PC APPROVED Minutes 02-14-19 Regular Meeting Minutes
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Council Chambers— City Hall
February 14,2019
I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 5:59 p.m.
H. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance.
IH. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins took roll and the following members and staff were present:
James Johnson Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
Danielle Kaschmitter Lori Barlow, Senior Planner
Timothy Kelley arrived late at 6:01 p.m. Karen Kendall, Planner
Robert McKinley Martin Palaniuk, Planner
Michael Phillips, absent- excused Colin Quinn-Hurts, Planner
Michelle Rasmussen, absent-excused Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant
Matt Walton Deanna Horton, Secretary to the Commission
Hearing no objections, Commissioners Rasmussen and Phillips were excused from the
meeting.
IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the February 14, 2019 agenda as
presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against,
and the motion passed.
V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the meeting minutes from January 24,
2019 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on this motion was five in favor, zero
against and the motion passed
VL COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson thanked Secretary Horton for going
above and beyond in providing him the materials he needed in preparation for the meeting
due to his absence. Commissioner Johnson advised he attended the City Council meeting
February 5, 2019 regarding the Planned Action Ordinance for the Centennial Business Park
that the Commission forwarded. The Council unanimously moved the item forward for a
second reading and Chair Johnson congratulated the Commission on their work. He added
that he attended a lecture put on by YWCA at Gonzaga and the speaker was Jackson Cats,
PHD "What does it mean to be a strong Man". The lecture was regarding gender equality
and was eye opening.
VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow had nothing to report, but
commented that she would update the advanced agenda prior to the next meeting.
VIII. P UBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda.
Barb Howard, City of Spokane Valley: Ms. Howard advised that her public comment from
the January 24, 2019 meeting was not accurately reflected in the minutes. She stated her
comment regarding East Rich was mistaken to be East Ridge.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS:
02-14-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 10
i. Deliberations: CTA 2018-0005, a privately initiated amendment to Spokane Valley
Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40.050, 19.40.060 and 19.060.050, proposing changes to
duplex and townhome development standards.
Senior Planner Lori Barlow summarized that the amendment would modify the Permitted
Use Matrix in SVMC 19.60.050. This amendment would change the Matrix to add
supplemental regulations to the requirements for duplexes and would eliminate
townhomes in the R-3 zone. This would also add supplemental regulations restricting
duplexes to one duplex per acre, they would be required to be on separate lots with
separate parcel numbers. This amendment would also add regulations dictating duplex
location and proximity to each other. Lastly, this would modify Cottage Development
standards by requiring that the development have more than one owner.
Ms. Barlow explained that the Commissioners asked if the City had employment
projections or information relative to rental verses owner occupied housing at the
previous meeting. Ms. Barlow noted that she was unable to identify employment
projections for the City, but she was able to collect data from the 2018 census regarding
owner occupied housing units.
Ms. Barlow provided a map depicting housing units at the Census tract level identifying
the percentage of homes that are owner occupied within each tract. Ms. Barlow explained
the Census counts each dwelling unit as well as each single family home highlighting that
anything considered to be a"dwelling unit" was captured. For example, each unit within
a multi-family complex is a unit that would be counted. Ms. Barlow concluded that the
closer the areas are to corridors or the freeway the higher the rental rates,moving further
south and east of the City the owner occupied rate increases in those lower density zones.
Commissioner Kelly requested clarification asking if the percentages listed are owner
occupied or rentals. Ms. Barlow explained the percentages reflect owner occupied homes.
Commissioner Kelly asked how the map depicts rentals. Ms. Barlow explained that the
census identified these percentages by counting everything (single family, duplexes,
apartments, manufactured homes, etc.) that constitutes a dwelling unit. Continuing that
some of the tracts have very dense single family residential neighborhoods, but also have
a high number of apartment complexes. When these land uses are combined in the tract,
the results are skewed by the high number of apartments within the complexes. The
rentals are concentrated in one area; while if you look closer in the neighborhood the
single family areas have a very high percentage of owner occupied homes.
Commissioner Johnson stated he was surprised to see 84 %rental occupied units east of
Pines Road and south of the freeway. Ms. Barlow advised that the area in question has
900 housing units and 148 of them are owner occupied.
Commissioner Walton asked if the City has any current applications for new duplexes or
townhomes pending. Ms. Barlow stated she does not have information on current
construction permits. Information on the number of platted lots or plats under review
could be compiled, but it's problematic due to the length of time that it may take a
developer to record a plat following preliminary review. She continued to explain the
three step process for approving a plat She concluded that it is difficult to know how
many lots may be developed with duplexes versus how many lots are large enough to
allow a duplex.
Commissioner Johnson asked about a letter received in the packet from Leonard and
Nancy Percell, stating there was no date stamp on the letter and asked when it was
received. Ms. Barlow explained the letter was forwarded to the City via an email from
Ms. Pete Miller who was aware that it was not provided to us in time for the public
02-14-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 10
hearing. After discussion with the legal department it was determined it could be
provided for consideration as the public hearing was still open.
Commissioner Johnson asked for clarification on the number of duplexes that would be
reduced. Ms. Barlow explained that table three of the staff report captures how many
duplexes would be allowed under the current regulations verses how many duplexes
would be allowed if this code text amendment were to be passed. Ms. Barlow explained
that should you have a lot size of 10,000 to 15,000 square feet you would be allowed one
duplex under the current regulations. She continued that the code text amendment as
proposed insinuates you would have to have at least one acre of land and would not allow
any duplex development on 10,000 to 15,000 square feet. Commissioner Johnson
clarified that the 161 vacant lots that were 15,000 to 39,930 square feet would allow one
to three duplexes or two to six dwelling units under the current code. Commissioner
Johnson stated that under the proposed amendment up to one duplex could be developed,
and that was agreed upon by Ms. Barlow. Commissioner Johnson stated that the
amendment could potentially impact up to 600 dwelling units. Ms. Barlow concluded
that this amendment does not affect our land capacity analysis to due underlying
minimum lot size being the same for a single family dwelling as it is a duplex.
Commissioner Johnson asked about developmental rights. Deputy City Attorney Eric
Lamb explainedthat the City regulates land use and restrict rights through zoning. Mr.
Lamb added that the duplex portion of this proposed regulation limits the number of
duplexes,but does not necessarily limit the number of dwelling units in total. The
applicant would not be prohibited from constructing and using the land for residential
purposes with the same number of dwelling units. Mr. Lamb added it may be cheaper to
build duplex dwelling units, and the developer may see a different return on investment
but no total loss of units allowed would occur and thus no substantial injury incurred.
Mr. Lamb added that from a taking standpoint staff isn't overly concerned, but it is
something to consider.
Ms. Barlow concluded that if the Planning Commission recommendation is for approval,
staff requests the Planning Commissioners provide specific direction as to how to rewrite
the proposal making it implementable to alleviate staffs concerns.
Commissioner Johnson asked about a concern heard during public comment regarding
the feasibility of cottages as a viable development. Ms. Barlow explained that if this
were to be implemented as written, cottage development may not be allowed.
Commissioner Walton stated his concern was intent verses interpretation regarding
owners selling after development and if they would be in violation. Mr. Lamb added the
City does not regulate who purchases a property, since that is a private transaction
between two parties. Mr. Lamb added that if the application indicated multiple owners
the City would have no recourse. Commissioner Walton asked if the City has determined
an interpretation on converting a single family to a duplex and how that would be
regulated or impacted and the answer was no. There was discussion regarding a dwelling
that could be developed as duplex and the permit review process to determine if it can be
done. Ms. Barlow added that for the record the addition of accessory dwelling
units(ADU) is different than converting a home to a duplex. This happens frequently and
the ADU does not require a 5,000 square feet lot per dwelling unit.
Hearing no further questions Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 6:40 PM
During deliberation Commissioner Kelley stated the testimony from public comment was
excellent and understands their passion; however, he cannot see how to implement this as
presented. Commissioner McKinley added he agreed with Commissioner Kelley and had
02-14-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 10
nothing further. Commissioner Kaschmitter stated that she understands the desire to
protect the neighborhood character and the traffic concerns, but did not feel the proposal
to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. She added she is concerned with the
availability of affordable housing and is not in favor. Commissioner Walton expressed
his worry in trying to find a solution to the problem. He noted he has seen the uptick in
apartments and duplexes. Commissioner Walton stated he understands the community
character is changing and gave the elimination of the open space requirement in the
Mixed Use zones as an example He finds it concerning to see a more urbanized Valley.
He continued with his concerns regarding the language and how difficult it would be to
achieve while keeping in line with the Comprehensive Plan and concluded that he could
not support this proposal as presented.
Commissioner Johnson stated he understands the feelings surrounding the quality of life
as he grew up here and gave examples of his childhood. Commissioner Johnson asked
what the Valley would look like if it had been decided back then that they didn't want
growth. He added that change happens. He applauded the applicants for their work on
the amendment and effort to impact change in a positive manner. He went to state, that as
a government entity we have to consider the common good and the common good does
not necessarily mean what is best for a few. He went onto explain that he agrees that
owner occupied is much more desirable environment and encourages more investment
into the community. Commissioner Johnson felt if there was a moratorium on
development of duplexes there could be litigation. He concluded that he could not
support this proposal.
Commissioner Kelley moved to recommend denial of CTA 2018-0005.
Commissioner Walton stated there is still opportunity for residents to engage moving
forward and encouraged citizens that have concerns to come forward to the City Council
or member of the Commission to voice their opinions.
The vote on the motion was five in favor and zero opposed and the motion passed
ii. Study Session: Proposed 2019 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Ms. Barlow gave some background and introduced the 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan
Amendment process. Ms. Barlow explained that the deadline for applications was
October 31, 2018 at which time the City had received three privately initiated and seven
City initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments. The City Council approved the docket
on November 20, 2018 and the City began notification requirements and review. Ms.
Barlow advised the Commission will conduct the study session and that the public
hearing is scheduled February 28, 2019 with deliberations to be held on March 14, 2019.
Ms. Barlow highlighted procedural recommendations and urged the Commission to
consider the information provided and public comments. She noted that public comment
had not been closed and the Commission would receive additional comments up to the
public hearing.
Commissioner Johnson confirmed that these proposals will be addressed individually but
will be forwarded to the Council as a group. Ms. Barlow explained that yes, during the
public hearing stage each proposal would be discussed individually to allow for ease of
public comment. Each item will be addressed individually by the Commission and can
be modified, approved or denied. Finally, the recommendations will be forwarded to the
council as a complete package. Mr. Lamb added that the law requires these items to be
considered collectively to ensure that the impacts are considered cumulatively.
02-14-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 10
a. CPA-2019-0004: A City Initiated Amendment to update implementation
strategies to remove completed strategies, update timelines, and add new
strategies consistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Barlow introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0004. Ms.
Barlow explained that this will modify some strategies in Chapter 2 to refresh some
language and bring it into sync with the City's objectives. This will remove strategies
that have been completed, update timelines and modify with new information. Ms.
Barlow gave an example of strategies to remove such as pursuing funding for the
Barker Grade separation since the money has been procured and the City is moving
forward.
b. CPA-2019-0006:A City Initiated Amendment to Annexation and policy additions.
Ms. Barlow introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0006. Ms.
Barlow explained that this amendment would be to modify the existing annexation
policies and add one additional policy. The proposed amendment would require the
City to develop criteria for processing annexation requests and would develop
framework for regulations in the future. This amendment would also identify land
use designations in our unincorporated urban growth area. Lastly, a policy would be
modified to include that the City looks at fiscal impacts to utilities when considering
annexation.
c. CPA-2019-0008 A City Initiated Amendment to create a new map appendix of the
most recently adopted maps.
Ms. Barlow introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0008. Ms.
Barlow explained that this introduces a new map appendix to the Comprehensive
Plan. The maps are not new to the City but the appendix is new to the
Comprehensive Plan. The appendix will capture the maps and attached them to the
Comprehensive Plan making them more accessible to the public at a manageable size.
d. CPA-2019-0005 A City Initiated Amendment to update pedestrian and bicycle
component of the Transportation Element and related goals and policies.
Transportation Planner Colin Quinn-Hurst introduced Comprehensive Plan
Amendment CPA-2019-0004. Mr. Quinn-Hurst explained that this amendment
updates the pedestrian and bicycle components in completing the pathway and trail
network. This will add language to support consideration of Complete Streets. Mr.
Quinn-Hurst explained that the bicycle and pedestrian plan was first established in
2011 and the updates will revise the components to reflect changes in the network
based on current conditions and practicalities. The 2011 recommendations included a
network of 156 miles of sidewalk, 38 miles of bike lanes and 28 miles of new
pathways. Mr. Quinn-Hurts explained that with 156 miles at $600.00 per foot for a
new side walk the cost is a substantial amount of money adding up to half a billion
and decades of time.
Mr. Quinn-Hurst stated the City conducted a public involvement process that
included attending community events and an online survey. Through the survey it
was determined that the top priority for improvements was a completed sidewalk
system the second priority was good pavement, and third priority was pathway and
bikeway improvements followed by crosswalks. The City administered a technical
evaluation looking at crashes and safety, congestion and travel patterns, to find "hot
spots"where improvements would have the largest impact and fit in line with public
0214-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 10
comment. In conclusion adding text to Chapter 5 would outline these priorities, add
language to support the goal of connecting the pathway network by linking the
Appleway Trail to the Centennial Trail. Lastly this amendment would add language
supporting eventual consideration of a Complete Streets ordinance to leverage
existing funding.
e. CPA-2019-0007 A City Initiated Amendment to update Figures 26, 27 and 46 to
reflect changes and amendments to pedestrian and bicycle facility
recommendations.
Mr. Quinn-Hurst introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0007. Mr.
Quinn-Hurst advised this proposal is to update the Sidewalk, Bicycle and School
District Maps to reflect completed projects and updated networks.
f. CPA-2019-00010 A City Initiated Amendment create a new appendix of
transportation projects for a 20-year period that is informed by existing studies.
Mr. Quinn-Hurst introduced Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-0010. Mr.
Quinn -Hurst advised this amendment will create an appendix showing a list of 20-
year transportation projects. This will be regularly updated as a resource for vetting
and developing our transportation projects to make them eligible for grant
opportunities
Commissioner Kelley asked about the implementation of a sidewalk in R-3
residential zones on private property and how the setbacks are addressed with the '
homeowner. Mr. Quinn -Hurts advised that is one of the largest challenges of
constructing sidewalk as property owners often have landscaping in the City right-of-
way.
ight-ofway. It was discussed that the City has the authority to construct the improvement
within public right-of-way and that the City pays for all sidewalk improvements when
it is a City initiated project. The resident has no cost to them.
g. CPA-2019-00001: A Privately Initiated Amendment to change the Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial(I) to Single Family Residential(SFR)
and to change the Zoning District from Industrial(I) to Single Family Residential
Urban (R-3).
Planner Karen Kendall introduced CPA-2019-0001 a privately initiated
Comprehensive Plan amendment, located 300 feet south of the intersection of Park
Road and Broadway Avenue. This site-specific Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning
Map amendment is requesting to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Designation from Industrial (I) to Single Family Residential (SFR) and to change the
Zoning District from Industrial (I)to Single Family.
Ms. Kendall went on to explain the potential incompatibility of rezoning the site to R-
3 from Industrial as it would reduce the allowable uses from a broad range of industrial
uses to single family, duplex, cottages, townhomes, daycares, school and church uses.
The R-3 zone would allow six dwelling units per acre and up to 12 units per acre with
cottage development. Changing the land use designation and zoning of the subject
parcel will impact adjacent industrial properties as future development will be subject
to transitional regulations, limiting ability for full site development. The transitional
standards include greater setbacks, screening requirements and various other
restrictions. Ms. Kendall explained that if approved, the transitional regulations would
apply to any new development on the four parcels adjacent to the subject parcel Iocated
02-14-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 10
to the west and south. Ms. Kendall went on to explain that two of the surrounding
parcels have recent activity. One parcel has an active building permit and the other has
gone through a pre-application meeting -both for industrial development.
Commissioner Kelley asked questions regarding adding borders to residential and
industrial properties and how this would affect the size of each parcel. Ms. Kendall
explained that yes that would be the case, if this were to be changed to R-3 zoning it
would impact the future development of the four adjacent parcels as the land
surrounding the properties would become larger reducing the size of the existing. She
referred to the graphic highlighting the areas affected by the transitional regulation.
Commissioner Johnson asked for confirmation that one of the current parcels has
development occurring. Ms. Kendall explained, one property has an active building
permit and the other has completed a preliminary application meeting inquiring what
they can develop on the property. The site does not have an active permit, however
they are contemplating development.
Ms. Kendall concluded the proposed amendment is not consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Walton confirmed that if this were to pass this change would isolate two
parcels from the industrial zone bordering north Park Road. Commissioner Walton
asked how this change would impact existing use of surrounding property's? Ms.
Kendall advised the property would remain the same. if the amendment were to be
approved and if the property owners choose to redeveloped the property to a
nonresidential use in the future, they would have to comply with•the transitional
regulations.
h. CPA-2019-0002: A Privately Initiated Amendment to change the Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to
Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and to change the Zoning District from Single
Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial(NC)
Planner Marty Palaniuk presented CPA-2019-0002, explaining this is a privately
initiated amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from
Single Family Residential(SFR)to Neighborhood Commercial(NC) and to change the
Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban (R-3) to Neighborhood
Commercial (NC).
Mr. Palaniuk stated that the property is located at 8th Avenue and Sullivan Road. 8th
Avenue is a minor arterial, and Sullivan Road is a principal arterial with approximately
20,000 vehicle trips per day. This is directly across the street from Central Valley High
School which creates significant traffic. North of the high school there has been
substantial multifamily developments creating significant density. Mr. Palaniuk stated
that this site consists of two properties, one owned by the Genesis Church and one
residence. There is an irrigation district located to the west of the property and a
Bonneville Power Administration(BPA) easement. The easement encumbers both of
the properties along the east boundary and does create some issues.
Mr. Palaniuk explained the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for these
properties is to have single family residential units. If approved this would change the
land use designation to Neighborhood Commercial intended to provide neighborhood
scaled commercial developments to serve the neighborhoods. Mr. Palaniuk explained
the current zoning of R-3 limits the uses, changing the zoning would allow several
additional uses to include retail, office and convenience stores. He added the
02-14..2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 10
development restrictions to the Neighborhood Commercial zone would keep the scale
of the development to fit into the neighborhood. For example, height requirements
would be the same and setbacks would be designed to be consistent with the adjacent
residential lots. Mr. Palaniuk concluded that this proposal is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
i. CPA-2019-0003 A Privately Initiated Amendment Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multi Family Residential
(MFR) and to change the Zoning District from Single Family Residential Urban
(R-3) to Multi Family Residential (MFR)
Mr. Palaniuk presented CPA-2019-0003, a privately initiated amendment to change
the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Single Family Residential (SFR)
to Multifamily Residential (MFR) and to change the Zoning District from Single
Family Residential Urban (R-3)to Multifamily Residential (MFR). Mr. Palaniuk
stated the property is located near the Mullan Road and Argonne Road corridor which
are both principal arterials that are heavily traveled. Mr. Palaniuk added that this
corridor is mostly commercial uses with a large retail center located northeast of the
site. Mr. Palaniuk continued that this site is situated on the northwest corner of Sinto
Avenue and Marguerite Road within an older neighborhood. The site is a single
parcel with two duplexes and a single family home constructed on site. Current
regulations would not permit the numerous dwellings on one lot. Mr. Palaniuk
continued explaining the current uses adjacent to the site are commercial. The intent
of this amendment it to change the current land use designation of Single Family
Residential to Multifamily Residential. The change would allow multifamily
development and low impact commercial development, and would change the zoning
regulations significantly, the density would allow additional units. Mr. Palaniuk
continued adding that the most significant change would be increasing the height
requirements from 35 feet to 55 feet, and the setback requirements. Mr. Palaniuk
concluded this is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Walton asked how would this be in keeping with the Comprehensive
Plan as it is essentially creating a Multifamily Residential "island". Mr. Palaniuk
explained that normally if this were a site specific rezone it would not meet the criteria.
Due to this being an amendment this is considered to be an area wide rezone, looking
at the plan it seeks to situate multifamily near transportation corridors and retail centers.
Ms. Barlow added that the review of the Comprehensive Plan is just as Mr. Palaniuk
stated however, if this were a site specific rezone this would meet the criteria as the
commercial zone located across the street is a higher intensity zone; multifamily is a
less intensive zone and would meet the criteria. Commissioner Johnson asked if the
development directly north was a duplex development. Mr. Palaniuk advised that there
are five duplexes on the lot. It was believed the applicant approached the owners asking
if they had interest in the amendment, and they declined at this time.
j. CPA-2019-0009: A City Initiated Amendment Proposal to change
Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning district from Multifamily
Residential (MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU).
Planner Karen Kendall introduced CPA-2019-0009 a City initiated Comprehensive
Plan to change the land use designation and zoning district from Multifamily
Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. Ms. Kendall explained the property involved is
18.7 acres and includes 12 parcels of land north of Mission Avenue between
McDonald Road on the west and Mamer Road to the east. Ms. Kendall explained
that there is a 150-foot-wide Bonneville Power Administration(BPA) easement
02-14-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 10
crossing the properties and noted that the properties were largely developed as the
Whimsical Pig with other various owners and uses. Ms. Kendall went on to explain
the surrounding uses of the site include single family residence, multifamily,
professional offices, assisted living and retail. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan
land use designation is to provide land that will allow light manufacturing,retail,
multifamily and offices along transpiration corridors -the uses in the area currently fit
the intent. Ms. Kendall explained that should this change occur;the amendment area
would be allowed to further develop consistently with the adjacent land uses. Ms.
Kendall continued that the zone change would allow uses that align with the intent of
the Comprehensive Plan along the major transportation corridor being Mission
Avenue. Ms. Kendall concluded that there is limited development opportunity for
these properties. This proposal would allow development along the corridor
consistent with the corridor and would not be create any nonconforming use with the
change. The Corridor Mixed Use designation has no height limitations; in
comparison the current Multifamily Residential zone is limed to 50 feet in height.
However, there are not many buildings that currently push or exceed the 50-foot
height limit. Ms. Kendall added the Corridor Mixed use has no density limits and the
change may allow an increase in the density. Ms. Kendall concluded that the
amendment would make the location consistent with the surrounding area and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Johnson asked if parking can be located within the easement. Ms.
Kendall advised that yes there can be parking however,no buildings can be
constructed in the easement. Commissioner Johnson asked if the lots to the far east
were single family homes. Ms. Kendall advised they are single family residences and
there would be no transitional standards as transitional standards only apply between
zones.
Ms. Barlow addressed the Commission regarding procedural process and the next step
will be the public hearing scheduled for February 28, 2019. Commissioner Johnson
asked about public hearing notification. Ms. Barlow advised the notification went out
and the City increased the notification requirement area from the 400 feet to 800 feet
around the site specific requests.
X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Walton was appreciative to the community for their
civic duty and applauded them for taking action. He stated it was with regret that he had to
vote as he did. He stated the purpose of the Commission is to maintain the Comprehensive
Plan in looking out for the citizens and the future in keeping the Valley vibrant. Commissioner.
Kaschmitter thanked the staff and the public for their comments. Commissioner Johnson
thanked the public for their comments and understands the difficulties in loss for the quality of
life. He explained the Commission is here for the common good and that is the only way it
works. If it narrowed to serve the few,that is when it fails. He thanked the Commission for
their hard work. Commissioner Kelley commented on the Planned Action Ordinanc
amendment the Commission passed. He noted that an article in the paper noted the council
was looking at approving the amendment, but that there wasn't going to be a requirement for
any environmental study. Mr. Lamb advised that the article misstated the details. It was
determined that there may be an environmental review, but, the City will have already
undertaken the environmental review. The Council is considering allowing developers to rely
on the environmental review that has already been done. Commissioner Kelly asked for
clarification that should someone propose a project to the industrial zone that may need
additional study they will have to conduct further testing, Mr. Lamb advised that yes, that
would be the case.
02-14-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 10
XJ. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn at 8:05 p.m. The vote on the
motion was unanimous in favor, zero against, and the motion passed
.01/Z'e/ZG'ir
James Johnson, Chair Date signed
Robin Hutchins, Secretary