The URL can be used to link to this page

2007, 09-24 Permit: BLD-07002251 Determination of NonsignificanceSpoValle COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106; Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org RECEIVED CSV Development Engineering SEP 2 -t 2007 Project # DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Submittal # FILE NUMBER: BLD -07002251 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Replace existing boat dock with a new polyethylene "EZ Dock" and an aluminum gangway. OWNER/APPLICANT: Lien Le, 7713 E. South Riverway, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Parcel No. 45063.2135 addressed as 7713 East South Riverway, situated in the SW 1/4 of Section 06, Township 25, Range 44 E. W. M., Spokane Valley, Washington LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division DETERMINATION: The City of Spokane Valley adopted Ordinance No. 48, effective March 31, 2003, that implemented on an interim basis the Spokane Environmental Ordinance, effective November 19, 2002 and its provisions. The lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) calendar days from the date issued (below). Comments must be received by this department no later than 5:00 p.m., August 10, 2007. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Greg McCormick, Planning Manager City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PH: (509) 688-0023 / FX: (509) 921-1008 gmccormick@spokanevalley.org DATE ISSUED: July 27, 2007 SIGNATURE: STAFF CONTACT: Tavis Schmidt, Assistant Planner City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PH: (509) 688-0046 / FX: (509) 921-1008 tschmidt@spokanevalley.org APPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submi' ed to the Community Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with Section 11.10.170 (Appeals) of the City's Environmental Ordinance, and the required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to Section 11.10.170.3 of the City's Interim Environmental Ordinance, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. Determinafion ofNonSignificance BLD -07002251 July 27,2007 Copies of this DNS were mailed to: 1. Lien Le - applicant 2. City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Division 3. City of Spokane Valley Building Division 4. City of Spokane Valley Fire Department — Kevin Miller 5. Spokane Valley Police Department — Greg Snyder 6. Spokane County Division of Planning — John Pederson 7. Washington State Department of Ecology (Spokane) 8. Washington State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 9. Spokane Regional Health District 10. Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency (SRCAA) 11. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife— Karin Divens Enclosed documents: Lead Agency Review Form Environmental Checklist Vicinity Map Page 2 oft lley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106; Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ citvhafi(a7. kan all LEAD AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW DATE: July 27, 2007 A. BACKGROUND 1. PROJECT NUMBER: BLD -07002251 2. DESCRIPTION: Replace existing boat dock with a new polyethylene "EZ Dock" and an aluminum gangway. 3. PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: Lien Le, 7713 E. South Riverway, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 4. LOCATION: Parcel No. 45063.2135 addressed as 7713 East South Riverway, situated in the SW % of Section 06, Township 25, Range 44 E. W. M., Spokane Valley, Washington City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) BLD -07002251 (Parcel No. 45063.2135) July 27, 2007 Page 1 of 3 REVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS OF SECTION 14 OF PART A (BACKGROUND) FOR CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREA•(CARA) / AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA (ASA) The proposal lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). No concerns noted. 13. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Italics indicate potential mitigation measures, if any. Bold indicates unresolved issues or additional information that must be addressed by the applicant prior to final approval, as indicated. 1. EARTH Staff notes that project is to replace an existing boat dock in the Spokane River; therefore the project has a limited area that will be affected. No concerns noted. 2. AIR No concerns noted. 3. WATER Surface The SEPA Checklist states that the site is located on the Spokane River. Work will be done within Spokane River using a boat and hand tools. Staff notes that a floating dock will not increase downstream flood flows. No concerns noted. Ground The Checklist does not specify groundwater to be withdrawn or discharged. No concerns noted. Water Runoff No concerns noted. 4. PLANTS The Checklist states current vegetation consists of shrubs, and grasses. No concerns noted. 5. ANIMALS The SEPA Checklist states that birds and fish have been observed at the site. The Checklist does not specify any measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. No concerns noted. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES The Checklist states that a gasoline powered boat will be used for the project. No concerns noted. 7A. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS No concerns noted. 7B. NOISE No concerns noted. 8. SHORELINE AND LAND USES City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) BLD -07002251 (Parcel No. 45063.2135) July 27, 2007 Page 2 of 3 The Checklist states the site is currently used for recreational purposes through the use of an existing 18 foot by 18 foot dock. The existing dock will be deconstructed and removed. No concerns noted. 9. Housmic No concerns noted. 10. AESTHETICS No concerns noted. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE The SEPA Checklist states that no light will be produced by this project. No concerns noted. 12. RECREATION The Checklist states that the facility itself is a recreational opportunity. No concerns noted. 13. CULTURAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION The Checklist specifies that there are no known historical and cultural resources at the subject's property. Pursuant to RCW 27.53.060, on the private and public lands of this state it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or any agency or institution of the state or a political subdivision thereof to knowingly remove, alter, dig into, or excavate by use of any mechanical, hydraulic, or other means, or to damage, deface, or destroy any historic or prehistoric archaeological resource or site, or remove any archaeological object from such site, except for Indian graves or cairns, or ady glyptic or painted record of any tribe or peoples, or historic graves as defined in chapter 68.05 RCW, disturbances of which shall be a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW, without having obtained a written permit from the Director of the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation for such activities. Upon any discovery of potential or known archaeological resources at the subject properties prior to or during future on-site construction, the developer, contractor, and/or any other parties involved in construction shall immediately cease all on-site construction, shall act to protect the potential or known historical and cultural resources area from outside intrusion, and shall notify, within a maximum period of twenty -fours from the time of discovery, the City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department of said discovery. 14. TRANSPORTATION The SEPA Checklist states that access to the site is through residential means. No concerns noted. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES The SEPA Checklist states that no new services will be required as a result of the project. Staff notes that Spokane County Fire District No. 1 is the fire protection service provider for the City of Spokane Valley, and the police service provider is the City of Spokane Valley. The Spokane Transit Authority provides public transit service within the City of Spokane Valley. No concerns noted. 16. UTILITIES No concerns noted. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) BLD -07002251 (Parcel No. 45063.2135) July 27, 2007 Page 3 of3 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. 0-10013-51 RECEIVED JUN 13 ZW1 Purpose of checklist: COMM:J I: DEVELOPMENT The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts' on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DEPAMENPY This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for non -project proposals: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Note to user: this is a electronic form and each gray box can be filled out on vour computer. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicableDock Replacement 2. Name of applicant:Lien Le 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:7713 E. South Riverway, Spokane Valley, 99212 - 509.927.3328 Contact: Jon Le - (cell) 509.879.1169 45063:135 4. Date checklist prepared:June 13, 2007 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TC EE GCL .EE3 EI FL:ART 5. Agency requesting checklist:Spokane Wiley Planning Commission 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):1 day between June 14 -July 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? nolf yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? no If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. JARPA 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)Tb replace/repair an existing boat dock. Equipment to be used is a 20 foot aluminum flat bottom boat along with hand tools. Dock will consist of EZ Dock polyethylene materials and aluminum gangway. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.7713 E. South Riverway, Spokane Valley, WA '/. Section SW Section 06 Township 25 Range 44 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? noThe General Sewer Service Area? no The Priority Sewer Service Area? no(See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 2 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO cE C:MPLC E: o AFFLr5A.1:7 a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). NA 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? no 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. NA • 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? no b. Stormwater 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? 2. Will Stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1) Earth a. General description of the site (check one): ❑ Flat, D rolling, ❑ hilly, ❑ steep slopes; ❑ mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 3 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist 70 BE ',z:.F LETE: Ei' 1, F F LIOL...- d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. d. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.none b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?no If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.spokane river 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.yes - To replace/repair an existing boat City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 4 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO �E C ZY,FLETED E, AFF:7 dock. Equipment to be used is a 20 foot aluminum flat bottom boat along with hand tools. Dock will consist of EZ Dock polyethylene materials and aluminum gangway. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.no Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? no Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? no If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal .involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? no If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? no Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.none c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 5 a City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist :. BE ,..,!,'FLET =C. 4) Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: — deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑ evergreentree: fir, cedar, pine, other ® shrubs ® grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other — other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?none c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.none d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants,.or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:none 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ® birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ® fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.none c. Is the site part of a migration route?no If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.gas boat City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 6 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TG EE COIdFLETED EFrLIZ4I:T b. Would your project affect the potertial use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe.no c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? - List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?no If so, describe 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?none 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.none 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?recreational: a dock exists. we are replacing it b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.no c. Describe any structures on the site.a 18x18 dock exists City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 7 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO EE ELidPLETEC'01 AFFGCA_I:T d. Will any structures be demolished? yes If so, what?the existing dock will be deconstructed and removed e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?no f so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? none k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing.none b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?NA City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist BE CC',IFLETEC FLIC:; ,7 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, [f any: 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? none What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? no c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? none d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the projebt or applicant, if any: 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? no If so, generally describe b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 9 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO EE _I.,FLE EC E<„, 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. residential Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur, g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15) 'Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 10 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO SE OCr.iE,E,E Ei'APPLIZART b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: fNuQfx Date Submitted: 19-17-d— o - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? none a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? none a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? none City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 11 City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist J BE OJn!FLETE L 1 ,-F LICAI, a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? none a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. Flow would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are no change 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? none a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflictwith local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: IO 71) � Signature: 't J �`�✓/ V/� Please print or type: Proponent: l/1. /VEE Ln '' 1,�Jv— q Address: flI 2 L - 'DU 41.1-�-I" 'AW&A)7E7 _ 4i' VI4Z'I 2/ City of Spolcane Valley Update 6-5-06 12 111. Phone: City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist EE ::Mp_—D s: 55:0/5f Person completing form(ifdifferent from proponent): `; o t�0�4k&(M L2 -- Name: Address: Phone: C50178��1�� City of Spokane Valley Update 6-5-06 13 kc(Nuz_Vi wA-ir2 f2 Cuncsele ual l Caner wall 2 ea 2" gala, post pilings driven rain 7 IinddgAh to anchor dock using s.tiFCarot rnetltnd 3 R. 12 R. alum. gaaigway: [ringed to concrete wall, rolliotg out duck surface SIDE \rIlisv Fioatinesfoek Of WM River Bottom V1142 (50.126_451:IF Le Residence tin Ma iAg SE OpsirIC Airj 11r•. i an et r it ryst01,04A2-Ari, r--f-t4aposs l : • r/. err r9►! , /�-i , Ad air gin/ham-, rr%.71"%Ij� e , _414 4'',P /'%/11 CAa % e�jr, was �i,!!Juste i , lr lorsgV 14°%' 9rC A4Pal��/ E%%' y�, ► � ,} rm �I em p Iii, a wet A A n ✓--0911 11 d . GG/ ,}.%Fat' nled+lFa� .tea : �// ,ji; Al%I /% i/n .7D0�n�`Isiii �" %ir//'ri�� . oriyr�.ri•-�I%i%''% /311 I//r Vicinity Map of BLD -07002251 0 Legend eaten it/ Reads Scale 1:6,000 lin= 500a