Loading...
Koren S 204 Eagle Mountain Spec Whse/Office S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DEPAR7MENT OF BUILDIIJG AND PLANNING A DtvlSioN oF'iHE Pvsuc WoRtts DEPARTMMr jnMEs L Mnrtsorr C B O„ DtxXcroR DENM M SeoTr P E. DmEcTOR T0 Denus Scou, Duww, Pubhc Warks Department Bill Johns, County Engineer Bnice Rawls, Duwwr, Division of Utiluies M,arc Holman, Assismt Duwtor, Division of Bmlding & Plammg (Builduig) John Mercer, Acang Assistant Duwtior, Division of Plaaning & Planrung (Plaiuung) StacY Biordahl, Acting Heanngs Manager, Division of Builduig 8t Planiung (Planning) Jeff Fo , Senior Bunlding Techiucian, Division of Building & Plammg (B g) James Emacio, Chief Civil Depnty, Prosecuting Attarney's 4ffice Charles Dotson, Qty of Spokane Planning Ihrector FROM S , Duector, Ihvision of Builduig & Planning Tho her GP, Semor Planner DATE 995 a SUBJECT Spokane ty comphance with Engrossed Senate House BiII (ESHB) 1724- regulatory refonn Iam notifyuig you that we are orgamztng a first meeting of persons who (or whose offices) will hlcely be involved m the regulatory reform known as ESHB 1724 Faye Udby, of the Plannuig Secuon of the Ihvision of Builduig and Planning, will be contacnag you tio arrange a meeting which all of you, or a designated rep~resentaave, wffi be able to attend. The purpose of the meeung is discussed in the attached memora.adwn to Deruus Scott, hm Mansfln and Mait Hoimaa dated November 20, 1995 We need to estabhsh ateam of the appmpnate peisons to work on putang together Spokane County's response to ESHB 1724 It indeed will substantmlly affect many of the permittmg prooesses throughout Spokane County govesnment Once we get a gnp on the situanon, the camm~t~ee may boll down to a team af middle maaagement persons who will work fairly uidependendy, regulariy and qunckly to put together a proposal, keepmg the vanous depanment and division heads infonned as we go along At some point we aaay need to involve the Board of County Commiss~one~s in the prehannary stages The reason for the Board's involvement, elther duwily ar ttrough Dennis Scott or Jun Luidow, is because the Iand use appeal hearmgs, and possibly other appeal he,anngs or heanngs ar before the Boand of County Comnussioners, may tiecome a ttung of the past That is to say, the vanous appeal heanngs may be "oa the record," as opposed to an open pubhc sppeal heanng Or m some or all mstances the Board may choose not to deal Rnth appeals m any case The apaon exists to bypass the Board of County Comaussioners with most acaons and go directly to court from a pmfessioaal heanng examiner with what is called a"land use petinon," as opposed to the 1026 WEST BROADWAY AvPtJUE SPOKaNE, Wi45HINGTON 99260 Bun.viNG PHOrF- (509) 456-3675 Fax. (509) 456-4703 Pt.ANNtNG PHONE. (509) 456-2205 FAx (509) 455-2243 TilTl lSf191 474 o41lr,f Dentus Scott Director, Pubhc Works Department Bill Johns County Enguieer Bruce Rahls, Du1ector, lkvnion of Uahaes Marlc Holnaan, Assistant Duwtor, Division of Builduig & Planning (Bwldmg) John Mercer, Acting Asssstant Duector, Division of Planning & Planiung (Plainnuig) Stacy Bjordahl, Actwg Heanngs Manager, Division of Builduig & Planning (Planaing) Jeff Forry, Senior Bwldiag Techtucian, Divmon of Bwlchng & Planning (Biulduig) James Emacio, Gluef Civil Deputy, Prosecutyng Attorney's Office Charles Dotson, City of Spokane Plammmg Director I?ecember 4, 1995 Page 2 tradiaonal method of talung land use appeais and possibly other appeals into the Supenor Court system I have also included a couple of short summary documents pertauung to ESHB 1724 Pnor to any actual meehng of this mterdiscipluiary team, I will be forwardsng more uifoAnation for you (or sameone you might delegate) to consider and bring to that meeting Even if you do not administer a geraut drecdy affected by 1724, permit processes to which your secuon provides mput (e g, plathng and zoruag) may be altered enough to change your customary way of dealuig wnth chents and other d.epartments You may be cunous as to why Mr potson, from the City of Spokane, is invited The City of Spokane has to meet a suYUlar statutory requ,mment of having much of ttus in place by Mazch 31 1996 The City of Spokane has made more progress than the County toward comphance It is possibte that they may be able to assist us with some of the obhgauons that are ahead of us It is also gossible that we may be able to design some level of consistency between city and county procedurES if we begui consideruig that at the early stages of development of this regulatory reform package I look forward to working with you on these matters Faye will be in touch wYth you, or whoever makes appointments for you, m the near future You may call Faye at 209 if you have someone who mak,es your appomtments or if you wish to designate another person to attend ttus or subsequent meeungs c Spokane Board of County Commissioners Phillip D Hazns, Chair Steven Hasson John Roskelley Jmn I.uidow, Spokane County Cluef Admuustrauve Officer bcc Bill Hemin~ngs Pat Harper Scott Engelhard Tamnue Williams Attachmeats HD/FCU-1724 S ~ P ~ ~ S P O K A N E C O tT N T Y DF.nARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING A DrnnoN oF nHF. PvBUC Wom DExnxrmxr , Jams L. rLowN c.B o., DuEcroR DERvts M. saorr r E. nuEcroR TO Jun Manson, Duwtor, Division of Building & Plannmg Mark Holman Assistant Dumctor, Division of Bwlduig John Mercer, Assistant Duector Dlvision 4PIang FROM Thomas G Mosher, AICP, Sensor Planner DATE November 20, 1995 SUBJECT Proposed strategy for unplementing ESHB 1724 The attached is a suggested outluie for a countywide approach to complymg with ESHB 1724 I urge the highest level of attention and concern be given to startng tlus process ui earnest NDifCt3-1724 1026 WFST BROADwAYAvFNUE SPOKaNE, WASHMroN 99260 BvnMwc PHOivE. (509) 456-3675 FAc. (509) 456-4703 PLANrnNC PHONE (509) 456-2205 Fnx (509) 456 2243 TDD (509) 324-3165 a PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR IIVIPLEMENTATION OF ESHB 1724 (REGULATORY REFORM) BACKGROUND Engrossed Senate Honse Bil11724 (1724) is the 1995 state legislarinWs direcave m local and state goveanments to unprave the regulatoay s;rnem uivolvmg envuonmenial aad land use ma►ttem It requires om-tan peaformance by local governn~nt by certun danes, some of winch have already passed. The pnmary deadvne for havuig the reqwred regulatiory refrnm measnres in p18,cs is Mar+ch 31 and Apn119 1996 At the pre= time there n ao (Spolsane) countyvvide effart m exemine ttus legtslation and begia smuctnnag the refozms winch need tio be in place.l After ato~dance at several workshops, Spokaue County will not IMy meet the au~od u o deadlines ualess a considerably greater amouat of time and peison power n quickly apph m tlus effart. Follownng is a suggested sttategy to explore and aclueve comphance 1 Form an mtend~scipluiary tearm chaued by Dennis Scott, Du+ector of Pubhc Warks, and compnsed of one or more members of the Qvd Prosecutiag Attmney's office, the Divmon of UtLhnes, the Division of Enguieenng and Roads, the Divmon of Builduig and Plaaning and the County Engineer's Office The County Administrative Officer or a member of the Boand of County Commisnoners should sit on dus committee in its untial phases, if not extended phases 2 The purpose of thts commiuee's first meeang would be to dete:rmuie, as accurately as possible, who should be the members of the ongoing uiter+disophuary team and how much fame should be devoted by each of the above of5ces toward aciuevmg this goal of compl~anoe vsnth 1724 It may aLso be wise to invrte a lugh-level representanve of the (aty's 1724 compliance team m ut m on tlus first session. The puzpose of this would be to see whether there are areas ln winch the Oty and County should be cooperaaag, ia this wutdow of ume regardng regulatary reffotm, to tmng about as much consistency as possible between city and county regulatians 3 2 Afoer decidsng on an ongowg intiendiscipluiary teana, the mam should begin by identify►ing the vanous pernuts m the couaty winch are cleanrly affected by 1724, those which would appear not to be affected by the legislation and those wluch, although nnaffected legally, rnay well be included from the standpoint of consistency of pesmimng pmcedures 3 The ame hnes for each of the exisang permits should be exaauned by the team to see what the typical standard prooe.ssing time is for each of the idenafied perauts 4 Ea,ch of the permits should be classified by the team as to those low-Ievel-intensity permits that are likely exemgt from 1724, those winch requme minunal admuustrattve dzscreuon, those which are associated with a substantial amount of discreuon and those winch are legtslative m namne 5 A citm advisory group could be introduced at ttus poinL Most simil ar regulaoory refozm efforts have uivolved citizen advLsory gronps. 1 The C'ivd Prosecuting Att,oneey s office has had eome expenenae wuh ttLeja(haal appeal pomon of thus law and one staff pmon in the Divmon of Buidling and Planmg has boen allmted aboot 15 perceru of lus time to begm the effort to comply vnth ihe r+egulatory reform measums 2 A maJor factor of dus 17241egislation reqwres the County tio change us present pubLc heanog process reg,arding land use and environmental peraruts Clear and tunely dirmon is needed in tlus reprd 3 Charles Dotson Planning Duector, has recendy roestabLshed a suniler city team Although they have a draft of a consohdated code (zamng subchvmon shorelmes eoc.and a mme sophisticaoed permit process, needing less change and fewe,r addiftons tbw the Caimty, they are otherwise at a sunilsr pomt 3n atteanpting compLaace wit61724 The Board of County Commmoae,rs wiU Lkely want direct iuput to these changes 6 After presenang alternatives to, and being advised by, the Board of County Commissioners regarding changes ui the pubhc hearmg consideration of perauts and pubhc hearmg appeal consideration of permits, the team and the Board should decide on a strategy for pronessing vanous pemnits in complianoe with 1724's r►eqmrement that thera be a maximum of only one open public hearmg associated with each pernait, many of wbich now have two open pubhc heanngs The team should be advised by the Board as to whether the Baard waats to remain mvolved ui the pubhc heanng process or mrn all or a partLon of that hearmg s over to a professional he~nng exammner or the exLsang Hearmg F~caanner ~ 7 The team should develap tune lines for all pmmm consisroent vcnth the ame fiannes maudaoed by 1724 8 The team shonld desiga and produce consmtent comphanoe vath 1724 anth respect Lo deLerminations of complet,eness of apphcations, notice of apphcations, integration of the State Envronmental Pohcy Act (SEPA) perrnit review reqwrements (to the extent they are not now sufficient ut the exisang permit process) and notice of decision forrnat, 9 1724 reqwres evaluaaon of consistency with vanous adopted Cmowth Management Act (GMA) regulatioas and camprehe,asive plan. As more and mm-e of these products come on luie, there will be agmater reliance on them dunng project review upon these documents The system devised needs to accommodate a growing number of GMA documents We need to begin educatmg the pubhc that it wdl have less aud less influenve over pmject-by- project approvals and must focus us attieation as much as possible on citizen involvement at the development aad adoption of GMA plans and regulations 10 The teana needs to be cogmzaat of the evoluaon of SEPA and the changes that will be recommended by the State dnnag the first quaroer of 1996 as a part of 1724 regnlatory r+eform 11 The tieam needs to study and evaluate any ad.dttional mquu~ements with respect to regulatiory reform and the Shoreluie Management Act consistent vath effects on the standand permimng processes and environmental review 12 The team should present for consideration by the Planning Coauiussion and the Board of County Coanmssioners either proposed orduiance/statute amendments or proposed resolutions to the Board, dunng the months of February and Manch, designed to zmpiement intenm orper,manent regulaaoas, which regnlations would be reviewed over a penod of six months to a year far theu efficiency and svocess of aperation 13 The team should remain operational for monitoruig and proposed adjusmaents for at least a penod af 12 and possibly as many as 18 months after the March/Apnl, 1996 deadline Hn/Fcci-1724 PxxoposA. Summary of EHSB 1714 EHSB 1724 is compnsed of nine parts Part I- Growth Management Act Part 11 - State Environmentat Policy Act Pari 111 - Shorelme Management Act Part 1V - Local Permtt Process Pan V - Devefopment Agreements Part VI - State Permit Coordination Part VII Appeals Part VIII Study Part IX - Miscellaneous Part I- Growth Management Act • Establishes a means by which cities and counties will "docket", i e, cornpile and maintain a list, of suggested plan or development regulation amendments and consider them dunng the annuai - amendment process • The permitting process is not to be used as a substitute for the comprehensive pfanning process • Cities and counties must include in their development regulations a procedure for any interested person to suggest plan or development regulation amendments • Goals and policies of a city or county's shoreline master program become an eiement of the comprehensive pian • Special consideration must be given to measures which preserve and enhance anadromous fisheries • Pubiic participation programs tnust be developed for proposed amendments or revisions to the comprehensive plen & Appeals of Hearing Board decisions may now be filed in any superior ccurt, instead of only the Thurston County superior court • The "Growth Management Planning and Environmental Review Fund" is established to make grants to focal govemments to help pay for detailed environmental irnpact statements which are integrated with comprehenswe or subarea plans and development regulations Part il - State Environrnental Policy Act • Th+s part states the underlying rationale for SEPA/GMA integration refiected in our SEPA/GMA workbook, reported in our progress report to the Legislature in December 1994, implemented by recent changes to the SEPA rules, and addressed in six pilot projects conducted by local government in 1994-95 Cail us for any of these materials • Proposed projects should receive environmental review which is integfated in a smgle project review process Part III - Shorelme Management Act • Reaffirms the cooperative program of shoreline management between {ocal government and the state 0 An excellent summary of this part has been published in the Spnng 1995 issue of Coastal Currents available from the Department of Ecology Part IV - Local Permit Process • The project review process must integrate land use and environmental impact analysis • Project review is based on the fundamental land use ptanning choices made in the community comprehensive plan and development regufations • Project review should not require additional studies or mitigation where existing regulations have adequately addressed e proposed project s probable adverse environmental impacts ~ Consistency in the project review process is determined by considering four factors found in applicable regulations or plans The type of land use allowed, the level of development aliowed, infrastructure, and the character of the proposed development Projects consistent with adopted pians and regulations should enjoy greater certainty o By March 31, 1996, each local government must pass regutations which mandate the combining of the environmental review process with the review ofi proJeci permrts, and provide for no more than one open record hearing and one closed record appeat • All local governments planning under 36 70A 040 must establish a permit review process that provides for the integrated and consolidated review and decisian on two or more project permrts relating to a project action • Local govemments not plannmg under 36 70A 040 may incorporate some or all of the provisions relating to integrated end consolidated permit review • A local government is not Iiabie for damages rf it fails to make a final decision within the one hundred twenty day penod tollowing notification to the applicant that the application is complete • The legistative body of the city or county may adopt a heanng examiner system as an alternative to the planning commission for the purpose of hearing and reponing on any proposai to amend a toning ordinance, when the zoning change is not of general appiicability, as well as those other issues tt believes should be reviewed and decided by a hearing examiner • Sole authority to approve finai plats, and to adopt or amend platting ordinances witl reside in the legislative bodies • The Department of Communtty, Trade and Economic Developrnent will provide techrncal assistance to local communities in deve{oping local permit processes which comply wnh these new regulations Part V - Devetopment Agreements • A local government may enter into a development agreement with a person having ownership or control of reai property within its jurisdiction • A development agreement sets forth the development standards and other provisions that apply to and govem and vest the development, use, and mitigation of the development of the real property for the duration specified in the agreement • Dunng the tetm of the agreement, n is binding on the parties and their ~ successors • A development agreemsnt mey not be subject to an amendment to a zoning ordinance or development standard or regulation or a new zoning ordinance or development standard adopted after the effective date of the agreement • Within twenty-eight days after receiving a project permrt application a local governmeni planning under 36 70A 040 must provide the applicant with a written determination of completeness (or non compieteness) Once the applicant submits the addittonal information (if any) identtfied by the local government as necessary for completeness the local government must notify the appiicant within fourteen days whether the application is now complete or if additional information is stili necessary ~ Once an application is complete, a final decision must be issued within one hundred -twentp days • ylJithin fourteen daysfollowing the determination that the application is complete, the local government must provide a notice of application to the public and to the agencies and departments with jurisdiction The notice must contain a description of the proposed project, a iist of the project permits tncluded in the application, identification of other permits not tncfuded in the application, identification of ex,sting environmentai documents and studies that evaluate the proposed project, the dates of the public comment period, ihe hearing (if appiicabie), and a statement of the preliminary detercnination of those development regulations which wiil be used for project mitigation and consistency • Except for a determination of significance, the locai government may not issue its threshold determination, or issue a decision or a recommendation on a project permit untii the expiration of the pubiic comment penod • if an open record predecision heanng is required and the local govemment's threshold determination requires public notice, the threshoid determination must be issued at least fifteen days pnor to ihe open record predecision hearing • Ail state and local agencies must cooperate to the fullest extent possible wrth the local govemment in holding a joint hearing if requested to do so • A local government is not required to provide for administrative appeals • All local governments planning under 36 70A 040 musi adopt procedures for administrative interpretation of their development regulations • There must be a pubfic hearing before a local government can approve a development agreement Part VI - State Permit Coordination • The Permit Assistance Center is established within the Department of Ecology • An administrative process will be established for designating a coordinating permit agency for a proJect, which wili ensure that the applicant has atl the infomnation needed to apply for the component permits that are incorparated in the coordinated permit process for the project coordinate the review of those permits by the respective partlcipating permit agencres, ensure that timely permit decisions are made by the participating permit agencies, and assist in resolving any confiict or tnconststency among the permit requirement and conditions that are to be imposed by the participating permtt agencies with regard to the project • If an applicant requests, the Permit Assistance Center will designate a coordinating permrt agency • Within twenty-one days of the date thai the coordinating pernnit agency is designated, the permrt agency will convene a meeting with the project applicant and the participating permit agencies to discuss required permits application requirements, and timelines ~ The applicant may withdraw from the coordinated permit process at any time • The applicant may request at any time that a participating permit agency withdraw from participation in the process on the basis of a reasonabie belief that the issuance of the coordinated permit would be accelerated by the agency s withdrawal Part VII -Appeals • The writ of certiorari for appeal of land use decisions is replaced by _ filing a tand use petition in superior court • The petition is timely if tt is filed and served on all identified persons within twenty-one days of the issuance of the land use decision ~ The court is requrred to provide expedited review of land use petitions and the matter must be set for hearing within sixty days of the date set for submitting the local jurisdiction s record • Reasonabie attorneys fees and costs will be awarded to the prevailing party or substantially prevailing party before the court of appeals or the suprerne coun Part'`VIII - Study • The 4-and Use Study ComFntsmon, consisting of eleven members --eppointed by the govemor and the three directors (of director designees) of the Departmepnts gj C9mmunity, Trade _Wd Economic Development, Transportaticsn^ and Ecology, is created to integrate and consalidate the state's land use laws into a single, manageable statute Part X - Misceilaneous • The sections of the act which create the Land Use Study Commission are declared necessacy for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect June 1, 1995 • The court is required to provide expedrted review of land use petitions and the matter must be set for hearing within sixty days of the date set for submitting the local jurisdiction's cecord • Reasonable attorneys fees and costs wiil be awarded to the prevailing party or substantially prevailing party before the court of appeais or the supreme court Part Vll{ - Study • The Land Use Study Commission, consisting of eleven members appointed by the governor and the three directors (or director designees) of the Departments of Commurnty, Trade and Economic Development, Transpartation, and Ecology, is created to integrate and consolidate the state s land use laws into a single, manageable statute Part X - Miscellaneous • The sections of the act which create the Land Use Study Commission are declared necessary for the tmmediate preservation of the pubfic peace, health, oc safety, or suppoirt of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect June 1, 1995 • There must be a public heartng before a local government can approve a development agreerneni Part V I- State Permit Coordination • The Permit Assistance Center is established wnhin the Department of Ecology • An administrative process will be estabfished for designating a coordinating permit agency for a projeci which will ensure that the applicant has all the tnformation needed to appiy for ihe component permits that are incorporatedin t`ie coordinated perrmit process for the project, coordinate the review of those permits by the respective participating permit agencies, ensure that timely permit decisions are made by the participating permct agencies, and assrst in resolving any conflict or inconsistency among the permit requirement and condit,ons that are to be imposed by the participating permit agencies with regard to the project • If an applicant requests, the Permit Assistance Center witl designate a coordinating permit agency • Within twenty-one days of the date that the coardinating permn agency is designated, the permit agency will convene a meeting wiih the project appiicant and the participating permit agencies to discuss required permits, appiication requirements, and timelines • The applicani may withdraw from the coordinatad permit process at any time • The applicant may request at any time that a participating permit agency withdraw from participation in the process on the basis of a reasonabie belief that the issuance of the coordtnated permit would be accelerated by the agency's withdrawal Part VII -Appeals • The wrtt of certiorari for appeal of land use decisions ts replaced by fiting a tand use petition in superior court 0 The petrtion is timely if it is filed and served on all identified persons withtn twenty-one days of the issuance of the land use decision ESHB 1724 KEY DATES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 1-925 June 1 ~ The Land Use Study Commission is created July 23 • All sections of ESHB 1724 take effect, except for those with the« own dates, noted below Nov 1 " The Land Use Study Commission makes its initial report of findings, conciusions, and recommendations 1226 Jan 1- The Permit Assistance Center wili establish an administrative process fqr designating a coordinattng perrnit agency for a proposed project March 31 • Each local government plannmg under RCW 36 70A 040 will establish an integrated and consolidated project permrt process that may be included in its development regulations Each local government will combine the environmental review process with the review of project permits and, with the exception of a determination of significance, provide no more than one open record hearing and one closed record appeal April 1- Each local govemment planning under RCW 36 70A 040 will provide a notice of apptication to the publcc and the departments and agencies with jurisdiction for each permit application received Each local government will tssue its notice of final decision on a project permit application within 120 days after the application is complete Dec 1 z First annual report to the legislature on potential conflicts and perceived inconsistencies among existing statutes from the Permit Assistance Center 1724 Resource ~ist There are several excellent summaries and analyses of ESH6 1724 currently available ESHB 1724 Integrating Growth Management Pfanning and Environmental Review ' AWC Fact Skeet Assoc~a~tron of Washin on Cities 1076 4r nk n Street S E, Olympia, WA 98501 (390) 7 3 4137 'Analysis of Regulatory Reform Bill (ESHB 1724) " Subir Mukerlee, Dtrecter of Ptannmg and-Cofflrnunitf'Development, City of Olympia P 0 6ox 1967 Olympia WA.9$507:1967 (360) 753-8314 "House Bill Report - ESHB 1724 " Staff Steve Lundin (House Committee on Government Operations) (360) 786-7127 Susan Nakagawa (House Committee on Appropriations) (360) 786-7145 "Memorandum to Mayor, City Council and Planning Comrnission 1995 Legislatrve Changes Reiative to Pianning issues (EHB 1305, ESHB 1724, and ESB 5776) " lan Munce, Director of Planning & Community Development, City of Anacortes, P 0 6ox 547, Anacortes, WA 98221 (360) 293-1900 "Memorandum to Sean Gaffney, Planning Depanment Regutatory Reform (ESHB 1724) - What Pierce County must do and when we must do it " Eileen M McKain, Deputy Prosecutmg Attorney, Pierce County, Civrl Division, 955 Tacoma Avenue South, Suite 301, Tacoma, WA 98402-21 fi0 (206) 596-6732 "Washington Coastal Currents" SMA integrated with GMA - Spring 1995 edition - Vol XVIV No 4 1997 Nov 1 Land Use Study Commission submits to the governor and legislature its recommendations about what timeiines, if any, shauld be imposed on ihe local government consolidated permit process Dec 1 Permit Assistance Center submits to the legisiature detailing the number of instances in which a coordtnating permtt agency has been requested and used, the amount of time eiapsed between the +nitial request and the ultimate approval or disapproval of the permits and the number of instances in which the expedrted appeals process was requested 1928 June 30 - The Land Use Study Commission completes its work and is dissolved A local gvvernment's exemption from liabrlity for failrng to make a decision on an apptication within 124 days expires, as does the 120 day rule Ju1y 1- Local governments must estabiish in their development regulatrons trme periods for local government actions on specific project permit applications and provide timely and predictabie procedures to determine whether a compieted project permit appiication meets the requirements of those development reguiations 1222 Jur.e 30 - The Permii Asststance Center is terminated ?..4.5?Q June 30 - Sections of ESHB 1724 dealing with Part Vl - State Permit ' Coordination, are repealed ~ 1724 Resource List There are several excellent summanes and analyses of ESHB 1724 currentiy available "ESHB 1724 integrating Growth Management Planning and Environmental Review AWC Fact Sheet Association of Washington Cities 1076 Franklin Street S E, Olympta, WA 98501 (360) 753-4137 ' Analysis of Regulatory Reform Bill (ESHB 1724) " Subir Nl.ukerjee Director of Planning and Community Development, City of Olympia P 0 Box 1967 OI ympia, WA 98507-1967 (360) 753-8314 "House 6i11 Report - ESH6 1724 " Staff Steve Lundin (House Committee on Government Operations) (360) 786-7127, Susan Nakagawa (House Committee on Appropriations) (360) 786-7145 "Memorandum to Mayor, City Council and Planning Commission 1995 Legislative Changes Relative to Planning lssues (EHB 1305, ESHB 1724, and ESB 5776) " lan Munce, Director of Planrnng & Community Development, City of Anacortes, P 0 Box 547, Anacortes, WA 98221 (360) 293-1900 "Memorandum to Sean Gaffney, Planning Department Regulatory Reform (ESHB 1724) - What Pierce County must do and when we must do it " Eileen M McKain, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Prerce Caunty, Civil Diwsion, 955 Tacoma Avenue South, Suite 301, Tacoma, WA 98402-2160 (206) 596-6732 "Washington Coastal Currents" SMA integrated with GMA - Spring 1995 edition - Vol XVIV No 4 ESHB 1724 KEY DATES FOR LOCAL -,0v'ERi :',i1ENT June 1 ~ The Land Use Study Commission is created July 23 • All~ectiorltpf ,E,SNB 1724 take effect, except for those with their own dates, noted below Nov 1 " The Land Use Study Commission makes its initiai reporc of YMdings,-concTusions, and recommendations 1996 Jan 1- The Permit Assistance Center will establish an adm,nistrative process for designattng a coordinating permit agency for a proposed project March 31 - Each local government pianning under RCW 36 70A 040 will establish en integrated and consolidated project permit process that may be inciuded in ns development regulations Each local govemment will combine the environmental review process with the review of proJect permits and with the exception of a determination of significance, provide no more than one open record hearing and one closed record appeal April 1- Each local govemment planning under RCW 36 70A 040 will provide a notice of application to the pubiic and the departments and agenctes with jurisdiction for each permit appltcation received Each local government will issue its notice of final decision on a project permrt application within 120 days after the application is complete Dec 1- First annual report to the legisfature on potential conflicts and perceived inconsi$tencies among existing statutes from the Permit Assistance Center DRAINAG E TECHNICAL REPORT' for the 3RD AND KOREN COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 7UNE, 1995 Prepared 1 for WYATT ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATES, P S 2510 N Puies Road pFFICIAL PUBUC DOCUMLMT Spokane, Washungton 9920§t,(%ANF CODUTY ENGINEER S OFFlM r 0 =G- \~L '190JECTI4 ~ t I~t~)[TTAl. 0 1 a P'r~~ By -TuTN TO ~7NTY E)WGiNEER ~ Inlmd Pacific Enganeerutg Company 707 yV 7th Avenue Suite 20i0 Spokune, WA 99204 ' (509)45&6840 f j DRAINAGE REPORT for the 3rd and Koren Commercial Development Spokane County, Waslungton June, 1995 Prepared for Wyatt Arclutects and Associatcs P S 2510 N Pines Raad Spokane, Washuigton 99206 Prepared by Inland Pac#`ic Engrneenng Companry 707 W 7th Avenue Saute 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6940 Tlus report has been prcpared by the staff of Inland Pacific Engiaeermg Compauty under the duectton of the undersigned professonal engineer whose seal and signature appear hereon ~ ~ ~ ~ZW2 EXPIRES 9/24 Todd R Vl~u e P'E-' P ~ 3rd arad Korert Co»vnercaal Development Drainage Narratcve GENERAL The 3rd and Koren Commercial Development is the commercial re-development of a 2 5 a,cre site in the northwest quadrant of the 3rd Avenue and Koren Road intersection in the Spokane Valley, within Spokane County, Washuigton The site is currently vacant with weeds and dirt stockpiles and some demohaon debns The cunent zonmg is B-3 which is consistent vnth the development proposed A 1" to 400' scale vicimty and soils map is provided PURPOSE The purpose of this report is tA deternnne the extent of storm drainage facilities which will be requued to dispose of the site generated stormwater runoff created by the development of the 3rd and Koren Commer+cial site The storm drainage facilities on ttus project srte will be designed to dispose of runoff from the ten year design storm Tlus development is witlun the Aquifer Sensitive Area of Spokane County and is subject to '208' requuements For tlus project the 10-year curve from the Spokane, Medical Lake, Reardon, Cheney and Rockford intensity, duration and frequency (IDF) curves were used AIVALYSIS METHODOLOGY The Rational Method, which is recommended for basins less than ten a,cres in sm, will be used to determine the geak discharges and runoff volumes for all onsite basms PROJLCT DESCRIPT70N The 3rd and Koren Commemaal Developcnent pr+oject will develop the 2 5 acre parcel into two seperate buddtngs, the first will be a mixed use office and warehousmg building of 19876 sq ft and the seoond budding benng a 12075 sq ft smgle use funuture store retail buddmg The 3rd and Koren Commercial Developme.nt pMect is located m Section 23, T 25 N, R 43 E, W M in Spokane County, Washmgton TIOPOGRAPHY ~ At the present time the 3rd and Kore.n Commercial ate is a faarly flat vacant lot with weeds, old budding matenals and dut stockpiles For development purposes, the natural sloping was used far design and is mauitained as possible throughout the project Inlancl Pacfic Engrnaenng Conwany D 1 3nl and %ren Dranage Report SOILS As can be seen from the accompanying soils map from the Spokane County Soils Survey as performed by the SCS, the site consists of the Gamson Senes of sods, pnmanly Gamson Gravelly Loam (GgA) on 0 to S percent slopes These sods as defined, ar+e excessively drained and have moderately rapid permeablhty Wittun tius area, due to soil types and slopes, this type of soil can be expected to drain slowly wnth a nunimum potential for erosion As defined vvithin the Spokane County Drainage Guideline, this type of soil has been pre-apprnved for the installation of drywells DRAlNAGE NARRATIVE O, ffszte Ba.sed upon the tapography of ttus site there are no offsite basuis considered for tlus project Onszte All onsite drainage will be collected aad treated using the "208" runoff inethod as descnbed in the Spokane County Guideluies for Stormwater Management To facihtate this analysls the 3rd and Koren Commercial site was divided into 5 permaaent basms A, B, C, D and B These basins are shown on the attached Basul Map Please note that for this anayLsts the buildings were not included in the calculahons as they will have non-asphaltic surfaces and therefore will discharge directly to drywells "208" Calculations Wittun each basin the streets and impervious surfaces are either left as an entire urut or divided into sub-basrns by curb drops or uilets which capture upstream stormwater runoff from the imperviaus street surface and duect the runoff into grassy '208' ponds either by overland or piped flows As shown on ihe '208' calculation worksheet included, the '208' storage volume pravided is adequate to perform '208' treatment for the runoff created by the first half inch of rauifall Curb Dcop Caiculatious It is usually necessary to check the adequacy of the curb drops provided to divert the runoff from the gutter int4 the '208' ponds Please note that no curb drop calculations are provided for ttus project as an attempt has been made to keep all curb drops in the sump condirion where the assumptton is that a 4 0' curb drop can handle 4 0 cfs of flow Intand Pac~J'ic Enginmrfn8 ComPa3' D2 3nt ond Koren Drmnagc Report DRAINAGE CALCULA770NS SUMMARY Calculations have been included as requued for Drainage Basm consideraaons such as QTR SS and pond rouhng calculahons, Peak Flow, Time of Concentration, "208" sizmg, drywell requirements, uilet sunng, curb drops as well as culverts and pipe flow some of wtucb are summanzed below with the remauung calculations in the appendix Witlun the calculagon sectaon seveml sketches, as well as pond details from the plans have been incorporated to demonstrate assumptions and conclusions The enclosed basin map should be used for raeference whea reviewing the basin descnptions below Basin A- Basin A is made up of the northeast partang lot and landscaped pomon of the north half of the project site It is seperated from Basui B by the 19876 sq ft building as shown in the Basin Map The water is intended to access Pond A using overland and gutter flow through a curb drap Basm B- Basm B is made up of the northwest garla.ng lot and landscaped pomon of the north half of the project site as well as the landscaped area over the on-site septic sysrem It is seperated from Basm A by the 19876 sq ft buildmg as shown in the Basm Map The water is intended to access Pond A using overland and gutter flow through a curb drop Basm C- Basm C is made up of the southeast pariang lot and landscaped portion of ihe south half of the project stte It is seperated from Basia D aad B by t6e 12075 sq ft buildmg and from Basm A by the crown section of the aocess road as shown in the Basm Map The water is mtended to acoess Pond A usmg overland and gutter flow through a curb drop Basm D- Basm D is made up of the southwest parking lot and landscaped portioa of the south half of the project site as well as the lands~raped area over the on-site septic system It is seperated from Basm C and E by the 12075 sq ft builduig as shown in the Basm Map The water is iatended to access Pond A using overland and gutter flow through a curb drop Basin E- Basm E is made up of a small portion of the south parlang lot and landscaped pomon of the south half of the project site It is seperated from Basm D and E by lugh points created through site grading as shown in the Basm Map The water is intended to access Pond A usuig overland and gutter flow through a curb drop lrrlond Paci, fic Engincenng Comony D3 3td ond Konn Drainage Report Table No 1- Basin Summary Table - Areas • .~~.ri , , ~r r 'Cotw bnpeoious R"off ~ Ar" (mr") f Aru k$F) t4) - ~ 1 - , A 0 S55 16772 06702 B 0 493 14700 06637 C 0 372 9076 05700 D 0 237 3760 04233 < < E 0 072 2424 07319 The followulg Table 2, includes the identified basins for tlus and the reqmred 208 elements as well as those provided for ttus project Table No 2- 208 Basin Swmmary , 3rd and Kntft*Comoerciai DiWeJopment » AASIN S Y ~ ~ . L ~~a~ P~rnd ~ >~~attrauae ~ ~p~ ~ ~ Are~ . Dryweft . RequW (co ftequuvt~ (sQ ProvJd+~~ ~e%Wred ~ A A 699 1398 1486 lA < < B B 613 1226 1232 lA C C 378 756 780 lA D D 157 314 315 lA . < < E E 101 202 198 lA " Type A is a Spokaae Staadard DryweU Single Depth Capaoity 0.3 cfs Typs B is a Spokane Standard DryweU - Double Depth Capacity 10 cfs 1nJQnd PaOftc Engineenn,q Company D4 3rd and Koren Dronage Report KANE COUNTY WASHINGTON - SHEET NUMBER 74 R 43 E I ;f, 'trqjI y 1 010 ~ ~f'iss~ ~Q . . ~ ~ ~1 v O a _ E a y ° +}r re ~ : ~ r Rl4 9x8 C ~ 'rr! F ~R roor,. I ~ Pir B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ! q ~ h~ ~ ~ •Sp~ t'~P& ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ' r i ia' _ r {y 5"` ~ t R, ~ ~ 4r rt~ t c y A " ~ e 1 d ~ ~ ~ • L.'~' ~ ~ ~ K~~ a Pr.' 4 ~M 1"',y ► ~ w,i~► ~i ~ ~n ~ ~ N/rr~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 . ~ ~ ~ E ~ ,~,'°F d •it r " ' ~ odp♦ h »r ..~t, • ~ ~Pp M ~ t C ~ z ! t ~fi ~ ; 0 : ~ ~ ' y BE ~ ~ ~ ~ 43un~~~ ol k 1 ~ ~ ~Me Pe9 sb ~ Gp~ vi . :E. T r q Q w PSB ~ 858 c , ` GPo PSU 13r8 OC a~~ J ~J J I ~V ~ l ~ y ( StC t~o DeC UmC SOC . Y' , .nt • KA ` gnq d S' t ° Gpe Fi-a Mki6C~♦ T ~ '3pC. Q~e ~t ~ 3j$~~ ''l , y PsA + , p~ ~c. " 3rd and Koren - Commercial Development Runoff Coefficient Caiculabons Basin Total Imperv C" Sum Ac A 24180 ~ 16772 06702 0 555 B 21464 14700 06637 0 493 C 16208 9076 05700 , 0 372 D 10320 3760 0 4233 1 0 237 E 3124 2424 0 7319 1 0072 ~ BOWSTRINO METH00 PRQIECT 3rd end Karen Cammelolel Devel PEAK RaYV CALCUlATION PROJECT 3rd end Kaen Cammerdel Denrel DETENTtON BABIN DEBIGN BASIN A 8A81N A OEBiGNER TRW Tot Ates 0b8 Aares OATE. 07105Jg5 ImA Mea 18772 8F Cm 007 Tlmo (ncrement (min) 5 CABE t 11me d Cano (min) 6 00 Outflow (ets) 03 S A. Ovedand Row Oeslgn Year Row 10 Ares (eaw) o sfis Ct- 016 bripeMaus Area (eq ft) 18772 Lm 5 ft C Faeta 06702 n ° 040 "208 Voluma ProtAded 0 S a 0 020 Aree C 0 973 To R 074 m!n by Equntion 3-2 0! Guldelines ?tme Time Inc Intene q Oeval Yd In Yd Out 8taege 180 R QulDer Aow (m►n) (eeo) MfhI (ofe) (au tl) (cu Iq (ou tq ss==as mmmmmm •sM~os smes~a ees"=en ■semms asmmsa zi • so o ~rz2 eco 300 sIe >>e 478 eo 3e0 z2■ so Typea•1o n o 0 418 Rdled ■ 9 6 6 300 918 1 18 478 90 989 S o 0020 10 600 2 24 0.83 585 180 405 <=o is 900 177 ose soo 270 390 d= 0111 (L 20 1200 14b O.$1 702 380 342 25 1 S00 121 045 m 450 211 a R Q Tc To tft 1 00 30 1800 104 049 798 640 198 emmmmm memmm■ sMsmmm ■ac=os YfDQa"D aaoane esseaa ,~6 Q1QQ 0,81 094 745 690 116 0 82 0 09 1 18 165 6 00 918 1 18 40 2400 082 031 783 720 43 45 27G0 0 74 0m 771 810 -08 Opesk fa Case 1. 1 18 afa 60 3000 0 8B 026 786 A00 115 55 9900 064 0.24 810 890 160 so 3800 0 81 0.29 840 1080 -240 CASE 2 65 3900 0 60 0 22 889 1170 277 70 4200 0 6B 0.22 928 1260 -M Caae 2 aaeumea n Time ol Coneer►Oetlon laae tlhen 6 minutas so fhstlhe 75 4800 0 68 021 A68 1350 S91 peek Aow ■.80(318)(hnp Aree) • 110 c!e 80 4800 0 59 0a0 868 1440 -474 AS b100 0 62 0 19 1009 159Q -824 80 6400 0 80 018 1023 1820 -697 90 1ha Pealc Aow fa Ihe 9ftn le Ihe greater of the lwo Aows 8S 5700 0 48 019 1057 1710 -GS3 1 1 a ete too eooo oae ole 1089 lsoo »t QOB ORAINA4E FOND GALq1UiT10N8 Requlred 20B Storoge Valume - tmpavloue Aree x 6In 11Z Inik 898 ou R 208 Btaage Ydume Provlded 0 cu ft DAYVMELL HEQUTAEMENT8 10 YEAR DESIGN STOAM 'Maudmum Ssornge Required Dy Bowebing 405 cu R Number and Type o! Orywella Requhed 1 8ingte 0 Oouble INIAND PAGFlC ENOlNEERINO 80W91'RINO METM00 PROJECT 3rd and Koran Canmerolal Derd PEI1K FIOW CALCULATtON RROJECT 3ad end Koren Canmemel Oe+rd QETENTION BA81N OESIGN 8A81N B 8A81N B OESlQNEFL TRW toc Area o aa Acree oATE. 07107res Imp Area 14700 6F C ~ 0 88 Time Increment (min) s CABE 1 Time af Canc (mtn) S OD .....m. OutAow (a!s) 03 5 A. Ovwlend Raw Realgn Year Row 10 Mee teuxesl 0 483 Ct am 015 ImpeMare Area (aq tq 10700 L= 5(t C Fadar 06837 ~ w 040 208 VdWRe PrOVlded 0 S o 0020 Area C 0 321 Ta • 074 mir► by Equaatlon 3.2 ot GtAdeiines Time Tfine Inc lntene 0 Deird Vd 1n Yd Out 3taege 250 n Guttsf eow tmi+l (am) (trvhd (Cfa) (W tt) ta+ fo tC' m ■msmm• ■mrmw■ msmmm■ ■mseos ■owoooa eaeoaa eseaao Zt ■ 60 0 Fa Z2 6 00 900 318 104 418 9b 328 12 e 60 Typ@ B=10 n s 001e adied = as s 300 s 1e 104 418 eo 328 8• 0020 10 800 2.24 0 73 S15 190 395i 15 900 17T 0 66 580 270 910 dm 0110 ft 20 1200 145 047 818 S60 259 26 1600 1 21 0 40 834 450 164 A R 0 To Ta Gcfd I Oa 30 t800 104 034 847 340 107 maammn mmmmmm ■mmmm• maasma mmaasm ■srmo■ ■mmm ~s .~S Z100 091 0'30 856 890 2~11 061 0 05 115 419 5 00 3.18 104 40 2400 0 82 0 27 671 77D '48 46 47a0 4 74 024 878 B10 192 Opeek fot Ceae 1- 104 cfe BO 3000 0 88 0 22 890 900 210 56 3300 oea 021 »Q sso 27e 8p 3800 0 81 020 739 1080 -341 CASE 2 85 3OGO 060 0 20 788 1170 384 sammmm■ ?D 4200 058 018 816 1260 -044 Caae Z eeeumes a Time of Caneentradan lea tlmn 6 mhiu0ea ao tlw Ihe 76 4500 0,58 018 843 1350 .507 peek now = e0t9 1eIM+P Ar*• 0.97 cre eo eaoo 053 017 s6o 1440 .sso es 51oo osz o» ees 1630 -"S 90 eaoo oso ole eoo 1620 720 So, ihe Peek flaw ta tlre 8asln Is the gnaater ot tl►e lwo flavre 95 8lOD 049 016 990 1710 780 104 CIC 100 6m 0 48 018 96B 1800 -842 308 ORAINAQE POND CALWlATiONS Requred 208 8taage Vdume w hllpefYlOUti Area x 5 In / 14 InAI 813 W R 208 Storege Ydume Proyided 0 cu K ORYMVELL REOUIREMENTS 10 YEAR OE91iiN STORM Medmum 6taraee Reyuue0 by 8owstring 936 cu h ~ Ntunber end Type of Qrywella Requlted 1 81nAle 0 Doubte INLAND PACIFIC EN3INEERINO { JNI!l33NIDN3 OW10lId GNM'INI e14no0 0 •IGWS 1 PwmbO!! 01Pm0J0 P 8dA1 PuR xKWN v rto tet Bu4qwog Aq pwpnbey eBoicig wnuiwyy W!l018 NOIS30tltl311W 81N3W3klIf1D3d 113MAAH0 Yn2 0 DeRMmd ownpA e8wM8 BOZ Uno 8L6 WLq tI !u! 9 x otuy ono"dwl . OWpA a8WM6 BOZ Pe~nbey 8N011d1fib'ndO ONOd 30YNItlk10 e0t 6M OOBI 999 0t0 8b0 0008 ODt op L80 tO$t 0111 608 0&0 61P 0 OQL9 SB tmcD004 e4lpMMBe4laiWM 8WXJ140YXwdGLA'oS LB01 0E9t 6AS «0 090 0009 08 9w OESt pL4 tt0 L9'0 0018 SB eW orr< <sg «o cro ooev ae wP os o -(au+d dw)ie► sloa •mau *ad 00e- OSE& epS LI O 990 00st 91 etA 1WI os somYiW g uotA =I uopAusmao W eWiL Q wwnsao Z ert93 ►6[ 08Z& 8ZS Lt0 990 OOZP OL ...•■W. t9A, Ol lI 809 610 090 00n 48 t 39tl0 W9* osot eIr sIo teo ooes w ets oee t" vio veo oose 99 ssa ooe ,uro o► o ee o ooos 09 40 te o -1 asco xa xvedo ote- ole o" e t o dt o oott st S8L Ou 4E4 L S O t8 0 0009 Qb 18 0 8{ 6 009 f10 94'0 40 0 9E'O SOC. OF'~ sad 8t0 t6'0 OOIt 9E •■•a.■ ..ts.. ..v■e■ ...:.e ..ao.. M OdS 6td ZL'0 001 0091 QB s0 I mm ol 01 0 tl m OsI► 1&> 8t 0 tZ t 0091 9t Oti 09E 00> tC 0 SO' t OdL t Od 71 Soo4 m D Ooi ota ets eso «k oas st E91 091 66S 14'0 R. L 009 Ol 0300 • S ~8 t 08 IlZ L9 0 916 OOS S 4 E- Pelpd M0 0 m u 0 l= 8 edAl 09 ■ ZZ 19t 08 IlZ L8 0 9i 6 OOS 009 LZ i0a 0 04 ■I2 esamaa ■mmmoo momassm ■mmamm ■ees=s msmmm■ •mams• (M no) Iu noI Qj no) (SP) 44IW (ca0) (UIW) MOd joUng 71 QL 88mS 3n0 pA u! pA pm00 'qua3W nq e++l1 eWl1 coWIaPIng N L-c uopnb3 A4 WW I[ 0 =~1 Zm0 OvuN OZO 0 n 8 o PePV=d ewnpA e0 oa o ■ u L9 0 JOPOA 0 'L 9 ■ 1 8L06 (V bc) " empied+q B t 0 ■30 uE O ISam1 m+v o► MOa UBM MOe vUVuMo v s sa f%*1Awwm ~~Q=m=m 009 (uIW) CLO1Pewll 13M S (Ww) 1usumoui euul LB'o ■ ~ dS 8L06 m11 dwI SBJLWlO 311f0 SBMd L6 0 wfll 101 M!!1 :M01630 0 NI8a9 0 NfSYB N9183CINI9Y8 NOLLN3130 MADO MMu~WOO LOJONPURPJC 103Mkld NOIlY1f101N'J M01:f X113d PeO Iop1eW1+M9 UMN pulp W6 103t'Okld QOH13W ONkd18Ma8 BOWBTRINO ME7HOD PROJECT 3td end Koren Corrimerolet Devel pEAK FLOW CALCUtATION PRWECT 9rd and Koron CammwdW Devd OEIENTION BASIN OE81QN BA91N D BA81Nt D DEStdNER: TiiW Tot, Nee 0 24 Aaes DATE 07107195 Imp Aren 3790 SF cm 042 - Ttme Increment (min) S CA9E t iGne ol Conc (min) 500 9 putllpy (Ch) 03 aesee5 ROY61{OfIdROW QBS1ABVear AoW 10 qrea tQcmy 0237 Cte O1S ~~~(eq fQ 3760 L• b ft C feCW 04233 n• 0 40 208 Vdume Pralded 0 8■ 0020 Area C 0100 Te ■ 074 rtdn by Equatian 3.2 of Gufdelbres time Time Inc. Intena 0 Oe+rel Yd In Vd Out Staage eo R Cktter Raw Imin1 (sec) PnAh" (de) (cu m ta+ ft1 (a+ f1 mmmmm■ swvnea seaaom onaoee oaeaeaa aoaese ecamaa Zt ■ SOO FarZ2 600 300 318 092 128 80 98 22 • 5p Type B~ 10 ' n s OC18 Ralled ~ 9.5 b 900 918 0,92 128 8o 36 S s Q 02D 10 600 2 24 022 158 180 22 Is eoo 177 018 17e 270 -92 d• 0079 n, 20 imoo 145 ois +89 300 25 1e00 121 012 19e 460 -Me A R 0 tc Tc toml I Qa 30 1900 104 010 188 640 342 anma~s szwmaate smsasm ssmsm■ mmmrsa ses~sa ■~s~ts■ 3$ 2100 0 8) 0.09 201 wo 429 031 004 0 48 0 87 5 00 318 0.92 40 2400 082 0 OS 268 720 d14 45 7700 0 74 0 07 206 810 -642 Opeek tar Cese 1= 0 92 e!e ' 60 3000 0 68 0 07 212 A00 a898 ' 55 9300 064 008 218 8B0 772 6p 9600 0 81 006 227 1080 -M CASE 2 8S 9900 0 BO 0 08 241 1170 -929 .s■■..■ TO 4200 068 008 250 1260 1010 Caee 2 eswtta e Time of CancenOrotlon lesa thar+ 5 minuDos eo ihat fhe 75 4600 O 58 0 09 259 1350 1091 peek flaw ■ 90(918)(ImA Aree) • 0 25 cia 80 4800 0 69 005 261 1440 1178 88 5100 0.52 005 271 1590 1259 eo saoo 050 aas 276 1620 +344 8o tlha Peek Aow tor fhe BaWn Is the g►enter al Shelwo Bcwa 85 5700 0 49 005 285 1110 1425 032 do 100 aoo 046 005 294 1e00 isoe 208 DRAIMAGE PONO CALCULATIONB pegu)red'268 8taege Vdume ■ Impeivloue Arm x b fn 112 bUft 167 cu ft 208 8taage Ydume Ptorlided 0cuft ppY1NELLREGUIREMENTS 10 YEAR OE81GN STORM MeWmum gtaege pequfred py gowebing 38 ai R kumber and Type aT Qqwella Requlred 1 9fngle 0 Double INUND PACIFiC EAIOINEEAINO BOYVSTAING ME1'H00 PROJECT 9rd end Koren Carrtmerdd Qevel PEAK ROW CALCIILATION PROJECT 3rd end Koren Commerola! Devel flETENTION 8A81N DE81GN BA81N E 13A81N E DE91tiNER TRW ta Arm o 07 ac►ea DATE. 07107195 Imp Aren 2424 8F C m 073 Tfine Inaement (rtdn) 5 CA8E t Tfine af Cone (min) S 40 Outllow (ols) 09 8 h. Oveiland Flow Deslgn Year Flow 10 Ares (acm) 0072 Ct a Q 15 fmpeMaue Maa (aq fq 2424 L~ g R C Faatat 07319 n• 0 40 '208 Vdume Provided 0 ~k= 8 O 0020 Mea C 0.053 To = 074 min by Equehon 3-2 a! Qufdelines Ttme Time Ino lntens 0 Deval Yd In Yol Out 8taroge ao h cl,aer Row (min) IBeC1 "I fafel (a+ ft) (eU h) (cu to StMiM■ ■Qft==i Ofmimf mOmmmi m0ssmis =Sl3i0 =Ms=== Z1 e 500 F01 Z2 S 00 900 318 011 87 80 23 <sa 22 e SO Typs 8~ 10 nm 0 018 Rdlad ' 9.6 5 300 918 017 87 80 23 c.. s• 0020 to eoo 224 012 83 Ieo -07 16 eoo 177 oos es 270 177 dm 0 040 IL 20 1200 145 0 08 99 380 261 25 1500 121 008 102 460 -W A R 0 Ta TobEe! I Oc 30 lsop 104 0.05 104 aqp ,438 s..■■. .......:o.:v 95 2100 091 005 tOB 830 d21 0 08 002 0 08 0 89 6 00 918 017 40 2400 0 82 0 04 108 }QO 412 45 2700 0 74 0 04 109 810 701 Gpeek (a Caae 1- O 17 efe 60 3000 0 B8 004 111 800 789 55 9300 4 84 003 115 890 -875 ~ 80 9800 0 81 0 09 118 1080 461 CASE 2 BS 3900 060 0 03 127 1170 1043 •■m•s•• 70 4200 069 009 191 1280 1120 Ceao 2 eeamea a idne of Caneenfiddon lesa Ihan s Mnutes eo tha! the 78 4500 050 003 138 1360 1214 peek now • e0(3 10)(lmv arem) - o Ie eta so aeoo 053 003 197 1440 1303 88 8100 0 62 0 09 149 1690 1387 80 6400 0 80 0 09 145 1820 1476 8q the Peek Aow 1a the Bnsln ia tlte grenter of Ihe Mro Aowe 95 5700 0 49 0 03 1 SO 1710 1580 O 17 ote 100 8000 0 48 0 00 154 1800 1846 208 DRAINAGE POND CALQULATION3 Required 206 Staage Vdume - Imperviwe Area x 6 In I 12 In/It 101 au 8 208 8taege Valume Provided 0 cu ft ORYWELL REQUIREMENT8 10 YEAH DEStGN 8TOAM Maxdmum SCorege ReqWred Ey 8awWng -23 cu it NumDa end lype ot Dryweile Requirod 1 SlnAte 0 Oaubie INLAND PACIFlC HNOINEERINO ! INSTALL TYPE ~A ORYWQl PER SPOKANE COUNTY STANOARO B-1 WtiH 1YPE 4 METAL FRIWE dc GRATE (aM ELa194130 I PROPERTY UNE . - - ' - - ~ - - KOREN RDAD 1YpE 8 CURB 10^ g~e . . ~ ` A -Y , 4 TYPE 1 CURB INLET e925 tC EL=tsat sa SLOPE oma+ FLaw • ~ -t - - - - - - -i - - - ~ ~ o o.oo» IT/Fr ~ -so.W _ - - - ~ - a rnE I cxJRe iNLE-r 4 IYPE 1 CURB INLET ' lYPE A CURB TC EL=1942.08 TC E1.=194387 ~ POND "A» 1 WLUME REQ'Q-689 C F 5 8Tii1 AREA REC'D=1388 S F BTM AREA PROYIDEDa1486 S.F B'Tirl Eta1940 80 I 1 ~ 6' 1YPE 1 CUR6 INLET TY'E A CURB TC EL=1941 15 - ~ n ao' ~ INSTALI. TYPE pJ4r DRYWEL. PER SPOKANE COUMY STANDARD B-1 ls5 ~ noa~ WtTH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATF ~ - - - - Rlhl E1.=1940 75 ■ J ~ ~ PROPERTY LJNE POND 2 VOLUME REQ'D=613 C F 5 8TM AREA REa'D= 1226 S F 8TM AREA PROVIDED=1232 S F BTM Q.=1940 25 ~ VOLUME REQ'0=599 C F BTM AREA REQ'Da 1398 S F BTM AREA PR4VIDED= 1486 S F BTM EL.-1940 80 ~ r~ t , » PE B CURB ~ INSTALI. TYPE 'A" DRYWEI.L PER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD B-j KOREN RD WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE , RIM ELa1942 30 ► r rB c < ~ 135 ao ~ - - - - - i--~ _ - - - ~ PROPERTY IINE ~ ~ - - - t30 L ~ O _ 4o 4e75 f D qt ~ 4' TYPE 1 CURB INLET 4' TYPE 1 CURB INLET TC EL= 1942 40 TC EL= 1943 87 , J 1YPE A CURB ~--n POND "C' 3 - VOLUME REQ'D=384 46 C F 5 8TM AREA REQ'0=764 92 S f 8TM AREA PROVIDED=780 S F 81'M EL=194180 1 i~ TYPE A CURB , - 4' TYPE 1 CURB IN..ET TC EL= 1944 05 TYPE B CURB = $ - a~ 7 v _ a5 00' PROPERTY UNE L INSTALL TYPE "A" DRYWELL PER SPOKANE COUMY STANDARD B-t INITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE RIM EL=1943 25 POND n U ~ ~ VOLUME REO'D=157 C F 5 BTM AREA REQ'D=314 S F 8'i'M' AREA PROYIDEO=315 S F BTM EL.=1942 75 V POND C' ~ 7OLUME ~ REQ'a=380746 C F 5 BTW AREA REQ'13=760 92 S F 8TM AREA PROVIDEDa780 S F 9TM EL=194180 H , I-~ TYPE 8 CURB 3RD AVENUE ~ PROPER'lY LINE i - - • ~ ~ ~ I $ 3~ (X) 1 1YPE A CURB y ~ =3JRa_ 1_ 1 a - 4' TYPE 1 UR8 INLEf STA 8+75 HIRD AVE ) ~~INSTALL NpE "A" DRYWELL TC EL=194 45 PER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD 8-1 WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE RIM fl =1943 65 POND 5 1/OLUME REQ'Da98 54 C F 5 B'TM AREA REQ'D=197 08 S F 8TM AREA PROVIDED=198 S F 8TM ELa194315 Page 1 OIAFICE OIA TBTs COUNTY ffiNC3INSBR SPORANB COUNTY, WASHINGTON Project Eagle Mountain Date 7-11-95 Addreas S 204 Koren Review 1 Parcel No 23531-0802+ Ref No B95043 The County Engineering Department has completed a review of the above referenced project The following items need to be addressed 1 Show the 2' R/W dedication on Third Avenue Also, a copy of the recorded property deed is required to prepare the dedication documents 2 Add the datum note which appears on Sheet 3 3 Revise the three pavement elevations shown 4& 5 Coordinate taper lengths and beginning stations on Sheets 1 and 3 6 The R/W width on Roren is only 30' 7 Correct the Third Avenue R/W width 8 Submit revised grade calculations, showing all grades, cross- slopes, and low points 9 Show the R/W widths and dedication on the details 10 Add the scale to the curb return details 11 Coordinate the curb return elevation between Sheets 2, 3, & 4 12 Review the drainage on this curve The flow arrows shown on the detail do not correspond with the road profile elevatione 13 Add drainage notes 14 Optional Add top of pavement elevations for clarity 15 Revise Third Avenue R/W widths 16 Provide drainage calca for road & show facilities on plans ~ ~ OFFtcraL PuBLic oocuMErvr PROJECT WYATT ARCHI TECTS - THIRD AND KOREN i~~OKANE COUNENGINEER'g p~ PROJECT 95559 08"GINAL PREPARED BY MBZ DATE 5/ 11 /95 f7AL a ui-l,g TO COUNTY ENG~'NM KOREN +--------t--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ ;STATION ;CL ELEV ;DIST EO;ELEV EOP;EXST DEL;DEL NEW ;ELEViTOC; +--------+--------+--------t--------+--------t--------+--------+ ; 525 ; 42 27 ; 20 ; 42 15 ; 0 006 ; 0 02 ; 42 37 ; +--------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------t--------t ; 550 ; 42 61 ; 20 ; 42 54 ; O 0035 ; 0 02 ; 42 71 ; ; 575 ; 42 83 ; 20 ; 42 85 ;-0 001 ; 0 02 ; 42 93 ; ; 600 ; 43 03 ; 20 ; 42 87 ; 0 006 ; 0 02 ; 43 13 ; +--------+--------+--------t--------+--------+--------+--------+ ; 625 ; 43 16 ; 20 ; 43 15 ; 0 0015 ; 0 02 ; 43 28 ; +--------+--------+--------+--------+--------t--------+--------t ; 650 ; 43 37 ; 20 ; 43 33 ; 0 002 ; 0 02 ; 43 47 ; L---------r----------♦ ; 675 ; 43 6 ; 20 ; 43 48 ; 0 006 ; 0 02 ; 43 70 ; ; 700 ; 43 82 ; 20 ; 43 34 ; 0 024 ; 0 02 ; 43 92 ; t--------t--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------t i 725 ; 44 01 ; 20 ; 44 08 ;-0 0035 ; 0 02 ; 44 11 ; +.r...------♦--------.}.--------+--------+-------r+---w----i.--------+ ; 750 ; 44 21 ; 20 ; 44 29 ;-0 004 ; 0 02 ; 44 31 ; ; 775 ; 44 4; 20 ; 44 51 ;-0 0055 ; 0 02 ; 44 50 ; +--------+--------+--------+--------+--------t-__------+--------+ ; 840 ; 44 59 ; 20 ; 44 15 ; Q 022 ; 0 02 ; 44 69 ; +--------+-__-----+--------+--------t--------+--------+--------+ ; 825 ; 44 78 ; 20 ; 44 7; 0 004 ; 0 02 ; 44 88 ; ; 850 ; 44 98 ; 20 ; 44 96 ; 0 001 ; 0 02 ; 45 08 ; ; 875 ; 45 17 ; 20 ; 45 29 ;-0 006 ; 0 02 ; 45 27 ; ; 900 ; 45 36 ; 20 ; 45 38 ;-0 001 ; 0 02 ; 45 46 ; +--------t------- -t--------+--------+--------+--------t--------t ; 925 ; 45 55 ; 20 ; 45 52 ; 0 0015 ; p 02 ; 45 65 ; +--------t-___----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ ; 950 ; 45 75 ; 20 ; 45 65 ; 0 005 ; 0 02 ; 45 85 ; THIRD ;STATION 12'CL ELE;DIST EO;ELEV EOP;EXST DEL;DEL NEW ;ELEVOTOC; ; 751 13 ; 45 49 ; 12 ; 44 98 ; 0 043 ; 4 040 ; 45 16 ; ; 775 ; 45 56 ; 12 ; 45 02 ; 0 045 ; 0 040 ; 45 20 ; +--------+--------+--------+--------+---------t--------t--------+ ; 800 ; 45 63 ; 12 ; 45 12 ; 0 043 ; 0 040 ; 45 30 ; +---------+--------t--------+--------+-__-----+--------+-----_--_t ; 825 ; 45 7; 12 ; 45 25 ; 0 038 ; O 038 ; 45 45 ; ; 650 ; 45 74 ; 12 ; 45 34 ; 0 033 ; 0 033 ; 45 57 ; ; 875 ; 45 81 ; 12 ; 45 36 ; 0 036 ; 0 036 ; 45 59 ; ; 900 ; 45 89 ; 12 ; 45 51 ; 0 032 ; 0 032 ; 45 76 ; ; 925 ; 45 94 ; 12 ; 45 77 ; 0 014 ; 0 014 ; 46 16 ; ; 950 1 46 ; 12 ; 45 68 ; 0 027 ; 0 027 ; 45 97 ; I ~'`b i 'a 1 ~ , • 1 0 ~ `e ~ ~ , t ~ { 1 t _ ~ ~v r ~ d • ~ A ~ ~ ~ jok 1 - ; ~ r • ~ _ . a 04 - - aatiS • ~ ,o _.i~~~ • ! • ~ s ~,Iy " - ' a` ~,,'1l►~' ~ p~,~ t s„rC~ .r ns r O O~~` - - ' ` pR~~,~► rTt~~►1,_,K, . ~ J i~~ ~ G ~ LC~~ _ _ ..~~'~'~„a.~.i►t~ ~ _ - ~ ~ •n t1E%'j ~ a ~ ~.+^'~~-__~a~ ~ • ~ S' ~~'~EL Ui►.33't5 r. , ~ ~ _ 1 ~ y► L. EQ-T IDhptp D '~qo,tED 01%~ ~ ..t - p cr •~p - _ N~ ~ ~ - a ~ ~a ~ r ~ ~ ~ _ 4a a ~ ~i;~~..rB'/'~~_~ ~ti ~i.~ r r rv~•,• .n+'IY~!/~ ~ ►f~ k ~ ~..r+W ■ '"a ~ r~ ~~.ic,.'' - - - ,.,.s~ : _ ~ _ ,'~Y~• r t ti~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC July 7, 1995 W O No 95559 Spokane County Pubhc Works Engineering/Budding Division W 1026 Broadway Spokane, VVA 99260 Attn Doug Busko Re 3rd and Soren Commemal IDevelopment Project Dear poug Enclosed please find two copies of the storm drunage report and two basin maps for the above r+efereoced project If you have any other queshons regarding this,project please do not hesitate to call , Sincerely, Inla d Pacific Engineering Company ~ ~ ~ Todd R Wlupple, P E TRW/tw cc file 707 West 7th Swte 200 Spokane Washington 99204 509-458-6840 FAX 309 458 6844 ~ , , D-R-AINAGE TECHNICAL REPORT for the 3RD AND KOREN COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NNE, 1995 Prepared for , WYATT ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATES, P S 2510 N Fines Road Spokane, Washmgton 99206 , ► i Preparea sy ' OFFtCiAL PUBLIC DQCUMENT SF'QKANE COUNTY ENGINLEER s oFFIM Inland Pac~fic Enganeering Company ofa 707 W 7th Avenue , 'ROJE(:T tt Suue 20i0 sueMirraL h ~ . Spokane, WA 99204 RCTllRMT?#C*~ 1~TY ENG!NEER (509)458-6840 ~ DRAINAGE REPORT for the 3 rd and Koren Commercial Developrnent Spokane County, VVashington June, 1995 Prepazed for Wyatt Architects and AssocLates P S 2510 N Puies Road Spokane, Waslungfon 99206 PreWed by Inland Pactf'ic Engtneenng Companry 707 W 7th Avenue S'rute 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 This report has been prepared by the staff of Inland Pacific Enguieenng Comgany under the duechon of the undemgned professioaal engineer whose seal and signature appear hereon r p~~ ► ~ ~ bt ~ • ~ 2W2 EXPIRES 9/24~ Todd R ~ 3rd and Koren Commercaal Developmeru Draanage Narrative GENER4L The 3rd and Koren Commercial Developme,nt is the commercial re-development of a 2 5 acre site in the northwest quadrant of the 3rd Avenue and Koren Road intersection in the Spokane Valley, widun Spokane County, Washmgton The site is currently vacant with weeds and dut stockpiles and some demoution debns The current zorung is B-3 which is consistent with the development proposed A 1" to 400' scale vicvuty and soils map is provided PURPOSE The purpose of dus report is to deternune the ext,ent of storm draunage facilities which will be r+equued to dispose of the site generated stormwater runoff created by the develapment of tbe 3rd and Koren Commercial srte The storm drainage facthties on this project site will be designed to dispo5e of runoff from the ten year design storm Tlus development ts within the Aquifer Sensitive Area of Spokane County aad is subject to '208' requuements For tlus project the 10-year curve from the Sgokane, Medical Lake, Reardon, Cheney and Rockford inteauty, durataon and frequency (IDF) curve.s wer+e used ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The Rational Method, wiuch is recommended for basms less th~an ten acres in size, will be used to determine the peak discharges and runoff volumes for all onsite basins PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 3rd and Koren Commercial Develapment project will develop the 2 5 acre paroel into two seperate builduigs, the first will be a mUCed use office and warehousuig building of 19876 sq ft and the sevond budding bemg a 12075 sq ft single use furruture score retail buddmg The 3rd and Koren Commercial Development project is located in Section 23, T 25 N, R 43 E, W M in Spokane Couaty, Washington TZOPOGRA.PHY At the present tirne the 3rd and Koren Commercial sit,e is a fairly flat vacant lot with weed,s, old bwldmg matenals and dut stockpdes For development purposes, the natural slopwg was used for design and is mamtmned as possible throughout the project Inland Pac~'ic Engrneenng Compony D 1 3nd and Koren Dranage Report soILs As can be seen from the accompanying soils map from the Spokane County Sods Survey as performed by the SCS, the scte conasts of the Garnson Senes of soils, pnmanly Gamson Gravelly Loam (GgA) on 0 to 5-percent slopes These srnls as defined, are excessively drauted and have moderately rapid permeability Witlun this area, due to sotl types and slopes, ttus type of soil can be expected to drain slowly wnth a rturumum potential for erosion As defined withm the Spokane County Drainage Guideluie, tius rype of soil has been pre-apprnved for the installation of drywells DRAINAGE NAR1Z477VE Offsrte Based upon the topography of ttus site there are no offsite basms considered for this projecL Onsde All oasite drainage will be collected and treated using the "208" runoff inethod as descnbed m the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management To faciLtate this analysis the 3rd and Koren Commercial site was divided urto 5 permanent ba,sins A, B, C, D and E These basins are shown on the attached Basin Map Please note that for ttus anaylsis the buddings were not included in the calculations as they wdl have non-asphaltic surfaces and therefore will discharge directiy to drywells n2Mn CWCII18tlOnS Within each basin the stmts and impemous surfaces am eather left as an entire urut or divided into sub-basins by curb drops or uilets wtuch capture upstream stormwater runoff from the impernous street surface and direct the runoff into grassy '208' ponds either by overland or piped flows As shown on the '208' calculation worksheet included, the '208' storage volume provided is adequate to perform '208' breatment for the runoff created by the first half uich of rauifall Curb Drop Calculatious It is usually necessary to check the adequacy of the curb drops provided to divert the runoff from the gutt,er into the '208' ponds Please note that no curb drop catculations aze pmvided for ttus project as an attempt has been made to keep all curb drops in the sump condition where the assumption is that a 4 0' curb drop can handle 4 0 cfs of flow lnlarrd Pocfic Enguutnng Comporry D2 3rd and Koren Dranoge Raport DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SUMMARY Calculations have been uicluded as required for Drainage Basin oonsiderations such as QTR SS and pond routxng calculations, Peak Flow, Tune of Concentration, "208" sizing, drywell requirements, Wet smng, curb drops as well as culverts and pipe flow some of wtuch are summanzed below wnth the remauung calculations in the appendix Withn the calculaaon section several sket,ches, as well as pond detads from the plans have been incorporated to demonstrate assumptioas and conclumons The enclosed basin map should be used for reference when reviewing the basin descnptions below Basm A- Basm Ais made up of the northeast parlang lot and landscaped pomon of the north hal.f of the project site It is seperated from Basin B by the 19876 sq ft buildmg as showa in the Basm Map The water is intended tro access Pond A using overland and gutter flow through a curb drop Basm B- Basm B is made up of the northwest parlang lot and landscaped pornon of the north half of the project site as well as the landscaped area over the on-site septtc system It is seeperated from Basm A by the 19876 sq ft bui.ldmg as shown in the Basm Map The water is intended to aocess Pond A using overland and gutter flow through a curb drop Basm C- Basm C is made up of the southeast parkang lot and landscaped portion of the south half of the project site It is seperated from Basm D and E by the 12075 sq ft. budduig and from Basm A by the crown section of the aocess road as shown in the Basin Map The water is intended to access Pond A usuig overland and gutter flow through a curb drop Basm D- Basm D is made up of the southwest pariang lot and landscaped pomon of the south half of the project site as well as the laadscaped area over the on-site septic system It is seperated from Basm C and E by the 12075 sq ft building as shown in the Basm Map The water is intended to access Pond A using overland and gutter flow through a curb drop Basm E- Basm E is made up of a small portion of the south parlang lot and landscaped portivn of the south half of the project site It is seperated from Basm D and E by high points created through ute grading as shown in the Basm Map The water is intended to access Pond A using overland and gutter flow through a curb drop Inland Padfic EagrneednS Cowan3' D3 3rd artd Konn Dr+mnoge Riport Table No 1- Basin Summary Tabte - Areas 1 1 ~ x w Total ~n~Y~wis RMoO ~ ~ ~ ~~+►~s~ . ~ CQ!~~~. I4'~ , i A 0555 16772 06702 B 0 493 14700 06637 C 0 372 9076 05700 D 0 237 3760 04233 B 0 072 2424 07319 The followuig Table 2, mcludes the identified basins for this and the required 208 elements as well as those provided for tlus project Table No 2- 208 Basm Summary . . # 3rd a~~ Xenln,,Co~mercW Develo9xnent - BASM S ' ~ L L Ba~s~ ~ ~'ond ~ 208 Volume M Area 208 ~ DryweRs . S ° Reqqko (cO ktegUlved-(d) Pt'Ovnded (0 go q,lnkuL` M 1 ; A A 699 1398 1486 lA < < B B 613 1226 1232 lA C . C 378 756 780 lA D D 157 314 315 lA E E 101 202 198 lA ' Type A ie a Spakaae Staudard DryweU - Swgle Depth, Capacity 0.3 cfs - Type H is a Spokane Standard Drywell Double Depth Capacity 10 cfs Inlarrd Pac~'ic Enpneenng CompcrRy D4 3rd aid Koren Drmna,ge Report KANE COUNTY WASHINGTON - SWEET NUMBER 74 R 43 E ' 9,Y~ • - Rl a „ ~ x a~ - - . ~ I • ~ RA ~ ~ Vr p1r 5x8 ? ~ ~ ~ s . ~ ~ R~al►~C Sr~ . ~ ~t r ; t A , •v HhAk . 5tC Z%~' ~ • • ` ~ ~ • y ~ ug h - i~ ► G) O~g M,~B v 1N w. y j~ N . - ~ ~ • a k0. '01 ! `f B 1le. h i Y o ~ Y, ll~~ ns c ° oo'~a i- '°'Ma ?s ~ ~ 4 h~ 1 t1~~ ~ ' Ps8 S L t ot ~ a w ~ ~ . n ~iP •~T► ~r ~ S N ~ G,, ~ ° vo i PSe ~ Q t ~ Bs8 ~ ~ ~.~~'M ~4 ~ " V Ps~ Br8 G P~ ~ GpC ►t I _ ti i~►~ ~.Y' y ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DaC UmC fDC +yd~ Tr ~nA GDB • .C L ~ '~i ~c'~ Qog . ~ rr ~ Stt t ~ ..~i ~ -PsA ~ PB „ ~ ~ ~ 3rd and Koren - Commercial Development Runoff Coefficient Calculations Basin Total Impenv C" iSum Ac A 24180 16772 06702 0 555 B 21464 14700 06637 0 493 C 16208 9076 05700 0 372 D 10320 3760 0 4233 ~ 0 237 ~ E 3124 24241 07319 0072 , ~ souuaTFUKa MET140o PROJECT 3b a,e Kwm cor,u„erew oevW PEAK FIaN► CALCULATION PROJECT 9M end Kaen Comrnedel Devel DETENTION 8q81N OE81(iN BABIN A BABIN A OE81GNEiL TRW Tot Aren 0.68 Ar,m DATE. 07105195 Imp Mea 18772 8F C • 0.81 Time Incmrtent (mfn) b GA9E t Time o! Cano (min) 5.00 ■essess (cfe) 0.3 6 R Oveilend Flow QeWgn Yeer Row 10 Ama (acm) 0 5ss cc • 015 (mpeMoue Aree (aq 1t) 1e772 Ln 5 ft C Fncta 087Q2 n- 040 "M yd„me a►oWaed p 0 020 Nes C 0 972 Tc ■ 0 74 min by EquaUan 3-2 af GuideMes nme lime ine Intena o oerel va tn va ouc srornge teo h G,aer Aow (mh+) (am) fh" fN (CU N (cu fq (w Iq ■mmsm• smemss =s~aos s~~~~• ~~~sa:a aeeesa e~aae~ zi • soo Faz2 ~.o0 900 918 aM ea ses z2 • So type 6 •10 n - 0018 Rdied•9,s s 9D0 918 1 ie 470 so 9e0 sm 0020 10 soo 2.24 0e3 5e5 ieo 406 <m. tb eoo 177 ose asa 270 390 d a 0111 R 40 1200 145 4 64 702 380 342 43 1b00 121 045 721 450 271 A R 0 Tc Tctoml I Cc 30 1800 104 099 736 sqp 108 Nt==■ et=WWf ■/mmmm =sWW=■ ■mmme■ ■tmsmm •mmmtf W 2100 om QY9 7YV vOV 115 062 0 08 1 18 166 b 00 318 1 18 40 240D 0 82 0 91 789 714 dy /5 2700 0 74 028 771 810 39 Opeelt for CeeB 1- 1 18 Cfs 60 900p 0 88 025 786 A00 115 58 3900 0.84 024 810 090 180 60 3800 0 81 023 840 1080 240 CA9E 2 65 3800 060 0 22 689 1170 277 s•■•••• 70 4200 0 58 022 m 1260 +9.9Q Caae 2 aaaumes a Time of Cartcentrndon leu than 6 minutes ao tlhat Ihe 76 4600 0.68 0 21 859 1950 38t pedc now a e0(9 1 e)(Inp area) = 1 10 ere eo aeoo 0..53 020 ese 1440 -474 85 6100 0 62 019 1008 1530 S24 AO 6400 0 60 018 1m 1820 397 Sq Ihe Peek Aaw far Nre Besin Is tAe greeter ol tha Ma flows 85 6700 0 48 018 1057 1710 -853 118 cfe 100 6000 0 48 018 1089 1800 111 208 ORIUNAOE POND CALCULATION8 Requfred 208 BSornQe Volume - Imparvious Area x 6 in I 12 iMt 699 cu R 208 8taage Yolume Prorided O cu R ORWYELL REQUIREMENT9 10 YEAR OE810N STORM Mmdmum 8taege Requlred by Bowatdng 405 cu It Nunber and Type ol Oryrrella Required 1 8ingfe 0 Double INUWO PAClFlC EN(ilNEERIIVO 80W8TR1NG METHOD PROJECT 3rd and Kaen CammeroW Devel PE11K FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT 9t0 and Karen Cannterolef Devel DHTENTIQN BASIN DE810lV BA81N 9 BA81N B OE8tGNER. TRW Tat Area 0 49 Aarea DATE 01107l95 tmp Area 14700 8f L's Qse Time Irwortent (min) b CASE 1 Time a! Cona (min) 8.00 ■~a~s~s OUMOW (Qr6) 03 6 h Ovedend Flow Deslgn Yeer fiow 10 Area (ecres) 0493 Ct ■ 015 bnpefvloue Area (sq fq 14700 Lm 5 R. C FdcEor 06637 R■ 0 40 208 Ydume Pro+rtded 0 8n 0020 Mes' C 0 327 Tc = 074 min py EquWion 3-2 of GWdoilnes Time Thtte Inc, Intene 0 Devel Yol In Vol Oul Starage 250 R(iutter Aow (min) (a0) linlhn (aro) (cu fry Icu fq (CU 1g sms~ms a=saoa saoaao msoasa aomaano aeanaa aeaaoa I1 • 50 C Fa Z2 6 00 900 31B 104 418 80 318 Z2 m 80 Type 8 Q 10 n■ 0016 Ralled ■ 3.6 b 900 318 104 418 AO 328 S ° 0020 10 ow Z.~ 073 5~~ lso 335<aa is eoo I n o sa seo 770 310 d s 0110 R ZO 1200 1.45 047 618 38Q 258 26 tboo 121 oao e94 aso tea a R a tc fcoow i cc 30 1e00 104 0.34 e47 640 107 mmsmmm mmmmmm Mm==== mmammm mmamms sssess smssss 36 2100 o9) 030 ow a0 26 061 oos 115 2.1e sao 318 104 40 zaoo oea 0.27 671 tso .49 4S 2700 074 024 878 810 132 Cpenk la Cesa t- 104 da 80 50m 0 88 0.22 690 800 210 55 3900 084 021 712 990 276 60 3600 0 81 0 20 739 1080 .341 CASE 2 65 3900 0 60 020 786 1170 384 '•■sm•• 70 4200 0.56 019 818 1260 -444 Cese 2 esaumes e Tfma o! Concrentratlon leea lhen 5 Mrwtes so dW fhe ~ Tb 1500 0 58 018 843 1950 -501 pemc now •.e0(9 1e)(anp AreQ • a e7 cte eo aeoo 063 017 e50 1440 s90 es $too o.s2 017 ees 1530 .sos ao eaoo oso 010 eoo 1620 Mo So Ihe Peek Aow }a the Besin Is the gnaeter ot the hro Aowe 8b 6700 0.48 018 830 1710 780 104 cre soo sooo 040 016 szs 1e00 -e42 20e owuw+ae PoHO caLcuu►noNa Requfre0 208 SDoraga Vdume - ImpaMow Aroe x S In I tS? In/h 613 au fl 208 SUaege Vdume ProvYEed 0 ai R DRYWELL REOUIREMENTB 10 YEAR OESIf3N BTOAM Mtaxinum 6taage Requlred Ey BoweErtng 335 cu ft Number and Typeof Oryrralla Requued 1 8ingie 0 Oable INWVd PACIFIC ENGINEERING BOW9TRIN0 MEiHOD PROJECT 3td and Karen CananeroW Detrel PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT 3i0 nnd Kaen Caronemfal Oeve! OETENTIGN 8A8lN OESION BABIN C 6A81N C DESIONEit TR4Y Td Aren O 97 Actm DATE. Q7107185 (mp Aree 9078 SF C • 0.87 lhne Inaement (ndn) 5 CABE 1 ilme d Cona (ndn) b.00 onss=a• QutflOW (C" 03 6 R O+redena Row Dosign Yeet Row 10 i Area (naree) 0372 Ct= 016 (mpenrloue Are& (s4 (Q 9078 L■ 6 IL C Fnata 0 67 n m 040 208 Vdumo PraNded 0 s= 0020 aree c 0212 Te ~ 0 74 min by Equetlon 32 at GWdelina Time Thne Ina Intena Q Oevel Vd.ln Vol Out Staage 70 R Gutter Row (min) lwoI !i►Ih►1 (ate) (a+ tt) (a+ M Icu fU iam/m■ mmmmmm mfiiSm Qmvfmi mtmtmm1 mftmms mmmt1m 21 • 50 0 Fo1 Z2 8 00 300 318 067 271 80 181 Z2 m 60 TVpa 8 ~ 10 fl m 0016 Rplled s 9 6 a 6 300 918 067 271 Ap 181 <as 8m 0020 10 600 2.24 047 333 190 159 15 o0 177 0.38 378 270 108 d• 0085 ft 20 1200 1 AS 031 400 360 40 25 1600 121 028 411 480 -39 A R C TC Totatnl I Cc 30 1800 104 022 418 540 121 ■esam■ ■sesm■ mmmmmm esms.s msssss mmmmmm mmmm ~ 2100 0.81 019 425 830 '~S o se 004 056 073 s ao 318 o.s~ ao 2400 0.82 017 ass Mo ,zas 48 2700 0 74 018 440 B10 ,97D Qpeak ta Cae 1- 0 87 cfe b0 5000 0 B8 014 447 800 -49 68 9300 0.84 014 482 8Ap ,528 80 9800 0 81 019 419 1060 ~01 CASE2 6S 9900 080 019 509 1170 -681 s•••■== 70 4200 0.68 012 629 1280 731 Gase 2 nasumes a Timo of Concenvatan lew Ihen b mhwtes ao tlmt the 78 4800 0 58 012 b48 1950 -80e peelt Aow • 80(318)(Imp Area) • 0 BO ole 80 4800 0 53 O 11 651 1440 -M 85 6100 0.52 011 574 1530 4M 80 5400 0.50 0 11 689 1620 1037 So the Peek Aow fa Ihe Baaln la tlie greeter of the Mro Rowa 95 670fJ 0 48 010 809 1710 1107 0 67 cf8 100 80W 0 48 010 821 1800 1179 208 ORAINA3E POND CALGILATIONS Required 208 Siaage Vdume - fmpeMous Area x.S In 112 INh 3iH Cu R 208 8tamge Vaiume Provlded 0 cu Il ORYWELL REQUIREMENTB 10 YEAR OESION 8TORM Ma*wm Stamge Requfred by BoweWng te1 ai R Ntnnbet and Type ot Orywella Requlred 1 Single 0 Dauble INLAND PACIFlC ENG11NEERING BbWBTRING METFIOD PROJECT srd end Kam Commerolel Qevel PE!►K FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT 3rd end Kaen Cananeiebd Devel _ OETENTION BA81N DEBKiN 8A81N 0 BASIN D DESIGNER TRW Tot Area 0 21 Acres DATE 07107I9S Imp Area 9780 8F C m 042 Tlme Unorement (mU) b CA9E t Tinre o! Cono (mM) S 00 0ulQow (eta) 0.3 6 ft OveAend Row ; Design Year Row 10 Arsa (amu) 0137 q Q o ts frttpeMoue Area (e4lq 3780 L m 6IL } C Faooor 04233 040 208 vaume arovided o 6= 0020 Area C 0100 Tc = 0 74 min by Equndon 3-2 ot 6utdeline3 Tdne ?ime Inc Intene. 0 Deval Vd In Vd Out Staege eo rt, Gutter Row (rrdn) (aec) on" (ds) (c+ fq (eu fq (a ft) eso:sa aeaema na=oos mmsm:s iOSOO=O ■c==oa aoMe=a Z1 s 50 O FOt Z2 6.00 900 918 0 32 128 80 38 Z2 m 80 lype Bn 10 n• 0018 Rdled • 9.5 ~ 5 300 918 0 92 128 80 38 S m 0 020 10 800 2.24 0 22 168 tB0 22 16 A00 1 77 8 18 178 270 -92 d• 0079 f4 20 1200 145 018 189 960 171 ffi 1600 1 41 0 12 184 450 256 A R C Tc To toW I Oo 30 1800 104 010 188 649 442 smmmm• ■mssm■ ■smmma smmmmm WWss== sW=MWs •mmmma 3$ 21W 091 009 201 890 -029 0 31 0 04 048 0 87 6 40 318 032 40 2400 0,82 0 08 208 720 •614 45 2100 0 74 0 07 208 810 -802 Opeek ta Case t- 0 32 ofe 60 9000 0 98 0 07 212 900 -aB 55 3500 064 006 218 990 772 80 3600 001 0 08 227 1080 -859 CASE 2 85 300 0 60 0 08 241 1170 i29 maamam■ 70 42DO om 000 250 1260 1010 Ceee 2 eaaumes n Trme d Canaenhhetlon tese tlien 6 rt►fnutee eo IMt aro 76 45W 0 68 0 08 269 1350 1081 p6ek AOW ■ 80(918)(ImP Ates) ' 0 25 Cte 80 4800 0.69 0 05 2B1 1440 1178 85 SIOO 0 62 0 05 271 1550 1259 80 6400 0.50 005 276 1820 1344 So th0 Peek (low fa tha BaWn la Ihe greater of fhe Mro flowa 85 6700 049 005 28S 1710 1425 0 92 efa 100 6000 0 48 0 06 294 1600 1608 II08 DRAINAf3E POND CALCUlATI0N8 RequPred'2a8 8torage Volume a impenrioua Aree x 5In! tz " 167 au n 208 Staage Vdume Provided 0 cu ft ORYNIELL RECUIREMENT6 101'EAii DE81(iN BTORM Medmum 9taaga Requlred by Bawa4ing 38 ou R Numper end Type af Orywelle pequired 1 8ingle fi k 0 Double INIAND PACIFlC ENOINEEAINO BOWSTRINt3 MET1i0D PROJECT 3rd end Koren Cammercfal pevd PEAK fLOW CAIAUlATION PROJECT 9rd and Karen Cartmerdal DeNel QBTEWTION BAeIN DE81GN BA$IN E 8A81N E QESIGNEik TAW Tot lUee 0 07 Aae,t pATE: 07107198 Imp Aree 2424 SF C• 073 Time lnorement (rnfn) S CASE t Time d Carta (mfn) 6 Do Outllow (ete) 03 8 tL Ovedend Row Destgn Yeer pow 1G kes (norm) 0 872 Ct • 0 t 6 hnpervloue Afea (eq fQ 2424 L■ 5 n C FecOa► 07319 n• 0 40 '208 Yolume Protiided o 8 d 0 020 Area C 0053 TQ = 074 min by Equadon 3-2 of Guidelines Tin,e rnne Ino Inta,a o oevel va In va out scange 40 h. Gutter Flaw (min) (aec) pNhr) (eta) (Qu I) (au n) (p+N •==~s■ mmmme■ mnwaw a s=a~sa samm~mo ma=asa aevate I1 - ~0 FOrZ2 800 900 918 01~ BI 9D •23 caa I2 = 50 Type B •10 n• 0 Ot8 RoUed • 9 6 6 900 918 017 87 90 23 <=o 8m 0 020 10 600 2 21 012 83 180 -97 16 eoo 1 n 009 es 2m 177 d m 0 040 R ZO 1400 145 0 08 99 360 261 25 1500 121 008 102 450 -348 A R 0 k To tatal I Qa 30 1800 104 0 05 104 640 -498 amsmm• ssesee •mmesa msstee asaeaa sea=== 3$ 2100 091 00$ 106 630 $24 0 08 002 0013 0 69 b 00 318 017 40 2400 0 82 0 04 108 720 -612 46 2m 074 aoa 109 eio 701 Opeelt (a Cass t■ 017 ch BO 3000 068 0 01 111 A00 769 68 9900 084 0 09 116 990 -875 60 3e00 08i 009 119 1080 -m1 CABE a 86 3900 0 80 0 00 121 1170 1043 70 4200 0 68 0 00 181 1260 1120 Case 2 essumee e Time of Cancen0aon tew than S mbrutes so Umt tlhe 75 4600 0 68 003 198 1980 1214 peek flow• e0(3.18) IImp Aren1 s O 16 cte 80 4800 053 000 137 1440 1909 6b 5100 0 62 003 143 1690 1387 80 5400 0.50 009 145 1620 1415 So the Peek Aaw (ar the 8eeln ta the oreeter of Ihe Mro flows 95 5700 0 48 0 03 150 1710 1680 017 ofs 100 a000 0 46 0 09 154 1800 1848 408 ORNNAGE POND CALCULATIQNS Requtred 208 8tarage Vdume . hnpeNioue Areo x 5 irt 112 In/ft 101 au It 208 8taaga Vdume PraNided o cu R OR1fYrELI REGUIREMENTB 10 YEAR OEBIQN STORul Mmdmum 8tmge Flequlfed by Bowatfng 29 cu R Number end TYpe of Orywella Reqwred t SMgle O Double INUND PACIRC EN3lNEERINQ ~ INSTALL IYPE 'A DRYMrEIl. PER S'POKIWE COUMY STIWDARO 8-1 WRH 11tPE 4 METAL FRIWE dc CRATE RIM EL-194130 PROPERIY UNE . ' f KOREN ROAD IYPE B CURB ~ A IL y 4 TYPE 1 CURB INLEf NTC EL= 1941 64 SLOPE Oipl~ F1,pw_ . + I _amoo _ 1 I 0 0.0071 FT/FT LA ~ 4 IYPE 1 CURB INIET 4 TYPE 1 CURB INLET \\.,%.-TYPE A CURB 1C ELa194200 TC E1.a1943 87 , p POND "A" 1 VOUlhtE RE4'0■699 C F 5 8Tti1 ARfA REO'Da1398 S F BI'MI AREA PR01ADma1486 S.F ON E..a~M80 i ' 6' TYPE 1 CURB INl.ET 1YPE A CURB TC EL=1941 15 - T ~ - - - - - n oor ~ ` $ $ INSTALI TYPE "A" DRYWELL ~ PfR SPOKANE COUNTY STANOARD B-1 18 5~ ~ WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE ; i - - - - - - - RIM EL=1940 75 ~ - PROPERTY UNE I POND "B" 2 VOLUME REQ'D=613 C F 5 BTM AREA REQ'Dm 1226 S F 8TM AREA PROVIDED=1232 S F BTM EL=1940 25 VOLUME REQ'D=699 C F BTM AREA REQ'Dfl1398 S F BTM ARfA PROVIDEO=1486 S F BTM EL.=1940 80 f~ r L • k~ ~ 1 11A~ g4 ~y y M ~ f ~ y a''ff ~ P ~ ~ Y - ~ ~ ~ r YNW L~ PE B CURB INSTALI. 'TYPE pA" DRYVVELL ~ PER sPOKAwE courmr sraNDaRo a-1 KOREN RD WRH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME 8c GRATE RIM EL.=1942 30 . . . . . . . ~ C - - • 135 F~PROPERIY UNE ~ - - - - - r.3O 00' 13000 ~.7g ~ - L - - - - - ~ a r IT1 4' TYPE 1 CURB INLET 4' TYPE 1 CURB INLET TC EL= 1942 40 TC EL=1943 87 TYPE A CURB POND "C" 3 VOLUME REQ'D=38046 C F 5 81M AREA REQ'Dm760 92 S F BT'M AREA PROVIDED=780 S F BTM EL=194180 , ~ i TYPE A CURB ~ 4' TYPE 1 CURB IN-ET TC EL=1944 05 TYPE 8 CURB M ~ ~ 8 T ~ 45 pp, ~ O 10 0 D PR4PERIY LINE i INSTALL TYPE `A" DRYWELL PER SPOKANE COUNIY STANDARD B-1 WITH TYPE 4_METAL FRAME & GRATE RIM EL.=1943 25 POND "if 4 VOLUME REQ'Da157 C F 5 BTM AREA REQ'Da314 S F BTM AREA PROVIDEOa315 S F B'TM EL=1942 75 ~ POND C' 7LUME ~ REQ'D=380 46 C F 5 BTM AROp REQ'Dc=760 92 S F BYM AREA PROVIDEDa780 S F 8Tti! EL=194180 ~ TYPE B CURB 3RD AVENUE ~ , - PROPERTY UNE ~ - ~ - ~ 3~ 00 1 TYPE A CURB a _3~ GQ_ 1_ m 4' TYPE 1 URB INLET STA 8+75 IRD AVE ) TC EL~ 194 45 INSTALL. TYPE "A" DRYWELL PER SPOKANE COUNIY STANDARD B-1 WRH '1YPE 4 ME?AL FRAME & GRATE RIM ELa1943 65 PoND "S VOLUME REQ'D=98 54 C F 5 8TM AREA REQ'D= 197 08 S F 8TM AR£A PROVIDED=198 S F BTM ELa194315 2 ! ~ i! ~ ~ ° ' 1~ ` ~ R~ ~ ~ ~~~~i,~,`~ Bo E it ,D a 1 _ _•►P F IRS-c 3 ~ • i.. ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 0 1 r ' i~ ~ AW , ! ~ r f f \"t ) 3 ~o e o ~ ~ Q s ~ a~'+ • t r 58 J20_ Ac, 1 ~ lw2 3 r 6 ~ ~ ro Z ! q► ` - - ; ~ y~ ~ ~ • 7' R ~ ~ C A' _ ~ - ~ " ~ ; ~ - ~ ~ ► t ~ - " i 9 ~ ~ QL ~ _ F 0 • ~ pg 0 ~ , - ~ - Fn% . 64 i' 9 t N0 m E r 9 Z3S3i ~3 s ~ ~ ~js 2 ~ ✓ 23531-b0Q! J ~ 94 j r r 4 r ~ 5s ~ J `4 4 . ~ r r~ .79 t- 1 ~ 'r I T ~ r ~ - ~ . . ~ _ t.► ~ e ' ~j~{{ - ~ ~ i4 ,r ,,r ,s ~ T 5 g o~''' Z r { _ 'CJ , I Z,3 ' ~ 4 3 A1ehIw /mw 4r.vti, e a s,rWrE ,v.2 - wc wI~/~ wr~y,l..Woo,* w # + _ ( ~ ~ IO « • ~ ( ~ ' 1 t ~ ~ ~1 ~ R B r ~ 2 P L FIasT Av ~R- iP~ I E Pa ~ I ~ I Id Z r~ o i C~ ~ ~ I y ~ j i ~ • ~ ~ju 0, ~ 3 Z cia ~o s .Af dpL / ! ' J07 ~ xf 0~ ` Ad C4 ~a a (o - J 0 ~ ae ~ t I ~ 04 ~ .--~--,--,r--.- -,«rr, --~'~u---- ~ ~ oAt.u ~ L Rc ~ a, i ~ ~ ~ ----~LLL--~ r------ - _m" ~ i -1- - - ~ Ayf-1--- -.---~i:--'1 ~ i 7w_ fQURT~I l~~/E ~ 3 ~i,ev% t-gr - obiw , A`i 1 11 17,,~~ f ~R # T b~ L , o / ~ •R` ~ ~VE * ~P 1 - o ~ Zx ~z ImP2 ~ ~ y FiRST • o ;'j O ~~~1 4 ~ • , jo ~ 3 y ~ ~ S 3► ~p ° 60 i ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 5 r ► '4' ~ "86 ~ ~ ! ~ q~ . Q C?f ~ ► ~ / j 1 , ~ ~ 1 > ► 'S ~ ' ' ~ smw ~i 1! ~ ~ ` ~ ► ~ _ - ; ~ _ ,,tdL - ' ~ 9 ♦ t ~ y Q t,,,,, E Q.......11tZ tL _ FO Y OS ~ ~ J 5 ~ ~ ( j_.A a p ~SI P,ARK ~ HoME µ2353' 60~6 23~~1 •6Qol ~ ~ ' 9 2 - ~ ~ , t 1 p 3 ~ o x _ T tT ~ . ~ .~a~► ~ , ~ 9 0~ ~ ~ m ~ 76 1177 No. BEPORE THE HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKAAtE COUNTY, WABHINGT4r ZE-1Z0-78 ) ~ IN THE MATTER OF CHAAIGIATG THE ZOMNG ) MAP PR0 M MVLTIPLE PAAtiILY 8 iJBURHAN TO ) R E S O L U T I O N RMMG`TZD INpUSTRTAL ON PRORERTY ~ IrOGATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNBHIP 25 N., ) RANG$ 43, E.W . AII BpOKANE COUNTY. ) WASHIATGTON. ) The above-entitled anatter cominq on cequlacly for heacinq ibefore the Board of County Colnmissianera of Spokane CQUnty, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board tbat the Spokane County Platuiing Cominisslon has gfven due riotice af the heacing on the mattec in the manner and for the time pcovided by low; that $aid Planning, Coaunission has held a public hearing as required, and th4 the soLd' planning Commission cancura in the plan to zone the followinq deeacibed pnaperty a8• RE=RIGTED Ili1PV$TRIAL: Tbe 3outh 1/2 of vacated s tceet and Lots 11 and 2,. Block 8; Lot 3, Block 8, Lot 4, Block 8, sxcept Highway, East Wood Addttion, in Section 23, Township 25 AT , Range 43, E.W.M., 8pokane Co(pty, Wip shington. NOW, THEREFpR19, 8I IT RE30LVED, That the above-described property be, and the estne ie aoned under the olsseifiaation of RESTRICTED IATDU3TRIAL as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Spakane County, adopted Auqust 25, 1953, as amended. AND FUATHER H$ TT REBQLVED That any development on the above-desaribed property ehall be subJevt to the fallawing conditions: 1) The County F.ngineer' s Offiae has requested the followinq Note All requtred improvements shall be built to meet or(pxceed imum County construatfon standards. a) Applia$nt shall canatruct cement concrete curb and pave right of way to e4sting pavemenC, b) Acaeea permits for the advertised pcoperty shall be obtained from the Spoksne County Enqineer's Office prior to release of building pemits . c) Applicant sball obtain appcoval for on and off-site drainage plan before ieauance of building permite. d) Applicant shall pave the right of way on both Third Avenue and KQren and aonetruat aennent aonarete cutbing. 2) The applicant ehall aomply with ruiee and rgigulations of the Health District in providing for adequate sewaqe dii;poeal. All necessacy Health District permits shall be obtained pcior to building pormit issuance. 3) Mains and hydrants to be instailed, !n accordance with the Spokane County Fite Marsbal's tequlrements. 4) That a Final Dealaration of Non-Significance be si gned by the Boacd of County Commissioners e (contd. ) r ~ J r Z 8-120-78 (contd.) b) ImproveYnents shall be in substantial oonfornaance with the plot plan on file. 6) A landsoape plan showing specific detaii and accompanied by a performance bond shall be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prior to building permit is8uance. 7) That the provisians of SEPA' amo ira of Actinn pucsuant ko 43 .21c.080 R C. W. and the 8oard of County eamrnissionecs' Reaolution #77-1392 be acaompliehed by the appliaant within thittY (30) days of fornaal action by the Board, as instructed by the Planning Department staff o 6) Interior dEiveways and parking areas ahall be paved 9) That, if aftec one year frnm the date of the Planning Commission' a action, tbe applicant has not ceceived final adoption of the zone changa, the application ie void. PASSED BY TH£ 84ARD THIS ~ DAY OF , 1978. jo*~ BOARD OF COUNTY CO MMI88IONERB OF SPOKAYJE COUNTY, WASHIATGTON, f ~ NARRY M LARNED, CHM RAY VV CFIRISTENSEiV JERRY C KOPEI AWLSTt VERNO . OHIAND Cl the So Bll = Deputy I heteby certify that I have posted the above changes and revisions on the Zoating Map in the Buildinq Codee Departiaent, and do fiuther cectify that the zone alaaeiflcation change is the eame as described above and shown on the attached mao. o ~ o , SIGNID DATED: -2- p, Y ST~~ r 3 ~ 1 ♦ ~ 11~~ ~ T t ~ sr~~►°~,~ ~ y `~k~S,~M~I''~Lti ~ }~E~S"~•~d } 46 ~ ~ U., \ t ~ ~ ~ i ~ . ~ t i ~ ~ r ~ r y 1,, ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~5 \ ~ i' ' ~ ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ♦ , ~ ~ r ~ .c ~:r ~ ~ ~ ~ `J ~ ~ S t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z~ ~ ~ c~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ t i ~ ~ ~ + `r 1 fi ~ ~ ~ ~'~'s' ~ ~~G ' a,~- ~;~x" r;s~~ ~-'K ~ t ~ ~ t 1 'J ~ 4 ~ ,~r ~ ~ ~ ~ f 1 . ~ v ' +t 'i► , w` +w ti i - ~ ♦ ~ ' 4 • ~ ~ ♦ ~ ~ ~ i ~ t Z , i y "'t~ "rt • ♦ J i f s 1 .~♦/.ti ~K~ ,~"r'J ,x ~ n~ I ~ ~r ~ -"F ~ ~ a ti t.• 1 ~ ~ d'~'S! R' ~ J ^ fl~ ✓ ..a Y~ ♦ t A~` ~ r0~ ~ SA,. y rl~iM1 3 ~r~~ ~ ~ 9 t ~ > i ~ tk ~ - 1 ~ `~cw ~U P~ t Igo ~ r t L 7 { 3VFIth d 2 V _ ~ ~ 1 ~ r ~ f ~ ~ ~ t\ ~ t< < ~ ►i ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u > >Y i ~ dr I if tll ~ I~ ~ • + - j v ~ r 1 Y t ~ ~ ( ~ 1► ' S ~a`~ ~,i"•' 1 ~ y 4 t r ~ t ~ ~ & , V,'"~~ ! 1 ~ t , tl f + Tn mABm OF A ImS ~ CHOGIN4 TEI'B LONSa yAF oo THE YoLIOMa DEscRz M 4 To cHMc~N oxaia cainmoL TO BESTRICTSD IN00848IAL-•ZS PBRTY LYING 80iR711 OF TUX UNIOI pACIFICj'p$ 4RACg8, N0RT8 OF SPBAOQB AVM8 H8'llill 1~ RA~~A AND PBoAD, IN BBaTi0H8 33 MD i!, TVP. 26 x., 81NaE 48 V.wato I ~ TB&T PROPBaTi LYING SODTS OF SHWU8 AVE'QB BESM 0!lMA8M 6T, .l1ND THS FBSWAY INTIMC81lAiGS aT SPRBGUB AVE•, SXTSNDUG 115 FM ! 84UTH 08 TBB 5OUTE LIV$ OF SPBAGtJE >VS. M CWaB FBOd 0N0LS8M+ IFIBD TO CMOMCIJlL"-T)iAT FROPERTY LYlfia SOIITS AND MT OF TSF 8XI8TING COId11ERCIBI+ 444$E 05 TgS SOII48 BIDN OF 8PRAM8 A'QE. M ~ CARNASAN S TBSBT EiCTENDI)la TO FI88 T AYEM IW SZ0• 88,TWP 8M• S RMGB 43 B.W.Y• AND TO CSABGB IROIt AGRICQLTORAL TO aMMRCIAI.-P~ AFFIDAVIT 0F POSTING TELT sTRIP OF LAND LYu1G 80US OF Fm7 AYENtTE EXTMiDSD, BXTFNDIgti 860 MT xf `l M TSC 8i OF BIM8 11 aud 18+ &PRAM STATE OF WASHINGTON } ~EET ADDITION, HETNEM G9TSTffi; JND ) S S. GHRONICLB, HEIIIG ALL 0 F BLOCKS S aad 4 COIINTY OF SPOKANE ) MD NJ OF 11 4ad 120 SPRAM S'FRW ADD IN sECTiax 98, M. as N. s.a~GB 4$ 8.~ (oont•S ~ be ing f iret duly sworn, deposes and saye : That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citisen of the Unitad Statee, a resident oF Spokane CQUaty, Washington, aad aver the age of twenty-one years, ~ df That on ~ 195 , he personelly posted three (3) true and aorreat oopiee oP the hereto attQahed NOTICE OF PIISLIC HEARING at the followimg places in Spokane County, to-wit = ~ 2 V _ ~ ,v...- . C46e .Gr.~.. 3. ~ , Subaaribed e►nd sworn to bePore me ~ J , 195 . , NOTA'RY pi1 BLIC IN QND FOR SPOKANS COIINTY, WASKINGTON Residing at Spokane, WQShington ~ , / ► ~ q*~ ` ~ ~ 0. ooe ^pAD „F,,a sa " ~ 4 ~ • ~ 1 ,sTAT.~. ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . • 1 P~- z, R ~ P •Z jRs4T 0 3-5 ~ 1 t .55 ~ s lo ~ 2 ss ~t Co - t , 12~' ~ ~ ~ t ' ~ 24 1-2 '3 6 ~62 • ~ t►'" ; 1 ~ , ~ ' „~~•1G~'~~~ 1 + ~ 1 _zo iL _ F 0 k ~ ~ ` _ - • - 5 ~ . Hi Mi 103 (94 ~ 9 2 = Z 23531 _ eoar 41 s ~ ti ~T ~ _ ~a • - ~ ~ , 4 r ~ ~ 0~- . .w`,~►ti~'` alzk '°!I ~ I 78 1.Vi? No. BIWORE THB BO►ARD OF COUINTY COMMIS3IONERS OF SPOKANE COUr111TY, WA3Hm1'C701tT. ZE-120-96 y ~ TN THE MATTER OF CHAATGING THE ?ANING ) MAP PWM AIULTWU PAMILY SUBURtBAN TO ~ R E S O L U T I O N RB8'P1RICTED IMtT3TRIAL QN PROPERTY ~ IACA►TED IN SEGTION 23 , TOWNSHIP 2 5 N., ) RAATGE 43 , E.W . M. , BFOKANE CQUNTY, ) WMHINGq'ON. ) The abave-entitled matter coming on r+egularly for hearlnq befare the Board of County Commissioaers of 8pokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearfng to the 8oard that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notic:e of the hearing on the inatter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planilng Comnai$sion Ha s held a public hearing a s required, and diat the said Plannistg Commission concura in tlae pian to zone the following descdbed prope~'tY ae AEOMGTBD -V1V8TRIAL* The 3outh 2/2 of vacated street and LotB 1 and 2, 81ock 8; Lot 3, Block 8, Lot 4, Blodc 6, exapt Highway, Ea s t Wood Addt tton, in 5 ection 2 3, Townshlp 25 AT Ranqe 43 , E.W.11/t. . Spokane Cofinty. Washington. NOW,r TMREFORE , HE 1T RE3pLVED, That the above-described property be, and the eeme is zoned under the alassifi.oation of RE8TRICTED INDUS'TRIAL aa defined in the Zoning Ordinsnce of Spokane CounCy, adopted August 25, 1953, as amended. AND FURrHER 8B IT RESOLVED That any development on the above-descrlbed property shal3 be BWsat to the ftllow#ng czonditioase 1) The County Trtgiiear's Office has requested the following ~ xnta. All requ#red impravements shall be built to rnset or("ceed lmum ~ County construction standards. ~ _ a) ApFltrsant shall conatruct cement conccete curb and pave right of way to eatlstfng pavement. b) Access permlte for the advertised property shall be obtained finm the Spokane County Engtineer's Office prior to release of build#ng Petmlta . c) Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off--eite drainage plan before issuance of building perznits. d) ADpllcant shall pave the righE of way on both Third Avenue and Kroren an,d construct ceinent concrete curbing. Z) The appliaant sball comply wlth rales and rogulations of the Health Distcict in providittg for adeqmte sewage diliposal. AIl necessary I3ealth District permits shall be obtsined prior to bultdinq pernit issuance. 3) Mains and hy+drants to be installed, !n accordance with the Spokane County Fire Matshal's requirements. 4) That a Finai Declaration of Non-Siqnificance be s! gned by the Board af County Commissioners. (contd. ) r - v ~ Z E-120-7e (COnca.~ 5) Iaiprovementa shall be in substantial oonfonmance with the plot plan on file 6) A landsvape pUn show►ircg specsific detail and accompanied by a performance band ehaU be approved by the County Zoning Admfniatrator prior to building permlE iesuanCe. 7) That the p►mv1810nB of SEPA' eNo~aii ef A~tien puceuant to 43 .2 1c. 080 R. C. W, artd Rh+e Hoard of County Commlssloners' Resolut#on #77-1392 be accomplished bp thd appUesant within thirtp (30) days of fanaal action bp the Board, as inetructed by the Plarwing Department staff. 8) Intedor drtvewaya and parkinq areas shall be paved. 9) ThaE, if after vne yeac from the date of the Planning Commiaelon's action, the applicant hae not received finsl adoption of the zone change, the application ie voLd . pA$SED gY THE BOARD THIS ~ DAY OF . 1978. BOARD OF COUNTY COAIIMISSIONER9 OF SPOKANE COUNTY, VVASHIATGTON, NARRY M LARNED CHM RAY W CHRISTrNSEN JERRY C KOwET y r. ^ w ~ Ar1'E"L VERNO . OHLAM Cleuc re Bo BYs Deputp I heteby c.ertify that 3 have poeted the abave changes and ceviaions on the Zoning Map In the BuUdlm Cocies Department, and do furthec certify that the zone alassificatinn change ie the saYae as, deecribed abave and shown an Ehe attaahed tnap. o ~ SIGATED 1JATED. -2- r a ~ r ~ 9 } ~ . k w 1 ~ ~ r ! t ~ i ~ t ~ ~ ~ C ~ V~ ~ ° ,40 „i ~ r r . ! Y H r K,,,.,,~~ ~ d , ~ r 4~1~ I ~ a~ ~l y ~ " r ~ ~ ~ ~w ~ ~:~~r ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~...4 ~ ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~'.^E ~ r ' ~ ~ M _ - ' r~ P`k '~2~ r ~ 4~r ~ P ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ "r „ > f ~ ~ ~LLO L. ~ ~ ~ ~ s~~w f,,,1} J sw +,.e 1 "'~r ~.1'.I .~..d~'~ ~ t t ~ ~,rA~v"i`~~ ~Ir d l,r'~•••d r t ,irr~(~' ~ ~ . ~ t ~ k'w. 1 ~ f ~ ~ r a 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - r ~ e A , ~ `A , ~ " ~ l ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ i ~1 I f ' '~'~{~.li~..~ 4 _ ~.,r~,., ~ ~,~1~ ~ ~ ~ r t ~ ppppp" tp1 L Y£•Y' M , y ~4> (t~ { ~ f ~ N,y~'~ L~ ~ v L'L ~ ~ j li ~ ~ f ~ ~ j ~ ~i . e 41 ~ ro- g~ I ~ Z ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~•~..,s t ~ r,A~ ~ ~ w~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~z j~c r}~' ,f) ~ r Fllt, r t` t ~ 44 ~R lr % ~r fi ~ ~ 1'iZ " ~ ; ~ Y• y 1; ~~3 n } i'" ~ a , ~ ~ ~ ~P ~ af ~r' N~` ~J d Jt ~ ~a 1 ~ y " ~ ~ '*~tir j~{~i'~ r~A ~ r 1~ ~ ~ S r XS~: r t e~~~~`~" e ~ i~ t ~ s . ~ , ~ ~ A ~ 4 ir' I ~f AA{ a j~l~ Z. ht~4 C N,{I ~ 5 ~ n~ a ~ r ~ M,~ • y ~ ~ ;y ~ti ~ ~ F a ~4 ~ %Nf w S~ ~ ~k Z~ y }'~Y kJ~~~' ~ F 5~ ~ ~ l4.'~J t ~'X M a ~ ~ ~ Y r 7LT, I l,yyr+.aN IA r W~• ~ i S ~ y 4 s ~,v ✓ 4 i ~ w ~ w J .0K ~ +f' % ~ ,1~ ~ ~'~f ~ l ~ l i .~i-'' •r.~~ 1 l80 ,Q,~, i I ~ ~ ~►►A E[~ AVK I I I ZOfV E C ,e ` ~I ~ uar.~scc ~vt 11 t k f~ i - a+`+i st c I ~f Avt ONE A r ~ ~;0 Y ~ J 77-, T ~ ~ ~ ~i % • i ~ 1 r Q r ` ~ r ON~ ~ ^ ~ , ~ ~J ~ ,i ~.~11 ZON I _Y ~ ~ AvE ~ ~ UR ~ ~ ~L. ..r d~ ` , ~s'~ ~ ~ f r t~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ r ~!e ,r - -'sy" / / ) ~ ` x = ~ ~ l 9~ J ~ f I A 1 p.~ ~ w va 1 z0N E B j~` - J-- ~ _ 15 z x---e.y • ~v n VA ~L ` LN/OAt~ PACIF ` ~ ~ V N E ~ aRANM ~OINT~~ - ~ ~ ~ O AV ~ - 1 ~ CNR ~ ~ tCt# i 4- ? r-J 11 ) , ~ k ~ ~ " 4~ y I {I ~ P ~ r- z t ~ I ' ae~ ~ 23 T-~ ~ a•r''" b - i W ` ~ Y ~ ~ayF wvE r IL M ~ 'A Y I~ ONE ~ s» s' wv (J~ ~ - r ZONE A a ,r ,---1 1eTN AY t t0 EA I ~ 1~TM AV ~ u i ~ ~ A=. ~ S1 -ord Rair.oad Graee n r--- r 1 4 u 11-01 W W 6R ce ° r3~ ~ ass~~... V !t ~ n ~ ( a NE C G~ ~-27 A~ ZON E C R ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ u ~EEP • lsTN AV[NUt C0il31~ ~ a8ts ~ ' - ti 27TN AVtMut 1 ~ Q o o - ~ a ~ , 35 36