Agenda 02/22/2018 sokane
Valle K
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Agenda
City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 E. Sprague Ave.
Feb. 22, 2018 6:00 p.m.
Due to the size of the agenda
I. CALL TO ORDER items,there are several links to
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE the agenda items,please use the
individual links to review each
III. ROLL CALL item.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Feb. 08, 2018
VI. COMMISSION REPORTS
VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS:
i. Findings of Fact: CTA-2017-0005 —Wireless
Telecommunications Amendment. Proposed text amendment to
Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 22, and SVMC
Chapters 19.50.050, 17.80.030 and Appendix A
ii. Public Hearing — 2018 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
XI. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: February 22, 2018
Item: Check all that apply nold business Fl new business n public hearing
n information n study session n pending legislation
FILE NUMBER: CTA-2017-0005
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of Findings of Fact for Wireless Telecommunications
Amendments to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: A city-initiated text amendment to Title 22 SVMC, SVMC
19.60.050, SVMC 17.80.030 and Appendix A to update wireless facility regulations to address siting of
small cell wireless facilities within the public rights-of-way(ROW).
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Various Federal laws; chapter 35.99 RCW; RCW 35.21.860;
SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040; and RCW 36.70A.106
BACKGROUND: Wireless telecommunication facilities are subject to a number of increasing federal
and state laws. Further, wireless telecommunications are ever evolving, with new technologies and new
business models continuing to be implemented. Currently, the wireless telecommunication providers are
in the midst of rolling out"small cell"technology in the ROW,to meet growing bandwidth and data needs
of their customers. The City has been working with the providers, a consortium, and internally to develop
appropriate draft franchises and draft regulations to allow implementation of the small cell technology
within the ROW. This proposal is a City-initiated Code text amendment to provide regulations for small
cell deployments, to address new federal and state wireless telecommunication facilities permit review
periods, and to update existing regulations.
The accompanying staff report details the history, legal framework, existing conditions, proposed
regulations, and staff recommendation for this proposal.
On January 11, 2018, Planning Commission conducted a study session. Planning Commission had
numerous questions regarding the proposed regulations. Staff has incorporated proposed changes
(highlighted in yellow)to the draft regulations based upon some of those questions.
On January 25, 2018, and continued to February 8, 2018, Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing. At the public hearing, staff provided some responses to questions. Representatives from both
Verizon and Mobilitie (who provides infrastructure for Sprint) provided comments and also answered
questions of Planning Commission. Further, at the public hearing, written comments from Verizon,
Mobilitie, and T-Mobile were provided to Planning Commission. Upon completion of the public hearing,
Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve recommendation of the proposed amendments with several
modifications which are outlined in the attached Findings of Fact.
Tonight, the Planning Commission is considering the Findings of Fact for approval. These outline the
recommendation and associated findings. Further, a copy of the updated revised draft amendments
incorporating all modifications recommended by Planning Commission is included in the packet.
RPCA Findings of Fact for CTA-2017-0005 Page 1 of 2
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve the Findings of Fact and Recommendation
related to small cell regulations, with or without changes.
STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Findings of Fact and Recommendation
Draft proposed amendments, with all modifications shown in yellow highlight.
- Other materials, including the staff report,presentations, and public comment have been
previously provided during the January 11, January 25, and February 8 meetings. Please see the
Planning Commission packets for those meetings for those materials.
RPCA Findings of Fact for CTA-2017-0005 Page 2 of 2
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
DRAFT
APPENDIX A—DEFINITIONS
Radio/TV broadcasting studio:Facilities serving the broadcast media. See"Communication facilities,use
category."
Repeater facility:A facility for the noncommercial reception and retransmission of radio signals. See
"Communication facilities,use category."
RF Engineer: A person who, in the opinion of the City Manager,has appropriate is qualified with education,
training and experience in wireless communication services,radio frequencies,and FCC and other applicable
governmental regulations to provide the necessary certification(s)required pursuant to chapter 22.121 SVMC.
Telecommunications:The transmission,between or among points specified by the user,of audio and/or visual
information and data of the user's choosing,without change in the form or content of the information as sent and
received.
•Alternative mounting structure:A water tower,manmade tree,clock tower,church steeple,bell tower,utility
pole,light standard,freestanding sign, flagpole,or similar structure designed to support and camouflage or conceal
the presence of telecommunications antennas.
•Antenna:Any exterior apparatus designed for telephonic,radio,data,Internet or other communications through
the sending and/or receiving of radio frequency signals including,but not limited to,equipment attached to a tower,
pole,light standard,utility pole,building or other structure for the purpose of providing wireless services.Types of
antennas include:
-An"omni-directional antenna"receives and transmits radio frequency signals in a 360-degree radial
pattern;
-A"whip antenna"is an omni-directional antenna that is up to 15 feet in height and no more than six
inches in diameter;and
-A"directional or panel antenna"receives and transmits radio frequency signals in a specific directional
pattern of less than 360 degrees.A structure or device used to collect or radiate radio,television,or
microwave electromagnetic waves,including directional antennas, such as panels,wireless cable and
satellite dishes,and omni directional antennas, such as whips,but not including satellite earth stations or
noncommercial antennas installations for home use of radio or television.
•Antenna Height: The vertical distance measured from average building elevation to the highest point of the
antenna,or if on a rooftop or other structure,from the top of the roof or structure to the highest point of the antenna.
For replacement structures,antenna height is measured from the top of the existing structure to the highest point of
the antenna or new structure,whichever is greater.
•Approved small cell facility: Any small cell facility that has received all required permits.
•Array:An arrangement of antennas and their supporting structure.
•Base Station: A structure or equipment at a fixed location that enables FCC-licensed or authorized wireless
communications between user equipment and a communications network. The term does not encompass a tower as
defined herein nor any equipment associated with a tower. Base Station includes,without limitation:
-Equipment associated with wireless communications services as well as unlicensed wireless services and
fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul.
-Radio transceivers,antennas,coaxial or fiber-optic cable,regular and backup power supplies,and
comparable equipment,regardless of technological configuration(including Distributed Antenna Systems
("DAS")and small-cell networks).
-Any structure other than a tower that,at the time the relevant application is filed with the City, supports or
houses equipment described above that has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or
1
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
siting process,or under another State or local regulatory review process,even if the structure was not built
for the sole or primary purpose of providing that support.
The term does not include any structure that,at the time the relevant application is filed with the City,does not
support or house equipment described above.
•Collocation:The mounting or installation of transmission equipment on an eligible support structure for the
purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communication purposes.A single
telecommunications tower and/or site used by more than one telecommunications service provider.
•Concealment technology: Transmission facilities designed to look like some feature other than a wireless tower
or base station or which minimizes the visual impact of an antenna by use of nonreflective materials,appropriate
colors and/or a concealment canister or enclosure.
•Dish:A parabolic or bowl shaped device that receives and/or transmits signals in a specific directional pattern.
•EIA-222: Electronics Industries Association Standard 222,"Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and
Antennas Support Structures."
•Electric transmission:A self-supporting structure in excess of 50 feet in height designed to support high voltage
electric lines. This does not include local utility or distribution poles(with or without transformers)designed to
provide electric service to individual customers.
•Eligible Facilities Request: Any request for modification of an existing tower or base station that does not
substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station,involving:
-Collocation of new transmission equipment;
-Removal of transmission equipment;or
-Replacement of transmission equipment.
•Eligible support structure: Any tower or base station as defined in this section,provided that it is at the time the
relevant application is filed with the City,houses or supports an antenna,micro cell or small cell deployment.
•Equipment structure: A facility, shelter,cabinet or vault used to house and protect electronic or other associated
equipment necessary for processing wireless communications signals."Associated equipment"may include,for
example,air conditioning,backup power supplies and emergency generators.
•Existing: A constructed tower or base station is existing if it has been reviewed and approved under the applicable
zoning or siting process,or under another state or local regulatory review process,provided that a tower that has not
been reviewed and reviewed because it was not in a zoned area when it was built,but was lawfully constructed,is
existing for purposes of chapter 22.122 SVMC.
•Guyed,tower:Any telecommunications tower supported in whole or in part by cables anchored to the ground.
•Height:The distance measured from grade to the highest point of any and all components of the structure,
including antennas,hazard lighting,and other appurtenances,if any.
•Microcells: Has the same meaning as set forth in RCW 80.36.375,as now adopted or hereafter amended.
•Monopole:A self-supporting telecommunications tower,which consists of a single vertical pole,fixed into the
ground and/or attached to a foundation.
•Other support structure: A structure used to support small cell facilities or equipment structures,excluding
buildings,utility poles,and water reservoirs. Examples of"other support structures"include flagpoles and ball field
light standards.
•Panel:An antenna which receives and/or transmits signals in a directional pattern.
•Prior approval: Certification of approval(s)from the City authorizing the initial installation of a specific wireless
carrier's small cell facilities on a base station or tower.Prior approval may also include the subsequent approval(s)
from the City authorizing modifications to the initial installation that have resulted in the existing state of the small
cell facility including,but not limited to,the number and location of equipment structures,antennas,antenna support
structures,and ancillary equipment.
2
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
•Self-supporting lattice tower:A telecommunications tower that consists of an open network of metal braces,
usually triangular or square in cross-section.
•Service:The offering of telecommunications for a fee directly to the public,or to such classes of users as to be
effectively available directly to the public,regardless of the facilities used.
•Service provider: Has the same meaning as set forth in RCW 35.99.010(6)as now adopted or hereafter amended.
Service provider shall include those infrastructure companies that provide telecommunications services or
equipment to enable the deployment of personal wireless services.
•Small cell and small cell deployment:Have the same meaning as set forth in RCW 80.36.375,as now adopted or
hereafter amended.
•Stealth:A telecommunications antenna that is effectively camouflaged or concealed from view.
•Substantial change:A modification substantially changes the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure
if it meets any of the following criteria:
-For towers other than towers in the public rights-of-way,it increases the height of the tower by more than
10%or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not
to exceed twenty feet,whichever is greater;for other eligible support structures,it increases the height of
the structure by more than 10%or more than ten feet,whichever is greater;
-For towers other than towers in the public rights-of-way,it involves adding an appurtenance to the body
of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet,or more than the width
of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance,whichever is greater;for other eligible support
structures,it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the
edge of the structure by more than six feet;
-For any eligible support structure,it involves installation of more than the standard number of new
equipment cabinets for the technology involved,but not to exceed four cabinets;or,for towers in the public
rights-of-way and base stations,it involves installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if
there are no pre-existing ground cabinets associated with the structure,or else involves installation of
ground cabinets that are more than 10%larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets
associated with the structure;
-It entails any excavation or deployment outside the current site;
-It would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible support structure;or
-It does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval of the construction or modification
of the eligible support structure or base station equipment,provided,however,that this limitation does not
apply to any modification that is non-compliant only in a manner that would not exceed the thresholds
identified above.
•Telecommunications antenna:An antenna used to provide a telecommunications service. This excludes lightning
rods,private mobile radio systems,amateur radio antennas less than 35 feet in height in residential districts and 50
feet in height in nonresidential districts,and whip antennas less than four inches(10 cm)in diameter and less than
10 feet in height.
•Telecommunications service: Has the same meaning as set forth in RCW 35.99.010(7),as now adopted or
hereafter amended.
•Tower:Any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting any FCC-licensed or authorized antennas
and their associated facilities,including structures that are constructed for wireless communications services
including,but not limited to,private,broadcast,and public safety services,as well as unlicensed wireless services
and fixe&wireless services such as microwave backhaul and the associate&site. A"tower"shall not include a
replacement utility pole as authorized by a lease with the City,a franchise or a Small Cell Permit.A self supporting
or guyed structure more than 20 feet in height,built primarily to support one or more telecommunications antennas.
Does not include ham operator or wind turbine support towers.
•Transmission equipment: Equipment that facilitates transmission for any FCC-licensed or authorized wireless
communication service,including,but not limited to,radio transceivers,antennas,coaxial or fiber-optic cable,and
3
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
regular and backup power supply. The term includes equipment associate&with wireless communications services
including,but not limited to,private,broadcast,and public safety services,as well as unlicensed wireless services
and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul.
•Unified design enclosure: Concealment of antennas and equipment within a single enclosure.
•Utility pole: A structure designed and used primarily for the support of electrical wires,telephone wires,
television cable,traffic signals,or lighting for streets,parking areas,or pedestrian paths.
•Whip antenna: An omni directional dipole antenna of cylindrical shape which is no more than six inches in
diameter.
•Wireless:Having no wire or wires,operating by means of transmitted electromagnetic waves.
Tower,ham operator:A structure less than 75 feet in height above grade used for two-way communication for
hobby or emergency service purposes by private individuals. See"Communication facilities,use category."
DRAFT
SVMC 19.60.050
Use/Category Type R1 R2 R3 R4 MF1 MF2 MUC CMU GO 0 NC C RC P/OS I1 12
Communication
Facilities
Radio/TV
P P P P P P
broadcasting studio
Repeater facility PPPP P P P PPP P P
4
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
Chapter
Small cell
55555 S S S SSSSS S S S 22.121
deployment
SVMC
Telecommunication Chapter
wireless antenna SSSS S S S S CCSSS S S 22.120
array SVMC
Telecommunication Chapter
wireless support CCCC C C S S CCSSS S S 22.120
tower SVMC
SVMC
Tower,ham operator SSSS S S S S CCS SS S S
19.40.110(A)
5
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
DRAFT
Chapter 22.120 SVMC
22.120.010 Purpose and intent.
These standards were developed to protect the public health, safety,and welfare,and minimize visual impacts on
residential areas,while furthering the development of wireless communication services. These standards were
designed to comply with the Telecommunication Act of 1996. The provisions of this sectionchapter 22.120 are not
intended to and shall not be interpreted to prohibit or to have the effect of prohibiting wireless communication
services. Chapter 22.120 shall cover all wireless communication services other than small cell services,which are
regulated pursuant to chapter 22.121 SVMC.
22.120.020 Permits and exemptions.
Where a transmission tower or antenna support structure is located in a zoning district which allows such use as a
permitted use activity,administrative review,and a building permit, shall be required, subject to the project's
consistency with the development standards set forth in SVMC 22.120.040. In instances where the use is not
allowed as a permitted use activity,a conditional use permit and building permit shall be required in addition to a
demonstration of consistency with all required development standards.
Exemption: Wireless radio utilized for temporary emergency communications in the event of a disaster is exempt
from the provisions of this section and shall be permitted in all zones.
22.120.030 Required application submittals.
All applications for wireless antenna arrays and wireless communication support towers shall include the following:
A.A letter signed by the applicant stating that all applicable requirements of the FCC,the FAA,and any required
avigation easements have been satisfied.
B.A scaled site plan clearly indicating the location,type and height of the proposed tower, antennas,on-site land
uses and zoning,adjacent land uses and zoning,adjacent roadways,proposed means of access, setbacks from
property lines,elevation drawings of the proposed tower,the equipment structure,fencing,buffering and the type of
stealth technology which will be utilized. The full,detailed site plan shall not be required if the antenna is to be
mounted on an existing structure.
C.The applicant shall have performed and provided a photographic simulation of the proposed facility from all
affected properties and public rights-of-way.
D.The applicant shall provide copies of any environmental documents required by the State Environmental Policy
Act(SEPA).
E.The applicant shall have demonstrated effort to co-locate on an existing support tower or other structure.New
support towers shall not be permitted within one mile of an existing support tower unless it is demonstrated that no
existing support tower or other structure can accommodate the proposed antenna array. The City reserves the right to
retain a qualified consultant,at the applicant's expense,to review the supporting documentation for accuracy.
F. Evidence to demonstrate that no existing support tower or other structure can accommodate the proposed antenna
array may consist of the following:
1.No existing support towers or other structures are located within the geographic areas required to
meet the applicant's engineering requirements.
2. Existing support towers or other structures are not of sufficient height to meet the applicant's
engineering requirements.
6
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
3.Existing support towers or other structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support the
applicant's proposed antenna array and related equipment.
4.The applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on
the existing support towers or other structures,or the antenna on the existing support towers or other
structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna.
G.The applicant of a new tower shall provide a signed statement stating the applicant has provided notice to all
other area wireless service providers of its application to encourage the co-location of additional antennas on the
structure.
H.A signed statement from the owner and/or landlord to remove the facility or obtain another permit for the facility
within six months of when the facility is no longer operating as part of a wireless communication system authorized
and licensed by the FCC.
I.Proof that all the necessary property or easements have been secured to assure for the proper construction,
continued maintenance,and general safety of the properties adjoining the wireless communication facility.
22.120.040 Design standards.
The support tower,antenna array,and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be installed using
stealth technology. Stealth technology applies to all personal wireless service facilities,including,without limitation,
antennas,towers and equipment structures.For any facility, stealth technology means the use of both existing and
future technology through which a personal wireless service facility is designed to resemble an object which is
already present in the local environment, such as a tree, streetlight,or traffic signal. It also includes:
A.For personal wireless service support towers:
1. If within existing trees,"stealth technology"means:
a. The tower is to be painted a dark color;
b.Is made of wood or metal;and
c.A greenbelt easement is required to ensure permanent retention of the surrounding trees.
2. Stealth technology for towers in a more open setting means that they must have a backdrop(for
example,but not limited to,trees,a hillside,or a structure)on at least two sides,be a compatible
color with the backdrop,be made of compatible materials with the backdrop,and that architectural
or landscape screening be provided for the other two sides. If existing trees are the backdrop,then a
greenbelt easement is required to ensure permanent retention of the surrounding trees.
3.Antennas shall be integrated into the design of any personal wireless service tower to which they
are attached. External projections from the tower shall be limited to the greatest extent technically
feasible.
4.For rooftop antennas or antennas mounted on other structures:
a.For omni-directional antennas 15 feet or less above the roof, stealth technology means use
of a color compatible with the roof, structure or background;
b.For other antennas, stealth technology means use of compatible colors and architectural
screening or other techniques approved by the City.
B.For antennas mounted on one or more building facades, stealth technology means use of color and materials such
that the facility has architectural compatibility with the building.It shall be mounted on a wall of an existing
building in a configuration as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which
it is mounted.
C.For equipment structures, stealth technology means locating within a building,or if on top of a building,with
architecturally compatible screening.An underground location,or above ground with a solid fence and landscaping,
is also considered stealth technology.
D.Advertising or display shall not be located on any support tower or antenna array;however,the owner of the
antenna array shall place an identification plate indicating the name of the wireless service provider and a telephone
number for emergency contact on the site.
7
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
E.No artificial lights other than those required by FAA or other applicable authority shall be permitted.All security
lights shall be down-shielded,and installed to be consistent with Chapter 22.60 SVMC.
F. The facility shall be enclosed by a site-obscuring secured fence not less than six feet in height with a locking gate.
No barbed wire or razor wire shall be permitted.
G.The support tower foundations,equipment shelters,cabinets or other on-the-ground ancillary equipment shall be
buried below ground or screened with a site-obscuring secured fence not less than six feet high. The requirement for
a site-obscuring fence may be waived provided the applicant has secured all on-the-ground ancillary equipment in a
locked cabinet designed to be compatible with and blend into the setting,and the means of access for the support
tower is located a minimum of 12 feet above the ground.
H.All support structure(s)for wireless communication antennas shall have their means of access located a minimum
of eight feet above the ground unless the requirement for a fence has been waived.
I.The support tower shall meet the minimum primary structure setback requirements for the underlying zone.
J.Support towers shall not be permitted inside a public park,public monument or private holding located within a
public park or public monument.
K. The height of the support tower or antenna array above grade shall not exceed the maximum height identified in
Table 22.120-1 below.The height of a support tower shall include antenna,base pad,and other appurtenances and
shall be measured from the finished grade of the parcel.
Table 22.120-1—Tower Height Limitations
Zone Antenna Array Support Tower
R-1, Single-Family Residential
Estate
R-2, Single-Family Residential
Suburban
R-3, Single-Family Residential
Urban 20 feet above the zoning height
limitation or 16 feet above existing 60 feet
R 1, Single Family Residential structure
Urban
MFR-4,Multifamily
Residentialedium Density
Residential
MF 2,High Density Residential
Mixed Use Center(MUG)
Corridor Mixed Use(CMU)
City Center(CC) 20 feet above the zoning height
limitation or 16 feet above existing 60 feet
Garden Office(GO) structure
Office(0)
Neighborhood Commercial(NC)
Community Commercial(C)
Regional Commercial(RC) 20 feet above the zoning height 20 feet higher than the maximum height
limitation or 20 feet above existing allowed in the zone or 80 feet whichever is
Light Industrial Mixed Use(IMU- structure less*
�)
8
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
Table 22.120-1—Tower Height Limitations
Zone Antenna Array Support Tower
Heavy Industrial(I-2)
*An additional 20 feet in height for each additional antenna array co-located on the support tower,up to a maximum
tower height of 100 feet,including the height of all antennas.
22.120.050 Landscaping.
Refer to Chapter 22.70 SVMC for landscaping requirements applicable to the underlying zoning district.
I4S11414111111b1C
9
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
DRAFT
Chapter 22.121 SVMC—Small Cell Deployment
22.121.010 Overview.
In order to manage its right-of-way in a thoughtful manner which balances the need to accommodate new and evolving
technologies with the preservation of the natural and aesthetic environment of the City while complying with the
requirements of state and federal law, the City adopts chapter 22.121 SVMC for the deployment of small cell and
microcell technology. Service providers who seek to utilize the public right-of-way for small cell deployment in order
to provide wireless communication,data transmission or other related services to the citizens of the City shall receive
a valid franchise to provide the specific service seeking to utilize the small cell deployment. Entities with franchises
who wish to utilize a small cell deployment to upgrade or expand their existing services shall utilize the processes set
forth in chapter 22.121 SVMC and implementing small cell permits to deploy their technology and obtain design
approval of specific installations.
A. Nothing in chapter 22.121 SVMC revises or diminishes the rights and obligations of an existing franchise.
B. The term"small cell deployment" shall include the deployment of small cell facilities, micro cells and small cell
networks as those terms are defined by RCW 80.36.375 as now adopted or hereafter amended. Small cell deployment
elements which require SEPA review may utilize these processes only in conjunction with SEPA review.
22.121.015 Administration.
The City Manager is charged with administration of small cell deployment permitting and other wireless
communication review processes established under chapters 22.120,22.121,and 22.122 SVMC.
22.121.020 Small Cell Deployments.
A. Small Cell Deployments in Rights-of-Way. Small cell deployments in the public rights-of-way shall only be made
pursuant (1) to a valid franchise with the City, and (2) in compliance with all federal, state, and local small cell
permitting requirements.
B. Small Cell Deployments outside of Rights-of-Way. Small cell deployments outside of the public rights-of-way
shall only be made in compliance all federal, state,and local small cell permitting requirements.
22.121.030 Franchise Application.
A. Franchise Application. Service providers that desire to deploy small cell deployments in public rights-of-way
shall apply for a franchise using the City's franchise application form and submit a fee deposit commensurate with
the estimated administrative costs of processing on application for a franchise. Service providers seeking to utilize
City rights-of-way for small cell deployments shall specify geographic boundaries for the small cell deployment
described in the application and provide detailed schematics and visual renderings of the proposed facilities to be
utilized. Phased development is permitted and an applicant is encouraged to specify at least the initial small cell
deployment in its application.
B. Designation of Facilities. All applicants for franchises seeking to utilize small cell deployment shall provide the
following information. Existing franchisees that seek to utilize a small cell deployment to expand,assist or implement
an existing franchise may provide the information as a part of a small cell permit application for small cell deployment.
The applicant shall specify in the franchise application:
1.whether and where small cell facilities are proposed to be located on existing utility poles;
2.whether and where small cell facilities are proposed to be located on replacement utility poles,new poles,
towers,and/or other structures and the type of replacement poles to be installed;
10
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
3. the conduit and/or ground-mounted equipment necessary for and intended for use in the small cell
deployment, regardless of whether the additional facilities are to be constructed by the applicant or leased from an
infrastructure provider;
4.any facility which is eligible for or subject to the applicable federal review time periods under an eligible
facilities request or as a collocation.
C. SEPA Review. Any application for a franchise which contains an element which is not exempt from SEPA review
shall simultaneously submit an environmental checklist pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 21.20 SVMC.
D. Completeness. The City Manager shall review a small cell franchise application for completeness and notify the
applicant within 30 days of submission whether the application is complete,provided,however,that an applicant may
consent to a different completeness review period. A service provider may resubmit an application determined to be
incomplete within 30 days of notice by the City Manager. Failure to resubmit an application within the 30 day period
shall be deemed a withdrawal of that application. No application shall be deemed complete without the fee deposit
set by the City Manager.
22.121.040 Small Cell Permit Application.
A. Concurrent small cell permit application and franchise application. Rights granted under the franchise for
construction, installation, and placement of small cell facilities shall be implemented through the issuance of small
cell permits. The franchise application may be accompanied by one or more concurrent applications for a small cell
permit to deploy small cells.
B. Small cell permit application. A small cell permit application shall contain the following:
1. All small cell facility sites shall be specified. Up to 30 sites may be specified in one small cell permit
application for processing. The application shall include sufficient information about each site and facility in order
for the City to determine that it complies the design and location standards set forth in SVMC 22.121.060.
2. If the application includes small cell deployment in the public rights-of-way, a copy of the franchise
application or reference to approved existing franchise shall be included. Approval for a small cell permit to install a
small cell deployment shall be contingent upon approval of a small cell franchise or the possession of a valid small
cell franchise.
3. If more than one application for a small cell permit is submitted by an applicant,they shall be considered
in the order received. If multiple applications are submitted on the same date, the applicant shall indicate which
application shall be considered first.
4. Any element of a deployment which qualifies as either an eligible facilities request or a collocation shall
be specifically designated by the applicant and may be addressed separately by the City Manager in order to comply
with the applicable processing requirements established by federal law, state law, and chapter 22.122 SVMC.
5. Any application for a small cell permit which contains an element which is not exempt from SEPA review
shall simultaneously submit an environmental checklist pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 21.20 SVMC.
6. The applicant shall submit a sworn declaration under penalty of perjury signed by an RF Engineer with
knowledge of the proposed project affirming that the small cell deployment will be compliant with all FCC and any
other applicable regulations in connection with human exposure to radio frequency emissions for every frequency at
which the small cell facility and associated wireless backhaul will operate. An existing franchisee applying for a small
cell permit for small cell deployment shall provide an RF certification for all facilities included in the deployment.
7. The applicant shall provide proof of FCC and other regulatory approvals required to provide the service(s)
or utilize the technologies sought to be installed.
8. As applicable,the applicant shall provide written proof from any utility provider authorizing the applicant
to use the utility provider's utility poles for a small cell deployment. The applicant shall also provide evidence of a
11
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
professional engineer certification or other form of formal approval that the small cell deployment meets applicable
structural standards for any impacted utility pole.
C. Completeness;Small Cell Applications. The City Manager shall review an application for completeness and notify
the applicant within 30 days of submission whether the application is complete,provided,however,that an applicant
may consent to a different completeness review period. A service provider may resubmit an application determined
to be incomplete within 30 days of notice by the City Manager or designee. Failure to resubmit an application in a
timely manner shall be deemed a withdrawal of that application. No application shall be deemed complete without
the fee deposit set by the City Manager.
D. The City Manager may approve,deny or conditionally approve all or any portion of the sites proposed in the
small cell permit application.
22.121.050 Small Cell Franchise and Permit Review Process.
The following provisions relate to review of applications for a franchise or small cell permit for small cell
deployments.
A. Review of Facilities. Review of the site locations proposed by the applicant shall be governed by the provisions
of 47 U.S.C. 253 and 47 U.S.C. 332 and applicable case law. Applicants for franchises and the small cell permits
which implement the franchise shall be treated in a competitively neutral and non-discriminatory manner with other
service providers utilizing supporting infrastructure which is functionally equivalent,that is, service providers whose
facilities are similarly situated in terms of structure,placement or cumulative impacts. Franchise and small cell permit
application review under chapter 22.121 SVMC shall neither prohibit nor have the effect of prohibiting the ability of
an applicant to provide telecommunications services.
B. Design Review and Concealment. Small cell facilities shall conform to design, location, and concealment
standards and be subject to design review as set forth in SVMC 22.121.050.
C. Franchise approval. Franchises shall be approved in the form of a City ordinance, and franchises may only be
approved by the City Council pursuant to its standard ordinance approval process; provided however, that the City
shall meet any applicable federal or state time processing requirements in reviewing and approving or denying a
franchise application.
D. Other conditions of approval. Approval of a franchise, small cell permit and/or other approval referenced in
chapter 22.121 SVMC are conditioned on the following requirements:
1. Satisfy all applicable bulk requirements including but not limited to height, noise, light, and any other
applicable zoning requirements.
2. Provide written proof of the approval of the owner of any utility pole for the installation of its facilities
on such utility pole. Approval of a franchise does not authorize attachment to City-owned utility poles or other
structures.
3. Unless specifically provided for in a franchise, obtain a lease from the City or provide proof of a lease
between the City and the utility owner on whose poles the applicant is placing small cell utilities authorizing the utility
owner to utilize the City's ground space for the installation of any new pole,a replacement utility pole over 60 feet or
to locate any new ground based structure, base station or other attendant equipment on City right-of-way or City
property;
4. Comply with applicable City approval processes for the co-location of facilities,or the installation of any
new or replacement utility poles in the right-of-way;and
5. Comply with all City construction standards and state and federal codes when operating in the right-of-
way and obtain a required permit to enter the right-of-way.
12
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
22.121.060 Design and Concealment Standards.
Small cell facilities shall be installed using stealth or concealment technology. Stealth or concealment technology
applies to all small cell facilities, including, without limitation, antennas,towers and primary equipment enclosures.
For any small cell facility, stealth or concealment technology means the use of both existing and future technology
through which the small cell facility is designed to resemble or blend into an object which is already present in the
local environment, such as a tree, streetlight,or traffic signal.It also includes:
A.For those portions of small cell facilities attached to or part of light,power, sign,or other poles:
1. For new poles,integrated within the pole unless technically infeasible. New poles shall be subject to any
applicable City or industry standards;
2. For existing poles, integrated into the existing design of the pole to which it is attached, with external
projections limited in size and scope to the greatest extent technically feasible, including but not limited to being as
flush as possible to the pole,not projecting more than fifteen feet vertically above the pole, and having architectural
compatibility with the pole;
3. External projections shall be painted a color to resemble and match the pole so that they appear to be part
of the pole;
4. Shall conform to any structural standards so as not to degrade the structural engineering of the pole to
which it is attached;
5. Shall not interfere with the normal use for which the pole is intended,including but not limited to blocking
any light designed to be dispersed from existing lighting fixtures installed on light poles,interfering with power lines
on power poles,and obscuring any portion of the applicable sign-face on signs;and
6.
i. Antennae for small cell facilities shall be located inside of an antenna enclosure no more than
three cubic feet in volume, or in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements,the antenna and all of its
exposed elements could fit within an imaginary enclosure of no more than three cubic feet.
ii. In lieu of antennae and primary equipment enclosures,unified design enclosures are permitted,
provided that the overall dimensions of such designs shall not exceed six cubic feet in volume.
iii. Antennae and unified design enclosures shall be located at least 20 feet above the base elevation
of the ground unless technically infeasible.
B. Primary equipment enclosures shall be no larger than seventeen cubic feet in volume. The following associated
equipment may be located outside the primary equipment enclosure and if so located, are not included in the
calculation of equipment volume: electric meter,concealment,telecomm demarcation box,ground-based enclosures,
battery back-up power systems,grounding equipment,power transfer switch,and cut-off switch. Primary equipment
enclosures shall be buried below ground or locked and integrated into the surroundings unless technically infeasible.
This shall include incorporating the facilities into the base of the pole, integrating into existing surrounding fixtures,
such as garbage containers or other power boxes, and/or use of materials and colors that blend into the surrounding
setting. Ground-mounted facilities shall not be located in an improved street or sidewalk. Ground-mounted facilities
shall not located in a stormwater facility, including stormwater swales. Unified design enclosures are permitted
pursuant to SVMC 22.121.060(A)(6).
C.For small cell facilities mounted on one or more building facades, stealth or concealment technology means use of
color and materials such that the facility has architectural compatibility with the building. It shall be mounted on a
wall of an existing building in a configuration as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project more
than three feet above the wall on which it is mounted. Unified design enclosures are permitted pursuant to SVMC
22.121.060(A)(6).
D.Advertising or display shall not be located on any small cell facility;however,the owner of the small cell facility
shall place an identification plate indicating the name of the wireless service provider and a telephone number for
emergency contact on the site.
E.No artificial lights other than those required by FAA or other applicable authority shall be permitted.Any security
lights shall be down-shielded.
13
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
F. Small cell facilities that are not within the right-of-way shall meet the minimum primary structure setback
requirements for the underlying zone.
G. Small cell facilities shall not be permitted inside a public park,public monument or private holding located within
a public park or public monument.
H. Location. Small cell facilities shall not be located within 250 feet of any other small cell facility unless the
applicant demonstrates that no other location can accommodate or is sufficient to meet the wireless service needs. In
the event a small cell facility is required to be located within 250 feet of another existing small cell facility, the
applicant shall make a good faith effort to collocate the new facility on the same pole or structure as the existing small
facility in order to minimize impacts from new small cell facilities.
The City may require applicants to provide evidence of efforts for collocation. An applicant may demonstrate good
faith efforts to collocate by providing written evidence from the other wireless provider(s)that they are unwilling or
it is technically infeasible to collocate, or from pole or structure owners that they will not allow collocation or that it
is technically infeasible to allow collocation.
22.121.070 Small Cell Permit and Minor Deviations.
A. The City Manager shall review applications for small cell permits for small cell deployments approved by a
franchise or small cell permit. The City Manager may authorize minor deviations in the small cell permit from the
dimensional design and concealment technologies referenced in the exhibits to the franchise or design standards where
such deviation is necessary to allow the applicant to provide coverage and where such deviation either does not
materially differ from the City's design and concealment standards or achieves equivalent or better integration.
B. Deviations in the dimensions or volume of small cell facilities which do not exceed the cumulative total
provided by the definition of a small cell or microcell facility in RCW 80.36.375 shall be considered a minor deviation;
provided, however that they do not defeat the concealment features set by City's generally applicable design and
concealment standards.
C. Small cell permits to install facilities including approval of minor deviations shall be processed within 60
days of receipt of a complete application and final approval of a franchise,whichever occurs last.
22.121.080 Significant Deviations.
Any request for significant deviations from the approved small cell facilities design designated in the franchise, small
cell permit or City's design standards shall be require a conditional use permit and shall be considered under the
provisions of chapter 22.120 SVMC and pursuant to the timelines established in SVMC 22.122.030 and SVMC
22.122.040. A significant deviation is not a substantial change. See Appendix A of the SVMC.
22.121.090 Compliance with State Processing Limitations.
Review of franchise and small cell permits shall comply with the provisions of RCW 35.99.030. Applications shall
be reviewed,completeness determined and the timeframe tolled as provided in chapter 22.122 SVMC.
14
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
DRAFT
Chapter 22.122 SVMC—Wireless Communications and Small Cell Facility Review Periods.
22.122.010 Purpose.
Congress and the Federal Communications Commission have,pursuant to the authority granted by 47 U.S.C. 253(c)
and 47 U.S.C. 332(a), required local governments to act on wireless communication facility applications within a
reasonable period of time and have established time limits for local review. The Washington State Legislature has
also adopted similar limitations under the provisions of chapter 35.99 RCW. Accordingly, the City adopts the
following time limits for review of applications for eligible facility requests, small cell permits, and other approvals
for service providers of telecommunication services.
22.122.020 Eligible Facilities Request.
A. Application Review.
1. Application. The City Manager shall prepare and make publicly available an application form which
shall be limited to the information necessary for the City to consider whether an application is an eligible facilities
request. The application may not require the applicant to demonstrate a need or business case for the proposed
modification.
2. Type of Review. Upon receipt of an application for an eligible facilities request,the City Manager
shall review such application to determine whether the application qualifies as an eligible facilities request.
3. Timeframe for Review. Within 60 days of the date on which an applicant submits a complete
eligible facilities request application, the City Manager shall approve the application unless it determines that the
application is not covered by this SVMC 22.122.020.
4. Tolling of the Timeframe for Review. The 60-day review period begins to run when the complete
application is filed, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement by the City Manager and the applicant or in cases
where the City Manager determines that the application is incomplete. The timeframe for review of an Eligible
Facilities Request is not tolled by a moratorium on the review of applications.
a. To toll the timeframe for incompleteness,the City Manager shall provide written notice to
the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application,specifically delineating all missing documents or information
required in the application.
b. The timeframe for review begins running again when the applicant makes a compliant
supplemental submission in response to the City Manager's notice of incompleteness.
c. Following a supplemental submission, the City Manager shall notify the applicant within
10 days if the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating
missing information. The timeframe is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures
identified in paragraph 4 of this section. Second or subsequent notice of incompleteness may not specify missing
documents or information that was not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness.
B. Determination that Application is not an Eligible Facilities Request. If the City Manager determines that the
applicant's request does not qualify as an eligible facilities request,the time periods established by the applicable state
or federal law and chapter 22.122 SVMC begin to run from the issuance of the City Manager's decision that the
application is not an eligible facilities request. To the extent additional information is necessary, the City Manager
may request such information from the applicant to evaluate the application under other provisions of this chapter
22.122 SVMC and applicable law.
15
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
C. Failure to Act. In the event the City Manager fails to approve or deny a request for an eligible facilities request
within the timeframe for review(accounting for any tolling),the request shall be deemed granted. The deemed grant
does not become effective until the applicant notifies the City Manager in writing after the review period has expired
(accounting for any tolling)that the application has been deemed granted.
D.Remedies. Both the applicant and the City may bring claims related to Section 6409(a)of the Spectrum Act to any
court of competent jurisdiction.
22.122.030 Collocation.
Eligible collocations shall be processed within 90 days of receipt of a complete application. The City Manager shall
notify the applicant within 30 days of receipt of an application whether it is complete or if additional information is
required. The term collocation shall not apply to the initial placement of a small cell facility on a utility pole or on
any other base station or tower that was not constructed for the sole or primary purpose of an FCC licensed antenna
and their associated facilities.
22.122.040 New Wireless Communication Facilities.
New wireless communications facilities shall be processed within 150 days of receipt of a complete application. The
City Manager shall notify the applicant within 30 days of receipt of an application whether it is complete or if
additional information is required.
I ' 111111111 bl*
16
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
DRAFT
Chapter 17.80
17.80.030 Assignment of development application classification.
A. Assignment by Table. Land use and development applications shall be classified pursuant to Table 17.80-1 below:
Table 17.80-1—Permit Type and Land Use Application
SVMC Cross-
Type Land Use and Development Application Reference
Accessory dwelling units 19.40
Administrative determinations by city manager or designee or building official Multiple
Administrative exception 19.140
Administrative interpretation 17.50.010
Boundary line adjustments and eliminations 20.80
Building permits not subject to SEPA 21.20.040
Floodplain development 21.30
Grading permits 24.50
Type I
Home business permit 19.65.180
Shoreline letter of exemption 21.50
Record of survey to establish lots within a binding site plan 20.60.040
Right-of-way permits 22.130.100
Site plan review 19.130
Small cell permit 22.121;22.122
Temporary use permit 19.160
Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short subdivision,or binding site plan 20.30.060
Alterations—preliminary and final subdivisions, short subdivisions,binding site 20.50
plans
Binding site plan—preliminary and final 20.50
Binding site plan—change of conditions 20.50
SEPA threshold determination 21.20.060
Type II Shoreline conditional use permit 21.50
Shoreline nonconforming use or structure review 21.50
Shoreline substantial development permit 21.50
Shoreline variance 21.50
Short subdivision—preliminary and final 20.30,20.40
Preliminary short subdivision,binding site plan—change of conditions 20.30
Wireless communication facilities 22.120
Type III Conditional use permits 19.150
17
CTA 2017-0005 Draft 2/22/181/17/18
Planned residential developments 19.50
Plat vacation 20.70.020
Preliminary subdivision—change of conditions 20.50
Subdivisions—preliminary 20.30
Variance 19.170
Zoning map amendments(site-specific rezones) 19.30.030
Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments(text and/or map) 17.80.140
Type IV Area-wide zoning map amendments 17.80.140
Development Code text amendments 17.80.150
B.Assignment by City Manager or Designee.Land use and development applications not defined in Table 17.80-1
shall be assigned a type based on the most closely related application type by the city manager or designee,unless
exempt under SVMC 17.80.040. When more than one procedure may be appropriate,the process providing the
greatest opportunity for public notice shall be followed.
C. Shoreline letters of exemption, shoreline substantial development permits, shoreline conditional use permits,
shoreline variances,and shoreline nonconforming use or structure review shall be processed pursuant to the
procedures set forth in Chapter 17.80 SVMC, subject to any additional or modified procedures provided in Chapter
21.50 SVMC, Shoreline Regulations,including submittals,completeness review,notices,hearings,and decisions.
D. Small cell permits and wireless communication facilities shall be processed pursuant to the procedures set forth
in chapter 17.80 SVMC except as may otherwise be required pursuant to federal and state law,including but not
limited to 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)(Section 6409(a)of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012)and
chapter 35.99 RCW. Chapter 22.122 SVMC specifies applicable time periods for review and processing of eligible
facilities requests,collocations, small cell permits, and new wireless communication facilities.
DE.Except as provided in Table 17.80-1,change of conditions for permits shall be processed the same as the
original permit type.
18
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CTA-2017-0005
February 22,2018
The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval.
Background:
1. The City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan and related development regulations have been
adopted and amended and updated from time to time,with the most recent major update in December,
2016.
2. CTA-2017-0005 is a City-initiated text amendment to amend Title 22 SVMC, SVMC 19.60.050,
SVMC 17.80.030 and Appendix A to update wireless facility regulations to address siting of small cell
wireless facilities within the public rights-of-way(ROW).
3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on January 25,2018 and February 8,
2018 and conducted deliberations on February 8, 2018. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to
recommend approval as modified to City Council.
Planning Commission Findings:
1. Recommended Modifications
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendments as provided during the
January 25,2018 public hearing with the following modifications to CTA-2017-0005:
a. Maintain a requirement for a separation of 250 feet between small cell facilities.
b. Maintain the requirement that if the separation is not possible, for applicants to make a good faith
attempt to collocate facilities on the same pole. If collocation is not possible,new facilities
within the 250 feet would be allowed.
c. Maintain requirement that small cell facilities be located at least 20 feet above grade unless
technically infeasible.
d. Maintain requirement for providers to bury or integrate facilities into surroundings unless
technically infeasible.
e. Add requirement that applicant provide evidence that the small cell facility design will not impact
the structural integrity of the utility pole on which it is placed.
f. Add allowance for"unified design enclosure"to allow combined antenna and equipment
enclosure of up to six cubic feet in volume in lieu of separate antenna and equipment enclosures.
g. Make such other minor grammatical and minor corrections as recommended from public
comment.
2. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F)Approval Criteria
a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan.
Findings(s):
i. Goal ED-G1: Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley.
ii. Policy ED-P8: Provide and maintain an infrastructure system that supports Spokane Valley's
economic development priorities.
iii. Policy ED-P15: Pursue technology-based solutions that improve assistance to businesses.
Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2017-0005 Page 1 of 2
iv. Goal LU-G1: Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley.
v. Goal LU-G2: Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents,employees,
and visitors.
vi. Goal CF-G1: Coordinate with special districts, other jurisdictions, and the private sector to
effectively and affordably provide facilities and services.
vii. Goal U-G1: Coordinate with utility providers to balance cost-effectiveness with environmental
protection, aesthetic impact,public safety, and public health.
viii. Policy U-P1: Promote the efficient co-location of new utilities.
ix. Policy U-P2: Promote the development of citywide communication networks using the most
advanced technology available.
x. Policy U-P5: Require the placement of cellular facilities,substations,and antennas in a manner
that minimizes adverse impacts on adjacent land uses and utilizes existing structures.
xi. Policy U-P6: Coordinate with utility providers to ensure that sizing, locating, and phasing of
utility systems are appropriate for planned growth.
xii. Policy U-P8: Encourage the construction and maintenance of utility, communications, and
technology infrastructure that will help attract business and industry.
b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the
environment.
Finding(s):
The amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the
environment. The amendments allow wireless telecommunication providers to locate their small cell
deployments within the ROW while minimizing aesthetic impacts as allowed by law. Further,the
normal use of the ROW is maintained and the normal use of other utilities is maintained.
3. Conclusion(s):
a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the
approval criteria contained in SVMC 17.80.150(F).
b. The Growth Management Act requires that the comprehensive land use plan and development
regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City.
Recommendations:
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA-2017-
0005 with modifications specified above.
Approved this 22 day of February,2018
Michelle Rasmussen,Chair
ATTEST
Deanna Horton,Administrative Assistant
Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2017-0005 Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Review
Meeting Date: February 22, 2018
Item: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ®public hearing
❑information ❑admin.report ❑pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2018 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Public Hearing
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: On February 8, 2018, the Planning Commission was briefed on the 2018
Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPAs).
The Planning Commission will review the following proposed CPAs and make a recommendation
to City Council. City Council may choose to adopt the proposed individual amendments as
recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the proposed amendments, or modify and
adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal,they must either conduct a public
hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration.
2018 CPA's: The Community and Public Works Department is processing three privately initiated
requests for site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendments. In addition, the City is initiating two
proposed site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendments. Sites approved for a Comprehensive
Plan amendment will also be subject to a change in a zoning designation consistent with the new
land use designation.
At this time, the Planning Commission will conduct the public hearing on the proposed
amendments and consider public input.
STAFF CONTACT:
Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner,
Karen Kendall, Planner
Martin Palaniuk, Planner
Micki Harnois, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: PowerPoint
Exhibit 2: Yellow Binder
1 of 1
City of Spokane Valley
2018 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket Index
PRIVATELY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
File Number Map or Text Summary of Amendment
CPA-2018-0001 Land Use Map Change parcel 45153.2836 and 45153.2835 from
LDR to MFR (Robin Petrie)
CPA-2018-0002 Land Use Map Change parcel 55184.0903 and 55184.091 from LDR
to CMU ( Don Nelson and Char Detro Foote) -
Withdrawn by applicant (Dec. 18, 2017)
CPA-2018-0003 Land Use Map Change parcel 45333.1807 from SFR to CMU
(Dennis Crapo)
CPA-2018-0004 Land Use Map Change parcel 45212.1348 from SFR to NC (Heather
Bryant)
CITY INITIATED COMPRENSIVE PLAN SITE SPECIFIC MAP AMENDMENTS
File Number Map Summary of Amendment
CPA-2018-0005 Land Use Map Expand NC designation — Progress Road east of
Forker Road (Ken Tupper)
(46351.9005;46351.9049;46352.9014; 46352.9052;
and 46354.9127)
CPA-2018-0006 Land Use Map Change parcel 45011.0308 from SFR to IMU (TAPA
Business Park)
CPA-2018-0007 Map Conservation District (8th Avenue and Havana)
change property from MFR to P/OS ( 35233.9191;
35233.9192; 35233.9176; 35233.0513; 35233.0709;
35233.0710; 35233.0604; 35233.0605; 35233.0606;
35233.0607; 35233.0608; 35233.0609; 35233.0505)
Withdrawn at the request of Conservation District
CITY INITIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS
File Number Text Summary of Amendment
N/A
ot°Na,
Valley
2018 Annual Comprehensive Plan
Amendments
Planning Commission Public Hearing
February 22, 2018
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process
SVMC 17.80. 140
Staff Role Planning City Council
• Facilitate Process Commission • Legislative
• Conducts Review • Conducts Public Decision
and Analysis Hearing • Considers Public
• Prepares • Deliberates and Comment
Reports and Makes • Discretion to
public notices Recommendation approve, modify,
to Council or deny requests
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process
0
._
O — .V .N Administrative
.
_ • Study Session
a O 2-2- 18 •'0 Report
D
.v } •o 3 N a .c O 0 5►
Q 5 } } E i U Public Hearing`'` Ordinance 1
• N O O g 2-2248 U Reading
Q O O N >
Q N w Q Findings of Fact U Ordinance 2nd
0_
Q Z 3-8- 18 Reading
giM V igii I
Today
r --
EPA Pr
oCess Route to Agencies
with Jurisdiction • 14 day review period
- „ for Review and
Comment
J
SEPA is a Washington State
r
Law ( 1971 )
Issue DNS • Publish and Post
Tool to identify environmental (Determination of • 14 day comment and
impacts that MAY result from Non-Significance) appeal period
government decisions i.e. permits,
regulations, policies or plans r
Information provided allows Agency Decision • Unless Appeals are
agencies, applicants and public to Finalized received or Decision
understand environmental impacts withdrawn
Agency Routing - Who receives the application ?
— --iiiiIi.
Avista Comcast County Planning & Building
CVSD #356 SRCAA County Environmental Services
CenturyLink SRHD County Water District #3
SV Police East Spokane Water District # 1 SRTC
WA Ecology EVSD #361 STA
Liberty Lake WVSD #363 Spokane Tribe of Indians
City of Spokane Inland Power & Light SV Fire # 1
CSV Building Model Irrigation District # 18 Trentwood Irrigation District
CSV Engineering Consolidated Irrigation District # 19 Vera Water & Power
CSV Parks Modern Electric Water Company DOC
CSV Traffic WA Parks Dept DAHP
Millwood Spokane Aquifer Joint Board WA Fish & Wildlife
WSDOT Spokane County Fire #8 WA Natural Resources
PublicHearing
otice of
„---- ik % . L
.„,,1„.,•1,......tiom 1 MN I
lit° pezi,k\N-,,, &xN'''' '-nt.4.=
agog/0 N,r.,❑ Published in paper _ al
, + ... ,
2-2- 18 & 2-9- 1 8 -
i , ,411
PCO 0 0I
T i tISTPARPIFFrje/0\\I%III
'1 wilLA. 1 .4'ema dr-y i,4 / ,\ k.-
0 Era (4,,,,,,,❑ Posted 2-7- 18 ::.- v o ;
Mailed 2-7- 18 ,,_ 44iNizleeeeo'f\y'm.
14 S ok\-:„..virojAPA A Al 11., ‘
Extended noticingfrom 400 a"
feet radius to 800 feet. II1IIU
` ,Vk,t.•N,s.4s:N1/4‘,t, t1
Legend
"m m . 1Sj i
te
b___ Parcels _
Planning Commission Materials
_An_ iii
Yellow Binder
CV,afspO/alpo 1/J.,
❑ Application Materials 4nepreenS/ePfan
inents
O Staff Report
❑ Notices t,tF r
bfti
o Agency Comments
o Public Comments
o Maps r
a
'
❑ Any other related documents r`
:J reF .
Approval Criteria — Staff Report Analysis
=if
Required Findino Other Considerations
Supports public health, safety o Effect on Environment
welfare, and protects the ❑ Compatibility and impact on
environment existing uses and neighborhoods
Consistent with GMA and o Adequacy and impact on
Comprehensive Plan services
Responds to a change in o Benefit to City and Region
conditions
o Quantity, Location and Demand
Corrects an error for land
Addresses a deficiency o Projected population for area
o Other effects on Comp. Plan
2018 Amendments
a s
Privately Initiated City Initiated
❑ CPA-2018-0001 i CPA-201 8-0005
❑ CPA Withdrawn 12 CPA-201 8-0006
❑ CPA-2018-0003 CPA ;ifithdravir. )7
❑ CPA-2018-0004
Privately Initiated Map Amendment
CPA-201 8-0001
Micki Harnois, Planner
CPA-2018-0001
, i‘q fit,i. Av.:. C
11 ._.11111 , , , c 0
i: II
:h Z
Project CPA-2018-0001
Number: E i..ik.i. ,....Li•.. -• . ;_5
:2: !
Applicant: Robin Petrie
.,....,, ip
uj Owners: Robin R & Lori A Petrie .
> Audrey N Green ,
•c, ei.
3,
et ik:
...
7.:
u j Proposal: Change the land usec.
,,i
ii.
> designation from SFR - \
ESpr.2.,.,..b.,...2
0 pp artu ii it:,
0 to MFR and the zoning Project Site
from R-3 to MFR
_IIL E3,0L.,,
1 , „ ,, ,
E 4Lh Av.
I- •
CPA20180001 -� . l `
_Alp-
i 2 ;a
Of' , _ _i_ . v. . 11 7,.
Pr I a
a:
< -Il ill . lin .
I. MEM
4 111
r
2 ,
wN
---) I
R
. _... : - I c , .r....1 4.....z.,
(Displaying
QSurrounding uses $ 1. _
et = Commercial I
s i ,
� .-f
W -- _ k
= Multifamily — V W
mill
= CPA-2018-0001 = i i
PA-20 1 8-000 1
lz, -e
13 CMU
Lu ll Study Areal
`- I allevw a •'c, 1
V) el
Z :36
< _,_ E
X515 PAVE
W 1 124 S F R
= VALLE .2835
W z 1 _ '6 E
ALLEYWAY AVE
13. < [ n )
J = CMU L MFR
ci- 1
O 7--] = MFR '�
tis) -lir
= SFR
ili .r-
CPA-201 8-000ilimhzimaaia_iiiL j
14 I ei
CMU
Study Areal
a
Q
2 I
- E
0 4515 III PAVE
VALLEY .2B35
ZE
V. LLEYWAY AVE
Z = CMU
MF .
0
N = MFR _ L Mi , P
3 I.
N an- ve
= R-3
Comparison of Development Standards
,,
Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks
Building Minimum Lot dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side
Zone Hei ht Coverage
g Size acre Yard Yard Yard
R-3 35 ft. 50% 5,000 sqft 6 15 ft./20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft.
MFR* 50 ft. 60% 2,000 sqft 22 15 ft./ 20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft.
*Where MFR abuts R- 1 , R-2, or R-3 zones, development
shall comply with Transitional Regulations
Staff, Agency & Public Comment
ii.____JEL
Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment
❑ City's Public Works ❑ No public comments
❑ Spokane Valley Fire to date
Department No. 1
❑ Sewer
❑ WSDOT
❑ STA
iris I' 4
Ir, .fir
CPA-2018-0001 -
, TIF
OM _ iii
irl _
17 i. WV r Ki M+b
Ilib
Jail=:.ay
i 1
in
ile
u- iii
PUBLIC __ I j, *i,
is dr i �
COMMENT • -
.,,,, r 81: -
come to odium = r. 1 : ` .(please - .E;hlain,Av.e
I
1
1 +F- ,Flti 1
Privately Initiated Map Amendment
CPA-201 8-0003
Marty Palaniuk, Planner
C PA_2 0 1 8_000 3
, eel)) AUF
19 111111111._ ' '2'`,-.
1 1
IL
o
F'
Proiect CPA-2018-0003
Number
Project Site
Applicant: Whipple Consulting s,,......„••••••• ••••••••.. _ .
bo4tk.
1.1.1 i I c
i
Engineers .
Owners: ,
Ce Dennis & Melissa Crapo 7
( L
! 36
1.1.1 Proposal: Change the Land Use
, L
i r cp
E,*
•
- '
0 Designation from SFR to -
CMU and the zoning .
:
ri
f
I
n
i
,t InorPe,,a
'
S Y
from R-2 to CMU
x
, ..
-c e
, ..L.
I _ - ,
S rts'f"
radiw::
,-11. ipillij;;111,,,;!: ..:: :4111:41''
CPA-201 8_0003
4 1
, „ , . •
1. 11 ;
" ' 4 K".-- tt
,
20
4 l' .-,. ' -1":3LL-----T4- ...;- ".-L': 11-1 4e, 1 ••I
a
----1 c7-31 I.- tallial-4/14 '
di
OM I
• ii, -----,',-.„ ''-..., . 4141,WT!OP&
rAV---
i.„
* .. :. "4.2,r,..,,, ........ 0, :;,e,• ; ,...0111-r- .. . ::9: ". 4 , 4ifoirr, erg,. atottly:_ct: ? iireaite.
3
-..m.
,,,I.
.. , .',.,
N. kr i-10:, 'IP 4
f L
VrA.101
* ! ') "rt., , : ' :f•-.,-
,
lici....:4 • r t
.
) -1,
' ---. 4(1k ' V ''' t -- H' . ' - Zir ..1
S
,•-•••
, • ..
. ,
. 41„
_ • .,. . rN... ,. „,,, ,, . ‘
';'-1 ''' gi".
..,- - 04e._, --,i
•' ' ' p '.1
4
1
1
IMIMI -----.L.: •I'S / ..-------- -11 4
0' f" - r • % Jg
...t •• ' 1
I.
, —_1 . 1
-- I __
4 ' 1 '.-
-, • 1 t t
r
,:j j 1‘1 -: '
__ .. •1 i ---1
#11, .71: Li j'a.
ir,11. ' --
- 4—,
T , ,,, - ..... .
• .--
1
'1. 1 •k•.-;'.
------- ' '. 341 n , . o . . 1.
• es* _/. , ....
rir '- 4 T- --:r- -- - .
ili
-.-- -- t;, . i ,' l, 40 101 I S
,
', I - 1 ' iliC. . ',1-•'- -14-1. - 'PI It':'r- ''' 4 4 a '
Itait476 I I 1 * '.A ,101.,api .vi . 4.
CPA-2018-0003
. _. v421 0 •. ' -.
_� I.
it ` E
21 I` jJ � S
tn W Majority of site is in the F, . .fillilit-
_
floodplain rte-
_,..,. 10444,.. H„y
N Approximate location ,p • i( Chester ,'
CLOMR in 2017 removed o' „ 1.4,'..:01:7;a:-.:_.-.
,., '
� parcels south from ,� .� � .�- A . � ;.: �,
LLI
V floodplain _ .: 4 /1 o '• �, :i
Ce Chester Creek ft .! "` �'` '! ``'
QT •
(Type F stream) + ,, , .. ` •>' • -. n y�
Located north of site 1 + ,- *+, r i _• , a`
Ill ❑ Alluvium Soils F i,"` �1,1' -1. . _ ,q' �:
Entire site covered, no N'' i § . i ' :;—`
visual. L , ' 4
fl 8_0003 \::,,,.. . .... ......w„..„ .....,__ =Tip
VIII
4 Ere II
22 N::::,:\,,. 411111111 t
TIM i II
Lr..�;-SL-x.42
LLI .....„..N,N.... iii r_
in 0Z
Q7, ----,,,, . , .,,,.„ ..., ., , pi..,.
W * ,.
r
_ � tuIyAra : .
ZLLI )..„:7: 1 i a �
CL Q
A-t • .� ir
:_Z} AN „....... '`----/--__,,,....,---_,,..'''tit
* -1
CL = CMU ill
� .. ~ .
--J_'n0 rte[ :f h
0 - ..
t
FR
= SFR WY s
I -‘' 1 R. , ./ .--' 7-
L I I 1f I I_.
// N\ /
CPA-2O18-O003Nw _
__. .._ • ..,_E44!„h_A,E . . . \
,... N CMU1,.
23 ` a. ' r '2-
1--.1 - '
'.....,..., .,,, N. . TIM
R-3 -
R-2 F.
Q d
114.1fy
J
YtT
`k 1 turfy Area
0 ,:,
= CMU '
Z
o I■ . .,,
N = R-3 �a,n . ,
.
illf
III
R-2
= R-2 - _ ; I I� _
Comparison of Development Standards
Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks
Building Minimum dwelling/ Front/Flanking Rear Side
Zone Height Coverage
g Lot Size acre Yard Yard Yard
10,000
R-2 35 ft. 30% 4 15 ft./20ft. 20 ft. 5 ft.
sqft
CMU* Unlimited N/A N/A Unlimited N/A 10 ft.* 5 ft.*
* If abutting residential, development shall comply with Transitional Regulations
Staff, Agency & Public Comment
ii.____JEL
Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment
❑ City's Public Works ❑ Comments received
❑ Spokane Valley Fire Included in Planning
Department Commission Packet
❑ Sewer
❑ WA State Fish and Wildlife
PublicComment Discussion
iliri
di Au
1 i. . °:D r. 4
Chester Creek , ' r -
_ - r
_The�,Cn
'.` �-``' �Comments . ...„ r
Traffic f r � �4
Access a Jr 1 _ - - '1d`l r r
. `J __m- iiiay 'A- �' r'0 r..-t 3. ;_ 'r ,' _
Neighborhood ' $. � 'kms - .S t z- it' : ,+r
Character r. � vh�`ol� ,� s
ow
n =� , ,
Floodplain y, , ` ,.:
�q ;r .,
Schools _ i
y
''Sri
r
Y.
r VJ
h 4� 41
tis
q
ir.
., . .
: •
c pA-20 1 8_0003 . .. • 41 - _
ilik4 a..
` 0-- .r- ' * •I/ -411"1.411 ••• •. •
4 •1
•, 0 - - . 7 -1.--e. - '
.4V41.410.11611 .
— ' , ''''7.-7.7 E.4•1.1 A•e ,.. , .
27 • ,, '', .
. i fal i
— -LI — —illtlfirwall -
4, ,. 7' :"— •
--,_ .'-lag 1 ilk: ALAZILI
• :7/1F 4 /
;:" .1-7'.;I' . ‘.4)"'w. 0 „ ....-N--,::*.
-
4.i. - l' .v.. -:.- - it/ ' . 11t.::s.r,.„..,:.- ... .. '• . ' • 4.04,
' , ' . . ..
ft.' ' --.."--- fli.e 4
'40 44, •
i Nfillio \
PUBLIC , • . • ..
, ,.. _ t . , ,,,, r
-—, w 1.-144
, a
kvik.
e,4 - Iii-'- ''t '
1. •
, --,--.. .1
)t. '
' 4 . ,
•P t.,
V.44C,' **•
iff
. A -' . 0
*Or • 4, •.
... .. ,
COMMENT ,i. ii ----,1,! , - ...__, . .
1 4.10AIII .4 • .. _.
i. VIVI:' Eipm A .
„..
ssi, 4,w•
•S ' I .':
....
.14 die :Air' _, ...”. ., _.. .7
, ..
(please come to podium) - -_ .24i r4":"ei - .. , .,.
"Air; ' V ____ V • . —1
i
- gill
0 .
: i, -- _
------__L_ 1 / I I% •:I -
.; - - . .
Y .‘
all ..., ' • VC, '7
--'- • , ,Jr,. ,
'''' :: i-7'" '•
'-:,..
._ .
Privately Initiated Map Amendment
CPA-201 8-0004
Marty Palaniuk, Planner
Park i; =
i
in •i!
CpA_201 8_0004
P Cpi qui:,Au, z-
A
71 -
City Hall
29
I In
&way ded fr - - ...„."-----1-I -. ..
Project CPA-2018-0004 - -1
0 i i_ _I V
Number ,:
EC
Applicant:
Heather Bryant _
, : ,.:.., F.•,111 WO a ' 'MO -.
'. itliII,ii
I:
1-1,--.
.-
Owners:
Steve & Tresa
11:11C Schmautz
U>•1
m
mo
I1 TI"
Project Site
IT- • 1_ 111ProposalChange Land Use
1 MI nintill
' -1-I I LE i 'I. I IIIIIIINni 1 1
0 Designation SFR to E
` 77
1
Ave-
.
,1 c
E ,,
.7
Y 1
.c .e
NC and the zoning
g
from R-3 to NC
:)
: .:•:-. 1..:
I
.. ..
. 7
8-0004PA-201
. .
,._ .. ,... i_ _,..____. :: ,,, , . ___ 1 1
.:,. - . - acilac, _ „.:
, ... ....
=,. 1
, _ _
1, _ aa1•. • _a r . w
i 1
IL
30 lilail . "4 • ` 1
NE , Mi . _ .,„. .
N _ .. -
t
-
G' '�`° ., �"'
�: _ ter+
44IC 7 ,„
..
Th AvenueE-,,
2 .
•. .
if.
. _
.,, , ..
411... , .
1 _
_ ..
„ Oilli
iii.J:, '
Et
P ,
8th Avenue
- E S[t-ve
ilifit _ . - -r
L
- � ”
14
Ce II ihk
t
3 -�-
1
fFRP .1
CPA-20141831 __ '-1-a .eve1 8-000 - _
) r
W E ee _ . S F
D _ TR
H a - - 7'" Avenue -
Z Q Study Area
l\
* ,. \_�' d9
Iso j '� via
W —
Zet = 8th Avenue - — ,_ ���
CL Q = SFR
CL
8 = MFR Si
1i E 9'h-Ave I
= NC v
T---
Rii
s
CPA-201 - 4 l1-1_8 000
32
i
O
i .._� --
CL ESA >
R-3
Q I M
* . . 1 , 7th Avenue
Study Area
=
, . Fir
NC
ZL1:
0 --7 4•,, .
—
=1) __,------N
R-3 H $th A
= venue .
Z —
O 1r=--
N = MFR
~ F_9thr ve
E9th Ave
f
= NC
ad
�J - i 1
1 1
Comparison of Development Standards
Lot Maximums Density Minimum Setbacks
Building Minimum dwelling Front/Flanking Rear Side
Zone Hei ht Coverage
g Lot Size acre Yard Yard Yard
R-3 35 ft. 50% 5,000 6 15 ft.
/20ft. 10 ft. 5 ft.
sqft
NC 35ft. N/A * * 15ft. 10 ft.A 10 ft.^
* If residential development, comply with density & dimensional standards
of adjacent residential zone.
A If adjacent to residential use.
Staff, Agency & Public Comment
ii.____JEL
Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment
❑ City's Public Works ❑ Comments received
❑ Spokane Valley Fire Included in Planning
Department Commission Packet
❑ Sewer
PublicComment Discussion
35 II
L~
.. ' -
—
r
Ali
CommentsCe I I* iftfra.
, b y - -
❑ Traffic =_. ,
-� k i 7th Avenue
❑ Access _ -
❑ Neighborhood . if,
r . "IINV ,
Character = . I '111 II l'; _ --' Allit ... .
Au l lnrnl bl� . _ •
❑ Covenants y
,
n a
N
CPA-201 8-0004
Alg
36 :F* a ,.
Iiii# ins
rill
yy +�
111° 1
1
, r
„_ 1 PO P
U BL I C iO __ " 1 - ! Lit_
_ — i.
.... , - . r .._ 0,
ill; , Wit I
I.
COMMENT Y.
11 ill Ia.m • L'
(please come to podium) mi �, ° . , -syt . �P.
�. r
w
t Te m �� �� ��
T. flhIi. ,�' rul si$'. ' .1 ,.,,, .._
City Initiated Map Amendment
CPA-201 8-0005
Karen Kendall, Planner
. .....
CPA 201 8-0005
Project Site
38
— -
-- —
c n18
i
,
_PA-2., 0005-
Proiect
Number
City Valley
;
..
Applicant: of
Spokane
2
c
t
, u
E
...t
2 .
c
2 -
2 V
E
HO Sc h°°I n
,inolnYySd, '"
1.1.1 Owners: Five Fifty, LLC EaalEIlleY
I i
x . n
r
z ,
nn
cr
i
nl
Proposal: Expand the NC
- _ ^-1 Lri
11
z _t_IL E,t4."71'.'''''
-141..-L.
I rmilL---
F; ,1 nnnfm,
Cle
•
nationzoning
• & to
II ul '
imt
ra
designation . N
1.1J
> eliminate
split zoning
of
=
t
0 the
parcels currently
__DLI ..ntun
DI111_
__
-1 ;,Trentwooa
.'0 E Indutrial
designated SFR and NC ,, W—
_
ef
and zoned R-3 and NC. ,- -
ik
CXI
it
od
_ 0 _.PA-2 0 8 000 5 _, ''' 7, fi- :: "44: :Ir.-.. Ar
- ,. - , t, a
6 h
39
'.:r le mod
P . \.:\ . 4.41/1, .
, 0
, .
II
..1 4,Q
2I
1„
i
_.
a
_... t., .
, 4,,
x _
4 r
eve 4
I
jillijr .•
Q 1
_ -. k . VIP l \
. ' - '. ',.. •_.--,;. :11;i44-z4 _iw .),..,71: :,.2''"---14 ilk 1 .... _,..,
ILI
1114 _ __.
41-.7 1 —4— Ill , ...
., .. -
P li .• —� .
r �
t
P4 -201it Wr',.1 IP ' - - ,
„..i I:.
8—000 5 I�. - '• . ,- ,T �,
ee 0
s L
40 1 II .. Pig' i'ir s
vs / Majority of site is in the
floodplain4 . „.
. , . .� A
._
N Approximate location i
AL
W CLOMR currentlLLIy under
I-- I review.
V
Q im Easement
Q ID500 feet wide il
,
_ ❑ Bonneville Power Admin
E - a Tip - 4'.----1_ -., q404...s....
❑ Type F stream moi -`4jAit .; ,
Located NW corner of
LLI
PiLl''
' -�-- ~ � ,
site , may ' ' � 1
,.
CPA-201 8-0005 __ _.. ..
4f -0��s NC
. „, o-.4 E.L. .; 7
ti �xrn
0'42Vtudy1rBa,Y
41 _ s /7
"Study
4635:2M2dG351.90d5 \iii, '`
W 0ADDiESS 0 iDRESS f
8.
UNKNOWN UNKNOWN
Z Q ..,
W
* .1:5
A5354.9127
p uracNDWN
E.. r ,. SFR �a s�
W Z —
Cid — SFR - I,
O. 41:C
* —1
ICL , i 4.p. in c__J onlgrt
E .1 461111 tail Eli.0 m 1 44
T = Nc rse
J,Qu , ��� :- ri . #
..
. ._ ! -Amolio. 4 4,,
dlaii-h.: 466 _ —_0.......N6
7 41 11 *II
a
, __,.,___ „t,iy,!2'_A"! __,_------\ `F Clkvrnnuc-Ave"
CPA-201 8-0005 ---
.,.., -06952 o. - #��,„ Study Area
42 - — ke., . dfi
4052.9052 46;51.
IWH
O ADDRESS U AQ9R ESS
UNKNOWN LIN KN OWN
C / P
< \1.4._., ,,._______I
1
I4£85+99127
0
a UNKAD NOSS WN
iI
Z S�I�
= R-3 ._„___F,
_ L 1 I FOAL
F.. - it* ti
0 U
Mil11■
Na M u .
�,� ■
�' - `Mer+0
i.'f.,,.' :.s
.0c 0I.
CPA-201 8-0005
+# ' .- •,
,to..
..43 .. y..
a Vai
PARCEL CONFIGURATIONar
`
CORRECTING ERROR + '
kV'
v
Comprehensive Plan Zoning 4 4
= SFR = R-3
w .
Phi. -
l
A OIL
an .
z-
flied _ + r .
P \ . =
Staff, Agency & Public Comment
ii.____JEL
Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment
❑ City's Public Works ❑ No public comments
❑ Sewer to date
•
' . d ... lig:e•..,_ - .:.- '„gr It' 4 I 0
CPA-201 8-0005 qIII
Alir r --„, -. rIii h
45 � _^ __
v.
PUBLIC / . i„, 6
it
COMMENT w
t II
(please come to podium) : IP 1�• p• 7-1 ,
Mi11---- --
. - =4._ . Eill Ir.; I - t
• - :_ f
` P \ . --1 .
City Initiated Map Amendment
CPA-201 8-0006
Karen Kendall, Planner
C PA-20 1 8_0006 ,_
47
1 1 _
Proiect
Eaat Valley
,
High Snhool Site
Proiect CPA-2018-0006 :1 Eu,siValkgfeSflc,5 2 E
. %I.: 1
Number
, . .. _
'e,
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley
1. - 4
-
:: a
And Ur •)- - - 2
%
ILI Owner: MPR Spokane, LLC , ...-ji-Le,nurroirth Au,.
Frentwood
"r- Prim kva-
> Proposal: Expand the IMU • II1_ '''- '=-J1
11
1
LLI designation & zoning to
> eliminate split zoning of the
.: --r I
[E,;_-.u.:.-,-,a --
0 parcels currently ,
:!
E C hiduirial Park A!St;t
re) —
designated SFR and IMU — - .
,..-,
Tnirin Plc rfic
--.— -
a E
and zoned R-3 and IMU. _F Kiprnai,A,e= -F :r.3',....li -71, 'KduII Puk
sITa st Tv
6 5 G '
,_,•) a ,
Studd Area
-11
_ -, liumm ,,,,
•. 1113¢` F§o -
CPA-2018-0006 _ - _
Jar
.z
48 i
II
OM
4 �
<IC - , .- .
2 • . , ,,...... _
1.
4
45015.'4:5
, •
• 16F0o E
TRENT AVE
,
Q
MI le
Ce ei
■ e T • el
Wk.1_ .... ..
111111:C – — ..o..... . - _._.
Trent AVenue
(SR 290)
I,
, , I
., _
SFR
LU
Z a
W � 1145O15ri4U
W Z i IMU 16205 D
ce � = SFR TREF'JTA. _ _,_. - -
11
0
t.) j = IMU _ _ _ _ _ _E
�I=rent- �w•�-
CPA-2018-0006 iI ,� ��l :,' • L'=_
50
R-3
rQ
* _ _ __ 11::•=j1E- ' - i I
7
0 45095 . 1493.
Z = R-3 irow 16205 EI
0 I
TRENTA'dE
N = iMu _ t _
Staff, Agency & Public Comment
ii.____JEL
Staff & Agency Comments Public Comment
❑ City's Public Works ❑ No public comments
❑ Sewer to date
CPA-201 8-0006
52
PUBLIC
COMMENT
(please come to podium)
..tea `..
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
NEXT STEPS