The URL can be used to link to this page

2018, 05-01 Study SessionAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT (with some action items) Tuesday, May 1, 2018 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Proclamation: National Small Business Week ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Pines/Grace Intersection Safety Project — Craig Aldworth, Gloria Mantz [public comment] DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Dr. Lutz, Spokane Regional Health District Opioid Epidemic Discussion/Information 3. Craig Aldworth, Gloria Mantz Mission Avenue Improvement Project Discussion/Information 4. Mark Calhoun Community Member Recognition Discussion/Information 5. Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 6. Mayor Higgins Council Check in Discussion/Information 7. Mark Calhoun City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Study Session Agenda, May 1, 2018 Page 1 of 1 Spokane 4.0.0Valley 'lt rottamettion City of SpOone raley, Washington National' Smart Business Week April* 29 to .May 5, 2018 WHEREAS, America's progress has been driven by pioneering individuals who start small but think big, take risks and work hard; and WHEREAS, From family -run neighborhood grocers to high tech companies that keep America on the cutting edge, small businesses are the backbone of our economy; and WHEREAS, Because the 30 million small businesses in the United States create nearly two out of three jobs, we resolve to support small business owners, entrepreneurs and business start-ups which spur economic growth in America; and WHEREAS, Of the nearly 5,000 businesses located in Spokane Valley, nearly 70 percent employ less than 10 employees, and almost half employ fewer than five; and WHEREAS, When a community supports small business development, jobs are created, local residents can find employment within their community, and cities can preserve their unique culture; and WHEREAS, The President of the United States has proclaimed National Small Business Week every year since 1963 to highlight the programs and services available to entrepreneurs and small business owners through the U.S. Small Business Administration and other government jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, The City of Spokane Valley has a long tradition of supporting small businesses and wishes to join this national movement to encourage small businesses to do what they do best grow their business, create jobs, and ambitiously reach for a more vibrant tomorrow. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Rod Higgins, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the Spokane Valley City Council and the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, do hereby proclaim April 29 through May 5, 2018, as Small Business Week for the City of Spokane Valley, andl urge Spokane Valley citizens to join in the support of small businesses and merchants in recognition of the significant role they play in our local economy, the jobs they provide, and essential services that they deliver. Dated this 1st day of May 2018. L.R. Higgins, Mayor CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 5/1/18 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Pines Rd (SR 27) & Grace Avenue Intersection Safety Project, Bid Award GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • February 7, 2017 — Administrative report discussing amending the 2017 TIP, which included Pines and Grace Intersection Safety Project. • February 28, 2017 — Council passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP. • June 27, 2017 — Administrative Report discussing the project. • March 6, 2018 — Administrative Report discussing the project BACKGROUND: The idea for this project initially started in 2011 by way of a recommendation from our then traffic engineer, as part of a City safety grant program, to widen State Route 27/Grace Avenue to five lanes. The project was then carried forward in various TIPS (Transportation Improvement Program) over the years, with an initial start date of 2014. The project didn't actually progress further until July 26, 2016 when Council approved a motion for staff to apply for Fiscal Year 2018 TIB (Transportation Improvement Board) grants, which included this project. However, during an administrative report at the June 27, 2017, Council meeting, staff explained the difficulties in getting right-of-way on the southwest corner of this intersection, along with the result of public input at a June 12 meeting, staff put this project on hold until a solution could be found has the community's support. This support was garnered as part of an intersection redesign over this past fall and winter. The Pines Road and Grace Avenue intersection safety project will add a center turn lane on Pines Road on either side of the Grace Road intersection by widening Pines Road to the east from a four to a five -lane section. This improvement will tie in with a previous project that widened Pines Road at Mirabeau Parkway, creating a continuous five -lane section between Mirabeau and Grace. The center turn lane will reduce traffic congestion and improve safety by improving visibility and providing a refuge for turning vehicles. One of the goals of this project is to improve sight distance for eastbound traffic using the Grace Avenue intersection at Pines Road. On the west side of Pines at Grace, there are existing fences, signs, and walls that obstruct sight distance. The original design proposed to remove the sight obstructions at the intersection which required purchasing right-of-way on each of the corners for the west approach of the intersection at Grace Avenue. Unfortunately, the City was unable to come to reasonable negotiations with the property owner at the southwest corner. As a result, staff designed a median island or "pork chop" that allowed eastbound drivers on Grace to only turn right, restricting northbound movements onto Pines Road. A community meeting was held on June 12, 2017, where staff presented the proposed design. Fifteen people signed in at the meeting. All of the meeting attendees expressed concerns with the proposed pork chop on the west side. Staff worked with WSDOT to redesign the project without the porkchop. In January 2018, staff presented the new design to the public. The public supported the new design. The project was advertised on March 30, 2018 and bids were opened on Friday, April 20, 2018. The Engineer's Estimate, adjusted for an addendum revision in quantities was $518,686.00. The two bids received were not from the local firms that have typically specialized in this type of work. National Native American Construction, Inc., a Coeur d'Alene company, tendered a $614,015 bid, while Award Construction, Inc., a contractor from Ferndale, Washington, submitted the lowest bid for $608,893.50. The lowest bid is $90,207.50 above the Engineer's Estimate. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Expenditures: PE $ 161,000 ROW $ 191,150 Construction Bid Award $ 608,894 5% Construction Contingency $ 30,445 Construction PE $ 40,000 Total Estimated Expenditures $ 1,031,489 An additional $160,389 is needed for the project in order to award the Contract, establish a construction contingency of 5% ($30,445) and pay for construction administration and inspection. The additional funds will come from Fund 302. The current and proposed project funding is: Current Project Funding HSIP Grant City Fund 402 Total Current $ 671,100 $ 200,000 $ 871,100 Proposed Project Funding HSIP Grant $ 671,100 City Fund 402 $ 200,000 City Fund 302 $ 160,389 Total Proposed $ 1,031,489 OPTIONS: Award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Pines Rd (SR 27) and Grace Avenue Intersection Safety Project, CIP 00166 to Award Construction, Inc., in the amount of $608,893.50 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager Craig Aldworth, PE, Project Engineer ATTACHMENTS: ROW Exhibit; Presentation; 4/20/18 Bid Tabulation PINES RD LEGEND RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISTION RIGHT OF WAY NOT ACQUIRED PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASTMENT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT May 1, 2018 Pines Rd (SR -27) & Grace Ave Intersection Safety Project Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager Craig Aldworth, PE, Project Manager 1 Spokane .000 Valley Presentation Agenda May 1, 2018 Project Scope Bid Results Project History Project ROW Project Cost & Funding Spokane .000 Valley Project Scope May 1, 2018 Add Left Turn Lanes Improve Sight Distance at Pines & Grace (West Side) Provide Stormwater Improvements Not a Pavement Preservation Project WSDOT is Responsible for Maintaining Pavement 3 Spokane .000 Valley Bid Results May 1, 2018 Local Contractors Busy — Did Not Submit Bids 2 Bids Received: Award Construction Inc., Ferndale, WA National Native American Construction, Inc., Coeur d'Alene, ID Increased Pricing — Excavation, Flatwork, Landscaping, Water Work Low Bid $90,207.50 Above Engineers Estimate (including Addenda) S` ikane 4 P 4,1000 Valley Project History May 1, 2018 2011 City Applied for Federal HSIP Grant 2012 Project Selected for Grant in July, Agreement Executed October 2013 City Began Survey, Design & Environmental Work 2014 January — WSDOT Granted W Side Sight Distance Design Deviation, Began ROW Acquisition, Finished NEPA & SEPA 2015 December — City Requested Additional Time To Obligate CN due to East Side ROW Acquisition Delay 2016 Spring — ROW & Design Complete: WSDOT Reversed W Side Sight Distance Design Requiring W Side ROW Acquisition 2016 November — City Unable to Secure ROW on SW Corner of Pines & Grace Project History Continued May 1, 2018 2017 January — Redesigned Project with Pork Chop Island in West Leg of Intersection 2017 June — Project Design ROW & Design Complete Neighborhood Reaction to Pork Chop Island Halted Bid 2017 Fall — Staff Redesigned Project with "Narrowed Lanes" Concept 2018 March — WSDOT Approved Redesign 2018 April 20 — Project Bids Opened 6 Project ROW May 1, 2018 PINES RD i LEGEND RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISTION RIGHT OF WAY NOT ACQUIRED PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASTMENT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT 7 • One ROW Acquisition Could not Be Negotiated (SW Corner) • Administrative Settlement (NW Corner) • Temporary Construction Easements Expired and Had to Be Renegotiated S"'okane P Va11ey �s Project Cost May 1, 2018 Preliminary Engineering Right -of -Way Construction Bid Award 5% Construction Contingency Construction PE Total Estimated Cost 8 $ 161,000 $ 191,150 $ 608,894 $ 30,445 $ 40,000 $1,031,489 Spokane .000 Valley Project Funding May 1, 2018 Current Project Budget Federal HSIP Grant City Fund 402 Current Budget Proposed Project Budget Federal HSIP Grant City Fund 402 City Fund 302 Proposed Budget $ 671,100 $ 200,000 $ 871,100 $ 671,100 $ 200,000 $ 160,389 $ 1,031,489 Spokane .000 Valley Questions May 1, 2018 PINES ROAD (SR 27) 1 1 10 0 n m m Spokane .000 Valley BID TABULATION Pines Rd (5327) and Grace Ave Intersection Safety- Federal Aid No.: CM -1223(003) Project CIP No. 0166 Bid Opening: 10:00 AM April 20, 2018 Sched A - Roadwork Item Units Quantity Engineers Estimate Award Construction, Inc. National Native American Construction Inc. Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 100 MOBILIZATION L.5. 1 550,000.00 350,000.00 043,000.00 343,000.00 518,258.00 518,258.00 101 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L.S. 1 05,000.00 $5,000.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 514,000.00 514,000.00 102 MINOR CHANGE EST. 1 510,000.00 510,000.00 510,000.00 510,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 103 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 51,000.00 51,000.00 5650.00 5650.00 51,003.00 $1,003.00 104 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 $40,000.00 040,000.00 $7,500.00 57,500.00 056,821.00 $56,821.00 105 FLAGGCOS HR. 600 555.00 033,000.00 $46.50 027,900.00 5107.00 064,200.00 106 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN HR. 2352 37.00 $16,464.00 $3.00 57,056.00 54.00 $9,408.00 107 CLEARING AND GRUBBING ACRE 0.4 $1,000.00 $400.00 556,500.00 $22,600.00 313,175.00 $5,270.00 108 REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES AND OBSTRUCTIONS L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $8,500.00 50,500.00 59,595.00 $9,595.00 109 ROADWAY EXCAV. INCL. HA01 C.Y. 700 $20.00 $14,000.00 $31.00 521,700.00 $40.00 $28,000.00 110 EMBANKMENT COMPACTION C.V. 65 510.00 $650.00 $48.50 53,152.50 $109.00 57,085.00 111 SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT LF -IN 7250 51.00 57,250.00 $0.40 $2,900.00 $2.00 $14,500.00 112 REMOVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT S.Y. 994 55.00 54,970.00 $23.50 523,359.00 35.00 54,970.00 113 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB L.F. 1065 $5.00 $5,325.00 57.50 07,987.50 5200 52.130.00 114 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETESIDEWALK/ DRIVEWAY APPROACH 5.5. 680 $5.00 $3,400.00 03450 $23,460.00 $7.00 $4,760.00 115 REMOVE FENCE L.F. 35 030.00 51,050.00 $14.00 3490.00 $16.00 0560.00 116 REMOVE AND RE -INSTALL VINYL FENCE L.F. 55 3100.00 05,500.00 365.00 03,575.00 $39.00 $2,145.00 117 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 6 IN. DEPTH 5.9. 120 510.00 51,200.00 $12.50 51,500.00 $27.00 03,240.00 118 CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE, 12 IN. DEPTH 5.0. 1.160 520.00 $23,200.00 $18.00 020,880.00 021.00 324,360.00 119 HMA CL. 1/2" PG 70-280.33 FT. DEPTH 5.9. 120 525.00 53,000.00 548.50 $5,820.00 550.00 $6,000.00 120 HMA CL. 1/2" PG 70-280.50 FT. DEPTH S.Y. 1540 330.00 346,200.00 03200 $49,280.00 533.00 $50,820.00 121 JOINT ADHESIVE L.F, 1205 51.00 51,205.00 51.50 51,807.50 52.00 52,410.00 122 208MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 51.00 $1.00 51.00 01.00 51.00 51.00 123 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 51.00 51.00 5100 51.00 $1.00 51.00 124 EROSION CONTROL L.S. 1 51,000.00 51,000.00 57,500.00 $7,500.00 59,086.00 59,086.00 125 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 2 51,000.00 52,000.00 5350.00 5700.00 5797.00 51,594.00 126 HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH 2 54,000.00 58,000.00 56,500.00 513,000.00 56,019.00 512,038.00 127 SERVICE CONNECTION 1-1/4 IN. DIA. EACH 1 55,000.00 55,000.00 53,200.00 $3,200.00 $845.00 5845.00 128 WATER SERVICE LINE 1 IN. DIA. L.F. 30 $30.00 5900.00 $50.00 01,500.00 5100.00 $3,000.00 129 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 936 $15.00 514,040.00 $28.75 026,910.00 $19.00 $17,784.00 130 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB L.F. 110 $15.00 51,650.00 032.50 53,575.00 046.00 $5,06000 131 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.V. 590 535.00 520,650.00 356.50 033,335.00 057.00 033,630.00 132 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL A EACH 3 52,000.00 56,000.00 01,500.00 04,500.00 $1,361.00 54,083.00 133 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE CUSTOM PARALLEL A EACH 3 $2,000.00 56,000.00 52,900.00 $8,700.00 $1,648.00 54,944.00 134 CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB L.F. 75 515.00 51,125.00 530.00 $2,250.00 $32.00 $2,400.00 135 CONCRETE LAWN EDGING L.F. 35 030.00 $1,050.00 530.00 51,050.00 $29.00 51,015.00 136 MASONRY MODIFICATIONS L.S. 1 $1,000.00 51,000.00 53,53000 53,500.00 3932.00 5932.00 137 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 1 51,000.00 51,000.00 5510.00 5510.00 3570.00 5570.00 138 ADJUST EXISTING UTILITY VAULT EACH 1 51,500.00 51,500.00 5750.3 575000 $679.00 5679.00 139 FURNISH AND INSTALL WATER VALVE BOX EACH 4 5500.00 $2,000.00 3520.00 52,080.00 5738.00 $2,952.00 140 TOPSOIL, TYPE A S.Y. 450 510.00 04,500.00 06.25 52,812.50 59.00 $4,050.00 141 SOD INSTALLATION 5.Y. 235 520.00 54,700.00 $3.00 5705.00 334.00 57,990.00 142 BARK MULCH S.Y. 215 015.00 53,22500 56.65 51,429.75 59.00 51,935.00 143 VINYL FENCE, 6 FT. L.F. 35 5100.00 53,500.00 555.00 32,275.00 346.00 51,610.00 144 LANDSCAPE LAWN EDGING LF 400 $10.00 54,000.00 59.00 $3,600.00 017.00 06,800.00 145 PLANT SELECTION - YEW EACH 8 540.00 $320.00 560.00 5480.00 $82.00 146 PLANT SELECTION - SUGAR MAPLE EACH 12 $150.00 51,800.00 5255.00 03,060.00 082.00 0656.00 $984.00 147 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EACH 3 3500.00 51,500.00 59,650.00 528,950.00 55,827.00 517,481.00 148 PERMANENT SIGNING L.S. 1 52,000.00 52,000.00 34,800.00 $4,800.00 51,216.00 51,210.00 149 REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING L.F. 4635 52.00 59,270.00 51.15 $5,330.25 $1.00 $4,635.00 150 PAINT LINE 52.00 31,000.00 50.60 $300.00 51.70 5867.00 151 PLASTIC WIDE LANE LINE L.F. 200 16.00 $ 40.00 17.00 $ 600.00 15.10 $ 604.00 152 PLASTIC STOP LINE L.F. 40563 516.00 $640. $17.00 $680.00 5 $15.10 $604.00 5 153 PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 8 5150.00 51,200.00 5150.00 51,200.00 5153.50 01,228.00 154 PLASTIC LINE -TYPES L.F. 4450 54.00 517,800.00 53.50 $15,575.00 52.70 512,015.00 155 ADA FEATURES SURVEYING LS. 1 52,000.00 32,000.00 52,000.00 52,000.00 01,165.00 01,165.00 Total Sched A - 5405,206.01 5492,183.00 5504,885.00 Sched e - Stormwater Work Item R Units Quantity Engineers Estimate Award Construction, Inc. National Native American Construction Inc. Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost 200 TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM L.S. 1 5500.00 3500.00 55,500.00 55,500.00 $1,320.00 201 SWALE EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL C.Y. 90 $50.00 $4,500.00 065.00 55,850.00 35900 31,320.00 $5,310.00 202 REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EACH 1 5500.00 $500.00 5500.00 5500.00 5654.00 203 ABANDON EXISTING ORYWELL EACH 2 5800.00 $1,600.00 51,100.00 52,200.00 5575.00 3654.00 51,150.00 204 DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 6 IN. DIA. L.F. 27 595.00 32,565.00 585.50 52,308.50 591.00 205 DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 101N. DIA. L.F. 206 $100.00 $20,600.00 583.50 517,201.00 $73.00 52,457.00 206 STORM DRAIN L.F. 36$2,916.00 530.00ENCASEMENT51,080.00 $108000 $90.0 0 53,240.00 $81.00 $15,038.00 207 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 EACH7 52,500.00 517,500.00 01.650.00 511,550.00 51,620.00 208 CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 EACH2 32,000.00 54,000.00 32,200.00 54,400.00 51,741.00 511,340.00 209 CURB INLET TYPE 2 EACH3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 52,121.00 53,482.00 210 CONNECTION TO EXISTING DRYWELL EACH1 51,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $987.00 $6,363.00 211 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRYWELL EACH 2 $1,00000 52,000.00 5325.00 5650.00 3552.00 5987.00 212 METAL GRATE TYPE 1 (BYPASS) EACH1 $500.3 5500.00 $480.00 $480.00 3190.00 31,104.00 $190.00 213 TYPE 4 FRAME AND SOLID COVER EACH 1 5500.00 5500.00 5640.00 5640.00 5349.00 5349.00 214 PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPE A WITH TYPE 4 GRATE EACH 3 53,000.00 59,000.00 55,650.00 516,950.00 53,689.00 215 PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPES WITH TYPE4 GRATE EACH1 $5,000,00 $5,000.00 57,90000 $7,900.00 54,927.00 $11,067.00 216 SEGMENTAL CONCRETE RETAINING WALL S.F. 139 550.00 66,950.00 $71.00 59,869.00 533.00 $4,927,00 217 CONCRETE SPLASH PAD S.V. 10 550.00 5500.00 5115.00 31.150.00 343.00 54,587.00 218 SWALE IRRIGATION SYSTEM EACH 1 510,000.00 510,000.00 59,650.00 59,650.00 05,827.00 $430.00 55,827.00 219 TOPSOIL TYPE 5.6. 660 510.3 56,600.00 $6.25 54,125.00 $9.00 220 SOD INSTALLATION S.V. 505 515.3 57,575.00 33.00 51,515.00 534.00 55,940.00 221 SEEDING, FERTILIZING AND MULCHING 5.Y. 130 515.3 $1,950.00 511.50 51,495.00 $14.00 517,170.00 51,820.00 222 PLANT SELECTION - PINE EACH 2 5150.3 0300.00 5285.00 5570.00 587.00 5174.00 223 PLANT SELECTION- BURNING BUSH EACH 10 040.3 0400.00 525.50 $255.00 558.00 224 PLANT SELECTION -PERIWINKLEEACH 84 540.3 $3,360.00 $18.00 51,512.3 $47.00 5580.00 $3,948.00 Total Sched B - 3113,480.00 $116,710.50 5109,130.00 TOTAL (All schedules) $518,686.00 $608,893.50 $614,015.00 Federal Debarment Checked ✓ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 1, 2018 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ® admin. report AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Opioid Epidemic Overview GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Department Director Approval: ['new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session BACKGROUND: At Council's request, Dr. Lutz of the Spokane Regional Health District, will give an overview the current opioid crisis. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF/OTHER CONTACT: Dr. Bob Lutz, Spokane Regional Health District Health Officer ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint; background information; ESHB 1427 opioid crisis Spokane Valley Study Session 05.01.18 Bob Lutz overview background 5Ws going forward facts 2016 63,632 drug overdoses 174 deaths/day = 1 death/8.3 minutes 42,249 opioid -related 115 deaths/day = 1 death/12.5 minutes 97 million people used opioid pain medications 2.1 million misused for first time 11.5 million (>age 12) misused — 40x increased risk for transition to heroin 170,000 of ^'950,000 heroin users first time 214 million prescriptions written (66.5/100 persons) Drugs Involved in U.S. Overdose Deaths, 2000 to 2016 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 1000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20)0 2007 2000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3016 $rnthetic Opicid5 clher than Methadone, 20,145 I1eroin, 15,446 Nslural and semi- synthetic 4piaids, 14,427 Cocaine, 10,510 hlelharnphetarning, 7.663 Methadone, 3.314 4 what pharmacy opioid use disorder treatment when past present Deaths per 100,000 population Q N 1 U1 3 Waves of the Rise in Opioid Overdose Deaths Synthetic opioids like fentanyl Heroin Natural and semi- synthetic opioids like oxycodone or hydrocodone Wave 1: Rise in Prescription Opioid Overdose Deaths N tf l 0 0 0 N 0 r Wave 2: Rise in Heroin Overdose Deaths 1 Wave 3: Rise in Synthetic Opioid Overdose Deaths SOURCE: National Vital Statistics System Mortality File. 7 who gender age race & ethnicity deaths of despair decline in life expectancy unintentional injury — 3rd leading cause of mortality highest rates 25-54 y/o (much younger than cvd & cancer) decrease in workforce (^'20% men, 25% women) association where national regional state local why risk factors social inequity strategies CDC Opioid prescription guidelines 2017 Washington State Opioid Response Plan Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 1427 Spokane opioid task force Policy Development and Enforcement Addiction Treatment Harm Reduction Community Education -Public Awareness -Coalition Action =Data & Evaluation Pain -Patient Support Provider Education Diversion Control Hospital Emergency Department Policies 14 Spokane Valley City Council May 01, 2018 Bob Lutz Subject — Opioid Crisis Background. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were an estimated 63,632 drug overdose (OD) deaths in the United States in 2016. This translated to 174 deaths per day (115 opioid - related), or one death every 8.3 minutes. Of this number of OD deaths, 42,249 (66.4%) were due to opioids — 19400 from synthetic opioids, 15500 from heroin and 14500 from natural/semisynthetic drugs. The death rate from synthetic opioids doubled between 2015 & 2016. These values represent more deaths than during the peak of the AIDS epidemic. "Unintentional injuries" are now the 3rd leading cause of mortality in the US, after heart disease and cancer. The CDC estimates the total "economic burden" of prescription opioid misuse alone in the United States is $78.5 billion a year, including the costs of healthcare, lost productivity, addiction treatment, and criminal justice involvement. To further expand upon these findings, 142,000 Americans died from alcohol- and drug-induced fatalities and suicide. These "despair deaths" increased by 11% between 2015 and 2016. There has been a 2 -year trend of decreasing life spans for Americans, the first time since the early 1960s — a male child born could now expect to live for 76.1 years, a decrease of 0.2 years, while the average American women's life expectancy remains 81.1 years. This has been largely affected by a 10% increase in death rates for people between the ages of 25-34 (in contrast - the death rate continues to decrease for people over the age of 65). These diseases of despair have been attributed to a worsening of the economy and social well-being. It is suggested these factors have significantly contributed to the drug epidemic, especially for White Americans with lower educational attainment and socioeconomic status. The mortality rate for Whites with no more than a high school degree was about 30% lower than the rate of Black Americans in 1999; in 2015, it was 30% higher, with both men and women equally affected. Overdose rates were greater in urban areas until 2004, at which time rates converged and have been trending higher in rural areas since 2006 (rural rate of 17.0 per 100,000 versus an urban rate of 16.2 per 100,000 in 2015). Between 1999 and 2015, opioid death rates in rural areas quadrupled among those ages 18-25 and tripled for women. The overall rate increased by 325%. This significant increase has been suggested to be related to fewer employment opportunities and greater isolation to services, such as healthcare. Another plausible explanation, recently suggested by research, is the inadequacy of treatment for individuals with Substance Use Disorder (SUD) and/or Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). It's estimated less than 10% of these individuals are currently receiving treatment, whether because of the lack of access and/or the desire to do so. It has also been reported almost three-quarters of individuals enrolled in needle exchange programs are interested in treatment. This would suggest a significant mismatch between the availability of treatment and those desiring to address their problem. 1 Deaths from opioids is not restricted to White America, however. Death rates for Black Americans more than doubled between 1999 and 2015 (although the increase was less than Whites) and rose by more than 500% among American Indian/Alaska Natives. Between 2015 and 2016 - Black Americans saw an increase of 58% for overall opioid overdose rates (synthetic opioids deaths increased 169%; heroin deaths increased 45%); an overall OD rate increase of 35% for Latinos (synthetic opioid -related deaths increased 183%); and Asians saw an increase of overall opioid deaths of 41% and an increase of 140% for synthetic opioids. Evolving Understanding of Addiction. The current understanding of OUD represents a significant change from the past. It is now recognized as a "chronic brain disease" affected by both genetics and the environment. Risk factors for opioid misuse or addiction include past or current substance abuse, untreated psychiatric disorders, younger age, and social or family environments that encourage misuse leading to intergenerational trauma. A greater number of adverse childhood experiences (ACES) is associated with an earlier age of opioid initiation, injection drug use, and lifetime overdose. Opioids bind to a receptor, mu (and others), that causes release of the neurotransmitter, dopamine, and the subsequent "reward/reinforcement" response. The reward system controls the body's ability to feel pleasure and motivates repetitive survival behaviors, such as eating. Overstimulation can lead to a euphoric state, or "high." This can become reinforcing, causing the repeated use of the medications. Structural changes occur, such as an increase in the number of mu receptors (other changes include neuronal circuits involved in learning and memory, motivation and drive, and inhibitory control). Functional changes also develop — opioids become necessary for normal function. Hypersensitization results in more opioids being needed by the reward pathway to reexperience the high and/or prevent craving from occurring in their absence. Continued use results in the brain adjusting to the excess dopamine by making less of it and/or reducing the ability of cells in the reward circuit to respond to it. The high is reduced as compared to when the drug is first taken - an effect known as tolerance — more drug is needed to achieve the same high. Previously enjoyed activities become less important as the addicted individual focuses on reexperiencing the feeling of their first high. Going Forward. Given the crisis, the challenges of addressing the problem are many. The CDC has developed prescription guidelines for providers. The 2017 Washington Legislature passed, and the Governor signed into law, Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 1427. It provides safe opioid prescribing rules, expands access and use of Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) data, and improves access to medication assisted treatment (MAT). Opioid prescribing rates have steadily decreased since their peak in 2010, but remain excessive. In some situations, individuals on chronic opioid treatment have found themselves cut off, leading to withdrawal and/or turning to heroin. Its cost has decreased while its potency has increased. In many parts of the country, it is laced with fentanyl or fentanyl analogs, significantly more potent opioids, which lead to increased rates of overdoses. MAT programs, using medications such as methadone and buprenorphine, are alternatives for those interested in controlling their addiction. Combined with behavioral therapy, a "whole person" approach has demonstrated clinical success. 2 Public health's "harm reduction" approach to opioid misuse and addiction is premised on the acknowledgement that drug use, both licit and illicit, is inevitable. It emphasizes the reduction of adverse outcomes and concurrently the measurement of health, social and economic outcomes, as opposed to the measurement of drug consumption. For those individuals using intravenous drugs (IVDUs) who may be neither ready for MAT and/or do not have access, needle exchange programs have been found to decrease rates of communicable diseases, such as Hepatitis C and HIV. Controversy surrounds supervised injection facilities, where IVDUs inject under medical supervision. Rates of infectious diseases and overdoses are significantly lessened. Providing individuals with Naloxone, an opioid -antagonist medication that can reverse the effects of an opioid overdose, complements the above. It is currently available over-the-counter in more than 40 states and Washington, D.C. Drug return/take-back opportunities importantly lead to lower rates of drug diversion — the transfer of a legally prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person for any illicit use — a significant contributor to opioid misuse, especially for youth. The reality, however, is opioid misuse is an outcome of a much broader problem — social inequity. The World Health Organization identifies social determinants of health as the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and play. Conversely, social determinants of health inequities are those conditions and the structural processes that distribute these factors unequally in society—differences in health status between groups that are socially produced, systematic in their distribution across the population and avoidable and unfair. The American situation is bested by only two countries — Portugal and Chile, in having a larger income -based gap in the health status of its citizens than thirty-two countries studied. While the number of Americans without health insurance decreased significantly with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, it occurred unequally. Insurance does not equate with access —the "timely use of personal health services to achieve the best health outcomes." Disenfranchised groups, such as those with mental illness, people living in poverty and the homeless, those living in rural areas, and ethnic groups, such as Native American/Alaskan Natives are disproportionately impacted. These structural problems will continue to have Americans experience poorer health outcomes than residents of other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, due in large part to their greater spending on social services — the major OECD countries spend an average of $1.70 on social services for each $1 on health services, while the US spends 56 cents per health dollar. Conversely, the US spent ^'18% of its GDP on healthcare ($10,348/person), while these countries averaged 9-12% of theirs. Until every American is granted the right to health along the continuum of their life, they will struggle to achieve their declared unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. 3 CRRTTFTCATTON OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1427 415th Leg:isial_ure 2017 Regular Session Passed by the Ilouse April 20, 2017 ['P,RTIF'ICAT'F; Yeas 88 Nays 8 Speaker of the House of Representatives I'a, reed by the Senate April 13, 2J1f Yeas 49 NAyn 0 President of the Senate I, E rr ird i)enn, Chief Clerk € F the House of Representatives of rho, State of Washington, do hereby nerti fy l.ryre al:lac:I'ed ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSI BILL 1427 as passed by House of KepresenLak.iveci and L.}ie Senate all the dates hereon ;et forth_ Approved FILED Governor of the State of Washington Chief Clerk Secretary of State State of Washington ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE HILL 1427 AS IMF,Nr)4,D BY THE SENATE Passed Legislature - 2017 Regular Session Stab of Washington 65th Legislature 2017 Regular Sessaon By House Health Care & Wellness (r)r_i,c i ria I M y sponsored by Reprc.. nL_aL.i.ves Cody, Ji nk i rt , Peterson, and Pallet} READ FIRST TIME 02/17/17. 1 AN ACT ReIal._ ng to opioid treatment programs; amending RCW 2 70.225.040, 71.24.560, 71.24.585, 71.24.590, /1.24,590, /1.24.595, 3 and /1 , 4.595; adding a crew section to chapter 18.22 RCW; adding a 4 new section to chapter 18.32 RCW; adding a new secJLion to chapter 5 18.57 PCW; adding a new : ec:1_ i nn to chapter 10.57A RCCA adding a new fi section to chapter 18.71 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 18./1A 7 RCW; adding a new section Lo c:h.ap!_e r 18./9 RCW; adding a new section 8 I_c� chapter 70.22S RCW; adding a new section to chapter 71.24 RCW; 9 creating a new section; and providing c_or, L. i neer I. effective dates . 10 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE QL' '1'1iE STA` F. QF WT\SHTNGTON. 13 NEW SECTION. Sea. 1. The legislature finds that in. 201S an 12 average of two Washington residents died per day in this state from 1:3 opioid overdose and that opioid overdose deaths have more L.harr 14 doubled between 2010 and 2015. 15 The legislature further finds that medically prescribed opi.orda 16 intended to treat pain have contributed L.:.) the opioid epidemic and 17 a I (._hough Wash i ng l_on has done much to address the prescribing and 18 tracking of opioid prescriptions, marc: rbc od:3 Lo be done to ensure 19 proper p msc.r i b i ng and use pi opioids and access to treatment. This 20 includes allowing local health officers to acco5.s Lhe pre cr.iption 21 monitoring program in order to provide patient follow-up and care p. 1 ESHB 1427 . PL 1 coordination, including directing care to opioid treatment programs 2 in the arca as appropriate to the patient following an overdose 3 event. 4 The legislature intends to streamline its already comprehensive 5 system of tracking and treating opioid abuse by: Reducing harriers to 6 the siting, of opioid t_reatmerrt programs; ensuring ease of access for prescribers, including those prescribers who provide services in 8 opioid treatment programs, to the prescription monitoring program; 9 allowing facilities and practitioners to use the information received 10 under the. prescription monitoring program For the purpose of 11 providing individual prescriber quality improvement feedback; and 12 requiring the boards and commissions of t.hc health care professions 13 with prescriptive authority to adopt rules establishing requirements 14 for prescribing opioid drugs with the goal of reducing the number of 15 people who inadvertently become addicted to opioids and, 16 consequently, reducing the burden on opioid treatment programs. 17 NEW S CTTON. See. 2. A new section is added to chapter 18.22 18 RCW to read as follows: 19 (1) By January 1, 2019, the hoard must adopt rules establishing 20 requirements for prescribing opioid drugs. The rules may contain 21 exemptions based oaf education, training, amount of opioids 22 prescribed, patient panel, and practice environment., 23 (2) in developing the rules, the board must consider the agency 24 mcdic:al c:iir-ec4:ors' group and centers for disease control guidelines, 25 and may consult with the department oi: health, I._he University of 26 Washington, cir,d I_Firs arge:l_ professional association of podiatric 27 physicians and sargeons in the state. 28 NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 18.32 29 RCW to read as follows: 30 (1) Ry January 1, 2019, the commission must adopt rules 31 establishing requirements for prescribing opioid drugs. The rules. may 32 contain exemptions based on education, training, amount of opioids 33 prescribed, patient panel, and prsc_ 1-_i c;e environment. 34 (2) Tri developing the rules, the commission must consider the 35 agency medical directors' group and centers for disease control 36 guidelines, and may cons ! f. wi l.h the department of health, the 37 University of Washington, and the largest professional association of 38 dentists in the state, p. 2 LS11L 1427 . PL 1 NEW SECTION. S. 4. A new section is added to chapter 18.57 2 RCW to read as follows: 3 (1.) By Jani.dc ry 1, 201 3, the board must adopt rules establishing 4 requirements for prescribing opioid drugs. The rules morh L.a ; fl 5 oxcinp-ti or b. bated ori education, training, amount of opioids 6 prescribed, patient panel, and practice env-ronmen4. 7 (2) In developing the rules, the boarc must consider the agency medical directors' group and centers for disease control guidelines, 9 and may consult with the department of hcalL-hr [Ale University of 10 Washington, and the largest professional association of osteopathic 11 physicians and surgeons in the state. 12 tEW _SECTION. Sec. 5. A new section -s added to chapter 18.57A 13 RCW to read as follows: 14 (1) By January 1, 2019, the board must adopt rules establishing 15 requirements for prescribing opioid drugs. The r: u 1 es may contain 16 exemptions based on. education, training, amount of opioids 17 prescribed, patient panel, and practice cnv,_ronincrit. 18 (2) Trr developing the rules, i;he hoarc must consider the agency 19 medical directors' group and centers for disease control guidelines, 20 and may consult with t.hc department of health, Lt:h, t:he University of 21 Washington, and the largest professional association of osteopathic 22 physician assistants in. the stale, 23 NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added. to chapter 38.'/1 24 RCW IL_o read f o I l ows : 25 (1) By January 1, 2019, the commission must adopt. rWes 26 cs I a b 1 i is i n cl rcq., i rc.}rrie n is hr prescribing opioid drugs. The rules may 27 contain exempticns based on education, training, amount of opioids 28 prescribed, patient panel, and practice env ronrnerhl._. 29 (2) In developing the rules, the commission must consider the 30 ardency medical directors' group and ccriLe rs for di8ea173e corp t_ro1 j1 {lu i de I i nes, and may consult with the department of health, the 32 University of Washington, and the largest professional association o.1 3=3 physl.cs_ians in Lhe staLe. 34 NEW SECTTON. Sec. 7 11 new sect=ion ;s added to chapter 18.71A 35 RCW to read as follows: 36 (1) By January 1, 2019, (Ale commission must adopt rules 37 establishing requirements for prescribing opioid drugs. Tho rules may p. 3 ESHB 1427,1:97, 1 contain exemptions based on educt. 1. Tori, training, amount of opioids 2 prescribed, patient panel, and practice environment. 3 (2) Tn developing the rules, the eorn-n i ss i c~'rr consider the 4 agency medical directors' group and centers for disease control 5 guidelines, and may consult wi_L-1s the dti'pa:rt.rgienL of Fiea.ILh, the 6 University of Washington, and the largest professional association of 7 physician assistants in the state. 8 NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. A new section is added to chapter 18.79 3 i CW to read as 1:1 I ows : 10 (1) By January 1, 2019, the commission must adopt rules 11 es l_a b I i .- Fw i ruj rc.qu i rcmc ri Ls For prescribing upioici drugs. T}7e rules may 12 contain. exemptions based on education, training, amount of opioids 13 prescribed, patient panel, and practice environment. 14 (2) In developing the rules, the commission must consider the 15 agency medical directors' group and centers for disease control 16 guidelines, and may c:onsu [ L with the department of health, the 17 University of Washington, and the largest professional associations 18 for advanced registered nurse p.rac-L-.i k..4OTic=ra and eer-Li f-i{3ci registered 19 nurse anesthetists in the state. 20 Sea. 9. RCW 70.225.040 and 2016 c 104 s 1 are each amended to 21 road as follows: 22 (1) Prescription information submitted to the department must. be 23 confidential, in compliance with chapter 70.02 RCW and federal health 24 care iriForniad.-ion privacy requirements and. lot subject 3_o disclosure, 25 except as provided in subsections (3) ((and)), (4), and (5) of this 26 3cct..iori, 27 (2) The department must maintain procedures to ensure that the 28 privacy and confidentiality of patients and patient information 29 collected, recorded, Lransrr;it_Led, and maintained is not disclosed to 30 persons except as in subsections (3) ((and)), (4), and (5) of this 331 section, 32 (3) The department may provide data in the prescription 33 monitoring program to the Loilowr.ng persons: 34 (a) Persons authorized to prescribe or dispense controlled 35 substances o.r-. legend drug,,, for the purpose or providing medical or 35 pharmaceutical care for their patients; 37 (b) An individual who requests the i.ndividual's own prescription 3fl monitoring information; p. 4 ESllii 1427..PL 1 (c) Health professional licensing, cer Li l ir,ationr or regulatory 2 agency or entity; (d) Appropriate law enforcement or proecriR_orial officials/ 4 including local, state, and federal officials and officials of 5 federally recognized tribes, who are engaged in a bona fide specific 6 investigation involving a designated person; 7 (e) Authorized practitioners of the department of social and 8 health services and the heal L -h care re aul_hority regarding medicaid 9 program// rec i pi srr_: s; 10 (f) The director or the director's designee within the health 11 care a'.:.th_,,..i L -y regarding medicaid c_ien=s for the purposes or cafe I i k_y 12 Lmprovement, patient safety, and c2::fr, coordination. The information 13 may not be used for contrac_L.i rich or %4r„ i ue-based_purchasing decisions; 14 (q) The director or director's designee within the department of 15 labor and industries regarding worker's' compensation claimants; 15 (((g))) (h) The director or the director's designee within the 1'1 department of corrections regarding of renders committed to the 18 depart.rrlent. of corrections; 19 (((h))) (i) Other entities under grar:d jury subpoena or court 20 order; 21 (((i))) (i) Personnel of the department for purposes ci 22 _{i) Assessing prescribing practices_ including controlled 23 substances reLai_ed to mortality and morbidity; 24 {ii) Providing quality improvement feedback to providers, 25 including comparison of their respective data to aggregate c}u L -s f o r 26 providers with the same type of license arrc:i same :specialty; and 2.7 (iii) Administration and enforcement of this chapter or chapter 28 fig . (1 RC:W; 2L (((j)-)) ikl Pcrsonru of e test site that meet the. standards 30 under RCW /[0.'225,(}10 pursuant to an agreement between the I..rsf, site 31 and a person identified in (a) of i.h_ s subsection. to provide. 32 assistance in determining which medications are being used by an 3.3 identified patient who is under the care of that person; 34 (((k))) (]_) A hes f f_h care facility or entity for the purpose of 15 providing medical or pharmaceutical care 1_o the patients of the 36 facility or entity, or Uor- quality improvement purposes if: 37 (i) The facility or entity is licen3od by Iekre department or_.._ s 38 operated by the federal government or a federally recognized. Indian 39 Uribe; and p. 5 H}HB 1.427.1DT, 1 (ii) The. facility or entity is a trading partner with the state's 2 health i nrormat..i rr exchange; ((nnid 3 (1)-)) imi A health care provider group of five or more provider.. 4 for purposes or providing medical or pharmaceutical care to the 5 patients of the provider group, or for quality improvement. purposes 6 if: 7 (i) All the providers in the provider group are licensed by the 0 department or the provider group is aperatcd by the federal 9 government or a federally recognized Indian tribe; and 10 (ii) The provider group is a trading partner with the r,_al_e' s 7.1 health i.n f orma t i :in e chi ngeL 12 (n) The local health officer of a local health jurisdiction For 13 the purposes of patient follow-up and care coordination following a 14 control_lel _substance overdose event. For the p=poses of this 15 subsection "local health officer" has the MC meaning as in RCW 16 70.05.010; and 17 (o) The coordinated care electronic tracking program developed in 18 response to section 213, chapter 7, Laws of 2012 2nd sp. Ness., 19 commonly referred to as the seven best practices in emergency 20 medicine, for the purposes or provi.dinq 21 (i) Prescription monitoring program diva to emergency department. 22 personnel when tae pat.ient recr i sl_er's ;n Lhe emergency department; and. 23 (ii} Notice to providers, appropriate care coordination staff, 24 and. prescribers listed in the patient's p»escri pt_ion monitoring 25 program record that the. patient has e perienced a controlled 26 substance overdose event. The department s=rall determine the content 27 and r ormat or 14)e notice in consultation with the Washington state 28 hospital association, Washington state medical association, and 29 Washington state health care ant.hority, and the notice may be :30 modified as necessary to reflect current needs and best practices. 31 (4) The departmorr-, sjhr.11, on at least a gua r'l._e r l v basis, and 32 L3ursnant_ to a scheric.le determined by the department, provide a 33 facility or entity identified under subsection (3)(l) or this section :34 car a provider grro,_p identified under subsection (3)(m) of this 35 section with facility or entity and individual prescriber i n F orma l_ i ort 36 if [Ale f ac i t i Ly, eri l_ i Ly, or provider group: 37 (a) Uses the information only for internal quality improvement 30 and individual prescriber quality Improvement feedback purposes and 39 does not use the information as the sole basis for any medical staff 40 sanction or adverse employment. action; and p. 6 ESHB 1427 . PL 1 (b) Provider to the department a standardized list of current 2 prescribers of the facility, entity, or provider group. The t, per; i C i c 3 facility, entity, or provider group intormaLion provided pursuant to 4 this subsection and the requirements unde� this subsection Tr]sL be 5 determined by the department. in cyOtrsult-a!_ir]n with the Washington 6 state hospital association, Washington state medical association, and 7 Washington state health care a u Lho r i Ly, and may be modified as 8 necessary to rel. I ec:t_ current needs and best practices . 9 (5)(a) The department may provide data to publ i [.. or private 10 entities l car si.at- i sl--:ica:i.., research, or educational purposes after 11 removing information that. could be used to identify individual 12 patients, dispensers, prescribers, and persons who received 13 prescriptions from dispensers. 14 (b)(i) The department may provide d i sv,ense.r a:1d pi esoriber data 15 and data that includes indirect patient identifiers to the Washington 16 state hospital association for use 5o1e1y in connection with its 1.7 coordinated quality improvement program maintained under RCW 18 43.70510 after entering into a data use agreeamcrrt- as spec i I i eco in 19 RCW 43.70.05 (8) with the. association. 20 (ii) For the purposes of this subsection, "indirect pat-ient. 21 identifiers" means data that_ may include; Hospital or provider 22 identifiers, a five -digit zip code, county, state, and country of 23 resident; dates that include month and year; age Ln years; and race 24 and ethnicity; but does not include the ,patient's first name; middle_ 25 name; last name; social security number; control or medical record 26 number; rip code plus Four r diqits; dates that include day, month, and 27 year; or admission and discharge date in combination. 28 -) -4\-- -ipet er or prac_I- i !.inner}) (6) Persons authorized in 2g subsections (3 ), (4 ), and (5) of this section to receive data in the 30 prescription monitoring program from the dei r: Lrme'nL, acting in good 31 r a, i t.ti ((4e1) , are immune from any civil, criminal, disciplinary, or 32 administrative liability that might ot.berwj se be incurred or imposed 33 rf r ((r-ni iic3ti ng, r oai v i rig, or using information from the program)) 34 acting under this chapter. 35 NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. A new section is added to chapLer 10.22.5 36 RCW to read as Eo1.low,i : 37 Beginning November 15, 2017, the department shall annually report. 38 to the governor and the appropriate corrirri i I--ees o.l the legislature on. 39 the number of facilities, entities, or provider groups identified i.n p- 7 ESHR 1.42.7 . FT, i RCW 70.225.040 ( 7) (1) and (m) that have integrated their federally 2 certified electronic health records with the prescription. noni L -or i ncl 3 program u1.. i 1 it i n4 the state hes LLh information exchange. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2!-) 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 _33 34 :35 36 37 38 Sae. 11. RCW 11.24,60 and 2016 sp.s. c 29 s 506 are each amended to read as follows: (1.) All a.Dpr-oved ( fop itil.-c nuh.7ti.Luti on) } opioid treatment programs that provide services to women who are pregnant are required to disseminate up-to-date and accurate health education information to all their pregnant clients concerning the possible addiction and health risks that their (( i-a-t-•substi tIon)) treatment_ may have ori their baby. 1 I ! pregnant_ clients must also be advised of the risks to both them and their baby associated with not remaining on the ((opiate subutitute)) opioid treatment program. The information must he provided to these clients both verbally and in writing. The health education information provided to the pregnant ;i i e_ nL'.a rn,ie 1- Lncii]de referral options for the ((;ddictcd)) substance -exposed baby. (2) opioid program asai„Lcd The department shall adopt rules that require &.w .1 ((op i a L(=) ) I.- rea l..rraen i. programs Lo educate ail pregnant women in their on the benefits and risks of ((matt ,adisne)) medication- Lo cdicaLion- Lo Lhe i r betore Lhey are provided these medications, as part of their ( (addiction)) treatment. The department shall meet. thc- .r-ecju.i rcmetrl:-s under thH l.-hisubsection i.on within the appropriations provided for ((opiate)) opioid treatment programs. The department, shall working develop and with treatment providers and medical ex po r L , disseminate the educational certified ((opiate)) opioid treatment programs. materials to all. Sec. 12. RCW 71.24.585 and 2016 sp.s. c 29 s 519 are each, amended to read as follows: The state of Washington declares that there is no fundamental right to ep.i te—s bstitutien)) medication -assisted opiod use disorder_ The state of Washington further while (( atee 3aa- it-u-ti€?n--drugs)) medications used in of ((opiotc c_# pc ndencyk ) substances, that they nevertheless have several legal, important, )usti mport anL- )uSF..i iiced uses :ind that one:, of their appropriate and legal uses in conjunction with other required therapeutic procedures, in treatment for declares that t. h e treatment opioid use disorder are addictive. and d is, the tr-eatmeTnt of persons ((oddi ct.c_d Lo or hni-.iruotcd to opioid)) with opioid use disorder. Tli.e state of Washington recognizes as evidence - p. 8 FSFfF. 1 427. PTS 1 based for the management of opioid use disorder the medicat.oris 2 approved by the federal rood and draa administration for the 3 treatment, ol opioid use disorder. ((Opiate uub:7Lil_rltion)) Medication - 4 assisted treatment should onty he used for participants. who are 5 deemed appr'opri f_e to need this level of intervention ((and should 6 not be the first treat. _ _ _ _ iatr_ ;:,ddicta)) . 7 Providers musl.- inform patients of all treatment options available. 8 The provider and. the patient sha f I consider alternative treaLmen1.. 9 option:,, like abstinence, when developing the treatment_ plan. If 10 ridical:ions are prescribed, follow up must be included in. the 11 treatment plan in order I."o work towards the goal of abstinence. 12 Because ( (opiate substitution dr•ug:a, Lrifc'`d it the treatment. of 13iw -s a 3chedufn IT)) 14 some such medications are controlled substances in chapter 59.50 RCW, 15 I..he state of Washington ((hag)) ma i ntains the legal obligation and 16 right to regulate the ((unc_ of opiate substitutions L_- o trncnt . The 17 Dt. L.c' of Washington declares ito authority to control and regulate 1R carefully,—in contlitation with counties and citieu, all clinical 19 U300 Of op i :r Lv. . uhititution drugs used in thc: treatment of opiate 20 ,addiction)) clinical uses or (."hese medications in the treatment_ of 21 opioid use disorder. 22 Further, the state declares Lhat the ((primary)) main goal of 23 opiate 4b,it.4 LuL. ion treatment is total abstinence From substance use 24 tor the individuals who participate in the treatment program, but 25 recognizes the additional goals of reduced morbidity, and restoration 26 of. Lhe ability to lead a productive and c,l t filling life. The state recognizes that a small percentage of persons who para." r.:•i pate in 28 ((op:i.aLc LiLihnL_.i tution)) opioid treatment programs require treatment. 29 for an extended period or Lime. ( (Opiate substitution)) °plaid 30 treatment programs shall provide a comprehensive transition program 31 to ei: 1riate substance user including ((opiate and --opiate pubot"i.l."uf"c_ 32 addictien) ) opioid use of program participants. 33 NEW t3ECT10N . Sec. 13. A new section is added to chapter 71.24 34 RCW to .read as follows: 35 The state declares that a person lawfully possessing or using 36 lawfully prescribed medication for the treatment of opioid uae 37 disorder must be treated the same in judicial and administrative 38 proceedings a a person lawfully possessing or using other lawfully 39 prescribed medications. p, 9 FIF, FB 1.127.PL 1 S. 14. RCW 71.24.590 and 200] c 242 8 2 are each amended to 2 read as follows: 3 (1) ((For parpouc3 of thiu oection, "orea" meanu Lhc ! county in 4 5 count -4e adlacent, or !tear to, ',he cot n—which the progrnm in 6 proposed to be located.)) 7 When making a decision on an application for certification 01 a 8 program, the department shall: 9 (a) Consult with the county legislative authorities in the arca 10 i ri which an applicani, proposes to locate a program and 11 legislative authority in any city in which an applicant proposes to 12 locate a program; 13 (h Certify only programs that will be sited in accordance with 14 the appropriate county or city landuse ordinances. CounLies and 1 h citLes may req,Jire conditional ((or npccial)) use permits with 16 reasonable conditions for the siting of rograms. Pursuant to RCW 1.7 36,701\.200, no I()eal comprehensive pdan or development regulation may 18 preclude the siting of essential public facilities; 19 (c) Not discriminate in its certification decision on the ba8is 20 of the corporate structure of the applicant, 21 (d) Consider the size of the populatien in need of treatment in 22 the area in which the program would be located and certify only 23 applicants whose programs meet the necessary treatment needs or that 24 population.; 25 (e) ((Demonstrate a need in the community for opiate—slaboti.tia-tiela 26 treatment and not certify more pr.ogrnm 31oLu thin juntiticd by the 27 need in that community. No program shall. exceed three hundred fifty 28 participants unleas spe-cifically uuthorized by thc county ri which 29 the program is c=tified; 30 .(fA)) Consider the availability of other certified opioid 31. treatment programs near the area in which the applicant proposes to 32 locate the program; 33 (((q))) ILL Cori6idr the tran8portation systems that would 34 provide service to the program and whether the systems will provide 35 reasonable opportunities to access the program for persons in need of 36 treatment; 37 (((h))) (g) Consider whether the appricant has, or fiats 3t1 demonstrated in the past, the capability to provide the appropriate 39 services to assist the persons who utilize the program in meting 40 goals established by the legislature((, including abstinence from p. 10 ESHB 1427.PL - - the city 1 opiates 2 imprQ and opine nahntitutcs., obtai Iny mental health t..r.-cu.Lrc_nt, end€ncc, and reducing ad in RCW ;i€)r;deviated with illcqo i lac of corifoll.cd :7uhstanees) ) 4 71.24.585. The department jha t i prioritize certification to 5 a ppi i cants who have demonstrated such ca ab i s i L y and are air i. c_ to 6 measure; their success in meeting such outcomes; 7 (((i))) (h„ _ hold (Cot lest)) one pub.] i c: hearing in the H ( (county)) community in which the faci. J. t.y is proposed to be located 9 ((and on hearing in. the arca in which the facility io proposed to be 10 located)). The hccir i req shall be held at a l: urne and location that are 11 most likely to permit the largest number of interested persons to 1.2 attend and presort testimony. The department shall nota ly all 13 appropriate media outlets of they time, date, and location of the 14 hearing at least three weeks in advance of the hearing. 1) (2) A county may impose a maximum cap city for a program of not 16 leas than three hundred fifty participants if nC.c c sary to address 17 specific local crxndiLions cited by the coun_-v. 18 (3) A program applying for certification from the department and 19 d program applying for a contract from a state agency that has been 20 denied the c e r t i . i.cation or contract shall he provided. with a written 21 notice specifying the rationale and reason for the denial. 22 (L-3-) )) (4 For the purpose of this chapter, ((opiate 23 tuba L i Lution)) opioid treatment program means: 4 (a) Visporr i nq ((a ate, sub:A i f:u-ion drug)) a medication 25 approved by the federal drug administration for the treatment of 26 ((opiate addict -on)) op i c id use disorder and dispensing mcdI c a I_ i ort 27 for the reversal of opioid overdo se; and 28 (h) Providing a comprehensive range of ni d i €:.al and rehabilitative 29 services. 30 Sec. 15. RCW /1.24.590 and 2001 c 7..42 e 2 are. each amended to 31 read as {oLlows: 32 (1) (( e-pir-pc rac:of this section, "areii" means the county in 33 which Jn applicant proposes to Locate a cert“i cd program and 34 c:f ti s --,a44 iccnt, or near to, the c pro] 35 proposed to be located.)) 36 When making a decision on an application for licensing or 37 certification or a program, the department shall: 38 (a) Consult with the county legislative authorities in tha arca 39 in which an applicant icant proposes to locate a program and the city p. 11 SHB 1427.PL 1 legislative authority in any city in which an applicant proposes ;_.o 2 locate a program; 3 (b) License or certify only programs that will be sited in 4 accordance with the appro ariaL.e county or c;i [..y land gine ordinances. 5 Counties and cities may require conditional ((or special)) use 6 permits with reasonable conditions for the siting e l programs. 7 Pursuant, to RCM 36-70A.200, no local comprehensive plan or 8 development regulation may preclude the siting of essential public 9 [acili1_i.es; 10 (c) Not discriminate in its licensing or certification decision 11 on Lhe basis or I._Fre corpor'a[_e iLruc:l'.ure of r_he applicant; 12 (d) Consider the size of the population in need of treatment in 1.3 the arca in which the program would bc_ located and license or certify 14 only applicants whose programs meet the necessary treatment needs of 15 that population; 16 (e) ( (flemon.Gt_rat_r_ a need in the community for opiate substitution 17 treatment and not certify more—pregram slotz than justif c - tle 1.8 nr:-cd in 00 I._ co,nmun i ;._y. No program ihall encccd three hundred fifty 19 participants unless specifically aathorizccl t-hc county--i __._ .i_eh 20 the program is certified, 21 (f))) Consider the availability of other licensed or certified 22 opioid treatment programs near the arca ire which I..hc: asap[ ic;anL 23 proposes to locate the program; 24 (((g))) (f) Consider the transportation. sysL-erni [.rias. would 25 provide service Lo Lhe program and whether the systems will provide 26 reasonable opportunities to access the program for person: iri need of 27 L.re aC.xsaoriL.; 28 {((h))) .SJ.) Consider whether the applicant has, or has 29 demonstrated in the past., L-he capability Lo provide Lhe appropriate :3n services Lo assist_ the persons who utilize the program in meeting 31 goals established by the legislature((, including ab;stincncc From 32 tip i a)°.deer cine op i _:Lo . uh.,1_:i [_;if_e:a, obtaining mental health treatment, 33 improving ocoromic inccp_:_ev.,—and—redu-ding adverse ccrriseiu.crac.c :34 oc i n I_r_d w i L!s i J I c q I. elle_ e1_ controlled substances)) in RCW 35 71.24.585. The department shall prioritize licensing or certification 36 Lo applicants who have demons L.raLed such pab :1 i Ly and are able to 37 measure their success in meeting such.autcomes; 38 { (-(-i))) Ili Hold ((at- l etas+)) one public hearing in the 39 ((county)) community in which the facility is proposed to be located 40 ((and-one thear-ing- in- twho— a:re-a in wfa.i ch Lhe i <-ae i. I i L.y i :] proposed to be p. 12 ESHB 1427.PL 1 loc.zt:d)). The hearing shall be held at a time and location that are 2 most likely to permit the largest number of interested persons to 3 attend and present testimony. The department shall notify all. 4 appropriate media outlets of the time, date, and location o r the 5 hearing at least three weeks in advance of the hearing. 6 (2) A county may impose a maximum capacity for a program a l 7 less than t=hree hundred fifty participants if necessary to address 8 specific local conditions cited by the county. 9 (3) 7t program applying for l icens i ri or c:er't_J tj.c.at ton. from the 10 department and a program applying for a contract from a state agency 11 that- has been, denied the J. i cens i rrg or cue r t. i f i c:,a I.- i an or contract shall 12 be provided with a written notice specifying the rationale and 13 reasons for the denial, 14 (((:3)) } (4) For the purpose of this chapter, ((cpiatc 15 substitution)) opioid treatment program means: 16 (a) Dispensing ((orn ap i LC_ ;arihn L i I.-ut I on drug)) a medication 17 approved by the federal drug administration for the treatment of 18 ( {t )) use disorder arra d i :Fenn Lnr medication 19 for the reversal cif opioid cs erdos ., and 20 (b) Providing a comprehensive range of medical and retrnb i I i I. -at. -i ve 23 services. 22 Sec. 16. RCW X1.24.595 and 2003 c 207 s 6 are each amended to 23 read as follows: 24 (1) The dc:p;;.rt.mcTnti., i T7 consultation w i &..I -i ((c>p i fr t -c. rib ;t-:Ltution) ) 25 or_:i;id treatment program service providers and counties and cities, 26 ;vhui..‘ establish statewide treatment st.arida-,d,i For certified ((optatc 27 :: ub:stitution)) opioid treatment programs. The department shall 28 enforce these treatment standards. The ..rcat.merrt standards shall 29 include, but not. be l i cit i I. -ed to, reasonable provisions for all 30 appropriate and necessary medical procedures, counseling 31 rcc u i rerrmcTrts, u.V iria t ysi s, and crLher- sii i Lab to tests as needed to 32 ensure compliance with this chapter. 33 (2) The department-, in consultation with ((opintc nuhntitution) ) 34 opioid treatment programs and counties, shall establish statewide 35 operating standards for certified ((vpj ate :ii bot. i LUL i an)) opioid 36 treatment programs. The department shall enforce these operating 37 standards. The operating standards shall include, but. not be 1 i rri i Led :iii #:o, reasonable provisions necessary to enable the department and 39 counties to monitor certified and licensed ((opiat : uk. u t:. i to t i orr)) p. 13 F„i-P, 14; 7.PT,. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1.5 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 opioid treatment programs for compliance daith this chapter and the treatment stand rds authorized by this chapter and to minimize the impact of the (opIate- substitution)) opioid treatment programs upon the business and residential located. (3) { (T,bc c.1c:purl-rtcnI. dot. tb1':.:h—cT`; [..cri :t for evaluating ;-hex compliance of opiate substitution treatment programs with th g-e-als and :3tund:zrds catabliohcd under this chapter. ALI u c€;nd i L..i €ori of certification, opiate substitution programn ,hall submit an annual repo/47- t7('.3 --the •department and county l '-s-lzt vc---ai th€ - it s -ire data as specified by the department ncce..rinri y .For outcome analysis.) ) The department shall analyze and evaluate the data submitted by each Lr'eatmerwl.- p rog frn and 1-, ke c.csr~r-& ::t.ive a':L. 1 o wherE nec.esaar'y to ensure compliance with the goals and standards enumerated under this chapter, Opioid treatment programs aro :pub icOL i.o the oversi.ght required for other substance use disorder treatment programs as described in this chapter. neighborhoods in which the program is Sec. 17. RCW 71.24.595 and 2003 c 207 s 6 are each ascended to read as lot tcos (1) The department, in consultation with ((opiate substitution)) opioid treaL.rareriL program service providers and counties and cities, shall establish statewide treatment standards for licensed or cerl..i (led ((opiake:--st t bort)) opioid treatment.- programs. The department shall enforce these treatment- standards. The treatment 25 standards shall include, but not be limiter to, reasonable provisions .6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 36 :37 38 Igor all approrwiate and necessary medic. - L procedures, counseling requirements, u-inalysis, and other suitable tests as needed to ensure compliance with this chapter. (2) The department, in consultation with ((opiate substitution)) opioid treatment program; and counties, shall establish statewide operating standards for certified ((opiate_ substitution)) opioid treatment programs. The department shall enforce these operating standards. The cperating standards shall include, but not be limited to, reasonable provisions necessary to enable the department and counties to rrcrri i Lor certified ( (iared) ) []r licensed { ({3piait substitution)) opioid treatment programs for compliance with. this chapter ind the L.r'eal..menI.- standards author i ;ed by this chapter and to minimize the impact of the ((opiate substitution)) opioid treatment J4 ESHE 1427 . PL 1 programs upon the business and residential, neighborhoods in which the 2 program is located. 3 (3) ( (The department shall establish criteria for evaluating the 4 compliance. c -+ p#t tte mib;il_.i.i:ul=ion treatment programs Frith the goals- and o;l -land standards established under this- .chapter. A3 :z condition of 6 cert.ificatirnr, upiate JubnLitution program.] shall submit an annual report to the department and county legislative author'ih_yr including 0 data as -specified by the dcpar..-L.mc_rs1._ r:e: cc: ic10 ry !or outcome anal- s3 ) ) 9 Thu department shall.l analyze and evaluate The data submitted by each 10 treatment program and talk co r -r uc Li ve ati7 L. i on where necessary to 11 ensure compliance with the goals and standards enumerated under. this 12 chapter._ Opioid treatment programs are uub-eu[. Lo the oversight 13 required for other substance use disorder treatment programs, as 1.4 de c:i i bed in thiE chapter. 15 NEW SECTTQN. Sec. 18. Sections 14 and 16 of this arch._ I..uke 16 effect only if neither Substitute Heauie Bi I I No. 1308 (including any 17 later. : mendmenLs orsubstitutes) nor Substitute Senate 13il] No. 5259 7 L# (including any later amendments or substitutes) is signed into law by 19 the governor by the effective date of this section. 20 NEW SI C'L'lON . Sec. 19. h_ i ons 15 and 17 of this act take 21 effect_ only it Substitute House Bill No. 1388 (including any later 22 amendments or substitutes) or SubstlLote Senate Bill No. 5259 23 (including any Tater amendments or substitutes) is signed into :Law by 24 the governor by the effective date of this secs I._ i earl . --- END -- p. 15 J SIp13 1427.8L CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 5/1/2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Mission Avenue Improvement Project, CIP 0123 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual Advanced Six -Year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • February 9, 2016 — Council approved Resolution 16-005 adopting the 2016 Amended TIP which also included this project. • July 26, 2016, Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Call for Projects, which included this project. • February 28, 2017 — Council passed Resolution 17-006, amending the 2017 TIP. • May 23, 2017: Council passed Resolution 17-011, adopting the 2018-2023 Six Year TIP, which included this project. • March 13, 2018: Council passed Resolution 18-002, amending the 2018-2023 TIP, which included this project BACKGROUND: The Mission Avenue Improvement project will reconstruct the existing Mission Avenue roadway from a two-lane gravel shouldered roadway to a two-lane roadway with bike lanes, curb and sidewalk on each side between Flora Rd and Barker Rd. A storm drain system will pipe storm water to grassy swales for treatment. The City applied for and received a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Surface Transportation Grant in 2009. The grant provided Federal matching funds up to 86.5% of the design (PE) and right-of-way (RW) costs, but included no construction (CN) funding. In the spring of 2014 and 2015, City staff held three public meetings on the project with the North Greenacres Community to gather project input and refine the design. The community requested the City revise the project design by narrowing the pavement section, including a traffic calming roundabout and preferred that storm water be piped to several large grassed swales for treatment instead of having linear swales between curb and sidewalk. In the spring of 2016, FHWA agreed to the scope revisions approved by the community and granted environmental (NEPA) approval. Staff hired a ROW Consultant to negotiate needed easements and RW for the storm water swales and the roundabout. The Central Valley School District announced plans to construct the Riverbend Elementary School on the southeast corner of the Mission Avenue and Long Road intersection. In July 2016, City Council directed staff to remove from consideration, a roundabout at the Long Road and Mission Avenue intersection. The City applied for and was awarded a Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) construction grant for $2,716,332 in 2016. Staff reached out to each adjacent landowner to work out the details for driveway reconnections and landscape patch backs. In 2017, City Staff held public meetings in January and November to get neighborhood input on the design. In February 2018 ROW Certification was granted by WSDOT and the project advertised on April 10, 2018. Bids will be opened on May 4, 2018. Construction is scheduled to start on June 18, 2018. The Contract requires substantial completion of the Mission Avenue between Flora Road and Arties Road by the end of August and substantial completion of the entire project by the end of October. A public meeting was held on April 18, 2018 to present the final design to the neighborhood. The public comments concerning the street and landscape plans were favorable. However, many meeting attendees living on Montgomery Avenue objected to the proposed temporary traffic detour route on Montgomery. The plans call for closing Mission Avenue between Flora Road and Barker Road during construction. After the neighborhood meeting, staff reconfigured the detour plan to be an eastbound only detour on Montgomery with a westbound only detour on Alki Road. Once the Sprague Preservation Project between Corbin and Barker Road is completed in Mid -August, the Mission Avenue detour will be routed down to Sprague Avenue. OPTIONS: Discussion only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total project budget is $4,333,334. The current total estimated cost falls within the current budget. However prices on recent bids for highway related construction are increasing and most available contractors have a full schedule this summer. STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, Engineering Manager Craig Aldworth, Project Manager ATTACHMENTS: Presentation Spokane ,Valle Gloria Mantz, PE, Engineering Manager Craig Aldworth, PE, Project Manager Project Vicinity May 1, 2018 RE Maorril CC 2 Project History May 1, 2018 August 2010 - Federal Grant for Design and ROW Spring 2016 — CVSD Announces Riverbend School Plans August 2016 — City Council Removes From Consideration, Roundabout at Lon g Rd City Applies for TIB Grant, Dec. 2016 - TIB Grant for Construction — Design Accelerates February 2018 — ROW Certification Obtained April 10, 2018 — TIB Authorizes Bid Advertisement Public Meetings 3 3/14, 5/14, 1/15, 8/16, 1/17, 11/17 and 4/18 Spokane .000 Valley Typical Road Section May 1, 2018 Vehicle Lanes — 11.5 Ft Bike Lanes — 5 Ft Sidewalks — 6 Ft Planter Strip — Up to 5 Ft Utility Strip — 2 Ft South, 1 Ft Buffer North 30' 2'(MIN) - - SIDEWALK 6' +am 1.5% MIN 111111® CURD Sc PLANTER STRIP (5.1010 VARIES) +0.17' A)MISSION RD SECTION NOT TO SCALE BIKE LANE 5' LANE 11-5' 2iMIN a U w LANE 11-5' 2% MIN 30' BIKE LANE 5' t +g�e is �q • .a.iertfriwr .wy t. J.ti• lca.1iI X•• • STA: 1 3+54.20 - 28+90.00 STA: 45+93.65 - 59+05.35 HMA CU56 & PLANTER STRIP OM DM VARIES) +0.17 Flip% 6115 *0.17 SIDEWALK 6' Road Section at Greenacres Church May 1, 2018 Centerline Shift of 3.5 ft Parking Stall — 9 ft Including Curb Utility Strip — 2.0 ft South, 3.0 ft Buffer North -EN 30' 3' CURB & BIKE LANE SIDEWALK 6.5' 5, (SEE NOTE 1) 1.5% kt1 +025' LANE 11.5' 2% MIN 0 p 'n wd- 4' +0.08' ")MISSION RD SECTION (--c 1 NOT TO SCALE 5 HMA 2% MIN C'J w LANE 11.5' 0.00' STA 42+02 87 - 44+72 99 BIKE LANE 5' 2% MIN 30' ROAD SIDE PARKING 6.0' CURB & SIDEWALK 6.5' -0.07' 1.5% MIN Left Hand Turn Lanes at Long Road May 1, 2018 Planter Strip 5.5 Ft West of Long No Planter Strip East of Long Utility Strip 2.0 Ft South No Buffer North ' MISSION RD EC11011 6 Sio!)kane .000 Valley Mission and Long Intersection May 1, 2018 RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) __II - I ti J SCHOOL ZONE FLASHING BEACON 1 E ' 1 1 Ll -J RRFB MtSSIQN AIIE ' =----- LJ "SCHOOL BEACON FURNISHED BY CVSD INSTALLED BY PROJECT. SCHOOL ZONE FLASHING BEACON RRFB �1\ a1 0i I 11 ' SCHOOL ZONE OJ FLASHING BEACON r rce 1 Crosswalk North and South Sides — White Bars West side — Red Concrete with White Outside Stripe Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons Flashes when Pedestrian Activates Radar Speed Limit Signs School Beacons East and West of Intersection Activated During School Hours 8 Stormwater Swales May 1, 2018 North Side Swale Locations East Side of Greenacres Road Both Sides of Arties Road South Side Swale Locations Riverbend Elementary School Opposite Corbin Road South East Corner of Arc Road Project Traffic Control May 1, 2018 MONTGOMERY AVE I g0 9 INDIANA AVE MISSION AVE 171w w BOONE AVE CATALDO AVE BROADWAY AVE ALKI AVE c7 Mid June to Mid August Aim— EASTBOUND — WESTBOUND immummommommio Br-DfRECTIONAL - VI/I///il.�Irld ROAD CLOSURE INDIANA AVE ..... ..f., .e...... MISSION AVE' U fes. 0 BOONE AVE l—CATALDO AVE —Li—BROADWAY AVE L- LLL LJ r2� 1 ALKI AVE SPRAGUE AVE I I Mid August to October Project Progress May 1, 2018 Riverbend Elementary School at SW corner Mission / Long Opening August 2018 Project Schedule Advertised April 13, 2018 Bid Opening May 4, 2018 Bid Award May 15, 2018 Start Construction June 18, 2018 Complete Flora to Arties August 31, 2018 Complete Arties to Barker End of October, 2018 10 Spokane .000 Valley Funding and Costs May 1, 2018 Current Funding Federal Grant TIB Grant City Funds Total Current Costs Design ROW Construction Total 11 $ 474,885 $ 2,716,332 $ 1,142,117 $ 4,333,334 $ 317,000 $ 232,000 $ 3,784,334 $ 4,333,334 Spokane .000 Valley 12 Questions May 1, 2018 Spokane .000 Valley MONTGOMERY AVE MONTGOMERY AVE INDIANA AVE 0 L MISSION AVE cc cc Q oz z w O c6 w o BOONE AVE J -----__-o 190 BROADWAY AVE I CATALDO AVE ALKI AVE 111111111111 n EASTBOUND — WESTBOUND BI-DIRECTIONAL ROAD CLOSURE m EASTBOUND Imo WESTBOUND BI-DIRECTIONAL �lll� ROAD CLOSURE INDIANA AVE 0 cc MISSION AVE ""' w oz z w 1 o w Li_o r BOONE AVE --- _-o 190 BROADWAY AVE CATALDO AVE 0 w cc P P SPRAGUE AVE INDIANA AVE 0 cc MISSION AVE FEEELT 0� (260 0 0 ( o zc:cL o w Bcc OONE AVE �}J--.moo m 1-90 BROADWAY AVE CATALDO AVE PPP�E/i SPR AGUE AVE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: May 1, 2018 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing ['information ® admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Community Member Recognition GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: During the December 18, 2012 Council meeting, then Mayor Towey announced his proposal to start a monthly community recognition program as part of our ten-year anniversary celebrations for the year 2013; he explained the proposed process of making nominations, voting, and of the recipient receiving a key to the City; there were no Council objections to proceed with the program and thus began the Community Recognition Program. Forms were sent out, and announcements made with noted deadlines for each month. Once the nomination forms were received they were distributed to members of Council for their input to the Mayor. Each month during one of the Council meetings, a recipient for the recognition and key was announced, including who made the nomination, along with some positive comments. At the January 16, 2018 Council meeting, Councilmember Peetz suggested this recognition be re -visited. She proposed we recognize individual members of the community for their commendable work, perhaps at least quarterly, and there was consensus to place this item on an upcoming Council agenda. BACKGROUND: Tonight's purpose is to provide an opportunity for Council discussion, including the frequency of these recognition opportunities (such as monthly or quarterly). Assuming Council concurs with a quarterly award, staff suggests awards be made during the second formal meeting of the months of March, June, September and December, with nomination forms turned in no later than the first day of those months. Additional consideration is, should this be awarded much the same as a committee appointment, i.e., with recommendation by the Mayor and concurrence by the Council, or have the sole decision made by the Mayor. Once Council agrees on the general process and frequency to move this forward, staff will finalize the nomination form, the announcement, and the process for and deadline to submit recommendations. OPTIONS: Council discretion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council discretion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Cost would be limited to a key and certificate and would likely be accommodated by Council's existing supply budget. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Previous information flyer and nomination form. SVaiI.EY' 2002.2033 Ten Year Anniversary Community Recognition Program As part of our Ten Year Anniversary celebrations in 2013, the City of Spokane Valley wants to recognize those individuals, organizations and businesses in Spokane Valley that have made our community a better place. Throughout the anniversary year, Mayor Tom Towey and members of the Spokane Valley City Council will honor individuals, organizations and businesses that have had positive impacts on our community. Those selected for recognition will be honored at a City Council meeting and presented with a Key to the City. We invite residents of Spokane Valley to submit nominations telling us how these individuals and entities have had positive impacts on our community Guidelines • Individual nominees must be residents of the city of Spokane Valley. • Business and organization nominees must be located within the city limits of Spokane Valley. • Nominees need not be well-known or have a high profile in the community. Nominations of individuals/businesses/ organizations whose quiet good works may not otherwise be widely recognized, but whose accomplishments and characteristics exemplify the best of our community are welcomed, • Nominees should have a reputation for honesty, integrity, and pride in our community. • City of Spokane Valley elected officials, staff members and their relatives are greatly appreciated for their efforts, but are not eligible for nomination. • Nominations will be accepted beginning January 1, 2013 through December 5, 2013 and honorees will be selected from all nominations received. • To make a nomination, submit a fully completed Community Recognition Nomination Form (see form on back), or complete a form online at www.spokanevalleyl0.com. (You may nominate more than one person/organization/ business, but you must submit a separate nomination form for each one.) Send completed nomination form to: Community Recognition Nominations Spokane Valley City Hall Attn: Chris Bainbridge 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 or email to: ebainbridge@spokanevalley.org spokanevalley.org or FAX to: 509-688-0194 Selection Honorees for the Community Recognition Program will be selected by the Spokane Valley City Council from among the nominations received. Honorees will be invited to join Mayor Tom Towey and the Spokane Valley City Councilmembers at a City Council meeting to be formally introduced to the community and to receive a certificate of recognition and a Key to the City. FOR MORE INFORMATION: Email cbainbridge@spokanevalley.org or call 509-720-5102. sV I Itw O J4O1I CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Spokane 2013 - Ten Year Anniversary �� Community Recognition Program y Nomination Form Directions for completing the nomination form: • PIease complete all questions on the nomination form below. Be sure to print clearly. • Nominations must be received by the fifth of the month to be considered for that month's selection process; however, all nominations will be kept on file for future consideration. • Once submitted, infomnation entered on this form becomes a public record, and is subject to public disclosure. Send completed nomination form to: Community Recognition Nominations Spokane Valley City Hall Attn: Chris Bainbridge 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206, Or email to: cbainbridge@spokanevalley.org, Or FAX to: 509-688-0194 Nomination submitted by: Your daytime phone number: Your address: City: ST: Zip: Your email address: NOMINEEE INFORMATION: Name of Nominee: Nominee's daytime phone number: Nominee's Address: Nominee's email address: How long has the nominee been a part of the Spokane Valley community? Please describe, in a few short sentences, how the nominee has made Spokane Valley a better place. DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of April 26, 2018; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Mav 8, 2018, Formal Meetin2 Format, 6:00 p.m. Proclamations: Lemonade Day, May 19, 2018; Lupus Awareness Month 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Mayoral Appointment: TPA Opening — Mayor Higgins 3. 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 4. Consolidated Rail Infrastructure & Safety Improvement Grant — Adam Jackson 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue Mav 11 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) (5 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] Mav 15, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: Bid Award Mission Ave Improv. Project- C.Aldworth. G.Mantz NON -ACTION ITEMS 2. Sullivan and Wellesley Intersection Improvement — Erica Amsden, Gloria Mantz 3. Proposed 2019-2024 Six -Year TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst 4. Duplex/Single Family Dwellings Definition — Doug Powell 5. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins [due Tue Mav 81 (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (25 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 75 mins] Mav 22, 2018, Formal Meetin2 Format, 6:00 p.m. Proclamation: Older Americans' Month 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 2. First Reading Ordinance Amending 2018 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 3. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 4. Admin Report: Spokane Valley Youth Voices — Councilmember Thompson 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 6. Info Item: Department Reports [due Tue May 151 (15 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] May 29, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Ordinance Amending 2018 Budget — Chelsie Taylor NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. ITS/SRTMC Discussion — John Hohman, Ray Wright, and Becky Spangle of WSDOT 3. Code Enforcement Update — Rachelle McFetridge; Nicole Montano 4. Economic Analysis of Tourism Related Venues & Events — Chelsie Taylor 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue May 221 (10 minutes) (30 minutes) (20 minutes) (45 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 110 mins] June 5, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2019-2024 TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst 2. Resolution 18- Adopting 2019-2024, Six -Year TIP — Colin Quinn -Hurst NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. Retail Recruitment Plan — Chaz Bates 4. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue May 29] (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 45 mins] Draft Advance Agenda 4/26/2018 12:48:10 PM Page 1 of 3 August 7, 2018 Meeting Cancelled — National Night Out June 12, 2018, Formal 6 pm Meeting cancelled June 12, 2018, Special Meeting, Budget Workshop (8:30 a.m. — 3:30 p.m.) June 19, 2018, Study Session, with action items 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 3. Info Only: Department Reports (normally due for the June 26 meeting) June 26, 2018, Formal 6:00 p.m. Meeting cancelled June 26-29, 2018: AWC Annual Conference, Yakima, WA July 3, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEM: 1. Motion Consideration: Bid Award: Argonne Rd Preser.Project, Broadway to Indiana — NON -ACTION ITEM: 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue June 5] [due Tue June 12 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] July 10, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins July 17, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Council Goals/Priorities for Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins July 24, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Quarterly Police Department Report — Chief Werner 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 4. Info Item: Department Reports July 31, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Motion Consideration: Council Goals/Priorities For Lodging Tax — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 14, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue June 261 G. Mantz (15 min) (5 minutes) [due MON July 3] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue July 10] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue July 17] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue July 24] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 7] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 4/26/2018 12:48:10 PM Page 2 of 3 August 21, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Estimated Revenues & Expenditures 2019 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 28, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 3. Info Item: Department Reports Sept 4, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Sept 11, 2018, Formal meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING #1: 2019 Revenues including Property Taxes 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes; motion to set Oct 9 budget hearing) 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue Aug 141 (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 211 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Aug 281 (5 minutes) [due Tue Sept 41 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) Sept 18, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 111 1. Admin Report: Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2019 Property Taxes — Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Outside Agencies Presentations (Economic Dev & Social Services combined) — Chelsie Taylor — 90 minutes 3. Advance Agenda - Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Sept 25, 2018, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. City Manager Presentation of 2019 Preliminary Budget — Mark Calhoun 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 4. Info Item: Department Reports Oct 2, 2018, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Budget Amendment, 2018 — Chelsie Taylor 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Animal Control Regulations (SVMC 7.30) BNSF 2nd Rail Camping in RVs City Hall Generator Donation Recognition Governance Manual Legislative Remote Testimony (Chambers) LTAC/Council Jt Mtg (Aug?) Naming City Facilities Protocol Neighborhood Restoration Program Police Dept. Quarterly Rpt (April, July, Oct, Jan) Police Precinct Lease Renewal (Nov '18) Sign Ordinance Street Addressing Standard St. Illumination (ownership, cost, location) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Tobacco 21 Resolution Utility Facilities in ROW [due Tue Sept 181 (5 minutes) (45 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Sept 25 (10 minutes) (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 4/26/2018 12:48:10 PM Page 3 of 3