2010, 09-02 Permit App: 10002589 AdditionProject Number: 10002589 Inv: 1
Application
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit
Date: 9/2/2010 Page 1 of 2
Project Information:
Permit Use: 2ND STORY ADDITION AND DECK Contact: SANDERS, ROBERT P & DEBORAH
Address: 10712 E 47TH AVE
C - S - Z: SPOKANE, WA 99206
Setbacks: Front Left: Right: Rear: Phone: (509) 927-8545
Group Name:
Site Information: Project Name:
Plat Key: 001742 Name: MYRON EST # 6 District: Sout
Parcel Number: 44042.1801 Block:
SiteAddress: 10712 E 47TH AVE
Location:: CSV
Lot:
Owner: Name: SANDERS, ROBERT P & DEBORA
Address: 10712 E 47T11 AVE
SPOKANE, WA 99206
Zoning: R-1 SF Res Estate District
Water District: 101 SPO CO WATER DIST#3B Hold: L
Area: 43,647 Sq Ft Width: 0 Depth: 0 Right Of Way (ft): 50
Nbr of Bldgs: 1 Nbr of Dwellings: 1
Review Information:
Review
Building Plan Review
Originally Released: 9/1/2010 By: RGuerry
Landuse/Zoning/HE Conditions
APPROVED SITE PLANS ON BUILDING PLAN SHEET - JD
Originally Released: 8/23/2010 By: KKENDAL
Permits:
Operator: JD Printed By: jmm Print Date: 9/2/2010
Project Number: 10002589
Inv: 1
Application
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit
Date: 9/2/2010 Page 2 of 2
Contractor: OWNER
Description
2ND FLOOR
Gro
R-3
Building Permit
Tvpe Notes
VB 84 SQFT
2ND FLR
ADD/ 300
SQFT DECK
Item Description
RESIDENTIAL PERMIT FEE
WSBCC SURCHARGE
SF PLNS RVW <7999 SQ FT
Totals:
Finn: OWNER
Phone: (000) 000-0000
This Application: Total Project:
So Ft Valuation Sq Ft Valuation
0 $15,000.00 0 $15,000.00
0 $15,000.00
Units Unit Desc
1 SFT FCT
1 SELECT
1 SELECT
0 $15,000.00
Fee Amount
$251.25
$4.50
$100.50
Permit Total Fees: $356.25
Notes:
Payment Summary:'
Permit Type Fee Amount Invoice Amount Amount Paid Amount Owing
Building Permit $356.25 $356.25 $100.50 $255.75
$356.25 $356.25 $100.50 $255.75
Disclaimer:
Submittal of this application certifies the owner (or person(s) authorized by the owner) has both examined and finds the information
contained within to be true and correct, and agrees that all provisions of laws and/or regulations governing this type of work will be
complied with. Subsequent issuance of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of
the provisions of the code or of any other state or local laws or ordinances.
Signature:
Operator: JD Printed By: jmm
Print Date: 9/2/2010
Spot' e``
1#P
PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT FEE:
(Staff Use Only)
LC k
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Community Development Department
Permit Center
11703 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 6-3
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Tel: (509) 688-0036
Fax: (509) 688-0037
permitcenter(asookaneval ley.orq
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
❑ NEW CONSTRUCTION 0 ADDITION/REMODEL 0 ACCESSORY BUILDING
0 DECK ❑ OTHER
SITE ADDRESS: /07/ L E if 7 94 coO/ f e. //s//c y w.ri 922-0
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: LQQGYZ- /S(Ol LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Myron F5 j4n e5 Nn.
1 / 3 N
BUILDING OWNER NAME:
NAME:
fie, 4e. T 9- Oc4o,4. <4n Zs S
ADDRESS:
/o7/Z F_ '-/7 T; 4.-c
Cnv: Cocas n c //c y
PRONE:
X09 939 Cry/3
CONTACT NAME:
STATE:
FAX:
5-0 9
w61-
.9y.- CELL:
ZIP:
SCR'
991°C
93 4 — 9 41/3
to Ta,c,/t/i
pumME: Fax:
CELL: S)9 939-89!73
CONTRACTOR NAME: NPrt L -
MAILING ADDRESS:
STATE: ZIP:
PHONE:
Fax:
CELL:
CONTRACTOR LICENSE No.:
MORES: CITY WSINESS LICENSE No.:
DESCRIBE THE SCOPE OF WORK IN DETAIL AND INDICATE USE:
K70.Pns/•n o 1 ,2/in,yts rmo Ort 1.4 iy. c7eins
Zo-ISfi..afrPn ec NCA.. Octk-
PROPOSED USE:
Pe eta iv/ rC se
CSVPFHMil .CEN TER
AUG 2 :', 2'� O
,project# c2-
I Name
Submittal #__� __
Effective October 28, 2007
C:\Users\Debbie\AppData\Loral\Temp\Residential Construction Permit App. LAoc
Page 1 of 2
****YOU MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING****
MARK N/A IF NOT APPLICABLE
Height to Peak:
/
Dimensions:
7 /Z
No. of Stories:
Total Habitable
Space: -'q Sq P
Main Floor SQ
FT:
Upper FI or SQ
FT:
Unfinished Basement
SQ FT: n//,
Finished Basement
SQ FT: NJ,q
Garage SQ FT:
A//fi
Deck/Covered Patio
SQ FT: 3 op
Impervious Surface
Area: ,ya c k ti,.ye
30% Slopes on
Property:
No. of
Bedrooms:'lig.
Construction
Type:
Heat Source:
fy oS .
Sewer or Septic:
. _Se 4,--e.-
TOTAL COST OF PROJECT: $
DISCLAIMER
The permitted verifies, acknowledges and agrees by their signature that: 1) if this permit is for construction or on a dwelling, the dwelling is/will
be served by potable water. 2) Ownership of this City of Spokane Valley permit inure to the property owner. 3) The signatory is the property
owner or has permission to represent the property owner in this transaction. 4) All construction is to be done in full compliance with the City of
Spokane Valley Development code. Referenced codes are available for review at the City of Spokane Valley Permit Center. 5) The City of
Spokane Valley permit is not a permit or approval for any violation of federal, state or local Saws, codes or ordinances. 5) Plans or additional
information may be required to be submitted and subsequently approved before this application can be processed.
Signature
Date: Ff/z3 //cv
Method of payment: ❑ Cash ❑ Check
Bankcard #:
❑ Visa ❑ Mastercard
EXP: VIN#:
Authorized Signature:
Effective October 28, 2007 Page 2 of 2
C:\Users\Debbie\AppData\Local\Temp\Residential Construction Permit App.1.doc
Spokane
Portland
San Diego
in
August SO, 2010
it Dan Tedlear
(5091.710-1087
Re: Remodel at Residence for Bob & Debbie Sondem— 1071ZE. 47°1. Spokane Valley, WA 99208
Dear Dan:
I've reviewed the -drawings dated 8-182010 spedflcally regarding the new location of the wall dee NE corner of
the structure. In my opinion, relocating the wall In a similar configuration e-10 W to the north neither Improves
nor decreases the morel resistance for the structure and therefore should be acceptable.
The new beating well and tooting yot have specified along the nam side on the lower levelWI be sufficient for
the support ofthe new second floorttaming iWiich wM span north -south between me new wall and the iodating
structure.
The editing rooftmmingwill be supported at the east wall by a new bearing wall at the upper level and a new
beam at the floorlevel. Itis acceptable to leave the existing roof beam end 4d) post at the upper level implace;
however, they wig become non -beating when the new wag Is added. It M acceptable to remove the edegng post
et the lower level as it will be replaced by the new beam et the floor level.
tyou have any othorconcems, please let me know and 1 would be happy to review them.
Sincerely,
801 W. RNerside, Suite 800 Spokane, Washington, 99201 Phone (509) 4554448
Service Innovation Value
Spokane
jUalley
For City Use Only
PLUS Project Number \ Ox %Z ` C1
Project Address
11703 E Sprague Ave Suite B-3 • Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.688.0036 • Fax: 509.688.0037 • permitcenter@spokanevalley.org
As part of our on-going commitment to customer service during the review process of your project
application, we are providing you with a TARGET DATE for the initial technical application review. If for
any reason we cannot meet this date, we will contact you with a revised target date.
Your application review TARGET DATE is
\--zsc)n
The TARGET DATE is the date we estimate your project application will have had its initial technical
review. It is not the date for approval or permit issuance.
Yips for a Smoother Project Application Review
Submit complete, accurate plans and documents.
Extra time may be required for re -submittals as project application reviewers work on multiple applications and it
may be several days before they can look at your new or .revisea(information.
➢ Designate a specific contact person to communicate with the City.
While the person designated as the applicant's contact person with the City can be changed, one individual with the
expertise for dealing with reviewer comments would be the best choice for the entire review process.
Call staff regarding the status of your project only after the target date shown at the top of the page.
Although you should be contacted on or by the target date, please feel free to contact us if you haven't heard from us
by your target date. Staff may contact you before the target date if the initial review is complete. By following this
procedure, you will save time and allow the reviewers to complete the work more expeditiously.
Steps in the Permit Process
1. Counter Complete. Your application has been accepted as counter complete. This means all of the required
documents, as indicated on your Pre -Application Checklist have been submitted or have been approved for deferred
submittal. This does not prevent technical staff from requesting additional information as a result of their technical review.
2. Quality Check. The next step in the process•is a quality check to make sure that the application is reviewable and free
from substantive flaws that would prevent technical staff from completing the technical review once it is started. When
this step is complete, your application will be routed to the appropriate staff and remain in their review queue until it
comes up for review.
3. Technical Compliance. Once an application is administratively complete, it is routed to technical staff for compliance
review. Depending on the type of project, technical staff may include multiple reviewers. You should be contacted by
phone, fax, email, or mail by your TARGET DATE once the initial technical compliance review is complete.
4. Permit Issuance. When the technical compliance review of the application is complete, including any subsequent re -
submittals, each reviewer will approve their section of the application and route it to the Permit Center. When all sections
of the application are received, a Permit Specialist will process the application and contact the person specified on your
application for permit pick-up. Information regarding fees and pre -construction meetings (if required) will be provided by
the Permit Specialist at that time.
WHITE -APPLICANT PINK - BUILDING FILE
REV 9/07
cler .JLI
ale
mein Hee-
gBSovue
Eveett
1
p
4
1
1
Spokane
Portland
San Diego
Austin'
August 30,2010
Mr. Dat Terhaar
(509).74;1087
Re: Remodel at Residence for Bob & Debbie Sanders — 10712'E. 47". Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Dear Dan:
I've reviewed the drawingsdated 8-18-2010 specifically regarding the new location of Ibe wall the NE caner of
the structure. In my opinion, relocating the wall In a similar configuration 6'-10 W to the north neither improves
nor decreases the lateral resistance for the structure and therefore should be acceptable.
The new bearing wall and !doting you,have spedged along the north side on the lower level will be suftictent for
the support of the new set:ond floorframingwtdch wig span north -south between,(he new Wail end the exledrg
structure.
The existing roof framing will be supported at the east wag by a new bearing wag at the upper level and a new
beam at the boor level. R is acceptable to leave the existing roof beam and 4x8 post at the upper sin -place;
however, they will become non-beadng viten the new wall Is added. It Is acceptable to remove the e,dstlng post
et the lower level as It will be replaced by the new beam at the floor revel.
If you have any other concerns, please let me know and Iwould be happy to revlewthem.
Sincerely,
envkl
60001.516/
601 W. RNersld°, Sults 6001 Spokane, Washington, 90201 Phone (509) 465-4448
Service Innovation value
EAST ELEVATION.
SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"
I
I
._.—._.—._.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ _._._.—.—.—._._.—._._.—.—.—._._.—._.—.—.—.—._
I
47TH
I
(MIW
TITLE: FLOOR PLANS, SITE PLAN, EXT ELEV
r
WALLS (A.G)----------
/..—.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._
WALL5 (B.G.)----------
R-21
FLOORS (EXPOSED) --
R-30
FLOORS (SLAB) -----
R-1 O
CEILING (FLAT) -----
R-38
CEILING NAULTED) ---
R-30
'
i
.
U=0.58
I
O
I
�
(
DECK LIVE LOAD.._,...._........40 P5F
WIND ............ ... _. -i0 MPH ZONE, EXP G
G PER IRC,
tu
ry
I
3 FOUNDATIONS:
ASSUMED ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRE59URE - 1 500 PSF
NEW POST (TYP OF 4)
i <
!
ALL FOOTINGS TO REST ON FIRM UNDISTURBED 501L WITH A MINIMUM OF 12” BELOW
I �
I
ZOUTLINE
<
4. CONCRETE:
MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE 5TRENGTH 3000 P510 25 DAYS (NO SPECIAL INSPECT.)
OF
NEW DECK
;
MAXIMUM SLUMP 5" FOR SLA55 AND FOOTINGS, 4" FOR WALLS
I
I DRIVEWAY
REMOVE TREE'
ENTRY
DECK
DECK
4
P'
I
,
i
,
;
' I,
r ;,
}
1
OUTLINE OF
i e NEW MAIN FLOOR
ADDITION
U F o
4 1 1 £1 EXIST I?Er r
V
� I
i I
� I I
I I
I
FARDEL #:
44042.1 801
L ,4
EGL DESCRIPTION:
TFm F L A INL 1, BLK2, MYRON ESTATES
N
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SCALE: 1" =20'-O" SPOKANE COUNTY
STATE OF WA
II-----------------------------------+
--------------------------------
NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"
&ENERAL NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL MEET LOCAL CODES, ORDINANCES 4 CURRENT
EDITION OF LR.C..
2. ALL NAILING SHALL COMPLY WITH NAILING SCHEDULE OF I.R.G.
5. COMPLIANCE CARD TO BE P05TED VERIFYING INSUL INSTALLED
IN INALLS, CEILING AND FLOORS.
4. PROVIDE METAL NAIL STOPPERS TO COVER HOLES IN STUDS
WHERE NAILS COULD PUNCTURE PLUMBING.
5. MAINTAIN 3" MIN. CLR. BETINEEN CEILING FIXTURES 4 INSULATION
ro. ALL WOOD COMING IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR MASONRY
SHALL BE "WOLMANIZED"
-1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY 4 CHECK ALL CONDITIONS 4
DIMENSIONS AT THE BUILDING . REPORT ANY INCONSISTENCIES.
8. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH WA5H. STATE ENERGY CODE
4 VENTILATION / INDOOR AIR QUALITY CODE.
CL PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING @ ALL HAZARDOUS AREAS
PER I.R.G. SECT 308.1
ENERGY COMPLIANCE
(MIW
TITLE: FLOOR PLANS, SITE PLAN, EXT ELEV
r
WALLS (A.G)----------
PI -21
WALL5 (B.G.)----------
R-21
FLOORS (EXPOSED) --
R-30
FLOORS (SLAB) -----
R-1 O
CEILING (FLAT) -----
R-38
CEILING NAULTED) ---
R-30
GLAZING (VERT) --
0=0.55
GLAZING (OVERHD) --
U=0.58
DOORS
U= 0.20
0,
ALUM / TEMP'D GL
RAIL PER I,R.C. 5 1 2 (TYP)
NEW DEC
5/4" "TREX" OR SIM DEGK'G
ALUM RAIL PER I.R.G. 3 12 (TYP)
O
r--------.f 7.---
I 11
NEW 4X8 POST
1
1 NEW GOVEREDDEGLG � 1
' I 1
i
0
SCISSOR ROOF TRU55E5 -1
O ® O.C. 01 1
I
--- ( I IUX011 1
r- ----�_ i�.--------------------Z1Y11--- F---
------ \
1 3/0 X 6/4m 3/O x 6/4# 1 1
EXIST ROOF OVERHANG FIXED TEMP'L� FIXED TEMP'D
E
(2) 3/O X. &/10 =---- --
w1 DOOR y /
\5347 REGISTERED
1 ARCHITECT,
DUSTIN L. HALL
STATE OF WASHINGTON
LINE OF NEW ROOF
OVERHANG
LINE OF CANTL'D tV
ROOF BM
iA
1
U)
EXIST RIDGE 5M F EXIST 4x8 POST
/\ Z NEW 2x6 EXT WALLS
I EXIST EXT NALL 111 INN S 4'-0" INCL WDW5 4 DR5
/ I
(REMOVE EX15T DECK)
' ' 1
I I ,_ _.� ceu..as• '
- LINE OF EXIST DECK
EXIST INT WALL �� REMOVE EXIST EXT WALL
4 MTL SL GL DR 4 MTL WDI^I'S
LINE OF EXIST ROOF
'(AV TME
i'1VI.'7t("riPFil ; REMOVE
EXIST DECK
Si , bat on s' , LIVIN6 THI5LOCATION
DECKS: Ledger board requires %2" lag bolt @ 16" o.c. with
flashing behind. Guardrail 36 in. high required if floor more than
30 in. above grade. Picket spacing no more than 4 in. apart. Posts
. require approved base and beam connectors. Min. 24 in. frost
protection to finish grade with min. 12 in. footing base. ------
1/8)'
----,1/81' GAP
BE i "V1tEEN' SH ATHIN GUARDRAILS & HANDRAILS: Design required to meet a
single concentrated load of 200 psf applied in any direction at any
point along the top. In -fill components must meet 50 psf
concentrated load. Glazing in -fill must be designed for a safety KITCHEN
factor of 4.
ENTRY 4 U PPER LEVEL RLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" '
NEW FIN. FLOOR SPACE: 1
NEW DECK AREA:
RINVIIIIIII
Permanently mounted outdoor lighting requires high
efficacy luminaries (pin style base compact fluorescent
bulbs) or incandescent fixtures controlled by motion POST/ FTG 5GHEVULE
sensors with integral photo sensors.
TYPE A
NEW 4x8: P05T
_ - 12" O GONG PIER 4
FTG 24" 50 X 12" DEEP
Minimum depth for frost protection is 24 inches
measured from the bottom of the footing to finish grade. TYPE B
Grade slope away from building a minimum 6 inches in
NEN 4x8 POST
P Y g 12' 4P GONG PIER 4
first 10 feet. FTG 50" 5Q x 12" DEEP
Horizontal Reinforcement for Wall Height-
< 8 ft: (1) #4 w/in 12" of top & (1) #4 at mid height.
> 8 ft: (1) #4 w/in 12" of top & (1) #4 @ 1/3 points.
Q1'C �t�i71'INGS':I�UST E bNTINUt U
Exhaust Fans:
Kitchen- 100 cfm
Bathroom- 50 chn
Laundry- 50 c$n
Vented to Exterior
NOTE: (DECK DIMENSION)
/----------•------------�
7 NEW G.L.BM
�---- -- ---^ ---- -------- �}- -�---------
1—� L— --�-------------------- ----•- J ---------r
TYPE A I -moi
I w TYPE A
I Q'o I
No 1
w� I
OUTLINE OF
NEW DECK
0
Q
TYPE B
— ----- - -
,
il
NEWG.L.SM---- ------------------------
_J LJ__
TI
I NEN
2Xb STUDS 0 16"O.G.), TYPE B
I * 8" GONG FDN I
A -------6" X 16" GONG FT6
- ------------------------------------I,
' I LINE OF EXIST DECK II
------
(REMOVE ,1ST 4 DEGK'G)
I------ --------------- ---- I'
_ __
REMOVE EXIST BM 1 1 LINE OF �+
1 ; NEYY DECK h
O REMOVE EX15T P05T LINE OF NEN
2 0 1 1 DBL RIM JST O
N_ (CANTL'D 4 SET IN •-
� y� W 0 1 1 il NEIN WALL AS 5HOWN)
Z a to �\
z i i LINE OF
1 1 EX15T DECK
E T1
(REMOVE J5T/DEGK'(5,)
-----------------------------------------,
G I
I I
EXIST LOWER LEVEL EXT WALL ;- - - - -
I I
EXIST LOWER LEVEL EXT WALL REMOVE EXIST BM
1 I
REMOVE EXIST P05T
LINE OF EXIST DECK
(REMOVE.15T 4 DECK'G)
I I
I I
I I
0R PLA
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I 1
I I
DEL @ RESIDENCE FOR BOB & DEBBIE SANDERS
N1101.4.1— Attic insulation certification required as to
TITLE: FLOOR PLANS, SITE PLAN, EXT ELEV
r
SHEET
1. GENERAL:
R -Value or coverage. Markers; attached to trusses or
VERIFY DEMENSIONS AT SITE. GHANGE5, OM155IONS OR SUBSTITUTIONS ARE NOT
DRAWN BY: DAN TERHAAR (509)922-7314
OF 1
PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION.
rafters, required for every 300 sf of attic space with 1
2. 17E51GN LOADS:
inch high numbers for installed thickness of insulation.
ROOF LIVE LOAD.... -...._..-„..30 PSF
FLOOR LIVE LOAD..._......_,._40 PSF
DECK LIVE LOAD.._,...._........40 P5F
WIND ............ ... _. -i0 MPH ZONE, EXP G
G PER IRC,
ater-Resistive
Barri required
3 FOUNDATIONS:
ASSUMED ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRE59URE - 1 500 PSF
Udder siding
ALL FOOTINGS TO REST ON FIRM UNDISTURBED 501L WITH A MINIMUM OF 12” BELOW
GRADE
ALL EXTERIOR FOOTINGS TO EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 24" BELOW FINISHED GRADE
4. CONCRETE:
MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE 5TRENGTH 3000 P510 25 DAYS (NO SPECIAL INSPECT.)
Ice Barrier- Two layers of
Y
MAXIMUM SLUMP 5" FOR SLA55 AND FOOTINGS, 4" FOR WALLS
underlayment
KEEP COVERED 4 NET FOR -1 DAYS 4 PROVIDE AIR ENTRAINMENT
cemented to
ALL CONTINUOUS REINFORCING 30 DIAMETERS, 12" MIN UNLE55 5HOWN OTHERWI5E gether or self adhering poly -
CONTINUOUS HOOKS OR CORNER BARS a CORNERS
mer modified bitumen sheet
5 REINFORCING STEEL:
24" inside exterior wall
DEFORMED BARS MEETING A5TM A615 GRADE 60
L O
yq F0
SECURELY TIE IN PLACE WITH DOUBLE ANNEALED 16 GA. IRON WIRE
PROVIDE REINFORCING BARS WITH CLEAR EMBEDMENT Its FOLLOWS:
CONCRETE AGAIN5T 501L = 3" FORMED CONCRETE AGAINST SOIL
= 2" SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0"
WALLS EXPOSED TO WEATHER = 2" WALL5 NOT EXP05ED TO WEATHER
=1 1/2"
5LA55 ON GRADE .2" COLUMNS NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER
= 1 1/2"
WELDED WIRE FABRIC TO CONFORM TO ASTM A52 4 A 185
6. WOOD:
ALL FRAMING TO BE DOUGLAS FIR -LARCH. 5AWN LUMBER No 2 OR BETTER
KD 1 q% PEP, WWPA GRADING
STRUCTURAL CLU -LAMINATE BEAMS 4 PURLIN5.2400 P51 PER AITC
PLYWOOD 5HTH6 G -D INT APA WITH EXTERIOR GLUE OR AS SPECIFIED
ALL STRONG TIE FASTENERS SHALL BE "SIMPSON" OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT
NAIL OR BOLT FASTENERS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS
-1. ROOF TRU55E5 (WOOD):
TRUSSED SHALL BE DESIGNED 4 STAMPED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN STATE OF WA.
SHOP DRAWIN65, TRUSS DETAILS AND 5TRES5 DIAGRAMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
FOR REVIEW 4 SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON 51TE FOR THE FRAMING INSPECTION
BRACING PER MANUFAGTUREW5 SPECS, TRUSS SPACING - 24" O.G.
TRU55 LOADING: T.G. LIVE LOAD = 30 PSF, T.G. DEAD LOAD = -f PSF,
B.C. DEAD LOAD = 10 PSF, TOTAL DESIGN LOAD = 4-f PSF
Exhaust Fans:
Kitchen- 100 cfm
Bathroom- 50 chn
Laundry- 50 c$n
Vented to Exterior
NOTE: (DECK DIMENSION)
/----------•------------�
7 NEW G.L.BM
�---- -- ---^ ---- -------- �}- -�---------
1—� L— --�-------------------- ----•- J ---------r
TYPE A I -moi
I w TYPE A
I Q'o I
No 1
w� I
OUTLINE OF
NEW DECK
0
Q
TYPE B
— ----- - -
,
il
NEWG.L.SM---- ------------------------
_J LJ__
TI
I NEN
2Xb STUDS 0 16"O.G.), TYPE B
I * 8" GONG FDN I
A -------6" X 16" GONG FT6
- ------------------------------------I,
' I LINE OF EXIST DECK II
------
(REMOVE ,1ST 4 DEGK'G)
I------ --------------- ---- I'
_ __
REMOVE EXIST BM 1 1 LINE OF �+
1 ; NEYY DECK h
O REMOVE EX15T P05T LINE OF NEN
2 0 1 1 DBL RIM JST O
N_ (CANTL'D 4 SET IN •-
� y� W 0 1 1 il NEIN WALL AS 5HOWN)
Z a to �\
z i i LINE OF
1 1 EX15T DECK
E T1
(REMOVE J5T/DEGK'(5,)
-----------------------------------------,
G I
I I
EXIST LOWER LEVEL EXT WALL ;- - - - -
I I
EXIST LOWER LEVEL EXT WALL REMOVE EXIST BM
1 I
REMOVE EXIST P05T
LINE OF EXIST DECK
(REMOVE.15T 4 DECK'G)
I I
I I
I I
0R PLA
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I 1
I I
DEL @ RESIDENCE FOR BOB & DEBBIE SANDERS
E. 47TH - SPOKANE VALLEY$ WA 99206
TITLE: FLOOR PLANS, SITE PLAN, EXT ELEV
r
SHEET
8-16-2010
DRAWN BY: DAN TERHAAR (509)922-7314
OF 1
SUBMITTAL SET