The URL can be used to link to this page

2019, 07-23 Regular MeetingAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT Tuesday, July 23, 2019 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 10210 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION: Pastor Mike Graef, United Methodist Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION: Nick Maurer Days 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on July 23, 2019 Request for Council Action Form Total: $3,434,736.94 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending July 15, 2019: $413,463.21 c. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 9, 2019, Study Session Format NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Reading Ordinance 19-009 Street Vacation 2019-0001, Industrial Area — Connor Lange [Public Hearing Previously Held: No Public Comments] 3. Second Reading Ordinance 19-010 Street Vacation 2019-0002, Baldwin Ave, Glenn Rd— Connor Lange [Public Hearing Previously Held: No Public Comments] 4. Second Reading Ordinance 19-011 Marijuana Transportation — Erik Lamb [Public Hearing Previously Held: No Public Comments] PUBLIC COMMENTS: Thus is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those action items above. Public comments will be taken on the above action items where indicated, at the time those items are discussed. When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence, spell your last name for the record, and limit remarks to three minutes. Council Agenda 07-23-19 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 5. Police Department Quarterly Report — Chief Werner 6. Potential 2020 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projects — John Hohman 7. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins CITY MANAGER COMMENTS INFORMATION ONLY (will not be reported or discussed): 8. Department Reports EXECUTIVE SESSION IRCW 42.30.110(1)(b)1 9. Acquisition of Real Estate ADJOURNMENT Council Agenda 07-23-19 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 •••"\... Si)45„ kane 'I~ roctamation IN OBSERVANCE OF THE 90th ANNIVERSARY OF THE FLIGHT OF THE SPOKANE SUN GOD WHEREAS, the people of the City of Spokane Valley recognize and honor the 1929 flight of the Spokane Sun God which flew nonstop from Spokane to San Francisco, from San Francisco to New York, and from New York back to Spokane, proving that air-to-air refueling makes flying anywhere on earth without landing possible; and WHEREAS, Nicholas B. "Nick" Mamer faithfully served the people of the United States of America during World War I, serving in the U.S. Army with the 7th Aero Squadron in the Panama Canal Zone, emerging as 2nd Lieutenant, Reserve Military Aviator and Pursuit Pilot; and WHEREAS, the flight of the Sun God was planned by Nick Mamer, the unanimous choice of citizens, and was supported and financed by citizens in response to a forward -thinking and community -oriented committee of business leaders headed by Victor Dessert; and WHEREAS, Nick Mamer took off from Felts Field with his selected co-pilot Art Walker, August 15, 1929, guided the Spokane Sun God unerringly over dangerous mountain peaks, through horrendous electrical storms, and, although low on gas, manager to refuel at night and even by 5 -gallon creamery cans to sustain the nonstop goal of the flight and return to Felts Field 90 years ago on August 20, 1929; and WHEREAS, following the flight of the Sun God, the dauntless Nick Mamer continued to bring flying records and selfless service to the citizens of the region, subsequently became a lead pilot with Northwest Airlines until his untimely death at age 39 caused by a malfunction of his airliner over Bozeman, MT on January 10, 1938; and WHEREAS, in 1939 the grateful citizens erected a clock tower memorial at Felts Field to honor the memory and accomplishments of Nick Mamer; and WHEREAS, these outpourings from the community provided a model of unity of purpose and belief in the achievement possible by generous and coordinated support that became an inspiration for generations that follow. NOW, THEREFORE, I Rod Higgins, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, do hereby proclaim August 15-20, 2019 As Nick Mamer Days, the 90th Anniversary of the Flight of the Spokane Sun God Dated this 23rd day of July, 2019, L.R. Higgins, Mayor Meeting Date: July 23, 2019 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS 07/03/2019 47976-47995 07/08/2019 47996-48046; 7235282 07/10/2019 8285-8324 07/11/2019 8325 07/11/2019 48047-48083; 7277181 07/16/2019 48084-48134 (-48118) GRAND TOTAL: TOTAL AMOUNT $20,042.82 $2,004,238.32 $7,295.00 $75.00 $740,598.83 $662,486.97 $3,434,73694 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001. - General Fund 001.011.000.511. City Council 001.013.000.513. City Manager 001.013.015.515. Legal 001.016.000. Public Safety 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 001.018.014.514. Finance 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 001.040.041. Engineering 001.040.042. Economic Development 001.040.043. Building 001.076.000.576. Parks & Rec—Administration 001.076.300.576. Parks & Ree -Maintenance 001.076.301.571. Parks & Rec-Recreation 001.076.302.576. Parks & Rec- Aquatics 001.076.304.575. Parks & Rec- Senior Center 001.076.305.571. Parks & Rec-CenterPlace 001.090.000.511. General Gov't- Council related 001.090.000.514. General Gov't -Finance related 001.090.000.517. General Gov't -Employee supply 001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Serv. 001.090.000.519. General Gov't -Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't -Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't -Natural & Eco. 001.090.000.595. General Gov't -Pavement Preser. 001.090.000.560. General Gov't -Social Services 001.090.000.594 General Gov't -Capital Outlay Other Funds: 101— Street Fund 103 — Paths & Trails 105 — Hotel/Motel Tax 106 — Solid Waste 120 — CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121 -- Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 — Winter Weather Reserve 204 — Debi Service 301 — REET 1 Capital Projects 302 —REST 2 Capital Projects 303 -- Street Capital Projects 309 — Parks Capital Grants 310 — Civic Bldg. Capital Projects 311 — Pavement Preservation 312 — Capital Reserve 314 -- Railroad Grade Separation Projects 402 — Stormwater Management 403 — Aquifer Protection Area 501— Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 — Risk Management RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist 07/0312019 4:28:53PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 1 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 47976 7/3/2019 006143 ACTION DRAIN AND ROOTER WA LLC 338029 47977 7/3/2019 000394 AM LANDSHAPER INC 47978 7/3/2019 004046 AMERICAN ONSITE SERVICES Pay App 5 A-297923 A-298092 47979 7/3/2019 001545 BERNARDO WILLS ARCHITECTS PC 19386 47980 7/3/2019 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 47981 7/3/2019 000007 GRAINGER 47982 7/3/2019 002712 GTFX INC. 47983 7/3/2019 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 47984 7/3/2019 006729 JAKT FOUNDATION 47985 7/312019 004926 LE CATERING CO 47986 7/3/2019 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 0069839 0073688 0075628 S0218923 S0219111 9208803602 47719 1395945 2019 E01808 V359377 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 001.076.305.575 SERVICE AT CENTERPLACE 309.000.280.594 0280 -CONSTRUCTION 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARK: 001.076.300.576 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT PARK: Total : 001.076.000.576 19-04-104 RIVERFRONT TRAIL SYE 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 Total : Total : Total : LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C Total : 001.016.016.521 SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT 001.076.305.575 SERVICE GREASE TRAP Total : Total : 381.15 381.15 5,516.06 5,516.06 169.00 190.05 359.05 2,600.00 2,600.00 512.15 579.09 579.09 44.43 29.62 1,744.38 356.60 356.60 119.79 119.79 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 42.14 Total : 42.14 105.000.000.557 2019 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 001.076.000.576 E01808: PARKS MASTER PLAN 44.77 Total : 44.77 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 73.34 1,612.50 Total : 1,612.50 Page: 1 vchlist 07/03/2019 4:28:53PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: 2 Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 47986 7/3/2019 001860 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 47987 7/3/2019 002592 PURE FILTRATION PRODUCTS 47988 7/3/2019 000415 ROSAUERS FOOD & DRUG CENTER 47989 7/3/2019 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 9241378 9264845 (Continued) 54791 09-1470995 47990 7/3/2019 000404 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM 2019 2019 2019 47991 7/3/2019 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 3611 3627 3629 47992 7/3/2019 006178 WALTER E NELSON CO 47993 7/3/2019 005719 WASHINGTON STATE FIRST AID 47994 7/3/2019 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 47995 7/3/2019 004961 ZOME INC 20 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 384376 1032 11249449 11249450 Fund/Dept 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 105.000.000.557 105.000.000.557 105.000.000.557 309.000.296.594 001.076.000.576 001.076.000.576 001.076.305.575 001.076.301.571 001.076.305.575 001.076.305.575 ZDM-49-228-223-225 001.076.301.571 Description/Account Amount Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : INTEGRATED GROUNDS MAINT- C INTEGRATED GROUNDS MAINT- C Total : 2019 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 2019 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 2019 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB Total : 0296 -ENG & ARCH. SVCS 19-006 SPOKANE VALLEY PARKS A 19-013 EDGECLIFF PARK SWINGS Total SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total FIRST AID RENEWAL CLASS - REC Total : SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE SUPPIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : STAFF UNIFORMS & CAMPER SHIF Total : Bank total : 20 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 73.34 241.07 241.07 19.98 19.98 196.02 196.02 392.04 175.00 432.00 460.00 1,067.00 804.00 553.72 60.53 1,418.25 438.55 438.55 480.00 480.00 584.16 156.16 740.32 2,395.83 2,395.83 20,042.82 20,042.82 Page: 2 vchlist 07108/2019 9:43:58AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 47996 47997 7/8/2019 000197 ACRANET 7/8/2019 001081 ALSCO 47998 7/8/2019 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 11109 LSP02164078 LS P02169083 LSP02189329 Fund/Dept 001.018.016.518 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 1 FFW-TYGY-4NX7 001.040.041.543 101.000.000.542 INV -00991 001.076.305.575 EXPENSES 001.040.041.543 134254-1947 001.040.043.558 10287 001.040.043.558 47999 7/8/2019 006403 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC S124145295 48000 718/2019 004185 AMP'D ENTERTAINMENT LLC 48001 7/8/2019 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA 48002 7/8/2019 000135 APA 48003 7/8/2019 004278 ARCHITECTS WEST INC 48004 7/8/2019 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 48005 7/8/2019 001816 BENTHIN & ASSOCIATES 48006 7/8/2019 003122 CALHOUN, MARK 240847 242887 243098 243270 243277 3065 July 2019 101.042.000.542 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.013.015.515 001.013.000.513 Description/Account Amount BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR EMP Total : FLOOR MATS AT PRECINCT FLOOR MATS AT PRECINCT FLOOR MATS AT PRECINCT Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES: CPW ENGINEE Total : VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI Total : SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : MEMBERSHIP 2019: K KENDALL Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CRACK SEAL SUPPLIES: STORMWATER SUPPLIES: STREET SUPPLIES: STREET SUPPLIES: STREET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : Total : Total : MONTHLY AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR 212.00 212.00 24.14 24,14 24.86 73.14 29.39 29.39 265.56 265.56 12.55 12.55 75.40 75.40 338.00 338.00 4,850.00 4,850.00 4,809.35 29.38 32.23 52.21 20.93 4,944.10 2,700.00 2,700.00 400.00 Page: �� vchlist 07/08/2019 9:43:58AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48006 7/8/2019 003122 003122 CALHOUN, MARK 48007 7/8/2019 000322 CENTURYLINK 48008 7/8/2019 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 48009 7/8/2019 001888 COMCAST 48010 7/8/2019 001880 CROWN WEST REALTY LLC 48011 7/8/2019 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 48012 7/8/2019 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 48013 7/8/2019 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION (Continued) 6-19-19 to 7-19-19 JUNE 2019 4/19/2019 5/16/2019 6/14/2019 6/21/2019 6/27/2019 6/6/2019 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.518 001.076.000.576 001.040.042.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.042.558 001.040.041.543 June 18 -July 17 2019 001.090.000.518 JULY 2019 101.042.000.543 615050 101.042.000.543 80018291 80023057 80023983 80024216 80024217 80024218 80024219 RE-313-ATB90617058 RE-313-ATB90617067 RE-313-ATB90617154 48014 7/8/2019 006327 DEVRIES MOVING PACKING STORAGE 88274 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.548 001.090.000.548 101.042.000.542 101.000.000.542 311.000.252.595 001.040.043.558 Description/Account Amount Total : CITY HALL PHONES 2019 PHONE SVCS: ACCT 509 Z14 - Total : PETTY CASH: 15696 PETTY CASH: 17853 PETTY CASH: 17859, -60 PETTY CASH: 17862 PETTY CASH: 17865, 17868 PETTY CASH: 17857 INTERNET CITY HALL Total : Total : COMMON AREA CHARGES FOR M) Total : TOWER RENTAL Total : COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0 COMPUTER LEASE 3050 MICRO COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0 COMPUTER LEASE: 001-8922117-0 Total : REIMBURSE TRAFFIC SVCS REIMBURSE ROADWAY MAINT./TR 0252: CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERI Total : MOVING SERVICES 400.00 270.61 567.06 837.67 5.00 0.50 4.70 0.50 18.14 4.40 33.24 106.18 106.18 34.74 34.74 214.45 214.45 1,051.20 863.72 231.89 139.58 658.51 368.09 187.76 3,500,75 16,485.55 7,618.96 687.29 24,791.80 873.75 Page: vchlist 07/08/2019 9:43:58AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48014 7/8/2019 006327 006327 DEVRIES MOVING PACKING STORA (Continued) 48015 7/8/2019 000869 EVCO SOUND & ELECTRONICS 48016 7/8/2019 005046 FASTSIGNS 48017 7/8/2019 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY LLC 48018 7/8/2019 000007 GRAINGER 48019 7/8/2019 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC 48020 7/8/2019 005353 INTERMOUNTAIN MATERIALS 48021 7/8/2019 001944 LANCER LTD 48022 7/8/2019 004632 LEVEL3 COMMUNICATIONS 48023 7/8/2019 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT 48024 7/8/2019 003384 MORT'S DUST & EROSION CONTROL 48025 7/8/2019 001130 MPLC 8633 540-11211 540-11226 2019296 9203429833 9203429841 9214508872 1200196848 10842 10849 10854 0474052 81629826 June 2019 14308 504221924 Fund/Dept 001.033.000.518 001.076.301.571 001.076.301.571 101.042.000.542 001.040.041.543 001, 040.041.543 402.402.000.531 001.040.041.543 311.000.252.595 311.000.284.595 303.000.279.595 001.076.000.576 001.076.305.575 001.033.000.518 303.000.276.595 001.076.305.575 Description/Account Amount Total : VAX -1D SINGLE DOOR CONTROLL Total : SIGNS FOR REC PROGRAMS & PC SIGNS FOR REC PROGRAMS & PC Total : SUPPLIES Total : SAFETY EQUIPMENT: CPW ENGIN SUPPLIES: CPW ENGINEERING SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: STO Total : ENGINEERING: PINES RD GRANT Total : 0252 -MATERIALS TESTING 0284 -MATERIALS TESTING 0279 -MATERIALS TESTING BUSINESS CARDS TELECOM SERVICES Total : Total : Total : OPERATING SUPPLIES: CITY HALL Total : 0276: DUST CONTROL Total : 873.75 1,095.42 1,095.42 1,149.98 52.27 1,202.25 10.69 10.69 22.50 58.54 91.30 172.34 1,507.72 1,507.72 2,868.56 276.68 2,462.92 5,608.16 99.11 99.11 1,351.34 1,351.34 1,178.00 1,178.00 2,772.70 2,772.70 LICENSE FOR MOTION PICTURES 587.21 Page: vchlist 07/08/2019 9:43:58AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: �#--- Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept DescriptionlAccount Amount Total : 587.21 48025 7/8/2019 001130 001130 MPLC (Continued) 48026 7/8/2019 004850 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS, HRA PLAN 10199840 48027 7/8/2019 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 332119368001 332119614001 001.018.016.518 FLEX SPENDING ADMINISTRATION Total : 001.018.016.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 001.018.016.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR Total : 400.00 400.00 111.67 164.86 276.53 48028 7/8/2019 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 2862-338337 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI -99.70 2862-343490 001.040.041.543 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI 58.42 2862-343744 001.040.041.543 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI 50.39 2862-343833 001.018.014.514 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI 41.36 2862-344196 001.040.041.558 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI 13.63 2862-344595 001.040.041.558 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI 45.62 Total : 109.72 48029 7/8/2019 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 199917 001,040.041.543 COPY PAPER: CPW 214.32 Total : 214.32 48030 7/8/2019 007280 PATTERSON, MARCI EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 6.51 Total: 6.51 48031 7/8/2019 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY V334421 001.016.016.521 SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT 92.14 Total : 92.14 48032 7/8/2019 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 51609 001.040.041.543 CUBICLE NAME 65.34 51729 001.033.000.518 DOOR SIGNAGE 130.68 51775 001.011.000.511 VEHICLE MAGNETS 147.02 Total : 343.04 48033 7/8/2019 004133 ROE BACKFLOW TESTING 266 101.042.000.543 BACKFLOW TESTING 45.00 Total : 45.00 48034 7/8/2019 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS IN106005 001.040.043.558 JUNE 2019 COPIER COSTS 1,363.05 Total : 1,363.05 48035 7/8/2019 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE JUNE 2019 001.040.043.558 RECORDING FEES 1,121.00 Page: -� vchlist 07/08/2019 9:43:58AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48035 7/8/2019 000230 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE (Continued) 48036 7/812019 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51504948 48037 7/8/2019 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER D1ST#3 48038 7/8/2019 007092 SPOKANE WEDDINGS AND EVENTS 48039 7/8/2019 007107 STANTEC CONSULTING SVCS INC June 2019 10083 1513772 48040 7/8/2019 003532 STERICYCLE COMMUNICATION SOLUT 8010980863 48041 7/8/2019 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 48042 7/8/2019 007159 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 48043 7/8/2019 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 48044 7/8/2019 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS INC. 48045 7/8/2019 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS INC 1453751 488443755 488870932 489527622 489740068 496761750 497235291 497447789 497896035 9832378821 012019 0000039178 Fund/Dept 101.042.000.542 402.402.000.531 001.076.305.575 001.040.043.558 001.076.305.575 101.042.000.542 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 001.016.016.521 001.033.000.518 101.042.000.543 001.033.000.518 001.033.000.518 001.040.043.558 101.042.000.594 Description/Account Amount Total : WORK CREW INVOICE MAY 2019 Total : WATER CHARGES FOR JUNE #2 Total : MEMBERSHIP DUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : Total : ANSWERING SERVICE FOR CENTE Total : TRANSFER STATION CPW MAY 20'' Total : SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT SUPPLIES FOR PRECINCT SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL SUPPLIES FOR MAINTENANCE SH SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL Total : JUNE 2019 CELL PHONE/DEVICE C Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : 1,121.00 6,531.90 6,531.90 1,012.90 1,012.90 225.00 225.00 12,021.75 12,021.75 54.88 54.88 695.79 695.79 -333.23 749.00 259.01 -52.93 295.47 64.40 156.69 152.79 1,291.20 2,994.01 2,994.01 7,700.60 7,700.60 CONTROLLER CABINET WITH PLU 23,421.88 vchlist 07/08/2019 9:43:58AM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 48045 7/8/2019 000980 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS INC (Continued) 48046 7/8/2019 000842 WM WINKLER COMPANY PAY APP 1 PAY APP 2 7235282 6/28/2019 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 9290201564 311.000.290.595 0290 -CONSTRUCTION 303.000.278.595 0278 -CONSTRUCTION Total : 23,421.88 Total : 135,402.56 213,757.88 349,160.44 001.016.000.521 LE CONTRACT BILLING JUNE 2019 1,535,279.00 Total : 1,535,279.00 52 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 2,004,238.32 52 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 2,004,238.32 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: —G— vchlist 07/10/2019 12:26:13PM Voucher List Page: -r-- Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 8285 7/10/2019 007332 ALMOND, BARBARA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00 Total : 75.00 8286 7/10/2019 007333 BAUMGARDEN, JANE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PAM. 75.00 Total : 75.00 8287 7/10/2019 007334 BRUMFIELD, DRUSCILLA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF 75.00 Total : 75.00 8288 7/10/2019 007335 CANALE, ANNIE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY Pt 75.00 Total : 75.00 8289 7/10/2019 000588 CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PARK REFUND 001.237.10,99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT RM, SM 210.00 Total : 210.00 8290 7/10/2019 007326 CHARBONNEAU, RACHEL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 35.00 Total : 35.00 8291 7/10/2019 007327 CUTLER, REBECCA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 35.00 Total : 35.00 8292 7/10/2019 007336 DANIELSON, AMBER PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00 Total : 75.00 8293 7/10/2019 007337 DAUGHERTY, RUTH PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 8294 7/10/2019 005448 DEMARA, MICHELLE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE VIEV 75.00 Total : 75.00 8295 7/10/2019 006596 FLETCHER, NATHAN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 480.00 Total : 480.00 8296 7/10/2019 007338 FRONTIER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GR ROOM, SM 210.00 Total : 210.00 8297 7/10/2019 007339 GNATENKO, IRYNA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 379.00 vchlist 07/10/2019 12:26:13 P M Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : Voucher pk-ref Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 8297 7/10/2019 007339 007339 GNATENKO, IRYNA (Continued) Total : 379.00 8298 7/10/2019 007328 GOLOVINA, YELENA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 5.00 Total : 5.00 8299 7/10/2019 007340 GOODE, CHELSEA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: SULLIVAN PAR 159.00 Total : 159.00 8300 7/10/2019 006728 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY ROTARY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEd 75.00 Total : 75.00 8301 7/10/2019 006702 HAMMER, ROSS PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 8302 7/10/2019 007341 HEMINGWAY, JESSICA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 500.00 Total : 500.00 8303 7/10/2019 007342 HOPPE, JANET PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU SPF 300.00 Total : 300.00 8304 7/10/2019 007343 HYATT, ROXANNE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM TEAM REFUND 120.00 Total : 120.00 8305 7/10/2019 007329 JOYNES, TRACY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 35.00 Total : 35.00 8306 7/10/2019 007344 KIMM, HOLLY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 70.00 Total : 70.00 8307 7/10/2019 007345 LOPEZ DE VICTORIA, NEREIDA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: TERRACE 1/ EV 75.00 Total : 75.00 8308 7/10/2019 007330 MCINTOSH, TARA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND: WK 109.00 Total : 109.00 8309 7/10/2019 007346 MEDVEDEV, IGOR PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 8310 7/10/2019 007347 MELCHER, BRENYA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 500.00 Page: r2 r vchlist 07/10/2019 12: 26:13 P M // Voucher List Page:` Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount 8310 7/10/2019 007347 007347 MELCHER, BRENYA (Continued) Total : 500.00 8311 7/10/2019 007348 NEWBILL, BRANDON PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 144.00 Total : 144.00 8312 7/10/2019 007349 NEWBILL, DOROTHY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOU 210.00 Total : 210.00 8313 7/10/2019 006639 NIEHUSER, TERESA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PA 75.00 Total : 75.00 8314 7/10/2019 007350 OLSON, ANDREW PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 300.00 Total : 300.00 8315 7/10/2019 007351 PALMER, JENNIFER PARK REFUND 001237,10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: VALLEY MISSIC 75.00 Total : 75.00 8316 7/10/2019 007352 RAUCH, KATHI PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75,00 8317 7/10/2019 007353 RODRIGUES, MISTY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME 75.00 Total : 75.00 8318 7/10/2019 005289 SENIOR ACTION NETWORK PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEQ 75.00 Total : 75.00 8319 7/10/2019 007354 SKINFILL, KEVIN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 120.00 Total : 120.00 8320 7/10/2019 007355 SPOKANE HOME BUILDERS ASSN. PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 8321 7/10/2019 007357 STENZEL, ANGAEL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 WEDDING PKG REFUND 1,960.00 Total : 1,960.00 8322 7/10/2019 005140 THORDARSON, SARAH PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00 Total : 75.00 8323 7/10/2019 007358 VANHOFF, MARIA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME 75.00 Page: '-3�� vchlist 07/1012019 12:26:13PM Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount Total : 75.00 8323 7/10/2019 007358 007358 VANHOFF, MARIA (Continued) 8324 7/10/2019 007359 WEIGUM, SAMANTHA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 35.00 Total : 35.00 40 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 7,295.00 Total vouchers : 7,295.00 40 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: vchlist 07/11/2019 1:44:45PM /3 Voucher List Page: --f-- Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 8325 7/11/2019 007306 FIRESTONE, KELSEY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF SI- 75.00 Total : 75.00 1 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 75.00 Total vouchers : 75.00 1 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: vchlist 07/11/2019 2:14:44PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48047 7/11/2019 000958 AAA SWEEPING LLC 48048 48049 48050 48051 48052 48053 48054 48055 48056 48057 48058 64909 64910-A 7/11/2019 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 108408 7/11/2019 007365 ALTITUDE TRAMPOLINE PARK 15077 7/11/2019 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA EXPENSES 7/11/2019 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 243547 7/11/2019 006767 ATLAS INTEGRATED 7/11/2019 007366 BIG SKY ID CORP 7/11/2019 004965 CARTER, CAROL 7/11/2019 000101 CDW-G 7/11/2019 003795 CLEARWATER SUMMIT GROUP 7/11/2019 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 7/11/2019 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 2019-11169 PAY APP 1 EXPENSES STB3731 M0519.6872 60002062 June 2019 June 2019 FundlDept 402.402.000.531 402.402.000.531 101.000.000.542 001.076.301.571 001.040.041.543 Description/Account Amount STORM DRAIN CLEANING STREET SWEEPING Total VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLE, Total : EVENT 6/19/2019 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 001.033.000.518 SUPPLIES: CITY HALL 001.040.042.558 ADVERTISING 303.000.276.595 0276 -CONSTRUCTION 001.076.305.575 001.090.000.518 402.402.000.531 Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Total : SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: GEN Total : ARTERIAL WEED SPRAYING 001.040.043.558 JUNE 2019 FLEET FUEL BILL Total : Total : 402.402.000.531 UTILITIES: JUNE 2019 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: JUNE 2019 PARKS AND 24,563.09 81,455.51 106,018.60 16.10 16.10 1,110.78 1,110.78 34.80 34.80 85.29 85.29 1,625.00 1,625.00 422,757.15 422,757.15 86.42 86.42 40.35 40.35 21,235.50 21,235.50 1,803.21 1,803.21 839.23 1,461.57 Page: vchlist Voucher List 07/11/2019 2:14:44PM Spokane Valley Page: `—Z Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48058 7/11/2019 000326 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 (Continued) 48059 7/11/2019 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 80026609 48060 7/11/2019 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING INC. 48061 7/11/2019 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 48062 7/11/2019 000999 EASTERN WAATTORNEY SVC INC 48063 7/11/2019 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY LLC 48064 7/11/2019 005474 FREIGHTLINER NORTHWEST 48065 7/11/2019 007361 FUSION CLOUD SERVICES LLC 48066 7/11/2019 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 48067 7/11/2019 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 48068 7/11/2019 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO 361632 June 2019 122807 122808 2019379 PC001451767:01 27328551 29589 AR114949 AR114950 AR114951 AR 114952 AR 117439 AR 117440 June 2019 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.548 001.076.305.575 402.402.000.531 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 001.033.000.518 101.000.000.542 001.076, 305.575 001.040.042.558 001.011.000.511 001.018.014.514 001.018.016.518 001.013.000.513 001.013.015.515 001.040.043.558 101.042.000.542 Description/Account Amount Total : COMPUTER LEASE: 3 YR WORKS? Total : RECYCLING COLLECTION AT CP Total : WATER CHARGES FOR JUNE 2019 2,300.80 2,288.54 2,288.54 20.00 20.00 5,982.95 Total : 5,982.95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : SAFETY SUPPLIES Total : VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE: Total : PHONE SERVICE AT CENTERPLAC Total : 02-2019 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEP Total : COPIER COSTS: WEST WING/CITY COPIER COSTS: IT COPIER COSTS: HR COPIER COSTS: OPS/ADMIN COPIER COSTS: LEGAL COPIER COSTS: PERMIT CTR Total : 105.00 85.00 190.00 23.40 23.40 24.22 24.22 474.83 474.83 5,125.00 5,125.00 209.00 14.88 64.34 200.52 151.03 84.84 724.61 UTILITIES: JUNE 2019 439.05 Total : 439.05 vchlist 07/1/12019 2:14:44PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: /r Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 48069 7/11/2019 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 June 2019 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: PARKS AND CPW JUNE 2,060.04 Total : 2,060.04 48070 7/11/2019 006729 JAKT FOUNDATION 120 001.040.042.558 MARKETING FOR CENTERPLACE F 9,500.00 Total : 9,500.00 48071 7/11/2019 007362 LC EAGLE LLC 55052.9028 314.000.143.595 CIP: 0143 - TEMP ACCESS PERMIT 800.00 Total : 800.00 48072 7/11/2019 004926 LE CATERING CO E01554 001.076.305.575 E01554: INLAND EMPIRE GARDENI 204.48 E01676 001.076.305.575 E01676: INLAND EMPIRE GARDENI 1,000.18 E01728 001.076.305.575 E01728: ACTION COACH 1,109.54 Total : 2,314.20 48073 7/11/2019 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO June 2019 001.076.302.576 UTILITIES: PARKS JUNE 2019 4,665.60 June 2019 402.402.000.531 UTILITIES: JUNE 2019 PW 12,287.49 Total : 16, 953.09 48074 7/11/2019 004621 OREILLYAUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 2862-330543 402.402.000.531 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI 58.76 Total : 58.76 48075 7/11/2019 007360 PONDERAARCHITECTURE PC 2019-02 001.090.000.513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,200.00 Total : 3,200.00 48076 7/11/2019 000415 ROSAUERS FOOD & DRUG CENTER 10-3026217 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 9.56 Total : 9.56 48077 7/11/2019 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS IN104999 001.076.000.576 COPIER SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 47.89 Total : 47.89 48078 7/11/2019 005012 SPOKANE CO ENVIRONMENTAL July 2019 001.076.300.576 SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS: JUI 1,778.31 Total : 1,778.31 48079 7/11/2019 007364 SUBSURFACE INVESTMENT PARTNERS 55052.9030 314.000.143.595 CIP 0143: 55052.9030 Total : 360.00 360.00 48080 7/11/2019 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 1465334 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION CPW JUNE 2( 324.11 vchlist 07/11/2019 2:14:44PM /2 Voucher List Page: Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48080 7/11/2019 001969 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL (Continued) Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount Total : 324.11 48081 7/11/2019 000167 VERA WATER & POWER June 2019 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: JUNE 2019 4,205.00 Total : 4,205.00 48082 7/11/2019 002651 WOODARD, ARNE EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 159.82 Total : 159.82 48083 7/11/2019 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC 2019070025710 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICE 242.10 Total : 242.10 7277181 7/5/2019 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER JUNE 2018 001.016.000.512 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 126,179.35 Total : 126,179, 35 38 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 740,598.83 38 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 740,598.83 Page: 4 vchlist 07/16/2019 3:54:22PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: cm Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48084 7/16/2019 000648 ABADAN REPROGRAPHICS 48085 7/16/2019 001685 AICPA 48086 7/16/2019 000212 ANS OF WASHINGTON INC 48087 7/16/2019 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOCIATES INC 48088 7/16/2019 000101 CDW-G 48089 7/16/2019 000143 CITY OF SPOKANE 48090 7/16/2019 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 48091 7/16/2019 000999 EASTERN WAATTORNEY SVC INC 48092 7/16/2019 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 48093 7/16/2019 003392 EPICENTER SERVICES LLC 48094 7/16/2019 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 104648 000022574 7-16-2019 M18262-1 SPH4720 IN -032984 446735 122821 4289749 2019-09 535447 536528 536529 537216 48095 7/16/2019 004813 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 250913 Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 303.000.265.595 PRINT SERVICE 001.013.000.513 001.013.015.515 311.000.290.595 001.090.000.518 001.040.043.558 314.000.143.595 001.013.015.515 001.040.041.543 106.000.000.537 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.076.305.575 Total : MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: M CALH( Total : NOTARY RENEWAL: S. BULLOCK Total : 0290 -MATERIALS TESTING Total : APC PDU FOR CENTERPLACE Total : HEARING EXAMINER - INTERLOCA 0143 -DESIGN SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 746.62 746.62 285.00 285.00 134.45 134.45 3,801.55 3,801.55 487.64 487.64 4,600.00 Total : 4,600.00 Total : Total : FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : 103,750.70 103,750.70 70.00 70.00 1,648.39 1,648.39 148.50 148.50 37.92 80.58 84.53 76.50 279.53 COFFEE SERVICE AT CENTERPLA 181.13 Page: vchlist 07116/2019 3:54:22PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: —2 - Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48095 7/16/2019 004813 004813 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES (Continued) 48096 7/16/2019 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 48097 7/16/2019 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 50003 50027 50050 June19 1042 48098 7/16/2019 003085 GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING, STAND, 03035983 48099 7/16/2019 000007 GRAINGER 48100 7/16/2019 000161 IIMC 48101 7/16/2019 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 48102 7/16/2019 006328 KREM-TV 48103 7/16/2019 001944 LANCER LTD 48104 7/16/2019 001002 M & L SUPPLY CO INC 48105 7/16/2019 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP 48106 7/16/2019 002948 NA DEGERSTROM 9221688477 21848 8688 1399923 Fund/Dept 001.013.000.513 001.040.043.558 001.040.043.558 001.011.000.511 001.018.014.514 001.076.305.575 001.013.000.513 001.013.000.513 001.076.305.575 6-2019 SUMMARY BILL 001.040.042.558 0474236 S100389849.001 419 462 480 001.040.042.558 001.076.305.575 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 001.013.015.515 PAY ARP 2 303.000.279.595 Description/Account Amount LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION Total : Total : GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SERVIC Total : GASB SUBSCRIPTION - 538990 Total : SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE Total : ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: C KOUDEL ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: C BAINBRI Total : JUNE 2019 MONTHLY CLEANING A Total : Total : Total : ADVERTISING BUSINESS CARDS SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total : 181.13 43.35 95.20 176.00 314.55 5,213.62 5,213.62 278.00 278.00 27.64 27.64 135.00 235.00 370.00 8,085.09 8,085.09 7,000.00 7,000.00 56.09 56.09 21.28 21.28 2,972.47 236.50 2,513.38 5,722.35 0279 -CONSTRUCTION 152,718.54 Page: vchlist 07/16/2019 3:54:22PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: �3' Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48106 7/16/2019 002948 002948 NA DEGERSTROM 48107 7/16/2019 001035 NDM TECHNOLOGIES INC 48108 7/16/2019 001546 NORCO INC 48109 7/16/2019 000058 OMA 48110 7/16/2019 007154 PAINE HAMBLEN LLP 48111 7/16/2019 005049 PEDERSON, MICHAEL ROY (Continued) 28287 30555851260 30555909343 A500163 376734 JUNE 2019 48112 7/16/2019 005109 PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP REFUND ERROR 48113 7/16/2019 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC. 46113 46114 46115 6668 48114 7/16/2019 000675 RAMAX PRINTING & AWARDS INC 31932 48115 7/16/2019 002520 RWC GROUP 48116 7/16/2019 003231 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 48117 7/16/2019 004535 SHRED -IT USA LLC 102126N 102154N 2345-3 8127625312 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.518 101.042.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.018.016.518 001.013.015.515 101.042.000.542 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 402.402.000.531 001.011.000.511 101.000.000.542 101.000.000.542 101.042.000.542 001.090.000.518 Description/Account Amount Total : 152,718.54 1 YR ENERGIZER UPDATES FOR B Total : SUPPLIES: STREET SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIP: STR Total : EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL EXAMS Total : CONTRACT ATTORNEY SERVICES DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL 4,074.18 4,074.18 511.30 176.11 687.41 500.00 500.00 2,125.00 Total : 2,125.00 Total : REFUND ERRONEOUS PAYMENT F Total : STREET & STORMWATER MAINTEI STREET & STORMWATER MAINTEI STREET & STORMWATER MAINTEI SUPPLIES: STORMWATER Total : NAME TAG Total : VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLI Total : SUPPLIES: STREET Total : 1,050.00 1,050.00 2,395.80 2,395.80 42, 890.98 33,127.52 26,472.19 32.58 102,523.27 21.78 21.78 208.17 27.49 235.66 122.82 122.82 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 156.30 Page: vchlist 07116/20/9 3:54:22PM Voucher List Spokane Valley 2/ Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48117 7/16/2019 004535 004535 SHRED -IT USA LLC 48118 7/16/2019 006773 SMARSH 1/0/4c 48119 7/16/2019 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 48120 7/16/2019 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 48121 7/16/2019 007368 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 48122 7/16/2019 000093 SPOKESMAN -REVIEW, THE 48123 7/16/2019 007107 STANTEC CONSULTING SVCS INC 48124 7/16/2019 001875 STRATA INCORPORATED 48125 7/16/2019 004740 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 48126 7/16/2019 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC 48127 7/16/2019 006846 US LINEN & UNIFORM INC 48128 7/16/2019 000964 VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP (Continued) INV00523134 50318644 110100241 42000636 51504979 7-9-2019 RENEWAL 1523531 SP190233-I N 840549651 6252019 2369789 2373623 2377491 2381342 Fund/Dept 001.011.000.511 001.040.043.558 101.042.000.542 001.016.000.554 001.016.000.523 001.090.000.518 001.011.000.511 001.040.043.558 303.000.278.595 001.013.015.515 001.011.000.511 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 101.042.000.543 42621986 001.090.000.518 Description/Account Amount Total : TEXT MESSAGING ARCHIVING CO: Total : COUNTY IT SUPPORT JUNE 2019 Total : JUNE 2018 ENGINEERING ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES AUG JULY 2019 HOUSING Total : PUBLIC SAFETY TAX RENEWAL INI Total : SUBSCRIPTION ACCOUNT 288112E Total : Total : Total : Total : PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0278 -MATERIALS TESTING SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS Total : SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP SUPPLIES: MAINTENANCE SHOP Total : HELP DESK TEMP 156.30 356,06 356.06 14,464.40 14,464.40 77, 309.89 21, 792.39 116,443.56 215, 545.84 288.00 288.00 275.60 275.60 4,435.00 4,435.00 7,025.50 7,025.50 821.97 821.97 990.00 990.00 30.66 30.66 30.66 30.66 122.64 602.99 Page: vchlist 07/16/2019 3:54:22PM Voucher List Spokane Valley Page: Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 48128 7/16/2019 000964 VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP 48129 7/16/2019 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE LTD 48130 7/16/2019 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 48131 7/16/2019 000158 WELCH COMER & ASSOC. INC 48132 7/16/2019 007156 WIDENER & ASSOCIATES 48133 7/16/2019 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC 48134 7/16/2019 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC 51 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 51 Vouchers in this report (Continued) 42643584 68184 0069798-1518-7 51068000-008 206472 2019070005522 2019070003578 Fund/Dept 001.090.000.518 303.000.265.595 402.402.000.531 101.042.000.542 314.000.223.595 Description/Account Amount HELP DESK TEMP POSTAGE SERVICES Total : Total : VACTORING WASTE JUNE 2019 Total : ENGINEERING SERVICES Total : 0223 -ENVIRONMENTAL AND PERM Total : 001.090.000.518 INTERNET 001.090.000.518 Total : NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE DAf Total : 673.60 1,276.59 424.69 424.69 2,106.58 2,106.58 2,607.57 2,607.57 1,363.20 1,363.20 Bank total : 662, 626.70 626.70 279.80 279.80 Total vouchers : TiU`7843 9.�� 1/ Y6- 577 Page: 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 23, 2019 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing ['information ❑admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending July 15, 2019 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Gross: $ 341,420.10 $ Benefits: $ 72,043.11 $ Council Total payroll $ 413,463.21 $ Total $ 341,420.10 $ 72,043.11 $ 413,463.21 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR MEETING, FORMAL FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley, Washington July 9, 2019 Mayor Higgins called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Rod Higgins, Mayor Pam Haley, Deputy Mayor Brandi Peetz, Councilmember Linda Thompson, Councilmember Ben Wick, Councilmember Arne Woodard, Councilmember Sam Wood, Councilmember Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Cary Driskell, City Attorney Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Bill Helbig, City Engineer Mike Basinger, Economic Development Mgr. Connor Lange, Planner John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager Morgan Koudelka, Sr. Administrative Analyst Jeff Kleingartner, Public Information Officer Carrie Koudelka, Deputy City Clerk INVOCATION: Reverend Mike Munoz of Genesis Church gave the invocation on behalf of Pastor Brad Bruszer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council, staff, and the audience stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Deputy City Clerk Koudelka called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Thompson said she attended the Board of Health meeting and reported they are looking to find a new CEO and she was appointed to the policy committee, and elected to the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) board of directors. Councilmember Wick said he attended the AWC conference, the Board of Health meeting where they talked about air quality measurements and how to determine if events should be cancelled due to poor air quality. He thanked the Parks and Recreation department for the big Connect 4 game they provided at the Farmer's Market. Councilmember Wood said he had nothing to report. Councilmember Peetz said she attended the NextGen Leaders Coalition with Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rogers. Councilmember Woodard said he attended the AWC conference and the Continuum of Care meeting where they discussed grant funding and allocation. Deputy Mayor Haley said she attended two Spokane Transit Authority (STA) board meetings where they debated the no cost/low cost bus passes for low-income people, and she toured the jail. Council Regular Formal Meeting: 07-09-2019 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Higgins said he attended the West Valley Class Reunion with his wife and toured some of the various Spokane Valley projects with visiting staffers from Senator Murray's office. PROCLAMATION: Parks and Recreation Month After Mayor Higgins read the proclamation, Parks Director Mike Stone thanked Council and discussed this year's theme "Game On." He said there will be a celebration at Terrace View Park on July 28 from 1:00 pm to 5:00 pm with free food, games and entertainment. He also mentioned the Free Park program that, in cooperation with East Valley School District, will provide kids with 3,000 free breakfasts and 1,100 free lunches at various Valley parks throughout the summer In addition, he said this is the first year for their Teen Camp; and noted that more information is available on the City's website and he encouraged everyone to visit the parks. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a. Approval of claim vouchers on July 9, 2019 Request for Council Action Form Total: $1,252,914.85 b. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending June 30, 2019: $525,718.45 c. Approval of June 11, 2019 Council Special Meeting Minutes — Workshop d. Approval of June 18, 2019 Council Study Session Meeting Minutes e. Approval of June 24, 2019 Council Special Meeting Minutes f. Approval of July 2, 2019 Council Study Session Meeting Minutes It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 2. First Reading Ordinance 19-009 Street Vacation 2019-001, Industrial Area — Mike Basinger After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded, to advance Ordinance 19-009 to a second reading at the July 23, 2019 Council meeting. Mr. Basinger described the process for the street vacation as outlined in the RCA and said the right-of-way was dedicated in 1911 and that neither the City nor the County paid for the right-of-way. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous; opposed: none. Motion carried. 3. First Reading Ordinance 19-010 Street Vacation 2019-0002, Baldwin Ave, Glenn Rd — Connor Lange After Deputy City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded, to advance Ordinance 19-010 to a second reading at the July 23, 2019 Council meeting. Mr. Lange described the street vacation as outlined in the RCA and went through the Powerpoint presentation. He said staff is recommending removal of University Road from the original proposal based on a study conducted by Fehr and Peers and he mentioned that the right-of-way was originally designated in the 1908 Sullivan Plat. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous; opposed: none. Motion carried. 4. First Reading Ordinance 19-011, Marijuana Transportation — Erik Lamb After City Clerk Koudelka read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded, to advance Ordinance 19-011 adopting amendments to allow licensed marijuana transporters to a second reading. Mr. Lamb said Council directed staff to prepare proposed amendments for consideration by the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission held a hearing on May 23, 2019. He went through the presentation and added that in talking with our Police Chief, no problems have been identified by commercial vehicle officers to date. He said the Clean Air Agency would address and enforce issues pertaining to marijuana odor. Vote by acclamation: in favor: Mayor Higgins, Deputy Mayor Haley, Councilmembers Wick, Wood and Woodard; opposed: Councilmembers Peetz and Thompson. Motion carried. Council Regular Formal Meeting: 07-09-2019 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT 5. Proposed Resolution 19-011, CERB Grant — Mike Basinger It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley and seconded to approve Resolution 19-011. formally authorizing the CERB application. Mr. Basinger said the Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) planning grant will be used to pay for a feasibility study for business improvements to connect users of the Appleway Trail to businesses. Mayor Higgins invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous; opposed: none. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Higgins invited Senator Padden to discuss transportation issues. Senator Padden informed Council that the Barker to Harvard project was included in the Senate Transportation budget and that while Barker is the only road in Spokane Valley's jurisdiction, the project will benefit residents of the Valley because of the number of Valley students attending the new middle school and high school. He said Central Valley School District (CVSD) Superintendent Ben Smalls estimates that forty percent of the middle school students will be Spokane Valley residents and thirty-five percent of the high school students will be from the Valley. He said this was a major effort on the part of several agencies including the City of Liberty Lake, Central Valley School District, the City of Spokane Valley and the state, and the project funding should make it into the 2020 Supplemental Budget and continue until the projects are finished. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley, said she would like staff to look into the City's code for junk vehicles. She said she reported a property with junk vehicles to the City on June 17, 2019, and she was told code enforcement is working with the property owner to get it cleaned up but nothing has been done yet. She said she would like to know why. Rocky Sampson, Spokane Valley, said he is the General Manger of Checker Auto and thanked the Mayor for his involvement in changing the attire of the baristas in his neighborhood. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 6. New Employee Report — John Whitehead Mr. Whitehead said we hired three new employees during the second quarter, filling the Engineering Technician I position in Capital Improvement Projects, the Office Assistant I position in the Parks Department and the Public Information Officer position in Economic Development. 7. Indiana Avenue Crosswalk Lighting — Bill Helbig Mr. Helbig said the City set aside $110,000 in 2018 for crosswalks and lighting on Indiana Avenue and in working with STA, together we have identified the need for additional bus stops and a mid -block crosswalk; that in 2019, CHAS Health purchased property along East Indiana Avenue for development of their clinic with parking across the street. He said that as part of their parking lot development, CHAS Health is required to construct a mid -block pedestrian crossing on East Indiana Avenue; that CHAS Health will install the lighting, but would like the City to acquire the streetlights from CHAS Health for long-term operations and maintenance. He said staff is seeking consensus from Council to pull the funds out of Capital Reserve fund #312 to fund the project. City Manager Calhoun said the money was appropriated as part of the 2018 budget but we did not use it. He said it now appears the cost will only be $72,000, liberating $38,000, and that this would come before Council as a budget amendment in 2019. Mr. Helbig said the crosswalk will become City property because it is infrastructure and in the City's right-of-way. It was the consensus of Council to move forward with the crosswalk lighting infrastructure acquisition. 8. Homelessness Related Issues Discussion — Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb, Morgan Koudelka Mr. Driskell said the city is experiencing homelessness related issues and that we have had several comments from the public about some of the issues. He said tonight he, Mr. Lamb and Mr. Koudelka will discuss the Martin v. City of Boise case decision from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals impacting how jurisdictions address homelessness and camping in public. He began the Powerpoint presentation and said they will be looking for consensus from Council as to how to move forward. Mr. Lamb stated there are Council Regular Formal Meeting: 07-09-2019 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT some gray areas in the case decision and there has been a significant amount of discussion among jurisdictions around the state and throughout the 9th Circuit, of which Spokane Valley is included. He said the legal basis for the court's decision is that prohibiting camping in public places violates the 8th amendment to the US Constitution prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment by criminalizing homelessness and needing a place to sleep. Mr. Driskell said cities across the state along with Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) and AWC are struggling with how to address the issues and work within the decision of the case. He said it is a very complex issue and it has significant impact on the cities. One of the impacts to us is that we do not have any homeless shelters within our city limits so we need to discuss what we can do to address camping in our public spaces and rights-of-way. Mr. Driskell said currently the City is indirectly responsible for $1.2M going into the system through filing fees to the County Auditor and Community Development Block Grant funds; the Spokane County Housing and Community Development (SCHCD) Advisory Committee and the Continuum of Care Advisory Committee makes allocation recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners of those funds. He said part of those funds go to the House of Charity in Spokane. Mr. Koudelka said the City of Spokane is looking to acquire a new shelter at the former Grocery Outlet store at Havana and Sprague, on the border of our city limits. He said Spokane approached other jurisdictions for help in funding the purchase of the facility and after presenting their proposal for the facility to the SCHCD, Spokane County set aside $1.2M in recording fees to assist with the purchase. However, the funds have not yet been transferred due to lacking details with regard to operations of the facility, terms of operation, and types of people it would serve. In talking with County staff, he learned that Spokane issued an RFP (request for proposal) for a facility operator and received three applications but they have not made a decision as to which will be selected. Mr. Koudelka said we have told the County that the City of Spokane Valley is not interested in funding a facility that has the same outcome as the 24-7 facility located in Spokane and the impact the facility has had on the neighborhood it is located in. He said after many conversations with the County, his feeling is that they are very closely aligned with the philosophy of Spokane Valley; they are looking for conditions that require shelter users to work on transitioning out of homelessness and address the root causes of homelessness. He said we are trying to maintain our public spaces for use by all of our citizens and keep the areas safe; impact homelessness in a positive manner and allow people to help themselves and leave homelessness behind; and ensure accountability that if we are investing Spokane Valley funds that there are measures in place that demonstrate effective use and that progress is being made. Participating jurisdictions, by assisting with funding for the purchase of the facility, may have leverage in setting conditions for the facility and how it is operated. He said we want to ensure Spokane understands that the $1.2M in recording fees is generated from jurisdictions outside the City of Spokane, including Spokane Valley and Liberty Lake and therefore, bed space would be available to homeless populations originating in all the jurisdictions outside of Spokane and would also serve emergency responders transporting homeless individuals to that shelter. He said another impact we would want to see addressed is the impact to the surrounding neighborhood to ensure appropriate security and safety measures are in place. He said there is a community forum scheduled for July 30, 2019 where we are hoping to get input to forward along to the County. He said staff would like to draft a letter to the County Commissioners expressing our desires for the funding of the facility and its operations, for Council consideration and input before forwarding it on to the County. He said the current funding allocation process flows through the Advisory Committee with final decision by the County Commissioners so if Council wants to voice their thoughts directly to the Commissioners, a letter crafted by staff and collectively agreed upon by Council helps ensure that Commissioners can consider the concerns of our Council before making an award. There was consensus of Council to have staff draft a letter to the County and the Advisory Committee reflecting the views and concerns of Council with regard to potential participation in the Havana facility. Mayor Higgins called for a recess at 8:01 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8: 08 p.m. Council Regular Formal Meeting: 07-09-2019 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mr. Lamb said homelessness and affordable housing were key issues for the legislature this year and we thought SHB 1406 funds could be utilized for homeless shelters; however, after further review it looks like they can only be used for low-income affordable housing. He said this is a new funding mechanism and is a state sales tax credit. If the City opts to take the credit, it does not increase the sales tax but is taken as a credit against existing sales taxes. The calculation of taking the .0073% credit would be approximately $178,000 per year for the next twenty years. He said it will have to go toward affordable housing purposes and the Council will have to adopt a resolution of intent by January 31, 2020 and take the total amount of the funding by July 2020. The second component to the bill is an additional .0073% that the City can opt to take but to do so, the City would have to adopt a "qualifying tax" consisting of three options, all of which require voter approval. He said the most realistic option of the three is a levy lid lift, which would have to be approved and enacted by the voters prior to July 2020. It was consensus of Council to have staff draft a resolution of intent regarding use of the first .0073% of credited state sales tax revenue pursuant to SHB 1406. 9. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Mr. Calhoun reported that he signed the BUILD grant application for the Pines Road Grade Separation project and we will send it tomorrow. He also congratulated Councilmember Peetz on receiving certification from AWC for municipal leadership and mentioned that Councilmember Thompson was elected to the AWC Board of Directors. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Haley, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Regular Formal Meeting: 07-09-2019 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 23, 2019 Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['information ❑admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ['public hearing ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance 19-009 for STV- 2019-0001. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140, Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 35A.47.020 and RCW 35.79. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 9, 2019, City Council approved Resolution 19- 005 initiating the street vacation process, and Resolution 19-006 setting a Planning Commission Public Hearing for May 23, 2019. On June 24, 2019, City Council heard an administrative report on the proposed street vacations. On July 9, 2019, City Council voted to advanceOrdinance 19- 009 to a second reading. BACKGROUND:. On May 23, 2019, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of STV -2019-0001 to the City Council. This request is being initiated as part of the City's Economic Development Program. The rights of way (ROW), as they currently exist, are not needed and limit the usability of the adjacent parcels. None of the ROW contain any city facilities or utility improvements. Adequate vehicular access will be provided at the time of development. The ROW includes 1,266 feet of Tschirley Road, 1,565 feet of Long Road, 1,328 feet of Rich Avenue, and 2,615 feet of Greenacres Road. The ROW width is 30 feet on Tschirley Road, 30 feet on Long Road, 30 feet on Rich Avenue, and 30 feet on Greenacres Road. The vacation will remove physical barriers that may impede future development. The intent is to allow underutilized industrial land to be considered for future development. The area of vacation is located northwest of the intersection of Barker Road and Euclid Avenue adjacent to eleven parcels: 55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 and 55061.9066. OPTIONS: Move to approve with or without amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 19-009. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager; Connor Lange, Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 19-009 2. Signed Planning Commission Findings 3. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission 4. Approved Planning Commission meeting minutes DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 19-009 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION OF 1,266 FEET OF TSCHIRLEY ROAD, 1,565 FEET OF LONG ROAD, 1,328 FEET OF RICH AVENUE, AND 2,615 FEET OF GREENACRES ROAD. THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH IS 30 FEET ON TSCHIRLEY ROAD, 30 FEET ON LONG ROAD, 30 FEET ON RICH AVENUE, AND 30 FEET ON GREENACRES ROAD. THE AREA OF VACATION IS LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF BARKER ROAD AND EUCLID AVENUE ADJACENT TO ELEVEN PARCELS: 55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 AND 55061.9066, AND FOR OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, on April 9, 2019, the City Council passed Resolution 19-005 initiating the vacation of 1,266 feet of Tschirley Road, 1,565 feet of Long Road, 1,328 feet of Rich Avenue, and 2,615 feet of Greenacres Road. The right-of-way (ROW) width is 30 feet on Tschirley Road, 30 feet on Long Road, 30 feet on Rich Avenue, and 30 feet on Greenacres Road of unnamed right-of-way; and WHEREAS, on April 9, 2019, the City Council passed Resolution 19-006 setting a public hearing before the Planning Commission for May 23, 2019; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing; and WHEREAS, following the hearing, the Planning Commission found that the notice and hearing requirements of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140.020 had been met; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and minutes have been filed with the City Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacations; and WHEREAS, none of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated filed a written objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 22.140 SVMC, upon vacation of the roads, the City shall transfer the vacated property to abutting property owners, the zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street shall attach to the vacated property, a record of survey shall be completed, and all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street shall be paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred property. In this particular case, the vacated property shall be transferred to eleven parcels: 55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 and 55061.9066; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to vacate the above streets pursuant to chapter 22.140 SVMC. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The portion of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue, and Greenacres Road proposed to be vacated are unimproved. The vacations are expected to have no impact on the general public as surrounding parcels currently do not use the ROWs for access. 2. The ROWs consists of vacant land not being utilized for public access. The ROWs are not required for current or future public access. 3. There is no need for a new and different public way. Ordinance 19-009 Street Vacation Page 1 of 4 DRAFT 4. It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require the use of the subject ROWs for public access. Future development may require improvements, which will be reviewed and ROW needs assessed at such time. 5. No objections or public comments were received for any of the ROWs. 6. The ROW is adjacent to parcels 55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 and 55061.9066 and title shall vest in those parcels. 7. Pursuant to Resolution No. 07-009, Policy for Imposing Vacation Charges Pursuant to RCW 35.70.030: a. The City of Spokane Valley has the authority to charge for vacations in an amount that does not exceed 50% of the full appraised value or for the full amount of the area vacated where the street has been part of a dedicated right-of-way for over twenty five years or if the property was acquired at public expense. b. Alternatively, the Council shall reserve the right to deviate from this policy upon the adoption of written findings of fact that demonstrate the public interest shall be best served by an alternative approach. The following facts are relevant to Council's determination of an alternative approach: i. The proposed vacation of the Tschirley Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue, and Greenacres Road were initiated by the City. The ROWs are unimproved and not anticipated to be used for public access. Based on the above findings, the City does not seek payment for the vacated rights-of-way. Section 2. Property to be Vacated. Based upon the above findings and in accordance with this Ordinance, the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley which is incorporated herein by reference, legally described as follows: Tschirley Road right-of-way lying west of Barker Road, north of Union Pacific Railroad and Euclid Avenue, West half of Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M.; and further defined as follows: That portion of an unnamed street in Plat No. 3 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts according to plat thereof recorded in Volume T of Plats, page 6, lying north of the easterly extension of the North line of Tract 61 of said West Farms Irrigated Tracts, said street being between Tracts 57 and 58 and a portion of Tract 62. Long Road right-of-way lying west of Barker Road, north of Union Pacific Railroad and Euclid Avenue, East half of Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M.; and further defined as follows: That portion of an unnamed street in Plat No. 3 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts according to plat thereof recorded in Volume T of Plats, page 6, lying north of previously vacated street (by County vacation number 2093) said street being between Tracts 55 and 56 and between Tracts 63 and 64 and a portion of Tract 67. Rich Avenue right-of-way lying west of Barker Road, north of Union Pacific Railroad and Euclid Avenue, East half of Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 E., W.M.; and further defined as follows: That portion of an unnamed street in Plat No. 3 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts according to plat thereof recorded in Volume T of Plats, page 6, being the north 20 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6, said street being north of and adjacent to Tract 54, and Tract 55. Greenacres Road right-of-way lying west of Barker Road, north of Union Pacific Railroad and Euclid Avenue, East half of Section 6, Township 25N., Range 45E., W.M.; and further defined as follows: That portion of an unnamed street in Plat No. 3 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts according to plat thereof recorded in Volume T of Plats, page 6, lying north of the westerly extension of the North line of Tract 76 of said West Farms Irrigated Tracts, said street being east of and adjacent to Tract 54, Tract 65, Tract 66 and a portion of Tract 75. Ordinance 19-009 Street Vacation Page 2 of 4 DRAFT Section 3. Division of Property to be Vacated. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.040 and SVMC 22.140.040(C), the vacated portion of the street or alley shall belong to the abutting property owners, one- half to each, unless factual circumstances otherwise dictate a different division and distribution of the street or alley to be vacated. The ROW to be vacated shall be divided amongst parcels 55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 and 55061.9066 as recorded in the record of survey which shall be created and recorded with Spokane County as required pursuant to SVMC 22.140.090. Section 4. Zoning. The zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation attached to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The City Manager or designee is authorized to make this notation on the official Zoning Map of the City. Section 5. Conditions of Vacation. The following conditions shall be fully satisfied for each ROW prior to the transfer of title by the City. 1. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcels (55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 and 55061.9066) as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office. 2. Following the City Council's passage of the Ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of each of the areas to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington, including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be completed. 3. The surveyor shall locate a monument at the intersection of the centerline of each of the vacated rights-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the Spokane Valley Street Standards. 4. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated ROWs from public to private ownership, including but not limited to, title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees shall be paid by the City. 5. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each ROW to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in each of the vacations shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the industrial district. The adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 6. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 7. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Section 6. Closing. Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor, and the City Manager is authorized to execute and finalize all necessary documents in order to complete the transfer of the property identified herein. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or Ordinance 19-009 Street Vacation Page 3 of 4 DRAFT unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of July, 2019. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance 19-009 Street Vacation Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval of File No. STV -2019-0001. A. Background: 1. Chapter 22.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), governing street vacations, was adopted in September 2007 and became effective on October 28, 2007. 2. STV -2019-0001 is a City -initiated street vacation proposing to vacate 1,266 feet of Tschirley Road, 1,565 feet of Long Road, 1,328 feet of Rich Avenue, and 2,615 feet of Greenacres Road. The Right of Way (ROW) width is 30 feet on Tschirley Road, 30 feet on Long Road, 30 feet on Rich Avenue, and 30 feet on Greenacres Road. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on May 23, 2019. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of STV -2019-0001 to the City Council. B. Planning Commission Findings: Compliance with SVMC 22.140.030 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is unimproved. The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public as surrounding parcels currently do not use the ROWfor access. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The subject ROW is currently vacant land not being utilized for public access and is not required for future public access. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? The City of Spokane Valley is constructing a new road (Garland Avenue) between Flora Road and Barker Road that will provide access to future development in the area. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? The construction of Garland Avenue will provide access to future development and the existing ROW as presently configured will not provide a greater use or need. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? No objections were received. C. Conclusions: The findings confirm that the criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission STV -2019-000I Page 1 of 2 D. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve STV -2019-0001. 1. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcels (55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 and 55061.9066) as shown on the record of survey. 2. Following the City Council's passage of the Ordinance approving the street vacation, a Record of Survey (ROS) shall be prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington. The ROS shall include an exact metes and bounds legal description specifying any applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services. 3. The surveyor shall locate a monument at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the Spokane Valley Street Standards. 4. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall be subject to the regulations of the extended districts. 5. The ROS and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 6. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Approved this 13th' day of June, 2019 (--- James J nson, Chairiian ATTEST Nint) Deanna Horton, Administrative Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission STV -2019-0001 Page 2 of 2 Spokcii� of COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 40000 Valley FILE No: STV -2019-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 23, 2019 FILE NO: STV -2019-0001 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: City initiated street vacation for 1,266 feet of Tschirley Road, 1,565 feet of Long Road, 1,328 feet of Rich Avenue, and 2,615 feet of Greenacres Road. The ROW width is 30 feet on Tschirley Road, 30 feet on Long Road, 30 feet on Rich Avenue, and 30 feet on Greenacres Road. STAFF: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager; 509.720.5331; mbasingergspokanevalley.org PROPOSAL LOCATION: The portion of right-of-way proposed to be vacated is located northwest of the intersection of Barker Road and Euclid Avenue adjacent to eleven parcels (55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 and 55061.9066), further defined as follows: that portion of Tschirley Road located in the West half of Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M, in Plat No. 3 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume T of Plats, page 6, lying north of the easterly extension of the North line of Tract 61 of said West Farms Irrigated Tracts, said street being between Tracts 57 and 58 and a portion of Tract 62; and that portion of Long Road located in the East half of Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M. in Plat No. 3 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume T of Plats, page 6, lying north of previously vacated street (by County vacation number 2093) said street being between Tracts 55 and 56 and between Tracts 63 and 64 and a portion of Tract 67; that portion of Rich Avenue further located in the East half of Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 E., W.M., Plat No. 3 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume T of Plats, page 6, being the north 20 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6, said street being north of and adjacent to Tract 54, and Tract 55; that portion of Greenacres Road located in the East half of Section 6, Township 25N., Range 45E., W.M. in Plat No. 3 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume T of Plats, page 6, lying north of the westerly extension of the North line of Tract 76 of said West Farms Irrigated Tracts, said street being east of and adjacent to Tract 54, Tract 65, Tract 66 and a portion of Tract 75, in Spokane Valley, Washington. BACKGROUND: On April 9, 2019 the City Council passed Resolution 19-005 initiating the vacation of four unimproved rights-of-way (ROW) and Resolution 19-006 setting the public hearing date with the Planning Commission. This request is being initiated as part of the City's Economic Development Program. The rights of ways, as they currently exist, are not needed and limit the usability of the adjacent parcels. None of the ROW contain any city facilities or utility improvements. Adequate vehicular access will be provided at the time of development. The ROW includes 1,266 feet of Tschirley Road, 1,565 feet of Long Road, 1,328 feet of Rich Avenue, and 2,615 feet of Greenacres Road. The ROW width is 30 feet on Tschirley Road, 30 feet on Long Road, 30 feet on Rich Avenue, and 30 feet on Greenacres Road. The vacation will remove physical barriers that may impede future development. The intent is to allow underutilized industrial land to be considered for future development. This request is being initiated as part of the City's Economic Development Program. The rights of ways, as they currently exist, are not needed and limit the usability of the adjacent parcels. The vacation will remove physical barriers that may impede future development. The intent is to allow underutilized industrial land to be considered for future development. Page 1 of 4 The proposed vacation will eliminate public ROW access to parcel 55061.9060 Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 20.20.090.F states `Every lot shall have direct access to a paved public street, private street or an easement for a private driveway. " The owner may consolidate the parcels, reconfigure the parcels with a Boundary Line Adjustment, or create an easement for access as proposed in the recommended conditions. Adequate vehicular access will be provided at the time of development. APPROVAL CRITERIA: 1. SVMC — Title 20 (Subdivision Regulations) 2. SVMC — Title 21 (Environmental Controls) 3. SVMC — Title 22 (Street Vacations) 4. City of Spokane Valley Street Standards ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Exhibit 2: Aerial Map Exhibit 3: Resolution 19-005 and Resolution 19-006 Exhibit 4: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 5: Agency Comments I. PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics of proposed vacation: The ROW consists of 1,266 feet on Tschirley Road, 1,565 feet of Long Road, 1,328 feet of Rich Avenue, and 2,615 feet of Greenacres Road. The ROW width is 30 feet on Tschirley Road, 30 feet on Long Road, 30 feet on Rich Avenue, and 30 feet on Greenacres Road. Adjacent Comprehensive Plan Designation: Industrial (I) Zoning Adjacent to ROW: Industrial (I) Adjacent Land Use(s): All eleven parcels abutting the four ROW are vacant. II. STAFF ANALYSIS OF STREET VACATION PROPOSAL A. COMPLIANCE WITH SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE (SVMC) TITLE 22.140.030 Findings: 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is unimproved. The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public as surrounding parcels currently do not use ROW for access. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The subject ROW is currently vacant land not being utilized for public access and is not required for current or future public access. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? The City of Spokane Valley is constructing a new road (Garland Avenue) between Flora Road and Barker Road to service new industries in the area. Page 2 of 4 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? The construction of Garland Avenue will provide access to future development and the existing ROW as presently configured will not provide a greater use or need. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? No objections or public comment has been received. Conclusions: The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met. B. COMPLIANCE WITH SVMC TITLE 21— ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and SVMC 21.20.040 from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). III. PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: A Notice of Public Hearing signs was posted on the property on April 25, 2016 and public hearing notices were mailed to all petitioners of the vacation the same as the eleven parcels abutting the four ROW on the same day. Notices were posted in the Spokane Valley Public Library, City of Spokane Valley main reception area and CenterPlace Event Center on April 25, 2016. Lastly, the notice was published in the Spokane Valley Herald and Exchange on April 26, 2019 and May 3, 2019. Staff received no public comment(s). Conclusion(s): Staff concludes that adequate public noticing was conducted for STV -2017-0001 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. No concerns were raised in public comment received. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS Notice was provided to agencies and service providers. Comments are attached as exhibits to this staff report. Conclusion(s): Spokane Valley Fire Department provided a response stating that they completed a review of the proposed vacations and have no comments. V. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS Staff concludes that STV -2019-0001 as proposed is generally consistent, or will be made consistent, through the recommended conditions of approval based on the approval criteria stated herein. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request to vacate 1,266 feet by 30 feet of Tschirley Road, 1,565 feet by 30 feet of Long Road, 1,328 feet by 30 feet of Rich Avenue, and 2,615 feet by 30 feet of Greenacres Road subject to the following conditions. Page 3 of 4 1. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcels (55065.0107, 55061.9062, 55065.0105, 55065.0190, 55065.0171, 55064.0169, 55064.0170, 55065.0170, 55064.1107, 55064.9030 and 55061.9066) as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office. 2. Following the City Council's passage of the Ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington, including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be completed. 3. The surveyor shall locate a monument at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the SVSS. 4. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the industrial district. The adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 5. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 6. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Page 4 of 4 Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall April 25, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Danielle Kaschmitter Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Timothy Kelley, absent - excused Karen Kendall, Planner Robert McKinley Michael Philips, absent - excused Michelle Rasmussen, absent - excused Matt Walton Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioners Kelly, Rasmussen and Phillips were excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the April 25, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the April 11, 2019 minutes as written. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson reported he attended the last few City Council meetings. Commissioner Johnson also attended the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force executive committee where they discussed considering a region wide leadership meeting. He is pleased to be a part of this team that is looking out for human rights in the area and is excited to be a part of the coming changes. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no administrative report. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Findings of Fact: CTA -2019-0001, a proposed text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 22 and Appendix A, regarding addressing standards. Planner Karen Kendall provided a brief overview of the amendment and discussed the procedural guidelines for the proposed text amendment to SVMC Title 22 and Appendix A. Ms. Kendall explained that this meeting is to finalize the recommendation from the Commission. Following public comment at the public hearing held April 11, 2019 the Commission deliberated and voted six in favor and zero opposed to approve CTA -2019- 0001 as presented and forward a recommendation to the City Council. 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 6 There was no further discussion. Commissioner Walton moved to approve CTA -2019-0001 Planning Commission Findings of Fact recommendation as presented to the City Council. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. ii. Study Session: STV -2019-0001, a proposed street vacation of a portion of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue, and Greenacres Road in the Northeast Industrial Area. Senior Planner Lori Barlow gave a presentation to the Commission outlining the Northeast Industrial Area City Initiated Street Vacation. Ms. Barlow explained that this area is located between Flora Road and Barker Road and is South of Trent Avenue. The proposed vacations are the unimproved Right of Ways (ROW) of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Greenacres Road and Rich Avenue that connects Long Road with Greenacres Road, Ms. Barlow noted that this property is predominantly owned by one property owner. However, there is one parcel located off of Rich Avenue with a separate property owner. Mr. Barlow highlighted this being a City Initiated Street Vacation the City is working to ensure there is easement access for the property that would be affected by the vacation. Staff stated that these ROW's are not necessary as all parcels will have access off of Garland Avenue once construction is completed. Ms. Barlow provided brief background information on the Garland Avenue project that was also a City initiated proposal. The proposal is currently undergoing environmental review and is expected to begin construction soon. It should be completed by the end of 2019. Ms. Barlow continued, that there is not an application on file at this point, and it is uncertain how the properties will be reconfigured. It is anticipated that once development is considered the property owner will come forward with a Binding Site Plan (BSP) to r identify access points to the properties in the development. Commissioner Walton asked if there will be a stipulation on the property owner to continue providing access for emergency services off of Garland Avenue. Ms. Barlow spoke to the BSP review process at which time parcels would be divided up and access points would be determined prior to development occurring. Ms. Barlow added this proposal has been routed to all agencies, and the Spokane Valley Fire Department advised they would manage situations as development occurs. Commissioner Johnson asked if the access will be maintained by the City. Ms. Barlow explained that if done through the BSP it would be a private street maintained by the property owners. Garland Avenue is a public road and would be maintain by the City. Commissioner Johnson spoke about the amount of property involved and asked if there would be any monetary compensation to the City. Ms. Barlow explained that is not being forwarded as a recommendation as this is a City initiated proposal with no expectations of reimbursement from the property owner. Ms. Barlow concluded that the current ROW may be an impediment to the future development. The City is trying to make this area more adaptable for future developments. iii. Study Session: CTA -2018-0006, a proposed code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapters 19.60.050, 19.65.130, 19.40.035 and Appendix A, regarding affordable housing. 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 6 Ms. Barlow provided background information into the privately initiated Code Text Amendment (CTA) Ms. Barlow corrected the numbering error to be CTA-2018-0006 not CTA-2019-0006. Ms. Barlow advised this proposal was originally submitted in 2018, , then revised and resubmitted earlier in 2019. Ms. Barlow advised that staff had reviewed the application for environmental impact and a determination of non-significance was issued March 29, 2019. The notice of public hearing was posted in the newspaper as well as on the City's website. Ms. Barlow clarified that this proposal is a CTA which is not site-specific, therefore on site posting requirements do not apply. Ms. Barlow clarified procedural requirements. The Commission is conducting the study session, and the public hearing is scheduled for May 9, 2019. Once a recommendation is made by the Planning Commission, it will be formalized in the Findings of Fact scheduled for May 23, 2019. Ms, Barlow highlighted a recent change the City Council has made to the Governance Manual. The Council will no longer take public comment on items that have had a public hearing by the Planning Commission during their review process. Ms. Barlow stressed that the opportunity for public comment will only be during the Planning Commissions public hearing. Once that hearing is closed, there will be no further opportunity for public comment. Ms. Barlow continued, the proposals intent is to allow multifamily in the residential (R-3) zone as long as it meets supplemental regulations. Ms. Barlow explained that currently multifamily is not allowed in the R-3 zone. Multifamily is only allowed in multifamily residential and both mixed use zones. Ms. Barlow continued that this proposal would change the Permitted Use Matrix SVMC 19.60.050 by adding an "S" indicating multifamily could be allowed but subject to supplemental use regulations. Ms. Barlow described that this proposal would add supplemental language to SVMC 19.65.130 stating that multifamily could be allowed if it complies with Chapter 19.40 of SVMC Alternative Residential Development Options. Newly added section 19.40.035 identifies that multifamily in the R-3 zone would be allowed if specific criteria are met for applicability, site and building standards and other related agreements. Ms. Barlow continued that in order for a development to utilize this section of the code at least 51% of the units proposed must be used for affordable housing. Commissioner Johnson asked how the City would monitor that the 51% is being maintained? Ms. Barlow explained that this would be part of the agreement section. An agreement would be signed and recorded with the County, that during the lifetime of the project they would maintain 51% of the units as affordable housing units. Ms. Barlow continued that similarly during multifamily application review with affordable housing units the applicant provides evidence that the units meet an affordable housing standard. Commissioner Johnson asked what is included in affordable housing costs? Ms. Barlow stated it refers to the Federal definition that annual housing costs shall not exceed 1/3 of a families' annual income and is calculated by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Commissioner. Johnson asked if the percentage included utilities, etc., or just the direct housing cost. Ms. Barlow said she was uncertain and that she will provide that information at the next meeting. Ms. Barlow explained some of the criteria. Key criteria would require the property to be a single parcel, under single ownership. The parcel uses must include a church, school and the multifamily units all located on one parcel at least 10-20 acres in size. Ms. Barlow continued that the entire site can be used to calculate the six dwelling units per acre as the maximum density allowed in the R-3 zoning district. Currently the R-3 zone does not allow multifamily development but does allow single family development at a density of six dwelling units per acre. Ms. Barlow explained this amendment proposes to utilize the 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes. Page 4 of 6 entire site to calculate what could have been allowed for single family development, but then allows the units to be clustered in the form of a multifamily development. The proposal intends to maintain the density. For example, if you have a 10 -acre parcel allowing six dwelling units per acre it would allow for 60 single family residential dwelling units. The proposal would allow you to develop a site that has a school and church with 60 single family dwelling units in a multifamily complex which would still maintain the density that is established within the R-3 Zone. Commissioner Walton asked how many 10-20 acre parcels are in the valley that would qualify. Ms. Barlow advised she did provide analysis in the staff report and used a query that identified a church on the property and any adjacent properties owned by same owner. Staff did find trough this query that there are 75 church sites in the city and of those 75, 25 of them fit within the 10-20 acres. Only one site had a church, school, and fit the criteria. However, a site could be developed. Commissioner Walton asked how many vacant parcels meet the criteria that do not currently have a school/church combination? Ms. Barlow concluded it would be difficult to compile that information as properties could be aggregated. Ms. Barlow continued that on site the school, church and multifamily may share parking and open space to help prevent overbuilding. Commissioner Kaschrnitter asked for clarification if parking can be used for open space. Ms. Barlow advised that would not be the case and explained how the City would calculate need during the review process for uses to share without building additional parking spaces. There was some additional discussion related to the intent, and that the hours of operation vary for each use with some concern of overflow street parking. Ms. Barlow mentioned the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process would allow the opportunity to determine adequate parking and what "share "specifically means. Commission Johnson asked if staff knows of any advantage to limiting the size of this development to 20 acres, and why require both a church and a school? Ms. Barlow reminded the Commission that this is a privately initiated CTA and that during the public hearing the applicant can address questions as to what their intent may be. Ms. Barlow continued with other criteria that applies when specific circumstances exist, such as natural amenities shall be incorporated into the site, buildings, including parking structures, shall have design continuity to look as if they are part of a campus, pedestrian. areas shall be delineated and protected to provide clear areas for pedestrian activity. Ms. Barlow continued with development standards and noted that the proposal identified that it must meet residential standards in the dimensional and standards table 19.70-01, which includes building height of 35 feet, and setbacks, to maintain the surrounding character already in place. Ms. Barlow continued that the minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet is not applicable. Ms. Barlow continued that the density is still applicable 6 dwelling units per acre and lot coverage of 50% or greater. However, that should not be an issue with lot sizes of 10-20 acres. Ms. Barlow explained other requirements would be agreements to ensure compliance and that the conditions will run with the land and will not transfer with the owner. The agreement would be specific to the land, and that the affordable housing component will remain for the life of the project, Lastly, Ms. Barlow concluded this would be processed as a type three permit that requires a CUP. Ms. Barlow gave an overview of the CUP process and advised the permit would be considered by the hearing examiner, requires public notice, a public hearing, and can be denied or conditioned. Ms. Barlow explained that through the Hearing Examiner process 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6 uses that may have unanticipated impacts could be conditioned to mitigate those impacts, or the permit could be denied completely. Mr. Walton asked for clarification how this would run with the land? Would the City put a covenant on the property moving forward? Should the 10-20-acre property have affordable housing built on one portion and later wanted to sell off the undeveloped portions of the property would they be able to do so as they utilized the 10-20 acre and max number of units. Ms. Barlow said agreements would be recorded and the site would be bound to the agreement; in theory property could be sold off it wasn't needed to meet the minimum requirements of the criteria. Commissioner Walton asked if they have 20 acres and they only use the minimum 10 acres and build 60 dwelling units could they create a secondary project within the 20 acres and use the additional 60 dwelling units available to them? Ms. Barlow explained that yes, the CUP process would allow for that. Ms. Barlow gave an example that if someone came in with a proposal of 20 acres and only proposed to build to a density that is less than max, they could come back and ask for modification to CUP. Commissioner Walton asked if they chose to use a portion of property and the dwelling units available to them which would only utilize half of the property, and sell 10 acres of the overall portion, is that locked in since they applied under the 20 acres. Ms. Barlow explained the City would have to review what the original capacity to determine if they had extra land to eliminate from the site and still meet the conditions. Ms. Barlow highlighted that if a CUP is granted that is identifying all criteria are met it is the baseline to determine what they could do moving forward. The process may require the Hearing Examiner revisit the CUP Commissioner Johnson asked how would the City know if someone decides to sell five acres. Ms. Barlow advised the criteria defines this would have to be one parcel under single ownership. The owner would have to go through segregation process in order to divide off a piece of land, The City would be involved in that process and would be aware of the underlying CUP, and the encumbrances recorded with County Auditor. Commissioner Johnson spoke to the topic of a comment made by Ann Fritzel with the Commerce Department and read a statement from her comment: "affordable housing gross density of 6 units per acre on the five-acre parcel". Commissioner Johnson provided a Birdseye view and zoning map of the only viable location that fits all of the criteria. He explained that there are five parcels that would be owned by the entity. Commissioner Johnson stated he has dealt with Catholic Charities and their hearts are always in the right place. He continued explaining that if the five parcels depicted on the map are converted to one single parcel there would not be much room left for development. He continued the three parcels on Walnut Road, the parcel facing Far Road, and on Valleyway Avenue are all somewhat developed. The only parcel remaining without development must be the five acres referenced by Ms. Fritzel. Commissioner Johnson continued that the 17 acres combined could develop 103 dwelling units on that five-acre parcel and asked if that would make this a high density development in an R-3 zone with no transitional requirements? Ms. Barlow explained that transitional regulations are not required, however a CUP would be required. Ms. Barlow continued that if it were to show impacts such as a three story building backed up to single family residence with obvious conflict some transitional regulations could be required by the Hearing Examiner. Ms. Barlow explained the development in question does have 5 pieces of property however they could aggregate and reduce the size or increase the size. She added that it is difficult not to focus on the one existing opportunity, but it is not our only focus as there is no proposal at this time. Commissioner Johnson wanted to make sure the commission is considering the worst case scenario. Should this move forward and be approved by the City Council, it does become 04-25-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6 less probable that public testimony will be taken due to it already been approved. Commissioner Johnson's concern also lends to public notification and hopes the applicant contacts the neighboring properties. Commissioner Walton asked if there is anything that would prevent the applicant from applying for a rezone to multifamily residential to meet R-3 zone criteria? Ms. Barlow explained they couldn't apply for a rezone due to land use designation. A rezone could be considered through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, however that process is only allowed on an annual basis Commissioner Johnson asked for clarification on approved land use regarding cottage developments being allowed in the R-3, multifamily and both mixed use zones? Ms. Barlow explained cottage developments are allowed in those zones and at twice the underlying density of the R-3 zone. A cottage development could be proposed in the R-3 zone with up to 12 dwelling units per acre and it is required to be aggregated around the site to speak to open space requirements. Commissioner Johnson asked if that is calculated on the aggregate land and the entire parcel. Ms. Barlow stated it is assumed that it is on the entire site and only being used for cottage development. There was discussion regarding affordable housing and it was noted that there is no affordable housing component in cottage development. Commissioner McKinley asked if this proposal conflicts with the previous density related Duplex CTA proposed in the R-3 zone that the Commission voted against? Ms. Barlow explained the Duplex CTA was attempting to limit the number of duplexes that could be allowed on a per acre basis. Currently attached and detached single family development is allowed in the R-3 zone as long as you meet the minimum lot size. The previous Duplex CTA was limiting the number of duplexes developed even if the minimum lot size was met. The CTA being reviewed tonight is proposing to add a use that is not currently allowed in the R-3 zone. The only commonality is the R-3 zone component. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Johnson encouraged the Commission to bring items to share for the Good of the Order as he feels it is important. Commissioner Johnson read aloud a heartfelt statement he wrote illustrating his sentiments of pride and concerns for his hometown the City of Spokane Valley. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:10 p.m. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. Id I I P ,„S'74'/I/Z.0/7 ames Johnson, Chairman Date signed 4A-e-12-eLA--\„ ) Robin Hutchins, Secretary Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall May 23, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.rn. II, Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Danielle Kaschmitter Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Timothy Kelley Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Robert McKinley Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Michael Phillips, absent - excused Connor Lange, Planner Michelle Rasmussen, absent - excused Matt Walton Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioners Phillips and Rasmussen were excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the May 23, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to amend the May 9, 2019 minutes to correct the misspelling of his last name on page 8 from Walter to Walton. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed VL COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson reported on May 14, 2019 he attended the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force executive committee to discuss the confluence of leadership meeting where it was determined that meeting will be a long range plan. He also attended the City Council meeting and expressed his concerns for the lack of accurate representation by the 4t" legislative district and requested a more diverse invocation at the City Council meetings. On May 21, 2019 he attended the Spokane County Human Right Task Force regular meeting where they received rapid response training. The training was to prepare for public acts of hate received through a portal developed by the task force to report hate crimes. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Economic Development Manager Mike Basinger advised that after the first reading with the City Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments the Council agreed with all of the Planning Commission's recommendations. Mr. Basinger added that Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA -2019-0003 that had no recommendation from the Planning Commission was denied by the City Council. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. Chair Johnson asked the Commission for a consensus on standardizing a three-minute time limit for all public comment excluding proponent comments. A standard three- minute time limit was concluded to be essential in keeping order. 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 9 There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Findings of Fact: CTA -2018-0006, a proposed text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapters 19.60.050, 19.65.130, 19.40.035 and Appendix A, regarding affordable housing and multifamily development. Senior Planner Lori Barlow summarized the Findings of Fact for the privately initiated code text amendment (CTA). The intent of the amendment is to allow multifamily (MF) development as a conditional use in the residential R-3 zone subject to specific criteria. This proposal came before the Planning Commission on two prior occasions. A study session was held on April 25, 2019 and a public hearing on May 9, 2019. After hearing considerable public testimony, the Planning Commission deliberated and voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of denial to the City Council. Ms. Barlow explained that the Findings of Fact formalize the pivotal actions and capture the Planning Commission's recommendation and vote. Ms. Barlow concluded that as this item moves forward to the City Council there will be no further opportunity for public comment unless the Council takes specific action to do so. Commissioner Walton stated this CTA was one of the more contentious items reviewed in his time with the Conunission. He appreciated the public for their participation and the deliberation from the Commission. He added that despite the struggles the Commission may have had in moving forward he felt this was the correct outcome and is in support of the Findings of Fact. Commissioner Walton moved to approve Findings of Fact CTA -2018-0006 as presented There was no discussion The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. ii. Public Hearing: STV -2019-0002, a privately initiated street vacation of a portion of Glenn, University Roads and Baldwin Avenue. Planner Connor Lange provided a presentation outlining the privately initiated application to vacate unimproved portions of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road. Mr. Lange explained the right-of-ways (ROW) are located between I-90 to the north, Nora Avenue to the south and further bordered by Overland Avenue to the west. Mr. Lange provided procedural overview advising the application was submitted March 8, 2019, the study session was conducted on May 9, 2019, and tonight the public hearing is being held. Mr. Lange advised the majority of the property surrounding the proposed ROWs to be vacated are owned by Circle M Properties. The applicant feels the request will allow for maximum use of abutting properties and that a right of way connection for an overpass is not feasible at University Road. Mr. Lange highlighted a study done in 2015 reviewed the feasibility for an overpass crossing at University Road, the project was determined to be costly and not viable at the time. However, it is unknown if a project on University Road may provide a greater level of service in the future. Due to future development, staff is recommending an amendment to the proposal by removing University Road from the vacation proposal. Mr. Lange advised that all required notices have been satisfied. Notice was posted at CenterPlace, City Hall and the library. Notice was also posted in the newspaper of record on two separate occasions. Written notice was provided to the owner's adjacent to the 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 unimproved portions of University Road and Baldwin Avenue and signs were posted at the end of each street to be vacated. Mr. Lange advised that in processing a street vacation, staff reviews a number of criteria for approval to determine if the street is still required for public access. Staff does not anticipate that either Baldwin Avenue or Glenn Road would serve any public use and are still part of the recommendation from staff to vacate. Mr. Lange added that there has been a request for both ingress/egress and sewer easements that have been added as a recommended condition of approval. Staff also reviews conditional changes and feels University Road may provide a public benefit in the future should an overpass be proposed. There were no public objections during the comment period. Commissioner Kelley asked for clarification pertaining to University Road and what the City was asking. Mr. Lange advised the City would like to retain University Road and not allow it to be vacated in order to preserve it for future projects. Comrnissioner Johnson referenced an email from Jen Brunner requesting a 20 -foot public sanitary sewer easement and asked where that would be located. Mr. Lange advised that is yet to be determined however; it would most likely be along the proposed access point parallel to Baldwin Road. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 6:20 PM Todd Whipple; 212 N Pines Road: Mr. Whipple stated the retention of University Road by the City was a surprise to his client. He advised that when his client had come to him asking about this piece of property, they had done their research before purchasing. He cautioned his client not to purchase the property until they had clarification concerning the crossing at University Road from the City that they had located in the 1985 SR90 Environmental Impact Statement. Mr. Whipple continued that during their Pre - Application meetings they brought the University Road crossing information to the City's attention and were advised by City staff to move forward and vacate University Road, now they have changed their mind. Mr. Whipple advised the customer has done a considerable amount of work, provided plans to the City and had received a grading permit. He added that the grading permit restrictions specified that until the street vacations were approved they were not to do any work on the ROWs. He explained that it became too difficult to maneuver around the property and then the customer had to stop the project. Staff has taken University Road out of the proposal completely. Mr. Whipple stated they received correspondence that the City would entertain a license agreement in order to use the property as if it were vacated to protect the possible future public improvements while the City retains ownership. Mr. Whipple asked the Planning Commission to maintain the University Street Vacation in order to give them time to go before the City Council with a request for a license agreement to use University Road ROW while the City retains ownership. Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Whipple, if the license agreernent is obtained and years down the road the City decided to build a bridge, at whose expense would it be to remove the work they had done? Mr. Whipple advised it would depend on the license agreement and would most likely be the responsibility of Circle M Properties. Mr. Whipple gave some details into what they have done and hope to do. He advised they would grade to highway elevation to create the access road between the two distinct properties on either side and explained their road would be well below University Road. Mr. Whipple gave details into building a crossing structure over 1-90 and stated the work they have and will do should not affect future bridge development. He added they would be willing to work with the City in regards to abutment and girder locations at that time. 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 9 Commissioner Kaschmitter asked that if the access road they would build is lower than University Road and should a bridge be built; would the bridge have to be longer in order to accommodate? Mr. Whipple explained that may be the case adding that currently there isn't enough ROW to widen. University Road. He explained that University Road is 50 - feet wide and building a 45 -foot road to go over 1-90 would require walls straight up and down. He explained that would be cost prohibitive and would be cheaper to build girders and a deck. Commissioner Walton asked for clarification that should it be decided to move forward as amended and University Road is retained how would that impact what they are currently doing until they obtain the license. Mr. Whipple advised the work would stop and could potentially kill the project. They will need to enter on one side and exit on the other due to the size of equipment they use in order to move their materials. If they cannot use University Road, then they purchased a piece of property they can't use. He added that they are moving their corporate headquarters to this site, losing University Road was a big deal and losing the license agreement would be detrimental. Patrick J Mitchelli, 4107 E Broadway Avenue; Mx. Mitchelli explained Mr. Whipple covered all of their concerns. He added that before purchasing the property they made sure University Road would be able to be vacated and explained that if that is no longer the case that will put their business in a tough spot. Mr. Mitchelli added that directly across from University Road is the junk yard and stated that isn't going anywhere in the near future. Justin Fabio, 302 N Walnut Road; Mr. Fabio asked if the traffic was going to run north of University Road and where it would exit. It was determined that the street would run north of University Road, through Circle M Properties and would exit onto Raymond Road. Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 6:39 PM Commissioner Johnson asked staff why they concluded to remove University Road from the proposal and creating a license agreement. Mr. Basinger stated staff recognized that there may be a potential use for University Road sometime in the future adding that not knowing when that might happen the license agreement is an appropriate means to move forward. He highlighted that currently Circle M Properties is located on prime retail property on Pines Road and them moving would open that property to better uses. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb spoke to the license agreement terms stating the City can require that the applicant's improvements are subject to the City putting in a future project. He added that the license agreement would allow Circle M Properties to use the property while the City retains control to build a future project. It was determined the license agreement details do not require Planning Commission action. Commissioner Kelley spoke about his experience driving truck while serving in the United States Army and how difficult they are to turn around in small spaces. He is concerned for the applicant's future as they invest their funds and work for a number of years and then the City builds a bridge. Commissioner Johnson advised that in the early 1990's he was involved in a two-year long process with Spokane County where an overpass was discussed for University Road trying to mitigate the traffic flow on Argonne Road. At the time, the bypass would start near Bigelow Gulch Road, above Hutton settlement, across the river and to University Road, he is unsure if that is still the long range plan. An interchange at University Road is not feasible at this time however, an overpass may be needed in twenty years. Commissioner 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 Johnson is opposed to leaving University Road in the proposal and is in support of the amendment presented by staff, Commissioner McKinley asked staff if the City would have eminent domain rights. Mr. Lamb explained that if in fact University Road was vacated the City would have eminent domain. The City could either purchase or condemn the property and it would be a matter of retaining the right to do so in the future or the City may feel comfortable enough not to develop and willing to pay the cost in the future if necessary. Currently it is City property and should a bridge be developed at a later date the City would have all rights to the property. Commissioner Walton stated the possibilities in cost associated with repurchasing or condemning the property and the legal implication are concerning. He added that looking at the future and how approvals impact the valley as a whole he feels the City needs to leave all possible mechanisms in place. Commissioner Kaschmitter stated she feels the license agreement will help and is in favor of it. She also agrees there may be a need for a bridge in the future. Commissioner Walton moved to approve STV -2019-0002 for Baldwin Road and Glenn Road with the removal of University Road from the street vacation application as amended by staff. Commissioner Kelley advised in looking at the map it appears there are four structures that would have to be removed in order build a bridge at a later date. He added that he is opposed to the motion and feels the street vacation for University Road should remain.. Commissioner Walton advised he understands where the proponent and applicant stand as it seems the City changed their mind late in the process. He added that in doing so staff was looking to do what's right for the future of the City and feels the City was well within the right to make the change as the vacation had not yet occurred. He strongly urges City Council to consider the license agreement to run concurrent as it continues to move forward. Commissioner Walton added that he can't, in good conscience, support the promise to obtain licensure if the vacation is approved and is in support of the motion as it stands. Commissioner Kasehmitter agreed with Commissioner Walton. Commissioner McKinley supports the motion and also agreed with Commissioner Kelly regarding the structures that would need to be removed. The vote on the motion was four in favor, one opposed with Commissioner Kelley dissenting, and the motion passed.. iii. Public Hearing: CTA -2019-0002, a proposed code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 19.60, Chapter 19.85 and Appendix A to allow and provide regulations on licensed marijuana transportation businesses. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 6:57 PM Mr. Lamb provided a presentation outlining the code text amendment to allow licensed marijuana transport operators to operate within the City of Spokane Valley. Mr. Lamb provided background into Washington Initiative I-502 that passed in 2012 legalizing marijuana in Washington State. The City responded with adopting comprehensive regulations for the allowable state license uses to be production, process and retail stores. As part of the regulations the City Council adopted a provision 19.85.040 that prohibits all other uses within the City of Spokane Valley. In the fall of 2018 the City had a citizen 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 inquiry from a license transporter hoping to do business in the City. Staff presented an administrative report to the City Council and the Council gave consensus to bring a proposal forward to the Planning Commission for consideration. Mr. Lamb continued that transportation is only between the licensed production, process, retail stores and research facilities and is not for home delivery. The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) oversees the licensing and licensed transporters are subject to WSLCB requirements. Mr. Lamb continued that license marijuana transporters are required to have a physical location or office to store their fleet and state law prohibits them from storing marijuana in an office or physical location. State requires transportation logs and manifests in keeping with the state mandate that marijuana be suitably tracked from seed to sale. Mr. Lamb explained the product is transported in secured compartments, required to be attached to the vehicle or vehicle body and are locked at all times. Delivery has to be made within 48 hours from the time of pick up as there may be an instance where the marijuana is left in the vehicle overnight. Commissioner Johnson asked about shorter stops such a dinner and lunch breaks. Mr. Lamb advised it is allowed to be in the vehicle in a secured compartment no matter the length of the break. Commissioner Kelley asked if a truck could be stored in a storage facility or garage? Mr. Lamb advised that is an option, adding that under state law the product cannot be stored in an office and there is no mandate that the vehicle has to be stored in a garage or storage facility. Mr. Lamb added that state law prohibits licensed marijuana transporters from being within 1,000 feet of enumerated sensitive uses such as schools, playgrounds, public transit and libraries. Mr. Lamb gave an example that currently under state law a marijuana shop could be built near an empty park like property with no current use. The City's buffers already in place prohibit marijuana shops from being built within 1,000 feet of vacant uses in order to prohibit non -conforming uses. Mr. Lamb addressed the questions posed by the Commission during the study session starting with the transportation of live plants. Transporting live plants is allowed in a secured compartment, those compartments could be metal partitions, cages or shatter proof acrylic to allow the plant to stay alive. Mr. Lamb added that the vehicle transporting the live plants must be windowless to the maximum extent possible. Mr. Lamb addressed advertising concerns advising state law prohibits advertising on or in private vehicles to limit the draw of attention. Mr. Lamb addressed the question regarding being stopped by law enforcement and identifying themselves. Transporters are required to keep a binder with their license details in the vehicle at all times to easily provide to law enforcement. Transport vehicles under the law are considered to be an extension of the licensed premises and can be stopped and inspected at any time. Mr. Lamb concluded that staff identified potential impacts to be traffic; as there are no restriction on fleet size, odor; as marijuana will be kept in vehicles, and crime; also due to marijuana being kept in vehicles. WSLCB is not aware of any complaints regarding odor or any break-ins to transport vehicles. Mr. Lamb concluded that this proposal is to allow licensed transporters in the Regional Commercial (RC), Industrial Mixed Use (IMU) and Industrial (I) zones as this will address traffic issues by placing them near arterials. The proposal includes the City buffers related to vacant school, library and City properties and also requires a lockable enclosure for the fleet if they are in the RC zone. 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 Commissioner Kelley asked what the definition of Regional Commercial zone is. Mr. Basinger explained that RC zones are for commercial regional uses located throughout 1- 90 along high traffic exits like the Spokane Valley Mall. Mr. Basinger added the enclosure suggested are due to the fact that there would be a lot of individuals shopping in these zone. The City wants to ensure the vehicles and products are stored properly. Kevin Lynch, 722 W Wedgewood; Mr. Lynch advised there are other transport companies in the state that already stay the night in the City of Spokane Valley during transport. He spoke to the topic of smell advising the product is vacuum sealed for packaging, then placed in sealed totes and then in a compartment in the van preventing odor. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Lynch if he currently ships live plants? Mr. Lynch advised he does periodically as it is 1% of his business. He added that per state law the vehicle that ships live plants cannot have any windows as Mr. Lamb had mentioned. Commissioner Walton asked Mr. Lynch to describe what a law enforcement interaction would look like. Mr. Lynch explained that his staff are required to wear ID badges to prove they are an employee. He continued that the binder carried in the vehicles as mentioned before include their common carrier license, business license, insurance card and affidavit. There is a manifest and invoice in the primary tote that can be provided to law enforcement when requested. Mr. Lynch explained that it can range from law enforcement knowing the business being conducted before even making contact with them to being asked to provide all documents in the vehicle and in the totes. Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Lynch why the information isn't offered to the officer and it was explained that would be breaking the chain of custody due to the seed to sale laws. Mr. Lynch added that by law he does not have to prove to law enforcement what is being transported in the totes unless instructed to do provide documentation. Commissioner Walton asked Mr. Lynch what impacts the City's request to have a secure enclosure would have on his business? Mr. Lynch advised it does add to cost. He stated that he is a proponent of the request as it will make his staff, drivers, product and vehicles more secure. He added that buildings are hard to find and cost ranges from $1,800 to $2,500 dollars a month, it is also difficult to find a landlord that will rent to him. Mr. Lamb addressed the discussion pertaining to law enforcement stops highlighting that there is a preemption prevision in state law that WSLCB provides all operations of the licensed uses. The City would not be able to ask for any additional forms of identification or supplemental documentation. Commissioner Walton asked staff why the City chose to exempt Appleway trail from the 1,000 -foot exclusion zone? Mr. Lamb advised that the City Council does provide a prohibition on retail sales within 1,000 feet of Appleway trail to prevent the end users from using the trail. Council felt it appropriate to exempt Appleway trail due to its extent across the City and crossing multiple zones. Mr. Lamb added the limitations in place such as production staying indoors and no chemical processing. This was a compromise for business rights and property rights verses the trail and its beneficial use by citizens. Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at. 7:23 p. rn. 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes. Page 8 of 9 Commissioner Walton stated he was intrigued by this proposal due to the attitudes and state adoption of marijuana usage across the country. He feels it's a good idea to stay at the cutting edge of the process within state guidelines and state law, adding that the City wants to promote growth of all kinds. Commissioner Walton likes the proposal and feels there is a good compromise in the adoption of the enclosures and is in support. Commissioner Kelley explained his understanding of the process due to an acquaintance having a similar business and how it operated. Commissioner Kelly explained he feels this will attract criminals that want to steal the trucks and the product. Commissioner Kelly stated he does not appreciate the confrontational attitude toward law enforcement. He added that having been part of this first hand, landlords have the right not to lease to businesses they feel will be a detriment to the community. Commissioner Kelly believes there is a lot of crime attracted to and associated with marijuana businesses and is concerned for people's safety. Commissioner Walton move to approve CTA -2019-0002 as presented. Commissioner Kelley reminded the Commission that when I-502 was first presented, the marijuana grow, production and retail facilities were voted down by the Commission. He added that his belief is that if the Iegaliation of marijuana would have been brought to the vote of the people of Spokane Valley it would not have passed and he is greatly opposed. Commissioner Walton thanked Commissioner Kelley for the background. He added that he is in support as the City allows this type of business and are staying on the cutting edge. Commissioner Walton advised that location and regulations have addressed many concerns. Commissioner Walton continued one of his primary considerations was to understand how this business is being perceived by local law enforcement and appreciated the perspective from the proponent as well as Commissioner Kelley's position. The vote on the motion was four in favor, one opposed with Commissioner Kelley dissenting, and the motion passed iv. Public Hearing: STV -2019-0001, proposed street vacations of a portion of TshirIey Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue, and Greenacres Road in the Northeast Industrial Area. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 7:40 p. m. Mr. Basinger provided a presentation to the Commission outlining the Northeast Industrial Area City Initiated Street Vacation. Mr. Basinger provided background advising on April 29, 2019 City Council initiated the Street Vacation and set a public hearing with the Planning Commission. On April 25, 2019 a study session was conducted and tonight the public hearing is being held. Mr. Basinger explained this area is located in the Northeast Industrial Area were the City has taken action to advance development. The City rezoned the property to allow a broader variety of industrial uses, extended the sewer from Sullivan Road to Barker Road and have adopted a planned action ordinance to streamline development. The proposed street vacations will further prepare the area for development.. Mr. Basinger advised Garland Avenue will provide access for future development. He added that the current ROW may be an impediment for a large industrial user to developed in the future. Mr. Basinger continued, the proposed vacations are the unimproved Right of 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 9 Ways (ROW) of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Greenacres Road and Rich Avenue. Public notice was posted and mailed on April 25, 2019, posted in the Valley Herald and the Exchange on April 26, 2019 and May 3, 2019 and signs were posted on each end of proposed vacation areas. There have been no public or agency comments to date. Mr. Basinger added that the City has been working with Consolidated Irrigation District as they would like to loop their water system. The City will have an easement in place once Tschirley Road ROW is removed to accommodate for their loop. Staff is requesting the approval to vacate the ROWs subject to the conditions in the staff report. Mr. Basinger provided a list of the conditions. Vacated property will be transferred into the abutting parcels, if approved the area will be surveyed to identify applicable easements. There was some discussion regarding a Pre -Application meeting that determined there would be a land locked parcel once the ROWs are vacated. However, the applicants are proposing to apply for a boundary line elimination to make one parcel mitigating this issue. Mr. Basinger concluded that the zoning will be extended to include the vacated ROWs, a survey will be recorded and all conditions will be fully satisfied prior to transfer of title. Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 7: 49 p.m. Commissioner Walton moved to approve STV -2019-0001 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Kaschmitter thanked the public for their comments. Commissioner Walton spoke about his reflection on the previous meeting and overall dedication from the Commission and community. He thanked Commissioner Kelley for reminding himself and staff of his passion in allowing the public to have their free speech. Commissioner Walton apologized to the Commission and members of the public if his comments felt as if they were dissuading the public from speaking as that was not his intent. Commissioner Walton concluded with thanking the Commission for their dedication. Mr. Basinger added currently the Planning Commission is the forum where comments will be received, so it is with utmost importance they are heard. It is also important to forward a recommendation that synthesizes the Commission's vote and he appreciated the Commissions service. Commissioner Johnson stated he concurred with Commissioner Walton and also appreciated being a part of this team. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:55 p.m. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed 0/3/20/7 James Johnson, Chairman Date signed P -44t1,--) Robin Hutchins, Secretary CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 23, 2019 Department Director: Check all that apply: ❑ consent n old business ®new business n public hearing ❑ information n admin. report n pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance 19-010 — Street Vacation of Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140; Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 35A.47.020 and RCW 35.79 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: At the April 9, 2019 City Council meeting, a public hearing date was set with the Planning Commission for May 23, 2019. On June 24, 2019, City Council heard an administrative report on the proposed street vacation. On July 9, 2019, City Council voted to advance Ordinance 19-010 to a second reading. BACKGROUND: The City received an application on March 8, 2019, from Whipple Consulting Engineering representing Circle M Family Properties, requesting to vacate the unimproved portions of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road. The total area requested to be vacated for Baldwin Avenue (669 feet in length) is 40,144 square feet, for University Road (225 feet in length) is 12,926 square feet, and for Glenn Road (19 feet in length) is 878 square feet. The right-of-way widths are 50-60 feet. The property owner has identified the following reasons for making the request: 1. The area proposed to be vacated is unimproved and not maintained; 2. The vacation will allow maximum use of abutting properties because parcels 45093.1519 and 45084.0401, owned by Circle M Family Properties, accounts for the majority of ownership along the unimproved right-of-ways; and 3. Interstate 90 intersects University Road and Glenn Road to the north hindering future right-of- way connection; and Baldwin Avenue right-of-way is offset from the constructed Baldwin Avenue to the west, which prohibits connection. A 2015 study by Fehr & Peers evaluated the feasibility of an overpass connection at University Road. The study examined the cost of the project in comparison with level of service that would be provided by the improvements. Due to the relatively high cost and low level of service an overpass at University Road would provide, other alternative projects were chosen to be completed. However, recent discussions among City staff regarding the University Road right -of way concluded that the University Road right-of- way may provide potential public benefit if a pedestrian or vehicle access crossing becomes viable in the future. Therefore, due to these recent discussions, it is the City's recommendation to remove the vacation of University Road from the proposal. The Planning Commission conducted a study session on May 9, 2019 and a public hearing on May 23, 2019. Following public testimony and deliberations, the Planning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend approval of the amended proposal (as described above) to vacate Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road, but retain the right-of-way for University Road. The findings and recommendations were approved by the Planning Commission on June 13, 2019 (see attached). SVMC Section 22.140.040 directs City Council to consider the Planning Commission's findings, conditions and/or limitations appropriate to preserve the public use or benefit, the division of the vacated RCA 2" Ordinance Reading for STV -2019-0002 Page 1 of 2 right-of-way among abutting property owners, and lastly whether to require compensation for the right- of-way and when it is to be paid. Council established Resolution 07-009 to provide parameters on requiring compensation. Within the Resolution, Section 1(Policy); states "The cost for property received as a result of a vacation initiated by an adjacent property owner shall equal 50% of the appraised value of the vacated property received" Section 1.1.a allows the property values to be averaged, if value of adjacent properties differs. The table below includes the analysis for associating an estimated appraised value for the vacated property. Parcel Number Appraised Market Value (2019) Lot Size in Square Appraised Value per Square 2 2 Feet ft Foot ft 45093.1519 $32,940 131,745 2 Average appraised value per ft Square feet of Baldwin Avenue & Glenn Road Appraised value for the area of street vacation 50% of appraised value Subtracting amount paid for application processing 1 $0.25 $0.25/1 = $0.25 2 41,022 ft 2 41,022 ft x $0.25 = $10,255.50 $10,255.50 x 50% = $5,127.75 $5,127.75 - $ 1,365.00 = $3,762.75 Estimated value of Baldwin Avenue & Glenn Road = $3,762.75 Therefore, 50% of the appraised value for the unimproved portions of Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road minus the application fees total $3,762.75. In accordance with Section 1.2 of Resolution 07-009 the Ordinance includes a condition requiring payment to the city for the $3,762.75. OPTIONS: Move to approve with or without amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 19-010 STAFF CONTACT: Connor Lange, Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 19-010 2. Signed Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation 3. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission 4. Approved Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 9, 2019 5. Approved Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 23, 2019 6. Approved Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 13, 2019 RCA 2" Ordinance Reading for STV -2019-0002 Page 2 of 2 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 19-010 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION OF APPROXIMATELY 41,022 SQUARE FEET OF BALDWIN AVENUE AND GLENN ROAD WHICH BISECTS PARCEL 45093.1519 AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, on March 8, 2019, a completed application for vacation was filed requesting the vacation of Baldwin Avenue approximately 40,144 square feet, University Road approximately 12,926 square feet, and Glenn Road approximately 878 square feet; and WHEREAS, on April 9, 2019, the City Council by Resolution 19-007 set a public hearing date for May 23, 2019 with the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing; and WHEREAS, following the hearing, the Planning Commission found that the notice and hearing requirements of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140.020 had been met; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and minutes have been filed with the City Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacation; and WHEREAS, none of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated filed a written objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 22.140 SVMC, upon vacation of the road, the City shall transfer the vacated property to abutting property owners, the zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street shall attach to the vacated property, a record of survey shall be submitted to the City, and all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street shall be paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred property. In this particular case, the vacated property shall be transferred to parcel 45093.1519; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to vacate the above street pursuant to chapter 22.140 SVMC. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The area proposed to be vacated is unimproved and no utilities are located within the right- of-way. However, Spokane County Environmental Services requested an easement for sanitary sewer. The applicant stated in the application materials that an ingress/egress easement would be created to provide future access to parcel 45093.2401. The vacation of Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road is expected to have no impact on the general public as surrounding parcels currently do not use the right-of-way for access. However, the vacation of University Road has potential to impact the general public. Therefore, staff recommends the City retain the University Road right-of-way for projects that are unforeseen at this time. 2. The subject right-of-way is unimproved and not being utilized for public access. The site is bordered by Interstate 90 to the north which provides no reasonable means of connection for Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road. However, University Road right-of-way could provide potential future public benefit if a pedestrian or vehicle access crossing was ever proposed. There is no need for a new and different public way around the subject ROW. So long as access to the drywell for maintenance is provided, the public interest is served. Ordinance 19-010 - Street Vacation STV -2019-0002 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT 3. Public access is not needed in this area because no properties currently utilize the right-of- way for access and the majority of ownership along the unimproved right-of-way is owned by Circle M Family Properties. There is no need for a new and different public way. An ingress/egress access easement will be required to ensure access for parcel number 45093.2401. 4. Based on the comprehensive plan, it is not anticipated that changes will occur in the future that would require the use of the Baldwin Avenue or Glenn Road right-of-way for public access. However, University Road has potential to serve a greater purpose than currently exists. The right-of-way could provide future public benefit with a pedestrian or vehicle access overpass. 5. No objections or public comment was received. 6. The subject ROW bisects parcel 45093.1519 and title shall vest in that parcel. 7. Resolution 07-009 was adopted pursuant to RCW 35.79.030 to set the City's policy for imposing vacation charges. Pursuant to Section 1 of Resolution 07-009: a. The cost for property received as a result of a vacation initiated by an adjacent property owner shall equal 50% of the appraised value of the vacated property received to the extent the cost exceeds the amount charged by the City of Spokane Valley to initiate the vacation process. i. The appraised value shall be the same as the value of an equivalent portion of property adjacent to the proposed vacation as established by Spokane County Assessor at the time the matter is considered by the City Council. ii. If the value of adjacent properties differs, than the average of the adjacent property values per square foot will be used. Based on the average assessed value of the adjacent properties, $5,127.75 is 50% of the assessed value. Therefore, $5,127.75 minus the $1,365 application fee equals $3,762.75. Section 2. Property to be Vacated. Based upon the above findings and in accordance with this Ordinance, the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley which is incorporated herein by reference, and legally described as follows: BALDWIN AVENUE VACATION A STRIP OF LAND, 60 FEET IN WIDTH, BEING A PORTION OF BALDWIN AVENUE AS DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SULLIVAN ADDITION AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "K" OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, (SAID BALDWIN AVENUE DEPICTED AS INDIANA AVENUE ON SAID PLAT); LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, W.M., CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WA; SAID STRIP BEING BOUND ON THE WEST BY THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF UNIVERSITY ROAD (SANDS ROAD PER SAID PLAT); AND BOUND ON THE EAST BY THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF GLENN ROAD (PATRICK STREET PER SAID PLAT). GLENN ROAD VACATION A STRIP OF LAND, 60 FEET IN WIDTH, BEING A PORTION OF GLENN ROAD AS DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SULLIVAN ADDITION AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "K" OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON (SAID GLENN AVENUE DEPICTED AS PATRICK STREET ON SAID PLAT); LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, W.M., CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WA; SAID STRIP BEING BOUND ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF BALDWIN AVENUE (INDIANA AVENUE PER SAID PLAT); AND BOUND ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF INTERSTATE 90. Ordinance 19-010 - Street Vacation STV -2019-0002 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT Section 3. Division of Property to be Vacated. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.040 and SVMC 22.140.040(C), the vacated portion of the street or alley shall belong to the abutting property owners, one- half to each, unless factual circumstances otherwise dictate a different division and distribution of the street or alley to be vacated. In this particular instance a different division and distribution of the vacated property is necessary. The property to be vacated bisects parcel 45093.1519 which requires that the entirety of the vacated property belong to that single parcel. The completion of the vacation shall be recorded in the record of survey which shall be created and recorded with Spokane County as required pursuant to SVMC 22.140.090. Section 4. Zoning. The zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation attached to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The City Manager or designee is authorized to make this notation on the official Zoning Map of the City. Section 5. Conditions of Vacation. The following conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to the transfer of title by the City. 1. Initial work to satisfy conditions of the street vacation (File No. STV -2019-0002), including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within 90 days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcel (45093.1519) as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office pursuant to condition 8. 3. The following easements shall be established. Submit the recording number on the record of survey and written documentation of the easement for City verification. a. All existing lots shall have access to a public street or existing driveway easement prior to finalization. Parcels shall be reconfigured through a boundary line adjustment or an easement shall be created to provide access to parcel 45093.2401. b. An easement acceptable to Spokane County Environmental Services for access to public sewer to serve parcel 45093.2401. If parcel 45093.2401 is consolidated with an adjacent parcel that has access to the sanitary sewer system, no easement is required. 4. Following the City Council's passage of the Ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington, including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the City Manager or designee, for review. 5. The surveyor shall locate a monument at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the Spokane Valley Street Standards. 6. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership, including but not limited to, title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees shall be paid by the proponent. The City shall not and does not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 7. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The Ordinance 19-010 - Street Vacation STV -2019-0002 Page 3 of 4 DRAFT adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 8. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. 10. Payment in the amount of $3,762.75 shall be paid to the City by the property owner(s) requesting vacation. Section 6. Closing. Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor, and the City Manager is authorized to execute and finalize all necessary documents in order to complete the transfer of the property identified herein. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of July, 2019. ATTEST: L.R. Higgins, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 19-010 - Street Vacation STV -2019-0002 Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION STV -2019-0002 —Street vacation of n portion of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following tlic public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission reconiniendation. A, Background: 1. Chapter 22.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), governing street vacations, was adopted in September 2007 and became effective on October 28, 2007. 2. The privately -initiated street vacation, STV -2019-0002, proposes to vacate unimproved sections of Baldwin Avenue (669 feet in length), University Road (225 feet in length) and Glenn Road (19 feet in length) 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on May 23, 2019 and conducted a study session on May 9, 2019. The Commission voted four to one to recommend approval Mae amended proposal (front staff) to vacate Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road but retain the right-of-way for University Road. B. Planning Coniniission Findings: Compliance with SVMC 22.140.030 Planning Commission review and recommendation Finding(s): 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is unimproved and no utilities are located within the right-of-way. However, Spokane County Environmental Services requested an easement for sanitary sewer. The applicant stated in the application materials that an ingresslegress easement would be created to provide future access to parcel 45093.2401. The vacation of Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road is expected to have no impact on the general public as surrolniding parcels currently do not use the right-of- way ight-ofway for access. However, the vacation of University Road has potential to impact the general public. Therefore, staff recommends the City retain the University Road right-of-way for projects that are unforeseen at this time. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public Access? The subject right-of-way is unimproved and not being utilized for public access. The site is bordered by Interstate 90 to ilie north which provides no reasonable means of connection for Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road. However, as referenced in the Background section University Road right-of-way could provide potential future public benefit if a pedestrian or vehicle access Grossing was ever proposed. Findings and Rocommendatinns of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission STV -2019.0002 Page 1 of 3 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? Public access is not needed in this area because no properties currently utilize the right- of-way for access and the majority of ownership along the unimproved right-of-way is owned by Circle M Family Properties. There is no need for a new and different public way. An ingress/egress access easement will be required to ensure access for parcel number 45093.2401. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? Based on the comprehensive plan it is not anticipated that changes will occur in the future that would require the use of the Baldwin Avenue or Glenn Road right-of-way for public access. However, as discussed in the background section University Road has potential to serve a greater purpose than currently exists. The right-of-way could. provide future public benefit with a pedestrian or vehicle access overpass. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? No objections or public comment was received. C. Conclusion: The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been net. D. Recommendation: Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the amended proposal to vacate Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road but retain the right-of-way for University Road subject to the following: I. Initial work to satisfy conditions of the street vacation (File No. STV -2019-0002), including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within 90 days following the effective date of approval by the City Council, 2. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcel (45093.1519) as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office pursuant to condition 8. 3. The following easements shall be established. Submit recording number on record of survey and written documentation of easement for City verification. a. All existing lots shall have access to a public street or existing driveway easement prior to finalization. Parcels shall be reconfigured through a boundary line adjustment or an easement shall be created to provide access to parcel 45093.2401. b. An easement acceptable to Spokane County Environmental Services for access to public sewer to serve parcel 45093.2401. 1f, parcel 45093.2401 is consolidated with an adjacent parcel that has access to the sanitary sewer system, no easement is required. 4. Following the City Council's passage of the Ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington, including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the City Manager, or designee, for review. Findings and Recommendations oRhe Spokane Valley Planning Commission SYV•2019-O002 Page 2 of 5. The surveyor shall locate a monument at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of- way ight-ofway with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the SVSS. 6. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership, including but not limited to, title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees shall be paid by the proponent. The City shall not and does not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 7. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 8. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokanc County Auditor. 9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer oftitle by the City. Approved this 13th day ofJune, 2019 attres , 'olrnson, Chairu� n ATTEST Deannii Horton, Ad min istrative Assistant Findings and Recommendations or the Spokane Valley Planning Commission STV -Z0,19 -1:10G2 Page 3 013 Stiorkane ..Valley COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING & PLANNING STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FILE: STV -2019-0002 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 16, 2019 FILE NO: STV -2019-0002 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Request to vacate unimproved sections of Baldwin Avenue (669 feet in length), University Road (225 feet in length) and Glenn Road (19 feet in length). The right-of-way widths vary ranging from 50 to 64 feet. STAFF PLANNER: Connor Lange, Planner, Community & Public Works PROPERTY OWNER: Circle M Family Properties LLC; 2123 N Pines Road; Spokane Valley, WA 99216 PROPOSAL LOCATION: The portion of right-of-ways proposed to be vacated are located between Interstate 90 (north) and Nora Avenue (south) and adjacent to three parcels (45093.1519, 45084.0401 and 45084.1314) further located in the SW quarter of the SW quarter of Section 9, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington BACKGROUND: The City received an application on March 8, 2019 from Whipple Consulting Engineering representing Circle M Family Properties, requesting to vacate the unimproved portions of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road. The total area requested to be vacated for Baldwin Avenue is 40,144 square feet, for University Road approximately 12,926 square feet and for Glenn Road approximately 878 square feet. The property owner has identified the following reasons for making the request: 1. The area proposed to be vacated is unimproved and not maintained; 2. The vacation will allow maximum use of abutting properties because parcels 45093.1519 & 45084.0401 owned by Circle M Family Properties accounts for the majority of ownership along the unimproved right-of-ways; and 3. Interstate 90 intersects University Road and Glenn Road to the north hindering future right of way connection; and Baldwin Avenue right-of-way is offset from the constructed Baldwin Avenue to the west, which prohibits connection. A 2015 study by Fehr & Peers evaluated the feasibility of an overpass connection at University Road. The study examined the cost of the project in comparison with level of service that would be provided by the improvements. Due to the relatively high cost and low level of service an overpass at University Road would provide, other alternative projects were chosen to be completed. However, recent discussions among city staff regarding the University Road right-of-way concluded that the Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 Page 1 of 11 May 15, 2019 University Road right-of-way may provide potential public benefit if a pedestrian or vehicle access crossing becomes viable in the future. Therefore, due to these recent discussions it is the City's recommendation to remove the vacation of University Road from the proposal. The site does not contain any city facilities or utility improvements. All improvements stop at the edge of the pavement for University Road which will remain as dedicated right-of-way. Although the majority of the lots are owned by one entity a vacation of the right-of-way would leave parcel number 45093.2401 without access for both ingress/egress and sanitary sewer. Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 20.20.090.E "Every lot shall have direct access to a paved public street, private street, or an easement for a private driveway." The application states that an ingress/egress easement would be established to allow access to University Road across parcel 45093.1519 that is owned by Circle M Family Properties. Spokane County Environmental Services has requested a 20 foot public sanitary sewer easement in lieu of the public right of way. APPROVAL CRITERIA: 1. SVMC — Title 20 (Subdivision Regulations) 2. SVMC — Title 21 (Environmental Controls) 3. SVMC — Title 22 (Street Vacations) 4. City of Spokane Valley Street Standards ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Exhibit 2: Aerial Map Exhibit 3: Application Material Exhibit 4: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 5: Agency Comments I. PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics of proposed vacation: The unimproved right of way area is approximately 40,144 square feet for Baldwin Avenue, 12,926 square feet for University Road and 878 square feet for Glenn Road. The entirety of the subject right of way is unimproved and covered in grass and weeds. Adjacent Comprehensive Plan Designation: Corridor Mixed. Use (CMU) Adjacent Zoning: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Adjacent Land Use(s): Parcel 45093.1519, 45084.0401 and 45093.2401 are all vacant. Parcel 45084,1314 is Tract C of the University View Estates Planned Unit Development which is utilized for drainage and is planted with grass. Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 May 15, 2019 Page 2 of 11 II. STAFF ANALYSIS OF STREET VACATION PROPOSAL A. COMPLIANCE WITH SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE (SVMC) TITLE 22.140.030 Findings: 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is unimproved and no utilities are located within the right- of-way. However, Spokane County Environmental Services requested an easement for sanitary sewer. The applicant stated in the application materials that an ingress/egress easement would be created to provide future access to parcel 45093.2401. The vacation of Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road are expected to have no impact on the general public as surrounding parcels currently do not use the right-of-way for access. However, the vacation of University Road has potential to impact the general public. As referenced above in the Background section, the right-of-way could provide future public benefit and therefore, staff recommends the City retain the University Road right-of-way for projects that are unforeseen at this time. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The subject right-of-way is unimproved and not being utilized for public access. The site is bordered by Interstate 90 to the north which provides no reasonable means of connection for Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road. However, as referenced in the Background section University Road right-of-way could provide potential future public benefit if a pedestrian or vehicle access crossing was ever proposed. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? Public access is not needed in this area because no properties currently utilize the right-of- way for access and the majority of ownership along the unimproved right -of --way is owned by Circle M Family Properties. There is no need for a new and different public way. An ingress/egress access easement will be required to ensure access for parcel number 45093.2401. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? Based on the comprehensive plan it is not anticipated that changes will occur in the future that would require the use of the Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road right-of-way for public access. However, as discussed in the Background section the vacation of University Road has potential to provide a greater use than currently exists. The right-of-way could provide future public benefit with a pedestrian or vehicle access overpass. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? No objections or public comment has been received. Conclusions: Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 Page 3 of 11 May 15, 2019 The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met. B. COMPLIANCE WITH SVMC TITLE 21 —ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(2)(i) and SVMC 21.20.040 from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). III. PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: No public comments have been received following the notice of public hearing issued, mailed and posted on April 19, 2019. A Notice of Public Hearing sign was posted on the property April 19, 2019 in three separate locations and public hearing notices were mailed to all owners adjacent to the right-of-ways being vacated. Notices were posted in the Spokane Valley Public Library, City of Spokane Valley main reception area and CenterPlace Event Center on April 19, 2019. Lastly, the notice was published in the Spokane Valley Herald on April 19, 2019 and April 26, 2019. Conclusion(s): Staff concludes that adequate public noticing was conducted for STV -2019-0002 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS Notice was provided to agencies and service providers. Comments were received from the following agencies and are attached as exhibits to this staff report. Where necessary, comments have been incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval in Section V. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Public Works Yes 4-19-19 Spokane Valley Fire District No.1 Yes 4-18-19 Spokane County Environmental Services Yes 5-10-19 Spokane Regional Health District No Avista Utilities Yes 3-4-19 Spokane Transit Authority No City of Spokane Valley Police Department No Century Link Yes 3-4-19 Comcast Yes 3-1-19 Modern Electric Water Company Yes 5-10-19 WA Archaeology and Historic Preservation Yes 4-23-19 WA Department of Transportation No Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 May 15, 2019 Page 4 of 11 Spokane County Division of Utilities No Findings: Notice of application was routed to jurisdictional agencies, utilities, and public districts for review and comment. On April 19, 2019 comments were received from Ryan Kipp (Spokane Valley Traffic Engineer) which did not recommend the approval of the vacation for University Road due to the potential future public benefit of an overpass at University Road. Spokane County Environmental Services submitted comments on May 10, 2019 that requested a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement for vacant parcel 45093.2401 because it will no longer have any access to the public right-of-way. No other substantive agency comments have been received to date. Conclusion(s): Staff concludes that jurisdictional agencies, utilities, and or public districts have no concerns regarding the proposed street vacation for Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road. V. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS Staff concludes that STV -2019-0002 as proposed is generally consistent, or will be made consistent, through the recommended conditions of approval based on the approval criteria stated herein. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request to vacate a 669.08 foot unimproved portion of Baldwin Avenue and 19.90 feet of Glenn Road subject to the following: 1. Initial work to satisfy conditions of the street vacation (File No. STV -2019-0002), including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within 90 days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcels (45093.1519, 45084.0401 and 45084.1314) as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office pursuant to condition 8. 3. The following easements are required to be established. Submit recording number on record of survey and written documentation of easement for City verification. a. All existing lots shall have access to a public street or existing driveway easement prior to finalization. Parcels shall be reconfigured through a boundary line adjustment or an easement shall be created to provide access to parcel 45093.2401. b. An easement acceptable to Spokane County Environmental Services for access to public sewer to serve parcel 45093.2401. If, parcel 45093.2401 is consolidated with an adjacent parcel that has access to the sanitary sewer system, no easement is required. 4. Following the City Council's passage of the Ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 Page 5 of 11 May 15, 2019 Washington, including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the City Manager, or designee, for review. 5. The surveyor shall locate a monument at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right- of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the SVSS. 6. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership, including but not limited to, title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees shall be paid by the proponent. The City shall not and does not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title.. 7. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 8. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 Page 6 of 11 May 15, 2019 EXHIBIT 1 Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 Page 7 of 11 May 15, 2019 I)S.iA' L E tlCawtOTJAsp' P-•• EXHIBIT 2 Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 Page 8 of 11 May 15, 2019 EXHIBIT 3 Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 Page 9 of I 1 May 15, 2019 400°Valley STREET VACATION APPLICATION SVMC 22.140 Community Development -- Planning Division 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5310 +M Fax: 509.688.0037 t planning spokanevalley_orR STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: Received by: �t Fee: PLUS #: File #: prr1 s-•Fw• a1-'l..l PART 1 -REQUIRED MATERIAL RECEIVED "'THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED•`. MAR U 8 1U19 ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ Application Fee CSV PERMIT CENTER ❑ Notice of Application Packet (17.80.110) — Adjacent Property(ies) SUB # REV, j�� ID Written Narrative — A written narrative describing the reasons for posed—street-vacation, t --I physical limits of the proposed street vacation and the public benefit of the proposed street vacation. ❑ Written Correspondence from Utility Purveyors Telephone Cable Electric _ Other (Specify ) Water District Fire District Gas Utility Sewer Utility ® Vicinity Map — Submit a map showing the general area of the proposed vacation ❑ Record of Survey, if available, for the subject street and/or alsey proposed for vacation, and abutting properties, streets and alleys within 100 feet on all sides of the proposed vacation. ❑ Written Evidence of all easements, allowances or reservations, if available, pertaining to the street and/or alley proposed for vacation. PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT NAME: Whipple Consulting Engineers, Brett Griffith MAILING ADDRESS: 21 S. Pines Road CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA ZIP: 99206 PHONE: 509-893-2617 FAX: CELL: EMAIL: bgriffith@whipplece.com PROPERTY OWNER No. 1: Circle M Family Properties, Brandon Michielli MAILING ADDRESS: 2123 N. Pines Road CITY: Spokane Valley PL -15 V1.0 STATE: WA ZIP: 99216 Page 1 of 3 Spokan'' ..001FVal ley PHONE: 509-928-3255 FAX: PROPERTY OWNER No, 2: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: CELL: S"l REG I VACATION APPL[CATION EMAIL: brandon@spokanelandsCa0e.net PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: If more than two (2) abutting property owners, include information and writlen authorization on a separate sheet of paper for each. NAME OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: Baldwin Avenue & Glenn Road & University Road DIMENSIONS OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: Baldwin = 60' wide, University E. ROW to Glenn W.ROW l Glenn = 60' wide, Baldwin S. ROW to 1-90 S. ROW / University = 50' wide, 1-90 5. ROW --225.50' south SQUARE FEET OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: -53,948 S.F. ABUTTING TAX PARCEL No(s).: 45093.1519, 45084,0401 & 45084.1314 ADDRESSES OF ABUTTING PARCELS: Unknown addresses ZONING DESIGNATION: Corridor Mixed Use THE FOLLOWING IS CRITERIA EVALUATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN FORMULATING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS SHALL BE ANSWERED IN A DETAILED MANNER; 1 . How DOES A CHANGE OF USE OR VACATION OF THE STREET/ALLEY IMPROVE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC? 2. IS THE STREET OR ALLEY NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC ACCESS? EXPLAIN. 3. WOULD SUBSTITUTION OF A NEW AND/OR DIFFERENT PUBLIC RIGHT -OE -WAY BETTER SERVE THE PUBLIC? EXPLAIN. 4. How WILL USE OR NEED FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY BE AFFECTED BY FUTURE CONDITIONS? EXPLAIN. 5. WILL EASEMENTS BE RETAINED FOR ALL UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES? THE REQUESTED VACATION IS LOCATED IN THE SERVICE AREA OF WHAT UTILITY COMPANIES. (SPECIFY)? 6. DOES THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INCLUDE STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES (SPECIFY)? PLEASE NOTE: PER RCW 35.79.040 (TITLE TO VACATED STREET/ALLEY), THE PROPERTY WITHIN A PUBLIC STREET OR ALLEY VACATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL BELONG TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS, ONE-HALF (1/2) TO EACH, THEREFORE, PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN THE STREET VACATION APPLICATION. PL -15 V1,0 Page 2 of 4 SOO ane �Val1ey STREET VACATION APPLICATION PER RESOLUTION 07-009 OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, THE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE CHARGES FOR STREET/ALLEY VACATION PURSUANT TO ROW 36.79.030 PART III - AUTHORIZATION 1 ` (Signature of owner or authorized representative) I. `(g,{ or1 �I ]1C-h►�} !I , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this NOTARY SEAL NOTARY (Date) day of MAft,V\ , 2019 OT " Y SIGNAT Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at: CM3 �O (� Cc ✓LQ C My appointment expires: i1 23Zo LEGAL OWNER NO, 1 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; authorize 6y r � owner of the above described property do hereby regarding this application. to represent rite and my interests in all matters LEGAL OWNER NO. 2 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; PL -15 V1.0 Page 3 of 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STREET VACATION APPLICATION - NARRATIVE 1. How does a change of use or vacation of the street/alley improve service to the public? A change of use or vacation of this street will improve service to the public because the street is geographically separated from the City of Spokane Valley by Interstate -90 from the North and a large slope from the south just north of Mission Ridge 2" Addition, and should have been vacated when I.90 was extended through the area. This vacation would also increase tax revenue (Land Use Tax) for the City, turning public right-of-way into taxable land. 2. Is the street or alley no longer required for public use or public access? (Explain) The subject street is no longer required for public use or public access. Parcel 1145093.2401 is essentially land -locked with no reasonable means of access. The proposed project plans to provide a utility easement to Parcel #/45093.2401, therefore access will also be provided through a proposed drive aisle of the project. Parcel 1145093.1519 has access from University Road. The City has also mentioned no interest for an overpass at University Road over 1-90. Current road improvements also stop South of Baldwin Avenue, at the proposed vacation limits per the exhibit attached. 3. Would substitution of a new and/or different public right-of-way better serve the public? (Explain) No, a substitution of a new/different public right-of-way would not better serve the public due to the geographical separation (as explained in Question #1) and no interest to the City of Spokane Valley (as explained in Question #2). 4. How will use or need for this right-of-way be affected by future conditions? (Explain) The use/need for this right-of-way will not be affected by future conditions because WCE already has a "conditioned" project. 5. Will easements be retained for all underground and overhead utilities? The requested vacation is located in the service area of what utility companies? (Specify) No easements were found in the subject area; therefore, no easements will be retained for underground/overhead utilities. Utility companies servicing the subject area include: County Sewer, Modern Electric Water, Century Link, Comcast, Avista. (Refer to correspondence with Utility Purveyors included in application packet). 6. Does the right-of-way include stormwater drainage facilities? (Specify) No, the right-of-way does not include any stormwater drainage facilities. project == r9.otei RECEIVED MAR 0 8 1W9 CSV PEI/MIT CENTER Page I 1 SUB # F REV. ' 1-11 Ryan Andrade From: Ryan Andrade Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 1:47 PM To: 'Chris Wafstet; Bryan StClair; 'Harvey, Traci'; 'Depner, Colin'; 'mark.welch@centurylink.com'; 'bryan_richardson@comcast.com'; john.luse@avistacorp.corn'; 'michael.truex@avistacorp.com' Cc: Save Whipple (save@whipplece,com); Brett Griffith Subject: 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation Attachments: 2207 -STREET -VACATION -MAP-030119.pdf All, Attached is a PDF showing an exhibit of a proposed street vacation we are proposing for the Circle M Landscape Yard project located at 10620 E Baldwin Avenue in Spokane Valley. Can we please get correspondence from you regarding this vacation, on whether you are good with it or not? Also, if you happen to have any easements or easement documents in this area could you send those to us as well? If you do not have any easements, then no need to worry about sending us anything for that. Let me know if you have any questions with this. Thank you, Ryan Andrade, EIT Civil Engmeer Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc. Phone: 509.893.2617 1 Fax: 509.926.0227 IWC E Whipple Consulting Engineers VICE , u ,aes Lan! oevelvprtler'1 SetYfCCx 0) the li+ ).714.+49 ).,Cas: Land Surlty.rm../, Crvr. Structur,V and !,attic Engrwenn9, Lan0 P.iei nneq;uxI Cry iascerpeArtnteC ure. I. , f ,. � . „G. Yr t Project .= -2(11(11X0 1 RECEIVED MAR U 8 2U19 CSV PERMIT CENTER S U B7 REV. .T. Ryan Andrade From: Koschalk, Robb <Robb.Koschalk@avistacorp.com> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 3:34 PM To: Luse, John; Davis, Blake; Byus, Dave; Ryan Andrade Cc: Save; Brett Griffith Subject: RE: [External] 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation lo All: There are no gas facilities that would be affected by the vacation of Baldwin. No objections. Robb Koschalk, Customer Project Coordinator 1411 E Mission Ave 14C-060, Spokane, WA, 99202 P 509.495.2034 i C 509.280.7383 www.avistaOlities.com 4 i1'ISTA Mow whits below Cao Waft ,ri From: Luse, John Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 3:09 PM To: Davis, Blake <Blake.Davis@avistacorp.com>; Byus, Dave <Dave.Byus@avistacorp.com>; Ryan Andrade <ra nd rade@whipplece.com> Cc: Save csave@whipplece.com>; Brett Griffith <bgriffith@whipplece.com>; Koschalk, Robb <Robb.Koschalk@avistacorp.com> Subject: RE: (External) 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation !will differ to Robh for the gas response. Thanks, John Luse Customer Project Coordinator tIIISTA Nubo< .. S o.an: 1411 E Mission Ave $r1okane. WA 99202 P 599.495.2967 C 509.795.9150 I Ilii /www avrsluut l,,u- r -, pia ran two r• From: Davis, Blake Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 2:36 PM To: Byus, Dave <Dave.Bvus(avistacorp.com>; Luse, John <John.Luse@avistacorp.com>; Ryan Andrade <randrade@whipplece.com> Cc: Save <save@whipplece.com>; Brett Griffith <bgriffith@whipplece.com>; Koschalk, Robb <Robb.Koschalk@avistacorp.com> Subject: RE: [External] 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation To All, No objections from the Avista electric side. Thank you Blake Davis Customer Project Coordinator #VISTA' ..tt, -I ion for, PFr19 t -.?. 1i c 019 f95 9551 Ii1lrJ.1;4��'rw+..V14tr7irlllrin:� r,t,rr; Yom• ,earl Thi:. . email tinclud,ng any altachmenlsi may contain ftonfrcdenhhl and privileged information. and unauthorized disclosure pr use is to vurr are not an Intended recipient. please notify the sender and delete this email from your totem Thank ycJu From: Byus, Dave Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 1:47 PM To: Luse, John <John.Luse@avistacorp.corn>; Ryan Andrade <randrade(whipplece.com> Cc: Save <save@whipplece.com>; Brett Griffith <bgriffith@whipplece.com>; Koschalk, Robb <Robb,Koschalk@avistacorp.com>; Davis, Blake <Blake.Davis@avistacorp.com> Subject: RE: [External] 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation Ryan, reviewed the area of Baldwin Ave you are wanting to vacate and have no issues with the request. I believe Modern Electric is the primary service provider for electricity and Avista is the primary service provider for gas. We dont have any gas facilities installed in this portion of Baldwin Ave. I could not locate any easements other than the utility dedication from the original Sullivan Addition plat which I have attached. Unless John, Robb, or Blake have an issue with something I have overlooked I would not oppose this request to vacate this section of Baldwin Ave 2 Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks Dave Byus Real Estate Representative /tipY Air *NISTA Box :3727 MSC-25 14ol,arle, WA 99221) 1411 E MIssIon Ave MdC•25 Spokane, WA 9l202 r r'I'i .1 `1 2f11 Aitlhes 00171 emvirerbiles i�l��lr�► This elm!! (tncludin9 any attachments) may contain confidential and priviteged Information, and unauthorized diac1Q5ure or use is prohibited If you afe not an intended recipient pease notify the sender and delete this email from your system Thank you from: Luse, John Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 10:25 AM To: Ryan Andrade <randrade@whipplece.corn>; Byus, Dave <Dave.Byus@avistacorp.cam> Cc: Save <save@whipplece.corn>; Brett Griffith <bgriffith@whipolece.cam>; Koschalk, Robb <Robb,Koschalk(<avistacorp.com>; Davis, Blake <Blake,Davis@avistacorp.com> Subject: RE: [External] 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation Ryan, I believe the gentleman you are looking for would be Dave Byus. Dave is the Avista Real Estate Rep for the area. Dave, are you aware of this vacation or have any insight for Ryan? Thanks, John Luse Customer Project Coordinator Aoki VISTA 0(1Ecr ra.1, Spokane. WA 1-e). 1411 E Mlssin A **elle WA 9920 P 509,495.2967 C 509.795 9150 1lttp:lurww avis,itiuhlil.te,'• 3 From: Ryan Andrade[mailto:randrade(uwhipplece.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 1:47 PM To: Chris Wafstet <cwafstet@mewco.com>; Bryan StClair <BStClairpmewco.coni>; Harvey, Traci <HarvevT@SpokaneValleyFire.com>; Depner, Colin <CDEPNER@spokanecountv.ort;>; mark.welch@centurvlink.com; brvari richardson@comcast.com; Luse, John <John.Luse@avistacorp.com>; Truex, Michael <Michael.Truex@avistacorp.com> Cc: Save <save@whipplece.corn>; Brett Griffith <bgriffith@whipplece.com> Subject: [External] 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation All, Attached is a PDF showing an exhibit of a proposed street vacation we are proposing for the Circle M Landscape Yard project located at 10620 E Baldwin Avenue in Spokane Valley. Can we please get correspondence from you regarding this vacation, on whether you are good with it or not? Also, if you happen to have any easements or easement documents in this area could you send those to us as well? If you do not have any easements, then no need to worry about sending us anything for that. Let me know if you have any questions with this. Thank you, Ryan Andrade, EFT Civil Engineer Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc. Phone: 509.893.2617 I Fax: 509.926.0227 kWCE VVn pple Consulting Engineers WCE prov,dCS Land Development Ser e'S rn rhe iratterilg are41$ Lard Surveywy. C. Sinrctula <irdd T/./1',C Engaio i ng, Land PontA g MKr t anAticape Afcnrr'clt re. flSeulhrim►Road.gpOIanrVt. ' w►.rrarr..r c<.� USE CAUTION - EXTERNAL SENDER Do not click on links or open attachments that are not familiar. For questions or concerns, please e-mail phishing@avistacorp.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential andlor privrieged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of This message or an agent of the intended recipient, or if this message has been addressed lo you in error. please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. 4 Ryan Andrade From: Welch, Mark <Mark.WelchCCenturyLink.com> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 1:53 PM To: Ryan Andrade Subject: RE: 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation Hi Ryan, Looks like we have no facilities in the area of your project. Let me know if you need any more information... Thanks! • 0 o E BALDWIN LN CZ )- 0 0 ETt 4 Mark Welch Engineer 11 904 N. Columbus St., Spokane, WA, 99202 tel: 509.835.4604 cell: 509.703.2705 mark.welchia?centurylink.com CenturyLink• From: Ryan Andrade [mailto:randrade@whipplece.com] Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 1:47 PM To: Chris Wafstet; Bryan StClair; Harvey, Traci; Depner, Colin; Welch, Mark; bryan_richardson@comcast.com; john.luse@avistacorp.com; michael.truex@avistacorp.com Cc: Save; Brett Griffith Subject: 2207 - Circle M Street Vacation All, Attached is a PDF showing an exhibit of a proposed street vacation we are proposing for the Circle M Landscape Yard project located at 10620 E Baldwin Avenue in Spokane Valley. Can we please get correspondence from you regarding this vacation, on whether you are good with it or not? Also, if you happen to have any easements or easement documents in this area could you send those to us as well? if you do not have any easements, then no need to worry about sending us anything for that. Let me know if you have any questions with this. Thank you, Ryan Andrade, EIT Civil Engineer Whipple Consultinc, Engineers, lnc. Phone: 509.893.2617 f Fax: 509.926.0227 IWCE Whipple Consulting Engineers INCE p'OvtdeS Livid Development wr s to the takowig areas. Land &flirty/hf, Clt-i SI+ucNratand Ttartrc Eng+neenng, Lana Pi tH) and Lruuac,n;7c A/ch,lcctute 11 South fuNvi • Sgplant V014:y, WA 41Tf4G Wh.fip'rrr rr..fl This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. 2 COMCAST March 1, 2019 Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc. ATTN: Ryan Andrade 21 S Pines Rd Spokane Valley, WA 99206 RE: Vacation of right of Way. Circle M Street Vacation Comcast has reviewed the vacation request. We have no objections to the vacation. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, i r an Rithardkin Contractor Coordinator for Comcast Cable, Spokane (509)755-4717 1717 E Buckeye Spokane, WA 99207 www.comcastcorporalion,com 14.00' U U Q H M I\ 0 L=50.34', R=11360.00' X30' \% Nt\o i 64.00 20' Co u'1 CITY REQUESTED STREET VACATION APPROXIMATELY 12.926 S.F. INTERSTATE-90 NTERSTATE90 TAX PARCEL #45093.1519 509.12 BALDWIN AVENUE (INDIANA AVENUE? ) /.I/O///////i%yY /7////////////7/ PROPOSED STREET VACATION APPROXIMATELY 41.022.45 S.F. 19.9 VACATION LIMITS PROPOSED 5.0 FEET FROM END OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 669.0 i 60. 9 32 NTION TAX PARCEL #45093.1519 TAX PARCEL #45093.1519 60 1 I 1 11 2 3 4 I I 1 1 1 NORA AVENUE 5 6 7 MISSION RIDGE FIRST ADDITION PROJ #: 19-2207 DATE: 03-08-19 DRAFTED BY: BAG REVIEWED BY:TRW SCALE: 1'= f OD' SHEET': OF I W t 1 8 9 10 1 11 12 13 14 MISSION RIDGE• 2ND ADDITION EXHIBIT PROPOSED STREET VACATION BALDWIN AVENUE SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON TAX PARCEL #45093.2401 SULLIVAN ADDITION ti 4WC E WHIPPLE CONSULTING eV-111EERS 21 S. PINES P:OAb SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99206 PH: 509-93.26';7 FAX. 509-926.0227 Project :. 'gptei -DO 1 RECEIVED MAR 0 8 2019 CSV PERMIT CENTE : SUB # REV.' Spokane .00Val ley MEMORANDUM NOTICE OF APPLICATION MAILING PACKET Project _„9-311/ ci---CitypII RECEIVED To: Title Company FROM: Department of Community Development, Planning Divition SUBJECT: Notice of Application Owner/Taxpayer List MAR 0 8 10) CSV PERMIT CENTER 1 SUB # REv. r= Please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record of all properties adjacent to the proposal (or total adjoining ownership; including optioned land, to the extent known) as outlined on the accompanying Spokane County Assessor's map(s). FILE No, : PART 1Il TITLE COMPARY AND APPLICANT CERTIFICATION TITL,E_COMPANY CERTIFICATION I do hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses, consisting of the attached pages from the Spokane County Assessor's or Treasurer's most current computer records, is to the best of my knowledge correct. I also certify I have provided loan numbers, if possible. when the owner is listed as a finance company. Signed by: Debbie Richardson Date: 2/19/2019 For. (Title Company Official) Spokane County Title (Company Name) APPI (CANT QFRTIFICATIOI'( I, the applicant or agent for the applicant. have verified the attached ownership list with the attached Assessor's map(s) and find that all lax parcel numbers adjacent to the project site, including owned or optioned land as shown on the Assessor's map(s) have been listed by the Title Company, Applicant: IA1W1Pete CoNSULrW& ini6f iEE S Signed by: 7:4144— (Print Name) Date: — 1— i PL -33 V1.0 Page 3 of 45084.0401 Circle M Family Properties LLC 4107 E Broadway Spokane. WA 99202 45093.2401 Thomas Flake 4729 View Dr Everett, WA 98203 45084,1314 University View Estates Pud Owners Assoc 1806 N Oberlin Rd Spokane Valley, WA 99206 45093.1519 Circle M Family Properties LLC 4107 E Broadway Spokane, WA 99202 EXHIBIT 4 Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019.0002 Page 10 of 11 May 15, 2019 ley Stioliane Community & Public Works Department Building & Planning Division NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING THE SPOKANE VALLEY COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS SENDING THIS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ALL PETITIONERS (IF ANY) AND ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING THE STREET PROPOSED TO BE VACATED BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS FROM THE SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OR TREASURER'S OFFICE. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW: HEARING DATE: May 23, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. HEARING LOCATION: Spokane Valley City Council Chambers, City Hall, 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206. REVIEW AUTHORITY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission STAFF: Connor Lange, Planner; (509) 720-5332; clange@spokanevalley.org. FILE NUMBER: STV -2019-0002 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request to vacate unimproved sections of Baldwin Avenue (669 feet in length), University Road (225 feet in length) and Glenn Road (19 feet in length). The right-of-way widths vary ranging from 50 to 64 feet. PROPOSAL LOCATION: The portion of right-of-ways proposed to be vacated are located between Interstate 90 (north) and Nora Avenue (south) and adjacent to three parcels (45093.1519, 45084.0401 and 45084.1314) further located in the SW quarter of the SW quarter of Section 9, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington APPLICANT: Whipple Consulting Engineers (Attn: Brett Griffith); 21 S Pines Rd; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 OWNER: Circle M Family Properties LLC; 2123 N Pines Road; Spokane Valley, WA 99216 HEARING PROCEDURES AND APPEALS: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct the hearing pursuant to PIanning Commission rules of procedure. Interested persons may testify at the public hearing and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Planning Commission may limit the time given to speakers. The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the proposed amendment to the Spokane Valley City Council. Appeals shall be pursuant to SVMC 19.90 Appeals ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Planning Division has reviewed the proposal/project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC); Title 21 (.1-?nvironmental Controls) from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days prior to the hearing at Spokane Valley City Hall, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, Monday -Friday, excluding holidays. Send written comments to the City of Spokane Valley Department of Community and Public Works, 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206; Attn: Connor Lange, File No. STV -2019-0002 SPECIAL ASSISTANCE: Individuals planning to attend the public hearing who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 720-5102 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. EXHIBIT 5 Staff Report and Recommendation STV -2019-0002 Page 11 of 11 May 15, 2019 >:•i1 1 1.1 1. CIT`! OF SPOKANE VALLEY To: Connor Lange CC: From: Jenn Bruner Date: Friday, May 10, 2019 Planning/Building Subject STV -2019-0002 Stage: Final Phase: Vacate sections of Baldwin, University, Address: Baldwin and University CO01 Comment: Because the street vacation would leave a parcel that will not have access to public sewer, a sanitary sewer easement, with a width acceptable to the Environmental Services Department, will be required for parcel 45093.2401. A 20' public sanitary sewer easement will be required in lieu of using the public right of way that is to be vacated. Connor Lange From: Chris Wafstet <cwafstet@mewco.com> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 1:39 PM To: Connor Lange Subject: RE: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Connor: Modern Electric Water Co does not have any facilities (electric or water) that would be impacted by the vacation process. If the owner has any requirement for new infrastructure and/or the relocation of any existing infrastructure in and around the project site, they will need contact us f MEWCo) to initiate the new construction procedure. Any other questions, please let me know. Thank You ,ruk WW GIS Operator Modern Electric Water Company Phone: (509) 928-4540 Direct: (509) 755-9006 cwafstet@mewco.com MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY Gall, la fore you dig. reliably serving the Spokane Valley since 1905 From: Connor Lange <clange@spokanevailey.org> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 1:30 PM To: Chris Wafstet <cwafstet@mewco.com>; jbruner@spokanecounty.org; CKnudson@spokanecounty.org; CDEPNER@spokanecounty.org Subject: FW: STV -2019-0002 AgencyRouting Good afternoon all, I am working on my Staff Report for the street vacation south of 1-90 for portions of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road. I didn't see in the application materials where either Spokane County Environmental Services or Modern Electric had provided a response to Ryan Andrade and didn't see any comments during the Agency Comment period. I am just checking to make sure that SC Env. Services & Modern doesn't have any facilities that would be impacted by the vacation process, Thank you From: Connor Lange Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 3:53 PM To: Bill Helbig <bhelbig@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Phillips <cphillips@spokanevalley.org>; Ray Wright 1 Connor Lange From: Wardlaw, Dennis (DAHP) <dennis.wardlaw@dahp.wa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 9:47 AM To: Connor Lange Subject: RE: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Hi Conner, DAHP has no concerns with this project. Regards, Dennis Dennis Wardlaw, M.A. Transportation Archaeologist Dept. of Archaeology and Historic Preservation 1110 Capitol Way South, Suite 30 Olympia, WA 98501 Voice: 360-586-3085 Cell: 360-485-5014 EA please consider the environment before printing this email From: Connor Lange <clange@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 10:35 AM To: SEPA (DAHP) <sepa@dahp.wa.gov> Subject: FW: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Please review the attached proposal to vacate a portion of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road between Interstate 90 (north) and Nora Avenue (south). Comments are requested by Thursday, May 2, 2019. Thank you From: Connor Lange Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 3:53 PM To: Bill Helbig <bhelbig@a spokanevallev.org>; Chad Phillips <cphillios@spokanevalley.org>; Ray Wright <rwright@spakanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt(u, spokanevallev.org>; Traci Harvey<harveyt@spokanevalfeyfire.com>; Spokane Valley Fire (inspections a SpokaneValleyFire.com) <inspections@SpokaneValleyFire.com>; CKnudson@spokanecounty.org; CDEPNER(a, spokanecounty.org; 'jbruner@spokanecounty.org' <jbruner@spokanecounty.org>;'Paul Savage' <psavage@srhd.org>; Chris Wafstet (Modern Electric) <cwafstet@mewco.coma; figgg@wsdot,wa.gov;'KOtterstrom@spokanetransit.com' <KOtterstrom@spokanetransit.com>; dave.byus@avistacorp.com; Karen. Stoddard(karen.stoddard@centurylink.com) <karen.stoddard@centurylink.com>; bryan richardson as cable.comcast.com; Christine Connor Lange From: Chad Phillips Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 8:57 AM To: Connor Lange Cc: Ray Wright; Ryan Kipp; Bill Helbig; Shane Arlt; Chad Riggs; Aaron Clary Subject RE: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Connor Stormwater has no concerns with the proposed vacations. Existing stormwater facilities are in place at end of current roadway improvements. Thanks Chad Chad Phillips, P.E. 1 Engineer, Stormwater 10210 E. Sprague Avenue 1 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720 - 5013 1 cphillips@spokanevalley.org <if1 t# -y This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Connor Lange Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 3:53 PM To: Bill Helbig <bhelbig@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Phillips <cphillips@spokanevalley.org>; Ray Wright <rwright@spokanevailey.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org>; Traci Harvey<harveyt@spokanevalleyfire.com>; Spokane Valley Fire (inspections@SpokaneValleyFire.com) <inspections@SpokaneValleyFire.com>; CKnudson@spokanecounty.org; CDEPNER@spokanecounty.org; jbruner@spokanecounty.org; Paul Savage <psavage@srhd.org>; Chris Wafstet (Modern Electric) <cwafstet@mewco.com>; figgg@wsdot.wa.gov; KOtterstrom@spokanetransit.com; dave.byus@avistacorp.com; Karen. Stoddard (karen.stoddard@centurylink.com) <karen.stoddard@centurylink.com>; bryan_richardson@cable.comcast.com; Christine <CMCMAHONCHASE@spokanecounty.org>; Grepp@spokanecounty.org; crjohnston@spokanesheriff.org; Wardlaw, Dennis (DAHP) <dennis.wardlaw@dahp.wa.gov>; Stephanie.Jolivette@dahp.wa.gov Subject: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Hello all, Please review the attached proposal to vacate a portion of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road between Interstate 90 (north) and Nora Avenue (south). Comments are requested by Thursday, May 2, 2019. Thank you Connor Lange 1 Planner 10210 E. Sprague Avenue 1 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 1 Connor Lange From: John Hohman Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 4:46 PM To: Connor Lange; Ryan Kipp Cc: Jenny Nickerson; Ray Wright Subject: RE: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Connor, I suggest that you incorporate a statement such as "Staff recommends the City retain the University right of way for future needs that are currently unforeseen" or something similar. I believe this is a safe position for us to take. Thanks, John From: Connor Lange Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 3:04 PM To: Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; John Hohman <jhohman@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Jenny Nickerson <jnickerson@spokanevalley.org>; Ray Wright <rwright@spokanevalley.org> Subject: RE: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Hello Ryan & John, I am requesting some clarification regarding the comments made on April 19' from Traffic for the Street Vacation (STV - 2019 -0002). It was my initial interpretation based on feedback !received that the Fehr & Peers study demonstrated that the cost of the University overpass was significant based on the level of service it would actually provide. Therefore, not making it feasible. I am preparing my staff report for the Public Hearing to Planning Commission and want to clear up the record regarding the University Road overpass issue. At this point it appears the application complies with appropriate portions of SVMC and I could recommend approval to the PC. However, without amended comments from Traffic my recommendation would exclude University Road from the proposal to be vacated? If the position of the city is that the University Road overpass scenario is infeasible then I would request updated comments from Ryan stating that Traffic has no issues with the vacation going forward as is. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you From: Ray Wright Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 9:06 AM To: Connor Lange <clange@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevallev.org> Subject: FW: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Connor, please see Ryan's Traffic comments below. Thank you, Ray 1 From: Ryan Kipp Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 8:33 AM To: Ray Wright <rwright@spokanevalley,org>; Bill Helbig <bhelbig@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley,org>; Chad Phillips <cphillips@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org> Subject: RE: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting Traffic would not recommend the vacation of University ROW. There are have numerous discussions in the past of there being some type of overpass over 1-90. Traffic would be okay with the vacation of the ROW of Baldwin. However are there any requirements for there being some type of turn around on University? Ryan From: Ray Wright Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 4:04 PM To: Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org> Subject: FW: STV-2019-0002_AgencyRouting FYI From: Connor Lange Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 3:53 PM To: Bill Helbig <bhelbig@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Phillips <cphillips@spokanevalley.org>; Ray Wright <rwright@spokanevallev.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org>; Traci Harvey<harvest@spokanevalleyfire.com>; Spokane Valley Fire (inspections@SpokaneValleyFire.com) <inspections@SpokaneValleyFire.com>; CKnudson@spokanecounty.org; CDEPNER@spokanecounty.org; lbruner@spokanecounty.org; Paul Savage <psavage@srhd.org>; Chris Wafstet (Modern Electric) <cwafstet@mewco.com>; mewco.com>; figgg@wsdot.wa.gov; KOtterstrom@spokanetransit.com; dave.byus@avistacorp.com; Karen. Stoddard (karen.stoddard@centurylink.com) <karen.stoddard@centurylink.com>; bryan richardson@cabie.comcast.com; Christine <CMCMAHONCHASE@spokanecounty.org>; Grepp@spokanecountv.org; criohnston@spokanesheriff.org; Wardlaw, Dennis (DAHP) <dennis.wardlaw@dahp.wa.gov>; Stephanie.Jolivette@dahp.wa.gov Subject: STV-2019-0002AgencyRouting Hello all, Please review the attached proposal to vacate a portion of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road between Interstate 90 (north) and Nora Avenue (south). Comments are requested by Thursday, May 2, 2019. Thank you Connor Lange 1 Planner 10210 E. Sprague Avenue 1 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5332 1 clange@spokanevalley.org X1eys This email and any attachments may he subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 April 18, 2019 City of Spokane Valley 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 il,„11111 iC�di 1 Jl i ilii BRYAN COLLINS, FIRE CFFIrF 2120 N. Wilbur Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 928-1700 Main (509) 892-4125 Fax t•.>, pk neevaIleyfire.com s r� in' rw: LP d RE: STV -2019-0002 CITY t'i SPOKANE VALLEY Between 1-90 and Nora Avenue - Baldwin Avenue; University Road & Glenn Road The Spokane Valley Fire Department has completed a review for the above referenced project and has no comments on the Street Vacation. All specific fire department requirements shall be conditioned on future commercial permits. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ;wee, celettea, f Traci Harvey Fire Protection Engineer Spokane Valley Fire Department Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Nanning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall May 9, 2019 1. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 1.1. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. 111. Office Assistant Robin T-Iutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Danielle Kaschmitter, absent - excused Eric Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Timothy Kelley Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Robert McKinley Connor Lange, Planner Michael Phillips Michelle Rasrnussen Matt Walton Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioner Kasclunitter was excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to amend the May 9, 2019 agenda. The motion was to add item i,a. Findings and Recommendations for CTA -2018-0005 to review and correct an error. There was no discussion. The vote on the motif »? was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the April 25, 2019 minutes as written. There was no discussion. The vole on the motion was six in fervor, zero opposed and the motion passed VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson reported he did not attend any City Council meeting however he did watch the televised meetings. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no administrative report. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i.a. Amended Findings and Recommendations for CTA -2018-0005 Senior Planner Lori Barlow explained that staff recognized a discrepancy in the Findings and Recommendations for CTA -2018-0005 being forwarded to the City Council for review at the Tuesday May 14, 2019 meeting, The Convni:ssion denied the request, however the discrepancy found was in the last sentence of the introductory paragraph of the Findings and Recomtnendations. The language struck from the Findings and Recommendations read "The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation that City Cottnel-adopt the-antemilFient", The language was changed to accurately reflect the Commission's action by striking the last six words of the sentence. (15.09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Pogo 2 of 12 Commissioner Walton moved to approve the amended Findings of Fact fir CTA-20J8- 0005 cis presented. Commissioner Walton explained the intent was to correct the language in order to reflect the deliberation and vote, he was in favor of the adopted language. The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. Public Hearing: CTA-2018-0006, a proposed text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapters 19.60.050, 19.65.130, 19.40.035 and Appendix A, regarding affordable housing and multifamily development. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. Ms, Barlow provided background information into the privately initiated code text amendment (CTA). Ms. Barlow advised that staff reviewed the application for environmental impact and a determination of non-significance was issued March 29, 2019. The notice of public hearing was posted in the newspaper as well as on the City's website, Ms. Barlow clarified that this proposal is a CTA which is not site-specific, therefore on site posting requirements did not apply. Ms. Barlow continued that the Commission conducted a study session of this proposal on April 25, 2019 and are conducting the public hearing to consider public comment. Ms. Barlow highlighted a recent change the City Council made to the Governance Manual. The Council will no longer take public comment on items that have had a public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission. Ms. Barlow stressed that the opportunity for public comment will only be during the Planning Commissions public hearing. Once a recommendation is made by the Planning Commission, it would be formalized in the Findings of Fact scheduled for May 23, 2019. Ms. Barlow continued, the proposals intent is to allow multifamily (MF) in the residential (R-3) zone as long as it meets supplemental regulations. Ms. Barlow explained that currently multifamily is only allowed in multifamily residential and both mixed use zones. This proposal would change the Permitted Use Matrix SVMC 19.60.050 by adding an "S" indicating multifamily could be allowed but subject to supplemental use regulations. Ms. Barlow described that this proposal would add supplemental language to SVMC 19.65.130 stating that multifamily could be allowed if it complies with Chapter 19.40 of SVMC Alternative Residential Development Options. The newly added section, 19.40.035 identifies that multifamily in the R-3 zone would be allowed if specific criteria are met for applicability, site and building standards and other related agreements. Ms. Barlow continued that in order for a development to utilize this section of the code at least 51% of the units proposed must be used for affordable housing. Ms. Barlow continued the property must be a single parcel under single ownership. The parcel uses must include a church, school and multifamily units all located on a site at least 10-20 acres in size. Ms. Barlow continued that the entire site can be used to calculate the six dwelling units per acre as the maximum density allowed in the R-3 zoning district. Currently the R-3 zone does not allow multifamily development but does allow single family development at a density of six dwelling units per acre. Ms. Barlow explained this amendment proposes to utilize the entire site to calculate what could have been allowed for single family development, but then allows the units to be clustered in the form of a multifamily development. For example, if you have a 10-acre parcel allowing six dwelling units per acre it would allow for 60 single family residential dwelling units. The proposal would allow you to develop 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Paga 3 col' 12 a site that has a school and church with 60 dwelling units in a multifamily complex which would maintain the density that is established within the R-3 Zone. Ms. Barlow advised the school, church and multifamily may share parking and open space to help prevent overbuilding. Ms. Barlow continued highlighting other criteria that applies when specific circumstances exist, such as natural amenities will be incorporated into the site, buildings that include parking structures shall have design continuity to look as if they are part of a campus and pedestrian areas shall be delineated and protected. Ms. Barlow continued with development standards and noted that the proposal identified that it must meet residential standards in the Dimensional and Standards Table 19.70-01, which includes a building height limit of 35 feet, and setbacks, to maintain the surrounding character. Ms. Barlow continued that the minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet is not applicable since the criteria requires the lot size has to be 10-20 acres in size. The development must provide at least 10% of the gross area of the site for open space. Ms. Barlow explained other requirements would be agreements to ensure compliance with all criteria for the life of the project. The conditions will run with the land and will not transfer with the owner. Ms. Barlow continued this would be processed as a Type III Permit that requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and gave an overview of the process. Ms. Barlow explained that through the CUP process uses that may have unanticipated impacts could be conditioned by the Hearing Examiner to mitigate those impacts, or the permit could be denied completely. Ms. Barlow highlighted the items discussed by the Commission during the study session. As part of the proposal at least 51% of the units proposed must be used for affordable housing and it was asked what that figure included. Ms. Barlow explained the federal standard for affordable housings definition includes housing and utilities. The other item discussed was pertaining to the number of existing sites in the City that could support this proposal. Staff's analysis within the staff report identified 75 properties within the City owned by churches. Out of those 75 sites, 25 of then are in the R-3 zone and two of those properties meet the 10 acre minimum criteria. Of those two sites one has both a school and a church. Ms. Barlow explained that this information shows a snap shot in time as all circumstances could change. Ms. Barlow added that these regulations are not limited to existing churches and schools, the regulations state that if multifamily were to be allowed in the R-3 zone it would have to be in conjunction with a church and a school. Anyone could aggregate land and propose a development with a church, school and multifamily component. Ms. Barlow explained the City's GIS specialist queried single property owners within the R-3 zone that would meet the criteria and identified eight sites. If this proposal were adopted this could apply to those eight sites owned by a single property owner within the R-3 zone. Ms. Barlow highlighted procedural recommendations and urged the Commission to consider the public comments provided. Commissioner Johnson asked if there was a determination as to why the limit was 20 acres? Ms. Barlow advised the applicant may be able to address that question. Ms. Barlow stressed that this proposal is not a Cityinitiated proposal and has been proposed by Catholic Charities, the City is processing the request. Commissioner Johnson asked if the City has a definition of a church and a school in order to determine if anyone could open a church and one grade level school and meet the criteria. Ms. Barlow explained the City does have a definition for schools, this proposal does not identify as a public or private school. However, it is assumed to be private as it is associated with a church. It was determined the City has a definition for a church and it was read aloud. It was concluded the City would automatically defer to the City's definition if the language was not provided in the 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 12 proposal. Commissioner Johnson spoke to the topic of nonprofit not being identified in the definition and it was concluded that either profit based or nonprofit organizations could apply. Commissioner McKinley asked for clarification that currently only one site fit the criteria; it was concluded to be accurate. There was discussion that a property could exceed the maximum and only utilize the amount the property needed; but property could also be aggregated to fit the criteria. Ms. Barlow added that the City received three additional comments, from Daniel and Deborah Hippie, Sara Goulart and Kim I-Ielm. Each comment stressed they are in opposition and all live within close proximity to the St. Vianney church site. Johnathan Manahan Vice President of housing for Catholic Charities of Eastern Washington provided an informational video depicting Catholic Charities mission. Mr. Manahan spoke about the need for affordable housing for seniors. Mr. Manahan explained that Catholic Charities strives to develop the support of communities and bring dignity to vulnerable individuals. He explained Catholic Charities has a variety of programs that provide basic needs to include food, security, access to employment, counselling and housing. I -Ie continues that Catholic Charities provides over 1,300 units of affordable housing throughout Easter Washington that serves seniors, families, homeless and farmworkers, Mr. Mallahan explained Catholic social teachings believe that individuals deserve basic human dignity that these project provide. Mr. Manahan touched on other developers and explained that their mission may be different than Catholic Charites. Mr. Mallahan explained they have been transparent to stwrounding neighbors and will do what they can to mitigate any impacts. Mr. Mallahan discussed discriminating to one population and explained that natural limits dictate who can be served on a campus with a church and a school. He went on to explain you couldn't put a low barrier housing project on a parcel that has a school as you wouldn't be able to attain funding. Adding that it wouldn't be in compliance as you have to accept individuals into those project with criminal history and with a school on site that wouldn't be appropriate. Lastly, Mr. Mallahan continued that seniors often times downsize due to retirement and income changes and this would allow seniors to stay in the community they are accustom to. Mr. Mallahan stated this proposal is in keeping with the City's Comprehensive Plan regarding affordable housing. He addressed housing costs stating they have increased by 29% with only a 6% household income increase. This will push individuals out of housing and is disproportionate to seniors due to fixed incomes. Catholic Charities would like to afford seniors the opportunity to age in place, reduce the frequency of moving and explained the importance of the onsite social services affording the assistance to help seniors to live independently. Mr. Manahan concluded by thanking the Commission and stated that if this proposal passes Catholic Charities will proceed with applying for funding and a CUP for development. Commissioner Walton identified for the record that he knows Mr, Mallahan as they attended Gonzaga University together. Commissioner Walton stated he has no affiliation with Catholic Charities and did not intended to recuse himself from deliberation. Commission Johnson also advised he has worked with Catholic Charities and Rob McCann is a member of the Spokane County Human Rights Tasks force with him. Commissioner Johnson does not have reason to support the charity other than their ultimate goals and is viewing the proposal and how it would affect other properties within the City. 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 12 Commissioner Kelley asked the applicant if the main goal is intended for Senior Citizens then why isn't it stated as such? Mr. Mallahan explained that listing a specific population in code could be a liability and a violation of fair housing standards. Deputy City Attorney Eric Lamb explained that the Office of the City Attorney would also have concerns with listing specific protected classes whether based on disability or age, the City does not discriminate and does not want to discriminate. Commissioner Johnson asked the applicant why they chose the 51% as the number of units to be low income? Mr. Mallahan advised that is a common standard with public funding and aids in obtaining funding. Commissioner Johnson also asked what the reason was for limiting to 20 acres? Mr. Mallahan explained the internet was to narrow the amount of land that this would apply too, but at this time realized that the upper limit didn't add value to this proposal. Commissioners Johnson asked about parking and the overflow concerns with overlap of those at home during church services. Mr. Mallahan explained that parishioners typically traveling to attend the services would now be living on site and attending the services with no additional parking impacts. Commissioner Johnson asked staff if there was a way to limit or encourage additional parking? Ms. Barlow explained those items would be worked out through the CUP process. Ms. Barlow stressed how the CUP process is the tool to address unanticipated impacts that the Hearing Examiner would review. Commissioner Johnson asked about shared space and asked what the applicants vision was? Mr. Mallahan explained that this project is an appropriate context for shared as well as separate space for the school. Commissioner Johnson stated his concerns for open space and security issues for the school. Ms. Barlow explained that security measures would be put in place by the owner and operator of the schools. Commissioner Johnson spoke to the topic of nonprofit or for-profit business and his concern is the entities that might take advantage of the locations that staff identified. Mr. Mallahan stated that naturally the 51% requirement provides a disincentive to develop for-profit. Net operation income potential for a property with 51% affordability is limited and drives down the revenue, those developers would find less cumbersome opportunities in other areas of the City. Commissioner Johnson asked if the applicant would be opposed to 60% and Mr. Mallahan advised they would not. Commissioner Walton asked staff if the City currently asks for trip generation studies within the MFR zone if they exceed density? Ms. Barlow explained that trip generation studies are required based on the number of trips generated during peak hour traffic. If a project is expected to generate more than 10 peak hour trips a study would be required. Ms. Barlow added that concurrency is also required as part of the study from the City's Senior traffic engineer. Commissioner Walton asked the applicant to explain the application process, Mr. Mallahan explained they are a fair housing provider and everyone is welcome to apply. He continued that there is ability within the fare hosing rules to have communities that serve senior populations exclusively. The applicant would have to be 62 years of age or older, they perform a background and credit check to ensure a safe environment and that the applicant has the ability to afford the housing. Mr. Mallahan noted not each property would use the sante criminal background check standards depending on location. Commissioner Walton asked if citizenship was required as part.of the population served were farmworkers? Mr. Mallahan advised that is not a part of the process. Kafiri Lankford, Walnut Road; Ms. Lankford stated she lives directly across the street from the site. She understands the need for affordable housing however feels it needs to be in the right area, not in an R-3 zone. Gary Graupner, 10219 E Valleyway Avenue; Mr. Graupner advised his largest concern is the same now as it was before, traffic impacts. He stated that between Felts Road and 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Inge 6 of 12 Harrold Road their will a new development of thirteen houses. 1-Ie does not want to see Valleyway Avenue become another Broadway by making Valleyway Avenue a through street from Argonne Road to University Road. I•Ie asked that they find another location and is opposed. Mark Zielfelder, 417 N Harold Road; Mr. Zielfelder explained that his concerns are the sante as they were 8 years ago. He is concerned about traffic impacts and for the inlrastructUre. He works for the City of Spokane Water and stated the water infrastructure 4vou1d not be able to support this project and gave examples as to why. Ile feels there are too many variables that need to be looked at. He added that no one wants to see the removal of the Walnut trees to accommodate for sidewalks. Mr. Zielfelder stated the video presented showed that the project was clearly in a commercial zone not in a neighborhood, 'Phonies Dixon, 608 N Farr Road; Mr, Dixon explained the church is in his backyard. He and his wife chose to buy in this area clue to the character and location. He is concerned with traffic impacts. He advised he supports Catholic Charities however is opposed to this proposal. Linda Dixon, 608 N Farr Road; Mrs. Dixon explained this is the second time they have gone through this. Mrs. Dixon continued they live in a great neighborhood and do not want to see this neighborhood ruined. She added they didn't know this was happening until last night when someone put a note on their door, Michael Lehman, 9920 E Broadway; Mr. Lehman was concerned with the unknowns and that there were no studies being done regarding traffic or water. He found it hard to believe there were no adverse impacts. He continued that he was thankful for the video presented but felt it was terrible as it proved to be in a commercial zone with access to public transit, none of these items would be accessible on Walnut Road. He feels there are too many unanswered questions and is opposed. Ken Marks 10001 E Broadway Ave; Agrees with Mr. Lehman Dave Mode, 124 N Walnut Roadd; Mr, Fode explained that current zones protect us from situations like these. He feels this would decrease his property value and also agrees with the concerns for the infrastructure. Christine Fode, 124 N Walnut Road; Mrs. Fode explained she moved to the area because she liked the street. She was shocked to receive a letter dated April 301h from Catholic Charities and St. Vianney Church. She is not opposed to affordable housing; she is opposed. to the CTA as the zoning needs to stay Single Family. Joann Maxfield, 205 N Walnut Road; She agrees with all public eonnnnents and it mostly concerned with traffic. Sandy Holder, 9814 E Valleyway, Ms. Molder agrees with all public comments and expressed her concerns for property values going down and the unknowns. Ms. holder is concerned with traffic impacts should Valleyway Avenue be opened up. She has a deaf child and is concerned for the safety of those with disabilities. She is also concerned with overflow parking as the church holds events a few times a year where. they block off the street. She is opposed to this proposal and suggested relocating this to a commercial property. Sadie Lieuallen, 123 N Walnut Road, Ms. Lieuallen agrees with all public comments and is opposed. Ryan Lieuallen, 123 N Walnut Road, agrees with. Mrs. Lieuallen. 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Mage 7 rel 12 Levi Strauss, 302 N Walnut Road, Mr. Strauss explained that eight years ago it was determined to be a bad idea and still is, 1 -Ie continued that parking and traffic are already a problem as the current students get dropped off and picked up by their parents. Mr. Strauss continued that Catholic Charities is big business trying to make money with no respect for the neighborhood. Mr. Strauss continued that this monstrosity is too big and doesn't fit and asked the conunission not to institutionalize the neighborhood. Mr. Strauss concluded that he had a problem with Commissioner Walton not recusing himself. Chair Johnson reminded the audience to remain respectful to all those in the room. Commissioner Walton stated he felt it important that the Conunission is professional and appreciated the statement in terms of the audience. Commissioner Walton pointed out that the Commission is allowing extended public comment rather than limiting comments to three -,minutes that they have the ability to do. Ne reminded the audience that if they are repeating comments to keep therm succinct. Karen Stroud, 302 N Walnut Road; Ms. Stroud stated she received a letter left on her front door regarding this meeting. Her concern is that the church already creates a loi of traffic from the school and is also concerned with parking and is opposed. Claudia Nelson, 707 N Walnut Road; Ms. Nelson stated that she and Mr. Kuder agree with all comments, it is hard to get out onto Walnut Road as it is and they are opposed. Tini Bieber, 312 N Farr Road; Mr. Bieber explained he will use the same statement he used eight years ago. The Founders of the valley built Walnut Street to symbolize a hub of the valley and created building restrictions to protect it Mr. Bieber stated we have to respect unwritten constitution. Mr. Bieber stated he doesn't want to move out of the neighborhood as it's worth keeping pure. Mr. Bieber added that if this proposal is approved it will destroy the neighborhood and he is opposed. Shelly. Stevens, South Hill; Ms. Stevens explains she no longer lives on Walnut Road partially due to the proposal eight years ago and she gave details into the trials the neighborhood had. Ms. Stevens reminded the Commission that Rob McCann advised all of the City council members to resign based on their decision to deny the previous request. Ms. Stevens explained the 51% suggested does apply to tor-protit builders as long as they are a low income property for a specific member of years. Ms. Stevens added that this is about money, and stated that St Vianney is listed in bankruptcy. Ms. Stevens added that she could not believe Rob McCann wasn't present and sent sorneone else. Commissioner Walton wanted 10 reiterate that public comments needed to be directed 10 the dais. Ile fell it unfortunate that 1,i'hile tensions are high with strong opinions that members of the audience would get personal and asked again that those comments be directed to the dais. Commissioner Kelley stated he fell that everyone present knows what Commissioner Waltonjust said. He agreed that some individuals may have been carried away due to emotion and added that Commissioner Walton's' constant interrupting or continents when someone speaks to the /Ssue is intimidating. Ile told Commissioner Walton that he feels he needs to stand down as the audience knows what the rules are and are doing a good job at holding bacic•emotions and stated he had heard enough. Commissioner Walton moved for a three-minute recess, with no second., the motion failed fbr the lack of a second Daniel Ripple, 313 N Walnut Road; Mr. Hippie explained that he has the most to lose out of anyone due to where he is located. He continued by thanking the Commission for representing the public and hearing what is being said. Mr, Hipple advised he had done some calculations and advised that within 10-20 acres there could be 76 units however, this 05-09-201V Planning Con.nuissinn Minutes Page 8 of 12 proposal is talking about one acre within the property. Mr. Hipple asked the Commissioners if this were going to happen a few feet from where they live would they be attending the meeting on the other side? Rick Woods, 608 N Walnut Road; Mr. Wood explained that he works downtown one block away from the IIouse of Charity. Ile is concerned that the type of individuals he sees at work will move into his neighborhood and is strongly opposed. Robert Popendick, 426 N Walnut Road; Mr. Popendick lives directly across the street and stated the traffic is already a problem. He added that his concern is also the infrastructure. He heard the school is in bankruptcy and if it goes under does it disqualify the property from being built? He's also concerned that they are using this building to keep the school funded and feels that is wrong. Mike Gleason, 5211 N Allen Place; Mr. Gleason advised he does not live in the area and was there in support of the Hippie's at 313 N Walnut Road. Mr, Gleason stated he has been in the real estate business for 28 years and has a 10 unit building in Browns Addition. He gave examples of his average rent to be $750.00 and has two vacancies, Mr. Gleason asked the Commission if they lived in the neighborhood would they want a 76 unit building across the street? Jan Rulea, 3218 N Elton Road; Ms. Rulea used to own a home at 9802 E Valleyway Avenue. She too is concerned with what the building will look like, traffic problems and with the water and sewer. There have been problems with the sewer before. Ms. Rulea is also concerned with the possibility of extending Valleyway Avenue, she is opposed. Todd Shucics,116 N Walnut; Mr. Shucks is opposed to the proposal. Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 8:04 PM Commissioner Rasmussen asked staff about the concerns she heard regarding water and how the City reviews water uses? Ms. Barlow explained that This proposal is to consider the legislative action to make a change to our code. The request is to allow for a development like this to be proposed and Catholic Charities is being transparent with their hope to move forward. Ms. Darlow explained that during review of an application, agencies with jurisdiction would be contacted, including the water and sewer purveyors. Currently there is no project under review therefore those items have not been looked at. Mr. Lamb added that during review of an application the City does have water concurrency requirement. 'l'he applicant would have to demonstrate that there is adequate water for the project and would have to obtain a certificate of water concurrency from the specific water agency before being allowed to move forward.. Commissioner Johnson asked if the letter provided by Catholic Charities was a requirement? Ms. Barlow explained that it was not a requirement and Catholic Charities took it upon themselves in an ellbrl to be lranspareni with the surrounding neighbors. Commissioner Walton stated it is clear by the turn out that there is strong opinion and a lot of good valid concerns were brought up, Commissioner Walton added he can sympathize that if something like this were to happen in his neighborhood he would be on the other side in the audience. He added that there are a lot of unanswered questions for the proposal and that the Commission were reviewing a zoning change that would allow any applicant to apply. He added that he understands how difficult it may be to focus on the broad implications when currently there is only one property that fits the criteria. Commissioner Walton continued that he is out the fence as he has strong concerns related to the for-profit entity could come forward, the definition of a church provides some issues moving forward and the idea of a school on the properly is the most limiting factor. Commissioner Walton 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Pogo 9 of 12 continued that he struggles that this is a narrowly tailored idea. I -Le concluded that there arc zones within the Valley that are more conducive to this type of development, however asking a church to purchase property in these areas does put a burden on them due to cost. Commissioner Walton thanked the public for testifying. Commissioner McKinley thanked Catholic Charities for the presentation and the public fpr their comments. He stated his concerns are due to only one property currently fitting the criteria and he cannot support this due to its small pinpointed scope. Commissioner Kelly stated he can't support the proposal, because it goes against the code. Commissioner Kelley stated the question should be, is the Commission willing to build a 76 -unit apartment complexes in an R-3 zones. He is opposed. Commissioner Rasmussen thanked the public for corning and for their comments, Commissioner Rasmussen is concerned with what this could open up in other R-3 zones. She is concerned that public transit infrastructure isn't in place and is also concerned with increased traffic due to delivery trucks and visitors. Commissioner Rasmussen added that nothing has changed since last time the proposal was denied by both the Commission and Council. Commissioner Rasmussen also mentioned this is not entirely in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan that states we will retain a resemblance of what Spokane Valley is. She understands growth and progress and the City has to find affordable housing but does not feel that the R-3 zone is the right location. Commissioner Johnson thanked Catholic Charities for listening to the Commission and providing public notice. He added that he has worked with Catholic Charities and if the Commission was not looking at a Valley wide change he may have different considerations, He is concerned with the opportunity for individuals whom may not be as neighborly as Catholic Charitcs. He is also concerned with parking and overflow. He agrees that this type of multifamily construction project would not fit in the R-3 zone and is opposed. Co,n,nissioncr McKinley moved to recommend denial of CTA -2018-0006 to the City Council. No further discussion. The vote on the motion Was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. Study Session: STV -2019-0002, a proposed street vacation of a portion of Baldwin Avenue. Planner Connor Lange provided a presentation outlining the privately initiated application to vacate unimproved portions of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road. Mr. Lange explained the vacation is located between 1-90 to the north, Nora Avenue to the South and further boarded by Overland Avenue to the west. Mr. Lange provided procedural overview advising the application was submitted March 8, 2019, the study session is being conducted, the public hearing is scheduled for May 23, 2019 and the Findings of Fact is scheduled for June 13, 2019. Mr. Lange advised that in processing a street vacation staff reviews connectivity, traffic volume, future developments and access. Potential conditions to consider would be utility and easement access, removal of the portion of the street vacated and design or construction improvements. Mr. Lange advised the request is to vacate 669 feet of Baldwin Avenue, 225 of University Road and 19 feet of Glenn Road ranging in widths from 50-64 feet with no known easements in the area to be vacated. The request will allow for maximum use of abutting properties owned by Circle M properties. Mr. Lange advised that I-90 prevents future connection with the unimproved rights of ways. He highlighted a study done in 2015 that 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 12 reviewed the potential for a pedestrian overpass at University Road and the study concluded the cost was too significant, Commissioner Johnson advised that in the early 1990's he was on a citizen advisory committee for Pasadena park were they developed a number of traffic solutions to include a bypass that would tie in with University Road and asked if this was no longer the case? Mr. Lange concluded this to be correct as the costs were too significant to warrant the bypass and not feasible. Commissioner Johnson asked if there is a permit issued? Mr, Lange advised a determination of non -significance was issued on March 15, 2019 for the grading work and an engineered grading permit was issued April 25, 2019 for grading work to be completed at the Circle M Properties landscape yard, ii. Study Session: CTA -2019-0002, a proposed code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 19.6, Chapter 19.85 and Appendix A to allow and provide regulations on licensed marijuana transportation businesses. Mr. Lamb provided a presentation outlining the code text amendment to allow licensed marijuana transport operators to operate within the City of Spokane Valley. Mr. Lamb provided background into Washington Initiative I-502 that passed in 2012 legalizing marijuana in Washington State. The City responded with adopting comprehensive regulations for the allowable state license uses. The three primary license uses were production to allow growing, process to make the product usable and retail to purchase the product. As part of the regulations the City Council adopted a provision 19.85.040 that prohibits all other uses within the City of Spokane Valley, In the fall of 2018 the City had a citizen inquiry from a license transporter hoping to do business in the City. Staff presented an administrative report to the City Council and the Council gave consensus to bring a proposal forward to the Planning Commission for consideration. Mr. Lamb advised this is a City initiated amendment even though it was brought to our attention by a citizen. Mr. Lamb continued explaining that state law was amended after the initial adoption to allow license marijuana transporters. Transportation is only between the licensed production, process, retail stores and research facilities not for home delivery. The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) oversees the licensing as such, licensed transports are subject to WSLCB requirements. Mr. Lamb continued that license marijuana transporters are required to have a physical location or office to store their fleet and state law prohibits them from storing marijuana in the office or physical location. The operator or vehicle are considered a common carrier and must obtain Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission common carrier permits that regulate commercial travel over public right of ways and state highways. State requires transportation logs and manifests in keeping with the state mandate that marijuana be suitably tracked from seed to sale as the state has a robust system due to Federal prohibition. Mr. Lamb explained the product is transported in secured compartments, required to be attached to the vehicle or vehicle body and are locked at all times. Delivery has to be made within 48 hours from the time of pick up as there may be an instance where the marijuana is left in the vehicle overnight. Mr. Lamb added that state law prohibits licensed marijuana transporters from being within 1,000 feet of enumerated sensitive uses such as schools, playgrounds, public transit and libraries. Mr. Lamb continued that staff has identified potential impacts to be traffic; as there are no restriction on fleet size, odor; as marijuana will be kept in vehicles, and crime also due to marijuana being kept in vehicles. WSLCB is not aware of any complaints regarding odor or any break-ins. Mr. Lamb added that during the development of this proposal staff was 05.09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 12 cognizant of other uses transported that might entice crime such as beer, money and jewelry however; marijuana is treated differently. Mr. Lamb concluded that this proposal is to allow licensed transporters in the Regional Commercial (RC), Industrial Mixed Use (IMU) and Industrial (I) zones as this will address traffic issues by placing them near arterials. The proposal includes the City buffers related to vacant school, library and City properties. Mr. Lamb gave an example that currently the vacant property aeross the street from the City Hall is owned by the Library with the intent to build a library. Under the current state law, a marijuana shop could be built near the vacant property as there is no library on the site. The City's buffers already put in place for marijuana producers and processors would not allow for non-conforming uses to be built. The proposed amendment also requires a lockable enclosure for the fleet if they are in the RC zone. Mr. Lamb concluded with an illustration of the proposed amendments adding marijuana transporters to the Permitted Use Matrix 19.60.050 subject to supplemental regulations in the RC, IMU and I zone. This will also add them to 19.85.040 established buffers to prevent nonconforming marijuana shops being built near a school or library to be constructed at a later date. This will also prohibit them from being within 1,000 feet of CenterPlace or City Hall. Subsection B states they must have a lockable enclosure and a marijuana transporter definition has been added to Appendix A in order to track with statutory requirements. Commissioner Rasmussen asked about the transportation of immature plants and that the products must be in sealed packages and is wondering how immature plants are transported and how that might affect the odor? Mr. Lamb advised that plants are allowed to be transported however there may be additional requirements that he will research and provide at the public hearing. Commissioner Walton asked about firearm carrying stipulations and wanted clarification if that was a state law? Mr. Lamb advised that is state law. Commissioner Walton asked how transport vehicles will be identified and if markings or advertising of the vehicle was a requirement? Mr. Lamb stated he is not aware of any state law or regulations that requires them to identify they are a delivery however; there are businesses that do advertise the use. Commissioner Walton asked how local or state law enforcement will interact with the transporters and how they identify themselves? Mr. Lamb advised they are a licensed marijuana transporter and it is a lawful use under state law and would be treated as such once the driver demonstrated his transporter license credentials. Commissioner McKinley asked if this business is specific to transporting with no other components such as production and it was concluded to the case. Mr. Lamb added that there are over 20 producers/processors and 3 retailers in the City. In speaking with WSLCB they have 17 or 18 statewide licensed marijuana transporters at this time. Commissioner Johnson spoke about the City not having these types of restrictions for alcohol, nicotine, oxycodone or opioids and Mr. Lamb stated that was correct but could not speak to the Federal or State restrictions. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER. Commissioner McKinley stated he supported Commissioner Kelley in his earlier statement regarding interrupting the speakers during the public hearing. He recommended that in the future with a large crowd the Commission should put a three- minute time limit on the comments to reduce emotion. Commissioner Walton stated that when emotions are high it is important to remember that rules and process arc in place for a reason. 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Pngc 12 or 12 He felt the outcome of the Commission was clear, that audience participation was greatly valued. IIe stressed that if there was any idea that what he was saying was meant to dissuaded the public from speaking he strongly pushes back, He added that the incivility of the Commission members toward each other should be avoided at all times as they are there for the same purpose. He appreciated that it was brought to his attention that it was concern and he did not interrupt any speaker at any time. IIe thanked the members of the Commission for conducting a fair and dedicated meeting. Commissioner Kelley added that Chair Johnson did an excellent job at running the meeting and gave direction when appropriate. Commissioner Johnson stated he didn't feel as though any of the Commissioners weren't civil. IIe understood the points and felt as though Commissioner Walton was supporting him in keeping order. Commissioner Johnson read a statement illustrating that your beliefs do not change the reality. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:57 p.m. The vote on the ?notion was six in favor, zero opposed,. and the motion passed. James Johnson, Chairman -7A-(4ut-fc Robin Hutchins, Secretary Date signed Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall May 23, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. H. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Danielle Kasclunitter Erik Lanib, Deputy City Attorney Timothy Kelley Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Robert McKinley Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Michael Phillips, absent - excused Connor Lange, Planner Michelle Rasmussen, absent - excused Matt Walton Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioners Philips and Rasmussen were excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Walton moved to approve the May 23, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Walton moved to amend the May 9, 2019 minutes to correct the misspelling of his last name on page 8 from Walter to Walton. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Johnson reported on May 14, 2019 he attended the Spokane County Human Rights Task Force executive committee to discuss the confluence of leadership meeting where it was determined that meeting will be a long range plan. He also attended the City Council meeting and expressed his concerns for the lack of accurate representation by the 411` legislative district and requested a more diverse invocation at the City Council meetings. On May 21, 2019 he attended the Spokane County Human Right Task Force regular meeting where they received rapid response training. The training was to prepare for public acts of hate received through a portal developed by the task force to report hate crimes. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Economic Development Manager Mike Basinger advised that after the first reading with the City Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments the Council agreed with all of the Planning Commission's recommendations. Mr. Basinger added that Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA -2019-0003 that had no recommendation from the Planning Commission was denied by the City Council. V11I. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. Chair Johnson asked the Commission for a consensus on standardizing a three-minute time limit for all public comment excluding proponent comments. A standard three- minute time limit was concluded to be essential in keeping order. 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 9 There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: i. Findings of Fact: CTA -2018-0006, a proposed teat amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapters 19.60.050, 19.65.130, 19.40.035 and Appendix A, regarding affordable housing and multifamily development. Senior Planner Lori Barlow summarized the Findings of Fact for the privately initiated code text amendment (CTA). The intent of the amendment is to allow multifamily (MF) development as a conditional use in the residential R-3 zone subject to specific criteria. This proposal came before the Planning Commission on two prior occasions. A study session was held on April 25, 2019 and a public heating on May 9, 2019. After hearing considerable public testimony, the Planning Commission deliberated and voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of denial to the City Council. Ms. Barlow explained that the Findings of Fact formalize the pivotal actions and capture the Planning Commission's recommendation and vote. Ms. Barlow concluded that as this item moves forward to the City Council there will be no further opportunity for public comment unless the Council takes specific action to do so. Commissioner Walton stated this CTA was one of the more contentious items reviewed in his time with the Commission. He appreciated the public for their participation and the deliberation from the Commission. He added that despite the struggles the Commission may have had in moving forward he felt this was the correct outcome and is in support of the Findings of Fact. Commissioner Walton moved to approve Findings of Fact CTA -2018-0006 as presented. There was no discussion The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. ii. Public Hearing: STV -2019-0002, a privately initiated street vacation of a portion of Glenn, University Roads and Baldwin Avenue. Planner Connor Lange provided a presentation outlining the privately initiated application to vacate unimproved portions of Baldwin Avenue, University Road and Glenn Road. Mr. Lange explained the right-of-ways (ROW) are located between I-90 to the north, Nora Avenue to the south and further bordered by Overland Avenue to the west. Mr. Lange provided procedural overview advising the application was submitted March 8, 2019, the study session was conducted on May 9, 2019, and tonight the public hearing is being held. Mr. Lange advised the majority of the property surrounding the proposed ROWs to be vacated are owned by Circle M Properties. The applicant feels the request will allow for maximum use of abutting properties and that a right of way connection for an overpass is not feasible at University Road. Mr. Lange highlighted a study done in 2015 reviewed the feasibility for an overpass crossing at University Road, the project was determined to be costly and not viable at the time. However, it is unknown if a project on University Road may provide a greater level of service in the future. Due to future development, staff is recommending an amendment to the proposal by removing University Road from the vacation proposal. Mr. Lange advised that all required notices have been satisfied. Notice was posted al CenterPlace, City Hall and the library. Notice was also posted in the newspaper of record on two separate occasions. Written notice was provided to the owner's adjacent to the 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 unimproved portions of University Road and Baldwin Avenue and signs were posted at the end of each street to be vacated. Mr. Lange advised that in processing a street vacation, staff reviews a number of criteria for approval to determine if the street is still required for public access. Staff does not anticipate that either Baldwin Avenue or Glenn Road would serve any public use and are still part of the recommendation from staff to vacate. Mr. Lange added that there has been a request for both ingress/egress and sewer easements that have been added as a recommended condition of approval. Staff also reviews conditional changes and feels University Road may provide a public benefit in the future should an overpass be proposed. There were no public objections during the comment period. Commissioner Kelley asked for clarification pertaining to University Road and what the City was asking. Mr. Lange advised the City would like to retain University Road and not allow it to be vacated in order to preserve it for future projects. Commissioner Johnson referenced an email from Jen Brunner requesting a 20 -foot public sanitary sewer easement and asked where that would be located. Mr. Lange advised that is yet to be determined however; it would most likely be along the proposed access point parallel to Baldwin Road. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 6.20 PM Todd Whipple; 212 N Pines Road: Mr. Whipple stated the retention of University Road by the City was a surprise to his client. He advised that when his client had come to him asking about this piece of property, they had done their research before purchasing. He cautioned his client not to purchase the property until they had clarification concerning the crossing at University Road from the City that they had located in the 1985 SR90 Environmental Impact Statement. Mr. Whipple continued that during their Pre - Application meetings they brought the University Road crossing information to the City's attention and were advised by City staff to move forward and vacate University Road, now they have changed their mind. Mr. Whipple advised the customer has done a considerable amount of work, provided plans to the City and had received a grading permit. I Ie added that the grading permit restrictions specified that until the street vacations were approved they were not to do any work on the ROWs. He explained that it became too difficult to maneuver around the property and then the customer had to stop the project. Staff has taken University Road out of the proposal completely. Mr. Whipple stated they received correspondence that the City would entertain a license agreement in order to use the property as if it were vacated to protect the possible future public improvements while the City retains ownership. Mr. Whipple asked the Planning Commission to maintain the University Street Vacation in order to give them time to go before the City Council with a request for a license agreement to use University Road ROW while the City retains ownership. Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Whipple, if the license agreement is obtained and years down the road the City decided to build a bridge, at whose expense would it be to remove the work they had done? Mr. Whipple advised it would depend on the license agreement and would most likely be the responsibility of Circle M Properties. Mr. Whipple gave some details into what they have done and hope to do. He advised they would grade to highway elevation to create the access road between the two distinct properties on either side and explained their road would be well below University Road. Mr. Whipple gave details into building a crossing structure over 1-90 and stated the work they have and will do should not affect future bridge development. He added they would be willing to work with the City in regards to abutirient and girder locations at that time. 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 9 Commissioner Kasclunitter asked that if the access road they would build is lower than University Road and should a bridge be built; would the bridge have to be longer in order to accommodate? Mr. Whipple explained that may be the case adding that currently there isn't enough ROW to widen University Road. He explained that University Road is 50- feet wide and building a 45-foot road to go over 1-90 would require walls straight up and down. He explained that would be cost prohibitive and would be cheaper to build girders and a deck. Commissioner Walton asked for clarification that should it be decided to move forward as amended and University Road is retained how would that impact what they are currently doing until they obtain the license. Mr. Whipple advised the work would stop and could potentially kill the project. They will need to enter on one side and exit on the other due to the size of equipment they use in order to move their materials. If they cannot use University Road, then they purchased a piece of property they can't use. He added that they are moving their corporate headquarters to this site, losing University Road was a big deal and losing the license agreement would be detrimental. Patrick J Mitchelli, 4107 E Broadway Avenue; Mr. Mitchelli explained Mr. Whipple covered all of their concerns. He added that before purchasing the property they made sure University Road would be able to be vacated and explained that if that is no longer the case that will put their business in a tough spot. Mr. Mitchelli added that directly across from University Road is the junk yard and stated that isn't going anywhere in the near future. Justin Fabio, 302 N Walnut Road; Mr. Fabio asked if the traffic was going to run north of University Road and where it would exit. It was determined that the street would run north of University Road, through Circle M Properties and would exit onto Raymond Road. Clair Johnson closed the public Dearing at 6:39 PM Commissioner Johnson asked staff why they concluded to remove University Road from the proposal and creating a license agreement. Mr. Basinger stated staff recognized that there may be a potential use for University Road sometime in the future adding that not knowing when that might happen the license agreement is an appropriate means to move forward. He highlighted that currently Circle M Properties is located on prime retail property on Pines Road and thein moving would open that property to better uses. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb spoke to the license agreement terms stating the City can require that the applicant's improvements are subject to the City putting in a future project. He added that the license agreement would allow Circle M Properties to use the property while the City retains control to build a future project. It was determined the license agreement details do not require Planning Commission action. Commissioner Kelley spoke about his experience driving truck while serving in the United States Army and how difficult they are to turn around in small spaces. He is concerned for the applicant's future as they invest their funds and work for a number of years and then the City builds a bridge. Commissioner Johnson advised that in the early 1990's he was involved in a two-year long process with Spokane County where an overpass was discussed for University Road trying to mitigate the traffic flow on Argonne Road. At the time, the bypass would start near Bigelow Gulch Road, above Hutton settlement, across the river and to University Road, he is unsure if that is still the long range plan. An interchange at University Road is not feasible at this time however, an overpass may be needed in twenty years. Commissioner 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutcs Pogo 5 of 9 Johnson is opposed to leaving University Road in the proposal and is in support of the amendment presented by staff Commissioner McKinley asked staff if the City would have eminent domain rights. Mr. Lamb explained that if in fact University Road was vacated the City would have eminent domain. The City could either purchase or condemn the property and it would be a matter of retaining the right to do so in the future or the City may feel comfortable enough not to develop and willing to pay the cost in the future if necessary. Currently it is City property and should a bridge be developed at a later date the City would have all rights to the property. Commissioner Walton stated the possibilities in cost associated with repurchasing or condemning the property and the legal implication are concerning. He added that looking at the future and how approvals impact the valley as a whole he feels the City needs to leave all possible mechanisms in place. Commissioner Kaschmitter stated she feels the license agreement will help and is in favor of it. She also agrees there may be a need for a bridge in the future. Commissioner Walton moved to approve STV -2019-0002 for Baldwin Road and Glenn Road with the removal of University Road from the street vacation application as amended by staff Commissioner Kelley advised in looking at the map it appears there are four structures that would have to be removed in order build a bridge at a later date. He added that he is opposed to the motion and feels the street vacation for University Road should remain. Commissioner Walton advised he understands where the proponent and applicant stand as it seems the City changed their mind late in the process. He added that in doing so staff was looking to do what's right for the future of the City and feels the City was well within the right to make the change as the vacation had not yet occurred. He strongly urges City Council to consider the license agreement to run concurrent as it continues to move forward. Comtnissioner Walton added that he can't, in good conscience, support the promise to obtain licensure if the vacation is approved and is in support of the motion as it stands. Commissioner Kaschmitter agreed with Commissioner Walton. Commissioner McKinley supports the motion and also agreed with Commissioner Kelly regarding the structures that would need to be removed. The vote on the motion was four in ,f n'or, one opposed with Commissioner Kelley dissenting, and the motion passed. iii. Public Hearing: CTA -2019-0002, a proposed code text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Cocle (SVMC) Chapter 19.60, Chapter 19.85 and Appendix A to allow and provide regulations on licensed marijuana transportation businesses. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 6:57 PM Mr. Lamb provided a presentation outlining the code text amendment to allow licensed marijuana transport operators to operate within the City of Spokane Valley. Mr. Lamb provided background into Washington Initiative 1-502 that passed in 2012.legalizing marijuana in Washington State. The City responded with adopting comprehensive regulations for the allowable state license uses to be production, process and retail stores. As part of the regulations the City Council adopted a provision 19.85.040 that prohibits all other uses within the City of Spokane Valley. In the fall of 2018 the City had a citizen 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 inquiry from a license transporter hoping to do business in the City. Staff presented an administrative report to the City Council and the Council gave consensus to bring a proposal forward to the Planning Commission for consideration. Mr. Lamb continued that transportation is only between the licensed production, process, retail stores and research facilities and is not for home delivery. The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) oversees the licensing and licensed transporters are subject to WSLCB requirements. Mr. Lamb continued that license marijuana transporters are required to have a physical location or office to store their fleet and state law prohibits them from storing marijuana in an office or physical location. State requires transportation logs and manifests in keeping with the state mandate that marijuana be suitably tracked from seed to sale. Mr. Lamb explained the product is transported in secured compartments, required to be attached to the vehicle or vehicle body and are Iocked at all times. Delivery has to be made within 48 hours from the time of pick up as there may be an instance where the marijuana is left in the vehicle overnight. Commissioner Johnson asked about shorter stops such a dinner and lunch breaks. Mr. Lamb advised it is allowed to be in the vehicle in a secured compartment no matter the length of the break. Commissioner Kelley asked if a truck could be stored in a storage facility or garage? Mr. Lamb advised that is an option, adding that under state law the product cannot be stored in an office and there is no mandate that the vehicle has to be stored in a garage or storage facility. Mr. Lamb added that state law prohibits licensed marijuana transporters from being within 1,000 feet of enumerated sensitive uses such as schools, playgrounds, public transit and. libraries. Mr. Lamb gave an example that currently under state law a marijuana shop could be built near an empty park like property with no current use. The City's buffers already in place prohibit marijuana shops from being built within 1,000 feet of vacant uses in order to prohibit non -conforming uses. Mr. Lamb addressed the questions posed by the Commission during the study session starting with the transportation of live plants. Transporting live plants is allowed in a secured compartment, those compartments could be metal partitions, cages or shatter proof acrylic to allow the plant to stay alive. Mr. Lainb added that the vehicle transporting the live plants must be windowless to the maximum extent possible. Mr. Lamb addressed advertising concerns advising state law prohibits advertising on or in private vehicles to limit the draw of attention. Mr. Lamb addressed the question regarding being stopped by law enforcement and identifying themselves. Transporters are required to keep a binder with their license details in the vehicle at all tunes to easily provide to law enforcement. Transport vehicles under the law are considered to be an extension of the licensed premises and can be stopped and inspected at any time. Mr. Lamb concluded that staff identified potential impacts to be traffic; as there are no restriction on fleet size, odor; as marijuana will be kept in vehicles, and crime; also due to marijuana being kept in vehicles. WSLCB is not aware of any complaints regarding odor or any break-ins to transport vehicles. Mr. Lamb concluded that this proposal is to allow licensed transporters in the Regional Commercial (RC), Industrial Mixed Use (IMU) and Industrial (1) zones as this will address traffic issues by placing them near arterials. The proposal includes the City buffers related to vacant school, library and City properties and also requires a lockable enclosure for the fleet if they are in the RC zone. 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 Commissioner Kelley asked what the definition of Regional Commercial zone is. Mr. Basinger explained that RC zones are for commercial regional uses located throughout 1- 90 along high traffic exits like the Spokane Valley Mall. Mr. Basinger added the enclosure suggested are due to the fact that there would be a lot of individuals shopping in these zone. The City wants to ensure the vehicles and products are stored properly. Kevin Lynch, 722 W Wedgewood; Mr. Lynch advised there are other transport companies in the state that already stay the night in the City of Spokane Valley during transport. He spoke to the topic of smell advising the product is vacuum sealed for packaging, then placed in sealed totes and then in a compartment in the van preventing odor. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Lynch if he currently ships live plants? Mr. Lynch advised he does periodically as it is 1% of his business. I -Ie added that per state law the vehicle that ships live plants cannot have any windows as Mr. Lamb had mentioned. Commissioner Walton asked Mr. Lynch to describe what a law enforcement interaction would look like. Mr. Lynch explained that his staff ale required to wear ID badges to prove they are an employee. I -ie continued that the binder carried in the vehicles as mentioned before include their common carrier license, business license, insurance card and affidavit. There is a manifest and invoice in the primary tote that can be provided to law enforcement when requested. Mr. Lynch explained that it can range from law enforcement knowing the business being conducted before even making contact with them to being asked to provide all documents in the vehicle and in the totes. Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Lynch why the information isn't offered to the officer and it was explained that would be breaking the chain of custody due to the seed to sale laws. Mr. Lynch added that by law he does not have to prove to law enforcement what is being transported in the totes unless instructed to do provide documentation. Commissioner Walton asked Mr. Lynch what impacts the City's request to have a secure enclosure would have on his business? Mr. Lynch advised it does acid to cost. He stated that he is a proponent of the request as it will make his staff, drivers, product and vehicles more secure. I -Ie added that buildings are hard to find and cost ranges from $1,800 to $2,500 dollars a month, it is also difficult to find a landlord that will rent to him. Mr. Lamb addressed the discussion pertaining to law enforcement stops highlighting that there is a preemption prevision in state law that WSLCB provides all operations of the licensed uses. The City would not be able to ask for any additional forms of identification or supplemental documentation. Commissioner Walton asked staff why the City chose to exempt Appleway trail from the 1,000 -foot exclusion zone? Mr. Lamb advised that the City Council does provide a prohibition on retail sales within 1,000 feet of Appleway trail to prevent the end users from using the trail. Council felt it appropriate to exempt Appleway trail due to its extent across the City and crossing multiple zones. Mr. Lamb added the limitations in place such as production staying indoors and no chemical processing. This was a compromise for business rights and property rights verses the trail and its beneficial use by citizens. Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 af 9 Commissioner Walton stated he was intrigued by this proposal due to the attitudes and state adoption of marijuana usage across the country. He feels it's a good idea to stay at the cutting edge of the process within state guidelines and state law, adding that the City wants to promote growth of all kinds. Commissioner Walton likes the proposal and feels there is a good compromise in the adoption of the enclosures and is in support. Commissioner Kelley explained his understanding of the process due to an acquaintance having a similar business and how it operated. Commissioner Kelly explained he feels this will attract criminals that want to steal the trucks and the product. Commissioner Kelly stated he does not appreciate the confrontational attitude toward law enforcement. He added that having been part of this first hand, landlords have the right not to lease to businesses they feel will be a detriment to the community. Commissioner Kelly believes there is a lot of crime attracted to and associated with marijuana businesses and is concerned for people's safety. Commissioner Walton move to approve CTA -2019-0002 as presented. Commissioner Kelley reminded the Commission that when I-502 was first presented, the marijuana grow, production and retail facilities were voted down by the Commission. IIe added that his belief is that if the legalization of marijuana would have been brought to the vote of the people of Spokane Valley it would not have passed and he is greatly opposed. Commissioner Walton thanked Commissioner Kelley for the background. He added that he is in support as the City allows this type of business and are staying on the cutting edge. Commissioner Walton advised that location and regulations have addressed many concerns. Commissioner Walton continued one of his primary considerations was to understand how this business is being perceived by local law enforcement and appreciated the perspective from the proponent as well as Commissioner Kelley's position. The vote on the motion was four in favor, one opposed with Commissioner Kelley dissenting, and the motion passed. iv. Public Hearing: STV -2019-0001, proposed street vacations of a portion of Tshirley Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue, and Greenacres Road in the Northeast Industrial Area. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 7;40 p.nr. Mr. Basinger provided a presentation to the Commission outlining the Northeast Industrial Area. City Initiated Street Vacation. Mr. Basinger provided background advising on April 29, 2019 City Council initiated the Street Vacation and set a public hearing with the Planning Commission. On April 25, 2019 a study session was conducted and tonight the public hearing is being held. Mr. Basinger explained this area is located in the Northeast Industrial Area were the City has taken action to advance development. The City rezoned the property to allow a broader variety of industrial uses, extended the sewer from Sullivan Road to Barker Road and have adopted a planned action ordinance to streamline development. The proposed street vacations will further prepare the arca for development. Mr. Basinger advised Garland Avenue will provide access for future development. He added that the current ROW may be an impediment for a large industrial user to developed in the future. Mr. Basinger continued, the proposed vacations are the unimproved Right of 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 9 Ways (ROW) of Tschirley Road, Long Road, Greenacres Road and Rich Avenue. Public notice was posted and mailed on April 25, 2019, posted in the Valley Herald and the Exchange on April 26, 2019 and May 3, 2019 and signs were posted on each end of proposed vacation areas. 'There have been no public or agency comments to date. Mr. Basinger added that the City has been working with Consolidated Irrigation District as they would like to loop their water system. The City will have an easement in place once Tschirley Road ROW is removed to accommodate for their loop. Staff is requesting the approval to vacate the ROWs subject to the conditions in the staff report, Mr. Basinger provided a list of the conditions. Vacated property will be transferred into the abutting parcels, if approved the area will be surveyed to identify applicable easements. There was some discussion regarding a Pre -Application meeting that determined there would be a land locked parcel once the ROWs are vacated. However, the applicants are proposing to apply for a boundary line elimination to make one parcel mitigating this issue. Mr. Basinger concluded that the zoning will be extended to include the vacated ROWs, a survey will be recorded and all conditions will be fully satisfied prior to transfer of title. Chair Johnsen closed the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. Commissioner Walton moved to approve STV -2019-0001 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Kaschmitter thanked the public for their comments. Commissioner Walton spoke about his reflection on the previous meeting and overall dedication from the Commission and community. He thanked Commissioner Kelley for reminding himself and staff of his passion in allowing the public to have their free speech. Commissioner Walton apologized to the Commission and members of the public if his comments felt as if they were dissuading the public from speaking as that was not his intent. Commissioner Walton concluded with thanking the Commission for their dedication. Mr. Basinger added currently the Planning Commission is the forum where comments will be received, so it is with utmost importance they arc heard. It is also important to forward a recommendation that synthesizes the Commission's vote and he appreciated the Commissions service. Commissioner Johnson stated he concurred with Commissioner Walton and also appreciated being a part of this team. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Walton moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:55 p.m. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. James Johnson, Chairman Date signed ‘0/55/zevr Robin Hutchins, Secretary Regular Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall June 13, 2019 I. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. III. Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: James Johnson Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Danielle Kaschmitter Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney Timothy Kelley Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Robert McKinley Conner Lange, Planner Michael Phillips, absent - excused Michelle Rasmussen Matt Walton, absent - excused Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Hearing no objections, Commissioners Phillips and Walton were excused from the meeting. IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Rasmussen moved to approve the June 13, 2019 agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor; zero opposed, and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Rasmussen moved to approve the May 23, 2019 minutes. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. VL COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Rasmussen attended the Chester Creek pavement preservation presentation given by the City. She was impressed by the proactive approach and the high level achieved in reaching out to the community. Commissioner Johnson attended the Inlander Volume music festival on the 31St of May and 1st of June, he was amazed at the quality and variety of music by local musicians. He also attended the Spokane County Human Right Task Force on the 11th of June where they discussed a media release pertaining to their hate crimes portal and how to gather hate crime data from higher education entities. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Economic Development Manager Mike Basinger gave an update of the Barker Road and Garland Avenue projects. He highlighted that the City has been working on Barker Road for two weeks and have installed 1,000 feet of the 3,700 -foot sewer line total. Mr. Basinger advised USDOT awarded the City a $1.25 million dollar grant for the Pines Road BNSF grade separation project. The City has secured $5.1 million dollars in project funding that puts the City in a position of 100 percent for design and 80 percent for right of way acquisitions. Mr. Basinger advised the Parks and Recreation Department will be holding a workshop on Thursday June 20, 2019 from 6:00-7:30 p.m. at CenterPlace conducted by Chaz Bates. Mr. Basinger concluded with items coming before the City Council to include the Pines grade separation design, an administrative report on Catholic Charities Code Text Amendment (CTA) and a request for a pavement management ad hoc committee to represent the community as a whole. 06-13-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of3 VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: Findings of Fact: STV -2019-0002, a privately initiated street vacation of a portion of Glenn Road, University Road and Baldwin Avenue. Mr. Lange explained the Findings of Fact reflected the process and decision the Commission made regarding STV -2019-0002, the privately initiated street vacation of a portion of Glenn Road, University Road and Baldwin Avenue. Mr. Lange advised the Commission conducted a public hearing on May 23, 2019. After deliberations the Commission voted four in favor and one opposed to forward a recommendation of approval of the amended proposal to the City Council. The amendment was to vacate a portion of Baldwin Avenue and Glenn Road while retaining University Road. Mr. Lange advised there was a scrivener error related to a parcel number that has been corrected. There was some discussion regarding a scrivener error of the Commission's vote in the Findings of Fact that reflected an incorrect vote of five to one, the correct vote being four to one. Commissioner Rasmussen moved to amend the Findings of Fact STV -2019-0002 to reflect the correct vote f turn five to one, to four to one. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. Commissioner Kaschmitter moved to approve Findings of Fact STV -2019-0002 as amended. There was no discussion. The vote an the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. ii. Findings of Fact: CTA -2019-0002, a proposed text amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 19.60, Chapter 19.85 and Appendix A to allow and provide regulation on licensed marijuana transportation businesses. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb summarized the Findings of Fact for the proposed code text amendment CTA -2019-0002, allowing licensed marijuana transport businesses to operate within the City with certain limitations. Mr. Lamb explained the Commission conducted a public hearing on May 23, 2019. After deliberations the Commission voted four in favor, one opposed to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council. Commissioner Rasmussen moved to approve Findings of Fact CTA -2019-0002 as presented. There was no discussion, The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. iii. Findings of Fact: STV -2019-0001, proposed street vacations of a portion of Tshirley Road, Long Road, Rich Avenue and Greenacres Road in the Northeast Industrial Area. Mr. Basinger summarized the Findings of Fact for the City initiated street vacation STV - 2019 -0001, a proposed street vacation in the Northeast Industrial Area. Mr. Basinger explained the Commission conducted a public hearing on May 23, 2019. After deliberations the Commission voted five in favor, zero opposed to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council. Commissioner Rasmussen moved to approve Findings of Fact STV -2019-0001 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner McKinley advised that his wife lost her father on Memorial Day. In light of Father's Day, he encouraged everyone to spend time with their families as you never know when it will be the last. Commissioner Rasmussen apologized for missing the last meeting and the miscommunication. Commissioner Johnson spoke about a 06-13-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Page3 af 3 speech Jon Stewart gave to Congress regarding the 911 Victims Compensation Fund. Commissioner Johnson feels it is of utmost importance that all countries take care of their first responders and is abhorrent when that does not occur. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Rasmussen moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:20 p.m. The vote an the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. James Johnson, Chairman Robin Hutchins, Secretary 7X///? Date signed CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 23, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ® new business ['public hearing ['information ❑ admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance No. 19-011 adopting proposed amendments to allow licensed marijuana transporters. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; RCW 69.50 (codifying Initiative 502); WAC 314-55-310; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040; Chapter 19.85 SVMC; SVMC 19.60.050. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council adopted comprehensive marijuana regulations in 2016. On November 20, 2018, Council heard an administrative report and gave consensus to have Planning Commission hear a proposal to allow marijuana transporters in the City. On June 24, 2019, City Council heard an administrative report on CTA -2019-0002 to allow marijuana transporters and conducted a first reading on July 9, 2019. BACKGROUND: In 2016, the City Council adopted comprehensive marijuana regulations governing all licensed and registered marijuana use within the City which are set forth in chapter 19.85 SVMC. As part of those regulations, the City Council determined to allow licensed marijuana production, marijuana processing, and the existing three marijuana retailers within certain zones of the City and subject to a number of other requirements. Understanding that in the future, there could be additional rule changes by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) or other types of marijuana uses authorized by the State Legislature, City Council adopted a prohibition on all other licensed and registered marijuana uses in the City. This prohibition is set forth in SVMC 19.85.040. Thus, the prohibition acts as a proactive measure to allow measured review of new uses prior to them being allowed, rather than having to rely on a reactive approach such as through a moratorium. Pursuant to RCW 69.50.382 and .385, and rules promulgated by the WSLCB in WAC 314-55- 310, applicants may receive a license to operate as a licensed marijuana transport business to transport marijuana and marijuana products between other licensed marijuana producers, processors, and retail stores. A marijuana transportation license requires that the license holder have a physical location as the primary business location, that all vehicles for the business be permitted by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission as common carriers, that the license holder carry certain insurance, and that the license holder maintain detailed records of the marijuana items being transported, including clear documentation of the chain of custody for each delivery. WAC 314-55-310(2-4). Only the licensee or employees of the licensee who are at least 21 years old may transport any product. Id. Marijuana must be in sealed containers in a locked storage unit within the vehicle. Live plants may be transported. Id. Pursuant to direction from City Council, staff developed proposed regulations to allow licensed marijuana transport uses within the City for Planning Commission consideration. Specifically, the proposal will amend SVMC 19.60.050 (the permitted use matrix), chapter 19.85 SVMC, and Appendix A. The proposed regulations are similar in form to the City's regulations for licensed marijuana producers, processors, and retail stores. The proposed regulations allow marijuana transport businesses to be located in the RC, IMU, and I zones. In the RC zones, the transport business must have a lockable enclosure to keep the fleet in, as the WSLCB rules allow transporters to have marijuana in the vehicles for up to 48 hours and staff understand that there are instances where transporters will have marijuana in the vehicles overnight. Further, as with the production and processing uses, the proposed regulations have added buffers to certain sensitive uses in addition to those set forth by the State. These buffers prohibit marijuana transport uses from being within 1,000 feet of undeveloped school, library, and City property (other than stormwater and ROW), and prohibit such uses from being within 1,000 feet of City Hall and CenterPlace. After conducting a public hearing on May 23, 2019, Planning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend that City Council approve the proposed marijuana transporter amendments. On June 24, 2019, City Council heard an administrative report and requested (1) zoning maps to show the allowable zones, (2) information regarding law enforcement interaction, and (3) information regarding odor control. A zoning map has been attached to highlight the zones where marijuana transport businesses would be allowed: RC, IMU, and I zones. Staff contacted Police Chief Mark Werner, who provided the following information regarding the interaction of commercial vehicle officers with marijuana transporters. First, he indicated that there have been limited interactions between officers and transporters. However, those that have occurred did not have any noticeable difficulties or issues. Officers generally look to whether the transporter has the necessary time -stamped LCB -approved information to identify them as a licensed transporter and to identify the cargo. Additionally, there cannot be access between the cab and cargo and officers would check to confirm this. Generally, the primary issue for officers was to seek and verify the appropriate documentation to confirm that the transporter was a licensed transporter, but that it would not be a problematic issue for any licensed transporter who is complying with LCB requirements. Notably, the amendments are only land -use amendments to address the impacts from the business' primary location. The amendments do not address such police -transporter interactions, as delivery operations are solely governed by the LCB and the City is preempted from regulating such aspects of the business. Finally, even if the City does not allow licensed marijuana transporters from locating within the City, transporters may still operate their vehicles on City streets to pick-up and drop-off at licensed marijuana producers, processors, and retailers located in the City. Finally, as staff indicated during the administrative report, state law prohibits transporters from keeping any product inside their facilities, which thereby limits the City's ability to minimize odor. However, any marijuana that is kept in vehicles must be in a lockable container inside the vehicle. In speaking with a marijuana transporter, they indicated a desire to minimize odor because they did not want to draw attention to the vehicles in order to limit crime. As mentioned during the administrative report, the WSLCB was not aware of any odor issues from transporters. The proposed zones do limit the impacts from odor on residential uses, as they are in major commercial and industrial zones that are generally located away from residential uses. Notably, the City allows production and processing facilities in the RC zone, which likely have greater odor issues due to the larger amount of marijuana present at such facilities. OPTIONS: Move to approve, with or without amendments; or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 19-011 adopting amendments to allow licensed marijuana transporters. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: A. Proposed Ordinance No. 19-011 B. Zoning map C. Planning Commission meeting minutes: May 9, May 23, and June 13, 2019 D. Findings and Recommendation adopted by Planning Commission on June 13, 2019 E. Staff Report DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 19-011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE APPENDIX A, SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.60.050, AND CHAPTER 19.85 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE DEFINITIONS AND ALLOW LICENSED MARIJUANA TRANSPORTER USES, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, since 1970, federal law has prohibited the manufacture and possession of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, based on the federal government's categorization of marijuana as having a "high potential for abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, and absence of any accepted safety for use in medically supervised treatment." Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 14 (2005), Controlled Substance Act (CSA), 84 Stat. 1242, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2012, voters of the State of Washington approved Initiative Measure No. 502 (I-502), now codified in various chapters of the RCW, including chapters 69.50, 46.04, 46.20, 46.21, and 46.61 RCW, which provisions, (1) decriminalized possession and use of certain amounts of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia; (2) amended state laws pertaining to driving under the influence of intoxicants to include driving under the influence of marijuana; and (3) established a regulatory system licensing producers, processors, and retailers of recreational marijuana for adults 21 years of age and older, and provide for the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board ("WSLCB") to adopt rules governing licensed marijuana uses; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted chapter 19.85 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code ("SVMC"), which provides comprehensive regulations governing licensed marijuana uses within the City, but which prohibits marijuana transporter uses; and WHEREAS, the State has adopted RCW 69.50.382 and .385, and the WSLCB has adopted WAC 314- 55-310 to authorize and regulate licensed marijuana transporters to transport marijuana and marijuana products between licensed marijuana producers, processors, retailers, and researchers; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to allow licensed marijuana transporter uses as provided in the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2019, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a 60 -day notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2019, and May 10, 2019, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report followed by deliberations, and provided a recommendation to approve the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on June 24, 2019, the City Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2019, the City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and Ordinance 19-011 Page 1 of 7 DRAFT WHEREAS, on July 23, 2019, City Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendments below bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, and welfare and protection of the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes and adopts the following findings and conclusions: A. Growth Management Act Policies — The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. Compliance with Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.150(F): 1. The proposed amendments are consistent with the following applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: ED -G1: Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. ED -G6: Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability, and stability. ED -P2: Identify and encourage business and employment growth in new and innovative industries and occupations. LU -G1: Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU -P5: Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses. LU -P9: Provide supportive regulations for new and innovative development types on commercial, industrial, and mixed-use land. LU -P10: Ensure that freight -intensive operations have convenient access to designated truck routes and intermodal terminals. 2. The proposed amendments bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment as follows: The proposed amendments will allow compliance with state law and allow state - licensed marijuana transport businesses to locate within Spokane Valley while separating such uses from identified sensitive uses and the City's existing and future residential uses. Further, the amendment will allow transportation businesses near transportation infrastructure. Ordinance 19-011 Page 2 of 7 DRAFT Section 2. Amendment. Appendix A of the SVMC is hereby amended with the following additions and amendments, to be added alphabetically: APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS A. General Provisions. 1. For the purpose of this Code, certain words and terms are herein defined. The word "shall" is always mandatory. The word "may" is permissive, subject to the judgment of the person administering the Code. 2. Words not defined herein shall be construed as defined in Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. 3. The present tense includes the future, and the future the present. 4. The singular number includes the plural and the plural the singular. 5. Use of male designations shall also include female. B. Definitions. Manufacturing, petroleum and coal products: The manufacture of asphalt paving, roofing and coating and petroleum refining. See "Industrial, heavy use category." Marijuana club or lounge: A club, association, or other business, for profit or otherwise, that conducts or maintains a premises for the primary or incidental purpose of providing a location where members or other persons may keep or consume marijuana on the premises, whether licensed by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board or not, or such other similar use pursuant to RCW 69.50.465, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Marijuana cooperative: A marijuana cooperative formed pursuant to chapter 69.51A RCW, as now adopted or hereafter amended. A marijuana cooperative is comprised of up to four qualifying patients or designated providers and formed for the purposes of sharing responsibility for acquiring and supplying the resources, and producing and processing marijuana for the medical use of the members of the marijuana cooperative. Marijuana processing: Processing marijuana into usable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates; packaging and labeling usable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates for sale in retail outlets; and sale of usable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates at wholesale by a marijuana processor licensed by the State Liquor Control and Cannabis Board and pursuant to Chapter 69.50 RCW and rules promulgated thereunder, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Marijuana production: Production and sale of marijuana at wholesale by a marijuana producer licensed by the State Liquor Control and Cannabis Board and pursuant to Chapter 69.50 RCW and rules promulgated thereunder, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Marijuana sales: Selling usable marijuana, marijuana -infused products, and marijuana concentrates in a retail outlet by a marijuana retailer licensed by the State Liquor Control and Cannabis Board, along with any applicable other use allowed as part of the marijuana sales pursuant to an endorsement associated with marijuana retail including, but not limited to, marijuana sales with a medical endorsement, operation of a marijuana club or lounge pursuant to an endorsement, or delivery of marijuana that may require an endorsement, all as provided pursuant to Chapter 69.50 RCW and rules promulgated thereunder, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Ordinance 19-011 Page 3 of 7 DRAFT Marijuana sales with medical endorsement: Marijuana sales and medical marijuana sales by a marijuana retailer licensed by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board that has been issued a medical marijuana endorsement pursuant to Chapter 69.50 RCW and rules promulgated thereunder, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Marijuana transporter: A common carrier engaged in marijuana -related transportation or delivery services licensed for such marijuana -related transportation or delivery, all as provided pursuant to chapter 69.50 RCW and rules promulgated thereunder, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Marijuana transporters shall only include common carriers providing marijuana -related transportation services between licensed marijuana producers, marijuana processors, marijuana researchers, and marijuana retailers and shall not include any residential delivery or delivery to end-users. Marijuana uses, category: Marijuana uses conducted in compliance with state law, including but not limited to Chapters 69.50 and 69.51A RCW and rules promulgated thereunder, as now adopted or hereafter amended. Market, outdoor: A temporary or seasonal location where produce and agricultural products including, but not limited to, pumpkins, Christmas trees and firewood, as well as crafts and other items, are offered for sale to the public. See "Retail sales and services, use category." Section 3. Amendment. SVMC 19.60.050 is hereby amended with the following additions: 19.60.050 Permitted uses matrix. Section 4. Amendment. Chapter 19.85 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance 19-011 Page 4 of 7 Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space R-1 R-2 R-3 MFR MU CMU NC RC IMU I POS Lodging Bed and breakfast P P P P P Hotel/motel P P P P S Recreational vehicle park/campground S Marijuana Uses Marijuana club or lounge Marijuana cooperative Marijuana processing S S Marijuana production S S Marijuana sales S S S Marijuana transporter S S S Medical S P P P P P Section 4. Amendment. Chapter 19.85 SVMC is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance 19-011 Page 4 of 7 DRAFT Chapter 19.85 MARIJUANA USES 19.85.010 Marijuana production standards. A. Marijuana production shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line, measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana production facility to the nearest property line of any one or more of the following uses: 1. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts as established in RCW Title 28A; 2. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts as established in Chapter 27.12 RCW; 3. Vacant or undeveloped parcels leased or owned by the City; provided the following shall be excluded from consideration under SVMC 19.85.010: a. Any stormwater facility or right-of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a stormwater facility or right-of-way in any document, plan, or program adopted by the council; and b. The Appleway Trail; or 4. a. Any facility or building designated or identified in any document, plan, or program adopted by the Council as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other similar term that identifies such facilities or buildings as the City's primary administrative and legislative location; or b. CenterPlace. B. Marijuana production in the RC zone shall only be permitted indoors. 19.85.020 Marijuana processing standards. A. Marijuana processing shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line, measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana processing facility to the nearest property line of any one or more of the following uses: 1. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts as established in RCW Title 28A; 2. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts as established in Chapter 27.12 RCW; 3. Vacant or undeveloped parcels leased or owned by the City; provided the following shall be excluded from consideration under SVMC 19.85.020: a. Any stormwater facility or right-of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a stormwater facility or right-of-way in any document, plan, or program adopted by the City; and b. The Appleway Trail; or 4. a. Any facility or building designated or identified in any document, plan, or program adopted by the City as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other similar term that identifies such facilities or buildings as the City's primary administrative and legislative location; or b. CenterPlace. B. Marijuana processing in the RC zone shall be limited to packaging and labeling of usable marijuana. 19.85.030 Marijuana retail sales standards. A. New marijuana sales shall not be permitted within any zoning districts. Ordinance 19-011 Page 5 of 7 DRAFT B. Marijuana sales uses in existence and in continuous and lawful operation prior to July 27, 2016, shall not be deemed nonconforming and shall be permitted as a legal use subject to the following: marijuana sales shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line, measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana sales facility to the nearest property line of any one or more of the following uses: 1. Centennial Trail; 2. Appleway Trail; 3. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts as established in RCW Title 28A; 4. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts as established in Chapter 27.12 RCW; 5. Vacant or undeveloped parcels leased or owned by the City; provided any stormwater facility or right- of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a stormwater facility or right- of-way in any document, plan, or program adopted by the council shall be excluded from consideration under SVMC 19.85.030; or 6. a. Any facility or building designated or identified in any document, plan, or program adopted by the council as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other similar term that identifies such facilities or buildings as the City's primary administrative and legislative location; or b. CenterPlace. 19.85.040 Marijuana transporter standards. A. Marijuana transporter uses shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line, measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana transporter facility to the nearest property line of any one or more of the following uses: 1. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts as established in RCW Title 28A; 2. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts as established in chapter 27.12 RCW; 3. Vacant or undeveloped parcels leased or owned by the City; provided the following shall be excluded from consideration under SVMC 19.85.040: a. Any stormwater facility or right-of-way parcels owned or leased by the City and designated or identified as a stormwater facility or right-of-way in any document, plan, or program adopted by the City; and b. The Appleway Trail; or 4. a. Any facility or building designated or identified in any document, plan, or program adopted by the City as "Spokane Valley City Hall" or other similar term that identifies such facilities or buildings as the City's primary administrative and legislative location; or b. CenterPlace. B. Marijuana transporter uses in the RC zone shall include a lockable enclosure for any vehicles used for marijuana -related transport. Such enclosure shall be subject to applicable setback, transitional, and screening requirements. 19.85.0450 Other licensed or registered marijuana uses prohibited. Marijuana production, marijuana processing, and existing marijuana sales, and marijuana transporters shall be permitted pursuant to SVMC 19.85.010, 19.85.020, X19.85.030, and 19.85.040. All other commercial and noncommercial licensed or registered marijuana uses are prohibited within all zoning districts of the City. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, marijuana clubs or lounges and marijuana cooperatives. This Ordinance 19-011 Page 6 of 7 DRAFT prohibition does not apply to home growing or processing of marijuana by qualified patients or designated providers in residential zoning districts as set forth in SVMC 19.85.060 and in compliance with state law. 19.85.0560 Marijuana production and processing in residential zones. Washington state law authorizes qualified patients and designated providers to produce marijuana and to process marijuana in dwellings, residences, domiciles, and similar housing units under limited circumstances and with limited processing methods. Subject to applicable federal, state, and local laws, any owner, lessor, or leasing agent may request or require disclosure of a renter or lessee's desire to produce or process marijuana within a rented or leased dwelling unit. In addition to compliance with any applicable state or federal laws and regulations, lawful production or processing of marijuana by any person in a dwelling, residence, domicile, or other similar housing unit shall be subject to all locally applicable land use, development, zoning, and building regulation requirements including, but not limited to, all applicable requirements set forth in SVMC Titles 17 through 24 as the same are now adopted or hereafter amended, and the following regulations: A. Any home production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law shall not be permitted outside of the dwelling or accessory structure; B. Any home production or processing of marijuana by any person or allowed by state law in a dwelling or accessory structure shall be enclosed, blocked, or sight -screened from the public right-of-way and from adjacent properties so that no portion may be readily seen by normal unaided vision or readily smelled from such locations. Accessory structures shall be permanent structures enclosed by a roof and walls on all sides and connected to a permanent foundation. For purposes of SVMC 19.85.060, accessory structures shall not include cargo containers, recreational vehicles, or other similar types of structures. Accessory structures shall be completely opaque in addition to necessary site -screening; C. Home processing of marijuana shall not involve any combustible method and shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and rules, including all standards adopted by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board; and D. Production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law in a dwelling or accessory structure shall only be allowed in the R-1, R-2, and R-3 zones. Section 5. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Appendix A and Title 19 SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of July, 2019. ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney L.R. Higgins, Mayor Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 19-011 Page 7 of 7 OCC❑ u OU a a❑ ipcSi efr E'Do (-;� CD Ot, Schafer ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 u ❑D: Carnaha o D rn ❑ z- 11 Rd Dickey St rma w O- rdleyO D o CD �1 Y. IQ \? y nch r Rd Thierman St rk alAy UO!SS W Rd G �C70 N �.� ❑ Q❑Cu❑❑p > D m m is v Vis aRc m o 3 Cy c�❑❑G O x eco Herald Rd °P < Arq.nneRd [D fys M Ilan R Farr Rd sc0 rJ adison� Rd ❑ 0 L000000 Hera d Rd D N Universi R Bowdish o R w O m a d m a Uni ersit m cDo ald Ftd sauoz ajgirnojjy pasodo.Jd c DDDD❑CDDDDD❑ll ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ M A Donald a a�W Ev rgre n Ra Evergre ❑ ❑ Adams d n Rd Progdess Rc ❑ o iklin Rd ra Rd a. N r ❑ O fD ❑ ❑❑� • (Q L❑D D !Z 1 ii0 6 -c (D N 0) co 1 l.)- iim 000000C. OE= N O arker Rd m 0. D0 m = O. D❑❑DDiU D'O CDDD:❑D❑PDD❑CDEPDD CDDD❑0 CD❑DDI m ��i� CD �o. CD 'r o 't � o • o O 0 t� CD n i CCD 0 0 0 r Z 2 o a O.. ',7.1 ��'"' a.rs o 5. -- p -h _ rz N ° o � n Cl)• arca F i•-. .o a Ai aic as °O a. CI 'aa o,� 0 a P 1 PD0 °. Id ICD " °n �ao ea o CD C • "a N- """'V'r E. @ r„2,. >. CSCD In '0 a. P• 5. A� m A7 .. CD 171 AD AI 5 n CD gag •- fi.= a m ms`s •- rA aq -- '� j' o [D a 0 5 4 `C 0 LI)C ,-• �. rA 0 0 0 0 ". CD cDno . a o p a- �• o o• ii - F at 6 Findings and Recommendations for CTA -2018-0005 : SSINIisnal I�IOISSIIAl1�1IOa There was no public comment. OD DI'Ii311a ENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no administrative report. 0 O ed E. 0 cra z <o cD 0 y ran 2 .. D m 0 o• cD 0 c co a. 0 o is a a r= a• 0 The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed Hearing no objections, Commissioner Kaschmitter was excused from the meeting. uotie[k1 new Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant uassnu SJ aIio4[o!JA sdillTud pm -pt CT 2 o 0 0 CD ?Id `a uWZ iouuo3 Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Danielle Kaschmitter, absent - excused Eric Lainb, Deputy City Attorney uosugof saUJBf Jenny Nickerson, Building Official - — Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: 0 sioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. eco °-h o co to D, r=.'' (7' 6 FE: r4' t•~]�''' :.11•8 8 O Otci>4 o 4-':5-2 Q C� 1. Ea.. -- O O O - Cd kc - to n �p.O �. " QOO nO n N UQ Tr�7."7 L. CiO _ 0 h cc CD O co . ...ti, r O . .+ 4,> OW OflOCOO to 0 Q - Op 0[fa = O" - di O;O _'- - N a o' .icl ..-3Vr-A.fl'� •111- g '_'. 0C,. 0 "I SnC~C O - ,"fj O Oco O O E' O O_Y CB F"jrO. en p Lj ""C;aO C.A., 'C '_'.yO ff�rr ► . te' . n O SC `r O+ . + p er' . CD.❑r.. �; cm ❑ - • ' b O �' 0' 5 O Cco C .r `C E .-r .-. CD Z' ¢ CD 5.,.- .:,.. C Y. i1` co j -_- �-' "' (� to Q- f7 (7 Cq (� ("� r..] ,... CD .r. ° C6 '.3 ¢7 i,1 [n co ¢� 0 CD ~ C) �. Q+ Sb Qa C1 r"S 0 r-. Q- 0 ra V t+ - r•r 2, O �C N -• O r = fl.. "►j OO �7 O -_ •+ .�- Q �, O C3 n . "� Q- �r�� r Cr. t� Q' O CA CD ¢� CD r `L i--• O O 7 O CD r *r''''' CD tG .� .= ° a'3 " h Oi.' �' SZ` 0 kJ O Q 0 a .-I Lv o w o 0 O.• '-. ;, r. n o ' � ua 5 0° ="' r`u 0 0 E2 LD CD E. �• . r• ,� r 0 o 0 `-. a nCD 0 ~- rD m`$ CD a c 1 CD CSD - ct a 0 ig • y p CAD •3' �, CD Cp U1II44I9iUL P2 — r'_ .0.. N 0+ G' •-r Q r � ❑�- N p 'G .`....- ,.... `L3 ^'-Ea- ter . C] CD @ O a? . •- .� n O .=+ 0 CD 0. p ❑ CD "� "• + w "� O 0 fC Cn' ... 0. r. 0..0. : • ,..h ,� °v O A. moo! Q ;� sr �• m ❑ CSD 6 er �PI p ►+' r-� '� o 0 '- ' "❑ 5- Q° Oq p 'o 0 Y r "' C tD ' ❑ O v' L1. O ►, 0 w (�" Fs i ❑� r r `_' Oq r o `c d C: ❑ CD B L 6 'z w r...' rh -. Cr �_ N CDc.D cm O_ O0 O �_ � • O �r �C�/�D �^h {� P,. On n ° "� CCD '� F -t ° Lys W el ''� - CD 2 . O `Q* 'o.. O O ' A❑ f1 �a rte • frC "�° 0 - COQ? CD Cori' CD O O O O ,,• O O O Q ''-"' '- �' 5" CD O+ 4RO �' [� rn �-• U, is [D. CD U4 '.� _ O CD C3. e1, .�- 6" ' ( �` CD 6 -o aQ m" ra O 'Y R ¢ .'3 d; Y- ^ vl CD C2. a 0 0 .- p+ O .k CD 33) . Y. O 0 ❑ QQ 0. �' p� 0 G p `� . CY LT �-_ �Q.. .ter O Co ❑ '� h = Q CA C ..... P ° CD O O �O' C� ❑ - O 4 - ,-t, c� ,�.r , CD r CD CD C7 'G Co m )--- ,-.. . t.. r . 0 ,--1 on 0 .:a Ct '.. CD in co 04 OGOr . r O 0. �� QQ _ CD '- co {'1 '- rh �. CA m -+ '.3 `� Cn CD C Ca ej CD ' 1.. „O„• " CD 0 �h .O ❑ :J c O CD Co .. r -r CD Cry ;- = G1 rs Y. .rt C4. w �3 0' CD CD . . ,3- - C~t? \O '� �-'• ❑ `"'s' 0Cia .. 6-. Q. jD �'�-• fl1 O r - cryo o.,. � 2- n ❑ ¢ i= `� P '-' �" S CR CD O OD rOn [D �} �' F.,,,:, ^' p ?� 0= t. O h�' p 0, �-, Q C "G LD Cry ❑ - F. CD C CZ. E " tk .-. O y G- r CD Y C3 O Cn CD +•� ¢7 ., Q �_ 'C� CD C7 ¢ "� Sy t�A cn ..+13- t.� 0 0- Eg 0 .' .� 1-7 O O r o. P., fir• 'CS ._.. '� 0 . r. CSD UOQ C , C ■"- Q ,, -.•O ?� , + Cep CD ''! en - O co O CD ,n O {•D , I .... Q �C i i".. O O C3 O . A, R3 3 i, O .-- `C3 CD CO [D Cn �-• O O Q sn x tD �. ►" v. 'C� '� O 5" 2 �? . mo CSD 5 C n C'•"• fl c . 0 ' r r• 'O Q7 A�' 5 'Q 0 A� 0. 0 4 ... Eo_. Y•.18 a. .�.. CG C7 C1. O G �" y Q `S� COn ,Or o,:°0 • .� "Os .€17 t,1-" OR rOr-: .... ' +s .". p *j VI CD 0 O CD 0 D m �- T 8 CD CDC O Z5' CD [Ss ❑ C� O O O N Q ry -. 0 O O Q.. 0 'O N .• • 'O 0 �y (/1 - r N p- 0- . ©^- CD m `* O c0yD D CCD CD "O Q CD „CD CD r+ C 0 : CD CD 5- O Co 0 -p. co i3 O @ *S 4* S37 ¢y C3 CD r- ❑ 0 Q Q CD 63 0 Q rCi O Cn7j� O /�.�- O Fi �' '` Q CD a C •� v h CD `G CJ} CD CD Q. '�•F O lJt 1-1.) .fir CD Y h Qi CD .7 CD CD + h The vote on the motion was six in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passu' n io 0 a. 5 51 CD C'3 '6 0 y p O 4 yCD CD co 0.. C Q rro CD 00.. 0 O 0 0 CD C1. 0 n O — F2.'0Cfq ID IIC CSD 0 CD O CD ci css 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes fra CP xA 1,:.(-),,i nn _d < 0 o -0 n in 1.12 O'0 m4.da 0.n 5• (" :? MI CD.. n `.- 4. a C 0 pip . , ' cc cp 8 O o. : C1~ � "7 - 'O`. - -.; "OC(� G" Eg n - 0 4 �,.. c,) -v O.. �• Y ¢@S- f:u O- �['f"W ON 04 [ ' D O` d ° C+'Ir—..-0. „c:; o- ' - J P2 `G ( 4 5.l. rCY ,CA CO -- 5• O @, 9 En - O CT O'OOO � CD7 r O y @ rp rN :+ < O ►O A ° p UQwO � :* O Ch LS a:Gq rt c� y �.O"% d� .'�E,� ,...1.a. 5 07 DAD ryi .+ 2 iy‘-- Cl.' m ' � O O CD rt'III 3 [ r F @ E. „ P n W a F4{@~'r-. (�-• T/ (vD " .•r O. p@1i s� nO , q�fiDSDtiO@d 0 CD d G < fAD ✓ @ Q .0 + " r.-4.; @ @ y 0 r�,-'•+ - °..-,- .CO. y@ TA C O 0 ro O CD Od CDr .-r{Q *b °i• @ R. r.4 ,-. v = 6 C Cn -00 n r3 O td �+ ` .0°.. �,r 0` 0o x. o r . `T fiGO© ° 4 °0'C ��°°o �° Cfa. '—..• O mo ° µ-o D' � r ¢- �co ,� ocr- * R, . • p a 0 n '0 o .-...s... to 2 _ m n- m ' cD R- 0 �y ". G.@O 0�.V, r•. *' .6‘- 1 E- g O *! (,,L.,-. 6 = AD L ) C 7 a., Sy@d ` 10 cn CD 0 �h W 8 5 R. .'-'' Frd- d n -0:...2.a" 4.: iry��_y Z. � a. r. ° O Q- rn CD n 0 o `� O r s„, O ' .. . Vv -� � �a O < n AJ � .-- �' rrm--,-- , 0 . • w-'C��O@ O n , u @A.* 4 ' a cnn Vs p- O �OO -r n d9J. F,O -.. npa)@ @y „OCA „ ET) CAe-. C.z. , -,r -..r C�. 0• Q°Z5" 5-.0 ^C'G7 r ,.Az 5 PI A) a CD e pa,-•`,, o5 < O 0••• p [^ CL =. A- a' =. m O '20 trqt4 s* E@ .eDfl �CD C ( -Cd �Yhte@`C�( `+ ? (pO �po C�►O�o 0 CA CO -0 A 0 r. .+ N d OrA 0- 1.-- ", MO0A D •CL- : 0G y @ G @n 0 co'CD 0 on @ - _ c7 r. " O g @ O \ ' O aGmrtO.• Q.n '-O0. .¢OO (ClIt CD.�CU ° CD ' - d cnO wrig a, CQ_ co esf�' Crai, 'r iO . = C7 @.O�7,+ O j} CP. `?� ° 4-4 Ci., ^ ,..,..CD CD CI 0 a. .►+.�(p 4Q— 0�-r @3�c^F CI"0 Cr C a O - d oRCD Q rrA 0 _•nO As cD.f en .-• . [) R. +n Z. rty O '0 o Oag B3 m ~QCQ CNOm @µ �¢.-ry�O�►hC@ ._U'��`�. O C0CQ C '` �. Do CD p 0�-P"0°-CA,5o n .0.1..• 5. �GC C -. � vO -' SO0 0 r 0 ii .-. 0- 05- . � ..r .-•. 2.jD * C O O p n •-... " DG =) 00 O. rnCD O ° � � O 0 UvOamCPC5iG3Qa= tn �O�C, .'•3CrC C - m , CO@. O D %+p .D .. �O. Q.,.... 0 0 0 DD I-. CD ' CD 0 p Mg E,,) raO O n � D"• CO '3 °C'@L»� CD o@ sg '_- 20 .-- O = G ... .0- Cr-5C C -r n- �►.r�ho0" Cn��@�'r `'` ti Q r�€�' * 7 � '�Q y - CD � r.` �, ,LOD qLa13,9¢' m p4to ' v5t1q n Q CD cm rn "o ''2. NAD QpAD X AD O/a p - p cm CD Vt al y Ori cY m 7 an;n �.D �vd n 0 Olrn G n � O C 0 ,-kt oO U�rt c'� O�. �. r .�. oAa °dy@ CO[n CD '' ►+ M. �. '- O . u., .�+0 + A'� O @ '0'-< � = r, nt'O. C� 1=O ` Ch ,rfidQ ` @. [n AI c.0 D• b L�. kVp Qd`"dO4C @ O @ 0' y' -h 0 n Fl... 0D 0 = ..` Y C 4 @ ¢ Cp,rtn-,2 p- r3 O- CO n co ' CD rO ,,r o °.1241 _C, ° v p* k rj RcA CA Q ° QQ COro 112 = '' 21 m O OO r"C.. oO @o@ D gtj 0.,:.O �.r^��teQn.-: O°~�`f�r. CD O r) CD [CCF' n /A@r 0 O £. + , -s'COV4 r Q 0,E, 0{OOO O �- AO n 5. 3 CO a:CD CD ,..--4.- �3 @ oO ' cFn QC -C p CDw p -; "O d en, v, O P . ei- _Est ► a 14; O p 2 n�CO CO rn tm"" 3 X n 0 O 1-1.)OCDD ,0 7�@ rD v O [ M' .+ , `�,0.- O�O +53 -‹ til �2 O. • CD y • 0 1 '.,-+ Q 't33 ` O°0 �. O 6- C ; Cr O -CO Cr� y �O AD d OCrn @tn O o �t@ SO 7 n 0 ... rn O ..• $13 �; �•-.0r+ °•rn r+ .. ay, -..0 SCD @ t�¢.";? O, ~O e r 0 C en 0 •.] 0 0 r - v ' -C 0 M. 0 ,-- O.. C % -G rn 0 -. ` 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes on ya.rr'�I.�- `¢"`� `� d6x7 '•r 5 0,- iOt--. On° n co — c° [(O.Lj C s, -....0 O °4 oG ar, PFCiO ra aq 'rs Oa P Oo o °�►f. ie �5N C 0 Q+ i; p O C O 0 -. Cu tp� IR; f t�'V� h�C ;O. r' �CD n N• ( A rFA' ... _, pp rO. a 0 [q 0 a O D V] ( C O 5,...,,, 2; ^' • ,-: o _. (31C1 V 2 CL AN" C-+ rA cm . E. O O- O..` - A - .-Ch- 5O`'T .•'° FlO • C.. ]O5t1 CL a' w` O. O 0. g Cr pr �Y r. r O A �- CD % ¢ CM 4. N ��0 O 0OO a z do a. a ° o. 50 o ov.-- �O 0 O ° CD ' C O CD CD 20 • spD a O `0O a0C0 P. Ai m s CO , ( FL,- =. O 5` v 0 :. ©v: C 5 O fl.= D 0 A O O 0 m 0 ON ' Erg.- • Q. �r CD O _ til y R. CwO oa. 0y�00a rn 0C AD. 0 � [AO .amHn 5r r?. ro '_yw aom.Y'r • [.OCZ ~ryO 7 4+) rt w - '..7,-•CCO .� . R fr' O O' C�-Ocr, cm O CO CO i,. E . - o • (HsQ O Q 0.: r r vi 1-t) uOGA G En cO' -'_'r O �O rt0O ► s n 0U'Q"O.'i; ,-Gp'0. 1 NF-'.. x ,O r. A, '-h 0 D +CDO '- O r"pr CD En aCDC (� C`.1i OA • O ¢7 Fril v r =' O CnOO o '2. 0 T3OCr - cc ,:i 1-h '0. a y - C � 4 O � O O. -° D��h �r4 �?a a.. ' r0,, pD 74 0 0-r< "Xr'p0 O C C ^• (jtCCCOcD On'G O -O j�'O ..-¢'O C� it= C0SD C nO�-D,-r - Tn D Ln* .-- - e! ..f0 oD o00 23 'p �pDD "s -h 5_ c'�¢ 0 D O vFAO•O• ° 2) �ce* .... k CC. 54 %.<G S(Dvi'p CD p ° '` D OOL. `(C0�0 3 0 O rCO CD JO, 00 n E0 A,, }3 O+ D .r. a . Cj 0 g' 0 ..OO c' • [." O 14. a 0 .. OO0Or 0 cn a= 2 C '0 t3.0 _ A rn 0 rt Uj Y� 0 Q r -r 0 2 „"': O .`Y G3 r'3 r•r =. ✓ O Xit: O . .< O r., r 0 0-• 0 O 0 Q'•? 0 ¢. •4. El, '-" cA 5:'-- 5+ � 0 .. 0 r. QQ op , ,... , E [. 0 O ar 57 �' ° i] rF (!J rn O Oh �O- TDA" ` CD 0C'l r . .. L7 g �f CD �. �` CD }" O '.'. ►+ O {� Cors CCD FL n w ... 17, r rn o - '�-" tOn . %� C�.�S 0 C2 CD O• ~ O• f6 on C FOA 0 O cm O "" Q CD 'r.S 0 rr ° a �e �', ('� c� .-+ ca 0 .,• FA �- u�. �,- �. 0 ° DI n 0 (� 0 _5 cD .- t3 'pcrl -r n 0 ,-. "h A� FA R' o © o cD ,� cD ED'�+ R� o �, ,� CD ✓ 0 Y O rr r+ O 0 `C CD O' ❑- O < rA - 0- 0 -F `C co fs ° O O C a O C w �_ a O0 O O 0 P • •- cD ; o O C O 0 K. I. »rPr [ ' 0 O O•O`O ca ,C2)MFA0 - 5 ' b.M . Cs 0. CM��SD ‘.<$ SI' .* < r+ r7 <r F 0, J) ..< ?Vn 0 tiO_• r. 4-9- ... -' 0 n .5ttop. CoO .5 r•. g — Ct:r'-1. a,af. f ►v r' <• tD n r* co.SO A5C�O0CDn Ocati in - 0 �' * /cned p zC'r tiC oo cn •' 9 C� �.9 fcPAq 0 ,} 4 �rc0• ..Sy • O C+ -wCD R C.07 • s .+ OO ,-CO Tng OU a p `O.,., •.M•-• G ,-�P CD C . O. O3 v� iv'S''d CVh QQ vQs co OCD O U'a a C•n ' Da rni irs • VI . i !-; o: 1 • rb Xi Ltr • O cSID Q.a.:~IflihIj - 0 W A = • Sd r O QQ-3N d C4a. r G p„—• CA4,- y oN 0 ,0 O .a.. .CCnX .-r- Q !`7 a, C t' — r d s • .' or. 0,E rO AQ G i 5 O �P,4VCD pGD .. '. sD '• O g '- f O Q O O Q d3�- (De' .51. • nE+-c ma ., - 9.-... 1Cp r, F�- CDDc/s� CO a.. p a• O O , �.dy ;a C . :? +S Cr ,CD 5 a.a0-p ycp d ,.. p• 4 AT ¢ n ri-<ccg ..pf t.O [' ph ”' 5.s �) . Aor,ayp" - oD 0 ,, - f�O U �CS'+2 C5 = .rO n^ 0 {.Q"" N .c¢.G d I�d (�H�y +� S��. +-—CDdA:�..C d".. Cn: �` 5 i ~ o ' `C a^• d o �C,p, O I"` A --4,i 0'5C6 0C0 ��'.+rCD '- C7 •-,`� ,+ om Sb - D O Sr,OrQ CN-: C • ✓ O C ` RSr C .• h + pp P._ • DI .. O�h O rA.�+ PL '4. [ I-" r---. .=�Cr13 P Cn ? co 2 QCO�`C O CVOCA 5 ^ ,C CD CD CD r►C. CD cn c., ‘.< n .r'. 177' JC rng d Q 0 O Ort 9 F• =- n a.� rja p rOC ..¢`C pinvsG Ecft Z QC@ F SD n [ Q' O. ". --,...8: .c ..d �5'[ E co' G" N�(D CAOcnill 17-t. .CD ,�. 1.1 CCa"+ O O .' - rt [rtQ p- go- •,:4. 0 o. `J '*0 0- < o C 0 ,.E GM. =a qra'``-o @ = O c'' ,= cnn0z0v R. CD rr-- 5 = 8o@5"li�•0PO Q "' a, 0y c ] O^dn 7'' a..� CD,rArCO4 Cd Q C " P �r,'teS�. r0 aQ�.C.. LFp zy... _Y -: 2,11- Ca ^". ..• - C� .D d �- r O Crr y .�• Da � 'F fn D ? O p a Q Psi.+�f¢ A- a � 1 C: S?Cd ' .�Q • r=. �R , y QqCm CCO aOV'U0Q , w Rp VI D O CD O `C ,...A ►sAr,.� C) GO 20O'3S• `GOV0 Ov ,:CDOh [D x �--0..'7€].''COrt a\r. O a y '� .-cD CD. AQ'r 00 �e y .-t..CD SE .. •Q ] Sv' Ca� i . a.[V 'CZ' 17c10 5,2 Q O DO � .,. O {A y .O yCD•Q,-r¢rQ o z'W 2- <.... +E (-5i 20 OCCrrDrO- tA4Ca'i -. „.c ..�•O rKC-o O^O O- *K. r+A) O OO-Ofal- co,4.C=2 cn CD ci,'.3 r'' np F.a` r Ua- y` ., i a. p Oe .. 5 o-< o cc.�+. o¢n, n R-:8 r a o cn Odf3i"hOOQ• _nQr. ~AQ1i�` Odr"-�O'A:loC0,x„ ' �ci',' +�cia a. UQ. o f ,. r „ ]a C] a`!a o O . C,,p0 0.C5-CD ** O �.�OQ�ti' ^'2 (9DD --a ^ a 5 0- P �p.aEQz �er C[r»~Z , cnr0 —0 0 a Q •-F E -.0 CD r+ = PO 'LS .-w '-': '-, Q o-0 ..''' O 0-0Qn"C].p OD - n CDpQ►°EDOEID d�HI D . = la- �e. pa.n S_�,--�Lf y r 'Si: O,, G LO C7RO r� Zg. @ Q C0ii ?CC0 cn00��y IatQa..-'• ra• D tQ CD D Ciis = CD CD O -r P cn D. cn A.-at4N ).+ cii • co 0 174- t. < 0; o x a� O o 0-.D 1,. c CO r. O CCS ". 3,:a + pet,Ls ~'S0`O' CD IO00 TA•Do C�0 CD 2 L9IIc. 2: Ea � -" 9r_it © L - CS I -I -+ 0r. Aa 0 pp moC0 0 N N "- 1J coco A*i, t- Cn CD r.t ." h AW W Cr-r a. O C.- `C o C 1 0 ('] :, 51 r El - O R. A� Cep o h ,-r "�. s re.re.• 0., �' •p O" .- O p tD P2 CD 5.1 PD CD crq P s o = co 0 OOO o rn O h a 0fDC �. v, cD 4 4 p 0 0 0 `17 �' co PD X O 5.i ' < 4CZ sz { _' .- "C� U3 0 K. CP- 0 F' 0 VD D--• 1-.3 "O-' 00 5 W CD CD DiC Ocn 0 ;. c ",,0 o 0© n Ncy a. z •O- 0 O"c_ y- L.., c.. CI- CD O 0cnca "Cy O O. O C� "a [ n K. O n [D O O m O CD CD ;3 '� 0 y rr-i 9..- 0 n C - CD .� CD r.s O• Q. y `S3 A _ o a-`- c-�0 a. ?' 0 , t , -i- Ken Marlcs 10001 E Broadway Ave; Agrees with Mr Lehman .-1- .'Y_ • icD D yw-t000)s ... o w o + o. •- +cOf0a00 CD p O CD 0 0 : E 5- 5 00 1DxCryCD , � 5 `�C-Cy >O r+ CCSa co. o' 0CD O 0 CT0 0, 2 Q„ 0= vO sw o 0 : '177' 0 O c ..— en1-i < O rn � .- C. = D 0 D C • -,: CD 0 O CD'CC[CD Z ip`r) C, .QO m vG O 040 _ g 0 . 0- t3 ,. o � � as ci,Da s mCD ,v� II O,Mx a. �"' , ' '� cnDa. c a 0. po• c�3 1` '/+ Lg. O-O~D,=y �C Sn 0 3O CO V� O6" © CD cig 0 ¢ Q p ONN sn : ,- CD O,..y CS ; szo OD �Y ► /r+C D O f; -~ tfD ,S CD 0 � m--7 maon O= un _ v0+ y ". 4- '4 t7 0= c o. '46 CC 1-.. o (Cco 5 . a.O cm p 11/C`< no�' o p�. asa N 0° r4 o . — ,h, CM P O S, C O CD _ cr ,-- , ?� :� d 0 �* O 0 "C n 0 rCD-• -' CD .� o n- .�- iv Sy 0 P 0 co p< C4 0. CD '� '-.. 0 O 00 R. p3 0'cl, L7 m �- �, CLp. may-. 00 rq a. O c.,"nAo m 48 0 21D p y 2 8 O O- 0CD . 4 - O�+ Sy -n N N O A„ Y~ . • K. p' 4O OC , 0. . a0 '',"- xDyy F.D., D .+ co p- O O �' �? 0 CL ,� = O - .� `LS VI M. 9 uOs O < r" •►• 0 *c = D. 2. ... CU txD :C.7. Q 23 C<D O C7. b 0 r•r56 y r- o O CCD. �. �. CE,Op- t r r KS" CD 6 CYO n- 2 Oq O, m o CM c Ai '0.�. `R m O 0 O 0 o CD �'izo ' ' p. 'e a- cD a. a a 0 c 0-. 0 • 0- 0 0 0 c�D o c0D 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Yob mon s� nan - C� �.ppsal 001-arn =nig g'- n C iti ro w O •0 -; a ° S p �» ca co D 0- 6 (4. to �. co 0 0 �. 0 0 : 'o fa '. �, m a y $y Via` ' , < n o vs al ° 0 0 -- 0 0 o r - C. ,� "' y QQ (pi tn_ CD .�.',. •'' �.. t1." O ffl `rt eL "'r U7 cC' O r�. �Q `� -.. .° y� n o° q' ��.,. Z o CD �• 0 0 E o o° e `� c o m was T r - "0 p [p fa S . , cn ,-I. V< C? ° ¢ CD �. 0. [D r - ° .r.. G] --. CO Crq @ `may `! �,. t:z I i Z C3" O r , rt r+ 2) O" W O R. !c''..--- (p C13 'zs ° �.. �, o a a �' 0- m, �-. �- t -s* n 0 i co p� y a "'`r-- (a C, ••.. m y ry - - •* � r ° or.°.. n te° �' - O O'Q N -� --�. o 00 ..a a z- a °4o° 00• ,y r- ort t°o /as 0�.�..� R (--. -/-�} a �. o 0- CD ,1- k-.; k�.� • o ~ ate' ° �'. o,y- y a� ' . _ 0. AD 4 cn Q C F V co yF...�j �. S� 1l3 wF1. < 0 .•; Q �• Vj ,� `a. �.� izt, �. C'< 'E -D Q r�r. - �• r : �"'`� 1� - - ha � ti,, C 'i fa - t]. CD a.., f0 MR' �. �' fi y r+� CJS [n i -r r'%' Pr O r` S_ .' CD ..r f4 Q- b C a a. CZ O G 0 ,O„ O C9 ' S p S� ,_Ort •^•ct, �` to (p CO = . o o O .� 0 Ivaa 1-1 0 Og 0" 0 ,� 0 o oa ° c ' °� $' ° as tro �. o o --{ D, t" c a Q F+• -3. C�i7 f3 ^ - `� r_,a CIQ - , 0 ..•. t rr fa,0 CD O_ P CO.O-r sr rr' .W.. O ••. Sp ',.. ty0 Izs Q„ � f. -1 La a ;0. r t• 0 CD Va CD ".S• in. ° cr .-. 0 CD 'moi 0 0 4 n - y y �" 'l= y =" S. � �� O ^, --. �- '�- 0 Q,. va O CD .`3 < ry tD O cA a �' �^ ?' - fa ..,. �' .., td *+ " g O O O,. P CD `CS r "�' O Ca Q. ncf2 O ��,. N O ° x n A. szt Cn- ' m 0 r - r C3' to ° p `a O prtj O CD '' o . 0 'CS - �, _, �: - p ° c1:1 P 5 0 P 2) ° Cr ° ,V `< `Cf -�" ° E. O o n fti 0 cm q cco ... — z c) to ... O C .- -- 0 `� •-;- ►� a - �. c� �, O• �, rt '" ^ ft) CD "c3 U y ` s -r ti to !z C3 0 ..... 0 t- ti3 p-` CSD 0. r < � Nrt rt O .i. -- CD ¢- s ] tC n - `a' .i` cC p ,2 �-»• 4- CD Cp `�' .- .-- Z m 0 7a 0'0 S O QR -, z , - ;�- � G - - 0- o OR O O O r° CD m ¢. Cp �- tO n o a � M O 0 F 0 o °.. 0 o - -. - � - � a" � � o c• . - D a 0 rt °h pr° Z�- OD al rig a f0 ,.a 0. [D CD ,�' 'Er,'C CD 'LS ,-- .O ©r_fCL fes. f6' rte. y U{� ca CO' co CO o -J ° €- A7 CO CO O CD °C15 ,` a O �{! s' O CCN* �R' UOA oco Z ' Z0DI° 0�7 CC ° y . ca co c7; O�._. . . eZZ ~° ef" co h ., CCO •`a < gr, 0. O°U ..v0''� +.. a S�-" 0 Ca"y AzNkQ 0 O <.-. -rt, • ..0.:a`:. 0 o Cr,°° cm iU° Or* ° ~CMa ••_ ° to O�.Q'O O- 0 O CCA 0 ,-. 0 Z. fa z r.,-, tz. r. = 0 D ci, Chair Johnson reminded the audience to remain t espectftd to all those in the room. 0 0 6, U CD° 0 - 00 0 0 ,E.. ,000 O 0 c# , .:+ cn fit. rt m -. i3+ r•- .. 0 0 0 ^J' O O aL 0✓ CO 0 ri 10.0 0 tr Da 0 cr W CD up p¢0-rr n x5 z m 0 'er ° r� 0 0 0 cr R o p r 'O ,--a. .. ro-05"- 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Al 0 r- r+ sn 4 K O (-) r.r�.(--) 1II!fIIU!f 1-1 Et... 0 -' Pr cn• �' 0 0 CO3 0 co co 0 0 0 -Cr Pa 0' 0 ►� m (� r a' ' 0 F ". .dam � +a. O+ 0' — O h ' , . 0 0 0- cn C�a.d-�''0 -gt � ca o 9.rp o 1`' a, d cc 5' p ��'" c� �ry� a• W 3 cD r • CD Ca. . c 00' Ca. EIDD "' d � r 1 / al ... .. li1r7 = 1 rC CC pa 0,.s �a; C d Q 0 0 0 Cn * a' " Cpa d -r OQ n �1 :p -S VO d r--. a 12 ca d•d X jr 0. Cry 0 cn ad ccON*0 o . aen . N Pa .C dYh O a C*0r vtr = R0a . no O a. B h Q• 0=a'r Pr . C n o 0 ca 0 aa. as bZ a- c . S cn r° �-oa 113 0 ea aa "23rn 0-10'' co 0 'n `C a(n r. 0te4 ..'r ,.. 'a ,+ _ . L [ONp 0 �.-r d ap e-0Cr G O fl a w ^,. U7 '� �• 0 .'T.- �'h 0 0. 1. H X a O rt Onaida D .-'7-. (� 0•v,tn �. •r+ -. �0 Cm AO. 66' F 0 d. • Cap g° ria n 0fj,D m [' 0- - CSD CD CD 5.1.'0" - 0M ( tiO O 0 OD CD 0 O ',- d Q rn O 0-r f -i CD `C �` .� '� o <, 0`.� m� {7 C. CD . =. O 6-4. f3.. O r d 1.-i., O.. < 0 �. [ M O 1- 0 o 0 oa ta.a. a .0 o o 0. r- 0 CD CI'Q a 0) d.. . ,' 0 O Cn a.. 0 O 0 n C) or 0'5 rn H, rn co Cn co •Q �� o cin a. 0' 0 0 0•-c m o 1-0 �c� cfa __ _ ?� rn CD �' r. O C- =" a art d ton O o' ~� Cin �' d CD CD 0 A7 0 AD r„y, M:1 . Cp co '. g< G C] Cj '0 't3 O .s. O ,� 0- -AL3 O Sem '�]. � r.. ='3 < d ~ O a yrs. e..-.$ ,, 0 /o r' r/i /5T' CD .— /may'. /I, . ¢ a d 0 0 /�� 0 10. r -h r, 03 + D3 M t y Q u) P r; O :--' PI ,1-• F+- too F± i--.. Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 8:04 PM Todd Shucks, 116 N Walnut; Mr. Shucks is opposed to the proposal. ca Po O. -r 1�' �- sy . ^' can esu a ro a ,' cu '.. . ^ r {7 x cn -- .+ C 0 S O i'3 CC r . OCA to '� pa • 0- Y on o 0 co a o '� 0~ r 0t QPa 0". r; O CD '3 14-, co G tom. 0 p DD vs 7V a a c t...., 0 ra I...3.) 0 O+ d 0' a. t loa "a. L3 ry. p rn 0..) fD C_ d.-•. 0 ~ O 0 0-0 CI ' O r - 0.. OD r-4. ►`3 O 0 • O 00 C. C06 w O 0 0 0 CD s-• -- n M CD '+ ro $33 . f—D 0 .-t, 2., u7 . Yv0 oo Ao• 1-.Zj n ] COOo O M. 0 co r • 0.• raWit. UR 0 o 0 0- 0- cn Z a .6.. 5 0 '-v�'0 0 0 ' 0 ' ' a 0 0 0 ¢+ 0 Q.. r+ O? fa1. a.ry� `C ._„ -. co 0 0 0• o tC ,-. r� n '0 so 0. CD Cr;0 A' 0• En 0 CCD d �_h 0.'+ 0 cin ea 0 d `.�0 _ d V- V� .`+ n co C3' 0 0 gD a -. .CA 1-po a 0 0—.,ri• - FA . °' ..,f A, , ,. rte (31P ; • 20 @ 'En- O O O 0 o P , ... co ' '0 0 .-- sn 0 saantny/ uo!ssIURuIOD 5u!uuuld 61OZ-6O-CO O , wo0c' �-• . < '�J cn .0 ria O• '-0 S* (- rs 0 nO-04 0 c4 ". cn Q 0 r!O da�,, Y0 .wtCa O OO OCOQ OOrY D -CD O c O co O r: .. CO' . r _ 1. �- C] + J rl r W 'S CDQQ Cn 5 < "° co y .- (I) 'rc to C" r }r :72,- r c @' -a R�`OC OcCw , GrCD M hr3 Y �. D . ivv•G ' 0'5 trQ g 0nCw< D f!O3 '"'4GCCm w O "t ? .DOfT/O'^ COrn fQ - ACn CD `. CQ CO ' /Cs'' " '-'- 11:'qia Cntnfl] El [n' � O C 7 ri0.- C13• C53C p n?._, `cO m Z Q ' ,!,4-:-P2.. rn pq O:M- n OO n -. O .r r -- . ° CCC .+ r--.1. '-. 0 O O''.�rnt] 0.) - O O. wp O Q 0 O O r�• r. My,Jp . O Q. r'�O r -'w c = ° w c ri0 O CD . G • CD ", r .+ .- co < so 0 Q3 OG rDI CO 0O OOcD D0 0 ° 0.. rn' 0 M - M.' pI-: } 7cr s g. ~ '0�12 r- r ,. rfl k ,*•• Z3 o „r�, R• 0 CD CD nO' rC: < A7 y CD tD '0 r- C E [n 0 .- rn 0 g= cn CD O' 5 < Q n c" C ¢. C Q- 0 O�° ' on ° ' p0 O- D 'rtea cr�C O cC{CD=G O Cra n D rO' 7 ° r r- ce,H,5000O O + ° .. ar '5n -. .-,. , 0 D w ''o nwo Q'CD �2C? ` Os on 03 3.° 2►�Q. yaq CO Ai'w �•h CD uIt n -:DCSO 003 rCe O �<O Ru ....VI G O7CD Cny `"ci (�cm '1.114 Fic r. o 20 O ii �C ao O ^ So 0.O A.+3 .v. N n�,UncC-ils + CD n -t• �.. Oj ty y�A` ' Cr A7 rt �' *� 'c CD Q w a- .. Q- ,_r. ••.< . Cir['ccJ 'r10. O- CArn O <°G1 :J 03 CZ, �.; as CD O - OC1_W CO nFO�pC cr so la .0.. 0_ C's OU4 0r0O�r^rteo �. O CD CP 0. 2 O P- ril ry y �.'� F a.r- (DP-: ;L.." �. OOCDry Q Cra' CO 0. o w �, o C�Do 0o • C�CR CD o� c, b Ncv cO m vo O Or -` P CC ,o °M• P 0. r•-: CDaQ A- .�p 1-` CA .. �'- ts .-+ - ° O '-.-�O p. ZV,a oCD C ° P0n 0 C 0 P CT O O G �cs c D ? r, Dr `< 4 r '-h r=<0 wY. c� r(D w fiw " .<3 3 Ocei n go :O "''< is_r� = ,-p-rtCt. =-O $ % CD rn rCD G Q co w � co �• n � 'n O F3 O w ^* •- O cro- w O+ 2) Cn@' C 'ad ►-OO° r-�a-AQCC-'C xt-' y.�a Cr. ; n m CD . Ci �.° CD C/3r- to *" rS 3`C° no CD r.,, Ms.• O- e-' Cc M (11 co O CcoO Cc O -SO'ar W CP CO r'• fa, D G- �-- P. O ." P 0 . p 3. �O,c` OO O 'O r• ' 'Y. cow n }-- 0- < D' c . O C3 SCQa S' CM < O �. n ° w =:...OrFc,a CDrta O ,. 0 w E. jcis a. ' - rt- . n OP fCJ HI . CD 0 ' z. c ° - O' '0 ms' c - r CQ. O Ga, 8 w3 0 0 �o `CO© o 'Cps Jy o- , O Q w O ] �,+ .+ 1O' cD O '' co a.. p. D r« D3 < g -CD CD3 '� O v < • d 0-C• ' .-i.f�`O rCO° Err.3. CIO ` Q �co cQY =< p �t S. Csa. a. - Y vO CDw O .T P.0 '¢ gypw< fl �.. OG O O.ra ' En `�' CD CD iO. 0P MZO... . Os. '- Do - *u' FL +O flO OQG Cy r rey 0' ✓7O III'C0.0s' *" c N O CD O P. O N r ONw r; • NC� O' o r- cpC4po-DO A ADa.-t- pr w� oR-'° '30 LI~Q z Ol''') N) E.oq© 0 0 ofl n ° fi3C5 �' '��. ro CD CO O co N �M > O CDS w r. < C ? r+ ►OV OtC�.O Ifl C fr CD w CCM ... O � C6 �, _. R. D "D r' . O` Qi ` D 1].: Q, o s FpO+ .�,__tP `g *O W ' co O '" 0. '" O .-0 ap�. N p 1 ,.w vaCO�L• O r, '�h 3 .+ 0. O ; -* to . N.- ,O a .-. L7 --p- CI -i Ocr• Cco (D �n. c° .-c so to .- r.O�0 - c- O ¢: til 'r G.� (Do g. OO O O' 3' CD • 0' 0 0 .../. 0 rnr"P � �M. `' 0 n -r Mr '1..:_: _~' '.o--rr 5:- EL —' � 7 4-� n, r_t CC..r. go . CS. '�'-7O < as F-Cmo 0 `- 0 `C O o `G a- co .�C3 L.`Z' O.. co rn o O.. n �.COa 0".'-'47 i- %'soCco G t: oO `i -.,:n r ^- 0 -no - o ' C C L. 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes y CD D O 0- 'o O 5o4 5- CD 0o 0- . go O soo P� mem':- Gd a. o CD CD � < 0 co E O- CD Cr CD O c- 0 0 cDi' UR 0 fy p CSD 0. 0 o e -h 04 P h -h O o O 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 "O -h L'3 CD `< 1. 0 5 C-, 0 0 O .� ► h rl N. o r O r.0n fl its 0o" 2. 0- 0a, ,-4„ o 0 AD CCD P• coo c<D Z. - 0 �__0 F; CD 0 p- CSc.D o o 0`.: Vo PD tig 0 C6 'c3 c.. fn C<D � Cj . CZ fD • 0 ,0��©D W- �«g50-Q o0a •0+A, 0 ] .-CDma' ,y. CA t {y �C0. 0 �' O < Lv U 0 r~ -•r CD C/a 0 O o crQ 0,10 .o o o ' n r- ..- ,-. i 0 0. O c6 m mono °,c�' �° , r� �0- o- �' o ° cn co @ 0 .. D cD 0 -' - - 0 y v' 0- X 0 r; M P 0 C0D cn 0 fl sv D 0 01 0 u' 0 0 CD En 0- 0 �0•. �O 0 0 , 0 �a p04 0O C0- i.o maU'0 '5' 5-0�0'.'�Q. [ cn.. y c0D r < to G7 8 s d( 8 0 .+ fj O o 0 go go 0i.o go k- a 0 D , 5 Dr+ ^~-► r=-ce, , a 15 8 r•' `S tom...." R .< 1•y 0 ay tC)- O0 mp < O 0 0 -. PO �CS3r` .. "ADr""' *-P- a .. : + O n C0 Cr O f ." C 0,o 0 CO a ,... m0 ,�a 0, cr,z 03 — 0 CSS , p- t- n $' O' � ��* LSD r v' a `-L" rl COD 0 CD 0 *i (D NJ n-° o w o• o S 5 - -. co CSD 0 0 C3 CD 0 0 0 fa. [co ,...1-:. 0.. `0 P `" 0 iy CD ..� O (IQ < 0 0. PO 5. -4 D 0" OG-� p. "" AD CD O p 0 0 R- a- . v0' 0 0 CCD - 0 O- 0 P: 5• o o 0 0 CM m o w D'0 0 `0".+ v'•• ;•-r ''"r' o - = 00.. ►moi _� O O. - S" a 03 ,-- Ci' "'• t4 D. 0 O 'O 0 '--` O .... * h 5 `t c". P. O sv o O O - p-Do0 0 �, m 0. O AD CDO <0 ..co '6 0 o r* v' r=-..., tD 0CI) 0.Q 01-4 d2 �! O , �7 Eri 7 �r NO . a) °0NO O 0 h o C.)c9 'aO cD - O ,-C ,� OQ� CSD O 4,4 Oa w 0 0 0 COD 0= 7+•• CD 'P H, 0 '-•- OQ 0 0 - -c .-- r* v rt• v~�' O O 1. N CO21 CD .< 0 '-• 0 ' .-- 00 to O 0 Pc -7 '�$ 0' Cz DD' O 2. po a ._3 0ea,no • tD oz' CA tt n O' D < ncroo et, m Q 2 D ;00 s. 0 0 I ¢' 0 0 ^. 4 O :� 0 K . �C rt fat O C O- CSD c.m oP� O O [OD Q-, 0 is lzs, y rro p Ci' m° °- `Q 00- C9OP 0 0 y 0 5- C4 gr- 0 [D 00 0 O O.1 D 0 C] ,0=' 00 O cfD v, 0 [D -- (� CO S CD 0Q .- 2 -DO y -8 a' 113C D pP C' COD Ft- < • C 1 ` 0 rT: N 0 cD 0 .. O '4' 'D� N 0 C<D QRr d fl 0-• - •— cr 0 0 . 0 O OQ DD O c -' C' 0- 0 c '0 0 , 0- 0 C' 0 0. 2. Q•. = D O 0 '� o �'- m a. a. o 0. ;rip.). 0 �o 0-51, 0- - 0 t O 0 0 D n 0. R. O ' 0 (�D 0- r, .-p- '0 G 0.O <• G. D r .4 m 0 0 -`< CD C3 '"' - t..1. CA 0 ti 0 `-C 0 - a, 5 ; ° o c< -D FT 0,. - m up O 0 00.. Do SXI CD O 10 �- O fl.. D r-. efzi r D, 0< c. C et:L]-a 0 rr -r +-., CSD. 1.- ` 0 t' O '-h0. 0 O P. H, o0 k-+- ,..t LPL OQ• 'ate'+ cDi� O D *eA 0'o --. �j1=1 0 = C/) '0 - D 0 o, a '' N m O cr;0 O 0 fD r4 ao.. g 1'• . 04 ,-i7 •-J 0 0 ►'� < O O 0 r+ ' . h tDi' O 0 '' CD CSD N `C 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes o •.. "� '� mn -C"* ' o n a 5. n w"Sy n- r`ra; '.3j ��.C] ca 5 n'1oC0.'•,9.. , K o g h FL:. .'DT oG} 4 . m =a^O o aCD@a a a0 °�CDCDy 002`<t) Cna@ 0 .. onO ._,.5 l'"? 5 0.0 c `' cO_p Oq rId i_,,:: c.7. .,+Co CZI`Crr Sv t C0 ,... CorCDy ro ¢ C - C:::. `-pDAC:LT.naafi0[o r• r., ° . O a) ei- @ 'G 0.LSOan°a nO7C C y xr'• .0 rSOOn- C (79"@ ° r0=C..`G CD CD n CD 0C4 to iv. m •aCD~0en• i-' tD¢' n-. aO. .,4, C ° c. O a @ .,0 Ctla _x AD v g PD ��OO' '*01.• -h '�- a ►-@ @p7 �rt lD ° C 7 O .v -O° ,rr- yQ ?. a @co'1-:N.. 7 A , C o PD ..r.-?SP.-C ,. ,.QcoCD 1_, 4 a6�W-C* m@ ... 'on .[Ca 'O' C ° o- ppr.Al0 O ,".'-'1.34 oO. @ p, @ . s e 0. _ OD��ati✓e0N r CD ... '_ wC -; O @ O t' -t D O �; 7 C� " O '` CD �- @ AD „yF.°'[.O- C O n O ' ,- o@ en A '+ A= a-.- ° vC p @~ Co CoD O ~rJOua � m @ R @1th@@C-...r. ,Ft. ... PO O CD wCnr CD !' enO. P 0-1. @ („el Cr r•yter- 113 :711 • C ,- CCD •„� r` n [f ° Po r Ow 0 O 5 ti ,a:.= --,” o@ n @50 (v0 p„.„„. Cn 0.. 0.,r:_ i .... 0 �_ 0 o -0 r* !-; 0. «+ +Ay Ct"1 CD a r @- _ Fa P-.1`' CD n '” ao• e'•. - , -y[A.,�G. O y yCD @Ui nn 3 fO i]. ""• CQ- ?@ C1.a CO"{'-.�`,P4' -@ * O . €. n ' = O . CC .; .. 5. Uco o � -� 0 • n- `G O �n- p .iP'¢wO +@ @ � Cr [ Q• � fo€-r p- O O - �f. I..�14n s- Q r O�-rn g. ` un r+ n C- D "* 5•-C@m �TJ * 3.aS9 . D i 0 p f_f �' C Cr@ 1 7 O @ �' 93 O i. a cto v ( C 4 p2•..• H @ S@r. om. n t--• W f!�H+ ro cc/ } 4 ¢ el.,. ° �.vO -` 3'C@t ,-'cCUm- cm-- , rr0. *y D rSG` -i r¢pa O .-r."2 15)- 1'4,5' z 5 5, ._. �O @'` Ca. A Cn na @ O ° /`: O CCN�,..4. r-rcoCU m °- ° O 6 a- te�C - .- = 27 n V! f�) + @a ¢ @0. cp,r ' 0 i:3 aas t° a @ }� co -r 97 C == 'F;c- ," C . r+ 0 p .-. 0 Z / y. 05 -+ ,-,a, a..QCp+ @ :. LA 1.0 r `C •-•• @, %7m n rc.o n m p Ct7 Co Co n Q. S ...4 fn �- `m nyh [74 . Oa O r. r ►�'0 .- ZS N P. D0 - n. 2, = O c. @ C po u3 ,-.- ►r¢co nrteC_'I• UQ CD =7 [) ` .= O ° a� aS�-<. @ @ Q O. ya . C 5. _ r- s.o ° Otl O . 2yC CD 0-0- - �''� . � A @ O• cm 0- C.,.. O Nz 0 © t.@ ? - •° co —C U3 C°r 2 @ p7 O M. -`' °- C a ca ° O C ,- ° n CE- 0 O ix,- CD @ 0 . 55 5 ..,, -6.a „ S nSh .�C rC- ¢- CD -5:8 0*CcClFz 0• n R- o A, C. • .-' E. .pAO C' nn O 3 g . � 'n- " ►'6 a- a a 4' 5- O on VCFN,'". c6" Et.' 0 CD _ �CD _P* -..3 `L ¢ UG O. vR` n QC O @ @ , `C OP f '_ UQO CD L 0 0 o O [ m ] Q U @ 0w ,,. , � y-.•-. @-.v.�•n- ��-.��,-,, r ° . + r O rrO haO °rr � r 'Ci s' @ � ` C 0 DD @ O @ �. v `°`�Pr• . 5 ,-4. j�.ro- C `v ]�o -01 o ° 0 y dP ° ��- s n x- CD O C 0 �coI@ '. @ O'Q@ —�CD Cr Cr �.. 0 0 , 1-• rC . ai -.. Cn "C@ -.. o ° O .- ro "= 0 . s .0 OO z3 • a. on IDD n -' 2 V] �C @ co �" • AC,7,- 0 ° i3] O��. (ID n p 6 CL, CA C-rp° ..Q�T @ a tin V7h 'IZj �@ r • Cx__..,• u @ v Q .-r 4 pO '• 5 K p-, ..7. O- P- to 'O a=C ° ' n g�"r . = 0° C 4— O@5. f,-+, o�� r• . O O C r* ..r•4 '"DyO n CD 0- to CD DI @ 5'O. C @ C 0 c13 0 0 OO °@ 0 O @ .. CID HZ O 0 O 0 Q- fr+D .-CD vCr.s O.r• CDI CD O+ 05.09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes aci 0 Robin Hutchins, Secretary James Johnson, Chairman CD Cg CD NalaorUY NT: Commissioner McKinsey moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:57 p.m. tn.�. -- to Lo Let CSD fl.2,O h[rtD `�' O , 0 LI) Qj _ r. O ,Z tp r O 'O-' 0 O- "' 0 U' Q rn c4 O. .' C1.. = iZ+ CD 0' *.. CD o Q =,. B C].., 0 Cil ZO P 04 g Oh '6-7DCm trg ' C „ — D Co 0 rt O , . O ol. 2(-1, co 5• 04 �- O C O m O y p..+' t< F • • - N `< !� us 'ZS f1. .� • I O 'P- n CD m �. 5 R. C, . yam ' Cr O CA O . , cri: • _0 55 'x'_2'"..,2 it (.3 Q v� r a- tJ• cop O ; %r : 'CD FD 14 rrt ' 6.• CD CO 0 ) ma,y-Ecn Fp ..g., , dQ Y �0(, r+ CD PO 0 - 0 _ CD n0 , CD F., in ;1 `.• n C• O &) `< O- r O 0 pROP R O o O h O 0 • Y• D vi w 0 p- C,ti v , ,I• O ri O HI L17 CD .....-Z C 05-09-2019 Planning Commission Minutes c n E • Zr co, n o � � N y Cr4 0 n g cte n ro � a A. z z 6 CJ f4 ca m m PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. G A) n�� 0a004b c tl �' ug--r4 -y " 0 coo'' M 0C12' O > W*.-) CL. CD 4 0 Cr4 n< C7 0 C z 0 0Gr5'el0 (oy .o < 0 nQ 0� 0 O 0 0 O 8 a r. ci oq Q 0_ 0 c- 4 - b x cD c �_ Q CD 8 pzi p -o 0 = n 0-0- 0 o 0 O 'CSn 0 Y_ CD o ti CA ''�7 C.] 0 ° 0.0 as- „ 0" 0 0 x �-o 0 Q Y •- .• N O - 0 V 0 may.. . n O. 0 o 0 cD 0 o 0 P izs r- ca0- rte-. g 00.. 0- C 0 g n 0 0 n Ua O co y Q, ren < �-.•• N CD n CD N _ < 0 r' LG c o• .00. tea.- O sszcn < Q `zt 0 [D Pr Q Q.. -. 0 .e 0 r x — - 0 0' QCTO The vote on the motionwas five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. m - CD tn.o c�e+ CD 0 8- as o 0 cos 4 aoo 5- 4 A, ‘.G nr` O 0. O rt cD y• co n G_ O .F3 CD • 0 0 The vote on the motion was five in fervor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. `°0z d o n CI, O '-• n j c En 0 Q a 0 0 pD0 0 CD [ra 0 Q to co 0 o N co 21 CM CM 0 co 0 0 Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant Michelle Rasmussen, absent excused Michael Phillips, absent - excused Connor Lange, Planner icolu!}IoW t:tago'J Lori Barlow, Senior Planner iaJlo)I xcl1ottru .ta4tltutlas8-)I 3llaTu1U bV rg0202 c• lat - rl O_`� Q �- %C 0 0 O 0 a 5 s.� cru uostrgo f sauinr Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called toll and the following members and staff were present: Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. G ''' ' O x 0 J=L ° CD C CD B` rs^-� CSD .�. r � << .... G Oa i, .=- f,- o .~-• a' .C.- �+ `b CSD CD CD n .- co rr -- Or x.04 [ ° ►*� . Si7 ¢ 0 'B F- ri CM CD ;� o a/ ' . o 0 r. = 0 o �0. - G co E1�R /� '•� w. P* P d "< CD O., p 1. --,CD O 'C C7 '.; _.-• • • fl_' P G d O K. `[� P. CD �. C C7 O C, 27 O O .0 O {p O O r O. 'V' 01 CD And fl•'� ry ; N CD :�+ C 1-+ '-:, r�3 —. My _f CD r, a �• a. "• � 1a'h A O ' c-. D m 74 s?. :1 Tae c``< , N ,-w . r-; CD .--. .-q CD 0 O �. .�,. CD 00 N. o� 'C3 O w . rte. `< , 112 ^�•,- '-' .-. S1T ,t . co 0 cD cD r� cQ �-dzi �' .�- - (.(DJ r -'Z < -nom '' ° ' O a.. P. as > -. cD ,' 0ten m w`° Oc6 21 O a `e [n C ° 4 �- C_�D -, CD R- n• < ,--. CFD !D 5. ° CD < tic 0.,• . o " 2 a a' Q- 0 Ucm'g E , .-'• a tea . 0 Q n CD CD O c44 .0 z,- 0 `Gco 0- .-. tt P 0 'g 0 y -' r Cr CD fD �L7 �' .-M CD •- fl <-. 0 r.r. .� O = C CD fl-. '0 .< COD 0* O 8- . ° V a7 0 y `O - 0 `�'�-. .... C] CA cj 0-. , C1. .7, n CD O 0 `� Cr: O 76 Cj 0- d o - WP i O �' v.{ ,—t. 0 a0 "tri ¢t rte' t .-t CI. . O to n" a !. C0D ca �. a7 0 .O ___ :+ c 'G CD (TQ O r=t AI 4 O rr co �. O .. .T D , rt ..• c 0 a - ren s� �: CD 0 0 = 0 Cc- co O PZI '0 p °'O 0 O 0 �.N • r a. t•,� tea- ot 1/2 °C= 5°o a. i 'Yd CD .-. 0 . CD 7D SL• DD C �Cvi V)' ° CCD CD 2; 1-1 0C�. e -r The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed uo ssnosip ou sum a.iaLLL i 0-• 'o 0nCD rd a o n a yo 1 . . . .1 - 11. ' n 00 -7- . p. .. -1 7'. - i b - c - a:: ; ; ; Pc:- vi" i'o CD ; : : - .: ' c'4CD "ay. Q. O �.8 5 'Xbo> '&I o cm@fl - p 2. ° p"r. C4 c. l fl 0 1:0 n v d .,74,- ° oo a0 inn C O "-h v;an o ' . A O. Q. Ot? ^3 • `"_ r: O t�4 0 g cn O py CD r+ 0'Q C 0 a C = ..? Z rij 0 C NCD E C i.C� " $..0 CD �'. a .- n Q cDD-xH o.. ¢-,1;' yam , a, `xa o ,.,,xP o < 0 o. ca Y .�-cD nas rp 0 �' v, Cr 0 ;a ¢- a. 0' .- P 0 � O, 0= c: d pc, O4 O O- r v • ,• a. Cz 0,, N- D a CD ...,1 C 8 O • o CD o° a c Di r; . a• . co- n 0_--- a+ >-'CD CSD L1:. CD F a O C =- n 8 .LI. £C "r, - P cro a`'' .° • oo CIO o o y o CD 0 O O Co °- a O CD &' r0. E g F. 79,...4., ,:,..„,,a• c.: a o Com- `" 0-Vr '`_�T f.,4 z, 9 0 on `Ci O ,�'-. 0 0 0- N O -0 a- 5• c CD G O fOFi 9 c.`� y tO? O . .O r ~ O.. ,-. Ci N 0 r,. F .0-- rte. A0y Cn ,~7. "n ny` ,� �. ,• fl-- c ;-- m_ `0 a h p �„ cm ciy - O a .� ....r0n CD ° cD Ll. - CD .-y 0 0 FA C 00 0.. Cin %< P `. o- ss�u�sn� AloIssILlu Toa There was no public comment. soinum uo!ssliuufo3 610Z -£Z -SO .. o cr, O ° c� o C3 Z°n fCyQ. G. 0-c. vo -a'n a'cC o a ' n y ; o� _ d c,rt ~: : • O : CD r�Cvi' - co D Cj .!_..2• r O O. Q , �rCf� D r!.�Cr'. m vO.O a CC+A tat Okn. ,.,. Ej 'rO �v 0. `< CD c+ co O L 4 -.2,i(O4..C2, -.-6o rs (.' CI Oc� 0 c�D tz ,�••� �: °" C <•• _ ' ...< O r' O - ` ?C� = CD g. �► co 'M Sr � * i J _ ' -h N 0. Xm - ^. .+0 a' .C - v. r , 0 :=.. 2 '0 O , C= --co . .:4•~'< °1-:OAD O C Pa .•-=7✓[Y O n4' ¢ j O ^ O Q�^_ . .. r SCD CD C3� AC[CA K 611 o0= COtD�Q CD ,�-"Q1].CD�CD~. AD OR Q��. 4( h(] mQ~o.'Cv=D.+ v •* 0 O . • Cr ..O v `� cn .�_ CD n :"_c g. �Co0o p7a c©o ; i, r �y D S' ' r. c_C�c6 j . O""O Cn . CO i�CC-`sv Or.r Q. r+. - O T4'. • Oa `.+ ...D C'Ab '2`<4 � Qy Cn-.7 O co C9O 0CDCO O 0 0 yp rpC• CD O✓v�- N a-. 0 O O+t' Cr cCD O 0fH. , 0," 'R � �.S.CNZOtiQhfaa W R Dh 0 co < :CORsv fO' O •"�E...QQat5-. (D.CD .... n O - ;4 'ts <44O OcO' C ...OO"Aa Ca "i3vC 1.1 C/1 "O p., CD at rn <Cp ,.t. CD c.7 ,.y.a[D*'2. A)A' CD 05iCDO'C �me:-= y_�' CD CDD• r°C~.-y C0 �i CfA O C[n O - npOCQ,.r O.' , q `C n ,fr• ¢' S [iO r.. �..'Or. O¢'LS .° 0 J [jOCD O 0 m ..+r. ;,r.. m 0 p. J • 1-- .,. c ) OQnQ00r• CJ z C" uaSU.[D�.•S• -° A. g_ op. cn Cn D 0 0- C/a�r� O 0 r •-r .-t. .+ O Q' z D .- Cf5'` O ''.O' OC"O ,p`� fLCDO 0 91 • O.r�PI C`f�`aFP. C/3 faL U4'rO ��VD 37 C " y; .Q�Q C Z , ' CD ,--CnP-, 0 eD= OA �7 Co . CCD Q't' i' S ' M. F) :.CD .� 0-1 CD CD iD�. �. CDCC µ' Go ,.-p- -CDA C `Z 1Q ° P ~' °h,O h O C'�" SCr `' yQ- aQ •-P• p te OOD'. n ,- n*" O ' = C -"[ 1.--1 O n .+ - ?`` Nra b C 8. C y .ci, O O CD r• S -r .< p- C 0 • ~CDO .�. CD - iS' CD O 5 ,O i -h '3 pr v, 6 G : C c O C.Q n..+pCc- o ~ DO O . C- 3 O •QrCD tZCD p , A) O y I7' [nfDnO o.c^ O. co CrOrmrDnC�t,O< Q C -- = .+ .,-1, 2. .- <CDOOG¢,om�'nri en o° C - 0.- CI @p3C� gnc5.CI0 c4 E. c PD O Cr.►Cn ^. -{-C.!C O CCDCrQ ClJ A) Sv O b DCr'sa• 2 E,S FT IE ^ O `C,� " .+O Q O X Cr- y•CD < O. - p,A6-0 -�Vr-r r i O O te ~5� p 0 '�sC a. LD 3 CD . ^Z 3 Q0,-,.._...,. .: O �C-CD �► CAO f COjVO O S` _ < C Cpf MI CD .gJ < Y .+ ..4. a SD pi ✓ .0 0. �, 2) m p�O�tii 0O tCD a � D' S 3 O °- Op E. O .�.•-► �. .+ _� 5� fa q cy<CCR.. 6 _ !V4at r. ••Or+ 0- CD' Z C C 0_ D =A'�""'. . O 0 O -h O COO , ►- O. 0 r. "rm cr � O C CC+ OSEO QQ .�- ...i ?�AD CD .. "C J[ `Cf.�m C�. ..O3'OOn1F O - O 0. .- a Z.. • 0 2) C 1' 'C oO; O CA w • •v] C OP .+ Cm O a 0 -En S�`D^'-' .fC h O CD m 'Scs, ,O ='yE•C(I)C. - ey 05 CD "3 0 cc °OriQ .. C") .rs O¢. O r• N O r '5 aY .z* QC thIH cm O. � D . 0. Q. n Os`� CD Cl..UQ,+ En r to C ° ,0 0.p °Cp1-y 00. CD ,-, O °O0 fOn!70 •3 z L. ,- 0 ... R) cr . w r OP r+ D 0 ° r.�. pb C O O+ O 0 ~'te0DD0 OD .4 - yrDC CO OR- t».O i� m 5.... x'F3.• A)[' - a..O . n ~- 0i-: 0 CD .+ CD m 0 CD 0 .+ P co n Cn CD O o 0 5 Q. cn :a 0 CD .+ AD 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes 0 0 rsc IDLv c4 ' 0 o GCD O• ca". a- - :D6- — tn,ID o r 0CD CD 0_ CD 'G .0 COC0] PD IS"- ¢ n W to O '-r) `C �, = ?_ �D (D L. `C O 0 O� 'r 0 � C`O 12: ?O �0 0 a °0v • -a O-0 ,-,--0- a 'fir. AD C- �, [D 0. CO) �. O 0 0 to ire. P "-' O ..- co '--- cD ' P VO. C14 Fd O0' O u3 0 m Opc 0' G -. an O ., ' LO O'.i .c. O7 " O ] ° C_ to ° c - e -- •°sn no 0 mUQ`C .••r CD - < CD CD' 'O_O 1007w I CD • 0 'r C) U4 CD tip 2 a r r•3- 0. rt O 414 0 ,may 0 5 °' r CD rit Cr°r-h .54 t4aQ .+. CCD A, = Or COD 6] A� cs `� •-• ca. 474 O G r E<- -- -t CI) CD CD . CD cA Z o o O 0 O 0 `C :•r t3 co CCD 0- cD 0 0 Ocn CD %a CDr., 5 O UOQ Sy n 0 CD 03 DD CD n `C 0 0 C) E CD O 5 0 1v ° Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 6:39 PM 0cCst`[o' 0 ° g 'v'FI7 CC : ,L.: Rro Coo " •O4T4O Pow oO6OfD cot.. Dr�Cep ' ui Q' tO .° < _ r .-• £] c�- P.... r `.-. . ID '-i u C4- '� . C t' fld ova OD 0 `C �_ CT p O ,. �"", n, R'_ O CS' G �• COD. O g. 20 `' E r 8 `. F '' O ' v' O O n 0 �` r-' .-7 Chi A� Q .O " H 0 O.. 0 ri7 : `O• O_ sn O y .••r `S �-- fir r cri C) ' Sy aq .O.. r�r,_1••„ An CD x CD CD r CA e 4 _ °� 0-O = C7 Q" 7S' CD II Cn .-. I., '-► Ljr ... j co ' As 1y� =M CD y,TI N ° coo ?. CD 3 �. ,2rO OOOO G fa.O_O -, "2 IN —=< EC pn rnn£1 %s . yO -- 00 te,t w�'1 n O O O Ddr,, O' < ° C r..) aa to Cr 'r'' CD O `O '�C- G ' PO . .°( O- . r1, 0 CD cD _ x 5 O C) 0 co �. PV � o o o a G 1 o— m o o c '`a r:603 cD LacD to C0.. 0 -. Y r.1.0rN. 'C ` = Oc'0' 0 SD CD C . =' D r"O CO-- O-tY .-r O ,4. .. O _ OC0 `O2tp 4�' 0 '- d Q [D CGU-h n o _„ C.°�� 0. CH: 'F'D CD 2-¢,'a o _. –,,- co �"Cc..0`'.n 2Gy X --:-.•C,�O,G-CQ k .• 67. CD 0 CR O c-ri. aC'` GGrt O So YG�0Q6 = . C6O cn @ OO `G�O O- = vsw N O `G O .'.1- �r `. . ePO N 4Q `C O n Q '<0020 aim •,.02 . &nJ,itR 5: P :=Z- ,- 01 0 cPcyy'^N � 0 o Ya ., m.o — . t+,fio . ` ° OL] - O + 11, Cn D �- O C 0 'e [ 0OUQ-CDO`Cto30-to 0- iCD r-, CD (D 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes 'a'4 � CD � r, CYO As 0 a . no co no r 0 a a. G 5 T p €° 0 CD a r p 5. 2 rt e' `6 '�- .-. 0 0 ° CD Fi -. "6- 0 *0 .H• 0- - 0 ..--. [On °,00 . m 0 0 `< - O O 0 O 0 0 O o `: C3 fD r•,- =r 44 0o CD 0 a- 0- i.C&I CD C0' — a 0 O 0- ID O O Nz ?< O O '* un a OD CO0 0 0hi F-' �* LA - ° 'r3 a. CD 0 o •. C f]CMC4oR pz.o m a. 0 o ` N 0 no 14 SnpOq •-; [T rt 0 P 0 • rr CD [1 Q N P 0O <- S O = 0 aq 0 -a- Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 6:57 PM y CaC., E `0 o n 0 O n `s' :� {'] O 0 a,. .2 n 'F5 P a. O a, r n O a a. CrD O .O O 0 O O 5 WO Q 'PG °° a 1 C '� a n CG • nO ' - R. AZ _ a• Oco .,. my * �CD 3- crus 5a. a' ae+. �= y.O 'a p = 9. � �-, 0 0�.� C. ra X r. 0 Y- 7..- su0., meCD �,Q' o - � �`0 �. LA Cr 0 rt Immo O '�.,'� Z' O :D ,� O Q n r CD O »� ---1 0 ,�.- �-- LU r r+ CD CD co �'�' 3.. N coc✓ti E. fD Q `� G {C'p C3 UV , N 0' F"'- a. I� *� n FS" to .9 � z- r. ZS ►' (D • 0 0 CSD O O +�+ �+ C- N �' co z 0 ¢ = m 2 CD A) va A' AZ 0 .... �• �D i1�� ' v� CD `�' �. O ca .- (� A� r. �- t1. `a' O<�* R. a y O CSD f1 !-+ fa CD �~ OQ r+ �• a. m . ,t d m sn 5 CD �` ,rt ,-`s '2' G• PI o a- O r� 0-O 0 a.0 5- 0. Z. �, rn < a. Al cn E? co fp cD n IDD oAs 0g a- C'r � O n` C9 O O O (D 0 �` r* '3 s CD =' on 0 N 'c3 0 ", t� ra Ct. AZ AZ AS -= �¢2�vS11. DLDO � S0 a.. • Q c••• ` 0 C�-�. e-: . .1. -'�gr. •• 0 • 0j o_ill) , .. c 0.. r, C6fOp O - -. = �p' eO_ r.<OO - F(�A CD �: a -1' IDD ED ra�C_.tL fl f. ,. - s '-� `- C.-rn � In . �- O uAD . (p . x+ n Q a- t; ..� -.i co vo ZD 04- O N~C0 co On uACC= Cth ., . a., .j -.. s) t"-) R-- c ? Q., co -`- Di a. a., a a- '' Otri ^ .� y a 0 .~. C� '`-C co �' �^,"� .�- C7 cin ��-• (D .~�. Cep 1D CG O 0 O fl7 {� `' Dt y a- o0 Qi cCrq a- n w c�'*co C .oL00 z 0 cog a �co i••••0p ,�a' f a O-- 0 4 .i Oa,' -0 S5. D 0 . v C7 O r v, 5' rt• -: �O. N - `•C- rp O' `-C i CD < GrarZL O O O O Ly Ay -. CG '' 0 O a' '+ O G g PI M_ CTI r '� P .fir ✓ CSD cn ; 2 w O m- c O `G d P 0; 7 p -. - 0 0 Z rra C# '. CD Z .r 0• .-r- OR O--, fD '< O ..ci ..„ T 0 a 0 C 0 LoS0 L72 O "CS 0 Lea co a. O CTO 0 DD 0 a. 0 O O .r 0 0 CD 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes 0 C p- r+ .v.:. =..a ma H rw-11'.. :.• g7 :,; A3 A w0o4 "- �Q' g': a� 'A- o P.P u c r. cn' .0 -'�J a+ 5.- 0T [0 -/J t-'.. r.Y E- CD w0. @(_Pwa0 oao :6 o -@ nC nh O o a�0 ,-. ‹ 0 . nr a o ,5-. .4 'F'�O' O Q @¢•, ,"•• 1Q * „. i cn r - O E. ' 0c@~,y p.o w a --o C" e" ,,'- C' o „ 1:„ .0 +-@@o" r` li ' i.';. - rt; rj r � " `� " '• @ .U4 r@,6 n `G 0 AD mto- �G O )-I.2Q�C1 CD r+ P ,... g AD Sy �-.O ° Aj OrVl t a.O O O ZO .• h UJN O C(p P--,+ 0 aC y �@ ▪ fld ma 'y n � • O, @C ' R. -A7 rrO O Cr @O �n - (� -@., A 1. )S pr @ @ VD < y OQQ p-❑-@ _Dgv.O ^y' M�fiD C @ . Or (— 0 a. {„- r # iA: C @ h ./ r 0 @ to ,• �'Co- ' 2, < • a - L37 lP- 12 a 50 . a. �.. m�a@r @¢to GRo - ' CCD - •' 0.0 O rr @ , -. -a- 'a'LrO • @DU tro E. �Aj 0QR �hi� O c1. 5 = E. .YPo �- ) 0 a. ' 0E@7y�"aO,@ + @ cn • � r ,@ @ • � F. 'CS AD .aCO E "0F• O @ ig �.i ! @ , `<2 • i..-I�@ m < N A7 '0 o O . ~ @ O CIA 1.,..,6 5 @° fiy cl) nCp 0 rapP. 5 -pan Ai �_r �-"�°@O@t@A @OO -. .=-1- 2 2 �• 0 f ' Ai [a tOp- r--.CQ �' 5 cn- 00 a. p2: i.-4 AD 0 a..O s .-."' 'O N (p' r+ ...- a) @ @ O '3- (7 .-r Or • O � r:;0 QQ -.. y @ r.$P-0 6... F. r'C-D' '� d 0.. U] r- rr _ @ Q. O. O ,-.d n ro,@ -. "p 2 6,-5Ca ca nrC'1.•y cr OCQcu tin O O PO ••d o °o• Cvs cr --@ 0 m• ^ co p o .•G oD im0= Q•yw Re ..... • s,,-,..°�t=r ` • . Cr@@• �r @ @ Y a. O @ Q - Z5,r• taw r.aCy R=0flCC• @ n.. . r C• O`cz. ci Ca 5O OO @ C @ CD '13 M GO0 -s @ IA O. .. @ 4. d O Aj .- OP �� • Q @ .i y @ • .O @ r� .z' Qi - r.. �- cin _ r• � gj O 0 to op Cp d *-• CB O r-. .-r 01 .00. CD ,---`< te crq i- CD ° �_ � [@p• - @ Co 0...., M r,• .5: ,D, @ .O p , o O "" �•'- t.b y - to AD .; o...O g� O ,. _.. g7 @ .= O. < ▪ @ go p @ N ' O C^p rr P < @ Co:? a — 'O CCp O. f@D .T ° fl A? d = .'3 `� ( ;; �. @_ tR y < O , v O '15 r:,. .p.• O.• O Q. RI O c. r -. @ ,_ 0 E. Y @ r O.• 'y co n �' @@ �' 1JHHIli ... .. dO @ r. ,.•, �; ,1 @ C3▪ '- C CS' v �'+ CD 10 .-. O [n .OCr so cr � Cp w ° ' @ ,,,• @ 20 ra 0 '+ @ A7 [D n '3 " `•� `.3 • vsO O .' .- @ a -r p7 O - 5- Uj ▪ C �. @ -+� @ @ cm @ O, to - = A3 ca Cr cp iv ► w w 23 s» ^ to o cri ., rn �,, cp cry @ to Cp m aj aj O' O O o • rh @ U h .d ,.-,, < `O IDD 0 .- d O. @ '-; - • to ?� ,�-. cn •.--.. :5 `. si4 O 0 ▪ y ,--. A ` co .� 2 "CS ° @ rt `� to ih 4 g7 .-' .-,- , O @ 0 m 'O '-0 =-; O r-. CD e h o o.. d Ez c=: h @ 0 C.1Cp O- (p 5 • a. @ ,., @ a• 0 CD r+ Aj M �- . O 't3 CD En 2 CD .`% Cr ,--,. (�C F""T. 0. Q CcD a. C -. 2 .f D„ 0 'O' 17. CM (D 44 r ga M▪ r CD O- V) ,--• gi W. DV =-* • �G O 0- @ ,--t) SD 0 1-: tom. 0. O.• 0@ `C arS v, C/i CC @ w 0 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. o - Ca p0¢Bo ro' CD C, ,., C VA _ -C- o �- cc o° A ao`<—.p. n C a °cn' ��cil 0 rj3 <<-.7 0 cn CL O O O o W o t'' EA EA a0 cc c- - • ° 0 0.a cD p r X .C.- n M a a _c 1.0 ,ti a- a•. ,°_:', C C 0 PiflU �G `C3 5' .•. - z) - • a- CSD Q I.= a CD `* 0 0 N a) k a- v) AD `00 0 0 <.0 to m a CD CZ 4) r3-~. AD cn < p CD a 0 * 0-''•' .t) O O 0 f. c 0 0y .... G — E, n `.Z. .+ 0 — S` ! H Cr ••r C co c4 CD c . c, a .O a .O O -CD O i 'CD D .=r Co CO �(xi O 13+ 0 0 °` ~ C SCy O,-.1Cr. C'�. .p, co a. a `0 co a. - „ o o a a a- a. a a - = <• oe 0D CCCo,CC.+� Cv _ .-. �>rO a. Q- co 3 Cp Oo ' '00 aeo C5e -- - ea -- c• - co O �rcD a —. P on a ,; �" r Z [n CL Uq 0 `< O' O 03 GO .- nn ' a5i�0n SW B a: ia LIT •'' ° = 0 0 ,.,- 2 pp 2,) c PO to a crn ,-.4-c6 `0'ti' On 4, O ¢" ,7ua OO CD a-,�CDO. b d y zp. . s a- �. ` CC ' , �? a. '7O�O-F ,a. cOA. D F -i S. .- co nCL CD .-..Q .• �0 .-. 05 -�• 0 , O CD c.3 r. I to .~•, W PD .0 P A) Q (9 < 2 ... 12 ❑ cD g' c�'n ... CN O .-1- ;a p .rte' Cp (Iq „ p c7 0 C a .•. Q. o 2 a+ a �- d o� 0 p, a 0 o IDD c. A) r,. C •S, Q CO C CD ^ sv fp CSD ... 5 ; 0' • �- �• a' r fl. OCI) - co eD O00 CD . ~a - o .-- ciz.a * t' 0 Ci+ Ca,.., o wc7— a. Co 0 cca- CD O ao0�NN 0 0 O fC a. `•C 0 0 a. c.0 O O 0 0 cD CCDD O o ..n °�.a 0 ^HC" oCdn o crq o�' "'. as CD 0-- z- Fp- r '<- C/ . Co ' 0 C v, 0. - 'O Op CD a '-4 Cp 0 ...C.D '~' A, CAPD 'y-. N CD 0 �0 2 Q — DL01' 0 0 O'er 3 -'rte- '' O 7 o a R. .a 0 �` `i O 0 ,_, r 8 .a.1 cn O Cris CD O C`.D• . , C `'< DA 5 m a� �h cp o n pa t< ¢ p O a. y o ,-1- Q. 3-• R-00 W po a O Cr fl.. c - CC CCD a co cp < a Uq o O +xj rn _�a co ,. O AI �' ,`� 0- '[s a 5 0 ,--• .a r4 et-'_D: u [n Cn D •' ; ; Cp 0 O O ., a.. P civ o = c° 'G• ate. oPM,_ 20 <=`�o aro a. Q.. Sn - ."i ,-• r. — N O Cr-. D a a. 0f`'‹R v3 CM - cn -ocC wa. =,LN 00O .- im C07 O O O n '' ►C1iO- CD at? r, UR .-,- 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes a4 45t, 0 1-cI CD a C d cn cn CrQ O CD G G"‹ CDp. D CD CC0 D ,+ C6 `0 `i5 �• rQn O CD 0 < 4 O .. Oqcn ren O f D ^• -4 (D r. �•z ims C ;.1a 0 O CD o 0 CD 1-4 CD Q t'-- @ .0 O ~• c.M O O n .. S'' n 0 m - ,.z:1:3 Q O .. CD O cDD C^+ Or <. 'C Q 0 c.- O' E {/� C? 'o Q. Do in E-. 61o 2 R. . @ . I:00 n CFD 0 ,==.-`c 124 En En CDS as • n (D - 'z30 fis O 0 < 0 P.to -: ._ D �' @ CD•,, • N - 3 171 N @ c Q O 0 cn. N Go O r G @ .•+ 0 co 0 co t4 .. ¢ Q 2, rh En A� .G Q „� 5' t70G. g 4-- _ a. c CD -i- 0. � Q " -,. 0O 0. ten 0- �n C7 r. Am < 'VI Cf CD W -. O 0 O-' k3 Q.. O rr A) 0 A 0 CD Po 0 2, @ L0.•-0 c n 2) n O �^� O �- O 'r (,- qG m G 0 0- Er o co pC@6 N H - 0..." '-. .- fD rZ so] @ 0. @ O O n @ }' ✓ .u -i cD ^ 5 O o4 ,. ,-t 0 O 1< o .-2'z. o c -'r t • 4-' 0 =. '" a n CD ..� O. r -r- 0 CD +-. Chair Johnson opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. a `'Z s? . '— o an n < o@Q62,�S c- z•.;• '3 C5. D L• . o A - �- r,i- _ FG r -. - `C3 5 cn CA va to '+ Z 0 En 1_ 0 A o ° a' ° ° c� ff° r.:. z < o 0 L O 22 @ Uj' p *'- O Cr 0 c� ,,..to 0- 5 g3 @ ,.. m in•tP• O Oo hCA aD " R - C o h ,-.- O ...-0 op u, - Y 2: LC A, n ...t.O O O M (, cCr O cia O. n p. C6 Jr'r- rD- .G =�,O , CD :: "7 _ c�n QM .fief- c• ,55. `•C ^r Q Z. CD 0 r~•f i--. &' C n r© '_'ono m @ O - .n O Q t6S O , CD O }'`3 C7 n• o CD 0 Do n 0. 0 Gs .. _ O 1i rn O O 7 r'4 O C3 c0 `� @ G O• - `ham L`s C2D co n n� ci I-, O '-a 0. O cn 47 CD r O vo .•i rrn _ ...O `*Z•r ,... r fC CD 0 0 «Z. rn rn N O �' O- O r C 0 0 -pcecD o - .-p,`.4- CD ts;; SOr�nfi77: ::,,P1- �r n�D N OO Z . CD LC E. @ UC co .O '� O • to y O..-+ ccDD O �. !^J m @ N CSD .- p- r+ r�•+ 0 E. to co co C~D @ CD O cn R' CD O N faa vi 'O CA CSD L3. CD Commissioner Walton move to approve CTA -2019-0002 as presented. C) = 0 w m n m o° K.c @ @ - A- O. 'S o O 7.: rr coe5. `s coS�-- P w. O O @ O' c6 0 O , -- 0- o O 'G."- • o C CA— © 0 Os gC C 0 Q r-. r .- R.1 0•cr. Cr, 6 ,.'er C.03i OCD O v'TZS � to 0 m O pp `tofOXcn C -.. - COnma,y ,© . co co foo his- = fDQ.. 1 r.0 0 + 2nw=Cb..:.. s.AD Ocn rn .Or �-. n d4 corp n `T' S Q. CL = M O O o .„=., '-r-' N @ 'O @ CD Po o L-... (-) ::: %9 :.6. d A- r-+ "C5 Off. A) -,6:- '10 AD Uteri' CSD ;"~ 0 i1 O O. C 0 'r .�+ .�. A7 20 Al 0 .�-'• A ter Q v 0. t a w 0 0 '�! O n CD O co cn CO2 sro CD 0 0 O y r. _0 n 2 O@ Cn 0 n c7 CD 0 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Robin Hutchins, Secretary The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed uao ;.I.t�i�I+1II�I2II10I'Q�v' .urd Sg,L 2uUaatu at(t uanofp13 poAOTZT u04113M .TauWT O. o cCoC0-nn 0' oc0.0 o 0 o O OO0o< R ti g g'6 0 crg O 0 1.n O hO D S pO 2 9 oV ma2N _.Q @ H p•y. nr. • }J.y ji 0 co ,- r* n O r+ o o o' • • 0, ..< 'D b0 '-•G p h 0 Ca 9 CD o„ t,";' CD,� ' O AS -, 0 •"" 1 R. Cn "� p ,.. � Q �. op Cp,0L'niC 0 cm pc r a .' 1 - _ C ., O _n'`.o R ,O O -,.-1.,•,‘ Off4 pa n 0 r cD 5-cD c71-cn o d g0 R Q Q p o VI m CD `S R 1- p 1 cm ! O a N ►O p • p7 C O n Q`, G 0.,O 0 a.E"'-,0 r.0 O coa. ~ O O c, O O. _ C3 .y+ 0 o © C5D o = 5 6. O 0 Q 5.. ~ _o- N ,17 Q.. O 17.3. A%• p- A7 0 H7 CD ,1 a a, ti PD C0 :-+ Do . Q - .on The vote on the motion was five in, favor; zero opposed, and the motion passed Chair Johnson closed the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. 6 • 5 a, R10 0. cD �n 1-3 g rid ` t� O n1 ,••yy*�.° s m O r� x Q a 0- sa- 0-- c i �'' ua- t° R. C3..!n G CD 0..910050108 pa < Q.+ - d �4. -- Q O -0 F'D' '- sc- oR- y�n F2 d (NI Qa tzs 5. �. po QG 0`rr -. CD p] 0 c/a va 2 n D a' D 9(-D� S3D in- 10 sr cac `< r. O t O ^� 0- VD CD Q CD iti 5 p, 0 v tea, co , ( -9 ' ' ' , ., LT ut" - ' <°, - „ Ff ' Dpi 0 C'S c. .. 2, -<' 4 > g o G o rb -.a a a R.R CY as p CC) •, EC , -3 'Fr. "N ca ¢ C4 0 o C 5 O (D P CN LLC Ga`5 -r' ( ON QyOcD0 a < == 0 Cn • r N C a. ay(A) ✓p dg Cnpa G7 0 ^OEL CD ' W R O O •`�7r v O+ r- < . a _. 0 v2 DI [C (gyp p ,Q ,�j '+ �.. •:-t P? CSD •• V. ''*.+ p. `C i6 '� r_:..'al'' a' : . i 11. g v R : Q. `C S d w ..T.4 cs CD aG paDC).,4.:s'<@w c O Op C _. Ca7 .. O -. ril CZD Gl CD f1a 'ms's O , . O v • .-e-ga r0.•. r/a O .-t-C:1, �' R Occ .0--• P --r C~D 0.. �"�i7 CCD 'C' . ' CSD C7 05-23-2019 Planning Commission Minutes go n n tj '-= 0„ CI.9. Do ar. 0 y 0sa.n OD ti OD (� 'Zs Z' O y n �' 'b '-'•oo O Z 0 CD no o y 0 p la . cin 8-P 0 �`�° ~O �'w �' ° 0 tL 0 -� is y- o- 0 C 0 J Z° G rtCD X CD -e vs no 00 O c 0' tz 0 p rn CA Ft] Cil C, 471HP' -.Cicn 0 °` C 4 n, -• ¢' 0 O p d a is C0 CD sv vS Ccil IO ''O H E 4 �, ` CD Pi ° O O °0PQ.OC• O Nt1. • rn 8 0 Uc., s3 • OC N .c p,cn 5:,3 OCD '- D rn 0-. 0 0, En y 5- /W CD .S 0 CD O Ow O co O..O ,tO 0 Ca0 0C),wO _ 0. t., -) O SOP 0m cn P, 4O,-'tC`C -c, 17._ ^ n ✓- O C 0, .\C 0 p 0 h '0 LO V 5 bO .�`rSYO c "6 ,, 0 N tCD C 'CW DP . PO -hN nCD 5' OC7 0-,P»O CO DJ[O W_ L!1 r Cr. _ CD ft cs O O �r CD Li] �� PR� �� CFD 1,-) 00o- O-oo -�' .¢-CD c• te] Q- 0 Po O. r Hearing no objections, Commissioners Philips and Walton were excused from the meeting. pasnoxa - luasgn `uollp 1TN Robin Hutchins, Office Assistant uassnu S J allagom pasnoxa - luasgn `sdiIiuId 13m4011A1 0 CD 0 a Id `auw7 aatruo0 0 J oTIaN xz(towa Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager JomurgosuN allaiueQ ffau1ouy 4TH ,ctndo `quIwJ p1 0 0 r 0 Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Office Assistant Robin Hutchins called roll and the following members and staff were present: n 0 issioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. con o � � rfl R `.. EJC, F,Cr; 1 CP: n na 0 VD sID rn CD CD ."Z• aQ o fa - co 7.t o C7 o • 5 0 P F53 0 n a a.. .o.aa O V 0 ° CD 0 0 ¢ m5. o O CD CD ° 0.0rn p o -. 0 C Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 r -i • Ilmte 0• X N ›-/d '.. no 0 o t7 b 4 '-]a n o bdo nn'd n It 0 0 o �s a "' o ° x 0 o o co o o `� o c o o a- 5. QOS c0 co r • ref R C `.! a+ f0 0 r r co C➢ O ° ►., *7Di Q Y, k-+ o ca n �' m O coo' c~n' o a o 0 O ~ o �. R r- A3 0 ca �t 0 ..e.D. +� . , fa C t„ (i D R O o O C ,..4, p,. r. CD ,—, 0 s '� ^� O CD ADup en O O O CD O Odt o. Zt '17 ,'. �" P CP 1-' o �� o P' `� = n "s' .- kZ O coo It cD k� o o .. cD n o rt LTJ O �-, 0 ,.., a+ A cn R- N C3 r C� O ° 171 ¢ Q 11 0 ,8- 0 n rW ° ;T o r" CD sv R. SZ. c'' �. a " ° 7�o ' y o Q. too yo• •0- o tlJ R 0 . ° ° �:CD N '�C R' N H • c�co, An N O arO R O. O R ,„ -.p � p. ..i—.A N CO .-., 1 o cp O o oZq O C R p ;�n �- � � O 0-.q 5- 0 '0 O TJ QQ o O p+ A? ] nD?° .-'• YcP: 0 •CD o►C ±J O VG• Cr c +. ot ti, n 0 o a aZ)Zs o 20v H DOc 0 eH /. ciD 0T"wo CD O R O Q¢O0.17i N0 CPo yR .C✓1m ` N CA N s co n " 0 0 O ~ O . O y Oy CD 8 rs C cm = O ,iio.+ i-%. G O — ! 3" ay[n R N CR CA rz Oo n• ` O O r1:ii ,r 5-' la xj 0 .. Q CO rt CD o �.C ccD O o-:47 ' r 1? C~�o m C �rP. AASZ y — +° �y �+, ri, Cy cCS ¢ 3�T CI - on t N {CER �,Y. Ai1 0to�.CD y C •-•< C n P-4 ..e-F`C OCR ' O el `p C 1 i.i iOR 12- 0, w --,-n 0 0 cr o 0 .-A• 71 0 fp V) zt Ca r -i- ..i. . :- c ,--...t) --1,_,z$ x = f20 P > Ei ... 0 0 et eD n z o . • 0 z) .0 cn lia ,4. 0 5. t:J a o H ° w 0 ci' o o 20 5 > 4 0 . 0 ,-0 4 .. a CD .si f'D .1 .-o- a 'CS = --,• 0- ,., 6.' --'3 cr DD m .. m tPL) c.n 4-- = o oa Z ..." 0 -C 0 5t E 0 0 Da le+, o •-t el:, "1- a 3: 4-p• 2. 0 c.,,, — • e...) CD 0 0 CD .-- 9 tiD CA r9 t: V: c": 17:$ C4 t.t 0 0- — . uoul ,_,. ,.. on P" ,...74- cDP ccl: . 0- ci) 0 0 C o cr •-: 9 0 '''DDS (-) P ';': 0 CZcc:... n N Po CD CID +O n. n3 • n O Q t-1 PL,CT' , o co f -t- o m Q n n c sy o o a ccsD °� o O apo O t0 `Crt Y° ��ci)• O C3 �` o ti O O r, _ io 0 0 �°to0 cy''i ° ono cD �' co o n o o t3 o 1775 0 w z� f mac„ rtCI 0 •rr o o5 c. 0 � � tIP� � p U 0 Q y '1 o 0 �, .r - m o SO f0 2 2 i [� 0 O CD �+ `C . <o t.,. rr, on P-. r+, @ CD by o0 oggnd ou sum atoll PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. 06-13-2019 Planning Commission Minutes 01.11. Robin Hutchins, Secretary ut UUit 4D `110s11t40 f SO -Mr The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero opposed, and the motion passed. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Rasmussen moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:20 p.m. I.113nn01S 110f 06-13-2019 Planning Commission Minutes Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA -2019-0002 roCrqco 0 G I-1:1 cnb Gr • w .d trl 0 w toD p- E CD 0 CD '10 fa. la PD C 0 rA p 0 b � O 00 00 O � 0 0 0 a O 0 m C 0 CD 5 o qq 0 0 CL 0 O o o 0 G p, • LU -P5: Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercia 'SOSn 1L'pSnpUt .IO LU -G1: Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. ED -G6: Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability, and stability. n1 C, - p 0 C 0 � 55 0 'C rn r .0 oad4•a. PP 'n co a 0 "0 Pr4, 0 w Q G 0 0 P4 0 P 5 0 0 .,5, a C. 0 0 0 V) rn • ZZ. 0 CD0 0 c 0- 5, 0 0 '. 0 Cr 0 Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. O ,.0 5•CrLD o 0 0 � 0 0 0 O 0 2. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F) Approval Criteria Recommended Modifications AZ Er r. N � crQ y I!. 0 =. ecu S. g O G 0 O. n O 0 :::WcGn..>N0 O''`"' GcOi, "G 'r va'G . r« IQ a. a 5--2,_ i ._ �_ 0 ,o n o' rn p O' �.U09 P k w cn ai 0r 0 w v' �' on p G ^- W ` P. P4 q CSD O ni 0 JU Q. c"D do 0 LO O rt .B "O O- PO 'G 'O 0-QO 1 -mg 0O Z m 17 0 CSD G r' LL O O .0n 0 �' (G 0 '.j Ga. t. G CD G O Q m n g -- -3•4 a s =: n a �, rt o cis �. a0 ©'cs 'a 0 p,,'.-.7` n m coo w o a 0.0. 0; r,. w 5 moo� <p 0 f O ¢. 0 O - p T -i 0 �°. '1 _- _. 0 0 C) ^a CCD ro { ro a. P P'. • O O c G -7, c„ rn y G R 0 G w w 0 o+c. ) : :: 2- . E. W • t. P* aO'i••., O .la pa ' m 0. :punoathprg a: w `0 O 0_ .4 O O • Pa +t- " o � C o on 04 P Q Q 0 5 v�•_.7 G `G G � nom• O Co co 00 0 0 E 0 �Z o' G o'er 0 'C3 0 0- m 0- R.' a- 0 tra m rn w 0 a. oa °CL G p3 or CTA -2019-0002 — Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Findings and Recommendations or the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA -2019-0902 Approved this 13th day of Jane, 2019 p o H ;A w Pi Qua trl 0 m ? E 6, E.,?, 0 a �y �. cnr-HEt 7_H ,t -C p a '5 Dara ° 0 6' '74 ,0 0cl' n40 n i -d `C c �..° h. a h .°C o 'a° p 1-0 — ° h- co 0 00 0GO 0 -r* Cr AD �m m 0 al a. < a.o w cp os'� 0� Cr rt o. m , ca m to —. w 0 0 K �. i. > 0 0 o = ° tn '�s rna 0 �� En °00a r 03 Fo •-t- .1 w 0 K n- t4 a o a a = r- o • w Q@, 0 0 o ca a 0° ^ CC C O n PD 0 o ca 0- P < rn = n CD y _ wcr A CD g n' O0 C r PD r* m 0 O f-1. P0" 0 0 0 0 o "G •" 0 0 G A2 =' 0 0 PD Cha. EEn '—• co CD CAD C [n H H 0- 0 iD U op [a PD 0 " a. 0 N 0 Q "0 CD • p c Dil a r.• �• 0 n n m s13 CD r C" CD - 5 04, 2 va cd, p rr� H o• o Pz1 a° o - c 1-hy CD w z N O CD CD C4 Ea Er w o z rt oc,D co co " PD. 0 Department of Commerce 60 -day Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment Sent Notice of Public Hearing to staff/agencies Published Notice of Public Hearing SEPA Determination Process 0 v May 8, 2019 May 3, 2019 and May 10, 2019 May 2, 2019 N P: tb O CrQ cn PaN 0 et c C o on 2 0 - CD ~a o d o m o :ONISSHDOZId NOLLVDI'Iddy 'j •sampaoo.cd 2u[SsaooJd H a Exhibit 1: Proposed text amendments to chapters 19.60 and 19.85 SVMC and Appendix A. H 1-3 l) STAFF: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney cA 4 n >0 n a. z P re+ o N ;re, -to • O coM W' O it. o a < 0 a Pa aEr '5 C w -o . ro 0 a Cc APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, SVMC 17.80.150, 19.30.040. PROPONENT: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. coo Up o b n hB C = G O o o crq a.> nc — zr P b No n n o z 3 5•,,o.o _ 2 4C a, H a 0 = c4 z o p M. C .. trl n 0Do O r .. 0 cm a cc w 0 NI 0 P PD (D �:n0 Or €v 0 PD Q s �_ C PD "'"S` O O.O+rn 0 F.', X s., co o o'Y � o a C p `B 0 w •coo• 0-' ‘2 V • VD CA O X p A. ..=. p1 ..'28. co o < E* 0 o0 ��, n m PDccn v a '—' STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 2019 90 O Q. 0 rp 0 g. 0- c� AD 0 "G w x 0" c0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn ro Drivers must be at least 21 years old. Transportation log documenting chain of custody for each delivery, including driver and vehicle Must keep printed transport manifest with the product at all times. Must have a physical location for operations and insurance. .11 0 0-- r'h ,� rr•4 ff '-"' 6' ro w 5 w'a- tti�--h VI II, ro o„ w w n w rn Z' `Cf =. .".•_. ' O vi [� N @ w [fir VI w A7 PD ro .. CD `` --t-'''''')�0 C o r py :(1)V n a m a O ° `G w p cl6 w w C U ,_ a' O co 0" cep � " G 0 A' O U' f` y 0 �• C ot rron v w �n n El N N w V h} r . ?t m C - r oa p a. fwro?c 0 p �^w U � s UG — ro00 pma 'cn p�P O m p Cas .cn � ' ° CD -c- - �oCn m 0C. -7. E', ,Z Q >wp w 13. y mwT < o v, m ,* pp rap u 0 C� OP AD ro 0 r C n n @ w n@ T3 O ce C1a r2 . r.. V d .r I-•. co ^� w m w CD p DI �° _ rn `� �C - ro U <` G o [i w `� '��, CL) 11'00 . .rcn ,,rron ora m c=a -, o rt z 0 W� ¢ 7. a 2 1a to4:1 o n CA co `fl ro ro 74. ccc A. F °; H �% �' w o 0 0 as n` ro o• ' o o ^• 0¢ a` ° ro n p car 0 0 a '0n p, n —= a `0 c .�' rfl o `ten w `a �, �_ w w , ro o r. col 0 m �. 0 C 8 C• 'B 0 o 0 0 0-• ora P- o w (IT `r 0 0 t.-• �.: tra v n 0 8.=-- c6 ro is w cn o w ;h ro o a= LA (:2 . { -: P. `O5. 0- , l ro 1-h VI O " Ili '•7 G ::: !nft Ri p CC gi. . .0 1 a�-' C �?0.pp 2 �j'vwiO• CC �,P, Q crq n�'P-,Y'3' C7U E7 2 m w wb a m f n o o rz0:1- a- x a g�' 0.1 o 0' K' o C] w " 0 0 sa cin ° P� w 5 5 w 5= 7 {+ r 0 tr tiG C �7 o cr' �. m ri 0= `P w uo h o Po a �-0 w �' 5 ro a - o a,,. a 5' d o {"] o w �. -, w o CD 0 , w B' 0 m w o �' 0 oro w 0 o Q a.cA�m �o cga "' o P . �, �in- C 5 ro 0= CD ca C C 0 Z n cu RR. ,••r, P7 c0.. 0 0 do ` w o 'S CD 0, �' w ss rn o Q, _n cu o cr �: o o 5 ci o �, C� n Ca a 5 CD a `° C" -- rr s„ R• 2 ti m CD Cr P o a co 0 w 5 a 5 cue ?'. ` m P n �° ¢' - : c, o rn n co 5 pa co p '� r-• w -0 o c o 0 r. o w ,rt r:. u, r w ro 0. r+ al rA P In 3 vPL 0 Pa Fws (`79 �. ro ".---F" 4 w N O .+ O D 0 0 `r ° 7 cn w� N '* e N �.0 c � CD 0 0 Ica 0 0 co P. CD vn CD • 0 CD 0 SID 0 LU -G1: Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. d d o G7 rn"- 4&.) rr , = 0 o _rt ..-oc' w o = r3 co a 0 0 0 O0 Cl.. o e: c 0 8• a 0 a� o Co c Si' CD o el co' P- 0 0• a. co P CD o v' `0 E En CD CI `� '-h r+ -61 4 0 o Ei a o 0 D - 0 • CD Relevant Comprehensive Plan goals and policies are shown below: = n -a . W 0 r). aoCr a rn 0 0 - 0 a < o 4. t/2. o' a b CA 'a O. c 0aw The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment, if it finds that SVMC 17.80.150(F) Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: P:1 o G,. o 0` a. o o• n c) X o 1-6 a C co° co F o a.. ,.a co rn to 0 C v P �,j 0. 0 CD 3 CD ro' .coy A (� 0 aa' r0 • a _ O 8 in P. C� d jQ o. CA O .6- n C a. P ;[ a�'-n v `� o- o y' d coo c4 0 a- do �. 0 --: �" CD c �t< m US - �p A�' .0 O S i� CD 4. C-° v w ,' ° . Co o © ° �-o o� w cD.. a C°"0. n — r ° O _ N • O 0 ,T • r' a U - a .. a. - g w 0 — :r. - N [ ""' O ` h a 0 0.' n a ' = w C6 O c• O co O _ C"' co r- 0�! vi ^ (� v O J o0 . R p a. m0- 0 � � 0 O 0 rn 0 rD o cc n c 0 a" z CrcA • C^ C''''' , 0 o = _ �•0 �� CD i] ° _. a.• o v dq 54 °wm wo ' � �0c o r co ,, 0 T-, pa w v, - - 0 a, 0 �0,,% ij P 0 C) J O • C ^y -^-rte.,. a r. F a 0 2 po pD c -r 0-- c 0 �• @ o 0 ��' !-t ,...-z . 00� rr-. cn rt O. tD CD �' c �CD C.0 t4 0 �• o C R" u O cii a. p o . O 0_= 0 H �? 0 r FAD a f6 r° 0 p �" CD N V) CCD c v, J .`5� O CSD ¢ COD p C/1 '.. m 0 O .-0 0 0 0 C" 04 0 E 0• r-- 10. All deliveries must be made within 48 -hours from the time of pick-up. CDCD P- 0 0 0 . w C CD 0 Fai 0.`• 0 C -a w o 0 0 Can 0r. Cr 0 c CD m Co 0 0 slo crq 0 co 0 CCD c -r c o 0 O ▪ 0 0 �� n�. J -. 60 • Cr In P rah Co 0 • '0 co 'Cto 0 '0 CD CCD 0 0. O • CD P.) w 0 cn O 0 0 vs" 0 KOISfrIDNOD aILY1,S 'Q The proposed code text amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. 0 r to z In the absence of substantive agency comments, staff makes no conclusions. :(s)uoisnpuop •q No substantive agency comments have been received to date. :s2uipum .R sa Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments 0 0 O rn -zb cr oc 0 N cn +. n 59 ca w PD 0 0. CD 0 .0 = 0 o 00 con cn 1 cn0 0 0 0 0 cn 0 v, potdope qi!m aom p000u :(s)uoisnpuo3 •q No public comments have been received to date. p � a ' z P. ICI AD cria F G4 m 0 tr 0 5 The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. :(s)uotsnpuo3 q H EFI - L0 1 .,, CT 0 2 "wr'r. 0 H eL 0. w b 0 O w • `. o 0 0 • v' a. 0 4- o 2 4 w 0 cel • CD CD CD PO d _ o 0. o '" • w 0 Z - o .0 O �i 5 a�� G- Q_ ` 0 O o E. g co cn I— 5.c'0 o n y @• '0 0 w o 0 — E . 0 -c .r. To. o • cn .--`4 w 0 co EC m 0 a EL 0'Q clr g. c , g `' 0 0 - P. n r M'Ci o � cin 0 s 5- 0 o m 0 o zo g. '0 o cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r � O C 0. 0 4 w 0 E o V) • 0 w O � n..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..0 0 O 0 }code j AIJepen0 :SJN3INH3dlld :13V1NO3 dddlS e/u :S1OddINI1VI3NVNId/13Jaf18 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion uoissnosia :SNOIldO 53 co 0 0 Ft G) 0 c z v 0 (D 3 cu' m 3 m co. m v 0 m 0 0 0 :N3)id1 NOIl3V 1I3NfO3 Sf1OIAMId :NOIlV-ISI93-1 ONIN213AOO AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Police Department Quarterly Report 0 m 5 ❑ ❑ n -., 0 0 CD o' ® ❑ v 0 D. Cr 5 C m �. -0 CD 0 N ❑ ❑ CD Q 5' (7)' ❑ ❑ CD -0 X C CDCr 0 = C 0 v CD cnw s' ssauisnq MOU :lenoaddd ao}oaaia }uauapedea El -< (DO O (J) 13 0 X O y = • Z O rn o • 1- SVPD Quarterly Report 2nd Quarter 2019 ➢ SCOPE ➢ Patrol ➢ Investigative Unit SCOPE Sheriff's Community Oriented Policing Effort Admin Hrs LE Hrs Total Hrs Central Valley 164 154.5 174 East Valley* 640 821.5 926.5 Edgecliff 175 161 190.5 Trentwood 182 170 210.5 University 423 457.5 519.5 West Valley* 480.5 446 509 Total 2,064.5 2,210.5 4,275 Volunteer Value at $30.46/hr $260,433 *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Patrol • Average Patrol Staffing* per Shift o Dayshift = 6.33 o Nightshift = 6.58 o Power Shift = 2.94 *Does not include supervisors, Traffic Unit, or School Resource Deputies. .3 % Change Patrol 2nd Qtr. Activity 2018 vs. 2019 Citizen Initiated CFS* CFS Receiving Officer Response 11,854 7,482 11,864 7,915 +0.08% +5.79% Officer Initiated Incidents 5,192 4,532 -12.71% Total Officer Involved Incidents 12,674 12,447 *Does not include Crime Check reports, cancelled calls, or Medics/Fire type codes. -1.79% 4 Patrol Citizen Complaints Four external complaints were received during the 2nd quarter of 2019 that included the following four allegations: o Three allegations of discourteous or disrespectful behavior • Two reduced to inquiry* • One is pending o One allegation of excessive force • Accused deputy was exonerated *In both cases the complainant chose to withdraw the formal complaint. •5 Patrol • 4 Deputies attending the CJTC Academy in Burien • 9 New hires expected to start the Spokane Academy in August • 4 New Hires and 2 Lateral Deputies currently in field training • 2 Lateral Deputies expected to start field training in August • 4 to 6 new hires expected to start the SCSO pre - academy training in October •6 Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) 1st and 2"d Quarter 2019 • 207 Persons Charged o 44 Booked o 163 Charged by affidavit • 328 felony and 155 misdemeanor charges Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) 34 Search Warrants o 4 Residences o 21 Vehicles o 1 Storage Unit o 1 Motel Room o 4 Bank records o 1 GPS Tracker o 3 cell phones Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) Seizures and Recoveries • $100,923 in stolen property recovered • Ten stolen firearms recovered • Six firearms seized from felons • $15,116 and 5 vehicles seized from drug dealers • $500+ counterfeit currency seized • Recovered over 300 stolen mail items • Over 3,000 fraudulent/forged checks recovered .9 Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) controlled Substance seizures • 2.13 pounds methamphetamine • 1.06 pounds heroin • 14 grams powder cocaine • 21 misc. schedule 111+ pills and suboxone strips • 28 grams psilocybin mushrooms •10 Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) 1st and 2nd Qtrs. 2019 SVIU Detectives reviewed 4,234 property crime incidents. 1,549 were handled by SVPD patrol personnel 1,655 were unassigned due to lack of leads 756 were assigned and investigated by SVIU detectives 274 were unassigned due to insufficient staffing •11 Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) 1st and 2nd Qtrs. 2019 SVIU Detectives investigated 756 property crime incidents. • 438 investigated and closed (47% by arrest or charging request) • 235 are under active investigation • 66 incidents were referred to other jurisdiction or agency • 15 were determined to be unfounded • 2 were closed due to lack of victim cooperation 012 Spokane Valley Investigative Unit (SVIU) • 46 Chronic Nuisance Property Notices served • 5 Chronic Nuisance Properties addressed 013 Questions? CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 23, 2019 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ Consent ❑ Old business ❑ New business ❑ Public Hearing ® Admin. Report ❑ Pending Legislation ❑ Information AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Community Development Block Grant Program — Potential 2020 CDBG Project GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley is a member of the Spokane County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consortium. Each year the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development provides CDBG entitlement funding to Spokane County. The City receives a 20 percent set-aside of Spokane County's annual federal appropriation for infrastructure projects. Spokane Valley's share is generally around $270,000 for eligible projects. To be eligible for CDBG funding, projects must be located in residential, low to moderate income target areas or be used for low to moderate income individuals. Proposed projects must also be ranked as a "high priority" in Spokane County's Consolidated Plan, the guiding document for Spokane County's CDBG program. High priority infrastructure projects include water, sewer and street improvements. Applications for the CDBG program year 2020 are expected to be due in November 2019. For the 2020 program year the City is considering a collaborative sewer project between the City, Spokane County Environmental Services Division and Spokane County Housing & Community Development Division. The sewer project is located east of Barker (see attached map) in a manufactured home subdivision. The project will eliminate septic systems above the region's sole source aquifer. In this collaborative effort, Spokane County Environmental Services would install sewer and pave -back the roadway with the City providing financial support potentially through our Street Wear Fee and Aquafer Protection funds. The proposed streets to be repaved are all in poor condition. Additionally, it is proposed that the City could use its CDBG set-aside to assist eligible homeowners with side -sewer connection fees; Spokane County Housing and Community Development would manage this portion of the program. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None at this time. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Will be determined through further discussions with the County. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Chaz Bates, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Barker Road Mobile Home Community Map 1 pokane ounty 1,4 .I oI I iiberty bake H a'��III 4 I Not Sewered 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Feet U To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of July 18, 2019; 9:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings July 30, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue July 231 Proclamation: Goodguys Great NW National Rod & Custom Show ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Appleway Trail Project, Evergreen to Sullivan — Gloria Mantz (10 min) 2. Motion Consideration: Council Goals/Priorities, Lodging Tax Advisory Cmte (LTAC)-C.Taylor (10 min) NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. Spokane Co. Conservation District Project Update -Vicki Carter 4. Proposed 2019 TIP Amendment #2 — Adam Jackson 5. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 6. Executive Session: Acquisition of Real Estate (15 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 mins] August 6, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. — Meeting cancelled Councilmembers attend National Night Out August 13, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amended 2019 TIP — Adam Jackson 2. Proposed Resolution 19-012 Adopting Amended 2019 TIP — Adam Jackson 3. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) [due Tue Aug 61 (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) 4. Admin report: DNR (Dept. of Natural Resources) Property Discussion — Mike Stone, Cary Driskell (30 min) 5. Admin report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting 60 mins] August 20, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. 2020 Budget: Estimated Revenues & Expenditures — Chelsie Taylor 2. Potential and Pending Projects — Chelsie Taylor 3. Council Draft 2020 Budget Goals — Mark Calhoun 4. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins August 27, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 3. Info Only: Department Reports [due Tue Aug 131 (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting 50 mins] [due Tue Aug 201 (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting mins] Sept 3, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 271 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Special Meeting: Friday, September 6, 2019, Spokane County Council of Governments, 9:30 a.m. to Noon, Spokane Co. Fair & Expo Center; Conference Facility, 404 N Havana Street Sept 10, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 31 1. PUBLIC HEARING: #1 — 2020 Budget Estimates Revenues & Expenditures — Chelsie Taylor (10 min) 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Set 2020 Budget hearing for Oct 8, 2019 — Chelsie Taylor 4. Admin report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting mins] Draft Advance Agenda 7/18/2019 9:10:21 AM Page 1 of 2 Sept 17, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Outside Agencies Presentations — Chelsie Taylor 2. Proposed Ordinance 2020 Property Taxes — Chelsie Taylor 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue Sept 101 (- 90 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting 105 mins] Sept 24, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. 2020 Preliminary Budget Presentation by City Manager— Mark Calhoun 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 4. Info Only: Department Reports Oct 1, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Proposed 2019 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 2. New Employee Quarterly Report — John Whitehead 3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue Sept 171 (5 minutes) (60 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting mins] Oct 8, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: #2 — 2020 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, 2020 Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins Oct 15, 2019, Study Session, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins [due Tue Sept 241 (15 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Oct 11 (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Tue Oct 81 (5 minutes) Oct 22, 2019, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2019 Budget Amendment — Chelsie Taylor 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, 2020 Property Tax — Chelsie Taylor 4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, 2020 Budget — Chelsie Taylor 5. Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Grant Awards — Chelsie Taylor 6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor Higgins 7. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Affordable Housing SHB 1406 Appleway Trail Amenities Camping in RVs Crisis Co -response team funding Donation Recognition Duplexes, Townhouses, Cottages Graffiti Health District Re SV Stats Land Use Notice Requirements Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Naming City Facilities Protocol New Employee Qrt Rpt (Jan, April, July, Oct) Park Lighting Park Reg. Ord. amendments Draft Advance Agenda 7/18/2019 9:10:21 AM Tue Oct 151 (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) 55 mins] PFD Presentation Police Dept. Qtr Rpt (Jan, April, July, Oct) Right -of -Way process Safe Routes to School Sign Ordinance Snow Removal: Streets, Sidewalks SRTC/Census Coordinator St. Illumination (ownership, cost, location) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Studded Snow Tires Utility Facilities in ROW Vaping Water Districts & Green Space Way Finding Signs Page 2 of 2 City of Spokane Valley Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 07/01/2019 15:31 Page 1 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Pre -Application Meetings Requested A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 23 Pre -Application Meetings in June 2019. 30 20 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application ® Commercial Pre -App Meeting Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 94 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 9 9 9 14 4 4 7 4 13 13 Printed 07/01/2019 15:31 Page 2 of 11 6 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '91111"'l Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Online Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 244 Online Applications in June 2019. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit Sign Permit Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Approach Permit Approach Permit Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 1 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 7 21 34 37 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 33 46 64 76 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 110 101 127 116 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 212 153 173 232 233 °ID! v Annual Total To -Date: Printed 07/01/2019 15:31 1,247 Page 3 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Construction Applications RecP,--4 Community & Public Works Department received a total of 495 Construction Applications in June 2019. 600 400 200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New L , Commercial - TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 29 23 8 6 1 8 20 16 7 15 14 17 0 0 0 5 10 21 14 31 18 0 0 0 14 6 10 12 13 21 0 0 0 0 0 41 22 35 47 67 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 10 14 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 *9 *6 *8 *12 *6 0 0 0 0 0 0 *13 *4 *9 *12 *5 *6 0 0 0 *271 *214 *227 *335 *338 *333 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 397 309 333 463 497 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 07/01/2019 15:32 2,485 Page 4 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. 85 125 1461 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Land Use Applications Received Community & Public Works Department received a total of 65 Land Use Applications in June 2019. 150 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Pal 1 Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits oundary Line Adjustment hort Plat Preliminary ong Plat Preliminary inding Site Plan Preliminary inal Platting r oning Map/Comp Plan Amendment -tate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) dministrative xception/Interpretation ther Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5 2 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 8 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 115 125 119 130 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 onthly Totals 1111r o 1' "r " Annual Total To -Date: Printed 07/01/2019 15:32 701 Page 5 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Construction Permits Issued Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 468 Construction Permits in June 2019. 600 400 200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New - Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 6 16 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 14 15 10 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 10 20 23 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 5 11 15 13 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 29 26 53 55 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 6 17 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 8 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 6 14 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 247 194 209 331 308 320 0 0 0 0 0 0 onthly Totals 338 269 305 475 443 464 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 07/01/2019 15:32 2,294 Page 6 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Land Use Applications Approved Community & Public Works Department approved a total of 29 Land Use Applications in June 2019. 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 40 43 45 48 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 42 41 IFFP TV," Annual Total To -Date: Printed 07/01/2019 15:32 252 Page 7 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Development Inspections Performed Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1191 Development Inspections in June 2019. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017 2018 2019 2019 2018 2017 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 1,134 799 1,116 1,510 1,657 1,127 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,053 1,023 1,561 1,484 1,776 2,005 1,606 1,676 1,465 1,556 1,247 982 967 779 1,356 1,351 1,726 1,680 1,374 1,760 1,462 1,630 1,381 1,114 Printed 07/01/2019 15:33 Page 8 of 11 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 65 citizen requests in the month of June. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 100 50 0 ]an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ;±i♦ CE -Stop Work Order Environmental General Nuisance ® Property Complaint, Non -Violation CE -Stop Work Order Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 11 31 41 40 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 13 18 22 35 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 55 24 50 67 76 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 07/01/2019 15:33 337 Page 9 of 11 Revenue 2019 Trend 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Community & Public Works Department Revenue totaled $243,261 in June 2019. 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 Jan 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Feb Mar Apr -+� 2019 2018 - Five -Year Trend May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals $162,701 $231,361 $308,846 $210,262 $243,779 $243,261 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 x$1,400,210 $148,196 $129,428 $224,427 $201,128 $266,240 $190,344 $165,307 $214,059 $183,920 $202,755 $157,915 $135,238 $193,214 $127,869 $224,540 $223,783 $235,713 $163,706 $261,083 $364,042 $254,117 $272,071 $204,526 $169,814 $185,045 $153,153 $153,939 $237,444 $318,163 $274,897 $156,278 $144,167 $159,789 $202,869 $250,078 $173,009 $2,408,831 $213,319 $191,658 $383,912 $196,705 $371,319 $243,029 $128,848 $271,684 $252,268 $207,849 $150,902 $133,482 $2,744,975 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $99,627 $102,195 1,581,462 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 11,665,046 $2,218,958 $2,694,478 Printed 07/01/2019 15:34 Page 10 of 11 Building Permit Valuation 2019 Trend 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 01/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 Community & Public Works Department Building Permit Valuation totaled $15,018,819 in June 2019. 40, 000, 000 30, 000, 000 20, 000, 000 10, 000, 000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec --•- 2019 2018 -• Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals $5.66M $22.21M $19.46M $12.43M $20.93M $15.02M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $95.71M $10.15M $13.28M $21.64M $15.34M $24.66M $19.20M $11.50M $18.72M $16.08M $12.64M $21.96M $8.08M $12.84M $6.72M $27.60M $7.87M $9.55M $26.26M $29.25M $25.44M $20.69M $21.88M $25.46M $6.70M $23.82M $18.37M $6.98M $31.20M $35.66M $35.64M $9.78M $9.05M $8.88M $10.05M $67.10M $16.78M $7.97M $28.14M $55.63M $10.10M $36.76M $19.11M $7.07M $41.60M $33.68M $9.13M $7.76M $5.52M $2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $6.73M $7.53M $5.05M $8.06M $5.15M $14.42M $5.86M $5.08M 8.19M] $3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.01M $7.74M $3.60M $6.30M 193.24M 220.26M 273.31M 262.47M Printed 07/01/2019 15:34 Page 11 of 11 treet Maintenance treet Sweeping torm Drain Cleaning Snow- On Call Operators Landscaping Weed Spraying Emergency Traffic Control Litter and Weed Control State Highway Maintenance Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Dead Animal Control Community & Public Works Department Monthly Report 06/01/19 — 06/30/19 MAINTENANCE Agreements for Services Adopted and In Operation * Budget estimates ** Does not include June Contract Name Contractor Contract Amount Total % of Contract Expended Expended Poe Asphalt AAA Sweeping„Pr AAA Sweeping Multiple Senske TBD Senske Geiger Work Crew WSDOT Spokane Cou LN. Mike Pederson $1,561,663.00 $490,200.00 $202,587.50 $765,000.00 $134,877.83 $0.00 $10,000.00 $70,000.00 $265,000.00 $670,000.00 $20,000.00 $857,487.25 $292,951.54 $134,875.56 $237,653.33 $16,841.64 $21,235.50 $3,977.84 $29,597.60 $126,216.24 $211,747.14 $5,150.00 54.91% 59.76% 66.58% 31.07% 12.49% 0.00 39.78% 42.28% 47.63% 31.60% 25.75% IMEMEMIE Citizen Requests for Public Works - June 2019 Request Submitted In Progress Resolved / Waitin: Broken Sprinker CPW Projects Dead Animal Removal General Street Maint Graffiti on City Prope Gravel Shouldering Hazard on Street Illegal Dumping - Private Construction Report a Pothole Sidewalks - repair Street Sweeping Vegetation / Weeds SOLID WASTE STORMWATER 3 11 3 11 6 2 2 3 1 10 2 1 22 2 19 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 9 3 10 3 8 6 1 2 3 1 10 1 1 18 2 10 Traffic Signs: Missing/ Damaged 16 14 Totals 12,IM 0 2 16 12 STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for June 2019: • Poe Asphalt — Gravel shoulder maintenance. Cracksealing continued on arterials. Completed asphalt patches on Herald north of Sprague, 8th west of Sullivan, Dishman- Mica at 4th, Gertrude and overlay on Boone east of Greenacres. Continued with stormwater repair work throughout the City. • AAA Sweeping—Arterial sweeping, sidewalk and concrete median cleaning and continued with residential sweeping. • AAA Sweeping Vactor Contract — Cleaning arterial catchbasins and drywells, sidewalk underdrains and swale inlets. • Geiger Work Crew — Litter Pickup, tree trimming and cutting dryland grass along city right of ways and swale properties. • Pothole patching WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of City Stormwater Utility activities for June 2019: • Begin Task Management of the Drywell Retrofit with Pavement Preservation Water Quality Agreement. Environmental tasks initiated — SEPA, Cultural Resources, and Inadvertent Discovery Plan. • Compile and submit Air Quality Report to Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency. • Attain Hydraulic Permit Approval from Department of Fish and Wildlife for Chester Creek Annual Cleanup and Vegetation Maintenance. • CIP coordination and support including acquisition of drainage easement along Broadway Ave for water quality improvements and development of testing requirements for pervious concrete gutter pan on Wellesley Ave project. • Continue internal review of NPDES Permit and development of implementation plan. • Continued annual management and/or participation of the following service contracts: o Senske — swale maintenance o AAA Sweeping — Spring Sweep o AAA Sweeping — Storm Drain Cleaning • Continue development of 2019 Small Works contract — Pervious Gravel Shoulders. • Continued working on the following tasks: o Responded to stormwater related issues, 21 sites. o Stormwater action requests for small works and maintenance projects 2019. 2 Current status to date is shown below: Stormwater Project Requests (Incl. Public and In -Staff Requests) June - 19 Total Requests Logged Since 2009: 492 2019 Completed Projects: Completed Projects 2009-2019: Locations not warranting work: 8 213 176 Total Project Backlog: 103 Remaining Projects Assigned for 2018-2020 Small Works: Maintenance: Large Capital: 61 31 11 Unfunded Projects Large Capital: 6 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING The following is a summary of Development Engineering activities for June 2019: • Assisted Building and Planning Division with preparation of design requirements for (14) Commercial and (9) Land Use Pre -Application meetings. • Prepared multiple Recommended Conditions of Approvals for preliminary plats and Dedication Languages for final plats. Reviewed multiple final plats and submittal packages to record final plats. • Reviewed civil plans and drainage reports for Engineered Grading Permits associated with commercial and land use projects. Coordinated with private Engineers and Developers. • Reviewed civil plans for the following projects: o 12th & Carnahan Apartments o Chas Health Parking Lot o Horizon Middle School Renovations o 3rd Avenue Boarding House o Vistas at Belleaire — Phase 1— 19 lots o Trentwood Elementary School Parking Lot Expansion o Murphy Apartments o TAPA Business Park — Purfect Action Lots 12 — 14 o Woodruff Short Plat — 8 lots o Euclid Office Building Parking Lot Modification o Spokane Elite Dance Studio o Skyline at Flora Subdivision —15 lots o Bonner Short Plat — 3 lots o Central Business Park — Phase 2 o Main Residential Care Facility 3 o Adams Rd and 28th Ave PUD o Chester Ridge — Paxton Addition o Broadway Apartments — Phase 2 o Orchard Crest Memory Care Facility o Centennial Properties Access Road o Sprague Avenue Car Sales • Met with citizens and developers in Permit Center to answer inquiries and discuss design requirements for potential commercial and land use projects. • Conducted preconstruction meetings, performed site visits, prepared punch lists, reviewed surety estimates, and reviewed and approved construction certification packages to finalize final plats and to issue commercial building certificates of occupancy. 4 CAPITAL PROJECTS Spokane Public Works Projects Monthly Summary - Design & Construction June -2019 Project# Design &Construction Projects Funding Proposed Ad Date Bid Open Date % Complete Estimated Construction Completion Total Project Cost PE I CN Street Projects 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation (PE & ROW) FHWA - STP(U) TBD TBD 60 0 12/31/22 $ 5,215,702 0249 Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection Improv (PE & ROW) FHWA-STP(U) TBD TBD 60 0 12/31/20 $ 1,370,000 0265 Wellesley Sidewalk Project FHWA-CMAQ 05/24/19 06/14/19 100 25 12/31/19 $ 886,367 0267 Mission SW - Bowdish to Union TIB- SP 03/01/19 03/22/19 100 0 12/31/19 $ 2,196,922 0276 Barker Rd Widening - Euclid to Trent COSV 03/22/19 04/12/19 100 25 12/31/19 $ 2,625,000 0278 Wilbur Sidewalk- Boone to Broadway CDBG 03/15/19 03/29/19 100 99 06/30/19 $ 476,997 0279 Knox Ave Sidewalk: Hutchinson to Sargent CDBG 03/22/19 04/05/19 100 99 06/30/19 $ 499,896 0295 Garland Avenue Extension COSV 04/05/19 04/19/19 100 0 12/31/19 $ 2,900,000 Street Preservation Projects 0252 Argonne Resurfacing: Broadway to Mission FHWA-STP(U) 10/05/18 10/26/18 100 99 07/01/19 $ 843,151 0269 Evergreen- Mission Connector to Indiana FHWA -STP(U) 04/05/19 04/26/19 100 99 12/31/19 $ 802,050 0284 Argonne Rd. Pres - Valleywayto Broadway COSV 03/01/19 03/15/19 100 99 06/30/19 $ 288,000 0285 Indiana Ave Pres - Evergreen to Sullivan COSV TBD TBD 60 0 12/31/20 $ 70,400 0287 University Pres-Dishman-Mica to l6th TIB- UAP 03/01/19 03/22/19 100 25 12/31/19 $ 4,095,000 0290 2019 Local Access Streets (Midilome) COSV 03/29/19 04/12/19 100 25 12/31/19 $ 1,600,902 Traffic Projects 0293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 0294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels Parks Projects 0268 ApplewayTrail-Evergreen to Sullivan H 51P N/A N/A 20 0 12/31/20 $ 180,000 H 51P N/A N/A 10 0 12/31/20 $ 78,000 FHWA-STP(U) 06/28/19 07/19/19 100 0 12/31/20 $ 2,395,000 Project # Design Only Projects Funding Design Complete Date Complete Total Project Cost PE Street Projects 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent 0259 North Sullivan ITS Project 0273 Barker/I-90 Interchange 0275 Barker Rd Widening - Riverto Euclid 0291 Adams Sidewalk InfiII Project 0299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont COSV 12/31/20 COSV TBD FHWA - CMAQ 02/01/18 WSDOT TBD FMSIB, STBG 12/31/20 TIB -SP TBD COSV TBD Street Preservation Projects 0286 Broadway Preservation: Havana to Fancher COSV TBD 0292 Mullan Preservation: Broadway -Mission COSV TBD 7 25 99 40 30 0 0 65 0 $ 142,021 $ 1,710,000 $ 914,209 $ 900,000 $ 220,000 $ 507,051 $ 80,000 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 Stormwater Projects 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID Dept of Ecology 03/01/20 30 $ 20,000 5 TRAFFIC BNSF Request for Presignals for R/R crossings at Park and Vista The City's Community and Public Works group was contacted in May by BNSF to discuss the results of their investigation on required clearance times at the dual railroad tracks crossing Park and Vista south of Trent (SR -290). A new standard establishing clearance times has been developed by BNSF & Texas DOT and adopted by the Federal Railroad Administration. Under the new criteria, at these locations the existing clearance times are inadequate WSDOT has a traffic counting and video system for collecting data called MioVision. WSDOT is able to set the equipment up at a site for investigation. The equipment films the location and traffic data is collected using proprietary software. These files are sent to MioVision who formats the traffic data in tabular format and releases video for the section under review. WSDOT and the City of Spokane Valley teamed up to collect data simultaneously at both the crossing and at the intersection at Trent for both the Park and Vista crossings. Review of this information shows that traffic rarely backs up beyond the 2nd mainline track to the south, only occurring rarely between 12 noon to 4 p.m. With this data, it was shown that the signal timing can be extended for northbound traffic at Trent at Park and Vista, and nothing more may be required. WSDOT will set-up the MioVision after adding time to the signals to measure the northbound queues. R/R Quiet Zone Request across Mirabeau Pkwy & Indiana Nothing new to report, Traffic awaits a Quiet Zone Safety and Warrant Study. The City's Community and Public Works and the City's Economic Development groups were approached by a developer who may have an opportunity to build a hotel north of the Union Pacific R/R tracks at Mirabeau Pkwy. According to the developer, a hotel would be feasible, even along the tracks, but the crossing would need to be designated as a quiet zone before a hotel would be built. The City met with the developer and helped scope out the work with his consulting engineer who has experience working with UP and preparing engineering studies to obtain quiet zone status. The developer and his consultant will conduct the study at the Mirabeau crossing and then the City will work with the UP Railroad to possibly implement the quiet zone at this crossing. Pine Valley Ranch, Manufactured Home Park Nothing new to report, Traffic awaits the TIA for approval. The City's Traffic group is currently working with a private developer, Spokane County, and WSDOT on a proposed application of a 300 unit manufactured home park (rentals) proposed between 32nd and 40th Avenues fronting the west side of SR -27. The Traffic Scoping meeting has been held with the public and a Trip Generation and Distribution Letter has been approved. The 6 developer and his engineer will be working on a Traffic Impact Analysis to provide with his SEPA application expected by the end of June. PLANNING AND GRANTS Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Program FY19 On April 17, the BUILD program announced its 2019 call -for -projects. On June 4th, 2019, City Council authorized the City Manager to apply for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project with a total project cost of $29 million. Applications are due July 15, 2019 and awards are anticipated by November 12, 2019. Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Call for Projects In June, 2019, TIB announced its annual call for projects. The City typically applies for funding from the Urban Arterial Program (UAP) and the Sidewalk Program (SP). On June 18, 2019, staff presented an administrative report which recommended four project applications, two for each program. UAP projects included Mullan Road preservation from Broadway Ave. to Mission Ave. and the Argonne Road & Montgomery Ave. intersection concrete reconstruction project. SP projects included Farr Road sidewalk from 6th Ave. to 8th Ave. and Park Road sidewalk from Mission Ave. to Boone Ave. Applications are due August 16, 2019. Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) Program In July 2018, the City submitted a funding application to the Federal Rail Administration's (FRA) CRISI Program for fiscal year (FY) 18. The City submitted a total PE phase request of $1,246,500 with a City -match of $1,246,500 (50% match), for a total PE phase cost of $2,493,000. In June 2019, FRA notified the City that the project was selected for funding. Staff is currently working with FRA to coordinate the appropriate next steps. 2020-2025 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and, after holding a public hearing, adopt a comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation by June 30th of each year. Adoption of the 2020-2025 Six -Year TIP occurred on June 4, 2019. Pavement Management Update Public Outreach & Education On June 18, 2019, staff brought forward an administrative report discussing a pavement preservation commission to help the City's efforts in prioritizing its pavement management program. At this council meeting, it was decided to put the commission on hold while staff gathers the City's past pavement preservation presentations. The purpose would be to show how over the years the pavement management program developed and how the cost to maintain the City's streets at a given condition would be effected. Additional information will be brought forward to Council in late summer or early fall. 7 Spokane 4.0 Valley Memorandum FINANCE DEPARTMENT Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director 10210 E Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 • Fax: (509) 720-5075 • www.spokanevalley.org To: Mark Calhoun, City Manager From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Date: July 17, 2019 Re: Finance Department Activity Report — June 2019 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of June 2019 and included herein is an updated 2019 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end June. 2018 Year-end Process The 2018 books were closed in April and the annual financial report was completed in May. The State Auditor's Office arrived on site at the beginning of June and are currently working on completing the single audit and financial statement portions of the audit. We do not expect the audit to be completed before the end of the summer. 2019 Budget Amendment #2 As we have progressed through 2019 the need for a number of budget amendments has arisen. Council review will take place at the following meetings: • May 14 Admin Report • May 28 Public Hearing • May 28 First reading on proposed ordinance amending the 2019 Budget • June 4 Second reading on proposed ordinance amending the 2019 Budget 2020 Budget Development The 2020 Budget development process began in the Finance Department in early March, and on April 81h we sent detailed budget requests to all departments to complete by mid-May. By the time the budget is scheduled to be adopted on November 121h, the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss the budget on eight occasions including three public hearings. • June 11 Council budget workshop • August 20 Admin report on 2020 revenues and expenditures • September 10 Public hearing #1 on the 2020 revenues and expenditures • September 24 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2020 Budget • October 8 Public hearing #2 on 2020 Budget • October 22 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2020 Budget • November 12 Public hearing #3 on the 2020 Budget • November 12 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2020 Budget P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201912019 06 30.docx Page 1 2020 Property Tax Levy A significant part of the budget development process includes the annual levy of property taxes which in 2019 are expected to account for approximately 26.5% of recurring General Fund revenues. Council discussions specifically related to this topic will take place at the following meetings: • September 10 Public hearing on 2020 revenues including property taxes • September 17 Admin Report on proposed ordinance levying 2020 property taxes • October 8 First reading of ordinance levying 2020 property taxes and confirming tax levy • October 22 Second reading of ordinance levying 2020 property taxes and confirming tax levy Outside Agency Funding in the 2020 Budget The City has historically provided funding for local organizations involved in either social services or economic development activities and the preliminary 2020 Budget currently has $244,000 collectively available for this, with $62,000 being set aside for contracted economic development. The schedule leading to awarding funds is as follows: • July 12 Letters mailed to agencies that have historically received funding, media release to City website and notice to newspapers • August 9 Agency requests are due at City Hall • September 17 Economic development and social service agency presentations to Council • October 22 Council makes final determination of awards Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2019 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2019 Budget was adopted is located on pages 6 through 18. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner, this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that are reflected in our 2018 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The 2019 Budget as adopted o June 2019 activity o Cumulative 2019 activity through June 2019 o Budget remaining in terms of dollars o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 6): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 46.61 % of the amount budgeted with 50.00% of the year elapsed. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201912019 06 30.docx Page 2 • Property taxes are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2019 are $6,722,793 or 55.77% of the amount budgeted. • Sales tax collections represent only five months of collections thus far because taxes collected in June are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of July. Collections are currently at $9,340,423 or 40.76% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at $119,366 or 30.84% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are paid quarterly with second quarter payments due by July 31St • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2019 we have received $329,003 or 26.88% of the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. Through June we've received remittances totaling $830,884 or 43.51% of the amount budgeted. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through June we've received remittances through the month of May with receipts of $428,452 or 39.73% of the amount budgeted. • Community and Public Works service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently at $1,312,315 or 69.72% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program revenues are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in -season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $424,337 or 67.48% of the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at $18,193,807 or 43.40% of the amount budgeted with 50.00% of the year elapsed. Investments (page 19) Investments at June 30 total $70,338,012 and are composed of $68,292,182 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $2,045,830 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 20) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through June and total $10,560,377 including general, criminal justice, and public safety taxes. This figure is $539,117 or 5.38% greater than the same five-month period in 2018. Economic Indicators (pages 21 — 23) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 21) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 23) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201912019 06 30.docx Page 3 Page 21 provides a 10 -year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2010. • Compared with calendar year 2018, 2019 collections have increased by $472,806 or 5.33%. • Tax receipts reached an all-time high in 2018 at $22,642,856, besting the previous record year of 2017 when $21,089,134 was collected. Page 22 provides a 10 -year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2010. • Compared with calendar year 2018, 2019 collections have increased by $18,498 or 9.30%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2018 of $646,976, exceeding the previous high set in 2017 of $615,980. Page 23 provides a 10 -year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2010. • Compared with calendar year 2018, 2019 collections have decreased by $437,500 or 28.01%. The decrease is primarily related to there being an unusually high amount collected in May of 2018. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2018 of $3,800,432, exceeding the previous high set in 2017 of $3,007,573. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 24) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value for property taxes which for 2019 is $9,351,389,045. Following the December 1, 2018 debt service payments, the City has $12,270,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 8.75% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.75% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $4,645,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. o $730,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. o $6,895,000 remains on bonds issued for construction of the new City Hall. The bonds are to be repaid with General Fund revenues. Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 25 and 26) The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: • Page 25 provides a 10 -year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2010. o Compared with calendar year 2018, 2019 collections have decreased by $49,792 or 5.92%. o Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $1,857,000 to $2,072,000 in the years 2011 through 2018. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201912019 06 30.docx Page 4 • Page 26 provides a 10 -year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2010. o Compared with 2018, 2019 collections have decreased by $78,622 or 10.50%. Unlike tax revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to the City directly by the service provider. Consequently there is not a "clean cutoff' in terms of when a vendor pays the tax. o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. o The 2019 Budget is set at $1,700,000. We will watch actual receipts closely as the year progresses. o The City has hired a consultant to perform an audit of providers who pay the telephone utility tax. The audit will assess whether providers are accurately remitting all taxes owed to the City, and the consultant will be paid on a contingent basis out of revenues recovered from the telephone providers. Three audits have been completed, and the City has received payments totaling $398,865 which is comprised of recovered revenue plus interest and penalty fees. Per the contract with the consultant, the City paid $99,716 or 25% of the amount recovered. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201912019 06 30.docx Page 5 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports \2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 #001 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Property Tax 12,054,400 905,852 6,722,793 (5,331,607) 55.77% Sales Tax 22,917,000 1,946,112 9,340,423 (13,576,577) 40.76% Sales Tax - Public Safety 1,081,900 91,930 440,491 (641,409) 40.71 % Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 1,944,000 162,946 779,464 (1,164,536) 40.10% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 387,000 2,165 119,366 (267,634) 30.84% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,224,000 8,135 329,003 (894,997) 26.88% State Shared Revenues 1,909,800 268,967 830,884 (1,078,916) 43.51 % Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,078,500 78,058 428,452 (650,048) 39.73% Community and Public Works 1,882,300 221,429 1,312,315 (569,985) 69.72% Recreation Program Revenues 628,800 57,516 424,337 (204,463) 67.48% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 1,500 133 21,227 19,727 1415.13% Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 358,200 123,354 455,864 97,664 127.27% Transfers in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 45,497,400 3,866,597 21,204,616 (24,292,784) 46.61 % Expenditures City Council 612,359 35,567 311,441 300,918 50.86% City Manager 964,527 69,704 417,929 546,598 43.33% City Attorney 618,756 51,527 295,164 323,592 47.70% Public Safety 25,927,488 2,014,895 11,404,106 14,523,382 43.98% Deputy City Manager 271,044 18,648 158,236 112,808 58.38% Finance / IT 1,427,700 102,443 660,116 767,584 46.24% Human Resources 305,843 23,203 142,460 163,383 46.58% City Hall Operations and Maintenance 291,894 24,775 124,677 167,217 42.71% Community & Public Works - Engineering 1,841,617 128,496 847,811 993,806 46.04% Community & Public Works - Econ Dev 1,030,737 90,975 426,907 603,830 41.42% Community & Public Works - Bldg & Plan 2,281,474 186,034 1,090,509 1,190,965 47.80% Parks & Rec - Administration 340,120 25,687 144,186 195,935 42.39% Parks & Rec - Maintenance 893,500 140,485 377,506 515,994 42.25% Parks & Rec - Recreation 254,818 27,515 87,944 166,874 34.51 % Parks & Rec - Aquatics 491,153 3,738 14,977 476,176 3.05% Parks & Rec - Senior Center 102,907 125 16,902 86,005 16.42% Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 956,332 63,534 407,370 548,962 42.60% General Government 1,348,950 36,723 285,492 1,063,458 21.16% Transfers out - #204 ('16 LTGO bond debt service) 401,250 33,438 200,625 200,625 50.00% Transfers out - #309 (park capital projects) 160,000 13,333 80,000 80,000 50.00% Transfers out - #311 (Pavement Preservation) 972,300 81,025 486,150 486,150 50.00% Transfers out - #501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 18,300 18,300 50.00% Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 390,000 32,500 195,000 195,000 50.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 41,921,369 3,207,420 18,193,807 23,727,562 43.40% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 3,576,031 659,177 3,010,809 (565,222) Page 6 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 #001 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in - #106 (Repymt of Solid Waste) Miscellaneous Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget 40,422 3,369 20,211 (20,211) 50.00% 0 0 5,000 5,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 40,422 3,369 25,211 (15,211) 62.37% Expenditures General Government - IT capital replacements 107,000 32,615 106,517 483 99.55% Public Safety (carpet & workstation replacement) 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Public Safety (full facility generator) 200,000 0 0 200,000 0.00% Public Safety (SV Police Athletic League Grant) 0 1,330 1,330 (1,330) 0.00% Community & Public Works (Retail Recruitment) 25,000 5,000 25,000 0 100.00% General Government (City Hall generator) 203,000 5,870 88,712 114,288 43.70% Transfers out - #122 (replenish reserve) 120,000 0 0 120,000 0.00% Transfers out - #309 (Browns Park restroom & othe 1,160,000 0 0 1,160,000 0.00% Transfers out - #312 7,109,300 0 0 7,109,300 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 8,974,300 44,815 221,559 8,752,741 2.47% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (8,933,878) (41,446) (196,348) 8,737,530 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (5,357,847) 617,730 2,814,461 8,172,308 Beginning fund balance 36,817,956 36,817,956 Ending fund balance 31,460,109 39,632,417 Page 7 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 - STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Telephone Utility Tax 1,700,000 135,668 670,003 (1,029,997) 39.41% Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 2,092,300 184,889 787,789 (1,304,511) 37.65% Multimodal Transportation 132,200 33,160 66,327 (65,873) 50.17% Right -of -Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 0 2,501 (67,499) 3.57% Investment Interest 6,000 125 2,511 (3,489) 41.85% Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 0 466 (9,534) 4.66% Total Recurring Revenues 4,010,500 353,842 1,529,597 (2,480,903) 38.14% Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 1,057,744 56,016 529,231 528,513 50.03% Supplies 113,300 1,855 53,959 59,341 47.62% Services & Charges 2,326,974 678,004 1,286,770 1,040,204 55.30% Snow Operations 497,200 19,576 680,914 (183,714) 136.95% Intergovernmental Payments 855,000 80,906 232,748 622,252 27.22% Transfers out - #501 (non -plow vehicle rental) 21,250 1,771 10,625 10,625 50.00% Transfers out - #501 (plow replace.) 77,929 6,494 38,965 38,965 50.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,949,397 844,622 2,833,210 2,116,187 57.24% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures (938,897) (490,780) (1,303,614) (364,717) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Insurance proceeds (traffic signal cabinet) 0 0 6,453 6,453 0.00% Transfers in - #122 120,000 0 0 (120,000) 0.00% Transfers in - #312 907,544 75,629 453,772 (453,772) 50.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 1,027,544 75,629 460,225 (567,319) 44.79% Expenditures Misc 68,000 0 991 67,009 1.46% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 68,000 0 991 67,009 1.46% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 959,544 75,629 459,234 (500,310) Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures 20,647 (415,152) (844,380) (865,027) Beginning fund balance 784,972 784,972 Ending fund balance 805,619 (59,408) #103 - PATHS & TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment Interest 8,800 780 3,323 (5,477) 37.76% 400 15 66 (334) 16.43% Total revenues 9,200 795 3,388 (5,812) 36.83% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out - #309 (Appleway Trail - Sullivan to C 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 9,200 Beginning fund balance 5,417 Ending fund balance 14,617 795 Page 8 3,388 5,417 8,805 (5,812) P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget #104 - TOURISM FACILITIES HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel Tax 390,000 33,300 132,455 (257,545) 33.96% Investment Interest 7,000 3,625 17,704 10,704 252.91% Transfers in - #105 275,000 0 0 (275,000) 0.00% Total revenues Expenditures Capital Expenditures Total expenditures 672,000 36,925 150,159 (521,841) 22.35% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 672,000 36,925 150,159 (521,841) Beginning fund balance 1,918,072 1,918,072 Ending fund balance 2,590,072 2,068,231 #105 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest 600,000 53,596 217,476 (382,524) 36.25% 2,000 825 3,369 1,369 168.44% Total revenues 602,000 54,422 220,845 (381,155) 36.69% Expenditures Transfers out - #001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Transfers out - #104 275,000 0 0 275,000 0.00% Tourism Promotion 350,000 6,150 27,902 322,098 7.97% Total expenditures 655,000 6,150 27,902 627,098 Revenues over (under) expenditures (53,000) 48,271 192,943 (1,008,253) Beginning fund balance 277,929 277,929 Ending fund balance 224,929 470,872 4.26% #106 - SOLID WASTE Revenues Solid Waste Administrative Fees 225,000 12,685 105,108 119,892 46.71% Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 1,500,000 145,879 668,226 831,774 44.55% Investment Interest 1,300 2,068 7,684 (6,384) 591.10% Total revenues 1,726,300 160,632 781,019 945,281 45.24% Expenditures Transfers out - #001 40,422 3,369 20,211 20,211 50.00% Transfers out - #311 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0.00% Education & Contract Administration 185,878 2,757 14,630 171,248 7.87% Total expenditures 1,726,300 6,125 34,841 1,691,459 2.02% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 154,507 746,178 (746,178) Beginning fund balance 431,359 431,359 Ending fund balance 431,359 1,177,537 Page 9 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #107 - PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG Contribution Investment Interest Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget 76,000 0 19,958 56,042 26.26% 0 185 922 (922) 0.00% 76,000 185 20,880 55,120 27.47% Expenditures PEG Reimbursement - CMTV 40,100 0 0 40,100 0.00% Capital Outlay 31,000 0 0 31,000 0.00% Total expenditures 71,100 0 0 71,100 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 4,900 185 20,880 (15,980) Beginning fund balance 84,831 84,831 Ending fund balance 89,731 105,711 #120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Transfers in 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 #121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Transfers in 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Operations Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 Ending fund balance 5,500,000 5,500,000 #122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 5,000 908 4,475 (525) 89.50% Transfers in - #001 120,000 0 0 (120,000) 0.00% Subtotal revenues Expenditures Snow removal expenses Transfers out - #101 125,000 908 4,475 (120,525) 3.58% 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% 120,000 0 0 120,000 0.00% Total expenditures 620,000 0 0 620,000 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures (495,000) 908 4,475 (740,525) Beginning fund balance 503,070 503,070 Ending fund balance 8,070 507,545 Page 10 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget #204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 432,150 0 88,575 (343,575) 20.50% Transfers in - #001 401,250 33,438 200,625 (200,625) 50.00% Transfers in - #301 82,475 6,873 41,238 (41,237) 50.00% Transfers in - #302 82,475 6,873 41,238 (41,237) 50.00% Total revenues 998,350 47,183 371,675 (626,675) 37.23% Expenditures Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace 432,150 0 88,575 343,575 20.50% Debt Service Payments - Roads 164,950 0 12,475 152,475 7.56% Debt Service Payments -'16 LTGO Bond 401,250 0 120,625 280,625 30.06% Total expenditures 998,350 0 221,675 776,675 22.20% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 47,183 150,000 (1,403,350) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 150,000 Page 11 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 - Taxes Investment Interest Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget 1,000,000 173,764 575,186 (424,814) 57.52% 22,000 5,329 26,093 4,093 118.61% 1,022,000 179,093 601,280 (420,720) 58.83% Expenditures Transfers out - #204 82,475 6,873 41,238 41,237 50.00% Transfers out - #303 504,172 0 0 504,172 0.00% Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 734,300 0 0 734,300 0.00% Transfers out - #314 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Total expenditures 1,370,947 6,873 41,238 1,329,709 3.01 % Revenues over (under) expenditures (348,947) 172,220 560,042 (1,750,430) Beginning fund balance 2,480,268 2,480,268 Ending fund balance 2,131,321 3,040,310 #302 - SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2 - Taxes Investment Interest 1,000,000 173,764 575,186 (424,814) 57.52% 25,000 6,674 33,121 8,121 132.49% Total revenues 1,025,000 180,438 608,308 (416,692) 59.35% Expenditures Transfers out - #204 82,475 6,873 41,238 41,237 50.00% Transfers out - #303 167,434 0 0 167,434 0.00% Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 734,300 0 0 734,300 0.00% Total expenditures 984,209 6,873 41,238 942,971 4.19% Revenues over (under) expenditures 40,791 173,565 567,070 (1,359,664) Beginning fund balance 3,240,220 3,240,220 Ending fund balance 3,281,011 3,807,290 Page 12 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 5,084,281 123,027 345,824 (4,738,457) 6.80% Developer Contribution 1,535,700 0 0 (1,535,700) 0.00% Transfers in -#301 504,172 0 0 (504,172) 0.00% Transfers in - #302 167,434 0 0 (167,434) 0.00% Transfers in - #312 4,584,400 0 0 (4,584,400) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 0 586 586 0.00% Total revenues 11,875,987 123,027 346,410 (11,529,577) 2.92% Expenditures 123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker 5,000 2,199 27,143 (22,143) 542.85% 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 12,500 271 585 11,915 4.68% 166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int. Safety 5,000 100 1,444 3,556 28.87% 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 5,000 0 1,397 3,603 27.94% 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 35,700 6,950 10,807 24,893 30.27% 247 8th & Carnahan Intersection Improvements 45,000 0 (155) 45,155 -0.34% 249 Sullivan & Wellesley Intersection 1,167,287 2,128 48,780 1,118,507 4.18% 251 Euclid Ave Reconstruction Project 5,000 0 2,703 2,297 54.06% 258 32nd Ave Sidewalk-SR27 to Evergreen 5,000 0 0 5,000 0.00% 259 North Sullivan ITS Project 730,000 253 3,006 726,994 0.41% 265 Wellesley Sidewalk Project 382,000 3,910 19,254 362,746 5.04% 267 Mission Ave Sidewalk 420,000 1,510 8,730 411,270 2.08% 273 Barker/I-90 Interchange 500,000 39,027 77,024 422,976 15.40% 275 Barker Rd Widening - River to Euclid 310,000 3,452 6,895 303,105 2.22% 276 Barker Rd Widening - Euclid to Trent 3,400,000 12,647 72,023 3,327,977 2.12% 278 Wilbur Sidewalk - Boone to Broadway 354,500 131,976 176,433 178,067 49.77% 279 Know Ave Sidewalk: Hutchinson to Sargent 294,000 147,003 189,219 104,781 64.36% 281 Highland Estates Connector 200,000 0 17,396 182,604 8.70% 287 University Pres - Dishman Mica to 16th 0 0 78,913 (78,913) 0.00% 291 Adams Sidewalk Infill Project 0 7,912 8,344 (8,344) 0.00% 293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 0 2,070 2,104 (2,104) 0.00% 294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels 0 0 150 (150) 0.00% 295 Garland Avenue Extension 3,000,000 0 4,934 2,995,066 0.16% Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00% Total expenditures 11,875,987 361,408 757,128 11,118,859 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (238,381) (410,718) (22,648,436) Beginning fund balance 66,906 66,906 Ending fund balance 66,906 (343,812) Note: Work performed in the Street Capital Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 13 6.38% P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget #309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 572,308 485,388 596,246 23,938 104.18% Transfers in - #001 1,320,000 13,333 80,000 (1,240,000) 6.06% Transfers in - #312 (Appleway Trail) 14,788 0 0 (14,788) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 0 24 24 0.00% Total revenues 1,907,096 498,721 676,269 (1,230,827) 35.46% Expenditures 237 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin 5,000 535 16,791 (11,791) 335.81 % 268 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan 72,500 12,057 57,809 14,691 79.74% 280 Appleway Trail Amenities: Univ. - Pines 509,595 174,838 670,316 (160,721) 131.54% 282 Browns Park Sand Volleyball Courts 0 0 1,249 (1,249) 0.00% 296 Browns Park 2019 Construction Improvements 1,000,000 26,607 42,020 957,980 4.20% Browns Park Restroom 160,000 0 0 160,000 0.00% Swing Sets 25,000 0 0 25,000 0.00% Resurface Discovery Park 40,000 0 0 40,000 0.00% Total expenditures 1,812,095 214,036 788,184 1,023,911 43.50% Revenues over (under) expenditures 95,001 284,685 (111,915) (2,254,738) Beginning fund balance 39,294 39,294 Ending fund balance 134,295 (72,621) #310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 9,000 1,517 7,637 (1,363) 84.86% Total revenues 9,000 1,517 7,637 (1,363) 84.86% Expenditures Transfers out 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 9,000 1,517 7,637 (1,363) Beginning fund balance 857,737 857,737 Ending fund balance 866,737 865,374 Note: The fund balance includes $839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of $839,285.10. Page 14 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget #311 - PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND Revenues Transfers in -#001 972,300 81,025 486,150 (486,150) 50.00% Transfers in - #106 1,500,000 0 0 (1,500,000) 0.00% Transfers in - #301 734,300 0 0 (734,300) 0.00% Transfers in - #302 734,300 0 0 (734,300) 0.00% Grant Proceeds 1,820,000 0 59,821 (1,760,180) 3.29% Investment Interest 0 7,805 35,946 35,946 0.00% Total revenues 5,760,900 88,830 581,916 (5,178,984) 10.10% Expenditures Pre -Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 22,125 27,875 44.25% Pavement Preservation 7,238,200 0 0 7,238,200 0.00% 248 Sprague Street Pres- Sullivan to Corbin 0 1,238 7,132 (7,132) 0.00% 252 Argonne Resurfacing: Broadway to Indiana 0 304,519 473,999 (473,999) 0.00% 254 Mission - McDonald to Evergreen 0 0 2,387 (2,387) 0.00% 256 University Rd Pres - 24th to Dishman Mica 0 0 2,831 (2,831) 0.00% 257 University Rd Pres - 16th to 24th 0 0 3,009 (3,009) 0.00% 267 Mission SW - Bowdish to Union 0 326 25,974 (25,974) 0.00% 269 Evergreen - Mission Connector to Indiana 0 18,993 62,242 (62,242) 0.00% 284 Argonne Rd. Pres - Valleyway to Broadway 0 100,714 114,288 (114,288) 0.00% 285 Indiana Ave Pres - Evergreen to Sullivan 0 5,013 19,983 (19,983) 0.00% 286 Broadway Preservation: Havana to Fancher 0 164 18,743 (18,743) 0.00% 287 University Pres - Dishman Mica to 16th 0 22,843 25,212 (25,212) 0.00% 290 2019 Local Access Streets (Midilome) 0 18,404 44,293 (44,293) 0.00% 292 Mullan Preservation: Broadway -Mission 0 2,730 11,116 (11,116) 0.00% 297 2019 SCWD#3 Street Preservation 0 0 303 (303) 0.00% Total expenditures 7,288,200 474,944 833,637 Revenues over (under) expenditures (1,527,300) (386,115) (251,721) Beginning fund balance 4,637,315 4,637,315 Ending fund balance 3,110,015 4,385,594 #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 Investment Interest 6,454,563 (11,633,547) 11.44% 7,109,300 0 0 (7,109,300) 50,000 15,078 80,799 30,799 0.00% 161.60% Total revenues 7,159,300 15,078 80,799 (7,078,501) 1.13% Expenditures Transfers out - #101 907,544 75,629 453,772 453,772 50.00% Transfers out - #303 4,584,400 0 0 4,584,400 0.00% Transfers out - #309 14,788 0 0 14,788 0.00% Total expenditures 5,506,732 75,629 453,772 5,052,960 8.24% Revenues over (under) expenditures 1,652,568 (60,550) (372,973) (12,131,461) Beginning fund balance 8,974,920 8,974,920 Ending fund balance 10,627,488 8,601,947 Page 15 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued #313 - CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND Revenues Investment Interest Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget 0 155 780 780 0.00% Total revenues 0 155 780 780 0.00% Expenditures Transfers out - #312 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 155 780 780 Beginning fund balance 87,636 87,636 Ending fund balance 87,636 88,416 #314 - RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 3,750,000 0 365,684 (3,384,316) 9.75% Investment Interest 0 1,425 7,774 7,774 0.00% Transfers in - #301 50,000 0 0 (50,000) 0.00% Total revenues 3,800,000 1,425 373,459 (3,426,541) 9.83% Expenditures 143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation 3,800,000 167,777 579,743 3,220,257 15.26% 223 Pines Rd Underpass 900,000 7,019 22,763 877,237 2.53% Total expenditures 4,700,000 174,796 602,507 4,097,493 12.82% Revenues over (under) expenditures (900,000) (173,371) (229,048) (7,524,035) Beginning fund balance 1,036,455 1,036,455 Ending fund balance 136,455 807,407 Page 16 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402 - STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees Investment Interest Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget 1,890,000 160,065 1,105,080 (784,920) 58.47% 20,000 5,016 23,290 3,290 116.45% Total Recurring Revenues 1,910,000 165,082 1,128,370 (781,630) 59.08% Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 502,325 36,036 200,488 301,837 39.91 % Supplies 10,700 2,878 8,330 2,370 77.85% Services & Charges 1,236,575 184,694 393,750 842,825 31.84% Intergovernmental Payments 37,500 0 18,447 19,053 49.19% Vehicle Rentals - #501 12,750 1,063 6,375 6,375 50.00% Office Furniture & Equipment 0 0 491 (491) 0.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,799,850 224,670 627,881 1,171,969 34.89% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 110,150 (59,589) 500,488 390,338 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 106,000 0 55,066 (50,934) 51.95% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 106,000 0 55,066 (50,934) 51.95% Expenditures Capital - various projects 335,160 0 223 334,937 0.07% 193 Effectiveness Study 10,000 0 0 10,000 0.00% 252 Argonne Resurfacing: Broadway to Mission 0 16,815 51,701 (51,701) 0.00% 267 Mission SW - Bowdish to Union 65,000 0 2,421 62,579 3.73% 278 Wilbur Sidewalk - Boone to Broadway 24,600 36,209 42,295 (17,695) 171.93% 279 Knox Ave Sidewalk: Hutchinson to Sargent 25,240 76,347 88,665 (63,425) 351.29% Watershed Studies 100,000 0 3,374 96,626 3.37% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 560,000 129,371 188,679 371,321 33.69% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (454,000) (129,371) (133,613) 320,387 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (343,850) (188,959) 366,875 710,725 Beginning working capital 2,216,210 2,216,210 Ending working capital 1,872,360 2,583,085 Note: Work performed in the Stormwater Fund for preservation projects is for stormwater improvements that were bid with the pavement preservation work. #403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 460,000 263,325 263,325 (196,675) 57.24% Grant Proceeds 317,200 0 2,717 (314,483) 0.86% Investment Interest 10,000 3,712 16,839 6,839 168.39% Total revenues 787,200 267,038 282,881 (504,319) 35.94% Expenditures Capital - various projects 832,600 727 5,269 827,331 0.63% Total expenditures 832,600 727 5,269 827,331 0.63% Revenues over (under) expenditures (45,400) 266,311 277,612 (1,331,649) Beginning working capital 1,840,005 1,840,005 Ending working capital 1,794,605 2,117,617 Page 17 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Budget Year Elapsed = 2019 50.00% 2019 Budget Actual Actual through Budget June June 30 Remaining % of Budget #501 - ER&R FUND Revenues Interfund vehicle lease - #001 30,000 2,500 15,000 (15,000) 50.00% Interfund vehicle lease - #101 21,250 1,771 10,625 (10,625) 50.00% Interfund vehicle lease - #101 (plow replace) 77,929 6,494 38,965 (38,964) 50.00% Interfund vehicle lease - #402 12,750 1,063 6,375 (6,375) 50.00% Transfers in - #001 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 3,050 18,300 (18,300) 50.00% Investment Interest 9,500 2,438 11,648 2,148 122.61% Total revenues Expenditures Equipment Repair & Maintenance Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 188,029 17,316 100,913 (87,116) 53.67% 20,000 313 1,097 18,903 5.49% 20,000 313 1,097 18,903 5.49% 168,029 1,290,971 17,003 99,816 1,290,971 1,459,000 1,390,787 (106,019) #502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 153 153 153 0.00% Transfers in - #001 390,000 32,500 195,000 (195,000) 50.00% Total revenues 390,000 32,653 195,153 (194,847) 50.04% Expenditures Auto & Property Insurance 390,000 0 349,527 40,473 89.62% Equipment Repair & Maintenance 0 0 (733) 733 0.00% Unemployment Claims 0 0 22,831 (22,831) 0.00% Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 263,778 390,000 0 371,625 18,375 95.29% 0 32,653 (176,472) (213,222) 263,778 263,778 87,306 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds Per Revenue Status Report Difference Total of Expenditures for all Funds Per Expenditure Status Report 90,725,228 90,725,228 6,170,859 6,170,859 29,811,331 29,811,331 97,124,436 5,778,772 26,246,241 97,124,436 5,778,772 26,246,241 Total Capital expenditures (included in total expenditures) 27,567,882 1,376,952 3,294,424 Page 18 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Investment Report For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 Beginning Deposits Withdrawls Interest Ending 001 General Fund 101 Street Fund 103 Trails & Paths 104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel 105 Hotel/Motel 106 Solid Waste Fund 107 PEG Fund 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 Winter Weather Reserve 301 Capital Projects 302 Special Capital Projects 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 309 Parks Capital Project 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 311 Pavement Preservation 312 Capital Reserve Fund 313 City Hall Construction Fund 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects 402 Stormwater Management 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 Risk Management "Local Government Investment Pool 7/15/2019 LGI P" UMPQUA CD #9731 UMPQUA CD #0689 Total Investments $ 66,565,223.42 $ 3,035,525.76 $ 2,045,830.26 $ 60,146,128.50 2,789,701.14 0.00 0.00 2,789,701.14 (1,200,000.00) (3,069,732.98) 0.00 (4,269,732.98) 137,257.90 34,207.22 0.00 171,465.12 $ 68,292,182.46 $ (0.00) $ 2,045,830.26 $ 70,338,012.72 matures: 6/28/2019 11/15/2019 rate: 2.30% 2.85% Balance Earnings Current Period Year to date Budget $ 36,450,449.62 $ 114,410.03 62,136.72 124.89 7,679.39 15.43 1,803,790.94 3,625.37 410,666.47 825.38 1,028,898.59 2,067.94 92,195.25 185.30 0.00 0.00 5, 500, 000.00 0.00 451,692.53 907.84 2,651,581.52 5,329.31 3,320,497.02 6,673.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 754, 729.27 1,516.90 3,883,233.48 7,804.77 7,502,118.69 15, 078.23 77,111.52 154.98 709,101.25 1,425.20 2,495,883.86 5,016.38 1,846,979.74 3,712.18 1,213,122.98 2,438.21 76,143.88 153.04 410,723.87 $ 300,000.00 2,511.10 6,000.00 65.71 400.00 17,703.93 7,000.00 3,368.76 2,000.00 7,684.35 1,300.00 921.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,474.93 5,000.00 26, 093.24 22, 000.00 33,121.32 25, 000.00 586.08 0.00 23.93 0.00 7,637.32 9,000.00 35, 945.57 0.00 80,799.08 50, 000.00 780.32 0.00 7,774.29 0.00 23,289.62 20,000.00 16, 838.67 10, 000.00 11,648.42 9,500.00 153.04 0.00 $ 70,338,012.72 $ 171,465.12 $ 692,145.20 $ 467,200.00 Page 19 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2019\2019 06 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Receipts For the Six -Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 Month Received 2018 2019 7/15/2019 Difference February 2,353,128.35 2,530,639.23 177,510.88 7.54% March 1,744,900.00 1,861,849.29 116,949.29 6.70% April 1,757,754.18 1,758,550.64 796.46 0.05% May 2,173,916.87 2,208,350.09 34,433.22 1.58% June 1,991,560.58 2,200,987.91 209,427.33 10.52% 10, 021, 259.98 July 2,115,585.73 August 2,328,306.22 September 2,238,047.38 October 2,280,671.98 November 2,272,076.06 December 2,196,294.60 January 2,170,652.01 10, 560, 377.16 25, 622, 893.96 10, 560, 377.16 539,117.18 5.38% Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.9%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.9% tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% * - Criminal Justice 0.10% - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.40% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.80% * 8.90% Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 20 1 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Collections - May For the years 2010 through 2019 January February March April May P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax\2019\sales tax collections 2019.xlsx 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015 1 2016 1 2017 1 2018 1 2019 1,491,059 963,749 1,018,468 1,184,137 1,102, 523 1,460,548 990,157 1,015,762 1,284,180 1,187, 737 1,589,887 1,009,389 1,067,733 1,277,621 1,174, 962 1,671,269 1,133, 347 1,148, 486 1,358,834 1,320,449 1,677,887 1,170, 640 1,201,991 1,448,539 1,400,956 1,732,299 1,197, 323 1,235,252 1,462,096 1,373,710 1,863,225 1,316,682 1,378,300 1,640,913 1,566,178 1,992,273 1,369,740 1,389,644 1,737,933 1,564,119 2,078,412 1,536,252 1,564,282 1,926,551 1,762,119 2,240,908 1,648,657 1,549,275 1,955,470 1,946,112 Collected to date 5,759,936 5,938,384 6,119,592 6,632,385 6,900,013 7,000,680 7,765,298 8,053,709 8,867,616 9,340,422 June 1,123,907 1,248,218 1,290,976 1,389,802 1,462,558 1,693,461 1,641,642 1,751,936 1,871,077 0 July 1,260,873 1,332,834 1,302,706 1,424,243 1,545,052 1,718,428 1,776,653 1,935,028 2,053,961 0 August 1,211,450 1,279,500 1,299,678 1,465,563 1,575,371 1,684,700 1,746,371 1,877,899 1,980,940 0 September 1,191,558 1,294,403 1,383,123 1,466,148 1,552,736 1,563,950 1,816,923 1,946,689 2,019,198 0 October 1,269,505 1,291,217 1,358,533 1,439,321 1,594,503 1,618,821 1,822,998 1,898,067 2,005,836 0 November 1,139,058 1,217,933 1,349,580 1,362,021 1,426,254 1,487,624 1,652,181 1,768,817 1,925,817 0 December 1,141, 012 1,247, 920 1,323,189 1,408,134 1,383, 596 1,441,904 1,664, 983 1,856, 989 1,918, 411 0 Total Collections 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 18,209,568 19,887,049 21,089,134 22,642,856 9,340,422 Budget Estimate 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400 18,480,500 19,852,100 20,881,900 22,917,000 Actual over (under) budg (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 581,168 1,406,549 1,237,034 1,760,956 (13,576,578) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 97.83% 104.51 % 108.57% 108.77% 102.65% 103.30% 107.61 % 106.23% 108.43% n/a % change in annual total collected (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% 4.41% 9.21% 6.04% 7.37% n/a % of budget collected through May 39.97% 41.79% 43.07% 43.49% 40.61% 39.71% 42.02% 40.57% 42.47% 40.76% % of actual total collected through May 40.86% 39.99% 39.67% 39.98% 39.56% 38.45% 39.05% 38.19% 39.16% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 ■ May 7/17/2019 2019 to 2018 Difference ok 162,496 7.82% 112,405 7.32% (15,007) (0.96%) 28,919 1.50% 183,993 10.44% 472,806 5.33% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 • May • April • March • February • January Page 21 1 • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through - Actual for the years 2010 through 2019 January February March April May Total Collections P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax\2019\105 hotel motel tax 2019.xlsx 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015 1 2016 1 2017 1 2018 1 2019 7/2/2019 2019 to 2018 Difference 22,707 22,212 21,442 24,185 25,425 27,092 31,887 27,210 28,752 31,865 3,113 10.83% 23,417 22,792 21,549 25,975 26,014 27,111 27,773 26,795 28,878 32,821 3,943 13.65% 24,232 24,611 25,655 27,739 29,384 32,998 34,330 31,601 31,906 40,076 8,170 25.61% 39,463 38,230 52,130 40,979 48,246 50,455 52,551 52,242 57,664 59,117 1,453 2.52% 34,683 33,791 37,478 40,560 41,123 44,283 50,230 50,112 51,777 53,596 1,819 3.51% 144,503 141,637 158,255 159,438 170,191 181,939 196,771 187,960 198,977 217,475 18,498 9.30% June 39,935 41,403 43,971 47,850 52,618 56,975 55,060 60,637 62,048 0 July 47,385 49,312 52,819 56,157 61,514 61,809 65,007 69,337 71,865 0 August 54,923 57,452 57,229 63,816 70,384 72,697 73,700 76,972 79,368 0 September 59,419 58,908 64,299 70,794 76,100 74,051 70,305 80,173 79,661 0 October 41,272 39,028 43,699 43,836 45,604 49,880 55,660 56,631 61,826 0 November 34,330 37,339 39,301 42,542 39,600 42,376 46,393 47,090 52,868 0 December 26,777 32,523 30,432 34,238 33,256 41,510 33,478 37,180 40,363 0 Total Collections 448,545 457,603 490,004 518,672 549,267 581,237 596,374 615,980 646,976 217,475 Budget Estimate 380,000 480,000 430,000 490,000 530,000 550,000 580,000 580,000 580,000 600,000 Actual over (under) budg 68,545 (22,397) 60,004 28,672 19,267 31,237 16,374 35,980 66,976 (382,525) Total actual collections as a % of total budget % change in annual total collected % of budget collected through May 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% 105.68% 102.82% 106.20% 111.55% n/a 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% 5.82% 2.60% 3.29% 5.03% n/a 38.03% 29.51% 36.80% 32.54% 32.11% 33.08% 33.93% 32.41% 34.31% 36.25% % of actual total collected through May 32.22% 30.95% 32.30% 30.74% 30.99% 31.30% 32.99% 30.51% 30.75% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 2010 2011 May 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 May April March February January Page 22 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 1st and 2nd 1/4% REET Collections through May Actual for the years 2010 through 2019 January February March April May Collected to date P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\REET\2019\301 and 302 REET for 2019.xlsx 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 1 2019 59,887 64,122 86,204 99,507 109,625 64,128 36,443 95,880 79,681 124,692 46,359 56,115 71,730 86,537 111,627 56,898 155,226 72,172 90,377 116,165 61,192 67,049 81,724 105,448 198,870 96,141 103,508 165,868 236,521 165,748 104,446 83,583 220,637 205,654 192,806 153,661 124,514 282,724 169,060 202,734 239,437 146,892 310,562 218,842 646,397 120,809 199,209 193,913 347,528 263,171 7/17/2019 2019 to 2018 Difference (118,628) (49.54%) 52,317 35.62% (116,649) (37.56%) 128,686 58.80% (383,226) (59.29%) 419,345 400,824 372,367 490,838 514,282 767,786 807,128 932,693 1,562,130 1,124,630 (437,500) (28.01%) June 105,680 81,579 124,976 139,112 106,676 347,421 284,897 248,768 277,424 0 July 84,834 79,629 101,049 128,921 208,199 217,375 248,899 449,654 302,941 0 August 72,630 129,472 106,517 117,150 172,536 202,525 231,200 472,420 261,626 0 September 75,812 68,020 63,517 174,070 152,323 179,849 178,046 187,348 259,492 0 October 93,256 61,396 238,095 117,806 123,505 128,833 253,038 207,895 584,792 0 November 72,021 74,753 104,886 78,324 172,227 129,870 186,434 229,800 263,115 0 December 38,725 65,077 74,300 75,429 117,682 157,919 164,180 278,995 288,912 0 Total distributed by Spokane County 962,304 960,751 1,185,707 1,321,650 1,567,429 2,131,578 2,353,822 3,007,573 3,800,432 1,124,630 Budget estimate 1,380,000 780,000 875,000 975,000 1,100,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 Actual over (under) budget (417,696) 180,751 310,707 346,650 467,429 731,578 353,822 1,007,573 800,432 (875,370) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 69.73% 123.17% 135.51% 135.55% 142.49% 152.26% 117.69% 150.38% 126.68% n/a % change in annual total collected (11.57%) (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% 18.60% 35.99% 10.43% 27.77% 26.36% n/a % of budget collected through May % of actual total collected through May 30.39% 51.39% 42.56% 50.34% 46.75% 54.84% 40.36% 46.63% 52.07% 56.23% 43.58% 41.72% 31.40% 37.14% 32.81% 36.02% 34.29% 31.01% 41.10% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 May 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 • May • April • March • February • Ja nua ry Page 23 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Debt Capacity\2019\debt capacity 2019.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Debt Capacity 2018 Assessed Value for 2019 Property Taxes 9,351,389,045 Voted (UTGO) Nonvoted (LTGO) Voted park Voted utility 1.00% of assessed value 1.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt ok Capacity 12/31/2018 Capacity Utilized 93,513,890 140,270,836 233, 784, 726 233, 784, 726 701, 354,178 0 93,513,890 12, 270, 000 128, 000, 836 0 233,784,726 0 233,784,726 12,270,000 689,084,178 0.00% 8.75% 0.00% 0.00% 1.75% Bonds Repaid 2014 LTGO Bonds 12/1/2014 12/1/2015 12/1/2016 12/1/2017 12/1/2018 225,000 175,000 185,000 190,000 230,000 135,000 125,000 130,000 130,000 135,000 360,000 300,000 315,000 320,000 365,000 0 0 75,000 150,000 155,000 360,000 300,000 390,000 470,000 520,000 1,005,000 655,000 1,660,000 \ 380,000 2,040,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 95,000 660,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 00,000 705,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 2 5,000 600,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 2 5,000 515,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 220,000 465,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 225,000 450,000 Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 235,000 415,000 Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 240,000 370,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000 12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,000 260,000 12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,000 270,000 12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,000 280,000 12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,000 290,000 12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,00 305,000 12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,00 315,000 12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 12/1/2042 0 0 0 355,000 355,000 12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000 12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000 4,645,000 730,000 5,375,000 6,895,000 12,270,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275,000 14,310,000 Page 24 4/22/2019 Road & LTGO Bonds Period Street 2016 LTGO Grand Ending CenterPlace Improvements Total Bonds Total 12/1/2014 12/1/2015 12/1/2016 12/1/2017 12/1/2018 225,000 175,000 185,000 190,000 230,000 135,000 125,000 130,000 130,000 135,000 360,000 300,000 315,000 320,000 365,000 0 0 75,000 150,000 155,000 360,000 300,000 390,000 470,000 520,000 1,005,000 655,000 1,660,000 \ 380,000 2,040,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 160,000 555,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 165,000 595,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 170,000 635,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 175,000 675,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 180,000 725,000 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 185,000 615,000 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 95,000 660,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 00,000 705,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 2 5,000 600,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 2 5,000 515,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 220,000 465,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 225,000 450,000 Bonds 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 235,000 415,000 Remaining 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 240,000 370,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 250,000 415,000 12/1/2034 0 0 0 260,000 260,000 12/1/2035 0 0 0 270,000 270,000 12/1/2036 0 0 0 280,000 280,000 12/1/2037 0 0 0 290,000 290,000 12/1/2038 0 0 0 305,00 305,000 12/1/2039 0 0 0 315,00 315,000 12/1/2040 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 12/1/2041 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 12/1/2042 0 0 0 355,000 355,000 12/1/2043 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 12/1/2044 0 0 0 375,000 375,000 12/1/2045 0 0 0 390,000 390,000 4,645,000 730,000 5,375,000 6,895,000 12,270,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 7,275,000 14,310,000 Page 24 4/22/2019 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Motor Fuel (Gas) Tax Collections - May For the years 2010 through 2019 January February March April May P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue \MVFT\2019\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2019.xlsx 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015 1 2016 1 2017 1 2018 1 2019 161,298 145,869 140,486 161,721 158,119 154,792 146,353 141,849 165,019 154,700 159,607 135,208 144,297 153,546 144,670 146,145 145,998 135,695 156,529 151,595 152,906 148,118 131,247 156,269 156,850 152,598 145,455 140,999 157,994 156,259 163,918 163,037 145,537 167,304 171,829 150,654 164,807 138,205 168,000 174,211 162,359 175,936 139,826 168,796 193,986 148,530 181,823 131,009 144,080 185,669 7/17/2019 2019 to 2018 Difference ok (13,829) (8.52%) 5,887 3.35% (8,817) (6.31%) (24,716) (14.64%) (8,317) (4.29%) Collected to date 767,493 762,713 737,328 735,962 745,390 753,305 811,625 795,877 840,903 791,111 (49,792) (5.92%) June 168,146 158,351 159,827 167,479 161,965 164,872 157,737 174,838 144,308 0 July 164,221 165,398 160,565 155,348 157,805 168,205 177,427 177,019 194,267 0 August 176,869 153,361 164,050 173,983 172,308 186,277 177,567 195,780 205,438 0 September 175,067 173,820 171,651 195,397 173,299 174,505 194,640 184,342 180,874 0 October 164,475 158,889 153,022 133,441 160,539 161,520 166,369 163,780 158,062 0 November 168,477 160,461 162,324 164,303 165,871 181,771 176,178 194,814 199,282 0 December 143,257 124,714 138,223 142,140 141,298 153,338 152,787 154,298 148,960 0 Total Collections 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,943,793 2,014,330 2,040,748 2,072,094 791,111 Budget Estimate 1,900,000 1,875,000 1,905,800 1,868,900 1,866,400 1,867,700 2,013,400 2,048,900 2,061,100 2,101,100 Actual over (under) budg 28,005 (17,293) (58,810) (847) 12,075 76,093 930 (8,152) 10,994 (1,309,989) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 101.47% 99.08% 96.91 % 99.95% 100.65% 104.07% 100.05% 99.60% 100.53% n/a % change in annual total collected 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% 3.48% 3.63% 1.31% 1.54% n/a % of budget collected through 40.39% 40.68% 38.69% 39.38% 39.94% 40.33% 40.31% 38.84% 40.80% 37.65% % of actual total collected through May 39.81% 41.06% 39.92% 39.40% 39.68% 38.75% 40.29% 39.00% 40.58% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 M ay 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 May April March February January Page 25 • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Telephone Utility Tax Collections - May For the years 2010 through 2019 January February March April May P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2019\telephone utility tax collections 2019.xlsx 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 234,622 266,041 264,175 254,984 255,056 241,357 230,366 245,539 238,561 236,985 193,818 261,074 234,113 229,565 227,469 217,478 216,552 223,884 214,618 129,270 210,777 205,953 208,206 206,038 210,010 177,948 212,845 174,738 214,431 187,856 182,167 173,971 177,209 171,770 174,512 162,734 163,300 162,536 157,285 161,506 130,196 164,060 158,416 146,519 149,434 136,615 132,538 138,727 126,455 135,668 7/17/2019 2019 to 2018 Difference 6,419 4.93% (31,522) (19.21%) (19,689) (12.43%) (20,064) (13.69%) (13,766) (9.21%) Collected to date 1,274,878 1,192,808 1,146,039 1,001,802 1,040,984 967,818 879,629 807,361 748,625 670,003 (78,622) (10.50%) June 251,880 239,013 234,542 293,668 210,289 187,412 170,450 156,023 150,780 0 July 250,593 244,191 226,118 213,078 205,651 190,984 174,405 157,502 147,281 0 August 246,261 349,669 228,789 211,929 205,645 185,172 171,909 150,644 148,158 0 September 240,111 241,476 227,042 210,602 199,193 183,351 170,476 155,977 141,290 0 October 238,500 237,111 225,735 205,559 183,767 183,739 166,784 153,075 142,925 0 November 247,848 240,246 225,319 212,947 213,454 175,235 166,823 151,208 139,209 0 December 236,065 236,449 221,883 213,097 202,077 183,472 168,832 161,115 140,102 0 Total Collections 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 2,257,183 2,069,308 1,892,905 1,758,370 670,003 Budget Estimate 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 2,340,000 2,000,000 1,900,000 1,700,000 Actual over (under) budg 186,136 (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (307,917) (270,692) (107,095) (141,630) (1,029,997) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 106.65% 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% 88.00% 88.43% 94.65% 92.55% n/a % change in annual total collected (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) (8.28%) (8.32%) (8.52%) (7.11%) n/a % of budget collected through May 45.53% 39.76% 38.20% 34.54% 37.85% 37.73% 37.59% 40.37% 39.40% 39.41% % of actual total collected through May 42.69% 40.01% 41.90% 39.09% 42.30% 42.88% 42.51% 42.65% 42.57% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of May 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 May 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 • May • April • March • February • January Page 26 PARKS AND RECREATION Siokane SECOND QUARTER REPORT jValley° APRIL—JUNE 2019 ADMINISTRATION AND PARKS: • Contracts worked on in the second quarter include: o Construction Agreement to remove and replace the existing fir tree in front of City Hall Sewer Connection Charge Agreement for sewer connection for the restroom at the Appleway Trail University to Pines trailhead o Agreement for Services for our recreation management software o Agreement for Recreational Services to conduct sports camps for kids ages 4-12 as part of our recreation program o Agreement for Recreational Services to conduct sports development programs for kids ages 3-6 years as part of our recreation program o Agreement for Professional Services for a Spokane Valley River Trail System Plan o Agreement for Professional Services for the Balfour Park Master Plan Update o Agreement for Professional Services for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Park Inventory o Agreement for Janitorial Services for CenterPlace o Area Lighting Agreement for a new pole and lighting in the parking lot at Terrace View Construction Agreement for the Browns Park 2019 Improvements project o Amendment to the Lease Agreement with the Western Dance Association for leasing the dance hall located at Sullivan Park o Agreement for Services for Summer Day Camp transportation to field trips o Agreement for Recreational Services for a musical entertainment at "Game On!" at Terrace View Park o Agreement for Recreational Services for our Outdoor Movies in the Park o Agreement for Design Services for the CenterPlace West Lawn Phase 2 • Staff spent considerable time developing and putting together the City budget for our department for 2020. The budget workshop was held on June 11. • Our Park Ambassador was added for the summer season. This position has proven to be invaluable as a direct liaison with the citizens and shelter reservations, and for helping solve numerous problems that arise on evenings and weekends in the parks. • Staff worked on completing the City's Business Plan. • The Appleway Trail Amenities University to Pines Project was completed. The project consisted of additional amenities such as a restroom, topsoil, limited turf and dryland seeding, trees, drinking fountain, and benches. • Bids for the Browns Park 2019 Improvements were opened on May 17. The project consists of demolition of existing shelter and restroom building, installing new restroom, two shelters, asphalt trail with lighting and a skate dot. Onsite work will begin August 19, when the bulk of the volleyball season winds down. 1 ADMINISTRATION AND PARKS CONT'D: • Staff has been working on completing the paperwork for the Department of Commerce for the Direct -Appropriation grant received for Browns Park. This grant will provide for all new play equipment, a new shelter and restroom located in the southwest section of the park. • The process to update the Balfour Park Master Plan has been initiated. Staff is working with Bernardo Wills and Associates who prepared the original master plan. • Staff was met with representatives of Redeemer Lutheran Church to discuss potential park development. Currently staff is reviewing floodplain and traffic issues. • Staff is responsible for the setting up, taking down and staffing of the City's booth at the Friday Farmers Market in the parking lot. • Staff has been participating, along with other City staff, on continued discussions regarding a variety of potential tourism venues that the Council has been discussing. • Plans and specifications were developed and put out to bid for the Edgecliff Park Swings Project. Bids were due on July 10. • A new gate and jersey barriers were installed at the entrances to Myrna Park. These improvements will help control access and parking at the park. • Staff has been working with Economic Development to update the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The last update was done in 2013. Two community meetings/workshops were held in May and June, and we received enthusiastic participation from the public. These gave citizens the opportunity to provide input and feedback regarding needs, priorities, and amenities for parks and recreation programs. The update process will continue throughout the summer with input being gathered at our free movies in the parks and our "Game On!" event. The process will wrap up in September. Additionally, a statically valid telephone survey will be conducted. 2 CENTERPLACE: • CenterPlace hosted 320 events in the second quarter of 2019. We also have a total of 856 reservations on the books for 2019 and 191 for 2020. • CenterPlace staff participated in three business fairs this quarter. All three of these fairs represented different business segments: o The Inland Northwest Business Travel Association Trade show which was held at the Spokane Convention Center April 16, 2019. It is a good opportunity to showcase CenterPlace to Meeting Planners and meet with the people that plan meetings for their organizations. o The Post Falls Chamber Business Fair on April 24 at the Greyhound Event Center in Post Falls. This particular business fair attracts more local residents than any other business fairs in the area. o The Greater Spokane Valley Chamber Business Fair at the Mirabeau Park Hotel on May 2. • The Farmer's Market, which is being organized by the JAKT Foundation, started June 7 and will run through September 13. The market is held in the CenterPlace parking lot every Friday from 5:00-8:00 p.m. The event features over 30 vendors and food trucks, and also provides a beer garden and live music as well. It has been very popular with approximately 1,000 attendees each Friday. • Staff worked with Parks and Recreation and IT staff to determine to move our Sportsman Reservation Software to the cloud. The software was previously housed on the City's servers and crashed when we had a large group of participants trying to register for classes such as swim lessons or swim team. Peak, the Software manufacturer, has the ability to process lessons and payments more quickly. • We recruited and filled the CenterPlace Office Assistant I position at the front desk. Laura Goulding comes to us from Fairchild Air Force Base where she worked for 18 years in various hospitality positions. We are pleased to have such a crucial position filled as we enter our peak summer season. • CenterPlace also filled three vacant part-time Recreation Assistant -Host positions to cover events at CenterPlace, and assisted in the interviews of the summer Recreation staff. • Parks and Recreation and CenterPlace phones have started using an automated answering attendant to help with the many phone calls that we receive over the summer. This helps us better direct calls to the right people and cuts down on the extra summer staff needed to help with the phones during the summer. • CenterPlace is going to a new inventory system for our rental of linens and napkins. We were on a stocking system that had a weekly minimum inventory on the shelf. We are going to a system that we will be ordering weekly instead of keeping an inventory on hand. This should help to reduce costs for linens, especially during CenterPlace's slower months. • Staff met with representatives from the Community Colleges of Spokane regarding a new lease. Their lease expired on June 30, 2019. We negotiated a three-month extension while the new lease is being prepared. The Community Colleges would like to reduce rental space from three rooms to one room, which will be used for exercise classes. The reduction is due to budget cutbacks. CenterPlace can utilize the extra rooms on the second floor for events. 3 RECREATION AND AQUATICS: • With the start of the summer season, we interviewed, hired and trained recreation staff for all our programs. Ten Camp Counselors were hired to work in our Summer Day Camp and our Teen Camp, three Park Program Leads were hired to staff our Free Summer Park Program, and one Recreation Intern joined us for the 2019 season. • Four teens (ages 14-16) are participating in the Counselor In Training Program this season. For involvement in this exciting program, participants completed an application and interview. CITs learn leadership skills, team building strategies and implementation, communication skills, and gain CPR/First Aid Certification. After they complete the course, they shadow at Summer Day Camp and Park Programs to gain hands-on experience. • Summer Day Camp began the week of June 17. All camps filled to capacity quickly after registration began. Waitlists are available in case of cancelations. Each week, 56 campers (ages 6-11 years) go on exciting field trips, go swimming, and visit local parks. • The free Summer Park Program began with a "ROAR" as the Spokane County Library District helped us kick off this fantastic park program at three of our Spokane Valley Parks. Jenks Juggling and Children's Music That Really Rocks entertained the crowds at Edgecliff Park, Terrace View Park, and Valley Mission Park. The Franz Grilled Cheese Machine joined our kick off event and served up free grilled cheese sandwiches at Valley Mission Park. This Free Summer Park Program is June 17 -Aug 1. Our onsite summer Parks and Recreation staff lead games, arts, crafts, and other fun activities Monday through Thursday mornings. Due to a great partnership with East Valley School District, we are able to offer free meals for all children 18 years and younger at these parks. To date, we have served over 2,000 breakfasts and 1,100 lunches. • Park Road Pool and Terrace View Pool opened for the season June 15 with Valley Mission Pool to follow. Registrations for swim lessons continue to be popular at all three pools. Swim team is extremely popular, with 175 team members. Swim meets are held Wednesday evenings at Park Road Pool. • Tina Gregerson, our Recreation Coordinator, attended the Washington Recreation and Parks Association Annual Conference and Trade Show at the Hilton Convention Center in Vancouver, WA April 9-12 This is a great opportunity to meet up with more than 400 WRPA professionals to network and learn within the Parks and Recreation industry, and to discover new products and services. 4 RECREATION AND AQUATICS CONT'D: • Planning and preparation began for our "GAME ON!" event on Sunday, July 28, celebrating National Parks and Recreation Month. This event will take place at Terrace View Park from 1:00-5:00 p.m. The Parks and Recreation Department is collaborating with the Spokane Parks Foundation / Make a Splash in a Kids Life, Franz Bakery, and Umpqua Bank to provide free swimming, free grilled cheese sandwiches and hot dogs, and free frozen treats. There will also be games and activities, along with music too. SENIOR CENTER: • Senior Center volunteers met at Darcy's on April 20 for a Volunteer Luncheon. • A luncheon was held on May 9 for all the Senior Center front desk volunteers. The Act 2 Program Manager, Wendy Drum, from Spokane Community Colleges addressed the group about the Act 2 program, and Larry Murdza spoke about Alzheimer's and Dementia. • On May 23, Jane Franks was recognized for her 35 years of volunteer service to our Spokane Valley Senior Center. Jane's family was in attendance for this surprise honor and plaque presentation. During Jane's years of service she has served on the Senior Center Board of Directors, participated in countless activities, and continues to volunteer at the Senior Center Front Desk. • A new class began for seniors to socialize and finish projects. The seniors are enjoying and participating in this new class entitled Projects Half Done (PHD). This class meets in the Arts & Crafts Room on Fridays from 1:00-4:00 p.m. • Table tennis continues to be a big hit in the Senior Center! This activity is averaging over 235 participants a month. This provides a great active, competitive, and lively activity for all participants. • The Senior Center hosts a weekly dance every Wednesday afternoon. Everyone in attendance enjoyed the live music provided by Dick Baker for "After Dark" in May for the Senior Center Dance. Numbers That Count... April May June Total Attendance 2,381 2,645 2,216 New Members 17 17 14 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 23, 2019 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ['public hearing ['information ❑admin. report ['pending legislation ® executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Acquisition of Real Estate GOVERNING LEGISLATION: [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)] PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "I move that Council adjourn into executive session for approximately thirty minutes to discuss acquisition of real estate, and that no action will be taken upon return to open session." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman ATTACHMENTS: