The URL can be used to link to this page

UNIVERSITY S 1613 Interior Remodel University Elementary . . - / ~ -Y - _ ` ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# B94034-9.4 Related File # ( ZE-171-55) Date to Review 3-14-94 Time 11:00 # PRE-APPLICATION Date to AA & DR Time Date Received 2-24-94 Project Name IN'TERIOR REMODEL UNIVERSITY ELEMENTARY No. Lots No.Acres Section - Township - Range SITE ADDRESS UNIVERSITY S 1613/S 16TH/N 18TH PARCEL # 28542-9004 Applicant's Name CHIP MISSLER . Phone # 838-8240 Address Work # Date Conditions mailed Contact person Phone # rLOOD ZONE d NO W S SCI-IOOL Etigineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name Planning Contact Person Phone # 456-2205 Date Subnv►ted Description Initials AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED / I DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS / f HEARING EXAM APPROVED _DENIED-_APPEALED BBC / PROJEC7' _APPROVED _llENIED r',~,/'h/li~,r~~,~f Pi~~~ ►N~Z p►~~.s ~ . ~-j ~j. -r .~WMI./. 0. ,.n , k\pV`review.for / ~ 1 7 ~ BUILDINC, PERMIT CHECKLIST ~ PR P . . . . . : . . . _ . . . . . . .~..:,:r::::-.....:.... : ..E., . . . . . : P. R ( Ni i:.^ ' . . N...~ J . . . .~r.. A6~~~~~:~ ..TING~:~ . . . . . . M 166L so 3 -q4 f~EG~U IRE CO ET D - - - ~ . , _ . . : . . . . GEi~ . .:.:::......ANA . . IU1 - ~ . EN:. -A~~~EMENT-TO-PAYFrES . . . . . . RIGHT OF WAY DEPARTMENT DEED ~ EASEMENTS R/W RID LEGAL DESCRIPTION CI-IECK . LETTER FROM SCAPCA RECIPROCAL USE AGREEMENT ~c/1~c-r~n/~ ~ l+P~~!' • .C~i'K ; ~-t L-~j f-ea ~ 4In-z 2~es ✓ 1~ . . . . - - . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..5 T . . . . : . . , . . . . . X. . . .I:-- E.... . . . . . ..,.:r... . . . . . - -NOFITN-A~FIOW t/' . SCALE ✓ BENCI-IMARK ROAD NAM ES 1/, R/W DIMENSIONS v PROPERTY LINES SET-ASIDE GRADES STAM P PAVING TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLAN ✓ APPROACN PERMIT ' ~ - :.r.::: : . D . . . . . . NAGE . . . . . ...:...::::::.::..:.....::.;:r ..::i: . . . RAI . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - . - 20e CALCULATIoNs ✓ SWALE CROSS-SECTION SPECIAL SOIL TESTS ROOF CONSTRUCTION ✓ NVAC ON ROOF LANDSCAPE PLAN (208 CONFLICT) DITCH CALULATIONS ` BACKWATER CALCULATIONS GRATE CALCULATIONS PIPE CALCULATIONS RETENTION/DETENTION CALCS 10/50/100 YEAR STORM TR-55 ANALYSIS . . . : . . . . . . . - : . . . . . . . . . :~.r:::~.;:..: . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . C~ AD.S:: . . . _ . . . . . , . . . R . . . . . I _ . . . . . . . . GRADE SNF-ET (EXISTING ROAD) , STAM P OWNERS SIGNATURE ROAD DRAINAGE (SWALES, STRUCTURES,..) "R" VALUE TESTS NEW ROAD DESIGN BOND MYLAR COUNTY STAMP Eu.oTusu.mvs nnrtNcn rLP,i W--r_ r.w K i PROJECT,NUMBER= 940026~ APPLICATIOIv' ' D( ;='-04/Ol-/-94• PAGE= 01 v ~fi {-s THIS IS NOT A PERMIT , . PENALTIES WILL BE ASSESSED FOR COMMENCING WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT SITE STREET= 1613 S UNIVERSITY RD PARCEL#= 45282.9004 ADDRESS= SPOI{ANE WA 99206 PERMIT USE= INTERIOR REMODEL OF UNIVERSITY ELEMENTARY PLAT#= 999999 PLAT NAME= FtANGE . BLOCK= LOT= ZONE= UR-3.5 DIST#= E AREA= 00000000 F/A= A WIDTH= DEPTH= R/W= 60 # OF BLDGS= 1 # DWELLINGS= WATER DIST = OWNER= CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DIST PHONE= STREET= 19307 E CATALDO AVE ADDRESS= GREENACRES WA 99016 CONTACT NAME= CHIP MISSLER - NW ARCHITECT PHONE NUMBER= 509 838 8240 BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT= NA LEFT= NA RIGHT= NA REAR= NA REVIEW INFORMATION DEPARTMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENT BUILDING REVIEW COORDINATOR - J SHATTO COMMENTS : ~ BUILDING PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED ~ . COMMENTS: ~ ~ \ - ENGINEER APPROACH/FLOOD PLAIN/DRAINAGE ► ~'~tiY`Q~ COMMENTS : ENGINEER DRAINAGE PLAN REQ'D COMMENTS: HEALTHDIST PUBLIC/PRIVATE SCHOOL . COMMENT S : ~ PLANNING SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED COMMENTS: FIRE DISTR FIRE FLOW TO BE REVIEWED~-lt- ~.:~-~~--~o fD --~o ~ i ~ r KEPORT OF 3/14/94 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE 1613 S. Univcrsity - Universily Elementary Intcrior Remodel ~ NMMB I AnnEtP.ss ~ crrY ~ STATB ~ 71P ~ PitoNP, Icorrrncr OWM?R ~ Ceotral Vdky Schoal D'at 119307 E. Cataldo ~ Greenacres ~ WA ~ 99016 ~ 922-6700 ~ ARC'1{(fECt ( S4eve McNutt, NW 11203 W. Rivrrside iSpokanc ~ WA I 99201 ~ 838-8240 I X STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT(SEPA) 7he proposal was rcviewed by the Division of Buildings [or compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act. A threshold detcrmination is not rcquired based on WAC 197-11-800(3) exempting remodeling projects that do not involve change in use or material cxpaRSion. PROIEG'I'OVERVIEW 'ihe entire school will be brought to current code. Sprinkling of the building is proposed. Landscaping is planned, along with updating the irrigation systcm. Play areas will be defined. Minimal work is planned on the parking lot. A separate bus Iane is proposed. ne sprinkler system, lifc sa[ety issues. & sanitary issues will be Stage 1. Applicant would like to be completed by Sept. School board will meet this evening to Gnalize the Cnancing of this project. SUMMARY OF PROPOSBD occu- LANO US6 PANT CONST PIRE PARCEL ZONB ACi70NS rne BUILDING lIS6 SQ.F('. GROUP TYPB FLOW VHATER ►URVEYOR /►HONE l32d29001 I UK-3S I ZE171-55 I Remodel ~ Scbool I E1 I VN I EASting I Model lrrigadon DtsL R18 926-5759 I I I ~ ~ I I I D►scussioN rorIcs (deNlicetbro, addilbro, end oortectioro to wntten comments) PLANNING DF.PARTMBNT (456-2205) CONTACT: JIM MILLGARD • Written comments were prepared & a copy given to the applicant. • Submit legal description of parcel. • Identify, label & dimension all property lines & center lines of all roadway rights-of-way. •'ihe cost of the remodel exceeds SO% of the assessed value, therefore the site must comply with current landscaping & scrcening standards. Applicant may request relief via letter to Planning for review & approval. • Providc calculations that no more than SO% of the site is covered by building footprint. • Incorporate eaisting landscaping into landscaping requirements. ENGINEERING & ROADS (456-3600) CONTACI': BOB'I'URNER • Written comments were prepared & a copy given to the appGcant. • Thc cost of the remodel exceeds 50% of the assessed value, therefore thc entire sitc must be retrofitted for 205. Engineer's work with applicant. ' Clearly identify existing & new asphalt. 1IG1ALTH DISTRICT (324-1560) CONTAC'T: DARYL WAY • School district is planning for radon mitigating measures. • Submit a complete set of plans for review. ' Landscaping must be located outside of fencing, therefore it may have to be relocated due to property line location. FIRE DISTRICE NO. 1(928-2462) CONTAC7': PAUL CHASE • Existing hydrant in the back in the field may be removed. • Submit sprinkler plans for review. DIV[SION OF BUILDINGS (456-3675) CONTACT: KEN JEFCREY • Relocate barrier free parkingcloser to building. • For information on the Americanswith Disabilities Act,call 1-800-435-7232. •'ihe new Washington State Energy Code gces into effect 4/11'94. • If there's more than 6 fatures in a restroom, an ambulatory stall is required. • A sitc visit for barrier free issues was attempted, but not completed due to Gnalization of approval for proposed remodel. SEE REVERSE FOR PERMfT RELfi1SE REOUIREMENTS 1 Z 4 PERMI1' RELEASE 1tEQUIREMF.NTS Please submit seven (7) sets of revised sitc;, drainage, and lanciscapeplans plus three (3) complete sets of construction drawings to the Department of Bulldings fvr acknowldgement and ciistribution to aJl the appropriate agencies. In order for all agencics to eApeditiously process your projec4 it is important tbat submittals include aU necessary drawings and documents to insure that rc;view ofyvurproject is completed in tlre Ic;ast amount of time. Documcnts should include: building address and legal dc;scription of property. Spokane County's Project Review Coordinator will be Julie Shatto at the Div. of Buildings (456-3675). I PLANMNG I ENGINEER~ HEALTM I FIRE IBUILDINGS . ' . . . . . f...~..~.......~ ::...............:.::.1...:.I:.::.t.•::f::J:.~:.1.~Xf ..jf.. .:fL Y.Y •J•. .'f•JYf :~Yf.•::l•Xf:.• y~~ ♦ r •F. "2•::{rr .i'r.•:•'r:•: .f:.ti......~ r.f~.~rrrr.;:; . . ~ . . } Y 'r} : ' . . ~ . . : v . . . : ~ ~ : ..1 . r... . :v'}ixrr r ..Sti : hv.ti ~ t f~ :•:ti?•: }:•'r'S•: ? ..v 'r:}..$i::.: n }r. 'r} •r}rr . . . . . . . . .::.~::::.~:::::::.~::r::.~ •:::::::r:::::::.........:.:.:. ..:X . . . . . ~1:.. • ..{::ti?•i'• :rl.. :?i . . . . . . f. ~ r..... . ; ..v...x:~: •r • r~ r ti ~ r. . • . ~~~:ti~:::v:::: ~ :::.w. ~~:v ~ . r.« :v.r•.ti : . . .J 1 . . . ..1 . . . . . M. . . :..}~t {~i }..}.1. . :~:v} •iir: .:T}::ti ~iti::~~:~: ..~..~..~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~r.~......... • 1... .:.::::ii:. : ~:1. :..^.T.`~`.I~~~•`~~.~ V. . ~~i.•..........._ .11 Yr ! . .1::.~l:lJl:.~: • rJktif.~{titiY•.:::Vf•.•. • f.:.~ , •lY 1 Bicycle racks (location & number) ~ X 21 1 Building height in stories & feet ~ X 31 1 Clear view triangle at ingress/egress ~ X 41 1 Curbing around landscaping ~ X 51 1 Exterior lighting/direction of iUumination ~ X 61 1 Fence location, height, & type ~ X 71 1 Landscaping of parking lot ~ X 81 15 feet 1ype III landscaping along Uaiversity, Glenn, 16th & 18tb ~ X ~ 91 1 Landscaping (location, species, size) ~ X 101 1 Parking & traffic circulatio❑ plan X 111 1 Parking stalls (number, striping, dimeasion, directionai arrows) ~ X 12 1 Paving ~ X ~ X 131 ISetbacks ~ X I 141 1 Traf6c control devices ~ X I 151 1 Dr~ a'nage Qlan ( s wales> dr Yv''ells> calculations) X . . . ~•~yy r....... . r... . . . . . ~ : ~ ~ :.:v.~.w:::.tiw: r : : : v: v.w w.ti :::v nv. ~ r:::.:v. . v::::: x • w: r f.• Y ~i::::::::: . : : r. v: ~ : . h y . . . f f . r..; f r ti'}. ~ : . . 1. . . ..:.•::t.~Jl.•l........J.M1....•ti.. •.....h....X. .l.M1.......• .....:.:::::::.~'J.:::.~ ..~f~....t.~:J:: YN:l......~J . '..::::::V:i . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . J....... . . . ..•.........1 .lVJ'l.•.':1l 'llf •J.~•.~:Y.•% ..•..•...1 ~ .......::..•:•.t. JVl:•'• :ff..~J. . . . . . . . . ....1... ...•..•..............................:.~:•::':':•:1f.`:L . !•X~~'.~:JJ/ • . . . . ~ . . . f. . . . ..1.. . r ..h.........•.. ..........1..1J.r...~. ......Yl.....lf. L....•. .V..f 'lf+:~'ll . . . . . . » . . . . . . ................J:tir..l........ . . . . ~~f :}~...J... . . . . . . . . . . . .....s. r........ ;:....r.~ • ,t • ~t•s:•:•::~::~:...... . . . • . . . . , .tr b.,.........,............ ..h........... r 161, 1 Certificate of Exemption ~ X 171 1 Irrigation system ~ X 181 ~ Nursery estimate ~ X 191 Promissory letter for landscape requirements ~ X 201 Agrecment to pay fees & minimum requirements list X 211, ( Approach permit for access to University, 16th, or Glenn X X 221 Lock (Knox) box entrY sYstem ~ - _ . ...............r........................ . • . . ......••Jf•:::::J. Y1F :.V,y'~ ! . J f . . . . . . . . . . .M1..J.•.• :.y~`j.... . . . . r.vr : { . . r} , r,i w:::..4.•r.:•r.}::{4::.•r{.; . 1r: rr: ~ y}:.>: : ± :•.r ti~: . •:Y . +y. +rt,r. '+;C . y. •>i:: i:: ~i:{i?v ~:tiw:: :r~~:>:•: ¢ . . . ~ ~ w:::: • ~ • : 4 . . . . . . . . : : . : . • ~ ~ . • •}i::'f.:•::•:•:•:: i}}:•i: ...............t••::.••.•!.•1f1f:............ {.l:.h. • . ~JJ•.'1::::. ' •f.1:'! } . M :.ti'i i Yi i i i i i ':Y f' ::'::•l }1 • h ti • : • • . : : . V: . i ' t ' , . } : . l ~ . l. • ~ • r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v~••;, ti~X4r•}Y.%:... • rr..:...... ~ . ~ . • . i.{r{n'ti?•.ti+i.tiL?ti : {{ti .titiv: :•S}}i . . , . . :.~1:4:::;ii{:i;; ~}i:•:•:•: ~:tiv. ~ : • ~..:.~C..:::•:~::::v.~.....:.. .........._.~~~..f................. , - - ~ 23 1 ~ Barrier-Free Requuements (WAC 51-20) X 241 1 Elcctrical details X 251 1 Fnergy details/calculations & heat loss X 261 1 Heating, veatilation & air conditioning drawings X 271 1 Lighting budgets X 281 I Plumbing details X 291 1 Structural drawings with wet stamps 84 calculatioqs / X . ~ 1,~•...~„~..~ , > Sign ur of Cflordinator v t r Page 1 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPORANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Project: University Elementary-Remodel Date 3-14-94 Address: S. 1613 University Parcel No: 28542-9004 Ref No. B94034 The County Engineering Department has completed a review of the above referenced project. The following information must be provided in order for us to proceed with our review. A) For any new hard surface area, for an asphaltic roof, or a roof containing HVAC machinery, a drainage plan for the site shall be prepared in compliance with Spokane County "Guidelines for Stormwater Management". At a minimum the plan must contain: l. Drainage calculations for stormwater volumes generated on site. 2. Calculations for total impervious surfaces contained within the site. 3. Finished grade elevations for structures to be constructed on site. 4. Finished grade elevations at the top and bottom of the 208 swale. 5. A typical cross section of the 208 swale. 6. Calculations to justify the number and type of drywells proposed. 7. Elevation of drywell inlets where applicable. 8. Copy of the proposed landscape plan. B) The subject property is affected by the "Findings and Order" and the "Conditions of Approval" for the following land use action: Spokane County Zone Change No. ZE-171-55 C) The following improvements within adjacent Right of Way are required prior to the release of a building permit: 1. Approach permits must be obtained, after a site plan has been approved, and before the issuance of a building permit, from the County Engineering Department for any new or improved driveway approaches to the following streets: a. University b. 16th c. Glenn D) Insufficient information was submitted with the proposal. We are unable to proceed with our review. We will need the following before we can proceed: 1. Site Plan. 2. Drainage plan as specified. 3. Other information: paqe 2 . ' n shall at~on pla The C c ir ~`~1 Enq lr'eer - be in and traf f ne county lls shallpa,vin9 as A paryl y th"~ S fo parKlng staL practl req red ed a• ' p r °ved n' ent oi" eer ln w i l. Y~e t r av+el by p anqe engor a n d a a r r i c . c e1 e d . e s u t o a t lon a and a rd tr ri ng ordl to b e ~cc g g ht of ~a Y ae5iqn~ 1 eW ith St ~nty p ct vhiCh onto tne ew pa~ement. a..°rded bY t~`etne pr°~eto ~a~k Q s~inq ar'`d n ranqinq rec1'~portio,~,t f~s ill,~gal ~~1 a11 eXl iple for tion as ~ hlcles, I Cle~rlY 1a ee ls resp s or reloca b• on • p er. m i t t ad7 ~s t e ~ oV eme n t , ~lty C°nd S ar~ uti~-lt o f tY'e lmp ed t E~ Ut 1 a11 neCe com'P1et1Qn e auth°r, 1 ok.ane C~~ ~cnu t ~e f~uired f°r operty o e th d siqn p docume rt ew W 111 . r o f.~ne pr Co.mplet Fees„ , Th e ,plan ~a 1 This Tre Ow~,,e ~ati~e Ynust ~ to paY ieers p f f i ' ex,ec'.lt e tv,,rn F) r epr esen p,qr eeme ~,ntY Enq n dQcu.~ent ts p l~a Q~ ~t trie . Enq ln nea to th ed v~nt 11 t these C° Contact 'Per s ret`~r comple ttac~hed t° to yOur ot be . a ent a m aoCV,ment lete~ A9 ~e t, ~s been q i tnY,,e the ~ o m p De p a r t ti v e h' e o f a l ~l del lne . E n~ 3 1 neers • s r~ p r~se ota n C~'~5 m i n l~` e a r t ment ctay o u l d tor h l st 1 5 ~ e d a s a • ee r s D p c t a n a he a p l ic5. T his s h o u l d b ts t h e En Q ft h e pr a ~ e , on arlY U,1 em~~,ts r,eeded p~ r t issv1equlremeew abave e re~S. .re.ments 11ir►1T'um a 0omplet,e ~e f re~i ore p ermi listed been • v~a. e m rm od . ents has ltho~t to pe ing the p aria req~l SarY reV eleased' is n°t b~ in pro1~ rif ormat ana the reG ermit be r . Depart~ent nq r fter all o h~omplet our bulldlng Enqineeri s~pplled hed w111 Y the CountY accompll5 ct pexson at Your canta456-3600. t Turnert RQber • e - a REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJECT B94034 REVIEWER: Bob Turner PROJECT NAME: University Elementary DATE: 16 May 94 REVIEW 3(as per phone call 5/16/94) CONIlKENTS GENERAL: Al1 plans submitted to this department are required to have a professional engineer's stamp or registered architects stamp by state law. Architect stamp must include a signature. Professional Engineer stamps must include the current seal and expiration date as well as signature and date. Approach Permits are required on all new approaches as well as all approaches that will be altered.* Contact Sylvia Lightfoot at the County Engineer's Department. Approach permits for county roads will not be issued until a site plan is approved. DRAINAGE REPORT : 1208' Calculations for the site are required for runoff of asphaltic surfaces (pavement, roofs, etc.) within the Aquifer Sensitive Area. Show the quantity of asphaltic area, volume required and provided, swale area required and provided. Your swale is sized properly but your calculations are incorrect. The sidewalk by the existing asphalt line drains to the building. Two existing trees in swale must be removed. Planning will not require more landscaping. I 1 . i ~y S P O K A N E , C O U N T X OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Date: 3 M~ 9y SUBJECT: %)H; vr-Rs: r!S ELVM,eN r*Q#1 Gentlemen: A review of the road, drainage, or site plan for the above-referenced building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached plan set and calculations marked "ORIGINAL". Please make the corrections and resubmit them to the Building Department in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color and include the mark-up. Please note that the plan set and calculations marked "ORIGINAL" are official public documents, and must be returned with the revised plans and calculations. Review of the revised plans and calculations will not proceed until the "ORIGINAL" set is returned to the County. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald Hormann, P. E. okCoty Engineer Sp ~ ~ r" r obert Tuitrner, E.I.T. ur Plans Review Engineer ~ . . _ . ~ 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 t . • , REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJECT B94034 REVIEWER: Bob Turner , PROJECT NAME: University Elementary DATE: 3 May 94 REVIEW 2 CONIl4EN'I'S cErrExAL : Al1 pans submitted to this department are required to have a professional engineer's stamp or registered architects stamp by state law. Architect stamp must include a signature. Professional Engineer stamps must include the current seal and expiration date as well as signature and date. Approach Permits are required on all new approaches as well as all approaches that will be altered. Contact Sylvia Lightfoot at the co~? County Engineer's Department. Approach permits for county roads will.not be issued until a site plan is approved. DRAINAGE REPORT : 1208' Calculations for the site are required for runoff of ~ haltic surfaces (pavement, roofs, etc.) within the Aquifer Area. Show the quantity of asphaltic area, volume required and provided, swale area required and provided. Show.a typical section of a swale. The swale must be sodded and c,-`_side slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 for up to 12" in depth. For swales with greater depths use 3:1. The top of the swale should be a minimum 2 in. above the drywell lid. Provide bottom of swale elevations. vProvide drywell grate elevations. ,,,,ZThe -County requires a Spokane County Type 4 drywell lid for drywells in 208 swales. Specify on the drawings this type of lid. Provide contours or sufficient spot elevations to check site Page 1 of 2 t i grades. One-percent is the minimum requirement without special construction requirements by a licensed engineer. An area in the proposed bus lane has no method of draining to the swale and needs to be reconsidered. tLx~iy►.Am G.9 .0 :4 teoJS A- landscape plan is required to ensure there is no conflict with swale area. i rc9 77 ~q DRA~~.sA~e cq~~Ls S~dE WAIk b1`aejAS Q r ~ , , Page 2 of 2 GENERAL NOTES 1. CURB INLET SHAII BE CONSTRUCiED IN ACCOROANCE NATH AST11 C 478 (AASHTO 11 199) dc AST1A C 990 UNLESS OTHEHINSE SHOWN ON PLANS OR NO1E0 IN THE PROJECT SPEGAL PROV1510NS. 2. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOIA fINISHEO. 3. ALL EXIFRNAL EOGES NOT IABElEO SHAII BE r iROWEIlED 1MTH 1/4' RADIUS EDGER. DIAIENSION 'L' SHAII 9E SHOwN ON THE PIANS. ~tDRAINAGF ~ CURB OROP ' ~ SWALE I ' • (L DRAINAGF swuE ~ /r--CURB AND ~ • GUTTER 4' PORTLAND CEAIENT CONCRETE SECTION B-8 BY 3'-. CURB INLET TYPE 1 ,p 4 M01 o. ~s SPOKANE COUNTY APPROVED: STANDARD S}I~T i I ~ I I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COu+iTr CNGt1EER l~o~,t t~ A Y RfVlSlOr4 sPacarE, wti 99205 45e-3e00 OATE:~L•Z~~ ~~D CURB INLET TYPE 1 8-8 , RYWELL BARREL OR GENERAL NOTES : cATCH easIN waLL WATERPROOF • PIPE (TYP.) m 1. GRAVEL BACKFlLL QUANTITY FOR ORYWfIIS NON-SHRINK N OTE. TYPE 'A' - 30 CUBIC YAROS IAINIIAUTA / 42 TONS. GROUi iYPE 'B' - 40 CUBIC TAROS uINIUUN / 56 TONS. PVC PIPE ADAPiERS AND GASKET MAY VAR1f IN SHAPE ANO SRE AS ILLUSTRATED IN OR A5 SPECIfIEO ON ROlID PLANS, DETAIL BT ACCEPTABIE ALiERNATE !N & 2. SPECIAL BACKFILL MIATERIAL fOR DRYN'Ell$ SHALL CONSIST OF ACCOROANCE WITH A.5.T,11.-C-428, WASHEO CRAVEL CRAOEO fROY 1' TO 3' MATH A NAXIUUII OF 5% PASSINC THE U.S. No. 200 SCREEN, AS ►~EASURED BY wEICHT. , ASKEi A MAqIIUM OF tOX OF 1HE ACGRECATE, AS I~EASURED AY WEIGHT, VC ADAPIER SHAL BE NAiUERALLY CCURRINC UNFRACNRED REMAINING 0% PVC ADAPTER 3. caNcRErE sue sHxu eE cuss 3000 caNcRtrE. (SAND COLLAR) I.SEE STANDARO PlANS SHEEiS B-2 AND 8-3 FOR PRECAST CONCRETE OEfuLS. 9. ADJUST6IENT BLOCKS SHAII 8f CEMENT CONCRETE. SOLIO COVER FIN(SHED CRADE ~ 8. PRECAST RISER MAY BE USED IN CONBINAl10N i $EE SHT, B-1 (PA4EIAENT) N1iH OR lN UEU OF ADJUSi1NC BLOCKS. W y iiiiniii ~ 3 W f 1. WHEN PYC PIPE IS USED A PVC ADAf'1ER SHALL 8E INSTALLED. MORTAR IN PUCE 8. PIPES SHAII BE GROUIED INTO DRYWEILS. pRTAREO 11DJUSTIAENT , a I•r,; : RINCS ~ 2'-0' SEE~ SHi. BRIS. 3 CCE ~ NERAL ~ fINISHED CRADE SEE NOiE 3 ; f (PAVEMENT) ~ o iv cZ ib~ MORTAR IN PLACE NLET PIPE I~ +..,.i _ ' .j..,.,.• .t..- .j, ~ MOR1tiRED ' AOJUSi1aENi RINGS ~ Y 4' CONC. SlAB. ir 2'-0' m. ~ i•f '•~SEE NOTE 7 o SEE CENERAL N NOTE 3 SEE GEN. NOTE 1 d~ , f'. --2X ~INIET PiPE ~ CRAVEL ;I • SEEPACE PORTS, ~ BACKFILL SEE OETAIL, SHT. B-2, 7 eo } a ~ i: fABRICUHER SEE CEN. '•i~ I a c NMERE SHOYNd NOTE t k 2 :J U O = I N ON 1HE PLANS CRAVEL , ~ pBACKFILI, Q Q r'~SEE N`~ ~ ~ tJ ~SE~,PACE PORTS e~;~ SEE DE AIL, SHEE7 8-2. `•~I I°~., t' FABRIC IINER ~ .,?I WHERE SHOwN MIN, pry TNE PLANS IAIN. 'i:::r~. •:i;~1'~ :.`•::'..;ti'• SOIL STURBED ~DISTURBEO DRYWELL - TYPE 'A' DRYWELL - TYPE '8' , no-nea S'R ' a i ADD~Q SPOKANE COUNTY qppRp~ STANOARO N H CHANGFD A K IL N E5 DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS C~+TM E+a~~ A~ PRECAST DRYWELL$ 8'1 ~l UASION SYdfAUL NA 99206 456-3600 OATE: ame i . . ~ L}.- . ~ ~ e-~~'• ~ ~a~ I ►~a` G~~ d ~ u(' V ~p v~'~ ~ ~=d •2 r Of nvi: . ~+~o Ar~`"; A,\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - . - . ~ hzt~~u~z~l om , panyPs March 17, 1994 aruce E SiaLkmer, AIA Dale S BrOOKic, AIA Richard F Cook pE I;obertj Grossmar, A.'P. Cofin r2 Jones, AIA Robert Turner A F•ed Kiny, AIA Spokane County Engineering Stevenj rrcNirt, nin Ben,en A Nielsan, A A Spokane County Public Works Building Vdilliam lvti Podobrn4., .41.4 1026 West Broadway B. Russell Smiln, AIA Spokane, WA 99260 Gregory J 5luck, AIA RE: University Elementary School Modernization, 92077 - 1Ba Dear Bob: As you know, your Department recently reviewed this project at a Pre-application Conference. You noted a requirement or desire for an upgrading of existing parking lots to meet 208 standards. After careful examination of this request, we find that full 208 upgrading will be very difficult both physically and financially so much so that the added costs will scuttle the project until the School District finds other funding resources. Because of these circumstances, we ask for hardship consideration on the following basis (only as it applies to existing parking lots): 1. The enclosed updated site grading plan shows that the existing parking lots would have to be completely reconstructed to meet 208 criteria. These lots are situated on an existing very-flat site with center drywells and perimeter curbs. To shed the drainage to the perimeter would be a major earthwork and paving operation, currently unaffordable by the School District. 2. Most of the area which could have been converted to 208 swales was deeded to the County for widening of 16th Avenue and University Road. This makes solving our drainage problem even more difficult than it would be customarily. 3. As you know, we are appealing parking requirements with County Planning. We are fearful that reconstruction of the parking lots for 208 would be compounded with setback and landscaping requirements. Together the costs would be totally out of reach and the reconfigured parking would consume space that we'd much rather devote to playgrounds for students and neighbors. Our site is considered marginally substandard for size by the Superintendent of Public Instruction and these 208/parking requirements will aggravate this situation. 4. We clearly have an existing use which will remain unchanged. As I understand it, this 208 upgrading would not be necessary except for the dollar volume of work generated by our interior remodeling even though there is no usage or functional change within the School. In an odd way, we seem to have triggered these cf'ices in requirements because of the seemingly unrelated dollar level of interior building Spol:one ond Seattle work. 1203 Wc,st Rive-side Spokone, W6sh ngtar 49201-' 107 TE: 509-838-8240 FNX 509-838-8261 Robert Turner, Spokane County Engineering University Elementary School Modernization, 92077 - 1Ba March 171 1994 Page 2 The School District in anxious to reach a final determination on these questions and is eager for a reply by March 28, if at all possible. On the evening of the 28th the School Board will take up the question of proceeding with this project. Crucial to the District are the cost issues surrounding these requirements. By the present budget, this project would totally deplete their capital fund. So with the potential added expense of requirements cited herein (as well as parking and landscaping requirements of Planning) the project will not go forward or at least be forestalled indefinitely until the added $150,000 to $250,000 expense of these improvements is covered. Obviously, the School Board would not want to authorize the bidding of the project on the 28th and subsequently scuttle the project due to unaffordable requirements. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sin ely, l Steven J IV cNutt, AIA cc: Dave Jackman, Central Valley School District Julius Presta, Central Valley School District Jim Millgard, County Planning Chip Missler, Northwest Architectural Company kp/b031694 ' A ~ t ° U!PS ~ March 17, 1994 Bruce E. Elockmer, aIA Dale S. Brookie. AIA ~ Richord E. Cook, PE ~ q c~{JR Roberr),Grossmon, AIA ~ G 1994 Colin R. Jones, A1A Mr. Wallace Hubbard, Director ~ ~ A. Fred Kmg, AIA Spokane County Planning Department Sreven J. McNun, AIA ~~~~f~~~ Benson A_ Nielsen, r11A Spokane County Public Works Building Williom Pd1. Podobnik, AIA 1026 West Broadway B. Russell Smith, AIA Spokane, WA 99260 ~iegoryj. stack, AIA RE: University Elementary Schaol Modernization, 92077 - 1Ba Dear Mr. Hubbard: We recently participated in a Pre-application Conference for this interior remodeling project. The project was reviewed by Jim Millgard. It aQpears that the value of the improvements will trigger fiill compliance with the Zoning Ordinance to the point of ineeting criteria for an all-new building. Many of these requirements are extremely difficult to accomplish both physically and financially - so much so that the added costs would scuttle the project until the School District could acquire added funds by other means. Because of these circumstances, we ask for hardship consideration and administrative exemption on the following requirements: 1. Off-street Parking. We have made modest additions to the existing parking to accommodate mainstream park.ing criteria for classroom and office spaces. However, the gymnasium parking requirement would have us add approxunately 40 spaces and increase our total parking from 53 to 93 cars. We ask for hardship consideration on the following basis: . a. It is a very infrequent occurrence where assemblies are scheduled during the day that would attract parents and cars. Typically such events occur in the evening during parents' non-work hours. b. Added parking space means converting existing playground area. These forty cars would elinai.nate the equivalent of one soccer field. The students will suffer the loss of recreation and physical education space. c. Our site is currently under-sized by SPI standards (Superi.ntendent of Public Instruction). This 8.09 acre site has been granted an exemption from the 10-acre SPI criterion. Thus by SPI standards, adding parking space does indeed diminish space available to students. - d. This is an existi.ng use and occupancy with a parking situation that the neighbors have accommodated since 1957. We are improving the situation pffices in somewhat, but we doubt the neighborhood has an expectation,of a radical Spokone and Seorrle upgrade. And, just to be a good neighbor, the School's Principal has met 1203 Wesr Riverside with 5 or 6 neighbors fronting on the School to the north (16th Avenue) and Spokor.e. Wasningtan all neighbors along Glenn Road to the east. No objections were raised to 9920 1-11Q7 our plans in these informal encounters. ;EL 50e-838-82-40 Fax 509-338-8261 . ,:,g t c Mr. Wallace Hubbard, Director, Spokane County Planning Department University Elementary School Modernization, 9207'1 1Ba ' March 17, 1994 Page 2 e. The $60,000 cost of this parking space is beyond the School District's current means. It would force them to acquire added funds and scuttle the project until such funds are acquireri. f. Lastly we should note that we are appealing for a similar hardship exemption from County Engineering where, because of an assessment of dollar value, they are ask.ing thai 208 drainage standards be met with existing parking. This alone would financially kill (or stall indefinitely) this project, and it has a related compounding negative effeci on budget and lost usable space. The District is feeling especially hard-squeezed by these tough-to-satisfy requests. 2. Landscaping and Screening Standards. Because of an assessment of dollar value, we are asked to meet Laadscaping and Screening Standards. We are seeking an administrative hardship exemption from the parking screening requirements (as they apply to existing parking only) and the Type III screening around the perimeter of the site for the following reasons: a. Because the District deeded land to the County to widen 16th and University, we have no available open space to place landscape screening. Our only option is to relocate existing parking at great expense and loss of playground area for students and recreational users. b. The perimeter site landscaping will tend to visually screen and enclose the site. The District has concerns that this will adversely affect site security and reduce the effectiveness of perimeter observation by law enforcement officials and other observers. In addition, the District notes there are no County Parks in this neighborhoad and they wish to keep the site as open and inviting as possible for neighborhood users of playfields. c. _ Health District Officials expressed concern about this landscaping as a safety problem at the Pre-application Conference. They felt the planting would have to be placed outside the fence which, for the most part, is on our eurrent property line. Thus, moving the fence at great expense seems to be the only resolution of this problem. d. Again, we have an existing use and occupancy where, most likely, the neighborhood has little or no expectation of radical change in landscaping. If we're allowed to maintain our present course without requested upgrades, we will siill improve the landscaping and building to a modest degree that should be a net gain visually for the neighborhood. e. Again, most neighbors have been contacted informally by the Principal who has found no objections to our proposed scope of work. The School District is anxious to reach a final determination on these questions and is eager for a reply by March 28, if at all possible. On the evening of the 28th the School Board will take up the question of proceeding with this projeci. ~ . ~ . W. Wallace Hubbard, D'uector, Spokane County Planning Department University Elementary School Modernizaiion, 92077 - I]Ba ' March 17, 1994 Page 3 Crucial to the District are the cost issues surrounding these requirements. By the present budget, this project would totally deplete their capital fund. So with the potential added expense of requirements cited herein (as well as 208 requirements of County Engineering) the project will not go forward or at least be forestalled indefinitely until the added $150,000 to $250,000 expense of these improvements is covered. Obviously, the School Board would not want to authorize the bidding of the project oa the 28th and subsequently scuttle the project due to unaffordable requirements. We realize the variance process is available to us, but we were caught a little off guard by these issues; and the time delay would force us to miss the summer construction season, pushing the project into 1995/96. We are hoping that you see our requests as reasonable and of little or no impact to the neighborhood in comparison to the present use of the site. If so, the need for a formal variance process would seem marginal at best. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sin ely, ' Steven J. cNutt, AIA cc: Dave Jackman, Central Valley School District Julius Presta, Central Valley School District Jim Millgard, County Planning Robert Turner, County Engineering Chip Missler, Northwest Architectural Company kp/a031694 ~ . ' REVIEW CONMENTS SPOF,ANE COUNTY F.NGINEER D£VELOPMENT ENGINEERIIVG SERVICES PROJECT B94034 REVIEWER : Bob Turn,er PROJECT NAME; University Ele~~~~ary DATE: 3 May 94 REVIEW # : 2 CONN=S GETZRAL: A11 plans submitted to rhis d.epartment are required ta have a prafessional engineer's stamp sar regi,stered architects stamp by state law. Architect stamp must include a signature. Professional Engineer stamps must include the current seal and expirativn date as we11 as signature and date. Approach Permits are required on all new approaches as well as al,l appraaches that will be altered. Contact Sylvia Lightfoot at tkxe Counry Engineer' s Department. Approach permits for county roads will, not be issued until asite plan as appraved. I1/RAIi•AGE Rd.+4 Yili ! e I 2D8Calculations for the site are required for runoff of asghaltic surfaces {pavernent, roofs, etc.} within the Aquifer Sensitive Area. Show the quaxrti,ty of asphaltic area, volume required and provided, swale area required and provided. Show. ~typical secta.vn of a swale. 'z'he swale must be sodded and side slopes should not he steeper than 2.1 for up to 12 " in depth. For swal~s with greater depths use 3:1. The top of the swale should be a minirnum 2 in. above the drywel l 1 id . t Frvvide bottom of swale elevatians. Provide dryuel.l grate elevations. The County requires aSpokane County Type 4 drywell lid for drywells in 208 swales.Specify on the drawings this type of lid. Prouide contours or sufficient spvt e1evatians ta chec]~ sl'.te Page 1 af 2 ~ f` • grades. One-percent is the minimum requirement without special construction requirements by a licensed engineer. An area in the proposed bus lane has no method of draining to the swale and needs to be reconsidered. A- landscape plan is required to ensure there is no conflict with swale area. Page 2 of 2 ~ . ~ S P O K A 1~7 E a C O U N T Y OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EIVGINEER • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., I?irector Date: ~ - ~ C1 ~ SUBJECT: (j ~ n ~ ~ , Gentlemen: y1'~` .1 . , A review of the road, drainage, or site plan for the above-referenced building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached plan set and calculations marked "ORIGINAL". Please make the corrections and resubmit them to the Building Department in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all chanizes on the revised vnnt in color and include the mark-uT). Please note that the plan set and calculations marked "ORIGINAL" are official public documents, and must be returned with the revised plans and calculations. Review of the revised plans and calculations will not proceed until the "ORIGINAL" set is returned to the County. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer . j Robert Turner, E.I.T. Plans Review Engineer 4V.1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FfLX (509) 456-4715 TDD: (509) 324-3166 ~ • REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJECT B94034 REVIEWER: Bob Turner PROJECT NAME: University Elementary DATE: 12 Apr 94 REVIEW 1 COMMENTS GENERAL: G,,-~n agreement to pay fees is required before any further review can occur on the project. All plans submitted to this department are required to have a professional engineer's stamp or registered architects stamp by Ostate law. Architect stamp must include a signature. Professional Engineer stamps must include the current seal and expiration date as well as signature and date. Approach Permits are required on all new approaches as well as all D approaches that will be altered. Contact Sylvia Lightfoot at the County Engineer's Department. Approach permits for county roads will not be issued until a site plan is approved. 1208' Calculations for the site are required for runoff of asphaltic surfaces (pavement, roofs, etc.) within the Aquifer C) Sensitive Area. Show the quantity of asphaltic area, volume required and provided, swale area required and provided. Show a typical section of a swale. The swale must be sodded and ~ side slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 for up to 12" in depth. For swales with greater depths use 3.1. The top of the swale should be a minimum 2 in. above the drywell lid. See attached details. Proper sizing of drywells is required. A Type "A" drywell will handle 5,000 sf and a Type "B" drywell will handle 15,000 sf. Use L,--,ffultiples of each to provide adequate drywell structures. Bowstring calculations to prove that the drywell type selected is sufficient will be required if these recommended values are exceeded. A landscape plan is required to ensure there is no conf lict with v swale area. A drainage plan for the site shall be prepared in compliance with Spokane County "Guidelines for Stormwater Management". *Ltk Arr^v RoT4~~1 ~ l• I i ~ / Fr I . 1% * + r ~~~ATION $30.00 DATE RoAD rr.~ I (bTK AW . q,. ~ ~ i v ~~i TY pp. CR.P/Rr~ # NAME OF PLAT TittR~ ~PPITtoN To Pt~~S CC-Me'Ierz-'r P1at # ADDRESS QFSLDG 15-• 161_2~ 0NlVC-lZ5l7'~ ~ ~~~e glq?,,,04 NAME a~ BLDG PRO,rECr ~4lVE-:(2-s(r l-r qLC-M. scH-wat_ BLDG# B9 S ~ T~ ~ ~~~ERAJ-/srATF, PRO,rECT # NA PuOJEcr~ LlMrTs . EXIS"ITNG CONDTTION5; PROPOSED IMP'ROVEMENTS: ROAD WID'IH N1~~ mc*4e ROAD SURFACE NIA . IUbNc- AVG. DAELY TRAFFi~ ~IA ~KANG-f Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DIESCR=DN 1 IJ1"IEIZ! DZ glEMODG LWC~ 9PF F.AI ~ST 114& kA*ol. . gzrA i t1 mCiSrtIU& j;'A~! ~ ~ ~ f0_"c8Fr.„~ ~lT)0r~ CFV 3 5V"s). 62D 005 LQAPLLjf LANO Wi loB V*~,~A&~r t PRopOs~D DEsIGN DEuEATIaN _~v:s~~ 96MiN j7,K ~ ~ -209 WcrJ& LoT-s JUs~~CATIOrr; ~ ~IM@~ r-O @9~; MQ*JC-IZ • ~~~UF,;t ttAS stTLO PiA,~.5 MoMP) ~ suBM=D s~ SMV676) 7. Mt,,%lu lr AiA ~A-rF- ~.4- ALJJR.V~S __jNt' A&A• ~_J~ W. ~~~~~j2ffq ~F~_WA +~.i.M4 CVDiT! PHOItiFE # ADIVIINIS'IRATIVE V~iA~AF ~30.{~ 0 FAI~ T~ SPO~E CO[Il'V'~'Y 1o26 w~ BROaDWAY, spOx~v~ i~a ~~z~~v~ ~~~~~32s-36on F~ (s09)32~.-347s -REQU~.ST V1~vVED WIT~-I FUNDS- GASIVCHEC # RECETVED BY . DATE ky&desip,da- N" - ~ + ~ ~ T~ . DESIGN Dn''IAT7'ON STAFF RECONMENDA'ItIONS C" rwesto Approved Approved wJconditions Nat Approved ~ - . r Pro]eCt IViSIISgeT Date ~ ~ ~ i -r, G rL +I ! -5 RL1't 74 '?-r o "*'1 1~o9-c 7-~S C9 AJ G*O-..7i"~ ~ 4+--,> D<z> T-- Ckr~ ^-G Approved Approved w/conditions Not Approved °2-3 --9q- - Planning i& Traff"ic Enginee~ Date • 6elcwl ~~lfeA G~ zzo 14 -ez~A - 1 41S, Approved Approved wlconditions Not Approved ~~q v- ProJect Ivfanagementingineer Date . Approved Approved w/canditiogs Not Approved Co ~ . Operations Engineer Daie SPOKANE COLlNT-'Y ENGIlNEER'5 I] ETERARNAT~ON; - ~ - - ~ Approved w/ino conditivrts Approved as x=mmended above Not Approved Spokane Caunty En&eer Dar~ 8193 S • ^ ~ % X.0117zt~;~ur~rl Yf aql/~) y PS !!~."ET^ S,8`s,.- ~ ► March 17, 1994 F Y= - Bruce E. Blockmer, AIA Oole S. Brookie, AIA Richard E. Cook, PE Robei i J. Giossmon, AIA Colln R. jones, AIA Robert Turner A fred King, AIA Spokane County Engineering stevenj. nAcNuii, AIA Benson A. Nielsen, AIA Spokane County Public Works Building wiliiam M. Podobnik. AIA • 1026 West Broadwa B. Russel) Smilh, AIA y Gregory). Srock, AIA Spokane, yVA 99260 RE: University Elementary School Modernization, 92077 - 1Ba Dear Bob: As you know, your Department recendy reviewed this project at a Pre-application Conference. You noted a requirement or desire for an upgrading of euisting parking lots to ' meet 208 standards. After carefui e,zamination of this request, we find that full 208 upgrading will be very difficult both physically and finaacially - so much so thai the added costs will scuttle the project until the School District finds other funding resources. Because of these c'vrcumstances, we ask for hardship consideratioa on the following basis (only as it applies to existing parking lots): 1. The enclosed updated site grading plan shows thai the existing parking lots would bave to be completeiy reconstructed to meet 208 criteria. These lots are situated on an existing very-flat site with center drywells and perimeter curbs. To shed the drainage to the perimeter would be a major earthwork and paving operation, currently unaffordable by the School District. 2, Most of the area which could have been converted to 208 swales was deeded to the Cou.nty for widening of 16th Avenue and University Road. This makes solving our drainage problem even more difficult than it would be customarily. 3. As you know, we are appealing parking requirements with County Planning. We are fearful that reconstructioa of the parking lots for 208 would be compounded with setback and Iandscaping requirements. Together the costs would be totally out of - reach and the re:onfigured pazking would consume space that we'd much rather devote to playgrounds for students and neighbors. Qur site is considered marginally substandard for size by the Superintendent of Public Instruction and these 208/parking requiremem.s will aggravate this situation. 4. We clearly have an ezisting use which will remain unc,hanged. As I understand it, this ZOS upgrading wouid not be necessary except for the dollar volume of work generated by our interior remodeling - even though there is no usage or functional change within the School. In an odd way, we seem to 'have triggered these Offices in requirements because of the seemingly unrelated dollar level of interior building Spokone ond Seottle work. . 1203 West Riverside $pokone. Woshinglon 49201 • I 107 1El 509•838•8240 FAX 509•838-8261 , . ~ Robert Turner, Spokane County Engineering Ukiversity Elementary School Modernization, 92077 -'1Ba ' March 17, 1994 Page 2 The School Distrirt in aiuious to reach a final determination on these questions and is eager for a reply by March 28, if at all possible. On the evening of the 28th the School Board will take up the question of proceeding with this project. Crucial to the District are the cost issues surrounding these requirements. By the present budgex, this project would totally deplete their capital fund. So with the potential added expense of requirements cited herein (as well as pazking and landscaping requirements of Planning) the project will not go forward or at least be forestalled indefinitely until the added $150,000 to $250,000 eapense of these improvements is covered. Obviously, the School Board would not want to authorize the bidding of the project on the 28th and subsequently scuttle the project due to unaffordable requirements. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Z ' Sin ely, r . ~ ~U Steven cNutt, AIA cc: Dave Jackman, Central Valley School District Julius Presta, Central Valley School District - Jim Millgard, County Planning Chip Missler, Northwest Architeciural Company kp/b031694 ~ ~ • , I ~ • ' I . . , , . i . S Y O It C O LI N "I, Y OFFICE QF TI IE COUNTY ENCINEER • A[71VISIQN OF1'l IC PUlll.1C WORKS DE('ARl?v1ENT Etonald C. t{armatin, I'.E., Cuunfy Cngineer Dennis M. Scott, I'.E., Director AGRECMENT TO PAY FEES ENCiNCLit'S ACItEEMENT NUMI3ER 0 g y03y Tliis agreement between Spokane County and Central valley School District tvo. 356 , knamc oi pcrson) wliose interest in the rroject is owner (I.c. owncr, agcnl, cic.) is entered into tllis 7 th day o f April , 19 94 . Tliis agreement is applicable to (lie project ktlown as: Remodel of University Elementary School South 1613 Un~v rsity Roac~ :q4aakan.P wA 9920ti • tprajec r s'btTilenamZr& it'e n m cr I'liat tlte inclivicluals ancl rartics natnecl herein as having an interest in the above cfescribecl prorerty or rrajcct agrce to the following: 1. Reimburse Srokane County for rroject review ancl insrection fces as sreciCecl in Cliapter 9.14 of (lie Srokane County Code. The fees will b:, based o» acttial salary eosts incurrecl by Spokane County for project reviews ancl / or inspections rlus a ten perceiit aclministrative charge, ancl will he billecl montltly as accniecl. Any ftnal billing amourits, (o inclucle any late fees or any otlier exl)enscs incurrecl in tlle eollection of an overclue account must be raid rrior to the County's accentance of (lie project for filiiig. 2. The undersigiied agrees tliat tliese fees Are ctue and rayable uron reeeipt of the billing as srecifiecl above. 3. Any invoices not paicf witliin 30 clays oF the invoice clate will be subjectecl to a late fee cliarge of l°.o per tnonth (12% pet ycar) oti tlic unpaid balance of tlie account ancl ariy accrueci iate fee charges. In adclition, if any outstaciclin6 balance on the account for tliis project is not naicl within 30 days of lhe invoice ciate, tio ftirtlier reviews oF the nroject clocuineiits will be conciuctecf until tlie entire acc;ount balanee is raicf. Aiiy balaiicc on (lie account for this rroject not raicl witllin 65 cfays of tlle tnvoice date may result in Iegal action or (lie initation of otlier collection rroceclures, inclucling rcferral to a colleclion agency. 71ie Sponsor will be liable fur any ailcl all exre.nses incurrecl by the Couiity for (lie eollectioti of overcfue accounts. 4. The tnontltly billing sliatilcl be sent to (lie attention of: NAME: Dave Jackman Central Valley School District No. 356 ADDRESS: East 19307 Cataldo , CITY, STATE: Greenacres, Washinqton ZIP CODE: 99016 Pd-IONE 509-922-6745 I uncierstancl that failure to ray these fees may result in clclay in conirletian or arproval of the project or otlter possible sanctions. ❑ tf tliis fee 1Sreemcnt is comrletecl by soineone otlicr llian tlie Sponsor (i.e., tlle Projec;t owner or a princiral in the firrn sponsoring the project), sucli as (lie Engineer clesigtiing thc rrojcct, tlien written autliorization from the Sponsor specifically nutlioriziiig (lie A6ent to execute lliis Cee Abreeitieiit is%at=t.acliecl ta lllis Fee Agreetiient. I S I G N A'I'U IZ E By: Dave Jackman , (PRINT NAMC) RETURN YELI.OW CnI'Y TU Si''OKANC COUN'I'Y LNr[NErRS k\pV\agreerncn.(ee 8/20193 - ..-i .~•r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Zo17 I 8~ . ~ . • ~ 1 ~ i ~ S ' • , , S p o1t A N r C o v N rr ~r Or-fICE OF TI IE COUNTY CNCINCCR • A DIVISIQN Or TI IC C'UULIC WOKKS I7f1'ARTMEN7 ltonalcl C. Ildrmaiin, I'.E., Cuuttly Liigineer Uennis M. Scolt, i'.C., Uireclor AGIZCLMENT 'I'O 1'AX FErS 'S ACItCCMCNi' NUMIlClt ~ ~ 0 qCINCCit . Tliis agreement Vetween Spoktiiie Cotiiity anc1 Central valley school District tvo. 356 , --MI-RE 0! JR o11 iose ititerest in (lie liroject is owner ---(t~vi~~~ enterecl 111to tllis 7th day of April , 19 94 , This Agreetnetit is arplicable to (lie project lowtl cis: Remodel of University Elementary School ~ • i~iJ~T~iETYbi"TiulsTfifl~liT~ , W A ~ 4 ~(1 ~ '[liat tlie inclivicltiais niicl pnrties natiiecl lierein as itaviiig aii interest in the abave clescribecl property or ~ojcct agrcc to the following: Reimburse Srokane Cotinty for nroject review Anc1 iiislieceioti fees ns speciCecl ili Charter 9.14 of (lie 5pokane County Cocle. 'I`he fecs will bc basecl oti actual salary costs tiicurrecl by SpokAne Couiity for rroject reviews anci / or iiisrections rlus a teil rercetit aclininislralive cliarge, ancl will lie billecl i»oiitllly as accrtiecl. Any finnl Uillitig atnounts, to iiiclucle aiiy lute fecs vr aiiy otlicr expenscs itictirrecl in tlle collection of an overclue nccourit t»ust be paic1 prior to the County's acceplnnce of (lie rroject for filiiig. 2. Tlie uiiclersigiieci ngrees iliat tliese fees are cliie ancl rayable tiroii reeeipl of (lie biliing as specifiecl aUove. 3. Aity invoices not ra'tcl witliiii 30 clays of the iiivolce clate will be subjcctecl to ti late fee cliarge of l% ner iiioiitli (12°1o rer yenr) oti Ilie utinaicl ba11nce of tlle Accoilrit Anci niiy acertiecl late fee cliarges. In uclcfilioii, 1f any otitsttiiiclirib balaiiee on the Aecount for tltis project is tiot liaicl williin 30 clays of Ilie itivoice cfate, rlo t'tirtlier . reviews oF llie rroject clociiineiits will be conctuctecf until (lie eiilire accotirit balnnce js paid. Aiiy balaiice oii ihc accoutit [or lliis project iiot raicl witliiti 65 clays of (lie itivoice clate inny result in legal aclioij or the initAtion of ollter collectioii rrocecltites, iiicltiding referral to a collec;tion ngcncy. 7lie Spo»sor will bc liable fur any atlcl all experises iticurrecl by (lie Couiity for (lie collectfott of overcfue accounts. 4. Tlic tnotillily billing sliotild bc sctit lo (lie atteittiott of: • NAMC: Dave Jackman ~ Central Valley School District No. 356 ADDIZCSS: Eas t 19307 Cataldo CITY, STATE: Greenacres, Washinqton ZlP CODE: 99016 P[IONC 509-922-6745 . i unclers(ancl tl»t failure to ray tliesc fees ttiAy result in clclay in cotlirlet'torl or arrroval of (lie lirojcct or lier rossible sanclions. • ❑ If tliis fee ngrceniciit is cotiipletecl by sviiieone otlier tliari (lie Sporisor (i.e., (lie rraject owtier or a rriiicipal in tlie firrii srunsoring (lie rrojec(), sticli ns the Engiiieer clesigtiing the project, tlien written autliorizaliatt froi» (lie Sporlsor speci(icnlly ntilliariziiig (lie Agent lo exectite lliis.. I+ee A6reei iettt 'ts~silcliecl to lltis Fee Agreeiiietit. S[GNAI'Ulti? I3y: ~ acq Dave Jackmar} ~N (I'R1N"T N/1MC) ~ rTLli_i~_! YELI~01Y CnPY 'Tn SIw()f{ANC CO_tlN'I-l I:NCINCFItS .~n--•--...~., r_~ oi~.~,n~ ! ' ~ _ _ _ ~ , ~ NOTICE OF T"J~A~lSMI1~~~~ ~AL ~ . ~i . S= • ~ ~'ROJECT ~ - I ~_C~ ~ ~ L _~---r-~ c~ i < BUSINESS. NAME: ~ ~ ~ PARCEL NO./LEGAL j~~--✓~.~ ~~L C~--i~ F' ~=--1 DESCRIPTION: ~ ~ / PROP~JSE USE:~ c`~ • c~-' t--~ LV ~ ,~~D ~ ~ ~ ~ r c~' - e~c CONTACT: ~ ' - , J~ . ~ PHONE: C~. ~ ~'2~ ss1 . ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ REASON FOR TRANSMITTAL , ~ , PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFER~NCE OTHER: DATE: j TIME: ~ j~ Q Q ~ DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED DISTRIBUTED TO: ' RECD DESCRIPTION BUILDINGS PLANNING ENGINEERS HEALTH SCAFCA FIR6 D[ST f! ~ OTH R: . , i <<~~,s ~Site Plan ne (revisecl) ~~~x~ ~ x ~ x ( ! : : : : : :r Critical Mate 'a ri 1s List : ~ : : : : : : : : : . ~ : : : : : : : : : : : . : : : : :.r ~ . . . . ...1. ~~:vir:::: I r:: ~•~:~~r: ~ : z;~ r:::::; ~ ~ Parkin Plan .:.L.:.:~:::~.::::~.:>:::.::~-:; . g ~ ~ . .......::~i:~;:::.:::~~ . . :::r:::::~:=~~~.. ~ . ~~-~'~.::~i`i~`~`~~~:;'~ r.:•:~r` 1 . . . . •.•l.': i'l::•:~.~.•.'.'.. :.1'i.}i. '.'f i i • : .l S ~ ~ :1'JJ.'r':` na e ! P an : t: :~k., g ~ ~ ~ :::r..:~~. . . :::<~:::<:`::::::<;;:::::::<:~:<::::::::: • . :.f:~`:~:::::: . . ..........:r:::.. - . ~ . '•a:tv• h:•::•>:.. ~ :$•:i:: . `in~: ..~Jf`.'..... ~ - . iL . ::;~':~`•a.,~.,• ~1 Li h n P lan ~ : € b r::::: . : : . . . . . : : . . : , ; ~ rf? :+r}:::.. ti',v,r.. ,~.'};i:..'{ii:5}Yr:': : I:~i4: ~:~$:::?:,'v,:;{'ry':: , . : . . . ' " tii': . . . . ' ' ' ' ' : - . . . < . ~ . . . . ~ ~ 'r:.ti. ti`~:;:;7: ~ ~ ~ : = : Draina e Plan g :.r:. . ~ . ~ ;;:;:r:~:::::~: . . . . . . . ~:~r;:~: . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . ....:.:::r : . . . . i:::~,:;~::~::::::::::>:~::==:.:: I . • . . r..::. .s - ~ ' Draina e Calculations { :~r::~.::_::.: - ~ ~ :~:4:..x.r . J~ g - . ~ . , ..t::,.:: ` • . . . . . . . . J. ~y},~,.~ • ' V.111::•..:._: •:t. ~':Y ~ l...:l....~:::::::_::: v: . . • . .........J.{•yi. . ::f.` f.Y1l.•::::i:l : ~ ..,1. ,1 , . . . ~ : . . " . . . . ~ v.:.......ti . 5}"' ~ : SY. ~ ~ ~ : rr. }}•.}ii ti A reement to . . . : ' .:..{::ti:•.:tititi• . : : ~::..~.v~:.•r:~.~.:: Pa Fees ~.f.:;.::?:.:::>.:-:::<.:;::~;~:::::::::::::~::;~ b 1 • • . • . ; :•.;•;tti , $:titi~;}::%:• r... v : ~ . . . - . I . _ : i:?:?}:tiv::: . : }:::rs4;.}~y.} ~ v: v.~::::: :•v. " . • . -.}::{.~:5;: ti•:f{. . . " . f i . yyy111 4{~ ;•r;•r I i a P rr ion la r~< n '.ti~ { ~ I . '::1~:.:.'::: ll::..• . . I {.j~ : ir':; :.':"F.'~' I I . . . . . . ....1V~r _ .~.~~fV. . . F Lv . . . . ~ . ..i~ ~ ~ :'St+S,'v':'': % ' + ~ : . ~ . . d a ~:z~•: ~:i:~:~$::~~:~:~~ L.an sc e Plan :::ti: P ~ I ~ ~ :~:~:;::::;'`::n:::;~'~' J.1•:. ~ ~ . : ~ . . h:>:::;':::::: ~ . . : . f... ':.1V:i • • : • • ~ . ~ . • '..'.'}::.•l:::~: .:::;::ti: or t r ~ . Le e . :r::.:::.:::.: Y '~~R ! . ..,::::-.:._:::~-~f~{ . - ~ . Pro rruss t y . . : ~ . : . . . . . ~ -.:t:, . . . „~;.,<.::<<<...~. . . ~ , - . :~r<:=: ;:::.:..;v . r . . - . . . . . ~ . . . . :::r,.;:._;.::::::`;~;;: . . . . :.........::...:.~:•~:-~::tv;r, t.::~:::.;•...; . :;•r::,•::>r:::::::..: . . . Landsca e Cost Estimate p : . . . . : . ~ ~ ...........i . .........?14-0:~. v. , . i:::::: _ . :~i{ii ~?'r:{•i.'r. "•:Q:;',Y::;: r. _ _ . . . : • . . . r...... . iCi~+ii0.ti~'L~ir: v::::. ' . . . ' lf J.L~ NYf f.•f.t ~ {f {M1'J.: • i.'}r 'J:..:.•~•.•. Traffic C~rculation Ptan ~ + I : • : • ~?:r : - s;~i;:•:>~::: ~ ~ :::•a::ee~::~r : _ ~ I~~?::::;i;::::: ~r?;i:~.::; :;::.::•r:•>;:- . . ~ ......I:..~ . : . . S . : . { ~ ~ . L [ Construction Draw~n ~ } `~A-~ t ::v: ~ € ~ ( I j ~ fr:{.: .:L ~ ~J;l.••••~ • ~:~~f~ .1': ~ . . . 'i} a . . . •F . • tf.. . . .'f • . . . . . ~::i'.~~..'. . . . . _ P\, . . . : ~ V • - ::'l.'~ . Floor tan : .:::..<< . . . ~ti' ti '~~L':.ti•: ~ ~ . V u ~~S;:tti:; _ ;:.r . '~r.v.... ~ / \ :c ::;;~r'•• . ~~.>r :a;G::a ' ;,ti . ~ ; . ~ .CC~.;i,.:.?.~ rr~.t .}..'+wrr. ':r.s~:?~ `~i~:>;:~: ~'r:....... ~ • .::r,sr..~: . . • : • ~:`;Y:~: ~ I I ( ~ I I ( ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .r N ~ ~ I I ~ I~I I, i~t~ I I I 71~e above ltems hnve becil ~ V\~ recei ved.• ~ / , Date of Transmittal~ Review Coordinat . ' 1.~~ ~ Circulated by: S>>ok~rnc Couiity Divisia►r ~f Buildi~l~~s * 1026 We.c~ L3~•o~thvt~y Avenue * Spokaac, WA 99260 *(509)456-3675 . y NOTICJIJ OF TRAN1..JMITTAL ADDRESS: ~ • P ao1 EC'I' j ~ BUSINESS NAME: PARCEL NO./LEGAL . ~ D CS C 12I PT[ 0 N: PROPOSCP_ US• : • ~ ~ ~ ~ CO /1CT: • ' ` ju ' PHONE: A . REASON F0R TRANSMZT'TAL PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PRECONBTRUCTION CONFFRENCE OTHER: DATE: TIME: ~ - DOeYJMENTS CIRCULATED ~ DISTRIBUTED TO: RDM DESCRIPT[ON BUIi.DINGS PLANNiNG ENGWEF,RS HEALTH SCAPCA FgtE DIST A' ~ OTHER: Site Ptan (new)t(ieviseclr! 5?,. Critical Materials ~isf'- j ~ ~ ,r f, ~ , , • , . • iParicing Pla.n. ~ . ~ ~ Sigaage Plaa M ~M~M~~1 ♦•111 ~ ~ _ . . Lighting Plan IDrainage Plan . . . . , . . -,<<. - ~ IDrainagc Calculations - - ~.1 ~.M ~IMI~ ~M • XM~.,~~Nr .1M~M\w~ AM♦ III.II ~Mv1 ♦ IIM~ MF~~~~.Ir lAgreemcnt to Pay Fees ~ lImgation Plan l- im. MI_ - - - Landsc:apc Plan. Promissory Lcitec ~ • nII II tM ~1'r Y~ 1.~~ ♦✓YM ~~1~N • ~~N Mw ♦ ♦V MMM ♦ wXiJ.A,~IIdSG'iPC COSt Estl[I11tC . . . F ~ • ~ ~ . . ITraffic Circulation Plan iConstruction Drawings I • R ~ Floor Plan ~ _ ~ . . . . . X G~l ~1r'!~'~ ~~~f`~ ~ 1 I l i I • The abovc itcros havc bec►i recci vcd: . I . Date of Review Coordinator~ ~'r-ansm~ttal: 4-cve? ~ ~ - ~ Circ;ulatccl I,y: , ' t PERMIT RELEASE REQUIREMENTS ♦ I I H Please submit seven Cl") seu of rcyisrd site, cfrainage, and laadsape p6as plus•three (3) complete sets of coastrucdoo drawiags to t6e Departrrrent ot Bwlciings for aclmowldgcment and ctistrrbutioa to aU the apprvpriate ageacirs Ia ordrr for all ageneies tv eWectitious/ypr,acess your projr+cl, it ir rarportaQt tbat submittaLs include a11 aecessary drawiags and documents to iasure t6at revrew of yvur prvjau a compkteJ in the k.ast amount of time. DocumeaCs shorrld include: building address and legal desc.ription of propcrry. Spokane :.aunty's Projeci AQView Coocdinator wiil be Julie Shatto at tfie Div. of Buildings (456-3675). . ~ f~~ . . . . . r ♦ ♦ . IA . N. . • • . ♦ , . 11113 ~ $lGyclC r'dCiC3 OocuOQ dL allIIlbCr) ~ Z) g I BU11dlIIg hClght III 3LOtfCS & fCC[ 319 I Qe1C VICW Lt1anglC 3L ing~CgTC.SS 4 I CUI'b1Og arOUIId }B.IIdscaQIIIY S Eaerior li#tins;/directian of Mumiaation 61$ 1 Fence locat~tifln, hetht, dc rype 71 G I Landscaping of pariQng lot ~ ~a 81 G 15 feet Type III laadscapiag along University, Glean, 16th & 18th 91 a I Lanasca,m~ ~dm Species, size) ~ 101 A I ~ & n-afk drcuLidoo plan ~ 4_P~ ~ 111 a I p~ ~(II~. s~g, aimensiog airectional arra~) ~ y, r 121 A I' Pa,►ing 13 R ~ Sesbacks 14 Traffic vontrol devic,es lan swales. ells, calculations iS D rainaire ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; ~ . . . M. 161 ~ I CertifiCate of F.=mption 171 ~ Irrigaaon system 181 & NurserY estimate 191 A I Prvmissory letter for landscape requiremeats - . 201 A I A~rZement to pay faes & minimum requirements list - 211 1 Approach perarit for access to University, 16th, or Gienn ~ 1AILock (Knox) bac entrY sYsrem r.. . .i... i i.... . ~ ~ . . . "La, m A.. / I . . A . . . . . . . . . 231 1 Barrier-Frez Requirements (WAC 51-20) 241 1 IIectrical details ' 251.8 1 Energy detailikalculadons & heatios.s . 261 A I Heating, veatiiatioa & air coaditioninz drawings 2711 B ( Lighting budgets 28 11 A ~ Plumbing detai7s 291 44 1 Strv,ctural drawings with wet stamps & calculations ~ u 'LLR, ~Signatlre of Coorciinator v LE&e~.J P> f~. 1n1GC.vb~~ iN npccvW,~, svanirm4U ~ I nll~.il ~(5n W IU15 Sv~ ~T-r-•4 c... G . Aorn (rJ#s-r4.Tr-~ vE L-xs_:rmPT orl ~ ` NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL ADDRESS: ' r PRO1 EC1' BUSINESS INAML: PARCEL NO./I.EGAL -,e-~ D ES C RI PTION: PROPOSED j SE: . CO CT: PHONE- S ~,~q . ~ REASON FOR TRANSMITTAY. , PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERF.NCE OTHER: , DATE: TIME: DO CUrMEN7CS CI1tCULA'TED DISTRIBUTED TO: . R~ DESCRIPTION BUILDINGS PLANNiNG ENGIN&RS HEAI.TH SCAPCA FIItE D1ST 0 ~OrI'HER: , -'tical Mat6rialsFI:ist - ~ . Cn ~ FPr~rking Plan. ♦~Mr N~++MMMNiM~~~M~N~ M~M~MW/ MM/i♦ M • M MV~NN ~ ISiguAge Plaa N./1 ~ ~ ~~M XY11r♦ Ni1MnM !i /nM1 jLighting Plan ~ . . • ~ . . ~ . << . ~ . ~,•,,a,,, IL Drainaga Ca;cutations I./II~MMM~NM Mi ♦~NN~4WM~M ~ ~MM M{M~+11 M~NMM~WI4 tl1~YMMM~ V~ MII ♦MY~~MY~II~IIW Y' lAgreement ta Pay Fees . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~I IIIFMMIII I~~MMMIIIYM~~~ . ~Y~ . I - ►I.~u~idscaQe Pian . X . ~ L ~ - ~ / ~ ~ .t ~ a• Proaussory Letter • [y - +1• ~~MwM • .~~~I IMMI M~~1MIwM11'V .1~MwMN1~M/ 1M, •1IM ♦I ~M ~rMI I..artdSCBpe COSt Estt;nate . ~ . INM N/M WM I MIMMMMII~ Tcaffic Circulation Plaii Consttuction Drawings ~ ~ ~ , ~ „ : , , • . . +Floor Plan X Cvu`..2 1~ ~ , I I >C I . I ~ ~I I I i I ~ 'Ihc Rbovc ilcros have bceri ~ - rccci vcd: ' ~ , ~ • , Date of Transmittal: Revi,:;%R, Coordinato ~ J ci««t:~ted t,y: . . . . ~ 4 rn-►i ~ii.._, n.•,.,.,~~...,,. ,e,•.•.,~i.• * .C►~nk:rrir Wit 007(4 * (S(}4lQ,56-3675 ~ - NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL /1 D 17IZ ;~5 S P R U1ECr1, /t : QUS[NrSS NnME:, 1'ARCF-L NO./LCGnL LL_jl~ L~-e=T1.`.s 14. L,~ )-.-U-.r'~Z.c2._✓Z D[;S C R I t'T C O N: PROI'OS E US E: CONDCT:, r, ~ f PHONE: REASON I'OR TRANSMITTAL PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENC6 OTNER: DATE: TIME: DQCUMENTS CIRCULATED ; DISTRiBUTED T0: kCCn DESCRIPTION BUILDINGS PLaNNING ENGINEERS HEALTH SCAPCA FIRE DtST N OTHER: ISite Plan (new) (reviszcl) . . :.1:::.., . . •.r:~:.::.;:::;.: Critical Materials Li.tt i . . ~ ~:::>.:1~~:-:`:: . ~~:•::--::~r . ~ :r::>:-.::. :cr,. ~ =.;ti~ • r,,; ' - - xt ::t•.. : ; =n~y. v.~}~i:Tii: : i.•: ~ . . • i . . 1•. : ~V. ~ - : Y .t~ v.;: '.V.:•::: : _~Nll.:' I Parkinbr Plan ..ti.: 4'~~ •'r:.::~;?:?{:{.`:-.v: 'r'i:~$•:~~:;•'{{-:{.}:~'r::-:;;r,r:_,::;: : .s..... . . .::hii:'•.. . . , , . :vv••, v:: IS.gn r , , ~ • •:n•:?T:;}; . i:t:•~:; ti:'4:.,-'~ :;i:;~::r.+..:•?}:? ::i:-: .r. :r+:::::.."':. • ..w:: ::i:??i?':{?"•'ti: ~ ..v:: 'r)i~i: :•i'r'r: :~w• ::v:{- :x .+L-. :i{.} ..r•'-~: - . . age Plan ~ ~ ~ . v. :rv::. tiw::.::. ~;r:. . . . : ~ . ~ ~ •.v:.:-.: ~ ~Hafa :•:ti•::: v .ti}•.ii i::': h:; • :•r.;. i;{•ii:•i:v}: i::.. }~:.}••i::• . .h..:..~{•.~ . ~ - . :•S •i: i.'ti:•:..•_.:V ~ . ti•~•:';: :•:Q:.:::•:.ti : f... . :::'i.: - • .•$Vt . ::•.i. Lishting Plan I . . .-:-:r : . . . . .:r.~:.. . Y~ : ~••r::::::: :~;v: ~~x•r::c•::ii:-•`'~ ~~r , . : r . . j i:. • ~ ~ 1 , . ~ : lan . . . . : . )wc~jDr a►n' age P . . . . . . . . . . •..:Y::: •:'}•.-:~lh: .:.1Yy.:... ii :Y:::: .•:1': ::V~:•:.~. . . . ~ i ~ ' l. ~ \S Y. . ' 1 '.:Y:.• :~:1:. . Yf: -:'._.:.5:•.: . ..i._~~:.: • . . i . • ~ t~.~..:'.~1.~ : :'i:..•.:. ..1':::.•.... ".Y ti ~a....: ..::::;:r . . . . : . . . . . rainaSe Calcul1fiOns ....:::r.: ~ , ~D : ~ 1. :::1~ ~.1.. fL.• ~ }Y. 'l~~.. • j}•., ~ 1j.1:• ':•l:•:'::::f . J::. ~ ; l..• , . , . , +MM' ~ ' . . . "4. ~ • ' . ::ti::•-;. ' ~}ri:-. ~ "~i{i: w. . . y~. 1..: •ti{• .v. . :~i::: =::~:ti• ..v .\.:iri1lL'._:1: .••~'..:_•.•:S•: v!':::.. fN T: • : rr,y x:. r..... ~ r w:. „ ~r:: ' • ...ti . .....{.v :::r....: •.::ti: :.ti.-:::}n?_~....r ' r:}}:i IAsreement to PaY Fees ~_...s.::... . :.::::~~::;:..r..: r:. • ::r.,, . • . _ . . , . . :r.:;:::.r;::>_;::;,:. ;:«.::::x;:;:::,•f :.ti~: _;;:x::'=:r::. , . . . . - iIrrigation Plan : f':: }ti. .,M1.•.:;, • ~J:..-:•':.• • • J✓ . ::3C}:•. ' ~l...; . l: . - : iii:r'-:%:?• i:{--::'?:{~i~' r'i~i'-=-''Y•: Landscape Plan r~ :::;::;v.•::-;. •.r•: . . ~ :..r:........ .~s. . . :........y_ . . . . . • - ;r::. .:•r.t.::-•:~ ::<:.ti:: . ~ -r. ~ r:. ' • ' ~ . ¢•....:'tiy;:.__ ; . , . ti:•v .;;v.._ _Y . , , 4 3C~.. ?''r' . ~ v. "-::{•v: ~ •;:;v:.ti~ ..:.ti ..•::.::v•..... .r.v..: ~ . r_.:,-. . I ~ Procnisso Leter . . . ::.a:._ Nr•::.J.~:iV~..:?}~ _.'Y.:•.f::' Yl:::l:t. . ..:~.lV::ti::::•-~ ...'v::'y . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . ._.!r , _ .....~.ti , . .i.~ .:::.::..f . ':~.V.:: a~...::• '.:Y.:. • ::ti:::i.. • ,1Y.. •.ti~{•:•J?•-• . rJ..::J. L'.•:.V .rl:.~.. - i:..:: ~i: i ✓.::•:.Yf J.. .~f. • Yl:: :X r........__ . .1~•. ..~J .'.{!l:•. :•S~'. ~ ~ ~i:~S.S !::t•ti•.'.' . t m e :..:.:t_:::•.:>: . . ti at . ILandscape Cos Es . ~5~=:.....:.:..>::; : ~ - . . .:,:.:;:::;r.:•- ~ ~ :::;:r::.,::~ ITrafFc Circulation Plan :::~::::=`.:Y:=-~::: ~:w:=::::<::'~'~::•:`=~ ~:.';:,_~.}~.,.:••::~L •;N~'.:~,•• ~ l.:•_,-.!Jl:.: I I : .ti•::::: Y j k•~ . ::l✓' ~ X... . . • : . : i ICon 1 •.:.~j. :~'.'::•.l:.:%•• . . . : ~f. . W: I{:::• ~ W. ~ : : . • • X•: ~ : ~ ~~:L~'.••:':::'}: : ~'.':'::ti . - ..1......... -V::::::~:• . ..y. . . .....ti' . ;v.: ''•}•'v . v.::.: ~ . v w::: . : ' • ' . . struct. ~on DraWi ngs l .r... .,.4 •:r.:::... •:r. ~ `i~•:.::::•~ ~::~;c•:>: :s:> . }:'r -:Li::::::•iii ~ • . _ . . . v ~i~ ..ti:.~:_....-._... . - . . .y-}:: :.~•r:. :.t:ii•.i1S~ 7:4}i~ . . ; . . . ~ .:.i::.~~ • . :•i.~~':•~.1.:•:.:~:::•: , r •}Y :'Y{v:?:ti:v:i:>•• :ii:~?T$ .i•i:: . . •~f.. ~::•.•.y'.•:•:••'•: . t..... !:L•'. . .1'• ~ti:~`.1:j i ~"ri:+:~ ~ ..4 :t{t}:::::'rf';:y}T:: {$:::::•:>:~}ir:...: r. . Floor P1an •i..~•.:::~... t::.~.. -::.:li:... ~.i~•:•."..••l~ J. .:l': f.•: - X:~• ~ . `.'N: •.L :L • .'.i'. • : Ni . ' • i.: . : : f:.':. ~ .'i. " •:•.ti::.... ':M I • ~ A I ~ ~ ~ I I I r-~ ~ I I ~ 73re abovc items have bceir rccci vctl: C . . . W ~ 1!~ Rzvizw Coordinator. Date oF Transmittal: 5 ` Circulated by: SPokcrrrc Comr«y Divva•ion (!f l3urltling.r * 1026 Wcxi I3rmrdwaY Avciiuc * SJwkwicf, WA 99260 M(509)456-3675 . - ~ . ' FR3PERTY OF ~ SPOKk'NLc- GOUNTY . ~ j ASSESSOR ~ L-A ~ 1 y't hY r. ~ - ~ ~ ~~~Glf~ O ~ ~ ~ n r. L • . : . 7 44 ~ . OPPOf~Tl.f/y/T Y I T I ~'J 5 ) . , /9- S4 r a ' } SUBUR,BS ~ t,305 ` E 171 -55 . . , . 1 , ~ ~ ✓ ~'/t'Y Y~ E ti/ /9C,'4'.Es .T ~ 1 , . c . ' ~ i- ! 1~r ' 1 ~ < S . , . . Z \ '~r,o . ~ . yN treY . s . ~ ~ . . _,l