The URL can be used to link to this page

2019, 10-01 Study Session AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday, October 1,2019 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10210 E Sprague Avenue (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA ACTION ITEM: 1.Motion Consideration: Request to Participate Via Telephone October 15 Council Meeting—Deputy Mayor Haley [public comment] 2.Motion Consideration: City Hall Council Chamber East Wall Repair-John Hohman, Cary Driskell [public comment] NON-ACTION ITEMS: DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 3.John Whitehead New Employee Quarterly Report Discussion/Information 4. Chelsie Taylor Proposed 2019 Budget Amendment Discussion/Information 5.Mike Stone, Chaz Bates Parks&Recreation Master Plan Update Discussion/Information 6.Adam Jackson Grant Award History Discussion/Information 7.Adam Jackson Potential Grant Opportunity: Freight Rail Discussion/Information Assistance Program (FRAP) 8.Adam Jackson,John Hohman, Pavement Preservation Discussion/Information Bill Helbig, Chelsie Taylor 9.Mayor Higgins Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 10. Information Only(will not be reported or discussed):Police Department Monthly Report 11.Mayor Higgins Council Comments Discussion/Information 12.Mark Calhoun City Manager Comments Discussion/Information 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pending Litigation [RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)] ADJOURN Study Session Agenda,October 1,2019 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 1, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Request to Participate via telephone October 15, 2019 Council meeting GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City Governance Manual, Chapter 1, C7: "7. Councilmember Meeting Participation by Telephone/Video Conference Telephone/video conference participation by Councilmembers may be allowed provided that a quorum of Councilmembers shall be physically present for the Council meeting in question, and provided technical availability and compatibility of electronic equipment enables the conferencing Councilmember(s) to hear the proceedings, be heard by those present, and participate in Council discussion. More than one Councilmember may request participation via telephone for the same meeting, provided that those Councilmembers would be able to be reached at the same phone number, as the Council Chamber's current system can only accommodate the use of one telephone number per meeting. a. Requests to use telephone/video conference participation shall be approved by the Council by motion. Such participating Councilmember(s) shall be present and counted. So as not to disrupt the Council meeting,adequate notice shall be given to allow appropriate setup in time for the beginning of the meeting. b. Telephone/video conference participation for voting purposes shall be allowed for public hearings or any quasi-judicial proceedings, and the requesting Councilmember(s)shall declare that (s)he has reviewed the associated material (if any)provided for those hearings and/or proceedings prior to the time the vote will be taken by Council." PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: n/a BACKGROUND: Deputy Mayor Haley has indicated she will be out of town October 15, 2019, but would like to participate in the meeting via telephone conference call. OPTIONS: Council Discretion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Deputy Mayor Haley's request to participate in the October 15, 2019 Council meeting via telephone conference. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: na STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Deputy Mayor Haley ATTACHMENTS: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 1,2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ®new business ❑public hearing ❑information ❑ admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: City Hall Council Chamber east wall repair work. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.40.020. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:There have been multiple meetings relating to the design and approval of the City Hall contract,including the bid award to Meridian Construction on May 3,2016. The building was substantially completed in early September, 2017, and the City received a certificate of occupancy on September 5,2017. On March 19,2019 and on September 24,2019,Council heard an update on the status of the east Council Chamber wall. BACKGROUND: Since the City moved into City Hall in early September,2017,staff noted various punch list items to be completed or fixed by the construction contractor, Meridian, which they did over several months. In addition to these punch list items, staff noted what appeared to be settling of the building along the curved east wall of the Council Chambers.After advising Meridian of the issue in 2018,staff continued to monitor the issue through the assistance of several experts to analyze the extent of the issue, including potential options for repair. On February 21,2019,the City filed a claim against Meridian Construction pursuant to the contract to work toward resolution. Staff is providing this report to update the Council and public on the status of the repairs. As stated in the previous report,the City contracted with a structural engineer who has determined that the Chambers are safe to occupy while this issue is addressed. Staff and consultants retained by the City are concerned about additional settling damage to the wall unless repairs are made prior to this winter. As such,staff has identified this as an emergency pursuant to SVMC 3.40.020(C). As such, staff cannot timely adhere to the bidding practices adopted by Council, and staff seeks a declaration by Council that an emergency exists for purposes of repairing the damage prior to winter. Staff has selected a contractor with appropriate experience to analyze and repair the damage, and the firm is named Construction Services. This firm will act as the general contractor, and work with Budinger & Associates to install nine micropiles with attaching brackets deep under the building at stable native soil. Although much of the repair work is known, a portion includes removal of concrete inside the Chamber along the curved wall for additional testing to determine if there is additional damage that needs to be repaired. If additional repairs are needed,then there will be additional costs. Given the level of uncertainty, staff is presenting this motion as authorization as a"not to exceed" construction contract up to $400,000. As previously stated, all such repair costs are being submitted to Meridian Construction pursuant to the City's prior contract to build a City Hall free of defects such as this. If staff finds additional authorization is necessary,we will return to Council. Staff will update Council as appropriate and necessary once we have more information on the additional inspections. OPTIONS: (1) Motion to declare emergency conditions exist relative to repairing the curved wall area, and authorizing staff to contract for repairs to the same; or(2)take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we declare that emergency conditions exist for repair of the Council Chamber curved east wall area pursuant to SVMC 3.40.020(C) due to approaching winter,that there is insufficient time to comply with the competitive bidding requirements of chapter 3.40 SVMC, and that the City Manager is authorized to finalize and execute any contracts necessary to repair the curved east wall area,in an amount not to exceed $400,000. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Total estimated cost to repair the east wall of the Council Chambers is$500,000,including repairs and consultant efforts. The cost will be offset by a$500,000 reimbursement paid by Meridian Construction. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; John Hohman, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS: None. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 1, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: New Employee Report GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Spokane Valley City Council previously requested to be informed quarterly of new employees that are appointed to City positions. BACKGROUND: The following employee has been appointed in the second quarter of 2019: Marianne Lemons, Appointed 9-16-19 to the position of Office Assistant II, as the receptionist in the 1St floor lobby and as support for the Building Division. OPTIONS: Discussion/information RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion/information BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This position is included as part of the 93.75 FTEs included in the 2019 Budget. This appointment reflects the replacement of a position previously vacated. STAFF CONTACT: John Whitehead, Human Resources Manager ATTACHMENTS n/a CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 1, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed 2019 Budget Amendment. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: In order for the City to amend an adopted budget, State law requires the Council to approve an ordinance that appropriates additional funds. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council last took formal action on the 2019 Budget when it was amended on June 4, 2019 for the second time. BACKGROUND: Since the amendment of the 2019 Budget on June 4, 2019, a number of events have transpired in the normal course of operations that necessitate a third 2019 Budget amendment. They include: #001 - General Fund Nonrecurring revenues are increased by $500,000 to account for reimbursements to the City for amounts spend in repairing the east wall in council chambers at City Hall (see additional information under expenditures below). Provide additional appropriations (expenditures) of$1,061,102 comprised of: • $10,102 for the City's share of a Census Coordinator for the 2020 census in partnership with the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) and other local jurisdictions. • $30,000 for additional outside legal services due to an increased need for outside legal expertise on issues during 2019. • $500,000 in nonrecurring expenditures for repairs to the east wall in council chambers at City Hall. Staff believes this to be a conservative estimate and expects actual costs to be less than this amount. Costs incurred by the City will be reimbursed and are also included in the budget amendment as a nonrecurring revenue (see above). • $500,000 in nonrecurring transfers out to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309 to fund phase two of improvements to the CenterPlace west lawn. This project will be partially completed in 2019 and 2020, with total costs of$2,000,000 over the two years. • $21,000 in nonrecurring transfers out to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309 to fund preliminary engineering for replacement of the CenterPlace roof. #101 — Street O&M Fund Decrease revenues by $161,400 due to updated estimates for the Telephone Utility Tax, which represents a decrease of $100,000, and Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes, which represents a decrease of$61,400. #105 — Hotel/Motel Tax Fund Decrease in expenditures for tourism promotion in the amount of $108,000. This decrease matches the total budgeted expenditures to actual lodging tax awards approved by Council in December 2018. Page 1 of 4 #106 — Solid Waste Fund Increase transfers out to the Pavement Preservation Fund #311 by $108,028 due to 2018 receipts of the road wear administration fee related to the Waste Management collection contract exceeding previous estimates. #301 — REET 1 Capital Projects Fund Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue is increased by $400,000 based on revised revenue projections. Increase expenditures by $372,617 due to changes in expected transfers out to the Street Capital Projects Fund #303 to reflect current estimates for various projects and the Railroad Grade Separation Projects Fund #314 for the Barker Grade Separation project. Grant proceeds are expected to be expended prior to City REET funds to the extent possible. #302 — REET 2 Capital Projects Fund Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue is increased by $400,000 based on revised revenue projections. Increase expenditures by $188,153 due to changes in the expected transfers out to the Street Capital Projects Fund #303 to reflect current estimates for various projects. #303 — Street Capital Projects Fund Both revenue and expenditures decrease by $2,742,317 to reflect current estimates on a number of projects, including the Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection, widening of Barker Road, and construction of the extension of Garland Avenue. #309 — Park Capital Projects Fund This fund is being amended to reflect current estimates on a number of projects. Revenues are increase by $2,949,602 reflecting: • $2,132,152 increase in grant proceeds for the Evergreen to Sullivan segment of the Appleway Trail. • $500,000 increase in transfers in from the General Fund for phase two of improvements to the CenterPlace west lawn. See additional information above under the General Fund #001. • $21,000 increase in transfers in from the General Fund for preliminary engineering related to the replacement of the CenterPlace roof. • $296,450 increase in transfers in from the Capital Reserve Fund #312 for segments of the Appleway Trail. Expenditures increase by $3,016,981, including: • An increase of $11,791 for the Sullivan to Corbin segment of the Appleway Trail reflecting project closeout costs. • An increase of $2,293,021 for the Evergreen to Sullivan segment of the Appleway Trail due to construction on this project being moved up from 2020 to 2019. • An increase of $177,920 for amenities on the University to Pines segment of the Appleway Trail due to bids coming in at over the expected cost. • An increase of$1,249 for the Browns Park volleyball courts reflecting project closeout costs. • An increase of $12,000 on additional swingsets for playgrounds, which were previously included in the 2019 Budget for $25,000, due to the costs of project coming in excess of expectations. • An increase of $500,000 for phase two of improvements to the CenterPlace west lawn. See additional information above under the General Fund #001. • An increase of $21,000 for preliminary engineering related to the replacement of the CenterPlace roof. Page 2 of 4 #310 — Civic Facilities Capital Proiects Fund Expenditures are increased by $18,452 in transfers out to the Capital Reserve Fund #312. This amount reflects excess investment earnings that have accumulated in Fund #310. #311 — Pavement Preservation Fund This fund is being amended to reflect estimated progress on a number of projects as well as updates to estimated project costs. There is an increase of $2,297,255 in revenues, which primarily consist of increases to grant proceeds and developer fees. There is an increase of $2,021,621 for expenditures consisting primarily of work on the preservation project on University from Dishman Mica to 16th #312 — Capital Reserve Fund Revenues increase by $107,042 in transfers in from the Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund #310 and the City Hall Construction Fund #313, representing accumulated investment earnings in those funds. See explanations under those funds for additional information. Increases expenditures/appropriations of$114,548 include: • Decreases of$1,252,602 in transfers out to the Street Capital Projects Fund for improvements at 8th and Carnahan, widening of Barker Road, and construction of Garland Avenue. • Increases of$296,450 in transfers out to the Parks Capital Projects Fund #309 for segments of the Appleway Trail. • $226,700 for the purchase of land adjacent to the Spokane Valley Police Precinct. • $844,000 for the purchase of park land adjacent to Sullivan Park. #313 — City Hall Construction Fund Revenues increase by $954 representing estimated investment interest earnings. Expenditures increase by $88,590 in transfers out to the Capital Reserve Fund #312. This amount reflects excess investment earnings that have accumulated in Fund #313, and this transfer will eliminate the remaining fund balance in this fund. Once the remaining fund balance is eliminated, this Fund will be closed out as part of the 2020 Budget process. #314 — Railroad Grade Separation Fund Revenues and expenditures decrease by $394,024. These decreases are related to updated timing of work that is currently being done on the Barker Grade Separation Project. Page 3 of 4 The 2019 Budget amendment reflects the changes noted above and will affect 13 funds resulting in total revenue increases of $3,357,112 and appropriation/expenditure increases of $3,745,751. Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 500,000 1,061,102 101 Street O&M Fund (161,400) 0 105 HotelMotel Tax Fund 0 (108,000) 106 Solid Waste Fund 0 108,028 301 REET 1 Capital Projects Fund 400,000 372,617 302 REET 2 Capital Projects Fund 400,000 188,153 303 Street Capital Projects Fund (2,742,317) (2,742,317) 309 Parks Capital Projects Fund 2,949,602 3,016,981 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund 0 18,452 311 Pavement Preservation Fund 2,297,255 2,021,621 312 Capital Reserve Fund 107,042 114,548 313 City Hall Construction Fund 954 88,590 314 Railroad Grade Separation Projects Fund (394,024) (394,024) 3,357,112 3,745,751 OPTIONS: Future options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in-part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff seek Council consensus to move forward with amendments to the 2019 Budget as presented. If Council concurs, we anticipate the following calendar of events leading to Council approval of the amending ordinance. • October 22, 2019 — Public hearing on the 2019 Budget Amendment. • October 22, 2019 — First reading of Ordinance #19-016 amending the 2019 Budget. • November 12, 2019—Second reading of Ordinance #19-016 amending the 2019 Budget. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations for the 2019 Budget that were adopted on November 13, 2018 and subsequently amended on March 26, 2019 and June 4, 2019. There are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Fund level line-item detail of revenues and expenditures. • Fund summaries for all funds affected by the proposed budget amendment. Page 4 of 4 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\2019 Amendment No 3 Detail v1 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget-Amendment#3 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #001 -General Fund Recurring Expenditures Professional Services-Misc 001.011.000.511.60.41.05 - Census Coordinator for 2020 Census 0 10,102 10,102 Outside Legal Services 001.013.015.515.32.41.04 - Increased costs due to extra outside legal services 45,212 30,000 75,212 Total recurring expenditures 40,102 Nonrecurring Revenues Judgments and Settlements 001.033.099.369.40.00 - Reimbursement of repair to chambers east wall 0 500,000 500,000 Total nonrecurring revenues 500,000 Nonrecurring expenditures Building Repairs 001.033.099.518.30.48.01 - Repair chambers east wall 0 500,000 500,000 Transfers out-#309 001.090.099.597.30.00.90 - CenterPlace west lawn improvements 0 500,000 500,000 Transfers out-#309 001.090.099.597.30.00.90 - CenterPlace Roof 0 21,000 21,000 Total nonrecurring expenditures 1,021,000 Total of all General Fund revenues 500,000 Total of all General Fund expenditures 1,061,102 #101 -Street O&M Fund Revenues Telephone Utility Tax 101.042.000.316.47.01 - Revised revenue estimate 1,700,000 (100,000) 1,600,000 Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax 101.042.000.336.00.87 - Revised revenue estimate 2,092,300 (61,400) 2,030,900 Total revenues (161,400) #105-Hotel/Motel Tax Fund Expenditures Tourism Promotion 105.105.000.557.30.41.00 - Reduce to match actual awards for 2019 350,000 (108,000) 242,000 Total expenditures (108,000) Page 1 of 6 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\2019 Amendment No 3 Detail v1 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget-Amendment#3 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #106-Solid Waste Fund Expenditures Transfers out-#311 106.000.000.597.31.00.10 - 2018 road wear fee in excess of estimates 1,500,000 108,028 1,608,028 Total expenditures 108,028 #301 -REET 1 Capital Projects Fund Revenues REET 1 - 1st Quarter Percent 301.301.000.318.34.00 - Revised revenue estimate 1,000,000 400,000 1,400,000 Total revenues 400,000 Expenditures Transfers out-#303 301.000.000.597.30.00.30 - Updated construction project estimates 504,172 (28,436) 475,736 Transfers out-#314 301.000.000.597.31.00.40 - Updated construction project estimates 50,000 401,053 451,053 Total expenditures 372,617 #302-REET 2 Capital Projects Fund Revenues REET 2-2nd Quarter Percent 302.302.000.318.35.00 - Revised revenue estimate 1,000,000 400,000 1,400,000 Total revenues 400,000 Expenditures Transfers out-#303 302.000.000.597.30.00.30 - Updated construction project estimates 167,434 188,153 355,587 Total expenditures 188,153 Page 2 of 6 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\2019 Amendment No 3 Detail v1 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget-Amendment#3 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #303-Street Capital Projects Fund Revenues Grant Proceeds 303.000.000.330.00.00 - Updated construction project estimates 5,084,281 (1,101,953) 3,982,328 Developer Fees 303.000.000.367.12.01 - Updated construction project estimates 1,535,700 (547,479) 988,221 Transfer in -#301 303.000.000.397.30.10 - Updated construction project estimates 504,172 (28,436) 475,736 Transfer in -#302 303.000.000.397.30.20 - Updated construction project estimates 167,434 188,153 355,587 Transfer in -#312 303.000.000.397.31.20 - Updated construction project estimates 4,584,400 (1,252,602) 3,331,798 Total revenues (2,742,317) Expenditures Mission Ave. -Flora to Barker 303.000.123.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 5,000 23,791 28,791 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan PCC Inter 303.000.142.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 12,500 (11,915) 585 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improveme303.000.205.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 35,700 17,402 53,102 8th &Carnahan Intersection Improveme 303.000.247.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 45,000 (45,000) 0 Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection 303.000.249.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 1,167,287 (1,087,287) 80,000 32nd Ave Sidewalk-SR27 to Evergreei 303.000.258.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 5,000 (5,000) 0 N. Sullivan Corridor ITS Project 303.000.259.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 730,000 (666,302) 63,698 Wellesley Sidewalk 303.000.265.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 382,000 209,125 591,125 Mission Ave Sidewalk 303.000.267.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 420,000 (13,119) 406,881 Barker/I-90 Interchange 303.000.273.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 500,000 310,000 810,000 Barker Rd Widening -River to Euclid 303.000.275.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 310,000 (39,143) 270,857 Barker Rd Widening -Euclid to Garland 303.000.276.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 3,346,000 (754,940) 2,591,060 Barker Rd Widening-Garland to Trent 303.000.277.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 54,000 (54,000) 0 Wilbur Rd Sidewalk-Boone to Broadm 303.000.278.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 354,500 60,867 415,367 Knox Ave Sidewalk-Hutchinson to Sari 303.000.279.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 294,000 67,619 361,619 Highland Estates Connector 303.000.281.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 200,000 (154,000) 46,000 University Pres-Dishman-Mica to 16th 303.000.287.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 79,000 79,000 Adams Sidewalk Infill 303.000.291.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 62,406 62,406 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BI303.000.293.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 23,250 23,250 Citywide Reflective Signal Post Panels 303.000.294.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 5,200 5,200 Garland Ave Construction 303.000.295.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 3,000,000 (1,050,000) 1,950,000 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to F'303.000.299.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 48,000 48,000 Pines and Mission Intersection Improve 303.000.300.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 72,000 72,000 Park and Mission Intersection Improven 303.000.301.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 112,750 112,750 Ella Sidewalk-Broadway to Alki 303.000.302.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 30,979 30,979 S. Conklin Sidewalk 303.000.303.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 16,000 16,000 Total expenditures (2,742,317) #309-Parks Capital Projects Fund Page 3 of 6 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\2019 Amendment No 3 Detail v1 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget-Amendment#3 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget Revenues Grant Proceeds 309.000.000.333.20.20 - Appleway Trail construction update 572,308 2,132,152 2,704,460 Transfer in -#001 309.000.000.397.00.10 - CenterPlace west lawn improvements 1,320,000 500,000 - CenterPlace roof repairs 21,000 1,841,000 Transfer in -#312 309.000.000.397.31.20 - Appleway Trail construction update 14,788 296,450 311,238 Total revenues 2,949,602 Expenditures Appleway Trail (Sullivan to Corbin) 309.000.237.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 5,000 11,791 16,791 Appleway Trail (Evergreen to Sullivan) 309.000.268.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 72,500 2,293,021 2,365,521 Appleway Trail Amenities (Univ to Pines) 309.000.280.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 509,595 177,920 687,515 Browns Park volleyball courts 309.000.282.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 1,249 1,249 Swingsets 309.000.xxx.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 25,000 12,000 37,000 CenterPlace west lawn improvements 309.000.304.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 500,000 500,000 CenterPlace roof repairs 309.000.xxx.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 0 21,000 21,000 Total expenditures 3,016,981 #310-Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund Expenditures Transfers out-#312 310.000.000.597.31.00.20 - Excess interest income 0 18,452 18,452 Total expenditures 18,452 #311 -Pavement Preservation Fund Revenues Transfers in -#106 311.000.000.397.10.60 - 2018 road wear fee in excess of estimates 1,500,000 108,028 1,608,028 Grant Proceeds 311.000.xxx.333.20.20 - Updated construction project estimates 1,820,000 1,049,227 2,869,227 Developer Fees 311.000.xxx.367.12.01 0 1,140,000 1,140,000 Total revenues 2,297,255 Expenditures Pavement Preservation 311.000.xxx.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 7,238,200 2,021,621 9,259,821 Total expenditures 2,021,621 Page 4 of 6 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\2019 Amendment No 3 Detail v1 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget-Amendment#3 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget #312-Capital Reserve Fund Revenues Transfers in -#310 312.000.000.397.31.00 - Excess interest income 0 18,452 18,452 Transfers in -#313 312.000.000.397.31.30 - Excess interest income 0 88,590 88,590 Total revenues 107,042 Expenditures Transfers out-#303 (8th& Carnahan Inte 312.000.000.597.30.00.30 - Updated construction project estimates 45,000 (45,000) 0 Transfers out-#303 (Barker Road Corridc312.000.000.597.30.00.30 - Updated construction project estimates 3,034,400 (722,852) 2,311,548 Transfers out-#303 (Garland Ave.) 312.000.000.597.30.00.30 - Updated construction project estimates 1,500,000 (484,750) 1,015,250 Transfers out-#309 (Appleway Trail-Sui 312.000.000.597.30.00.90 - Updated construction project estimates 5,000 (5,000) 0 Transfers out-#309 (Appleway Trail-Ey(312.000.000.597.30.00.90 - Updated construction project estimates 9,788 301,450 311,238 Precinct Property Acquisition 312.000.000.594.21.61.00 - Land acquisition 0 226,700 226,700 DOT Park Property Acquisition 312.000.000.594.76.61.00 - Land acquisition 0 844,000 844,000 Total expenditures 114,548 #313-City Hall Construction Fund Revenues Investment Interest 313.000.000.361.11.00 - Revised revenue estimate 0 954 954 Total revenues 954 Expenditures Transfers out-#312 313.000.000.597.31.00.20 - Excess interest income 0 88,590 88,590 Total expenditures 88,590 #314-Railroad Grade Separation Projects Fund Revenues Grant Proceeds 314.000.xxx.333.20.20 - Updated construction project estimates 3,750,000 (795,077) 2,954,923 Transfers in -#301 314.000.143.397.30.10 - Updated construction project estimates 50,000 401,053 451,053 Total revenues (394,024) Expenditures Barker BNSF Grade Separation 314.000.143.595.xx.xx.xx - Updated construction project estimates 3,800,000 (394,024) 3,405,976 Total expenditures (394,024) Page 5 of 6 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\2019 Amendment No 3 Detail v1 for RCA.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget-Amendment#3 Line Item Detail Account Account Initial Amended Description Number Description/Justification Budget Amendment Budget Totals Across all Funds Total revenues 3,357,112 Total expenditures 3,745,751 Page 6 of 6 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 12,054,400 0 0 0 12,054,400 Sales Tax 22,917,000 0 0 0 22,917,000 Sales Tax-Public Safety 1,081,900 0 0 0 1,081,900 Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 1,944,000 0 0 0 1,944,000 Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 387,000 0 0 0 387,000 Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,224,000 0 0 0 1,224,000 State Shared Revenues 1,909,800 0 0 0 1,909,800 Fines and Forfeitures/Public Safety 1,078,500 0 0 0 1,078,500 Community and Public Works 1,882,300 0 0 0 1,882,300 Recreation Program Revenues 628,800 0 0 0 628,800 Miscellaneous Department Revenue 1,000 500 0 0 1,500 Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 358,200 0 0 0 358,200 Transfers in-#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Total Recurring Revenues 45,496,900 500 0 0 45,497,400 Expenditures City Council 545,903 66,456 0 10,102 622,461 City Manager 948,835 15,692 0 0 964,527 City Attorney 610,549 8,207 0 30,000 648,756 Public Safety 25,927,304 184 0 0 25,927,488 Deputy City Manager 267,044 4,000 0 0 271,044 Finance/IT 1,402,497 25,203 0 0 1,427,700 Human Resources 297,421 8,422 0 0 305,843 City Hall Operations and Maintenance 290,543 1,351 0 0 291,894 Community&Public Works-Engineering 1,816,141 25,476 0 0 1,841,617 Community&Public Works-Economic Dev 1,018,772 11,965 0 0 1,030,737 Community&Public Works-Building&Planning 2,248,698 32,776 0 0 2,281,474 Parks&Rec-Administration 335,958 4,162 0 0 340,120 Parks&Rec-Maintenance 893,500 0 0 0 893,500 Parks&Rec-Recreation 253,622 1,196 0 0 254,818 Parks&Rec-Aquatics 491,153 0 0 0 491,153 Parks&Rec-Senior Center 101,215 1,692 0 0 102,907 Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 949,414 6,918 0 0 956,332 General Government 1,332,650 16,300 0 0 1,348,950 Transfers out-#204 (2016 LTGO debt service) 401,250 0 0 0 401,250 Transfers out-#309 (park capital projects) 160,000 0 0 0 160,000 Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 972,300 0 0 0 972,300 Transfers out-#501 (CenterPlace kitchen reserve) 36,600 0 0 0 36,600 Transfers out-#502 (insurance premium) 390,000 0 0 0 390,000 Total Recurring Expenditures 41,691,369 230,000 0 40,102 41,961,471 Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 3,805,531 (229,500) 0 (40,102) 3,535,929 Page 1 of 9 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended #001 -GENERAL FUND-continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in-#106 (solid waste repayment) 40,422 0 0 0 40,422 Grant Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Reimbursement of chamber wall repairs 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 40,422 0 0 500,000 540,422 Expenditures General Government-IT capital replacements 107,000 0 0 0 107,000 Public Safety(full facility generator) 0 0 200,000 0 200,000 Public Safety(carpet&workstation replacement) 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 City Hall chamber east wall repairs 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 Economic Development(retail recruitment) 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Building (equipment for new Code Enf. Officer) 0 0 0 0 0 Parks&Rec(carpet at CenterPlace) 0 0 0 0 0 General Government(City Hall generator) 0 0 203,000 0 203,000 Transfers out-#122 (replenish reserve) 0 120,000 0 0 120,000 Transfers out-#309(Browns Park restroom) 160,000 0 0 0 160,000 Transfers out-#309 (Browns Park other) 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 Transfers out-#309 (CenterPlace west lawn) 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 Transfers out-#309 (CenterPlace roof repairs) 0 0 0 21,000 21,000 Transfers out-#312 ('17 fund bal>50%) 0 7,109,300 0 0 7,109,300 Transfers out-#501 (new Code Enf. Vehicle) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,342,000 7,229,300 403,000 1,021,000 9,995,300 Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,301,578) (7,229,300) (403,000) (521,000) (9,454,878) Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 2,503,953 (7,458,800) (403,000) (561,102) (5,918,949) Beginning unrestricted fund balance 36,817,803 36,817,803 Ending unrestricted fund balance 39,321,756 30,898,854 Fund balance as a percent of recurring expenditures 1 94.32% 73.64% Page 2 of 9 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Utility Tax 1,700,000 0 0 (100,000) 1,600,000 Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 2,092,300 0 0 (61,400) 2,030,900 Multimodal Transportation Revenue 132,200 0 0 0 132,200 Right-of-Way Maintenance Fee 70,000 0 0 0 70,000 Investment Interest 6,000 0 0 0 6,000 Miscellaneous 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 Total Recurring Revenues 4,010,500 0 0 (161,400) 3,849,100 Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 1,044,547 13,197 0 0 1,057,744 Supplies 113,300 0 0 0 113,300 Services&Charges 2,308,818 18,156 0 0 2,326,974 Snow Operations 497,200 0 0 0 497,200 Intergovernmental Payments 855,000 0 0 0 855,000 Vehicle rentals-#501 (non-plow vehicle rental) 21,250 0 0 0 21,250 Vehicle rentals-#501 (plow replace.) 77,929 0 0 0 77,929 Total Recurring Expenditures 4,918,044 31,353 0 0 4,949,397 Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (907,544) (31,353) 0 (161,400) (1,100,297) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfers in-#122 0 120,000 0 0 120,000 Transfers in-#312 907,544 0 0 0 907,544 Total Nonrecurring Revenues 907,544 120,000 0 0 1,027,544 Expenditures Spare traffic signal equipment 0 0 68,000 0 68,000 Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 68,000 0 68,000 Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 907,544 120,000 (68,000) 0 959,544 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures 0 88,647 (68,000) (161,400) (140,753) Beginning fund balance 784,972 784,972 Ending fund balance 784,972 644,219 Page 3 of 9 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #105-HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 600,000 0 0 0 600,000 Investment Interest 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 Total revenues 602,000 0 0 0 602,000 Expenditures Transfers out-#001 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Transfers out-#104 0 275,000 0 0 275,000 Tourism Promotion 625,000 (275,000) 0 (108,000) 242,000 Total expenditures 655,000 0 0 (108,000) 547,000 Revenues over(under)expenditures (53,000) 55,000 Beginning fund balance 277,929 277,929 Ending fund balance 224,929 332,929 #106-SOLID WASTE FUND Revenues Solid Waste Administrative Fee 225,000 0 0 0 225,000 Solid Waste Road Wear Fee 1,500,000 0 0 0 1,500,000 Investment Interest 1,300 0 0 0 1,300 Total revenues 1,726,300 0 0 0 1,726,300 Expenditures Education/Contract Admin 185,878 0 0 0 185,878 Transfers out-#001 40,422 0 0 0 40,422 Transfers out-#311 1,500,000 0 0 108,028 1,608,028 Total expenditures 1,726,300 0 0 108,028 1,834,328 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (108,028) Beginning fund balance 431,359 431,359 Ending fund balance 431,359 323,331 Page 4 of 9 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -REET 1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 1,000,000 0 0 400,000 1,400,000 Investment Interest 22,000 0 0 0 22,000 Total revenues 1,022,000 0 0 400,000 1,422,000 Expenditures Transfers out-#204 82,475 0 0 0 82,475 Transfers out-#303 504,172 0 0 (28,436) 475,736 Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 734,300 0 0 0 734,300 Transfers out-#314 (Barker Grade Separation) 50,000 0 0 401,053 451,053 Total expenditures 1,370,947 0 0 372,617 1,743,564 Revenues over(under)expenditures (348,947) (321,564) Beginning fund balance 2,480,268 2,480,268 Ending fund balance 2,131,321 2,158,704 #302-REET 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 1,000,000 0 0 400,000 1,400,000 Investment Interest 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Total revenues 1,025,000 0 0 400,000 1,425,000 Expenditures Transfers out-#204 82,475 0 0 0 82,475 Transfers out-#303 167,434 0 0 188,153 355,587 Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 734,300 0 0 0 734,300 Total expenditures 984,209 0 0 188,153 1,172,362 Revenues over(under)expenditures 40,791 252,638 Beginning fund balance 3,240,220 3,240,220 Ending fund balance 3,281,011 3,492,858 Page 5 of 9 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303-STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 4,408,681 675,600 0 (1,101,953) 3,982,328 Developer 35,700 1,500,000 0 (547,479) 988,221 Transfers in-#301 504,172 0 0 (28,436) 475,736 Transfers in-#302 167,434 0 0 188,153 355,587 Transfers in-#312-Euclid Ave-Flora to Barker 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 Transfers in-#312-8th&Carnahan Intersection 45,000 0 0 (45,000) 0 Transfers in-#312-Barker Corridor 267,000 2,767,400 0 (722,852) 2,311,548 Transfers in-#312-Garland Ave 0 1,500,000 0 (484,750) 1,015,250 Total revenues 5,432,987 6,443,000 0 (2,742,317) 9,133,670 Expenditures 123 Mission Ave. -Flora to Barker 5,000 0 0 23,791 28,791 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan PCC intersection 12,500 0 0 (11,915) 585 166 Pines Rd(SR27)&Grace Ave. Intersect Safety 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 205 Sprague/Barker Intersections Improvement 35,700 0 0 17,402 53,102 247 8th &Carnahan Intersection Improvements 45,000 0 0 (45,000) 0 249 Sullivan/Wellesley Intersection 1,167,287 0 0 (1,087,287) 80,000 251 Euclid Ave. -Flora to Barker 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 258 32nd Ave Sidewalk-SR27 to Evergreen 5,000 0 0 (5,000) 0 259 N. Sullivan Corridor ITS Project 730,000 0 0 (666,302) 63,698 265 Wellesley Sidewalk Project 382,000 0 0 209,125 591,125 267 Mission Ave Sidewalk 420,000 0 0 (13,119) 406,881 273 Barker/I-90 Interchange 500,000 0 0 310,000 810,000 275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid 132,000 178,000 0 (39,143) 270,857 276 Barker Rd Widening-Euclid to Garland 81,000 3,265,000 0 (754,940) 2,591,060 277 Barker Rd Widening-Garland to Trent 54,000 0 0 (54,000) 0 278 Wilbur Rd Sidewalk-Boone to Broadway 354,500 0 0 60,867 415,367 279 Knox Ave Sidewalk-Hutchinson to Sargent 294,000 0 0 67,619 361,619 281 Highland Estates Connector 200,000 0 0 (154,000) 46,000 285 Indiana Ave Pres-Evergreen to Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 287 University Pres-Dishman-Mica to 16th 0 0 0 79,000 79,000 291 Adams Sidewalk Infill 0 0 0 62,406 62,406 293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP 0 0 0 23,250 23,250 294 Citywide Reflective Signal Post Panels 0 0 0 5,200 5,200 295 Garland Ave Construction 0 3,000,000 0 (1,050,000) 1,950,000 299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont 0 0 0 48,000 48,000 300 Pines and Mission Intersection Improvement 0 0 0 72,000 72,000 301 Park and Mission Intersection Improvements 0 0 0 112,750 112,750 302 Ella Sidewalk-Broadway to Alki 0 0 0 30,979 30,979 303 S. Conklin Sidewalk 0 0 0 16,000 16,000 069 Park Rd Reconstruction#2(Repay Grant Funds) 0 0 0 0 0 Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 Total expenditures 5,432,987 6,443,000 0 (2,742,317) 9,133,670 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 Beginning fund balance 67,041 67,041 Ending fund balance 67,041 67,041 Note: Work performed for pavement preservation projects out of the Street Capital Projects Fund is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that the were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 6 of 9 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #309-PARK CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 572,308 0 0 2,132,152 2,704,460 Transfers in-#001 1,320,000 0 0 521,000 1,841,000 Transfers in-#312 14,788 0 0 296,450 311,238 Total revenues 1,907,096 0 0 2,949,602 4,856,698 Expenditures 237 Appleway Trail (Sullivan to Corbin) 5,000 0 0 11,791 16,791 268 Appleway Trail (Evergreen to Sullivan) 72,500 0 0 2,293,021 2,365,521 280 Appleway Trail Amenities(Univ-Pines) 509,595 0 0 177,920 687,515 282 Browns Park volleyball courts 0 0 0 1,249 1,249 293 Browns Park improvements 1,160,000 0 0 0 1,160,000 Swingsets 25,000 0 0 12,000 37,000 Resurface Discovery Park 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 304 CenterPlace west lawn improvements-Ph. 2 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 CenterPlace roof repairs 0 0 0 21,000 21,000 Total expenditures 1,812,095 0 0 3,016,981 4,829,076 Revenues over(under)expenditures 95,001 27,622 Beginning fund balance 39,294 39,294 Ending fund balance 134,295 66,916 #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 9,000 0 0 0 9,000 Total revenues 9,000 0 0 0 9,000 Expenditures Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers out-#312 0 0 0 18,452 18,452 Total expenditures 0 0 0 18,452 18,452 Revenues over(under)expenditures 9,000 (9,452) Beginning fund balance 857,737 857,737 Ending fund balance 866,737 848,285 Note: The fund balance in#310 includes$839,281.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this land at the original sale price of$839,285.10. Page 7 of 9 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION Revenues Transfers in-#001 972,300 0 0 0 972,300 Transfers in-#106 1,500,000 0 0 108,028 1,608,028 Transfers in-#301 734,300 0 0 0 734,300 Transfers in-#302 734,300 0 0 0 734,300 Grant Proceeds 1,820,000 0 0 1,049,227 2,869,227 Developer 0 0 0 1,140,000 1,140,000 Total revenues 5,760,900 0 0 2,297,255 8,058,155 Expenditures Pavement preservation 7,238,200 0 0 2,021,621 9,259,821 Pre-project GeoTech 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Total expenditures 7,288,200 0 0 2,021,621 9,309,821 Revenues over(under)expenditures (1,527,300) (1,251,666) Beginning fund balance 4,637,315 4,637,315 Ending fund balance 3,110,015 3,385,649 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 0 7,109,300 0 0 7,109,300 Transfers in-#310 0 0 0 18,452 18,452 Transfers in-#313 0 0 0 88,590 88,590 Investment Interest 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Total revenues 50,000 7,109,300 0 107,042 7,266,342 Expenditures Transfers out-#101 907,544 0 0 0 907,544 Transfers out-#303 (Euclid Ave-Flora to Barker) 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 Transfers out-#303 (8th&Carnahan Intersection) 45,000 0 0 (45,000) 0 Transfers out-#303(Barker Road Corridor) 267,000 2,767,400 0 (722,852) 2,311,548 Transfers out-#303(Garland Ave.) 0 1,500,000 0 (484,750) 1,015,250 Transfers out-#309 (Appleway Trail-Sullivan-Cort 5,000 0 0 (5,000) 0 Transfers out-#309(Appleway Trail-Evergreen-Si 9,788 0 0 301,450 311,238 Transfers out-#314(Pines Rd Underpass) 0 0 0 0 0 Precinct Property Acquisition 0 0 0 226,700 226,700 DOT Park Property Acquisition 0 0 0 844,000 844,000 Total expenditures 1,239,332 4,267,400 0 114,548 5,621,280 Revenues over(under)expenditures (1,189,332) 1,645,062 Beginning fund balance 8,974,920 8,974,920 Ending fund balance 7,785,588 10,619,982 Page 8 of 9 P:\Finance\2019 Budget\Amendment#3\2019 10 01\Budget Summary for Amended Funds#3.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 9/25/2019 2019 Budget Amendment#3 Summary of Amended Funds 2019 As 1st 2nd 3rd As Adopted Amendment Amendment Amendment Amended CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #313-CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 954 954 Total revenues 0 0 0 954 954 Expenditures Transfers out-#312 0 0 0 88,590 88,590 Total expenditures 0 0 0 88,590 88,590 Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (87,636) Beginning fund balance 87,636 87,636 Ending fund balance 87,636 0 #314-RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 3,750,000 0 0 (795,077) 2,954,923 Transfers in#301 50,000 0 0 401,053 451,053 Transfers in#312 0 0 0 0 0 Total revenues 3,800,000 0 0 (394,024) 3,405,976 Expenditures 143 Barker BNSF Grade Separation 3,800,000 0 0 (394,024) 3,405,976 223 Pines Rd Underpass 900,000 0 0 0 900,000 Total expenditures 4,700,000 0 0 (394,024) 4,305,976 Revenues over(under)expenditures (900,000) (900,000) Beginning fund balance 1,036,472 1,036,472 Ending fund balance 136,472 136,472 Page 9 of 9 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 1, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2019 Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City Council adopted the original Parks & Recreation Master Plan by Resolution 06-008 on April 25, 2006, and the Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2013 Update by Resolution 13-013 on December 17, 2013. BACKGROUND: The draft of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2019 Update is complete. The update incorporates recent studies and plans, including tourism studies and the 2017 Comprehensive Plan. While the 2019 update functions as a "stand-alone" document, it cross- references and draws from the 2013 plan. The update includes a significant public engagement effort, basing its recommendations on exhaustive stakeholder interviews, two public meetings, and input during several public events such as the Farmers Market, Game On and Movies in the Park events. The update will also maintain the City's grant eligibility with the Washington State Resource Conservation Office. The update to the 2013 Parks and Recreation Master Plan is necessary not only to maintain grant eligibility but also to update the project list. Since adopting the 2013 plan, the City has completed the Appleway Trail, purchased and received new park property, installed splash pads at Edgecliff and Browns Parks, completed the sand volleyball courts at Browns Park, and made significant updates to the West Lawn and North Meadow at CenterPlace. The 2019 update includes a number of changes based on the community's desires and changing conditions. These changes include: • Developing new parks in underserved areas • Ensuring park facilities to accommodate needs of all user groups • Strengthening partnerships with Spokane County and School Districts • Increasing access to the north side of Spokane River • Replacing horse arena with bicycle pump track and/or skate park • Supporting events at CenterPlace • Completing Balfour Park expansion Staff will be providing an overview of the draft plan update, seeking input and comments from the City Council. Staff is anticipating bringing the draft plan update back in the near future for a resolution to adopt. OPTIONS: 1) Suggest changes to the plan update; or 2) Provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Seeking City Council consensus to bring forward a resolution to adopt the Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2019 Update at a future date. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, CPRP, Director of Parks and Recreation; Chaz Bates, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS:PowerPoint Presentation; Draft Parks & Recreation Master Plan 2019 Update Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2019 Update /M1 October 1 , 2019 2 Master Plan Update Overview City staff developed this update for 2019 Stand-alone document but draws from 2013 plan Incorporates recent studies and plans I Reflects shifts in community priorities ______ o Public involvement component Jr J o Maintains grant eligibility _y ek Provides priorities of the Parks & Recreation Department 41� Provides a capital project list , v . a irvpi Parks and Recreation Master Flan 7F7V20/9 Update „Am I 3 Master Plan Benefits Meets requirements for Recreation and Conservation Office grant eligibility Provides direction and guidance Allows for flexibility in priorities and scheduling to maximize funding opportunities Recommends specificpark acquisition de? p areas and improvements Provides range of options I 4 Some Achievements Since 2u13 ipirm Developed Valley Mission Dog Park ct Added Myrna Park - 12 acres a ' o Completed Master Plan at Browns Park and created a 16-court sand volleyball complex Developed CenterPlace West Lawn t„ _ -e Master Plan and implemented Phase 1 4: ZainiiMEN Replacedpicnic shelter and added p �sNE splash pad at Edgecliff Park - I 5 Some Achievements, Continued o Completed sections of the Appleway Trail: e ' University to Pines Pines to Evergreen Sullivan to Corbin Evergreen to Sullivan (2020) o Added 13.84 acres to Sullivan Park Developed Master Plan for expansion of Balfour Park A k Added new features to Discovery - "- � i6 ,' keg Playground R �c I 6 Public Involvement Crucial step to ensure the public has an effective voice in shaping the plan Needs expressed in the plan - should accurately reflect community desires Utilized stakeholder interviews, tabling booths, and two public ri fir meetings = == = I 7 Public Process - Stakeholder Interviews 25 Agencies ...Discovery.. SoutheastValeP School Districts, County, a-w �, rotioteJpurisr ,---- ` ' ,tateParks iDog Parks r 7roveMrabeauHotelers Trails, Arts CenterPlaceSportscomp1exSPCommfssionow rt PickelballCourts Fair rounds q Ue� �.IC� A1C sv g °�.� � Mmbeauia �=m�aa� —sEnoughPools Key Takeaways - P;;Develop. aIfour�AE��ess E@astValle .a �paabe�a�k �m, °t:,, . hef-jU �'a SecuritY. %,-SkatePark Partnerships Critical �s"a'4a. ate, sP"- •WestValley. ess ,,�V More Fields (all types) sChYohoIDIStrlCtS ��• �, a basea IaI-Wr. Ias�� River Access �SqP prt 'S.Fry, �,�a�� T q e3t�dnoE-•_\c'0 aMITI @ V ` � Trail Connections G1 \..eKMa. C44//f RiverAccess 2) t a«�ab�� Winters orts s `° „ Improve CenterPlace -�<<.a 7, SplashpPa0s , „ „„4&- „° s and Balfour Park EnoughSandVBCFIEICILIghtll g qpicklebalICOurt CltySpokane CountyLibraryDistrict CityLibertyLakei�� Lowe rincomeAreas v Community Center I 8 Public Process — Workshop 1 t Swimming Valleyfest Current Successes: f ParkOppprtunities Trails Well - maintained Picnic_shelters Maintenance Community Events ols PetrFriend)s 'a I" cSplashPads iNatural Areas JRestro_ms_Dscovery Playground s. RiverTreesS ftb ll_Fel s Community Events ,� Discovery_Playground :03. Playgrounds Future Desires: Rec Opportunities spaces Volleyball 40. Need more parks ]0n Distribute parks POJ 100 Bigger parks budget o . . I • - - There isan Parks and The parks and Users of all The parks and The city There am The parks The parks Public art Mal The parks adequate recreation recreation abilities have recreation provides variety of facilities are system is reflects system is well amount of facilities are budget adequate facilities are adequate recreation modem and adequately Spokane maintained More access f o r a I I userspark land to provided adequately access to well designed.recreational oppodundies meet the supplemented Valley is and clean meet resident equitably and meets the parks and attractive.and services and for both needs of by the county incorporated needs. conveniently needs of recreational sale. programming residents and resident and school in thecitys throughout the residents. opportunities_ to meet halters. recreation districts. park system. city. residents demands. needs. 9 Public Process - Movies, Game On, and Workshop 2 Key Takeaways Replace horse arena 1603" New splash pads ,1. Community events 10 Upgrade restrooms Disc golf 11111111 New dog park 4 New playgrounds Basketball courts Replace New splash Community Upgrade New disc New dog New New Expand and Upgrade Horse Arena pads in Events restrooms golf course park playgrounds basketball improve softball Expand B a I f o u rwith skate parks park and/or courts Balfour Park fields bike park Upgrade softball fields I 10 „, Fr Goals, Policies and O .. bjectives Revised and consolidated from 2013 Willey.,.. .#� ''' Reflect new studies and plans since 2013 Parks and 0.19t4,40- a� ; 34 Recreation `` ' Modifications worth noting include. MasterPlan , r 2013 Update Priority for new parks 4 Priority in developing park facilities to n m 0-7 A{ accom343.4 modate needs of usergroups ;` '"'' iii' , .. ` , ``�, 11 Sample Recommendations 1 Pursue acquisition of park land as the availability of undeveloped property continues to shrink o Continue to seek grants, private land ,� -0,,,a-ft! ik� � donations, or property swaps x :R I ` �'.- Explore the potential to create and . . , • 4 N' establish a Spokane Valley River Trail1k*' ' along the north side of the Spokane ' �� ` River between Plante's Ferry Sports Complex and Barker Road ' v 12 Sample Recommendations 2 Provide new neighborhood parks in the northwest, southwest and northeast areas of the City Develop master plan to replace horse arena with bicycle pump track and/or ; { , f j a skate park 0; Work with the Department �eartment of 11�+ �k Y Natural Resources to create a = w k *fit plan for public access to Pinecroft +: a site adjacent to Mirabeau Point Park Extend Appleway Trail to the west and connect to Centennial Trail , ri F: :h 13 Capital Project Priorities 1 Develop new neighborhood parks Update/ replace restrooms, shelters and play equipment o Develop master plan to replace horse arena with bicycle pump track and/or a skate park Complete Phase 2 - .t 3 x r � ,.... ` � � y. � lS�'� .Tf��Sy ��i �`r r of CenterPlace _ I6 L Y. .F West Lawn Project C 1rc r 0II r�7YElw , a ' Y - ii- - � 1ir�� I !_ \ ---,to, - f - I 14 Capital Project Priorities 2 Develop Forestry Management Plan for Mirabeau Point Park Develop Master Plan for the expansion of Sullivan Park Partner with DNR on a public access plan for the 100-acre Pinecroft Natural Preserve Begin to implement Balfour Park Master Plan , 'k'..k 16,}w"•1! g '# a Z 1., T 7, .. s { ti r'''' �y�`s� s , �� Al ;' 5 - tA# 4� il .4 'y .. LYv xz t .l AilriliL oil -- : 10.... } .. —._}.. ....7 v.l�'rt • ' ! E _ l Wy 3.Nee init. h ,. Ai *, . ___. r 11r— '11, I, '. -_ . ..16,ir 1 del f I!r „it r Q--ae..... ...........6..... . mow Win, d SpOkane S�. . ' .. Val ler 11. 1 ' . ' Parks and Recreation Master Plan -� �Ic_ *. � 2019 Update 2019 Update to the City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Master Plan Acknowledgements City Council Mayor Rod Higgins - (position 1) Brandi Peetz - (position 2) Arne Woodard - (position 3) w Ben Wick- (position 4) Deputy Mayor Pam Haley- (position 5) imik Sam Wood - (position 6) Linda Thompson - (position 7) Executive Mark Calhoun, City Manager John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Parks and Recreation Department Mike Stone, Director Patty Bischoff,Administrative Assistant Parks and Recreation Staff Economic Development Department Chaz Bates, Senior Planner Additional Assistance By: Michael Terrell Landscape Architecture, PLLC Bernardo Wills Architects PC Special thanks to all the community members who participated in the public outreach events. Page 12 Table of Contents City Council 2 Chapter 1.0: Introduction 6 1.1 Public Involvement 6 1.2 Report Organization 6 1.3 Goals, Policies and Objectives 6 Chapter 2.0: Planning Context 10 2.1 Regional Context 10 2.2 Planning Area 11 2.3 Demographic Characteristics 11 2.4 Land Use 13 2.5 Housing 14 2.6 Population Growth 15 Chapter 3.0: Existing Parks and Facilities 16 3.1 Park Land Definitions 17 3.2 Park Land Inventory 18 Chapter 4.0: Existing Operations 22 4.1 Organizational Structure 22 4.2 Staffing Levels 24 4.3 Revenues and Expenditures 24 4.4 Maintenance Operations 26 4.5 Recreation Programs 26 Chapter 5.0: Needs Assessment 27 5.1 Stakeholder Interviews 27 5.2 Public Workshops 28 5.3 Summary of Park Land Needs 34 5.3.3 Summary of Park Land Needs 37 5.4 Summary of Recreation Facility Needs 38 5.5 Other Facility and Program Needs 38 Page 1 3 Chapter 6.0: Recommendations 39 6.1 Park Plan Concept 39 6.2 Park and Facility Recommendations 42 6.3 New Parks 54 6.4 Recreation Programs and Services Recommendations 54 6.5 Administration and Management Recommendations 55 6.6 Maintenance Recommendations 55 6.7 River Access Recommendations 55 Chapter 7.0: Implementation 56 7.1 Recommended Capital Projects 56 7.2 Cost Estimates for New Parks 60 7.3 Financing Strategy and Capital Improvement Plan 60 7.4 Funding Sources 62 Appendix A: Inventory Table of Tables Table 2-1: Age Group by Percentage of Population 12 Table 2-2: Income Characteristics for Selected Geographies 13 Table 2-3: Top 5 Industry Sectors for Workers and Residents 13 Table 3-1: Count and Acres of Park Facilities by Park Type 18 Table 3-2: Existing Aquatic Facilities in Spokane Valley 19 Table 3-3: Park Facility Inventory 21 Table 4-1: Budget Allocation 2012-2019 25 Table 4-2: Parks and Recreation Division Budget Breakdown 25 Table 4-3: Net Cost per Capita 26 Table 5-1: Weighted Gap Analysis and Agreement 30 Table 5-2: Future Park Land Demand at Adopted Level of Service 37 Table 5-3: Proposed Acres Needed by Park Type 37 Table 7-1: Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Program 57 Table 7-2: Capital Improvement Plan for Project Beyond 2035 60 Table of Figures Figure 2-A: Regional Context 10 Figure 2-B: City of Spokane Valley Planning Area 11 Figure 3-A: Park Inventory Map 20 Figure 4-A: Simplified Organization Chart for the City of Spokane Valley 23 Figure 4-B: Organization Chart for the Parks and Recreation Department 24 Figure 5-A: Favorite Elements about Parks Locally and Elsewhere 29 Page 1 4 Figure 5-B: Facility Improvement Exercise Edgecliff Park 31 Figure 5-C: Facility Improvement Exercise Terrace View Park 31 Figure 5-D: Facility Improvement Exercise Valley Mission Park 32 Figure 5-E: Park Location Exercise Results 33 Figure 5-F: Movies in the Park and "Game On!"Poll 34 Figure 5-G: Park Service Areas for Spokane Valley Parks 36 Figure 6-A: 2013 Proposed Park Layout Plan 41 Page I 5 Chapter 1.0: Introduction This Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2019 (2019 Plan) updates the 2013 Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2013 Plan), reflecting changes in the community since that plan's adoption. The update is structured in a manner similar to the 2013 Plan, facilitating reference between the old and new. Chapter topics and section numbering all match, with only those sections requiring amendment included in this update. Since adopting the 2013 Plan,the City has continued to focus on its core beliefs and values. This focus has resulted in the implementation of several projects identified in the 2013 Plan as well as other community improvements. The planning context for this 2019 Plan is a bit different than when the 2013 Plan was prepared, reflecting recent updates to the city's comprehensive plan. Li Public Involvement Public involvement is a crucial step in comprehensive parks and recreation planning, ensuring that the community has an effective voice in shaping the plan and that the needs expressed in the plan and included in the implementation program accurately reflect community desires. The 2013 Plan included an extensive public engagement effort, and this Plan Update does as well,basing its recommendations on exhaustive stakeholder interviews, a statistically valid telephone survey,two public meetings, and a number of tabling events at local parks throughout the summer of 2019. 1.2 Report Organization The plan's structure mirrors the 2013 Plan,with chapters and sections as in that document. It is configured this way to aid in cross-referencing and to ensure continued compliance with the Recreation and Conservation Office's (RCO) planning guidelines. Chapter 1 - Introduction Chapter 2 - Planning Context Chapter 3 - Existing Parks Facilities Chapter 4 - Existing Operations Chapter 5 - Needs Assessment Chapter 6 - Recommendations Chapter 7 - Implementation 1.3 Goals, Policies and Objectives The goals are statements about the City's desired future. These goals are supported by policies that guide plan implementation and objectives that provide realistic, achievable, and measurable steps toward reaching the goals. Together,the goals (bold text), policies (italic text), and objectives (regular text) can be used to help measure the plan's success. 16 1. The Parks and Recreation system is diverse, balanced and accessible. 1.1. Develop parks and recreation facilities that are easily accessed and spread equitably throughout the city. 1.1.1.Acquire and/or develop new parks and recreation facilities to match the needs of residents. 1.1.2. Invest in improvements to existing parks and recreation facilities. 1.1.3. Identify potential areas that need parks and open space to be served equitably. 1.1.4. Ensure that existing and new parks are conveniently accessible to users. 1.1.5. Develop a parks and open space acquisition program to take advantage of present opportunities to meet future needs. 1.1.6. Consider all options, including partnerships and collaborations, to acquire and develop neighborhood and community parks in unserved or underserved areas. 1.2. Broaden the recreational opportunities and activities for both residents and visitors. 1.2.1. Offer recreational opportunities and programs that serve people of all ages, abilities, and economic and cultural backgrounds. 1.2.2. At least biannually, identify community needs for recreation programming. 1.2.3. Maximize the use of existing facilities and programs to support local needs and encourage tourism and regional use. 1.2.4. Provide athletic facilities for residents and visitors through development or collaboration. 1.2.5. Explore the potential to create and establish a Spokane Valley River Trail system along the north side of the Spokane River between Plante's Ferry Park and Barker Road. 1.3. Maintain the grant eligibility of the parks plan. 1.3.1. Identify funding options for all proposed projects. 1.3.2. Make fiscally reasonable recommendations for the development of facilities and services. 17 2. The Parks and Recreation system reflects the area's cultural, physical and natural character. 2.1. Ensure there is a balance in both passive and active design in parks and recreation facilities. 2.1.1. Prioritize the renovation and upgrade of existing facilities over the development of new facilities. 2.1.2.Annually assess the condition of amenities and facilities. 2.1.3. Establish a program and budget for addressing deferred maintenance. 2.1.4. Consider environmentally sound practices in the development of park resources. 2.2. Ensure that parks and recreation facilities are well maintained. 2.2.1. Maintain the existing level of maintenance. fill 2.2.2. Implement cost-effective ways of providing high-quality facility management and maintenance. 2.3. Prioritize the acquisition and designation of park land with natural features and resources. 2.3.1. Acquire riparian corridors where feasible to offer potential sites for trail development and provide access to the river. 2.3.2. Develop natural resource management plans for natural areas within parks and other City-owned or controlled lands to identify management priorities and guide restoration. 2.4. Seek opportunities to incorporate public art into public spaces. 2.4.1. Encourage public art that highlights Spokane Valley's cultural and historic connections. 2.4.2. Identify potential locations for public art in community places. 3. The Parks and Recreation system is fiscally responsible. 3.1. Provide facilities,programs and personnel in a fiscally responsible and cost effective manner. 3.1.1. Pursue cost sharing and cost recovery mechanisms where appropriate. Pae 18 3.1.2. Establish equitable fee structure (free, low-cost, full price) to ensure affordability and access to facilities and programs. 3.1.3. Use revenue-generating programs to help fund or subsidize other programs and services. 3.1.4. Explore new program offerings without expecting them to be self-supporting. 3.2. Provide parks and recreation services that are not provided by private service providers. 3.2.1. Periodically assess parks and recreation services provided by private service providers to minimize duplicative efforts. 3.3. Cooperate with non-city providers of parks and recreational resources on the provision of parks and recreation facilities. 3.3.1. Cooperate with other regional recreation and park providers to maximize the provision of these services. 3.3.2. Develop partnerships with school districts to leverage resources to meet community needs for parks and recreation services. 111. Page 19 Chapter 2.0: Planning Context This chapter provides a profile of Spokane Valley in the planning context of parks, recreation facilities, and programs. This profile includes a description of the region, planning area and subareas, natural resources, climate, demographics, land use, housing, and population projections. Key Findings The following key findings emerged from an evaluation of the planning context: • Several natural resource areas in Spokane Valley are important for recreation. These -° cI1NADA lands may be environmentally sensitive and/ UNITEDTATES or already used for recreation, examples include Dishman Hills,Antoine Peak, and the Spokane River and its adjoining riparian corridor and flood zone. ,, 4' • Spokane Valley has a four-season climate that WAS IN o ro .f . supports diverse recreational opportunities r year-round. Indoor and outdoor facilities should be considered to take advantage of r this climate. City of Spokane Valley • Spokane Valley is the tenth largest city in Washington and the second largest in City of Mn ., al Caw flkne Spokane County, with an estimated 2019 population of 96,720. - - IDAHO • Demographic characteristics often provide I insights regarding recreation demand, Figure 2-A: Regional Context interests, and participation. Since the City was incorporated in 2003, there is limited historical data to illustrate demographic variations. • In 2016 the city adopted the 2013 park plan by reference into its Comprehensive Plan, as this plan maintains the integrity and consistency with the adopted Comprehensive Plan,which will be updated as needed. 2.1 Regional Context Spokane Valley is located near the eastern border of the State of Washington in a valley that stretches from the west plains in Eastern Washington, eastward through Spokane and Spokane Valley to Post Falls and Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. The City is located in the heart of Spokane County. In general,the City is bordered on the west by the City of Spokane and on the east by unincorporated Spokane County and the City of Liberty Lake. Figure 2-A illustrates this regional context. Page 110 2.2 Planning Area The planning area for the Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Plan includes land within the city limits plus land within the City's urban growth area (UGA) (Figure 2-B). The City encompasses roughly 38.5 square miles (24,640 acres). 1 1.i 0.,, 1 Ikea.dpwk il 11111111 pili , t coo, .. -iiiiiirpnimmi MIMI sArimlir Pill-I Er' �11111111••=17 grer.,-.-mi , MEP „ __ PMk, gal - ....". i 14111111=11 1114111 ` f I 5poke neValley Planning Area UrixAn Growth Area I I I Figure 2-B: City of Spokane Valley Planning Area 2.3 Demographic Characteristics Demographic characteristics often provide insight for recreation needs. Spokane Valley residents are the people who will use Spokane Valley parks and recreation facilities most often; as such,the residents of the City serve as the foundation for parks and facility demands. Factors such as age and income significantly affect the level of participation and overall interest in recreational activities. Employment, education, and ethnicity also play a role. Age is an important factor in outdoor recreation. Generally as people age,their participation in outdoor activities declines, with the highest participation rates occurring in children. In general,the older the people,the less they participate in active and/or competitive recreation activities. Children and young adults tend to favor active and/or competitive recreation activities; these activities include basketball,baseball, soccer, and swimming. Emerging trends have been toward non-competitive extreme sports, including skateboarding, in-line skating, mountain biking and rock climbing. Older adults tend to have a more passive interest in recreation programs and participate in parent/child activities or spend time as a spectator at youth events. Page 111 The American Community Survey estimates a 2017 population of 94,424.About one- quarter of the City's population is under the age of 20 and 21 percent are 60 or older.While the under 20 population is generally in line with similarly sized cities,the over 60 population is higher than comparable cities, which may indicate recreational participation rates are lower than comparable cities in Washington. Table 2-1 compares similarly sized cities with the City across four broad age groups: less than 20 years of age, between ages 20-34, between ages 35-59, and over age 60. Table 2-1: A_•e Grou. b Percenta_•e of Population Total Percent Percent Percent Percent Population 19 and 20-34 35-59 60 and younger older Everett 107,560 24.10 25.10 34.10 16.70 Renton 99,692 24.40 24.40 35.10 16.30 Federal Way 94,905 26.50 21.80 33.10 18.60 Spokane 94,424 24.40 21.60 32.20 21.70 Valley Yakima 93,182 30.20 22.30 28.70 18.70 Bellingham 85,388 21.70 33.20 25.40 19.60 Kirkland 68,772 22.30 22.20 36.20 19.20 Source: U.S. Census Bureau,2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Additionally,when compared to Spokane County as a whole,the number of households with children is decreasing more rapidly in Spokane Valley. The percentage of the City's households with children decreased by 5.6%-from 35.6% to 30%-between 2005 and 2014, while the proportion of households with children in the County dropped by 1.5% during the same time period. Income levels also reveal important recreational participation characteristics. In general, the higher income groups tend to participate at higher rates in outdoor recreation than lower income groups. Higher incomes also tend to participate in more expensive types of recreation. Lower income groups may rely on subsidized programs or free facilities, such as play areas, trails, and non-scheduled sports fields. Table 2-2 compares median (the middle) and mean (the average) incomes for both households and families. Households include all people occupying a housing unit; whereas, families consist of a householder and one or more people who are related by birth, marriage, or adoption; thus there are more households than families. Page 112 Table 2-2: Income Characteristics for Selected Geo•ra•hies Median HH Mean HH Median Family Mean Family Income Income Income Income Everett $ 54,562 $ 70,353 $ 64,931 $ 82,300 Renton $ 70,661 $ 89,808 $ 82,233 $102,592 Federal Way $ 62,086 $ 80,248 $ 70,833 $ 88,943 Spokane Valley $48,015 $ 61,176 $ 62,815 $ 73,916 Yakima $ 42,092 $ 58,462 $ 50,003 $ 66,786 Bellingham $ 47,886 $ 63,825 $ 69,466 $ 84,917 Kirkland $104,319 $133,674 $124,803 $162,150 Source: U.S. Census Bureau,2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates In 2015,there were 48,428 jobs within the city with nearly 28 percent (13,552) who both lived and worked within the city. The city is a net importer of jobs, importing close to 35,000 jobs,with close to 28,000 people who reside within the city but work outside the city. Table 2-3 compares the top five industry sectors for workers (jobs in the City) to the top five industry sectors for residents (jobs held by residents).An analysis of employment in the City reveals the largest class of jobs in the city was "Retail Trade"followed by "Manufacturing." However,the largest class of jobs for residents was "Health Care and Social Services"followed by"Retail Trade." Table 2-3: To. 5 Industr Sectors for Workers and Residents Top 5 Industry Sectors for Workers Top 5 Industry Sectors for Residents Retail Trade 17.5% Health Care and Social Services 18.5% Manufacturing 14.3% Retail Trade 13.5% Health Care and Social Services 13.8% Manufacturing 9.6% Accommodation and Food Service 7.6% Accommodation and Food Service 8.3% Educational Services 7.5% Educational Services 8.1% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application, https://onthemap.ces.census.gov, (2015). Over 97 percent of people in the city identify with one race. Of those that identify with one race in Spokane Valley, over 91 percent identified themselves as White; 1 percent as Black or African American; 1.2 percent as American Indian and Alaska Native; and 1.6 percent as Asian. Nearly 6 percent identified themselves as Hispanic; people of Hispanic origin may be of any race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 2.4 Land Use Land use plays an important role in the location, distribution, and availability of park and recreational facilities; for example, residential areas need nearby parks to serve the people who live in each neighborhood. Generally, as individual outdoor space decreases the need for public open space increases. Industrial areas may need open space or natural area buffers and parks for employee or corporate use during the day. Dense commercial areas Page 113 are more likely to require plazas and small areas for passive recreation and may rely on a centralized larger community park. Based on geographic information,the City is 20,053 acres. The majority of the City is zoned for residential use (61 percent) followed by industrial use (20 percent), mixed- use/commercial (17 percent), and parks and open space (2 percent). Because most of the developed land in the City is classified residential,the proximity and location of parks and support facilities within neighborhoods are important criteria to consider for park planning. Spokane Valley developed primarily as low density suburban sprawl. Incorporated in 2003, the City developed as an urbanized area of Spokane County for decades. This development pattern leaves many partially used sites with one single-family residence on an acre or more of land. This land use pattern makes it difficult to acquire larger sized parcels for park use and ensure access to formal parks. 2.5 Housing In 2017, Spokane Valley had an estimated 50,700 housing units.Almost 30,000 of those dwellings were built prior to 1980. Roughly 15%, or 7,845units, of the total housing stock was built after 2000. Spokane Valley's housing growth has been modest, but steady since it incorporated in 2003, growing at a rate of about 1% per year.Approximately 6,000 new residences were added to Spokane Valley's total housing stock between 2003 and 2015. The steady increase represents an ongoing upward pressure on demand for park and recreation space. The type of occupied housing is also changing to reflect changing demographics, aging population and fewer households with children. The trend from 2005 to 2014 as been toward renter occupied housing. The trend is also borne out by market data showing a stabilized vacancy rate for multiple family housing at 4 percent and increasing asking rents. The trend indicates that demand for smaller housing options will likely increase in Spokane Valley overall. The growing aging population and fewer households with children may act as headwinds to the demand for park land resulting from the upward pressure from population growth. An important consideration for recreation participation is the percentage of household income used to pay monthly costs: mortgage, real estate taxes, insurances, utilities, and homeowner association fees. Knowing the percentage of monthly costs-to-income provides an indicator of housing affordability. In general,the more affordable a home,the more income can be used for recreation.A commonly accepted measurement of whether such costs are considered excessive is if those costs exceed 30 percent of household income. According to the ACS, nearly 36 percent of all households (renters and owners) were considered cost-burdened 2014. The percentage of cost-burdened households in Spokane Valley increased by 1% between 2005 and 2014. The cost-burdened disproportionately affects renters versus owners. The data shows that 51 percent of renters versus 26 percent of owners are cost-burdened. The data would indicate that demand for recreation would be Page 114 weighed down by a combination of the affordability housing and the increase of multiple family units which are typically renter households. 2.6 Population Growth The Washington State Office of Financial Management(OFM) estimates population for all cities and counties in the state. OFM's April 1, 2019 estimate for the City is 96,720.According to the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan,the projected 2037 population for the City is 109,913. The Board of County Commissioners allocated a population target of 14,650 to the city. The analysis completed for the comprehensive plan estimates an additional 6,659 homes will be needed to accommodate that growth and that the growth can accommodate that growth within its urban growth area. This increased growth will increase the demand for park land. Page 115 Chapter 3.0: Existing Parks and Facilities Understanding the parks and recreation facilities inventory at the planning period's outset is critical. The City is one of the primary providers of parks and recreational facilities in the City. Other public and private providers also contribute parks and open space in the area. Four school districts (West Valley, Central Valley, East Valley, and Spokane Public Schools) provide a variety of athletic facilities that contribute to the diversity of facilities available in the City. Spokane County has a number of open space facilities adjacent to the city including formal field spaces and natural open space recreation areas. This chapter summarizes the proposed park classification system, along with key findings regarding existing parks, open space, and recreation facilities.A complete inventory of park land and recreation facilities in the Spokane Valley Planning Area was completed for this process and is available from the Parks and Recreation Department. Key Findings • The City's parks system consists of active and passive recreational areas. There are five neighborhood parks, three community parks, one large urban park, eight special use areas, two trails/linear parks, two undeveloped portions of existing parks, and two natural open space areas in the parks system (see Table 3-1). In total, there are approximately 240.22 acres of park land. • The City owns and operates three seasonal outdoor pools: Terrace View Pool, Park Road Pool, and Valley Mission Pool. The City contracts with the Valley YMCA to operate and maintain the pools. The pools were renovated in 2008-2009. • The City does not manage or actively program youth or adult softball, soccer or volleyball programs. • There are a number of County and State parks sites that either border the City or are nearby. These nearby recreation resources are noted, and are recognized as contributing to the open space character of the community. • In terms of overall design and site utilization, most of the parks provide a balance between active use areas and general open space. • Accessibility and the lack of ADA access needs to be addressed throughout the park system. The City should continue its efforts to provide sidewalks to park amenities from parking areas, and providing accessible routes, ramps, or transfer stations to/in playgrounds. • Some play equipment and park furniture is reaching an age requiring specific maintenance, including replacement of wood components or the replacement of the structure. Use of wood components on play structures,benches and safety surfacing containment borders requires an annual commitment for review, maintenance and replacement when necessary. Page 116 3.1 Park Land Definitions In order to address specific planning needs for park, open space, and recreational areas, park classifications have been adopted. Each park classification provides a distinct type of recreational opportunity. The ideal community park system is made up of several different types or classifications of parks. The classification system adopted for the City is as follows: • Neighborhood Parks: Neighborhood parks are designed primarily for non- supervised, non-organized recreational activities. They are generally small in size (about 3-7 acres) and serve people living within approximately one-half mile of the park. Since these parks are located within walking and bicycling distance of most users, the activities they offer serve the entire neighborhood, including children. Typical facilities found in a neighborhood park include: playgrounds, picnic areas, trails, open grass areas for passive use, outdoor basketball courts, restrooms, picnic shelters, and multi-use open grass areas for practice field sports. • Community Parks: A community park is planned primarily to provide active and structured recreational opportunities for young people and adults. Community park facilities are designed for organized activities and sports, although individual and family activities are also encouraged. Community parks can also provide indoor facilities to meet a wider range of recreational interests. Community parks serve a much larger area and offer more facilities than neighborhood parks.As a result, they require more support facilities, such as parking, restrooms, and covered play areas. Community parks usually have sport fields or similar facilities as the central focus of the park, and range in size from about 10 to 30 acres. Their service area has roughly a 1-2 mile radius. • Large Urban Parks: Large urban parks are parks designed to serve the entire community. Generally,they provide a wide variety of specialized facilities, such as sports fields, indoor recreation areas, and large picnic areas. Due to their size and facilities offered, they require more support facilities, such as parking, restrooms, and play areas. Large urban parks usually exceed 40 acres in size and should be designed to accommodate large numbers of people. • Regional Parks: Regional parks are large recreational areas designed to serve an entire region beyond the city limits. Often they are acquired to provide a specific and sometimes unique recreational opportunity. • Special Use Areas: Special use areas are sites often occupied by a specialized recreational facility and can be a component of a park. Some uses that fall into this category include waterfront parks,boat ramps,botanical gardens, community gardens, single purpose sites used for a particular field sport, or sites occupied by recreational buildings. • Linear Parks: Linear parks are developed landscaped areas and other lands that follow linear corridors such as rivers, creeks, abandoned railroad rights-of-way, Page 117 canals, power lines, and other elongated features. This type of park usually contains trails, landscaped areas,viewpoints, and seating areas. • Natural Open Space: Natural open space is defined as undeveloped land primarily left in its natural form with recreational uses as a secondary objective. It is usually owned or managed by a governmental agency and may or may not have public access. This type of land may include wetlands, steep hillsides, or other similar spaces. In some cases, environmentally sensitive areas are considered open space and can include wildlife habitats, stream and creek corridors, or unique and/or endangered plant species. • Undeveloped Land: This land is undeveloped and has not yet been designated for a specific park use. 3.2 Park Land Inventory The City is joined by the State of Washington and Spokane County in providing park land in the planning area. This section summarizes the park, open space, and recreational areas provided by these entities. The park plan recognizes that there are several park and open space sites located just outside the city limits, such as the Dishman Hills Natural Area, the Iller Creek,Antoine Peak, and Saltese Uplands Conservation Areas and Plante's Ferry Park, which provide nearby recreational opportunities for area residents. In the summer of 2019, an assessment of the City's park facilities was completed based on a tour of the individual park and conversations with Park staff. Table 3-3: Park Facility Inventory and Figure 3-A: Park Inventory Map provide a detailed listing of the City's park inventory and the facilities available at each park. Table 3-1 below a summary of the City's parks by park type. Table 3-1: Count and Acres of Park Facilities b Park T •e Park Type Count Acres Current Ratio (Acres per 1,000 People) Community Park 3 48.62 0.52 Large Urban Park 1 55.51 0.59 Neighborhood Park 5 27.96 0.30 Trails and Linear Parks 2 52.12a 0.55 Special Use Areas b 8 - - Undeveloped Areas 2 12.79 0.14 Natural Open Space Areas 2 43.22c 0.46 Grand Total 23 240.22 2.56 a Total includes the Appleway Trail but does not include land owned by Washington State Parks,including Centennial Trail which is managed by the city. b With the exception of Park Road Pool and West City Gateway,special use areas are within existing parks,so the acreage is not calculated separately. c Includes only Myrna Park and Myrtle Point; Balfour and Valley Mission have undeveloped portions that are included in their respective totals. 3.2.1 Sports Fields The City has limited field space to program sports activities,see Table 3.2, and thus does not currently have an adult/youth sports recreational program. Residents of the City must rely on the Page 118 robust sports programing from Spokane County or the City of Spokane. The Spokane County program uses the City's facilities as part of their programming. The City has a tournament quality sand volleyball complex with 16 sand volleyball courts.The programming, renting and court maintenance is conducted by Evergreen Regional Volleyball Association (ERVA). ERVA currently pays the City a monthly fee to use the courts; the courts are free to the public when they are available. 3.2.2 Aquatic Facilities The City of Spokane Valley owns and operates three seasonal outdoor swimming pools and contracts with the Spokane YMCA to operate and maintain the pools. Two of the pools are associated with existing parks, Terrace View and Valley Mission. The third pool, Park Road Pool, is not associated with a park,but is adjacent to a middle school. The pools were upgraded in 2008-2009 and are in good condition. Table 3-2: Existin_• A•uatic Facilities in S•okane Valle Facility Notes Ownership Park Road Pool 6-lane x 25-yard outdoor pool and a City of Spokane Valley separate slide feature Terrace View Pool 6-lane x 25-yard outdoor pool and a City of Spokane Valley separate lazy river feature Valley Mission Pool 6-lane x 25-yard outdoor pool with a City of Spokane Valley separate zero depth entry pool Spokane Valley YMCA Leisure and lap pools YMCA Splashdown Outdoor aquatic park Private/leased 3.2.3 Trails and Shared Use Pathways The City of Spokane Valley has two grade separated shared use pathways within its jurisdiction: the Appleway Trail and the Centennial Trail. Appleway Trail The Appleway Trail is an urban trail and greenway, approximately 52.12 acres in size, which runs east-west through the heart of Spokane Valley. It provides a shared use path for walking, running, and cycling. The trail also provides connections for residents to the commercial corridor. When fully completed,the trail will allow citizens to travel from Dishman Hills east to Liberty Lake. Centennial Trail The Centennial Trail provides 40 miles of paved trail from Nine Mile Falls,WA to the Idaho State Line, along the Spokane River. The trail is managed by Washington State Parks as Centennial Trail State Park, but maintained cooperatively by each jurisdiction the trail travels through. Spokane Valley's section is approximately from mile marker 5.5 to 12.5. There is parking at various trailheads along the route. Spokane Valley's trailheads include: Mirabeau Point Park (North and South), Sullivan Park, Mission Avenue and Barker Road. Page 119 Myrtle Point Park a 31.1 acres Centennial Trail natural open space,trail 40 miles access e (-7 in Spokane Valley) weesiev -wE. ■.11 l 1; .� ,: .a nye ..,.,..,, „gym z ' .mm,,,,o,0 ..� Mir be u-acres ark Greenacres Park 0 8.3 acfesiaunmu-` t , ,jp) _� "'"`� �� Discovery Playground,CenterPlace, z disc golf,splash pad,playground, IPSO multi-la field e: -e,�,J .p1� �\ Mirabeau Meadows,Mirabeau Springs P Y EFAlli.11WL". � - � F1 "a e24 acres ark �.r eM.,sreia ��. �� - /, ,µt Sallfleld,pool,Splash Down, G-,,,,, J :�v equestrian arena,tennis 7.2 acres unimproved - Ix' arb 111.0011111 � .. ,aL'M'rf E M on Ove 44%. Park Road Pool '. n rc ■ _ I 2.0 acres �2 sriA ,,y^.e� pool only h Sullivan•-rk 002 \ Balfour Park 16.1 acres �� i� 2.8 acres radio control car area,daft D open play area,playground boat launch,dance hall .• - 5.6 acres unmproved " - � PP all MIF711/1 . ra '"wga"m' ,t-miii__ El d, plasf Park '�• 4.7 acres G Appleway Trail playground,splash pad,ballfield,t -,ya 5.6 miles pickleball I Av` paved trail SIMM. _. Castle Park 2.7 acres Terrace iew Park open play area t 9.2 acres Azea i X53 \� `' E aznanee pool,ballfield,playground co : � 8 c City Boundary 1 a ur D e i p Brow wns Pak City Parks mow+-.. - �� sand volleyball,splash pad Myrna Park Ea,mav Park Desingation(notcityowned) nacres - natural open space Trails School Property Outside Agency Recreation Land I 1 ik4 t Figure 3-A:Park Inventory Map Page 120 Table 3-3: Park Facility Inventory 0 to a O 3 N ' N 0C m � _ co 00 m N .t t N- ) omU U 4 N E Q Q 7, 2`°a = Q o I - m Other amenities andspecial uses m cT-m o m m m m >" U- > Yn N m3 moNgj sd N d nn — m = _ n °- 1 n m 8 m a a Z m = Qa m N 2 w 0 E m a w Neighborhood Park' . Balfour Park(2.8 acres) Browns Park(9 acres) - Castle Park(2.7 acres) Edgecliff Park(4.7 acres) Greenacres Park(8.6 acres) 9 hole disc golf Community Parks Sullivan Park(16.1 acres) 151 Radio control car area,dance hall,drift boat launch Terrace View Park(9.2 acres) 118 Horseshoe pit Valley Mission Park(23.3 acres) 341 Dog park,Splash Down(lease) Large Urban Parks Mirabeau Point Park(55.1 acres) CenterPlace(54,000 sq.ft event center), •Discovery Playground 503 North Meadow,West Lawn,waterfall/pond, •Mirabeau Meadows dock,and viewing platform,stage,trail head •Mirabeau Springs Special Use Facilities Park Road Pool(2.0 acres) 101 West City Gateway Trails and Linear Parks Centennial Trail(9 mi in COSV) Y 37 miles total in WA and extends to CDA ID Appleway Trail(5.6 miles) III Y Natural Open Space Areas Myrna Park(12.1 acres) Myrtle Point Park(31.1 acres) Centennial Trail Access Undeveloped Parks Balfour West(5.6 acres) 11111111111111 South Valley Mission(7.2 acres) a 121 Chapter 4.0: Existing Operations This chapter reviews the existing operations and management of the Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department. The review includes an analysis of the Department's organizational structure, staffing levels, and operations, including the operating budget, revenue and expenditures, and maintenance costs. This chapter also discusses current program participation. Key Findings The following key findings emerged from the analysis of parks and recreation operations and management: • The Parks and Recreation Department is composed of six divisions: Parks Administration, Parks Maintenance, Recreation,Aquatics, Senior Center, and CenterPlace. • As of 2019,the City budgeted for nine full-time positions. • Parks Maintenance and Aquatics services are contracted with external businesses or agencies. • In 2018 the city spent just over $25 per person to run, manage and operate the parks system. The City's park operations have changed little since the 2013 Plan. The Department's organizational structure remains the same, as does its approach to operating recreation programs and system maintenance. 4.1 Organizational Structure The organizational structure of the Parks and Recreation Department,along with its position within the government of the City, affects the management and provision of parks and recreation services. 4.1.1 City Structure In Spokane Valley, there are five separate departments that provide municipal services to City residents: City Attorney, Community and Public Works, Police, Finance, and Parks and Recreation. Each of these departments report to the City Manager who in turn transmits information to the Mayor and City Council and ultimately the citizens. Currently, several City services are contracted out to private businesses or agencies. These include street maintenance, parks maintenance, and aquatic operations. Figure 4-A shows the organizational structure of the City. Page X22 Citizens of Spokane Valley I City Council I City Manager I I I I I Community City Parks and Finance and Public Police Attorney Recreation Works Figure 4-A: Simplified Organization Chart for the City of Spokane Valley 4.1.2 Parks and Recreation Department Within the Parks and Recreation Department there are six primary areas of responsibility: Parks Administration, Parks Maintenance, Recreation,Aquatics, Senior Center, and CenterPlace. Each of these areas is managed and/or supervised by the Parks and Recreation Director. Figure 4-B shows the organization of the Parks and Recreation Department. • Parks Administration: The Parks Administration division is responsible for implementing the City Council's goals and objectives for providing parks and recreation services. • Parks Maintenance: This division is primarily responsible for monitoring the general upkeep of parks and public areas throughout the City, consistent with the goals and objectives set forth by the City Council. Currently, parks maintenance services are contracted with a private operator. • Recreation: The Recreation Division is responsible for developing, coordinating and facilitating the delivery of recreation services and programs within the City. Currently, programs include a summer day camp, summer park program,youth programming, preschool programming, adult dance classes, and limited special events. • Aquatics: This division is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the City's three outdoor swimming pools. The City has contracted with a private provider to operate and maintain the three pools since 2005. Page 123 • Senior Center: The Senior Center Division is responsible for coordinating services at the Spokane Valley Senior Center. The Senior Center programs and services were moved from its original building to CenterPlace. • CenterPlace: This division is responsible for the operation and management of CenterPlace Regional Event Center. Parks and Recreation Director Administrative Assistant I I I I I I Prks Park dminist atio Recreation Aquatics Senior Center CenterPlace Maintenance Recreation CenterPlace Maintenance Coordinator Coordinator Worker Facili 2 Recreation ti Office Office Specialist Assistant 1 Assistant 2 Figure 4-B: Organization Chart for the Parks and Recreation Department 4.2 Staffing Levels In order to meet the demand for parks and recreation services, the City has budgeted for a staff of nine full-time positions. The number of employees (full-time equivalents or FTE) has remained at nine since 2007.A typical measure for staffing by the National Recreation and Recreation Association (NRPA)1 is the number of FTEs per 10,000 residents.At current staffing levels the city has approximately one FTE/ 10,000 residents. While this is on the low end, the number does not account for city's contracts for park maintenance and aquatics operations. 4.3 Revenues and Expenditures Table 4-1 shows the City's General Fund budget and the recurring budget for parks and recreation services. Generally,the parks and recreation budget has kept pace with the City budget as a percentage of General Fund expenditures. It is expected that the Parks and Recreation budget will continue to keep pace with General Fund expenditures. 1 The 2019 NRPA Agency Performance Review presents the data and key insights from 1,075 parks and recreation agencies collected by survey.This report can be read here https://www.nrpa.org/publications- research/research-papers/agency-performance-review/and is attached as an Appendix to this plan. Page 124 Table 4-1: Bud:et Allocation 2012-2019 Year City General Fund Parks and Recreation Percentage Expendituresa Budget of totalb 2012 $ 34,660,400 $ 2,953,219 8.5 2013 $ 35,312,674 $ 2,667,678 7.6 2014 $ 36,898,910 $ 2,711,233 7.3 2015 $ 38,292,307 $ 2,757,358 7.2 2016 $ 39,707,433 $ 2,796,331 7.0 2017 $ 40,163,702 $ 3,097,760 7.7 2018 $ 40,901,919 $ 3,149,531 7.7 a#001 -General Fund Recurring Activity b Percentage Based on Department Budget 4.3.1 Departmental Expenditures Table 4-2 illustrates Departmental expenditures for each Division in the Parks and Recreation Department. In 2017 and 2018, CenterPlace received close to a third of the Parks and Recreation budget. The various budget allocations for the divisions appear to receive appropriate amounts relative to overall allocation of resources. Table 4-2: Parks and Recreation Division Bud_•et Breakdown Division 2017 Percent 2018 Percent Expenditures of Total Expenditures of Total Parks $ 296,764 10 $ 301,311 10 Administration Parks $ 861,350 28 $ 863,975 27 Maintenance Recreation $ 246,295 8 $ 260,802 8 Aquatics $ 497,350 16 $ 515,900 16 Senior Center $ 95,916 3 $ 98,229 3 CenterPlace $ 901,468 29 $910,696 29 Capital Projectsa $ 160,000 5 $ 160,000 5 CenterPlace $ 36,000 1 $ 36,000 1 Kitchenb Total $ 3,097,760 $ 3,149,531 a Beginning in 2017 the Parks and Recreation Department began to transfer$160,000 from its general fund budget to Fund 309 Parks Capital Projects. b These funds account for the equipment rental and replacement in the CenterPlace kitchen. 4.3.2 Department Revenues Aside from local taxes (property tax, retail sales and use tax, excise tax), the Parks and Recreation Department charges fees for selected recreation programs, which offset direct costs related to providing the program. In addition, fees are charged for the use of various rooms within CenterPlace and the rental of park spaces. These fees supplement the Parks and Recreation Department budget and are not considered enterprise funds. In 2018,the City generated $725,945 through parks recreation and aquatic program fees, which includes through facility rentals - such as CenterPlace, and program fees - such as aquatics and recreation. When compared to the total Parks and Recreation budget, Page 125 revenues from Parks and Recreation services account for approximately 23 percent of the total operating budget. One means of analyzing revenue production is to compare operating costs on a per capita basis. The gross cost per capita is the total cost of the services divided by the number of persons in the service area. However, this is not necessarily the true cost to the taxpayer because it does not reflect the net cost after revenue is deducted. Table 4-3 shows the cost per capita for the Parks and Recreation system. Table 4-3: Net Cost •er Ca•ita Year Population Operating Revenue Net Costs Cost/Capita Costs 2013 91,490 $ 2,667,678 $ 560,065 $ 2,107,613 $23.04 2014 92,050 $ 2,711,233 $ 627,045 $ 2,084,188 $ 22.64 2015 93,340 $ 2,757,385 $ 684,254 $ 2,073,131 $ 22.21 2016 94,160 $ 2,796,331 $ 712,843 $ 2,083,488 $ 22.13 2017 94,890 $ 3,097,760 $ 754,848 $ 2,342,912 $ 24.69 2018 95,810 $ 3,149,531 $ 725,945 $ 2,423,586 $ 25.30 4.4 Maintenance Operations Spokane Valley contracts out the maintenance of its park facilities. In 2018,the City spent approximately $886,536 for the parks maintenance, which equates to approximately $3,690 per acre park land. 4.5 Recreation Programs The City offers a number of recreation programs including: summer day camp; summer park program; winter camp; sports programs for preschool age and older, adult dance programs; and special events, such as Breakfast with Santa and Movies in the Park. In 2018, there were approximately 57,277 participants in the programs offered. The majority of participants, 40,464,were recreation swim participants,that is, people who paid for recreational swim time at one of the three pools. Page X26 Chapter 5.0: Needs Assessment This chapter discusses the need for parks, facilities and other recreational services within the City. It contains a summary of the stakeholder interviews, public workshops and other public engagement processes. This update presents a current needs assessment based on the findings of the public process. 5.1 Stakeholder Interviews The update process started with several one-on-one interviews with a variety of stakeholders and interest groups in Spokane Valley. Specific stakeholder groups included school districts, trails groups, Spokane River Forum, private recreation program providers, hoteliers,Arts Council, Spokane County and City staff. The following key findings emerged from the stakeholder interviews: • Partnership - The City Parks and Recreation Department maintains an excellent relationship with schools,the county and private sports program providers. The Department should continue these mutually beneficial relationships. • Schools - School property,both gymnasiums and athletic fields, provide opportunities for both formal (sports programs such as baseball) and informal (enjoyment by neighbors). However,these sites are not always available for the general public. The City should work towards developing joint use agreements with the schools. • Recreation Programs - The City's recreation program fills a niche,but opportunities exist for expanded offerings. • Spokane River - The Spokane River is an asset to the community and while there are a number of access locations, additional access should be considered to realize the full potential. Consideration for increased connectivity between parks via the river and water trail is important. • Neighborhood Parks - Providing park access to neighborhood kids should be the Parks Department's "highest calling." Ensuring that all areas of the community have park land accessible should be an important priority. • Economic Development -Access to parks or trails provides development and investment incentives, and most people like to live and/or work near parks. The City should continue its efforts to support tourism, such as improvements at CenterPlace, Balfour Park expansion and recent Brown's Park improvements. The City should consider taking advantage of sports related tourism with tournament quality facilities such as artificial turf and lighting. • Facility Types - Generally,the type of facilities available are adequate. However, some facilities such as the horse arena at Valley Mission Park are under-used and Page X27 some modern facility types such as skate parks and bicycle pump tracks are desired. The City should consider new modern facility types and perhaps repurposing older facility types. • Acquisition-As the City becomes more urban, there will be an increased need for park land especially to underserved areas. The amount of park land available is inadequate to meet present and future needs, especially as it relates to open space and athletic fields. 5.2 Public Workshops As part of the update process,the City conducted a two public workshops at CenterPlace. The first workshop focused on goal and policy development and the second workshop asked participants to focus on specific demands and needs for the parks and recreation system. Key Findings on Public Engagement The key findings, listed in no particular order, from the various public outreach activities and public workshops, include: • Residents desire more park land that is conveniently and equitability located throughout the city. • New park land should take advantage of vacant land or partner with school districts. • The Parks and Recreation Department budget is not adequate to meet the needs and desires of residents. • Parks and recreation opportunities need to be available for users of all abilities, including ADA. • Replace the horse arena at Valley Mission Park with a bicycle pump track, skate park or both. • Community events are important and should be continued and expanded when possible. • Splash pads have a high user value and efforts should be made to include them in parks. • Restrooms need to be well maintained and upgraded or improved in older facilities. • Take advantage of existing unimproved trails along the northern bank of the Spokane River by providing signage. 5.2.1 Goals and Policy Workshop On Wednesday, May 15, 2019, approximately 27 individuals, including staff attended the first public workshop to update the 2013 Plan. This first public meeting followed a series of stakeholder interviews and was the first public workshop for the 2019 Plan. The meeting was held at CenterPlace and was advertised as a Special Meeting by the City Council. Following a presentation by Parks and Recreation staff providing context as to why the City is updating its Parks and Recreation Master Plan,table groups were asked to participate in two exercises to help give input for the plan goals and policies. This paper summarizes the results of those exercises. Page 128 Exercise 1: Choosing Favorites In the first exercise, participant groups were asked to identify things they liked about the City of Spokane Valley Parks and things they liked about parks generally or they have experienced elsewhere. This was an open-ended discussion that asked participants to converse amongst each other and begin to think about what parks mean to them. The images below, known as a word cloud, summarize the results of the first exercise.A word cloud identifies the frequency of a words by displaying high frequency words in larger- sized text and less frequent words in smaller-sized text. Like about Spokane Valley Parks Like about Parks Generally Swimming Pocket ParksParks_PlanningTheme_Park ValleyfestBike Racks — Park_Opportunities River Retail Rec_Opportunities We I I-m a l nta i n ed Partnership[ra I I SAquatic_Facility Pa Picnic shelters vilions'nteractive Communit _Events Treei Outdoor Fitness .Y -. Tree n to rp ret i veIneluslve i Parkin Pet Friendly S lashPads g Natur=al_AreaTra i sRestrooms M o re Pa rks RiverTreesAOAbA� Fesb;e Destination Facility Discovery_Playground Natural —Areas Playgrounds Playgrounds Rec O portunities _,. og_ —Open space DParksVaried_Programming oile bll Diverse_landscape Y Well-maintained Sports Complex Wate r_AccessWater_Featu res Figure 5-A: Favorite Elements about Parks Locally and Elsewhere Exercise 2: Gap Analysis In the second exercise, participants were asked to consider 11 policy statements related to parks and recreation. Participants were asked to evaluate how well each policy statement is being done today and how well they would like the statement to be in the future. Groups were then asked to compare the existing to future status. The interval from existing to future was identified as the "Gap"value.A high "Gap"value indicates that a significant amount of change is needed to move from the current status to desired future conditions. After identifying the "Gap"for each policy statement, groups were asked to apply a relative priority to each of the policy statements by assigning a "Weight"value to each statement. Groups were given a total budget of 22 units which they were permitted to allocate however the table saw fit, provided the total for all 11 statements did not exceed 22. The table below combines the gap values and the weighted values to show a weighted gap. A high-weighted gap indicates a policy that needs the most change and was considered important to the groups. Page X29 Table 5-1: Weighted Gap Analysis and Agreement # Weighted Gap 1 There is an adequate amount of park land to meet resident needs. 800 2 Parks and recreation facilities are provided equitably and conveniently 391 throughout the city. 3 The Parks and Recreation budget adequately meets the needs of residents. 252 4 Users of all abilities have adequate access to parks and recreational opportunities. 198 5 The parks and recreation facilities are well designed,attractive,and safe. 88 61 The city provides adequate recreational services and programming to meet 70 residents'needs. 71 There are a variety of recreational opportunities for both residents and visitors. 60 8 The parks facilities are modern and meet the needs of residents'recreational 36 demands. 9 The parks system is adequately supplemented by the county and school districts. 21 10 Public art that reflects Spokane Valley is incorporated in the city's park system. 10 11 The parks system is well maintained and clean. 0 5.2.2 Demands and Needs Workshop As part of the Demands and Needs Workshop,the City held engagement activities at three parks during the City's Free Summer Park Program from June 17-19, 2019.A formal public workshop on June 20, 2019 was held at CenterPlace where in addition to specific facility improvement questions, participants were asked to identify potential locations for new park land. Exercise 1: Facility Improvements In the first exercise, participants were given a limited budget of dots to "spend"across various facility improvements across a select set of parks. The cost of facility improvements were in order of magnitude relative to each other; for example, a restroom replacement cost three dots and a basketball court cost two dots. Participants were not given enough dots to "pay for"all the improvements listed, and thus,were forced to make priority investments. The charts below summarize the results of the improvement exercise for all events. Page 130 %People Buying Improvement 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Edgecliff Park Improve softball field - 4% Replace tennis court with and pickleball court 8% Replace restroom 13% Add basketball court 13% New playground 13% Balfour Park Balfour expansion 19% Splash pad(included in expansion) 12% Add basketball court(included in expansion) 3% New picnic shelter(included in expansion) 11% New playground(included in expansion) - 5% Figure 5-B: Facility Improvement Exercise Edgecliff Park %People Buying Improvement 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Terrace View Park Softball field improvements 3% Convert softball field to soccer field ' 0% Add/upgrade sidewalk access 16% Add basketball court 11% Replace restroom 20% Sullivan Park New picnic area(north side) 9% Replace restroom 5% Add vendor space for non-motorized 7/ watercraft rentals Disc golf course(west) 10% New signage to trail,better access 18% Figure 5-C: Facility Improvement Exercise Terrace View Park Page 131 %People Buying Improvement 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Valley Mission Park Skate park and/or bike park at horse arena 20% Replace tennis courts with new pickleball courts 10% Replace restroom 13% Convert softball to multipurpose field 4% New playground 111.. 18% Greenacres Park Phase II completion 6% Baseball field(included in Phase II) - 2% Multipurpose field(included in Phase II) 9% Basketball court(included in Phase II) 7% Tennis/pickleball courts(included in Phase II) 11% Figure 5-D: Facility Improvement Exercise Valley Mission Park Exercise 2: Park System Needs In the second exercise, participants were asked to identify locations for new parks. Each table was provided a large format map that identified all school district-owned property, existing and proposed bike and sidewalk paths, low and moderate income census blocks, existing city-owned land and vacant property of at least five acres. Each table, as a group,were asked to spend two green dots.A green dot represented one new neighborhood park of about five acres. Participants needed to use both green dots for a five-acre park, if the park was not located on vacant property. Tables could also exchange one green dot for two yellow dots, if the park was located jointly on school district property. Participants were asked to consider the following park land needs in their exercise: • Is there a park within a 1/2 mile? • Can you easily and safely walk or bike to the facility? o Are there barriers: I-90, river, major arterials? • Is there an elementary school within a 1/2 mile? • Are other recreational opportunities such as Centennial Trail or Dishman Hills nearby? • The minimum size of a neighborhood park is five acres. • Is the property vacant? • Is the area identified as low to moderate income? Page 132 The figure below shows the results of the second exercise: ` ARKS A C -'EATTON `E . ,.` N[ AN • EEDS ANALYSIS J / -.44111110 In. --"tii•-0°"47---i"---, - I r nr y PPlialiMai miii: � ■a _ ,,,,,,,,t, ,A.,,ismilipiii „,,r, ., ,, , .Li.l■.lid.■■ il��■ . i � �.kii■■'.0 ..■ - -mrr�oil f 1 lir. i MI Mile ' , is ' - filikaltilnilW --1,- 1 Instructions: % 11 1” tlM ' I. MM— lMwVtlhab— lw:I.ae avrm�k:H r:,,vzmw \Hi1If'-!' .re c.P Lac[raa -Ciriax PropeM-M.xeP[, �F knew.' ,--0,,,, NOISE: �x wnxvaxProp.n .....PWIP r.xwv �. "-_ w......... ,...._...-... a.........i.....-..._.. uW Gea.iQaf. mmaawntl.s...m.asx..a .,. ...w.c ,P z UPD,Ecastit ex M,z.sx Pnx - - e neaarran.nneeEenonpanrarem.eX.zarw reasmnx Figure 5-E: Park Location Exercise Results 5.2.3 Movies in the Park and "Game On!" In addition to the engagement activities associated with public workshops, the City also conducted listening booths at Movies in the Park and "Game On!" Both these programs are free community events conducted by the City on different dates and at different parks within the system. Itis estimated that approximately 1,200 people attended these events.At these events,the City conducted another dot exercise similar to the facilities exercise used for the Demands and Needs workshop. The chart below shows the results of the Movies in the Park and "Game On!" exercise. Page 133 Upgrade softball fields 5% New picnic shelters Expand and improve Balfour Park New trail signage(north river near Sullivan) 4% 5% — —4% / / 1Construct new pickleball courts New basketball courts 3% 5% Appleway Trail interpretive signs 2% New playgrounds(in Balfour,Sullivan, Convert tennis courts to pickleball Edgecliff and Valley Mission) courts 7°%a 1% Replace Horse Arena with skate park New dog park_ _ _ _ and/or bike park(Valley Mission) 7% 14% New disc golf cour_se_- 8% New splash pads in parks 14% Upgrade restrooms(Terrace View,Valley Movies in the Park & Mission and Edgecliff) Game On Counts 10% Community Events 11% Figure 5-F: Movies in the Park and "Game On!" Poll 5.3 Summary of Park Land Needs This section provides the Needs Assessment for the City. It provides the information necessary to make informed decisions on how many acres of parks and numbers of facilities are needed to meet current and future needs. These needs are based on the vision set forth by the community and the demand for recreational opportunities, as measured in various public involvement venues. However, not all needs can be or should be provided by the City. Some community needs can be met by other agencies, schools,the County, private organizations, and public service organizations such as the YMCA. The community needs identified in this chapter were used to develop recommendations for the park system presented in Chapter 6. 5.3.1 Methodology Developing a statement of needs for parks and open space areas depends on localized values, availability of land, financial resources, and desired service levels. To determine specific park land needs for the Spokane Valley Planning Area, several analytical methods were used. These include: • Recreational demands (measured through public involvement activities) • National trends and standards Page 134 • Land availability • Geographic deficiencies for parks and open space areas • Adopted level of service In synthesizing this information, the adopted level of service standard is the main driver for determining how much park land the City will need in the future, and the other components help determine what types of park facilities are desired, available, and needed. Using the adopted level of service in the City's Comprehensive Plan, the analysis determined the amount of park land needed in 2037. The year 2037 was chosen because it represents the adopted population projection in the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. The analysis then established a demand need for park types; the demand need is expressed as a percentage of the overall need for park land. The percentage of park land devoted to a park type was determined based on local conditions, national trends, and land availability. 5.3.2 Adopted Level of Service Standards The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts 1.92 acres per 1,000 residents as the minimum level of service for parks. This plan proposes to increase the level of service to 3.25 acres per 1,000 residents. The following service areas were used to help calculate park needs: • Neighborhood Parks - Service area of half-mile radius • Community Parks - Service area of two-mile radius • Special Use Area - No service area recommended as people will generally travel as far as needed to use the facilities • Large Urban Park-Within 30 minutes by personal vehicle for cities of 25,000 to 250,000 • Natural Open Space - No service area recommended Figure 5-G shows the service areas for the existing Neighborhood and Community Parks as identified above. For those park lands that do not have a recommended service area: Special Use, Large Urban Park, and Natural Open Space, only the names and location are provided. Page 135 rands Ave E R. -n P' E Valley '. E Wellesley ■ dye 3pringe.3i�— Me_ �9` I ni etD� �� -� L;03., Spokane EU y� 7.1 CC E a E Frederidt u_ _ Ave uclid Ave Millwood Z E-Fucli� db.ve Mlllwoo. - . � 'Felts Field Mi au / ' i u1 / .�-, E Mansfla. Poiark Z E r II `'PvB 9 90 >Ile L_ — S . an cc P"''Spa. ,r l:4S1'UMW EfhUiana0\4 ,�y m �• Libe`rety � ,..,//" , Pafk s a Ave nacres z 4 G ■ GrePark °_ o� - k Park E Broadway A- ... 17 z `m Late r. z ly Balfour Z ■ sera▪,_ � Ave E3rd '% :0 EA .ems• Park Appleway I - -. _ E oh Trail 721 o`� ntY Edg ecllff � EBth Ave "` 0 i Park to o i� li z E 17th U 'v_ g C 16th Ave m Ave 3 re CA. .m 27. Terrace to h `4 �> View �� L' NPark �; Spokane co X"_ County Browns U ,��ese�n EAvn Service Area by Park Type Castle Park Park Ii-- 1--11 M. Spokane Valley Park ��< Spokane Valley " ce E 44th Ep' Service Area co Ave P Community Park(2 mi) — Neighborhood Park(1i2 mi) I Trail(1/4 mi) I / \ Figure 5-G: Park Service Areas for Spokane Valley Parks 136 5.3.3 Summary of Park Land Needs Table 5-2 shows that the City of Spokane Valley will need an additional 117 acres of park land by 2037 to accommodate projected population at the level of service (LOS) standard of 3.25 acres per 1,000 people. The following terms are used in the analysis: • Adopted LOS is the level of service standard adopted by the City for park land. It is expressed as a ratio of acres per 1,000 people. • 2037 Project Population is the adopted population projection found in the City's Comprehensive Plan. • Total Need (year 2037) is the number of acres of park land that will be needed to serve the City's residents in 2037. It is determined by multiplying the adopted LOS by the quotient of the projected population divided by 1,000. • Existing Park Land is the total designated park land with the City and includes undeveloped park land but does not include park land or open spaces owned by other agencies. • Net Need (year 2037) is the amount of park acres that will be needed at build-out after subtracting the existing park land. Table 5-2: Future Park Land Demand at Ado•ted Level of Service Adopted LOS 2037 Projected Total Need Existing Park Landa Net Need (ac/1,000 Population (2037) (2037) residents) 3.25 109,913 357.21 240.22 117.00 a. Does not include Washington State Park property associated with the Centennial Trail. The analysis of park land need shows that the city needs an additional 117 acres of park land. Table 5-2 shows a need of 117 acres park land to meet future needs. Table 5-3 shows how the needed acreage could be allocated to various park types based on existing ratios; however, other factors such as area, location, and funding would play a deciding factor in determining what park type would be developed. To state this simply,the city will use the ratios as a guide but will take advantage of opportunities as they arise. Table 5-3: Pro•osed Acres Needed b Park T •e Park Type Existing Acres Existing Ratio Park Land Need at Existing Ratios in 2037 Community 48.62 20% 23.68 Large Urban 55.51 23% 27.04 Neighborhood 27.96 12% 13.62 Natural Open Space 43.22 18% 21.05 Trails and Linear 52.12 22% 25.38 Total 240.22 100% 117.00 Page 137 5.4 Summary of Recreation Facility Needs The City has limited field space to program sports activities. Residents of the City rely on the sports programming from Spokane County or the City of Spokane. Spokane County runs the largest adult softball league in the County with 285 teams (2018), down from 400 teams participating in 2012. Spokane County has been experiencing the same declining and/or flat trend in participation rates for team sports (softball/baseball) as national trends2. This plan recognizes that the City is not the prime provider of field space within the region, and provides a supporting role with its limited facilities. The plan also recognizes the importance and value of the regional partnerships with Spokane County and the three school districts within the City. According to Spokane County's parks plan, Spokane County may pursue satisfying much of the current demand for softball fields through the renovation of Plante's Ferry Sports Complex. The renovation of Plante's Ferry Sports Complex would include synthetic turf infields, lights, and re-grading increasing the potential hours of use. Spokane County doesn't foresee constructing any additional softball fields beyond the renovation of Plante's Ferry Sports Complex over the next six years. 53 Other Facility and Program Needs Currently,the City does not have some of the recreation resources found in many communities such as recreation centers, indoor aquatic facilities, teen centers, arts centers, and a comprehensive range of recreational programs. The development of these types of facilities and services will generate more interest and participation in recreational activities. 2 2019 Physical Activity Council Participation Report pages 7-9 (http://www.physicalactivitycouncil.com/pdfs/current.pdf) Page 138 Chapter 6.0: Recommendations This chapter provides recommendations for developing and managing a parks and recreation program in the City of Spokane Valley. These recommendations were developed from staff input, public input, and a comprehensive analysis of park land conditions and current maintenance operations. Individual recommendations are subject to further study and final budget and policy approval by the City Council. 6.1 Park Plan Concept Spokane Valley inherited its park system from Spokane County. That system consists of neighborhood parks, community parks, special use areas, and larger day-use parks. The ideal park system for the City should be one made up of a hierarchy of various park types, each offering certain types of recreation and/or open space opportunities. Separately, each park type may serve a primary function, but collectively,they will meet the needs of the entire community. By recognizing this concept, the City can develop an efficient, cost effective, and comprehensive park system. The basic concept of the park system for the City is to provide park and open space areas within convenient walking distance of most neighborhoods. This plan also suggests recreational resources like skate parks, bicycle pump tracks, splash pads, and disc golf be added to parks . Figure 6-A identifies the general areas where additional parks should be located. Generalized areas for park sites were used because the majority of the community is already developed making specific site location challenging.Acquiring and developing park land will continue to be a challenge in the future. The focus should be in the areas identified in Figure 6-A. To achieve its goal of acquiring park land, the City should consider the following: • Formalize partnerships with the school districts to provide playground and park amenities that can be available to residents during non-school hours. Depending upon the level of development proposed,the concept may mean that the City would assist in funding improvements and maintenance of the outdoor play areas. • Be aggressive in pursuing the acquisition of park land as the availability of undeveloped property continues to shrink. • Continue to seek grants, private land donations, or property swaps. The Park Layout Plan is a graphic representation of the proposed park system for Spokane Valley. Figure 6-A illustrates the conceptual location proposed park sites, river access sites, and the location of existing facilities. The map does not pinpoint specific locations for future parks. Some important notes about the layout plan include: 1. The final location of park sites would be determined later in the development of City plans and would be influenced by land availability, acquisition costs, and property ownership. Page 139 2. The proposed river access points are derived from the draft Shoreline Master Program. For precise location and description of river access, please see the SMP. 3. The proposed and existing trails are identified in the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Bikeway Network map. /MI lh Page X40 c Park Plan Concept Antoine Peak Conserv,I lion — -Spokane Valley Park Parks Shoreland Access ' • • CentennialTrail Existing * Opportunity Site Outside Agency Parks -_ .05` New Park Area E Welles,+ey —,----- Fla-51An - . 3ara sradaN Ca _/---- 011111111111."' 10. m drnae o n AM LL z IPP"". Ila-Slala Ants- tenmal Trad -= _, E Mission Ave / ize a c 1 m 11111 ___Mar .le z z i.0 I= ES.:• eAve a \E Appleway Ave I] a a ' At c Haan r. a a ii Ln ft CD Miura:Area 1 Q to _ • . - Ri Ns O = See. co s © co Uplands VN co fmsevalbn Area e._ Ce Ganser vaban \ET N Area-forth UnA is 0 E 44th Ave I 1 Marrow Pail, ash/ran WRs / Net e a!Area Conservaluo Area Sada 1.10t Figure 6-A: 2013 Proposed Park Layout Plan Page 141 6.2 Park and Facility Recommendations Recommendations for park improvements are listed by park name. The discussion about trails are also listed by trail name. The discussion of new parks, park land, or other recreational facility not associated with park are discussed in Section 6.4. 6.2.1 General Park Recommendations Continue efforts and development of partnerships with Spokane County and School Districts. Page X42 6.2.2 Appleway Trail Recommendations • Add park amenity features. • Develop a themed master plan for each section. • Continue westward expansion consistent with the proposed Bikeway Network adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. • Complete the Evergreen to Sullivan section of the trail. • Connect extended Appleway Trail to City Hall and Balfour Park. • Create a trail network map showing shared parking areas. • Improve connections from trailhead to trail. • Install wayfinding and interpretative signage. 4 f I A 6.2.3 Balfour Park Recommendations: • Balfour Park Expansion. Future expansion of Balfour Park on adjacent 5.6 acres includes: a mini amphitheater, meandering paths, multi-purpose shelter with restroom, stage, performance seating space, open field/play area, reconfigured parking lot, splash pad, new basketball court, and expansion of existing play area. J � a "d .{.i.F._ iii 1 ta �ar+=1 v 1 47 .YI a-J y J46,6tr -14 ry_ lu4 a _ W d Zl Page X43 6.2.4 Browns Park Recommendations: • Replace play structure. • Add ramp to play area and add access from sidewalks. • Install lighting in parking lots. • Add new restroom. • Add tot playground. • Add a new shelter. • • ♦' • 1 6.2.5 Castle Park Recommendations: • Pave parking lot or repair. • Remove wood fence. • Add restroom facilities. • Add picnic shelter. • Add playground area. • Add drinking fountains. • Add splash pad. • Add basketball court or other sport court. E • ,� CITY or SPOKM1WE uAEEY � -' � t s Mn RccRr,finoN , -- ! PARKS, ..^P�`•�—�. _ Page X44 6.2.6 Centennial Trail Recommendations: • Continue to participate with the Centennial Trail Coordinating Council and the Spokane River Centennial Trail Interagency Cooperative Agreement. 6 f In aq Barker Road Trailhead • Pave the parking lot. • Make the restroom ADA accessible. Mirabeau Point Park Trailhead North and South • Repair and reopen restroom with potable water. Old Mission Trailhead • Repaint trail access bollards. Sullivan Road Trailhead • Develop a designated parking area for trailhead. Page X45 6.2.7 Edgecliff Park Recommendations: • Add new sidewalk access to playground and restrooms. • Rebuild the tennis and pickleball courts with new surfacing and fences. • Replace play equipment. • Replace the restroom. • Locate existing utilities underground. x r_ iy, 0 k17 __... 1 111 ii-7_ ---- .41::' Al 6.2.8 Greenacres Park Recommendations: 1111 . • Implement the Greenacres Neighborhood Park Master Plan Phase 2,which includes: o Add a basketball court. o Add a pickleball court. o Add a new sports court. o Add a skate park/dot. o Add a community garden. • Extend the perimeter sidewalk. • Make the sand/water play area ADA accessible. • Re-stain splash pad concrete. irr i Bp Pr AAIUN" Page X46 6.2.9 Mirabeau Point Park Recommendations: • Develop forestry management plan. • Install wayfinding signage for walkers/joggers. • Repair and repave pedestrian pathways. CenterPlace Regional Event Center • Replace the roof. CenterPlace West Lawn and North Meadow • Implement the West Lawn Master Plan Phase 2,which includes: o Reconfigure old turn around to a new one. o Add event plaza with hardscaping and lighting. o Add wedding/performance venue with a shelter. o Add a concession building with restrooms. o Add a storage facility. o Add new sidewalks/pathways. o Add more landscaped lawn area. • Add a permanent stage at the North Meadow. s: 4 Discovery Playground • Add new interactive play features. • Replace the foot bridge. 1 ;_, __ __ , IR Page X47 Mirabeau Meadows • Repair or replace the exterior of the restroom. • Install roll bumpers on the stage. • Repair the trash enclosure. ' �. �. a �� '4 WC '.•`I Ti. •}. l,,,R� og :'. Mirabeau Springs • Repair the pond liner where visible. • Replace/repair the waterfall pump system. • Minor maintenance of the shelter is need. 1 "itlr3 Bft f& ., wy � g `w i I. ¶ allk%r ,,. , 1 ,e Fps , '1y ,{F r� r 1 .., ite Department of Natural Resources Property(west of CenterPlace Regional Event Center) Replace the roof. Work in partnership with the Department of Natural Resources to develop a public access plan for the 100 acres Pinecroft Natural Area Preserve. 6.2.10 Myrna Park Recommendations: • Devise a master plan for a trail network. • Install wayfinding and interpretative signage. Page X48 J .' , 4.714 '� T l. ‘' 4 .ir k u'_ s 1 ate' ' 6.2.11 Myrtle Point Park Recommendations: • Develop a park master plan. • Create a trailhead location near Portland Ave. • Install wayfinding and interpretative signage. 'i Y, a d '7-7:: . W r -. i. ,,' ]r,,:Y ,,oaf.. *''.4‘..14. ,- - "` ,'4 43 i,. meg , E, vii 6.2.12 Park Road Pool Recommendations: • Install an ADA accessible drinking fountain inside pool fence. • Repave the parking lot surface. • Consider and explore a partnership with the School District to expand the park. gob �r.w. w rif 'go, a Aft* _ . ---•••-•.....,g 6 ---' ''I -, -.6.- ,::-- ....,,,fr,—' a, _:-:j'''"----7.,:r,-;',, iiii `i Page X49 6.2.13 Sullivan Park Recommendations: • Restripe the parking lots. • Remove the smaller, older east shelter. • Install an ADA accessible pathway and river viewing opportunities. • Install wayfinding signage for access to WA State Parks lands and trails. • Evaluate opportunities to connect the park upstream with WA State Parks property via a trail under the Sullivan Bridge. • Seek opportunities to promote whitewater activities at and near Sullivan Park. • Develop a master plan for the expansion of Sullivan Park. • Consider the design and construction of a river trail on the north bank of the Spokane River from Plante's Ferry Park to Barker Road to provide a safe and scenic mode of transportation along the Spokane River Corridor. A river trail of this nature would safely separate pedestrian traffic from vehicular traffic and provide an interactive natural experience for users. 1r> ` kr e F 4}S�4 s ? : .. Af — k a , Radio-Controlled Car Track • Conduct a facility evaluation to review the existing use. Western Dance Hall • Conduct a facility evaluation to review the existing use. F e 4 F 4 i = vP Page 150 6.2.14 Terrace View Park Recommendations: • Install inner park pathways for ADA accessibility. • Ensure all drinking fountains are ADA accessible. • Install basketball court. • Repair/upgrade the softball field, including the backstop fencing, infield, dugout, and benches. • Replace restroom. 4 4 w .fw• aiii, i+ Terrace View Pool • Ensure all drinking fountains are ADA accessible • Repair or replace north fascia. M 4 IL43 Page 151 6.2.15 Valley Mission Park Recommendations: • Develop a master plan to replace the horse arena and stables area with a bicycle pump track and/or a skate park. • Repave the parking lot. • Repair fencing. • Replace the tennis court and basketball court. • Install more benches around the playground. • Replace restrooms. a _ { Valley Mission Dog Park • Install ADA accessible ramps into enclosures. • Add more play features. T u A w P a ra ' d sMn .G.EAP a `_ AtiMeta t FIQ ... 1 1 syr `. Valley Mission Pool • Replace existing drinking fountain with an ADA fountain. 1PrTv may. _ w 41." 1111 Valley Mission South • Repair or repave parking lot. Page 152 6.2.16 West City Gateway Recommendations: • Add a public art piece. y � spo�R��kne �k Vallee II- . x II ) Ilic iiAli h Page 53 6.3 New Parks The new park areas listed below are not in any particular order. The acquisition and development of new parks is highly dependent of funding sources, timing, and opportunity. The areas identified are based on the public process conducted for this plan. New Park Area 1 Property acquisition and development for new park north of Trent between Evergreen Road and Sullivan Road. Because very little undeveloped and available land exists in this area, additional recreation facilities could be added to the existing school facilities.A school/park could be developed at East Valley Middle or East Valley High School. New Park Area 2 Property acquisition and development for new park south of Appleway Trail between Pines Road and Sullivan Road. New Park Area 3 Property acquisition and development for a park south of 32nd Avenue, north of 44th Avenue between Bowdish and Schaffer. Castle Park currently exists in a mostly undeveloped state but both the Union Pacific railroad and Dishman Mica present a significant bicycle and pedestrian barrier. This area needs careful consideration to ensure the new park or improved park is assessable to neighborhood residents. New Park Area 4 Property acquisition and development for new park between 8th and 16th Avenues and between Dishman Mica Road and University. This area contains an inaccessible city owned property that could form a piece of a neighborhood park. New Park Area 5 Property acquisition and development for new park around Park Road Pool. Because very little undeveloped and available land exists in this area, additional recreation facilities could be added to the existing school facilities.A school/park could be developed at Centennial Middle School in conjunction with Park Road Pool. 6.3.1 Trail Plan Recommendations The City has integrated its trail planning into the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and Transportation Improvement Program. The proposed shared use paths and connections can be found in the Transportation Element. New trail recommendations will be considered in future Comprehensive Plan amendments. 6.4 Recreation Programs and Services Recommendations • Offer sustained, year-round programs to both youth and adults. • Seek 100 percent cost recovery based on direct costs, but explore new program offerings without expecting them to be immediately self-supporting. • Support the development and expansion of tourism related activities and events on park property. Page 154 • Continue participation in the agreement with the Spokane Valley Senior Citizens Association to support their programming. • Seek partnership opportunities to initiate a youth and teen program with the Boys and Girls Club to manage a program. • Continue providing arts, drama and dancing programs by using existing City-owned and operated spaces. 6.5 Administration and Management Recommendations • Encourage special events that attract large numbers of participants and promote City services. • Publish articles in the City newsletter and other forums promoting the benefits of parks and recreation. • Use social medial and other avenues to advertise special events and programs in the media. • Update and develop promotional and informational brochures and display materials. • Update and prepare a marketing plan for park events and programming. • Continue to seek partnerships with other providers, especially school districts to help meet the needs and distribute the responsibilities and costs. • Update private user leases for Evergreen Region Volleyball Association, Radio- Controlled Car Club of Spokane, Western Dance Association, and Splashdown. • Seek grants to implement identified parks and recreation recommendations. 6.6 Maintenance Recommendations • Dedicate time and resources to check on the work being performed. • Continue to incorporate into the contract requirements for minimum standards by which park maintenance personnel will interact with the public. • Establish a maintenance funding goal calculated on a per acre basis and define minimum maintenance service levels. • Develop an integrated pest management plan to define use of herbicides and pesticides in parks and open space areas. • Develop a schedule to assess the replacement and upgrade needs for all parks and facilities. 6.7 River Access Recommendations • Increase access to the Spokane River. o In considering development near the Spokane River or any body of water, reference shall be made to the Shoreline Master Program. • Work with Economic Development Division to identify potential acquisition sites adjacent to the Spokane River. Page 155 Chapter 7.0: Implementation This chapter takes the recommendations and needs and identifies a funding strategy for implementation. This chapter should be reviewed annually to identify potential park improvement projects. 7.1 Recommended Capital Projects The projects below identify a number of improvements throughout the City's parks system. The projects achieve the goals and objectives of this plan, and are anticipated to be funded through two major sources: the General Fund and Recreation Conservation Office grants. Additional funding for tourism-related projects will use lodging tax dollars collected by the City. Other funding opportunities may arise and the City plans to take advantage of those opportunities as they present themselves. Page 156 Table 7-1:Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Program RCO Funding RCO Funding RCO Funding Cycle Cycle Cycle Potential Funding Source Cost Estimate 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Appleway Tral Complete Evergreen to Sullivan section of trail. Legislative Appropriation 2,000,000 2,000,000 Connect extended Appleway Trail to City Hall and Balfour Park City,grants 1,500,000 1,500,000 Create trail network map showing shared parking area City 25,000 25,000 Add park amenity features City 120,000 120,000 Develop themed master plan City 50,000 50,000 Install wayfinding and interpretative signs City 100,000 100,000 Balfour Park AS EP 0 Complete Phase 1 of master plan for Balfour Park Expansion(East) City,RCO WWRP Local Parks 2,500,000 2,500,000 Complete remaining Phase(s)of Balfour Park Expansion City,RCO WWRP Local Parks 3,705,658 3,705,658 Browns Park AIM 111111 AIMIIMI City,Legislative 125,000 125,000 Add new small restroom Appropriation City,Legislative 200,000 200,000 Replace play equipment Appropriation City,Legislative 20,000 20,000 Add ramp to play area,add access from sidewalks Appropriation Installation of lighting in parking lots City 150,000 150,000 City,Legislative 80,000 80,000 Add new small picnic shelter Appropriation Repave NW and SE parking lots City 186,000 186,000 11111=111. MEM_ Add paved parking lot for 15 cars City 50,000 50,000 Add restroom facilities City 125,000 125,000 Add playground area City 200,000 200,000 Add drinking fountain City 4,000 _ 4,000 !MIN Willi Mr ` Renovate Barker Road restroom to be ADA accessible City Pave parking lot at Barker Road trailhead City 125,000 125,000 New sidewalk access to playground and restrooms City 10,000 10,000 Locate existing utilities underground City 150,000 150,000 Replace restroom City 150,000 150,000 eliMEIM-111=111- lie .- AIL Make sand-water play area ADA accessible City 10,000 10,000 Add 2 pickleball courts City 90,000 90,000 Add basketball court-Phase 2 City 70,000 70,000 irabeau .oint 'ark fill..11 IF 157 RCO Funding RCO Funding RCO Funding Cycle Cycle Cycle Potential Funding Source Cost Estimate 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Develop forestry management plan City 100,000 100,000 Develop public access plan with DNR for 100-acre Pinecroft Natural Preserve City/RCO WWRP/DNR 75,000 75,000 Repair and repave pedestrian path City 300,000 300,000 Install wayfinding for walkers/joggers City 30,000 30,000 Discovery Playground Replace small foot bridge City 7,500 7,500 Add new interactive play features City 350,000 120,000 Mirabeau Meadows Repair or replace exterior on restroom City 30,000 30,000 Install roll bumpers on the stage City 20,000 20,000 Mirabeau Springs Repair shelter beams as necessary City 10,000 10,000 CenterPlace North Meadow Add permanent stage City 20,000 20,000 CenterPlace West Lawn Add WiFi to plaza City 5,000 5,000 Complete Master Plan Phase 2 City 2,000,000 2,000,000 CenterPlace(building) Replace roof City 550,000 550,000 Repair/Seal Parking Lot City 250,000 250,000 rk Road Pool Install ADA accessible fountain inside pool fence City 4,000 4,000 I=311. AMOS 111111=111111- Develop master plan for the expanded Sullivan Park which could include a City 75,000 75,000 river trail component. Remove small east shelter City 3,000 3,000 EMMEN _.MM._ MM. M 111111111 Upgrade all water fountains for ADA accessibility City 25,000 25,000 Install basketball court City 70,000 70,000 Install curbs and sidewalks along E 24th and S Blake Road City 40,000 40,000 Replace restroom. City 150,000 150,000 Terrace View Pool Repaint or replace main entrance doors City 7,500 7,500 Repaint or replace north fascia City 7,500 7,500 Valley Mission Develop Master Plan to replace horse arena with bicycle pump-track and/or City 40,000 40,000 a skate park Repave the parking lot City 240,000 240,000 Repair fencing City 25,000 25,000 Install more benches around the playground City 10,000 10,000 Page 158 RCO Funding RCO Funding RCO Funding Cycle Cycle Cycle Potential Funding Source Cost Estimate 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Valley Mission Dog Park Install ADA accessible ramps into enclosures City 5,000 5,000 Valley Mission Pool City Replace existing drinking fountain with an ADA fountain City 4,000 4,000 Valley Mission South Repair or repave parking lot City 240,000 240,000 TOTAL: 5,105,500 3,910,000 1,735,000 978,000 2,885,000 3,805,658 Page 159 7.2 Cost Estimates for New Parks Development costs can vary widely depending on the location, facility type, construction method, off-site costs, quality of development, and other constraints on the project. For purposes of estimating cost, the following assumptions were made: • Land Acquisition: Land prices were estimated at$65,000 per acre. In some areas of the City, land acquisition could exceed this amount. • Construction Costs: Potential costs were established for each element of park development for each park site. These costs excluded street improvements and any other off-site costs. For typical neighborhood and community parks, an assumption of$650,000 per acre was used. • School Park Improvements: An estimated cost of$250,000 per site was used. • Design: The figures assume a project designed by a professional design firm and bid through a competitive public bidding process. Design costs were estimated at 10 percent of construction cost. • Contingency: A contingency of 15 percent was used. 7.3 Financing Strategy and Capital Improvement Plan The projects below fall outside the six-year capital improvement program for parks (see Table 7-1). The projects may not have a funding source identified, nor may they have a targeted timeline. It is intended that the projects in Table 7-2 would be moved into the Capital Improvement Project list as opportunity and funding arise. Table 7-2 summarizes the recommended projects and funding sources for the 2014-2019 planning period. Table 7-2: Ca•ital Im•rovement Plan for Pro'ect Be and 2035 Park Name Project Description Appleway Trail Explore design options for the extension of Appleway Trail to Dishman Hills Balfour Park Implement Remaining portion of the master plan if needed Browns Park Replace fencing on north and east sides. Castle Park Add picnic shelter Add splash pad Add basketball court or other sport court Centennial Trail Develop a designated parking area for Sullivan Road trailhead Repair and reopen Mirabeau Point Trailhead restroom with potable water Page 160 Park Name Project Description Discovery Playground Complete implementation of new features Edgecliff Rebuild the tennis and pickleball court with new surfacing and fences Replace play equipment Greenacres Add baseball/softball field - Phase 2 Add tennis court - Phase 2 Add community garden - Phase 2 Add skate park- Phase 2 Mirabeau Springs Repair pond liner where visible Replace/repair springs pump system Myrna Master plan a trail network Install wayfinding and interpretative signage Myrtle Point Create entrance trail head location near Portland Ave Develop park master plan Install wayfinding and interpretative signage Park Road Pool Repave the parking lot Sullivan Repave parking lot Install ADA accessible pathway and river viewing opportunities Install wayfinding for access to State Park lands and trails Seek opportunities to promote whitewater activities at and near Sullivan Park Terrace View Install inner park sidewalks for ADA accessibility Repair/upgrade softball field: Backstop fencing, infield repair, dugout and benches repair Valley Mission Replace upper restroom Implement horse arena master plan Replace tennis courts Replace basketball court Page 161 Park Name Project Description Valley Mission Dog Park Add additional play elements Valley Mission Pool Valley Mission South West City Gateway Add donated public art piece New Pet Park Develop a 3 acre off-leash pet park as either a new facility or component of an existing park New Neighborhood Park- 5 acres Property acquisition and development for new neighborhood park north of Trent between Evergreen Road and Sullivan Road. New Neighborhood Park- 5 acres Property acquisition and development for new neighborhood park south of Sprague Avenue between Pines and Sullivan. New Neighborhood Park- 5 acres Property acquisition and development for new neighborhood park around Park Road Pool. New Neighborhood Park- 5 acres Property acquisition and development for new neighborhood park between 8th and 16th Avenues and between Dishman Mica Road and University. New neighborhood Park- 5 acres Property acquisition and development for new neighborhood park south of 32nd Avenue, north of 44th Avenue between Bowdish and Shaffer. 7.4 Funding Sources The following are possible funding sources for acquiring, developing, and maintaining parks and other recreational areas in the City: Page 162 General Fund This is the City's primary source for operating revenue. Most of this revenue comes from taxes levied on property and the sale of merchandise within the City's boundary.This fund provides the majority of revenue for park improvements. Recreation Program The Parks and Recreation Department charges fees for selected recreation Fees programs.These fees offset direct costs related to providing the program. CenterPlace Fees The Parks and Recreation Department charges fees for use of CenterPlace. Uses include regional meetings, weddings, receptions and banquets. Rental rooms include classrooms, meeting rooms, the Great Room Dining Room, Fireside Lounge, auditorium, and banquet facilities. Real Estate Excise Tax Both sources of REET funding (REET 1 and REET 2) can be used for park (REET) capital improvement projects, including park development. Motor Vehicle Excise The State of Washington collects a $0.494 per gallon motor vehicle fuel tax Tax at the pump. Of this amount, the State remits a portion of the tax back to cities on a per capita basis. A portion 0.42 percent is used for paths and trails. It is anticipated that this fund will generate$8,800 in 2019. Hotel/Motel Tax The City imposes a 1.3%tax on all charges made for the furnishing of lodging Tourism Facilities at hotels, motels, and similar establishments.The revenues generated may only be used for capital expenditures for acquiring, constructing, making improvements to or other related capital expenditures for large sporting venues, or venues for tourism-related facilities. Hotel/Motel Tax The City imposes a 2%tax on all charges made for the furnishing of lodging at hotels, motels, and similar establishments.The tax is taken as a credit against the 6.5% state sales tax. The revenues generated by this tax may be used solely for paying for tourism promotion and for the acquisition and/or operation of tourism-related facilities. Bonds The city has the authority to borrow money by selling bonds for land acquisition, renovations, expansions, or construction of facilities.There are three types of bonds:voter-approved general obligation bonds; limited tax general obligation bonds; and revenue bonds. General Obligation General obligation bonds (also called voted debt) must be approved by 60% Bonds of the voters, with a voter turnout equal to at least 40%of those who voted in the most recent general election. When the voters are being asked to approve the issuance of these bonds, they are simultaneously asked to approve an excess levy which raises their property taxes to cover the debt service payments. These bonds can only be used for capital improvements. Limited Tax General Limited tax general obligation (LTGO) bonds (also called "councilmanic" Obligation (LTGO) bonds or non-voted debt), may be issued by a vote of the legislative body. Bonds LTGO debt does not provide any additional revenue to fund debt service payments and must be paid from existing revenue sources. Park Impact Fees Park Impact Fees are fees imposed on new development because of the impacts the projects have on the City's infrastructure. While common in many Washington cities, Spokane Valley does not impose this fee. Page 163 Conservation Futures Conservation Futures funding is a Spokane County program that can be used Funding for the acquisition of property and development rights to benefit wildlife, conserve natural resources, increase passive recreation and educational opportunities. Typically, city parks do not meet the threshold requirements of the funding program because they are not left natural. However, maintaining and protecting the City's natural open spaces may qualify for Conservation Futures funding. Grant Programs Washington State The RCO Funding Board, combines funds from several federal and state Recreation and sources to distribute in the form of grants to eligible application sponsors for Conservation Office outdoor recreation and conservation projects.The amount of money (RCO) Grants available varies from year-to-year depending on the Washington State budget. Grants are awarded to state and local agencies through a highly competitive process that often requires local matching funds. RCO- The LWCF is a federal program that provides grants to acquire or develop Land and Water public lands for outdoor recreation. Each state may submit two proposals for Conservation Fund national competition. A grant applicant must contribute a match that equals (LWCF) the amount of the grant request.This is called providing a 50 percent matching share. RCO- The YAF is a grant program that provides money to buy land and develop or Youth Athletic renovate outdoor athletic facilities such as ball fields, courts, swimming Facilities(YAF) pools, BMX tracks, and skate parks that serve youth. It excludes: playgrounds, tot lots,vacant lots, and open or undeveloped fields. A grant applicant must contribute a match that equals the amount of the grant request.This is called providing a 50 percent matching share. RCO- The ALEA grant program is for the acquisition, improvement, or protection of Aquatic Lands aquatic lands for public purposes. They also may be used to provide or Enhancement improve public access to the waterfront. A grant applicant must contribute a Account(ALEA) match that equals the amount of the grant request.This is called providing a 50 percent matching share. RCO- WWRP provides funding for a broad range of projects that conserve wildlife Washington Wildlife habitat, forestland, and farmland; buys land for parks and trails; and and Recreation develops outdoor recreational facilities. WWRP funding is allocated into Program (WWRP) three accounts: Farm and Forest, Habitat Conservation, and Outdoor Recreation Account.The accounts are divided further into categories with unique funding priorities. A grant applicant must contribute a match that equals the amount of the grant request.This is called providing a 50 percent matching share. Community These grants from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development Block Development are available for a wide variety of projects.They are Grants distributed in the lower income areas of the community. Other Potential Sources Page 164 Partnerships The City is in a unique position to develop additional partnerships with other jurisdictions, school districts, or agencies to implement park projects. Some potential partners include the YMCA, Boys and Girls Club, private sport and conservation groups, neighborhood organizations, school districts, Spokane County, and the City of Spokane. Joint Public/Private This is when the City enters into a working agreement with a private Partnership corporation to help fund, build, and/or operate a public facility. Private Grants and Private grants and foundations provide money for a wide range of projects. Foundations They are sometimes difficult to find and equally difficult to secure because of the open competition. They usually fund unique projects or ones demonstrating extreme need. Lifetime Estates This is an agreement between a City and a landowner, where the City gives the former owner the right to live on the site after it is sold until such time as the former owner either moves off the property or passes away. Donations Donations of labor, land, or cash by service agencies, private groups, or individuals are ways to raise small amounts of money or receive land. Service agencies such as Kiwanis, Lions, and Rotary Clubs often fund small projects such as playground improvements. If\ r Page 165 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Contents Major Issues: Safety Accessibility Maintenance Specific Park Inventory Existing Conditions Neighborhood Parks (NP) Balfour Park Browns Park Castle Park Edgecliff Park Greenacres Park Community Parks (CP) Sullivan Park Terrace View Park Valley Mission Park Large Urban Parks (LUP) Mirabeau Point Park (Discovery Playground) (Mirabeau Meadows) (Mirabeau Springs) Regional Parks (RP) None Special Use Facilities (SUF) CenterPlace Regional Event Center CenterPlace: North Meadow CenterPlace: West Lawn Park Road Pool Valley Mission Dog Park Valley Mission Pool Terrace View Pool West City Gateway Trails and Linear Parks (T) Appleway Trail Centennial Trail Michael Terrell • Landscape Architect 1 4 2 1 N . M e a d o w w o o d Lane , Suite 1 5 0 Liberty Lake , WA 9 9 0 1 9 ( 5 0 9 ) 9 2 2 - 7 4 4 9 m t e r r e l l@ m t - l a . c o m Member American Society of Landscape Architects Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington Valley Park Facility Inventory July 31, 2019 Natural Open Space Areas(NOS) Myrtle Point Park Myrna Park Undeveloped Lands (UL) Valley Mission Park South Balfour Park West Michael Terrell • Landscape Architect 1 4 2 1 N . M e a d o w w o o d Lane , Suite 1 5 0 Liberty Lake , WA 9 9 0 1 9 ( 5 0 9 ) 9 2 2 - 7 4 4 9 m t e r r e l l@ m t - l a . c o m Member American Society of Landscape Arch i t e c t s Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 This assessment is based on a tour of the individual parks and conversations with Parks staff. It is intended to provide an overview of the existing facilities and conditions in Spokane Valley Parks. Conditions considered include: • Overall Condition o Excellent, Good, Average, or Poor based on: plant material, vandalism, ADA access, field and court conditions, and playgrounds. • Playgrounds • Pools/Splash Pads • Fields and Athletic Facilities • Support Facilities • Parking and Access • Irrigation Systems Major Issues: Safety: There are several issues related to safety that were identified during the on-site review of parks. 1. Lighting: Lighting in the parks is not consistent in application and location. Many parking lots lack lighting or have insufficient lighting to provide visibility for law enforcement. 2. Play equipment: Many parks have play equipment and park furniture that is reaching an age requiring specific maintenance, replacement of wood components or replacement of the structure. Use of wood components on play structures, benches and safety surfacing containment borders requires an annual commitment for review, maintenance and replacement when necessary. 3. Fencing: Many parks have sections of chain-link fence that have been damaged by vehicles, maintenance equipment and heavy use. Some of this damage poses a potential safety hazard when located adjacent to a play field. 4. Concrete and asphalt repair: Review, identification and repair of broken, cracked and displaced concrete and asphalt should be integrated in long term maintenance programs. Accessibility: Lack of ADA access is a primary concern for Spokane Valley Parks. In many parks, sidewalks are not provided to all or some of the park amenities from parking areas. 3 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington 4o•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 In addition, a number of playgrounds do not provide accessible routes, ramps or transfer stations. Maintenance: Ongoing preventative and corrective maintenance is always a challenge for park departments. Primary maintenance issues include damaged fencing, damaged signage and damaged paving surfaces. Vandalism is also a recognized challenge in many parks. Some parks have inadequate irrigation systems. These should be assessed to determine if changes in irrigation scheduling or adjustment of equipment can solve issues. Maintenance issues should be addressed based on priority determined by the severity of damage and visibility by users. 4 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Balfour Park (NP) Address: 105 N. Balfour Road Size: 2.86 Acres, plus additional 5.56 undeveloped acres that will be included as part of the park upon it, completion of the master plan. Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed. However a master plan calls for the development of 5.56 acres immediately west of the park. This park is located next to University Fire Station, across the street from Spokane Valley City Hall Amenities include a sand volleyball court, playground, I�jfld 1� �. 41h��, ��J restroom, parking lot, and picnic tables. ralt Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): The park is in good condition however it lacks ADA �- "re, accessibility to the play structure, sand volleyball court, and drinking fountain. Playgrounds: The play structure is an interactive system which includes activities like slides, climbing areas, tunnels and a bridge. • The play structure is in fair condition, with the exception of noticeable wearing of the polyester coating on platforms and some wearing of powder coating on some poles. There is significant wear at the base of the yellow slide, and graffiti is etched into some plastic pieces. Some sharp cracks are visible, but some appear to be worn or ground down. • The transition from the walk to the play area is not ADA accessible. Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields and Athletic Facilities: Though a small park, it includes a nice area of open turf as well as a volleyball court. • Edging around the volleyball court needs replacement. 5 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Support Facilities: The restroom facility is in good condition with a metal roof and masonry construction. Parking and Access: One parking lot is provided for this park as well as street parking on two sides. Akt • tit • 13 parking spaces are available near the restroom and playground, plus one ADA space. • There are additional access points on the north and east sides of the park; however, these are not ADA accessible. • Parking asphalt is in poor condition and striping is worn. • Parking curb stops and bumpers are damaged. Irrigation Systems: Irrigation appears adequate. • There are areas of standing water, but the grass is in good condition. Additional Comments: • There are various areas of chain-link fence damage, especially on the south side of the parking lot. • No curbs or sidewalks exist on the north and east sides of the park. • Future expansion of Balfour Park on adjacent 5.56 acres is planned. A master plan for this site has been developed in conjunction with the Spokane County Library District. 6 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Browns Park (NP) J Address: 3101 S. Pines Road *line Size: 8.2 Acres mti+v,rvr,, Ownership: City SpokaneY of Valle fl.. Status: Developed - This neighborhood park is located across the street from University High School. Amenities include sand volleyball courts, a playground, splash pad, restroom, shelter, ;_ parking lot, and picnic tables. Improvements for 2019 include a walking trail with lighting and benches, a new -';n • restroom, renovated storage building, a tot playground, a skate dot, new shelters, and a new fence on S. Pines Rd and E 32nd Ave. Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): The overall condition of the park is average, with various maintenance issues, accessibility issues and minimal lighting. Playgrounds: The play structure consists of an interactive play system, including slides, swinging bridge, balance 44 beams, etc. The main structure is primarily wood c`i construction, with plastic components and powder- • coated components. • Some horizontal wood components are in poor condition with noticeable splitting. - • Powder coating is worn off in some places. • There is no accessible route from ADA spaces in either. • Play area edging is wood, with no ADA ramp to accessible features. • The playground sign has been vandalized. 111.111111”FRIPIE w _ 7 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Pools/Splash Pads: F ' A tall palm tree, shell, starfish, and other water • elements on the splash pad create a beach theme that a+ ' relates to the sand volleyball courts in the park. It is11190.4 fully ADA accessible. ' • The splash pad is in good working order, though _Et some of the water moves into the surrounding concrete rather than into the splash pad drains. — • The colored concrete is fading, there are some fine cracks, and some joints are in need of repair. Fields and Athletic Facilities: • A full court basketball court with benches is in good condition. There are a couple of depressions in the north portion of the court and the striping ,, needs refreshing. to — • There are no accessible routes to the court. „,__ • Sand volleyball courts exist on the site, including i °” 15 courts and one championship court in the center of the park, and 2 courts along 32nd Ave. • The volleyball courts are in good condition, with the exception of the two courts on 32nd Ave, which have deteriorating wood curbs. • Two bleachers exist near the volleyball courts. There are currently no accessible routes to the volleyball courts or bleachers. Support Facilities: The park includes a park identity sign, restroom, picnic tables, a drinking fountain, a kiosk, a park shelter and a maintenance building. • There are empty concrete pads near the restrooms where picnic tables used to sit. • The drinking fountain near the restroom appears to be ADA compliant however there is no accessible walkway accessing it. • The plexi-glass on the kiosk is hard to see through and should be replaced. Parking and Access: There are two parking lots for the park; one off of 32nd on the southeast corner. The other is on the west side along Pines. There is also access from the East 31st Avenue cul-de-sac on the east side of the park. • The west parking lot has 40 parking places, with an additional 2 ADA parking places. This is the only accessible fence break in the park. The asphalt has patched cracks and is showing signs 8 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington ��Ualley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 of aging and requires re-striping. There is no lighting provided. • The southeast parking lot has 37 parking places with an additional 2 ADA parking places, though no ADA access through the fence. There is no lighting. Irriciation Systems: Irrigation is adequate, though ponding exists on the site. 9 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Castle Park (NP) Address: 3415 S. University Road Size: 2.71 Acres Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed Castle Park is an open turf park surrounded on three sides by houses. There are no amenities and parking is limited. Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): The park is in good condition except for some issues with the pump house owned by a water district. 4 Playgrounds: Not Applicable Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields: The open turf area is in good condition, though large areas of clover exist. The turf area is useful for soccer practice or general play area. Support Facilities: The only structure in the park is a small pump house building. • The masonry maintenance building has a flat roof which shows signs of damage with missing fascia pieces and debris coating the roof top. • The door to the building has been heavily damaged. • There are no other amenities at this park. • A small number of non-permanent trash receptacles and tables exist. Parking and Access: Parking consists of a gravel driveway. This area is separated from the park by a wood pole fence. This drive is located off of a fairly busy street. There is also an access point on the north east corner of the park from the residential neighborhood. Only street parking is available there. There is no walk connecting the street to the park. Irrigation Systems: Irrigation is adequate. Additional Comments: This site has potential to fill park needs in an area with few options. 10 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington ��Ualley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Edgecliff Park (NP) icw Address: 800 S. Park Road Size: 4.75 Acres now 17 Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed Edgecliff Park offers many amenities such as a playground and splash pad nestled in mature pines, apt 4, restroom, softball field, tennis court, pickleball court, • , E, � , and basketball hoops, and a large open turf area. ., Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): The park is in fair condition but showing its age in places, such as old ragged fencing, deficiencies in paving surfaces and worn areas on the play structure, though some elements have been replaced. A new shelter and splash pad attract neighbors and are getting lots of use. p _ as Plavarounds: The playground structure is in interactive unit with metal construction, plastic slides, a bridge, climbing areas and stairs for access. • There is no sidewalk access to the play structure, making it not ADA accessible. Even though there is a concrete curb edging around the play structure, there isn't an ADA ramp for access. • Safety surfacing is engineered wood fiber and could benefit from extra material under the slides and in other high-use areas. • Some areas of the powder coating are wearing ,h off, though the most serious is on the bridge where the poly coating is peeling off, leaving a r, sharp metal edge. • The plexi-glass on the clock panel is scratched and hard to see though, while wear on the plexi- glass ' in another place makes it difficult to see through. • r r , Pools/Splash Pads: The splash pad consists of a tall dumping bucket, tall sprayer, and a handful of small in- ground elements that spurt and spray. • The splash pad is in great condition. • Colored concrete is in good condition 11 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Fields/Athletic Facilities: There are multiple open m turf areas for play, a softball field, and one tennis court rv1, �� Itr.• and one pickleball court with basketball hoops sharing - the same space. • The turf areas are in good condition, showing no dry patches. =' • The backstop fence shows some bulging behind home plate. There is no mow strip under this �e fence, requiring extra maintenance. Bleachers at the softball field have peeling paint, some splitting and cracking of the seats. Dugout benches are warped and cracked and also need stain. There is concrete under one of the bleacher stands and not the other. There is lighting at the softball field. • The tennis court fences are old, bent, rusted and torn in many places. There is not a bottom rail on the tennis court fence. The surfacing of the tennis court is badly cracked and in need of resurfacing and restriping. There are some low spots that collect water. There is no ADA accessible entrance into the tennis court area. • There are basketball hoops installed inside the tennis enclosure. Support Facilities: There is a masonry restroom with a metal roof, a new metal park shelter, new ADA drinking fountain, a message kiosk and a park location sign. • The restroom has exterior peeling paint and the interior concrete flooring needs paint. There are no sidewalks to the restroom or to the nearby water fountain. • The new metal park shelter features lighting and power, and many picnic tables are situated beneath it. The shelter roof has some graffiti on the top. An ADA accessible fountain with pet attachment is situated nearby, and the area is accessible from the parking lot via a concrete sidewalk. • The message kiosk shows some signs of wear and staining, but the plexi-glass is new and easy to see through. • There are no mow strips under fences or around planting areas. • There are some permanent wooden picnic tables, most of which have slats splitting and paint peeling. 12 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Parking and Access: There are two parking lots for this park, one on the south side and one on the north. r#1 40 ADA accessibility exists only in the north lot. There are also sidewalk on the exterior of the fence on the east R ` 2 side and some on the south. There are curbs on three �, _V -`"r� sides. • Parking on the north side of the park has 25 spaces and 2 additional ADA space and an accessible sidewalk to the shelter and splash pad. , • Parking on the south side is used mostly for softball and tennis areas. It has 13 spaces and no ADA spaces. • Since it has few interior sidewalks, ADA accessibility is limited in this park. • Both lots would benefit from restriping. Irrigation Systems: The turf areas and trees appear to be in excellent condition. Additional Comments: • Amenities such as designated basketball courts and volleyball courts could increase the use of this park. 13 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Greenacres Park (NP) Address: 1311 N. Long Road w Size: 8.64 Acres A Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed (Phase I Complete) The park was completed in 2011 and is completely ADA accessible, has lighting at the parking lot, playground and water play area, kiosk, dog waste station, restroom, disc golf and park structures. Li <_{ Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): The park is generally in great condition with the exception of significant mower damage to many trees. Jr Plavarounds: Playground includes an interactive play structure with slides, music opportunities and climbing areas. There are individual items like a spinner cup, Ferdinand the Cow sculpture, a sand-water play area with an oversized apple, swings for older children and tots. Some wear exists on the top of the music • elements, and there are some minor cracking and 11 smudges on the barn element. Some safety tiles around the bull are being pulled up. Pools/Splash Pads: The splash pad has numerous spray and dumping features that spray onto a faded non-slip concrete surface. Fields: There are large expanses of turf for soccer ori At lawn games, and a designated 9-hole disc golf course. 'The turf area north of the restroom provides an opportunity for future addition of basketball and tennis courts, skate facility and other uses. Support Facilities: There is a barn-themed restroom and large park shelter and a perimeter walking path. In conjunction with the play area, there is an additional picnic shelter. • The restroom has men's and women's restrooms, mechanical space and an exterior ADA water fountain. • The large 30'x40' park shelter has many temporary tables, lighting and electrical 14 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 available. It is steel construction with a metal roof. An ADA accessible drinking fountain is also -,4114111Pr"711 4111 located at the shelter, though it has poor water pressure. • The 16' x 16' shelter associated with the play 1t area has a concrete surface, metal posts and metal roof. • There is also a yellow shade sail structure over the sand/water play area. Parking and Access: The parking lot is paved and has curbs and sidewalks which promote easy access into the playground and restroom area, as well as to the perimeter concrete sidewalk. ADA parking is provided with an access ramp and walk directly to the play area and restroom. The large shelter is accessible from the south and from a walk that leads from the restroom area to the shelter. Irrigation Systems: Irrigation appears to be in good working order, though some over-saturated areas are present in the turf and planter areas. Drip tubing is visible in the planter areas. Additional Comments: There is a Phase 2 of the master plan that includes tennis/pickleball courts, basketball court, skate park, baseball field, community garden, and passive and active open space. 15 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Terrace View Park (CP) Address: 13525 E. 24th Ave. W"' Size: 9.24 Acres . ,q IliOwnership: City of Spokane Valley 1044, 1 Status: Developed Terrace View Park features play areas shaded by mature pines, and open turf and field areas. It contains several amenities such as a playground, softball field, large shelter, restroom facility, drinking fountains, and pool i . and lazy river. Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): tr -r a `:`" .p' The park is in good condition however it lacks ADA ` s ;fi accessibility to the drinking fountain, and a basketball - hoop in the east parking lot poses a safety hazard as it invites play in an area where vehicles are moving. Plavarounds: The playground structure is an interactive unit with metal construction, plastic slides, rope climbing areas, a tot play area, swing set, plastic merry-go-round, and spinner. • There is an ADA accessible sidewalk to the playground, however it doesn't appear that a t- ramp provides access into the play area. The _ _ ,. ,! �i� wood fiber safety surfacing needs to be filled. '' • High-use areas underneath swings and slide exits require more safety surfacing, and weed fabric is emerging beneath the merry-go-round. • A sign is missing near the entrance of the r playground. Only a steel pole remains. 14,4- Pools/Splash ,E Pools/Splash Pads: The pool has an adjacent pool house, restroom and lazy river. , ` it • The pool house/restroom exterior looks good A ;� ' — r except for some peeling paint on the fascia and damage to the main entrance doors. Fields: The softball field has a large backstop, bleachers and dugout benches. • The fence material on the backstop is bulging and there are weeds at the base of the fence. The bleachers need stain and some dugout benches need boards replaced. 16 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Support Facilities: There is a restroom constructed of , masonry block with a metal roof. The picnic shelter is made of steel with a wood interior ceiling and a metal yx ; roof. There is a standard park location sign, various picnic tables, benches and water fountains. _ Y • The restroom has graffiti remnants, and the eves need stain. One of the skylights is badly cracked. • The large park shelter is new and in great condition. There is an ADA accessible sidewalk from the parking lot to this new structure. There is interior lighting as well as lighting along the ! _. access sidewalk. 14- • The park location sign is new and in excellent conditions _ • The fence surrounding the park is old with some torn areas, but there is a mow strip on the south end which eases maintenance. • There are no sidewalks or curbs on E 24th Ave or S Blake Road. Neighborhood access would be improved with these features. • There are 3 water fountains of various styles, but none are ADA accessible. • There are many picnic tables, some moveable metal, and others permanent wood over concrete. Some metal tables are missing poly coating and have rusted metal areas exposed. The wood tables need stain or slats/legs replaced. Parking and Access: Two parking lots serve this park. • The east parking lot is very large, with 86 spaces and 3 ADA accessible spaces. There is a basketball hoop installed in the southeast corner of the parking lot. The paving is full of cracks and bulges; there are curbs all around this parking lot, but no sidewalks except to the pool area. The park is ADA accessible from this parking lot and there is overhead lighting, both old and new. The east lot need restriping, especially near where the basketball hoop is. • The west parking lot is divided into two sections with a peninsula of grass between the two areas. The southern section has 14 spaces and 2 ADA spaces. There are no curbs, sidewalks and there is a water retention swale that is mowed but not irrigated. The northern section of this parking lot has 13 more spaces. 17 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Irriciation Systems: The grass is in good condition ,3 except for some areas with clover and dandelions. There r .. r 4 is some damage to sod from vehicles or maintenance r` .,- equipment, and a soggy turf area near the pool. x ...:4 : ..r r umiNia. NM Additional Comments: • Park would benefit from having the street improvements, such as curbs and sidewalks, along E 24th Ave and S Blake Road. 18 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Valley Mission Park (CP) ., Address: 11123 E. Mission Ave. VALLEY�IlS5r Size: 23.26 Acres k �L Ownership: City of Spokane Valley (portion leased to private concessionaire) Status: Developed The park includes a pool area with a pool house, dog park, a separate restroom, basketball court, tennis court, softball field, play area, park shelter, lots of open turf areas and the horse arena and Splashdown business, which leases space from the city. Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): The park and turf areas are in good condition, but the horse arena is in poor condition. Playgrounds: The playground has 2 big play structures for different age groups, swings and multiple smaller play equipment pieces that appear to be in good condition. �• • A new sidewalk from the parking lot and a concrete ramp into the play area makes it ADA accessible. • There is not a park shelter at the playground area, but adequate shade is provided by mature evergreen trees. • There are 2 permanent benches that are not ADA accessible, 2 permanent tables and a few 44 movable ones, and an ADA accessible water fountain in this area. ,r = _ a all • The lighting is adequate at the playground and along the sidewalk. Pools/Splash Pads: There is a public pool at the park, in addition to Splash Down which operates a water park on property leased from the City. • The public pool house exterior is in good condition, built of masonry block with a metal roof. There is a sidewalk in front of the pool house and along the west side of the pool which leads directly to Splashdown and to the softball field and tennis and basketball courts. An ADA 19 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 ramp has been added to allow access from the parking lot. • Fields/Athletic Facilities: There is a softball field, + ' 11 large areas of open turf, a basketball court and tennis - - ' • ! I"` courts. • The softball fencing appears to be in good ' condition with only some bowing on the north sides, and the infield is in good condition. The dugout benches at the softball field are peeling, warped, broken and mismatched slats. The aluminum bleacher seats are bent in places, and concrete behind them is cracked. • Two lights provide adequate lighting for this area. ' ri• u1, '4 • The open turf areas spread across a large portion �,,. `= of the park. Portions of it are very steep. There is r sporadic lighting for security, and the turf areas are green and well maintained. • The full-sized basketball court is directly north of the swimming pool and has good access to the restroom and water fountain. The concrete court • q is cracking and the colored surface and painted _ - •,- : stripes are almost worn off. It is ADA accessible *'r and has lights. Bleachers need a couple of boards f wk replaced. • The asphalt tennis court surfacing contains large • e cracks that have been filled with tar and need resurfacing. Fences are in decent condition. There is no lighting, and one net needs to be tightened. No ADA access. Support Facilities: There is a restroom facility, a park shelter, location sign, a small pump house building, the Splashdown facility and the horse arena and its support buildings. • The restroom is located next to the pool house and is easily accessed from the tennis, basketball, softball and shelter areas. It is some distance from the playground. It is constructed of unpainted masonry block with a metal roof. The floors need paint and some of the stall doors have been vandalized with carving and graffiti. • The park shelter is in excellent condition. There is good lighting in and around the structure. There is an ADA accessible sidewalk from the parking lot to the shelter. There is a faucet close by but it is not ADA accessible. 20 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 • The location sign is new and in excellent condition. • The kiosk is at a slight angle. • A pump house building in the field east of the parking lot has peeling paint and rotting wood a siding. The stain on the fascia is peeling, and it M`' will soon require a new roof. "' • There is some lighting for security in the east _ 4 --- turf area. _ - • The Splashdown facility is in excellent condition from the exterior. • The horse arena has stables, a restroom with a non-ADA drinking fountain, and an arena with a small open booth. The fence is not installed on the south side, and all fencing needs paint. The stables are still functioning, but there is lots of peeling paint, nail heads protruding, fascia boards missing and broken, and in need of ." maintenance overall. Substandard repairs have l ftlit- been made in some areas. Non-potable water _ faucets are available. The arena lighting is excellent; the arena fence has peeling paint and general abuse. The bleachers are on bare ground; need stain and replacement of some of the seat slats. The A-frame booth roof is good, the decking and stairs to access it are gone in some cases and broken down in others. It is not ADA accessible. The arena floor is in fair shape except for some weeds around the southwest corner. Parking and Access: There is a main parking lot located directly south of the pool house and east of the park shelter. Valley Mission South is located directly across the street and provides additional parking. There is also parking in conjunction with the horse arena which is accessed via the unimproved right-of-way of Bowdish. The paving has lots of patches and is rapidly deteriorating, with potholes forming. ADA spaces are available and provide access to the playground. There is lighting only on the west side of the parking lot next to the new shelter. The chain-link fencing is warped and lacks a bottom rail. This parking lot has over 200 spaces available. Irrigation Systems: The turf areas are in good condition. 21 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Valley Mission Dog Park (CP) Address: 11123 E. Mission Ave. slum is st ': ��ix� �. • • kl I u inn ucomo Size: 1.14 Acres Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed The dog park is located within the southeast corner of Valley Mission Park and includes large and small dog areas, a shade sail structure, a dog wash station, drinking fountains, and agility features. The parking lot is shared with Valley Mission Park. ; " ' o Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): The dog parks are in good condition though there are some accessibility issues. Playgrounds: Not applicable Pools/Splash Pads: Not applicable Fields: Not applicable Support Facilities: The dog park features a rules board under an entry structure, decomposed granite dog areas, and various site features: • Dog washing station • Canvas shade sail structures • ADA drinking fountain with attached pet bowl • Pet waste station and trash cans • Picnic tables • Benches Parking and Access: The parking lot is shared with Valley Mission Park, and there is parking along the street on N Bowdish Rd. „n' • The parking lot paving has lots of patches and is :ft rapidly deteriorating. There is lighting onlyon p Y 9 9 the west side of the parking lot next to the new . 'x:.. shelter. This parking lot has over 200 spaces available. Irrigation Systems: The turf areas are in good condition, though a few bubblers are exposed and need reburying in the small dog area. 22 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 MIRABEAU POINT PARK is a 55.51-acre park that includes: Mirabeau Meadows, Mirabeau Springs, Discovery Playground, natural vegetation, CenterPlace Regional Event Center, Spokane Valley Senior Center, and the City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Dept. Mirabeau Point Park '' (Discovery Playground) (LUP) Address: 2426 N. Discovery Placer-1": III � r r iun Size: 1.5 acres Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed This park opened in 2010 and it has been well used, but - the general maintenance has been good. Features include a variety of play elements, a splash pad, _ multiple shelters, restroom, and bike racks. Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): It is all ADA accessible, but safety surfacing and some equipment are showing signs of wear. Plavarounds: There are numerous play stations throughout the playground. --cfM 7- • The entry arch is in excellent condition, is bright, colorful and inviting. a. • The entry gardens that are not in raised beds show the signs of lots of little feet walking through them, but in general, they are holding up. • Most of the shrubs are withstanding the use very well. • Musical drums are worn and need new paint • There is lots of sand and gravel in various places ^' on concrete paths. This is to be expected where n there is sand being tracked out of the sand play * . area. • Some concrete areas are cracked • The sand play area is well used, but holding up well. It has a large sand area that includes xz „:' d ; _# water. It is ADA accessible with a raised play 23 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 station. The base of the water spigot is exposed, and more sand is needed to fill it in. • There are opportunities for imagination in this park, with smaller, colorful items such as a fish sculpture, inchworm, and tall metal flowers. �-� ` `' There have been problems with vandalism with I , M1 ;- these items and steps have been taken to make them more resistant to this. The flower sculptures have been fenced off to prevent • children from climbing on them. Egg elements at the south end have been removed. • The interior of the pumpkin has some graffiti, and the exterior has extensive dents and dings • Red concrete wall next to pumpkin needs new iF r paint $, • There are areas where there have been trails ``4 ars ; carved up steep slopes, causing potential erosion issues. p ,. • Fixed chimes have broken cables, and the wooden posts are worn and need stain • Safety surfacing in high use areas under swings and at the bottom of slides are chipped and worn. • In some areas turf has been completely worn away Pools/Splash Pads: The splash pad is a popular feature that provides many opportunities to get wet. Fields: Not Applicable Support Facilities: There is an accessible restroom, lighting, two park shelters and 2 ADA accessible water fountains. There are 8 benches and a bench swing, and 8 tables under the shelters. • The restroom doors have had graffiti on them that has been mostly scrubbed off. • The shelters are in great condition. • The paint finish on the checker board tables is peeling off. • There is lighting at this playground, allowing security and extended use. Parking and Access: The playground parking is in conjunction with CenterPlace Regional Event Center. There are many regular spaces available as well as ADA spaces right by the entrance to the playground. The parking lot will require new striping. 24 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Irrigation Systems: The surrounding turf areas and interior planting and turf areas seem to be healthy except for overuse on some turf areas and drip emitter tubing surfacing or being pulled up. Mira beau Point Park (Mirabeau Meadows) (LUP) t k Address: 13500 E. Mirabeau Parkway Pft Size: 7.25 acres Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed Mirabeau Meadows Park offers amenities such as a restroom, park shelter, multiple kiosks, paved walking >= "y = ,_ �:, r .' �• , path, gravel nature trails, a stage area and general connection to the Centennial Trail. 4 Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): Maintenance is good, turf areas are green and neatly mowed and the trees and shrubs are generally healthy, except for lawn mower damage to trees. Playgrounds: Not Applicable MOO: Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable �. _. Fields: There are large open turf areas available for a variety of uses such as kid's soccer, Frisbee and dog walking. If -4 ` k Support Facilities: There is a restroom, a park shelter with a countertop and sink, and a stage for small concerts. • The restroom building siding is in need of stain and readjustment of the nearby sprinklers to avoid hitting the side of cedar building. • The park is fully ADA accessible, except for some picnic tables. tom " • There are several permanent tables and benches near the shelter and restroom area. • There is a nicely maintained gravel path which winds through the native area on the west side of wz the park. There are very few noxious weeds in 25 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 ,Irthis area, mostly a mix of native trees, shrubs and perennials ,, • The trail system connects Mirabeau Meadows 1R a with Mirabeau Springs and CenterPlace and theme «��. . YMCA to the south. • The park shelter has lighting, a sink and a faucet. �' It is in good condition with no cracking in the , „ concrete and the structure is in good shape as 1. . , •a , 1;; ._ _ _ well, aside from the need of new stain. • The stage area is ADA accessible and provides power. • There are outlets available, but no permanent lighting. Parking and Access: Parking lot asphalt is in excellent condition, and all areas are ADA accessible. It will need restriping. Irrigation Systems: Turf and shrub areas are all healthy and in good shape with no dry areas. 26 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Mirabeau Point Park (Mirabeau Springs) (LUP) x _ ,fi41. t Address: 13500 E. Mirabeau Parkway Size: .78 Acres Ownership: City of Spokane Valley •co Status: Developed Mirabeau Springs has matured into a beautiful park, f. fY complete with a man-made waterfall, overlook areas, connection to the park trail systems, a rock and cedar r , park shelter and an ADA accessible deck over the water. B ' Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): Maintenance is excellent, allowing the vegetation to assume a natural state of growth without letting it take � x 774,4:144e; � % Playgrounds: Not Applicable 4.10 Pools/Splash Pads: The pond is man-made and not ! .: intended for fishing, swimming, wading or dogs. Fields: Not Applicable Support Facilities: There is a park shelter, and a series of scenic overlooks areas, including a deck above the pond, and a dock that extends over the pond. • The park shelter has a stone base and a cedar , kv structure. It has lighting on each post. i+b11, • There is not an identifying sign for this park, but it exists north of CenterPlace Regional Event �. Center and west of the North Meadow and is within the continuing park system of Mirabeau Point Park. • • The scenic overlook areas provide plenty of seating options. The decks are made of man- made, weather resistant decking materials; the rails are powder-coated metal. • The dok over the water doesn't have handrails, but it does have bumpers to prevent wheeled items from rolling into the water. • This site does not have a restroom facility, but there is a portable toilet across the street at the 27 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 trailhead and there are restrooms in CenterPlace and at Mirabeau Meadows not far away to the e,_ 10 -0 north. • The water fountain is located next to the shelter but is not ADA accessible. '` Parking and Access: Parking is provided both across the street at the Mirabeau Trailhead south and at CenterPlace Regional Event Center. Irrigation Systems: All areas that are irrigated are healthy and well-maintained. 28 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 CenterPlace Regional Event Center (SUF) Address: 2426 N. Discovery Place Size: 13.6 Acres Ownership: Developed — Completed in Septemberam& 2005 Aratti Status: City of Spokane Valley CenterPlace Regional Event Center is the City of Spokane Valley's event center and it also contains the Parks and Recreation Department and the Spokane Valley Senior Center. 4 Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.) The condition of this facility is in good condition, including i` ape" maintenance of the grass areas, planting areas and j parking lots. Playgrounds: Discovery Playground is located at CenterPlace and is covered separately. Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields: There are various turf areas around the parking .41,1„4.?7, lots, as well as the west lawn land north meadow areas to the west and north of the building. s> y y Support Facilities: CenterPlace is the headquarters for the City of Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation Department and the Spokane Valley Senior Center and consists of a 54,000-square-foot, multi-function building. _ . Parking and Access: There are 400 parking spaces that support CenterPlace and Discovery Playground. • There are many planting areas with turf, shrubs, trees and groundcover plants that are interspersed throughout the parking lot area. These are in great condition. They are not over- pruned and the variety and health of the plant material is excellent. Concrete mow strips around plant areas help ease maintenance. • The pedestrian circulation is well done, including ADA accessible sidewalks with ramps that extend throughout the parking areas. 29 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington Valley' Park Facility Inventory July 31, 2019 • The paving and curbs are in generally good condition, however the entire lot is in need of I•. restriping • Lighting has been provided for the parking lot areas. r ti Irrigation Systems: Irrigation appears to be in good ' ' � working condition in most areas. Ay itkg .', 30 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Center Place - North Meadow (SUF) • _ Y Address: 2426 N. Discovery Place - _ Size: .58 Acres Ownership: Developed - Completed in 2018 Status: City of Spokane Valley Center Place North Meadow now has the facilities to host community events and weddings. Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.) This facility is in excellent condition, with new sod, � ornamental iron fencing with a mow curb, and trees �x 4&`x''1 along Mirabeau Pkwy. The southernmost sidewalk is i II I'] badly cracked where it meets the sod. � ,� ' Plavarounds: Not Applicable. Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields: The North Meadow is turf grass up to the north hillside. It is not lit, but there are new lights along the • adjacent asphalt trail. .ter. Support Facilities: Not Applicable Parking and Access: Parking is provided both across the street at the Mirabeau Trailhead south and at CenterPlace Regional Event Center. Irrigation Systems: Irrigation appears to be in good working condition. 31 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 CenterPlace - West Lawn (SUF) Address: 2426 N. Discovery Place Size: 1.75 Acres Ownership: Developed - Phase 2 Improvements coming 2020 -i v`RI Status: City of Spokane Valley West Lawn plans include a plaza for events, plaza gateway, restroom, new grass, performance/wedding venue space, event space/seating, event storage, and reconfigured paths. Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.) The t. condition of this facility is good. Playgrounds: Not Applicable. Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields: There are various turf areas around the parking =, , lots. These will be improved with the implementation of Phase 2 of the West Lawn Master Plan. `-- Support Facilities: Not Applicable Parking and Access: Parking is provided both across the street at the Mirabeau Trailhead south and at CenterPlace Regional Event Center. Irrigation Systems: Irrigation appears to be in good working condition. 32 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Park Road Pool (SUF) Address: 906 N. Park Road Size: 2 Acres -4 Ownership: City of Spokane Valley ¢4+? Status: Developed l` Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.) This pool is located next to Centennial Middle School and offers along with the pool, extra parking for the school's softball field to the north. Maintenance issues are paving deterioration. - ,d1 I..I� Playgrounds: Not Applicable = ; 1' i+ Pools/Splash Pads: Swimming pool has an ADA pool � - lift chair and slide, and appears to be in good condition. fir ' A shade sail structure and furniture is provided. Fields: Not Applicable I '. Support Facilities: The location sign is in good shape, though hidden from the street by a tree on the south and overgrown vegetation on the north. • Paint on the pool building is in good condition, but one outside wall needs paint to cover graffiti - - — - - remnants and wear. Parking and Access: There are 93 parking spaces and 2 ADA accessible spaces. • The paving surface has numerous cracks and patches and will need eventual repaving Irrigation Systems: Turf areas appear to be watered adequately. Additional Comments • ADA accessible fountain is outside the pool fence, making it difficult to use. A • There are no mow strips on the south side of the site between the grass and the shrub area. 6 • Also, there are limited mow strips under the fences, creating additional maintenance. � • The north side of the parking lot does not have a curb. 33 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington ..,••0 Valley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Sullivan Park (CP) _ Address: 1901 N. Sullivan Road z� Pr's , ' 4 •' , it i ", —, I'l Is ,. Size: 16.07 Acres ta .. ,,,-40c-4' of,i;11 Ownership: City of Spokane Valley (portion leased to private concessionaire) ikk Status: Developed The park consists of an area rented by a radio-controlled car track club and also a large building used by a squaret .y• dance club. There is a very substantial parking lot at ; this level of the park and also a lower parking level with ..if: ` � a park area associated with access to the river. "a- ,Ys s h�^ `b - C R.T w Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): , Maintenance of park property is good, though there is � e. some graffiti near the river. 1 ' { Playgrounds: Not Applicable Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields: There is an open turf area in both the lower and ' ` rsy •` upper areas of the park. Support Facilities: Three park shelters of varying age �a i Y and condition exist next to the river in the lower park -- . _ ,shq. --.,, ;, area. There is a park location sign, in good condition, -�*- along the upper parking lot, easily seen from Sullivan 'r= *. Road. • The large wood park structure is in overall good shape, with minor cracking and graffiti on the floor. The wood structure and the stone walls are in good condition. There are several temporary `„ry. ` tables in this structure. The nearby stone ,� 011 Y .. drinking fountain is not ADA accessible. 0s, 4ii l 9$ • The small shelter is also in fair condition. It also has a stone base with wood structure and a 'fix ., metal roof. The interior has built-in benches. It is not ADA accessible since there is no ramp or ,, sidewalk access. The interior has suffered some ` damage from carving and there is minor cracking L.. on the concrete floor and wall caps. • A third metal shelter exists further to the west. It is newer and it appears in good condition, with several picnic benches and trash receptacles 34 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington �'�Ualley Park Facility Inventory . r- July 31, 2019 underneath. It has lights and power, and the ? ,_ concrete floor is in excellent condition. • There is a restroom at the dance hall with an exterior entrance. It is ADA accessible. • There is a small maintenance shed off of the upper parking lot utilized by the radio controlled car club that needs paint. • There are several permanent benches along the top edge of the river bank. Extensive erosion has occurred at the base of several of them, leaving ' exposed roots of nearby trees and a steep drop- off down to the river. These benches have sustained a lot of damage and carving. . • A new gravel kayak/canoe launch adjacent to the Sullivan bridge is in good shape, with minimal graffiti on nearby boulders. • The dance hall appears in good condition overall. The metal carport adjacent to the dance hall is in fair condition and has a picnic table and trash receptacle underneath. The long linear shelter for bbq's is worn and would benefit from some painting. • The radio-controlled race track is maintained by the club. Parking and Access: There is an upper and a lower ® or - --_ dr.. parking lot. ADA accessibility is difficult in this park " since there are only minimal sidewalks. lJ1,4> • The upper parking lot serves the radio-controlled car club facility, as well as the square dance association. The paving has been patched, and will need to be restriped. This parking lot has bumpers in some places and curbs with no 3 ,; sidewalks in other places. Many bumpers have � T °ter ',1 been pushed out of alignment. fi mf' • The lower parking lot is also cracked, though not as badly as the upper parking " lot. There is a ��__ � sidewalk from this parking lot up to the street level that is ADA accessible. There are no lights on this lower level. - ate" Irrigation Systems: Existing irrigation is adequate. Water is provided by a well that does not have the capacity to provide sufficient water to maintain the turfed areas of the park. Park contains a large amount of native or unmaintained areas with no irrigation. 35 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington 4o•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Additional Comments: • The river bank consists mostly of large boulders and rocky ledges. The water can move very swiftly through this area. There are very few places along the shore to enjoy the river easily, certainly not by handicapped visitors. 36 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Valley Mission Pool (SUF) Address: 11123 E. Mission Avenue Size: .51 acres • 44 Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): s One lap pool and one zero depth entry pool exist north --� •_ of a pool house. The zero depth entry pool is 3 feet deep and has a water bucket feature that could benefit from some new paint. Pools appear to be in excellent condition. Playgrounds: Not Applicable ,t100.4* Pools/Splash Pads: Fields: Not Applicable _ Support Facilities: There is a pool house in conjunction with the pool, and a drinking fountain that is not ADA. A few large shade umbrellas and furniture are provided. Parking and Access: There are over 200 parking spaces available at Valley Mission Park and more across the street at Valley Mission South. 37 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington ��Ualley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 West Gateway (West Entry Sign and Landscaping) (SUF) Address: Approximately 6569 Appleway Blvd. 44, Size: Approximately .29 Acres I k r✓ cs� Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Developed4 'i` Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): All trees and most shrubs are in great condition. Grass is mar well maintained. Playgrounds: Not Applicable Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable � 7 4 sa Fields/Athletic Facilities: Not Applicable Support Facilities: Not Applicable Parking and Access: No parking is provided. A dirt drive is located along the west end of the property. This 441. area is often used as a cut through or bypass for motorists. Sidewalks exist to the north and south of the property. A paver area separates the sidewalks on the east side, and a trash receptacle is provided. Irrigation Systems: Irrigation system is in good shape. 38 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Appleway Trail (T) The Appleway Trail is an urban trail and greenway, approximately 52.12 acres in size, which runs 5.2 miles east-west through the heart of Spokane Valley. It provides a shared use path for walking, running, and cycling. The trail also provides connections for residents to the commercial corridor. When fully completed, the trail will allow citizens to travel from Dishman Hills east to Liberty Lake. Balfour Park to S University Rd *y.1 • Seeking Funding • Balfour Park will be the end point of the p "� ' Appleway Trail S University Rd: • Entrance from University is a decomposed granite plaza area with trees in a grid. Gabion and wood seating and lighting is provided, as well as a location sign. A corten tactile warning strip lines the east portion of sidewalk along University Rd and defines the western plaza edge. • Amenities: ADA restroom and drinking fountains, v, trash receptacle, bike racks, ADA drinking ±rte x11,. _ ,� fountain, gabion seating, dog waste station. - • University to Pines, Completed 2015 S Pines Rd: �- � .` , I�.YY cam. � q... , • Pines Rd entrance has nice decomposed granite • f planter areas contained by mow curbs. Plants appear to be in good condition. • Amenities: Trash receptacle, dog waste station, bench on plank pavers. Pines to Evergreen, Completed 2017 Evergreen Rd: • Evergreen entrance has nice decomposed granite planter areas contained by mow curbs, and sod up to the Evergreen sidewalk. Plants appear to be in good condition. Trail appears to be well lit and is ADA accessible. r' • Amenities: Trash receptacle, dog waste station, h ;r ' bench on concrete pad. 39 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Evergreen to Sullivan, Under Construction 2019 Sullivan Rd: , �� ' 1.010 • Sullivan Road entrance has decomposed granite planter areas contained by mow curbs, and sod -- ---- up to the Sullivan sidewalk. Some plants are struggling in this location. Trail appears to be well lit and is ADA accessible. • Amenities: There are concrete pads for future amenities. Sullivan to Corbin, Completed 2018 Corbin Rd: • Corbin Road entrance has a new parking lot with ADA access to the trail. Decomposed granite planter areas buffer the trail from Sprague Ave, and beautify the Sprague bus stop. Plants appear healthy, and sodded swales are well maintained overall. Trail and parking area appear to be well lit and is ADA accessible. • Amenities: ADA restroom with ADA drinking fountains, parking lot with ADA parking and access. Concrete pads exist for future amenities. — Fain - Corbin to City Limit, Completed 2008 • Asphalt trail is buffered from Appleway Ave by a small strip of grass, and some street trees. There is city-owned undeveloped land to the south of the trail. • No lighting is provided, and no amenities exist. a • Trail turns connects with concrete sidewalk just past city limit. _ m 40 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Centennial Trail (T) The Centennial Trail provides 40 miles of paved trail from Nine Mile Falls, WA to the Idaho State Line, along the Spokane River. The trail is managed by Washington State Parks as Centennial Trail State Park, but maintained cooperatively by each jurisdiction the trail travels through. Spokane Valley's section is approximately from mile marker 5.5 to 12.5. There is parking at various trailheads along the route. Spokane Valley's trailheads include: Mirabeau Point Park (North and South), Sullivan Park, Mission Avenue and Barker Road. Barker Road Trailhead • Access to this trailhead is off Barker Road. • A gravel parking lot has been provided. The rustic wooden fence surrounding the parking lot is in good condition, save for a missing rail. • The wood rail fence along Barker is in good4>. condition. • There are no lights for this parking lot. • A restroom, trash receptacle, and kiosk have t " been provided at this site. • Old Mission Trailhead s -� � � • Access point is off of Mission Avenue. is` f • Trail access has bollards which are in need of painting. • 12' access trail has minor cracking. • The trailhead sign has been removed. • There is good ADA access to the trail at this -, ,• trailhead. • No restrooms or other facilities exist. k ' ; • Additional buffer from future apartments on the south side may be desirable. • There is a cable easement of the south side of the trail. • Native shrubs and trees (Ponderosa pine, Serviceberry, Buckthorn, Mahonia, Roses, Snowberry, etc.). y .• f 41 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Mirabeau Point Trailhead South • Access point is across from Mirabeau Springs • 28 paved parking spaces are available with 2 ADA accessible spaces as well as good ADA access to the trail. Lot would benefit from restriping. •' • Between Mirabeau South and North trailheads ■ 1 ■ there is an existing restroom building. It is Nh currently closed. • Two portable toilets have been provided at Mirabeau South Trailhead. • There is a nice gravel path down to the river at the north end of the bridge on the north side of the trailhead. It has some wooded boards that act as stairs and erosion control. • The rustic wooden fence is in great shape, but is missing at least one rail. • One older wooden bench and a stone trash receptacle in fair shape. • No lighting is provided. • Kiosk appears to be in good shape. • Entrance sign is missing Mirabeau Point Trailhead North • Access point is located across from Mirabeau %._ Meadows Park. • It has an identifying sign. • A kiosk at the trailhead has some graffiti on the glass. • The parking lot is in excellent condition with no cracks, though it would benefit from restriping. • Stone trash receptacle is in fair shape, with some damage to the corners. • No lighting is provided. Sullivan Road Trailhead • Access to this trailhead is on the south side of the _ rt`, river, west of Sullivan Road. • There is no designated parking. Trail users may t be parking at the nearby Spokane Valley Mall. • There are steps with a bike tire groove included which provide access down to the trail. This is not ADA accessible. • The trail paving and kiosk sign are in good condition. 42 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Wit_ 9';77. Myrtle Point Park (NOS) Address: 11495 East Upriver Drive, 99206 Size: 31.07 Acres Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Natural Open Space Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): The "' .`b z < Centennial Trail runs through this natural area along the ,$ Spokane River. Otherwise it is entirely natural, with native vegetation. 4 Playgrounds: Not Applicable Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields: Not Applicable y _ Support Facilities: Not Applicable Parking and Access: Access to this area is from Spokane County maintained Islands Trailhead on the north side of the river, then across the river on the trail bridge. Additional access is available from the south on the Centennial Trail by parking at a gravel trailhead just titt , � west of the river on the north side of Trent Avenue. F *y R. �- , 43 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Myrna Park (NOS) Address: 22310 E. Saltese Lake Road Greenacres, WA 99016 M' �.. ` Size: 12 Acres Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Undeveloped S Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): This natural area was donated to the City by the Gothmann family. It features a gravel road that climbs a hill to an open meadow. Many native species border the road (Holodiscus, Ribes, Mahonia, Lupinus). The location sign is new and in excellent condition. Playgrounds: Not Applicable Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields: Not Applicable Support Facilities: Not Applicable • Parking and Access: Only roadside parking exists. A . gate keeps vehicles from accessing the park, and hikers have to step around it. Additional Comments: • Power pole and powerline along meadow edge. 44 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan City of Spokane Valley Spokane Spokane Valley, Washington do•OValley Park Facility Inventory •7 July 31, 2019 Valley Mission Park (South) (UL) Address: E. Mission Avenue Size: 7.23 Acres :r a Ownership: City of Spokane Valley Status: Undeveloped Overall Condition (Safety, Maintenance, etc.): A portion of this area is used as overflow parking for Valley Mission North. It has been paved and has perimeter fencing and has had a pedestrian light installed to safely get people across the street. Major cracking of the pavement and damage to some fencing, - _ as well as numerous weeds in the gravel are the major maintenance issues. The remainder of the property is undeveloped. Plavarounds: Not Applicable Pools/Splash Pads: Not Applicable Fields: Not Applicable Support Facilities: Not Applicable Parking and Access: This facility is essentially one big parking lot with a grass buffer next to Mission, and a central grass strip with several trees. • The paving suffers from extremely large cracks, but weeds have been sprayed out. • There is no lighting in this parking lot. • There are 226 parking spaces, ADA parking is provided. • There is damage to the chain-link fence along Mission where posts have been pushed over. • Irrigation Systems: Turf areas in the center of the parking lot have several dry spots. Remainder of turf is in good condition. 45 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 10/01/19 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: History of Grants Received GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: On September 26, 2017, staff provided an administrative report outlining the City's grant application history for public works projects. The grant history dates back to 2011. This report includes information on the applications submitted between 2011 and present. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Discussion STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, Engineer— Planning & Grants ATTACHMENTS: Grant Funding History PowerPoint GRANT FUNDING REVIEW A LOOK AT CITY-APPLIED GRANT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES 2011-2018 ADAM JACKSON OCTOBER 1, 2019 Spö - jValley INTRODUCTION Spokane Valley relies heavily on grant funds to supplement City funds on Capital Projects. TOTAL PROJECT FUNDS = CITY FUNDS + GRANT FUNDS CAPITAL PROJECTS What are Capital Projects? RCW 82.46 defines "capital projects" as: those public works projects of a local government for planning, acquisition, construction, reconstruction, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, or improvement of streets; roads, highways,sidewalks,street and road lighting systems, traffic signals; ,bridges;,,.parks, recreational facilities, trails,,. 3 CITY FUNDS City funds which contribute to Capital Projects: ■ Fund #001 - General Fund ■ Fund #301 - REET 1 Capital Projects ■ Fund #302 - REET 2 Capital Projects ■ Fund #303 - Street Capital Projects ■ Fund #309 - Parks Capital Projects ■ Fund #311 - Pavement Preservation ■ Fund #314 - Grade Separation ■ Fund #402 - Stormwater Management ■ Fund #403 - Aquifer Protection 4 GRANT FUNDS Grant funds which contribute to Capital Projects: • BUILD - Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development • LDA - Legislative Direct Appropriation • CDBG -Community Development Block Grant • NHFP - National Highway Freight Program • CMAQ -Congestion Mitigation &Air Quality • PBS - Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Grant Program • FASTLANE - Fostering Advancements in Shipping and Transportation for ■ RCO-Washington State Recreation Conservation Office the Long-Term Achievement of National Efficiencies Grant • SRTS-Safe Routes to School • FHBP - Federal Highways Bridge Program • STP-Surface Transportation Program • FMSIB - Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board • TAP-Transportation Alternatives Program • FTA- Federal Transit Administration • TIB -Transportation Improvement Board • HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program • TCSP - Transportation, Community, and System Preservation • INFRA - Infrastructure for Rebuilding America • TIGER -Transportation Investment Generating Economic • IS - Innovative Safety Program (from HSIP) Recovery • WUTC - Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission Orange Wext = City has never been awarded funds. 5 GRANT AVAILABILITY a 0 0 7 - am U m a m ( a a a a a m 0 r Wm (- ) 13:11- 5 1- m02U LL � p = a 'cc' cc 1— m F u z "' cn F cn 2011 X X X XX 2012 X X X X X X XX X 2013 X X X X XXX 2014 X X X X X X X XX X 2015 X X X X X XX 2016 X X X X X XX X X X 2017 X X XXX X 2018 X X X X X X XX X XX X XX 2019 X X X X XX XX 6 FUNDING HISTORY TOTAL PROJECT FUNDS = CITY FUNDS + GRANT FUNDS + Other Per the 2011 - 2018 Actual Budgets* : City Funds $ 52 Million Grant Funds $ 51 Million + Other Funds $ 6 Million Total Project Costs $ 109 Million *NOTE: Projects include Funds: #303 Street Capital Projects #309 Parks Capital Projects #311 Pavement Preservation #314 Grade Separation #402 Stormwater Management #403 Aquifer Protection Area "Other" Funds can include developer contributions, Spokane County contributions, Investment Interest, etc. 7 2011-2018 FUNDING HISTORY 20,000,000 $607,975 18,000,000 16,000,000 Other Grant City Funds $9 31 $566,597 $628,485 14,000,000 $473,879 .' $10,660,013 12,000,000 $1,322,111 $5,421,357 � 10,000,000 $769,770 $514,973 $10,64 ,678 $6,83 ',239 Z I p 8,000,000 $4,013,382 $4,568,552 2 $4, 68,085 $4,374,600 Q 6,000,000IIII 4,000,000720 $8,982,586 756 $6,711,024 $5,879,652 $7,386,203 $7, 2,000,000 $4, 043 $6, $4,802,206 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Projects include Funds : YEAR #303 Street Capital Projects #309 Parks Capital Projects #311 Pavement Preservation #314 Grade Separation #402 Stormwater Management #403 Aquifer Protection Area 8 "Other" Funds can include developer contributions, Spokane County contributions, Investment Interest, etc. FUNDING APPLICATIONS 2011 - 2018 GRANT FUNDING SUCCESS RATE Year Funds Awarded Funds Not Awarded Total Applications Success Rate 2011 8 10 18 44% 2012 12 9 21 57% 2013 4 10 14 29% 2014 8 18 26 31% 2015 10 5 15 67% 2016 7 11 18 39% 2017 7 6 13 54% 2018 14 19 33 42% Total 70 88 158 44% 9 FUNDING APPLICATIONS 2011 - 2018 GRANT FUNDING SUCCESS RATE Grant Fund Funds Funds Not Total Success Grant Fund Funds Funds Not Total Success Awarded Awarded Applications Rate Awarded Awarded Applications Rate BUILD 0 1 1 0% INFRA 0 1 1 0% CDBG 9 6 15 60% LDA 1 1 2 50% CMAQ 7 3 10 70% LDA & RCO 1 0 1 100% CRISI 1 1 2 50% NHFP 1 3 4 25% FASTLANE 0 3 3 0% PBP 0 7 7 0% TCSP 0 3 3 0% SRTS 1 11 12 8% FHBP 1 1 2 50% STBG 17 14 31 55% FMSIB 1 2 3 33% STBG-SA 2 1 3 67% FTA 3 1 4 75% TIB 13 17 30 43% HSIP 11 17 65% TIGER 1 5 6 17% 10 FUNDING APPLICATIONS 2011 - 2018 GRANT FUNDING SUCCESS RATE Year Total Grant Funds Requested Total Grant Funds Awarded % Received 2011 $18,049,889 $5,543,479 31% 2012 $28,482,501 $7,858,691 28% 2013 $15,514,561 $1,925,984 12% 2014 $41,771,707 $5,838,801 14% 2015 $33,280,472 $7,283,269 22% 2016* $114,105,649 $4,901,952 4% 2017 $62,679,425 $19,339,581 31% 2018 $54,779,945 $10,923,711 20% Total $368,664,149 $63,615,468 17% *NOTE: Values are skewed by FASTLANE, FASTLANE II, and TIGER applications for Pines & Barker Grade Separation Projects totaling$105 Million. 11 FUNDING APPLICATIONS 2019 PENDING GRANT APPLICATIONS (4) TIB Applications -Results in November 2019 (1) BUILD Application - Results in Fall/Winter 2019 (1) Possible INFRA Application - Winter 2019 - Results in 2020 ■ Spokane Valley's annual CDBG allocation is planned to contribute to Spokane County's sewer extension and road reconstruction project in the Barker Road Mobile Homes neighborhood (southeast corner of Barker Rd and Buckeye Ave). 12 QUESTIONS? CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 1, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Potential Grant Opportunity— Freight Rail Assistance Program (FRAP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six Year Transportation Improvement Program PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • June 4, 2019 —Adoption of Resolution 19-008 adopting the 2020-2025 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) BACKGROUND: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) provides the Freight Rail Assistance Program (FRAP) as a grant program to both public and private sectors, including cities, county rail districts, counties, economic development councils, port districts, and privately or publicly owned railroads. FRAP grants are directed toward larger rail-oriented projects, where it is difficult to gain a contribution and where the rail location or the project is of strategic importance to the state, as well as the local community. Most recently, in 2019, WSDOT received 18 FRAP grant applications requesting more than $24.5 million in funding. Four of these applications were from public sector agencies. The applications generally fell into three broad categories: critical infrastructure including bridges/tunnels, improvement and maintenance of existing rail infrastructure, and business development. Projects that directly increase existing rail transportation were ranked higher than those that were forecasted as being beneficial. The FRAP application identifies the following examples as typical awarded projects: • Rehabilitating tracks, or restoring tracks that were removed • Upgrading tracks to handle heavier rail cars and/or improve system velocity • Developing rail infrastructure that can be proven essential to attract new businesses • Repairing damaged rail infrastructure • Increasing rail system capacity and/or velocity in general • Preserving a rail corridor • Improving connections to a port or transload facilities • Software and other IT solutions to facilitate rail maintenance or operations • Constructing transload or other facilities • Purchasing or rehabilitating railroad equipment • Developing strategic multimodal consolidation centers with proof of commitments from shippers and Class I railroad(s) • Purchasing rail rolling stock (powered or unpowered) • Building or improving intermodal transfer or transload facilities or terminals, including attached fixtures and equipment used exclusively for the facility • Building or improving terminals, yards, roadway buildings, fuel stations, or railroad wharves or docks, including attached fixtures and equipment used exclusively in the facility • Purchasing and installing railroad signal, communication, or other operating systems • Purchasing and installing siding track • Grading railroads or boring tunnels • Purchasing and/or installing track including ties, rails, ballast or other track material. • Constructing bridges, trestles, culverts or other elevated or submerged structures Table 1 shows 2019's list of awarded applicants, projects, rank, and award amount. Table 1. 2019 FRAP Grant Program Funded List Applicant Project Rank Grant Columbia Basin/CW Sunnyside to Granger 1 $ 650,000 PSAP Hoquiam Bridge 2 $ 840,320 Port of Benton Berry's Bridge, Yakima Bridge, Jadwin Xing 3 $ 1,500,000 Columbia/Walla Walla Aggregate Cars 4 $ 300,000 Columbia Basin/CW Wheeler to Moses Lake 5 $ 700,000 Washington Eastern MP 11-24, 37-57 6 $ 780,730 Rainer Rail Blakeslee to Chehalis/Bridges 7 $ 440,000 POVA Usk to Newport 8 $ 600,000 Washington and Idaho Marshall to Oakesdale 9 $ 750,000 Tacoma Rail MVD Track 10 $ 1,100,000 For the 2019-2021 biennium, a total of $2.9 million is available for supplemental FRAP grants. This is a supplemental call for projects because projects from 2019 were delivered under budget or not delivered at all. The regularly scheduled call for projects in 2020 is still anticipated. For this 2019 supplemental call, applications are due October 18, 2019. WSDOT will review all applications and shall submit a prioritized list of recommended projects to the state office of financial management and the transportation committees of the legislature by November 15, 2019. If awarded, funds will be available as authorized during the 2020 legislative session. This means awarded funds are likely available for use by fall 2020. There is no limit to an applicant's funding request amount, nor is there a minimum required match for the applicant. However, a benefit cost analysis is required as part of the application and it considers the requested funding amount and the agency's local match amount. Agencies with higher local matches are eligible to receive higher point-scores during application review. OPTIONS: Discussion on the City's applicable projects that may or may not be quality candidates to receive a funding award from FRAP. • Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project (GSP): the project's phasing and projected timeline may not be the best fit for this supplemental call's funding cycle and funding amount. The GSP is expected to be in the right-of-way (ROW) phase in 2020 and 2021. ROW requests are eligible expenses through FRAP, however they are not typically awarded, as discussed above. Further, given outstanding construction (CN) costs that are still unfunded, the GSP's financial need is far greater than the capacity of these supplemental FRAP funds. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus that staff not submit a grant application to the FRAP. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. — Engineer - Planning & Grants ATTACHMENTS: None. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 1, 2019 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing [' information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report — History of Pavement Management Program GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.020 — Powers vested in legislative bodies of noncharter and charter code cities. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The topics of street operations and maintenance, pavement preservation, and associated funding mechanisms, have been a topic of discussion for Councils since shortly after the City's incorporation. This topic has been before Council at least 44 times: Date Meeting Type Presentation Type Subject/Activity • 10/12/2004 Regular Administrative Report Budget Discussion: Street Fund • 10/12/2004 Regular Informational Item Utility Tax Scenarios • 10/26/2004 Regular Pending Legislation First Reading: Proposed Utility Tax Ordinance • 11/02/2004 Study Session Pending Legislation Public Comment: Proposed Utility Tax Ordinance • 11/09/2004 Regular Pending Legislation First Reading: Proposed Utility Tax Ordinance • 11/16/2004 Study Session Informational Item Update on Utility Tax Data • 12/07/2004 Study Session Pending Legislation First Reading: Proposed Utility Tax Ordinance • 01/11/2005 Regular Administrative Report Utility Tax Report • 04/05/2005 Study Session Informational Item Pavement Management and Associated Policy Issues • 06/11/2005 Workshop Informational Item Review of Budget Goals Draft Scope of Work for Street Masterplan • 12/20/2005 Study Session Informational Item and Related Activities Review Budget Goals: Draft a well-defined • 02/11/2006 Workshop Informational Item Street Master Plan, with Funding Options Motion Consideration: Amendment to JUB • 10/10/2006 Regular Informational Item Contract for Street MasterPlan for Street Development Standards • 12/19/2006 Study Session Informational Item Street MasterPlan Update • 01/27/2007 Workshop Informational Item Adopt a street master plan • 06/02/2007 Workshop Informational Item Summer Retreat- No specific topic • 07/17/2007 Study Session Administrative Report Draft Street Master Plan Presentation • 10/16/2007 Study Session Administrative Report Street Masterplan First Reading of Proposed Ordinance 08- • 07/22/2008 Regular Pending Legislation 014 Telephone Tax • 08/12/2008 Regular Motion Consideration Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance 08-014 Telephone Tax • 01/20/2009 Study Session Informational Item J-U-B Street Master Plan Update • 08/17/2010 Study Session Informational Item Street Preservation Program • 08/17/2010 Study Session Informational Item City Transportation Benefit District • 12/27/2011 Regular Informational Item Street Preservation (Info only) • 02/07/2012 Workshop Informational Item Street Preservation Funding Options • 03/20/2012 Study Session Administrative Report Pavement Management Plan • 03/27/2012 Regular Administrative Report Funding Options, Pavement Management Pavement Management Plan Update for • 03/27/2012 Regular Motion Consideration 2011 • 06/12/2012 Special Informational Item Public Works • 12/17/2013 Study Session Administrative Report Pavement Management Plan Update • 03/15/2016 Workshop Informational Item Planning for sustained funding of PMP beyond 2020 • 06/14/2016 Workshop Informational Item Transportation & Infrastructure Issues Transportation and Infrastructure Funding • 11/01/2016 Study Session Administrative Report - Utility Taxes Transportation and Infrastructure Funding • 11/08/2016 Regular Public Hearing - Utility Taxes Transportation and Infrastructure Funding • 12/06/2016 Special Special Meeting - Utility Tax Proposal • 02/14/2017 Workshop Informational Item Street O&M, Pavement Preservation and Street Construction • 01/9/2018 Regular Administrative Report Solid Waste Collection Street-Wear Fee Waste Management Contract • 01/30/2018 Study Session Motion Consideration Amendment, Street Wear Fee • 02/13/2018 Workshop Informational Item Street O&M, Pavement Preservation and Street Construction • 05/29/2018 Study Session Administrative Report Street O&M Fund #101 - Level of Service/Financial Challenges • 06/12/2018 Workshop Informational Item Street Operations & Maintenance Fund • 07/10/2018 Regular Administrative Report Telephone Utility Tax • 04/2/2019 Study Session Administrative Report Pavement Preservation • 6/18/2019 Study Session Administrative Report Pavement Management Ad-Hoc Commission • Since 2011, Council has approved annual budgetary General Fund transfers to the Pavement Preservation Fund. Between 2011 and 2019 these transfers total approximately$9 million. BACKGROUND: The City has been unable to identify a sustainable funding source for its pavement management program (PMP). Over the years, the amount of funding required to maintain the existing condition of the street network has always exceeded the amount of funding available. Today the City streets are generally in good condition and are relatively young. While multiple updates to the City's PMP have recommended increased funding levels, the actual pavement conditions have generally remained consistently in "good" condition. However, as our streets continue to age and revenue sources decline, the City is anticipating an underfunded PMP that will cause streets to degrade faster than City resources can handle. This projection leads to a reduced level of service that will cost more to maintain in the long term. At the June 18, 2019, Council meeting referenced above, staff introduced the topic of a Pavement Management Ad-Hoc Commission to help investigate the City's existing pavement network, a preferred City-wide average pavement condition target, the necessary budget to sustain the preferred pavement condition, and the revenue source(s) to support it. After hearing concerns from Council regarding the reliability of the City's pavement management program's findings and recommendations, staff opted to delay the ad-hoc commission while it revisited the pavement management program's history with Council. OPTIONS: Given the information provided in the attached PowerPoint presentation, staff requests Council direction on what elements of the pavement management program require further discussion or clarification. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff requests Council direction regarding any outstanding questions or concerns that may exist. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Impacts will be dependent on Council direction. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Deputy City Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Bill Helbig, City Engineer Adam Jackson, Engineer— Planning & Grants ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation Pavement Management in Spokane Valley October 1, 2019 John Hohman, Deputy City Manager *WaneChelsie Taylor, Finance Director *Valley® � Bill Helbig, City Engineer Adam Jackson, Planning & Grants Engineer Pavement Management Programn captured on one slide... City Conditio Objectives, Functional Area Policies& Class �Yd2] PCI1 Backlogs ExcellentIP BudgetsIN Major Arterial 993,200 71 1.2 Minor Arterial 1,465,800 67 0.5 al -7 '.- Balanced Collector 669,700 68 0.4 Very Good Priorities, Approach Local 6,473,400 70 5.1 Analysis Network 9,602,100 69 7.3 Good Techniques I-, � 1 Values taken from IMS's 2017 survey data and aged to & Understanding January 1, 2019 using Easy Street. 6G Reporting /II. of Condition Fair A 40%of pavement life Pavement Life Cycle Curve 40 Excellent 1 has a 15%drop in qualityMB1JOr Very Good 15%of pavement life arterial0% , II Targe[Zone for Pavement Rehabilrta[ionGood $1 spent nowa (+j '.,-Arterial.. 25 E Fair ? `•,Increased Pavement Life'•,> Local,68% Collector,7%a ••.Costs$8 ifyed_ PMPoor Very Poor c„Pee&.,h, a Pavement Per%.r;;;ance Time Time Q 2 Pavement Management - CounciI History Dating back to October 12, 2004, there have been at least: 44 pavement management-specific council items 21 Informational Items 13 Administrative Reports 6 Public Hearings and/or Pending Legislation o1,, �fEJ ,,a wwtln 1 Special Meeting •w'.M�. � 3 Motion Considerations* `o_af�°g °�▪ "" ,"`�` r."ovaeaFd �� d��'�� ' Tpyy' ,.4'„:.: 411 0 08/12/2008 - Telephone Utility Tax :-- o 03/27/2012 - Council adoption of 2011 PMP update •. n 7 .yrr..,-g f-z• ' o 01/30/2018 - Annual Street Wear Fee • 1, E4. *Excludes annual budget amendments that transfer funds "''',4.7:74',71:;t:,,,,,p from the General Fund to Fund #311. Since 2011, Council has •. °�' {.., approved approximately $9 million total. � :Z..1,-...-•..'4---441,1.,„ bp �N � �t'r p pe:..� y•w`ygww�b ,4,„w mpf, � y 41 unique council meeting dates/times 29 Council Meetings (Regular, Study Session) ," 12 Workshops, Retreats, Special Meetings Pavement Management - Milestones 2004 2006/2007 2008 Proposed Utility Tax City conducts its 1St discussion does not PMP Telephone Utility Tax move forward Passes Street Master Plan 2012 2013 2011 100% of General Civic Facility Fund #311 Created Fund surplus used Replacement Fund for Pres. Projects #123 transfers into #311 over 4 ears 2014 2016 2018 Council sets goal for > Proposed Utility Tax a sustainable PMP discussion does not Solid Waste Collection Fee (recurring thru 2019) move forward City Council Goals & Pavement Management 2014 Focus on sustainability of Street Preservation program beyond 2016. 2015 Pursue a sustainability plan in connection with the City's Street Preservation program, to include sustained funding in the City's Street fund to address concerns beyond the year 2019. 2016 Pursue a sustainability plan in connection with the City's Street Preservation program, to include sustained funding in the City's Street Fund #311 to address concerns beyond year 2020. 2017 Pursue a sustainability plan in connection with the City's Street Preservation program, to include sustained funding in the City's Street Fund #101 and Pavement Preservation Fund #311 to address concerns beyond year 2021. 2018 Continue to pursue a plan to sustain the City's Pavement Preservation Program, to include sustained financing for the Street Fund #101 and Pavement Preservation Fund #311 2019 Continue to pursue a plan to sustain the City's Pavement Preservation Program, to include sustained financing for the Street 0&M Fund #101 and Pavement Preservation Fund #311 b Pavement Management Plan Recommendations PMP Annual Cost Presented PMP Details Year to Maintain to Council 2006 $9,900,000 07/17/2007 -City's first Street MasterPlan after 2 years of preparation. -Consultant managed, walking survey, Cartegraph software. -Consultant managed, walking survey, Cartegraph software. 2008 $9,900,000 01/20/2009 *The PMP recommends $9,900,000 to maintain network PCI, but during the $7,300,000* 08/17/2010 recession staff allowed for local streets to decline in order to reduce the funding to $7,300,000. 12/27/2011 -Consultant managed, semi-automated digital survey, Cartegraph software. 2010 $13,300,000 02/07/2012 -Pavement modelling, projections, and survey methods improved and updated. 03/20/2012 -Council adopted this plan on 03/27/2012 03/27/2012 -PCI Targets: 70 Arterials/Collectors, 65 Locals -City managed, semi-automated digital survey, consultant's excel file (software) 2013 $7,250,000 12/17/2013 -Based on pavement-only costs: excluded traffic control, mobilization, ADA, engineering design, construction inspection, or other non-pavement related costs required on all City-funded projects. Years 2015, 2017, and 2019 are continued on the next page. Pavement Management Plan Recommendations PMP Annual Cost Presented PMP Details Year to Maintain to Council -Found no council items during 2014 and 2015 calendar years. -City managed, semi-automated digital survey, consultant's excel file (software) 03/15/2016 -Based on pavement-only costs: excluded traffic control, mobilization, ADA, 2015 $7,500,000 11/01/2016 engineering design, construction inspection, or other non-pavement related $6,800,000* 11/08/2016 costs required on all City-funded projects. 12/06/2016 *The PMP recommendation of $7,500,000 is based on an average of three methods for calculating the annual cost to maintain the network PCI. The $6,800,000 budget was the lowest cost "option" used to find the average. -City managed, semi-automated digital survey, consultant's excel file (software) 2017 $7,000,000 02/13/2018 -Based on pavement-only costs: excluded traffic control, mobilization, ADA, engineering design, construction inspection, or other non-pavement related costs required on all City-funded projects. A third party review by Nichols Consulting Engineers (NCE) of City's current PMP 2019 $10,000,000 04/02/2019 identified corrective measures, including updating unit costs used in PMP to estimate annual budget requirements. See next page for NCE recommendations. NCE Recommendations Identify Level of Service Targets Condition PCI PCI Examples 100 PCi:100 —, Pa.90 Good, Fair, Poor Excellent ,: Current Network PCI of 70 85 Council may choose to adjust Very Gnod Ili 1— 1 PCI ranges, targets, definitions, etc. Good 70 P0=75 PCI=60 Use All-inclusive Treatment Costs G° Consider Alternative Surface Treatments Fair Obtain a More User-friendly Software Package 40 pa 240 PCI=5 Poor Continue to verify pavement performance curves 'S Identify Alternative Revenue Sources Needed to Meet Level of Service Targets V Y Poor 0 8 NCE Recommendations - Level of Service Example: Maintain Existing Network Condition Keepthe average of ALL City streets in Good Condition (PCI 70) Arterials/Collectors Local Access Total Target Condition Good (PCI 70) Good (PCI 70) Good (PCI 70) Target Budget $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,000,000 Budgeted Revenue Sources General Fund (311) 1,000,000 - Street Wear Fee (106) - 1,500,000 Street O&M (101) 1,000,000 - Estimated Grants (303 & 311) 1,500,000 - REET Matching Funds (303 & 311) 300,000 - Total Budgeted Revenue a $ 3,800,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 5,300,000 Needed Revenue to Meet Target Conditions mil $ 11,200,000 I $ 3,500,000 $4,700,000 Note: This budget amount maintains the network-wide pavement condition average in Good condition. Beyond the 5-year horizon, it is expected that an increased annual budget will be needed to maintain the PCI targets. Generally, the annual cost to maintain a given condition increases as the pavement condition rating decreases. NCE Recommendations - Level of Service Example: Maintain Arterials and Collectors, Reduce Local Streets Keep the average of Arterial & Collector streets in Good Condition (PCI 70) while Reducingthe average of Local streets to a PCI of 65. Arterials/Collectors Local Access Total Target Condition Good (PCI 70) Good (PCI 65) Good Target Budget $ 5,000,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 6,900,000 Budgeted Revenue Sources (Estimated from Applicable City Funds) General Fund (311) 1,000,000 - Street Wear Fee (106) - 1,500,000 Street O&M (101) 1,000,000 - Estimated Grants (303 & 311) 1,500,000 - REET Matching Funds (303 & 311) 300,000 - Total Budgeted Revenue $ 3,800,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 5,300,000 Needed Revenue to Meet Target Conditions 1,200,000 $ 400,000 $1,600,000 Note: This budget amount reduces the pavement condition average of Local streets by 5 PCI points over 5 years but still keeps the average of the local streets in a reasonably Good condition. However, beyond the 5-year horizon, local streets will continue to drop 1 PCI point per year unless additional revenue is provided. It is estimated that at least $5 million per year would be needed to stop the decline of the local street network. Capital Project Budgeting How much pavement-related work has the City funded in the past? $15,000,000 $14,000,000 $13,000,000 NJ $12,000,000 L ▪ $11,000,000 C15 $10,000,000 $9,564,110 Cl. W $9,000,000 y $8,000,000 -) $6,961,931 RI $7,000,000 _ $4,635,600 $6,080,237 $6,132,468 a $6,000,000 Actual Grant &Other Funds — $5,623,855 _ $2,119,485 d $5,000,000 $4,554,166 $1,582,212 173 Actual Fund #303/311 Expenditures $2,980,456 - $2,077,519 • $4,000,000 p $3,628,254 C $2,994, 723$2,085,531 - $3,000,000 $3,584,976 $850,248 $3,667,768 Actual Fund #101 Expenditures $3.814 $3,407,600 $2,000,000 $1,953,769 $2,502,661 $1,728,281 $1,253,801 $1,775,474 $1,000,000 -Annual Actual PMP Totals $1,146,012 $1,257,470 $915,628 $1,214,834 $1,002,532 $1,043,675 $1,142,656 $1,260,742 $0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 1019 ZZ Year Capital Project Budgeting How much has the City funded versus the PMP recommendations? $15,000,000 $14,000,000 PMP Budget to Maintain PCI $13,300,000 $13,000,000 vl $12,000,000 PMP Budget to Maintain PCI i PMP Budget to Maintain PCI $11,000,000 PMP Budget to Maintain PCI $7,250,000 $10,000,000 c $10,000,000 $9200200 J $9,564,110 PMP Budget to Maintain PCI � Cl. W $9,000,000 $7,500,000 I I tea, $8,000,000 ro $6,961,931N.. I ---------- Tij $7,000,000 ...... CC $6,080,237 $6,132,468 — $5,623,855 a $6,000,000 Actual Grant &Other Funds a $5,000,000 $4,554,166 Tu IT $3,628,254 $4,000,000 Actual Fund #303/311 Expenditures PMP Budget to Maintain PCI c $2,994,723 C $7,000,000 < $3,000,000 Actual Fund #101 Expenditures $2,000,000 vill $1,000,000 —Annual Actual PMP Totals $0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 12 Year Capital Project Budgeting How has the PCI score been impacted by funding levels? $15,000,000 $14,000,000 $13,000,000 Surveyed PCI Surveyed PCI 80 Locals 73 Surveyed PCI Surveyed PCI Surveyed PCI Locals 73 Surveyed PCI Locals 71 Locals 71 Locals 71 cil Locals 70$12,000,000 Sept 2019 Survey • • Surveyed PCI PCI TBD 70 Surveyed PCI V }, $11,000,000 • p. '6 Arterials/Collectors 73 Surveyed PCI Surveyed PCI Arterials/Collectors 71 Surveyed PCI $9,564,110 X • $10,000,000 Arterials/Collectors 67 Surveyed PCI Arterials/Collectors 68 — Arterials/Collectors 66 60 w Q. Arterials/Collectors 64 'C X $9,000,000 - y $8,000,000 50 O aa O +a $6,961,931 *' Ti j $7,000,000 'O CC $6,080,237 $6,132,468 40 00 $5,623,855 U CI. $6,000,000 Actual Grant & Other Funds4-,$5,000,000 $4,554,166 O 30 W a fi • $4,000,000 Actual Fund #303/311 Expenditures E $3,628,254 W O $2,994,723 20 a < $3,000,000 Actual Fund #101 Expenditures $2,000,000 II 10 $1,000,000 —Annual Actual PMP Totals $0 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 13 Year Capital Project Budgeting Why has the PCI maintained despite underfunding the PMP? A 40%of pavement life 1.1411 Excellent has a 16%drop in quality Very Good 16%of pavement life p The time is now. . . R f1)1 i Good $1 spent now J C has a 40%drop in quality E °' Fair d R a Poor Costs$8 if layed Pavement Life Cycle Curve Pat, er,?ent pe Very Poor Cp-fre o,/notice Time - Target Zone for Pavement Rehab'jtation d '•• Increased Pavement Life '•. d a Un'►ehahilitated Spokane Pavement Pe,c.........>,. rmance 4000 Valley Time Network Pavement Condition Index Overall a "Good" network, but "Fair" streets will continue decline ! - rriEn - -111'1.. 4 _ — Pavement Evaluation 1n4 Cost v Pavement Condlion Index - coNt.o 1!li:iiiiiii -II .• $$$$$$ Failed(0-10) irmu;.d! r $$$$$ Senous(10-25) I;� .i... iii.:;__� , $$$$ VeryP r(25-40) ITT. . i�� U_� . L E I01;- ;. _ . ■��i t $$( Poor{4i 55) __M Ui__ 1iiri■ mill WI it _ I y r��m 1 �__ :::&a ilDIrii;i�5`■ v111!,u �' $ — Fair(55 70) iii- E— .- - '' "lgit - –' (—}. L. 91 p . - "Good " and " Fair" streets are IT ir 1- ,�• good candidates for preservation treatments. What 's Next for the PMP? Confirm a target for the City's network-wide pavement Level of Service 3/27/2012: Adopted PMP with the following targets Arterials/Collectors - 70 PCI Locals - 65 PCI (Locals currently at 70 PCI) Council consensus for revenue needs, challenges and shortfalls Telephone utility tax revenue ($3M in 2009 down to $1.7M budgeted for 2019, 5.37% avg. annual) 2019 Budget: Street Fund #101 - $908,000 shortfall, estimated $1.8M shortfall by 2023 2020 Budget: Street Fund #101 - $1,364,000 shortfall 2019 Budget: Pavement Preservation Fund #311 - $1.6M - $4.7M shortfall (varies with PCI) Potential Solutions Identify New Revenue Reduce Level or Service and/or Revise Targets What does Council need to meet its 2019 goal to "...sustain the City's Pavement Preservation Program...?" QUESTIONS? DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of September 26,2019; 10:00 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Oct 8,2019,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 11 Proclamation:Domestic Violence Awareness Month 1. PUBLIC HEARING: #2—2020 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 19-014 Code Compliance Amendments—Caitlin Prunty (15 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance 19-015,2020 Property Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 45 mins] Oct 15,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 81 1. Park Regulations—Mike Stone,Erik Lamb (30 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Oct 22,2019,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 151 Proclamation: Bicentenary of the Birth of the BAB (Bahai) 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2019 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2.First Reading Ordinance 19-016 Budget Amendment for 2019—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 4. Second Reading Ordinance 19-015,2020 Property Tax—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.First Reading Ordinance 19-017,2020 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Grant Awards—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 7.Admin Rpt: 2020 State Legislative Agenda—M. Calhoun, C.Driskell,Briahna Murray,Josh Weiss(20min) 8.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 9. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting 85 mins] Oct 29,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 221 1. Police Dept Quarterly Report—Chief Werner (10 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Election Night and Council Meetings History Nov 5,2019 Meeting Cancelled (election night) Nov 12,2019,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 51 1. PUBLIC HEARING: #3—Final 2020 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance 19-016 for Budget Amendment 2019—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4. Second Reading Ordinance 19-017,2020 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to Council—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 mins] Nov 19,2019,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 121 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Motion: 2020 State Legislative Agenda—M.Calhoun, C. Driskell,Briahna Murray,Josh Weiss(10 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Proposed 2020 Fee Resolution—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: mins] Draft Advance Agenda 9/26/2019 11:20:50 AM Page 1 of 2 Nov 26,2019,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 191 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: mins] Dec 3,2019,Study Session,Meeting Cancelled (due to Thanksgiving Week) Dec 10,2019,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 31 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Fee Resolution for 2020—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Lodging Tax Awards for 2020—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) Dec 17,2019, Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 101 1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) December 24,2019,and December 31,2019 meetings cancelled Jan 7,2020,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Dec 311 1. Council officer Selections for Mayor and Deputy Mayor—Chris Bainbridge (15 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda—Mayor Higgins (5 minutes) *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appleway Trail Amenities Camping in RVs Donation Recognition Graffiti Health District Re SV Stats Land Use Notice Requirements Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. Naming City Facilities Protocol New Employee Rpt(Jan,April,July,Oct) Park Lighting Park Reg. Ord. amendments PFD Presentation Police Dept Qtr Rpt(Jan,April,July, Oct) Sign Ordinance SRTC/Census Coordinator St. Illumination(owners,cost,location) St. O&M Pavement Preservation Tree City USA Utility Facilities in ROW Vaping Water Districts&Green Space Way Finding Signs Draft Advance Agenda 9/26/2019 11:20:50 AM Page 2 of 2 Mark Werner Ozzie Knezovich Chief of Police Sheriff _ lA Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 5 �' a Services provided in partnership with ° � the Spokane County Sherds Office and the Community, i' rf Dedicated to Your Safety. TO: Mark Calhoun, City Manager FROM: Mark Werner, Chief of Police DATE: September 16, 2019 RE: Monthly Report August 2019 In August 2016, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification, which means we went from reporting based on a hierarchy to reporting all the crimes for each incident. Consequently, comparing crime statistics before August 2016 to crime statistics after that timeframe is not recommended using the data provided in the attached charts and graphs. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief Werner attended the swearing in of seven new deputies to the Sheriff's Office: Anandae Clark—Is 25-years old and is from Nine Mile Falls,WA. She attended Eastern Washington University on a Track and Field Scholarship where she competed in the Pole Vault. She graduated summa cum laude with a Bachelor's Degree in Biology. Prior to working for the SCSO Anandae worked part-time for Inland Imaging Clinical Services and for her mother's cleaning business. Christopher Garwood — Is 35-years old and is from Lacy, WA. He is married and they have two daughters. Chris attended Eastern Washington University and earned a Bachelor's Degree in Sociology. Prior to working for the SCSO Chris worked for the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services as a Juvenile Rehabilitation Counselor. Andrew Dresback— Is 30-years old and is from Spokane. Andrew is married and they have a one- year old son. Andrew attended the University of Idaho and played football-quarterback for the Vandals. He graduated with a Bachelor's Degree in Sociology. Prior to working for the SCSO Andrew worked for Wilderness Medical Staffing as Director of Recruitment. Jason Lee—Is 25-years old and is from Deer Park,WA. Jason is married. Jason is an Eagle Scout. He attended Spokane Falls Community College and earned an Associate of Arts Degree. Prior to working for the SCSO Jason worked for Spokane Cremation and Funeral Services as an Apprentice Funeral Director. Page 1 Matthew Pierson — Is 30-years old and is from Coeur d' Alene. Matthew is married. He attended the University of Idaho and earned a Bachelor's Degree in Mechanical Engineering. Prior to working for the SCSO Matthew worked for Outotec Energy Products as the Business Development Manager/Solution Lead. Jason Burks — Is 48-years old and is from Texas. Jason is married, and they have two daughters. Jason recently retired from the United States Army after serving 29-years; he was most recently assigned to the Asymmetric Warfare Group where he was the Squadron Commander and held the rank of Command Sergeant Major. Jordan Sowell — Is 25-years old and is from Spokane. Jordan was recently married. He attended Spokane Falls Community College and earned an Associate of Arts Degree. Prior to working for the SCSO Jordan worked for Spokane County Detention Services as a Corrections Officer. All the new deputies are attending Basic Law Enforcement Academy Class #792 in Spokane and are set to graduate in December. We also welcomed a lateral deputy to the Sheriff's Office. Stefan Moore—Is 26-years old. He is married and they are expecting their first baby in the very near future. Stefan is originally from Spokane and is a graduate of Whitworth University where he earned his Bachelor's Degree in Sociology. He has served as a Washington State Patrol Trooper the last three years on the west side of the state. Chief Werner attended the Spokane Regional Emergency Communications (SREC) governing board meeting at the beginning of the month, as well as subsequent SREC general meetings. Chief Werner, Inspector Lyons, Spokane Valley Investigative Unit(SVIU) Sergeant Bloomer and the detectives with the unit all attended the National Night Out festivities in Spokane Valley. Detectives paired up with some of the city council members as they attended various parties in the area. Chief Werner was joined by others from the Sheriff's Office and Spokane Valley PD to assist some young shoppers with the Salvation Army Back to School Shopping in mid-August. The monthly Joint Terrorism Task Force meeting was held in late August, which Chief Werner attended. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of August, S.C.O.P.E. participated in: • S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training (4 new volunteers) • Greater Spokane Substance Abuse Coalition • Spokane Interstate Fair Safety Mtg. Mtg. • National Night Out Celebration • Valleyfest Park Mtg. • National Night Out at the Spokane Valley • S.C.O.P.E. Moving Forward Valley Meeting. Mall (Edgecliff, University, Trentwood and West • City of Spokane Valley Neighborhood Valley S.C.O.P.E. stations) Restoration Mtg. • East Valley Community Coalition Mtg. • East Valley Back-to-School Event Underage Drinking/Drug Prevention • Millwood Daze Page 2 August 2019 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 7 64.5 65.5 130 East Valley* 22 200 374 574 Edgecliff 12 224 12.5 236.5 Trentwood 6 148 88 236 University 20 368.5 93.5 462 West Valley* 21 328 76 404 TOTALS 88 1,333 709.5 2,042.5 Volunteer Value ($30.46 per hour) $62,214.55 for August 2019 The SCOPE Latent Fingerprint Team was given 81 cases for the month of August. Out of those 81 cases, 45 were from crimes in Spokane Valley. The team located fingerprints on 29 vehicles; 15 of those were Spokane Valley cases. Great job SCOPE Latent Fingerprint Team! S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 62 on-scene hours (including travel time) in August, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control; 30 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. There was one special event in August,which was in the county. Total volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 1,301; total for 2019 is 11,612. Abandoned Vehicles June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 Tagged for Impounding 38 84 56 Cited/Towed 0 1 1 Hulks Processed 12 14 22 Total Vehicles Processed 122 230 174 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT # of # of Hrs. #Disabled # Warnings # Non - Disabled Vol. Infractions Issued Infractions Issued City of Spokane Valley Issued January 2 12 2 7 0 February 2 13.5 5 3 0 March 3 15 3 20 0 April 1 2 0 2 0 May 2 4 1 3 0 June 1 4 2 5 0 July 2 20 4 14 0 August 1 9 3 8 0 YTD Total 15 79.5 20 62 0 Page 3 # of # of Hrs. #Disabled #Warnings #Non-Disabled Vol. Infractions Issued Infractions Issued Spokane County Issued January 2 3.5 1 1 0 February 4 28 9 11 0 March 5 20.5 4 17 0 April 3 21 5 9 0 May 7 27 2 21 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 August 2 22 5 7 0 YTD Total 27 143 41 63 0 OPERATIONS: Spokane Valley Deputies Respond to Stabbing on Skyview-Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the scene of a reported stabbing. One male was detained,and a second male was transported to a hospital with possible life-threatening injuries. Major Crime Detectives responded to the scene to continue the investigation. In early August, at approximately 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to a reported stabbing at a residence located in the 12500 block of E. Skyview, in Spokane Valley. The adult male caller stated he had just stabbed his roommate. Deputies quickly detained the male caller while Spokane Valley Fire personnel provided medical treatment to the second adult male, who was transported to a hospital with possible life-threatening injuries. Major Crimes Detectives, later in the evening, arrested a 26-year-old male suspect and booked him into the Spokane County Jail for Assault 1st Degree (DV). The suspect told investigators he acted in self-defense. The 45-year-old roommate/victim was transported to a hospital where he is in satisfactory condition. The suspect stated his roommate had been drinking alcohol and was "out of control." This was an on- going dispute,which reignited when he took his dog out to the back yard. His roommate came out of the house and said he was going to urinate on the neighbor's dog because it always urinated in his yard. The suspect began arguing with his roommate due to his statements and went back downstairs into his bedroom. The argument continued and began to escalate so the suspect armed himself with a knife. As the argument continued at the doorway of the suspect's bedroom door, his much larger roommate pushed his way into the suspect's bedroom and began to assault him. The suspect then began swinging the knife, stabbing/cutting his roommate several times. The suspect's roommate, the victim, admitted he had been drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana. He explained he had been involved in an on-going argument with the suspect throughout the day, but couldn't recall why they had been arguing. The victim stated he went downstairs and was stabbed by the suspect for an unknown reason. Major Crimes Detectives applied for and were granted a search warrant for the residence. With the assistance of Spokane County Sheriff's Forensic Unit personnel, they processed the scene for evidence, which will be extremely important due to the conflicting versions of this incident. DV Suspect Arrested a 2nd Time Following Another Violent Assault - Spokane Valley Deputies arrested and booked a 23-year-old male suspect for three felony domestic violence-related charges. The suspect was previously arrested on May 28,2019,and charged with two felony and two misdemeanor domestic violence-related charges after the victim reported she was assaulted Page 4 by him. He was released on May 29,2019,after posting a$10,000 bond,and a Domestic Violence No Contact Order forbidding the suspect from contacting the victim was issued by the court. In early August, Spokane Valley Deputy Krystal Bitzer responded to the report of a domestic violence assault that occurred the day before. The victim stated an argument escalated into a violent assault by the suspect. During the assault, the suspect grabbed her by the throat and threw her against the wall, while blaming her for his anger. As the argument continued, the suspect grabbed the victim by the throat again, lifted her from the ground and squeezed, causing her to feel dizzy, light-headed, and her vision to blur. He finally released his grip, and the victim fell to the ground. During the incident, the male suspect punched her and prevented her from leaving until she eventually was able to flee. Deputy Bitzer observed injuries consistent with the victim's account of the violent assault. Also, a Domestic Violence No Contact Order was in effect forbidding the suspect from having any contact with the victim. The suspect was contacted at a residence located in the 7300 block of E. Sinto. After being advised of his rights, the suspect declined to answer any question or provide a statement. He was booked into the Spokane County Jail for Assault 2nd Degree-Strangulation (DV), Violation of a No Contact Order (DV), and Unlawful Imprisonment (DV) where he remains with a bond totaling $100,000, which includes his charges from last May. (On May 28, 2019, the suspect reportedly was involved in an argument with the victim. The victim explained during the violent assault, the suspect pointed a pistol at her head and grabbed her by the throat, restricting her ability to breath. He was arrested and booked into jail for Assault 1st Degree (DV),Assault 2nd Degree(DV), and two counts of Assault 4th Degree (DV). After his first appearance in court the following day, his bond was set at $10,000. Later that evening, the suspect was released after his bond was secured via a bail bonds company. (Charges later amended to two counts Assault rd Degree (DV), Harassment(DV), Assault 4 DV.) During the investigation,the pistol believed to have been used during the assault was located by Deputy Natalie Woolard and determined to be a BB gun. Armed Suspect Fires Weapon Outside a Business/SIRR Team Investigating Deputy Involved Shooting - Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to a call of a male, armed with a pistol, attempting to enter a business, which is not open to the public. Moments later, the caller reported the suspect was firing the weapon as deputies arrived in the multi-business complex parking lot. Two deputies fired their weapons at the armed suspect who was pronounced deceased at the scene. No citizens or deputies were injured. Initial information indicates in mid- August, at approximately 9:08 a.m., a caller reported an adult male known to him was attempting to get into a business located in the 10000 block of E. Knox in the Spokane Valley. The caller/victim stated the business was not open to the public, and the doors were locked. The victim advised he had been told the suspect,who was the ex-boyfriend of the victim's current girlfriend,was intoxicated and armed with a pistol on his hip. Approximately four minutes later, the victim advised the suspect was hitting the window and then began firing his weapon as deputies arrived in the area, also reporting possible shots fired. Moments later, deputies reported shots fired; the suspect was hit and requested medics. At approximately 9:14 a.m., deputies advised the suspect crashed his vehicle into a tree, which was located in the northeast corner of the complex parking lot. Members of the Spokane Police Department SWAT Team,who happened to be training a short distance away,heard the call and began to respond to assist. The suspect was pronounced deceased at the scene. The Officer Involved Protocol was enacted, and SIRR Team investigators responded to conduct the investigation and process the scene for evidence. As per standard protocol, the two deputies who fired their weapons were placed on paid administrative leaving pending the outcome of the investigation. Page 5 The SIRR Team is comprised of multiple agencies in eastern Washington, including the Spokane Police Department, Washington State Patrol, Spokane County Sheriff's Office and Spokane Valley Police Department. • The Spokane Police Department is the case managing agency in this incident. All future communications regarding this investigation will be sent via the SIRR Team. • The Spokane County Sheriff's Office will release the name of the Spokane Valley Deputies involved in the incident at a later time. • Once the SIRR Team investigation is complete, the case will be forwarded to the Spokane County Prosecutor's Office for review. WA DOC Brownstone Work Release Inmate Walks Away from Hospital—During the evening hours in mid-August,a Washington State Department of Corrections Brownstone Work Release Inmate, a 54-year-old male suspect, walked away from Valley Hospital. The suspect was receiving medical treatment when he left without permission. He was convicted of Trafficking Stolen Property. In mid-August, at approximately 10:30 p.m., a Washington State Department of Corrections Brownstone employee reported the suspect walked away from Valley Hospital where he was receiving medical care. Spokane Valley Deputies checked the area of the hospital, but were unsuccessful in locating the suspect. A short time later,the suspect's mother advised he arrived at her residence and took her white Chrysler LHS. She stated the vehicle belongs to the suspect, although it is registered to her. Just after midnight, a citizen reported finding an unoccupied white Chrysler LHS with no license plates in the 6000 block E. Broadway. The caller stated the vehicle appeared to have struck a fence and a tree. Arriving deputies noted the airbags had deployed and quickly established a perimeter. A K9 search did not locate the suspect. Three days later, at approximately 1:30 a.m., Spokane Valley Deputies located the suspect near University and Sprague, and booked him into the Spokane County Jail on a felony Washington Department of Corrections warrant. Requesting Tips/Information Regarding Suspicious Activity - Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the report of a white male, driving an older, block or boxy style white minivan, who attempted to contact a young female. Anyone with information regarding similar incidents or can help identify the male is asked to call Crime Check at 509-456-2233, reference #10118548. Investigators would like to identify and contact the male to determine his intentions or if a crime occurred. In mid-August, at approximately 5:37 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputies responded to the report of suspicious activity in the area of the 8700 block of E. Alki. They received information a white male, driving an older, faded or dirty white, minivan with a "blocky nose," attempted to contact a young female as she rode her bike. As the young girl waited for another child to cross the street, the male stopped, told her he knew her, and"get in." He then drove away without saying anything else,nor did he attempt to exit his vehicle. The nine-year-old girl was able to provide this detailed description: a white male (early 20's-estimate), dirty/greasy, shoulder-length blond hair. She said he clenched his teeth and his face appeared flushed red and covered in acne. She and her mother, who observed the incident, believed they had seen the minivan around the neighborhood, but neither of them knew the man. Anyone who can help identify this male, help locate the vehicle, or can provide any information about this or similar incidents, is asked to call Crime Check at 509- 456-2233,reference #10118548. Page 6 Deputies Use Great Restraint Subduing an Extremely Large Suspect, Armed with a Knife - Second Suspect Arrested for Assaulting Deputy-Spokane Valley and Spokane County Sheriff's Deputies exercised great restraint while subduing an aggressive suspect who said he had a knife while failing to follow multiple commands. During the struggle, he pulled an illegal knife from his pocket. A second person interjected herself into the situation and was arrested for felony assault after striking one of the deputies. The victim,who placed the original call reporting an assault, was arrested for obstructing, but was later released after she was issued a criminal citation. In mid-August, at approximately 11:30 p.m., Spokane Valley and Spokane County Deputies responded to the Peking Palace, located at 11110 E. Sprague, for a reported assault. The victim said she was assaulted by a male, who suddenly kissed her, inside the bar. Deputy Hilton and Deputy Vicini contacted the victim in the parking lot of the business along with several other individuals. As Deputy Hilton spoke with a potential witness,he suddenly looked past Deputy Hilton, said something about stopping him, and walked away. Then, Deputy Hilton noticed an extremely large male (described as 6'10", 320+pounds), later identified as the 23-year-old suspect,walking toward Deputy Vicini and the victim. The male suspect seemed agitated and appeared to have both his hands clenched into fists. Deputy Vicini also noticed the suspect approaching with his hands balled into fists, yelling, "I want to say my side!" Both deputies gave the suspect multiple commands to stop and sit down,but he ignored them as he continued toward the location of the victim. With the suspect's continued failure to follow commands and unknown intentions, the deputies continued to try and deescalate the situation, advising the suspect to calm down. The "� s�HECOR �4a` SHERIFF male suspect began to back away from the deputies SHERIFF OZZIE D.KNEZOVICH when he was told he would be searched for weapons. The male suspect was told to place his hands behind his back for the search, but he suddenly jammed his hand into his shorts pocket, 17 saying, "I have a knife!" Despite several commands telling the suspect to not reach for the • knife,he continued while the deputies attempted to take control of the suspect's hands. During the struggle, the male suspect pulled an opened, switch-blade style, knife from his pocket. He continued to resist and ignore commands to get on the ground, but eventually, the knife dropped from his hand, landing a couple of feet away. The deputies continued their attempt to take the very large suspect to the ground and gain control of him. Arriving at the scene to assist, Deputy Criswell witnessed the struggle,the male suspect's considerable stature, and several people, who appeared hostile, standing very close to the deputies. Due to the apparent safety concerns, he ordered the others to get back, but his commands were ignored. Several strikes and a successful leg sweep brought the suspect to the ground, but he continued to resist the deputies' efforts to secure his hands behind his back. The crowd became increasingly hostile, yelling at the deputies while standing extremely close. Eventually,the suspect was handcuffed. Two females, a 53- year-old female and the original victim, continued to yell at the deputies and approached within arm's reach despite multiple commands to move away. The 53-year-old female was advised she was under arrest for obstructing. She pulled away, spun, and struck a deputy, attempting to handcuff her, in the face. Continuing to struggle and scream, she was taken to the ground, handcuffed, and advised she was being charged with Assault 3rd, a felony, in addition to misdemeanor resisting arrest and obstructing. The second female/victim failed to follow additional commands to move back. She was arrested after several deputies arrived on scene to assist. Later, she was extremely apologetic and Page 7 provided a statement regarding the initial assault. She explained she and the other female went to the bar to sing Karaoke. They had some drinks, and she had just been introduced to the male suspect. She said the male suspect just leaned forward and pressed his lips hard against hers. She became angry, pushed him away as she told him that wasn't okay and that she was calling the police. Several of the male suspect's friends pushed her out of the bar, telling her to "forget about it." She continued to apologize saying she heard the male suspect say,"I have a knife"to the deputies as he came stomping out of the bar. She had no idea what was happening or why the male suspect fought with deputies when they tried to detain him. She was scared, and she became increasingly upset when the 53-year- old female was arrested. Afraid to go back to the bar, she was issued a criminal misdemeanor citation for Obstructing, given a ride to a the 53-year-old female's residence and released. The male suspect was advised of his rights and agreed to answer questions. He said he was playing a stupid prank on the victim by getting close and talking quietly in her ear. As she turned toward him to hear him,their lips touched, causing her to pull away suddenly. Knowing he did something stupid,he walked outside to clear his head. When he noticed the deputies arrive and contact the victim,he began walking toward them and failed to comply with commands to stop. He told the deputies he had a knife in his pocket and despite hearing the deputies' commands (approximately five) to not reach for the knife, he did. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for two felony counts of Assault 2nd Degree and misdemeanors charges of Resisting Arrest, Obstructing, Possession of a Dangerous Weapon, and Assault 4th Degree. At first appearance, his bond was set at $3,000, which he posted with the assistance of a bail bonds company five days later and released. The 53-year-old female was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Assault 3rd Degree, Resisting Arrest and Obstructing. At first appearance,her total bond was set at$10,000,which she posted with the assistance of a bail bonds company two days later and released. Major Crimes Detectives Investigation Dispels Concerns Circulated on Social Media of a "Carjacking" and Assault - Over a period of a few days, social media posts were circulating, drawing the attention of citizens and local news outlets. Those posts contained allegations regarding an adult male who was assaulted and his vehicle stolen on August 18,2019. No report of this incident was made at the time these posts began to circulate,but the male in question had been admitted to a hospital in critical condition and not expected to survive. Investigators located video which disproves these allegations,clearly showing the male suffered what appears to be a medical episode, not a criminal assault. In mid-August, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies began receiving inquiries regarding a social media post that was being circulated. These posts alleged an adult male was "attacked" before stumbling into a parking lot where he collapsed. Additional information indicated the male was admitted to a hospital and not expected to survive. Reviewing previous calls for service, it was discovered nothing like this was ever reported to the Spokane Valley Police, Spokane County Sheriff's Office, or the Spokane Police Department. However, hospital staff had contacted SPD requesting their help identifying a male who had been admitted in critical condition and not expected to survive. The vehicle the male was associated with had not been reported as stolen. Looking back through calls for service, a medical call was located on August 18th at 1:30 a.m., reporting a male was having trouble breathing in the 6300 block of E. Broadway. The caller went on to say the male "is od'ing". The unidentified, unconscious male was provided medical treatment and transported to the hospital in critical condition. The male was identified with the assistance of law enforcement agencies and attempts to contact his family were made. Approximately 10 days later, a family member of the male filed a report regarding the possible assault and theft of a vehicle. The information provided was from the unconfirmed information circulated on social media. Major Crimes Detectives began to investigate the allegations and located a surveillance video,which clearly Page 8 showed the male walking by himself, uninjured. He then appears to suffer some type of medical episode before collapsing and thrashing around on the ground. At no time was the male assaulted. Medical personnel arrived soon after, provided care, and transported him to the hospital. Due to the medical nature of the call and lack of any criminal allegation or assault reported, law enforcement was not notified of the incident. At last known, the male remained in critical condition and was not expected to survive. With the evidence collected showing no assault or associated crime, this investigation has been closed. The whereabouts of the dog, mentioned in the social media posts,is not known. Late Night Armed Robbery Reported at Browns Park on S. Pines - Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to a reported armed robbery in the west side parking lot of Browns Park in late August. The suspects fled the scene in a sedan,described as a white or silver 4-door Chrysler 200 with a shattered rear window. No one was injured, but the victims reported hearing what they believed was a gunshot as the suspects drove away. In late August, just after 11:30 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to the 3100 block of S. Pines for a reported armed robbery. Additionally,the caller stated the suspects fired a shot as they drove away. Arriving deputies contacted five victims (ranging from 17 to 20 years of age) in a parking lot near the location of the reported robbery. They all provided similar statements of what took place during the incident. Deputies were told the victims were listening to music on the south side of the west parking lot when a white or silver four-door sedan drove up. More specifically,the vehicle is described as a silver/gray older Chrysler sedan,possibly a Chrysler 200. The passenger's side rear window was broken and may be covered by plastic. Two white males armed with handguns exited and demanded their property while the driver, possibly a white female, stayed in the car. The suspects took a satchel, containing a wallet and AirPods, and a second victim's wallet. When they demanded a third victim's speaker,he began to argue with the armed suspects. Eventually, the suspects jumped in the vehicle, and as the vehicle fled the parking lot, the victims reported one of the suspects fired a shot out of the rear window. The two male suspects, armed with handguns, are said to be in their early to mid-20's with one described as having braided dark/black hair. The second suspect was wearing a black bandana covering his blond hair. The driver, and potential owner of the vehicle, was described as a white female. Deputies established a perimeter and searched the area, but did not locate the suspects or anyone who was injured. Registration for the 2019 Fall Citizens Academy is NOW OPEN This is YOUR opportunity to learn about the Spokane County Sheriff's Office, ask questions, and talk with Deputies, Detectives, and members of our specialty units, including K9, SWAT,Air 1, and others. Learn about the multiple functions/services the Sheriff's Office provides and how it differs from what some Hollywood writers portray in a made-for-TV crime drama. Page 9 Spokane County Sheriff's Office 2019 Fall Citizens Academy classes (8 total) are held on Monday nights from 6:00 p.m. —9:00 p.m. starting Monday, September 30th with the final class on November 18th. (Attendees must attend at least 7 of the 8 sessions) These classes are FREE and will be held at the Spokane County Sheriff's Office Training Center located at 6011 N. Chase Road, Newman Lake, WA. To Register: contact Deputy David Morris at 509-477-6044 or by email at dwmorris@spokanesheriff.org. Class size is limited, so sign up now. For the security of all attendees, a background check will be completed on all applicants. It's Back: Introduction to Women's Self-Defense Course Classes are Open to the Public & Fill Up Fast—Reserve Your Spot Today Saturday, September 28th, 2019 One 4-hour session (ages 14 and up): 8 a.m. - 12 p.m. Class Fee: $35 (Non-Refundable) Please invite your family, friends, co-workers, and neighbors to this valuable training opportunity! Spokane County Sheriff's Office - Training Opportunity: INTRODUCTION TO WOMEN'S SELF-DEFENSE SATURDAY, September 28th, 2019 Class Time: 8 a.m. - NOON Location: 6011 N Chase Rd., Newman Lake,WA 99025 ► REGISTRATION SEND EMAIL TO: SCSOTraining(a spokanesheriff.org Include NAME of all attending plus /EMAIL Address for attendees This class is an introduction to Women's Self-Defense Tactics including deterrents, avoidance, and detection of a personal attack. The class includes a hands-on portion where you will learn basic self-defense maneuvers. The Women's Self-Defense course is open to the public, females ages 14 and over. Please invite your friends/family/co-workers/neighbors to this valuable training course. This class is led by Spokane County Sheriff's Office Defensive Tactics Instructors. Payment Options: Payment methods will be sent to you after the Sheriff's Training Office has confirmed your registration. Thank you! Class Fee: $35 (Non-Refundable) Page 10 Training held at: Sheriff's Training Center 6011 N Chase Rd Newman Lake, WA 99025 Map to Location: (https://www.spokanecounty.org/DocumentCenter/View/4356) What to bring: Note taking material Water bottle • Towel Wear athletic attire/shoes for the hands-on portion. Questions: Call us at(509) 477-4793 or Email us at(SCSOTraining@spokanesheriff.org) o - - w- -- LOCK OBSERVE CARS SHOULD KEEP GARAGE ITEMS IN AND REPORT NEVER RUN DOORS CLOSED YOUR TRUNK UNATTENDED Page 11 Spokane County Sheriff's Officet� Y G°uN ' Regional Intelligence Group CI ' ' 4''S.frt Spokane Valley Districts IBR Classification: Burglary R l t; q 90 80 • 70 • 60 • • 50 40 • 2017 2018 14117 , 30 2019 • • • 20 10 0 } } = J } w } H K K K K cc cc U a z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 p w w wz o Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 55 51 33 February 53 26 20 March 42 33 37 April 49 36 35 May 47 34 57 June 59 29 34 July 51 44 48 August 56 51 58 September 78 38 October 37 48 November 32 49 December 33 47 Grand Total 11.11. 592 486 322 * IBR Offense: Burglary/Breaking& Entering 220 Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office . cOUNry Regional Intelligence Group 0 IIi.:* :t,-Li Spokane Valley Districts A IBR Classification: Murder NonNeg Manslaughter RIG 9 1.2 1 • • 0.8 0.6 X2017 2018 0.4 2019 0.2 0 >- >- I J >- w >- H K K cc K cc cc U < z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 p w w wz o Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January February March April May June 1 July 1 August September October November 1 December Grand TotalMM. 2 1 *IBR Offense: Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter 09A Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office cOUNTy Regional Intelligence Group 0 , , '''t Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Identity Theft RIG 9 35 • • 30 • • • • 25 •• •• •• • • • 20 •• 4 if 1 .••• 2017 15 • • • —M-2018 • • • • • • f 2019 10 • • • 5 • • • • 0 >- >- I J >- w > H K K K K K Ku a z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 p w w wz o (11 Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 9 20 19 February 24 16 10 March 22 13 13 April 16 22 19 May 32 21 13 June 19 17 5 July 23 14 12 August 13 14 8 September 17 13 October 15 21 November 19 23 December 25 16 Grand Total M. 1 234 210 99 *IBR Offense: Identity Theft 26F Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office cOUNry Regional Intelligence Group 0 IIi.:* .:S-Li Spokane Valley Districts -k‘,._,,,,- IBR ;IBR Classification: Fraud RIG 9 • 80 • 70 • • • • 60 1i 50r . l • • • • • 40 X2017 30 2018 • f 2019 20 • • • 10 • • • • 0 I >- >- I J >- w >- H K K K K K K U Q z J v7 w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m > > < a - o 2 o 2 2 z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 p w w w p N z Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 26 69 65 February 36 46 32 March 37 59 63 April 43 55 56 May 53 67 56 June 57 65 50 July 61 65 67 August 53 62 65 September 66 49 October 64 60 November 54 56 December 43 60 Grand Total 593 Ma 713 I 454 * IBR Offense: Fraud-Credit Card/ATM 26B, Fraud- False Pretenses/Swindling/Con Games 26A, & Fraud- Impersonation 26C Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office cOUNTy Regional Intelligence Group 0 - '''''t. Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: DUI RIG 9 45 • • 40 • • • • • 35 • • • • 30 •. ) 1 :•• • , # 25 ti • • ••• • • 4,1* 2017 2018 15 • --Ar 2019 • • • • • 10 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i i I i i i i 5 •0 • >- > I J rya._. ».. > H K K K K K K u cc J N w w w w < < CC a D D a] a] a] a] > > < < — o 2 o 2 2 z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 p w 'i w p N z Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 22 21 32 February 26 18 21 March 33 39 21 April 18 13 27 May 19 33 18 June 28 23 27 July 26 15 25 August 24 28 23 September 19 37 October 24 33 November 18 31 December 20 22 Grand Total 4 F 277 313 194 * IBR Offense: DUI 90D Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office cOUNry Regional Intelligence Group .P. ‘ 0 Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Drugs R i G 9 • 80 70 • • • • • • • •• • • • • • : r \ .! It , ; ;•• • •• • •• •••• •• • 40 • 2017 • 30 2018 2019 • • 20 • • 10 0 } } = J } w } H K K K K cc cc u a z J N w w w w a a CC a 2 D > > m m m m z cL 2 D w H w w a m a H U > U w a O 0 w 'i w p N z Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 19 42 51 February 30 38 42 March 30 64 58 April 37 56 67 May 23 36 40 June 20 56 30 July 21 57 45 August 26 43 53 September 25 33 October 24 52 November 39 41 December 25 48 Grand Total . 1 319 = 566 i 386 * IBR Offense: Drug Equipment Violations 35B& Drugs/Narcotics Violations 35A Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office - ,covNrj, Regional Intelligence Group 04, rill % A t` : R+� Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Theft From Motor Vehicle RIG 9 160 • 140 • • •• • 120 • • • , , ,.........1 100I: : ••..•• . . • ......; 80 • • • 2017 60 2018 • • —A-2019 40 • • • • • • • 20 •0 >- >- I J >- w >- H K K cc K cc cc U < z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m > > < < -, -' o 2 o 2 2 z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 0 w 'i w p N z Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 99 75 51 February 104 32 44 March 94 78 72 April 130 62 120 May 78 69 140 June 107 66 84 July 97 106 112 August 69 87 99 September 118 85 October 70 104 November 52 112 December 70 70 Grand Total 1088 1946 JIM722 * IBR Offense:Theft From Motor Vehicle 23F Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office cOUNTy Regional Intelligence Group 0 ' % Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Motor Vehicle Theft R i G 9 50 45 4/\ • • 40 •• • 35 •• •• • 30 • • 25 • • • • • 2017 • • 20 • • • • 2018 • 15 • • • f 2019 10 • • •5 0 > > I J > w >- H K K cc K cc cc U < z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m > > < < -, -' o 2 o 2 2 z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 p w 'i w p N z Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 44 36 34 February 37 24 22 March 44 28 19 April 42 27 29 May 27 25 33 June 28 24 25 July 41 39 31 August 36 18 31 September 43 26 October 40 31 November 34 45 December 28 29 Grand Total 444 352 iM224 * IBR Offense: Motor Vehicle Theft 240 Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office .coUNTj Regional Intelligence Group rill t o4, # t` R, Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Robbery R i G 9 12 10 8 6 --2017 2018 4 f 2019 V .2 0 > > S J > w > H K IL! Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 3 6 3 February 6 2 8 March 7 5 4 April 3 6 4 May 2 8 6 June 1 3 2 July 4 7 8 August 1 6 11 September 4 6 October 4 5 November 3 3 December 1 4 Grand Total 39 61 46 * IBR Offense: Robbery 120 Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office cOUNTy Regional Intelligence Group , ' % 0 Spokane Valley Districts A IBR Classification: Assault RIG 9 120 100 4---\ �` / S 80 YY .. 60 2017 2018 40 —A-2019 20 0 >- >- S J >- w >- H K K cc K cc cc U a z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 = > > m m m m > > < a -, o 2 o 2 2 z cL 2 D w H w w a m < H U > U w a 0 0 w 'i w p N z Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 96 84 71 February 95 62 62 March 78 100 74 April 90 88 68 May 93 80 87 June 93 102 79 July 95 112 103 August 73 84 96 September 92 76 October 87 82 November 84 79 December 84 89 Grand Total 1060 1038 iM640 * IBR Offense:Aggravated Assault 13A&Simple Assault 13B Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's OfficeCOUIvey Regional Intelligence Group CI? Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Theft RiG 9 300 250 200 �—.—. ill 150 —•—2017 f 2018 100 f 2019 50 0 >- >- I J >- w >- H K K cc cc cc cc U a z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m > > < a -, o 2 o 2 2 z cL 2 D w H w w a m < H U > U w a 0 p w 'i w p N z Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 205 238 238 February 199 165 188 March 214 208 212 April 203 202 208 May 235 230 231 June 251 223 230 July 236 236 238 August 222 213 254 September 213 194 October 237 234 November 219 199 December 198 251 Grand Total 2632 2593 1799 * IBR Offense:Theft-All Other 23H,Theft-Pocket-Picking 23A,Theft- Purse-Snatching 23B,Theft-Shoplifting 23C,Theft From Building 23D, Theft From Coin-Operated Machine 23E, &Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 23G Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's OfficecovNrj- Regional Intelligence Group rill \ o4, `ir. t` • R+- Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Rape RiG 9 18 • 16 • • 14 • • • • 12 • 10 ! • • I • 8 2017 J • • t 2018 , 4 : 6 • • • • f 2019 •4 2 • • •0 > > = J > w } H K K K K cL cL u a z J <n w w w w a a CC a 2 D > > m m m m z cL 2 D w H w w Q m Q H U > U w a O O w w w p N z Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 9 16 3 February 2 4 2 March 3 8 4 April 7 6 5 May 9 10 2 June 2 7 5 July 6 5 2 August 5 3 5 September 2 3 October 7 1 November 1 6 December 4 7 Grand Total 57 76 28 *IBR Offense: Rape- Forcible 11A, Sodomy- Forcible 11B, Sexual Assault Produced: 9/17/2019 with Object- 11C For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office cOUNTy Regional Intelligence Group 0 - % Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Counterfeiting Forgery RIG 9 30 25 204/\, 15 S ', A Ill. X2017 / 2018 10 /�I —A-2019 5 0 >- >- i J >- w >- H K K K K cc cc U < z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m > > < < -, -' 2 o 2 2 z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 0 w w wz o (11 Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 9 18 22 February 11 10 13 March 20 24 17 April 20 22 13 May 26 21 11 June 15 15 14 July 21 15 10 August 14 17 12 September 20 14 October 18 11 November 9 20 December 9 14 Grand Total 192 MIL 201 M112 *IBR Offense:Counterfeiting/Forgery 250 Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 Spokane County Sheriff's Office cOUNTy Regional Intelligence Group 0 - % Spokane Valley Districts ; IBR Classification: Destruction Damage Vandalism RIG 9 • 200 180 • • • • 160 • • • I 1 kkf. Al , 140 — 4110 120 100I • —0—2017 80 ,•; ; ; , 2018 f 2019 60 • • • • 40 • • •• • 20 •• • • •0 >- >- S J >- w >- H K K K K K K U a z J N w w w w < < CC 0 2 D > > m m m m z cL 2 D w H w w Q m < H U > U w a 0 p w w wz o Year Month Count 2017 2018 2019 January 159 146 124 February 148 95 67 March 136 121 122 April 173 127 144 May 139 142 161 June 143 140 133 July 178 141 156 August 149 132 145 September 160 155 October 119 165 November 131 155 December 105 125 Grand Total 1740 1644 1052 IBR Offense: Destruction/Damage/Vandalism 290 Produced: 9/17/2019 For Law Enforcement Use Only This document is confidential and may not be further disseminated or released to any unauthorized persons pursuant to RCW 42.56.420 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 1, 2019 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ® executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pending Litigation GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that Council adjourn into executive session for approximately 15 minutes to discuss pending litigation and that no action will be taken upon return to open session. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell ATTACHMENTS: