36TH E 9900 PONDEROSA EST ADD
1'rojectStatus Acr,ve ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET 36'I'H E. 9900
As L3uilt Plans Received Buildings File B00121
Road I'lans Approved
Companion Files:
New Road Standards 5- I S-9S Mylar
Related Files:
Hearing: Building Dept: B00003019
'I'cchnical l2cviexv:
Preliminary Review: 06/27/2000 Type: Scheduled l=or Large f ot ❑ Blclg. Square Feet
Date Receivecl: 06/27/2000 No. Lots: Na. Acres:
Project Name POIVDEROSA ES1 Allll GRADIIVG PRIVATE RD
Site Address 36"I'H E. 9900, N 361-1-I, W. WOODRUI'F
Applicant Range-Township-Section- 44 - 25 - 32 PARCEL(S): (first 20)
Jeff Morse Conditions Mailed: 45322.9120
STORHAUGH ENGINEERING Flood 7one No
1322 N. Monroe Water Source
SPOKANL', WA 99201-
Sewer Source
Phone Schoal Dist
(509) 242-1000 Fire Dist 1
Phone Dist
f3uilding Ph: 477-3675 / Planning Ph: 477-2205 Contact, R0131N t3URRIS
Date Subniitted Description l.nitials
Eng Need Technically Complete Eng Need Harvard Rd Mitigation
Gng Need Drainage Plans Eng Need Trafiic Analysis Eng Need Other
Eng Agree Pay Fees Received Eng Final Plat Fees ComplEted
Copy to Accounting
Eng Agree Prioriry Fees Received Eng Prelim Plat Fees Completed
Notice to i'ublic / Notice to Public # I 3 4 6 Completed - or Needs to be signed
Design Deviation Dates (In-0ut)
bona quanties tur
drainage item calculated
Hearing Date Uecision App nen Cond Appld BCC
Appealed to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appld Cuurt
Appealed to Court Decision App Den Cond Appld
J / Stamped Mylars to Secretary (San(ly) _
/ / S[amped 208 Lot Plans to Secretary (Ssi7dy)
Project Number: 00003019 Inv: 1 Appl ieation Date: 04/24/2000 Page 1 of 2
THIS I-S N01, A PERMIT
Penalties «Till be assessed for commencing wor-k without a permit
Proiect Iii fornration:
-
- - - - - - - - - -
,
Perniit Use: GltAl)ING PEEtMI'T I+,OR PRIVATE ROAI) Conlact: GI..ENN G[2EUVIG
Address: 1322 \T MONROE ST
C- S- Z: SFOKANE, WA 99201
Setbacks: Front Left: Right: Rear: Phone: (509) 242-1001
Group I`Tame:
Site Itifornuition: Project Name: Y Y J~
I'lat Key: 999999 Name: RANGE District: F
Parcel Number: -54-322:9999' 0 Block: Lot:
SiteAdclress4: 9900 E 36TH AVE ONvner: Name: PONDE120SA YROPERTIES
SPOKANE, WA USA 00000 Address: P.O. BO1 119988
Location:: SPO SPOKANE, WA 99211
Zoning: SRR-5 Senu-Rural Residential-5
Water District: 999 UNICNONVN Hold: ❑
Area: 0 Sq Ft W idth: 0 I7epth: 0 Itight Of Way (ft): 0
iNbr of Bldgs: 0 Nbr oEDwellings: 0
Reviefv Infoririation: - - - _ - ~ - ` ^ . , ,
Acpartment 12eview .
~ BUILDII\TG Plan Review By.
Holci Reasons:
Pernut Conditions:
ENGINEER Approach / Drainage By:
Hold Reasons:
Pennit Conditions: (AA-t-~44z-yt p►v'EC,)c..t *~`C ~E 1'Z- C, S 8 l ~ -7 lt o ltto
BUTLDTNG Critical Area Revieiv By.
- . s . oo
Pernut Conditions:
, s
~ BY: DK -~-o l-e ea S zr
&"Zt~ ~ ~
Hold Reasons: V 1 Q.~lIU I A. ~
~JF ~
Pernut Conditions: ~
~ler 4m ~~obI .
Perin tts . ~ . . _ . ~.I_ , . _ . . t~►Qu~~1~e~ ~ ~T'C'6
~ Y~:.n-1'L.~ic..3ra+... . ~,x~ ,~,tsa~~: ~ . ,~6s,i~.~... •-.iz..-.~" - , s.A~- ~ ~ _ . .
I
AA~
~ r-a Cr+(.~. ~ r-
+ l
. M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 24, 2000
TO: Jeff Forry, Division of Building and Code Enforcement
FROM: Brenda Sims and Virginia Darrell, P.E.; Stormwater Utility
RE: 00003019 - MDNS for Ponderosa Estates (Ponderosa Properties)
CC: WA Sta.te Department of Ecology, Bill Hemmings, File
We support the mitigating measures offered by the applicant for this project with the following
additional comments:
In conjunction with the water line installation:
As mentioned in our previous comments, clay soils, standing water, rock outcrops, and in some
locations, excessively soggy soils were observed on the site. The applicant's engineer should
take high groundwater into account in road design and construction as well as utility trench
design and construction. Groundwater should not be re-directed by the utility trench. The
applicant should provide information on how the trench will be constructed to avoid re-directing
groundwater from the site. The Division of Engineering should review this submittal.
In conjunction with the issuance of a grading permit:
✓ The final wetland report, including delineation, should be provided to the Washington State
Department of Ecology as well as the Spokane County Stormwater Utility for review prior to
issuance of a grading permit.
✓ Drainage easements for the natural drainageways must be sized according to the
requirements in the Guidelines for Stormwater Management (GSM), as amended. The
easements should be recorded on the plat and include maintenance requirements prior to
the issuance of a grading permit.
✓ The applicant has agreed to submit revised culvert sizing and details for review and
approval. Because of the significant drainage issues in this area, the Division of
Engineering should review this submittal.
In conjunction with the issuance of building permits:
✓ The applicant has agreed to submit a Wildlife Management Plan for all parcels being served
by the proposed road. The proposed road extends northward to connect to what appears to
be another private road. The plan should identify future road connections and take into
account traffic and growth related issues as well as measures to mitigate the impacts.
✓ Title notices should be filed on those properties affected by the wetlands prior to the
issuance of any building permits or if any of the parcels are sold, whichever occurs sooner.
The title notice should identify the location of the wetland and required buffer, as well as
any maintenance requirements for the wetland and requirements as presented in the
Wildlife Habitat Plan.
✓ As this property is further developed, the applicant should be aware of requirements in the
GSM that include provisions for the protection of natural drainage ways. There are
significant natural drainage ways located on this project site. As this property is further
developed, hydrologic and hydrogeologic impacts to the neighboring wetlands will have to
be analyzed. The clay soils and standing water indicate that infiltration may not work for
C.1W I N D 0 W S1T E M P100003019a, doc
Memo: Jeff Forry • Page 2
Re: 00003019 07/10/2000
stormwater disposal for this as a developed site. It also indicates that this may be an area
where basements may be prohibited.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
~
. .
. .Project Transmittal RECEIV
ED
Division of Building and Code .Enforcement JUN 2
l 2000
Tt•ansmittal Date: T1teShcly, Jtttte 27, ZOOO _ SPOKANE COUNTY E[yGINEER
Site Address: 9900 E 36TH AVE Project Number: 00003019
Parcel IVumber: 45322.9120 Zoning: SRR-5 Fire District: FD 01
Permit Use: GRADING PERMIT FOR PRIVATE ROAD
Applicanf: STORHAUG ENGINEERING Owner: PONDEROSA PROPERTIES
1322 N MONROE ST P.O. BOX 119988
SPOKANE, WA 99201 SPOKANE, WA 99211
(509) 242-1001
Contact: GLENN GREDVIG/JEFF MORSE Arch / Engineer:
1322 N MONROE ST
SPOKANE, WA 99201
(509) 242-1001
Contractor: MURPHY BROTHERS, INC
PO BOX 2685
SPOKANE, WA 99220
(509) 535-1591
f j
Building Landuse Engineer Utilities Health Fire Dist Assessor ~
~
x x x °
04~
Comments: Coordinator RBurris
b• `1 q •
• t ( ~
W
~ i _ ~t~~~ 1{i, };'~~i:.) n ~ N ~ ~ r':'~•,~,
' '.1~ ;1 `,.r '9 .~j p~ ~ ~ ~,i
c~i ,•'A
~~f~ ~ •~G ~y • a
y,~` J,. ~x ys ~ r , ` 11 ~a • '1 i ~i
~Lti i' . / + ~ ~ ' ' ~ •,~l t y.. l
~;~,a a~f S\ ~ S ` ' ,t:~~~ --~y~_vl%oswl__.~i
\i ! li "f O - r. •c • - _ -I .
A 14
~ l
- ti ~J_ ~ l~ n I
y ~ u • ,
• a . „ ~ ~ ~
• ~ ~ te
y i
11 ~
_ • o a ~z
' •Y Y u
qCa I
i
y ~ ja ~ p V~ a
'l ► , ~ b, • /
1 r ze
N a~
• ~ ~~1,~ ~~9 / 1 ~ ~f
4. ]•o e / ~ :l~y-~'~ a~• ►N r ~ti ~s
4J •Z/' ~ 1 V~ ~ ~S, I IN
. 5~ ~'~I ~l~)1 ~_i~ 1
/G~j \ a, ' ~9 E} ~ `a 1 ; •1-~ IT ~
X. ♦ ~ ~ N. ~ b---°~i ~t - - --i-.
N•O' JI~E 4;
\No.
. ~
<
i~
; I
Parcel: 45321.9112
Owner: ANCEL, RAYMOND L& COLLEEN
CoOwner:
Owner Address
9921 E 36TH AVE SPOKANE WA 99206-9555 USA ` 6' i~;~-~`-'a-' ~
PIE
Site Address
M-gm
9921 E 36TH AVE SPOKANE
A
Legal Description .
5h
32•25-44; TR 2 OF SP 94-945 AUD # 9411162062 8K 11 PG 57; LYG WlIN Ntl \
~
~
.
f $
co \
. ~1 ~ ~ •
~
Cimmaro
,
i i
n Ira
1
imm
I~
Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended
for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency.
Parcel: 45321,9113
Owner: PONDEROSA PROPERTIES LLC
CoOwner:
y JL..U.3MlLw-L-UtiL1-L, , , _
Owner Address
PO BOX 11988 SPOKANE WA 99211-1988 ~
Site Address
3310 S RIDGEVIEW DR SPOKANE
Legal Description ~ •',R f ^
32-25-44; PTN OF TR 3 OF SP 94-945 AUD # 9411160262
BK 11 PG 57 LYG WlIN NW114 OF NE114 OF SO SEC n (
. r
u ~
~
~
, ~Qa
c~ ~ I
~
'~?mar
,
1 ~
_
on r b
~ - camm
I A ~
Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended
for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency.
sco~
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
. ~
(WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230 (3) Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS)
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGIVIFICANCE "MDNS"
PROJECT NUMBER: 00003019
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Grading for a private road to serve eight parcels (future home sites) in
conjunction with the installation of a ten (10) inch water main.
PROPONENT: Ponderosa Properties
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDKESS, IF ANY: 36`h Avenue and Woodruff
Road, Section 32 Twn 25 Range 44
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact
on the environment if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not
required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on
request.
There is no comment period for this NIDNS; pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 (1).
~ This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Co ments regarding this NIDNS must be
submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., ~ LU'Z 0, c~- , 20Q~ , if they are
intended to alter the MDNS. ~
MITIGATING MEASURES:
In conjunction with ten (10) inch a►ater line installation:
1) Provide erosion and sediment control for wetland area, at the stream crossings and prevent tracking
onto county right of way during construction.
2) Should the grading permit not be obtained and / or work not commenced within 60 days, the type
5 stream(s) and drainage courses shall be restored to pre-construction conditions as verified by the
civil engineer of record in consultation with a wetlands biologist.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the construction of the private road:
1) The final wetlands report must be submitted, including associated maps delineating wetlands.
2) Provide recorded drainage easements for stormwater, including references to maintenance.
3) Submit for review and approval revised culvert sizing and installation details.
Prior to issuance of building permits on parcels served by the private road:
1) Prepare, receive approval of and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Wildlife Habitat
Management Plan for all parcels being served by the private road.
2) Submit as-built road plans certified by the civil engineer of record.
3) Record title notices on the titles for those properties effected by the identified wetland indicating
the wetland location and required buffer.
MSTR; A9DNS
REV: 12/90
MDNS; Project Number: 00003019 . Page 2
I acknowledge the above mitigating measures to be modifications a.nd adjustments to the above described
proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures in the future.
Date: 6/9/00 Printed/Typed Name: ARLF-N B. UOONEY 2 -]R •
Signature: ~ - I
:f:,~~:F ~.L~-~:t . ~ -~=i.:~~~~ •°r:5 : ~ .F~ . K~-:~-. . ~ ~r-~ , . . °rti ~-'r~:'r ~ . :r~. . °r:r=r~:fsf Yr:'r
Responsible Official: JIM MANSON by Jeff Forry
Position/Title: Senior Building Technician Phone: (509) 477-3675
Address: West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260
,
Date Issued: ~DZMSignature: 4-11
T T K K T K:C K if :r ~ K KC T~(' T T; Y 1 h h 1~ 1 h 1 h~ n K i~ T ht n ~t K:C 1 ^~'i K 1t 1~ 1 ~C ^~i ~ 1L ~t 1t 1 ~~~C i`
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the Spokane County
Division of Building & Code Enforcement, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline
is fourteen (14) calendar days after the signing of the Decision. This appeal must be written and make
specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building & Code Enforcement for assistance with the
specifics of a SEPA appeal.
A copy of the MDNS mailing list is attached.
MSTR; MDNS
RLV: 12/90
~
~ Notlce of Appllcatlon
The Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement (Review Authority) has published this Notice of
Application to provide the opportunity to comment on the described proposal. The comment period is 14 calendar days
from the date issued during which written comments may be submitted to the Review Authority. The file may be
examined between the hours of 3:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday tlvough Friday (except holidays) at the Division of
Building and Code Enforcement offices in the Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, Washington. ,
Questions may be directed ro the Project Coordinator listed below. ~o l~
~l
PROJECT 00003019
OWNER: PONDEROSA PROPERTIES PHONE: (509) 000-0000
CONTACT: GLENN GREDVIG/JEFF MORSE PHONE: (509) 242-1000
APPLICATION DATE: 24-Apr-00 DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: 4/25/2000
SITE ADDRESS: 9900 E 36TH AVE
GENERAL LOCATION: Section 32 Twn 25 Range 44
PARCEL NUMBER: 45322.9120
PROJECT: GR.ADING PERMIT FOR PRNATE ROAD
ZONING: SRR-5
OTHER PERMITS: NA
FURTHER STUDIES: NA -
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Review of existing development regulations, proposal zoning, and•typical
recommended conditions and/or mitigating measures indicate the likely State Environmental Policy Act threshold
deternunation will be a Deterrnination of Nonsignicance.
WRITTEN COMMENTS: Written comments may be submitted regarding the proposal and the enviromental review
process. f111 comments received within 14 calendar days of the date issued below will be considered prior to making a
decision on this application. Pursuant to WAC-197-11-355 this may be the only comment period for this project.
DEVELOPMENT REGUI.ATIONS: Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, Spokane
County Standards for Roads and Sewer Construcrion, Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and the
regulations of the Spokane Regional Health District aze the prunary regulations applicable to site development.
CONSISTANCY: In consideration of the above referenced development regularions and typical conditions and/or
mitigating measures, the proposal is found to be consistent with the "type of land use", " level of development", "
infrastructure", and "character of development".
ACTION: This decision is not subject to a future public hearing.
Jeff Forry SEPA Coordinator
REVIEW ALTTHORITY: RBurris Project Coordinator
James L. ylanson, Director
Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement
1026 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260-0050 ~
~
(509)477-3675 U;A.
Date Issued: Signature:
~
The comment period closes at 4: 00 p.m. on
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHECKLIST
SPOKANE ErJVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230'1-
.
SEPA ENvIRaNMnrTAL CHIEcKLlST
WAC 197- 1T -9GO Spokane Environmentai Ordinance 5ectinn 1 1.1 0.23D(1) -
PURPOSE oF CHECfCLIST
-ne State Enviranmental Policy A.ct {SEPA}, chapter 43.21C RCW, requires al1 govemmerttal agencies ta
consider ihe envirommental imgacts of a proposal before making decisions. An enviranmental iampact
statement (EIS) must be pregared for all praposals with prabable significant advetse irnpact's on the quality
af the environment. The purpose of #his checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency
identify irripact &rom yaur proposal (and to reduce ar avoid impacts from the proposal, if it ca.n be done) and
to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
INS 7'.~[lCTfUNS FOR APPLfCANTS
This environmental checklist asks yau to descnbe svme baKSic information about yaur proposal.
Government.al agencies use this checkla'st ta determine whether the environmental impa,cts ar your proposal are signif cant, requiring preparation of am EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give -the best description yau can. -
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you
shou1d be able to answer the questions from your owrt abservations or praject Rlans wi#haut the need to hire
experts. If you really do not kno-w the answer, or if a question does not apply ta your proposal, write "do nn#
know" orr "dves not apply". Cornplete annsv+vers to the questinns naw ma~ avaid unnecessary delays later.
Some questinns ask ahau# governmen-tal reguIa#ions, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designa#ians.
Answer these question if you can. Yf you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questaons apply to all parts af your prapasal, even ifyo'u plan to do them over aperiod oftime
or on different parcels of Iand. Attach any additional information that witl help describe your proposal or i#s
enviranmental effects. 'I`he agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers
or provide ad'ditional inforrnation reasonabiy related #o determining if there may be significant adverse
irnpact,
USE OF CN►ECJYLIS'T FUR }YO}V-PRD.IEC7' PROPUSAdS.
Complete this checklrst for non-graject grcaposals, even though qvestions may be answered "does not
apply " CN ADT}ITFOaV, corl7plete the SLIPPLEMElVTAL 5HEET F[)R AIQN-PROIECT t4G'TIoN5 (part D).
For non-project actioras, the references in the checklist ta the words 'Tprojec#,,, "aPPlicant," and "property or
5lte" S}1QUld bE read aS "pI'flpOS~~," "pY`4POSef," Sild "aff'ected geagraphic area," respectiaely.
,
Spok,ane Envirvnmenxal Ordirtance Checklist Page 2
of 21
a
o DC) C)~1~1 -
A* BACKGRDUrrD FILEJPROJEcTNo. CE-760-93. 94f494. ?-95
1. Name af prvposed projeet, if apglicabIe:
Pandersosa Estates. ~
2. Narne af applicant: Ponderosa ProDerties, LLC
3. Address and phone nurnber af applicant and cantact person:
clo Storhauiz Enaineerin2, attn: Jerrv Staffiaua, 1322 North Monroe Stree#. Svokane. WashinLrton 99201
4. Date checklist prepared:
Anril 21, 2000
5. Agency requesting checklist.
SDokane Countv Permit Ccntet C,, k
6. Propcrsed timing or schedule (including phasing, af applicable):
Canstruction to bep-in April 23, 2000 and be cornpfeted bv June 15. 2000.
5pokane Environmenral Ord'snance Cheeklisr Page 3of 21
A. BACKGROUND (continued):
7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
No.
b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes, ownership of approximately 45 acres to the east of the 7 recorded Certificates of ExemQtion.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to
this proposal.
Vu2 w. AWA¢A muS ) `LIi~
EneineerinQ plans for construction of the B-28 access road and the 10" water main have been Qrepared bv rep-istered
nrofessional eneineer. Review and acceptance of plans comnleted bv water district #3 and fire district # l.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Apnroach vermit tiranted bv Spokane Countv on 4/06/2000. The orieinal C.E. aoprovals were Qranted in 1993
(CE-760-93). There were also C.E. approvals aranted in December of 1994 (CE-946-94) and Januarv of 1995
(CE-7-95). Water District #3 and Fire District #l aQUrovals were both Qiven on March 22, 2000.
M` lS~~t~~~ ZO ~bc~w~~^'1C ~ t Ut ston~S s~' L c►'^'
C. ~ = C~ fL"t t F % c- 'L~C p
W ti Rr- 7 YZ fMP -1 'r CL-a wX Sl&d OL U i ScdA/ C, Iaw S~ _ V
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 4 of 21
A. ~~~KGROUND (C0ntff411Bd)-
11. Give a brief, corriplete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the prvject and
site. There are -several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your prvpasal.
Yau do not need ta repeat those answers on this page.
Creation of seven oarcels was comaIeted in 1995 bv the Certificate pfExCrravtiarl Dracess. Yhis orocess
reciuires the construction ofan access roadwav constructed to-B,-2-8 standards as estabiished bv Snokane
Cauntv. This orviec# is the canstruction of this access roadwav. as well as the 10" water main required to
meet the needs of the water di strict. AV?P-a w -75rb ~ ~ Aa-o s- c~v
12. ,Location of the proposal. Crive suf~icient infarrnatian For a person to u,nderstand the precise lacatian af yaur
proposed project, including astreet address, ifany, and section, township and range, ifknawn. If a groposaI would
occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Pravide alegal descriptivn, site prtan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonabty available. Whiie you shoultl submit any pians required by the
agerac}+, You are not required to duglicate maps vr detailed plans submitted with any perrn,it applicatian related to this
checklist.
Ponderosa Lane is in the hiortheast ciuarter 0f 32-2544.
13. Does the proposed action iie within the Aqraifer Sensitive Area (1~SA)? T a? The
Priority,Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane Count}r's A-SA Qverlay zane Atlas for boundaries)-
ASA - Yes
_ S
PSSA - No
Citv of Sr)okane - No
Spokane EnVizc)nmental Orciinance Checklisr Page 5 of 21
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMEIYTAL ELEMENTS:
l. EARTH
a. Generai description of the site (circle one): flat, rollin hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other:
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
10.5
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
Muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime
farmland.
Sandv Loam and basalt rock outcrouuinES.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe.
No.
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Approximatelv 780 cubic vards of aravel fill to be imvorted for sub-base under asnhalt
Roadwav. Drainaee ditch construction involves approximatelv 300 cubic vards of material
Excavation. No imvortation of soils onto site will occur for anvthinE other than the construction
of the B-28 access road. •
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Best manaQement practices will be utilized durinQ construction. All disturbed areas will
be hvdroseeded with drvland Qrass mixture. Erosion control plans have been prepared as
part of this aroiect. Construction will complv with SCAPA.
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 6 of 21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
Construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Less than 3 percent.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Hvdroseediniz of disturbed surface areas.
2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, ~
odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known.
One to three diesel driven tvpes of construction equipment will be overated durine proiect
timeframe.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe. .
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Compliance with local, state and federal reQulations rep-ardinp- emission impacts.
i
c
;
Spokane Environsnental Ordinance Checklist Page 7 of 21
t
B. ENYIRON11+1ENTAL E,LEiV[ENTS (Continaed): '
a
3. WA TER
a. Surface:
I) Is ther+e any surface water bady on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-rvund and seasonal strearris, saltwater, lalces, ponds, wetlands)? If ycs, describe
tJ'Pe and provide names. If appropr-iate, s#ate what stream or river it flows into.
Seasonal concentratians of stormwater runoff exist near Woodruff and alsu tvDe 5 strearn at
~~~~bim `AV~'F`
mid-Doin# of roadwav alianment. T-!,Cmv4 ~~~V It
US WCc.A,io o Kl
2) Wilr the pt~oject require any work vver, in, or adjacent #o (within 200 feet) the k1zo,;c.~"-r
described waters? If yes, please describe and atEach availa6le pIans. sr.-C, -r- gt~~~~yz~~
Yes - See attaehed construction plans
F
3} Estirraate the amount affIl a,nd dredge material that would be placed in ar removed From surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indieate the source of Fill maten'al.
Na fill or drefte material wou]d be ❑laced in the seasonal stream area. Raadvvav constnuction
cTOSSes the seasonal stream areas. See attached consttuction olans.
-
4) Will the proposal require surface wat~r withdrawals orr diversivns? Cive a general ,Description, purpose, and approximate quantities if knawn. ]vo.
5) Does the proposai lie within a 100-year floodplairr? Ifso, note location on the site
p1an. _
No.
~
~
Spokane Environmeratal Ordinance Checklist Page S of 21
B. ENVIRONNIENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, Describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ;
No. K
~
b. Ground:
l) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. ;
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the gound from septic tanks or '
other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, ~
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of persons the
system(s) are expected to serve. ,
i
N/A. '
~
;
3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste,
installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including
systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains).
Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the ,
system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which
may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting ~
activities). •
N/A.
f
~
c
i
~
~
Spokanc Environmcntal Ordinance Checklist Page 9 of 21
B. ENVIRONMEfYTAL ELEIVJEN"I"S (Contieued):
4) VViil any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroIeum fuels) be stared in abQVe-
ground or unclerground storage tanks? If so, wbat types and quantities of materials will
be Stored?
Na.
5) What pra#ective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills ofan}r chemicals
st-ored vr used on site will not be allowed to percolate to ground,water (this includes
measures to keep che-rrticals out vfdispasal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
N/A - None will be sto-red or used on site.
c. 1dVater Runo#'f(including storm water)
1) Descr%6e the source of runoff (including storm water) and methad o#' co] Eectian and
disposal, ifany (inctude quantities, if knvwn). Where will this water flvw? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
The,B-28 access raad will create a rntnimal amount of stotmwater ninoff.
The stormwater will flow into the surraundine natural 9-rass area and will not flow intm
other waters. There will be nv stormwater runoff created bv the construction nfthe 10,_
water rryatn,
2) VViIl any chemicals be stared, handled or used an the site in alocation where a spxIl or
leak will drain to surface or groundwater or ta a starm water dispasal system discharging tv
surface or grcaundwater?
No.
3} CouId waste materiais enter grcaund or surf'ace waters? If so, genera!]y describe.
Nv.
Spokane Env-ironmcntal Ordrnance Checlelisr Page 10 b$"21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELErIENTS (ConNnued):
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, ;f
any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on
explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this
checklist).
None are needed as ninoff imvact from the B-28 access road is minimal.
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree:(alder) maple, aspen, the
X evergreen tree fir, cedar ine, other
Shrubs
.X Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,
Other
Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
Other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Minimal amounts of 2rass will be removed in the construction of B-28 access road, and
water main.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None Known.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Most ail native trees, erass and brush will be maintained.
Spokane Emrironmrntal Orclinance Checklist Page 1 1 of 21
~
t
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELENIENTS (Continued): ~
5. ANIMALS ~
i
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or
near the site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eaglesongbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
No prioritv habitats or snecies per critical area maps. ;
~
~
e
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. ~
No. ;
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wiidlife, if any:
~
None.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used ;
to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for E
heating, manufacturing, etc.
N/A. '
,
~
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? :
If so, generally describe. .
~
1
No. l
,
i
~
f
t
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 12 of 21
B. C+NVIR47NMENTAG ELEMENT'S (Continued):
c, What kinds ofenergy conservation features are inclvded in #he plaris afthis groposal?
List o#her proposed measures ta reduce or c.ontrol energy impacts, if any=
N1A.
7. Eiw1VIRpNMENTAL HEA~L-TH
a. Are there any envirvnmental health hazards, incIuding exposure to taxic chemicats,
Risk of fire and explosivn, spill, or hazardaus waste, that could occur as a result of this
praposal? If sa, describe.
Onlv hazards associated with the creation of the B-28 access raad and -wat-er main.
Describe spec9al emergency services that might be required.
Nane.
2} Proposed measures ta reduce or cantrol envifonmental
Health hazards, if any:
Nane.
b. Noise
1} What types af noise exist in the area which fnay affcct yaur prvject (for example;
Trafftc, equtpment, operation, other)?
IVone.
2} What types and levels of noise would be created by ar associated with the project
on a short-tern or a longaterm basis (for exarnple; traffic, construction, operation,
other)? Indicate what houfs nQise would come frarn the site.
Short Term - Noise from canstruction of zhe B-28 access road.
Lvnti Term -Na toniz term noise wauld be created bv this pralect.
Spokane Environmenral Ordinance Checklist Page 13 of 21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): ,
3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None.
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
~
i
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
~
Site is vacant. Propertv to the South and Southeast is residentiaL nronertv to the West and :
North is laree rural tracts of nronertv.
i
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. ~
No. ~
!
f
~
i
i
i
c. Describe any structures on the site. '
None.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? ~
E
No. ~
,
P
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? SRR-5. ~
~
►
f
t
t
ti
t
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 14 of 21 ;
B. EW1ROlYVIENTAL ELEMENTS (Concinued):
f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? Semi-Rural
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify.
No - A wetland boundary lies approximately 350 feet to the east of the proiect area.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
None.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ;
None. '
~
t
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A.
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any:
Compliance with local codes.
;
f
I
1
f
~
I
Spokane Environmental Ordi.nance Checklist Page 15 of 21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
9. HoUSnvG
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
E
None. ~
,
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
~
None. `
i
. ~
!
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A.
10. AESTHETICS
i
I
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
N/A. i
~
i
~
i
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ~
~
None. :
~
~
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
(
N/A. ~
~
I
~
~
~
4
Spokane Environmental Orduiance Checklist Page 16 of 21
;
E
.
B. ENVIRONMENTA'L ELEMENTS (Continued):
~
11. LIGi3T AND GLARE ~
a. What type of 1ight or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day wouZd it
mainly accur?
IVone. '
b. Could light or glare fram the #inished project be a safety hazard or ir~terfere ,with .
views?
NIA c. What exiszsng off-site sources of light nr glare may affect ypur proposal?
hTone.
;
3
i
i
d. Propased rrteasures to reduce or controj light and glare impacts, ifany: I
~
~
NIA. !
12. REC REAITION
ao What designated and infotrnal recreational opporiunities are in the irnrnedia#e vicinity?
Dishman Wi lis Natural Area.
b. Would the propased project displace any existing recrea#ional uses? If so, describe.
1Vo. - ~
~
~
~
,
~
;
I
. ~
5pokane Emrironmental Ordinance Checkhst Page 17 of 21 ~
~
i
;
h
B. ENYIRONi1+IENTAL ELEi1+IENTS (CoRtinued):
c. Praposed measures ta reduce or can#rol impacts on tec-reatxon, including recreation
Opportunities to be provided hy the project ar applicant, if any:
N1A 4
~
13. HISTDRiC AND CULTCRAL PRESE]RVATION
a, Are there any plaees or objects .1 is#ed c►n, or propcased for, national, state, or lvcal -
Freservation registers, known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally descri6e.
~
None known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientif c
or cultural importance known to be ❑n or next tfl the site.
Norae knovtm.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or contFo] impacts, if any:
NlA
14. TRANSPOrtTATaoN ~
k
a. Identify public streets and highways serrring the site and describe proposcd acQess `
i
to the exist%ng street system. Show on site plans, if any. ~
~
:
36 th arrd Woodrxff. '
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the appraxirnate distance
io the neares# transit stop?
No - Appraxi,matelv 'A m ile to the East at 32"d and Universitv.
e
I!
1
E
~
Spokane Esiv-i.ronmenta.l Ordanance Checklist Page 18 af 21
(
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Cootinued):
~
,
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the ~
project eliminate? ~
~
~
None would be created.
None would be eliminated '
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads ;
or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or ,
private). '
~
No. '
e. Will the. project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
Transportation? If so, generally describe.
Railroad exists anuroximatelv 1000 feet to the east of the proiect.
i
f
~
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. '
i
None. ~
~
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
N/A.
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
i
~T i
l ~ o. , i
3
f
~
Spokane Enxrironmental Ordinance Checklist Page 19 of 21 '
~3. ENV[RUNMEN"E"AL'F.LFME1Y7"S Wniltinaed):
P ropased measures tp reduce vr co ritra I d irect im pact.s oii pu blic services, if an y,
NIA.
16s 4i II lLA TlES •
a. Circle utilityes curt-erri[y available at the site: eleciricity,,natrTral gas, water, refuse
seI'VEi're, tejepC7oiie, sanitm-y sewer, septic systerxt} oiher.
b. Describc ihe utitities that are proposed FoT ttie ,project, tJhe utility prov idang the
servicc, and lhe general cotistructicn activities on #I►e site or in the imniediate vtciiiity
wliteh mfg~it 4e tieede€i.
Ttie cujisti•tictioii of the 10" UVateP maln w91I C:C1I11ieC:t tF3e E1LiSt1niz 8"' wa#er main at 36`)' and
Woodrtt-ff wilh lhe existing 10"water mairi at a private drive thai iritersect~~ 24"' Avenue. 1 liis
wilI co r►iplete a mucli needed seainer3t of the water systcrn cr~atino, a 12gped line whicli wiil ~
mcrea,se the wat~r pressure For exES~~~ip- resMdence-
C. SIGNATCJ RE' 1,, the unckersigii M, swear under the peiia lty of perjury that the ahove t•espoiises are made trui.h ful iy and io the hest af iity
knowledge. xalso iiaidersfand tl»i, should there be aiiy willful misrepresentation ot°wilifu] lack of fu!I disclQSure oil nly
p~it, ihe ageriCY lllay vaitladraw any determEnattc,~ of non-srgnifcaiwe thxt It iiiig17t issiie in relparyce upo+i tl-iis ~~iecklist_
D#lte: ~"~n~ •
ProponCi3t: PCi1poll@"I:
(Plea4C type Qf` rDl'i11t:)..~ ~ (Sigiiaturc)
Add I'eSs: CI # y, Sta t e, ?.i p -
f'frolte.
f' r•
1'ersvn completing tlke frarin:
Plione:~:~~W~ t~.
~~~k~s~e: F?i3~'9~'UTtTnt:l7ta1 ~)r{~fnsi~~ec: ~:43~:[;k4i~l P.%r.• 2(1 of 21
FOR STAFF USE ONLY °
~
c
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checkl ist: f-
U
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: t
A. ~G Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current
C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends .
~
REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE
i
~
i
~
~
1
s
~
a
1
~
;
1
t
i
i
i
~
~
~
I
~
I
i
!i
!
1
t
,
Spokane EnVironmental Ordinance Checklist ' Page 21 of 21
~
~
~l
~
~
~ r
~ .
~ T
ui~
~ T
\ .
S