Loading...
1990, 10-30 Permit: 90005636 Garage SPOKANE MEN1 UP liU!LUINUb W. 1303 BROADWAY AVENUE SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 99260 (509)456-3675 I certify that I have examined this permit/application,state that the information contained in it and submitted by me or my agent to compile said permit/application is true and correct, and authorize Spokane County to proceed with processing. In addition, I have read and understand the INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS/NOTICE provisions included herein and agree to comply with same.All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not.I understand that the issuance of this permit/application and any subsequent inspection approvals or Certificates of Occupancy shall not be construed to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any state or local law regulating construction,or as a warranty of conformance with the provisions of any state or local laws regulating construction. SIGNATURE OF APPLICATION OWNER OR AGENT DATE PROJECT NUMBER= 90005636 D TESEI70 ' 0/20KMIT INFO EAGE= 01 3*3*3*****#3*3*********3*******3 ** PERMIT INFORMATION *3r****3x************x*******•* SITE STREET= 12103 E 26TH AVE PARCEL4= 28544•"'0919 ADDRESS= SPOKANE WA 99206 PERMIT USE= ATTACHED GARAGE PLAT= 002 392 PLAT NAME= SKYVIEW ACRES ADD BLOCK= 9 LOT= 19 ZONE= AGSIITL DI:STO= E AREA: F/A= F WIDTH= 80 DEPTH= 150 R/W= q OF BI...DGS= 41: DWELLING.3= OWNER= PIERCE, LYNN R PHONE= 509 928 3259 STREET= 1 2103 E. 26TH AVE ADDRESS= SPOKANE. WA 99206 CONTACT NAME= DENNIS BEREZAY PHONE NUMBER= 509 226 0776 BUILDING SETBACKS : FRONT= 18 LEFT= 3 RIGHT= NA REAR= NA x*x*3e3*3k •a*a*3x3*3e3*3*3*3E*3t•3ex*x3*3*3E*3e3*3*3* BUILDING PERMIT 3t•3{3i3i*•x3**3**3*at•*aeM •***•x:k*•x•N:3*b k3* CONTRACTOR= BEREZAY SIDING & REMODELING PHONE= 509 266 0776 STREET= 24404 E ROXANNE AVE" ADDRESS= NEWMAN LAKE WA 99025 NEW= REMODEL= ADDITION= X CHANGE OF USE= DWELL UNITS= OCCUP LD= BLDG HGT-: 12 STORIES=: BLDG X D = 24 X 24 SIS! FT= ` '76 SPRINKLER=: N REQ PARKING= OHANDICAP= CRITICAL MATS:: N DESCRIPTION GROUP TYPE SQ FT VALUATION GARAGE M-" VN 576 4032,00 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT RESIDENTIAL VALUATION Y 72.00 STATE:: SURCHARGE t' 4.50 COUNTY SURCHARGE Y 1 1 .5 ' 34**3*31•*****h** *x •** *3*•h* *3l•**x** PAYMENT SUMMARY a****a***313:•3***3*3**ri** *ax3*>1•* •3** * PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT:: PAYMENT AMOUNT 10/24/90 6641 88.02 TOTAL. DUE= .00 TOTAL F'AID:-: 88.02 PERMIT TYPE:: FEE AMOUNT AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT OWING BUILDING PERMIT 88.02 88.02 00 88.02 88.02 ..00 3* t•3*ii*3**3* *3*3*3*3****3*3*3**3**34.3****3333*3*#3*3**3x3** **3**4***3**3*3*#k**3*3*3*4*3*3*3**44444#3*3*3*3*3*4*4* x• PROJECT NOTE : TOPIC = CONDITIONS DEFT = BUILDING 3* 3l•3*3*3*3l 3k#3i•3l•3t•3*3*3t 3l•3k 3*3S'3t 3*3t 3t 3k 3t•3*3t•3F 3t 3t 3*3k 3l*3F 3f•3f•3*3*3*3*3t 3*3*3*3*3*3**3**3*3*31:3*3f•3t 3f•3l 4•#3t•3t•3i•3t 3t 3M 3l 3*3*3k 3*3*3*3t 3i H 3* FRONT & EIDE YARD VARIANCE VE••••56••-90 PROCESSED BY : WE NDE I... , GLORIAPRINTED BY : JULIE:: SHATTO 3l•3t•3*3l•3t•3*3*3***3.***.p.3*3**x1k4•3k3*3t4*•A:*•M3a3k3*a THANK YOU b•3* •31•3*3*3*3l•3*3* '3**3*i* 3*3*3*3<•h•3i•*3*3*##3*3*i**#3* 41111, ft SPECIAL CONDITION CHECKLIST Project Address: Project# Use: Dept: Date: Condition: Init. Appr: (in) (out) Dept.of Bldgs. Special insp.Final Report Hydrant( ) Lock Box , . . . • '.111 Engineer's RD/CRP Easements .„ '; ;—,'•',„•-•• Road Plans/Improvements • Bonds s•:- ••• • ;", Planning - ••••• • ,,,;,• ••, Bends1 •: "! . • ,...,. . ..••• , •-•-• .74 I : • . . . • ; . Utilities .1:- ,Dduble Plumbing ULID I .1. " • " T , 1 ,. ; Other . . . . . . . . ...— Other . . . . • • •• l• • • . . •••. . . . . . .. .. ... . .. .. ..... . *****"—********"'*--THIS SPACE FOR COMMERCIAL PLANS.TRACKING;CERT!FICATEOF OCCUPANCY ONLY**;—"."••!`r*.*T7—"******r-***"**— . . . . . Date received for C/0 processing: . .Plans pulled fcittinat processing: ••: • -* Temporary C/O issued: Certificate of Occupancy-issued: Office file review by: Date: Filed insp . Date: , Ninety days after C10 issuance: Owner/contractor called regarding the return of plans: Date: Plans returned: Received by. No response from owner/contractor-plans destroyed: . , , .. . 06.,{A„,,,,_ JkLtual clivLC_SeY 114 11101.: fon- 1(40486rx ,• 1 'wep..• 100,7 fio _ __ ____ __ cJb fir - V- -cta I - - , s, AL __ ______ _ ____ —66 IlL----- Ch1L- _ ._____ ----_________SUIVIar _C-•____i____C(14e, 4t ° -et_ f.,llico _A &xlet_18 _______ _____MjAdivc-Lpot _3__o i _• • -Ad lack. . Az -40 ` v �Y� 14rICR719:4-' I '41X 11- f6€44 -- ' _ _ i i ) _ li dP' 1 ta-W4RY- ,� 1 , _/c J; ..C.4 *sc . n • JU�)�YY`n`I 1 Nor , Pool 2 00 Dr o.% r,.e.1 of a_1' • ad Pr .pesed • Line .' 7— 3 • M 4 1 I � 1 r 1 •Ulrp A ' , 7 .� S%;AlI .1�aGK. j- 1 V) ?irp Pose ,,✓ � ( 2103 (\I UI79 - c� --ice j ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF VARIANCES FROM ) FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS ) FINDINGS OF FACT, [VE-56-90] LYNN PIERCE ) CONCLUSIONS, COMPANION FILES: FINAL PLAT #315 ) AND DECISION (Sky View Acres) ADDRESS: E. 12103 - 26th Ave PARCEL NUMBER: 28544-0919 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: 1) The applicant proposes to locate an attached garage addition to an existing single family dwelling 43 feet from the centerline of the roadway right of way(18 feet from the front property line); whereas,section 4.05.110 a. 1.of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a 55 foot (b setback('4Q)feet from the front property line)from the centerline of the roadway right-of-way; and 2) to locate the attached garage 3 feet from the side property line;whereas,section 4.05.110 a. 2.of the Ordinance requires a 5 foot side yard set back. Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to Section 4.25.030b. of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located on the northwest corner of Whipple Road and 26th Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Section 28,Township 25N,Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. The property is addressed as East 12103 26th. OPPONENTS OF RECORD: NONE PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: Y After consideration of all available information on file,exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the public hearing held on August 27, 1990,and the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on September a 04-4- , 1990 to APPROVE the i. application. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposal is generally described above. 2. The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the proposal as Urban. The proposed uses are generally consistent with this category. 3. The site is zoned Agricultural Suburban,which allows the proposed use upon approval of this application. 4. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include similar residential development,all of which are compatible with the proposal. Most houses in the area have double car garages; whereas,the applicant's house has only a single car garage. 5. The applicant's house was small,constructed originally (within three years of the subdivision's finalization) to the 40 foot front yard, 12 foot side yard and 20 foot flanking street yard requirements of the final plat dedication. These setbacks substantially exceed the CASE NO.VE-56-90 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3 111 2. Failure to comply with any of the conditions of approval contained in this decision, except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Ordinance and be subject to such enforcement as are appropriate. 3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or the conditions of approval as may be judged to be within the context of the original decision. II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The garage shall be of similar design and appearance as the existing dwelling structure. 2. The front yard set back pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance,is relieved from the 55 foot standard to 43 feet(results in a,'foot setback). II,� 3. The(west)side yard setback,ipunt to the Zoning Ordinance is relieved from the 5 foot standard to 3 feet. III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY 1. The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Building and Safety is required. IV. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County,as amended. V. HEALTH DISTRICT No Comment VI. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1. An approach permit must be obtained from the County Engineer prior to the construction of any new driveway approaches. This must be done prior to the release of a building permit. I tb Spokane County - m . , .-;4*.1,1 Department of Building & Safety =I 1 ►`--" -` 'e'r JAMES L.MANSON,DIRECTOR TO �U,1 WI cn 4 Planning Department FROM:\h Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator DATE: G - 9 i RE File Number: OC, -_...1 - Address: s - 1 d Address: g, /O i p c:›9 ,, sd . Our comments regarding the above are reflected in the marked box(es) below: • • (--1 The applicant shall contact the Department of Building and Safety at the earliest possible stage of n design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department;- e.g., State Building Code Act regulations such as requirements for fire hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access roads, street address assignment, barrier-free regulations, energy code regulations, and general coordination withthen aspects of project implementation. 171 LJ The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Building and Safety is required. 1--1 Requirements of Fire District No. need to be satisfied during the building permit process. - f1 The applicant is advised that the private road shall be named and signed in accordance with the provisions of l--J Spokane County Road Standards. This condition may be waived in the event that the Department of Building and Safety determines addressing on the private road is not acceptable. However, at such time the Department of Building and Safety feels the need for the road to become a private, named road, the applicant/owner shalt participate and cooperate in this process. r••i The required fire flow for any building or subdivision is determined by building size, type of construction I_.J and proximity of exposures. Based on information presented to this office regarding this subdivision, the minimus fire flow established by code of 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes is being required. e have no requirements for this proposal - existing conditions. U r-•1 Specific comments are as follows: u TLD WEST 1303 BROADWAY • SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 99260•0050 • TELEPHONE(509)456-3675 • CVO I 4 I., PLANNING DEPARTMENT !"!. ,„,„y BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET iL1 ailii• rlA {1' ey PHONE 456-2205 /7:111.4" ( I�_ .5sk1'l1 :4Ftim—''.- SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE NOTIICIE OIF SIFOIKANIE COUNTY ZONING AWUSTOIIB PFM411.411C II,IIC IHIIEAIIUNO DATE: August 27, 1990 TIME: 10:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department 2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Centre Building North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 AGENDA ITEM #: 5 File: VE-56-90 VARIANCE FROM FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK REOUIREMENTS J.O C A T I O N: Generally located on the northwest corner of Whipple Road and 26th Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Section 28, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. The property is addressed as East 12103 26th. PROPOSAL: 1). The applicant proposes to locate an attached garage addition to an existing single family dwelling 43 feet from the centerline of the roadway right of way (18 feet from the front property line); whereas, section 4.05.110 a. 1. of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a 55 foot setback (30 feet from the front property lines) from the centerline of the roadway right-of-way. 2). The applicant additionally proposes to locate the attached garage 3 feet from the side property line; whereas, section 4.05.110 a. 2. of the Ordinance requires a 5 foot side yard set back. EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural Suburban COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban SUBJECT SITE SIZE: Approximately 11,122 Square Feet APPLICANT: Lynn Pierce -E. 12103 26th Spokane WA 99206 ITEMS CARRIED OVER FROM IOUS HEARINGS MAY BE HEARD FIRST,POSSIBLY CAUSING DELAYS. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILES. APPEALS OF THE DECISION ON THE ABOVE LISTED CASE MAY ONLY BE FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD ACCOMPANIED BY A $100.00 FEE. (Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.) VE - 56 - 90 err s 4•^ in PI It O 1, °C I i 1 t 1 T H E 3 .511 2q} r > 0 .• ` • Ca/rN t��y ` 'Yti� �... •. IncluMst. 1. • EL. 2077 ``a�`e�i i grimM _i P,nes li t. Mrd ter it."‘.1 I I k t~ , TM -3 �l�" E C i a..,.......•. 410 y ES ,400..1 v000rov XIofMot 1 9 r d • • 3444"A. OC 844.4 .00)Wi/W). .+wvww.v..v..:.r. •✓% t• a • '•''' •..r. rv. . •I! •ta ' � .. ; (••*..4.441 c.Q(ll • 3• , a1. . • • j , ,•r • ' • <A• ••• ••••••:10.091/), j • ••••44,• . ill • _6 NN � � o .f c o°ilk -66 jar.in ... .m.- ii-i 4/0••••••••••••••••••••••ina•Teii. lliffir s.an�r+•.-art ":.•oo• --�-�ti•4 \,• T=='� •1:�'_s�. •1 Al • • ' �, ♦ r le iiikellilit MIS M.Elli i • • '1' f • jam, • % .T-_ __J.• yt W. • II. .. 1 � 1 yTH - vaatt w.,s,� •,..,. •4444.... • i II T . ec a 7 iii: .1 • .......••••••••••••• i W ie • • • • 6.443 . s4 Y• . • 100190•1100190•11089040~91.180A0~91• • - ,.f:•• -t .• - •.!9' __ u. ' .•+•fw�eoe..era.%Iwotut mem air •s••• : • • : •• dip I 1 • S 116 `. He 119 I • 2121 Q2 V 12 3 124 125 .26 127 128 129 '3 1 qvI • EIP Ii Y II wy IS. •- Limit• ........i; t 1�' s1 N •• r e, '4 .n is \l ; . •• ...,..„ • z. u wino lo ..•. .•I iii J1:1M1 •444:4 •• f 7 83 . 5 -- n , nu3hmmsj Nor , t, 00l 3 C 0-1 e_- __�_______-- __ 200 ,_r (3 t • £ 1S % ibus¢ 71 \ __ O _ 6, es... 4 i1 j Froposcd Gam* I kr 1.> T- I ' , ReOul YC.cI 1\ 1 I 1I M sC-'� �GC��, I I to1 . j / 1 :',' \PrO posed , �_1_ — v b Sf-( ba _�� I co F_ ( 2 1 03 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Certificate of Exemption No.: ,� /17/4- Application No.: UT-- S4 --9O Name of Applicant: L 11 1�.1.' Pierce- Agent: Y ) Street Address: E. /c;103 —oeo' `/ 1,/�� / Zip Phone - Home: City rokQm e- State: N/(t"1 Code: 42a Go Work: q,..2-2 Agents No. Name of Property Owner(s): L ,11AJ �, r!e re c. Street Address: E. / u / 03 -- -/ Zip Phone - Home: City d State: Wa Sh . Code: 9Work: REQ I . TED ACTIONS) (Circle appropriate action): Variance(s Conditional Use Permit Nonconforming Lot/Use o Violation Temporary Use/Structure Other: FOR STAFF USE ONLY CODE: ORDINANCE __ok. Cite Regulations Section(s): Q oS lit Property Violation/ Section: Zg Township: ZS Range: 7 7 Size: /p4-.z.5,-Enforcement: Y Co Existing Zone: f i C Comp. Plan Des.: ar f'1 Crossover u/e. .3• S /� LEGAL MAO O N AO N ASAI YJN FIRE DIST.: / CHECKED BY: Hearing Date: c/Z 7/r'0 Personnel Taking in Application: Existing Use of Property: cYsis/•e /l rer,tote wee Describe Intendeed Proposal in Terms of REQUESTED ACTIONS above:tifivi Ct' reet " Aftf L�1QI Se/hac ii, / A zoske totAhrg 10 a//04 a 201seageet wie,e 4 26/selloci • 7�a ! "� - /�� a' �i 1. f • QM(i( A/f 0 RII�Zf/ � fel4oci wierP Street Address of Property: E. . I Z 143 - 26 f 4 Ave re,/v.� ,S eQ Legal Description of Property (include easement, if applicable):SK rl/I EW AC_ L. lei 2 SIaOKAA,) COuj7y Parcel No(s): 2rcq "05)/9 Source of Legal: A s-e t'rev' re Cora' Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner/sponsor: What interest do you hold in the property? C..D'h?l'aetL Pit-ViCk4ree Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: St*v/eui 4ye ,Sj vi rro0.. , As- zoe C za4fe foZ-6 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) I SWEAR,UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY,THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 40D 110000040,.. ary <���s iory F�•F4A Address: . l2 /O 5 (►t c9• �`\ g- 3 C Date: NO Yc$BT AA) t I r� t* tPAU•-- G : * Lary Public 4- and for the state of Washington, :•f�, 3L� Or residing at Spe ane, Na, '14, sf , 1 \a ��=+� My appointment expires: Sept. 1,1990 _' 0f_ WASH r 0 BURDEN OF PROOF It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic case. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return it with your application. If you did not get a form, ask the Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed. ®$IGN- BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES OFF 0 COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT a) Proposed method of water supply: 5w �4 t%-t b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: ('.J I A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant Ati been f. i d of\requirements and s,Landa d Ar,� (Signature% (Date) ( Sign-off Waived) OCOUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has b n informed of requirements and standards. (Sig�re (Date) (Sign-off Waived) GCOUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Waive if outside WMAB) [ ] A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informe of requirements and standard . -(. L- _ 4•- 27- ?0 (Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived) [ I The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become informed of water system requirements and standards. [ ] The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become informed of sewage disposal requirements and standard's.` / © WATER PURVEYOR:rOO&a.' Q 4✓ ba". ' '.3 (Waive if outside CWSSA) a) The proposal js/omet located within the boundary of our future service area. b) The proposal is/jowl located within the boundary of our current district. c) We are/r ■i able to serve this site with adequate water. d) Satisfactory arrangements /have not been made to serve this prs •osa . )-eldr/ (Signa i re) (Date 6 pyo (Sign-off Waived) 1/SEWERAGE PURVEYOR: (If other than Spokane County) [ ] A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. (Signature) . (Date) (Sign-off Waived) Page 4 of 4 • VARIANCE BURDEN of PROOF Form NAME: Lynn Pierce FILE NUMBER 1/5— so' 9O Introduction to this form: A "variance" is the means by which an adjustment is made in the application of the specific regulations of the zoning classification for a particular (the subject) piece of property. This property, because of special circumstances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in a similar zone classification. This adjustment remedies the difference in privileges. A variance shall not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in the zone classification in which the property is located. The following questions will help to determine the outcome of your request. Your request requires accurate and complete responses. First circle either the "yes" or the "no" answer(s) following the questions below as they apply to your situation and then explain as needed (in the space provided) to make your unique situation clear. Certain phrases from the Spokane County Zoning Code section on variances are included in these questions. They are underlined. If your request is a ROAD FRONTAGE VARIANCE please answer only questions A,B,C,D, and E. A. Will this variance permit a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone? Yes �Vo� Explain: B. Are there special circumstances (lot size, shape, topography, location, access, surroundings, etc.) which apply to the subject property and which may not not apply to other properties in the vicinity? Yes (No1 Explain : C. Is the subject property deprived of privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in a similar zone classification? Ares) No Explain : All other houses(except one) have two car garages on 26th from Whipple to the point where it joins 25th. D. Will this variance be harmful to the public welfare or to other properties in the vicinity and a similar zone classification? Yes Nod Explain: E. Are there other similar si 'ons in the vicinity in a similar zone classification?4, No Are they permitted uses May No Are they "nonconforming" uses? Yes 'o Explain: 0/44- ,jp"),e.y 1•n !/i ci7 i- aos7s/-ee • F. Could the subject property be put to a reasonable and permitted use by you or another person without the requested variance? Yes No Explain: Most home owners have a minimum of two vehicles plus lawn ana yard. equipment. This property also has an above ground pool and desperately needs stora ;e. G. If this request is granted, will the subject property be more environmentally sensitive, energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic property? Yes No Explain: perhaps energy conserving because of the shade provided to the living space in the summer. Over please Rev: 5/22/90 Page 1 H. If this variance is granted, will the broader public need or interest be served? Yes No Explain: It will increase the value of the property and therefore help the neighborhood. Most single garage houses become rental property because home owners need and desire two,lo,r more garaes. I. Will this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies to the subject property? Yes No Explain: J. Will approval of this variance grant to the subject property the privileges of a different zone classification (in other words would this be a "de facto" zone change)? Yes No Explain: K. Will this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes No Explain L. Is this variance required for a reasonable economic return from the subject property or is the existing structure too small? 'Yes. No Explain:This variance is necessary for economic return because a single car garage is not desirable or acceptable on a 130Jsq. ft. M Did the practical difficulty which caused you to apply for this variance exist before you owned the subject property? Yes No Explain: I was a first time buyer and had not anticipated how much "equipment" it takes and storage for that equipment , plus a freezer, patio and pool equipment, and lawn and garden supplies. N. If approved, would this variance affect land use density regulations which exist to protect the Rathdrum/Spokane Aquifer? Yes No Explain: The following space is for further explanation. Your application will get better consideration if what, how, and why you propose your application is clear. Attach an additional page(s)if needed. This property needs to have a two vehicle garage to -be compatible with otner single family dwellings in the neighborhood. It runs the risk of becoming a rental property with the small garage and narrow driveway. It would upgrade the property and have more curb appeal . as well. Tne backyard aboveground pool requires equipment that takes up storage space at least 8 months a year. The yard and garden equipment, snowblower, freezer etc. cause extreme overcrowding. Eventually I would like to bring the utilites upstairs into the existing garage for added convenience and resale value. This is a very well built house ( built in 1060 ) with hardwood (oak) floors and wooden Pella windows. I hope to put vinyl siding on the new garage and eventually the entire house. You are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts,etc. in support of this application (we have the equipment to display video tapes). No such additional material is required and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of issues which need to be considered in relation to this requested variance. If you have questions about the procedure to be followed feel free to contact the Spokane County Planning Department (456-2205). Page 2 Continued on attached page. ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF VARIANCES FROM ) FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS ) FINDINGS OF FACT, [VE-56-90] LYNN PIERCE ) CONCLUSIONS, COMPANION FILES: FINAL PLAT #315 ) AND DECISION (Sky View Acres) ADDRESS: E. 12103 - 26th Ave PARCEL NUMBER: 28544-0919 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: 1) The applicant proposes to locate an attached garage addition to an existing single family dwelling 43 feet from the centerline of the roadway right of way(18 feet from the front property line); whereas, section 4.05.110 a. 1.of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a 55 foot setback(30 feet from the front property line)from the centerline of the roadway right-of-way; and 2) to locate the attached garage 3 feet from the side property line; whereas, section 4.05.110 a. 2.of the Ordinance requires a 5 foot side yard set back. Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to Section 4.25.030b.of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located on the northwest corner of Whipple Road and 26th Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Section 28,Township 25N,Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. The property is addressed as East 12103 26th. OPPONENTS OF RECORD: NONE PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all available information on file,exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the public hearing held on August 27, 1990,and the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on September c20" , 1990 to APPROVE the application. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposal is generally described above. 2. The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the proposal as Urban. The proposed uses are generally consistent with this category. 3. The site is zoned Agricultural Suburban,which allows the proposed use upon approval of this application. 4. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include similar residential development,all of which are compatible with the proposal. Most houses in the area have double car garages; whereas,the applicant's house has only a single car garage. 5. The applicant's house was small,constructed originally (within three years of the subdivision's finalization)to the 40 foot front yard, 12 foot side yard and 20 foot flanking street yard requirements of the final plat dedication. These setbacks substantially exceed the CASE NO.VE-56-90 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2 Zoning Ordinance requirements,both in 1956 and now. The 1956 file contains no hint as to why these setbacks were specified. With a drainfield at the rear of the dwelling and a previously constructed dwelling addition on the east side of the corner lot,no room exists for expansion. In order to have interior space comparable to other dwellings, front/side yard expansion is the only space left to consider. 6. Although only one variance is of record in the subdivision,numerous garages and portions of dwelling units are in the front yards of 26th Avenue. Most houses of the last 15-20 years also violate the dedication setbacks described in#5 above. 7. Granting these variances from provisions of the Zoning Ordinance does not grant relief from the setbacks set forth in the dedication of the plat. But,obviously few if any parties have been concerned about plat dedication language. 8. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washington State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6) (b). 9. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of various County agencies reviewing this project and has indicated those recommendations are acceptable. 10. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been met. 11. No adverse testimony or written comments were received regarding the proposal. 12. With the conditions of approval set forth below,the variance will: a) not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with limitations on other properties in the vicinity and similar zone;b)ensure that the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is achieved with regard to location, site design, appearance,and landscaping,etc; and c)protect the environment,public interest and general welfare. CONCLUSIONS DECISION From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the proposal, subject to compliance with the following CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. GENERAL 1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant,owner and successors in interest and shall run with the land. CASE NO.VE-56-90 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3 2. Failure to comply with any of the conditions of approval contained in this decision, except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Ordinance and be subject to such enforcement as are appropriate. 3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or the conditions of approval as may be judged to be within the context of the original decision. II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The garage shall be of similar design and appearance as the existing dwelling structure. 2. The front yard set back pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance,is relieved from the 55 foot standard to 43 feet(results in a 30 foot setback). 3. The(west)side yard setback,pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance is relieved from the 5 foot standard to 3 feet. III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY 1. The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Building and Safety is required. IV. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. V. HEALTH DISTRICT No Comment VI. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1. An approach permit must be obtained from the County Engineer prior to the construction of any new driveway approaches. This must be done prior to the release of a building permit. CASE NO.VE-56-90 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4 NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE,PERMITS MAY BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN(10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVER,THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL. DATED this o(Q day of September, 1990. OMAS'G.'r OSHER,AICP Zoning Ad ustor Spokane Qounty,Washington FILED: 1) Applicant(Certified/Return Receipt Mail) 2) Opponents of Record 3) Spokane County Engineer's Office 4) Spokane County Health District 5) Spokane County Utilities Department 6) Spokane County Department of Building&Safety 7) Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 8) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN(10)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$100.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT,BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING,NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE,WA 99260(Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance).