Sprague E 5204 Eagle Hardware
M
ENGIhfEEIt'S REVI~~~W SHEET
BLDG PERMIT # -or •EiL" B0149.03
Related File # ( ZE 33 S5)
Date to Renew 10-18-93 Mme 10:00 #
Iyatg to AA & DR Tlme
Date Reeeived I04-93
Project Name EAGI.E HARDW.ARE (OLD FRED 1VEYERS) No Lots No Acres
Sectn - Township - flange
SITD ADDRESS SPRAGUE E 5204/E CARNAHAN PARGEL # 23531-9009
AppLcant's Name JOHN HAUMOM Phone # 206)455-3203
Address Work #
Date Conditsans mailed
Contact Rerson PhoDe #
xLoon zorE vr No w s sCHooL
FAmneer / Sw'veyor's / Arcutect!s Name
Plsanun,g Coatact Person Pbone # 456-2205
,
Date Submitted Descnptton Iniqe]s
,
~ O 1'Z Q1 ~009 ACiltEElVSFri'r TO PAY FELS OR PRIORII'Y FEE CU11TLETED 14Y COPY TO ACOOLWMG
~
FIIVAL PLAT F'EES COMPLE7'ED & COPY TO GO
~ e_YNOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4~ _ S ]RE SiGNED
~ I DESIGN DEVLkTiON SUBMITIM `
,
I .1 ALTERATroN TO pLAT - HLocKs &LO~.~s
I ~ HBARING E,XAM APPROVfib DENIBD- APPBALED BBC ! PROJECT A!'PRO'VED DENIED
~~~-6? -3
, _ . .3!:ek
Je7~..~►~'
r ~
Awtl4r-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / /r ~ ~ ~ Li"' ~ ~~~J. f ~ F v~Y~ Ca~~I~~~~ AI ~ i~~~' 7! LaI ~ ~
- ~4r4-,.L
` ~ ~
~
~ _
_ 4z itA
I - ($:~16
, --v2- ff-T~ 4~- -~6' 71JA A
~ •
-qA ' 4-
MpWeViewlor ~ I '
E ~
~ y
Page 1
OFFICS OF TH$ COIINTY ENGINEER
SPORAN$ COUNTY, WABHINdTON
Project Eagle Hardware-Old Fred Meyers Date 10-18-93
Address E 5204 Sprague
Parcel No 23531-9009 Ref No 893149
The County Engineering Department has completed a review of
the above referenced project The followinq information must be
provided sn order for us to proceed with our review
Resolution No 80-1592, Section 1 2 07 states. "Building permits
for new construction or substantial improvement - nsubstantial
improvement" means any repair, reconstruction, or i.mprovement of
a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of
the market value of the structure either (1) before the
3.mprovement or repair is started, or (2) if the structure has
been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred "
are required to meet the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management
A) For any new hard surface area, for an asphaltic roof, or
a roof containinq HVAC machinery, a drainage plan
for the site shall be prepared in compliance with
Spokane County "Guidelines for Stormwater Management" At
a minimum the plan must contain.
1 Drainaqe calculations for stormwater volumes
generated on site
2 Calculations for total impervious surfaces
contained within the site
3 Finished grade elevations for structures to be
constructed on site
4 Finished grade elevations at the top and bottom of
the 208 swale
5 A typical cross section of the 208 swale
6 Calculations to justify the number and type of
drywells proposed
7 Elevation of drywell inlets where applicable
8 Copy of the proposed landscape plan
B) The subject property is affected by the "Findings and
Order" and the "Conditions of Approval" for the following
land use action
Spokane County Zone Change No ZE-33-55
C) The following improvements within adjacent Right of Way
are required prior to the release of a building permit
1 You must submit road and drainage plans for street
improvements These must be prepared by an
engineer Plans must be prepared for the following
streets
a Carnahan, Typical Roadway Section No 11
Minor Arterial Standard
b Sprague, Spokane County Special Section
Page 2
All required construction (sidewalk/curbing/pavement) within
the Public Road Right of Way is to be completed prior to the
release of a building permit or a financial guaranty in an amount
estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of
construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer Required plans are to be submitted prior to estiamating
the amount of the financial guaranty or permit release
2 As an alternative to the required road improvements
the County will accept an RID/CRP agreement
"Notice to Public No 6" on Spraque
3 Please submit a copy of a recorded property deed
from the Auditors office for the subject property
Upon receipt of the deed our staff will prepare the
RID/CRP agreement
4 Approach permits must be obtained, after a site
plan has been approved, and before the issuance of
a building permit, from the County Enqineer3.ng
Department for any new or improved driveway
approaches to the followinq streets
a Carnahan
b Sprague
D) Insufficient information was submitted with the proposal
We are unable to proceed with our review We will need
the followinq before we can proceed
1. Site Plan
2 Drainage plan as specified
3 Other information
a A parkirtg and traffic circulation plan shall
be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The
design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Paving as
required by the County Planninq Ordinance, will be required for
any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
b No access to 3rd Avenue will be allowed
E) Utility Condition Perm.i.ttee is responsible for arranging
for all necessary utility adjustments or relocation as
required for completion of the improvement
F) The owner of the property or the authorized
representative must complete and sign Spokane County
Engineers "Aqreement to Pay Fees". This document must be
returned to the County Engineers Office Plan review will
not be completed until this document is executed This
docutaent is attached to these comments Please return
the completed Agreement to your contact person at the
Engineers Department
~
~
Page 3
Only after all the information and requirements listed above
are sugplied or completed and the necessary review has been
accomplished will your building permit be released
Your contact person at the County Enqineering Department is
Robert Turner, 456-3600
~
~
i
s
Z
Atop
ot:
~
ou~~
~v• a
QC1K~' R
S o,~p
~
~
,~is
_
IF
r N r ~ 18 0
~ ~ S 4
RN ~ IM 1 ~
a c~ 6
~ 1 3_ 3
d ~ 1 ~ {
3
. , ~ , ~ ,
~ i r Ji" ' ~ ~ ~
{ t~' i!~~j► t
' `;~jl toa! ~ ~ ~i
ss. ~ a 12Q
rc ~ '4 4 - 6
1 ~ ~
450 ~ 1.2
~
i °
~ oN
M) V
~ • 1+N t
, ~1 e2 ..69 01111111111
~ ~F s
,s
~ p
2600
s ~J ~ • '
40
-
•l~
_ -
~"(j c
• ~ l'~ " j~' ~O4 '
,
~ i,~ g - - ' b3 t
~
-
; ~ i w `'~'f h ♦ ♦ ~
1 , ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ 4~~ ~ O
t!E
,
'j
~ - ~ t~ T9 ~ ~91' ~
I ' r+ ~ fi. ►
f'/f
. 1~.~ ~ f , , _n•
~
3 1 ~
/ a
C,p
~KAw~
4.3 '
~
►5 ~ - -
K.
~ iT,- q*
H M1~ 1 ,
03
~ i lw2
5~5''' ` 09
~
00
1 E
CoMMERC,A I-
RK ~
PA
1.2
' • 1111101111 ' $~'55
I x p` p
eo
,
~ 116-g3C L
~
~
Nd`~~Q
Fv ~
~ ~ ~
.
to = ~ 1~ ~
_ to
~ 414_ 5z
a
JD : 6~ i~,~►~' ~g,'~ ' , ,
f
UR•3 5 '
23g -
10) 44 -58 2°n-15
~ `
1 ~ ~b
'qC Q +p~,~
~j Q R~ !t►E`~~~,p►`t tiF
py~ ~
A ~
- ~ ~
i
~L
BF.FOB SM EOJILD 0F C=TY CO'XISST~~IMS 0Y SpMn.MP GOM3TY• tAAEiiY r4TaN
IN ME MA":M 0F A,`T )
Ai~~~ShT T0 TFS )
Z,,ZF M QRDI WICE OF ~
WiMR.~..~.' COUNTY,
Z`TGTX, U a rEi.A'Y' TM ~
TO W,AIYM CP R&a ) A28 Q L UTIox
YA'-.n ~~~~L EIT ~
Er-M490 &sVAU A'D )
PARK. STEACrJ$ QND ~
'
U P. RbIId201~.D
t ~
a
81l IT B-ESOLVM by the Hoard of County Oommisa ionprs of spokmne ~
GoLatp$ we-Shiagton ths.t the Zonia~ Jrdiaan e oP Sgolmne Oo nty, Baoolutifon 53-199 be amgnded to the ef`Peot Lhati AM sear 78rd reqnireaeat be valvsd
oa all p,roperty betweea the Union Paoifio 8ailroad Tra+aka, cmd 5gragm
Aveau+e, Park Eo$d end Rsqmita 8oad ~ p
`ta-i OS~OR' BI IT R3SOLYED tbat the pnperty iit the alova
~~e-a U vsivoA at the rear 7ard v."rtiraaeat
~ _ ~ • ~ ~ i ~ ,
OF aPa$144rao COil?MY• WaSIMiGTX
,
U • ~ _ ,
'7
.
-e
~ i
U
, ~ C 1
/
~33_~ d 4rJ i ~
Q . w Yt-tbe g+ea."~ '
77
."7► ^
~ `
g7 v ✓ .,r
1-
~A~M:it4
~
u
!
~o
TEB NUTSR OF A H~ C~GIBa 783 S~IbiG ]d,bP
18S FOLIAMO DEiCBI sT0 CSAHaT F8~1 E~CIJIL
~ T0 BE$'~ICT~D DiD08~IJL~ -muPrEbRwTsi LYING SOII18 OF TH8 UUNICE
FAiC I FICi'RR TRA=, 80RTS OF SP$ARTS AVSM HBOM 8!lOANA OD
PUM B08D, I8 SBCgIM 13 MD 14,p TNP. 25 g., 8A&GB 43 S.1►.N.
~ q'811? PBOPI~TTr LYIBG SGII~ 08 SFRJla08 AF~UB BE~ C!►R~id~ 8?.
~ MD WB P~AY I3TERCBMG8 Al' SPRAM M., ECTO1'DIBG 118 FM 8
/ SOUTS 08 TI8 SOUTEE LIBE OF SPUM AVB. 3+0 CRMB P8M[ QACLAB"
IFTBD TO COOMCIAL~&TBgT PROPEBTi 1-1II1G SOIIM AND MT OF TSB
ZI8TING CMBMCIAL tM ON 7SB SOQTIK 3IDE 0F 8PRAGUE A1t8. T0
~ CARTE SMW RXV'iD18G TO PI8ST AYEiIIB IS SEC• 2363'WP 265.0
~ RANG8 43 8.V.N. AND 70 CSMGL FBtM A+tMICQLMRAL TO CQOMCIl1Ir
AFFIQAVIT OF P03TING TEkT sTRIP OF LAND LYIKG SOIITS OF FI88?
~ AYE= EXT15D►BD, ZSTEbiDIBQ 860 FEBZ YA
TO TU S* OP' BLOCSS 11 md 1Z, 8Pft=
STATE OF WxSBINGTON ) mBFl ADDITION, HLTIMM CQBTER JlND
) S S. C880NICLE, BBIB G ALL OF BLO`MS 3 wad 4
couNTY oF SPOK.ANE ) ASD li* OF il and iZ, SNAUB 32R ADD. ~
IS SBCTION 900 TWP. 26 8.$ BUaS 43 B.M (oont•)
-
, beiag first duly aworn, depoaes aaa sQya
That at all times meatioaed hereixi he was, and now is, e, aitisen oF the United
States, a reaident of Spoke.ne County, We.shington, and over the age oF twenty-one
years,
That on , 195 , he personally posted three (3) true aad
aorreot aopies oP the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC IEARING at the follawing
places in Spokane County, to-w1t s
~
1 ~ ~ •
• ,~z?~ ~
~
2. ~s
ciw e.
~
. ..s,,. ~ ~
~
Subsaribed and sworn to before me
, 195 .
~
,
~
NaTAFtY PiT BLIC IN AND FOR
SPORANE COUNTY, WASHINGTOId
Res iding at SpokQae, Washiagton
~
roi
/r
.
~ r
♦
BUILDING PERMIT CHECKLIST
~j~
T ~ 'v _ . ~ , • ~ w ~ . \VV~ ~YIVS
V A4 1~\ ~ V-- iN c., i'r' I g 9 t i
~
W IIAEWRMM COWLETED > 11111A1'AGI~.IYI~
RIGHT OF WAY DEPARTMENT
DEED
EAsBnErvTS
tIlIA7
R/w P1w I
R1D ~ ,o~ ~j ~ ✓ I ~
LEGAL DESCRIPt 10 CHECK ~
LETTER FROM SCAPCA ~
RECIPROCAL USE At3REEMENT
~ ~ QIf ~ f;'~A . ~"*.a ~z~,~~ . I ✓ I f-00)
~ I
~ I
~ . . . . ~ ~ SI,TE
. . . . . . . . . . . . _ - . .
SCALE ~
BENCHMARK V.",_
ROAD NAMES V., ~
R/W DIMENSIONS 11/ ` I C~ ~
PROPERN UNES ✓ t~
I
SET-ASIDE 100 ~ ,i-
GRADES
STAM P
PAVINQ ~ ✓ ~ I ✓ ~
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLAN
APPROACH PERMIT
ft .,AA-j ~CU ~ ~ ~ ,~~~.e.. ~ ✓ I ✓
~ I
~ I
~ I
x DRAINAaE:,,~,
~ ✓ ,
zoe CALCUUkTIM
SWALE CROSS-SECTION
SPECIAL SOIL TESTS
ROOF CONSTRUCTION
HVAC ON ROOF I ✓
LANDSCAPE PLAN (208 CONFUCT)
I a/ I /
DITCH CALULATIONS ~ ✓ I ~
BACKWATER CALCULATIONS I ✓ I ~
CRATE CALCULATIONS ✓ I /
PIPE CALCULATIONS I f
RETENTION/DETENTION CALGS
10J50/100 YEAR STORM
TR-55 ANALYStS
~ I
~
~
~ I
~ I
R0AVs.
aFUOE sHEEr
(EXISTIN
STAMP ~ kx"
OWNERS SIGNATURE
ROAD DRAINAGE (SWALES, STRUCTURES, ~ I O~ ~
"R" VALUE TESTS
NEIV ROAD DESIGN C I
BOND v ~
MYLAR
COUNTY STAMP
~ i ,
E"TMOMDAM,~IOWWM
a
a.
PROJECT NUMBER- 930106 v REVISED FEES D tE= 12/07/93 PAGE= 01
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
PENALTIES WILL BE ASSESSED FOR COMIlRENCING WORK WITNOUT A PERMIT
SITE STREET= 5204 E SPRAGUE AVE PARCEL#= 35231 9009
ADDRESS= SPOKANE WA 99212
PERMIT USE= EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN
PLAT#= 999999 PLAT NAME= RANGE
BI.OCK-- LOT= ZONE= B-3 DIST#= E
AREA= E'/A= F WIDTH= DEQTH= R/W= 60
# OF BLDGSa 1 # DWELLINGSa WATER DIST a
OWNER= EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN PHONE= 206 431 5740
STREET= 101 ANDOVER PARK EAST AVE
ADDRESS= TIIKWILA WA 98062
CONTACT NAME= JOHN HALLSTROM PHONE NUMBERa 206 955 3203
BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT= UNii LEFT= UNK RIGHT= UNK REARa UNK
REVIEW IATFORMATION
DEPARTMENT REOIEW REQUIP►EMENT
BUILDING REVIEW COORDINATOR - J LARSON
CObIlvINTS .
SUILDING PLAN REVIEW - KEN JEFFREY
,
COMMENTS
BUILDING SPRINK BLDG - PI,AN REQ'D-
COMMENTS
SEPA REVIE BUII,DING +12, 000 SQ FT
.
COMMENTS
CMA REVIEW CRITICAL MATERIP,I,S (ALL COMM)
,
COMMENTS
ENGINEER APPROACH/FLOOD PLAIN/DRAINAGE
COMMENTS
/
ENGINEER S TE DRA NAGE TO HE VIEWE L 4441jn
ril.
!
a
BflND ESTIMATE
PROJECT Eagle Harctware -Garnahan improvements NME rbt DATE 26-Jan-94
- -
QRA1hlAGE 1TEMS UMITS QUANfTY PR1CE COSfi
1) Orywetl - Type A F.J4 # 200 00 000
2) Drywell - fiype B EA 2 160000 320000
' 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 30000 000
4) Grate Type 2 EA 5 33000 1650 00
6) Grate - rype 3 Ea 1 30000 30000
6) Backfl II For DW CY 15 50 0 00
7) ConCrete Inlet EA 5 70000 350000
e) C M Pipe 1 (Y Dia LF 65 2200 143000
9) C M Pipe 120 Dia LF 116 2550 2958 UO
10) G M Pipe 15" Qia LF 2750 000
11) C N! Pipe 180 Dte LF 2900 000
12) Precast AAanhale EA 1450 00 0 00
13) SalEd Itd EA 1 30000 30000
14) Dftch Eaccavation CY 78 1000 78000
15) Sod SF 2097 070 146790
NaN sTAruaARo oRvNAGE IrEMs
1) Wilbet# Vault Curb inlet EA 2 25000 54000
2) 0 00
3) 000
4) 000
sy 000
s) 000
-
DAAINACE SUBTOTAL 1608S90
--rr------:-------------------rrrrr--rr---r-rar---r rrr-rir►rrrr+r....rr.-fia
16} Monumenis EA 18000 000
17} Barncade LF 3004 0 00
18) Strevt Signs EA 8004 000
-
OTHER SuBTOTAL 000
GRADING SURFACING, CURB ANQ SIDEWAE.lf
19) Rough Grade CY 12228 1000 1222800
20) Top Course CY 5435 1400 760900
21) Base Course CY 1400 000
22) Asphalt Conarete Tans 5571 4400 2451240
23) Curb Type A LF 660 000
24) Curb Type 6 LF 629 790 4969 i 0
25) Curb Type R LF 760 0 00
26) Sidewalk SQ YD 4194 1640 687816
rr~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----------------------------~~~~
NaN --STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
ywr--l------------------------------ -rrri--a-------------- e----w-
1y 000
a) 000
3) 000
4) 000
-r....rr----rr--r:rr-
GRADING ANQ SiJRFACIfVG 5619666
~
GRANQ TOTAL 7228256
~
74;
~
sTREET OtAxTrttrEs
PROJECT NO - 893149 DESIGNER- RBT tiATE- 1/26f 94:
PROJECT DESG'RIPTI4N- Carriahan r0ad improvements far Eagle Hardware an Sprague
STREET # 1 ~
NAME- CARNAHAN LENGTH- 629 04 FT WIQTH- 32 00 FT
BFGIIdNZNG STA'I'IQN = 1291 00 ENDING STATIQN = 1920 44
O1dE SIDE 4NI,Y FWIDTH= 22 Oi] ✓ EWIDTH= 0 00 QWYDTH 10 00 vo'
TERM 1 TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 171 04+/
TERM # 2 GHOPPED
ITEM MEASURENENT QUANTITY
St7RFACE AREA- 22010 28 S F
ROA,DWAY ][?XCAVATION 1 50 FT 1222 8 C Y
CRUSHED SURFACIN'G TOF COXJRSE 0 67 FT 543 5C Y
CRUSHED SURFIAiCING HASE GOCTRSE 000 FT 00 C Y
ASPHALT CONCRETE 0 33 FT 557 1 TONS
CURB TYPE B EXISTING 0 00 FT PFtOPOSED 629 0 F2
SZDEWALK EXISTING D 00 S Y PROFO5ED 419.4 S Y
.ar-----:-~
TOTALS
ROADWAY EXCAVATION 1222 8 C Y
GRUSHED SUREAC I NG TOP COURSE 543 5 C Y
CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE a a C Y
ASFHALT GONCRETE 557 1 TONS
CURB TYFE B 629 0 FT
SIDE6TALK 419 4 S Y
C.-
C-p ~
1 ~
~ 01A11Lb
~i
.
. ~
S t~ o K A tv ~ ~ C o v rt -r ~r ~e~i r
~
OFFICB OP TI IB COUNIY ENCINB6R • A DrvisipN oF n IE P,euc WoRKs pErAInMeHr
Ronald C Harmann, P E CuuMy Bnglneer Dertnis M Scott P B, Dlrector
AGREEMENT TO PAY rEES
ENGINEER'S ACREEMENT NUMQER 7e, ~2 / 5~
'iliis agreement between Spokane County and T~S conzo
~ '
wliose interest in tlie rroject js Architect
tic ,
t ilictis, CIL)
is entered into tltis 25th day of October 919 93 Tlus egreement is applicabie to lhe project
known as
Ea le Hardware b Garden# E 5204 Sprague, Ref No B93149
TiiAt tlie indtvtduals and pnrties named herein as hoving an interest in ilie above describecl prorerty or
project agrce to ilie following
) Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as snecified in
Chapter 914 of tlie Spokane County Code The fees wjli bc bASed on actual salary
costs incurred by Spokane County for praject reviews ancl / or tnspections rfu9 a ten
percent eclminisirative cherge, end will he bitled niontlily as accruecf Any final
billing amounts, tu include any late fees or any otlter eapcnscs incurrecl in tlte
colieclton of an overclue account must be paicf nrtor to ilie Cuunty's Acceplance of
the project for filing
2 The undersisned agrces that tliese fces ace due and rayable tipon recetpt of tlle
billing as specified ebove
3 Any invoices not paid witliin 30 days of tlie invotce date will be subjected to a late
fee ciinrge of 1% per monih (12% pec year) on the unpAid balance of the account
and any accnied late fee charges In acldition, if any outstanciing balance on ilie
acc;ount for tlifs project is not pAtd williin 30 clays of the invoice date, nu further
reviews of tlte rroject docuntents wjll be canducted until tlte entlre account balance
is paid Any balance on the account for Ilus rroject not paid witliin 65 days of lhe
invoice date may result in legal action or tlie initation of otlier cOllecljon rraceclures,
inclucling rcfcrral ta a collection agency 7'he Sponsor will bc liable for any and all
expenses inctirred hy ilie Cotinty for ilie collcction of overclue accotints
4 T1ie montltily I3tll1n sliauld be sent to tlie aitention af
tagl e Hardware & Garden
NAMC c/o Sconzo/Hallstrom Architects
ADDRESS 919-124th Avenue NE #101
CITY, STATE Bellevue, WA
ZtP CODE 98005
PFIONE # (206) 455-3203
~
I understand tliat failure to pAy tliesc fees may resull in dciny in completton or arproval of tlle project or
other rossible sanclfons
❑ If tliis fee ngreemcnt is completed by someone otiter tltan tlie Sponsor (i C. the
project owncr or a principal in Ilie firm spwnsortng ilie praject), sticlt as tlie Engineer
designing tlic project, tlien writteo autliorization f tlle S specilicAlly
utitliorizing llie Agent to excciite lliis Fee A ente Acli to this Fee
Agreement
SIGNATURE Dy
Thomas A Sconzo
, (PRINT NAME) I jtMRN AW.OW CnPX-TO STqOfC4BE COU~TY ENGINEERS
IcVVUareemon feo 8120A3
W 1026 Qroatlway Ave SpO1CDllB WA 99260 0170 (509) 456 36Q0 i'AX (509) 456 4715
ko
aECEiiEC
~ ~ In oate 1-~t 9y Paroe~~3.~`~3/~90e~,90o9~ FILEOORRfCoROf 0
REOUEST P mm- ~ed 0 ~s~~ B 7
. ~ ~n Z~ ~ 55 fli 194 C-11
Req BY (W1d Oey) , 7' -NLQ, 6 1
wi-
TEROFFICE SPOKANE cauNz i wAs►+
NOTICE TO 9401280521
RID WAIVER, AGREEMENT AND COVENANT= ~
~
KNOW ALL MEN 8Y THESE PRESENTS, That EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN, INC A
WASHINGTON CORPORATION, VO~ M:D PAGE
being the ownera of the following deeoribed lande in consideration of Mutual
Benefite to be hereafter derived do for themeelvee, their heire, granteee, assiqns
and eucceasor(e) ia interest hereby agree to authorize Spokane County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the forcaation of a Road Improvement Dietrict (RID) by the
petition method pursuant to Cbapter 3u.88 RCW, which petition includee the owner(e)
property, and further not to objeot, by the eiqning oP a bsllot, or not to prote8t
to the formatior, of a RiD by the resolutioa aaethod purauant to Chapter 36 88 RCw,
which reaolution inciudee the owrser(e) property. tf a RID is formed by either the
petition or reeolution method, as provided gor i» Cbapter 36 88 RCw, the awner(e) or
succeesor(e) lurther agree: (1) that the improvemente or conetruction contemplated
within the proposed RID are fsaeible, (2) tbat the benetite to be derived from the
formation of the RZD by the property included therein, together with the amount of
any County participation, exceede the cost and expenee of formation of the RID, and
(3) that the property within the propoeed RIO ie eufficiently developed Provided,
further, the owner(s) or auaceeeor(e) ehall retain the right, as authorized under
Rcw 36 88 090, to object to any aesesement(e) on the property as a reeuit of the
improvemente called for in conju»otion wfth the form8tion of a RID by either the
petition or reeolution method under Cbapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior
Court the decfefon of the Board of County Commieeionere affirming the final
asaeaement roll
It is further aqreed that at euch titne as an RID ie cre8ted or any Road Improverrent
Project ie eanctioned by Spokane County, the itnprovemente reqvired (curb, eidewalk,
drainage control and paving to exieting pavement) ehall be at the eole experee of
the undersiqned owner, their heire, qranteee and aeeiqne without any monetary
participation by Spokane County
The RID waiver contained in thia agreement eball expire aftes ten (10) yeare from
the date of execution below However, 8t the expiration date the owner(e) or
sUCCeseor(e) agree to conetruct the required isaptovemente at their own expeneet F8Y
co Spokane County the then eotimated coet of thq regvired improvements to enable the
county to compiete the eame; or'furnieh a bond or other eecure method svitable to
the County, providinq for or securinq to the Couaty the actual conetruction of the
improvemente
~
a
The above conditione and covenant apply to the lollowing deeeribed property:
The South 650 00 feet of the vQrth 700 00 feet of the West Half of the
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 25
North, Range 43 East, W M, situate in the County of Spokane, State of
Washinqton
.
t
These requirements are and shall run with the land and shall be bindinq upon
the owners, their heirs, successors, or aseiqns
(over)
Z
a
•
VDt 1551PAGE1321
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned bas caused this mstrument to be executed on this 25th
day of Januarv 199
BY
EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN, INC
A S+aASHIi+IGTOId CORPORATION
Vice President
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF xzNC ) ss
I cerufy that I know or have sadsfactory evidence that George Smith
is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (helshe) signed this
instrument, on oath stated that (heJshe) was authonzed to execute the instrument and acknowledged it
asthe Vice President Of Eagle 8ardware and Garden' Inc
to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument
Dated S
~ V ti ~ ~ No ubl~c In and for the State of
Wash~ngton, resid~ng at J
.
~ Sy~o~ t, 1,''0~ rotWaylformslrwdeedlkmh
M ~
~ y ~ ~ M''~C + ~ •
~
w
~~~♦1~ ~~7
~
y
r 35231 9102
35231 9103
35231 9133
Portion oP Assessors Parcel No 35231 9134
9401280530 SPOKANE COVNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
spokane County, Washington
RIGHT OF WAY DEED
4 YOl 1551 PAGE1324
IN THE 14ATTER OF Carnahan Road I RF NO 1580 ,
tCNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN, INC , a
4 V 2
` t
WASHINCTON CORPORATION,
For and in consideration o! MutuBl Senetits, grants nnd conveys to
spokane County, the Pollowing desoribed parcel of land, aftuated in
spokane County, State oP Washington, to-wita
The West 32 00 feet of the North 651 feet of that portion of the Northwest
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range
43 East, W M, lyinq South of Sprague Avenue= situate in the County of
Spokane, State of Washington
EXCEPT The Right of Way for Carnahan Road
z uc" I " fUmp
Jate OPA a6 OW
L
~po1~tN
Located in Section 23 , Township 25 North, Range 93 East, w M
To N.AVE AND TO HOLD the same, unto the said Spokane county for the
purooses of a publfc road forever.
IN NVITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned bas caused this instrument to be executed on this 2Ltj
d 2 y o f Januarv 199 1A
EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN,
BY ~ 10 A WASHINGZ'ON CORPORATION
RFCEtvED
Vice Presiden[ILEO 4R RFCO%ED
REO UEST or _Lzap
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) .u 28 3 55 PH '94
COUNTY QF KING ) ssINTEROFFICE
wil
1
SPOKAHE CC..4TY W4SH
I cerufy chac I know or have saHsfactory evidence that George smith
is che person who appeared before me, and said person acknowIedged that (he/she) signed this
instrument, on oath stated that (heJshe) was author3zed to execute the instrument and acknowledged it
asthe Vice President Of Eagle Hardware and Garden, Inc
co be che free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes menuoned in the instrument
:
Dated
i ~
t~Q~ Notary 41cie In an for the State of
Washington, residing nt
.b tofwaylformsVwdeedlkmh
~ • ^IJ GO~~' ~
. .
ycF WASO
r l
-
VARrANCE # aLDG # J•um8 ENGiNEERS, INC
ENGIhtEERS SItRVEYORS "NEAS
OTMR # 2810 W Clearwater Ave Ste 201
S , T , R Kennemdc 11VA 99336
PARCEL # 4 ? 1143}9~ . Z!JJ 509*783 2144
ViMnt.i loftus P E ~ 509&73s-o790
RQAD IVAME _G /tiq&aj~ ProOcl Enp9nuer
The folloRwimg d+ocuments are aeeded before the Spokaae County Engmec's DegartmBnt can begm processing your
vanance or budding appltcattfln as approved. (509) 45&3600
~AGREEMENT T[} PAY FEES have been collected.
'--~RECORDED COPY 4F DEED$ DEED OF TRIIST, OOIItrSCt QC GQnveiig LaStrumeat These may be
abtaiaed from the County Auditor, 2nd Doar of che Courthouse _
b---~IE+GAL DFS+CRIPTI4N af yaur acce.s~ easeanenL
A I.iSTING UF NA1VM af mdsvidwals who wdl be slgmg the documents. These mdvidual nauies
shaald appear as the persou(s) legauy sqa tbeu aame. -
~A CURRFAT A►SSESSOR'S MA►P whwh deptcxs the focauoa of your progerty
4VMRSRW MICR4 RUN Zhese may be obtmed Umm the Caunty Assessors, 1st ftoor, of the
Courthouse, Jeffermn entrance, 2nd door on the left.
The aecewuy documents will be prepared by the Fng,tneefs Depsrtment, Ragbt-af-Wap Secuon, upoa provisioa of
the infotmatton noted abave.. Yau wifi be aotified whea thc docum,ents am ready for signature. The dacuments may
be sent tv yvu, hcvwever, IT SHOVLD 8E NUTED TgAT ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTAIUCZED The
Engmeer's Department does have avtanes avaflahle if you chaose ta mga the doctimeats at our office
~
Please call when ready ~ C ase mad whcn ready
~
Nouce to Fublt+c #-a Righi-o ay .
C°n
CONBMEM
40
~i 6W,
Right-of-W aY Ageat 460 Farward to you fram
,
Mplflnaitac 192
- A-dZ
c- - - -
AC
Gt~
~
1
/ ~ _ 2~ _ A _ ..~t ~ _
~
o► ¢
~ ~
~ r ' -
god O ,
~
91-3-41orl) ~ ~ ~ ~ If Qqc)6 3(Oy ,
('dd) quo ~
- -
2 ~ . ~ y~
~ ~ ,
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. TRANSMITTAL LETTER
ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING
TQ Mr Ray Moon, County R-O-W Agent DATE January 28,1994
Spokane County
W 1116 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99201 PROJECT Eagle Hardware &
Garden, Spokane, WA
WE TRANSMIT
(X) Herewith ( ) Under Separate Cover ( )
THE FOLLOWING
(X) RID Waivers ( ) Shop Drawings
(X) R-O-W Deed ( ) Samples
( ) Unbound Copy ( ) Product uterature
( ) Disk Copy ( )
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED
For Approval For Your Use
For Review & Comment For lnformation & File
For Your Distribution (X) As Requested
( ) For Record ( )
DESCR I PTION/COMM ENTS
DISTRI6UTIOIV
Tom Sco zo Vince Loftus J-U-B
FROM ~
4
Peggy Hammond, Survey Technician
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc
12501rcmwood Dnve Suite 220 Coeur dAlene, ID 83814 (2Q8)667 1574
~J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc
• . , ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
1250 Ironwood Drne Surte 220
Coeur d Alene ID 83814
anu2ry 13, 1994 208/6671574
RFCEIVko FAX 208/ss7 2176
Mr Bob Turner JAN 141994
Spokane County
North 811 Jefferson ~d~` ~Qeeriq~
Spokane, WA 99260
Dear Mr Turner
Fiale Gacden and Hardware
Enclosed are copies of the Deeds showmg the ownerslup in Eagle Garden and Hardware's
name I am subirutting these at the request of our Kennevnck Offce to asmst in the RID process
Please let me know if additional mfonnntion is needed
Sincerely,
J-U-B ENGINEERS Inc
Ernest M Warner, P L S
Regional Land Surveyor
EMW/gsl
Enclosures
c V'ince Loflus P E
~
► .
e ;
r
i
liTA
W"'a'r
ton W-W I
~
SPOKANE ENVIRONMIENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 [1]
RECEIvED
Nov z 3 M
,
COQE ENFORCEMENT
SpOKAIIE EtIYIROSQIElITAL ORD1NANtE
IYAt 147 11 9641 Sectfon 11 10 230(l)
Enviromental Chedcllst
F11t !10
Pnepose of Chndtllit
The Stat! Enviroa~ental Palfcy Att (SEPA) chapter 43 21C 1iCY repulres all governAentst agenctes to cantiaer the em►Ironnentei topacts ot a propoaal
betare nnkiuy daeislons M Enrtronmentel Iapact Ststeaent (EiS) awst pe prepated for ell praposals with probapte si9n1f1cant cQrerse Inmacts oe
the quality of the enrtronieent The Ourpose ot tl+Is chetkitst ts to orovtde iMonatian to Relo you and tAe aqency ldsntlty hapacts fron yaur
prvposai (ane to reMrca or aro1d tnpacts froal t1e Oraposal It !t tan be donel and to Aelp tAe agency det1de whether an Ei5 Is repulKb
lestruetiotls for Applictnts
Tbis e+ivlrome+tal cbpekllst asks you to descr/be soae Oas1c tnforngtlan ebout yaur proposel Goven+antat agenstes uae thts Metlclist to Qetereirte
rhetRer tRe envlrcnaental lapacts of yasir proaosal are slgnfflcant requtring preparatfon of en Et5 Artswer the ouesttons bileflyt witA the aost
Oreclse teforsatfon knarn cr glve the Oest descrl0tion you un
11w aust ansrar esch qnestfon aaurately and taretuity to tAr be3t ot raur knovteW Te most cases rau slrovld pe eble to anwer the gestions
tros your aw+ obsenretions or proJect Dians wlthaut the need to hlre expefts lf ,rov resily do not krtor the ensrer or It e questton does not aaply
to your propossl wite da Rot tnoM' ar Qoes not appty Camplete entners to the qwstiont now may arotd unnecesssryr deiayn tater
Soae anestlons ask abart gorermental requlattons wch a zonlnq sttarellna ans 1aoftrt desfqnations Ainwer tleese questtorn tt you can lt you
haMe probteas the gorerrmenta) a4enc/es can asslst you
TAe eheeRiist questtons aply to •i) parts ot your proaosal ernt► f1 you p1an to da them arer a perlo0 of ttee or on dlfferoat partels ot lend
Attub any, aOd/tfonal 1ntonYtlon tRat Mtil descMpe Yaarr proposel o* 1ts envtromerKal efiects The aqeixy to rb1cA you submlt this ehackittt my
ast you to explaie your snswers or provtde addltlonei 1nformtton reasonnsir relateQ to deLenalnlng 1f there war Qa stqniffcant aQ+rarse lmpact
use ot dKtkttst tor aonvrojett piosals
taapiete tAts checklist tor nonproject proposels evsn thougl+ auesilom w ee ans+.era~ does not gopty
iN ~tT101t coplete the SIIPPIEMElITAL SNBET FOR I!~!~lPft0.1ECT ACTIOltS(Part D~
For eonvro~eet actloes Me raterteicea f~ t1+e eheekltst to tAr ro.ds vro,~ect spplltant and praperty or site st►ou10 pe res0 es p~ossl
proposer ane stfected geWaphlc aree ros0Mtvely
A BALX6R0illID
tU.s ot prooosad vrofen +t .ol+c.ele Eagl e Nardware & Garden
zUe o, Om„c,,,t Sconzo/Ha] 1 s trom Archi tects
3 AOdress oW phone nober ot anlletnt or tontatt Person 919-124th venue HE #101
6e11evue, WA 98005
(206) 455-3203 - John HaYlstrom
4 ace a►eakti:e vrepane 11/4193
s,►gmr .eque,t,ng check,tst Buildi ng Department
6 Propoaea tldnq or sthedute (tnciudiRq pAa=1nq fr ,~~icait): St rt censtruct-ion L1DOn 7SCLld11 -P of p_gmiL
compTete construction within 150 days
7 e Oo you hsre any ptans for futuro aQ0lttons expansloe or turtnsr acttvitr related to or toe+ecte0 r1tA tti1s proposal' tl yes exp1a9n
140
b Do you orn or luve aptlons on lena nar0y or adjatant to thls proposel4 lf yes lxplNn No
8 L1st any envirensntal infomtton you ktww asaut thai Ass aeen Orepared or rtll be preparad Qtrectly rebte0 !o thts pmposai
_Hgpe
R" viisa ~
sraUZ eevucVMKrAL oXDPes+x
(VAC 197-11-960) Secslon 11 10 230(1)
A. BACZGIOMM (eontiauad)
9 Oo yw 1mw vtetAer appliutlou sce peediog tos 6ovetmeatal approvala ot otlfer pso6weals dimet2y afteeting cAe 9copast7 co oced tqr raur
Psopooal [f ye• expLio
No
10 Llnc soy so•asamnt appsovaL or araits cAac vlil oe aesdad toc yau pcoposal tf Imovo
Demolition permit and Building permit
ll Gioe a btieE caaplete deoeclptioo ot Ywc psopwul lecluftag ttr proyoeed wa• aa0 cAa piss of th projeet and site 'ltiere ate oe+reral
qnentioos lacer !o tbiio cbaetilisc ehac uk yw co daenribe eeetsio wpaet• ot rons ProPowd You do not oaW to repot those oasvers mn tAla
Wsa ~9$
Project consists of~emo 11 ~i on ot exi sti ng r red'~feyer s
-Construction of-T7- t5b,ln s - '
'
, #
-c
1. toucloa ot tHr pcoposal Clve suttieienc letoeeocioe [ot a peesos ce underseaad tlw oerele• lou tioe of rour ptoposed psojaet /netudtng •
•tee'c addreas !t aa' and "eelan eamhlp aod canp it Imovo Tf • pnopos►I wuld oeeus ow~ a range ot •ca 9:ovtda eM range oe
bouadarte• ot the aiu(s) Peovide a Uad desselptioo •ice plaa vleinlty ms9 and toMesphie aao tl «ueaaely avatisble trl+ile yau
should m6ait aoy o1mos ttpulftd by tlte ageat> >w act not npnised to dtqlieate "oe or dstal2td 9L" sodsitted vtth anr peemlt applLeaclo
teLted to tRl• eheekUst
E 5204 Sprague
13 Dms tlr psoposed aetion lts witblo tAe Aqattas 4e nltlve Asea (ASA)T 'Ae Ct"sal Sew r Serric• Acsa3 S'Ae Priorleq Serer Serlee Arrat 'he
Ctty o! Spoloaac (See Spohsse Couatr • A9A OwrLy Loae AcL• tos benaderleo)
NQt knoam ,
ro U CaUqsIM ei AeRtCAM
s ravsROMOOe-.aL m.nmztrrs
tv.tuseloe Fos
Aseoey u.a Ooiy
1 ElllC1l
a Geos:al daseripcion ot tee •!to (eleele ose t Lt eollias Allly scmp slepe• soustaleoos
otAer
e M.c l. che .se.p.,c .1o9e oa ce. .lc. c•wcmt"ce paee.at a,o,.,t s i te 7 s sioped
for storm water drai nage for existing -taci ~'i icies
c Uhat geasni tgpas of sotL sn tonad oa tAa •lto (!os uusple nlsy saood grawl paat anet)
if yvo Insov sAe eLulfieatLoo of aarlenltnral •oiL speelEp tAas aod aots any pslm [smLod
To be determined by soils investigation
d Aee than wrtsss !odleatiom or Aistoq ot wnuble ssiL ie tlr taediste deioityt It so
Qsadbt
No
2
'3PORANE ENYIAONlEMTJII OADINANCE
(YAC 197 11 9601 Sectlon 11 10 Z20(11 ~
B ElNlitOIMENTAL Elf1SENT5(tortttnuad)
Evelwtton Far
Aqencl► 1lse anly
e Descrtbe the purpose type ana approxta0te Quantltles ot any f1111ng or g►aQtng proposed
lndiutt sourte ot titi
aQproximate Quantities are not knoyn at this time. It is
intended that grading and filling be done using onsite
f 1MAd'bro1l0oM Li t result ot clesring eonstruetfen or use? It so qeneralty deacrlbe
TemQorajry erosion mav occur dlirina site exca atinn_
g About rAst pereertt ot tRe slte rt11 be corered rttl+ impervtoas surfaces 4tter project constnre
tlon (for examle uphelt or bultdings)?
+/-9Q%
h PropoaeQ wasuras ta reduce or coMrol eroafon or other tmpwts W tha earth 1t any
Normal construction erosion control methods would be
utilized during construction as required
2 AIR
a Whit typt ot emissions to the a1r rautd rasult from tAe praposal e dust autaaroblle odors
fndustriat voa4 saofcel durlnq eonstruct/on an0 .Aten the project Is capletedl 21 any
genwally eaacripe aae 9ire approxtmate Qwntttes 1t lnorn.
Normal construction vehicular emissions and dust can be
expected-lauring construction Vegicular emissions after
cons c ion wi t'T"be zraftic gene a edtrom the
e Are shere ~ny oH s+ie sources ot eo~tssio~s or oaor cnac wr arfecc nwr aroaoaalt tr ~
l nerslty aescrlbe
ot tfl our know i edge
t Proposed aeasa►es ta reduce or eontrol amtsslons or otAer tepacts to atr tt any
Water will be used to control dust as required
9 YATER
a Surface
(1) Is thera any surfaca Mater sody on or !n tRe freQfate rttlnftr at tht tlte 1nt1u01n} ppr-
ro+rnd nx0 seesonal stream asltwter lakes poads retiends)t It yes descrl0e Rypo aed
provlQe eanes It approprlate stita rlut stream or rtver 1t tioas lnto
No
I21 Y111 Llie Oro3eet requlre any rork oYar 1n or edjweet to (M1th1n Zm feet) the Qeuribed
~O 2 It ~nes ptease Qescrlba an0 attich arsilepte plans
3
(VAC 197-11-960) Seecioo 11 10 270(i)
0 ElfVUtOMUWM ELJ0123!'S (coatianed)
Evelustloa pot
Agenty Ose Ooly
Eadoate tM aoouac of Elll ud d:edse mtesial ehat watd be pLeed to ot cnoore4 trow che
sutEue wte= or vesLads aad iadiute ehe asw of tHe oite tdt vauld ba 4Iteaed tndleate
che •wsee of [!YI matestat
None
(o) Yill tbg yropoGat c"uln surEscG Maesr OlsAd aqla o: dlMUrssooM? Ciw •Seoeral 48scrip-
tfon parpon anA appcoslaata quaatitin• !f imown
N0
(S) Qme l11t plOpOsv Z1O VLCh1A • I"tlt tl00d pLlQT u W oOto LOCatSQG 00 tAe •jt! Plm
Not to our knowledge
(6) Dot• CAe prapowl tnvolve aey disclasgas of rqc1 Yte;lals to wetsce vatusl it w
desectbe che erpe of vute aad auleipated volur o! disehrrge
No
e ctound
(1) Wiil aroundwcss be rithdesve► os vill vstts se dleelatge0 to aeaudwte:T Ctve eensnl
a..ertpctoa Oueoose aed .pproslnac: auaaeieie. ft lmorn
No
(2) wseslee wsc• ..c.el.i st+ac viu ee aleeiurged inco etw gcvuad tra. .epcie saat* or octrr
aanleasp rRSte craao.at tsesiisy Doweria ctr gawr.i .sso of cAe q.cem ctr m eas of
1►ouseo to ►e escvad (it appltea►L) os td e+aber of persona tte nstes(s) atr espatuQ to
Gerva
None
(3) oe.erlee aa7 sy.eeu o:tre cesn eeo« aa.lgnse tos etr ets"ul of s.atcuq rwa
lnsuutd tos ebe puepoN of disel+aegtn e1utQ. OeLow ebe gsanne ansiaee (iaeludes hsuu weA
as sbn.e tes cAt AlNpo"I of scoin was o: dsalogo teas t2ooc dalea) IMseslbe tM type of
systas tl+e ononnc of nceital to be dtsyoud of tArangb th hsta eud cbt type• of •ceelaL
likelr to be dispoaed of (ioelwLLag astotlal• rhlcti msy oatet tM ystm insdwttanly tlarongh
roi3L of as a eamuic of tintightlna aatiKtlem)
jype "B" drywells are intended to handle stormwater run
off from the building "208" drainage swales in combo-
nati on wi th arywe ns wi rT-handi e the remaining storm
water runoff.
(o) viu 4ay ehsiuL (.qeeially oeganle wlvents or paseolans toala) be .tend !n a0ow-
ssouud oe MD"cPound ster4,90 taalMt It w "Uc tYpRe sn0 4040919109 ot mtsr"L vill to
seoe+ed!
500 aal l an above around oroMe st,graae tank
4
sMWAOZ OvDAMUMfrAL OIMUWM
(IiAC 197-11-960) Seetloo 11 10 230(1)
1 lIIVL1t0lQdlRAL O.IDERS (eoatiaued)
EValuatloo Per
Ageoh a.e ooiy
(S) 111uc proceectra m•sure• viil be c.Yea co teuuee ehac lasb et splil@ of any eheslcsla
stosed or wad on slce v111 not be a1loweA W pes+coLtt to eeouaftater ht iaelu t ausura•
te keep efaro~icsL auc of dtsposal systeu descrlbad la 3o(2) aad ~bt~)~ oclera~e er
hazardous products which Eagle stocks for sale will be
stored in conformance with the regulation of Article 74
(Flamnable and Combustible Liquids) and Article 80
-TBaaardous ffa-teri a f-s-) o#-Tne
e Waser Ruaott (loaluding *tom racsr)
(1) Oesesibt che soueee of suwott (laeladiog stors ratee) aod mtAod of eolleecloa aAd d100481
s" (lnelnde qtuntities it Imow) Whece vill c!n• wtu tlovt 1i111 t!►ts rtes tlaw lato
meMr wacar#i I[ w Qaseribe
Storm water runoff from roof areas and pavement will
be collected and dlrected to storm water system
(2) iill aay ebedeals Mscosed hsodiad or useQ os the •lu to s lacatfoa vhan a opill as
leak vill dsafe to snrtsee os seouadrater or to s@cors ras•r at.po..i n•cm disclaTglut to
surisee of scoandwter!
No
(flOCoald vmte rcesisls easar aroued er anttac• watesat Lf s0 6atueallr deseHbe
d Proposad sss wra• to reAuee or coattol wdace gcound snd ruaoH rateT lspaets li sny (!i
s che Propesed ution llse vitAin ebe Mu!!sr Seuattiw Arra M capstlally elsar oa aWLnatloos
c nlatlaa eo tselllclu eoaeeroity Seatiom ]p(a) 30(S)6 and k(2) of cbie olrockllst)c
Stormwater runoff will be controlled throuqh usQ of dry-
we11s and "208" swales in accordance with the Spokane
County %uidelines ror Stormwater Ranagement"
. nXIM
a ~One eirele c7►pe of raaetatloa iauad oa tM site:
dettdeow tres: aider saple uptn otlws
rreqewe trea: l is eadu plee otb+s
a1+en0s
srus
putute
erop of ssde
wc soil pLnt• eaetaii DntteceaO Oullswd ahm& u00aaa oclrr
Motot pLass Mu= lillr alseaq allioii oteoc
otMe qpes of regetacioe
b Y!►at kiod nsd sarat of wgetatloo vill es [emoved os altesedt
None
c Lisc cbraaeened os aa0angesed specLs Imotin co to oa or oest clw •its
None
d Peoloud Lndsu9lnR we ei wtln pLnt• os otAar rawraa co prososw os eaMnes sapusloo
oa eM site i[ mye
New landscaping wlii de providea per code
*These products may inc]ude paint and furniture removers,
lacquer, thtnner, adheshives, oils (lemon, tung, linseed,
danish), oil based paints, stains and primers, cleaners,
and lawn and garden products
SQOKME ENY1R0lQlEIRAL OftOiNANCE
(WAS 197 il 960) Sectlon 11 10 230111
B ENYiROR1ENTAL EL,fl1E1fTS ftontlnuedl
Evaluat/on For
Ageney u:e only
S Al11NALS
n Clrcie any btrds an0 aniaralt whicl+ hsve been o0served on or eaT the stte or are knwn to be on
or ear the slte
I~one
Oirds hwk hme ea91e songbtiMs other
maoels aeer brar elk peaver otAer ,
f19h baff salsoa trout ReR1rog slfelifl!h Other
cther b llst any tAreatane0 or e++dangerea sPec1es knam to be on or nesr the stte
None
c ts tAe slte psrt ot e mlgretton routa? If so em1a1n
An '
d Pryposed to preserve a* enhance wI1a11te 1t any
riOne
S EnERGY aNa pAtvaAL aESSttat¢s
a WAat kinds at ene►qy Ielectric nstural gu Mood stove solerl «i11 be used to peet the
tAe comaleted project s enerW neeQsT Oestrl0s whatRer tt rtlt be used tor AuNnq mtwfae
turinq etc Gas and electric would be re4uired for heatina and
lighting requirements ,
e Ibula yaur project aftect eAe pocentlat use of sol.r erterW er .4juent o*oveKies' tt so
generslly descrtee
No
c Mhat kirtOs ot enerq,!► tomervatton featurea are 1ncluded /n tbe pians of tAis prooosal? Lfst
other preposee wasures to mduce or ooMrol ensrpy teqaets II any
Project will be deslgned in accordance with current
a`shington Sna e tnergy co e
7 ENYIROIOIEMTAt NEALtN
a Are ehere any etnrlrormntal healq+ haurds leclu41n9 umosure to taxlt cheaiuis r1sk of flre
and explosl n sp111 0r ~ ous wasts qut cauid a ss • lt of tAts aa1T lf so
N~ der te or h zardous proc~ucts wi~ ch Eag I~e ~ to~k~ fo f
sale wi~ll ~e store3 in conformance with the regu atio s o
~C~tr icie 19-Mamma6le and'LomaustMe l,iquics and Article
s
j, lacque~
, linseedr4am4.Ah
>
t1Ja~.AM4,W4ri~~4~tsac afgnc be P"u+r"
None
6
srown aNviaooKSCRM oimrnA=
(VAC 197-11-460) Seetioa LL 10 230(1)
0 C"IOI1lOl1lCRL1. UJMffiRS (eoaciowd)
Evalustioa Por
ltgeary fbe enty
EtivtROlQZTRAL MAI.B (eoncinwd)
(2) Proposed ~sura• to ceduca os eencrol aarlsounsoeal b"ltb bwrds lt aaY
See resaonse to 7a*
e aoi..:
(1) Wbat ttPt@ of nolq &XlSt io th& ans wfiltA Yy attect yout Otofset (foi aampla: tsattit
aqulpoeat opocatioa otlrtt
Nnne
(2) Yhat qpn end lr►eL of aoiu wwald be oruced 1ry o= anocLated vicb tlia O[ojeet oa a
shoce-cees or • lonQ-tots bu!• (tor eaampis: erdtic comcrutloe operation otlrec)! tediuts
wfut honsi oolse rould coas [[oo tAe siu
Normal construction noise can be anticipated Uon
compietion normai acfivity tor fhis type o~aci ity
C
(Z) Proyo"d seswse to etdnco oe eonttai aolu bpecco ii sW
Non
8LAID "M SBORELiffg "St
S~te contains a
a YMc io che cnczaat w* of che site and adjaeaat Oro~ttlagf
Fred Meyer store and mobile home saies business
b itne clee •it• beea w.4 tor sasteulcnre i[ se NterlOe
Unknown
De.~~ibe .Lnmitur.s on th. .l.. Fred Meyer s tore , trai 1 er , and
several out buildings related to the mobile home
saies orrIce
a V,l, a,, .t.ucta,.s be demo,l.bod, it .o .,hiebT A11 existi ng bui 1 di ngs
wi]1 be demolished
a 11hac i• c!a cusrens sooias c.laseitieaclon of etr •it•t
I-2 Light stri al (with B-3 Devel onment Standa_rds_)
t iiluc is the enraent cmprabensiw pLa destgnsCloo of the @itN
Unknown
pp,~ieabla vHst !o ctw cumae aMrelies wcer peosss dasyeacion of the sic*f
a 2ti(~
A Nas aay paec of c4e &ita beea eLuitUd u so 'earieoumeatallr awitiva actat It so
•poeih
Not to our knowledge
i 11ppmiaouly lmr mnr vwPl. +ioule n.Ldo o: vost in cd emUctl psojecet
+/-100
7
stoW1M R+vUtioMUMM oltattuN.3
twAc 197-11-4601 saccson u io tso(i)
e tl.D~1li8 (eoatiawd)
waluation Por
Not known n~
~ Appeoslate27 ~~7 P~A~ w~d tM eotplatsd pTOjsCt diaplacel
t propo.W ....ur.s to .ro:e ot «auce al.plac..em i.pacts it m,►= New empt oyment
possibilities with Eagle Hardware & Garden
t fcopo.a .ea.osas ce .nans tfr proposd 1• eompatieL aits mistins ted peojettsd tand m.e. .pa
pl.m tc .ay:
Exterior of butld'in and landscaping will complv with
-'SpoKane County Coc~es and Or6inances
9 ti0ilSItEC
• Approsls.air har manl anico rouie be osoKdsd it anyt Iadleaa eb.ctNr htib- aidelr or
lov-locome howlttg
None
S Appeo:irtely Aov may mit• it avy rould be aILdoacedt todleate vAmthet htslr U6d1r os
Iov-latase houaln
Nane
c PtopeKd awums to cswued os eoattol Aooslas lspuc• it aaIs
None
10 A89TQETICS
a Vlut t• ehe callest MigAt dt any ycoOoaed sscvetan(s) not laclading aatiteuT Wac t• ctr
pKeeipd enteilos ealldias mtecial(s) pro9omid!
361-3-1/2" Exterior will be concrete and prefinished
metai
e aRac .tees ta cAe laoadtaca vlduicy woule b. .is.red or oasooaesdt
None
xTeri o or iu i~l ai ng w~~~f~ge pa ted anc site witl
be tandscaped
ii LIca- ,►n cLAa
a !liat typR o! lisht or sLee vtll td propoml pw"uut tfiwt tfas ot day ww3A !e dlnly aeedrT
Light from safety and parking lightinq will occur durinq
7aar k--hours glare from g1 ass cou1 d occur during day hours
b Coula issbc or =Lsa eroa eb. Einftlad projtec be . ssi.ef essasd or sntast.re vlce wLNt
No
e VMc oi.cing ott-.ies satsees ol 1:aht et gLri my aft.et yous ofoposal?
None
d lroposed wtusu ta sedves os eonsrol 1lSAt aod gLn lmwto it say:
Parking lot liqhting will be directed down onto the
site and wiij not extend beyond the property line
5
S!0=ML ZBWtROMaMAL OBDtRANM
(1iAC 197-11-960) Sectian 1I, 10 230(i)
D zpvUtOMMIUL IDCMlS (eontioand)
6valwtl,oa yos
iz accannor ~se~► u.. ooIy
a VAat dnsietutsd and inEonal ceetatioasl opporamitias ase !e ehs taeQisce deia!!y!
None
e Y~pae ehe prapoad osoj.ec at~Lce aay ni.tiog netmttowl ase.t u.o dswcsi~
IV
e Peopoud nomn• to ftdaes or coaetol Lspaets os teeswcLon loelaQleg tsntrtlodl oppostaol-
tles to D+ ptovtded by tM pTOjeat ei •pOlleaot it say
~
13 itISMIC Alia M.?08AL P=MA?iON
; Are ttrn say plsees oT oe,#cca liated oa os propoqd Lor oatiaaai itate or Local Pseseevs-
cioa nsiecars 4mra to Da ae ee eow to c!r alut U to Sansrally deserlbe
AI
0 Ginecal>> descdbe saw lseQarrks os evi"nce o! hUcosic art6aeologfeal aelaetitie or nnicnral
tapostases Imwe to 0e o0 or wsc to tAs slte
_Noe
e T eed suwreo to rednce os coatsoi itpaets it aqi
~one
1~ TRAlBPO~ATIdH
s tdeatity poblie stme• and bldh+ayo Nrvtes sM Ws asd desesl0e psopoend aeeaM to cir
aiioclea stnet q•ces 8hor•oo aiu pLea !t arW
Not known
b to •it• eursoatly KewW bp publle transle! if aat MMt i• c!e spprostaate disescce to tM
oqmet t[aoslt atopT
Not known
e aor ..ow p.r" .pace, woule cem compi.e.e vrojeec e.«t ftu a eae oroj.a didoate?
Existing parking w>>l be eliminated new parking
stalls wlll bp nrnvided for new storgT
d Vtll e!r pnposal rapuln any ow eaado os seseec* oi itoeoMtasts to asletiaj sasdr or aso.ee
Improvements8to ~ar`na'°`ia~ie~oa~ `wi'f~`~be ma9e °`~or~t~-
include paving, sidewalks, and curbs • Niil tta proiece nN (ot oaar !o tAe irdlau virioiq ot) watet nll es alt te+taspoetatfoat
Ii w 6eoatally deftsLDe
N0
9
1
8!OMM =1100a0fl1►t. OmqRAM
(YAC 197-11-960) 9aetsoa il 10 230(1)
s 91MIRDIRM9M G.e?dfRS (eonciaa.d)
Ewlast~oo Pes
llPnef Oia OnlY
[ Nae oaol VehiCtiLi C[1p• per dar rwld be gaorrsted D7 tbs easplated pcojeet• It known
iadieate wboo pmk vould oaur
Approximately 5000 vehicular trips per day would be
generated with peak trips at 7-9 AM and 4-6PP1
g trapmw .uwrae co reduee or eontrol ceuuyoetatton l"aete ii aay:
Improvements to Carnahan Road
15 MBI.IC SBaVTCES
a Vould the ptnjeec nals tu an toes*ued nrd tos pttblia steries• ([os axtspL tite ptoteetloo
poliae oroc.ettoa healtA ure sehooL etfrr)i II so pmt"U ftseri0a
Police and Fire protection would be minimal for
inspection purposes
e Ptoooned s"suers co cedun or eontroi di nes 1ayaet• oa poplie usvic*a ! ante
AonP
16 tf'tLI'tES
a Citelt utilitieo ensseecly aralLble at the •ite eledsieltr oasasal pe wtor ntw@
seeviae telep!►oee "aitan N+ur "ytte qsts oclee
e Deoeclbe CM ntllltie• thst ate pTOpopd foc the Ose=acs the uclliq psowtdias the oaewiet and
the Qeneral eoostevetloo seelvltias eo t!r •ite oe te ciw LamQiaso delnity +rhleA daAc bt
euedsd
Abnve utitities are available to the site and wi17 be
extended and modified to serve new buildtng
c sTaxass=
I the uwdatslgo" wums undar ter Prwltp o[ parjusT elat the abone rsqosa as+e made teutetal2y wd co tAa Oea af sy ImarLds* Ialso
uadarstsnd tlsat ahouid the» M sor rllltal alastpnqatatfan es vllllul laet oi tull dleaLowt+t an my part tl+e a a rr vlcMtw say
detetslwtloa ot oonsipitierocs etyc it slatss losm !o nalLaee npoa eRt• ebekiiat
e.tea 11/18l93 .lm"auz SconzoNal l strom Architects
Plvsa Mnc or lypar
Pwapono„t, ~ „ddrom 919-124th Avenue WE # 101
CSi~nstose~
nta.,.s 6 -32Q3 Bellevue, WA 98005
Per„n ~omputing t.,t Oennis Sconzo ac„ 11/18/93
P,an„ (206) 456-k03
M$SU" =9 OLt
se.t[ omear(.) e..inKea eeseku.c
sued oa seis scait ra.iev ot ctr en.traa..asai ebsekiin aad oeb.r pesctaane sotowmcfoa cbe aaEt
A Coaaludes ttne tlwn r[t no peobable signi[icaat adbcu lapaet• aaQ seearada • mtesstaatlon ot oocolSoliicaaea
e. CoaaLdso ctuc psabasls alinitieant aewna eartronnatal sapaaea eo esla tot the comae propesal sae raeoa.oe. .mttlgsced dacer-
atooelon ot omoi=ateseance nlee eeedtcloos
C Conel"o• tl,ac eirse aee prodbL sigailiaans adwese anvlmerezl lap.aeo aed nearms s dsamimtion oI •isaitieaoea
R1.21~ = - 175 00
10
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. TRANSMITTAL LETTER
ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING
TO Mr Bob Tumer DATE Dec 23,1993
Spokane County - Engineees Office
PROJECT Eagle Hardware
WE TRANSMIT
(X) Herewith ( ) Under Separate Cover ( )
THE FOLLOWING
( ) Design Drawings ( ) Shop Drawings
( } Copies of Standards ( ) Samples
(X) Legal Description ( ) Product Literature
Dtsk Copy ( )
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED
For Approval (X) For Your Use
For Review & Comment For Information & File
For Your Distribution As Requested
( ) For Record ( )
DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS
Eagle boundary for your use rn processing the RID documents
DISTRl6UTION
Owner Contractor
~
FROM
ggy Ha mond
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc
1250 Ironwood Dnve Smte 220 Coenr d Alene, ID 83814 (208)667 1574 •
RFCEIVED
V DEC 2 3 1993
4 ~F'i'llirlRE fCJgTY EMilIEER
~ ■
6-
: RECE0VED
. ~
~
~jDEC 2 31993 ;
f Mil f ~0 6
~ 1,4 ~
5~~ ~CUrtrt ENG1MM _ APPLICATION FOR
CFeRTIFICATE nF EXEMPTION
, .
►
' APPLYCATION NO
~
~ , „ y ► CorParnort FII.E No
SiO1lANC cpu11TY COURT NOYit Business Phone 2 09"(AD 67- fS 74
i AppLcants Name p~~~ WWr1)YdrJ-D Home Phone
,.5 -12,§-o LIoAv WOa srE .2 z o
Aaaress C tiarNeEg
cicy Qut`v/z d-w c- - scate ~Q z,p 23214.
Z LEGAL DESCRIPTION of property for whzch this "Certificate of Exempdon is being apphed
NOTB if fhe property es bung divjdtd or chaiged provJde the N8w LEGA,c. DF.scRip7roN below
Section Township 9-5~ /U. Range within Spokane County Washington
back
009 q
3 Exisung tax parcel numbers) ,3s13r 90072 1 o 2 913 q
'-2 G A~ ~
4 Total ex,sung acrease 9 (0 9 S New property• size.(s~f or acres) T 9 3 ~
C
6 Zonins 13 3 7' Comprehensive rlar, Cntegory
8 Eusung or intcnded use of property r o nti rA C~ P,4 /2K l ti~
wndnwa a, ack9 Extsttng road frontage name .S /~/t.-A 6UF Fccl of Frontage A t- /SJ
NOTE Minunum RoQd Frontage must extend Fnto or be adjaceru to the propeiry as required pa ZolveNO ljaccess !s
by Private Rocd o copy o/'recordeaf Privale Rard Easeinent mast be provuled wUh tW applicatian and the At/oi7'oR
REC01tvlNG N1IMBElt eniered as Exsun8 roatJ jiontage name" abave
10 I, (prrnt nwme), swear under penalty of perjury that
the ubove respoases are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge I aIso agree to
furnish any further dpcumentation that may be reqiured by the Plantung Departme.nt I alm
understand that, should there be any willtul misrepresentation or willful lack of full
chsclosure on my part. Spokane County may vvithdraw any approval that it might issue in
rehance on this apphcaaon I so have provided wntten pernussion from both property
owners, if this a aaon i r a"minor lot line adjustment "
sicrrM 41104 /,2 .2 3
Applicant ~ Date
r
ST"T ONLY
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ISSUBS THIS CERTIFTCAI"E OF EXEMPTION AS INDICATED
BELOW FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBE~q ~ ~!,~~.-~E, PURSUANT TO SPOK:ANE COUNTY
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, SEC'TTON
THYS CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION SHALL 8E SUBJECT TO THE FQLLO'WING
CONDITIONS AND/OR FINDINGS
The appLcant shall comply with all requuements and regulaUOns of theZONDJC3 CODE of Spokane County
V
Z~ The applicant shall comply with all requlrements of Lhe Spokane County Health Disonet and/or UuliUes
Division andJor County Engiaeering Dtviston rcgarding wastcwatcr disposal on sue water or public water
~ systems and access and roads, respecuvely
,
Tf ubovc lcgal is new thc applicanl sfiAtl filc SEGKEGATtON Al'PLICATIAN wiUi Uic County Asscssor us
soon as possible after this application is approved Not rcquin:d whcn dcnECd
4 If private road js used, no buildmg permit can be issucd unlU thc staadards ChAptcr 3 OS OSO of Lhc County
Code havc becn complied with for the location and construcuon of the prwatc road
S The applicaht shall comply with the followmg addiuonal condiuons
cani,ym an back
THIS CERTIFICATE OF EKEMPTION IS FOR AND SHALL RUN WITH THE LAND AND SHALL
B LE TO THE APPLICANT QWNER HETRS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
~ APPROVED THIS 23 na DAY OF . 19 q's
RECEIPT NUMBER Spokane Coun P nQ DeQartment
THIS CERTIFICATE OF EXEMMION ISSUED BY SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT 721 N JEFFERSON SPOKANE WA 99260 (509)456-2205
CER'H'g~CATE MUST ACCONPARTY YOTBt BUEUDING IPERMII[' AP1PUCATION
R.atr ApplbQanyRarno CS ApP MS'i1t(ro+.x R 4193
.
'
CLIENT Eagle Hardware & Garden Inc
PROJECT Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washington
DATE December 3, 1993
A portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 23,
Township 25 North, Range 43 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane
County, Washington described as follows
Commencing at a found iron pipe on the southerly right-of-way of
Sprague Avenue monumenting the Northeast Corner of the South 650
feet of the North 700 feet of the West Half of the North 60 rods of
the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of sas.d Section 23, being
also a point on the westerly line of Block 1 of EVERGREEN
CONMERCIAL PARK (Book 9 of Plats, Page 13, Records of Spokane
County, Washxngton), said iron pipe being the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING,
thence along the westerly Line of sas.d Block 1 South 00029 f55 " East
649 77 feet to a found steel pin on the northerly line of Lot 6 of
Block 1 of said EVERGREEN CONMERCIAL PARK,
thence leaving said westerly line along said northerly line
North 89049'100 West 450 19 feet to a found steel pin,
thence leaving said northerly line North 000301210 West 0 28 feet,
thence North 89059'49u West 178 18 feet,
thence North 00028'46" West 648 74 feet to the southerly right-of-
way of Sprague Avenue,
thence along said southerly right-of-way South 89056'15" East
628 15 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING,
Comprising 9 36 acres, more or less, subject to all existing
easements and rights of way of record or appearing on said tract
M wq9
w^s~ji,~~
~ r•~
1Z /t'1 /A=j
27128 ~
~sr ~ SCrsr~°
yA
AL LAW~
EXWRES Z~Z.S I~y
SPOKANE EIWIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKI.IST COMNiCNT ACCEPTANCE
DATfi of DNS December 3, 1993 Jan 5, 1994 -NOTE The attached
Envzronmental Checklist comment
PROJECT Eagle Hardware and Garden Store. 156.274 s f acceptance notice mailec7 to you on
Dec 27, 1993 was incorrectly addressed
FILB NfUMBER 93010650 as 11401 E Sprague The carrect
address, as indicated on theDetercnination
of Non-Significance (Dec. 3, 1993) is
LOCATION raps- E. **dfK 5204 E Sprague Ave
APPLICANT Dauus Scaiuo 919 - 124th Ave, N B#101
RBSPONSIBI.F OFFIQAL Jalaes L Maoson. Du-ector
c!o Lorne Lakshas, Laiid Use Planner
Spokane County Division of Butldmgs
1026 West Braadway
Spokaae Washmgton 99260
(509) 456•3675
~~*~***~*•~~*~*~~~****~r~~~**~*~et~*~~~**wr~~~~****~
T6e followmg commeat(s) cornesponds to the noted section of ds FsnvLnonmeatal Chockust snbmitted by the
apgLcomt sad becomes part of the cher,lcllst un accordanoe vrnth Sechon 11 10 160 of tbe Spokaae Envimnmental
Ordinaace and adopted polimes
1 Spokane County Aic Pollutioa Controt Authonty Per the attached mmo, addiUona1 reqwreomLs must
be met
2 Spokane County Enguneer's Off'ice Per the attached "Roadway Sechon No 1," the appucant shall
dedicate to Spokane County sufficieat ng6t-of-way to unplement Typical Roadway Secqoa No 1, Miaor
Artena! Standard A cony of the sechon is tacluded and illustrates 32 feet of nght-of-way from the ce,nter Las
of the road
nace, OV& r2~3 signaaue
A copy of dus Coaimeat Acceptance to the Eavironmentat Ghec.lc4st wes mauled to
Spokane County Air Pollutioa Contro! Authonty Spokaue County Health Distnct-Bnvironmeatal Health
Mr Enc Skalton Mr David Swuik
Spokaua County Ertgineer's Of~'ioe Washington State Depaitmeat Qf Eoology
Mr Bill HemQUngs Envuanmeatal Rsview Smuon - Ms Barbara Ritclue
Fire Distnct No 1 Washcngton Stato DepL of Social & Health Sernees
Mr Paul Chase Mr Tom Justus
Spokane County Uhliaes Deparmneac
Mr BtU Dobratz
~
~
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDIlVANCE
ENVIRONI411ENTAL CHECKI.IST COMt1ZNT ACCEPTANCE
DATE of DNS December 3, 1993
PROJfiC'f Eagte Hacdware and Garden Store 156.274 s f
FILE NUMBER 93010650
LOCATION 11401 fi Sprague
APPL.ICANT Deanis Sconw, 919 - 124th Ave., N E A►101
RfiSPONSIBLE OFFICIAL Jarnes L Manson, Diractvr
c% Lorne I.akshas, I.and Use Plao,aer
Spokane County Division of Bwldings
1026 West Broadway
Spokane, Was}nngton 99260
(509) 456-3675
a*~*•~*~~~~~~~~~~•**~~~*~*******~~***~~~~~~~~~~*♦~
T6e following connmeat(s) cornasponds ta► the noted sechoa of the Envu+oameatal ChSecklist submttted by the
appLcant sud becomss parE of the checklst m acoordance antb Secdon 1110 160 of the Spolmae Eavu+onmental
Ordmaace aad adopted poltc.ies
1 Spokane County Air Poltution Control Authonty Fer the attacbed memo addihonal reywremeats must
be aiet
2 Spokane County Engineer s Office Per the sttached "Roadway Secuon No 1," the applicant s6all
dedicate to Spokane County sufficient nght-of-way to implement Typical Roadway Secuon No l, Minor
Arten8l StBaderd A c,opy of the sechon is nacluded and illustrates 32 feet of nght-of-way from the center Lne
of the road ~
nate X2.e& (-9 3 s~~~re IZ4~ . ,
~MU~k+~F *#*~k~tt+k**+I~~k+k#iMi~#rM~b+l~*+M~M *~b~ki4i*~M~M~k~k**4•4~M**~k~~R+l~**4
A copy of tus Comme,at Acceptanoe to the Environmmtal Checkhst was mailed to
Spokane Caunty Air Polluhon Control Autbonty Spekane County Health Distnct-EnvironmeataJ Healtb
Mr Enc Skelton Mr David Swink
Spokaue Cownty Engineer s Offics Washwgton Stake Department Of Ecology
'•o' Mr Bii1 Hemmings Environmental Review Sechon • Ms Barbara Ritclue
Fus Distnct No 1 Washington State DepL of Social & Health Sennoes
Mr Paul Chase Mr Tom Justus
Spokane County IItiliUes Departcnent
Mr Bill Dobratz
r, N" r `
#IP- >1~ SPOKANE COUNTY
11 CUAR,vAm AIR POLlUTION
S o o K A N o-. CONTROI AUTHORITY
WEST 1101 COLLEGE SUITE 403 • SPOKANE WA 99201 •(S09) 456-0727 Fax (509) 454-6828
Date December 3, 1993
To Lorne Lakshas
County Planning
From Relle R Vigeland~V-
Spokane County Air Pollutian Control Authority
Re SCAPCA CONMENTS REGARDING
ENVIRONNENTAL CHSCKLIST
# 93-10650
EAGLE HARDTRARE & GARDEAT STORB
In addition to using water to control dust during conatruction (as
stated in the environmental checklist The follaw3.ng 9CAPCA►
requirements muat be met
Air pollution regulations require that dust emieszone during
demolition, construction and excavation projecta be
controlled Thia may require the uee of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or euapeneion of activity during certain weatber
coada.tions Haul roads should be treated and emisszone from
the tranafer of earthen material must be controlled as well as
emiesiona from all other construction related activitiea
* Measurea must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from uripaved aurfaces onto paved euxfaces If tracking or
spills occur on paved surfacee, measures must be taken
immediately to clean theae surfaces
* Debris generated ae a result of this pro j ect mu9t be dieposed
of by means other than burning (i e, construction waete,
etc )
* Demolition and renovation projecta muet comply with the
requirements of CFR 40, Part 61, Subpart M and SCAPCA
Regulation I. Article IX These regulations address aebeatos
removal requirementa A Notice of Intent to Demolish must be
filed with SCAPCA The agency contact person for asbestos is
Joe Southwell, (509)456-4727 ext 106
L, Arrntcd Qn RecycW Paper
•
~
SPUKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
D E ATION OF NONSIGNiFICANCE
Fae No 93010650
Descciptton of proposa! F~e Aardw,ac & GarAen Stare, 156,274 s,,L
Proponent J)ennuLSconzo,919 - 124th Avenue NJE„_#I01
Locatioa of propasal 5204 E, Spragge S2gkane, WA 9 2~,=
,2
Spokane County, the le+sad agancy for this proposal has deternuaed tbat it does not 6ave a probable significani advearse
impact on die envu+onmeni An Envwonmental Impact Stateaneni (EIS) is not requued under RCW
43 21C 030(2)(c) 'i'iiis decision was made aft revicew of acompleed wvironmental checkiist aad othes
infonmaqon on file with the lead ageacy The informatioa is available to the pubtic on request
[ j There Ls ao comment periad for thrs DNS
[X] T6is DNS is ssued under 197-11 340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for the reqwred IS day
revtew penod commencing on December 3, 1993 Comments partantng Lo dhLs cbecklist/determuiaaon must be
submitted/remved no Iater than 4 00 p m,December 17,1993
Responsible Official James L Maason, Director
c% Lorae L Lakshas, Land Use Planner
Spokane County Division of Building and Safexy
West 1026 Broadway Avenue
Spokane, Was6ington 99260 (509)456-3675
Date Decembgr 2,.,M3 Signature 4~~
e.. Yoo may appeal this detennuiauon within 10 catendar days after it becomes final
'I'he Board of County Commissioners
West 1116 8roadway Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99260
76e sppeal must be subnutted in wntmg no later than 4 00 p m, December 27, 1993 You should be prepared to
raake specific factual objections
Contact above responsible offciai to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals
~**~~***~x~****«**~*~e*********~~****s**~****s~«****s~~**s**a
A copy of the Determmanon of Nonsigtuficance was mailed to
Spokaue County Engtneer's Office Washington State Dept of Social & Health Sennces
1VIr Bi1i Hemaungs Mr Tom ]ustus
Washmgton State Dept of Eco[ogy Spokane County Au Polluuon Control Authorety
Envuoment Review Section-Ms Barbara Ritchie Mr Eric Skelton
Spvkane County Health Distrlct Environmental Health Fire Dist No 8 _
Mr David Swmk Mr ponatd L Hunt
Spokane County Utiliqes Department
Mr 8tlt Dobratz
~
~ SPOfWlE ENYIROWIRR1 OROpNANCE l
(YAC 197-11 9601 Settloe 11 10 230(I)
Envlrornentat theekllst e~~
c
Purpoae ot G~eetitst Ft1e Na
Tlee State Emlrommtst pollcy Att iSEPA) ehapter 43 YlC RCY requfres el) 4orernmntal agsnttes to consleer the environse++tel trapaets ot a proaosal
bafare mkirtg Aactsiaes J1n Envlromentil Iaipact Statennt (EIIS) aust be preparM for sil proposals witN proeaete stgn 1flcant adverse Iwpects on
the awilty of the environmt 1Re purpoie of thls cReckllst is to provlde tntonat/on to help you en0 the aqeney fdentf*y tapacts from your
propasat (ana to redae or avo14 fepacts froo tM proRosai it 1t can ba doee) snd to Aalp tlu aqancy Qeciea whether an EIS is rsQut►ed
lnstrvctlons for Applfcants
This eewironmd+ta1 cRectltst asks yau ta Qessrl0e saoe bas1t lntoraytlon apaut your praposal Gover+oental aqrnrcles use tA1s ehee1c11st to deteraine
wRether tAe ennrlronwental topacts of yrour ptoposal a►e stgnltlcant requ1M ng preparatton ot an EIS Answer the Questtons br/efly Mith the moat
p*ecise laiormNon ktian or giva the best deserlptton you cae
4on aust answet eatA questtcn atcuraiely ine caretnlly to ths eeat of yon► krtorte09e Ie mst tases you slrould ba abie to ansrer the auettlons
iroa pour own obserrations or projeet ptans Mtthout tDe need to ft/re evertt tf you reaifr ao noc kn" cne ,nwr or 1t a puestlon does eot anly
to pow Propassl .rite eo eot kna or does not tppty Cmplete ansvers to the qutstlcen nor My avo14 urtnetesserr delays later
Some questlons ask about qoYermmtel repulstlons wch as rontag tAOrellne tnd ianQmaet Oesiqrottans 1lpisrer tMse questlom it you can Q/ you
have probfds the qovernmental peRCles ean 4:s4st you
TAe CMekllst Questlons +ap1y to •11 parts of your propoaal even f♦ rou p1an co Qo thm a+rer a pwloa of tfue ar an 01Herent psrcals ot O•nd
AKach any aQdltioaal fMomtton tfut wt11 dourtbe yosirr pnwsat or /ts envlvroaaentsl etfacts The ageney to rt►IcA yau futralt tAts checklisL aay
ssk you to exp1a1e ponr answers or 0rovide aQd1t1one1 Inlorntion rtssoRaplr ►e1ate0 to deteraining f1 tAere mr be tlqnttteant adverse tnoact
Use of t1ot11it for nortprojeet propo:als
r
Cmplete tAis cAeckllat tor Ronprojett proposais e1►an thOttqh qulStioet ai Oe Ms~renee does eot aoply
[N ApD1TTOM caqleta the SUPPLEIff.N1Al SHEET iOt MOlmitOJE~CT ASTIO11S(Part 0~
For nanproject utlons !he rOerences /e tde eheckitst to tAe wr0s pro,fect appifcaM and propertY or stte ihould Oe rtn0 u propassl
proposer tnd aNectsb geoqrapAft eres roapect/Yely
A. BA[KOiOUlMO
1 'lame ot propose0 project It spplltable Eagl e Nardware & Garden
z w.e of AW„ca,t Sconzo/Hal l s trom Architects s uaereu ane okone nueer or .oo l+e.nt a* cont.ct verm Q 19-124th Avenue NE # 101
6ellevue, WA 98005 (206) 455-3203 - John Hallstrom
4 Data cbectlitt 0*rD+red 11/4193 sAgon,, ,,eqwst,~ ~hoo„:t Bui1 di ng Department '
6ProposQe ci.ing oT saeeute l1nrcludlnq phasing ir .pp»uele) Start cnnstructien uonn tccuancp ef e iL
complete construction within 150 days
7 a Oo ym hare any OTarts tor future additfons expatlslon or tnrther atttr/ty related t0 or Cofnetted Wtth tbls propasalT iF yes explain
I+tO
b Oo you wan ar hire opttorts On land nearpy or •dJatant to tbls pnoposal2 It yes esplaln No
8 L1st aar enviro.,eMa1 Infarmtton you kmv about that Aas Oesei prepared or rl ti pe Orepare0 dteettty nlateQ to thts proposal
Rev 2J1/88 ~
,
~ aPowM anismDmrtu. onnmurz ` -
(vAt 197-u-S60) seecioe u to 270(1)
A. dACKC.30011D (eoaciaued)
9 Oo Yao Imw vAetAas applieatloms •ce peodiag for govasamatal appsovala et otlree ptapo"is dlsaecly dfoeciaS the properc7 eo+rerad Dy your
peoposalt L[ Te• asplato
No
10 I.lst uq Qovesassot apptoraL os peralt• eluc vill bs a~ed los yone peopeul lt imore
Demolition permit and Building permit
Il 6ive s eele[ casplate deneHptios ot yaue ptopodal ineludias the propoud um• ana the •ite ot the projact and site 'Msa sn srroral
ouaocloIIS Lcec tn thie clrekl3sc elsc ask yon eo Aeaeeibe eertato dpeot• ot yaat psoyoul Yan do aoc oud co seprc tbos• ars~een oa cR!•
ws•
Project consi sts onemo Rffi on ot exiszi ng Fred-Pieyer sto~`e ngs
-Cons tructi on of-77- 155,274 g
573 new pdrkl"g svlalts. U"it site iandscovin Also 4ne4uded is 2 1 P;g#t-ef--way-
t,~
tf~ee tes a pse~oa co ItMslKiOd iM pt~C1N loeatloe ot foue proywe0 ptojeet le~eludtng •
i. toeaclaa ot ehe propo"l Clve sn[(ieteot laEoma
set~eet addr +eN lI se~ and aetioa to~dip aod caep it laanf tt • psoposai vw10 oocur ow► a aege of atu psovtd: eAe nnae or
Oovadasiai oi the •ite(s) ovtde a Iegal deaer~ sits, pbo vleialty mq aed topo ta Ate ~ tf reueessly avatLble V!►tla r+ou
sMuld wtmle aey plaw reqnt agency ron •n ooe seaUT-i" to'l-Uphsac! "pa oe eu p ns m0mtecsd vieh aer persic applleacteA
eRUeed to chis eheekltst
E 5204 Sprague
t102kiaddWo W- 4 3
3/, ~
1
nA.
.
.
» daes tAe psoyosed atcloo 11s vleAle /►aultet Sowicive Asta ( ! nm &l Sow[ SeMt• Aru! -he leioeity Swr SeMee Arna! 'la
Citr o[ Spokaae* (9ees Spokaos Councr o AS► OreeLr Loae keL• for bmedesias)
Not knOW11
ro sg aaCMXM ei arn.tcMW
s a~vuo~.nt. aZNrts
Evaluaslon Tes
Aaaaey 0se Oo3Y
1 Wt'tl
a Ceaeral daaertotton o[ the •lt@ (eiscle oos!Lt rollla= hllly stae9 •tepe• Soaatalaow
otlar:
0 ihat l• the sceepasc dope oa c!o alte (appcosfute paeeaU ~lop~)f S1 te i$ sioped
for storm water drai nage for existi ng -raci inies
c Mac 4btd~ete7rmmined o~ ~oi aca tovad oa the •ite (tor asaa~ple cLy saad a:anal out snet)
it y• iir tM aad aoa a ppls [a
Tby soil s i nves 01.
d An adieaeiem oe hlKeey ot uureable soiL ia the lamedista delaicyf tt so ~
descnbe
No ~
:
sPCKAKE ExvIaONROAL aaoINAKCE r
IYAC 197 11 9601 Soettlon 11 10 23D111
8 ENViRQNlEIiTJIL EtE?IENTS(contlnaad)
Erelustton for
Agaacy Use only
e Qescrfbt the purpase tyra and aparoxlmte QuanNttes ot any t/11 ing or grading propoted
1n0/ute scsirce of f111
AQQroximate auantities are not known at this time It i$
intended that grading and filling be done using onsite
t 011roWoSUP tYd result ot clear/ng consttuttlon cr utet It so ganerally descrtbe
Temagrarv erosion mav occyr durina site excavation_
q Abavt rnst parceft of the site wtii be corered vlth fapervfous snNaces Nter prosect conatrue
tf~ c ~tO~~nale espbalt or Ou11d1~s1'
+
b ►roposee measwes to reduce or control eroston or otter tmp4ets to the artA 1t any
Norinal construction erosion control methods would be
utilized during construction as required
2 Ata
a Yhat type ot enlutans to qte at► rauld rowlt trom the propassl (t e dust autanobite odors
lneiutrlai w000 saoke) dairtng coestruction and when the project ta coiqletedt !t anr
generally destrlbe and give aparoxlnta puintites if icnoirn
Normal construction vehicuiar emissions and dust can be
expected-"Buring construction e'i cuiar emissions after
const7Oction wi i'T"be zraftic genera'"f'ecTtrom flie
e Are there eny ott slte sources ot misstons or odor tAat ery attect your prooosali It to
tnerally descrlbe
~tot to our know ledge
c PreaosM aeawres to reduu or controi eeslsslons or other 1naets to atr tt anr
Water wiii be used to control dust as required
3 varErt
e Svrface
(l) 4s there anq suKate rater body oe ar ie the b~ed1ale v1elntty ot the site lecludlng yeer
rmund an0 teesonat strdua saltwter lakes ponQS tietlandtlT lf yes destrtlte type ard
provtde names lf eAp*opriste state rMt Stretm or r1ver It Itors iMo
WO
(2) Y111 the prosect requlre 4ny rort over in or adjaeent to lwlthln 200 teetl the dastMOed
tOarsY It yes 0leese descrl0e and attach Gvallaele p1aeK
1~!
3
c 8lOun ElIVIYomomm 6BDI!!AlICE r
(1tAC 197-U-960) Saccioo 11 10 230(1)
a EIIVIEOeOrUL BLOUR"5 (eoaciauad)
¢valusctoo Fos
Aseecy ose Only
BoWatg eM saonat et till se0 dradge rearid ctrt woald 0e pLoed ie or ra1Moved fwm t!r
suHtes wtes or retLoO• anW Indleatt the aeas oE the aite CAat ren1A Ea alleetad [ndlcate
the •oafte ot [ill msecw
None
(6) vill the peoposai cepnlre sartsee mtet vltbdcswL ot dlnsaloast G!w •gawral desceip-
esoo pnrpou aae appeoxsssce auaocicta. !t rnwn
No
(S) Doe• the oeoposal tle vithin a 1007sar ilaod PLtnf i! so moee lotstbn oo the •!te plso
Not to our knowledqe.
(6) Doe• the propopi laroi.e any dfsalstgai ot vaou musiaU te auface vatanf 2l w
deseribe the sm ot Nate sn0 aatieipaeed volam ot diaeAnrgo
N0 ,
e ceowd:
(t) YtU grouadwus d vitAdrwe ei vlll vatec ba dlaeEarpd te sconndwntett Civs saaeeal
Aeierlpciau yarposs aed aprosfaau Quantitles tl lamm
No
(2) a«eibe wasce .as.K.i ctrc riu be aiacbsrpo loto the seonee trm uptte cmke or octo*
saaitary wau etssosnc lasiiiq Oeseelbe e!r pmni •ip of c1r systes tM oumms o!
Aouies to be we+red (!E appilcaple) or the nsabee o[ petsoos the qatea(s) aer •speted co
~en►e
None
oesoribs any qscess oeter cAso eMae deaigand tor the dispeaa ot sanitiq rasce
taualled fos iM pnrpose of dlsebasfis= !lald• beLov tAe ssanod sastac• (loelube qscem saeb
u ehose !os the aisoaal ot ston wap: os dsatnge tem tloot deaina) Oaaacid the qpe of
apstam the ssonnt ot tatettal to 0e msposed ot tDrono t!n antes and the eM• of mssatiaL
ukal7 co Oe di.po.ed oi (ioeluaieg mateelals +AslM mq oocu c1r Anm loadwecaatly tdrous!►
spiiL or so a esgult ol (ica[ighcing aetivitias)
jype "6" drywells are intended to handle stormwater run
off from the building 11208" drainage swales in combo-
nation aui 5 arywe ns wif'T-handlefhe remai ning storm
water runoff ,
(0) vl11 aep eboleaL (especialiy oepnie tolrants or pesrolem tnaL) Et scmd in seora-
asoumd os uofteground uorqs taaM! It m utat Wp• and ouanKtlni et mcetlaL Kll be
atorsdt
500 gal 1 on above qrgund oroMe stc~r,,Qe talLk
4
~ O~OINA~~ ~
(Y14C 197 11-964) Seetioo li IO 230(1) SIORANL ~0
S ~IVI1i0l~iAL QANU'!S (eantinued)
Svslwcloc Pos
Aeesn u•e ouly
(S) V6ac peoteetire oaseure vlll be eskso co lnwce clat laato oe apiiL of aor ehsatcals
stored or nsad on •ite K1l nos be allo+tsd to peecoLt* co groundratar Al lncl • esaauca•
eo teep elowieals auc of dteposel qaeeu desesiDsd Ln 30(2) mnd 3b(7) Oa ra~ A1^
hazardous uroducts which Eagle stocks for sale will be
stored in conformance with the regulation of Article 7q
(Flanmabie and Combustible Liquids) and Article 80
-TRazaraous ffa eria n o#'-5e
e Vstas !ku►ot! (laclnilitts stoso vatee)
(I) Daseribe t!r soarce of eaaoK (loclndioa stoss vatar) and meW of eolleccioo and dloporl
if aeq (lae1uM Quantities !t tmova) Nban rill tbd• mtet ilort 1t111 thi• scar [lor laso
othse wcessi it so desceiee
Storm water runoff from roof areas and pavement will
be collected and directed to storm water system
(2) Ji12 any ehealcaL bs acorsl Aaadlad of nsad oo tl+e aite to a loeacfoa vtose s op111 os
leak vill dcala co surfsee or stoaad+eator ot co sasoss vatac disyoael Nttaw dlselacging to
svrtaao of =coasdwteel
No
(OConld wsce .sear1~ •ater aroas~d os sueEaee ~aesT t[ w a~raUy ~seKDe
IV
d froposstd aeasun• co rednna or conteol snelaee gswed sad maoit vstes impacc• tl any (ti
t the prepoaed aetloo lia• vttttla eM Aanltar Smaitiw Ana 6e aapeeLlly elyt oa aWLostloms
r rUatias so iseilitias cooear+niag 6satfons 3D(4) 3b(5) sod k(t) of thtt QlrseklUt)
Stormwater runoff will be controlled throuqh use of dry-
wells and "208" swales in accordance wyth the Spokane
County 'Gui cf~e ines tor Stormwater Managemen£'
a
• ck oT eleele rype of wtotation IouoO oo tbw site:
one
deeldua,s crNS aldee nple &open otlac
ewrsrao trees tlt eedms plne otAss
shsa0s
gras•
putun
erop of ardo
vac wii olaet• estsdi bsutaeeup bullruah atunk ubbfte otdr
watoe pleata: watec lilly nigtap ailtcil othu
oclsar cype• of wptacioa
b filas kins aad ooirnt of vegacatloe vl11 De emovod ot altesedt
N°ne
c List ehraacensd or andaaered speeies Imotio to be oa or n"s chr •ite
one
d PeoposeA Ladscapins v" of wcire pLne• os oeAae arasame to prea eoa or aalu=* vWcacloo
on sbe site ft mr
New landscaping wiil be provided per code
*These products may include paint and furniture removers,
lacquer, thinner, adheshives, oils (lemon, tung, linseed,
danish), oil based paints, stains and primers, cleaners,
and 1 awn and garden products
c uaiuK EWtaaaeRM aNatNURM
r
(MA[ 197 11 960) Sectlan il 10 230(1)
B ENYIa011MIE11TAL ELEfOfl5 (tontinued)
Evaluetlon For
S AMtNALS Aqency Use Qnly
e Eircle any blyds and aMtzais rAiM hsve eeen observad on or near the slte or a►e knarn to pe on
or neer tbe stte
NOn~
b' k hercr eaqte langbfbs Otf1er
mearaals deer bear elk beave► otAer
f1sA bsss salaon trout herring she11t1sA other
other
b L1st anr threatened or endangeeed spec4es tnwn to be on or mar tAe stta
None
c la che slte part ot a migrat/on routet It so explaln
d V~eaasures to preserna or eMaRte Mf101lIe 11 any
6 ENERGr ArID NATURAL RE501lRLES
a ttbst k/eds of enerqp (etectMc naWra1 gas Mood otone so1ar) r111 pe used to meet tRe
tha templetld pr0jtt 4 ettll'gy nledf! 0lftTlbe wftther 1t Mt il b! Yted tor Aatinq ywht•
curing ett
Gas and e]ectric would be reQuired for heatin4 and
lighting requirements
D wou1d yos►r projeet •Itett tha pateM/at use ot solar enarqy by aQjuent 0*opertiesi tt so
generslly deser/pe
MO
c lihat kteds ot enerW toaserration teaturos an teel4ded fn t!e plans ot tA1s ptwsolt L1st
olher propsad musures to redace or eoatrol enerW lapaets 11 any
Project wil] be designed in accordance with current
'WRO'hington Srale tnergy co e
I ENVIROWNTAL KEAITN
a Are there any eir►1romeate1 healtA Aaiards tnclud/ng aWsure to toxic etm.iuls Ndc of ftn
and exptast e sPtll ar hua aus ~+aste thit tould opmr u• svit of thtx sait !t so
e N~oderbte or~ d ous pro uccts wiich Eag~ e stocks for
sal will e store3zar
in conformance with the regu1ations of
-A'rtic i e rT-fl ammafi e and'"t.omousflMe Li quics anc-llrricl e
Tne3'e pro9Dcts
~
, linsee',-4a.m.s.h.).
! 1'}aW&Mrdener~~~f~~nst ~elght be reaulra0 ~
None
6
r BM?ma amnommvuL dbnAxm ~
(YAC 197-11-960) Seetion 11 10 230(1)
6 G'IVI1t0l4CCKis. ELAMR'b (eantinued )
Evalwtloo Pos
A6aaep Dse Only
P.IMR01KEItTAL MAL"B (eoattoued)
(2) P[oposed spsnema te raAuce oe eooecoi sorlsoanacal A"ith lssaeQs if snys
See resoonse to 7a*
e Noi.e:
(1) 1rlac tM• of oeies esLe !o tlLt are v4lcA tq alleet -yous pcojeec (toe ainpLa: tcattie
aQutproe opecstioo otds?
N°ne
(2) tfist eypes and lereL of nota ronld be acraud bp os anoelate0 vitb t1r OtojeeL oa •
sRost-tan or a loeg-tess Ont• (for ample: ttattie eomtebetion op+ntieo4 otl+es) tMtute
vhat hwt• notse voctid cww Ieom e!r afu
Normal construction noise can be anticipated Upon
comp e~` on norma I acfi vity tor this type of-faci ty
can `te
(3) Propowd waaure eo eoduce os eoecrol noiss laaec• it suys
N°ne
8 1J1.'ID AND SRORQfttC GSE S~ te con ta ~ ns a
s YAac t• che eus~aat use of cM •lea ~nd sdjoeeat Oray~actiso?
Fred Meyer store and mobile home saies busyness
e ttas tho oice beea ased tos agrieultutat ii to deseslbe
Unknown
c Descrlb. .n, .tructm.s an th. .it. Fred Meyer store, trai1 er , and
several out buildings related to the mobile home'l-
saies oftice
e WIu .t~c~.. Dt dAOllsirdt I[ .o A11 ex~ sti n4 bui 1 d~ n4s
wil~ be demolished
a Yhat 1o tM tueteet ioaloj eLastlleation of clre •iu?
_1 -2 Ltght Industrial (with B-3 Develonment Standards)
t gUc i• tbe curs+ons eomqceheasive pLa doolposiaa of e!r olta!
Unknown
~pp,~ieable vtyc 18 tte CascOat OMrelloa wc@t Otosso dasipnatloo of tio misa!
a tt~
b f!a• say paet of cM •ica Deeo eLpitlad u ao aavicoaratally wesltiti srof Ll w ~
speei"
Not to our knowledge
i Apptos3aruly toov aany peopls wou10 nNde os wost io che cmPlecad projeett
+/-100
~
c 8~ ~ ~
(VAC 147-11-960) Seetiao 11 10 230(1)
d f.NVIRQMMRAL 12M1!'9 (eootiawd)
raluucioe Poc
ll~aacy U~~ onl~
~
~ Ayoro~cls~csly hov san7 P~P~ wwold ebs eospl~ted ptojeec dlsyLeat IVot known T
r propo.ed .s..nr.s to ..oie ar reauce d1.,ucam.at s.p.ct. Lr New empl oyment\-
possibi1iti es with Eagl e Hardware & Garden
1 Proposed rawees to aewce tle pteyosal 1• eom"tlbL vitb edatlnf aad peojeeted land asao lC'~OC~~ ~
pian* tt sari
Exterior of buildt~n and landscaping wi11 com~ly with ~
'Spo~Cane County Codes and Ordi nances
9 gOUS Im Li~ Jh,~~D
• Aypsozfavttlr har aM mftt• rould be Oto+rldd it auyt fadleats wtatlMt ht{br aLdale- es ;~G(
lor-lmom hoiulas
None
~~D~ ~
b Apprasi..csir dow .anr aoic. it .ny roou ee aUde.c.at tobeate wb.ce.e in.ss- .iaai.- of
Loritrcase hoaeinQ
None
e 9copoaed waueu to ttlace of conssol Aa+eias Lpues 1! aays
None
io AZssuer:cs
• Vbac is the tallest hatgAt et auy osopoud seevetu»(s) not ieeludleg anteooast Ylre io eAe
pKecfqal etuKos eutldlag weorial(s) peoposedt
361-3-1/2" Exterior w111 be cvncrete and prefinished
metai
o Vhat viaw !u Che lmmeiiate rleiatty would bt altared oT odeencte,dt
None
c r wd qsasur~s o eoactoi Am ie 1sp-aIG i~ a~:
er~ or o~ 6ui di ng w~• ~e painted an-d s, te w, n
be landscaQed
u Liair urc cu►U
a Jt,.c s"e of ligbe os gLee vill ehe osegami psaduat VAat elm o! "y roaid ie salal7 ooaur
Light from safety and parking lightinq wlll occur durinq
~aar ci-hours 61are firom g1 ass coul d occur duri ng da~y hours
p toutd 2!iltt os gLsa teos cd tintalo8 pro}et be a sateey easasd or intaeltta rltb iieftt
No
e t rsirtiaa ot!-site soue~eu of ligAs of sLee ~7 atlsa 70u peoposalt
V~one
4 /sopoad amanreg to WWuce os conteol lisht sa aLss iaaatte it sefe
Parking lot_ _l__i ghting wi11 be directed down onto the
s~te and wiTT-not extend beyond the property line
s
C SPOiAL Z5MUWMFrf4L~ORDI1AI:a ~
(vAC 197-11-960) Seetlon ll 10 230(1)
0 AL la.IMMti3 (eescinnsd) Cvalwclon 9oc
Agancy Use Oo1y
12 RP.GRLIIT=CH
• Vbot deslgnated and intoerl ceaeaclooai oppocttmitie• are io cbe lsmdiata delaleYT
None
D IN d ehe psvOoad projecc dlsplaee aay axirelag neemcioaal +wet ti so dametl0e
e projrosed wrure• ta reduee as eootsol Lpaets oo recewtioo ixludias rsareatlooal oyRoetim!-
ele• co be O[ovided by tM projeec ot ap9lieaos Lt aoys
~
13 8IMlliC AND NLl11lIAL PItLSERVATxON "
a Ad tbeca soy plaea• or opject• liusd ae or psopond tor "tlowi ssate or local pcoKtva-
cion nsistass tmono co De o0 0: aast co tbe •ite1 tt wpasr&lly desesibe
b Caaarally deseHbe aoy laadmsb or rwiftaem ot hlceorie srchssolagieal oafaatilie o= culeued
lmportane• Imwo to be ao or aast to cM •lc•
_Npne posed e P~O e urwres eo eeaue• or eootrol l"aee• !i aay:
16 4RAi1S1W11l10N
a tdoositr puWic oteeet• ssd Alab+ap• ae+rias e1r •!t@ an0 desoriM proposad aeeso to tl+e
asieclog stieae 4ste SMwn •1te pLas tt any
Not known ,
b t• Nte enmanc>> wewd by publit esansit! I! noc MMt 16 tA~ OPPresfaAcS, dlGewtO to t4e
nwrsss tsaasit atapt
Not knW
C 110Y Ylty OStUOg gWls Y0{►1d illt t0w1lLfd PtOjfCt dNT 90r d tIe Ot0}C! laidO~Le
Exi sting parking wi 11 be el iminated new parLing
stails w,ll be °red for new store.
d Viil eM p:+oposai nqatn my aa+i saado or aes"u or isPsowsnto to mtetisg eaads or acMto
cot inciuasg drl~sw~at Ii ~ 1y dgpcri (ie4 q vdcd: b~lle or te
Improvements to ~arnaian oa~ wi"~1be mage °"or
include paving, sidewalks, and curbs
a oili tM proyees aM (or oaus in ede taodlats vieialq oi) inter eatl or dr tsammposcatloot
it so `~al>> denedd
No
9
J
~ slo~ASfL ~'II~E tfRDI11~1~CE ~
(VAC 197-11-960) Saetlon 11 LO 230(1)
S ffi4vI~o!KCf!'AL GZMEM (eontiaind) Evoluscioo io[
Aaaocy Ose Only
E Bov aar whitnLr tclps pas dsy vonld 0e pwnted b: tls eonplated pcojeett I[ lanorn
indiuce vben pwk voold ooeus
Approximately 5000 vehicular trips per day would be
generated with peak trips at 7-9 AM and 4-6PP1
s Propoee0 ueawns to sednee or coattoi [nesportatloo ispaeq !I asq:
Improvements to Carnahan Road
15 PObLiG SEAVLCLS
a ltauld e!r peo)eet reiolt ta n learsasad wa0 [or pnDlie sasvica (tos asnvL [!se psocsetion
peiles ptouectoa haalth can aeAooL oclMS)t Lt so pnerally descrlbe
Police and Fire protection would be minirnal for
inspection purposes
0 Proposrd wsnn• co nedazo ot wntnl dtsaet iipcto oo puelie pniae• ioWs
1ionP
16 tJ'24I-1L5
a CtscL utilitle• eurteaely avaiLble at tM •itos eLessieicy aatusal qo watwr ntwe
seMc• telepeone amltaq snnt Nacle systs oclrt
b OsmerlOe cAe neilltle• cAat ase Ptoyosad fot tbs pre3eat t!r utility provsdies tlr sar+riee aad
efre genatal eowtn+etloa setlvitles oe ete sit• et lo td lwdtace delnier vAteb dsAt De
Reedtd .
hnv_ utilities are available to the site and will be
extended and modified to serve new building
c sua►TOst
i ctu utdsnlgaed swws andes elrt penalq of p~rjury ehss tAe aemw ertpems• at+ uado tsnWiully aed te td 1aas of q kawlsage talso
undaruaed that stioulA ehm be iap villlal dottperpatattoo os rillinl isat of tull moelooum oo .y pue eha aVsM msy vitMssv my
detaealeetiw► of aooAigfttieancs that !t dghs luoe !e tallam,st upea thl• eUreklist
o.te 11/18/93 ftv.nt SconzolHal l strom Archi tects
Cra.a.* ft"c or n►vy
p~t -f5-- „mes" , 919-124th Avenue HE #101
(stee.cnr.)
ftomi (206) -3203 Bellevue? WA 98005
Paswo ~~uclitg fems Dennis Sconzo au, 11/18/93
M„n„ (206) 4bti-3203
TOR S?AW 046 OBLT
BLafI ~blT(i) Ht1eV1nj CllaCbllet2 ~
sued os ehl.s ssali cavia+r of elr snwlsoaa~aeal checkliss ud otl~s p~rtinent iato~aat3oo tl+~ ~taEls
A~ Coaelade@ etst thora are eo o"dele •loalHeaat advane tapaat• aod neameads a dee*ssloatioo of oouipttiesnee
e. CooaLWs• esst Orolrela sisnitieani adwna oeKroanacal fayaess do eslsc tor e!e enrrsat Propoaal sad eseommsml• a altipted daur-
aitiation of nonsignl[ieacee vltb eooditions
C Conelude• elrc cUase ace Psoba►1o sleattleaac a0varse aarleousacal lapaato and reemaod• a decarloation of •lpltieaoce
RLI11B Ts - :n 00
10
ZO
f 1Ct~,
r
'Y .
4 Qv"~' , c~.~
of
p~KA
~ aa
T~ ^A .9
~ • „Tri1 ~ ♦
~
~
~
z~
1vP2
~ ' i ~e r~ ^
F VT a 3 •5
•
~a ,
~
~ -55 ~ 3
' !
a
t y~ 4 ~
• ~ e
~ ~ / ~
1ZO_ C ►S6
1.2 ~.6 _f.#`-
~6Z ~ rt
t ti ~,~b" ~ ~4 ~ ~ ,w s
Jz~
.69
1 )St I ~1 ~ ~ fF~~~r' ' •
1 ~1 ~ ,~,,~cc--~ ► 7 , g- u
1 ' ~ ~ ~ r~~M I ( ~ ~ *f
/j ~ a r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~
ar
~ - - •~A ! ~ ~
MEM0RANDUM
TO: Bob Turner
FROMs Chris Reich
DATE: February 10, 1994
SIIBJFCT: Eagle Hardware Review
I have reviewed the revised plans submitted for Eagle Hardware I
have used your review comments dated January 26, 1994 as a
checklist for the items remaininq Please review the enclosed
summsry of what was done to address your requests
The following items need to be addressed
~A6d call out for the four catch basins in the outdoor
garden area They are supposed to be Spokane County
standard
VSpecify the invert elevation at the t -s
leaving the garden area Also add these
@1bOW3 tnd jzm-
Specify the pipe material used for the garden area
Vince at JUB indicated to me these would be PVC SDR
35, but it still should be called out on the plans
1/The pipe from the sump pump needs to be revised to 2"
as per Vince
~ The legend on the landscape plans will be revised
L/'IThe bond for the road improvements is still needed
!/A note indicating a manual on/off switch is required
for the pump
It appears most remaining requirements can be revised on Sheet C4,
except for the Landscape issue and the bond
I ♦
f ~
REVIEW CONIIMENTS
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
PRQJSCT 893149 REOZ$WSR: 8ab Turner
PROJECT NAMS: Eagle Hardware on Spraque DATE• 26 Jan 94
RLVZB'W 2
COMMSNTB
GSNRRAL:
Provide a mylar of the Carnahan road plans, once approved, with a
Developer's siqnature and date on the shee
~
MyZar provided N 44zf
~
Provide the drainage easement supplied in last eview comment
submittal
Copy of easement and recording receipt provided, copy of recorded
easement fs not available for ten days
All pipe lengths should be labeled on the plan
O K
A bond in the amount of $72,300 00 must be submitted to the County
Engineers Department This bond is for the cost of Carnahan road
improvements Please select one of the approved bond formats
included with this review The bond must be in place before a ,
building permit will be released
Bond not received yet )
DRAIPAGB ltFs*PORT : `
Paqe 2= Provide calculations and details of the garden area
drainage collection system
The garden center is befng collected by catch basins and piped
to an adjacent swale Accord3ng to the plans submitted to this
office th3s area is no longer connected to the roof drain system
CalcuZations provided include determing peak runoff from entire
area and using it to size pipes The discharge p3pe calc's were
also provided and the pipe is adequate The pipe from the trench l,~~
drain is analyzed and appears adequate The catch basins in the
outdoor garden area will be Spokan Standard according to
Vince Loftus (.TUB) He will be rev~sin e plans to incZude a
ca13 out Also needed are pipe m a pecified and elevatZOns
Page 1 of 3 ~
t
at the two elbows 1 eaving the garden area Cl eanou ts shoul d a1 so
be called out, but since on private property may not be
suthorized to ask for these
Provide calculations for the area flowing into the catch basin/dry
well arrangement at station 13+68 Your plans show a type "A"
drywell and your report calls out a type "B" drywell
The plan has been revised to ca11 out a Type "B" drywell tl~
P.LAIVS:
8beet C4s Detail the sump pump arranqement in the truck loading
ramp, include pipe calculations Correlate the outfall of the pipe
with sheet C3 C3 shows one concrete pad and C4 shows 2
A deta3l of sump pump/catch basin arrangement has been provided
The pump has a maximum discharge of 52 gpm which is less than the
76 gpm from the 10 year storm I ran this throuqh a Bowstring
calculation and 33 cf of storage would be needed This would
result in less than I" ponding depth on the truck weZl area, no
ponding on the ramp This is assum.fng a continuously runninq
pump durinq rain storms, but only lo minutes of operation forces
the cal culation ve storage requirement A note
indicating auaI on/off tcb is necessary ~
The swales on the North side of the site do not match your details
The curb inlets are the same elevatlon as the drywells There
should be a 2" difference between the curb inlet and the drywell
The elevations have been revised and necessary depth is provided 1.1~
PLAIITS:
Sheet C4 (cont.): The swales on the West side of the site have the
same type of problem as the North side Assuming a straight grade,
the elevations of the top of the berms are approximately the same
elevation as the pavement Maintain a minimum of 2" freeboard
The elevations have been revised and necessary depth is providedj,,----
Calculations and more details are necessary for the garden area
See the comments above ✓
The Southwest area of the site is still less than 1% grade All
grades are to be a minimum 1t unless a specif ic note appears on the
plans that grades will be set with an enqineers level
The note requiring a professional land surveyor had been ~
.incl uded
Please supply the information requested that is stamped on this
plan This information is being used to catalog development on each
parcel in the County
The necessary information has been provided
Paqe 2 of 3
s
Sheet C3: Provide details and calculations for the truck ramp,
correlate this plan with sheet C4
Plsn has been revised, see previous comment ~
Provide calculations and details for the garden ar
See previous comments addressing this item
Sheet C6: Add the following note regarding drywells "Wrap the
drywell and gravel envelope with filter fabric, AMOCO 4545 or
equivalent, in accordance with Spokane County Standard Detail B-1 "
Note has been added bl-~
Drywe 11 deta i 1 s shou ld ca 11 out a type 4 f rame and grate f or swa les
and solid lids for drvwells used in the uavement such as the
drywells used for the roof drainage
A note has been added to explafn use of lids ~
Use Spokane County standard type 1 frame for continuous grade and
type 2 frame for a sump along the curb in the street
A note has been added to explain this ~
Detail the type of grates used with the catch basins
DetaiZs have been provided t."~
8heet C2s Delete the painted crosswalk
The painted sidewalk has been deleted ~
Bheet PPis Will the vaults called out on this plan interfere with
the 208 swale'> What are the maintenance requirements for these
vaults*
This vaults have been moved into the paved areas and no longer
should conflict with the swales The maintenance for these
vau.Its calls for annual inspections, but since they are now
located out of the swale accessing these should not be a prob.Iem
Sheet A1.02. Provide details, such as a cataloq cut, on the trench
drain Also supply expected flows from the garden area to verify
drainage structure capacities
Catalog cuts have been supplied and ca3culat2on Justifying the~
size have been suppl3ed
Bbeet A2.01s Provide details and calculations for the garden area
See prev3ous comments, revised sheet A2 01 was not provided 11.-~
Sheet L2: Define the dashed line on the west side of the site,> Does
it conflict with the 12" SD and splashblock?
The dashed line on the west side has been labeled as a 2 112"L-,"~
irrigation line
Show irrigation for the 208 swales
The plan has been revised to illustrate the irrigation L/
Page 3 of 3
r e
1
Correct the north arrow
The north arrow has been corrected ~
Sheet L1: Delete the grass swale cross-hatching where there is no
grass swale proposed
The hatching has been revised and additionaZ revision will be
submitted The hatches on one of the legends .is reversed and theL_____~
engineer caught it and .is having it f.ixed
Add the note concerning the necessity of soil amendments to the
swales that are greater than 6" Chanqe City to County as noted
The necessary notes have been added and revisions made ✓
Correct the north arrow
The north arrow has been corrected ~
Sheet C7: Your plan and profile appear to be offset ~
The plan and proffle are sti11 offset, but a myZar has been
subm3tted You need to decsde if you want this corrected or not a
Per 8ob Brueggeman, County Traffic Engineer, the striping shall be
of a hiqhly durable material Also, per the Traffic Enqineer, the
roadway section must be revised as red-lined The 22' length is to
the front of the curb pan, not tbe bThis has been corrected
You need an owners signature on the mylar f the road plans
The owner has signed the mylar
My information on the vaults was out-dated You can keep the design
as is, or add another vault and delet he catch basin
No revis3on needed
Allowable cross-slope for the road is 2- 4 5% . f
The cross-section has been revised to be within this range ~
A bond amount for improvements has been provided and three approved
bondinq methods Please submit the bond to receive permit release
A bond has not been rece3ved
~
Page 4 of 3
~
REVIEW CONMENTS
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
PROJBCT B93149 REVIEWER. Bob Turner
PROJECT NAKE: Eagle Hardware on Sprague DATE: 26 Jan 94
RLVI$W #s 2
coM34sNrs
c,MBRAL:
V/Provide a mylar of the Carnahan road plans, once approved, with a
Developer's signature and date on the sheet
Provide the drainage easement supplied in last review coma►ent
submittal Covi or e•►temaw* av4c rs~XtPT baaj »c 6 06"e-0103e4 +to 60"s
✓Al1 pipe lengths should be labeled on the plan
p A bond in the amount of $72,300 00 must be submitted to the County
Engineers Department This bond is for the cost of Carnahan road
improvements Please select one of the approved bond formats
included with this review The bond must be in place before a
building permit will be released
DRAINAGB REPORT:
Paqe 2: Provide calculations and details of the garden area
~ drainage collection system
~ Provide calculatwns for the area flowinq into the catch basin/dry
well arrangement at station 13+68 Your plans show a type "A"
drywell and your report calls out a type "B" drywell Pc*Ns s►tou>
--t'.4m 'rb' waoi.rJ
PI.ANS •
Sheet C4. Detail the sump pump arrangement in the truck loadinq
✓ ramp, include pipe calculations Correlate the outfall of th~e pipe
with sheet C3 C3 shows one concrete pad and C4 shows 2(~ Pwo pe&rN
,/The swales on the North side of the site do not Yaatch your details
The curb inlets are the same elevation as the drywells There
should be a 2" difference between the curb inlet and the drywell
Page 1 of 3
v
RBVIBW C0MMENT8
PROJECT # 893149
RBRIBW # 2
27 Jaa 94
PLANS:
heet C4 (coat.): The swales on the West side of the site have the
V/Islame type of probleYn as the North side Asswaing a straight grade,
the elevations of the top of the berms are approximately the sante
elevation as the pavement Maintain a minimum of 2" freeboard
O Calculations and more details are necessary for the garden area
saeLa Q2,0 441 cAt. 6r c.a&soW A"v►. A►*.er► swwa oa fa+a+o Mo►P ft so 10
1 a. ~
The Southwest area of the site is still less than 1% grade All
✓ grades are to be a minimum 1t unless a specif ic note app ars o the
plans that grades will be set with an engineers level
Please supply the information requested that is stamped on this
plan This information is beinq used to catalog development on each
parcel in the County
✓8heet C3: Provide details and calculations for the truck ramp,
correlate this plan with sheet C4 •
0 Provide calculations and details for the qarden area
i8heet C6: Add the following note reqardinq drywells "Wrap the
✓ drywell and gravel envelope with filter fabric, AMOCO 4545 or
equivalent, in accordance with Spokane County Standard Detail B-1 "
Arywell details should call out a type 4 frame and grate for swales
and solid lids for drvwells used in the pavement such as the
drywells used for the roof drainage
11se Spokane County standard type 1 frame for continuous qrade and
✓type 2 frame for a sump along the curb in the street
-'Detail the type of grates used with the catch basins
VBheet C2: Delete the painted crosswalk
4 -heet FP1• Will the vaults called out on this plan interfere with
he 208 swalel What are the maintenance requirements for these
Vaults'> 9F,w"-mfvoK>T oF 5%44&,E ,•rJ t'1airr- W4C, q,JN4*Urf
Sheet A1.02s Provide details, such as a cataloq cut, on the trench
%/drain Also supply expected flows from the qarden area to verify
drainaqe structure capacities
isheet A2.01: Provide details and calculations for the garden area
Page 2 of 3
J6 ~
~
RLVIEW COMMENTS
P1tOJECT # 893149
RSOIRW # 2
27 JaII 94
✓Sheet L2. Define the dashed line on the west side of the site' Does
it conf lict with the 12" SD and splashblock' N~
~how irrigation for the 208 swales
Z
Correct the north arrow
veheet Li: Delete the grass swale cross-hatching where there is no
grass swale proposed
k*dd the note concerning the necessity of sail amendments to the
swales that are qreater than 6" Change City to County as noted
V/Correct the north arrow o.,6T
Sheet C7: Your plan and profile appear to be offset
Per Bob Brueggeman, County Traffic Engineer, the striping shall be
~lf a highly durable material Also, per the Traffic Engineer, the
Vroadway section must be revised as red-lined The 221 length is to
the front of the curb pan, not the back
Oi/Ou need an owners signature on the mylar of the road plans
<information on the vaults was out-dated You can keep the design
s, or add another vault and delete the catch basin
/Allowable cross-slope for the road is 2- 4 5%
~ A bond amount for improvements has been provided and three approved
bondinq methods Please submit the bond to receive permit release
~
Page 3 of 3
t
REVIEW CONMENT$
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
PROJ$CT 893149 R$VIEWBR: Bob Turner
PROJLCT NAME: Eagle Hardware on Sprague DAT$: 26 Jan 94
RSVIEW 2
COmmmS
G~'fNSRAL •
Provide a mylar of the Carnahan road plans, once approved, with a
Developer's signature and date on the sheet
Provide the drainage easement supplied in last review comment
submittal.
All pipe lenqths should be labeled on the plan
A bond in the amount of $72,300 00 must be submitted to the County
Engineers Department This bond is for the cost of Carnahan road
improvements Please select one of the approved bond formats
included with this review The bond must be in place before a
building permit will be released
DRAINA~GS REFORT:
Paqe 2• Provide calculations and details of the garden area
drainage collection system
Provide calculatj,ons for the area f lowing into the catch basin/dry
well arrangement at station 13+68 Your plans show a type "A"
drywell and your report calls out a type "B" drywell
PLANS:
Sheet C4: Detail the sump pump arrangement in the truck loading
ramp, include pipe calculations Correlate the outfall of the pipe
with sheet C3 C3 shows one concrete pad and C4 shows 2
The swales on the North side of the site do not match your details
The curb inlets are the same elevation as the drywells There
should be a 2" difference between the curb inlet and the drywell
Page 1 of 3
c •
RM$W COMMBMB
PROJBC'1' # 993149
RSVIBW # 2
27 Jan 94
PLANS:
8heet C4 (cont.): The swales on the West side of the site have the
same type of problem as the North side Assuming a straight grade,
the elevations of the top of the berms are approximately the same
elevation as the pavement Maintain a minlnum of 2" freeboard
Calculations and more details are necessary for the garden area
The Southwest area of the site is still less than 1% qrade Al1
grades are to be a min-tanum 1t unless a specif ic note appears on the
plans that grades will be set with an enqineers level
Please supply the information requested that is stamped on this
plan This information is being used to cataloq development on each
parcel in the County
Sheet C3: Provide details and calculations for the truck ramp,
correlate this plan with sheet C4
Provide calculations and details for the garden area
Sheet C6: Add the following note regarding drywells "Wrap the
drywell and gravel envelope with filter fabric. AMOCO 4545 or
equivalent, in accordance with Spokane County Standard Detail B-1 "
Drywell details should call out a type 4 frame and qrate for swales
and solid lids for drywells used in the pavement such as the
drywells used for the roof drainage
Use Spokane County standard type 1 frame for continuous grade and
type 2 frame for a sump along the curb in the street
Detail the type of grates used with the catch basins
Sheet C2: Delete the painted crosswalk
Sheet PP1: Will the vaults called out on this plan interfere with
the 208 swaleo> What are the maintenance requirements for these
vaults'
Sheet A1.02: Provide details, such as a catalog cut, on the trench
drain Also supply expected flows from the garden area to verify
drainage structure capacities
eheet A2.01: Provide details and calculations for the garden area
Page 2 of 3
t
RSVIS'W COMMEN'1'8
PROJRCT # H93149
RSVIB'W # 2
27 Jan 94
8heet L2: Define the dashed line on the west side of the site' Does
it conflict with the 12" SD and splashblock7
Show frrigation for the 208 swales
Correct the north arrow
Sheet Li: Delete the qrass swale cross-hatching where there is no
grass swale proposed
Add the note concerning the necessity of soil amendments to the
swales that are qreater than 6" Change City to County as noted
Correct the north arrow
Sheet C7: Your plan and profile appear to be offset
Per Bob Brueggeman, County Traffic Engineer, the striping shall be
of a highly durable material Also, per the Traffic Engineer, the
roadway section must be revised as red-lined The 22' length is to
the front of the curb pan, not the back
You need an owners signature on the mylar of the road plans
My information on the vaults was out-dated You can keep the design
as is, or add another vault and delete the catch basin
Allowable cross-slope for the road is 2- 4 5%
A bond amount for improvements has been provided and three approved
bonding methods Please submit the bond to receive permit release
Page 3 of 3
/ 1►
t ~
REVITW COMMENTS
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
PROJECT B93149 REOIBWER: Bob Turner
PROJ'ECT NAMB. Eagle Hardware on Sprague DAT$: 26 Jan 94
REVIBW 2
COX13NR'8
GSNSRAL:
Provide a mylar of the Carnahan road plans, once approved, with a
Developer's signature and date on the sheet
Provide the drainage easement supplied in last review comment
submittal
All pipe lengths should be labeled on the plan
A bond in the amount of $72,300 00 must be submitted to the County
Engineers Department This bond is for the cost of Carnahan road
improvements Please select one of the approved bond formats
included with this review The bond must be in place before a
buildinq periait will be released
DRAINAGE RSPiDRT:
Paqe 2: Provide calculations and details of the garden area
drainage collection system
Provide calculatvons for the area f lowing into the catch basin/dry
well arranqement at station 13+68 Your plans show a type "A"
drywell and your report calls out a type "B" drywell
PLANS:
Sheet C4: Detail the sump pump arrangement in the truck loading
ramp, include pipe calculations Correlate the outfall of the pipe
with sheet C3 C3 shows one concrete pad and C4 shows 2
The swales on the North side of the site do not match your details
The curb inlets are the same elevation as the drywells There
should be a 2" difference between the curb inlet and the drywell
Page 1 of 3
~
RZVXZW C0MMEr i 8
PROJSCT # 893149
ItEVI$W 2
27 JaII 94
PI.ANS:
Sheet C4 (cont.): The swales on the West side of the site have the
same type of problem as the North side Assum3.ng a straiqht grade,
the elevations of the top of the bertas are approxiaately the same
elevation as the pavement Maintain a minimum of 2" freeboard
Calculations and more details are necessary for the garden area
The Southwest area of the site is still less than 1% grade All
grades are to be a minimum 1% unless a specif ic note appears on the
plans that grades will be set with an enqineers level
Please supply the information requested that is stamped on this
plan This information is being used to catalog development on each
parcel in the County
8heet C3: Provide details and calculations for the truck ramp,
correlate this plan with sheet C4
Provide calculations and details for the garden area
Bheet C6: Add the following note regarding drywells "Wrap the
drywell and gravel envelope with filter fabric, AMOCO 4545 or
equivalent, in accordance with Spokane County Standard Detail B-1 "
Drywell details should call out a type 4 frame and grate for swales
and solid lids for drvwells used in the pavement such as the
drywells used for the roof drainage
Use Spokane County standard type 1 frame for continuaus grade and
type 2 frame for a sump along the curb in the street
Detail the type of grates used with the catch basins
Sheet C2: Delete the painted crosswalk
Sheet PP1: Will the vaults called out on this plan interfere with
the 208 swalel What are the maintenance requirements for these
vaults'7
Sheet A1.02. Provide details, such as a catalog cut, on the trench
drain Also supply expected flows from the garden area to verify
drainage structure capacities
8heet A2.01: Provide details and calculations for the garden area
Page 2 of 3
RBV=8W C.OMEENTS
PROJECT # B93149
REVI$W # 2
27 Jan 94
Sheet L2: Define the dashed line on the west side of the site' Does
it conflict with the 12" SD and splashblock'
Show irrigation for the 208 swales
Correct the north arrow
Sheet L1: Delete the grass swale cross-hatching where there is no
grass swale proposed
Add the note concerning the necessity of soil amendments to the
swales that are greater than 6" Chanqe City to County as noted
Correct the north arrow
8heet C7: Your plan and profile appear to be offset
Per Bob Brueggeman, County Traffic Engineer, the striping shall be
of a highly durable material Also, per the Traffic Engineer, the
roadway section must be revised as red-lined The 22' lenqth is to
the front of the curb pan, not the back
You need an owners signature on the mylar of the road plans
My information on the vaults was out-dated You can keep the design
as is, or add another vault and delete the catch basin
Allowable cross-slope for the road is 2- 4 50
A bond amount for improvements has been provided and three approved
bonding methods Please submit the bond to receive permit release
Page 3 of 3
I •
• ~
REVIEW CONIlHENTS
SPOKANE COIINTY ENGINEER
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
PROJSCT B93149 REVIBWBR• Bob Turner
PROJECT NAMS: Eaqle Hardware on Sprague DATE: 13 Dec 93
RSVIEW #s 1
COMMSN'1'8
GBNBRAL•
RID is required for Sprague and right of way for Carnahan
Please submit a recorded property deed, obtained from the Auditors
office, so that we can process this RID and right of way
S gest you use Spokane County curb inlet type 1, as attached for
11 lets
8 areas must be f lat to be considered in your drainaqe analysis
S es are labeled as 83 feet deep, minimum All swales deeper
an foot need to be sloped at 3 1
enchYn~rk is required for the project A f inished f loor elevation
is no 'adequate because it has not been constructed yet
A swales using depths greater than 6 inches shall comply with
oil amendment conditions as attached
TageAGII RgPORT:
2: Carnahan Road improvements must comply with 208 drainage
requirements Any time the width of one lane or more is being
installed 208 drainage requirements apply A more detailed drainage
plan for Carnahan is required
aqe A-1: I compute a smaller area available Please be more
detailed to verify your value 208 areas must be flat to be
;Co nidered in your drainaqe analysis
qe A-2: 208 areas must be flat to be considered in your drainage
nalysis Your swale is deeper than 1 foot and should have 3 1
sideslopes
Page 1 of 4
r ~
REV_EW CDMMEMB
PROJ$CT # B93149
REVILW # 1
13 DeC 93
7rade C4 of 7s All qrades must be a minimum of 1% indicates
where more spot elevation information is needed to verify
s County code requires all runoff to stay on site The
entrances are of particular importance to us Areas that appear to
be less than 1% are indicated with a Xt
rovide a bottom elevation for the south swale
L king at the elevations of the inlets and the asswaed wall
evation it appears that the wall is below the bottom of the
wale
V601re clearly indicate the outline of the south swale
etail the truck loading area How does runoff leave the area? How
does it go to a 208 as required'
Xovide a typical section of the SE swale The width only scales to
LI*2 feet which would not match you section BB
S~ow in general the extent of Swale 4 and in particular how the
~~swale is graded around the propane tank
Suggest you modify section DD as shown to prevent erosion
ction CC shows the footing for the retaining wall As discussed
with Mr Toler verbally, the footing is not to interfere with
dr ells or encroach more than half of the width of the swale
The berm detail should be modified as detailed on the site plan
jo*e NW swales are they connected or bermed or separated? Detail
.0he bottom of the NW swale appears to be above the inlet
ODetail the outlet of the pipe and include culvert and qrate
capacity calculations
eet C3 of 7: Detail how the runoff leaves the truck area It
appears that direct discharge to a drywell is occurring This is
not allowed
Jqheet A1.02: Provide details and calculations of the trench drain
&hoot A2.01: Provide a detailed plan showinq where all the drainaqe
Page 2 of 4
I ~
REVZ EW COMMENTS
PROJLCT # 893149
RE'oISW # 1
13 DeC 93
Pa heet A2.01 (coat.)e from the catch basins and trench drain goes
nd how it is treated by 208 as required
`pWrail the truck loading area for drainaqe requirements
C6 of 7: Clarify the curb and gutter detail Is it for on-
of f-s ite?
;Noelor
000
io.p'l.ude typical County details for catch basins and drywells
Bheet A1.01: The Architectural site plan does not match JUB
Enqineers plan The two must be the same
(Sheet L1: The North arrow is incorrect
TlwM is a possible conf lict with irrigation pipes and the culvert
wolo"si-hown of JUB plans C4 of 7
s landscaping site plan does not match JUB Engineers site plan
he two must be the same
03 11 208 areas must be irrigated
au"r_ L2: The North arrow is incorrect
T landscaping site plan does not match JUB Engineers site plan
he two must be the same
&<11 208 areas must be labeled as sod
%040 landscaping will be allowed in the county right of way
.Rhere appears to be a conflict with the landscaping and the SW 208
swale
,do evergreens or junipers will be allowed in the 208 areas or on
the sideslopes
L,Ktline the 208 areas to more clearly identify that there is no
conflict with landscaping
heet C2 of 7: Bob Brueqgemann, the County Traff ic Engineer, made
comments on this sheet The lane widths for the central Spraque
approach have been modified and an example of concrete approaches
with cross gutters is included This detail applies to every
approach to the site Stop bars are not required for approaches
Indicate the Carnahan taper on the site plan
Page 3 of 4
~ ►
• •
REV=EW C0~MIT8
PROJECT # 893149
RBVIBW # 1
13 Dea 93
Sheet '•Carnabaa Road =mprovements"s A detailed drainaqe report for
Carnahan road is required 208 is required for road runoff Suqqest
you use Wilbert Vaults to transport runoff under the sidewalk to
swales on site An easemerit permitting runoff from the public right
of way to private swales will be required of the applicant, see the
attached example
value tests are required These tests should follow the WSDOT
method and must be field verified by a Spokane County inspector
Contact Jim Radke at 509-456-3600 to arrange for an ihspector to be
present
~<A grade sheet as attached is required for this design
A bond amount for improvements will be provided to the applicant
once the plans are complete A mylar siqned by the owner will be
required once the plans have been approved by the County
Page 4 of 4
t
~
NOTICE OF TZkNSMITTAL
ADDRESS 5~r04 c. PROJECT /f
BUSINESS NAME PARCEL N4 /LEGAL
g DESCRIPTION
PROP4SED USE 35 2~
' CONTACT ~ ovV., PHONE
o~n Zra (P. - ~-155 2Q3 ~
REASON FOR TRANSNIITTAL
~
PREAPPWCATtON CONFBRENCB ~ PRECONSTRUCfION CONFQtENCE OTHER
,
DATE 10- I g-~,3 TIME C►t)
DOCUMENTS CIRCULA'I`ED ~
DLSTRLBUTED TO It DESCRiPr[ON E BUQ.D[NQS PLANNINQ ENOINLERS HEALTN SCAPGA FUtE DlST d' ~ OrTHPR
,
-ESite Plan ae (revised) I Cnticat MMWa'ls Ltst
Parlcing Plan n ~
♦ M M aw i Signago p18D
L.tghting Plan + ' M Y 4 4„
Draiaage Plan r " " fv
iDrainage Calcutahoas k~ • ~ . . ;
1 / M M\ 1~ I r M,I I IMw yV Y IrM Ylagi+oamenr co Pay Fees
,v , , r r.~~ ,r
ImgaUon Plan ~
' Landmpe Ptan
Promissory Letter
M. k M IBY MY M
I.BtLdSCSp6 COSL EStlt[l8t8
fi ♦ ~ i ~ A7 . M .
Traffic Grcutation Plan
Construction Drawings
Ftoor Plsn
~
27te above uems have been re~aeru~ed EA ~ ~
Date of Transnuttai a~ Revtew grdinator~ C EE
Circulated by
Spokane Counry Dlwsrost of Butldingr + 1026 West Brortdwcry Avoenue * Spokcuie, WA 99260 (509)456-3675
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL
ADDtZESS PROJECT 1#
G~ /
~
J 'v l/ ♦ ' if `t ~ -
r
BUSINESS NAME PARCEL NO /LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
~ .
PROPOSED USE ~
~
.ol
,t e X
CONTACT PHONE
3 REASON FOR TRANSMITTAL
pREAPPLICATtON CONFERLNCB PRECONSTRUCftON CONFERENCE OTHER
,
DATE TIME
DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED
~
DISTRIBUTED T4
R= D6SCRIP''t'ION BUiI.DINGS PLANNtNG ENGINEERS HEALTH SCAPCA FIRF D[ST # O?HER
v-
Stte Plan (new) (revtsed) Cntical Matenals List
~
iParking Plan ~ ~ i ♦ tr n a w M
r ~ Wa
Sigoage Plan
♦ i. ~ CI 1 il V M~ ti r t} YY
Lighhng Plan
~ s
Drainage Plaa
Dratnage Ca[aulauons
,
Agreement to Pay Fees
y}y . N I Y i ' 1A 1MN1 ~9 II
Ir,ngatzon Plan
Landscape Ptan
a . ~4a r Proaussory Ietter
Lautdscape Cost Estimate
Traffic Cic+culauon Plan
Coastruction Drawings ~
~Floor Plan
?he above items have beert
reccived
Revicew Coordi~ator
~ Date of Transnuttal
Circulated by
i
Snokmie Counry Divrstori ojBuildrngc * 1026 Wesr BioaulwRy Awiiue * Spoluuie WA 99260 ~(509)456-3675
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL
ADDRESS PROJECT #
-je
BUSn40S NAME PARCEL NO /LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED USE 3~0~3/ g~ 9
~~~~..~r ,•v~,~'
.
CONTACT ~ PHONE
..._le ,i~~.ss-~ a~8 G - ~ao ~
REASON FOR TRANSMITTAL
PREAPALICATION CONFFR6NCE PRECONSTRUCCION CONFERENCE OrI'NER
DATE TIME
DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED
DISTRIBUTED TO
REM DESCRIPTtON BUtLDINGS PLANNINO ENOINEERS HEALTH SCAPCA FME d1ST 0 OTHER
X'Site Plan (new) (}eviia Cntical Matenals Iist
V Parlang Plan
Signage Plan t~~ ~"z~,
Lighhag Plan ~ . j$ 90¢x
r rx f,
rainage Plan ~~3iti 'r ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~.v` ~ . y/ ~ • f~
.
, _ Qt _ ♦ . . . /.w "
Drainage Calculadons
A$r+eemeat to Pay Fees k" m~:
Imgahon Plsa
Landscape Plan ~
, ~ . . ~
,
PCOII11SSOl,y I.6HP.!
~ {'iiiiiiw Landscape Cost Eshmate
Traffic Circulattoa Plan
K
Construction DrawiDgs ~~'A
ioor Ptan
I 1
I I I
?he crbove ftpns haue becn ~k ~re.~eived ~
Date of Transrwual Z.9- Z Review Coordinator ~
Clrculated by
Spokiuie County Dtvistun of Butldingv * 1026 Wecr Brnndway Auenue * Spoltnite WA 99260 *(509)456-3675
/
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL
ADDRESS E,- .J Z04 5~gINGLA Z PROJECT ll
BUSINESS NAME ~GL_E F..t Aes>tokeE PARCEL NO /LEGAL
£ G DESCRtPTION
PROPOSED USE 3 ~Q-~S) 9009
~C71 A,tL
CONTACT PHONE
o HN HA LLc:>-Cec>rn 20(o- 145 rz..,- Zao3
REASON FOR TRANS1ViI'TTAL
PREAPPUCATION CONFERBNCB PREOdNSTRUCiTON CONF6R6NCE OR'HER ~
DATE TIME
DOCUMENZ'S CIRCULATED
DISTRIBUTED TO ~
RM DESCRIPRON BUtLDINOS PLANNINl3 6NG[NEF.ttS NEALTH SCAPCA FQtB DLST N~- Ort'HFR
Stta Plan (new)
Cnhcal Matertals Lzst
Parking Pian .
wr i + r
$tg18gC Plan
I,1ghbD$ Plan
Dmmage Plan
Drawage Calculatioas
Agr+eement to Pay Fees
r w+ w w».ri Ih /M
Imgstioa Plan
Landscape Plan
Promissory Letter
Mi MI h i i M11M
I.BtidSCape COSt EStltnate
■ •MM
Traffic Carcutatioa Plan
Coastruetion Drawmgs
Floor Plan
R ~
?he crbove rtens have beets
rccECVed
Vb0 •
Date of Transauttaf -3 'Q3 Review Coor+dinator WOf~ t jj
Cinculated by
Spokanc Counry Diwsiort o.jQuilditigs * 1026 West Biorrdwrty A«isue * Spokntre WA 99260 *(S09)4S6-3675
~ C
. n
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL
ADDRESS rG PROJECT #
~ a 3 -
BUSINESS NAME ~ PARCEL NO /LEGAL
E ag ~ e- 0 GtrJ Wa,re. DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED USE I 3523 I qOpq
CONTACT J ~ PHONE
o 4aU Is+,-O.f1'1
REASON FOR TRANSMI'TTAL
PRLAPPUCATtON CONFER6NC6 FRECONSTRUCTION CONFMtBNCB Ort'HFR ~
DATE IIME
DOCUMErITS CIItCULATED
' DLSTRYBUTED TO
RM DESCRIPnON BUIi.OMGS P[.ANNtNa BNGINB6RS HEALTH SCAPCA FIIt6 DLST R:.• OTHER.
, ito Plan (aewl i
Cnhcal Matenals "
Padang Plan
ry WM . M M 1 M.
Signage Plan
M M11
LAghttng Plan
Drauiage Plan x
_
Dcaiaage Calrtlaaons
, i r r~.Ur w.~. •IwMMM rr
Agrwmeat to Pay Fees
„ . _
Imgatioa Plan
I,andscape Plan
Pronussory I~etter y'
n rw ♦ r '
1.811dSC8~ ~:OSt ~11Lt~G ~
, . .
iTraffic Circulation Plan
Constcuauon Drawings x
Floor Plan ~
V-ArPA
X
Tfie aboNC Itcros have bewi b I ~ recoved
' t Date of Transnuttal j 2-3 6L3_ Revicew Coordinator '
Cu+culated by
Snoknire Coanhr Divrsrai of Buildargs * 1026 Wi►at 8madwny Aauiac * Spwkrule. WA 99260 •(509)456-3675
~ '
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc
' rjousB'l ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PIANNEAS
2810 W CleanhraterAvenue. Suke ZOt
Keruievwck. WA 99336
509/783-2144
FAX. 5091736-0790
February 4, 1994
Mr Bob Turner RECLZIIVED
Spokane County Enguieer Development Engineering Services FEe 09 1994
Spokane Counry Public Works CODE FNF
1026 West Broadwav Avenue OR~F~EN.,
Spokane, Washuigton 99260-0170
RE EAGLE HARDWARE, SPRAGUE - 2ND REVISIONS TO PLAN SETS
Dear Mr Turner
Enclosed for your uiformation are the revisions and responses to your comments of
Januarx 26, 1994 Tra.nsnutted herevvith aze the following documents
• Returned 1 set of County Engineer Redluaes of Drawings
• Returned 1 set of County Engineer Redluaes of Dramage Report
• Revised Clvll Plan Sets (2) Sheets Cl-CS
• Revi.sed Drauiage Report (2)
• Revlsed Sbeet P-1 (2)
• Revised Sheet FP-1 (Z)
• Revised Sheet Ll-L2 (2)
• Onguial Mylar Sheet G"7 With Owner's Signature
• Carna.han Road Draunage Easement
We have the followuig comments regarduig your review
RESFONSE TO COUNTY ENGINEER REVIEW OF JANUARY 269 1994
General
1 A mylar of the Carnahan plans wnth Developer's Signature is iacluded with this
subauttal
2 A copy of the executed drainage easement for Camahan Road is mcluded for your
information. A copy of the actual recorded document wlll not be avaiiable for about
10 days In its place we include the invoice for recordauon. The easement is shown
on the plans
~
cAt./,V5s-ot.23 Eqle Hardware sooicane
• ~
rj-u-s~
~
Eagaeers Surveyors Planners
Mr Bob Turner
February 4, 1994
Page 2
3 Pipe lengths have been noted on Plan Sheet C3
4 The Bond in the amount of $72,300 for Carnahan Road improvements is beuig
forwarded under sepazate cover
Drainage Report
1 The Garden Area and Greenhouse Area Analysis has been idenufied in the
Drauiage Report. Collecnon details are revised and shown on Sheet C3
The Greenhouse Roof (003) and Covered Storage Roof (005) drains are revised on
P-1 and piped directly to drywells The revised Sbeet P-1 is included.
2 Calculations for stormwater runoff to the catch basm/drywell azrangement at Stauon
13 + 68 is provided w the Drawaage Report. The drywell will be a Type 'B' as
shown in the report
Plans
.
Sheet A1 02
1 The trench drasn detail has been provided on Sheet C3 Catalog cuts of the drain
are included in the Drainage Report.
Sheet A? 01
1 Provided in the Drainage Report.
~
Sheet C2
1 Pauited crosswallc deleted
Sheet C3
1 Draznage calculauons for the truck ramp sump are included in the Drainage Reporc.
An addiuonal detaLl of the sunap is provnded on Sheet C3 and is conelated with
Sheet C4
2 Garden Area calculauons are provided in the Drainage Report
cCAL/127554123 Eagle Hardware spotcana
r f'J-U-B
i..~
Engineers Surveyors Planners
Mr Bob Turner
February 4, 1994
Page 4
Sheet FP-1
1 T'be vaults are redrawn on this sbeet to be located in the pazlang Iot as idennfied on
Sheet 0 The malntenance reqwremeats are estabhshed by WAC codes, to be
tested on, an annual basis Revised Sheet FP-1 Ls inciuded,
Sheet Ll and LZ
1 Rtevj.sions have been made and revLSed plan sheets mcluded.
Sincerely,
J-iJ-B ENGIINEERS, Inc.
Ghuck A. Larson, P.E
Project Manager
CAL.skt
Project No 12755-04
Enclosures
cc Tam Sconzo, Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
ca./1275"123 Eagla Hardware spokane
~
e
~
~
~ x
46
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ • ~s ~
H ~ , • ~ a
~ .
~ • ~ a, ~ g
Af
~ • ~
~
~ s.
~ • a ~
V A
~
~ ~ . . ~
~ w
8w~ ° o► ~
~
N ~ S o ~ ~S» ~
o•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
9 z x
~ M
x8 iwt
~
{
i
♦
~ a 46
~
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ Q ~
~
OOW,
`
► ~ ~ ~
~
`r %
% ~
f,
~ ~ ~ " 3w~•'~~~ ~~ti
1~+%
'r
0rp;a~,•~:
~ . ~
~
0
~ ~ .
,
,
~
3
I
y
~
O
t e } f;,{ r lr ~Ky r~;~ ~ t ;
► , ~N~y# r}~ 3 ~ f ~
~ Y~~ ► t3~~{~~f M ~ > >
{ 1 i ~ n [
{ 9 r
ti u
~
L ~ { l
s a~
~
%
y f, J 1
%At
A1
'Ay t~ ~~~5vy~ f r~~~t ~ ~ t
r~'~i
61'~~
i~r.,V"
~ y~ ~ r 1( ~ f N~' ~ N y t
~ r
titt x ~ 1 ~ s al } 1
no~
~t + }~.K P Y f~~ O~ In f ir }
} r ~ 'tf t ~ Y
} ~ w k r ~ ~ vS
c , I '~"~t► ~ ~ M~ i ~ ~e
~ vo y
0
8 S 8 $ _ , r $1
4
•it ( IM
",~f r~}~ti • ~ ~F..~~~ a~ ~ d r r}t 4
=
r
'yr 'j
ti v?ti = ~ +~,~~r Ft
~ I
1~~'~ '1fs+~ % PY
~jIL ~ ~Nr 44
i ~ ♦ ~
LETTEIi OF TRANSMITTAL
2810 w cleamaca nVouto Date Ainuary 21, 1994
s,~~ 20~
UOB ~ TCennewtakf"VA 99336 Projecf N8 12755-02
Awe oR9y7b-3W
F" (509)i36.0790 Project Name. Eagle bazdwere & Gardeo
Spokane, Washuigton
TO
1V1r Bob Turner
Develop.memt Liignn,eenwg SemcQs
Spokome County "PubhC Works
1026 West Btoadw►ay Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260
We are sending you attached the followihg items
Iyo of C~i~io Descriptva
1 County Rewew CoFy of Onginal '2081 Dravmg Report
These are Transmi.tted as Ghecked Below
_ For Appxoval X As Requested Reta met1 for Conectibns
X Fot Your Use
Reraarks
~
.
sigma .r~t.L~
C~ h 5, P.E , ROJBCrT ~1G I~~
cc
JAN-21-1994 16 52 FROM J-U-B ENGINEERSo INC TO 13243478 P 05
r
~ ~ hm
AsphahT~hno6o 0 A8~ ~ ~ ~ RhMAW
N 48t7 EtWa 5e 83 0 p O Bos 6304 • SpoUoa. WA 99WT
i~W) aWI7se
aiftard Consultants, tnc
2020 E. Sprin9fie1d
Spokane. WA 99202
Plroject $2687
Jenuary 18, 1994
A►ttn p Grant Cummf ngs
suaject IR-value report (WSO4T Method) on saaples from
Csrnahen aoad
8eanpte 10 R-value 0 400 psi
#j-
2p5' aovth 54
og Sprague
02-
355' south 52
of Sprague
There were no rocordable swell pressures
Xent Henderson, CET (141CEj)
JAN-21-1994 16 52 FROM J-U-B ENGINEERS. INC TO 13243478 P 04
.
Eag,1e Hardware and Garden, Iac 8-1429-04
Janyary ai, 1494
Page 2 ~
Subgzade eoil canditfons were 9imilar at each location and were °
described se consiating of inedium dettee to dense, brown, slightly
sandy, eilty g*M. =n-placo Aatural moisture cotsteata sanqe8
fram s to l it A Modf f ied Proctor Compact iLon TeBt (AABH'rO Ti 8 0)
w" conducted on a cornposite sample from tlLe three boringa The
teat reeulrs fndicated a maxitt+um dry den8ity of 135 pcf sad sa
optimum moisture content og 7* We believe these propertsee
reprssent typical eoil caaterfal that will comprise the new
pavement svbgrade
Samplee from I r11, mL~ M02>vere teetea fox "R-value l (WADOT
611) by Petroleuat Scfences, =nc Ae deBCYibed in the attached
seport, ths resultiag -
iTeing the R-value data, we reviewed rhe parking and acaEen ~
1
pavement dssign recomadatiane deecr3.lDed s.n our November 8, 1993 ~
repo,rt The origiaal recommendation8 wese baeod on an aseutned . C'
subgzada Cm value Reaaalyzs.ng pavewnt thicknees requirea:ents
&L_s--o$-tAw--'~-~~e'--d~ - ~
on the be
Z~-~~ ~i ~l R.00
- Jb~3 i►r~ , ~ A -AM ~ P~~ s s~'irs_ gat`__~~vm ~t-~---0~ia
' ;0
~ ~ These pavemeht ~
e~ conmreadat:ons are based on the aesumptian that the subgrade is
oompacted to 90 og the Modified pi^octor
We hope the abwve iaformatfon iLs euffiLcient for your needs a-t
this time if You have aay questions about this letter or the
attaChment plea►►ee let ue kriow
8incerely,
GiFFoRD cONSvlfrAMS, IaiC
-
4 8 Q rd, P. B
Presideat
cc Virice Lvftus, J V 8 Engineers
Attaohaent a R-value Test Resulte
JAN-21-1994 16 51 FROM J-U-B ENGINEERS. INC TO 13243470 P 03
'
~
61FFORO oONBYLTIUWM IMQ $-14 a 9- 04
Geotwhn*al Enekseers
• 2= E SptWQitetd • 3pokane.lAfA 99= o Tetephone IS09I 5364B7o • Fau 394-2926
January 21, 1994
Sagle Hardvrare snd Garderi, tnc
cJo Scoazo-Hallstroin Architectf;
919-124th Aveuuue N 8, Sufte 101
Bellevue, Washington 98005
Attn Hr Thomas 8conza
Preeident
RiSQLTB OY O08GRM 88PLOR1TIM9 AM TBSTIlG FOR
C!AR~AB~ ROAD. 9P'RAM AVMi'QS BAALB 8A8D~AR8 BTOR$, 8POXM.
This lettes report sueaaarizes results of euhgra8e exploratiorls
aad laboratoxy testiag tbat was coaducted for the Carnahan Road
W.iden3ng Project befrg conetructed ia conjunetion with the new
Sprague Avenue etore in 9pokane, washington We uriderstand that
the carnahan Road Ktdening project includoe rewovLng 20 f t on
the east eide of the existing 22 ft wide paved roadway, ana
recomatructing a 32 ft mide section to replace it, resultfng in
a totel new pavenvent aidth af 44 ft
on Deaember 3 0, 1993 Mr Vinae Lof tue at J U 8 $ngineezs in Tri -
citiea eaid that ths Spokane Cowaty bngineera requfred `A value'
test3.ng of the subgrade along Carnabaa Road Nhere the widensng
work will take place Ia thefr review commente they i=tdicated
this work had to be witnessed by a Caunty Inepector In our
subsequeat F with
i~~t~sts~3-t
~ - - . -
On January t, 1994 we made thYee eubgraW gxploration probe holee
eac31 about 4 5 ft deep to abtaia representative stoil samples
The boretvoles were ma8e on tha eaet side of Carnahaa Roard at the
folloaing locationac
of feet Sast fram Bast Bdge Of fset 9outh f rom Sprague
Aosehole # of CAMMULA& PaMMOLt. Lya -Cara Rd _ Intersect„
2oi ao gt aas €t
202 30 ft 355 ft
203 as ft 510 ft
AOen 8. 6woid. P.E
PMqQpM
JAN-21-1994 16 51 FROM J-U-B ENGINEERSe INC TO 13243478 P 02
jod aro .~~L~• o`f
GIiFFORD CONSULTANTS, 1NC.
s 2420 E S'puinAheid Ave, Spohem, WA 99202 W
TeleOone {5081534-3670 Fax 15491834-2925
it FACSAM/LE COVER SHEET 0
TiensmJtta/ Dete 9~ .
PLEASE FAX M.
Flrm -Z-Ll eE,,~~
FAX Mo I=7.~-o7~a ~2o~ySs-Q3S/ a-Oft
MMe.YA"
FROM
GIFFORD CONSULTi4NTS, lNC
Na~e
Total No of pages iransrnFtt~, bichfdwg cover sheet. ~
NQlmS
JAN-21-1994 16 51 FROM J-U-B ENGINEERS9 INC TO 13243478 P 01
~
FAx covsR SHEET
!A
Z810 W Cieawaoor Aroare Dace 1- 2- 1 .
~ 3nhe Z01
mmw*icac, aw ma6 Sr+oject No O ~
Fhone tS09)783-2144
paz cM7364M Subject•
ra FRoM
~
JLt~- om-
FAX NO NO PAGES TO P'OLLOW ~
~
bCSSAGF de
~ •
~
- i
6imp-son I;nc)ineefs, Inc.
CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
N 909 Argonne Road • Spokane, VVA 99212
(509) 926-1322 • Fax 926-1323
TO
L-op-LuAi.? E 41 • M vi a I VIF,-,rs , 2 15J a \d) .
~ 1 -r►~ s• r~ ~ u~~ 2 d 1 ~ 1C A- W °
v, ri t~ I. I~~~ ~ v9s 3
. I
SUBJECT 4221 t.r n a La
DATE ~ ~ t L4-,, I 9 9 ?
~~tP Q►- r~ v l.~r~! ~
' 41na T-7-1-~~; Uci. -7 L~,
~r~ Q Q-~ u 9~► ,
~ ~ r~ ~•r, ~ ~ ~..F -~ii~.t~ w r _ ,
~..t 'T:.)4 ar T ~.i~ L~ ~ r"G1 'P Y~ l~1/ A r~ ~1 ~ L.`4l"-
1V
Y-,r• t 4 d ~E- ~ o ~ ' S ;~r• LSL-Z7
13 e n e r r i i ~ c% » dj2 tL- 1 4 ):r~ i P7 ~ a-,R
~ ap a Q r7 F'
~ AU~ ve..
F ) rt
' Ut [L ~•s~-ss.. ~ ~ T~1S-
~
~.F.Li ~ ~..~..aa.~.. _'~.LS E~ ~ ~..=.r~.:~-
y ~
~ m
. Li ~ -61:LP-
4--cy i~d t , , cad Qr.rd Q"MJ~ t
~
~ -~A.~C ; d 914- . 6
~ 1
~-AX2ia t-a tl-.tiA ,
t,
ls,00, B,116 "Tu Y`Yl ~ 7%' 57 D rjaYSA4 e,15113gle a
3
LS
~ oE w''s'~ s
•4~! R.
~
St8ned 'AAksetlAF
le-
J-U•B ENGINEERS, Inc
~ . . , ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PUWNERS
2810 W Clearwatef Avenue Surte 201
KennewccK WA 99336
January 14, 1994 FqX, ~9n3&~oi~
Mr Bob Turner
Development Engineering Services
Spokane County Pubhc Works
1026 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, Washuigton 99260-0170
RE PROPOSED EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN STORE
Dear Mr Turner
We are subnuttuag revnsed plans for unprovements to Carnahan Road for review and
approval Your review comments have been incorporated into the plans and the attacbed
storin drainage report
Eagle's goal at this pomt is to get a buuldmg pernut ar at least a footnags &
foundation pernut so that construction may begm It ls our understandm,g that Carnahan
Road umprovement plans must be approved and a bond put in place for the improvements,
before the bwlcimg permit will be provided if the plans meet with your approval, please
adme us of the required bond amount as soon as possible
Your attentton to this matter is greatly appreciated
Smcerely,
J-U-B Ei~ IIVEERS, lnc
Vincent J ftus, P.E
Project Engmeer
Project No 12755-03
Enclosed Carnahan Road unprovement plans sheet C7
Detauls sheet C6
Grading and drasnage plan sheet C4
Storm drawage report
CQUnty red-luie comments
cc Mr Tom Sconzo
is
D VJL\turnet 114
-000-w-- J-U-B EwGINEERS, Inc
fjou'ps , ENGINEERS SURVEYORS * PLANNERS
2810 W Clearwater Avenue Suite 201
Kennewicic, WA 99336
January 14, 1994 FqX, 55o~gn~j719~o
Mr Bob Turner
Development Engineermg Services
Division of Engineenng and Roads
Spokane County Pubhc Works
1026 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99260-0170
RE PROPOSED EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEAI CENTER
Dear Mr Turner
We are submimng revised site civil plans and storm dramage report for revlew and
approval Your review comments have been incorporated mto tbe plans We would lzke
to discuss the following items indivydually
GENERAG
1) We have submitted a recorded property deed so you can process the R I D
and nght-of-way dedicanon. Please advise us d you need any additional
information
SHEET C4 OF 7
1) Design grades along the North and South curb lwes adjacent to the swale are
between OS% and 10% slope OVe have put a note on the gradmg a.nd
drmnage plan requinng a professional land surveyon ccensed ia the State nf
Washuigton venfy the top af rock grades before paving is allowed tn these
areas
2) The berm detail was not modified because #he swales have a nunlmum 2
inches of freeboazd above the cop of berms
"Caraahan Road Improveraents"
1) We are prepanng the Storm Dramage easement at this time and will rec4rd
it as soon as we get Eagl.e's signature
2) "R" Value samples bave been taken and the "R" Value test is currently under
way We expect to dehver a letter of the test results and any rmport to the
pavuig design to you by next week
Is
D Wl\tumer 114
i
rJ-U,B,i
~
Engineers Surveyors Planners
Mr Bob Turner
Jaauary 14, 1994
Page 2
3) A grade sheet should nat be necessary since we are proposiAg removal of the
east 10 feet of elustuig Carnahan Road and total reconstrucnon from there to
the new curb aud gutter A detail of the proposed road cross-sectian ts
included on the plan sheet
Your attention to this matter is greatty appreciated
Sincerely,
J-U-B :ftus, ERS, Inc
Vincent J P E
Project Engineer
Project No 12755-02
Enclosed Revised construction pla.ns
Revised storm drainage report
County review red-line markings
cc Mr Tom Sconzo
D VJL\tumer 114
/
~ J
c
~
~ .
t
~
X73 ~
~
.w
~ •
r ~
~
i
.
I 1,A ~ 01,17
- ~ ~
vo
~ -
~
~
~
~
C - -
l
- ~ /
9
~
a
L
~
DATSs ~CT088R 271, 1993
T0 0 Bd8 TQ1tNSR
PRCK: JIM RADR$
Rg: SAGLE A'1' EAST 5204 BPRAGIUE
Hob,
I~ attactdzq fde ZePaLt faW tWO p a besls aoaM=bed cai oabc~ber 25th at
tbe aboopMec:t azte, ge aite 3s lmdiwla3n by Ga~r3.eon son typeso oe aaeMult=t Ms
ae~aaz+n cf thf.9. The amauttmt el,ected to g.naeed wit~p test3ag at tbe afte eu
thouqh I fndicated to hua that it would not be reqtit2.redl.
tibe 3ngpecbors setxnt izxb that t~ bmdhWies UMre-iqpddly S~e niv" and that botb
type "A" or "B" drywelis wfth fllter fabria are appiicable to the site.
~
Percolation Tests
E 5204 Sdraque Ave
Eanle Hardware
Oet 25 1993
Jxm McLefresh
Three percolation tests were conducted at E 5204 SpragLte
Ave ( old Fred Mever Store? bv Gifford Cansultants A11 three
tests had the same sail and passed the percolation test See
attaached draw.ing for locations
TEST # i ! 2 & 3
~
Three wells was drilled to a deoth of 12' The fYrst 1'-2'
of soil was miltv fine aravel From 2' on the soil was medium to
course clean valZev orave].
Because of the soi], conditions the contractor was unable to
rnaintain thca wel1 at the 12' deoth A oer forated oioe, covered
with f ilter fabric= was ins#.alled into the well to a deoth nf 5'
Water was aumped into the Qipe at a rate of 20 oal per min
Each well received 250-340 oa],1ons Qf water At nv tirne did tMe
water level rise above the bottom of the hole
Sinale depth drv wel ls 5hculr~ suocort water f lows f rom thia
site I did nut reaware the cnntractor to comolete a one hour
soak because the test wol ls wpre kennina Uo with to water f1.ow
Recommendations
The ccanLractQr =hcaul. i ne n- ► t~ pa ntitala ,a.-mle LEoth
drv wel l BeGat.cse trce Less4 wcri - conduztec' with f i.lter f abr 4c we
sliould requxre the d-v w~~ll be a-sfiallod with i'a+brkc lxners
~
J i rtt McLe f res
~
`
~
~
KANE COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS
♦ h CALCULATION SHEET
Description NPZLA710d ~ESl ~ 5204 SPEACrut Project Na FAG~.E A2IDWA2E
coic by , me-LEfeESM Dot. ntie -
Checked by Date Shee4 ot
~ Notes
~ Fv- Q Lalcuiotlons ~
r _
~!~►II~1~11(l~ll Illll~i~'~~~~
r
-1)G u ~E! ~ ! I I ! E ' ~ _ ~
-y ~ ~~i►
~ _
_~_9 i 1 i~ f! I~ I I I I! I► I_~_ E`a
,~i ~ ~~~•~e~,
• . ~
~ ,~s~ ~ ~ ~ , ► ► ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ l~ I ( 1 ~ , _ ~ ~ ~
~ al ~I Illll i !l~~'~
' ~___.I 1•'' I I,-,f a ~ I ,,'4 _ ly c`~
,
I_ I I!~_~ I I I f I I I i ! 1
.
l, f I l! 1 I 1 I~ f I I~3~ ~
Ip ; I I I 1!! I I 1 _ ! l I
l 1 I 1_ l_ l 1 i I-~~ ! i { I ~
_
I_ r i I I i I i ~ { ~ I i! l _ I ~ I! I l
I 1 ~ ~ I ► I i i► f I~ ~ I~ [ i i I I I~ I i~ f~
C i ~ i i► ~ i~ ° I i i I
I 1_ ~ C-1 177 I 0 I-LI I I I ~ DI
I I I l I I ~ I I_ _ I~ l _
I I ! T ~ [ I I I~ ~ ~ i I I~ I I~ { I I' i - I
I ' I~ I~~ I ! l~ 1~~~~ I I~ ! i I 1 I I
l l l l 1 I ~ 9 1 [ 1 1 1 1 I f I ~
Iu I_I I~--
~ i ~ I ► o~c~~-~2~~ ~ /Y~ E; vE2 ~ - ~ - - ~
~~4 ~ I I 1 l! 1 I~ I I I I
l~ iT
i I ~I_ B 1 I I I_.I I~ 1~1 _ I _ I
I l I 1 I f l~ I I
~ 1 I~' ~ 1 1 I I I P (I
_ I
I ~ I i I 1~ I ~ I I~ (
I ~ I I I 1 ( - ~ ~ ,1 _
I _ ~I f I I I i~ f I
I~I I f~ I 1
I IF-I 1 I i 1 L _J- L
i
4 ~
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
DEl'ARTMENT OF BU1LDiNGS • A DIVIS[OV OE THE PIiBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
jAMES L MANSON C B O DIRECTOR DENNIS M SCOTT P E DIRECTOR
TO Francine Shaw, Planning Department
Ken Jeffrey, Department of 8uildinqs
Bob Turner, Division of Engineerirg & Roads
Terry Chambers, Health District
Paul Chase, Fire District #1
FROM Marcia McGarrigle, Office Assistant
Department of Buildinqs
DATE October 27, 1993
RE Correction to 10/18/93 Pre-Application Conference
Summary - 5204 East Spraque Avenue
CORRECTION TO SiMIIKARY OF CONFERENCE
ENGINEERING i ROADS (456-3600) CONTACT: HOB TQRNER
DELETE
*
pAM
ADD
* Road plans requiredf bond can be submitted.
Please revise your summary accordingly Should you have any
questions or need additional information, please feel free to
contact me
mim
cc Eagle
JUB Engineers
Sconzo/Hallstrom
Dennis Scott, Public Works Director
Kelle Viqeland, SCAPCA
VYTST 1026 BROADWAY SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 (509) 456-3675
FAX (509) 4564703
t 4L
~
S p O K A N' E C O U N T Y
OFFiCfi OF THS COUNTY ENCIIVEER • A DMSION OF THB PU81-[C WORKS DEPARTMENT
Ronald C Horm,ann. P fi County Engineer DeiuNS M. Soott P.E. Dlrechor
TO Lorne Lakshas
Division of Buildings
]1tOM Bob Turner
Division of Engineering and Roads
DATE November 30, 1993
BIISJECT SEPA checklist for E 5204 Sprague, Eagle Hardware
Lorne,
The SEPA checklist for the Eagle development should be modified in the
Transportation Section as follows
The applicant shall dedicate to Spokane County sufficient right-of-way to
implement Typical Roadway Section No 1, Minor Arterial Standard A copy of
the section is included and illustrates 32 feet of right-of-way from the
center line of the road
W 1026 Broadway Ave Spokane WA 99260-0190 (504) 456-3600 FAX (509) 456-4715
~ d
e 3 ~ . 0:_ ~ ?
l ~~-I d
If 2~a`
~ 3.~►'Y~
, ~s . W
i ~
n
10 _ ~a "
a ~
2
131
~0
.
Q m ~
d~ a
a w
~
N
Q
~u #a
1 00~
LL
e
~u s
~
.
2 4
0 d~~ sa°
~ Z a~
o a o lo 2
. ~
.0
3 u~ ~ o ►
~ ~2 u a O_ !
W ~ ~ ~ A1
~ di I
4
3 u ~ )s
i
au _
~
d d
~ '
a
w v.
( 9
f G
t ~l
.
~
.r C
~ -
GIFFORO C011BSULTANTB. IiYC E-1429-03
l Geotechnical Engineers
2020 E Springfield e Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone (509) 534-3670 • Fax 534-2925
November S. 1993
Eagle Hardware, Inc
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
919 - 124th Ave NE, Su1te 101
Bellevue, Washington 98005
Attn Mr Thomas A Sconzo
President
EBPLORATIONB AND GEOT$CMIICAL ENGI1EERING STIIDIES FOR T8E
PROP08ED NEW EAGLE HARDAARF BTORE, BPRAGiIIE AVM-IIL, SPORANE,
WA88INGTON
IMRODIICTION _
This letter report presents the results of field explorations and
qeotechnical enqineerinq studies that were conducted for the
proposed new Eaqle Hardware Store, in Spokane, Washington The
purpose of the work was to evaluate subsurface conditions at the
site and to develop recomiaendations for foundation desiqn and
construction The pro3ect was accomplished in general accordance
with our proposal lettertof October 14, 1993, which was
authorized on the same date.
' During the course of the field work, the project scope was
increased to include performinq in-place periaeability testing to
develop soxl properties for storm drainage dry well design
purposes Aaecond expansion of the oriqinal scope of work to
include excavatinq a series of exploratory test pits for sanitary
waste drainfield design purposes was discussed but has not been
authorized.
Tlfe followinq report describes the geotechnical work that was
accomplished and eur recommendations for foundation desiqn and
construction We will call you in a few days to follow up on
your receiving it, your uriderstandfnq of the conclusions and
recomaendations, and answer any questions you may haveRECEIVED
NOV Z 3 1993
CODE ENFORCEMENT
Anen e otnoro P E -
Prosido+t
Eaqle Hardware, Inc E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November S. 1993
Paqe 2
PROJECT DE3CRIPTION
We understand that Eaqle Hardware plans to construct a new retail
store on the site of the present Sprague Avenue Fred Meyer Store
See Fig 1 The work will include demolltion of the existinq
store and construction of a new build2mg. The new building will
have an approximate footgriat area of about 124,000 8F. The
project also Zncludes providing parkiaq apaces !or approuimately
550 vehicles
The structural engineer, Mt. Alx Hukair of Enqineers Northwest,
indicated that the column spacinq for the new structure will be
about 50 by 50 ft He estimated that the interior column loads
will be approxs.mately 115 ksps each. Perimeter walls will
consist of 6 5 in thick, pre-cast, tilt-up elements Non-
bearing perimeter walls are expected to have unit loadings of
about 2 kips per linear foot Bearinq walls are expected to have
unit loadings of approximately 3 klps per linear foot The
structure will have an interior clear beight of about 22 ft The
buildinq will have a slab-on-grade floor system capable of
supporting 200 to 250 psf
SIIBSURFACE EBPLORATIONS
Geotechnical Borinqs
On October 20-22, 1993, a series of eiqht esploratory boriaqs
were made at the approximate locations shown on Fiq 2, to
determine the nature of the subsurface conditions at the site.
These holes were identified as the 100 Series borinqs The
borings were drilled using a CME-75, truck-mounted, hollow-steaa
auger drill riq. Standard Penetration Tests were conducted at
2 5 ft depth intervals, in qeneral accordance with ASTM D 1586
This test procedure involves drivinq a 2 in 0 D by 1 5 in I D
standard split-spoon sampler 18 ins with a 140 lb hammer,
freely falling a distance of 30 ins Blow counts were recorded
for each 6 in increment of penetration The total of the last
12 ins of penetration is defined as the Standard Penetration
Resistance, or N-value This is an empirical parameter which can
be correlated to various soil enqineering properties and is often
used to establish the consistency of cohesive soils and the
relative density of qranular soils
. .
.
•
9
Eagle 8ardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
NOVembex 8, 1993
Page 3
Percolation Test Borinqs
On October 25, 1993, three percolatioa test boriaqs were made at
the approximate locations shown on Fiq Z These holes were
identified as the 200 Series borinqs. Each boring was extended
to a depth of about 13.5 ft , usinq a 7-1/4 in. diameter auger
No specific sampling was conducted. 3oi1 descriptsons were based
on the visual appearance of cuttinqs that were augered to the
surface The holes caved below 5 ft when the auger was removed
and before the temporary 6 in diameter test casinq could be
gully inserted The testinq, therePore, had to be conducted in
4 to 5 ft, deep holes Results of the percolation tests are
described in a subsequent section
A total of 169.7 linear feet of drzllsaq was accoa►plished Forty
Standard Penetratioa Tests were conducted and 39 sosl saaspies
were recovered Relative qround surface elevations were obtained
by a level survey, referenced to the floor Zn the existing Fred
Meyer Store Summary boring logs are shown on Fiq 5 through 11.
Ground water was not encountered in any og the borings conducted
for this project The site is located over the Spokane Aquifex
and, at t,his location, the depth to ground water is believed to
be about 40 to 50 ft below existing ground surface
LABORATORY TESTING
Soil materials were visually classified as they were recovered in
the field and then were re-evaluated in the laboratory, in
general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System as
described by ASTM D 2487. Natural mofsture aonteats were
determined on each of the recovered samples, in general
accordance with AsTrt D 2216. Moisture contents are shown plotted
on the boring logs, Figs 5 throuqh 11
Three qraia size analyses were conducted in general accordance
wlth ASTM D 422. Because of the relatively small quantity of
the sosl available from the drive sampling, several samples were
combined for these analyses Results are shown plotted on Fiq.
3 Particles qreater than 1 5 ins. Zn dianieter could not be
recovered because of the relatively sntall diameter of the
samplinq tool. Therefore, the gradation curves shown on Fig 3
are indicative of only the 1 5 in and smaller fraction of soil
present at the site Soil materials that were brought to the
surface by the auqe= during drilling indicated that a
considerable amount may be greater than 1 5 ins in diameter
Eagle gardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November 8, 1993
Paqe 4
This condition was considered during development of the final
sample descriptians
8II88IIRFACE INTEAPRETATION
The project site is located near the west end and on the south
side of the Spokane Valley This topographic feature consists of
a long, broad, east-west trending trough that was carved out of
ancfent metamorphic bedrock and overlying basalt flows during
catastrophic qlacial flooding Succeedinq flooding events
deposited coarse qrained alluvial soils throughout the valley,
f311ing it with sand and gravel and cobbles and boulders At the
surface, the flooding left alluvial plains and outwash terraces,
consistinq of th-ick sequences of sand and sandy gravel A thin
topsoil cover developed on top of the sandy gravel, partially
derived from wind blown silts and volcanic ash The alluvial
soils underlying the Spokane Valley provide a vast water storaqe
reservoir, which the U S EPA has designated a"Sole Source
Aquifer" Ths.s is the main source of drinkinq water for some
400,000 people in the Spokane-Coeur d'Alene area
The subsurface soils at this site consist primarily of coarse
grained alluviwa, derived from qlacial floodinq Generally, only
two dfstinct sofl units were encountered in the borings
• S i ity, saudy aRAvEL (FILL )
• Nat3,ve, saady GRAV$L
Eacb of these units can be described in general terias, as
follows•
831ty, saady GxAvzL (FILL) was encountered in all site borinqs,
down to about 3 ft below ground surface It was descrfbed as
consisting of loose to medium dense, dark brown, silty, sandy
GRAvEL (occasionally described as qravelly s-WID) and was
typically moist Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow count
values ranged from 4 to greater than 50 blows per foot and
averaged about 18 blows per foot Natural moisture contents
ranged froia 8 5 to 12 9 percent and averaqed about 11 2 percent.
Individual pieces of gravel were described as round to
subrounded. Much of the FILL sofl appears to be native soil that
has been rearranqed in place, probably as part of oriqY.nal site
qradinq operations Hased on the performance of the drillinq
equipment and materials that were brouqht to the surface by tlle
auqer, much of this upper soil unit includes 2 to 4 in. qravel
A gradation analysis performed on a composite of the SPT
r
s
Eagle Hardware, Inc E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstxom Arcbitects
November 8, 1993
Page 5
recovered samples shows about 54 percent was qravel size, 28
percent sand size, and 18 percent silt and clay size material
Native, sandy GRAVEL was encountered below the GRAVEL (FILL)
This soil unit extended the full depth of the bori.nqs and
probably extends much deeper than the 20 ft that was santpled
It was described as consisting of inedium dense to dense, brown,
sliqhtly silty to clean, sandy M vEL (occasionally descrfbed as
gravelly sAND) It was typically moist. Moisture contents
appeared to decrease with increasing depth. Samples from about
4 ft deep had low, average, and high mofsture contents of 5 7,
9 0 and 13 9 percent, respectively For samples from about 20
ft deep, low, averaqe, and high moisture contents were 2.0, 2 5
and 2 9 percent, respectively
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow count values for the native,
sandy GRAVEL ranqed from 10 to greater than 50 blows per foot and
averaged about 28 blows per foot. In some instances where the
measured blow counts were qreater than 50 blows per foot, the
sampler was probably driving into an over-size cobble or boulder
These hiqher blow counts probably do not reflect the real
relative density of the soil unit SPT blow counts typically
increased witb increasing depth. There was a sls.qht decrease in
penetration resistance at about 14 ft , but overall penetration
resistance, as measured by blow counts, increased at a rate of
about 1 3 per lineal foot of increasing depth
A gradation analysis was conducted on a composlte of the SPT
samples recovered from a depth of 4 to 5 ft , in the zone where
proposed new footings may be expected to be placed Results show
t.hat about 64 percent was gravel size, 26 pexcent was sand size,
and 10 percent was silt and clay size material
CONCLIISIONS AND RECOMIIriENDATIONB
General Site PreDaration
In our opinion, a ma]or part of the site preparation work for the
proposed new Eagle I3ardware Store project include demolition of
the existinq buildinq and removal of existinq underground
utilities Once the existinq buildinq is down, we recommend
thorouqhly removinq all old foundation elements. If old
foundations extend below depths proposed for new foundations, we
recommend that the difference in grade be made up by using
compacted structural Fxll If existing underground utilities are
present beneath proposed new buildinq areas, we recommend that
they be completely removed Under proposed paved areas, it may
Eaqle Hardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November 8, 1993
Paqe 6
be possible to abandon existing underqround utilities in place,
providing that all pipes are qrouted and the backfill over them
is thoroughly proof-compacted
Explorations show that the asphalt pavement in the existinq
parkinq area on the north ssde of the site is about 2 to 3 ins
thick There does not appear to be much, if any, base course
beneath the asphalt surfacinq In our opinion, all of the
existinq asphalt surfacs.nq in the proposed new building area
should be thoroughly stripped and removed from the site.
Althouqh the borings show that most of the near-surface soil
underlying the new building area fs medium dense, we reconumend
that a thorough proof-rolling operat3.on be conducted to fmprove
the general relative density of the subgrade Proof-rolling
should be done after the pavement surface is removed and rough
site qradinq is complete We recommend using a minimunt 10 ton
static weight, vibratory roller for this work and planning to
make at least four passes over the building footprint area This
work should be observed by an experienced qeotechnical engineer,
or engineering technician, to identify soft and loose zones that
may require over-excavation and replacement with compacted
Structural Fill
Escavations, 8ackfilliaq and 6tructural Fiii
In addition to a shallow general excavation to rentove existing
surface pavement, other excavations on the order of 3 to 8 ft
deep will probably be required for new foundations and new
underground utilities In our opi.riion, all of the excavation
work can probably be conducted with conventional equipment, such
as tractor-mounted backhoes and rubber-tired loaders Since
stable excavations are related to job safety, excavation
stability should be the responsibility of the Contractor All
excavations should conform to applicable Federal, State, and
local standards
In our oplnion, based on samples recovered from the exploratory
borings, the oa-sste aoils would classify as osBA Type C for
excavation purposes. For this soil classification, OSHA (and WAC
296-155-664, Part N) recommends that all unsupported, simple
slope excavations, 20 ft deep or less, have a maxuawa allowable
temporary construction slope anqle of 1.5 H on 1 0 V. Dependinq
on actual soil conditions encountered at the site, it may be
possible to safely use steeper excavation slopes This
condition, however, should be evaluated at the time of
construction
Eaqle Hardware, Inc E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November 8, 1993
Paqe 7
In our opinion, the existinq ffll and native soils enaountered in
the borinqs at this site would be suitable for reuse as compacted
Structural Fill, provided that the moisture content can be
controlled and the maxi.mum particle size is li.mited to 4 ins
For imported Structural Fill, we recommend usinq soil consisting
of clean, well graded sand and gravel, havinq a maximum particle
ss.ze of 4 ins. and not more than 15 percent passinq the
No 200 sieve, based on the minus 3/4 in fraction That portion
passing t,he No 200 sfeve should be non-plastic. Al1 imported
Structural Fill sofl should be laboratory compaction tested and
reviewed by the soils enqineer
Subqrade Preparation
our recommendations for subgrade preparation prior to the
placement of Structural gill, or concrete for new footings or
slabs-on-qrade are generally similar Orice the excavation qrade
is established, we recoYmnend scarifying the subqrade surface to a
depth of about 6 ins and conditioninq the soil with mossture, or
allowinq it to dry, as necessary If the subgrade is to support
new footings, we recommend compactinq the surface to obtain a
minimum of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor Maximum Dry Density
prior to settinq forms and placiriq concrete
If the desiqn elevation is at a hiqher qrade and requires the
placement of Structural Fill, we recommend scarifying the
subqrade and mixinq with about 6 ins of the proposed Structural
Fill material Thfs initial 6 in. layer should then be compacted
with several passes of the compaction equipment to obtain a
minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor followed by
placing and compactinq succeeding lifts of structural Fill
material We recommend that all compaction specifications for
this project refer to percentaqe densities determined on the
basis of the Modified Proctor Maximum Dry Density, usinq AA88T0 T
180
The Structural Fill should be brought to optimum moisture content
(±2%), then placed in maximwa 10 fne thick loose lifts, and
compacted to produce a density of not less than 95 percent.
Laboratory compaction testing should be performed on all
potential Structural Fill soil to establish moisture and density
criteria before fill placement In our opinion, field compaction
will probably be best accomplished with a vibratory compactor.
We recommend that Structural Fill placement and compaction be
iaonitored by an experienced qeotechnical enqineer, or enqineering
technician, representing the Owner
Eagle Hardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November 8, 1993
Paqe 8
To provide a reasonable level of quality assurance for Structural
Fill compactfon, we recommend that one field density test be
performed for every 250 cubs.c yards of Structural Fs.ll placed, or
for every 500 square yards of area compacted Tests should also
be conducted if there is a change in the soil moisture or
gradation, or if the compaction equipment is chanqed Additional
laboratory compaction tests should be performed if the gradation
changes
Fouadations
=n our opinfon, the new foundations gor the proposed building at
this site could be supported on shallow spread footings, bearing
in the native, sandy gUvEL, or in compacted Structural Fill
For either condition, we recommend using a maximwa allowable net
soil bearing pressure of 3,000 paf for sizing new footings No
foundations should bear on existing fill, or any other loose or
unsuitable soils that may be encountered during excavation
The 31000 psf soil bearing pressure is based on the estimated
engineering properties of the native, sandy gRAVEL that appear to
be present at a depth of about 3 ft below existing qround
surface across most of the site It assumes that footings have a
minimwm of 3 ft of total embedment for frost protection and a
minimura width of 2 ft for isolated footings. Continuous
footinqs should have a minimwa width of 1 5 ft For interior
footinqs, we recommend using a minunum embedment of 1 5 ft below
adjacent grade and reducing the allowable soil bearing pressures
to 2,000 psf Both of the recommended soil bearing pressures
include a factor of safety of about 3 and both could be lncreased
by one-third for transient loadi.riq conditions, such as those
resulting from wind or earthquake forces
We estinate that footinqs desiqned and constructed as described
above could settle approximately 0 25 to 0 75 inches Differen-
tial settlement between adjacent footings could ranqe from about
0 25 to 0 5 inches Because of the granular nature of the foun-
dation soils, we expect that settle.ntent will occur in an approxi-
mately elastic manner, almost as the loads are applied In this
case, the settlement will be essentially complete by the tine the
foundations are fully loaded and much of it will probably be
built out of the structure In our opinion, post-construction
settlement will probably be neqligible.
For footings constructed in the native, sandy GRAVEL, we recom-
mend that the final few inches of excavation be done by hand to
minimize excessive disturbance to the subqrade If the subgrade
,
Eagle Hardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November 8, 1993
Page 9
is disturbed durinq excavation, it may be necessary to tainp the
surface prior to forming and placing concrete. If loose or soft
subqrade soils are preserlt beneath footsngs, settlements greater
than those estimated above could occur
Immediately prior to placing concrete, the footinq subgrade
conditions should be verified by an experienced geotechnical
engineer or engineering technician to confirm that all loose
materials have been reanoved and that suitable bearinq exists
Latera3 forces from earth, wind, or seismic loadings will be
resisted by base friction and by passive earth pressure actinq
aqainst the buried portion of spread footinqs. In our opinion,
the passive earth psessure from compacted backfill aqainst the
sides of footings can be estunated usinq a soil pressure of
4003 psf, where H is the depth below adjacent grade in feet.
This loadinq will have a triangular distrzbutfon against the
outside of the footinq and the stem wall, with the maxinunt pres-
sure at the bottom It should be used wlth a factor of safety of
about 1 5 It also asswnes that all backfill around the footinq
is compacted as Structural Fill and that it extends beyond the
outside edqe of the footing a minimum Of two times the footing
embedment depth.
For sliding resistance at the base of footings, we recommend
using a coefficieat of slidiaq friation between mass concrete
and compacted Structural Fill, or native, sandy g.tAVEL, of 0.40
This value should also be used with a safety factor of about 1 5
The pro)ect site is located in 8eismfa Zone 28, as identified by
the 1991 IIniform Buildinq Code For structural design purposes,
the ses.smic zone factor would be 0 20 The site coefficient
would be 1 2
Below-Grade Walls
Below-grade walls, such as retaininq walls for truck doc3cs or
baseinent areas, should be desiqned for the lateral earth pressure
exerted by the soil backfill beinq retained. This loading will
have a triangular distribution against the backside of the wall,
with the maximum pressure at the bottom Retaining walls that
are not restrained from lateral movement at the top can be de-
siqned for an active earth pressure condition, usinq an equiva-
lent fluid pressure of 408 psf, where H is the height of the
backfill If the top of the retaining wall is restrained from
lateral movement, such as would be the case if attached to a
floor system before backfillinq beglns, it should be desiqned for
Eaqle Hardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November 8, 1993
Paqe 10
the at-rest earth pressure condition For this case, we recam-
mend using an equivalent fluid pressure of 608 psf. Both earth
pressure values assume that the wall backfill is qranular soil
and the walls are fully drained, so there is no additional
hydrostatic pressure
Slabs-on-arade
In our opinion, tbe compacted Structural Fill, or proof-compacted
native soil, will be capable of supportinq slab-on-qrade floor
loadings, which we estimate could be on the order of 200 to 250
psf We recommend that subgrade surfaces for slab-on-grade areas
be proof-compacted and then capped with a mitismum 4 inch layer of
3/4 inch minus, crushed rock base course to provide uniform
support. Both the gravel base coarse and the subgrade below it,
either native soil or Structural Fill, should be compacted to 95%
of the Modif ied Proctor Maxunum Dry Density We recoaumend that
laboratory compact3.on testinq be performed prior to field
placement on representative portions of materials proposed for
use as slab base course, as well as slab subqrade.
Typical current desiqn for slabs-on-grade usually includes a
vapor barrier overtop of the crushed rock base course and a 2 in
layer of sand over the vapor barrier. The sand layer helps
promote uniform curinq of the slab For best performance, the
degree of saturation of the sand layer should be less than 50%
prior to placinq the slab concrete In our opinion, these
additional provisions for slab-on-qrade construction are impor-
tant for interior floors that will be surfaced with tile, carpet-
ing, or epoxy coatinqs
site Drainaqe aad Peraolation Testfnq
Runoff from roof drains and pavements should be collected and
discharqed into storm sewers, drainaqe swales, or other storm
drainage facilities. In our opinion, the permeability of the
native soils at the estimated elevations of drywells for this
site will be relatively high.
Three fn-place percolation tests were performed at the
approximate locations shown on Fiq. 2 These tests were planned
to be conducted in general accordance with the Spokane County
Engineerinq Department Interim Guidelines. These typically
require installing a temporary test casing to a depth of about
Laqle Hardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November S, 1993
Paqe 11
12 ft Aowever, when cavinq so11 prevented the full lenqth
insertion of the 6 in diameter temporary casinq, Mr Jim
McElfresh the County Inspector authorized on-site modifications
and allowed the tests to be conducted at shallower depth. The
following table suminarizes the results of the percolation
tests.ng
SIIMMY OF PLRCOLATION TEST RESIILTB
B-2 O1 8-2 02 B-2 03
Test Locationm
Soil Type & Thickness
•Silty, Satidy GRAVE'L; (FILL) 0-2.0' 0-1 5' 0-2.0'
•Native, Sandy G~ 2 0-13 5' 1 5-13.5' 2 0-13.5'
Caving Depth 4 5-13.5' 5.0-13 5' 4.0-13.51
Casing Depth 4.5' 5 0l 4 0'
Casing Volume 6.6 gal 7 3 gal. 5.9 qal.
Inflow Rate 22 gpm 20 qpm 20 qpm
Inf low Time Perf od0) 9 min. 8 m.fn 12 mf n.
Total Inflow Volume 195 qal. 151 gal. 240 gal
Estimated Soil Permeability 67 ft/mfn 52 ft/min 83 ft/min.
MSee Fig 2
MA static water level could not be established in
these holes.
The results of the above tests show that the subsurface soils at
this site are highly permeable The Soil Conservation Service
Spokane County Soil Survey (1968) shows this area mapped as
Garrison qravelly laam and describes it as being hiqhly
permeable The Spokane County Gti.idel.Lnes for Storm Water
Management lists this soil type as beinq suitable for dry wells
for storm water ds.sposal Because the soil has very rapid
permeability, dry wells should be used in conjunction with
appropriate storia water detention systems to minimize the risk of
introducinq hazardous materials into the qround water.
If dry wells are used for storm water dralnaqe disposal, we
recommend that they be located at least 30 ft away from the
proposed new structure Tightlines for control of roof drainage
should be provided with cleari-outs at strateqlc locations to
allow for periodic maintenance Desiqn of final grading for the
site should promote drainaqe away from the new building
Eagle Hardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November S. 1993
Paqe 12
Pavement Desiqn Reaommendatfons
We anticipate that much of the existinq pavement will be damaqed
as a result of installinq new underqround utilities. In
addition, because of the generakly poor condition of the existing
pavement surfacing, we recommend the Eaqle Hardware project plan
on all new paveaaent for parkinq arid access roadways Except
where utility trenches are backfilled with Structural F111, most
of the new pavement subgrade will probably consist of the silty,
sandy GR4VEr4 (FILL) that appears to underlie the existinq
pavements
We estimate that the existinq aubqrade soil would have a Modified
Proctor maximwa dry density of about 235-140 pcf, an optimum
moisture content of about 4 to 6 percent, and a C8R value oP
about 30-35. IIsing these approximate values, and assuminq the
subqrade is compacted to 95 percent of the Modified Proctor and
the project requires a 20-year pavement life, we recommaend using
a minimwn of 2 ias. of asphalt surfacinq over 6 inse of arushed
rock base course !or parkiaq area pavements and 3 ins. of asphalt
over 8 ins. of crushed rock for d,riveways, truck access lanes,
and other areas subjected to heavy traffic loadinqs
The crushed roak base course should meet the gradation
requirements described in the 1991 Standard Specifications for
Road, 8ridqe, and Municipal Construction, Washington State
Department of Transportation Section 9-03 9(3), as follows:
Sieve Number percent passing
1-1/4 in square 100
5/8 in square 50-80
1/4 in square 30-50
U S No. 40 75
U S No 200 <7 5
Mini.mum t Fracture 75
Minimum Sand Equivalent 40%
Note All percentaqes are by weight.
The crushed rock base course should be placed in a single lift
and compacted to a density of not less than 95 percent of the
Maxuaum Density, as determined by the Modified Proctor (AASHTO T-
180) We recommend that the native soils makinq up the subgrade
beneath the base course also be compacted to 95 percent
t
Eaqle Hardware, Inc. E-1429-03
c/o Sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November 8, 1993
Paqe 13
The asphalt pavement surfacing mate.rial should meet the
specifications for Class B asphaltic concrete, as described in
the 1991 Standard Specificatfons for Road, Bridge, and Municipal
Construction, Washington State DOT, Section 9-03 S. We recommend
compacting it to 92 percent of the theoretical maximum, as
determined by WSDOT Test Method 705
LIMITATIONS
The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contafned in this
report are based on our interpretation of subsurface conditions
and assume that the information obtained from the exploratory
borings is representatfve of the subsurface conditions throuqhout
the site If subsurface conditions different from those encoun-
tered in the explorations and described herein appear to be pres-
ent beneath the site durinq construction, we should be advlsed at
once, so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our
recomendations
If there is a substantial lapse af t3.me between submission of
this report and the start of work at the site, or if conditions
have changed due to natural causes or construction operations at
or adjacent to the site, or if the buildinq location is chanqed,
we sbould be advised at ance, so that we can review these condi-
tions and reconsider our recommendations
We reaomiaend that we be retained to revlew those portions of the
plans and specifications which pertain to earthwork and founda-
tions to determine that they are consistent with our recominenda-
tions We also recommend that we be =etained to observe founda-
tion construction, particularly site preparation, subqrade evalu-
atlon, Structural Fill placelnent, footing excavations, and any
other earthwork or foundation field operations that may be
necessary
This report does not include a review of historical data, sam-
pling, reconnaissance, or testing to assess the presence of any
hazardous substances that may be present on the site.
Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered and cannot
be fully determined by merely taking soil samples or making ex-
plorations Unexpected conditions often require that additional
Eagle Hardware, Inc E-1429-03
c/o sconzo-Hallstrom Architects
November S, 1993
Paqe 14
expenditures be made to obtain a properly constructed project.
For this project, we recommend establishing a continqency fund to
accomiaodate such unexpected foundation conditions
Sincerely, GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC
s ~ ` • ~
8rian W Binsf ld, E I T
Geotechnical Engineer
-in ~
~N 6 G~0
W"~►i,yo?
. ~
14 t19 ~ GG2
F ~a -l"1J
Allen B. Giff
President
EXPIRES 05123/ai ~
Encl Fig 1- Vicins.ty Map
Fig 2- Borinq Location Plan
Fig 3 - Gradation Analysis
Fig 5-11 - Summary Borinq Loqs B-101 through B-108
s
~
a► ~
saa~. r.
PROJECT SITE I soo
T., ..~~I al ► da ~
Lr~-
D man
Y
M ~
s 500
~ ~
~
~
~ ~ ow
~ ~ ~ s
n
~ M` wi4a 2 4
15QD
a..,
V ~
~ t .
~ r
v .
W aaao
•~+w !
k ~
s ~
Ne ~ s.a 23 TZBN RME
~
co SPOKANEe WASHINOTON
I
Y
V
m
is
K}
~
Q'
O
~
0
y N
~
a NO SCALE
NEW EAGLE HARDWARE
VICINITY MAP
~ NOV 1993 E 1429-03
r aiFMtW coKSUMaNrs. INc l
` GL.~. GEOTEMUM" amamm } FIG. 1
~
~ _ 2020 s. t«IMorr.is 0 as.k,A.,, wah. 99102 1
N spRaauE AvENuE
~ ~
~ ~ao3 L J zoz
~
PARKtNG
i ~
19tos 11103
~
~ C
' I 107 ■O2 i 201
O 1 I '
PROPOSED NEIAI ~
cc ~ I EAGiLE HAFtDWARE ~
104 j
m z
cc I I e,.. ,
~r ~ ~---~------J
.r I
106
!
I I
~
~ ~
m ,
101
~ 105
~S ~ ~ ~o- - ~
~
M
- - - - - - r
.
~ o sP 100
o ~ SCALE IN FEET
~
0
LEGEND '
~106 G~~~ ~noN NEW EAGLE HAROWARE
,
~9zo1 PERcoLXIIoa TE,sr BoaM uOcATIoH BORIIVG LOC~1`t1ON PLAN
m t ~ NOV 1993 E• 1429•03
•~r~ ciFMo coNSUUnMs iNc
c
` NoTL TMIS oRaNnNQ~ noAPTEo FaoM IG...~L. GlamommL Diamon
FiG. 2
, o UPDATED SCONZO•HAL.1.8TROAA DAAW1NQ 1020 a svMngfW 0 evor.m waak. as:s:
Orawn By-z9,9 Orwg oate I/ ~ y3 Checked By FtelG Rep
SI EYE ANAl1Si S NIDaOMETER ANAtYSI S
Sitt Of OPEMiM6 IM INCN[! ~ NuweEA Oi uEtM PEI INCH U T 9TANOAAO , 6A41N fllE tN N11
«
~ ♦ \ O p O O b O~ • q N ~ O O O O O O
M ~ ~ PI MI ~ A • M q G O O O O O O O O O O
10 0 - ~ 0
~ _ -
~ - ~
1 1 I -
90 10
80 r-7- 20
10 30 ~
Cis
ibc 80 .40 ac
W
m m
w so ~ ~ - so y
- ~ _
o `
z 40
B0 ~
CA: ~
W ~
o. 70 ~ B - T0 w
4
.
20 eo
s0 80
0 0 ~ O IG, O m O ~ rl {'e ~ O 10 • N N • O HI - O IY • R p ^ I O O
O O O a m ~ H N O O O O O O O O O O o O
" a" " GAAIN SIIE (N MIIIINETERS o 0 0 0 0 0
C08BLES COApSE ~ FINE ^COARgE ~ Y[OIUY ~ fIME FIHES 1
iA411E1 SlNO
AMOIt OEP1H ii U S C CLASSIFICATION _ ~N~r x LL
P' New Eag1e Nazdware Store
A 1 5-3' - Near surface silty sand GRAVEL (CILL) 8 1 ConpoSlte Gradations
(5 samples)
i B 1 5-3' - GRAIN Sltf CLASSIFICATION
Parking area subgrade, silty, sandy GRAVCL 5 5
(FILL) (2 samples)
Novenber 1993 E-14 29-03
C 3 5-5' - Native sandp GRAVEL (6 sanples) , 4 4 GIFFORD CONBULTANTB INQ
~ Qeotechntcel Engineere
. ,
-ZQ * IANUAKU
SOIL OESCRIPTiON Os PENETRA?ION RE3ISTANCE
5 W • Blows per foot
Surtace Elevatiorc 100 0 p~ 03: ou. O 25 5p
ASPHALT PAVFMM
Mediwn dense, brawn, s i].ty, sandy ~
GRAVEL ( FILL), mOist
~
1 ~ 25
~
3 0 - o,
Medi.um dense to very derise, brown, S
slightly sil.ty, samdy GRA►VEL, mozst, ~
occasional cobbles 2
~ • 5 0
a)
~
~
w ~
~
3 ~ 7 5 s A .
~o
'r 3
~
= Cobbly zone at 9 f t 4 ~ 50,41(
• ♦
w
w r~ 10 0 On Y'bck ~
>
~
12 5
a
m
~
~ w
~
Q
M
" 5
• A
" 15 0
~
~
T
~
~
~
= 17 5 U
w
~
59 J
~ 6 • vn rock A
° 'ZO 0 " 2D 0
~ eottam of Bor3.ng - Completed 10/20/93
~
s
~
0
LEGEND 0 10 20
• 96 WATER CONTENT
I 2' O D Splft-Spoon Sampte Impenrious Seal
~ 3' O 0 ThtR-Well Semple ` Water levei New Eagle Hardwc"re
* Sempte Not Reaovered ~ Ptezometer Tto ~ L o G O F B O R t N G N O 101
~
~ Plaauc wmtt Liquld Umit pctober 1993 E- la a9-03
` ~IOTEnThe strattfication lInoe r~eeent ths.app~Ipxlmete ` w.~www ww.~.. 1
PENETRATION RESISTANCE
SOIL DESCRIPTION ♦ Blows per toot
aee Qevatlon 9+ 7 ull I o
o O 10 26r Sp
Surl ?
ASPHALT PAVENM /-~O 25
Very dense, Yrown/ sandy GRAVEL ( FILL) ♦ OPM
moist ~
25 s 5OJ3P •
3 0 cn on roc
Medivm dense, brawn, s13.ghtly si.lty, ~
sandy GRA,VEL,, mo3.st 2 ~
~ ♦ 0
5 0
s~
~
b
w ~
41
3 0 75 0 A '
0
a~
w ~
m y
~
v
3 ~
c 4
N lO O
a ~
tm
~
12 5
a
m
~
~ w
~
0
M
Loose and wet zone at 14 f t 5 *A
15 0
~
~
~
u
1? 5
~
z
u
Cobbly and wet below 18 f t "
M
'19 3 b ~ 50(3" -
` bottom of Boruig - Cartpleted 10/20i93 Zp p °n =°ek
m
~
~
V
~
a ' o to 20
LE G E N D • 96 WATER CONTENT
I 2' 0 D Split-Spoon 3ample Impervioua Seal
II s' 0 0 Thin-Wail 3ampie ` water Lsvet New Eagle Hat~dware
* 3ample Not Recovered ~ Ptesometer rv L O G O F 60 R i N G N Q 102
~ Plastla LlmttLIquld Llmft
c october 1993 E- la 29-0 3
` NOTE The atratltlcatioA ilnea reprseent ths epprxtmote
bounderlsa befween sei, l~rs~*+ Th• actuat traniit~ons R►ey jCIlFFClRO CONSULTANYS IN(` -
5uIL utac.Kir I iun 0.i F o` rcnc & An & aVe~1 MCa1~ 1 ANt.t
W c ♦ 81ows per toot
sur1ace Qevettorc 93 5 0IL ~ 03: ob p 25
so
ASPHALT PAVFMENT 1~•~5 1 j
~
~
Medium dense, dark brown, silty, sandy
GRAVEL, moi.st 1
2 5 s -s
Y
r%
w ~
~
2 ~
♦ •
'5 0 ~ 5 0
~
Bottam of Boring - Canpleted 10/21/93 0
~
7 5
0
Y
~
V
c
Q
.r
~
.r
~
~
a
v
~
~
0
~
~
o-
~
.o
~
Y
~
U
A
~
1
O
~
7
a
o~
s
~
0
LEGEND 0 10 zo
• 96 WATER CONTENT
I 2' O 0 Split-Spoon Sample Impervious Seai New Eagl,e Hardware
]I 3' O D ThirrWall Semple ` Water Leve!
Sample Not Recovered ~ Piezometer 'np L G ~ F B R I N G N O.~ 3
Plasttc limit Liqutd Umlt
= October 1993 E-1429-03
o ~iOTE The stratlilcetton Ilnea repreeent the apprQ xlmate 1
0 ounderles between soit typee The ectue! tteneltlons may ` pIFFORD CONSULTANT8. INC + Cir c
ho #4 oA es -w- -__e_
SOIL DESCRIPTION o~ ~ PENETRATtON RE318TANCE
pc W ♦ Blows per toot
suriace Eievatiorc 94 1 03 0~. 0 25 60
ASPHALT PAVEMENT ~ 0 25
Loose, brown, silty, sandy GRAVEL
( FILL ) , croist ~
1 an
1 2.5 A i .
3 0 I
Medium dense to dense, brvwn, slightly '-W ~
silty, sandy GRAVEL
2 5 ♦ ~
b 5 0 ~
~
w ~
~
V
3 7 5 • i
Y L
Y%
~
L
~
O 4 ~ A
~ lO O
>
cv o
Z
12 5
a
m
~
~ w
.r
b
..r
U. 5
• A
15 0
~
~
~
~
= 17 5
U
QM` w
~ 'ao o~ 20 0
~ eottam of Boring - Completed 10/21/93
o~
~
c LEGEND 0 10 zo
• 96 WATER CONTENT
I 2' O D Split-Spoon 8ample Impervtous Seal
II 3' O 0 Thin-Well Sample ` Water level New Eagle Hardware
* Semple Not Recovered ~ Piezometer Tip L O G O F B O R I N G N O. 104
~ Piastla Umlt liputd Llmlt
E Th
e stratlliaatlo Ilnea teQteaent the appr xlm4te ~tober ~.993 E-1429-03 detle~ between s01 tvoea Yhe " 1 zl tiat+alt~one ~nev ~ ra~-Fnpo C~t~ 114 ~ *NTS mFsI
~ 90OUTn
' ~ •v
SOlL DESCRIPTION ~ ~ o< v PENETRATION AESISTANCE
W a ~ • 81ows per toot
Surface Elevatlorr 100.2 p ~ v3 ou. 0 25 50
ASPHALT PAVIIMENT 0 25
/
Mediwn dense, brVwn> S ilghtly silty, ~
sandy GRAVEt., moist
1 2 5
w
H
2 ~ •A
~ s o ~
b
3,,,_ 50
/!D
on rock
~
~ 7 5
~ w W
0 4 3 • ♦
~ dft- lO O
~
a
~
0
z
a 12 5 '
m
~
M w
~
0
~
U. 5 ~
15 0 o~
o-
~c
a
~
Y
V
~ 17 5
~
~ w
`
~ 6 ,
~ • 57 •
r -2O 0 20 0
o Bottcm of Borung - Campleted 10/22/93
~
~
~
c
LEGEND ° 10 20
• 96 WATER CONTENT
I 2• o o scltt-sooon sennpie anvervtous seal New Eagle Hardware
~ 3' O 0 ThirrWall Sample ` Water level
* 3ample Not Recovered ~ Piezometer T1p L G O F B R I N G N O 10 5
a
~ Plastic Um1t Llquld Umlt
~ NOTE ~he atrstlilcatlon Iine• rapresent th• •voroxlmate ~obex 1993 E-14Z9-03
e bounda~ es between aoil types The •etuat transltton• may I alFFean CnNguL7,NT3_ IW[- j_._ _
~ PENETRATiQN RESI3TANCE
SQfL DESCRIPTCOIV dtaws per loot
,~y,
9urtaae Eteraelane 90 CU. ~ v3: LL D 28 50
ASPHALT FAVEMM D 25 - -
Medium dense, dart brown. S il#.y, sauady
GktAVEL ( FIiL), moist
1
2 5 A i ,
3 0
A2ediurn dense to denset brawn, slightly ~
sal#:y, sandy GRAVEL, moist 2 ~
~
cn 5 Q '
t
$4
m
b
~
7 S ~ A
c~ .
~
~
~
L ~
Q J~
~ .
~ 10 o
>
~
~
~
iz s ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
5
~
1s o ~
~
,
~
a
~
~ 1? 5
~
` 6 • A
° 2t}4 - 200 ~
n Bottam of Boring - Canpleted 10/22/'93
~
~
4
~ . . L-E-ra r; N D ° • % waTr ~a
coNrgNr
I 2' O D$plit-Spoon Sampie [mperWous S$a! New Eagle Hardwate
~ 3' 017 ThIrrWall Sample ~ Water Level
* Sample Not Recavered Plerosneter Tlp L O~~ F~~ ~f N~ N~ 10 ~
a
Pfastle l.~rndt L1qul~d L1mtr
~ OctobQr 1993 E-1429-03
~ AI4TE The strstlllc8tlon Iines ressnt the 8ppr ~timste
~ baurtdarfs~s het~ween rvtl types tre actval lrsnalt~ons may ~~~iFFORD CONS#JITANT9 INC t cti~ r.
~ S~DIL DESGRIPT[O~J ~ PE3~ ~ R~T10~ R~ $~~STIINCE
law p r ot
Su~a~ Elereuo~r 95 7 ,01 ~a: al! o 25 50
ASI~FiALT FA~P ~~-D. ZS
om~~ dark bLow1! Silty,, S~~ GRAY r,L ~
(FII+L mOiSt 1 ,
25 A
3 a -
~
Mediwm aense, brown, s].ightly si3.ty,,
sandy GRAVEL, noist 2 ~
~ !
~ s o
14
~
~
s
~
3
7.5
~
y ~
~
c 4
10 0 "
w ~
y ~
~
12 5 ~
0
~
~
~
-a
~
5 r
• A
15 0
4
~
~
~
~
~ 17.5
~
~
~
~
~ 6
L 20 0 20 0
~ Bottan af Honxig - Ccmpleted 10/21f93
~
a
~
L~ F. N D a • 96 wATE10 R CONTEMT' 2a
~ 2' d D Sptit-$poon Sampte impenrious Sea#
II 3' 0 0 Thirrwall samvre Water Le,rel New Eagl+e Hardware
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
t * Sampte Not Recaxered Piezometar TIp a LOG
~
~ Plastta Lierdt Liqutd LJmI!
~ OCtCbet 1993 E-1429-03
~ NOTE The stratEncatlon Ilnaa te rsa~ent the sRpr almale
boundarlea bst~+een aoll lyPea e aa#uei #ranait~ans may ~ i31i~Fi~~tD C+~t~~SULT~►NTS INC i~....
w' u $TANOAAO
- SOIL DESCRIPTION zzl PENETRATION RESISTANCE
a~ ~tu ♦ 81owe per toot
8urisee oevatlorr 916 oti ~ 03: ou.
0 25 80
ASPHALT PAVEMDD'T /-0 25
Loose to medium dense, dark browm, s ilty,
sandy GRPNEL ( FILL moist ~
1 ~ 2 5 -r► ~
u
~
~
~
2 3 A ~
5.0 5 0 .
Bottam of Boring - Ccmpleted 10/21/93
0
z
7 5 m
.0
to
~
~
0
~
N
>
O
C
a
m
L
~
V
~
U.
V
~
~
~
~
u
m
r
U
~
~
\
m
V
q
~
Cf
L
O LEGEND ° 10 20
• 96 WATER CONTENT
I I 2' O 0 Sp1lhSpocn Sample Impervious Seal New Ea~„e Hardware
II 3' O 0 Thtn-Well Sample ` Water Levef g
* Sample Not Recovered ~ Piezometar Tlp L O G O F 6 O R I N G N O 108
a
Pleatla Wm!lLlauld Umit
Q
NOT.~ E The 3trntlllaatton Ilnes tepreeent the_eppf gxlmats ~O~r 195~ _ E-14Z9-Q3
o
O. e _
~
i r
" ~ ,f ~ cyCl.~~-~, ✓'~4
,
~
~
er~,
Calz
~
~~p .vti. ~ 1 ~P~11
► L V~" r
~vnuon. ~ ( ~ N 1f U I~ 1C
,evE IZO N E I v sns~` q.
i avg i r q aNOI nv +HQ:
CNR HIC1.8
7 f ~ ' ~IIU
!f ~ ~ - ~ H ~
i. I II r
~ TN
I AY ~.1 I 11 ~ 1
wv
-
T"M
~
Q ,s o p
,
~r + ~ J 77tt wv 23 fa ;M~ ~
_?.2
24
aVE
~ a
~a.~~
STH
I,~TM wv
AVENUE ~ ZONE ~ u
ZoNE A J,
t~✓E q~ IATN AV I~ ZONE A 1~TM Av /
t
1_J A--1i_1 Q 11
1 ~ I Y =sa
A Vt
A ~ 1L_ yy~t r ~ a-=
' Y A I'
A.~ O/d Rarlrosd Grade
,0o"~<
LA'I l41
1 ~
W W
G1RL3~$
A.~ u a~v
n { ' 4 ZON E C
~I 7 ~l t1 a AV ~ G °C
~ 25 ~ 4GG.-at
I??O L
ZON E C ~ t
2 = h ~ r
0
1► ' Ql6THcAV`j
~ tl
I W( ~ 28T14 AVHNUE
M ~
L AV
- ;
27TM wvBNUE n
IN ~
~ r '~.e.Y£ :0rw Ay
J I! 1' ° ° a ' ~
q4 35
3~'
~
;
_
23 5 3
,
I
jS 1/S tr tIG
Alb
TT qa ~ ~
7
~
'0
a
p k Z-17 ~
Q ~ RG REEN
E VE
COMMERC/AL
PA RK
pt
Y
~
x 3t? 2~ `'1
60 U. ' '..-..•'00' ~
Z
! ' 9 ~ 0
f 3't GA f ~
~G Ga ~ , aa h,0
dA 3)~ b ~1
AB M ~ ~S I~~' ~F ~ ~
Q ~ t' ~ F'B f~"
. ~
T ~
Hp►LLE a i ~
gua o~v
i a IV
~ q K ~
SIRE
0
, ~ ~
~
f ~,~~C 1
f
. ' ~
* f a 3 ~4+
► ~
1 +
4'
4
} 1
1 A
i
~
~
l 41 ~ ~ ~
~ ~
► ~ 1~
t r~
~
~
11
~ • Rh
..a
Y ~
S ~
1
,
~
i
3
S
4
t
S P O K A N E Cc> L..J N T Y
OFRcE oF THE CotnNrY FNcLVEa • A DpAsloN oF rHE Puosc WaRxs DEPARnmEvr
Ronald G Hormann, P fi County Engineer Dennis M Scott P E Duector
Post ItTM brand fax transmittal memo 7671 #Wpsses►
~
To~ LaFTV 5 , From
c° 5u i~ c°
~
TO Vince Lo f tus Dept Phortd #
JU8 Engineers ft"" ~ ;G- 07cl Q V4 - 3~ 78
FMM Paul Lenneman
Spokane County Engineers Department
DATS 8-25-94
SUHJ$CT Eagle Hardware, Carnahan South Entrance
Vince,
It has come to the County's attention that the Carnahan South entrance has a
possxble turning radius problem Other items associated with this approach
have also come to light which I would like to summarize
First, there are existing power poles in the street side of an existing curb
line Neither the curb li.ne, power poles, or water and gas valves also
existing at the site were shown on your plans The power poles must be
relocated as soon as possible because of their accident potential A revised
site plan with a conrplete description of all existing utilities and revised
road improvements must also be submitted
Second, the location of the existing curb and the new Carnahan South approach
have a grade separation that may cause ponding to occur and the end of the
existing curb should be nosed down A drainage analysis of that location must
be performed with a suggested remedy
Third, an-site observation has shown that the turning radius for the Carnahan
South approach may be insufficient and unsafe An analysis of the approach
with turning radius diagrams must be submitted
Please respond as soon as possible to the concerns outlined above
r
Paul Lenneman
1026 W Broadway Ave Spokane WA 99250-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 3243478 TDi) (509) 324 3166
~
' y
~w
F
7 11 77) 771 LTR
& Gz4.a\-TZjF2\1
Sprague Avenue and Carnahan Road
! Spokane County, Washington
Revised
,
, February 1994 "ECEIVeD
~ ft 09 19~
~ CODE 'EN~
T~ . RCEAfFNT
r
r , STORNt WATER RuNOFF
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL
~ CALcu1.AnaNs
~
~
~
~ w
Prepared For
b
sco~rzo-~.~sTROm AR cTs, nvc.
~ 919 124th Avenup., Suite 101
Bellewe, WA 98005
~
~
.
,
. . j
r
~
, ci,Prepared By
~ y-U-B ENG S, Inc.
,
2810 W Clearwater, Suxte 201
Kennewick, Washington 99306
~ (509) 783-2144
3
,
r
.
.
~`f ~ ~ ~1
Sprague Avenue and Carnahan Road
Spokane County, Washington
~
~
~ Revised
: February 1994
STORM WATER RUNOFF
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL
~ CALCULATIONS
~
,
I Prepared For
a
SCONZO-HALLSTROM ARCHITECTS, INC.
J
W L o
~
~ 0~ A S~ CA N
O
tn Z _
~rr
2 88
FC ST AE
S ~
S ONA L EN
~ EXp I AES 3 _ Iq ,
Prepared By
- J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
I
y
u
- •
ti
♦
TABLF, oF CorrTErrrs
1
z
~ EAG~ HARDwARE & GAxnnv CErrrER
1 PIJRPOSE 1
- EXISTIlVG FACILTTIES Z
PROPOSED 'FACILITIES 2
~ Buildmg itunoff 2
= Parkmg Lot Rnnoff 2
_ Carnabsin Road Improvemeuts 3 APPENDI%
.
~
s
di
o. ~
~
«
r
~
.
E G FA S
The proposed site is approxunately 9 77 acres and is located south of Sprague
Avenue and east of Cainahan Road The site was previously used as a Fred Meyer
Deparnnent Store Currently all runoff from the site flows to existmg drywells located
~ throughout the site
PROPOSED FA S
' The proposed faclhties are parking faciunes and a 144,800 sq ft Eagle Hardware &
~ Garden bwlding There is no future expansion planned for this site
~
' Baulding Rnnoff
~ Runoff from the 134,045 sq ft. enclosed pornon of the F,agle builduig will be
tightlined directly to nine Type 'B' drywells located around the penmeter of the building
The runoff generated in the covered pornons of the garden center is not expected to
significan tly unpact the amount of flow entering the "208" swales The purpose of the trench
drazn and two catcb basuLS is to collect any excess water resulting from plant wateruig
Estvmated flows are not expected to exceed 10 GPM and 8 GPM respectlvely Pipes were
sized using the computer program "FLOWMASI'ER" and calculations have been included
m the Appendix.
- Tbe portion of the garden center that is not covered has been included m the Bow
Struig calculations for Area lA. The runoff from the garden center and truck well wlll be
directed to "208" swales around the penmeter of the parlang area.
_ All mechanical equspment on the roof of the building vvdl be sealed All of the
drywells will be interconnected by 12 inch sohd-walled pipe to equalize flow between them.
, ParUng Lot Ronoff
~
The proposed parlang lot is divYded into four drainage areas, I, II, III, and N
~ Area I sheet drains to the northwest to a 3,547 sq ft grassy swale Area II sheet drauis to
► the north to a 4,517 sq ft. grassy swale Area III also draws to the north to a 3,054 sq ft.
grassy swale Area N sbeet drauis -to the south, east and northeast to a 6,066 sq ft grassy
swale The area provided for uifiltration in each of these swales is greater than wbat is
reqLUred to store 0 5 inch of runoff at an S mch depth.
The largest peak flow runoff occurs in Area II The largest drainage area drazning
into a curb uilet occurs in Area II where a peak ten-year flaw of 1.57 CFS 1.s calculated (see
Appendix) The calculations show that in a peak flow situation, the inlet curb will be lepss
than 4 inches deep in water Inlet capacity calculauons for two catch basins in area 1 B are
- also mcluded in the appendix.
SWrsga & Diaposal Calatlabons Pega 2 procassleWe 23
•
PURPOSE
The purpose of tlus report ts to subnut, for approval, the assumpnons, calculations,
, and design of the roof and site dramage and drywells for the proposed Eagle Hardware &
Garden.
The uifonnanon in this report will provide calculanons for the following
. DryweU Sizmg - Drywells are sized as follows Type ' A' drywells will be
assumed to handle 5,000 square feet (sq ft) of surface runoff Type 'B'
drywells will be assumed to handle 15,000 sq ft of surface runoff Where
! this relanonship is exceeded, the Bowsuing method of runoff calculation will
- be used to justify the drywell selecnon. Outflow capacrty of Type ' A'
drywells is assumed to be 03 cubic feet per second (CFS) and 10 CFS for
Type 'B' drywells
• Drainage Structures - Pipes, ditches, and oiher dramage conveyance structure
sizes and geometry will be jusnfied wnth calculanons Runoff is calculated by
use of the Ranonal Method
~ Other information provided witb this report wfll provide the followma
,
_ • Grades - Contours and spot elevanons are provided on attached drawings
One percent minimum slopes are used to convey runoff across paved surfaces
` wbere concrete curb and gutter are not utilized
• Pavement - Attached drawuigs indicate where all travel surfaces are to be
paved unless a pavmg wazver has been granted
• Swale Cross-Sections - Typical cross sections of swales aze detailed Details
uidicate sodded side slopes not steeper than 21 for up to a maximum of 12
~ inches in depth Swales which are greater than 12 inches in depth will have
_ 3 1 side slopes The tops of swales are a minimum of 2 inches above the nm
elevation of drywells to provide freeboard for stormwater overIlow into
drywells The tops of swales aze also a muumum of 2 inches above tbe top
of overIIow berms between swale compartments
~ . Elevations - Both bottom of swale elevanons and drywell nm elevations are
- mdicated on attached draunngs
Calculations have been made in accordance wnth the Spokane County "Gucdelua for
Stormwater Marcagement,►
~
~
soorage dt nupvul c.lwlaaow Pagei 1 pr*@=%MIe.23
.
~
►
~
~
~
~
~s
~
~
~
i
•
Carnahan Road Improvements
- The proposed Carnahan Road unprovements include wndening the existing road from
~ 22 feet to 42 feet 'Ihe exisung road draunage 1s currently collected in drywells It is
assumed that these drywells are capable of handling the runoff from the exa.sting roadway
- Therefore, stormwater facihnes for the proposed road unprovements will only address the
_ addinonal pavement. A Type 'B' drywell and catch basin will be mstalled directly north
of the southern property enuance off of Carnahan Road to catch runoff from south of the
~ project. The area draining to this drywell is approximately 5,120 ft2 therefore a Type 'B'
~ drywell should be more than adequate An easement will be granted, by the Owner to allow
runoff from the pubhc nght-of-way into the on-site swales
~
Inlet capacities were checked for the catch basin at Sta. 16 + SO on Carnahan Road
and for the curb inlets located at Sta 19 + 19 The vaned grate uilet at Sta. 16 + 50 will
bypass a flow of 016 cfs Calculauons for the curb ulets at Sta. 19 + 19 indicaxed that two
curb uilets would be needed Spokane County only allows a maaamum of 2 curb inlets in
senes Catculauons for the second curb inlet indicate there wd1 be a bypass flow of 0135
i rfs This flow wiU be intercepted by a catch basin with an oil separator located at
` Sta 19 + 48 and piped to the Type ' B' diywell for the on-site Area 1
Culvert capa.ciry was also checked for the 12 inch culvert located at the nortb
entrance off of Carnahan Road The allowable headwater in the catch basin was calculated
to be 136 feet The calculated headwater usvag Equation 1 from the "Spokane County
Gutdelhes for Stormwater Management" for super cniacal flow, indicated a headwater depth
of 0 79 feet which is less than two times the pipe diameter
Storage & Duposal Calwlotions Paga 3 procesale*s 23
/
~
DE7'ENTION BASIN AND DRYVVELL DESIGN
DRAINAGE AREA I (See Figure I)
1 Paved Area Total = 48,890 sq ft
~ Area lA 301,110 ft 2
Area 1B 18,780 ft 2
~ 2 Swale Area Reqwrements (1 / 16 Ratio)
"208" 8 inch ponding depth, area 3,055 sq ft.
.
Area Available 3,547 > Area Reqau-ed 3,e5S
3 Dry Well Requirements (Bowstnng Method)
~ Type 'A' 0
1 Type ' B' 1
~
DRAINAGE AREA II
1 Paved Area 71,517 sq ft.
~
2 Swale Area Reqwrements (1 / 16 Ratio)
`708" 8 mch ponchng depth, area 4,470 sq ft.
.
~ Area AvailabLe 4,517 > Area Reqwred 4,470
,
~ 3 Dry Well Reqwrements (Bowstnng Method)
~
, Type 'A' 0
Type 'B' 1
+
~
~ Stomp 8t Drainage Calculaaons A i proassvaglem
~
RooF AREA
~ 1 Roof Area 134,045 sq ft
~ 3 Dry Well Requirements
Type 'A' 0
~ Type 'B' 9
I
~
~
~
i
,
~
r
Stotage ~ Dranagt Caiculaaoas A-3 P!'°°~ss~e~e.23
a
.
BOws"TRiNG NETHOD DETEiN'ttOy BaStti
DBSICti AiND aVALYS4S, POST DEVELAPME`T EACLE AREA I
'iI`E INCREVMvT Nl.~ ) S
• TL« OF CON('F-N7RA'iION t WN ~ S CALCI.f1.,1'fED BY HA,Y[7
• 01 "iFi.Ow (cFS ) 100 DEPEVDaNT UN ARAt.47ML.U DEStuN
DEStGN YEaR FtOw (YR.) to
9 • aREA (ACRES) 112 LVP[JT ARF.A
~ • DEVELOPED C FAC'TOR 0 40 CAi.CULATED tJS[,Vr WEIGH'tED C vALLB
AFtEa► a C 101
- DRAL\ACGE AREA (SQ FT i 48390
I LNIPERVIULS ARFA (bQ.FT ) 48890 BASIS OF VD.'~1MtN VRASS SWAL.E AREA
TNE hv( TWE 11M L\1E.V5RY Q nEVEL V IN v U[? 5T0RAcaF
(MIN) (SEc-I tLWMI t('FS ) Ic't Fi' f (c't' Fi' > (('i FT )
; 10 YEAR (`i1RVE 5 300 3 18 un/hr 3 21 1291.30 300 OU 991.30
10 600 124 m/6r 226 158340 60000 98840
15 900 1 77 mlht 179 179130 90000 891 SO
20 1200 145 ui/6r 146 190701 120000 70701
~ 25 1500 1211 m/hr 1212 195904 150000 453 04
~ 30 1800 104 udlu 105 ig98 11 180000 19311
, 35 2100 0 91 ut/hr 0 92 202411 210(t 00 75 39
- 40 2400 0 82 tnlbr 0 33 2072.41 240000 32759
~ 45 2700 0 74 uvhr 075 2094 .17 270000 -60' 1
50 3000 0 68 uiJbr 0 69 2130 7: 300000 .86923
T 55 3300 0 64 uvhr 065 219930.1 330000 110068
60 3600 0:61 mlhr 0 62 1611-19108 360000 1313 93
= 65 1900 tl 60 ui/hr 061 2425.51 390000 147449
70 4200 0.58 uL&u 0 1% 252012 420000 167933
~ 75 4500 0.56 wlhr 0.57 2603.21 450000 189679
80 4800 0 53 uvhu 0S4 262436 480000 217564
85 5100 0 52 in/hr 053 273243 S 100 00 2367.57
90 5400 OSQ wAu 051 277985 540000 262115
95 5700 049 m/hr 419 287176 5740 00 2323.24
100 6000 048 M/hr 0 48 295961 6000 00 3041.39
VIIv=13d~QDEV•t FOR te-- Tc
VIN=QDEV+t+.34•QDEV•Tc FOR t>Tc
- REQ[3IItED SWALE VOLUME 2037 CUBIC FT
y ' TOTAL STORAGE AVAII,ABLE 2037 CUB[C FEET ~ MAR = 99130
OUTFLOW
TYPE A" DRYwELLS 06D 030 ds = 0 00 cfs
TYPE 'B DItYWEII.S 1 a(,) L00 cfs = L00 cfs
~ TOTAI, a 100 cts
A-4
~
.
BOwSTRJNG HETHOU DETENTtoh BaSiN
DFSIGV aJvD AVALYSIS POST DEVEI.OPMENT EAGI.EAREA II
Q TI« I\C RE.VE`T (yQ~► ) '
~ 1'I« OF COh('£vTRA'I7UN (VQN ) 5 ~ AL( 6'LA1"EI) BY F[AYD
0 Ol'Mc)w (c'FS ) 100 DEPEti'UANT Oti DRAINTIEL[) UESiC6N
DES1CON YEAR FLnW (YR ) 10
( • pREA (A( RES) 1 64 l'PT? AREA
DEVE].oPEU cM Fac"fUR 090 c'Ai.c't'1.ATEU t rsi'%vVE1(.xHTEp C-vALt;FS
AR,E.a a 148
~ DRALNAGE AREA fSQ FT ) 71 -117
M4'EtVi0I'S AREA (SQ.FT ) 71517 SASIS OF ~r'Uvll 'v1 f,RASS SWr1L,E ARFA
TLME tNr TWE L`c IrTE.vSRY Q DEVEL vIv v ot tT STORAuE
(mQVI (SEC`) (Gr/fHR) WFS ) t('il Ff ) (('U FT ) (CI. Ff )
10 Yfir1R t LRVE S 300 3 18 mlhr 470 183894 30000 158894
10 600 2.24 iofhr 3.31 2323.53 6W 00 172353
- l5 900 177 mlhr 162 2620 63 9U0 00 172063
20 1200 145 wlhu 2.14 278961 1 Z00 00 1589.61
- 25 1500 131 tafhr 179 286426 150000 136426
30 1800 104 uLJbr 1.54 292: 86 180000 11'=':.36
35 2100 0 91 wihr 134 296089 210000 86089
40 2400 0.82 wlhr 1.21 3031.55 240000 63 1 SS
45 2704 0 73 uLJlu 109 306332 270000 16182
50 3000 0 68 mfir 100 3 l 16.&t 300000 11694
5.) 3300 A 64 cn/hr 0 95 3217.20 330000 8280
50 3600 0 61 uw'hr 0 90 3"36 84 360000 26.~.20
6{ 3900 0 60 mlhr 0 39 354807 390000 3ai 93
70 4201 0 58 mJhr 0 86 369691 420000 S 13 09
75 4500 0 56 ia/hr 0 83 330801 450000 -69199
30 4800 0.53 mdhr 078 383896 480000 96104
85 5100 0 52 mJbr 0 77 3997 03 510000 l 102 97
90 5400 0.50 m/hr 0 74 4064 94 540000 1_35 06
95 5700 049 m/hr 0 72 420096 570000 149914
100 6000 0.48 wihr 071 4327 90 600000 167210
- •~V4Y-134'QDEV't FAR c---= Tc
V LN= Q DEV • t+.34 * Q DEV • Tc FOR c> Tc
.
REQCIRED SwaLE vOLUME 2980 CUBtC FT
TOTAI. STORAGE AVAILABLE 2980 CUBIC b"EET > MAX, = 172333
w ovrFLow
TYPE ^p DRYWEL~ 0 (M 0.30 dS a 0 00 Cf8
~ TYPE "B DRYWELLS 1(aD 100 ds = 100 cfs
TOTAL = L00 cfs
A-S
1
.
BUwSTRtNC vtETHOD DETEN'fIQN BaSiV
DESI('N A`D ANALY51S PAST DEVELOPMEN'I' EAVI.E AREA III
TI.`tE I.%C'RF*vlEl%T (\+UN ) 5
•'I'I`IE UF (Uh('E.SI'RATION 1 MIN) S t Ai.rlZa'TEU BY HANU
0 o["IFLOW (('FS ) 1 00 pEF'£aYUA\T OV URAlYF[ELU DES1CN
DESIGN YEAR FLOW (YR.) 10
• AREA cAcREs) 112 riPcrr aREA
• DEVEI.OPEI) f" FACT'OR 0 90 CALCtA.ATED USLNC WEI(,H'IED C" VAL! FS
ARF.-k x 101
DRa►I-N AGE AREA (SQ FI' ) 48731
p WFRvtOl15 AREA (SQ.FT 1 49731 BASlS oF VQ.Ni'Vii'VI GRASs swaLE aREA
i~
'I'IViE I'vC TLME I\c GvTENSTTY Q 1)BVEI- V 1N V017 STQRA(aE
T mq) (SE(') (Iir/FIR) (CFS ) (('t F'1' ) (C i~ FI' ) (('1 FT )
~ 10 YEAR (,'L'It« 5 300 318 w/lu 3.: 0 128710 30000 98710
10 600 2.24 mfir 2.26 158Jw1 60000 983-23
L S 900 1 77 uk1br 1 78 1785 67 90000 83567
20 1240 145 tn/hr L46 190081 120000 70081
195168 150000 45168
25 1506 1.31 infhr 1."
30 1800 104 inlhr 105 199161 I 800 00 19161
35 2100 0 91 uilhr 0 92 2017Z2 2100 00 8?»43
~ 40 2300 0 82 uihr 0 33 206567 240000 314.33
JS 2904 0 74 uiihr 07S 208766 270000 -612 34
s0 3000 0 63 w/lsr 0 53 212179 300000 876-' 1
1 55 3100 0 64 inlhr 064 219217 330000 l 107 83
' 60 3600 0 61 mltu 061 2w73 66 600 UO 1".634
6.3 Z900 0 60 mlht 0 60 241762 z90000 1432.31
70 4204 0.58 in/6r OSR 251` 420000 1687 78
~ 75 4500 0 56 mllit 0.:16 259474 450000 19Q3~?f+
80 4840 0 53 m/hr 0S3 2615.83 490000 2191 17
85 5100 0 52 mlbr 0.52 27~..354 S 100 00 2?76 46
90 5400 0.50 m/hr OSO 276981 5400.00 2630 19
93 5700 0.49 m/hr 049 2862 42 570000 283758
100 6000 048 tn46r 0 48 294899 600000 305101
v IN = 1.34 • Q DEv 0 t POR t<-- Tc
^ V IAl - Q DEV • t+.34• Q DEV ' Tc FOR t> Tc
; REQCIRED SWAi.E VOLUiViE 2030 CUB1C Ff
- TOTaL STORaGE AvpII.a,BLE 2030 c[JBiC FEEC > Max. = 987 10
ovTFLow
i TYPE A" DRYWELLS 0 f~ 030 ds = O 00 cfs
0
T'YPE B DRYWELIS i1.00 cts - 100 cfs
~ TOTAL = 3 00 ds
~
A-6
~
.
BOwSTR1Nr NETHOD DEfEvTtON BaSih
DESiGV AvD avaLYSiS POST DEVELOP4tEN-T EArLE AREA tV
TL`¢ L`c'RF..N'T (M) 4
'iLME OF (ONCLN"IRATION 0Q,v ) S c,u.rttLA'i'ED BY NavD
• OL'"iFLOW (C`FS ) 100 pEPENDANT ()N DRAIYFIELU hES14`
DESiGN YErVt FLOW (YR.) 10
* pR,EA (at RF.'S) 1 35 EVPI r1' AREA
a DEvELOPED C" Fac'toR 0 90 CAt..rt..R.ATED t SINr, WEIGHTEU r" VaL[ tFS
AREA a C' 167
pRdL\AGE AItEA (SQ FT ) 8079 t
MERV1QItS AREA (SQ.Ff ) 80791 BAS[S UF'W\Il\ItiM t,RAJS SWALE AREA
_ ITME INC "RME [vc GN"mNStTY Q DEVEL v IN v U("i' STnRAc,E
00m) tSE(l (IN/HIIt) l(TS ) (("tJ FT ) (0 Fi' ) IrL FI' 1
10 YEAR c URVE S 300 3 18 mAu S.3I 2133 38 30040 1833 38
10 640 2.24 m/hr .274 262484 60000 302434
15 900 177 m/tir 2.95 296046 90000 206046
20 1200 145 u/hr 2.42 3151.35 120000 1951.35
25 1500 121 ui/hr 2.02 323568 150000 1735 68
30 1800 104 udhr 174 330188 190000 tS01 88
35 2100 0 91 ui/hr la., 334485 210000 134435
40 2400 08Z ul/hr 137 342467 240000 102467
35 2700 0 73 uuhr 124 3461 1z 270000 761 11
30 3000 0 68 uuhr 114 3521 02 300000 52102
55 3300 0 64 un/hr 107 363439 1300 OU 3U.: 9
60 3690 0 61 un/hr 103 376950 360000 169S0
65 3900 0 60 iaAu 100 400817 390000 104 17
70 4200 0 58 ui/hr 0 97 4165 01 420000 1199
' 75 4500 0.56 ui/lu 093 4301 82 450000 19818
80 4800 O.S3 w/hr 0 S8 433677 4800.00 463.23
~ 85 5100 0.52 uifir 0 87 4515 35 310000 53165
^ 90 5400 0.50 uft 0.8" 4592.07 5400 Ot) -807 9;
45 5700 0 49 us/br 0 82 4745.60 570000 95440
100 60A0 0 48 a/hr 0 80 4889 12 600000 111088
~ V IN = L34 • Q UEV ' t FOR c4-- Tc
( V IN = Q DEV ' c+.34` Q DEV • Tc FOR c> Tc
REQI.OlED SWALE YOLUVIE 3366 CUB1C Ff
~ TOTAI. STORAGE AVAILABLE 3366 CUBIC FEET > VGAR. _ :060 46
OVTFLOW
TYPE "A" DRYWELIS O(pd 030 cis = C 00 cts
~ TYPB "B DRYWELLS 1 0 100 d's = 100 cfs
~ TOTAL = 1.0O ds
A7
' }
.
PROJECT JOB NO / 27 S'~' a Z SHEET
AO rJ U~I ~ OESIGNED DATE ! I 5l I 7-
ITEM T v► ~e ~ ~ e. CHECKED ~ DATE
r~T~lef v c=vre
u \
~
f ~ 310~ ~
1
~
~
~~'reA Z ~As 4e, a.r oes 1" arec4- cratnr•►a ~-D 6L
~ I r ~e-f' S~~'vc~-a re ~ Z3
~ I'q ss-~ rte ~ C- O 90
~
.1
>
Z 3 73L -v A YS~GC
.
~
_ - i~ r ~ ( 3 / 0
~
.r
~ ~ - - - - - -
Q = 3 o-i_b ~ _ _ _ _ ~ _ -
3+
. 3~Z -
~
= 0 31 - ~,e.s - -
,
~ t 3
~ ~ = 1 = 1 1 1
~
~ : ►
. ,
I illl !'1~=1i~~!!II I~11
1
~
PROJECT j-<<~ J08 NO l Z~S^s~ SHEET
~
fJ U B l ~ OESIGNED DATE /5
ITEM ~ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ ± R eS CHECKED ~ DATE
1
/ov -1 o S:
T ! \r ,7~0 1~~'l ✓1E'L! L~ r'Lt I {Q' T
r~
~
rv n~ ona.l -C
y
A r'CG~
2 ~ ~ sZ D 9
~'SSv,r~ ~L ' ~/J'►~n~-~t's' .00 2
1
C = G 9 ~
~
.
Go 74/11/ 10 U s v r'e.•'~."~-~
°
rs;-s/
/
f - - -C- L 3 3 1 - = - ~ s c. ~arc ~ C c~fi ,
Sz = 5U44r
~ i
_ 1
0A , s~~ _ d~~~
o Z~' S y ~ J
-_-btArsurerse _ s!~
f~ ,
AZj
` cf = o_._..o g_ .
~ = ~ ~z - - _
V
r
~ - d__
~ Z
~
g
p &..&.Je
,
_
fosS r&l. ,A,-
=55
S~
~ ! L 615)
~
C, -(S ~ 1
~ Z/
PROJECT J08 NO J Z 75"7 - ~ ~ SHEET
~
fpJ U DESIGNED DATE
ITEM ~o ^ ~ ~ r~{ CC:veLa, -7 tS CHECKED ~ DATE
i
1
~ _ - - ~ Ve to c.
' A
V2 ~ ~ < < ~ r' c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~z.re _o ~o ~ ~ r
I~
!
~
. v r4> !n~~T . ~ S4 J~-ly (.~r n a a n T4?c4r.. J?
. Llso -~rf-n ro r'uno~~ by r~~~l wegoJ
Q=
I a~.~ C Z v:~``
~
4- (5t-0' 'r` St'
Q = -U
~
,
^ _ -vTaL.- OSP
y ~ - - - - _ _
:or o
y
~o s
(S L I
}
o`oZ)~_
~
a~
L3
;~~l;ii
_5_. _sH~' ~~y .
1 Z'~ 12 oA~ -1-1 ~
~ Ja$ N°
EQ DA►
~ ..~,~Ci pESiGN .
L-/'~,Q ~ • - ~
C~~,GR~"
090 pppJe~ ~
. ~ '
tTE '
Ic 3
=
4
-
W e ~ J ~ ~On ~ 2
i~(r•~ ~ r ~ / ~ ` ~fr~ ~ +
4j
_ r~ ~t~e
ep 6-u
~
'D
~po
Oc-/L, ,
• ~ ~ ~
~
~Q 10
~
~ • ' r
~•v ~
~ 4 Cl- -
.
1.~~►- . f r~ M ~ ~ ~
- ro
- ' ~
GW
_
, ~
_
-
0►-t'
" ~a-~ - ' - -
_ ,
` r . ~ ~j ~ - ,
•.LJ~--
~
_.r--
_
~
~ a t s►
ige i f~j ~
_ ` ~ Z 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ►
` ti . ! ~ ~
JDBN
_ ~ IZ
~ flES4GN~ '
pptOJECT
8, : -
C~ ~r
r 1 ~
.
Ct~ _ ! ~ ~ l 1 e
. -
~ro ~
1.
~
f ry ~ ~ _
Y3 3
~vt 1 G u r ~s~ta~r
l,~ , ~ a o~ ~,✓tE 3/
~ ~s
ol~
1 ~ 6~L) ~
w y
~ U
~ = 0, ~
: D 0&q
1 - - - «
C~~- _ _
_ q3
1 _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r
00
~ , y~~ M ~
r~
I ~L~-~`'
. ok.
t
_
-
- ~33
~ - _ -
~ ~ -
~
~ f ~j~
~~~`a~--- _
• ~
Qf' ~C~ - ~
! -
- z ~
a ~ -
- ~ ~ ____r•o`~, ,~tt n
y,
• ts~-_.---- . - 1 ~ i L ~
,jf11
~j~. ~ , ~ ► ~ ~ , ~
~
~ i -
• - ~ s/
f PRQJECT c~.♦ l~•cr'~ , JOB NO %Z 75~ - O Z SHEET
B> v OEStGNED OATE ~AFY
le
4
C4~i 4e s ITEM CHECKED ~ DATE
r
~
~
: A~2~.=
t C- 090
i ~
- Q= C~?D~,31~~` 0~38
~ r e
1~ ~
; ~-~G.c cT iniet e~
l , f
HLi 'i f?. G y~
31g
- - - LY v 5
c~ - 33
- ~ o~ ~ oz ) - - - -
_
0 fl I) o'
0`/~
-
_ c
- - -
J -Zd = :7_3 ' - - - - -
,
3 (Z,4
~p ~
03? = 12 sy c~t E _
~I ~ll~l~Ell'I~Il~llli~;ll' -
,
~ Z'.
S
joB 140,LZ 1<, ,
pp'~
f ~ DES~G%lW
~
eHEC~D '
~
,
Pp►oj
r
~Q _
~
~
, - t
T = 3•
~
1 ~
~ ► / , p
L,►. ~ ~ ,,;'U ~
~
t 1~ ~j ~c g J
~ ~
~
~ ,
4 pr
! o~~
_ _
~ Z _ . _ ~ _ ~
A_-
~
- - ~ - _s
-
- - -
~
~l~j
-
~ ~ ~ -r--"' r ~
'00
- ~f A "''~r► V
- ~ - D3~ - ~ -
~
• ~ - ~ ~ ~ r
~ - - ~ ► , i ~ ,
as
. ` ~ ' ~ f
~ J Z`~ SrS~- 4 Z ET ! I
PROJECT ~4 ! JOB NO SHE
~ rJ U 13.1 , DESIGNED DATE
'
ITEMfkoe-!c eVlver~' CHECKED ~ OATE
~
~~"~''rVv% t r C ► t' ~ ~ ~ Cv ~ vC r ~c'., ~5 ~ ~ ~ a,~ ►'1G r ~h e ~r ~a~ t ~ ° r
L dt.l-..T
! - f I 1
A baS Y~ ~ ~~J ♦5 C~ r n 1f~loo,A = 0 C C TS
i Qr3 ' POW
~ / ~
e, PO-0 t'rt~..~ .`.c'. c.o~+c~ ~,CL-Clnls"in Iin ~ lc••~ C<< po~ - j~, 5~.-CS
~
~r~oTi4t ' 1. ? q C'f S
ot' ~1ou.~ ~v r FQ aA- Ia%/o
P
y g+ ari ve yq
Ct'1-Ct G~~ U~ tOGt~ ~ ~~S
cr ~ ca J CE-Z>
i.1Qz .
~
~ _ t-r0~ 1 t SV PC~.C' Grt ta.1 C
zc__
~
fs
~ -r
7(3t ~.(~Z z)
~ . { - - -
.
~ - -
~
' , - -
► _ ~
~
N ~
PAOJECT, F-el e "arp QESIGNEA e
paTE, ~ Ary
.
HYDROLOGIC AND CNANNEI, INFOAMATION SKETCII
ITATION ~
so a 0 FL L • Xn LF
D/Z ,
n ~
AIIWI
pt 9 C1S TWI ~ t 1W -
l~sz ? 9 ~2 r
f
(0i + DE916N OlSCHAAGf, SAY Q 0 OR 4S0 1 El El CULVERI' DESCflIPTIOH T IIEADWAI'Eli COMPUTAI'ION r
Q 91tE OPEN fI.OW PAESSUAE fI.OW I I COU~IENT9
( ENTRaNCE T1IPE I bds10ui1ei ~ l ~
K~ ~ ~a ~a 4p y^ Ccnlrnl 0 IIW TW Ao 4So ~~1W ~
I'n Ir~ 1
~ z' L = 0 0~ ( JZ'' 055 'I'] re, levn ??n.~~ ti„~~
1,1 ' r I ~ , L l r~y t+'~ o u
v -&„I~~ ~
~ veIt cs 1%~
EI~ 4- z h
~
~
SUMMARY 8 RECOMMENDAI'IONgI
12' PvC
m os~
~ N
~ N
' r (
M~
t AIIW a AIIOwAe1,E HEAOWATEfl t FIW " d~~ ~ i-eK.) 3 MW n Hs 1►p • 1.9o 4,0 >da $pioi contra use egg vf
ZO OR tESS fOR 0:916 p4 U~~ Flpur~ ~l0 0 yd ~ Oullll Control ugs In,Vn
`'r- r r r /p"`►
P • - .r-
~
Circular Channel Analysis & Design
Solved with Maaning's Equation
Open Channel - Uniform flow
~
Worksheet Name
~
Comment TOTAL FLOW EXITING GARDEN CENTER
Solve For Full Flow Diameter
Given Input Data
Slope 0 0100 ft/ft
Manning's n 0 O11
Discharge 0 61 cf s
} Computed Results
Full Flow Diameter 0 48 ft
Full Flow Depth 0 48 ft
~ Velocity 3 31 fps
Flow Area 0 18 sf
Critical Depth 0 40 ft
Critical Slope 0 0099 ft/ft
Percent Full 100 00 t
I Full Capacity 0 61 cfs
QMAX @ 9 4D 0 66 cf s
Froude Number FULL
~
r ar 1 L. s _nir6A Z. ot
~
r? v i ~2 ~ ~rJ M. s lo c.e. Slope. o~ I% h&s beZei
~
uszl D~
~
~
+ Opea Chanael Flow Module, Versioa 3 12 (c) 1990
Haestad Methods, Inc ~ 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708
.
Circular Channel Analysis & Design
Solved with Manning's Fquation
Open Channel - Uniform flow
Worksheet Name
~
Comument PIPB SIZE FROM TRENCH DRAIN AT 5t SLOPE
~
Solve For Full Flow Diameter
~ Given Input Data
Slope 0 0050 ft/ft
Manning's n 0 O11
Discharge 0 02 cfs
~ Computed Results
Full Flow Diameter 0 15 ft
Full Flow Depth 0 15 ft
Velocity 1 09 fps
I Flow Area 0 02 sf
Critical Depth 0 10 ft
Critical Slope 0 0095 ft/ft
Percent Full 100 00 t
Full Capacity 0 02 cfs
QNZAX @ 9 4D 0 02 cf s
Froude Number FULL
_ , ~ +y I1 1 1
1 5 vh ~ r~ V Ili ~ V r rl.d► ~ ( ~ St ? .7 1 a j 9 r 1 ~ j ~S ~ ~ 1
• A r
1~' Ai' S l.~Pg 3t 1~~ I~1~
_ v S ZA D
Opea Ghannel Flow Module, Version 3 12 (c) 1990
Haestad Methods, Inc * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708
•
Circular Channel Analysis & Design
Solved with Manning's Equation
Open Channel - IIni f orm f 1 ow
~
Worksheet Name
Commeat COLLECTOR FROM TRENCH DRAIN & FLOOR DR.AIN
Solve For Full Flow Diameter
Given Input Data
~ Slope 0 0050 ft/ft
Manning's n 0 011
~ Discharge 0 04 cfs
Computed Results
Full Flow Diameter 0 20 ft
Full Flow Depth 0 20 ft
. Velocity 1 29 fps
Flow Area 0 03 sf
Critical Depth 0 13 ft
Critical Slope 0 0089 ft/ft
Percent Full 100 00 0
Full Capacity 0 04 cf s
QMAX a 9 4D 0 04 c f s
- Froude Number FULL
-
. ~ ~ C. Jr N P.4.f..
~ f' ~ ' t i~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ s ► ~ 0 Z r+ C?
~ -
_ ~e V ; rz vj,l~ u piPL ..k a. s Iope, or l~us
- ~.vt JS?~ t~~ i
,
a
- apea Channel Flow Module, Version 3 12 (c) 1990
Haestad Methods, Iac * 37 Srookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708
♦
♦ • ► qil+
•
• ~ a ~
CATC BAS
N INS
~
~ LARGE CaTCH BASINS SMaLL CATCH BAStNS
,All large catch basms include cast iron frame and grate wrth The small catch basin has the saTe width dimension as the
gformed knockouts for insert,on of channels and 6" outlets POLYDRAiN channels The catch basm pro~ndes economical
LYDRAlN S new stackable design enables mstaliation to d,rt retenUon and a foul aircrap accessory with galvan¢ed stee1
~ any required depih a POLYDRAIN exclusive trash bucket A!l small catch basins use the same removable
v~ NO 610 ~ NO 511 and lockable gratings as the channels
• ' NO 900 NO 901 NO 902 u~Y~~
v v ~ II
~ ! ~V ~ ! ~ • :
° " ~ ~
* f
v ~r~
. ^ iI
~r t~ I I I~ NO 900 NO 901 4 PVC NO 9024 P'VCon
4 0r 6 outlet at outlet and foul air sRhersideofbas,n
middfe or bottom trap in frne with w+th foul air trap
NO 610 CATCH BASlN of both sides and channels Chan Channels can en
PI-M yIEyy ~ ends Channels can nets enter from one ter from boih ends.
eriteer from erther or end only
CAST IRON b0th endS.
GRATE NO 900 CATCH BASIN
P~ 96~
0r
13 3°
61 ~
L OIJ L
POLYDRFUN ~ h ~
GMANNEL u J J ~ ~ yJ _ y
1CAST IRON GRATE FRM~IE i
SiDE vIEW I ~ sioE9 ~w ~
~ T
A A~-,----r-----------,~ ir -I r
6 PREFORMED
136 29 i KNOCKOUT OUTLETS i
"
94
32 5
~ 610CATCMBASIN 1116
1
• T
oP uNrr
~
~ - r - ~ 197 1 4 PREFOAMED '
6" PAEFGFlMEO j ~ KNOCKOUT i
KNOCKOUT OUTLET i 810 CATiCM BASfN ~ OUTLETS
18 B• LOCATION BC1T'T10M UNIT
'L
I 'Y
- ~ 1'
20 ~
12
-
.
•
; '~X:.
IRMINCS ~ r. w~ N.u r al. y bc
-a. ~ '`3~~`~ • ~ ► K,
V
~
PolyDrain ofrers a wicz farfety of gratings for any appircatlon These range from Iight duty grates for foot and light
vehicular traffic oextra neavy outy grates for h,gh speed heavy aircraft and track rype vehicles
For detailed inrormat►Qr refer to PolyGrain Grate Load Spec+ficaiion Chart
~-~~-=-~f~~ _ SLA~TTED GR~ITES MEDIUM DUTY
~ l•~ f~` PART NO MATERIAL LENGTH WEIGHT
-420 ralvarnied Steef 39 19 in (Nom,,-W 6 Lb__s__
• 421 Galvanized Steei 19 60 in Nom W) 3 Lbs
~ r 440 18 S Stainiess Steel 39 19 in Nom 1 m) 6 Lbs
~ 441 18 8 Stainless Sieei 19 60 in Nom lim) 3 Lbs
~ Also available in heat bonded plastic coated steel
~ Use Locking Device No 811
~
~
j SI.OITED GRATES HEA1/'Y DUTY
PART NO MATERIAL LENGTH WEIGHT
422 Galvarnzed Steel 39 19 in (Nom 1 m) 11 Lbs
423 Galvarnzed Steel 19 60 in Nom ~i~m) 6 Lbs
442 18-8 Stainless Steel 3919 m~Nom 1 m) 11 Lbs
I a 443 18 8 Stainless Steel 19 60 m(Nom ihm) 6 Lbs
~
Use Lacking Device No 811
Patent No 4553874
1 Jv
CAST IRON INLAY SLOTTED GRaTE -
HEAVY DUTY
PART NO MATERIAL LENGTH WEIGHT
~ ` 502 Gray Iron 19 60 in (Nom ~~m) 16 Lbs
d ~~y
~ Use Lacking Dev,ce No 811
~
(
DUCTIL.E IRON SLOTTED GRATE -
HEAVY DUTY
~ PART NO MATERIAL LENGTH WEIGNT
504 Ducdile Iron 19.60 in. (Nom 1/2m) 13 Lbs
Note Greater percentage open area Also available in HDC Monoca.st and
Anchor Frame HOC`" versions (see below) Specify number 514 524 or 534
Use Locking Dsvice Na 811
~
a
~ CAST IRON FRAME AND GRATE -
~t EXTRA HEAVY DUTY (HDC AND MONOCAST)
PART NO MATERIAL LENGTH WEiGHT
512 (HDC) Gray Iron 1960 m(Nom 1/2m) 26 Lbs
514 (HDC) Gray Iron Frame/ 3919 ,n (Nom 1m) 23 Lbs
Duchle Iron Grate ~
522 (Monocast) Gray Iron 19G0 in. (Nom 1/2m -120 Lbs
~ 524 (Monocast) Gray Iron Framel 19G0 fi(Nom yzm~ 50 45-110 Lbs
DucUle Iron Grate
Note Increases overall depth of channel by 112 inches. Loclung Omce Na 815
included Monocast Cast Iron Frame is factory bonded to channel
,
6~
~ •
~~t
CHANNEL - -a -A -1.
x
~
t
L.4P SPECIFICATIONS
1
CMAIINEI ONLI' i CIIAMMEL At111'OlfM1ALL
OVERALL
} pF I N/0U{fIIC 0Ait CYEAALL ! NTQNWIlC OAp
DEPFN ~M amI ~ iL01M {M ~
M41M1lM
; CMAMNEI ' SLOW ECT I
CitOSS SECT1011 iUTE Oi fl0~f wE(iMT I tpOZ SIQII ~Of i ~ i61N~
, NUMBEit MIM MAf I ItN}I I6Py1 iPaW10t1 ~ MIN I MAi ~ (tlai ~ tiPM)
dl~ ~ 9s ~ 30 r I'S ~ I b 34 ~ 1 S l 126 ~ 411
~ C 1 $b f 2 1 i35 j la! ~ 35 t18 ( 130 j 023 I s.
~ 58 t 50 1 01 ~ I4c ~ 30 130 1301 421 I 21
JC 58 ( oa ~ ItI !SI ~ i6 f!30 1321 431 1 534
w 60 ~ 3 ~ f53 iN ~ R ~ 13? ~ 35 441 1 st
USD t 3 2! z ~ 1113 r 111 ~ 3E ~ 135 i Il > >S Use this chart to eshmate flow
_ aC ~ i 07 ~ 111 j 181 J sb ~ 137 I 139 1 154 capac,ties and irnert elevations. Aaa
1,3 ~ 67 I 71' ~ !81 ~ 7co l al ~ 139 1 142 I 16 ~ SE a minimum of 4' to overall depths to
191 41 1I42!(la~ 479 I -AS estimate necessary excavabon ActuRl
'W! I1 i a ~ 199 eI 1144 ~ le b j 481 1 6c depth of excavaiion is governed by
3 1 ?j 1 201 ~ ,29 +t 1146 ~ 145 ~ 491 1 61
j= t 203 219 ~ 22 1 lA61 146 1 d9, 1 fi~~ slab or pavement th~ckness.
~ 100 t+ ~ '109 23 ~ as 1 146 ~ 149 ~ 497
( u
!l0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 211 ~ 54 ~ IS ~1e3(15! ~ SO ~ o
T i~ t a 9 i Fs ~i5 I,s 1 j Is 3 ~ 3` s More detaifecl information if need
- E30 37 >>a I 40 I<<~ ~~i-31 52 I s ed is contained in other PolyDrain
14 ~ o 1 '41 :83 + 41 1 iSo 158 + ili j a publications.
~ 3v ~ s ( e ► 57 ~ SOt ~ e4 1 Osa I to 1 i 545 M 5es
00 ~ I ~ ~01 ~ 31= d ~9 +167 ~163~ iSs I ~
- ! 10 j 91 (9 1 275 1 324 SL ~!6 l ~ 165 56 3 ~ t
i8D i 31 85 ~ 335 53 J 165 168 Si3 ~ re ~
_ 150 ~ 30 295 ~ 3SP 53 ~ 168 ITO 1 $81 ~ di
98 ~ y c 299 ~ 395 S3 ~ 170 ~ 170 ~ SQ ~ 144
I00 y A I 303 f 30 ~ 53 ~ 1i0~ 172 ~ 591 ~ 03
-Jio ~ rot cc> 313 ~ us ~ 54 1 1i2 ~ 1?$ ~ 601 6:
-20 103 ~ ill 5 P 1 387 I se 1 n s ~ 17 1 ~ 611 ( ~
1.3u ~ t0 ~ 0; 1 331 1 399 1 i1 li J1 119 f 619 1 723
~►a 2 ~ u c 1 341 313 1 se 119 1 152 1 629 °yi
sa If ustng NoS. 512 514 522 524 532
9liu 1I i ~ ,1 aro N se 11e2 1184 1 e31 s!s
oo ~ IL i15 ; 361 ~ osc ~ 6c ~ta 4 I Ia r ~ sa g ~ a P or 534 fr'dme and grete Systems ada
170 ~ i t s i u i 371 ~ 453 Iu ia I I la4 j 659 ~ p 112 inches to averall depths shown
2dC ~ iI 1 I! 1 r 379 ( 461 ~ 83 ~!83 1 !9! 66 j 83.1 here
' '9G I 119 I V 189 ~ 477 ~ 63 ' 19 t 1 194 617 ~ aab
2 1 ~ 395 ~ 485 ~ 62 J 194 1 194 ~ 6113 ~ 311
~ 300 !t ? I f S ~ 399 ~ 191 f 64 !9 a{ 196 1 697 880
~ Non sloping thannels
&1
49 Mirnmum overall depth PolyDram system can oe extertded to gr+eater len ths
(No 010) 53 in by rnsertion ot any number oi non slope channels ~No
_ 4 0 Maximum overall depth 021 091 096 197 and 291) at the approprFate
, (No 300) 12 5 m locations or by the addihon ot PolyWall Sidewall
~ I~ Inside top w,dth (a11 channels) 4 0 in Extensions
Cc
r~ Maximum c►oss secaon Ilow
area (No 300) 39 9 sq m 3919' sroee 0&~.
Normal channel Iength 39 19 in nom 1 m- I inom t meter3
(No 096) 19 60 irt ~nom /.,m
ertgth of s ope system 981 feet ~0 • ~ ~ ~~-Y O~N
Channel bottom thickness 10 in (Nom
; o ) -,-~~c----------------
I ~
•
I i
~
10
•
• D8a 1
pf;cos SUBMERSI6LE SUMP PUMPS
PUMPS TYPE PIP
SCREFNED SUMP PUMPS
AVAILABLE FOR OFF-THE-SHELF DELIVERY
u
_ A
. ~
PIP 700
U ~
■
eries
~
~ For Applications In ~
Non Hazardous Locations
Where Explosion Proof
Motors Are Not Required
~ • industrial C~uality ~ PI P 100a PI P 701 a P! P 702a ~
• Automatic Level Controls +
: • Oil Filled MotoTS °
- I
' E
• Easy to Insiall TECHNICAL DATA ~
• Corrosion Resrstant r
Hardware PIP 700a - Oil filled overload protected etectric motor ~
Heavy cast iron construction Elevated suction inlet
• Ideal for all residential de- Non-clog impeller passes any soiid that comes through
watering and draining jobs molded inlet screen Operates automatically or man
uaily Includes 8 feet of grounded 3 wire, oii proof UL
approved cor+d Automatic, mercury swltch level control
, switch
,
PIP 701e - Motor housing is molded of highly impact
resisiant material Pump body and bottom plate are
bronze Impeller is extremely high m abrasion resis
60 Hz tance Mechanicai shaft seal has har+d ceramic seat and
carbon rotating element operating in oii OiI fitfed motor
Capacities to 67 GPM in waterproof, hertnetically sealed housing Automatic,
~ Heads !0 30 Feet mercury switch level controi switch
Horsepowers %to 'A, pIp 702a - Bronze pump body Removable inlet screen
115 Volts between motor and pump bodies Six vane impeller
~ Sizes 1'/a to 1'/2° Discharge passes any soiid that comes through inlet screen Oil
Tem eraturss to 120°F filled motor in sealed waterproof housing, has built in
P overload protection Mechanical shaft seal has hard
- ceramic seat and carbon rotating element, operating in
oil Motor shaft is stainless steel Automaiic, mercury
switch level control switch
i
. 08a 1,
PERFORMANCE RANGE
60 H ERTZ
GPM @ Total Hesd Of Drive
Pump Number Ctaracteristics ngth Construetion ~ ygL
~ 51 ~ 10 1 15 ~ 201 1 25 1 30 1 HP I VoiL I PH
_ PIP 700a 1 45 { 36 1 25 ~ 1 1/3 I 115 1 1 1 8 iStandard Fitted 1 29
P1P 701a N 52 ~ 51 ~ 44 ~ 30 ~ 1 1 1/3 1 115 1 1 1 8 ~BronZe 8► Plastjcs ~ 29
PIP 702a 1 67 ~ 60 ~ 52 ~ 44 ~ 34 ~ 22 1 W 1 115 1 1 1 8 ~ 8ronze & Piastics ~ 32 ,
' DIMENSIONS
N PT
i OISCHARGE
.
r 0.4
I -
ll
I l CP I
• .
_ ~ ~ E
-Y ~ ooaQoao
Y ~
~
ri► '
1
TOP
~ VIE1N
r ° ~
SIDE
VIEW
AU aUENstoNS IN IMcMEs
Notc Tomperatnn Lbnitatlats 75 F Cantinuouaryt 1200F tnbnnitteMq
~I Notr. in pte Intmd ol produrt lmprowmtnl. Qinanslons an0 aRsc111eatiota an subjwt to dan9o wJMout eeoltw
Notr MlMnnnn suM depth b ts
MODEL I CP ~ O ~ Y ~ E ~ DISCH I WT
PIP 700a 8~/s 93/4 1% 7i+6 11/a 29
- PI P 701 a 11 i/i 9% 1% 7% 1 Va 29
PI P 702a 14 1/a 9% 131/a 7% 116 32
~AC1O6 PACO Pumps Inc 1 P o eox 12924 . sas 92nd avre . oaband. Ca sasoo 2924
PU MPS Plar+~ ~t(ons oektana. cA o Dallae. TX • Los Angeies CA • PbRiand. OR o Seanle WA
qlnro,v 0....s ~ a-V
~
~ • PtqCZ0 D8b.1
° SELECTIONS
~ PUMPS
SUBiVIERSIBLE SUMP PUMPS
~
_ TYPE PIP ,
~ NOTE Should larger sized unlts be requtred, refer to Catalog Section D4 tor PACO
Submersible Non-Clog Pumps, TYPE NSC and PIP
I I I I I I I f I! I 1 1 I! 1 1 ~ rnE suaMMsreLE MpaaR No -
_ i I ~ I I I 1 t I~ I I~ i►! ~ooa wo DE AM -
i I l I I I I I I 1 I I I I I~ i I i sm ucw aim►e Na ac.2W
APM - OATE "If
I I~~ I~ 1~ i~ I^i I , ,
40Ilillll III (~ttlfil jjlll~ll IIII1111~11l11~Illillitl~
IIIII I,IIIIIIIIIJIIIIII II III~I llf
LJ~
•30 ~ I I ~I ~ ~ ITI ! I I I I
I I f I I I I I iL I I 1 Ii ~
~ I I► I( I , M'~~ I I~ I ~ I I~ I I I i I
AP", a 20 1i~i~ jii~ t~~►~ ~~it'~i'~'t ~ i
~ ~ I I ~ ' ~ t~ ( I t j+ I I ' I I I~ I I I f 1 I
~ ~ I I( ~ ~D~arK Mp I i I i 4 I I f`~,1 I I~ t I I► 1 I
~ ll~~ i111111{ ~I I G I~~I iiE~ll!
II IIIII'lI~I'~+ 11~1 -:!i ~11~~
r 10I1+1~III~I~II~~iI '1~1i ~fl'r tll~~
I~III,I~IIIIiI~~illll III l ill ~~I
Il~~~t 1111i11111~111 II i I~
,
, o ,o 2o so ao so eo 76
U.S. dALLONS PEA MINIITB (BeaM o Z 4pnf pw spwml
_ TYPE S(VI
.
0 6 10 t6 20 n 3~0
MCDHL 1670~0 r~t~t~ iw 1880
, , s+sa fSl"xT irsuu ert wN► ?ri0 ~r*
- VV" SM wTa 11 T7
ar 1750 aarN Mo. RG1 ti0
Olq . 18
~ . '
Q.7Q" p~q 60'~ 1~
~ a~" 014 B6l4 Q
~ 40 - ~ J!
s
OIA s
~ ~ t0
OI
~
25 8
3
8
~ 4.OD"' OtA
4
~
Z
~
p ~ 0
- K wtio i~ NP 9070RS MOT AYAtLA81E
_ 0 m 40 m 90 100 m 1~0
NS01LLLIMoEA YIMlITg f9e~+~ . 1 oeu er orwl
Iy ~ ~
COMFARATIVE PA,RMG ANALYSIS
FOR
EAGLE ##315 - SPOKANE
E. 5204 SPRAGUE
PA►RKING STUDY FOR EAGLE HA►RDWARE AND GARDEN CE;NTERS
AUGUST 1991, REVISED JANUARY 13,1992
~ (DAVID I HAMLIN dt ASSOCIATES)
~
This study was de+eloped frotn surveys conducted on the Spokane ( N 6800 Dnnstan)
and Federal Way stores The garking demand aras based upon the retail floor space
~ (wluch mciudes the Hardware, Budding Mazenals, and Garden Supphes floor area, but
excludes Storags aad Offce areas) The proposed Spo[cane (E 5204 Sprague) store has
126,832 square feet of Retail floor space
The study mdicues that the rtiaximum ratio for the store would be 3 3 parking stalls per
thousand square feet of total Retad Sales space Tlus pariang supply would be sufficent
to meet the parking demands for the rnost active shoppmg day of the year
.
Based xpon tfus rate, the proposed Spokane stare would have the foqowtng parkmg
demand
126 832 x 3 3= 418 5 stalls
PARICNG UTII.IZATION AND CAPACITY
FINAL E LS FOR EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN STORE
CITY OF BELLEVUE
S ER 17, 1993
An addrtional study at the Tukwta aad Federal Way stores was condurted for the E I S
for the proposed BeJlevue store, to use as a corapanson wnth the parlung demand data
developed by Hambn The study adjusted the parlang deinand based upon sales
traASactians to develop a weighted average peak for customer spaces per 1,000 square
feet of RetmI floor space of 192 for weekdays and 2 95 for weekends Based upon these
rates, the proposed Spokane store woutd have the foilawcng customer parlung demand
Weekday 126,832 x 192 = 243 5 stalls
Weekend 1267832 x 2 95 = 374 2 stalls
(
The peak eatployee parlung demand occurs duruig the shift overlaps
Weekday- Shsft 1(7 30-4 30) 48
_ Shift 2(12 00-9 00) 32
- Total 80
Weekend Shift 1(7 30-4 40) 85
Sbnft 2(12 00-9 00) 32
117
Combnung the customer aad employee parking demandr, the total estunated parlang
demand for the proposed Spokane store would be
Weekday 243 5+ 80 = 323 5 stalls
Weekend 374 2+ 117 = 4912 stalls
CONCLUSION
The proposed 573 parkuzg stalls exceeds the actual parking demand esumated usmg the
above referenced studies eaclosed hereanth
1USE (SQ l'T ) SAOKANE CO SPOKANE CO HAMLIN BELLEVUE BELLEWE
(ALL RETAIL) (BULK RETAIL) PARKING EIS EIS
ANALYSIS WEEKDAY WEEKEND
HARQWARE 1200 1200 3 31000 1921000 2951000
(54,980) 2749 2749 1814 1056 1622
GARDEN
SC1PA[ IES 1200 1200 331000 1921000 2951000
(22,922) 1146 1146 756 44 676
H[11LDING
MATERIALS 1200 1500 33,1000 1921000 2951000
(48930) 2447 979 1615 939 1443
STORAGE 12000 I 2000 N/A N/A N/A
(26,530) 133 133
(JFFICEIADMIN 1350 1350 N/A N/A N/A
(291?) 83 $3
6MPLOYEES
(AT SIfIFT
(lVEltl AP) N/A N/A N/A 80 117
TOTAL PARKfNG I ~
REQ(JREA 6558 509 0 4185 3235 4911
['ARKINC PROVIQED 573 573 573 573 573
1
~
Fl NAL ENVI RO NN1 ENTAL I M PACT STATEM ENT
FOR
EAG LE HARDWARE & GARD E N STO RE
CITY OF BELLEVUE
Prepared for the revLew and comment of agencies, affected tnbes, aad members of
the public in compliance anth
The State Envsronmental Pohcy Act (SEPA)
Cbapter 43 21C of the RevLsed Code of Washiagton
as revned 1983
SEPA Rutes
Chapter 197• 11, W ashingtoa Admunsuative Code
BeIlevoe Environmental Procedures Code
C~apoer 20 02 of the City Code
Daw of Tssuance Septenabez 17,1993
F.arliest Date Acnoa
May be Takea September 24,1993
~10
-eioo~
Susan L. Sgachez
Eavironmental Coordinator
• ~
ELEMENTS OF THE ENViRONMENT
■ - ,
: .V4 Spa= 0f ympoad
~s=W&
0f8eftmIaadUse (',od&
~
.
~
~
S
Park,ng Utiiization and Capacity
The project propanent wdI provide 497 gazlang spaces on rhe site The City
of Bellevue Land Use Code requues a muumum of 4 4 spaces per 1004 net
square feet (nsfl of retail Aoor space and a maxunum of 4 5 spaces per 1,000
nsf of retail flaor space For bulk retaiI uses wbuch uzclude home futnishmgs
aad major apphances the Land Use Code requues 15 spaces per 1,000 nsf
up uo a maxinazam af 3 spaces per 1000 nsf
• Retad [63 5691 gsf at 4 0 1 000= 254
~ Buik Retail [79,783] gsf at 15 I,ooo= 120
Total 374
Parkirtg demaad was also estuaated, based on a parlang studies performed at
ocher EaQle Hardware stores The f rst study was prepared by David Harnim
and Associates m AugusL 1991 and updated in Decesnber 1991 The study
~ is ntled Parkucg Sacdy for Eugle Hardware (David I. Hamlui and AssocaLes,
1991) Ttus studv was made for Eagle Hardware stores in Spoksne aad
Tu]kwila. 'rhese two stores are snmilaz to the proposed Bellevue F.agle
~ Hardware store, but bath are smaller than the propos+ed store
The Hamlun study bases the demand for parkans! spaces on "reta.il floor space,"
~ which is calculated by dedacung storkee space trom arvss floorspace Forth+e
- Bellewe Eagle Hardwar+e store the retail floor space aznounts to 121,077
square feec of floor space The Hamlin study determined that the peak parking
,
EAGLE HARDWARE E15 205
~
~
•
SEt. iON 3
F
~
t
demand day was the Fnday after Thanksgivuig and requued about 3.3 stalls
per 1000 square feet of retad spac,e for cnstomers, and that the weekday peak
parlang demand was 73 percent of the weekend demand (2 41 sta]1s/1,000 sq
ft} Following 2s the estimated weekday and weekend peakparking demands,
based on the Hamlin stady parking raLes and the amount of retail floor space ~
in the Bellewe store
~ Weekday- 121077 x 2 41 = 292 spaces ~
• Weekend 121077 x 3.30 = 400 spaces
The second stody at Eagle Hardware stores aas perfonned as part of the
analysis and conducted for this EIS, and conmted of parking accumulatioa
studies at two eusvng Eagle Hardware stAres m ttie Seatde area on July 24, ~
1993 (Saturda.y) and July 27, 1993 (Tuesday), to use as compansons wnth
parking demand data developed by Hamlin.
~
Tukwda Store Hamlin a]so collected parking data at the Tukwila ute in
September 1991 and in Novernber 1991, on a Saturday and on a Monday
The September studies were made shortly after the openuig of the Eagle store ~
at that location, and could be different than an average, siace customers
t,ended to stay at the score longer tbaa at other stiores that had beea opened
longer (Spokane and Tukwda in November) The sttidies conducted for this ~
EI.S result,ed in apeakparking generatton rate of 2 77 spacesper 1,000 square
feet of retail floor space on Samrday, July 24 and 2 48 spaces per 1,000 square
feet of retail floor space on Tuesday, July 27 This compares annth Hamlia's ~
3 04 (Septenaber) and 2 41(November) rates for Saturday and 198 (Septem-
ber) and 195 (November) weekday parking generation rates ~
According to Eagle Hardware uansactLoas data, July is "typically one of the
lugher transaction moaths." Thus the July cownt data mnst be factored to ~
represent an average Sawrday or and average weekday Transaction data
supphed by Eagle Hardware mdicates that fa,ctors of 0 94 and 0 92 must be
apphed to the July daca to calculate the average parking generation rates of ~
2 60 and 191 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail floor space for Saturdsy
and weekdays, respectively Data from Hamvn's study were nsed to calculate
~ Saxurday and weekday parking generatioa rates Thus data indlcaties tbat ~
a factor of 126 must be apphed to the average rates tn amve at esnmated ~
parking geaerauon ratres Thus, the Saturday and weekday ~ parkiag
generation rates at TuMa are 3 30 and 2 42 spaces per 1000 square feet of ~
retatI floor space, respecuvely The 3 30 value compares favorably vnth
Hatnlui's recommendauon as a~a parktng demand rate ~
EAGIE HAROWARE El5 206
.
i
1
ELEMENTS 4F THE ENVIRONMENT ' f
- - - ~
1
Federal Way Datacollectedforttnssge md=te thatthe parlaaggenerabon
rams at ttie Federal Way store on Saturday, July 24 andTuesday,July 27 were
214and 130 spaces pe,r 1,400 square feetofretailspace, respecavely Using
the same ~nethrodology as for Twlswila, the ~ par]ang generanon rates for
Fedeacai Way were calctilated to be 2 63 and 146 spac.es per 1,000 square feet
of retail floar space for Samrdays and weekdays, respecttvely
WEIGHTED AVERAGE TUKWILAIFEDERAL WAY
A weighted average ~ pazkuig generatioa rate was calculated for the
coanbmed Tukwila and Federal Way stores. These pok valnes are Saturfty
-2 95 and weekday-192spaces per 1,000 sqnane feetofretad floorspa+ce
1'hese weighted averaae rates are lower than recommended in th+e Haaalin !
study, and wouid result in the following pariartg requueineats for customer
spaces for the proposed Bellevue Eagle store
• Weekday 121077 x 192 = 232 spaces
• Weekend 121477 x 2 95 = 357 spaces
Employee parkriaag demand has been esvaoatie d, based on the pmJectproponent's
esnsnaoe of number af einployees, by shift, for an average weekday and for an
average weelcend day
Followvng are the esnmated nuiaber of employees, by shift.
• weekday- shdt 1 (7 30- 4.30) 48
shift z (12 oag oo) 32
Totai, bath shfts 80
• weekend Shift 1(7 30- 4 30) 85
Shift 2(12 00-9 OQ) 32
Totai, both slufts 117
~
Since the shifts overlap the peakemployee parlang detnand will be during the
ame of rhe overlap Under the assumption chac 90 pezcent of the staff would
dnve thevr vehncles co work, the weekday and weekend employee peak
parlaag demands wonld be 72 and 105 spaces, respecnvely Combinnng the
~ customer and eYnployee pazking demands total es=atred pariang demaad far
weekday and weekend p+eaks wouid be 304 and 462 spaces, respectively 'Ihe
497 spaces proposed by the project propanent i.s m excess of the esamated
~ weekead peak padung dexaand of 462 spaces
- - • Anl4/ABC Cle, 207
[
t
~ .
PARYaINC: S°1'UDY
F4A
, LAGLE HaRDwARE AND GARDF.N S
AvGusT 1991
. REVISED JANUARY 13, 1992
.
DAVTD I HAML:.N AND ASSOCTATES
1319 Daxeer Aveaue North
Seactte Wssh 98109
(206) 285•9035
~
~
ti
TA$Lri. aF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS f
LIST OF TAHLES l~
I.IST OF FIGURES
H
IrrrROOVCTaoN 1
~
- SU'RtTEY LOCATIONS AND DATES 1
STORE CHARACTERISTSCS Z
SvRVV METHODaLoGY 3
SURVEY RESULTS 3
a Parkinq Accumulation 4
b Parklnq Duration 14
SUrIIKARY CF SURVEY REStJLTS 14
~
~
L1ST OF FIG~J!R~S
P age
FIGU'RE l, PARKSNG LOT ACCUMVLATioN, SPOKlNE STORE, 5
FRIDAY, JULY 19 , 1991
FIGURE 21 PARKING LOT ACCUrMVLATION, SPOKArdE STORE, 6
SATURDAY, JULY 20, 1991
FZGURE 31 PARKING LOT ACCUMVYATZON, TvKWILA STORE, ?
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1991
~ VIGURE 4, PARKING LOT ACCUMVLATICN, TUKWIS.A STOR£, 8
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
FIGURE 5, PARKING LOT ACCJJMULATION, TtJ' 'WILA STORE, 9
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 1991
FIGURE 6, PARKING LOT ACCUMULATION, TVKWILA STORE, 10
J MONDA't , NOVEZRBER 25, 1991
FIGURE PARKING LOT ACCUMULATION, TnRWILA STORE, 11
SATURDAY, JANUARY 11, 1992
FIGURE 71 AVF.ZAGE OURATION PARKED, SPOK;ANE STORE, 15
FRIDAY, JULY 191 1991
FIGtJRE 81 AVERP►GE DURATION PARKED, SPOX;ANE STORE, 16
SATURDAY, JULY 20, 1991
FIGURE 9, AvERAG£ DtJRATION PARKED, TVKWYLA STORE, 17
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1991
FIGURE 10, AVERAGE DaRATI4N PARKED, TVKWILA STORE, 18
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 161 1991
,
{
~
I.IST OF TABLTS
Page
TABLE 1, STORE CHARACTERISTICS, SPOKAHE STORE a
TASLL 21 STORE CAARACTERISTICS, TUKWILA aTORE 2
TABLE 3, MAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND, SPOKANE 4
TASLE a, MAXIM PARKING DEMAND, TUitWILA iZ
TABLE 5, SALES ACTIVITY, StJRVEY DAYB VS 12
AVLRAGE jMAXIM7M DAY
TABLE 6, ADSIISTLD PARKING DE»KAND l~
.
I !
~
~o~ucrr~N
The purposa of this report is to present the gindings of
parkinq surveys that have bsen conducted for Eagle HardWare
stores in Snokane and Tukwlla The parkinq surveys have been
conducted in order tv develop 6tatistics that can be used to
deter-mine parking supply requirements for Eaqle Hardware
- stores that taay be developed in the future.
~ SUKVLY LOCATtONS AND DATES
Parkinq characterisl.,'ics were aeasured at the Eaqle Hars3ware
store in Spokane on Friday, July 19, 1991 and Saturday, July
20, 1991 Parking characteristfcs were measured ar the Eaqle
Hardware store in Tukrdila on Saturday, September 7, 1991,
Monday, September 16, 1991, Sat•srday, HoveA~ber 23, 1991,
Monday, NovembQr 25, 1991, and Saturday, January 11, 1992
The Eagle Hardware s,6%.*re in Spokane is locate3 a ccnsiderable
dZStance ncrth of the downtawn area a=ong Divlsion Street, a
ma)or north-south ar±er=a1 facil-*_y T'-.e ge^e=a1 locat:on of
the store f s comme: c:a 1 in nature wi th tne tip ica l
• deveZopment canslsting of restaurants and stores with on-site
parkinq fac:lities Tha Eaqle Hardware store is a new
gaci l it•f w1 th a large supply o f on-s ite parking (415 slbaces )
The parking is arran5ed along the west side of the buildinq
(19 spaces), the north s ide of the building (52 smaces the
east si ' de of the bullding (130 spaces), and the south side of
the building (164 spacas) The parkzng along the south 6ide
of the building is closest to tbe entrance and exit for the
store and is where most customers gar.k Durinq perieds of
heavy parking demand, customers w111 park alonq tha west and
east siaes of the buildinq as =equlred Employe`S are
allowed to park on-site in the taoslAw. easterly parking areas on
alI days except Satu=day
The Soakane Eagle Hardware stare cflmmenced business in
Novenber 1990
The Earle Hardware store in Tukalla is located alonq the east
sice of 4he Sout`ic`nte= Shoopinq Mali and is easz?;l
accessible J.6.rom area freeways and sur:ace roadways The
s tore is served by a tota: of 389 par't..ng s talls of dhicz 47
are snared wlth othe: bus_nesses and arn awailable to
cus'Zocve:s of the har3ware stores onll on non-weekdays The
parkinS which is exclusi le? I availanle 'Zo Eagle custcmers is
locatad on the east and south sides vg tZe store I.-ui'_aing
The sspnlenenta? park_ng wrlcZ :s ava+_aAle only parm of %.he
time { s on the north side of the st*re eui_ding
Tb*te Tukd_la s"Core alsc conta=ns the c2rrorate otfIces for
Eagle riar3ware and Gar3en Canters Ive emp layess of t`:e bot`i
the s tpflre and twhe corporate cf f Zces are required to parn in a
secarat4 cff-s~tz parkinq faci_a.t1 The =,rpor3ce oif_css
i
~
are visited by a variety of peopl.a throuqhout the day and
these visitors park in fi.he s=e parkinq facilities as are
used by the customers of the store.
The Tukwila Eagle Hardware store commenced business on the
tirst day of Auqust, 19914
~ STQRE CHARACTERISTICS
Both of the EaqZe Hardware stozes used far this suzwey have a
combination of retail sales space and Btorage space The
retail sales space consists of "conventional" sales area and
"bulk" sales area The bulk salss area would include those
portfons of the store where very larqe items are on display
and available to the custamer The Tuk~~rila store alsc
contains the carporate oPPices Por Eaqle Hardware and Garden
Canters. A breakdown of the spaca utslization for each of
the two stores is ghown in the tables below
TABLE 1,
spg STt7Rr
JSAGE, FLOOR A.
Retail (canventional) 68,095 Sr
Ratail (bulk) 28,834 SF
Garden department 7.8 0 Sg
sub-total------------ 104,729 SF
Staraqe 9~_ i SF
total---------------- 1140240 Sc'
USLE 'L
TCJKWILA STORE
U GX FLOOR AAgh
Retail (conventional) 710584 SF
Retail (bulk) 31,081 SF
Garden department 7~20q SP
sub-tota..------------ 110,663 Sr
Storaqe 5.863 SF
sub-total------------ 116,530 Se
Corporate oCf ices 15.204 SF
total---------------- 131,730 Sr
There are several siqnificant difgerences betdeen the stores
that have a hear+nq on 4the rssults of t'^e parkinC 6urveys
The Spokane store allows erplayees to gark on-site during
weekdays,_ but not on weekenas TAhe presence of the
employeas' vehicles cn a weekday influences both the
accumulatzan and dur3t+on characrerast:cs for users of the
parking facilitie6 at thaz :ocat_cn The Tu3rrila store does
not al:ow employees ta Far't cn-site at any t.+me, however it
also serves as t'ie ? ocaz,.on : cr t:te cor~orate o ff_ces f or
i
Eaqle Hardware and Garden Centers and this attracts some
parkinq that is not dlrectly related to the store itsalf
This causes Bome fncrease in the asaount of vehicles in the
parkinq lot on a typical weekday, but would have negliqible
efPect on a weekend
&UVEY ~T OD
The parkinq eurveys tor t"e Spokane study and tor the first 2
days of the Tukwila study were conducted using the "licans8
plate method" This tec:snique involves making rQgular
circuits throuqh the parkinq lat and notinq the presence ar
~ absence of parked vehicles fn each parkinq stall vehicles
Pound to be irt the eame parking stall on subsequent circuits
are sa noted so that inforaatzon concerninq tha duration of
visits to the store can be compiled
The parkinq surveys for the last two days of the TuIvdi:a
Study (November 23 and 25) consistmed of makinq regular
circuits of tha parking facilities and countinq the number of
vahzc?es parked
The parkinq checks gor the Spokane storz were conducted a~
fifteen minute intervals from 845aM to 5PM on Fr,.day and at
30 minute a.ntervals f: om 1IAM to 5 3 OPM on Saturday Some
pesiods were missed on Friday due to the very large numbez of
parking stalls that were surleyed
The park.ng checks tor the Tukwila store were conductsd at 30
minute intervals for alI survey days The survey perlod was
from 10 OOAM to 5 30PM on Saturday, Septsmmer 7th, Erom
9 30AM to 5 30PM on Monc:ay September 16th, f:om 11 OOAM to
3 OOPM an Satirday, November 23rd, Erom li oOAM to 3 OOPX on
Monday, Navember 25th and from li oOAM to 3 OOPM on Saturday,
Januarl ilth The shorter survey periods for the last Z days
were possible hecause the peak perzods had been clearly
identi:ied in the earlier 2 surveys
The rssults of the parkinq studl clearly indicate that t.e
per:ads of maximum park{ ng detaand were ocserved during a:,l of
the sur leys
~uRv'5v R T
The data o4zained grom the parkang surveys prov_ded
_nfcr -.at+on Afor the summarizat+on of total par3cfng usage by
timQ of day (parking acCumuyatIon, for a:_ survey days and
4he ~i-e parked (park:nq durat f on ) f or a'_ 1 c f thase 4hc used
the parx_ng facilities on tie days «here t'-e i_cense plate
met'^od was usad
~
a ~,.~cirX.AccuMula%ion
Figures i and 2 show the Parking Accumulation by time of day
for the &pokane Eaqle Hardware store for each of the tao
survey days The qraphs show the total numbtr of vehicies
- parked (employees plus customers) and the total number of
custflmer vehicles that were parked tor each time period of
the survey The maximum numser of customer vehicles and the
time of maxamum accumulation is noted at the bottorn of each
o g thQ f igur es
Figures 3, 4, 51 6, and 7 shcw the Parkinq Accamulatsan Eor
the Tukjila Eagle Hardwara atore The infor.nation shown on
the graphs is the same as described aloove for the Spokane
store It is notEd that the parking facilities in the
2ukwila store are not availahia to any emplcyees of either
the store or the corpcrate oPficas, however the visitors ta
the corparate of+ices do use the parkzng on a rsqular basis
Park=ng sspply require=ents gor comaercial businesses are
qenerally based on tae amount of floor space ta:.t`t3n the
building ( s) that the park:nq f acf lzti is to serve Some
co=erc:a? builaings will cansist of several different types
of usaqe and it is usually appropriate ta-cOmgute tl%e parkinq
requirements gor each independent usage in orwer- to arrive at
the total requirement In the case of a tip+cal Eagle
Hardwara store, the facility is mostly rAtail sales snace
with some cffice and Warshouse space ta supporz the
comaescfal activ:.ty For t'sis rsasan, it wauld sesm
appropriatie to campute the park3ng racuirement solely on the
basis of reta!1 sales space (conventional plus bulk plus
garden) since that would be the best measure of parking
damand
Tables 3 and 4 show the max+mum parkinq usaqe for each of the
seven survey days for the tdo storss, exgressed as number of
spaces ut+litad per thousand square fegt of retail sales
space, and, tor c~paratvi re purposes, number of saaces
ut_ l,ze3 per thousand sCUare feet of Ithe entare s Lore
fac_liti (daes not inc:ude corporate ofr♦cas at Tukdila
stare)
MaLF,J.
L4AXI , _ oARK;NG DE'M,- :JPOKAN,F,
PA.K+NG SPACiS / PAR.K+:IG SPACE"S /
0 "RE:'&:-. SPI►C; 1OQD SF ErT•~ QRE
: r_Gdy , 4 i 19 f91 ~ 23 1 13
Satsr3ay, 4/20/91 1 75 1 60
~
1 ~
~
~ •
1
~
E ~Agt~
,
zco t
,
~
~ 1 1 S ~ ' ~
.a ~ ~ ~
t
oo rME
~ Lt~ p`~ p,N~ 1
F
r~ ~
~ ~
,0
' l1
EAGLE HaRawaRE PARKING STUDY
, - -
t
zoo -
18o-
~
w
~ ~ f ,
~
140 • `
Q
~ 1 z0 •
Y + 3 .
a E o
a 100 • °
ul
W
~ eO , '
W ~
> 80 ~
r ~
40 - 20 - '
1 4 10 11 12 I 1 ~ ~ S 8
JM ^ PY ~
T1 ME
PAP,KING LCT ACCIJMULATICN
SPCKANE
SATUROAY JUI.Y 20 1991
,
CUSTQMERS - ElaFO"E;S
CJS i OMERSE F1 G l,1 F` 2
~
~
~
.
EAG LE HAR D WaRE PAR KING S i U QY
sso~---- - _ ,
340- ti
3za -
ti
3OY ~ I
f ~ ~
ti
260 -
240 -
i
~
"O - i..~
ZQ0'' I
~
~
t80
i
t 60 • ~
O , -
Y 120 •
ac
a
d t oc -
~ W
v 80 ~
> 80 -
40 • i
TO - '
I
e 1 10 tz i t 3 • s e
Is AM n pM ~
TIME
PAFK,'NG ! aT aCCJMUI.A71CN
TUK'NI LA
'SwATUPGA( ccPTE41EE-0 7 1 y5 ~
F. J
t
L
I ..I rt, -r-7
^ ~`~vr w .~LrM
i
I
~ -
1
EAGLE HARDV11aRE PARKING STUDY
360 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~
3a0-
32a- ~
~
a8a -
2so - ~
~
z4o - ~
=20 -
zoo •
,
,80
~y
~
f~
160
t ,
1 `Q ~ I ~ v I
o w
Y 1 ZO - „
w ~
w
u 80 . ~
i ,
~ 80 -
40 • ,
20,
~
, . r.._.r.~ - - ~ .
e g 10 tt 12 ~ t ~ s ~
PARKING LC3 i ACCJMI;LAi IGN
TU KWI i.a
MONOAv SOcPO'cMBEP 1 E 1 95 1
FiGJRE
MaAla1'%.o•A CvSzGt~E= vFr-,'C~_~ 219 ,-7 , ^4 ^,.OGP',A
~
EAGLE HARDWARE F,4QKING STUdY
360j------- -
r ,
~ 34p -
3ZO - i
100 - '
~
280 - ~
260' l ~ r r
~
~
240 • •
1 N
V
22C -
~
~
Z00 - ~
~
t @0 ~ ~
160 ~ ' '
' +o F ~
W ~
Y i ZQ -
a t0o - ~
W
v 80-
' > 60 -
40 •
20 -
~ - .
-
8 i f0 11 11 1 I J ~ S 4
AY ^
~ pY /
TtME
FaRKiNG La'oi* a,CCUMUl.a-1CN
T V K'N I 1..r1
SATI;RQA" NOVEMEc < 23 1991
FiGUr-,,z- 5
~ 1 I'"~ I` ~A L ~ Lr ~1rI1 0 I 1 E ~ ~ C r j~r S Z ~ f I^ ~ 3 A J~A
Q
}
1
~
S ~ ut)y
~►R~~~ . ~ ~
1 - ,
a ~
' ~ 3ao ~ 1, ► ~
. ~ " ~ ~ ` ~ • ~
" 1 go@ ` , ~ ►
~
'
240
1
~ %sQ
~ l
~ 140.
46 10m ' ~ `1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ►
W 80 ~ 1 ' ` ~ i , - ' `
1~
40
pl'1
9 t~ , 1~ S1PaE
, ` . LnT
Y {VQ~'~"~E~~ 2 15
1 "'ONC
~
~
,
-
~ . _ _
~
~
EAGLE HARo-WARE PARKING- STUDY
360, - - - - - - - - - - - -
~
3a0 -
~
~
320 , ,
M-4
3CO - Y
Z80 - ~
260 - "
~ i
T;0 • .
M ~
220 ~ ~
20a -
180 - q
~
160 - ,
140 -
W ~
. x t 20 ~
~
a' 100 • ~
,
N ~
W
v 80 •
S `
> 60 -
40 -
~
,
20 r
i
~
8 ! t0 tt 12 1 t 3 ♦ l e
~ AY ~ AIL oof
TIME
PARKIN ; LCT ACCftvLMULA~idN
TU KV'I1L4
SAi URDAY JANUArtY 1~ 1542
3
FIGJRE 7
~
- ~ I c _ t - \ J v F
L
i
MAXIMQM DARICTNG DFMD - TUKWILA
PARXING SPACES/ PARKING SPACES/
DAYIDATE .1000 $F RETAIL SPkCF .100Q SF ENTME ST_E
Saturday, 9j7j91 3 04 2 89
_ Monday, 9116J91 1198 1 88
Saturday, 11/23/91 Z 41 2 29
Monday, 11/25/91 1 95 l 85
Saturday, 1j11/92 3 00 2 85
Daily sales volvme is considered to be the most reliable
variable that can be used to predict parkinq demand for Eaqle
Hardware and Garden Centers It is possible to campare sales
vclume on the day og a sur"iey to sales volume on an averaqe
and/or maximum sales day in order to equate parkinq demands
to a particular condition While evldenca suqqest that the
rate of cu,stomer increasee may nct be quite as great the tate
of increase in sales vol.wae, this technique allows the best
methad Par estzmatznq the azaount og parkinq that will be
raquire3 to accomtaodate csstomers for a varlety of
conditions
Information has been obtained grom Eagle Hardware and Garden
storss cartcerainq the business activiti an the par-ticslar
days oE the surveys as it relates to averaqe and maximum
sales conditions Sased on sales reczipts data acquired
since the szores have been onen, the fol.lowinq ingor-natien
concerninq sales activiti on the survay days ve:sus averaqe
and maxzmum sales days is presented
.TA9LE 3
SALES ~CTIVITY - SURtTr,,v, DAYS VEWUS AVF;R$2VM-AXjXL7M DAYS
JOCAT?ON /DATE, 3 AXZ,,.R_AGF~,S~S DAY ~t MAXINIUM SA;&S QU
Spoicane
Friday, 7/19191 11.9 5% 64 8%
Saturday, 7j20/91 129 70 4$
Tuk-aila
Satur3ay, 9/7/91 not ava11 74 4%
Monday, 9/17/91 not avail 54 3%
Satsr3ay, 11/23/91 not avail 73 3$
Monday, 11j25/91 not avail 50 7$
Satatday, 1j11/92 not avai+ 79 4$
Nate that :nfor-1at:.on ccnce=n.nq the ave: aqe day :etail sales
is rtot available far tlqe '*ukwila s-tore due ta t"e relat_trely
sncr= per_oa of t=me 6C^az the store has been ogen
Saturdays are *%*.radit+cna? _ f the busfest day og the 4eek with
t!~e sales recelpts on a *Zlpic31 Saturcay zeirtq agproxizaately
20 pe: cent greater t`:ar tMe sales rec`irts an atlpical
- ~.w„ 1, ~ ee- -%~kr .,0 r4p ",paZ 4il_ be dLr.,.na a
l
holiday period and may or may not be a Saturday, depending cn
the cireumstancas The maximum sales recsipts for the
Spokane store occurred on May 25, 1991 which was the Saturday
precedinq Memorial Day The maximum groes receipts for the
Tukwila stora occuzred on September 31, 1991 which was the
Saturday bef ore Labor Day The secarui bus f est day o fthe
year for the Tukrdila store was the day after Thanksgivinq
which was a Friday ne fiqures trom the day af ter
Tharksgivinq, which wera very nearly the same as gor the day
betore Labor Day, were used to computs the tiqures shawn in
Table 5 since they are considered to be mast representative
af a maximura day not intluencasi by the novelty of a new store
Btill experiencinq a qrand openinq phenoffiena
The information shown above in Tables 3, 4 and 5 can be
cambined ta develop an adjusted relatianship bet"dean parking
demand and tetail tloor sgace The adjusted parkinq ratios
for each og the survey days are shown in Table 6
J$,B~E 6
~D~ ED PA,NG IDEMM
• PAZ&Jn~Lg SPACES L= SF RET TT S'PACE
L QCAJ~TON / OA.„ AVERAG L.§AL.FS DAv,. xv 4waS W
Spokane
Fr~day (7/I9/91) 1 03 1 94
Satur3ay ( 7/ 2 0 f 91) 1 35 Z 49
Tuk•,dila
Satur3ay (9/7191) not avail 4 OS
Monday (9J16/91) not avail 3 65
Saturday (11j23/91) not avail 3 Zs
Monday (11/25/91) not avail 3 84
Saturday (1J11/92) not avali 3 78
It is notad that the ad]ustad partiinq deAand for twhe Spokane
stcre is consZStently lower than the adjusted par3cing demand
for the Tukdila store on a day-gor-da1 basis I~ is also
noted that tae p: o3ec tzd denand base3 on the park:.ng dat3 gor
the Tukdila store tor Monday, Seoter~er 16th and Mcnday
Novembe: ZSth are based on 6ta►tistics that are :nflue*tced by
pzrk;nq wh,,.cz is not di:ectIl related ta the stcre, i e, by
visitor parking denaand gene."atad by the ccrporate ofgice
space This parkinq ccmgonent would not be present on a
Saturday or holiday pe:icd
It is :urtoher ncted that the projected demand based cn the
:.,rs t Saturday survey of t-he Tukw i+a stare is inf luencec3 by
the newness og the storz at the ti=e of the surrey and the
presence of non-c~sstomer oarking that was relatad ta various
contractor act+vit.,es tzaL dere under•way ~nsicie the store at
that "Cime The fiqures fcr that par -.icular day shouId be
disccurtted in assessinq park_nq needs for Eag1A Har3ware ar.d
r,r4Qn Centers
b Park;na Qu=ation
Fiqures 8, 91 10, and 11 shcw ths duration of t_me that
vehicles remained in the parkang lots on each of the t-do days
of the Spokane survey and f or the f ust two days of the
_ Tukwlla survey It is noted that the Friday 6tatistics for
the Snokare store are afEected by the fact that empZoyees
wQrs garked on-site.
The parking surveys for the single Saturday at the Spokane
store and for the firgt Saturday at the Tukwila store showed
considerable difgerences between stares in terins af the
lenqth of time that vehicles remained in the parkinq lots A
compariscn oP the durations of stay on those survey days
shows that approximately 42 percent of the parke:s at the
TukwiZa store stayed more than 90 minutes while 12 percent ot
the parkers at the Spokane store stayed more than 90 minutes
The same comparison for the sinqle weekday survev at the
Spokane sl%loore and for the girst weekday survey at the Tukdila
store ehows that 30 pe: Cent of tZe parkers az the ':ukwiia
store stayed more than 90 minutzs and 25 percant of the
parkers at the Spokane store s-tayed more than 90 minutes and
this included a large number ot eaployees whose vehicles
rema+red virtually all day .
The unusual. conditians that existed at the Tukdila store at
the time of the September su=veys would account for the
lonqe: durations of stay that were recorded fer that gaciZity
f or those days when compared wi th the Spokane stcrp
While the more recent surveys did not include a study of
durat+ons of 6tay, it is assuaced that the average stay in the
parking lot would be much lower today and th:.s evidenced by
the statistics ptovZded in Table 6 which shows less overall
demand on c=itlcal days (Saturdays) for the second Saturday
which was surveyed aparoximately 2-1/2 months after tbe gitst
SaZUrday This decl:ne in overall demahd wi?1 mcst likely
cont.nue as more and anorz c..szamers ad3ust ta the store and
it,-s selectlon and ar:ancement of ineschandise, artd, more
partp:cularly, as more zagla Har3ware and Gar~zen Canters arQ
deve~aped Within the ?uget Svund reglon The new stares t'~at
a=e cur: ently in the p? anninq staqes are expeclZec to draw
cust-zmers f:om wlt~~n *%.,he sales area of the Tukdi_a store
t::ereby rsduc~nq de-mand at ttiat s,,te
UMMARY OF.V1tVEY RE~,j,TLTI
:'I-e infor-~ation gained frca *-e surieys descr+ber.-* in this
repcr= can be used to est:nate the requiremerts gor parking
supgll _n fsture E3gZe Har3ware stares T6-e sur rey has
incj catea that the tav s-e: es now irc caerac_en are genesat:ng
a^eed far park_nq suaces .0.6at wculd ranqe `rcm agproximacely
25 to acprox,.n.atzly : 3 sDaces per. thcusand sauare feet of
reta_1 f_ocr space (c--Vnvent_cnai reta:_ arsa pius mulk :ecai.
t
~
1
_ GLE HAROWAFZE FAR'1 N G S1VDj
~ EA
1200
,
, .
1040
~ 5276
$0'
aoa 1 ~
.
U, roao - ~
Vj
_ J
• U -
~
~
W
> 23%
L. 404 353
0 ~
, - ~
a
w
m ~ g% 6%
Z 200 146 96
' $6 1% 1?0 ~
. ~ 31 21 15
Z 'g
Z Z Iz ~ C Z
C
a~' t0 ~i ~ c ~ ~
Ul
a
S puRATt4N
AvERaG
crOKANE
, ,
i
~
- pp,RKl~tG STUOY
~GLS p,Rt)yV AR~
88~
1202
t 1200
r t
1000
t
,
Soo .0 600
~
U ~
Z
w ~
, 404 -
O '
w
m
~
~ 200
~ - ~
- ?5 4% 2%
-45 33
~
Z
~
Z ~ Z
Z a g
~ a C4 _
tp ~ ~ N
l 6 c r ~tJN ?PR4C~g ~'IGU~sE ~
p,VECURA
-rr
,KkNE
. .
r
~
EAG LE HAR D1NAR E PAR K I N G STU OY
1600 158%
1534 ,
' 1400
1200
1000
24%
~ SGO 774 '
w ~ .
~ U
Z
> 600
~O
OC ,
W 400
m
~ z ' 240
,
200 4%
1 1 V
■ r ~
Z
,
Z Z
c cv
C Qi -
~ I 1 C~
I ~ O N
AvE IAc~ auRA-aCn, ~aRs<ED FIGUR` 1 G
TU yC'N I l.a ~
_ i
EAGLE HARDWARE PARKING STUDY
1600 707a
1147
~
1400
~
1200
1000
w
J
~
}
tL
0
~
~ 4~}0 `
~ 57o
z 86
200 4%
S~
.
z
I z
~ v 2
+
c~ C G ~
~ fa cn
Av~~~~~ CURATiOrv ~~RKEO Fi GU RE 1 1
'i U K'Ni LA
~
V
f
area plus garden retail area), based on an assumed need to
satisfy the requirements that zay exist at the hu.ghest usaqe
period ag the day on the hiqhest business day of the year
This range of parking demand is hased on Satur3ay garkinq
charaeteristics since the traditional maximum shoppinq da1s
of the year would be on a day that is relatad to a holiday,
most Iikely the day after Thanksgiving, and thosa types og
days would be similar to a saturday in terms og shopper
characteristics
The two stores that were surveyed demonstrated somewhat
dZfferertt parking characteristics gor a variety og r0asons
that have been discussed in this report while the Tuk•aila
store sarves a larger urban area, it alsa shares its parking
with noa-store uses and should be considerad to repzesent a
"wcrst-case" condition when evaluating the need Eo= parking
requirements at other Eaqle Hardware and Garden Centers. The
Spokane store, which exl'iibited a much lower adjusted Satarday
demand characteristic is the mcre representative fac+lity Pcr
estimatinq parking demand sinca its parxing is used solely by
store customers on Saturdays and Holidays
The f lndinqs of this inves b%Uqation indicate that the tnax{ mum
ratio for parking supuly at Eagle Hardware and Garden Cente:s
. would he 3 3 parking stalZs per thousand square Peet ot total
retaiZ saZes sFace This pa=x+ng supoly would be sut!ic~ent
to mest the parkinq demands for the most ac~:ve shocping day
of the year It is recommended "Chat parking surveys be
pertoraed cn a requla: bas's at Qgeratin5 Eaq'_e Kardware and
Garden Cente:s in orde= to further ref ine the parking
requirements Evidence from this anaZysis indicates that the
recommended maximwa parking suppl;► may be excessive, however
this cannot be cortf ir=ed without gur ther data
i 1
~
~f PROJECT JOB NO ~-7S S--n Z SHEET ~
rJ V Bk ~ DESIGNED &4j6 DoITE
REM CHECICED DATE
. `
rc.L-e~
~
_ g
~
~ ~I ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 ~ N I'~ ~i,~ ~ aN ~C / Z ~l O p r 4I YT ,t I /t
~
✓G? Gc a►-r'Gf Y~ 4~ ~~C'G` ~ s ass v»+eel
~ ~ -
~ _ ~ vrJ eX47-i'on C. /'C ' aC2 ~G`
y
1 -
- R _
~
C~ = ( 1g-
_ _ _ ~ = ~ ~ ~-s - ~ r ~
` c.
4C.:6 _._1~ ' H6
~
,
~ G~I~~G~'t ~ ~ i~ • ~ ~ = Q~~ - - -
.
V 2.4
IQ'lSP•" , 47 <,^17
BOWSTRIAIG METHUD (TEN YEAR STflRM DESIGN) PRO3EC.`T
DETENTION SASIN DESIGN BASIItT •
DESIGNER
NUNBFR +aF DRYWELLS PRflP4SED DATE
Single 0 12 Double
Time af Conc (calc )(see H1) 2 4
Time of Conc (min) 5
lairea► (Acres) 0 Ob
C • FaCto= 0 9
rmpervious Area (sq ft } 2700
volume Pravided
Outflaw (cfs) 0 12
Area * C" Factor 0 054
#2 #3 #4 #5 #5 #7
Time Time Intensity Q dev V xn V" aut Storage
Inc Inc
(min } (sec ~ (in /hr a (cfs) (cu ft ) (cu ft ) (cu ft }
(#1*60) (A*c*#3) (outf 02) t#S-#6)
- - ~ -
5 300 3 18 o 17 69 36 33
5 300 3 18 0 17 69 36 33 14 600 2 24 0 12 85 72 13
15 900 1 77 0 lU 96 108 -12
20 1200 1 45 0 08 102 144 -42
25 1500 1 21 0 07 105 1BQ -75
34 1800 1 04 0 06 107 216 -149
35 2100 0 91 0 05 108 252 -144
40 2400 0 82 0 04 111 288 -177
45 2700 Q 74 0 04 112 324 -212
54 3000 0 68 0 04 114 360 -246
55 3300 0 64 0 03 118 396 -278
60 36YO Y 61 V 03 122 432 i310
65 3900 060 0 03 130 468 -338
70 4200 Q 58 0 03 135 504 -369
75 4500 0 56 003 139 540 -401
80 4800 d 53 0 03 140 576 -436
85 5100 4 52 0 43 146 612 -466
90 5400 0 50 a 03 149 648 -499
95 5700 049 0 43 154 684 -530
104 6000 0 48 U 03 158 724 -562
_ - _ _ -
- " so;` 1 M•.~• oni = ItAP-11 Frl 14917 1004
J t +
1 ~ mw m. . , • i ye •
;
a
~
~ ►
~ ~ .
~
.
~
.
.
• '
Alb
Y
.1 .
am
~ m • ~
~
~ . ~ ~ . •
w ~
p ~ ~ s
. ~ • ~ ~ s ~ ~
. • =N;~=~ ~
»
• so
• . ,
~ .
t r~ m a . .
• •n ` ! ~ ♦
r,.i • • • ~ • j ~ • • ~ ~ ~ 'w
~ •
1 ~ t t .+r ~ rl ~
~ ~ i ~ = r • A • 1 ~ ~ t S ~r~► ~j~ ~ .ss, sa . . . ~
ow _-i
N
,r ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~w ~irsa s~ ~ ~ • • ~ • • ' . '
( j .o ~ ~ ~ ~ • ..n m •
P ' f
! ~ ~ ~ r v,► ~ ~ r ~ . ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ d
~ ~,,,y a tr~ •'Q~ v► s ~ • . v •~r
~ ~ t ~ ! ~ . t lew ~ S 1 ~ ~i t ~ ~ ~ ~ y, ~ ~
y ~ r ! ~ ~ ~ + ~ ti ~f
~ . r ~ + , •r •
• ~ ~ ~ ~
• . r ~ ~ r
d ~
- - - -7-/qb5 ~ A(2,~ ~H6-_ ~ I C71- _
- ~ ~ ~ z - ~ K -T6f
7
~ - - - Ec- vr ~ -
/7
6 -
I
~
i +
AVENUE 30
. &6606 AUr
~ m WOW
r.
~ . .
ir
~ TYPE ~
/tt -
TWE ~
~ oRYWELL AGL F. , ~ oa~u ~
, ~a s oaYwtLL
~ ~
~
~
RlM EL. 1039,67
RIM El. 1930 84 ~
RIM EL. 193L49
.
- -
•~~~s~..~~ • ~r ~r • r~~.r~r~~~~~~~~~~~.. •.w r
i 4m w- , ~w~ ~~s~.~ 4m + r r -r
~ ~ ~ii~A~ ~ j ~rr~~~.rr~~~~ r. ~
~ ~ ♦ ~ p
! 2~ ♦ ~ ~ 1 1
t e.M. FouNc
~
EIEV, 1931 1
IjRyf .Z...~ ~~FrI~ ~ ~ ~`rA.~~~~ ♦ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ v • • ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~
, 00
i ~ ♦
~
► '1 ~ 1
f~ 1 4
i
~ • /7 • t9~05
, JA1~, t~ Il • i V'
Z0~' NAGE SW
t%A N
~
1AJl l~Tl.~ i1W ~ .A9 ~Ef ~~ll l' 1 ~ t
,lav r~r av ,~w.a~ - - - - - - ~
r
► ,
DO NOt OISTURB
~ M
EXISTtNi BUII.DINC ,
~ !ur R~ ~~,AS 1~?.AD ~
/ FOOTIN
19J _ ~
, / ►st~t.a~~
ow PROvIoE cR►vE.
, ,~xzo swALE eErWEEN
i
► EcistrNG ewLoINc
IWD NEw RETAINI
wau AwD TWAT
~ , .
NER9ICME
7ss-
, o .000
0 ~ EXISTI
i PosWC F8K NO!@ 76T1 aft.
3
~ Fmo I ~
BUILDI
ZV i ■ ' CoAep1, • ao, ' ~
. D
T
? 9 Z
F~ - IlJ~~I
6
"136 a'~ D
. ~ t..,~...
~
/
/
i ~
~ W
ooo~
/ ~
r
FEB-14-1994 26 32 FROM J-U-B ENGINEERSt INC TO 23243478 P 01
~AX covER sH$ET
~ 2910 a cteawata avenue Date.
U• lEl ~ xamwwtcr ww MM Project No L?-7geiC-D 2
ri a
'201
~ Ph eme ("7a3 2144
Paz csO)73ao790 Subject ~ 3 S _
. , ~ f G~ •
TO. FROM!
44V"
FAx Noa..(~oI) 32 3,Y'7$` _ NO PAGFS TO FOLLOW I
MESSAG£ ~ .
1
~ ~ . ~
!
~
~
~
~
r
t
w~
ld
HF o
~ R 3
V
4
~ Hp1-38,'~14, ~ or- o o WP ~ to
• ► ~
4W~
. ~
I E- 72
UAL
~
ON/OFF SWffCH SUMP PUMP , Z
~
C06RD NATE
. ~ PANE
r A 1.0
. WMi aRCH~
3M °
.
OR 43 oT R POWER
, . _
209
LDM4 ~
~ w
r W
tfOM27
T + o
. TRE HOWE PANE~. LE-L ~
LE-42
FAX COVER SHEET
Spokane County Engineer's Office - Third Ftoor Fax # 324-3478
1026 W 13ItOADWAY Sl'OKANC, WA 99260 - PIIONE #(SU9) 456-3600
DATE t./ N FAX # 5-0 7 7 3(o - 0~5~ Q
To Vi ti L e LaI
COMPANY ~ro- ~ CITY / STATE k.~••J @ •~'-'•`c l~ .
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING CO'VER SHEE'l) ~
FROM ?l4 ~-k L EN~~ E rA tA Ntil
MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTIZUCTION
~a H14 2C IwA2-e- e ~Q
~ FAX COVER SEILJUJ'EL"T 5 f► A K/► iV R C: A t1 N T Y
puouc wo= oErwarMaM
' SPOKANE COUNTY FAX #(509) 456-4715 DIVISION OF ENGtATEERtNG & ROADS
N 811 JEFFERSON SPOK:ANE, WA 99260 - PHONE #(509) 456-3600 ~W~~1 M70
DATE ~j ~ FAX #
TO t/
' CONiPANY
CTTY / STATE
I~
rTUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEE'T)
FRo
M ~
.
NI]ESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION r
~X4,;' C
- ~
f
~
_ _ .~.r~
~
a
SEC 23,T ~5 N F~ E 1N N!
t
~ SCALE I a0d ~ ~
` S~-
0
~ ~ - ~ ~ } - e~~~ -
e~~r- = ~ f.._ ~ d~ar C~ w, aR dNt Ce ~a"`ti
E S ~ S4°a - - - _ ~ ` - ~~13
_.il . ~ ~ ~ ~OA~ _Rf0 ~1~ ~ 4A9 IQ f' ~ ~
,~4 Q .av~ n
22 23 a , ~ t wwe couhTY Ro ft~~~x ~ ~ ti
~ ~ P, ~ ~ ~~F .
" ~ ' t ~ R M i
~ u r ~ ` ~ ~ c~t ~t
t ~ c° Q N rv. i
~ r a P '~,p t. t~ s ~ c
' 1~ ' N~ ~ r w N i~~ ~C,^ ~ O
y l
~ ~R~ ~ r i ~ a W i s ~ t"~t~ ~r ~
~ ~ _ ~ i w i. ~e ~ ~ ~
vli`d _ _..i_ ~ .
~ ~ ~ `g , e ~ r
C ~ _ •
~ Y ~
rs+' i ~ I ~ ~ ~I s !
~ . ~ an wvc. t ~~0
~ °'="~y ~ - --3 _ ~p~~
o°sa' ~ u i~~
~ ~
_ . . . . ~~a.so
~
" ~ ~ . °
N ~ ~ ~ ♦ ~ Y~_ ~ ~~~►ra4
q 3 t I ~.A~Ji'
~s ~ 's , ~~R N Fro ee~7 ad ~ ~ a ~ , 1 e ~ ~ ~
~ o V b 7
~ w~
~ ~FTM • ~ N'~. ~ I ♦ S A a e ~ 3 ♦ 1 s ~ a
n
i 1 ~ i f ~"M
a S = ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 d • fi • ( ~ ~ •
~ _ ~5 . ~ ir . • ~t+~,~
/i4 NN9- ~ ~ t 1~ ~te ~ I • a • ' ~ urxM . _
$T~$ " 9 XT . 'f 4 @LOG~ w ~7 9 1~ ~
I ~ l t9 i~► 0 Q $ t0 a e a, ~ T
i r ~ q 9' r~ ~ , s•~
~ r ~ 'r 4 ~ ° A r a /~r ~ ~
~ ~iIFNTM , ~ d . + ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ a ~ ~
~ P ( 1 ! ~4 e. ? ~ y _ 8 a t'~'' a ~ 9 • ~ ~ ~ ~ . •
da►
i ~ 4 pf~ ~ G ~ ~ /O p s • ~
n y ?li 2~,9 '~e 6A n 8 t A s~ ~•'SZ+w...d~t r - ° t' J r ~
T _ w• ~J ~es
~ ~r~ r • s, a !
~ ~ ~ .
! 4
g ~ P" 1 ~ ! r'M
1 ,
+~7 1
y A `~l
o, (
ti'~ e p
' i ►o•w
v ~ a ..Ht►~ ~ ~ !
wr~ •
~1 ~
~ ~
~ O
~ ~ O
~ t~
ti
O 8&SC 9 _TM~~FTF~ ~_~Y. ~I7~1 ~ ~
! ~ ~ ~
! a c
o ~ 1 ~ Orm►► dEd _
y d p ~ ~OA,~t 1 V
S R TNIRT81 NT~1 , ~ii ~r~ 7 <
~ ~ _ ~ Z
~ ~ = ~ r ~ Q
~
~ ~ Q ~
t~ «xar
~ ~ ~ q
r~« c o-.~a---o st~o ~ t~v~Exm y 1d„ ~ 1
z ~ , ~ g,„ ~ ~
ro f O ~ p~` ^J / ~
1 ~ c~ p t~ ~ ~J4 8 g ~U Z ~ ~~pLAaI~O ~ 4 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q S ~
Ii ~y fu~retan~ _~h,~~ e aa ~ n~.~}+~1A+~ A~^+ 6 6
i 8 ~
4 < ~ ~ .
~c eo - o~ ~ f _ V ~t Ip a. ~ti +nr_ ~ ~ ~ 8 r 2 ~yt~ ~ ~
--•e ~~i~!~ • `a
~7 ' v31c~ AO ~ a ~~7cauF77/M Nq fpl7 ae'~ 9~S .70~.Q 1~ L
2T 2~ " o ~r ~ysar •d~'C R P N~ 70
~ ~ A ~ , + T ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ a .~~~~R ~ ~5
q '~}~ss~r~o q . I
4 e+~ ro t► i ,
lS af a~ ~ s~ Ip ~ Ya►wws~o+sa P1os~~~ta
[?~V F~ ~c~' ~ ~ _ J`J~
~ ~y ~i ~ .~i.~
: 8 ~v
~ ri`~a'sw c.~ ~v'~•r~' , _ r.' ~f ~ e~ i ~ r- i _ - ~ _ ~ o.v7'F_ '
'v ,J~,G~tli b _ ~ ^ .u ..Z~-~[,-.'h,a4 " ^c!.9 vt ctir .tr...,.~c !er a2s .l.T7I ~ + ,r ~Q.Gr..~.c<" - - ~ - ~ !da-^• ~f2• ♦ , at ~ •
~~L.~. ~.~CL'..~t ~ ' .5t ,.'aL~ B s 3-- - - - -'-_'r - - - aw.et~B.'` f .
I ~ l~ t' .t ~.wr md~s~..sna_-~ _ _ _ _ 'r f4c+ s~
.J.t!~ , S1~lr."" ..u.~['n~Q.aP-.-"c'.cd - - - r~ : - - ~.L~1.~.c 1
~ ~ ~T , ~ ~ QTi. J nrrdl'l - - - ~L/1tRR'
I
.1 d r.r~ .r ~ s ~S a/ y w.._~. s ~~'1Y+L t L t~-~1-
I ~'t e+~ NL NOA4GtlfJ K~O~ b NpN Yta A =YH dGA ~Vt?Y g /.9 ~j:
1 -
- , - _ _ - ,
~ i . - ,
~
} '
~
. r ~
~ = ~ i _ ~ _ _
~
~1'~~I ~
, ,
~
~ .i~
~ ~ ~
~~,i„ - , ~
~ -
i
-s
• d i ~ . ~ , #
. ~ ~ .
~
1
~
. ~,t ~ i ~ F
~ ~ - - - z. ° _
i~~_ _ _ - ~ :r _ - v ,r-e+- .ri' - - ~ ~r'.'~ M .5 F ' J ~ • 39~~{ ~ *
. " ~~G,-~.~ ~L ~ ~ • 1
~ ~,,.P - . ~ ~ - > ~ - - - ~ ~_f , ~ . ~ 1
~l~•~ P~ h. . _ . _ .~n ~ ~ ' - ~ ~t . ~ * ' I _ ~ _
-r,~~,+~
r~ . i.~ -~Y:~- , ' , .~j _ - a,~ t f ~ i- • ,~R r "
' ,II~ , q ,j _ ,E ~ ~ s~ ~ ~~t'i ~ . I .K ~S'~~F.'. ~ _
~ r . . , yt. . .~s~p . ~5 . ~ . i.1 _ . . . ~ , . l~~ ~ ' , • • J, ~ f ~ ~ r ~.T7 ,t . . _ - ~~l.° r- - _
_ _ - - ~ - . . ~
r~ ~ ~
t. _
l
~ ki
l ~
~ ~e'~
_ ; ~tl ~
. ~ ~'_r ~ ~J~ ~ F ~ . ~ ~ i f~.
i ' ~ Ti ~ j ~ ~ - ~I'~ ,A~'I ( II ~
_ " - ~'.u~' ' ~ . ~ _ _ ' - " , j ~ , ~ ~
~ ~ .K a ~ ~.:i t. _ t ~ ~ - .1 n' ~U ,J;~
~ ~ ,r~ .~r° ~ ~
~ . L' } I .,y I
. ~ i~ a,
, r'
~ _ ~
.__.~L`._= _ ,i , _ _
~
~I