Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010, 04-16 REZ-02-09, SHP-18-09 Determination of NonsignificanceSpokane Walley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME T PLANNING DIVISION RECEIVED APR 2 0 2010 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106; Spokane Valley WA 9920.Spokane Valley Permit Center 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ ci halls okanevall:., n1- 8 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) FILE NUMBER: REZ-02-09/SHP-18-09 (Bowers SHP) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Consolidated project permit application requesting a rezone from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Single-family Residential Urban District (R-4) and preliminary subdivision approval to divide 0.33 acres into two (2) single-family residential lots. OWNER/APPLICANT: David Bowers, 15224 E. 6th Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99037 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Parcel No. 45183.0661. Addressed as 512 N. Ella St.; further located in the SW% of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division DETERMINATION: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued on April 16, 2010 pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2). There is no comment period for this DNS RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Greg McCormick, Planning Manager City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PH: (509) 720-5330 / FX: (509) 921-1008 gmccormick@spokanevalley.org DATE ISSUED: April 16, 2010 SIGNATURE: APPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the Community Development Department within 14 calendar days after the date issued. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with Chapter 17.90.030 (Appeals) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, and the required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to Chapter 21.20.150 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. STAFF CONTACT: Tavis Schmidt, Assistant Planner City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PH: (509) 720-5033 / FX: (509) 921-1008 tschmidt@spokanevalley.org Determination of Non -Significance REZ-02-09/SHP-18-09 April 16, 2010 Copies of this DNS were mailed to: 1. David Bowers.; Owner 2. City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Division 3. City of Spokane Valley Building Division 4. City of Spokane Valley Fire Department — Rick Freier 5. Washington State Department of Ecology (Spokane) 6. Washington State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 7. Spokane County Division of Utilities -Information Services 8. Spokane Regional Health District 9. Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency (SRCAA) 10. Avista Utilities 11. Qwest Enclosed documents: Lead Agency Review Form Environmental Checklist Vicinity Map Page 2 of 2 m S]101e COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106; Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ citvha11c spokanevalley.org LEAD AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW DATE: April 16, 2010 A. BACKGROUND Project Planner: Tavis Schmidt, Assistant Planner 1. PROJECT NUMBER: REZ-02-09/SHP-18-09 2. DESCRIPTION: Consolidated project permit application requesting a rezone from Single- family Residential District (R-3) to Single-family Residential Urban District (R-4) and preliminary subdivision approval to divide 0.33 acres into two (2) single-family residential lots. 3. APPLICANT/ OWNER: David Bowers, 15221 E. 6th Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99037 4. LOCATION: Parcel No. 45183.0661. Addressed as 512 N. Ella St.; further located in the SW'/4 of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Italics indicate potential mitigation measures, if any. Bold indicates unresolved issues or additional information that must be addressed by the applicant prior to final approval, as indicated. REVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS OF SECTION 14 OF PART A (BACKGROUND) FOR CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREA (CARA) / AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA (ASA) The proposal lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Staff notes the stormwater disposal methods shall be consistent with the 2001 Spokane County Stormwater Guidelines at time of future development. No concerns noted. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH The SEPA Checklist describes the site's topography as flat with no slopes. The checklist indicates no grading will occur. No concerns noted. 2. AIR The SEPA Checklist states there may be dust and construction equipment emissions during construction of a small home. Staff notes the site shall conform to Spokane Regional Clean Air Authority requirements to minimize air impacts. No concerns noted. 3. WATER Lead Agency Environmental Checklist Review Page 1 of 3 REZ-02-09/SHP-18-09 (Bowers) Surface The SEPA Checklist states that the site is not located near a surface water body nor will there be any discharge to a surface water body. No concerns noted. Ground The Checklist indicates that no groundwater will be withdrawn or discharged. Staffnotes that the newly created lot will be connected to a public sewer system and that stormwater flows will be discharged to residential landscaping. No concerns noted. Water Runoff The Checklist does not indicate the source of runoff; that storm water will be maintained on site with water to flow onto residential lawns. No concerns noted. 4. PLANTS The Checklist states grasses exist on site, and that 1200 square feet will be removed during construction. No concerns noted. 5. ANIMALS The Checklist indicates birds have been observed on the site. There are no measures in place to preserve or enhance this wildlife. No concerns noted. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES Checklist states that electricity and natural gas are expected to be used to meet all energy needs. No concerns noted. 7A. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS The checklist does not indicate any Environmental Health Hazards. No concerns noted. 7B. NOISE Checklist states increased noise during construction. Staff notes that average residential and traffic noise impacts are expected. No concerns noted. 8. SHORELINE AND LAND USES The site is currently developed with one single family dwelling unit. When completed, the development will have one (1) new single family dwelling. The new lot will be consistent with the provisions of the R-4 zoning district of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. No concerns noted. 9. HOUSING Two (2) middle income houses, one existing and one new construction. — No concerns noted. 10. AESTHETICS The SEPA Checklist indicates the home exteriors will be standard home construction materials and will be no more than eighteen (18) feet in height. Staff notes that all future development will be consistent with the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. No concerns noted. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE Light and glare will be produced that is associated with standard street lighting and residential housing during the night time hours. No concerns noted. 12. RECREATION Lead Agency Environmental Checklist Review Page 2 of 3 REZ-02-09/SHP-18-09 (Bowers) The Checklist states that schools are located in the immediate vicinity. No recreational opportunities will be displaced by this development. No concerns noted. 13. CULTURAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION The Checklist specifies that there are no known historical and cultural resources at the subject's property. Pursuant to RCW 27.53.060, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or any agency or institution of the state or a political subdivision thereof to knowingly remove, alter, dig into, or excavate by use of any mechanical, hydraulic, or other means, or to damage, deface, or destroy any historic or prehistoric archaeological resource or site, or remove any archaeological object from such site, except for Indian graves or cairns, or any glyptic or painted record of any tribe or peoples, or historic graves as defined in chapter 68.05 RCW, disturbances of which shall be a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW, without having obtained a written permit from the Director of the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation for such activities. This is applicable to both public and private property. Upon any discovery of potential or known archaeological resources at the subject properties prior to or during future on -site construction, the developer, contractor, and/or any other parties involved in construction shall immediately cease all on -site construction, shall act to protect the potential or known historical and cultural resources area from outside intrusion, and shall notify, within a maximum period of twenty -fours from the time of discovery, the City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department of said discovery. 14. TRANSPORTATION The site has access to Broadway Avenue and Ella Street. No concerns noted. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES Spokane County Fire District No. 1 is the fire protection service provider for the City of Spokane Valley, and the police service provider is the City of Spokane Valley. The Spokane Transit Authority provides public transit service within the City of Spokane Valley. The subject's property is located within the boundaries of West Valley School District. No concerns noted. 16. UTILITIES The subject's property is located within the service boundaries of Spokane County Division of Utilities and Hutchinson Irrigation District. Other utilities such as electricity, telephone and garbage are to be provided by franchise utility providers in conformance with applicable City standards and requirements. Staff notes that all new utilities are required to be located underground. Lead Agency Environmental Checklist Review Page 3 of 3 REZ-02-09/SHP-18-09 (Bowers) (;,,y of Spokane Valley SEPA CheckLis, TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C ROW, requires all _governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Ins`uuctions for applicants: - This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about govemmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for non -project proposals: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. r-r,s--n Trr% <-4rzLC Ve._r./ JAN 0 ri 2rt7 SPOKANE VALLEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Note to user: this is an electronic form and each gray box can be filled out on your computer. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable ,e O u+Crj 2. Name of applicant: 4o wen 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: /5-22/ e 6f4' Verse/s le 4,4 ?iro37 fl2-fl2' oafvC O Nre- J 4. Date checklist prepared: /as/ y. 5. Agency requesting checklist: / n CIT/7 OT faoCc.,C //r//ey AcA.Are /ram/ H/J/nN Effective October 28, 2007 Page 1 of 14 P:\Community Development\Fonns\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc Rl 2 o ve/ flo.1,o/r5L City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): /ape A 4 S4 d r, //6,/ et4 c .47 , o/ 0 741c ,dui/a/ .4•10'4,1 S/#•f�e e 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? ye If yes, explain. w //lee to / tlyd/ "e_r eieptt pN Nil*/ 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. les 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?fl,a If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. c;-,.e'�h11,, approve.), 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) w °u a€t 7 2 f'.r / `i/< %Y `/"Z /i/ E//L /N910 741 • 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. s i t N F/lam 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? y e1 The General Sewer Service Area? yet The Priority Sewer Service Area? p (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). Effective October 28, 2007 Page 2 of 14 P:\Community Development\Forms\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist of 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, ,other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). ,v/A 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? /t/ 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. .4/4 Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? ittia b. Stormwater what are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? 6.0 f ,e410 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. N Effective October 28, 2007 Page 3 of 14 P:\Community DeveiopmentWorms\Current Planning Application forrns\4ppendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1) Earth a. General description of the site (check one): © flat, ❑ rolling, ❑ hilly, ❑ steep slopes, ❑ mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification specify them and note any prime farmland. l,,. f 0 example, clay, sand, of agricultural soils, - wim loc./C Serf/ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. //oa✓ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: / F a• I seb p A (ie, Co_J9ra cP"o N Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Air Effective October 28, 2007 Page 4 of 14 P:\Communiity Development\Forms\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. e"stin 40 r > c re sect „cat.. oba b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? N° If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. p 2) Will theproject require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. `✓ . 3) Estimate the amount of fili and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. /1-/.° 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. droll• % .!s /.cue so 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? sti " If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Effective October 28, 2007 Page 5 of 14 P:\Community Development\Forms\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? iti° Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N „ c c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? fro if so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? An' If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: �// 41s7tr / V al..) ®T�pej 4) Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Effective October 28, 2007 Page 6 of 14 P:\Community Development\Forms\Current Planning Application formstAppendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ❑ shrubs © grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, buflrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other E other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? / ' s .r ho“t no o xeac // o! ��e%s �' //ICBM c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. f Home, e d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: rz I- _Ed it 4f 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ® birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other. ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. ❑ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be onor near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N v d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NA he / fax 4- e7et3rtc 7ur %IeF/i�j /- ea Mt? Effective October 28, 2007 Page 7 of 14 P:\Community Development\Forms\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. wD c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? yp If so, describe 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. /e/ o/ve ,eAr Clad N 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/j' b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. "sae/vs 4- 070rertdor I.4G7 A- /mr' 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Ivor/e G/c.s..-9 ,'',do✓eaA1 G, oy/t� Gies 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? rev/a ems, .r0 S` b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. ti' c. Describe any structures on the site. el,) !r, Is ea- t i A [ .cTl set / /Teo,< A1/44cLe✓ ti eta r-r Gr6% e Effective October 28, 2007 Page 8 of 14 P:\Community Development \Forms\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Will any structures be demolished? yes If so, what? j.n a!� f FrEy e e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? fl-3 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? fr®f /,cow. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the area? If so, specify. ti/I site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" /✓ o i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? / ,vew .!/ Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? esti oc' k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: /`V/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: AA'/1 o AI Iy / A0re f,', !e (E /- ref;c%a Ge 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. y!!/ _co /4r "'rile / M. /y A^..t lr�/ry /eve b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N o Effective October 28, 2007 Page 9 of 14 P:\communiity Development\ Forms\Current Planning Application forms Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: iivov/I /.4,0 P /vegan.. #11,ed 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? /e b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N °,,e c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: //A 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? /co etzebv loa,, eel b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? fro c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? A,& iv d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: H/A 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? fcloo / year .6y b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Ho c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: %✓�"� Effective October 28, 2007 Page 10 of 14 P:\Community Development\Forms\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City -of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? An If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.//A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. ifoa/e"'^Y/ e_ b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? /..�of Stile c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? Z How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? it, 0 If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? No If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not Iw re g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Ann" "„J *in+ Clore "'a 1- 7o eice Effective October 28, 2007 Page 11 of 14 P:\Community Development \ Forms\Current Planning Application forms \Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. fro b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: electricity, ® natural gas, ©water, M refuse service, ❑x telephone, ( sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: � av Date Submitted: D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? f®,,, e „rid U s e Effective October 28, 2007 Page 12 of 14 P:\Community Development \Forms\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist elf 10-28-07.doc G,.y of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: f o tie Ciffrt oy + l lN' rtt, -, AA/ i41/., — si"i/Zc, 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? ,00l S/fNnY/CFr a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likelylyto deplete energy or natural resources? rPa/// New .4sfoie a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Pti erf/, 2tfr Geew/ e„ /o/ Aft Ai 4 oyh e 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? ,/, a. Proposed measures to protect such resources onto avoid or reduce impacts are: Effective October 28, 2007 Page 13 of 14 P:\Community Development\Forms\Current Planning Application forms\Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley SEPA Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? /V4 a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? / i s � , `e reo!/. r a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 44.,/o e/,C / / AI0Lev !/dG a 7 1/ c 7'pc ,1 cfl4 4 s., 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 1 1 7,/`c ,c// /a„,,;4 /4 G. 11 ,vo, fin /W 11! rG � of/recf //, eR/!//I e ., E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Signature: Axr, 2c. ,— Date: /Z/Z o/ o f Please print or type: Proponent: 4<v, /./ Sow try Address: /SZZ/ 5- (/ 14eie/c Gil Phone: ""77- YC7 / Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Address: Phone: Effective October 28, 2007 Page 14 of 14 P:\Community Development\Forms\Current Planning Application forms1Appendix 21-A SEPA Environmental Checklist eff 10-28-07.doc City of Spokane Valley Project Vicinity Map De3met — � Cataldo Cataldo Centennial Middle � . Par6a12oad P t Ca C7 _ Broadway iu Y Alki REZ-02-09/SHP-18-09 A 1 V.alleylway_ a, • , 2.-ton t Main SQz/ iftmimmilmi am 1 1 1 1 1 1 i l l l a 1 a• 1- 1- 1 F 1 1 1 t 1 1 l 1 i 1 1 1 i Sprague c 1st J _Cn I 1st Appleway LIIIII1 -T-----I---,__ Legend SHP-18-09 Q Police Fire Stations Roads School/Church 1 1 Railroad Parcels MIR Parks 0 260 520 1,040 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I Feet Request for a rezone from R-3 to R-4 and preliminary short plat approval to divide 0.33 acres into two (2) residential lots Sj5k kane Map produced by City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Planning Division 1/21/10