Loading...
1993, 11-05 Permit App: 93010554 ResidenceADDRESS', �. 7_Qi Fi`�' cam, REVIEWED bil- � r _ -. - SL-- PLA N_ SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS / �DDRESS.....�`.�O. i' ..� �! . -50 Cl......... o RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE INSPECTION CHECKLIST o PERMIT #............................................................................ U C 0 0 0 0 WINDOWS & DOORS PER PLANS 9WINDOWS & DOORS CAULKED ADVANCED FRAMING: xl�;SOLEPLATE CAULKED WALLS 4, PLUMBINGHELECTRICAL CEILINGS PENETRATIONS CAULKED WALL INSULATION: R- / % ".,SEALED DUCTWORK VAULTED CEILING: R- '50 9 EXHAUST FANS/DUCTS -BATT INSTALLATION INSTALLED TECHNIQUES ,g -RECESSED LIGHTS 0 o APPROVED FOR COVER BY ) 221 i DATE 0 .VAPOR RETARDERS: WALL l CEILING ATTIC VENT BAFFLES pr,COMBUSTION AIR DUCTS INSTALLED //RAWLSPACE VENTILATION RADON FAN CIRCUIT MECHANICAL SYSTEMS WEATHERSTRIPPING A PLUMBING BATH EXHAUST DOORS & WINDOWS ,WATER HEATER PAD KITCHEN EXHAUST A ATTIC & CRAWL ACCESSES gSHOWER FLOW AUTOMATIC WHOLE HOUSE A SWITCH & OUTLET COVER FIREPLACEMOODSTOVE EXHAUST PLATES FIREPLACE DOORS MAKE-UP AIR INTAKES o FLUE DAMPER DUCTWORK ,qd INSULATION COMBUSTION AIR EQUIPMENT INSTRUCTIONS o FLOOR R- CRAWLSPACE GROUND COVER ,HEATING FUEL & SYSTEM TYPE: q ATTIC R-_:il�i fV11 CRAWLSPACE VENTILATION A BELOW -GRADE WALLS R-_L'�_ kRADON VENT & LABEL RADON MONITOR g;KBATT INSTALLATION 0 SERIAL NUMBER TECHNIQUES o FINAL APPROVAL BY L<? �y r)1L1 DATE 0 wsPcriKz.oTP l S P O K A N E PLANNING PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEAIRHHG C O U N T --y- WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR DATE: April 27, 1994 TIME: 9:00 a. m. or as soon thereafter as possible PLACE: Spokane County Public Works Building Commissioner's Assembly Room 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 AGENDA ITEM #: 1 File: VE-06-94(A&B) VARIANCE FROM FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR TWO LOTS LOCATION: Generally located in the Spokane Valley, approximately„feet west of Sullivan Road and 400 feet south of 24th Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Sectidh.2 Township 25N, Range 44EWM; Lots 7 and 8 of Block 1 on 26th Court at the end of the culdesac in Pleasant Cove subdivision. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to build a residence on each of two separate lots and is requesting 15 foot (front) yard setbacks from the east edge of the right-of-way of Murbach Road; whereas, section 14.616.325.A.1 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County requires a 30 foot front yard setback from the east edge of the Murbach Road right-of-way. EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residential 3.5 (UR -3.5) SITE SIZE: Approximately 10,377 square feet (Lot 7) Approximately 10,196 square feet (Lot 8) APPLICANT: Prokey Arger 300 N. Mullan Road Spokane, WA 99206 All meetings and hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to disabled individuals. For more particular information, please contact the Spokane County Planning Department at (509) 456-2205. NOTE: THE ZONING ADJUSTOR WILL ISSUE A WRITTEN DECISION TO APPROVE OR DENY THE ABOVE PROPOSAL. ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY APPEAL THE ZONING ADJUSTOR'S DECISION AND MUST DO SO WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE DECISIONS SIGNING. APPEALS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A $210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING, 1026 WEST BROADWAY, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (SECTION 14.412.042 OF THE ZONING CODE OF SPOKANE COUNTY). THE ABOVE REFERENCED FILE MAY BE EXAMINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE - SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 • (509) 456-2205 VE=6=94(A&B) Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No.: VE Lc!3-`"7 Name of Applicant: �fo I<e� Agent: (P N Street Address: J,). 300 M u l L,4, j Z� c�o ren( e- Zip Phone - Home: 926-967-0 City: State: WA- Code: 99.;1-06 Work: 92.6-53!/ Agent's No.: Name of Property Owner(s): e 4=S &ps►L� t-4„� Street Address: City: REQUESTED ACTIONS) Variance s I FOR STAFF USE ONLY Zip State: Code: (Circle appropriate action): Conditional Use Permit Phone - Home: Work: Expansion of a Nonconforming Use Violation/ Section Z6 Township kRange�_ Enforcement: Y •Lot and legal checked by: -Easement legal checked by: •CWSSA Water (purveyor. •ULID Agreement needed: Y •Existing zone: &IR-.3-.�- Cite Applicable Section: ! - •Arterial Road P1,4n designation: 4c.a -Comp. Plan desi t'o -Fire District: -Personnel doing preapc rnf. •Other/yreviousPlanning Department actions involving ths pro rty: Q<S w -Hearing Date: ABOUT THE PROPERTY Maint. agreement checked by: -Existing use of property: _ V a Ca* R I -Describe proposed use of the property: _ k40U 0 "7 A -N 8 0F0 •If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance sought in co parable terms: 3O' sPlhac,6 regalyFC' and r /z/ 54�- i4. / _ ,4P,,>/� ca,, /s" 69- -If a conditional use pernut'9pplication, does proposal meet all stanar s? Y N. If not, has one or more variances been requested? Y N. -What is the size of the original parcel if this proposal is a recent or proposed division? -Street address of property (if known):Cot,, Q, - T --Legal description of property (include easement, if applicable): L o -t -s -7 Fl -j D 93 --PLaso _`r C_o Li e- 7A (.oc�I- n A/,O •Parcel No(s).: -Source of legal: ►NaL •Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: •_7V -70 - What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? ©w rq e v, -- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ```K MC Signed:SIO ���'�4'•''�....,���` Address: 1-n Q t, t-. �$ o •�+4';< Phone No.: 92.6-53 i ► Date: N_=Gt—. Not u lic in and for the state'df Washington, residing at 0 LuMy appointment expires: ` 7 kI� page 1 of 2 BURDEN?„9`.,2OOF [t'%s rices • - ia licant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the • 7 "' '.l"' ;I should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor o ►�; s ? ap ' Cation. Accordingly, you should have been given a foil"' for your requested acr 40, . iceictoriditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which addrOss'e'the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the fouli out and return it with' your application. SIGN -OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Proposed method of water supply: ov62- c- ? b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: , � 1Ve 4 A preliminary consultatih of requirements and fit. yi� d (Signature) SPOKANE A preliminary co has been inforrnc e en held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed ate (Sign -off Waived) OUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ulta of 0 as been h d o discuss the proposal. The applicant ments ' d • . dards. /s F 9 c4 (Signature) (Date) (Sign -off Waived) SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waive if outside WWMA) A preliminaryonsultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been infoi��ied of requirements an ds. d st_� J ?/ 5 A (Signature) (Date) (Sign -off Waived by Planning?) ] �] a) b) c) d) The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with `I r to become infollned of water system requirements and standards. (See #4 below) The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become infoiuied of sewage disposal requirements and standards.`(See #5 below) WATER PURVEYOR: \[ C•QA The proposal isfi located within the boundary of our future service area. The proposal is% located within the boundary of our current district. We are/+ot able to serve this site with adequate water. S�ctoarrangements havet been made to serve this proposal. `7 �22�53 (Signature) (Date) 5. SEWERAGE PURVEYOR: S °L. -4Y Co A prel' consultation has b en held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirem - nts and standards. \ \ / / /S (Signature) (Date) ZA; APP REV; 1i91 page 2 of 2 VARIANCE BURDEN OF PROOF FORM Name: Pleasant Cove /Prokey Arger File Number: A "variance" is the means by which an adjustment is made in the application of the specific regulations of the zoning classification for a particular (the subject) piece of property. This property, because of special circumstances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in a similar zone classification. This adjustment remedies the difference in privileges. A variance shall not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in the zone classification in which the property is located. The following questions will help to determine the outcome of your request. Your request requires accurate and complete responses. First circle either the "yes" or the "no" answer(s) following the questions below as they apply to your situation and then`explain as needed (in the space provided) to make your unique situation clear. Certain phrases from the Zoning Code of Spokane County section on variances are included in these questions and are underlined for convenience. A; Will this variance permit a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone? Yes Explain: This variance only affects a side yard setback, allowing new houses to be built B. Are there special circumstances (lot size, shape, topography, location, access, surroundings, etc.) which apply to the subject property and which may not apply to other properties in the vicini? es No Explain: The two subject lots are located at the end of a dead end cul-de-sac with their side yards buffering next to an unimproved county right of way C. Is the subject property deprived of privileges commonly enjoyed by other 12roperties in the vicinity and in a similar zone classification? es No Explain: Other lots have standard side yard setback requirements. The subject lots were forced to treat -their side yard as a front yard, significantly restricting the buildable area. D. Will this variance be hazmful to the public welfare or to other properties in the vicinity and a similar zone classification? Yes ,o Explain: This variance request is not harmful to the public and is consistent with the other lots/subdivisions: The cul-de-sac provides a dead end street buffering the county's right of way. E. F. Are there other similar situations in the vioinit in a similar zone classification? No Are they permitted uses? es No Are they "nonconforming" uses. No Explain: There are other houses within area which have provided less dedication and setback to the unimproved county right of way. Could the subject property be put to a reasonable and permitted use by you or another person without the requested variance? Yes o Explain: Without the variance, the houses would be unreasonably limited in size and scope. Garages, etc. G . If this request is granted, will the subject property be more environmentally sensitive, energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic property? Yes leo Explain: Page 1 of 2 H. If this variance is granted, will the broader public need or interest be served? No Explain: This allows the market place to benefit from the availability of new housing. I. Will this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies to the subject property? Yes Explain: The side yard should not have been reclassified as front yard Will approval of this variance grant to the subject property the privileges of a different zone classification (in other words would this be a "de facto" zone change)? Yes n Explain: Remains only single family Will this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Explain: Does not change use of zoning classification. Yes Is this variance required for a reasonable economic return from the subject property or is the existing structure too small? Explain: The subject property wbuld only allow unreasonable sized housing units with use of garages in question. No M. Did the practical difficulty which caused you to apply for this variance exist before you owned the subject property? Yes Explain: We were with the understanding that the setback requirements would be an administrative department function. N. If approved, would this variance affect land use density regulations which exist to protect the Rathdrum/Spokane Aquifer? Yes Explain: Does not affect density. The following space is for further explanation. Attach an additional page(s) if needed. You are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of this application. We have the equipment to display video tapes. No such additional material is required and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of issues which need to be considered in relation to this requested variance. If you have questions about the procedure to be followed feel free to contact the Spokane County Planning Department at 456-2205. RP -VARIANCE ; BURDEN OF PROOF FORM Page 2 of 2 REV; 5/92 PLFASANT COVE BEING 'A RIPLAF OF A POT -ION TRACT 217 OF VESA IN THE SE 1 /4 OF SECTION 26, ' OWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON O 8 N 25th AVE. 6, 42.59 (42.49 REC.) 50.85 (50.88 REC.( 78°W, 46.93(46.92 REC.( Fd 1/2" RB PER R2 0.05, N 20' A TRACT "X' ROADWAY EASEMENT AS RECORDED \ BY AUDITOR'S FILE N0. 8706090093. 15 �%jViLD IN6 N 89'39'31' E Sere RC K B SP 86-438 Fd 1/2" R8 PER R2 635.43 10 30' 84.24 90.95 60.06 19.94 80.00 80.00 ( 80.00 C 75.23 79 9 0 _ 4 9037 Fd 1/2" RB PER RZ 80 4.67 3 zI xI 9 `R Z rn .14 3 9500 SF 51 j1ia J25' i 110, 3 0196 SF 25' BUILDING SETBACK IQ 26th AVE. d`° N7 < 00 Z N 9 / I -N r_ 0 Z 3 O 2 CO O � t' CC O 0 z D Z 9 10000 SF LINE 10' UTIL EASEMENT 445\ cJ ' - 36.43 Fd 1/2" RB 30' 15 20' jH-I 185.18 Fd 1/2" RB 3 tv 10 9515 SF BLOCK 1 n 11 9527 SF 12 9538 SF 13 9537 5F 40.00 30.00 25 n 30' BUILDING SETBACK LINE 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 80.00 80.00 z 80.00 79,90 N 89'45'28" QE(R) 35.34 20' SANITARY SEWER 9 UTILITY EASEMENT 26th COURT 530.00 a) O) 01 N 30.00 to r 00 Oa cJ N 89'45'28" E 56 0.0 0 \ '% 36.1 1 6 B III\, _ Lam-/ /_ - _ _1_ u-iry ' - 3 25' BUILDING SETBACK LINE n m 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 -10' UTILITY EASEMENT 5 m 0 30' BUILDING SETBACK LINE 10377 SF N 6 b 5 9584 SF 3 n b 0 4 9584 SF 10001 SF. 90.07 BLOCK 1 80.00 80.00 44.91 ®,/ 35.09 S 89'44'57" W Fd 1/2" RB 3 n b b ai z 3 9583 SF 3 •b cri 60.19 �C w II Zz \ w eg J__ 25'170 0 a 3 Y 5 1 w • t•-.1 �I n r; 1 2 <rn 1 9581 SF b 7 950B SF I rn. Irn co 40 15.0 80.00... 80.00 NI I I 25.00 10' UTILITY EASEMENT-' Fd 1/2' 8B w/n.n Y-.,.-. 80.00 635.25