Sprague E 14109 Solarium & Hallett Farms
,
r
~ ~3
' ENGINEER9S + S~ET
~ .BLDG. PERWT # -or •FILE# _
Reiared Ne #
Date to Review CONIIIIIINTB `T'ime #
_ ~
Date to AA & DR mme
Date Received 7-20=93
]-'roject Name SoIf,EAR3vM ADD ' .r FARMS No. Lots No.Acres
.
'SCCtI D - ToWIIShip - RSII$e ~
SII'1"E .ADDRESS SPRAGUE E 14109/W BANNLN RD PA1tCEL # 14543-9059
~
Ap,plicanft Name THOl►M R =HA,LI.ETI' FARMS IlNC Phone # 926-4076
Addres►s 1a~lo9 F, sPRAGUE-SPOKAN]E WA 99216 Wurk #
Date Conditious mailed
Contact person Phone #
FLOOD ZON-E d NO W S SCHO0L
Enginee~' 1 Surveyor's / Aflchikectls,Name
Plpning Contact Person Phon6 #456-2205 ~
Dats Submitted Descripttbu Initials'
1q AGREEMEIVT 'I0 PAY FEES COWLE'TED & COP'SC TO AGaOUNnqG
/ I F.INAL PLA1, FEES' CONgl_1» rFn & COPY TO ACCOtJN'1ING~ I I IR0'IIM TO PLTBLIC # 13 4 6 GOMPLE.fiM - OR NEEDS rP0 BJE SIGATED
~ I ~DESI('iN DEV,IAT70N SUBIWiIZTED
ALTERATIONTO PLAT -$i,OCKS & IATS
II I HEARINGEXAM APPR4VED DENIED _APF 7 _D BBC _APFR'OVED Pp11ED
2~ --q 2)
-7_
~ ~
1
iI
-4lftevi,ew.tor
~
~
S P O K A N E C O U N' T Y
OFRCE OF THE COUN71l ENGINEER • A DMSION OF TEiF PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR?MENT
Ronald C Hormann, P E., County fingineer Denms M. Scott, P E, Duector
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES
ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER 4 /
~ ~
T'his agreement between Spokane County and ~ A~
-nIiQ7C O f I
whose interest in the project is
--~S4s, 2
owaer, a '
is entered into this day of 119 This agreement is applicable to the project
known as:
wj s or e ~
That the mdividuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above descn'bed property or
project agee to the following.
1. Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in
8oard of County Commissioner's Resolution 80-1592 attachment C, as amended.
Tlle fees will be based on actual salary oosts incurred by Spokane County for project
reviews and ! or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be
billed monthly as accrued.
2. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the
biUhng as specified above. The tnonthly btlling should be sent to the attenhon of:
NAME. C' ` ~
ADDRESS ~ k C\I;
CITYs STATE: . &
ZIP CODE:
PHONE fo -
~
I undcrstand that failure to pay these fees may resuit in delay in cornpletion or approval of the project or
other possible sanctioas.
V
SIGNAT'URE By:
~ ~ ~~vh~S . f~~• e 1 l ~
(PRINT NAME)
RETURN YELLOW COP'Y TO SPOKANE COLiNTY ENGINEERS
k*V~agrcemen fee W026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 4564715
`9s9~
S~ ADG TO HTS
°
. ~ ' ~
~q DGt
° •sc
EP~AO~tl~ TH Avo ~ . • .
~r
_uE1GHT5 ~ ~ tl +
T_ TM V ~ RAOALE ~
. ~
,
Si X TM AD.a . • ' ~ ~ A b''
AOC 1Nfr/TE i9O.V/T/ON
T/YIRD x'/rrH ADl? io HE/6H1v :0 ,
VERA ~WB WQ H1~.D ~v _ ~i,
h
V6 ' ~ ' Q~ ~ ' • 3 Aq 1
• ~ ~ ~ V V ~ , I ~ J ~xe r
g 0c v~ a • ,Q
~ ~ i~ w 7~r~ •--rr ~ YJ rV ~ ~ y, i 86 ~ e~
C .-OD RICNaRO's Aoo ~
K a ~y t. WRADALE
~ M
~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ I R.C7 ♦ j~ • ~ ~v
34 IR-3.5 L R- M q ~
• 37-b~ 100
-?9c
R
L AootTIoN
- . .
~doe
, '
I$ r,o,c~Yr+w ~T lo~?t ~ ~
v v e ~VTiRE ~
, ' , • C ,r ~ 2V gG - ~ ' ~ c P 1S
~~~~EAl Q
FAp I T~'► , ~ r
IN • ~~tF
. ~ SU
~9~sr ~ - -c • C Q a~" ~yp . R ~
r: tf • B q~ tj6 n aop fLQD.
u
v~ I~ f •
, 4'S ~ cfI i ~
-
- a t► y ~ A ~Stits,
~ - ,
tt v' z z qI ;
'
~ ~ . • ~ •
a
~ . vEAWaOcE
/ R7,Kcs
g-~ ~ • N ~ ~ ~
0)
B A e ' ~ f//rfln'1'D
5~8~ ~r• ~ qb ' ~ ~L 251 ( ~K'1
.
o :~.aaez
~ ~d ~ J 6 V ~ 90 . • i !l. ifO~ N•d - ~ O!!M/1-0N T4 YF~~I ` T ~10hy ~
aa~t ~ •i~:~.~x n~r,i ~ ~ ~ +~+nr « ( "
IOL-•g4G Z~ ~ .
Ba-8~c 37-77c
• ' 1 ~ t
~
y` .
P~ _ ~ _ r~ i~"Z~ ~ _ ~ • I
f ~ ~ ~ ~M1
n
i
r ~ ~s
e
~ ~ , 3ae
~ ~ ~ Lr4
,
• M Y~ ♦
. ` , •
~ . G ~
' • * ,:ile No. ZE-9-80
~
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on September 4, 1980,
and the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Chairperson, Eldon
Thomas and Kenneth Kennedy .
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Curt Schimanski is requesting approvai of a change of conditions
File No. ZE-9-80 for clarificatjon and possible removal of Local Business sign
regulations placed on the site.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, and un-
developed.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for res-
idential devetopment.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application js
Commercial.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within
the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially
changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the pro-
posed request for a change from the orginial conditions attached to the
rezoning approval, is justified.
8. That the proposed use is compatibie with existing uses in the area.
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis-
approval of the proposed use.
10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony
with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare.
1
' ='ile No. ZE-9-80
D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
That the approval is for one sign to identify the business sjtes located within
the commercial center, and that such sign location and identification be approved
by the Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of a building permit.
All other conditions shall remain in full force and effect.
a) All conditions listed in the Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order
dated March 7, 1980 shall apply to this file, excepting condition D.3.
b) All conditions listed in the 6oard of County Commissioners Findings and
Order, dated April 21, 1980, shall apply to this file.
c} Provisions of Section 4.09.125 (Loca! Business Zone-Signs) subparagraph 5,
shall apply to this approval.
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of Curt Schtmanski for a change of conditions as described in the
applicaticn should be approved.
Motion by: Thomas Seconded by: Kennedy
Vote: Approved 2-1
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
~
r
Chai rman
r~
J&dwm
ATT EST :
WALL15 D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
By : ~a. 1!',ic»k3
Date:
2
• 'ile No. ZE-9-80
.
SPOKANE COUNTY APPEALEO,
H EA R I N G EXAM I N E R COMM I TT E E
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on March 6, 1980, and
the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Acting Chairman, Ted
McCoury and Paul Sceva, Jr. and having personally visited the site.
6. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Curt Schimanski, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification,
ZE-9-80, Agricultural Suburban to Commercial, for the purpose of developing a
commercial retail center and warehouse.
C. FlNDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the area is generally residential and commer-
cial.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residen-
tial development.
3. That the existing ioning of the property described in the application is
Agricultural Suburban.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfi I led .
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within
the proposed Zone C1assification.
7. That the proposed use is compatrble with existing uses in the area.
8. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval
of the proposed use.
9. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony
with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare.
D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
1. That a 6 foot high chainlink fence be constructed on the west and north
property lines before any construction is started.
2. That the west and north property lines be landscaped after comptetion of
the project in accordance with the zoning provisions, which would provide a
sight-obscuring barrier for the residential properties.
1
• =ile No. ZE-9-80
3. That any signs which would be erected on the project would comply with
the standards of the Local Business ione.
a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL
1. The site is located in Fire District #1.
2. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall
be required for this project. A water plan is required to be submitted
for approval prior to any land devetopment.
b) COUNTY ENGINEER
1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Bannen Road and a 20 foot radius on
Bannen Road and Sprague Avenue for right-of-way.
2. Applicant shall construct cement concrete sidewalk on Sprague Avenue.
3. Applicant shalt construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to
existing pavement on Bannen Road.
4. A detailed combined on-site sewage system and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project shall be approved by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance
of any building permit.
5. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. (Any portion
of the project which is to be) occupied or traveled by vehicles shall be
maintained in hard surface paving.
c) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Purveyor is Vera Water and Power Company and they are able to
supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation
uses up to 2000 gpm from Sprague.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Water service shall be from Vera Water District only.
2. A combined sewage and surface water disposal plan shall be approved
by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health
District prior to issuance of any building permits.
3. Sanitary plumbing shall be installed to facilitate connection to an
area-wide sewerage system.
4. The owner, his heirs and assigns shall agree to participate in and not
protect assessments for any local improvement district far sewering to
serve this property.
5. Connection to area-wide sewer collection system shall be made when the
system becomes available.
2
.
• , , 'ile No. ZE-9-80
e) SEPA
1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080
RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final
action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before
any site improvements are made.
2. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. There-
fore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the
Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee.
f) ZONING
1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any
building permits.
2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptaple to the Spokane County Zaning Administrator
shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to
release of building permits.
3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance
within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee.
Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be
permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes:
Building Iocation, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the
permitted aone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in
the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the
development plans shatl be maintained.
4. Direct Ilght from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend
over the property boundary.
g) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a
review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi-
cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration
of non-significance.
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of Curt Schimanski for a Zone reclassification as described in the
application should be approved.
Motion by: Sceva, Jr. Seconded by: McCoury
Vote: Unanimously (3-0) Approved
3
STAFF REPORT
DATE : September 4, 1980
TO: HEARING EXANjINER COMMITTEE
FROM: PLANN I NG DEPARTMENT STAFF
' SUBJECT: ZONE RECLA551 FICATION NUMBER: ZE-9-80 (Change of Conditions)
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: R. W. Lindelof
STATUS OF APPLICANT: Property Owners Representative
PROPERTY OWNER: Nebra Edmonds
REQUESTED ZONING: Commercial
REQUESTED CHANGE Clarify and remove Locai Business Zone
sign regulations which condition the devetopment
of this site.
APPROVED USE: Retail shopping plaza-75% warehouse-25$,
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located approximately at the north
west corner of Sprague Avenue and Bannen Road.
II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION
SITE StZE: Approximately 2.47 acres
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is currentty being deveioped.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The neighborhood is primarily single
family residential with commercial activity being pursued on property
fronting Sprague Avenue.
LAND USE: Site Commercial center under construction
North Single Family
East Single Family
West Single Family
South Undeveloped, Valley Plaia
ZONING: North Agricultural Suburban, estab{ished, 1958
East Agricultural Suburban, established, 1958
West Agriucluturat Suburban, established, 1958
South Residential Office, estabiished, 1970
1
.
' • • . ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOt► UMBER: ZE-9-80
II. SITE PLAN 1NFORMATION (continued)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Neighborhood
III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
,
The application for rezone of this site to the Commercial Classification was
heard and approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on March 9, 1980.
Foliowing the Committee's approval the applicant appealed one condition of
the approval to the Board of County Commissioners. Later, the appiicant
withdrew the appeal.
The request to be considered at this hearing is a clarification of the
Hearing Examiner Committee's Findings and Order. Specificalfy, the
Findings and Order require all signs erected on this site to comply with
the sign standards of the Local Business zone (Section 4.09.125). The
appiicant wishes to install a shopping center sign consistent with other
commerical facilities in the same area. Installation af such a sign is not
permitted by the Loca! Business zone sign standards.
The applicant indicates intent to comply with the Local Business sign
standards subparagraph 5 which addresses signs for individual establish-
ments within the commercial center.
IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
a) All conditions listed in the Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and
Order dated March 7, 1980 shall apply to this file, excepting condition
D.3.
b) All conditions listed in the Board of County Commissioners Findings
and Order, dated April 21, 1980, shall apply to this file.
c) Provisions of Section 4.09.125 (Local Business Zone-Signs)
subparagraph 5, shall apply to this approval.
2
.
. *
August 5j, 1980
REF: Fie No ZE..9-80 - Change of Conditions
Par3graph D3 was 3.nserted to cover local business zone paragraph 4009.125
sub-paragrapah 5 according to the discussions during the zons reclassification
heari-ng on riarch 6.p 1980.
'-lhen the findinas an3 order vas i.ssued pamgmph D3 dichl't speci.fy this
sub-p3reaaraph, and therefore., es t.'~iat all sub-parvgraphs are restricotion3.
Because p: ragraph 2 wasnft part of the zone he3rin;s, I ordered a$6.,200.00
shopning cent9r sign from Tr~± -S tata Sign Ca. Af'ter the sign tras camplet,ed~
~ri-+": ~,ate Si~+. jrent co get the pexmit and iras refu,sed by the ~ g
Department. 7hs s:.gn is desig~rr_ed to be iristaU.ed at t.he centor of the
shopping cer;ter ne.Vt to Spraewe Avenue 3.n line te-th other tusinesses on
Spragrue Avenue. Qur I.:ndscapin ;plan fits in:o 'uh; s 3rrangement. If sub-
paragraph llo. 2has to be folla:red., it puts the sign 3n the pa;ldng 3rea
which becones a safety hazard to aLt and can't be part of the Iandscapir.g
grvpasal.
Itn request:hig that findings and order~ naragragh ~J3, spec~.f`y local
bRas3ness zone~ par3graph ~t.09.125 sub-pzragraph 5, t4hi.cta .^.lari.fies which
: ps tr=~.cti.an tias discussed.
,
R. :•T. Linde? of
General Tiar.ad r
,.Zp 23
~
~
4,
9~F l9~
~ o ~o 0
tc•~'~/,~ ~,jy
F~L'
1 fWUY~ ~~.Ja
i
Is3a~
'I
k]
~
g ~
~
i u
u ~
~
' • u ~ C~' Q tNr : N< Nr vo 16 '
~
~ ; .
~ 6otv3 ao q
y ` . .n Q23 QV . ~7•~ ~'~Ir ~ ~'Z
A ~rva~ ,G nti~rt arm*"*~~ , • ~
F ° , ~ ~ _~~w~ •r
~
~ 6% ~ ~ ^ • O e ~ • •C•
N
3"~ ~-7~1v/r1x~]rS '~Vm S~.
~ y ~
. ~
lw
J
aw
~ u
~ R • ~ ~ ;o W
..A' ,
~
~ ~ - - - - Vj ~
>
~
I$ ( I
.
• ,
, ~ .
C •1
`
- • ~ - ~ ~ n
.
.
, . _ ~ ....1 d ~ ~ ~9 • ~ ~ ~
~ : • ~ 'J 1
16
~
S } ~ ~ ~ IS 4 } • .
►1 ~ ~ . ~ , ,
tj
o l~ .
~4
~ ` 4
4 ~ 6' , +o
~ . r-
~
, ~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ Q
~ a o \ • ~
z < ~ - i - ~ -
a ,
44) W
pow _ o . .Q
u ti
$ • .
,
L + ~ ~ ~ • a~ r•3 S~~ d~n
.
+ ,z~ ~ . ..1 • ~ yl 6Cb '1~ ~ ~
~ JL
0) 0 N
~ H ~ Y ~S s~ M• ~~~i • N~ti~~~~
0 t -.GL 1 WM ~~o
~ r L ~
L ~ ~ (T ~ ~ i Ql • Z
U1 , p IL~
`jpV'~
W u ~ WF2 LL~Pa~l 3Z
, d1> „ 0~ NN ~4L J „1 U.•~ u~
• w, ~ r ~ ~g ~ N~'` + 0~ oaa~ ~Z~ ~
~ p 0 x o~ • • u
~ W odi Q o ,.o > f- ~ ~~'~Q~_
1-~wo c~ u
C~jl o~ N° " o'o~'a oWO~W o ~ ~ 2
~~U . ~ p~ _L 0 %9 0 o0 > 0
v Wn
0
~ti 0 '°Q ~~w tiw L ~ ~
o v
~ o ~a~ 2 0
~ 0 c7' ~
~cv p ~ I Ao ~ -t,~ W 0 - ~
od q~Fw Qw~. .
U u~=Wt~ , W Wj~~ r, ~ ~ W u1 3 ~ d► .'~,WZ~o
~UQ},.~~1 ~ Q~ zWZ Z ~,1
W~G~`~ ~0> O<d~ t~ Ea ~ x ~Q U1J~NZ ~ i ~al0
n ~ ~2- T~ , 3 ~ W~ J0 dE~p! WJ ~ J 11p.-
~~p yW~ 3 ,~s► 4~~uZn~0 zZ,°~ v QjX3
, v2 . ~ cJci0. ~a~ 0~ ao ~ ~ ~f~~JN
.710a=~~~'a'~•=4 t~' ~
0rn~ Z~d~ ~'r
nt~ r~ 0a~~
p
_ { ~ 4 ~~•'n L~ m ~t a -
' • , ~ r.,, ~ n ~ h
~
, ~ tt ~n ~ ~
4D9
, ~ • r~ ~ ~ ^
.
qS~ o. • t~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ `
.
4o
1 J • ~
6
~ 1 ~ ~ L
,
~ , .
~ ~ ~ i I.
\ ~ ~ ~ + ~ s ~ ' ? ~
.
tj' 6
• '
~ ~ ~ , •
~ ~
. t
= r~
~ _ ~ ~ _-r=--- i } • ~ ~ ~ - 4 _ v
I9 ..4
~ -i Z ~ ~ ' ~ ! , . ~ , '1
C ~ ' ' / f ~ -
' • ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~~/'t~ ~ ~ ~oJ f~i~ ~ Y ' ~ ♦
`~fy .•rr~ /1, t ~ w ~ ~
J .
~
~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ • ~r , ' ~ !
~ • • • ~ ~ - • -
~r ~ ~ ~ . ~ r ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ t s~►
h' ~ r • ~ • ~ r ' 1 „~„u t..+~'"'"~~~~~^"~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' 'q ' ` Y1 ~ ` ,
vc
1 4 I
N ~ . ~ .y.1:...-...~- ~ f , o'
I ' t4
. , • • r._
. '
! ~ ~L~ ~ Qr 1
vJim~
v
i ,
. , ~
~ o ~ ~ ~ ' /'1 i ~
• ' ~
•
~l ` ` , a , ,~,w~ . ` . ~ ~ , l ~ o~ • - ,
.f • . - ~ Q~~ . s ~ o ~
f ~i1 ~ i d' • r ~ '
a f' hr l"+4 d ' x ~ ~ I r
op~
lr.,/ , ~i • ~ ~~~r ` ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~~1 • ~
- r ~ ~ ..j • ~ r , ' ' , ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~
~ , ' ~ , `t ~ ~ f ` JY ~ • ~ M ~ ~ ~ •
• , i ` ' , ~ : J ~ ' • ' ~ ~ ~~~7 ~ .'~/f ~1.C
6 n ,+r~..r M
J r ~ I • ` •
, o ar
` ~ f , ` ~ , ' i ~ ~ ,,~h G
~ ~ ♦ ~ ♦r ~ .L,~ G~r. X L0 ~i~G ♦
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rnl►-4+►
• ~
r4
• ~ ~
~ ~►'-o' ,r j~~ ti~ r
.
i2~o ~ 'r• S~r~
rri •
• . ~
ao
~
IIT~Clr oarTO•
..,3ZS•lsZe ~
ASC
so~ cx. 7
9Z09 C M c
. t ti~t
* wwsH, 9 rL ~
~~j f~,~~}1T~Q~ AP~ltOY. 1 t~ ' ~~r,~~ON ~ C
4109 p A T E
,~~t1E ,`N~• i 11 ~ 9 a~~~ . t L ~
. . .
z
P\u
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL
r n t~ S v s ~ `'t~ r s Z~4~ s Ir r~ ~ + v
~ „~l . A, t .a.a 4+~t+~ ,+'L x ~ h4 ~k Ac iF {'~jc.~~`''k} } ~~r^ ~f .s5 ~ ~~~4, w~.ry,• .iY~ ~'J . - l ` ~ ,.K. ~„yl _ ' . . ~ , { k'
~ ~ ~ *
i~ ~ ti ~ ~r. -
Y , y'"~~ `u i i.~ MyM~1~M" , .y~K'iw .if~~ ♦
. ~y
' ' ' ' . . .
ti
J
JAW-W
eTDi~iN~ PROJECT # ^
~
~1J.~~ce V
~ / ~i/V ~ +~~I 7 -I~ ` ,J , ~.~n -~,~n~rk~6^~~N~x~^%Yk{ j~• ~
,
. •"a',4p ~
. t
CRIPTION:
pARCEG WLEGAL DES
. `
~
BvsINEss rtaME 9aa 7
~ . ..S ~
~ ` •
-yf ~ S
1
POSBD USE ~ 1 . ~r~~~~k
LCOR
~ w~,d~$~.,.,.ww• y r.wM4rMr.u•~.'~'~
;MW;;ff`
T • PHO c a _ 25
0 ' ~ ,
ACT
I,
/ I
TYPE OF CO NCE '
P1tBAPPLICATION ~ PRECONSTRUCTION ~ DATE: ~ ~ • ~
TIME:
OTHER ~ -
~ - DocuMErrrs cIRcULATED _
DISTR~UTBD~ T0: ~aDtsr
=C.D D ON BUII.DINGS IPLAMMO I jHN(~II~ OMALTH I SCAPCA► xa ~ arMR ~
~
Site Plan (new)(rev.) ,
.
Critical Mate~rials List
Parldng Plan
iiiapplan , .
, Lighting Plan -
Drainage Plan _
, .
Dr~nt~a,ge (weulations
. ~ 'Agreeinent to Pay Fees
~
Irngadou Plan
. ~
Laadsc,ape Plan • u,
Promissory letWt ~ •
Landscape Cost Bstimate _
,
Traffic Circuladon Plan
,
Construction Drawings
Rloor Plan
~
The abovo itams havo been roccn►ed:
~ ~ 93
Date of transmittal: , By' ` ' -
~iq
Spokane County Departmcnt of Buildtngs • West 1303 Bcoadway Avenue ~ Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-3675
• .
.
Y t
r ,
S P 4 lK A N E C O t.J N T Y
oErnMUavroF sucwu4M JnMes 4 MAwsorL cao„ ouEcroR
TO : Keviewing Agencies
FROM: Department og Suild3.ngs
,JQ4l „0. Z4eWo.4/ (Review Coozdinator)
DATE : -P 0~?- E3
The following projeat has been submitted for review:
Address : ~p 'V-/Wza.f- dg..-r
Contatct : Phone -Vx sr 7,, ja
Description: ~,.../d '-~4~
_ _
A Pre-Application Conference was not scheduled, for this praposaa..
Accordingly, please revfew t.he information, submitted far aompliance
and torward your comments to our Depart7nent. Should you need,
a`dditiLonal inforiaation please feel free to contact the f.xidividual ~coordinatinq the review. '