4th E 9423 LDS Church - Add of Storehouse to Existing Bldg I PLAN NUMBER APPL ICAT ION / PER M IT PERMIT NUMBER
SPOKANE COUNTY - DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY
NORTH 811 JEFFERSON / SPOKANE, WASHINaTON 99260 !(509) 456-3675
~ ~
'
APPLICANT: COMPLETE NUMBERED SPACES - PRESS HARD TO MAKE 3 COPIES
~ SfREET ADDRESS PARCEL NO,
1. E 9423 4-rN AvE 2n5,,q - l0 35
L07 I BLOCK SueDivisiOr~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: '7'HE ~,`-r /SpTCF`T{2~T Zc~,
2. 0 i'~~Ta NlT~~
QWHEA PHONE WttONE
LDS 42ff-?59.S I P~
J MAILING ADORESS ZIp Nctual Set 8ac9ca In Fee1 to• v6
, L~' r
A~~ ~ 9y~cG ~ z
CONTRACTOq ISoum ~j9-S IEas1 EXIST I wRS~ TOi~
IICENSE EXPIRES I PMONE Sizoof Paroel ~ Zone GatsdicaUOn q~,cIen,1131
4. 5:)"~.~• RIt~T IW Di1ST C. :.iel 1/
AODFESS I ZIP Typ000rtst. I OocuAenc~' ~ SprlrtlttBfOtl
❑Yes DNo EIReq'd
DESIGNER PHONE NewOormt. Veluotion I Remodeied Vul~tion I Total Biog Fioor area
5. ~rnES n. mC-Aszmiu- - 355
AOORESS ~ I ZI~~ ~ MaAffial1w in Ftoor IUpper FIOa9 ~e3a~ I Groonh0use
~lt 5 ) 1'►(j11.S I ~
CHANGE OF t15E FROM ~ TO Q7ver Oeclc Ith~cv_ Deck ~ Fln, g~ment I llnfin. Basemeni
6. . -
No. Ba1►p ko Floora No Fm FtAprrs I Np pa,ollinps
- 7• OFPE ~ NEW ~ ALT. LCD'N. ~ RPL. O MVE. C OTHER I
WORK -~ILD. : PLMB. C MECH. ~ M H. 0 POOL W Certiri.of Fxemot I RectuYreo vesi' ►~oL ~Mx~er
VYriPnoB Reoeived Yes" No•~
8 CESG`RtBE LvORK ShorolinpW FlooC Maznrd I Rarss Repulretl 7
1~~'~ o1J aF 5'7~~,~iaaSE 'Tc ~~,u5•7tNQL_~C, vesZ: ►+maaalk c Rocoiwoa E:
'1ALUFTI4N S O1FCE GAS EIECTRIC pUBL ATE CR EPTIC ~ ~~h~p FEES COLLECTED
9 UTlLITIES PRIVATE C SEVdEF C' Pua~~ 0 Pti'aele u
I hereby cenify thal I have read and ezamined this appHcation and have read the 'NOTICE' provisiona fncluded on
reverse side and know the same to be true and correct All provisions ot laws and ordinances governing ihis type of Building
work wNi qe complied with whelher sp-eci(led hereM or not. The grant(ng of a permit does not presume to glve au-
Ihority to woiale or cancel tAe provisions of any other state or local law regulating oonstrucUor► or tfie p-erformance
of oonslruction. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR REOUIRED iNSPECTIONS PlurnDinp
SIGNATUP,E OF APPLICATION
OWNER OR AGEN? DATE mecti,
SPECIAL APPROVALS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR NOTICE) Ooc
PR£LIM FINAL DRTE Plan CAeck 175 s
~ Em- auafir• 1 I I
/
SEPa
F'P&n-li ng ~
~ MoOuler f
MFG. HOme
Fue
4 m,eni d
G
/ Enqinee, Other (Speci}Y)
~
LLI
tn,;aies ° LL
h
~
S~P~ TOTAL S
WHEN MACHINE VALIOATED IN THIS SPACE,
PERMfT IS NONTAANSFERABLE
THIS BECOMES A PERMIT.
~ PERMIT IS NULL AND VOID IF WORK HAS NOT COMMENCED
TcrA ~ ~ I I IN 180 OAYS
~ ~ DATE ISSllEO PERMR NO. TOTAL
►
1 ~
S~/~p ~Q~~Z ~d i'Ld • .
Contact Yerson Nsme Y4,t~-Z 4r Bu3ir►ess Name-/, ~ S c-~ C.,
Address Addcess ~ 9
Phone ~.3 f- -2.9 ?"A, Plione
County Contact Person Phone No. 456-3600
COriMERCIAL BUILUING PE[tMl1 ItEV [EW
This building permlt revtew is ineended to appraise you of ttle iaiprovcments (roaclway, side-
walk, curb, stormwater, etc.) which must be constructed in associatidn wleh your building
permit. This checkl.ist will be filled out by [he Engineer's staff and a copy will be
returned to you at the time that the permit is initialed by the Engineering Department.
A11 requirements sha.ll be compl.eted prior to issuance of the building permit. All un-
checked boxes require additional research or information Co make a determination.
I. Stormwater Drainage Considerations
A. Per guidelines tor '"Stormwater Management 1981" both on and off site.
1. 208 Coneiderations* ti Yes ~ No
2. Flood hazard zone considerations** ti Yes ~ No
3. Storm Drainage Plan tA Yes ~ No
II. Planning Action U
1. [2ezone, Conditional Uae or Variance on property ~ Yes ~ No
2. Are requirements of planning action incorporated ~ Yes tVi No
into site plan
III. IiZht of Way,
1. IJoes permit necessitate R.O.W. dedication ~ Yes No
2. Did znne change require R.O.W. dedication ~ Yes No
3. Radius at coener ~ Yes No
IV. County Road Improvements
1. Roads need to be improved. How wide a Yes ~ No
2. Curb ~ Yes No
3. CRP/RIA agreement q Yes No
4. Plans for improvements provided ~ Yes ~ No
5. Sidewalk ~ Yes ~ No
V. Parking Plan 6 Approach Loeation
1. Review and sign ofE by Traffic ~ Yes ~ No
2. Approech Permit from Engineer's Office Sxcs'~ ~ Yes No
3. State or City sign off a Yes ~ No
4. Is Chi,s road on 6 Year Plan ~ Yes ~ No
VZ. Field Review: Preliminary Coaunentx
* Ali iand wi.thin the Aquifer SenbiCive Area, where deerned Feasible by the County Engi-
neer, shall inCorpora[e stormwater tceatment to mi[igate ttie poCential for groundwater
degradxt3on. (See Cuidelines for StormwaCer Management 1981, Spakane i3oard nf County
Commissioner's Resolution Na. 80-1.592, as amended.)
The purpose aE tloocl hazarcl zone revlew is Co minimize losses ctuc Lo Elood inb in spe-
cific areab de5igna[ed by hlaod liazard Boundary maNs on Eile at the COunty Engineer's
Office. (See Spokane Koard oE CounCy Commissioner'S Resolution Nla. 81-0124), as
arnended.)
AL
l ~ ~ - II 1
1 ~v
~
~
' f ~ i ' t V!"N1(7L !)F
COUNTY ENGINEER
i-
q~-~. ROBERT S. TURNER
~ ~
~COUNTY ENGINEER
r. il.
a..,,,~,N. . • Si~~~iz.~.~ s, ~~Z'a~iu.vt~rov 99260
[Vovember 2, 1983
Mr. Ar [ No 11
Eas tl`2'I~rag'ne,
Spokane, WA 492-i-ft r-t %g O (D
RE: ZE-22-62, Building Setback Recommendation
Dear Mr. Noll:
I would like to thank you and Mr. Guthrie for reviewing your present building
and expansion plans for Mr. Githrie's 4th Avenue and University Rnad property. As
you know from our discuseion with you, the developrnent of the remaining property
originally zoned under ZE-22-62 will be reviewed by our Department for building per-
mit purpoaea.
The Coun[y's FtQad Conatruction Program hae contained for a number of years a
project to widen University Road from 4Ch Avenue south, eventually to the Dishman-
Piica Road. To date, no construction funding haa been approved for the project and at
least for one atate funding program, administered by the Urban Arterial Board (UAB),
it will not be again considered until the 185-'87 biennium. Never-the-less, we lmow
traffic demande on aouth Dniversity Road will continue to grow and we will continue ~
to seek funding necessary to construc[ the needed improveuoent.
Ttierefore, in planning for a widened roadway on Univereity Road, wa would recom-
mend that your deaign locate the bnilding and its aesociated drainfield with as much
physical setback from the exiating road and right-of-vsy ss posaible. That type of
design would be much more compatible with a future widened University roadway.
Again, I would like to thaak you for diecuaeing your plane vith us and for your
cooperation in coneidering our future widening plans on Univeraity Ftnad in your final
plaa design. If you have any questions, please advise.
Very truly yours,
Robert S. TLrner, P.E.
Spokane County Engineer
~
Gary W. Kennaly, P.E.
Planning and Traffic Diviafon Engineer
GWK/set
Pubac L1/orKS 3uildorg North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane. Washington 99260 (549) 456-3600