Loading...
2019, 04-25 Agenda Packet 0111111°1#1\11111111111k SIP/ okane Valley Spokane Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 E. Sprague Ave. April 25, 2019 6:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 11, 2019 VI. COMMISSION REPORTS VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Findings of Fact: CTA-2019-0001, a proposed text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 22 and Appendix A, regarding addressing standards. ii. Study Session: STV-2019-0001, a proposed street vacation of a portion of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue, and Greenacres Road in the Northeast Industrial Area. iii. Study Session: CTA-2019-0006, a proposed code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapters 19.60.050, 19.65.130, 19.40.035 and Appendix A, regarding affordable housing and multifamily developments on religious property. X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XI. ADJOURNMENT PC ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only As of April 17,2019 ***Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative and subject to change*** To: Commission& Staff From: PC Secretary Deanna Horton by direction of Deputy City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Commission Meetings May 9,2019 Public Hearing: CTA-2018-0006—Affordable Housing—Lori Study Session: STV-2019-0002—Baldwin Ave. Street Vacations—Connor Study Session: CTA-2019-0002—Marijuana Transport Regulations-Erik May 23,2019 Findings of Fact: CTA-2018-0006—Affordable Housing—Lori Public Hearing: STV-2019-0001 —NEIA Street Vacations—Mike Basinger Public Hearing: STV-2019-0002—Baldwin Ave. Street Vacations—Connor Public Hearing: CTA-2019-0002—Marijuana Transport Regulations-Erik June 13,2019 Findings of Fact: STV-2019-0001 —NEIA Street Vacations—Mike Basinger Findings of Fact: STV-2019-0002—Baldwin Ave. Street Vacations—Connor Findings of Fact: CTA-2019-0002—Marijuana Transport Regulations—Erik June 27, 2019 July 11,2019 August 8, 2019 August 22,2019 Draft Advance Agenda 4/17/2019 Page 1 of 1 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall April 11, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Cary Driskell, City Attorney Danielle Kaschmitter Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Timothy Kelley Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Robert McKinley Karen Kendall, Planner Michael Phillips, absent - excused Michelle Rasmussen Matt Walton Deanna Horton, Secretary to the Commission Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioner Phillips was excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the April 11, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the March 28, 2019 minutes as written. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson reported he attended the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force meeting where the discussions focus was surrounding human rights. He stated he would be giving a presentation during the good of the order section next Commission meeting. Commissioner Johnson also attended the Council meeting where they discussed a street vacation that the Commission will be reviewing in the coming weeks. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow reminded the Commission of an upcoming Short Course trainings. Ms. Barlow advised that the City continues to look for training opportunities for the Planning Commission members and encouraged them to attend. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Public Hearing: CTA-2019-0001, a City initiated text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 22 adding a new Chapter 22.136 Addressing Standards. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 6:06 p.m. 04-11-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 Planner Karen Kendall gave a presentation to the Commission reviewing the proposed amendment to SVMC Title 22 adding Chapter 22.135 Addressing Standards and incorporating definitions into Appendix A. Ms. Kendall summarized the process and spoke on the topic of the public comment received at the March 28, 2019 Study Session related to the City's numbering sequence. Staff concluded that changing the addressing sequence would cause an inconsistency in the City's protocol. Ms. Kendall added that no additional comments have been received. Ms. Kendall stated that since incorporation the City has assigned addresses consistent with Spokane County policies. Ms. Kendall continued that addressing inconsistencies in other jurisdictions have highlighted the need for regional standards. This change will establish a uniform method of addressing, will facilitate expedient emergency responses, and regulate the display of addresses providing continuity and predictability. Ms. Kendall added that all street naming is currently adopted within the City's Street Standards and nothing is being added. Ms. Kendall explained that addressing will provide identification of real properties and structures and applies to new buildings and properties. Should existing addresses be made non-conforming with this proposal those properties would be updated if found to be a safety hazard for emergency response, redevelopment, or requested by the owner or occupant. Ms. Kendall concluded the importance of addressing is to identify properties for the purpose of emergency response, utility service and parcel delivery. Having no one who wished to testify, Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 6:12 p.m. Commissioner Walton moved to approve CTA-2019-0001 as presented and forward a recommendation to City Council. Commissioner Walton thanked the staff for the presentation and the detail provided. He believes strongly in the need for uniform standards to help maintain public safety and accurate parcel delivery, adding that it is greatly appreciated. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing for the good of the order. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:14 p.m. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. James Johnson, Chairman Date signed Robin Hutchins, Secretary CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: April 25, 2019 Item: Check all that apply ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ study session ❑ pending legislation FILE NUMBER: CTA-2019-0001. AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Findings and Recommendations — Proposed amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 22 and Appendix A. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed amendment is a City-initiated text amendment to the SVMC, adding Chapter 22.135 establishing the procedural standards to assign addressing for property identification within the City. Addressing definitions would also be added to SVMC Appendix A. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150, SVMC 19.30.040 and RCW 36.70A.106 BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a study session. On April 11, 2019 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing. Following public comment, the public testimony portion of the hearing was closed. The Commission deliberated and voted 6-0 to recommend to the City Council that CTA-2019-0001 be approved. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve the Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation for CTA-2019-0001 or provide staff further direction. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Planner. ATTACHMENTS: 1. PC Findings and Recommendation CTA-2019-0001 RPCA Public Hearing for CTA-2019-0001 Page 1 of 1 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2019-0001—Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation that City Council adopt the amendment. Background: 1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13,2016,with December 28,2016 as the effective date. 2. CTA-2019-0001 is a City-initiated text amendment to the SVMC, adding Chapter 22.135 establishing the procedural standards to assign addressing for property identification within the City. Addressing definitions would also be added to SVMC Appendix A. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on April 11,2019. The Commissioners voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F) Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Findings:The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: CF-G3 Ensure efficient and cost-effective public safety and emergency services. CF-P6 Ensure that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service standards. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the goals and policies. b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. Findings: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment establishes procedural standards to reduce conflicts and inconsistences through addressing. Addressing is integral to the function of emergency responders,utility purveyors providing service, and citizens receiving parcel deliveries services or general wayfinding. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2019-0001 Page 1 of 2 2. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA-2019- 0001 as proposed. Attachments: Exhibit 1 —Proposed Amendment CTA-2019-0001 Approved this 25th day of April,2019 Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2019-0001 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commision Action Meeting Date: April 25, 2019 Check all that apply: ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® study session ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: City initiated street vacation. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 22.140 SVMC; RCW 35A.47.020 and chapter 35.79 RCW. PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: On April 9, 2019, the City Council passed Resolution 19-005 initiating the vacation of four unimproved rights-of-way (ROW). The City-initiated street vacation includes unimproved rights-of-way of portions of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue, and Greenacres Road in the Northeast Industrial Area between Flora Road and Barker Road. The intent is to remove impediments to future development in order to allow underutilized industrial land to be considered for future development. This request is being initiated as part of the City's Economic Development Program. The rights- of-way as they currently exist, are not needed by the City for public transportation purposes and limit the usability of the adjacent parcels. Adequate vehicular access will be provided at the time of development. The areas proposed for vacation are located between Flora Road and Barker Road, adjacent to the following parcels: 55065.0105, 55063.0151, 55065.0170, 55065.0190, 55064.0171, 55064.0169, 55065.0107, 55064.0170, 55064.1107, 55061.9062, 55061.9066, 55064.9030. On April 9, 2019, the City Council passed Resolution 19-006 to set a public hearing on May 23, 2019 with the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action recommended at this time. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing and consider the street vacation on May 23, 2019. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. PowerPoint Northeast Industrial Area City Initiated Street Vacation STV-19-0001 April 25, 2019 Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Street Vacation ,. . ,.''''' • • III 1 ' */ I _ ..... — I - 1- ...., _ I I i -a.'''' I Af'' -- ....• ,... ....."'" I , ______----- 1 , 11 III I I , 1 3 ILI ••• , _,-,--- _----- 1 V _ - - 55061 9062 55061 9060 --- Rich Ave • , _--- -------'— _----- / - -- ----- - — — , -__ -- —._ - —__- ' , r•,' ' I ^4. 1 .• 55065 9105 '3 55065 0105 73 . t E l' 55065 0195 'Z. <-, ..........„, Fi '-' 50061 9066 4. 555as 0170 M= 55065 0171 2 55065 0107 .. ',. -'14t ...• __.1 --.. • 'at, 55063 0151 INEL.,....••••••-•" ••••• ' ir ,__ • 55064 0169 Garland Ave(Planned) Tschirley ROW — Proposed Street Vacation ., I ' 5'3094 0170 i I Centerline 550650190 55064 9030 Long ROW Curbs iii .... 1 I = # Affected Parcels • Greenacres ROW 1 LA Spokane Valley Boundary 55064 1107 1 mu IL—iiiIIIK11011114121Miek,411 Rich ROW - , --- ---4,----A i.r. MO A .- 1 - 1 . -pm•ri l',,,i./.,„ - __ . "e alV_LICJ Kai 0 250 500 Feet r --i--, ‘I 0 Production Date 3127119 -,-, - --- I i I I I mow __ ii • _ , - -,k, 1 i-. -:gt, __IfZi 7 Process 11 Av_eo °Cit Council administrative report l ` e ,..........,71_--.--'------f'. 136Ave City Council consent agenda 11 Resolution 19-005 initiates street vacation z 67 Resolution 19-006 sets public hearing with PC 11 Gatlantl Ave-Planned m Planning Commission recommendation dC O U N LL H W Z Study Session � - 1 E Euclid Ave Public Hearing CityCouncil decision s 1 II Fn Staff completes the vacation s gates omeN P�e I- I 0 Tz _� I 1 — 3 Questions? Mike Basinger, AICP Economic Development Manager Sil ' ane p Valley° CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: April 25, 2019 Item: Check all that apply ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® study session ❑ pending legislation FILE NUMBER: CTA-2018-0006 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Study session - Amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40, 19.60 and 19.65. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Privately initiated code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40.035, SVMC 19.60.050, and SVMC 19.65.130 to allow multifamily development in the Single-Family Residential Urban Zone(R-3)if at least 51 percent of the units are used for affordable housing, on a property with a church and school, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, and other provisions. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150; and RCW 36.70A.106 BACKGROUND: The privately initiated proposed amendment creates a new conditional use to allow multifamily development in the R-3 Zone on parcels 10-20 acres in size, in conjunction with a church and school use. Multifamily development under this proposal is allowed only if 51 percent or more of the housing units are used for affordable housing. Multifamily development will be required to meet the residential standards of the R-3 zone, which include both density and dimensional standards, to create consistency with the existing character of the residential neighborhood. The maximum density allowed in the R-3 zone is six dwelling units per acre (6 du/acre). The proposal allows density to be calculated by considering the entire site, including developed areas. Existing site amenities, such as parking and open space, may be shared rather than constructing new amenities to serve the multifamily development. The proposal modifies SVMC 19.60.050 Permitted Use Matrix, SVMC 19.65.130 Supplemental Use Regulations — Residential and SVMC 19.40.035 Alternative Residential Development Options - Development Standards—Dwelling, Multifamily in the R-3 zone. Under the current zoning regulation multifamily development is permitted in the Multifamily Residential (MFR), Mixed Use (MU), and Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) zones. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action recommended at this time. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing and consider the code text amendment on May 9, 2019. STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report 2. Presentation—Note additional slides may be provided at the meeting for graphic purposes RPCA Study Session for CTA-2018-0006 Page 1 of 1 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS 01"1\11Mm%, BUILDING&PLANNING Spokane Valley STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2018-0006 STAFF REPORT DATE: April 18, 2019 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: May 9,2019,beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Privately initiated code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40.035, SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.130 to allow multifamily development in the Single-Family Residential Urban Zone (R-3) if at least 51 percent of the units are used for affordable housing,on a property with a church and school, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, and other provisions. APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, SVMC 17.80.150, 19.30.040. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that the proposed amendments to SVMC 19.40.035,SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.130 are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF CONTACT:Lori Barlow,AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: CTA-2018-0006 Application, attachment and proposed amendments to SVMC 19.40.035. SVMC 19.60.050 and SVMC 19.65.130. Exhibit 2: Agency Comments BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following table summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal. Process Date Application Submitted December 14,2018 Revised Application Submitted February 21, 2019 Depaitinent of Commerce 60-day Notice of Intent to Adopt March 19, 2019 Amendment SEPA—DNS Issued March 22, 2019 Published Notice of Public Hearing: April 19, 2019 PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment creates a new conditional use to allow limited multifamily development in the R-3 Zone on parcels 10-20 acres in size, in conjunction with a church and school use. Multifamily development under this proposal is allowed only if 51 percent or more of the housing units are used for affordable housing. Multifamily development will be required to meet the residential standards of the R-3 zone, which include both density and dimensional standards, to create consistency with the existing Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0006 character of the residential neighborhood. The maximum density allowed in the R-3 zone is six dwelling units per acre (6 du/acre). The proposal allows density to be calculated by considering the entire site, including developed areas, similar to how density was calculated in the mixed use zones prior to the 2016 Development Regulation update. Existing site amenities, such as parking and open space, may be shared rather than constructing new amenities to serve the multifamily development. The proposal modifies SVMC 19.60.050 Permitted Use Matrix, SVMC 19.65.130 Supplemental Use Regulations — Residential and SVMC 19.40.035 Alternative Residential Development Options - Development Standards—Dwelling, Multifamily in the R-3 zone. The basis for the proposed amendment stated in the application is to"Support development of affordable housing... consistent with the mission of the church"and"To use underdeveloped land adjacent to churches and schools"for the development. The application and specific language proposed are attached as Exhibit 1. The application materials include the definition of"affordable housing" as it currently exists in SVMC Appendix A—Definitions.No revisions are required to support the amendment. The definition is: Affordable housing:Where the term"affordable"is used,it refers to the federal definition of affordability stating that annual housing costs shall not exceed one-third of a family's annual income. When establishing affordability standards for moderate to extremely low- income families and individuals, the median household income is the amount calculated and published by the United States Depai talent of Housing and Urban Development each year for Spokane County. Analysis: Currently multifamily developments are allowed in three zones(see Table 1 below).Multifamily dwellings are defined in SVMC Appendix A - Definitions as a building designed for occupancy by three or more families with separate entrances and individual facilities for cooking, sleeping, and sanitation. Multifamily is allowed as a permitted use,subject to Density and Dimensional Standards in SVMC 19.70.020(see Table 2 below). Additional standards in SVMC 19.70.050 F and G which specify open space requirements and applicable requirements for development in the Mixed Use Zones also apply. Table 1—Current Zoning Districts that Allow Multifamily Development Parks and Open Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Space R-1 R-2 R-3 MFR MU CMU NC RC MU I POS Dwelling,cottage SSSS Dwelling,duplex P P P P Dwelling,industrial accessory S S dwelling unit 'Dwelling,multifamily P P P Dwelling,single-family PPP P P P P Dwelling,townhouse S SS S S Manufactured home park S S The proposed amendment has the following implications in the R-3 zone: Page 2 of 6 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0006 1. Allows multifamily development as a conditionally permitted use. Pursuant to SVMC 19.60.050 Permitted uses matrix multifamily development is allowed in the Multifamily Residential (MFR), Mixed Use (MU), and the Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) zones. Multifamily development is not allowed in the R-3 zone, except as part of a Planned Residential Development(PRD). The proposal would allow multifamily development in the R-3 zone subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)and consistent with specific criteria. A CUP is a Type III permit which requires public noticing and public hearing conducted by the Hearing Examiner(HEX)pursuant to SVMC 17.80.070. A CUP is subject to a specific review during which additional conditions may be imposed to assure compatibility of the use with other uses in the vicinity. A CUP may be denied if the review determines that the requested use is not compatible with other permitted uses in the vicinity or does not meet the criteria set forth in the SVMC. Chapter 19.150 Conditional Use Permits identifies the decision criteria and conditions that may be applied to a project. The CUP process considers consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and neighborhood character, scale of existing development, public health and safety, potential pedestrian and vehicular conflicts, and impacts to public facilities or services. The HEX may stipulate conditions to alleviate impacts from the use that are not addressed by the development regulations. 2. Allows multifamily development at a density consistent with the underlying zone. The R-3 zone allows for single-family residential development at an Table 2—Table 19.70-1-Residential Standards urban density that provides flexibility and promotes R-1 R-2 R-3 MFR(1) reinvestment in existing single- Front and Flanking Street Yard 35' 15' 15 15' family neighborhoods. Density Setback is limited to 6 du/ac (see Table Garage Setback 35' 20' 20' 20' 2).Multifamily development is Rear Yard Setback 20' 20' 10' 19' allowed in the MFR zoning Minimum district at 22 du/acre and at an Side Yard Setback 5 S' S unlimited density in the Mixed Open Space M/A N/A NIA 10%gross Use zones. The proposal limits area(3) the density to 6 du/acre, Lot Size) 40.000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. 5,000 sq.ft. N/A consistent with the R-3 zone Lot Coverage 30.0% 59.0% 50.0% 60.0% but allows the density to be calculated based on the entire Maximum Density 1 dulac 4 du/ac 6 dulac 22 dulac site including the developed Building Heightn 35' 35' 35' 50' portions of the site. While the multifamily development would be clustered on the site, the overall development would not exceed the density anticipated for future development within the zone. The impacts to transportation, services and utilities, would fall within parameters contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan for the R-3 zoned areas. Allowing the multifamily development to occur at the single family density would not result in additional population, trips, or demands on services, but establish a flexible opportunity to cluster the housing rather than provide for it on individual lots. 3. Increases affordable housing opportunities in the City of Spokane Valley. Generally, multifamily development provides an affordable housing option for renters versus renting a single family home. Although the rent price is market driven, the rent can be influenced by the cost of construction. Multifamily construction is generally less costly than single family construction for a variety of reasons which include shared infrastructure such as driveways, curb cuts, yards, utility service connections, and parking. Page 3 of 6 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0006 Ensuring affordable housing alternatives to meet the needs of the community is considered in the Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations. Providing a broad range of housing choices to meet the varying needs of City's income levels is specifically provided for in the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal specifically requires that at least 51 percent of the units must be used for affordable housing. According to the City's 2016 Comprehensive Plan Housing Element the median household income in Spokane Valley is $2,000 less than the average countywide annual earnings, and almost one-third of the City's residents earned between $25,000 and $50,000 annually. It was further noted that 51 percent of renters were cost burdened by rent, meaning that housing costs are greater than one-third of their income. Affordable housing continues to be a need in the City of Spokane Valley. 4. Allows Multifamily development where amenities may be shared The proposed amendment restricts the opportunity for multifamily development to sites that are developed with a church and school that are 10-20 acres in size, or to a proposal that contains all three elements. The proposal allows for parking and open space to be shared to efficiently utilize the existing amenities without overbuilding. In the case of existing developed school and church sites,the uses already provide adequate parking areas and open space that is vacant during the off hours. Sharing the parking spaces and drive ways avoids the overbuilding of hard spaces and minimizes the need to handle stormwater created by more paved surfaces. Church and school sites typically have significant grounds for play areas, fields, or passive open space areas that are generally used by the neighborhood and could also serve the needs of the multifamily tenants. If a new development were proposed the "shared" amenities would be determined through the CUP process to determine adequate areas or parking requirements. Since the proposal requires single ownership of the school, church and multifamily development for the life of the project, the owner would be responsible for any limitations on open space use or parking that conflict between the tenants, school or church uses. 5. Has limited application to existing church sites due to the criteria. The proposed regulation has limited application. The criteria requires that the site be 10-20 acres in size and developed with a church and school. A review of properties citywide identified 75 parcels are church owned;25 of the church sites are located in the R-3 zone,and 2 sites are greater than 10 acres in size. Those two sites are St.John Vianney Catholic Parish,located at 503 N.Walnut Road,and The Carmel of the Holy Trinity,located at 4027 S.Wilbur Road. The Carmel of Holy Trinity site is 20.3 acres in size and technically exceeds the property size criteria, and does not have a school. However, these results could change as churches develop schools, or acquire more property. Additionally, it should be noted that the proposal is not limited to existing church sites. A new development containing a church, school, and Multifamily affordable housing could be considered through the CUP process. In any case, it is not expected that this would be used as a mechanism for private development of multifamily by parties other than religious institutions intending to provide housing consistent with the church mission. A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria i. The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment, if it finds that Page 4 of 6 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0006 (1) The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: Staff notes that the Applicant has identified specific goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan that support the proposed amendment. In addition to the applicant identified goals and policies, staff notes that H-G2 and H-P2 also support the amendment. The Applicant noted the reason for the code amendment is that Spokane County has a high demand for affordable housing, and that a significant deficiency of affordable housing exists. The application further notes that the amendment allows churches to use underdeveloped land to further the Church's mission to provide for vulnerable individuals. Staff has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan and identified that the proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: Goal LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. Policy LU-P 14 Enable a variety of housing types Goal H-G 1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. Goal H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. Policy H-P2 Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by allowing innovative housing types including tiny homes, accessory dwelling units, pre- fabricated homes, co-housing, cottage housing, and other housing types. Policy H-P3 Support the development of affordable housing units using available financial and regulatory tools. Policy H-P4 Enable the creation of housing for resident individuals and families needing assistance from social and human service providers. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Analysis: Staff notes that the Applicant has identified how the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment by providing affordable housing for low income renters. In reviewing the proposed amendment, staff believe that the amendment creates regulations that are consistent with numerous goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and would create an opportunity for religious entities to provide alternative and affordable housing options in the R-3 zone. The amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare and protection of the environment. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. Page 5 of 6 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2018-0006 b. Conclusion(s): In the absence of public comments, staff makes no conclusions. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: The Notice of Application was routed to jurisdictional agencies, utilities, and public districts for review and comment. On March 28, 2019 comments were received from the Growth Management Services Division of the,Washington State Department of Commerce supporting the amendment and noting consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Spokane County Countywide Planning Policies(see attached). No other substantive agency comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Staff concludes that jurisdictional agencies, utilities, and or public districts have no concerns regarding the amendment and that the amendment is supported by the Washington State Depaitnient of Commerce. B. OVERALL CONCLUSION Staff finds the proposed code text amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and goals. Page 6 of 6 DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT SCITYOF,'A AMENDMENT APPLICATION pokane SVMC 17.80.150 jValley k 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509)720-5240 • Fax: (509)720-5075 •permitcenter(spokanevalley.org STAFF USE ONLY }ZESll3M I I CTA -7C Date Submitted: _Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File#: PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL RECEIVED **THE PLANNING DIVISION WILL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NoT PROVIDED** SPOKANE VALLEY ❑ Pre-Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from nreailMJNITY DEVELOPMENT ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ Application Fee El Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification. (Please note: DO NOT submit the notice of public hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses must be current within 30 days of the Planning Commission public hearing.) PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT NAME: Catholic Charities of Eastern Washington MAILING ADDRESS: PO Box 2253 CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99210 EMAIL: jmallahan@ccspokane.org PHONE: 509-926-2707 FAx: 509-838-2785 CELL: 509-991- 1029 SECTION(S)OF CODE PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED(INCLUDE CODE CITATION): 19.60.050, 19.65.130, 19.40.035 and Definitions Appendix SUMMARY OF REQUESTED CODE AMENDMENT(S): The proposed amendment creates a new conditional use to support multifamily developments in residential zones on large parcels with existing church and school uses. Development under this proposal is restricted to affordable housing and required to meet residential development standards. Further design guidelines are added to ensure that the character of surrounding residential neighborhoods is not disrupted. PL-08 V1.0 Page 1 of 2 Spokane �� VAlley TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION REASON(S) FOR CODE AMENDMENT(S): Spokane County has a significant deficiency if the availability of affordable housing. This challenge is compounded by increasing costs of living, rising development costs and lack of developable land. Over 50 percent of renters in Spokane County are rent burdened (paying over 30 percent of gross income towards housing costs) and an additional 10,000 units of affordable housing are estimated to be required by 2020 to meet regional demand. Supporting development of affordable housing to bring dignity and security to vulnerable individuals is consistent with the mission and teachings of the Catholic Church. This amendment allows the Church to use underdeveloped land adjacent to churches and schools to further this mission. IS THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Yes, this proposal falls in line with land use policies LU-P14 and land use goals LU-G1, LU-G2, housing goals H-G1, H-G2, Housing policies H-P2, H-P3, H-P4. DOES THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT BEAR A SUBSTANTIAL RELATION TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY,WELFARE, AND PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT: Yes, housing is an essential component of health and safety. PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of applicant) I, )0./44n-`N M/V-c-Ai44'' , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. -- i- 4\ (Sig (tire) (Date) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this / I S� day of rth , 20g NOTARY SEAL ```"titi��gssi����� NOTARY SIGNATURE "S M!A,134.0/ � Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ia NaOT&9. gymu, : #0/e � •� ��� • _ Residing at: My appointmentexpires: PL-08 V1.0 Page 2 of 2 19.60.050 Permitted uses matrix S in R-3 column for Dwelling, multifamily Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Residential Dwelling, multifamily S P P P 19.65 Supplemental Use Regulations 19.65.130 Residential K. Dwelling, multifamily. Multifamily shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options. Chapter 19.40 Alternative Residential Development Options 19.40.035 Development Standards—Dwelling, Multifamily in the R-3 zone A. Applicability. Multiple family development in the R-3 zone may be permitted if at least 51 percent of the units are used for affordable housing, and subject to the provisions of this section. B. Site. 1. Site shall be one contiguous parcel under single ownership for the life of the project 2. Site shall be between 10-20 acres in size 3. Density shall be calculated at 6 du/acre using the entire site 4. Site shall include a church and school 5. Parking and open space may be shared 6. The school, church and residential facility shall be located on one parcel 7. Natural amenities such as views, significant or unique trees, or grouping of trees, creeks, riparian corridors, and similar features unique to the site shall be incorporated into the design. 8. Emphasize, rather than obscure, natural topography. Buildings shall be designed to "step up" or"step down" hillsides to accommodate significant changes in elevation. 9. Projects shall have design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project, such as, architectural style and features, materials, colors, and textures. 10. Parking structures shall be architecturally consistent with exterior architectural elements of the primary structure(s), including rooflines, and finish materials. 11. Pedestrian pathways and pedestrian areas shall be delineated by separate paved routes using a variation in paved texture and color, and protected from abutting vehicle circulation areas using landscaping or other methods. C. Building. 1. Multifamily development shall meet the residential standards in Table 19.70-1 for the R-3 zone 2. Minimum lot size shall not be applicable 3. Development shall provide 10%gross area of the site for open space D. Other. 1. Prior to issuing a certificate of occupancy, an agreement in the form acceptable to the City that ensures compliance with the provisions of this section shall be recorded with the Spokane County Auditor's Office.This agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the assigns, heirs, and successors of the applicant. 2. Affordable housing units provided shall remain affordable for the life of the project. E. Permit Type. Multiple family development in the R-3 zone shall require approval of a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter SVMC. Definitions Affordable housing: Where the term "affordable" is used, it refers to the federal definition of affordability stating that annual housing costs shall not exceed one-third of a family's annual income. When establishing affordability standards for moderate to extremely low-income families and individuals, the median household income is the amount calculated and published by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development each year for Spokane County. Comprehensive Plan LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P14 Enable a variety of housing types. H-G1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. H-P2 Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by allowing innovative housing types including tiny homes, accessory dwelling units, pre-fabricated homes, co-housing, cottage housing, and other housing types. a� ql ��P``Y AC�RFO'T� Pursuing Excellence 0 v CFAI ISO S 'c' ' '�W BRYAN COLLINS,FIRE CHIEF FIRE DEPT t'p16'- 2120 N.Wilbur Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (509)928-1700 Main March 14, 2019 (509)892-4125 Fax spoka n eva l leyfi re.com City of Spokane Valley 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 RE: CTA-2018-0006 Technical Review Comments The Spokane Valley Fire Department has completed a review for the above referenced project and has no comments on the SEPA checklist. All specific fire department requirements shall be addressed as part of specific future project permits.. Sincerely, / Traci Harvey Fire Protection Engineer Spokane Valley Fire Department Robin Hutchins From: Chad Riggs Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 7:49 AM To: Lori Barlow Subject: RE: Notice of Application Request for Comments - File No. CTA-2018-0006 Lori, DE does not have any comments for CTA-2018-0006. Thank you, Chad Riggs, P.E. I Senior Engineer 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5033 I criggs@spokanevalley.org IIttr ne This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act,Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Lori Barlow Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 5:21 PM To: 'Avista Dave Byus' ; 'Central Valley School District#356'; 'CenturyLink'; Chad Riggs; 'Chris Johnston' ; Chris Knudson ; Christina Janssen (City of Millwood); Cindy Anderson (cyan461@ecy.wa.gov) ; City of Liberty Lake; 'City of Spokane Tirrell Black' ; 'Colin Depner'; 'Comcast'; 'Consolidated Irrigation District#19' ; Deborah Johnson; Derek Lilleberg (Conoco Phillips); 'East Spokane Water District#1' ; 'East Valley School District#361' ; Felts Field - Ryan Sheehan; Hutchinson Irrigation District; 'Inland Power& Light' ; Irvin Water District;Jacob McCann (Jmca461@ecy.wa.gov); Jenny Nickerson ; Larry Ostwald (Conoco Phillips); Leslie King (Leslie.King@dfw.wa.gov); Marty Long; Mike Stone; Model Irrigation District 18 (info@modirr.org); Modern Electric Water Co. ; orchardaveirrigationdist6@comcast.net; Patnode, Brian (PARKS); Ray Wright; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' ; 'Spokane County Planning& Building'; 'Spokane County Water District#3'; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency'; 'Spokane Regional Health District'; 'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' ; 'Spokane Transit Authority'; 'Spokane Tribe of Indians' ; Spokane Valley Fire Disttict;Tim Morgan West Valley School District; 'Traci Harvey, Spokane Valley Fire Dept No. 1'; 'Vera Water& Power'; 'WA Commerce'; 'WA Dept of Arch and Hist Preservation '; 'WA Ecology, Olympia'; 'WA Fish &Wildlife' ; 'WA Natural Resources' ; 'WA Transportation' Subject: Notice of Application Request for Comments- File No. CTA-2018-0006 All, Please review the attached application and SEPA checklist to allow multi-family residential development in the R-3 zone if 51 percent or more of the units are used for affordable housing on church owned property, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, and other provisions.The proposed Code Text Amendment is requesting to change the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) Sections 19.40.035, 19.60.050, and 19.65.130. Submit written comments via email or mail using the contact information below.The City of Spokane Valley is the lead SEPA agency for the environmental review of the above referenced privately initiated Code Text Amendment. 1 COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: March 18, 2019 Thank you. Lori Barlow,AICP I Senior Planner,Community and Public Works Department 10210 E.Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley,WA 99206 (509)720-5335 I LBarlow@spokanevalley.org err 40000Mi1ky. www.spokanevalley.orq This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act,chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 Robin Hutchins From: Byus, Dave <Dave.Byus@avistacorp.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 4:31 PM To: Lori Barlow Subject: RE: [External] Notice of Application Request for Comments - File No. CTA-2018-0006 Lori, No comments or opposition to the proposed code text amendment. Thanks Dave Byus Real Estate Representative `111 it VISTA PO Box 3727 MSC-25 Spokane, WA 99220 1411 E Mission Ave. MSC-25 Spokane, WA 99202 P 509.495.2013 C 509.993.7852 http://www.avistautilities.com 8111/1 whith taltes QM, limprpidli, This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and privileged information, and unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete this email from your system.Thank you. From: Lori Barlow [mailto:lbarlow@spokanevalley.org] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 5:21 PM To: Byus, Dave; 'Central Valley School District#356'; 'CenturyLink'; Chad Riggs; 'Chris Johnston'; Chris Knudson; Christina Janssen (City of Millwood); Cindy Anderson (cyan461@ecy.wa.gov) ; City of Liberty Lake; 'City of Spokane Tirrell Black' ; 'Colin Depner'; 'Comcast'; 'Consolidated Irrigation District#19' ; Deborah Johnson; Derek Lilleberg (Conoco Phillips); 'East Spokane Water District#1' ; 'East Valley School District#361' ; Felts Field - Ryan Sheehan; Hutchinson Irrigation District; 'Inland Power& Light' ; Irvin Water District;Jacob McCann (Jmca461@ecy.wa.gov); Jenny Nickerson ; Larry Ostwald (Conoco Phillips); Leslie King (Leslie.King@dfw.wa.gov); Marty Long; Mike Stone; Model Irrigation District 18 (info@modirr.org) ; Modern Electric Water Co. ; orchardaveirrigationdist6@comcast.net; Patnode, Brian (PARKS); Ray Wright; 'Spokane Aquifer Joint Board' ; 'Spokane County Planning& Building'; 'Spokane County Water District#3'; 'Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency'; 'Spokane Regional Health District'; 'Spokane Regional Transportation Council' ; 'Spokane Transit Authority'; 'Spokane Tribe of Indians' ; Spokane Valley Fire Disttict;Tim Morgan West Valley School District; 'Traci Harvey, Spokane Valley Fire Dept No. 1'; 'Vera Water& Power'; 'WA 1 Commerce' ; 'WA Dept of Arch and Hist Preservation '; 'WA Ecology, Olympia' ; 'WA Fish &Wildlife' ; 'WA Natural Resources' ; 'WA Transportation' Subject: [External] Notice of Application Request for Comments- File No. CTA-2018-0006 All, Please review the attached application and SEPA checklist to allow multi-family residential development in the R-3 zone if 51 percent or more of the units are used for affordable housing on church owned property, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, and other provisions.The proposed Code Text Amendment is requesting to change the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC) Sections 19.40.035, 19.60.050, and 19.65.130. Submit written comments via email or mail using the contact information below.The City of Spokane Valley is the lead SEPA agency for the environmental review of the above referenced privately initiated Code Text Amendment. COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: March 18, 2019 Thank you. Lori Barlow, AICP I Senior Planner, Community and Public Works Department 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5335 I LBarlow@spokanevalley.org n % 11ey www.spokanevalley.org This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. USE CAUTION-EXTERNAL SENDER Do not click on links or open attachments that are not familiar. For questions or concerns,please e-mail phishin2(a(avistacorp.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or an agent of the intended recipient, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. 2 Robin Hutchins From: Fritzel,Anne (COM) <anne.fritzel@commerce.wa.gov> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 1:35 PM To: Lori Barlow Cc: Andersen, Dave (COM) Subject: FW: Spokane Valley Code Text Amendment on Housing Hi Laurie, Thank you for speaking with me on the code text amendment to create a new conditional use to support affordable multifamily development in residential zones on large parcels with an existing church and school uses. We understand that development is limited to affordable housing, and will be at a gross density of 6 units per acre on the 5 acre parcel, not counting the land already used by the school and the church. We encourage you to consider this proposal as a way to allow/encourage the development of affordable housing in Spokane Valley. As you likely know, affordable housing is needed all over our state, and it appears that innovative forms of housing in the interest of affordability are well supported by the policies in your comprehensive plan and the countywide planning policies. Spokane Valley comprehensive plan policies LU-P14 Enable a variety of housing types. HG-1:Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. H-P2 Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by allowing innovative housing types including tiny homes, accessory dwelling units, pre fabricated homes, co-housing, cottage housing, and other housing types. H-P3 Support the develop of affordable housing units using available financial and regulatory tools. Spokane County Countywide Planning Policies 1. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall specify the strategies for attaining its affordable housing objectives. These strategies should include a diverse mix of housing types and prices, including low-income housing. 4. Each jurisdiction's development policies, regulations and standards should provide for the opportunity to create affordable housing in its community, such policies may include regulatory tools, such as inclusionary zoning, performance/impact zoning, mixed-use development and incentives for increasing density to promote greater choice and affordable housing. 6. In conjunction with other policy topics, coordinate housing, transportation, and economic development strategies to ensure that sufficient land and densities for affordable housing are provided in locations readily accessible to employment centers. There are couple of ways the city could regulate this, allowing the code amendment, requiring that any multifamily developing in this zoning district be designed to look like other development in the area.Also,the City could consider adopting a program under RCW 36.70A.540 to assure that any development under this code provision would remain affordable for 50 years.Affordable housing is so important for the local and the state economy, we encourage you to find ways to make it work. Anne Anne Aurelia Fritzel,AICP I Senior Planner Growth Management Services I Washington State Department of Commerce Office: 360.725.3064 I Mobile: 360.259.5216 I Email: Anne.Fritzel@commerce.wa.gov 1 www.commerce.wa.goy/serying-communities/orowth-management/ Subscribe for monthly e-mail updates from Growth Management Services. 2 s1o's >.r��n jUalleyA Planning Commission Meeting Study Session CTA-2018-0006 April 25, 2019 PROCESS : : '� 'JLO Study Session Administrative o •� April 25, 2019 c Report TBD a,' N = : •--' el a O W N © Public Hearing L� Ordinance 1st = : May 9, 2019 Reading TBD Po il ta : Findings of Fact Ordinance 2nd CiJ ll May 23, 2019 Reading TBD 1.4 © pi 4 ' .' 'V AI A A Today Proposed SVMC Amendment - Overview 3 El 19.60.050 SVMC Permitted use matrix Add "S" in the R-3 zone column — provides supplemental regulations for Multifamily development ❑ 19.65. 130 — Supplemental Use Regulations — Residential Add supplemental use language for multifamily development 19.40.035 — Development Standards — Multifamily in the R-3 Zone Add applicability section and criteria to be met for the site and building, and other related agreements Proposed Amendment SVMC 19 . 60. 050 -iim ■ I Permitted Uses Matrix Add an "S indicates the use Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial is permitted R-1 R-2 R-3 I MIR MU CMU NC RC !MU I subject to ae.el'-,g. ccqage SS S S supplemental use 1l,f;el . duplex F regulations. Dwel -g. i-rdu :vial accesso S S dwelling unit Dwelling, multifamily C7b) F' F F Dwelling. single-family F F P F' F F F Dwelling. townhouse S S S S S Manufactured Dome park S S Proposed Amendment SVMC Chapter 19 .65 Supplemental Use Regulations 19.65 . 130 Residential K. Dwelling, multifamily. Multifamily shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, alternative Residential Development Options. Add supplemental use language for Multifamily applicable to the R-3 zoning districts. Proposed Amendment SVMC Chapter 19 .40 Alternative Residential Development Options 19.40.035 Development standards — Dwelling, Multifamily in the R - 3 Zone A. Applicability. "May be permitted if at least 51 % of the units are used for affordable housing and subject to" additional criteria . Add supplemental use language for multifamily applicable to the R-3 zoning districts. Proposed Amendment SVMC Chapter 19 .40 Alternative Residential Development Options 19.40.035 Development standards — Dwelling, Multifamily in the R-3 Zone B. Site Add supplemental use language for Site development. 11111. Key Criteria id Other Criteria 1 . One parcel under single ownership; ❑ Natural amenities shall be all uses located on same parcel incorporated into design 2. 10-20 acres o Emphasize natural topography 3. Entire site utilized to calculate maximum density of 6 du/acre ❑ All buildings, including parking 4. Shall include church and school structures, shall have design 5.Parking andopenspacebe continuity may shared Pedestrian areas shall be delineated and protected Proposed Amendment SVMC Chapter 19 .40 Alternative Residential Development Options 19.40.035 Development standards — Dwelling, Multifamily in the R-3 Zone C. Building Meet the residential standards in Table 19.70- 1 for the R- 3 zone Minimum lot size not applicable Development shall provide 10% gross area of the site for open space Add supplemental use language for building development. SVMC Development t R_1 R_2 R_3 MFROI Table 19.70-1 35' 15' " 6 15' Setback MI GarageSetback(2) 35' :: 20 2U° Rear Yard Setback 20' ..3:: ' 0 10' Minimum Side Yard setback 5° 5 5' 5' Open Space fJ . , NV. ` , 10% gross area(2) Lot Size"4' 40:000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft 5.00E sq. ft. VA Lot Cove-age .30.0% 50.0% 50.D'/: 60 0% Maximum Dvn2ity 1 du?ac 4 dur"ac 6 tlu!.ac. 22 dur'ac Suilrlirlg Hlei°ght :' 35' 35' 35 60' SVMC 19.40.060: Duplexes must meet the minimum lot size per dwelling unit, setbacks, max lot coverage, and building height standards shown in Table 19.70- 1 . Proposed Amendment SVMC Chapter 19.40 Alternative Residential Development Options ■ 19.40.035 Development standards — Dwelling, Multifamily in the R-3 Zone D. Other Agreement is required ensuring compliance with conditions — to run with the land Affordable housing shall remain for life of project Add supplemental use language for Agreement. Proposed Amendment SVMC Chapter 19.40 Alternative Residential Development Options 19.40.035 Development standards — Dwelling, Multifamily in the R-3 Zone E. Permit Type Shall require a Conditional Use Permit Add supplemental use language for Permit Type. NEXT STEPS : : '� .JLO Study Session Administrative o •� April 25, 2019 c Report TBD a,' N = : •--' el a O W N © Public Hearing L� Ordinance 1st = : May 9, 2019 Reading TBD Po il �., ta . : Findings of Fact Ordinance 2nd CiJ ll May 23, 2019 Reading TBD 1.4 © pi 4 ' .' 'V AI A A Today 13 QUESTIONS