildings and accessory structures Any stormwater discharge to surface or ground waters must meet federal, state and local requirements for water quality treatment, stormwater runoff and infiltration. Each jurisdiction shall specify in its Comprehensive Plan a level of police protection that addresses Law Enforcement the safety of its citizens. Libraries Each jurisdiction will specify its own level of service. Parks Each jurisdiction will specify its own level of service. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 4 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.1 Regional Level of Service Standards FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD(LOS) Solid waste processing will meet Federal and State regulations. including maintaining any required Solid Waste facilities licenses. Each jurisdiction within the non-attainment area shall develop and use a street cleaning plan, coordinating with Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA) as the oversight agency, to meet mandated Particulate Matter dust standards Each jurisdiction's street cleaning plan will describe the programs and methods to be used to reduce particulate matter emissions from paved surfaces Each plan shall address but not be limited to the following: 1) Street Street Cleaning sweeping frequency and technology to be employed. 2) Factors for determining when and where to initiate street sweeping following a sanding event, with the goals of expeditious removal when safety and mobility requirements have been satisfied. 3) Sanding reduction goal. 4) Sanding materials specifications to be employed. 5) Locations, application rates and circumstances for use of chemical de-icers and other sanding alternatives. 6) Identification of priority roadways (over 15,000 average daily traffic count) Jurisdictions within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA) shall have policies consistent with the Public Transit level of service adopted by the Spokane Transit Authority Board of Directors. Urban areas jurisdictions in excess of 5.000 population, or once a population of 5,000 persons is achieved,shall be served by Fire District with at least a(Washington Survey and Rating Bureau of Insurance Services Office)Class 6 Insurance Rating or better. For the purposes of GMA minimum Levels of Service, Class 6 or better shall be based on the ISO Grading Schedule for municipal fire protection, 1974 edition,as amended, by using the fire district,fire service communication,and fire safety control portions of the grading schedule. The total deficiency points identified in these portions of the ISO or Washington Survey and Rating Bureau schedule shall not exceed 1,830 points. All jurisdictions, regardless of size.shall ensure that new development has a Fire Flow and Fire and Emergency hydrant placement per the International Fire Code adopted by that jurisdiction. Urban areas must Services be within 5 road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a "Class A" pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinkler(s)that are rated in accordance with the edition of the International Fire Code adopted by the jurisdiction, and is located within 5 road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a Class "A" rated pumper. Jrban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency. Urban areas should be served by an operating basic life saving unit within 5 miles;and an operating advanced life support unit within 6 miles or 10 minutes response time for those jurisdictions with urban areas in excess of 5,000 in population,and basic life support and advanced life support transport service. Public Schools To be determined by individual school district CFP. 2. Each jurisdiction and other providers of public services should use compatible information technologies to monitor demand for urban governmental and regional services and the efficiency of planning and services delivery. 3. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure that obstructions to regional transportation or utility corridors are not created. In addition, each jurisdiction should include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure sustainable growth beyond the 20-year planning horizon. 7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to address adequate fire protection. a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate limits of a city providing its own fire department. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 5 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for residents, fire department or district ingress/egress and water supply for fire protection. c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and adjacent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used. 9. Wellhead protection plans should be coordinated with water purveyors and implemented by local jurisdictions. The Steering Committee shall pursue strategies for regional (to include Idaho jurisdictions) water resource management, which sustain projected growth rates and protect the environment. 10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for the distribution of essential public facilities. 13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) which uses land efficiency, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban governmental services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate growth areas (six to ten year increments) within its Urban Growth Area (UGA) or establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans. Policy Topic 9—Fiscal Impacts Policies 1. Each jurisdiction shall identify, within the capital facilities element of its comprehensive plan, capital resources that will be available to accommodate the additional development which is anticipated within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). 4.2 Essential Public Facilities The City of Spokane Valley is required to plan for essential public facilities (EPFs) pursuant to GMA. Spokane County adopted through the CWPPs "Growth Management Essential Public Facilities Technical Committee Report" in 1996, which set forth a model project review process for the siting of EPFs. All jurisdictions within the County are required to provide a mechanism in the Comprehensive Plan to utilize the model project review process either verbatim or as a model. More recently, the Washington State Legislature passed two laws addressing siting of EPFs. In June 2001 the state enacted ESSB 6151, and in March 2002 the state enacted ESSB 6594. These laws require counties and cities fully planning under GMA to include a process in their Comprehensive Plans to provide for the siting of Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTFs). A"secure community transition facility" (SCTF) is the statutory name for a less restrictive alternative residential facility program operated or contracted by the Department of Social and Health Services. As stated in RCW 71 09.020, "...a secure community transition facility has supervision and security, and either provides or ensures the provision of sex offender treatment services.' The program offers 24-hour intensive staffing and line-of-sight supervision by trained escorts when residents leave the facility. A less restrictive alternative (LRA) placement is defined in the state law as a living arrangement that is less restrictive than total confinement. In response to these new state laws, planning staff from all jurisdictions in Spokane County formed a task force to cooperatively develop a regional siting process for all essential public facilities, including SCTFs. The Essential Public Facilities Task Force, with assistance from the Washington State Office of Community Development (OCD), the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), and technical staff from the jurisdictions developed a regional siting process for essential public facilities titled Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Table 4.2 below lists EPFs that are either wholly or partically of located within the City. The regional process provides for a review process with a location analysis. Public involvement takes place throughout the process with public comment periods as well as public hearings. The Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 6 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan review process requires the applicant for an EPF to assume responsibility for the bulk of the analysis and processing of the proposal. The analysis includes two parts. First, an analysis of functional criteria of all potential sites is conducted to select the highest-ranking ten (10) semi- finalist sites. Second, these ten semi-finalist sites are analyzed using more qualitative criteria and resulting in selection of at least three (3) preferred sites. Both analyses include public comment periods. Next, the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) conducts a public hearing on the Preferred Site List to allow for further public comment, identify strategies to address any issues associated with particular sites, and rank the finalist sites. The BoCC ranking is advisory to but not binding on the applicant. Last,the applicant, after selecting a specific site, will work directly with a local jurisdiction and its regulatory requirements to permit construction and operation of the EPF. The regional siting process is based on a coordinated inter-jurisdictional approach, which in combination with consistent development regulations among the jurisdictions will implement the requirement of equitable distribution of EPF of a statewide or regional/countywide nature. Table 4.2 Inventory of Essential Public Facilities Significance Category Name Address Statewide Regional Transportation Facilities Interstate 90 N/A Statewide Regional Transportation Facilities Centennial Trail N/A Regianal Regional Transportation Facilities Pence Cole Valley Park Ride 414 S.University Rd and Transit/Transfer Center Regional Regional Transportation Facilities Fines Road/I 90 Park&Ride E.Mc ntgomery,Pines Rd &I gp Regional Regional Transportation Facilities STA Maintenance Bowdish 123 S.Bowdish (Fleck Service Center) Regional Regional Transportation Facilities SR-27(Pines Road) N/A Regional Regional Transportation Facilities SR-290(Trent Avenue) N/A Regional Solid Waste,Wastewater&Water Facilities Valley Recycling-Transfer 3941 N.Sullivan Rd Regional Social Service Facilities Valley Hospital Medical 12606 E.Mission Ave Center Regional Social Service Facilities American Behavioral Health 12715 E.Mission Ave Systems 4.3 Goals and Policies The following goals and policies are consistent with the goals and policies of the GMA and the Countywide Planning Policies. The City of Spokane Valley will implement the goals and policies for services provided by the City. Special purpose districts, such as water, school, and fire, are encouraged to implement the goals and policies that are under their control. Spokane Valley intends to coordinate with special purpose districts when they adopt and amend their own system plans and capital improvement programs. General Goal CFG-1 Provide facilities and services that the City can most effectively deliver, and contract or franchise for those facilities and services that the City determines can best be provided by a special district, other jurisdiction, or the private sector. Policies CFP-1.1 Review plans of service providers within Spokane Valley to determine consistency with the SVCP. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 7 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CFP-1.2 The City should seek a balance between the quality and cost of providing public facilities and services. CFP-1.3 Optimize the use of existing public facilities and promote orderly compact urban growth. CFP-1.4 Coordinate the construction of public infrastructure with private development to minimize costs whenever practicable and feasible. Capital Facilities Planning and Level of Service Goal CFG-2 Adopt and implement a Capital Facilities Plan to ensure public facilities and services meet Level of Service Standards. Policies CFP-2.1 Facilities and services shall meet the following minimum Level of Service standards: Table 4.3 Spokane Valley Level of Service Standards Facility or Service Level of Service Standard Domestic Water Meet the minimum Regional LOS" Sewer Public sewer required for new development LOS D for Signalized Intersections Transportation LOS E for Un-signalized Intersections Stormwater Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Law Enforcement No minimum LOS adopted Parks 1.92 acres per 1000 residents Libraries Library District to set LOS Solid Waste Meet the minimum Regional LOS' Street Cleaning Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Public Transit Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Fire and EMS Meet the minimum Regional LOS* Public Schools School Districts to set LOS *See Page 4 for Regional LOS standards CFP-2.2 Update the City's Capital Facilities Plan annually to ensure that services and facilities are provided efficiently and effectively and to help establish budget priorities. CFP-2.3 Planned expenditures for capital improvements shall not exceed estimated revenues. CFP-2.4 If adopted level of service standards cannot be maintained, the City shall increase funding, reduce level of service standards or reassess the Land Use Element. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 8 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Safety - Fire and Police Goal CFG-3 Provide police protection efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane Valley residents. Coordinate with fire districts to ensure adequate fire protection and emergency services for Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-3.1 Encourage inter-jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared service and facility use. CFP-3.2 Develop a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts. CFP-3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/pressure for new development within the City. CFP-3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings in forested areas. Water and Sewer Goal CFG-4 Plans for water and sewer service should be consistent with the SVCP. Policies CFP-4.1 Review water and sewer plans to determine consistency with anticipated population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and development regulations. CFP-4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the SVCP. CFP-4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Department of Ecology. CFP-4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water. CFP-4.5 Discourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits. CFP-4.6 New development must connect to public sewer and water. Solid Waste Goal CFG-5 Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. Policies CFP-5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and environmental responsibility. CFP-5.2 Participate in updates to the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management plan and support its implementation. Stormwater Goal CFG-6 Ensure the provision of stormwater facilities and related management programs that protect surface and groundwater quality, prevent chronic flooding from stormwater, maintain natural stream hydrology and protect aquatic resources. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 9 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Policies CFP-6.1 Require stormwater management systems for new development. CFP-6.2 Create and implement a stormwater management plan to reduce impacts from urban runoff. CFP-6.3 Best management practices should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff prior to absorption of runoff into the ground. CFP-6.4 New development should include the multiple uses of facilities, such as the integration of stormwater facilities with recreation and/or open space areas, when possible. CFP-6.5 Encourage the use of alternatives to impervious surfaces. Library Service Goal CFG-7 Promote efficient and cost effective library service to Spokane Valley residents. Policies CFP-7.1 Encourage continued free, reciprocal library services among all libraries within the Spokane region. CFP-7.2 Land use regulations should allow siting of library facilities in locations convenient to residential areas. CFP-7.3 Work collaboratively with the Spokane County Library District to develop long- range library plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Schools Goal CFG-8 School sites and facilities should meet the education needs of Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-8.1 Develop lard use designations that allow new schools where they will best serve the community. CFP-8.2 Consider the adequacy of school facilities when reviewing new residential development. CFP-8.3 Assist school districts in their planning processes. Concurrency Goal CFG-9 New development shall be served with adequate facilities and services at the time of development, or within the time frame consistent with state law. Policies CFP-9.1 Implement a concurrency management system for transportation, water and sewer facilities. Financing Growth Goal CFG-10 Consider a variety of revenue sources and funding mechanisms including, but not limited to, impact fees. Policies CFP-16.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 10 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 4.4.3 Level of Service Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents. Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City. Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area. Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or the amount of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak morning and afternoon "rush hours." the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services. 4.4.4 Concurrency The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a specified time thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the same. 4.4.5 Financing Facilities and Services The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions. Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options should be considered: a. Increase revenues, b. decrease level of service standards, c. decrease the cost of the service or facility, d. decrease the demand for the service or facility, e. or some combination of the above. The following table presents possible financial resources available to the City for capital projects. Table 4.5 Funding Resources Funding Category Funding Source General Fund(Sales Tax,fees,property tax,utility tax,etc.) Current Revenues Real Estate Excise Tax(REET) Impact Fees Non-voted General Obligation Voted General Obligation Bonds Revenue(payable from a particular utility or enterprise) Local Improvement District(Assessment Bonds) Surface Transportation Program Bridge Replacement Funds Federal Grants Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program(CMAQ) Land and Water Conservation Fund Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 12 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.5 Funding Resources Funding Category Funding Source Community Development Block Grants Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account(ALEA) Transportation Improvement Account Centennial Clean Water Fund Public Works Trust Funds State Grants/Loans Interagency for Committee for Outdoor Recreation(IAC) Arterial Street Fund(Motor Fuel Tax) Urban Arterial Trust Account(UATA) Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account Hazardous Bridge Replacement Developer Contributions Other Donations Local Improvement Districts 4.4.6 Impact Fees New growth creates a demand for new and expanded public facilities and services. The GMA authorizes local governments to impose and collect impact fees to partially fund public facilities to accommodate new growth. Impact fees can be used to pay for new or expanded facilities and cannot be collected to address existing infrastructure deficiencies. The GMA allows impact fees to be assessed on the following: • Public Streets and Roads • Public Parks • Schools • Open Space • Fire Protection Facilities • Recreation Facilities The City has not enacted impact fees as a funding mechanism for capital facilities, but may study the issue as directed by future City policy. 4.4.7 Community Facilities This section of the CFP includes civic buildings such as government offices, community centers, and entertainment facilities. As a new City, Spokane Valley does not have a significant inventory of community facilities. Inventory of Existing Facilities Spokane Valley completed construction of CenterPlace at Mirabeau Point Park, in the summer, 2005. The facility houses the Spokane Valley Senior Center, conference facilities, classrooms and a "great room" for events. CenterPlace has a dining capacity of 400 and includes a full commercial kitchen Spokane Valley leases office and meeting space for employees and City Council in the Redwood Plaza office building, located at 11707 East Sprague Avenue. Spokane Valley also leases precinct and court space at the Valley Precinct Building located 12710 East Sprague. Level of Service Spokane Valley does not propose to adopt a level of service standard for community facilities. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 13 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Forecast of Future Needs The need for new community facilities is difficult to quantify and depends on the future structure of City government. If Spokane Valley continues to contract for services such as police. parks and road maintenance, the need to acquire and maintain facilities will be minimal. However, if Spokane Valley begins providing these services, there will be a corresponding need for administrative office space and other facilities. For example, if Spokane Valley assumes responsibility for parks maintenance, a new maintenance facility would have to be constructed to house equipment and employees. At some future point, Spokane Valley will likely purchase an existing building or construct a new building to house City Hall. This decision must be made with thought and vision. In the right location, City Hall will be the center for civic affairs and community events and will influence economic development and the creation of a City Center. The location should be centralized and accessible to all citizens. Nearly three-quarters of the Citizen Survey respondents support using public money to help create a City Center. Locating a civic building, such as City Hall, in the City Center would be a significant catalyst to creating a distinct center and identity for Spokane Valley. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Spokane Valley currently has no specific plans to construct new community facilities. The City must decide the location of a permanent City Hall and/or other civic buildings. Future updates to the Capital Facilities element will include information on locations and capacities for community facilities, Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley anticipates either constructing a new City Hall building, or purchasing and remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. The following table shows that Spokane Valley will use approximately $1,000,000 of Real Estate Excise Tax revenue for Civic Buildings. Table 4.6 Community Facilities Financing Plan Project 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Civic Facilities 563 550 750 1,300 3,163 Total 0 0 0 563 550 750 1,300 3,163 Revenue Source Real Estate Excise Tax 250 250 400 100 1,000 General Fund 313 300 350 1,200 2,163 Total i 0 0 0 563 550 750 1,300 3,163 4.4.8 Domestic Water The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by special purpose districts, associations, and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies service boundaries, establishes minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource management. The CWSP is updated as needed at the direction of the Board of County Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Health (DOH). Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 14 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan The City of Spokane Valley is supportive of existing regional water supply planning, water use efficiency programs and plans, watershed planning, wellhead protection plans, water quality plans, and planning for reclamation and reuse i�, Water Systems 41;�: t�, Water systems are categorized generally '� r' by the number of connections served; 14 , ! %..• ( •- Group A systems provide service to 15 or ;P..:," i ,;‘ more connections while Group B systems 1 0:; i serve 2 to 14 connections. Spokane ,f:0�',,�� i, Valley has 25 Group A systems and 13 .1, ''‘ 4*,.. . . � �-f Group B systems providing water service IC":-- - _ within the City. A detailed inventory of • _ - . 4 water systems is shown below in the __ _ _. inventory section. - - - Water System Plans The Washington State Department of Health recommends that all water purveyors prepare a water system plan to determine future needs for water facilities within their service areas. The plans must include an existing facility inventory, project future needs for water supply, conservation strategies, and identify and provide for the protection of aquifers against contaminates. Once a water system plan is adopted, it must be updated every six years. The Department of Health is the approval authority for water system plans. Water purveyors meeting the following criteria are required to have water system plans approved by DOH. 1. Systems having 1000 or more connections. 2. Systems required to develop water system plans under the Public Water System Coordination Act of 1977 (Chapter 70.116 RCW). 3. Any system experiencing problems related to planning, operation and/or management as determined by the Department of Health. 4. All new systems. 5. Any expanding system. 6. Any system proposing to use the document submittal exception process in WAC 246-290- 125 (documents such as project reports and constructions drawings). In 2003, the Washington State Legislation passed what is commonly referred to as the "Municipal Water Law" (MWL), amending sections of the State Board of Health Code (RCW 43.20); the laws governing Public Water Systems (RCW70.119A); and sections of the state's Water Code (RCW 90.03). The MWL requires that water system planning documents must be consistent with Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. The Department of Health is developing procedures that water systems must follow to ensure coordination with local jurisdictions and consistency with growth planning. Water Rights Washington State water law requires all prospective water uses to obtain a water right permit from the Department of Ecology (DOE) before constructing a well or withdrawing any groundwater from a well. However, the law does allow a water right permit exemption, referred to as the domestic exemption, which states that no water right permit is required for the withdrawal of up to 5,000 gallons of water per day from a well when the water is being used for the following: 1. Livestock watering. 2. Single or group domestic water supply. 3. Industrial purposes. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 15 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 4. Irrigation of no more than one half acre of lawn or noncommercial garden (RCW 90 44.050). For many years, Ecology issued water right certificates to water suppliers based on projected future use, rather than actual "beneficial use." The unused portions of those certificates or rights are known as "inchoate" rights, which could potentially be taken away by Ecology if not put to beneficial use. This situation was troubling to municipal water suppliers. Public water systems need a level of certainty to obtain financing for capital facilities as well as to issue letters of water availability to development interests. The "Municipal Water Law: of 2003" clarified that cities are entitled to inchoate (unused) water for the purpose of serving expanding areas. This ensures that municipalities have sufficient water for anticipated growth based on the communities' comprehensive plans and water and supply plans. Watershed Planning In 1998. Washington State passed the Watershed Management Act to develop a "thorough and cooperative method of determining what the current water resource situation is in each Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) of the state and to provide local citizens with the maximum possible input concerning their goals and objectives for water resource management and development" (RCW 90.82.005). In late 1998, a Planning Unit was formed for WRIAs 55 and 57, or the Middle Spokane-Little Spokane River watersheds, with Spokane County designated as the lead agency. The Watershed Management Act requires the Planning Unit to address water quantity issues and allows water quality, habitat and in-stream flows to be considered in the process. The watershed planning effort is expected to produce information on how water is used in the Water Resource Inventory Areas and recommendations for how it should be used in the future. The Planning Unit may also formulate a recommendation for in-stream flows for the Spokane and Little Spokane Rivers. The Department of Ecology may establish minimum water flows or levels for streams, lakes or other public waters for the purpose of protecting fish, game, birds or other wildlife resources, or recreational or aesthetic values of said public waters whenever it appears to be in the public interest to do so. The data, information and recommendations generated by the Planning Unit may be used by the Department of Ecology to assess the ability to issue new water rights for the Spokane Valley- Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. The WRIA 55 and 57 planning process will provide a basis for better understanding of potential water resource limits and will be incorporated into future updates to this capital facilities plan. Inventory of Water Systems Most of the water used by Spokane Valley residents and businesses is provided by water and irrigation districts and small water systems, listed in Tables 4.7 and 4.8 and shown on the Water Districts and Wellheads map, located at the end of this chapter. The City of Spokane provides water to the western portions of Spokane Valley, totaling approximately 620 connections. Group A water systems are those which have 15 or more service connections or regularly serve 25 or more people 60 or more days per year. Group B water systems serve two to 14 connections and are not subject to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Instead, they must meet state and local requirements for water quality and operations. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 16 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan P Table 4.7 Spokane Valley Water Purveyors-Group A Systems Current Residential Current Non Residential Storage Group A Systems Connections Connections Capacity (gallons) Bayou On Barker C 4 0 Burger Royal 4 50 Carnhope Irrigation District 7 455 0 0 Central Pre Mix-Sullivan Rd 4 4 0 City Of Spokane' 59700* 0 Not reported Consolidated Irrig Dist 19 System 1 3063 51 2,750,000 Consolidated Irrig Dist 19 System 2 3663 141 2,200,000 East Spokane Water Dist 1 1158 94 1,027,000 Hutchinson Irrigation Dist#16 790 0 1,200,000 Honeywell Electronic Mfg LLC 0 1 0 Irvin Water District#6 757 0 1,900.000 Kaiser Alum-Trentwood Works 0 - 2 21,200 Model Irrigation Dist#18 2116 4 550.000 Modern Electric Water Co 4302 0 — 1,500.000 Orchard Avenue Irrigation Dist 6 1186 0 0 Pinecroft Mobile Home Park 143 0 400 Puerta Vallarta 0 1 0 Spitfire Pub And Eatery 0 2 87 Spokane Business&Industrial Park 0 237 478,000 Spokane Co-Mirabeau Park 0 1 2 200 Spokane Co Water Dist#3 9788 426 6,880,000 Trentwood Irrigation District 3 1470 0 1,120,000 Vera Water&Power 6652 0 8,650.000 Woodland Park Trailer Court 30 0 0 •Approximately 620 connections within City of Spokane Valley Source Washington State Department of Health Table 4.8 Group B Systems Group B System Connections Holiday Trailer Court 12 Janzen&Janzen 1 Levernier Const,Water System 1 Mercer Trucking Co Inc 1 Middco Tool&Equipment 1 Systems Transport Inc 1 Tci Water System 6 Tds 2 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 17 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Union Pacific Railroad-Trentwood 1 Westco S Apparel Service 3 Western Structures Inc 2 WSDT-Pines Road Maintenance 1 Source: Washington State Department of Health Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes respectively. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors providing service within the City of Spokane Valley. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service Fire protection and emergency medical services (EMS) are provided by Spokane Valley Fire Department (District No. 1) and Spokane County • � Fire District No. 8. Spokane Valley Fire serves over 90% of the Valley, while District 8 serves a few , small areas in the southern part of the City (see Fire + = Districts Map at the end of this chapter). Both R districts serve the City with a full range of fire _ , . • are suppression and EMS services. Spokane Valley voters chose to annex to Spokane Valley Fire and _ ~� District No. 8 in September, 2004. . -_ Insurance Rating City fire departments and fire protection districts are assigned a numerical fire protection rating by the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform on-site inspections of fire districts to determine the rating. The Bureau analyzes five main areas: average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and staffing of facilities. Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score. Quality of fire service can have a significant impact on fire insurance rates, particularly for commercial businesses. As of April, 2006, Spokane Valley Fire Department has a Fire Insurance Rating of four and District No. 8 has a Rating of five, both indicating good fire protection. Inventory of Existing Facilities and Apparatus The Fire Districts Map shows the location of fire stations and service area boundaries for Spokane Valley Fire, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All fire agencies have mutual aid agreements to assist each other in major emergencies. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 18 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane Valley Fire 2006 apparatus inventory includes nine Class A engines, two Class A pumper/ladders, two medic vehicles, three brush trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff, training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and command. Spokane Valley Fire has ten stations. including eight within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as follows: Table 4.9 Spokane Valley Fire District Station Locations Station 1' 10319 East Sprague Station 2' 8007 East Trent Station 3 2218 North Harvard Station 4 22406 East Wellesley - Station 5' 15510 East Marietta Station 6' 6306 East Sprague Station 7' 1121 South Evergreen Station 8* ' North 2110 Wilbur Station 9 East 11514 16"' Station 10" East 17217 Sprague Inside Spokane Valley City Limits "'Medic-only station Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosa neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has two stations located outside the City limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324 South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wildland brush engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wildland brush engine. Level of Service Spokane Valley Fire's Level of Service goals for response time are as follows: • 5:00 minutes -80% of the time for fire calls • 5:00 minutes -80%of the time for Basic Life Support (BLS) • 8:00 minutes -80%of the time for Advanced Life Support (ALS) Basic Life Support refers to a level of training that does not involve any advanced medical procedures or administration of drugs. BLS providers can provide basic life saving and life sustaining interventions while transporting a patient to a hospital. This is the foundation on which all medical care is built. Good basic life support is key to survival of critically sick and injured patients. Advanced Life Support refers to a certain level of care that may be provided to a patient by rescue squad members. if necessary. Members trained in Advanced Life Support techniques are often referred to as ALS providers. Among other procedures, ALS providers are able to administer certain life-saving medications, perform advanced monitoring of heart rhythms, and are trained to perform advanced procedures to open and manage a patient's airway. Average response times for fire calls the past 4 years are as follows: • 2003- 5 minutes 22 seconds • 2002 - 5 minutes 27 seconds Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 19 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • 2001 - 5 minutes 28 seconds • 2000 -5 minutes 35 seconds The District's historic response time data does not distinguish between types of calls. Future data collection will divide calls between fire, ALS and BLS. Spokane Valley Fire has responded to an average 7,746 calls per year from 2000 to 2003. The following table shows the number of calls per year. Table 4.10 District 1 Fire Responses Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 Responses 7594 7406 7821 8165 The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for fire and emergency medical services as follows: Urban areas are required to be serviced by a Fire District with at least a Class Six Insurance rating. • Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides service with a "Class A" pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinklers. • Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within five miles and an operating advanced life support unit within six miles or ten minutes response time. Both Fire District 1 and 8 meet the minimum countywide level of service standards. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley Fire has identified two areas within the City of Spokane Valley that need improvement in response times and is planning to construct new stations to provide improved service levels. The most urgent need is to provide better coverage to the south valley, and the District is planning to move Station No. 9 to the vicinity of 32nd Ave. and Pines Rd. The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the City grows over the next ten to fifteen years, the District recognizes that a new station will need to be constructed to provide an adequate level of service. The station will be constructed in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Station No. 9 will be moved from its current location at 11514 East 16th to the vicinity of 32nd and Pines. The station will include two bays and dorms for eight personnel. The District plans to reconstruct Station No. 10 into a three bay facility with dorms for ten personnel. Station No. 11 will be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will also be two bays with dorms for eight personnel. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for 2014 or 2015. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley Fire Department is a junior taxing authority that supplements its regular taxes with special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go down, special levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by Fire District voters. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund capital projects. The Department's philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular revenues for future capital needs. The following table represents the Valley Fire planned capital expenditures. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 20 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.11 Spokane Valley Fire 6-year Capital Projects and Financing Plan Project 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Fire Station No.9 $1 000 $1,800 (new construction) Fire Station No. 10 S1,800 S1,800 (reconstruction) Total $1,000 $1,800 52,800 Note: Reserve funds from regular district taxes will fund capital improvements. (Amounts are times$1,000) 4.4.9 Library Service Library services are provided by the Spokane County Library District. The District has a long history of excellent service and upon incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley executed a one-year contract with the District for continued service. After the initial year, Spokane Valley and the Library District agreed to a five year contract for library services beginning in 2005. Eighty-seven percent of voters approved annexing back into the District in a May 2005 special election, with the annexation effective January 1, 2006. Facility Planning After incorporation, the Library District and the City of Spokane Valley collaborated on developing a new capital facilities plan for the District. In March 2004, the capital facilities planning process began and a significant amount of information was gathered, including: • Comparisons with library facilities in other similar sized Washington cities • Spokane Valley demographics • Public library facility standards • An analysis of current Spokane Valley area libraries • Pros and cons of various facility alternatives and • Community research Public Participation The Library District and the City of Spokane Valley conducted a random sample survey of Spokane Valley residents in March and April of 2004. The survey gathered information on local library use, satisfaction with library services and preferences regarding future library services. The District also conducted a community open house in May 2004, attended by 75 people, 75% of which were City residents. Information was obtained on satisfaction with facilities and service. facility improvement options, preferred library locations if a new main library were to replace the current Valley Library, constructing either one or two new branches, and willingness to pay for new libraries. Research Conclusions Analysis of information gathered leads to the conclusion that additional library space is needed to serve Spokane Valley residents. It is also determined that expanding the current Valley Library isn't a viable alternative. The community input showed a very high level (98%) of overall satisfaction with library services and a high level of satisfaction with current facilities. The public identified two areas needing improvement - materials availability, which requires a larger library, and public Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 21 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan access computer availability. Only a modest interest in funding new facilities was expressed, demonstrating a strong need for community education about future library facilities needs. Community Survey Spokane Valleys Community Preference Survey , included a question to gauge Spokane Valley . citizen's satisfaction with current Library services. _. The majority of survey respondents viewed library WM services in a positive light, with 83% of respondents reporting that library services were good. very good or excellent. - r; Inventory of Existing Facilities Spokane Valley has one library located inside its boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the District's largest facility, measuring 22,100 square feet, including administrative space. The District has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne and 22324 East Wellesley in Otis Orchards. As of May 2004, 35,544 Spokane Valley residents were Library District cardholders. Valley Library was the primary branch of registration, with Argonne VALLEY second and Otis Orchards third. Spokane County Library District has a reciprocal library card agreement f with the City of Spokane with over 1,500 Spokane •! E Bso3dway Av Valley residents owning a Spokane public library card. ° ■rV.n.yBnan MI E-• a•ueA Level of Service t< The Spokane County Library District has not established a level of service. E 1Nh Av Forecast of Future Needs The District uses a target Spokane Valley population of 105,000 for its future projections, which is consistent with the City of Spokane Valley's population allocation for growth within the existing City limits. The District recognizes that a new library needs to be built inside Spokane Valley to provide adequate library services. Future facilities will be divided between a main branch and a future neighborhood branch. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities The main branch should measure about 49,000 square feet to adequately serve a population of 84,000 people. The main branch should be located on an arterial street within about one-half mile of the Sprague corridor between Dartmouth and Sullivan Roads. A neighborhood branch of approximately 15,000 square feet serving a population of 20,000 would ideally be located within two to three miles of the main branch. Capital Projects and Financing Plan The future main branch is estimated to cost $11.4 million in 2004 dollars; the neighborhood branch would cost about $3.6 million. Voter-approved general obligation bonds are the normal financing method for library projects of this size. The District proposes the following capital improvement schedule: 1 to 5 years • Determine preferred locations for new libraries. • Develop funding plan. • Purchase land for libraries. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 22 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 5 to 10 years • Secure funding and purchase site(s) if not already done. • Construct new main branch. • Sell existing Valley branch. 10 to 20 years • Secure funding and construct neighborhood branch. Table 4.12 Spokane County Library District six year Capital Projects and Financing Plan Project 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total New Spokane Valley S100 S150 S1 700 $8.300 58,750 0 0 $19,000 Library Total $100 S150 S1,700 $8,300 S8,750 0 0 $19,000 Revenue Sources GO Bonds S100 $150 $1,700 $8,500 $8,750 0 0 19000 Total $100 $150 $1,700 $8,500 $8,750 0 0 19000 Note: The majority of General Fund expenses incurred in 2006 and 2007 are reimbursable from voter-approved bond funds. The Library District will continue to work with the City of Spokane Valley to further develop plans to construct new libraries. As plans are updated and refined, this Capital Facilities Plan will be amended to incorporate future changes. Operational Costs The Library District assumes that with efficient building design and continuing staff productivity improvements, a larger Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal District funding levels of 50 cents per$1,000 of assessed valuation. 4.4.10 Parks and Recreation Spokane Valley has a wide range of T_ recreational opportunities available to residents .! ~ �4:. and visitors. City parks, school play fields, golf �`r courses, trails, County parks and conservations areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane Valley residents. ,I �. j The City provides a system of local parks that is P . + � ' ; =' t r. managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and i k\ 11 _ Recreation Department. The Parks Department `-_�, . -is in the process of developing a new Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan. When finished, this plan will offer a detailed picture of the park, recreation and open space _ .. system, including changes and improvements that will be made in the future. •u "` This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parks inventory, level of service (LOS), future park needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years. Park Types Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 23 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Parks are classified by their size, service area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally recognized Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines, to establish standard for parks planning. Major classifications include mini-park, neighborhood, school-park, community, large urban, various trail designations and special use facilities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9, provides a thorough description of park types used for planning purposes. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all parks within Spokane Valley Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley. These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of service for parks. The Parks Master Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parks, including equipment, structures and other miscellaneous park facilities. Table 4.13 Spokane Valley Park Facilities Spokane Valley Parks Acreage Status Neighborhood Parks I Balfour Park 2.86 ! Developed Browns Park 8.03 ' Developed Castle Park 2.71 Minimally Developed Edgecliff Park 4.74 Developed Terrace View Park 9.24 Developed Subtotal 27.58 Community Parks Valley Mission Park 21.91 Developed Subtotal 21.91 Large Urban Parks Mirabeau Point Park 41.91 Developed Subtotal 41.91 Special Use Areas Park Road Pool 2.00 Developed Sullivan Park 16.07 Developed Valley Senior Center 2.09 Developed CenterPlace 13.60 Developed Subtotal 33.76 Undeveloped Park Land Myrtle Point Park 31.07 Undeveloped Valley Mission Park(South) 7.22 Undeveloped Subtotal 38.29 Total Park Acres 163.45 Adopted April 25. 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 24 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of service (LOS) standard for parks. Spokane Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt a LOS standard for parks that reflects the t�•'? expressed need and desire of our community. - ,. .f , The National Recreation and Parks Association ' ' • suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for different park types, such as mini (pocket), ' neighborhood, community and major parks. _ow Valley does not have a well-developed '° 7 park system and will use total City-owned park ' acres for its LOS measurement. Spokane Valley currently owns 163 acres of =. �' a- - developed and undeveloped park land. Using the • '' - -:� `-.'; 4At"-;. .,'_ 2006 population of 85,010 people, the current ms,. J parks LOS is 1.92 acres of City park land for every 1000 residents. Spokane Valley adopts 1.92 acres/1000 people as its minimum LOS — standard for parks, as shown is Table Table 4.14 Spokane Valley Parks Level of Service 4.14. Spokane Valley recognizes that schools, churches, natural areas and 2006 Population City-Owned Level of Service commercial enterprises all provide Park Acres '' recreation opportunities for Spokane t_-- �- Valley residents. These will all be 85,010 163 i 1.92 acres/1000 taken into consideration when Spokane Valley determines the best location to purchase new park land. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommodate 20,666 people over the next 20 years within the current City limits. In order to maintain the current LOS of 1.92 acres/1000 people, Spokane Valley would have to add about 40 acres of park land over the next 20 years, with 12 acres in the first six years, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan provides a more detailed analysis of park and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller service areas. Table 4.15 Future Park Demand Year Population Total Park Acres Acres Required at 1.92 Net Deficiency Acres Available acres/1000 2006 85,010 163 i 163 0 _ 2012 92,243 163 177 ...._._._. -14 2025 105,676 163 203 -40 'Assumes 20-year growth of 20,666 people Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres/1000 level of service standard, Spokane Valley must add 12 acres of park land by the year 2011. In order to address this deficiency, Spokane Valley will purchase 20 acres of park land within the six year time frame of this Capital Facilities Plan, resulting Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 25 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan in surplus of eight acres as shown in Table 4.16. The Master Plan will be used to determine the best locations for park land acquisitions. Table 4.16 Parks Capacity Analysis Year Population Total Park Acres Acres Required at 1.92 Net Reserve Acres Available acres/1000 2006 85.010 163 163 2012 92.243 183' 177 6 '20 acres of parkland will be purchased within first 6 years of plan Capital Projects and Financing Plan The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement financing plan. The table details projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity projects) and other capital improvements (non-capacity) projects Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facilities Plan Note:Amounts in$1,000 Project 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Park Land Acquisition (20 1,000 $1,000 Acres Capacity) Park Improvements 300 950 500 500 580 100 200 $3,130 Swimming Pool Upgrades 1,600 $1,600 Total 1,300 2,550 500 500 580 100 200 $5,730 Revenue Source General Fund 1,300 300 $1,600 REET#1 450 400 400 400 100 200 $1,950 Grants 200 100 100 180 $580 Spokane County 1,600 S1.600 - — I Total 1.300 2,550 500 500 580 100 200 $6,730 4.4.11 Public Safety The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the Spokane County Sheriffs Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses, and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship allows for the sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without duplicating services. Spokane Valley also contracts with Spokane County for judicial, jail and animal control services. The total contract for public safety for 2006 totaled over$16 million, including approximately 100 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 26 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan commissioned police officers. Spokane Valley supports community oriented policing and recognizes it as an important complement to traditional law enforcement. In Spokane County, community policing is known as S.C.O.P.E., or Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort. The community policing model balances reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of crime and disorder. Community policing requires police and citizens to join together as partners in the course of both identifying and effectively addressing these issues. About 364 Spokane Valley citizens are S.C.O.P.E volunteers. Community Survey The Community Preference Survey included questions to gauge the public's perception of police services. Results show that 85% of Spokane Valley residents believe police services are good, very good, or excellent, indicating a generally high level of confidence in the police force. Only 27% of respondents expressed a willingness to pay additional taxes to have improved police services. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Spokane Valley Police Precinct is located at 12710 E. Sprague and houses patrol and detective divisions, the traffic unit and administrative staff. The Precinct also includes a property storage facility and a Spokane County District Court. Spokane Valley is served by five S.C.O.P.E. stations, shown in the following table. Table 4.18 Spokane Valley S.C.O.P.E stations Neighborhood Location Neighborhood Location West Valley 3102 North Argonne Trentwood 2400 N.Wilbur#79 University 10621 East 15th Central Valley 115 N.Evergreen Rd. Edgecliff 522 S.Thierman Rd. East 4903 N.Harvard#3 Level of Service Public safety is a priority for the City of Spokane Valley. It is difficult to determine at this time, an adequate and measurable level of police protection. Spokane Valley will monitor the performance of the Spokane County Sheriffs Department and will adjust the contract for services as necessary to ensure an adequate level of police protection. Forecast of Future Needs Future needs for police protection will be determined as a part of the annual budget process. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time. 4.4.12 School Facilities Four public school districts provide service within Spokane Valley: East Valley, West Valley, Central Valley and Spokane School District 81. Spokane Valley must coordinate with each district to ensure consistency between the City's plan and school districts' plans. There are also a number of private schools that provide service to Spokane Valley area children. Inventory of Existing Facilities The School District Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows district boundaries and locations of all public schools within Spokane Valley. Tables 4.19 through 4.21 shows capacities of all schools located within Spokane Valley. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 27 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan School districts use portable classrooms at some school sites as interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built. Portable units are not included in capacity figures. School capacity figures are reported by the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction and are based on square footage per student. Table 4.19 Central Valley School Inventory Elementary School Sq.Ft. Area Capacity Adams 46,879 521 Summit(Formerly Blake) 34,823 436 Broadway 40,848 499 Chester 38,388 480 Greenacres 55,875 680 Keystone 33,669 421 Liberty Lake 60.477 756 McDonald 46,504 563 Opportunity 42,388 521 Ponderosa 51,377 642 Progress 37,573 452 South Pines 45,956 499 Sunrise 53,673 662 University 37,867 455 Total Elementary Permanent Facilities 626,097 7,587 Junior High Schools Sq.Ft.Area Capacity Bowdish 74,738 743 Evergreen 76,075 751 Greenacres 91,803 908 Horizon 84,795 838 North Pines 105,368 1,044 Total Junior High Permanent Facilities 432,779 4,284 Senior High Schools Sq.Ft.Area Capacity Central Valley 239,540 1,988 University 239,540 1,986 Total Senior High Facilities 479,080 3,974 Source: Central Valley School District Table 4.20 East Valley School Inventory Elementary School Sq.Ft.Area Capacity East Farms 47,047 579 Otis Orchards 51,789 629 Skyview 42,140 509 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 28 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.20 East Valley School Inventory Elementary School Sq. Ft.Area Capacity Trent 58,482 713 Trentwood 47 274 573 Total Elementary Permanent Facilities 246.732 3,003 Junior High Schools Sq. Ft.Area Capacity East Valley 84.561 831 Mountain View 82,544 816 High Junior Hi h Permanent Facilities 167,105 1,647 Senior High Schools Sq.Ft.Area Capacity East Valley 203,248 1,686 Total Senior High Facilities 203.248 1,686 Source: Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction Table 4.21 West Valley School Inventory Elementary School Sq.Ft.Area Capacity Millwood Early Childhood Ctr. 27,164 340 Ness 33,440 418 Orchard Center 34,094 426 Pasadena Park 34,002 425 Seth Woodward 35,941 449 Total Elementary Permanent Facilities 164,641 2,058 Middle Schools Sq.Ft.Area Capacity Centennial 89,870 875 West Valley City School 30,258 307 Total Junior High Permanent Facilities 120,128 1,182 Senior High Schools Sq.Ft.Area Capacity West Valley 149,128 1,207 Spokane Valley 13,902 116 Total Senior High Facilities 163,030 1,323 Source: West Valley School District Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires that all jurisdictions adopt a Level of Service standard for schools. Spokane Valley defers this responsibility to the individual school districts providing service within the City. Individual school districts may request that Spokane Valley adopt a Level of Service standard in future updates to the Capital Facilities Element. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 29 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Corrprehensive Plan Forecast of Future Needs Central Valley School District The Central Valley School District (CVSD) is experiencing a period of high growth in student population. particularly towards its eastern boundary. Liberty Lake and Greenacres Elementary Schools are currently over capacity. In response to this growth, the District initiated its "Community Linkages" planning process in the fall of 2004 to develop strategies and alternatives for accommodating its present and future students. The committee developed student population projections through the 2008/2009 school year for the entire district by analyzing growth trends in student population, building permit activity and proposed housing developments. The data will be used to guide decisions on where to locate school facilities. Table 4.23 shows the number of students enrolled in Central Valley Schools in 2005 for each school in the District and projections through the 2008-09 school year. In 2005, 11,480 students were enrolled in CVSD schools, with 9.363 of those students living within the City of Spokane Valley. Table 4.23 Central Valley Enrollment Projection Student New Projected Student Student School Attendance Area Enrollment In Enrollment 2005 2008-2009 Increase Elementary Schools Broadway 492 517 25 Progress 291 311 20 Opportunity 339 366 27 Adams 466 503 37 University 419 435 16 South Pines + 331 332 1 McDonald 356 ~ 364 8 Sunrise 490 532 42 Ponderosa 334 337 3 Chester 322 352 30 Greenacres 588 686 98 Liberty Lake 727 876 149 Total 5155 5611 456 Middle Schools North Pines 525 551 26 Bowdish 574 589 15 Horizon 440 1 462 22 Evergreen 578 630 52 Greenacres 644 757 113 Total - - 2761 2989 - 228 High Schools University High 1922 2055 133 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 30 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Central Valley High 1642 1804 162 Total 3564 3859 295 Total Student Enrollment 11,480 12,459 979 Source: Central Valley Linkages Committee-John Bottelli,Spokane County GIS The following table shows enrollment projections for Central Valley School District from the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction. The table provides historic and projected school enrollments for the years 2001 through 2010. Table 4.24 Central Valley School Enrollment Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 K-6 5,873 5,817 5,965 6,272 6,433 6.686 6,980 7,332 7,697 7,985 7-8 1,800 1,823 1,819 1,817 1,899 1.942 1,900 1,897 1,926 2.090 9-12 3,410 3.544 3,555 3,602 3,653 3,695 3,788 3.789 3,828 3,862 K-12 11.083 11,184 11,339 11,691 11,985 12.323 12,668 13,018 13,451 13,937 Source Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction East Valley School District East Valley School District has experienced a significant decline in enrollment in recent years. In 1999, enrollment peaked at just under 4,700 students down to 4,355 students enrolled in the fall of 2004. The following table indicates that East Valley will continue to lose students through the year 2010. Table 4.25 East Valley School Enrollment Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 K-6 2,355 2,288 2.167 2,139 2,082 2,022 1,974 1.964 1,931 1 917 7-8 743 735 732 716 690 681 659 599 572 564 9-12 1,592 1,565 1,544 1,500 1,396 1,354 1,322 1,337 1,292 r 1,217 K-12 4,690 4,588 4,443 4,355 4,168 4,057 3,955 3.900 3,795 3.698 Source. Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction East Valley School District estimates that out of 4,240 total students enrolled in the District in September, 2005, 2,378 lived within the City of Spokane Valley. West Valley School District West Valley School District has grown in student population consistently since 1998 and is projected to continuing growing through the year 2010, as shown in Table 4.25. Table 4.26 West Valley School Enrollment Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 K-6 1,591 1,552 1,614 1,581 1,605 1,610 1,632 1,710 1,728 1,750 7-8 545 566 575 528 542 560 587 503 519 589 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 31 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.26 West Valley School Enrollment Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment 9-12 1,469 1,502 1,503 1,534 1,510 1,538 1,554 1,559 1,576 1,493 K-12 3,605 3,620 3,692 3,643 3,657 3,708 3,753 3,772 3,823 3,832 Source: Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Central Valley School District The most urgent need for the CVSD is to add more elementary classroom space in the east end of the District. The District recently acquired two properties in the north Greenacres area for a new elementary school. The District will need to construct a new high school and middle school in the 20-year time frame of this comprehensive plan. The district has a site for a middle school adjacent to the Liberty Lake Elementary School. A number of elementary schools need to be completely remodeled, including Opportunity, Greenacres and Ponderosa. East Valley School District East Valley is not planning to construct any new facilities within the six year time frame of this capital facilities plan. Future updates to this plan will incorporate new capital projects. West Valley School District West Valley is remodeling its High School and will add elementary school classroom space. Capital Projects and Financing Plan West Valley School District passed a $35 million bond measure in 2004 that is being used to remodel West Valley High School, construct new elementary school classrooms and a new gymnasium. Central Valley School District is in the process of developing a Capital Improvement and Financing Plan. 4.4.13 Sewer Service Background In 1983, Spokane County initiated an ambitious program to bring sewers to houses and businesses located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Since that time, over 17,000 residences and businesses in the greater Spokane Valley area have been connected to the County's sewer system. Spokane County has invested nearly $200 million in sewer construction countywide to date. Continued sewer construction in Spokane Valley will cost another $74 million through the year 2010 when the County's Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP) is completed. This figure does not include costs for a new wastewater treatment plant, which is discussed later in this section. Upon Incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley entered into an interlocal agreement giving Spokane County lead agency authority to provide sewer service. At this time, Spokane County and Spokane Valley elected officials are exploring the options for the possible assumption of the Valley sewer system. However, no decisions have been made regarding the transfer of responsibility and ownership of Valley sewers. This section of the Capital Facilities Plan assumes that Spokane County will continue to own and operate the sewers in Spokane Valley. The CFP will be updated as necessary to incorporate future changes. Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan In 1996, the County adopted an Interim Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan (CWMP). The intent of the CWMP was to develop strategies to expedite the sewer program for protection of Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 32 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan the Aquifer, and to satisfy regulations established by the Washington State Departments of Health (DOH) and Ecology (DOE) and the Spokane County Health District. In 2001, Spokane County updated the CWMP, which focused on redefining priority sewer areas and conforming to requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA). Most significantly, the CWMP updated population and wastewater flow forecasts and produced a revised Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Wastewater Facilities Plan Along with the CWMP, Spokane County adopted a Wastewater Facilities Plan (WFP) in 2001 that identified wastewater facilities and programs required to meet the long-term sewer needs of the County. The WFP focuses on developing a long-term wastewater management strategy for the County. The WFP provides an in-depth analysis of various wastewater treatment technologies available. in addition to exploring the wide range of related environmental considerations. Public participation was fully integrated into this extensive planning effort. Wastewater Treatment Wastewater is conveyed through Spokane County's sewer system to the City of Spokane Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for treatment and discharge into the Spokane River. In 1982, Spokane County and the City of Spokane signed an interlocal agreement wherein the County purchased ten million gallons per day (mgd) of capacity in the RPWRF. Spokane County is currently using nearly eight mgd of its contracted capacity. A key component of the WFP is to develop a new Spokane County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) to serve wastewater generated in the greater Spokane Valley region. The WFP explores the following treatment alternatives: • Discharge of treated wastewater effluent to the Spokane River, using one or more new treatment plants between Liberty Lake and the City of Spokane. • Discharge of treated wastewater effluent to the Little Spokane River, providing flow augmentation in the Little Spokane River to help meet minimum stream flow needs. • Use of treated and reclaimed wastewater for irrigation of agricultural lands, golf courses, school grounds and parks. • Use of treated and reclaimed wastewater for creation of wetlands. • Underground storage of treated and reclaimed wastewater for subsequent use for irrigation or release to streams for flow augmentation during critical low-flow periods. • Recharge of the Spokane Aquifer with treated wastewater effluent, with the co-mingled water being available for all uses including potable water supplies. • Discharge of wastewater to the Liberty Lake treatment plant for treatment and subsequent discharge to the Spokane River. In June 2004, Spokane County amended its WFP to provide supplemental information related to water quality of the Spokane River, additional site-specific detail for the proposed treatment plant location and a report on the progress of key implementation activities. Site Selection During the development of the WFP, prior to Spokane Valley's incorporation, Spokane County engaged in an intensive public participation program to determine the most appropriate location for a new wastewater treatment plant. It was determined that the ideal location would be on the western end of the Valley within close proximity to the Spokane River and large enough to allow for future plant expansions(15 to 20 acres in size). Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 33 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Spokane County solicited nominations from the public and reviewed its land use database to identify potential parcels. Fifteen sites were initially identified and subjected to a thorough screening process. The sites were evaluated by a technical committee consisting of civil engineers, biologists, geo-engineers and land use planners. The selection process was monitored by a citizen focus group and included three public hearings to ensure continuous public participation. At the end of the process, two sites, Alki/Fancher(close to the Fairgrounds) and the old Stockyards site (on Market Street in the City of Spokane), were selected for further environmental review. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts on each site and conveyance routes for raw sewage and treated effluent. However, it was determined that the Alki/Fancher site could not be secured in time for site development. Therefore, the Playfair Race Track site was selected for further environmental evaluation After thorough review, and two more public hearings in early 2004, the Stockyards site was chosen as the preferred site to locate a new treatment plant. It has not been determined if the new treatment plant will be constructed, owned and operated by Spokane County, the City of Spokane Valley, or by a special purpose governmental body. Inventory of Existing Facilities Sewer facilities within Spokane Valley are a system of pipes and pumping stations that move untreated sewage to the City of Spokane Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF). The following tables provide an inventory of sewer facilities in the Valley. Table 4.27 Spokane Valley Pump Stations Station Pumps Horsepower Stand-by Power Spare Capacity(gpm) Ella 3 89 Yes No 2,600 Midilome 2 5 No Yes 185 Mirabeau 2 10 Yes No 280 Ridgemont 2 5 Yes Yes 150 Riverwalk 2 15 Yes No 300 Sprague 2 10 No No 920 gpm=gallons per minute Source. Spokane County Utilities Department Table 4.28 Spokane Valley Interceptors Level of Service Stand-by Capacity ' The Regional Minimum Level of Service Standards state Interceptor Power (gpd) that incorporated areas will be provided with wastewater South Valley No 30,800,000 collection and transport systems in accordance with the adopted sewer concurrency requirements of the North Valley No 10,150,000 jurisdiction. Spokane Valley requires all new gpd=gallons per day Source: Spokane development to be served with public sewer. Only County Uts Dept. existing residential, commercial and industrial lots may be served by septic systems/drain fields (approved by the Spokane County Health District) and only if public sewer is unavailable. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane County currently has about 26,223 customers within its sewer system area. Since some customers generate more flow than others, it is common to define an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) as a way to project future flows and to set the cost sewer service rates. Spokane County Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 34 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan figures an ERU to be 900 cubic feet of water per month, or about 225 gallons per day. The 26,223 customers account for 38,831 ERUs. Table 4.29 Spokane Valley Sewer Lines and Manholes 1' Gravity Mains Total Length(ft) 6" 1,282 8" 1,117,747 10" 125.782 12" 52,763 15" 39,820 18" 34,137 21" 14,603 24" 29.885 27" 12,585 30" 14,782 36" 18.807 42" 20.938 48" 11,088 54" 16,544 Total Length 1,510,763 ft=286 mi Manhole Covers 5,695 Source: Spokane County Utilities Department The following table shows that Spokane Valley accounts for 28,396 ERUs, or 73% of the County's total ERUs. Table 4.30 Spokane County Sewer Customers and ERUs Customer Type City of Spokane Valley Areas Remaining County Total for County Valley Outside of City Service Areas Service Areas Accounts ERUs Accounts ERUs Accounts ERUs Accounts ERUs Single Family 15,960 16,353 1,924 1.937 6,329 6,414 24.213 24,704 Multi-Family 377 5,043 88 137 127 948 592 6,128 Commercial 1,217 6,827 6 30 186 969 1,409 7.826 Mobile Home Parks 9 173 , 0 0 0 0 9 173 TOTAL 17,563 28,396 2,018 2,104 6,642 8,331 26,223 38,831 Source Spokane County Utilities Department The most urgent need for the Spokane region is to increase the capacity to treat wastewater. Spokane County adopted a new policy in 2005 making connection to the sewer system voluntary for new sewer construction areas as a part of the Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP). The County estimates that 50% of the parcels within the STEP area will connect voluntarily in the year Adopted April 25. 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 35 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan following sewer construction. Table 4.31 shows the County's historic and projected total connections to the sewer system through the year 2010. Table 4.31 Connections to County Sewer Septic Tank New Total Year Elimination Construction Connections 2002 1,490 609 2,099 2003 1,407 565 1,972 2004 1,573 474 2,047 2005 1,230 682 1,912 2006 596 585 - 1,181 2007 643 585 1,228 2008 554 585 1,139 2009 781 —__....... 585 1,366 2010 691 585 1,276 A two percent annual growth rate is used to project the amount of sewer flow that new construction will add to the system. Using these assumptions, the County expects to reach its contracted ten mgd capacity at the City of Spokane Reclamation Facility by the year 2014, as shown in the following table. Table 4.32 Spokane County Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity Projections Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Flow(mgd) 7.3 7.8 8.1 8.3 8 6 8.8 9.1 9.3 9.6 9.9 10.1 Source: Spokane County Utilities Department Note These are projected capacities for Spokane County. The City of Spokane Valley does not have its own allotted capacity Spokane Valley does not guarantee that wastewater capacity will be available'or new construction in the future Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Sewer Construction The purpose of the County's Septic Tank Elimination (STEP) program is to expedite the construction of sanitary sewers and dramatically reduce the number of on-site sewage treatment facilities over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer; and to satisfy regulations established by the State Departments of Heath and Ecology, Spokane County Health District and other regulatory agencies. The Sewer Projects Map found at the end of this chapter shows the areas where sewer will be extended as a part of the STEP program over the next six years. Spokane County anticipates that the construction of all sewers within the STEP project areas will be completed by the end of year 2010. The Sewer Project Priority Map shows areas that have had sewer lines installed within Spokane Valley and areas that are scheduled to have sewer lines installed by 2010. The industrial area in the far northeast corner of the City currently does not have public sewer service. To encourage economic development and job creation, Spokane Valley may consider extending public sewer to this area. Wastewater Treatment Plant The Spokane County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) will be located at the old Stockyards site inside the City of Spokane. The SCRWTP is scheduled to be operational by the Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 36 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan year 2012. Construction will occur in two phases to meet projected capacity requirements through the year 2025. Phase 1 will provide a maximum capacity of eight mgd and should be completed by 2012. Phase 2 will provide an additional four mgd capacity. Depending on the rate of growth, Phase 2 may be completed as early as 2015. Capital Projects and Financing Plan Wastewater Treatment Spokane County has programmed capital expenditures for its share of upgrading the City of Spokane Riverside State Park Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for the years 2006-2011, as shown in Table 4.33. The upgrades are required to meet State and Federal sewage treatment guidelines. Spokane County is also moving forward with plans to construct and operate a new Wastewater Treatment Plant at the old Stockyards site. Phase 1 construction costs are estimated at $132 million; Phase 2 is estimated at $42 million, bringing the total to $201 million for the new treatment plant. Capital costs for the years 2006-2011 are shown in Table 4.34. Table 4.33 Costs for City of Spokane Riverside State Park Reclamation Facility(RPWRF)Upgrades Project 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Water Quality Upgrade at RPWRF $6,100 S7,300 $1,000 S2.200 S8,700 $8,700 $34,000 Notes: 1. The 2006-2011 estimates were provided by the City of Spokane. 2. Funds for the RPWRF Upgrades will come from the Wastewater Treatment Plant Fund and General Facilities Fund 3. Assumes effluent filtration completed by 2012 to comply with dissolved oxygen total maximum daily load(TMDL) 4. Estimates in Thousands of Dollars Source: Spokane County Six-Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvement Program-2006 through 2011 Table 4.34 Costs for New Wastewater Treatment Facilities Project 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Engineering,Management $500 S500 $5' S,00 $250 $250 $2,500 and Legal Services Land-Pump Stations and Treatment Plant 5500 S1 S50Li S0 SO SO $2,400 Conveyance- Design/Bid/Build SO $875 $2,000 $9,000 $9.000 SO S20,875 Construction Cost Treatment Plant- Design/Build Construction SO $4,000 $9,250 $18,750 $20,000 $20,000 $72,000 Cost Totals $1,000 $6,775 $12,250 $28,250 $29,250 $20,250 $97,775 Annual Debt Service Payment from Reserves $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cumulative Bond Sales $0 $6,775 $19,025 , $42,275 $76,525 $96,775 Annual Debt Service $0 $567 $1,592 $3,956 $6,404 $8,098 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 37 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.34 Costs for New Wastewater Treatment Facilities Project 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Notes: 1. The above estimates are based upon the following assumptions - New 8 million gpd plant on the Stockyards site,with flows starting in 2012. - Effluent filtration will meet the requirements of the dissolved oxygen TMDL. - Outfall to Rebecca St.from the Wastewater Treatment Plant(WVVTP)site. - Pump Station&Force Main from Spokane Valley Interceptor to VVWTP, - Pump Station&Force Main from North Valley Interceptor to VWVTP. - Design/Build/Operate contract for the VVVVTP. - Design/Bid/Build public works contract for the conveyance projects. 2. "Annual Debt Service" is assumed to commence for a given expenditure in the year following the expenditure The amount shown for"Annual Debt Service" includes the estimated debt service for cumulative expenditures and assumes the annual sale of 20-year bonds at 5.5% interest rates. A portion of the annual costs may be paid from available reserves, rather than from bond proceeds. For those years where the"Cumulative Bond Sales"is listed at SO, it is assumed that the previous year's expenditures were paid from reserves, The primary sources of funding are the General Facilities Fund and Wastewater Treatment Plant Fund 3. Estimate in thousands of dollars Source: Spokane County Six-Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvement Program-2006 through 2011 Sewer Construction The following table represents Spokane County's adopted sewer construction program for 2006 through 2011. The Sewer Projects Map, found at the end of this chapter, shows the location of the sewer projects for the greater Spokane Valley, both inside and outside the City boundary. Table 4.35 Spokane County Septic Tank Elimination Program Six-Year Financing Plan Projects 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Valley Sewer Construction' S17.063 S12.312 $17,197 S24.639 $22.989 $0 $94,200 North Spokane Sewer Construction $0 $1,357 $4,240 SO $2265 SO S7,862 Miscellaneous $500 $500 $500 $500 S500 $500 $3,000 Total $17,563 $14,169 S21.937 $25.139 $25,754 S500 $105,062 Funding Sources State Grant $3,750 S3,750 $3,750 S3,750 $3,750 SO $18.750 General Facilities Fund $1,333 52,523 S2,603 $666 $3.019 SO $10,144 Capital Facilities Rate Prepayments _ $872 $777 $1,134 S1,038 $1,145 SO $4,966 Bonds $3,488 , $3,108 $4,536 S4,153 $4,579 0 $19,864 Subsidy Funding from Reserves $8,120 $4,011 $9,914 $15,532 $13,261 $500 $51,338 Total $17,563 ' $14,169 521,937 $25,139 $25,754 $500 $105.062 'Note: This table represents projects both inside and outside the City of Spokane Valley Amounts are times$1,000 Source: S•okane Count Six-Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvement Pro.ram-2006 throu•h 2011_ Spokane Valley will continue the commitment to replace septic systems with public sewers and will examine the feasibility of extending public sewer to unserved commercial and industrial areas to encourage economic development and job creation. 4.4.14 Solid Waste In 1988, the intergovernmental agency known as the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System (System) was formed by interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 38 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan all other cities and towns within the County. The System is responsible for implementing solid waste management plans, planning and developing specific waste management programs and updating solid waste plans for the entire County. The System is managed by the City of Spokane. which uses its structure to carry out the various solid waste management programs for our region. In Spokane Valley, solid waste services are provided by private haulers licensed by the Washington Utility and Transportation Commission (W.U.T.C.) through franchise agreements. Waste Management of Spokane provides residential and commercial garbage services and weekly curbside recycling collection; Sunshine Disposal provides only commercial services. At this time, Spokane Valley residents are allowed to self-haul their garbage to an appropriate dumping site. Inventory of Existing Facilities The Regional Solid Waste System includes a Waste to Energy facility located at 2900 South Geiger, and two recycling/transfer stations. One of the stations is located within Spokane Valley at 3941 N. Sullivan Road south of Trent and across from the Spokane Industrial Park: the other is located in north Spokane County at the intersection of Elk-Chattaroy Road and Highway 2. Landfills are necessary to provide disposal for solid waste that cannot be recycled or incinerated, or that exceeds the capacity of the WTE Facility. The Spokane County Regional Health District licenses six privately owned landfills in Spokane County. Level of Service The minimum Regional Level of Service Standards requires solid waste services to meet all State and Federal regulations. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley is participating on the update of the Spokane County Waste Management Plan (SCWMP). The SCWMP update process will determine future needs for solid waste disposal. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management Plan will provide information on future regional solid waste facilities. Finance Plan The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management plan will include a financing plan for future regional solid waste facilities. 4.4.15 Stormwater Facilities Stormwater runoff in Spokane Valley flows to a combination of public and private facilities. In developed areas, runoff flows down street gutters and is disposed through drywells in public road rights-of-way, drywells on private property and grassy swales with overflow drywells in easements on private property. There are advantages and disadvantages to relying on on-site facilities for all stormwater management. One advantage is that on-site facilities are typically constructed with private funds and can be integrated into the development as a green space amenity. However, on-site facilities are sometimes not well maintained. Their capacity may be diminished over time or they may fail entirely during large runoff events. On-site facilities may take up large portions of a development site, thereby reducing the effective density that can be accommodated in that area. In 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council created a stormwater utility to develop and maintain storm drainage systems on public land. To create revenues for the stormwater utility operations, the Council adopted an annual fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Residential ERUs are based on the number of single-family dwellings, while Commercial ERUs are based on the square footage of impervious surface associated with a business or commercial development. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 39 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Corrprehensive Plan Inventory of Existing Facilities Spokane Valley's inventory of stormwater facilities, most of which are integral to the safe function of our street system, consists of about 5,600 drywells, 928 swales six detention ponds, and one retention pond. Other facilities include curb inlets, bridge drains, and culverts, all of which require monitoring and maintenance. The retention pond, located at Dishman-Mica Road. and 32nd Ave., was constructed as a part of a road project and provides a disposal point for water flowing from Chester Creek. Level of Service The Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted new regional level of service standards for stormwater in 2004 as a part of the Countywide Planning Policies update. The standards reflect current best practices that are established in adopted stormwater design guidelines. Spokane Valley follows said guidelines in reviewing and approving new development and is therefore in compliance with the regional LOS standards for stormwater runoff. Forecast of Future Needs Spokane Valley will continue to use private, on-site treatment facilities for new development and will install drywells, swales and other facilities as needed for new street improvement projects. Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities Location and capacities of future facilities is dependent on the location and size of new development, future public street projects, and projects that will address current problem areas within the City. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will incorporate capital programming for stormwater facilities. Capital Projects and Financing Plan The City currently charges a $20 annual stormwater utility fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) to generate revenues for stormwater facility engineering, maintenance and administration. The stormwater fee is expected to generate$1.2 million annually. Transportation Facilities Inventory of Existing Facilities This section of the Capital Facilities Plan includes transportation facilities within Spokane Valley, including streets, bridges, pathways and sidewalks. Street maintenance is not included as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan, Spokane Valley is responsible for about 455 miles of public roads, including 51 miles of Urban Principal Arterials, 61 miles of Urban Minor Arterials, 44 miles of Urban Collectors, and 298.85 miles of Local Access Streets. Table 4.36 provides a list of all arterial intersections within Spokane Valley. Level of Service Spokane Valley uses arterial intersection delay as its transportation level of service (LOS). This LOS is based on travel delay and is expressed as letters "A" through "F", with "A" being the highest or best travel condition and "F" being the lowest or worst condition. The lowest acceptable LOS for signalized arterial intersections is set at "D"; the lowest acceptable LOS for un-signalized arterial intersections is set at "E". This LOS standard conforms to the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, published by the Transportation Research Board. Table 4.36 provides a six and twenty year level of service analysis for all arterial intersections in Spokane Valley. The analysis uses the regional transportation model prepared and maintained by the Spokane Regional Transportation Council as its basis for forecasting future intersection volumes. Levels of service calculations follow Highway Capacity Manual methodologies. The last column in the table cross-references to capital projects listed in Table 4.38. These projects will address capacity deficiencies at the corresponding intersection. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 40 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2007- 2005 2011 2011 2025 2025 2012 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Project LOS* LOS* # 1 4th /Sullivan 2005 Signal C B D 2 4th/Thierman 2005 4-way stop A B C 3 4th/University 2005 Signal C C C 4 8th/Bowdish 2000 2-way stop D E E F F 33 5 8th/Carnahan 2005 4-way stop B C C F F 18,40 6 8th/Dishman-Mica 2004 Signal B B C 7 8th/Evergreen 2003 Signal A A A 8 8th/McDonald 2005 2-way stop D E F 9 8th/Park 2005 2-way stop C C C D C 18 10 8th/Pines(SR-27) 2C31 2-way stop F F F 11 8th/Sullivan 2002 Signal 8 B C 12 8th/Thierman 2000 2-way stop C E F 18 13 8th/University 2005 Signal B B B 14 16th/Adams 2001 4-way stop A B D 15 16th /Bowdish 2005 4-way stop C C C F D 33 16 16th/Dishman-Mica 2004 Signal B B B 17 16th/Evergreen 2003 Signal B A A 36 18 16th/McDonald 2005 4-way stop B B C 19 16th/SR 27 2005 Signal D D 0 22,42 20 16th/Sullivan 2004 Signal B B C 21 16th/University 2000 Signal B B B Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 41 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2007- 2005 2011 2011 2025 2025 2012 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated project LOS' LOS' # 22 24th /Evergreen 2000 4-way stop A B B F F 36 23 24th/Sullivan 2004 S gnat B B F 24 32nd/Adams 2001 2-way stop B C C 25 2003 2-way stop COUNTY COUNTY 2 32nd/ 2 y p COU COU 26 32nd/Bowdish 2005 Signal B B B B B 33 27 32nd /Dishman-Mica 2002 2-way stop B B B 28 32nd/Evergreen 2002 2-way stop B B B C E 23,36 29 32nd/Pines 2005 Signal C C C 30 32nd/SR 27 2005 Signal C C D 31 32nd/Sullivan 2004 2-way stop COUNTY COUNTY 32 32nd/University 2005 Signal B B B 33 Appleway/Barker 2005 Signal C C C F F 1,20,24 34 Mir way/Dishman 2005 Signal C C C 35 Appleway/Farr 2005 Signal D C C 36 Appleway/Park 2005 Signal C C C 37 Appleway/Thierman 2005 Signal 0 E F 38 Appleway/University 2005 Signal C B B 5 39 Appleway/Vista 2005 Signal B A A 40 Broadway/Adams 2005 2-way stop C E F 8 41 Broadway/Argonne 2004 Signal A A B 8 42 Broadway/Bowdish 2005 Signal A A B 8 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 42 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2007- 2005 2011 2011 2025 2025 2012 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Project LOS* LOS* # 43 Broadway/Evergreen 2005 Sigral C C E 8 44 Broadway/Fancher 2002 Sigral D C F P F F F 25,34, 45 Broadway/Flora 2005 2-way stop C 35 46 Broadway/McDonald 2005 Sigral B B B 8 47 Broadway/Mullan 2004 Sigral B B C 8 48 Broadway/Park 2003 Signal D D C F C 10,61, 26 49 Broadway/Pines 2005 Signal D F C F 8,22 (SR-27) 50 Broadway/Sullivan 2005 Signal D D F 8 51 Broadway/Thierman 2005 Signal B C F 52 Broadway/University 2002 Signal A A A 8 53 Broadway/Vista 2002 Signal A A A 8 54 Broadway/Wal-Mart 2005 Signal B B C 5s Central Pre Mix/ 2003 Signal B B B Sullivan 56 Dishman-Mica/ 2005 Signal B C D Bowdish Dishman-Mica/ 57 2004 Signal C C C University-Schafer 58 Euclid(north)/Barker 2002 2-way stop B B B C C 28,32 59 Euclid(south)/Barker 2002 2-way stop B B B C C 32 s0 Euclid/Flora(north) 2003 2-way stop B D F 28 61 Euclid/Flora(south) 2003 2-way stop C D F 28 62 Euclid/Park 2005 2-way stop A B B 63 Euclid/Sullivan 2001 Signal C C C 0 C 30 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 43 of 55 , . City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis , 2011 1 2025 2025 2007- Mitigated Mitigated 2005 2011 2012 Intersection Count Control Project LOS LOS LOS LOS* LOS* 64 Indiana/Evergreen 2004 Signal B C C 65 Indiana/Mall-East 2005 Signal B B C 68 Indiana I Mail-West 2005 Signal B B B Indiana I IVIirabeau 67 2004 Signal B B B Pky • indiana I Pines(SR- 68 2004 Signal D C D 11 22 27) 69 Indiana/Sullivan 2005 Signal C C E 1 70 Kieman-B/Sullivan 2003 Signal B B C 30 1 I ,ellilliMM 71 Knox/Argonne 2004 Signal D D 0 19 Mansfield Pines 2-way 72 / 2004 F F C C 3,22 (SR-27) stop/signal 73 Marietta I Sullivan 2003 Signal B C F , Mirabeau Pky/FineS 2-way 74 2005 F F B 9 3,22 (SR-27) stop/signal 75 Mission/Adams 1999 2-way stop B B C — ' 78 Mission/Argonne 2005 Signal 0 0 D , - 1 . 2-way 77 Mission/Barker 2005 stop/signal E F A B . , 78 Mission/&AA/dish 1595 2-way stop C E F 7g Mission/Evergreen 2002 Signal A A A 80 Mission I McDonald 2002 Signal A A A 81 Mission/Mullah 2005 Signal B B C 52 Mission/Park 2002 Signal B B B B B 10 83 Mission/Pines 2002 Signal D E 0 F 22 84 Mission I Sullivan 2005 Signal C C F Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 44 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2007- 2011 2025 Intersection Count Control 2005 2011 Mitigated 2025 Mitigated 2012 t LOS LOS LOS' LOS LOS' Project 85 Mission/University 2004 2-way stop C E F 86 Montgomery/ 2004 Signal D D F 21 Argonne 87 Montgomery/ 2005 B B C Shopping Center 88 Montgomery/ 2002 2-way stop D D F University 89 Rutter/Park 2003 2-way stop B B D 90 Saltese/Sullivan 2004 2-way stop D F F 38 91 Sprague/Adams 2004 Signal B B C Sprague/Appleway 92 Ave- 2002 Signal B C F 31 Corbin 93 Sprague/Argonne 2005 Signal B B B 94 Sprague/Barker 2005 4-way stop B C B F F 24 95 Sprague/Bowdish 2005 Signal C D C D C 5 96 Sprague/Costco 2005 Signal B B B (east of Carnahan) 97 Sprague/Evergreen 2005 Signal C D C D C 6 98 Sprague/Fancher 2002 Signal D D D 99 Sprague/Farr 2005 Signal A A A 100 Sprague/Flora 1999 Signal B C B F D 25 101 Sprague/Gillis- 2005 Signal C C C 5 102 Sprague/McDonald 2005 Signal D D C F C 5 103 Sprague/Mullan 2005 Signal C B B 104 Sprague/Park 2005 Signal C B B 11,26 Adopted April 25. 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 45 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 1 2011 2025 ._ 2007- 2005 2011 2025 2012 Intersection Count Control Mitigated Mitigated LOS LOS LOS Project LOS* LOS* Sprague)Pines(SR- 105 2005 Signal ID E C F ID 5,22 27) I 106 Sprague/Progress 2005 Signal C B B B B 31 107 Sprague 1 Sullivan 2005 Signal ID E C F 0 31 i . . . . . los Sprague/Thierman 2005 Signal B B C 105 Sprague I University 2005 Signal C C 0 6 110 Sprague/Vista 2005 Signal C A A Trent(SR-290)/ ill 2004 Signal D E F Argonne . — Trent 290)l 112 2004 2-way stop F F F 1 B,C BTV Barker Trent(SR-290)/ 113 2003 Signal B B C Evergreen Trent(SR-290)/ 114 2000 Signal C i., C C Faucher 115 Trent(SR-290)I Flora 2003 2-way s:co .7 F E SW 116 Trent(SR-290)/Park 2003 Signal 0 B B C B 9,siv . . Trent(SR-290)1 117 2003 Signal E F ID F F 22,BTV Pines Trent(SR-290)/ 118 2002 2-way stop C D E Progress Trent(SR-290)i Inter- 119 2005 2-way stop F F section ETV University Removed Trent{SR 290)/ I 120 2005 , Signal A 0 F 0 30 Sullivan(North Ramp) Trent(SR-290)1 121 2003 Signal B B 1 F 0 30 Sullivan(Sputh Ramp) 1 122 Trent(SR-290)/Vista 2003 Signal B B B BTV I 123 Wellesley I Evergreen 2005 4-way stop B B C - , 124 Wellesley/Progress 2002 4-way stop C B B 125 Wellesley i Sullivan 2002 4-way stop C F F F F 4,39 l Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 46 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2007- 2005 2011 2011 2025 2025 2012 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated project LOS* LOS* Note See Table 4.38 for a listing of capital improvement projects. Regional Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies require that LOS standards be adopted in accordance with the regional minimum level of service standards set by the Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials. The Steering Committee approved the use of corridor travel time for use in establishing the regional transportation system. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council is determining annual average corridor travel time through a travel time study. This study is still in progress and corridor travel time Level of Service standards will be adopted upon its completion. Uses of Level of Service Standards As measures of transportation effectiveness, LOS standards can help jurisdictions identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affect system operation. Level of service provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. Level of service standards can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the surrounding road system. They can also be used to identify problems, suggest remedial actions and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a cornerstone in the development of equitable traffic impact fee systems, which makes development pay some of the costs for improvements to the transportation infrastructure. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) performed traffic modeling for the urban area, considering future population growth and distribution. This model examines the performance of the entire urban transportation system. Improvements to provide for the increased traffic volumes shown by the model at the adopted level of service standards, are included in this plan More information on the transportation modeling based on future land use assumptions is contained in Chapter 3, Transportation. Relationship to Concurrency Management Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The concept of concurrency predates the Growth Management Act for some public facilities, specifically through SEPA mitigation requirements. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. 'Adequate capacity refers to the maintenance of concurrency" (WAC 365-195-835). State Transportation Facilities The Growth Management Act requires local jurisdictions to include inventory and Level of Service information for state transportation facilities in their Comprehensive Plans. State facilities are divided into two categories: Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS), and Regionally Significant Highways (non-HSS). The Growth Management Act requires non-HSS facilities to be subject to concurrency. The following table lists State highways serving Spokane County. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 47 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan State Transportation Level of Service The Washington State Department of Transportation Table 4.37 State Highways (WSDOT) requires state transportation facilities in urban areas (inside the UGA) to maintain a minimum Highway Description Designation Level of Service standard "D." In rural areas 1-90 Interstate HSS (outside the UGA), the minimum LOS standard is "C." Those areas lying outside the UGA that may SR-27 Pines Road Non-HSS have urban characteristics can be evaluated by the SR-290 Trent Avenue Non-HSS WSDOT in conjunction with the City on a case-by- case basis to determine which standard is the most HSS=Highway of Statewide Significance Non-HSS=Regionally Significant Highway appropriate fit. Intergovernmental Coordination Transportation plans were distributed for comment to all jurisdictions that may be impacted by, or impact, Spokane Valley's transportation system, including adjacent towns and cities, Spokane County, Spokane Transit Authority, Washington State DOT, and Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC). SRTC has overall responsibility for intergovernmental coordination of transportation plans. Each jurisdiction in the region must submit transportation plans to SRTC for inclusion in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. SRTC responsibilities include: 1) Certifying the transportation elements of comprehensive plans adopted by the County, cities and towns in the region for consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; 2) Maintaining consistency between infrastructure plans and land use development plans, and 3) Reviewing LOS thresholds for transportation facilities in the Spokane Region. SRTC is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating the performance of regional transportation facilities as affected by land use and transportation improvement decisions. Concurrency management is linked to the planning process. Any amendments to the comprehensive plans require a concurrency management system analysis and must meet thresholds before their adoption. SRTC will annually assess the regional transportation system with respect to regional concurrency. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Capital Projects Table 4.38 contains a complete list of transportation related capital projects for the years 2008 through 2013, totaling over $95 million. The City updates the six year TIP throughout the year as project priorities and funding changes. This Plan adopts by reference any updates to the TIP occurring between Plan update cycles. The current TIP is available for viewing online at www.spokanevalley.org. These projects address capacity issues at intersections and safety improvements. Following is a discussion of potential funding sources. Funding Sources Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding assumptions. A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation funding options. Federal Assistance These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act for the 215` Century (SAFETEA-21) and are administered by the Federal Highway Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Adopted April 25. 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 48 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). State Assistance The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation programs. including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the Sidewalk Program (SP). City Funds Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds for transportation projects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel Tax. Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2009-2014 (dollars in thousands) 2009 Item Project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual Source ($) Amount 0 Broadway Avenue Safety Pines Rd(SR-27) Park Road UAP 187 933 Project 1 Pines/Mansfield TPP 206 1,796 2 Barker Road Bridge BR 204 4.159 3 Appleway/Sprague/Dishman Interstate 90 Dishman-Mica CMAQ 50 373 Mica ITS 4 STEP Paveback City 1,291 1,500 5 Street Preservation Project— Various Streets City 1.224 1,293 6 Broadway Avenue 180 ft east of Flora Road UAP 12 60 Moore 7 Appleway Blvd University Evergreen STP 121 937 8 WSDOT Urban Ramp Project- City 300 300 Broadway,Argonne,Freya I/C 9 Pines/Sprague Intersection STA 152 742 PCC 10 44th Ave Pathway—Sands to Sands Woodruff STP(E) 44 328 Woodruff 11 Broadway Avenue Rehab#2 Fancher Road Thierman Road STP(U) 82 608 12 Park Road#2(PE only) Broadway Avenue Indiana STP(U) 48 352 16 Sprague Avenue Resurfacing University Evergreen City 2.856 2,856 17 Evergreen/Sprague STA 233 1,133 Intersection PCC 18 McDonald/Sprague STA 219 1.069 Intersection PCC Annual Total $7,229 18.439 2010 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 49 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan item Project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual * Source ($) Amount 4 STEP Paveback City 1,204 1,399 5 Street Preservation Project City 1,224 1,293 6 Broadway Ave 180 ft.east of Flora Road UAP 342 1,708 Moore 7 Appleway Extension University Evergreen Other 206 2,859 13 PCC Sullivan/Sprague Intersection STP(U) 116 861 14 Mansfield Extension Pines(SR-27) Mirabeau Prkwy UAP 207 1,036 15 Flora Road Sprague Mission UAP 89 447 19 Park Road(Bridging the Other 31 750 Valley) Federal 20 Sprague Resurfacing#2 Evergreen Sullivan City 2,856 2,856 21 Sullivan Rd(PE Only) Euclid Wellesley STP(U) 80 595 23 Indiana/Sullivan Intersection STA 275 1,342 24 Broadway/Sullivan Intersection STA 253 1,230 25 Argonne Road Interstate 90 Trent CMAQ 77 576 27 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 735 28 Broadway Avenue Flora Barker UCP 63 314 29 Appleway-Theirman EB Lane CMAQ 3 26 Annual Total $7,026 18,027 I2011 R Item Project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual # Source (S) Amount 4 STEP Paveback City 1,204 1,399 5 Street Preservation Project City 1,224 1,293 7 Appleway Blvd University Evergreen UCP 448 7,734 14 Mansfield Extension Pines Rd(SR-27) Mirabeau Pkwy UAP 290 1,448 15 Flora Road Sprague Mission UAP 298 1,487 19 Park Road—Bridging the Other Federal 90 2.150 Valley 25 Argonne Road Interstate 90 Trent CMAQ 101 713 27 Sullivan Rd West Bridge BR 0 735 28 Broadway Avenue Flora Barker UCP 50 250 29 Appleway-Thierman EB lane CMAQ 22 161 30 Mission Avenue Flora Barker UAP 99 495 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 50 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 16Th Schafer - 31 C]ishman-Mica Rehab STP(P) 202 1,500 Bowdish City Limits 'I 32 Saltese/Sullivan Signal Other 104 414 34 Pines Corridor ITS Sprague Trent CMAQ 280 2,081 35 Barker Road Appleway Broadway UAP 156 778 Annual Total $4,568 $22,638 2012 item Project From To Primary City Total Annual # Source Amount(5) Amount 5 Street Preservation Projects City 2,261 2,392 15 Fiora Road Sprague Mission LJAP - 268 1,337 Park Road—Bridging the Other 19 'Valley Federal 288 6,8Q9 27 _ Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 4,056 28 Broadway Flora Barker UCP 565 2,826 30 Mission Flora Barker UAP I 340 ' 1,701 35 Barker Road Appleway Broadway UAP 289 1,445 1 36 Park Road-#2(CN only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) 270 2,000 37 32nd Avenue Evergreen Best STP(U) 21 153 Evergreen132"d 16b ' 32'd 38 STP(U) 108 526 Evergreen SR-27 39 Barker Road 8m Appleway UCP 74 371 Annual Total 5 4,482 $23,616 2013 Item Project - - From 1 To Primary I City Amount Total Annual i # Source ($) Amount 5 Street Preservation Project City 2,260 2.391 16 Park Road--Bridging the Other 286 6,809 Valley Federal 22 Sullivan Road Extension ' Bigelow Gulch City 55 55 27 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 4,056 30 Mission Avenue Flora Barker UAP 310 1,551 35 Barker Road Appleway Broadway UAP 188 1 942 36 Park Road-#2(CN only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) 314 2,326 37 32" Avenue Evergreen Best STP(U) 24 175 16g' — 32"d 38 Evergreen/32ne STP(U) 755 3,681 Evergreen SR-27 i 1 Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009)- Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 51 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2013 Item Project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual # Source (I) Amount 39 Barker Road 81' Appleway UCP 80 400 40 Sullivan Road(RW/CN only) Euclid Wellesley STP(U) 160 800 42 . Pines Corridor ITS Sprague 151' CMAQ 106 785 43 Sullivan Road Rehab Indiana Euclide STP(P) 22 165 45 32nd Avenue Rehab Dishman-Mica SR-27 STP(P) 29 212 l Annual Total $4,589 $24,348 I 2014 Item Project From To Primary City Amount Total Annual # Source ($) Amount 5 Street Preservation Project City 2,260 2,391 37 32"°Avenue Evergreen - Best STP(U) 95 70i 39 Barker Road 8"- - Appieway UCP 490 ! 2,449 40 Sullivan Road(RW/CN only) Euclid Wellsley STP(U) 545 2,725 43 Sullivan Road Rehab Indiana Euclid STP(P) 126 1 935 45 32"d Avenue Rehab Dishman-Mica SR-27 STP(P) 162 1-,198 46 Carnahan Truck Lane 8" City Limits STP(U) - -32 234 47 Appleway Extension Evergreen Tshirley STP - -113 834 48 University Road Inlay-2 15" 4" STP(P) 60 441 49 University Road Inlay-1 Dishman-Mica 15'x' STP(P) 20 99 52 Park Road-#3 Sprague Broadway STP(U) 12 141 53 Barker Road Spokane River Trent STP(U) 41 303 Flora Euclid Euclid - 54 Euclid Ave/Flora Road STP(U) 51 379 Euclid Flora Barker i Annual Total , $4,007 $12,832 i Table 4.39 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Summary 2009 Through 2014(in$1,000) Secured Pro acts Planned Pro ects TOTALS Year Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total 2009 5,531 1,522 3,063 4,230 14,346 409 4 403 3,277 4,093 5,940 1,526 3,466 7,507 18,439 i 2010 1,759 1,366 2,044 3,835 9,004 2,162 1,759 1,641 3,455 9,023 3,921 3,125 3,691 7,290 18,027 I 2011 2,413 0 0 3,073 5,486 5,843 9,136 414 1,759 17,152 8,2.56 9,136 414 4,832 22,638 2012 0 0 0 2,392 2,392 9,644 6,955 404 2,221 21,224 9,644 8,955 404 4,613 23,616 2013 0 0 0 2,391 2,391 14,098 5,120 410 2,329 21,957 14,098 5,120 410 4,720 24,348 2014 0 0 0 2,391 2,391 6,728 1,469 497 1,747 10,441 6,728 1,469 497 4,138 12,832 Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 52 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan II TOTALS 9,703 2,888 5,107 18,312 36,010 1 38,884 26,443 3,775 14,788 83890 I 48,587 29,331 8,882 33,100 119,900 �l Table 4.40 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2009 Through 2014(in$1,000) Projects Without Local Match Within Existing Resources • Project Name Project Description Total Cost 8th Avenue Phase 1 -Carnahan to Havana Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three lane section with curb, $2,615 gutter sidewalks and bike lanes. 8th Avenue Phase 2-Park to Dickey Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three lane section with curb, $3,156 gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes 8th Avenue Phase 3- Dickey to Carnahan Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three land section with curb, $3.811 gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes Barker Road Reconstruction-32nd to 8th Spokane County Project: reconstruct Barker to 3 land $40 section; City partner match Bowdish Road Rehab-32nd to 8th $4,593 Reconstruct and widen roadway to three lanes Bowdish Road Rehab-Dishman-Mica to $270 32nd 2 inch grind and inlay existing road SR-27/Pines/16th Intersection $3.132 Improvements to intersection (dual lane roundabout?) University/Sprague Intersection PCC Replace asphalt pavement with portland cement concrete $997 pavement TOTAL: $18,614 Potential Annexation Areas/Urban Services The Growth Management Act requires that counties designate urban growth areas (UGAs). The City of Spokane Valley identified lands adjacent to the City within existing UGAs that would likely be developed for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the City has identified existing service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This assessment should help identify the effects a potential annexation area will have on existing levels of service. Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs) PAAs Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff Domestic Water Pasadena Park Consolidated Consolidated Vera Vera S.C.W.D.No.3 East Spokane Hutton Settlement Consolidated S.C.W.D.No.3 J Fire&Emergency Services F.D.No 1&9 F.D.No 1 F.D.No.1 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.8 F.D.No.1&8 Law Enforcement Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Libraries S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist ' S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist. Parks&Open Space Spokane County ' Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Public Schools W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 E.V.S.D C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 Public Transit Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Sanitary Sewer Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Not Sewered Spokane County Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 53 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs) PAM Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff Solid Waste/Recycle Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt. Storm water Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Street Cleaning Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Transportation Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County The City of Spokane Valley has adopted Levels of Service (LOS)to measure a public facility or service's operational characteristics to gauge its performance. The following analysis will assess current levels of service in the PAAs to provide a context of how annexation could affect the City's LOS and provide guidance for phasing of annexations. Additionally, the analysis will provide City staff and elected officials information to assist in the planning and budgeting of public service delivery as a result of annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. The following study includes LOS analysis for sanitary sewer and parks and open space. Analysis is not provided for services where the City has adopted the minimum regional LOS. Services excluded from this analysis are domestic water, fire protection, law enforcement, libraries, public schools, public transit, sanitary sewer, solid waste/recycle, storm water. street cleaning, and transportation. If a level of service is measured on a per capita basis, the population assumptions are based on Table 2.1(Land Capacity Analysis) in the Land Use chapter and Spokane County's estimated current population in the Metropolitan Urban Growth Areas (UGAS). The City of Spokane Valley's land capacity analysis is based on the adopted regional methodology. Sanitary Sewer The City of Spokane Valley does not provide sanitary sewer service at this time. Spokane County provides wastewater collection and transport systems within the City of Spokane Valley. Incorporated areas must have wastewater collection and transport systems in accordance with the adopted sewer concurrency requirements. The table below provides a sewer assessment within the PAAs. Level of service is categorized as sewered, within the 6-year sewer plan, or not planned for sewer. Table 4.42 Sewer assessment within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs) in Acres PAAs Total Sewered Within 6-year Sewer not Percentage CIP available _ Sewered Northwood 1,820 1,397 0 423 77% Northeast 48 5 0 43 11% East 380 64 207 109 17% Southeast 791 443 0 347 56% South 1,041 669 0 371 64% Ponderosa 47 0 12 35 0% Edgecliff 298 21 0 276 7% Currently, Spokane County owns a capacity allocation of 10 million gallons per day (mgd) in the Spokane Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (SAWTP). By the year 2020, the County's flow is projected to reach 21 mgd. In 1999, Spokane County began a Wastewater Facilities Plan process to evaluate long- term regional wastewater needs, and to determine alternatives to meet those needs. The result was a decision by the Board of County Commissioners to build a new Spokane County Regional Water Reclamation Facility (SCRWRF). Spokane County is proposing to construct a new regional wastewater treatment plant at the Stockyards site in the City of Spokane. The new treatment plant and associated facilities will provide additional capacity for increased wastewater flows generated by the County's Septic Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 54 of 55 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Elimination Program and for projected growth in the County's service area. Many of the PAAs have sewer services, however new development will continue to add demand for new sewer services The City should evaluate existing sewer treatment capacity and infrastructure prior to annexation Parks and Open Space The City of Spokane Valley has an adopted level of service of 1.92 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. In 2007, Spokane County commissioned a fiscal study of the Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The report focuses on the services provided by Spokane County to the metropolitan UGAs and the revenue generated for Spokane County in these areas. The report established a base population in the metropolitan UGAs using 2000 Census data and building permits. The estimated population for the UGAs adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley was determined to be 7,294. The City of Spokane Valley 2007 Land Quantity Analysis (LQA) estimated the land capacity in the PAAs could potentially add 13,406 additional residents. Using the population estimate from Spokane County's fiscal study and the City of Spokane Valley's estimated land capacity there is the potential of 20,700 residents at build out in the PAAs. Currently there are no parks in the PAAs. If the City annexed all the PAAs 40 acres of parkland would be needed to meet the current level of service of 1.92 acres. According to the City's Park Master Plan, many residents in the City of Spokane Valley are not conveniently located near a park. The City's Park Master Plan states that parks should be one of the highest priorities for the City. The plan also states that meeting Park needs can be a challenge in neighborhoods where little vacant land exists. Many residents expressed a desire for sports fields (complexes), these facilities generally require large vacant properties. The City should consider purchasing parkland prior to annexation to ensure adequate facilities will be available to serve neighborhoods in Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 55 of 55 •. - r• _ ..."' •-. ' - :i,.,:1-1.a j,i--------...i....-inuxt,,,,, ...7•21- - ._ ......./-ii,,,_,_.,, _. _ _ _ _ _ _ri.„,..,_ .1___...... • ,..,r..__, Map 4.1 1 : . ,...• ..7`1. Pt/Mitt CI .--oeli . t c %Art 1 - • Isii <Or' I /644 , ,4 tn, 2643 : Tif,' ''''fait&tliPar L (•mitts's. .645 - ,. --,4#57,.-. ,_. ryiacp..--_, 4 r 1 ' 1 Y '. Z:--- Water Districts & I ni...„.„ , .. d..,..- 1 , 1 1 :, ,, , . • 4 IS -: ___ ,..;_ioS _et li - ..fs 1: , I. --.'1.• , s-, '' ,...I I ; 1 ,-----• Well Heads , . - rf-46evetj--• ..r,..4' I. 4' .,. . 1 (...lidased'.11 1 .--.• , 4 - • . 4 - -4. : I - C i ,i eki.• .4 th.e., It,. . i 4 . --t Ili 1!"! i ',mai.- 7. •-...„.7. . ; 1 , .,,,,k,,,,,•,- - --- -.--. t -t■ r 40 ,- -___........ • 41001-‘1,--f`i--2 • Solk44.44".4 ,,1 ,Dill .1.03 ' t' --- „ pi,3 ---r linitNrime to , I • 1. -‘,1".r_i , j; :.„..,...•i I • IL... . __,......, ... ,. r...".. ■110,41r• rat l''' ''' .1 I • I locra 1..1, • 1 I I- - ••••■ 0,1, i.. i; o• --* 6 . - ....._ ...c... i 1------- l - : .- 119 - -1- - - -- .,,f, - . -. . •wl../tle I I • I II i-.3 0.- A i '- . • ■-i: 0. 02 . . I 1 ,,-. . I • A:x..,.....1"Indp,!..i. r" . 1.egend ..;,,-, --.,.:.-:# 14.,,,„., ,4 ,• 'k I:- ir.,.. . s _ • Ir. •, : :• ,, ,....,,,,,.... _.,„„_, ...,........... , .4.1- . • ,....•,,,i .... ..-....-..... -"--1.- - - • v. -_ .. ... _ r., Municipal Wee,Purveron ..___1_ _ --T---'""'"-*.v. ''-i-'',-- ..... E I rr nil.1411 „ •••• •rtOir - r , i- c,,,,,a Spoktne Watts SCIVItt I "..7'...1, I 1 ..,- ._ • 'I,- -,i,..,..---,-- ,-..- ',II., . rd ,. . ..44N •.. r,'•.. .-Ir.in%%iler Distsritt*11.4 i '", 1,,...,,,,,,,,........,,,i' ,.--- - •. ''''''witr-"*. 1..• ....... Ii Dr 1.•.. , !.. 'rinkikor 2 ..,./ . 'ore See Jet t "'ijr;■.,i• - -':'-'-' --' - ---:''4 - ro0011011111111P 1,- 7.1 ' .-;' =city of Spokane Valley . -- -111111 . , .1, ■ . "' '-' 4' • Group A Well limit . -. ----l',.. j .... , • -, ,..,„,..-"; ;. ,„ . a, i' 4 • -_- • --• . •1 _ t. - • ,,,..5.....,.. ,,,, .itircr t- - . nrulittAtrol\ A. . ..,, • Cirntip II Weil Heads • - - 4;pi,i.aneThriniur,L.I ..i. '' -4...•.17-..... 1.4...?* sllig■-,r- filt_10,"" If r,-alulasrsi .! , , f . --'-- ...„,....!' 4.-if,r 01-w:or,Ilio' - . _, ___ ___, 1..4.4,..4.4;,,,:jr, _ . - wil'' • -rA.-.•.4" -- ---• . : i.,„ i •.--.. kill it 1.11-1...............1 TO •,... k t.r ta t.-•- 1 i lban Gmwth Area ; • ,..--ril-•'-ali I, -.5-i ,"Yii• '''''-' --.- "-,J. , .-_ -.,-; . ,........ , le , -iidllir11-11A1 .iir. ! '. •- . a ,•. 1 .. r• s,ii: 0.4,1.,, n....,.,._:i.m..! . .. .. "ft t - • ..-- i -AI'4. Y.r...1; 4,..,...- . ..- a , , _ _ . _..,., _ _ .-- ,,,,,41. v ,.____ . .., -, .• ;1... ...._, „..,...._ • ,,...._ a..„N ., -__ --- i• . ''' 5111 , , / 1-....f'.."'-- ,A, e.0" ' I '.r..APA..I ' •' • st■ ii.AA' A .3, -: ,.. .. . , .!. ......, . ,•„..,....;,•: • I rmtkvitt ,, ill --!r • .,,,... -. --•!my.... 4,-,-;ii,,,,, - i., •;,--1,,... ,..x.oki 111111=1 .1 '-'. 1 4,,. • ,t-,• .., ..." si .-it IrIcrUsi 1.- ,, ,. - ' - ••• 1... • ' nt/Itict II' AtrbiZ klite•.... -t " r ninrm"-WIIIIIIMIIIMMININIIIM MIMI.1111.111111.1111i '-i Ve i 4-- _■, all..I. I. -- tss• -.1,--L----..1--,-4,, . -- •n •‘ - 1- . , :,...-4 -"`.• i'• 70,74.(4.,!A kl• rst'' - i ,t .t i., •'''' 04,?,;0,if 2 ' .S.I..■1,-, ...' ,u ,' „. N,..„i . t• .,, : r. '• .-,,. ),... -._ . a, -, . I , 14.1 '‘4911, •" 1 '•-■.:.___.- rNr.., , ::4 ' ':A trit t • t . ,,• .,:IA . LT .4. , ,r, ,- ..-,I -..., •-i ,.., • -la-, - 1?..• •.. •-:_-_nar.7 f- i'",-3 - ,.... r.s.st.....4r, .,... ., : -, 4 u: .:. • ... . - . - A A--' .' tub :,'' 1-4, T., i , . , ,,■10,itd.sra ‘ - - _ -. VI Aft r- . -- ----1- • ..4. .,_-- -__,'..1..,:4--1..! . ,.. .- , • • -re. irilg.throa I- - . Eil, , .. ,•.•,. n,„..,111 ' ' ''.' *9'. 4 1! . • . . .ij - it ,,: .f.ii. ...„6.... . . , „.._.. :.. _.,...,;....,.; , • . - _,...-. 'Li . .- .,- -, A t , •-- ,-, ,,. IR' .4 - - •.-4 . Al 1, •' 1 ,J, ,...• 's'-'1"... 0 f: • .,.tits of 1•z....„.„.. alte...1.;, . Wier Santini ,. itp,...„..;,, _ .,..,,,,_,,,......„.,. . ... 1 I , ... „ .I ..... tr. / - - - Pm". '-'1. • -rt 1 - •,- imp., .i- . ..,- : • w.,44,....,t4,-.1 .....: ‘:.. •7....i'th ... , .* • • .,.:0,;-..r.,!,--,:.:•-...tik,.. ..:gi : ,,t I , 41_• , ' IT I I.• 1 t, •• .6,1_,_-,,,-4.4- -... --ttli., . _ . . ,,;,_. . . .1.i. . .,,g,,- . .,...4....- .,Agg....cpv.,,, .,..-, i 1 1 -- ' •,I ,41"47,,,.,--',.,„ ..,.."1.,`-".,:,----41----._:-.7, :1 : it. I. - ___ . J _ , _‘._,_ , Map Location •Wile'li • ... 1 A '7 1 ! ...A.,... 1,14. 1 ti .. Si• ,',.. \-:* P ‘,,- _ • • _ _41.41Ali.,,::_ t i„ •, ----11- . . It " I. . Milt:12/23/20001 1 Di , . 1 . , . • S' •. / no. i N = -, • '&-it. .... 1 , .. . .. 4/ t 1 , ,„.., . . - : 1 L suit.'N. T . is.. L )14: . It -.. 11! S s.\ • : . . ....0 Milky 4i° rlJ- - ii orr ; 1-6 1 1 _ , I ft".. • 1 f • • i ./ 1,.... i - I •-.-- A , , 1- . ' ' .. .--11\-.--lve-L,,,,1 , elite:3K I Pfiss '' ? 1 . . 1.4,,,_,-,. ,.., .1k* ...P. '' I ,,,,II■ (yr ,„,_., , _ ,, I I Ps."-v TA"11161/11N.ri.7#:win,r.dus mor.is.inms-aini him , tr. IV ill ... .,,,. 1,414:(; I' / I 14 aosettu uNisi0 4111begnimestogar Arms.Ho I./warriors ott derv. il& r 14 1 f't,'7ant.-..7„,'"Trtu -• L' 0,/mu tf, 205 cr. rstirrsoren oboe At arismis as csonnts of*.=runt ,,vy4 I I 111...,stem I/: '4.,..1‘.-"I , ''''',..--'..i/IrsliatIr...?Plith I i 1 t IA' I 1' tqty.,./.4.stuota MOO"to.ffsun sad ottssisess or its ststrfsta I Tapertsrms;Invents nithirt Ow erh of Nrwtomr rifiei enaurmour h- • \--t-- 11.- I OIN 1 kikaTrii.Ilkfriel Li ribNistftri se. i;,'-'''.k.rt,4 I i „... I iv..-hrwo iseasoriant i arenasi arr'unrrinte 4147691 f•i MO I '- - i kvoid.' 1 - 1 II i -, - __ r..a....4 mi.ilk eV/p..1w./At I.4 konsmatt 11.4.1....11”....IP _ r / \ / Prtyi _,,,,,44 l J 71 a —1 Map 4.3 (40 ',.;41.. / i .. L-=,__ itilivit.r ..... - re iir;:-. Parks & Recreation or 'd, • / 1 ,� r -V ) /fir,. _ r� } ». ; ; � ` _• i '' •. ¶• • A -w - • i,l. .- •a r- __..—I Legend City of 1 1 111\ �r t�- 1Y 7iY be__. ti�,okt111C / :- ' '+•tl !a •" -- --- -Community Park Cassoivan.t., •• -Congers-anon Land : far .../' 1 A<,....„„•i r"---s1 .,•A .,...._.• 1kS!!!�"1 M 1.— :J__ Itc}imnl Park Spoil;r'r,.. i ^'U rtll N11G ,;,_ r�r. T_ i • ` �nf �t'r ►y 1 -Special the Facilities • tom. + r �_._ , .3 1 Department of Natural Resources• f 41---- M, 11.,..A..-.- r , '8 n City of Spillane Vallet• r - .4..ai-lr v • , •1• t. - - __ ,..", ---to-T—S� `4'!�. �. r Ohm\lurinl+almos r�'''� _"' •� ` I �� ' ^ i` .1.1. .Urhan Growth Arm . � ualiI °� r� j k a . ft.,_.... 5t i ' • 'ti�► t? Water llrxiret r - = 1 �• _1. - .i �, .k(�11 'r.w. tt•i.i-ii', r.Mrt:„„4,I,I1A_ ir..hl 1� .1 - i Lake � ri�« Lii a•• = Proposed Troll System I r Type 1 : Iq a:. Win : • a: v�G Lusting Traits• - �i.�Y:..�,...r.ra.........."..�� I�u►na• .1 . hrylnrw.rn �� Pmpo-.edTrails Ilan.-;;aws��r,!'^'°'.-\ M.IIr•r P• -�'• Ti.... Il.a - Id• ..tit! rvr•"'S_—� �t y�`�' Proposed Parks ® I• ': ' .1 hl_. Fps, 1' • Mh fl-' ..r _ j Gi r ,, ` � 11�` —...f.1., 4pe PI IM! r 1'11 1 - � � -.� r/ . MY '" ' '-.1!'..'•��" 1 ' # , -,l, . _ — 1 '�(;r .T�, •1. , ;,' :E I4tgtrtscd SpaIAI Use Ales . I.Q * Pnopmed Common Park i Lam.! m. r. t, Alt 1. a r ;dr i�`., ��� °� > �i ' ,1 • 'I Prr�pnsed Neighborhood Part• 4 ar ; r• • 1 k' '�Y - "� ° •. kE:.-4 a� 'y•. ,• ` .M., .....1•4. i - A ...„.__/k.ofi- - .... . t_-„,„,„.„63,11,� illeir -O., e 111 l MnP aratrmt J O -r' . e ,,• min ii.'. ' 1 t s flair 1212.1.,n•i S 4i t, - --- L.,1 ,,,_ -..,,,ii i iikk?• i 7'1% adialra."\ • ._ , . • .. a �^ r L.MieWlier J ... a o 1 1 I Mdn, T.. ;-% re 1-4 �, 1 I I 1 /. A AI m /�rrlkrnoarntn 1ra1..T r..du r ow it(.ary.4vf Ow nrrr,•n „* ~��; 4 - `� 1 • flatwal ■arece.unit rr anb/rrr M 1 s/hlllrf,,,,,mot Mint aYal/•ma t 4u.r ' \ - u Jr •••,• I .+4aar►srpw h�Mr sram.y 1.rtwrlaq n/Aa tayl on f `�/ % myeellS.Mta'ifoIr/AI�MYt!'I�rrMfol�MlanAwa�MdlnwrrW !7 10 rvihla stung.away,Ow Orr al:�}okair Pain t'�w.rwrn '--- � • r•- �/-t,- Iteto4 a.�rrlr�laterlyd Preralwafr;or ne Oraar O.!biotin ` J ttid.4 tot r a v.M ti4Y••Y.A..r,,�rn r►..w/•rw De*wrw.w 1 • 1 1 I , 1 1 1 ; 1 ; 1 ; 1 , , , 1 i1 1 1 I , __,,,,,,,:_____ _____I__________1....._ --�--- ---, 1.. • �- . ----(----a---� -- Map 4.5 1 • ' I • ' , ' •' ' •' ' • ' 1 ' ' Six-Year Sewer Projects• I 1 1 ' ya 1 • • , • ' , } 1 1 i ir 1 , 1 , } 1 , t , i • 1 • • I- ii I • I :,• r 1 '• I - L: ? t f 1 1 I ••. , _ .afn ---- - --''' , •r f • 4t Legend Spokane' !'" �- a 0;1;e .r--1 I ,Ins ! I e -- -- -•- -- ---- , • , =City of Spokane Valley Boundary • • 1•U• I ' •1 iiihib,I , - '�� t I 1 _ i ;__- 1 Urtvin Crmwth AMa i Clan -a:', • -, - -- TI Iin a K1iI Woo ' - ; \lunlnp«I Arors i , r �7 _ ' ' '-^ 1 Wmul ll/rdlc•.■ -IWk.' ---- _-•- _--_ ----_ -- �,i. .... ...-'� - --- ! *-yij -- -- I---- --- ' ---, - - ---- • L :,M.I, , _ �t �' ,' ' .- ."ri _- r .•.. ,.' 113 .i i . .,i. ". - .L I �'� 1 / r_., 1� A.Q Sis Year['apual Imprarsmeal Pisa . �''tI, tc• 'II _ - n{ -� 1� I+x N ,� -- 4.,�,, 1•nto Lake? f'Year Clp(:U(1S-:olo) ' / •.I I a 1,=:, ' �� I ' µ �lte, »• -∎ -; Sniveled ,� - r ' ` , •�' 1 t�yir I legal ..iMllr'...•r 1�1 ' i��M � In}erlxpllH4 � I s•s r M11 ; --- Col lectors--.i "�' II �. ;i I. ,..�14� ..' ''nlh :MAI I - Mitts.Grid (,;-�-� (��'-�a.!. „1'.. ' ILL —- -( • 71,:r...:-. r f? •'.� ,a t al, - 111j���' t,t us....... ,not -" i !- -'----, 01 L.--- r.ItN.'LhrB.. ti _,_r�, MF✓r•a. - 111 .,....,,,,, k-,:la IA%II IIIIIII 1 - Iliorti - ..-- ile ,, , I, -..ask_ 1 :,(1-_,--1_'''—'7744,4— ' ..b : ,_ , ,,i_____,.----,----4.-2..-;-----i-. ----;---- i .• , , 1 • • • •1 1 ] • , Map Lncahon -2"4-1--- --.-----L----1----•A----Y----�-- -' ..,...i - --" ----- ,f : ; ---- -----r---•.1_-_ !-,IIP 1 ' 1 • , I I 1 •; 1 I 1 I v }t • • • • • •I •1 •^ • • • ; • ; • K I • , 1 • I ; t I}nr I'Jaltki i - :-----1---- ' ----'-----;----1-----s---- - -- �� --' • b ;----J-----I--- - n • I •, • • • , n ' ■ - . •. 1 •• •• } 1 •- -• •I I 1 I a:• I -1 --- ' ---1 • • -./WR;-_- . }' • •I •. �' ,vsr� -1":. I .+ �� ; -,- , , ---JM/ lI •,t I :4111r •I ' ' •• • • • ' 1 6e • I • ' 1 • • 1 ; ( • I r I i • ■ I e • • I • - • • • ' I • I / Num., I1,•,r}lilrsulltr11 I I •I I I • • i I • , I 1 • I , Anirn m 01n nqr a nr•71Ik•I bw,_tort;r i , I I • +. I I wn r r asI tf mAto t In tonna(mama The Cr!,MOO•In[lore- • a t # :. i7 _ ft emr IIlIYt mimeo l�'Rt WM[}K imago N/At MP..of I 1 -1!1 _ a - w j/ <� I _-� rrpn a.iAw:aty Hdrbt.,nnvs.wle�rlrrrru Mm tw too• Y __ LL .. VM1- -- -__ -_ __-..�jIS''' ^-' - _---T----I-----1 , ----T-- • - Iiio_aim•atvrw�i•ma tIlrCwIVtimbrYldlnt�•aI•Irrn 1 I • • , '� ' • •' 1 • ' I i i • lksd+Yr.errtlrylsa•rnr tlrylrelsWPIIn„pr-I$ JQ.?I•/NIn• I • • • 1 • I • I • • ' i • t ' , I ' -rt..,•tl�.t ylr•1 yGw\••I►1.t•I�errlr',mum..Ip•I•Ilrr I Chapter 8 — Natural Environment . ....* 2 ; , is Map 8.1 I. _Air , , . OW— — — --; — —` 11 1 Wetlands, -.I -ill .. , . . ,,,ik 1 i 71.--. -._, . -.-... ..,---- - , ---- kimkane tail _ ... �T, .4 t 412 L.�gend 6,s.+�,o� ..., I ) 1 --- , 4--,I ' - — Q Gty of Spt�l ene alley Hmaldnn I � _ _ _ a : Lr.,....j rGanr'11 t• - -- .t ,IL, r T(IK'fl n �l1I1W(/0 '--4F1.41-,- - - -4: - .. $^ _t -lhhttn Cmµth Area le I` °�3 -- i I i -Salk �. Jt - r Olha‘luntcrpaldtn .! r1 -� 1 I �-�: t‘,41111-,pt` , p► r._� it, I>�� tr 1: "��! Ma Wetlands / .a *�rCs.'I r. -- _. I` t', llw.feY • ��. a.r, r-�R,...' / S --- i- -�F- .�` (.,,� } -- _ i._ tom... ' DNR titrtamr -! - • • I _�!'7M'►- .r�. .ii t-.,_ -I. i' l;� �L i L. r 1� r� -.. '.lf...n. -i' L. . _ . �Il\'f0T■ t ` -f w' 1 -, �' ►, — '---0, 1. ,. Lake, limoi -i.e. 1 r * 1,,_.,__04.. t I i t ngi+ , { 1 ,i L nr, , i .+», a "S c . n w � _ H L ► ' 2 _; ` �= N .�5r ,tt' '544 r Mi sY -:11 ll'!; /' !!_•,1 1� +•�—" ,_ �>�: :.1 ra►1 e fl r _ ._ L—, 545'. r s�k. 1�y�ri. ....i iF"3 E .. ' .� ' l it -ii _ if/� 'iji I r r __• ti f■( a ott. I:: y�i1�( INI „. !A ' I, r ja 'iNIMf S rl'''•t.,.=`,, , P. 'i•t, --lb mil a(Ir� I 1 ♦ ' , r` �, wit �,•��'ft�� - ! n ., r� �k�rj ; �i y , ..a1 � tw .I� y�i- itilli• ‘ 1 ' M:or 'a •! I Map location ■ U " r, ✓'' 44 Pete:I : M` I U 1 in ii°■ -I ifrilii - 44.1,, ., - 1 1 bfd:, t t , , I I t , i 1 ti1 / IWunv /Arudbn .Am.mym.my Yur`Irpu vino rsolh,w nnrt..;p= 'XI M urne�, uLen7hr!'Malw>�4r 2443 s • ,r P.,.,.er..cAmt Ow crayon ar currrnr v Maus.ugr.ae+ atO Arias..hnhAl)Aar or.".vl me»rrr ul 4,.... tr i l rn ramars.nrratarr.+row tAr t 1N Af At,goy Veen.emmumm -I • e'SG - - 1� ����� ..� iii____ J i• /t"watraitr COI Deparmsesti therm.1*FAWN i .fir...«.rr..r*..a tw,...,�.. r r tr-+ ,..aw y' ref- .r -—. .i, }_. :aN.!.. " r ' .7'1 174-* . ` JC •* + ��. .,.�. , ` l *. J ' Map 8.3 .,.. ,..-- , , I Fish Wildlife Habitat ■e _4. r �' . -_ . ' 9 �( _, ,,, , 1 I 'i ' ...I..4'•• , ---"/ -.41;rve<4.,/or/ , 1.----- „.- �, , <+p.. An-.? 1,--. —F _ r - fry' 1.1.1, 4 1 . `,, e $j k s.r :_ � , ,E° _ �-" -.•�r' uduleerr �. ,-. �,. .,,I.M T- V , . Wow il �� r ? �N° iMrMs �r 4 - _Elk Halutai IllY3 0, ~' _ - ,iri- • ,a o, —4::11 n R_ " f ]k►r ��f B Urban Natured tl]yrra9 Shnrr 1".'*7 JI',I w ° - ! r�I r..,l,.mil ,? •, �' ------ -4°M.- ::: =ZCIfle ( k j� . ' r'5,'"Li , :.4 7-2 ,:- ,_:, lit,' : 1 ' -t--1 ,n ,.I I-"•. , I ' I IR--►5,x4.b_ - , _ "t. , , L - .�_. 4e�!"°• * - Urban Cip4,�plt ltl.m v� f 1 w �1_ ! t ' ■ - tksm t la - I I � r� 'x:.14+. 4 r i�� 4Va BAT. �� ,vr I '11_ � --p I r rT.67 - - . i sK- 7- -a. :.1 -.. t. . _ l its - 1.r r 4_ �14 --',= `�499 f3e+rt�'E4fYlad SPMlrclrllr iv. � i�k i° � ?_ a s9 ,k j it # i� _ i� .-i Fnlp lilehrtat t r �1' MWn p a i Q ,� k (SI).Von-fish l Waal rk' *z, 'ry �, ► max. �. liltx/l 1, I "1 ,, 9.1, W 7/:ir / . ,. ---' "1k fi'41,4 I "r�r j 5 # e1.6kIl .. re,.. 1 , t / A -r' in a Man Locator! ..._a.-- "//,.././.'''', /7 ,,/* ',,, , /////''"e;/' /:/?' ,, 4, "�' / "f '777' -�/fr /�J"//k� �/#/I q } '�� fl 1 LF 3 7 ?Male, . Jf. ,/r';./r``,Jr .{/ .1'Y, - ` ,.` r,// e/ + y F r ! 1 _ k p 1 1 l►' J . JJ ,+/ ./ l t / /" '' r f/1/'i` 1r 'J /.' ...., JI *fur Mr aMr•rmarem Ampnue otrx irq+ra te�pkpup yiFrmr'Wut-, ,^ C''.- '../"' '� ,"r `J:r '� .,/ dle;; � /' 114:'. j 4;:7 //'` .4/ f ,. r.M so watt dy0too:tote n,rr40WUille(Wyo./letaaraaka�yo f 7 ' ,//' t•I"jllJf ff ip }/{ // # f nr wt%ors lorroarhi anr�rma rir'tr wewr+,0441111W l °. • �/ 70.."J " �/ • •` ° 1'. f ' t' orit. 4,10 +.�.smNiy/i rrennm+kaWJwruk ns Ph,..1k iaYlto.NA /1).V/f " F { a+ f f �f4,;rnArx,n...,..,owtowt Oar f"pkk-W. 1,-kn.4 Fp:ffirm ,,/.�/__��fl r ''',/,./;#./�� jjffJ/ter / �� � Y�� s. /' / y,:: + _ /J� / 1\ '/ fir./V t ,� 1. IAp f 4r lNRJ4r i ktI of 1 - /T r/� ,I'J y��/ , ,, � �R' ►` / 4',#�r�e�xr �">! .f .1.SQil u:. 'to,. J ..,./.. r '. }.` f' "'s I -• _f ` ,,/,.; j PrOdeet.t ll.:k 11.,Imi.as k.kkP,t"fix 14..�a...+trpmremv