Loading...
1991, 08-27 Zone Reclassification-DenialO LI N T Y ART MENT OF BUILDINGS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR TO: j j rri, Planning Department FROM: Tom Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator DATE: - 07 7- 9/ RE: File Number: Address: Z E- LJ O 1/ SOG DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR Our comments regarding the above are reflected in the marked box(es) below: The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department; e.g., State Building Code Act regulations such as requirements for fire hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access roads, street address assignment, barrier -free regulations, energy code regulations, and general coordination with other aspects of project implementation. / The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Buildings is required. !!! Requirements of Fire District No. / need to be satisfied during the building permit process. The applicant is advised that the private road shall be named and signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Road Standards. This condition may be waived in the event that the Department of Buildings determines addressing on the private road is not acceptable. However, at such time the Department of Buildings feels the need for the road to become a private, named road, the applicant/owner shall participate and cooperate in this process. The required fire flow for any building or subdivision is determined by building size, type of construction and proximity- of exposures. Based on information presented to this office regarding this subdivision, the minimum fire flow established by code of 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes is being required. Hydrant distribution will be as follows: Residential Development(s). Fire hydrants shall be located at roadway intersections wherever possible and the maximum average distance between them shall be no furhter than 900 feet and these hydrants shall be placed so no portion of the structures are in excess of 450 feet from a hydrant. We have no requirements for this proposal - existing conditions. I� 1 No additional comments. Specific comments are as follows: ()Ory) niPn 1_3 4, 4, 7- - 9/ cvbstn64Y1 CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION WEST 1303 BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0550 • (509) 456-3675 FAX (509) 456-4703 L. c) t 1 IN • l - N, \ : ?; it li i�l\'t> A DIVISION Oi Tfif' lei i . ' [)1.\'\!S\! ,l" j` 1)I^::(`Tilt; TO: l 1yti'1 L 1�);ta,f7 Planning Department FROM: Tom Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator DATE: uL`i 21 1cic1( RE: File Number: c-iFte cc.u2177ES do. Z _ �-- �7 Address: Zvi 0.7 Our comments regarding the above are reflected in the marked box(es) below: The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of designJdevelopment in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department; e.g., State Building Code Act regulations such as requirements for fire hydrantrflow, fire apparatus access roads, street address assignment. barrier -free regulations, energy cede regulations, and general coordination with other aspects of project implementation. The issuance of a buildin: permit by the Department of Buildings is required. I Requirements of Fire District No. 1—need to be satisfied during the building permit process. The applicant is advised that the private road shall be named and signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Road Standards. This condition may be waived in the event that the Department of Buildings determines addressing on the private road is not acceptable. However, at such time the Department of Buildings feels the need for the road to become a private, named road, the applicant/owner shall participate and cooperate in this process. The required fire flow for any building or subdivision is determined by building size, type of construction and proximity of exposures. Based on information presented to this office regarding this subdivision, the minimum fire flow established by code of 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes is being required. Hydrant distribution will be as follows: Residential Development(s). Fire hydrants shall be located at roadway intersections wherever possible and the maximum average distance between them shall be no furhter than 900 feet and these hydrants shall be placed so no portion of the structures are in excess of 450 feet from a hydrant. We have no requirements for this proposal - existing conditions. No additional comments. Specific comments are as follows: O1) I »C .\1f.Nr DIVISION ^'t , i .. .. • tit'. . 1.1'ASHINCTON of 2c,..).(-1330 • - EGA- VSSIt"ICAT/ 0 APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: from 2:30 to 2.50 at the Plannin De artment V IS APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: Vk.t„ie 2.10 119q Department. —SUIL.DIN6S Depanment Contact Person: oAh Application Number: cl ICIC SECu a /TEES 0o. Action: Eats,: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner Committee. The following information or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after ±e proposal a complete and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda, The ac ceotance of the a 11 P°sal is accepted CC11Cdhlino of the annlir�ri� �3 meean on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this g. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a prelimina v revi w of the appli anon. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the infoin anon (not all agencies/departments have been contacted --only Mose who have been determined to have primary interest. a. Does the applicadon (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? ❑ YES ❑ NO b . If no, what is lacking? c. What requirements have not been met? After a reliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) Department Recommendations: 4. Addition al Information: SPOKANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 MEMORANDUM Pat Harper, County Engineer's Department Bill Wedlake, County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, County Health District Tom Davis, Division of Buildings Wyn Birkenthal, County Parks & Recreation Department FROM: Paul F. Jensen, Senior Planner DATE: June 18, 1991 RE: Zone Reclassification for Pacific Securities Company APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING July 3, 1991 AT 3:15 COUNTY PLANNING HEARING ROOM Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review continents on the attached form to Tim Lawhead for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Tim Lawhead of the Planning Department at 456-2205. c: Pacific Securities Company % Dave Gurthrie, N. 10 Post Street, Suite 525, Spokane, WA. 99201 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Application Form, Site PIann ;pia Art__ i'l63e1-9--,06e-iiol/W sz41-7/ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Date: %%5/9/ Application No: Name of applicant: tom- Ac-1Fic SEecR r y Cor-e-?A.vr.;S Street address of applicant: iq. 10 poor ST. Sur City: 5.7o►cAAJE State: WA Zip Code: 47Voi Phone: 61-(- a1 ea Name of property owner(s): TFk c 1 rf C S Ecil21-r y' C M Authorized agent representing owner (if other than owner): Existing zoning classification: L) P. - 3,5 Date existing zone classification established: f VI/ Existing use of property: . S 1 N G kA ,vr , ,LY Proposed zone classification: U R - 7 nag Proposed use of property: CoN 5 T 2uc71 o, J OF Two Du pk E/ F' $ Legal description of property: ,k_o T S j, 2 ,�, A, J O �l f R ko c /c � 5 ko K C /�-► 0 Street address of property: N/A If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Do.F S 'Jo T PP). Y Section: Z3 Township: c 5 Range: 449 Source of legal: IT1..1 IZ-Po2T (1 s* Aill E2ic1tN Ti I.E Co.) Assessor's Parcel No. (see tax statement): ti52b 3, .2515 AND A(52_S3 .2520 Property size: .- 6, 520 47 Pi Frontage: 0`/ / Feet on: -`! -"- Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: N/A Please Iist previous Planning Department actions involving this property: NorJE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions of the site area which you feel make this proposal is warranted? Tt- oRrc,NA/, T b Es re- AiA -r eS ,=ovR (!) 4.1�TY 1 oT S (5/ x 130_) wog . a Tcb R& 51)8 - s-rra-fv0142 p g €«+usg CIF AaT EAGt-(- 1300I.FX WookD iF roo'x r3o Ar.)a y4{jov� AvfP11 ov><r-tirry (/(6T S,zE is I0o'X130') 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? M+�,20vE D1AC �n;-� 1��o� �T1/ VALVE This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. le in -I 036 COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFI A preliminary consultation requirements for submittal satisfied CIE has been held to discuss the proposal. of this proposal for rezone have been e) Signature) _OUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held to requirements for submittal of this proposal ed. The deyij-hated water purveyor for a) b) c) (Signature) ATER PURVEYOR Our 2 ^1/ (Date) discuss the proposal. Our for this site one is haY, bee or- /3- 9 / (Date) The proposal(is not) located within the boundary of our service area. Satisfactory arrangements (have)have not) been propii' able to serve this site with a (Signature) DING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT are no made o Iv.sery.,- e 7this� t 4- equate water. SST se:t J � / 3 — H' / (Date) A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. This proposal is located in Fire District No. . ?or sit3/ (Signatur� 9 (Date) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A preliminary appjlcant has consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The been informed of our requirements and standards. 6 Ii/ (Signature) ( ate) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWI.FDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT] AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PROPOSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. (Signed): Pi45 tRt'r ,S Fr tile IT S Co rh PA-n11E y Date: (Address): N. 10 POS% S T Satz£ 525 Phone: C21-043 NOTARY NOTARY SEAL: SIGNATURE 00APPLICANT 0 AGENT REv.4/89:feu Date: SS 3 / / Date: / /i/ CORPORATE RESOLUTION I, Donald J. Migliuri, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected, qualified and acting assistant secretary of Pacific Security Companies, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington; that at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of said company held on the 13th day of May 1991, at which a quorum was present and voting, the following resolution was duly adopted and is now in full force and effect: BE IT RESOLVED that David L. Guthrie, as vice president, is authorized to represent Pacific Security Companies in all matters relating to the property at 2402- 2404 S. Bowdish Road, Spokane, Washington. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. ATTEST: Vicea-e President— Donald) /Miri FuTOP,r- 204A1 80� r J' I - r ' r r �RoPdSE t5 /X�S/�� I _ � r I Pleoi`os>) zaNiNG U2 7 6vicdiNG C'a��FRi16P - a d.% Es r. 'QPfN .SPA -c 8 13v,A.,g;ly& ff£/S/l-T - ao 47-. Er? I �lj-j 7 RTY �.iN� Pas h -jo �XISTI�G A+����X(.�) EXISTING bVPtiEX PAACE>_ tJo. yS2.8z.3 33p I E Date: L k(J SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Name of applicant: CD Reco-BI cS51 j, Street address of applicant: '# 3 ?O$ 3 (00 L POCAP City: J OCW:C VC State: t-04V Zip Code: G''QZAYPhone: e e - )-S1 / Name of property owner(s): t t {kitvj sJ S'EA- ( Authorized agentrepre enttng Qw � � 5 ' S S (if other than owner) : ( �� 1659 t/ 1 - � a y " V q Existing zoning classification: --4-Gt - �� ; - C- f2� L C.45.¢3'3 Date existing zone classification established:rek [ (/ ( O'1.67 Existing use of property: OFF" i Fyn Croa L etsn .ate Proposed zone classification: LA-R— [Z. Proposed use of property: OFFICE - S MALL �u 5 t i JzS S Legal description of N property: 2 02= L, oT S /'ELK l y) a aceli <—ibra Application No: Section: 1 B ' Township: Range: T Source of legal: (' ci rl'Ss Eg 04 Assessor's Parcel No.'(see tax statement):y JgLi. 0338'/`8CVY j?e Property size: (' `l '� i i Frontage: � � y Feet on: OMnD cJr4 y Total amount of adjoining land lled by this owner or sponsor: tTe -J — Street address of property: g contCSo4 --eRDR1Da,o If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this roperty: _ IthiS 0 ft.S ?--Ow Eircte,,� Pic -0,;;&ea /ira404R,c-hi r S2 plod Fry mo,ka f20since c .�i.7QwT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: f2DAL.NG i c kb 0CS 1. What are the changed conditions'of the site area which you feel make this proposal is warranted? I.SceS),UrSs m4CR t#tivO .7 C ON Bnt041M4fr 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? LO,(( MA9r<F 1-14-tc Ana N GGEil 7�CGlAt - pf P\7T.FtlDut hfr7 GAO lt1L, k V This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. REv.4/89:fcu 4. BUTLDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. This proposal is Located in Fire District No. 1 (Date) nary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. NOTARY SEAL: .+‘1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been ied (Sign. ure) 2. COUNTY UTILITIES 0F1-ICE A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone hav satisfied. The designated/ water purveyor for this site is / � _, y ��3y nla't/urg^j ' 7-2 -9/ (Sig (Date) 3. WA 2PURVEYOR E IS7It4 M A-Ths . XXIIarre) MOE- a) The proposal (is)(is not) located within the boundary of our service area. b) Satisfactory arrangements (have)(have not) been made to serve this proposal. c) We (are)(are not) able to serve this site with adequate water. MLA.- st)O Ninner ?b 44 b Pe4a: (Signature) (Date) Sign re) 5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A prelim appl(san, ha) been informed of our re uirements and standards. .22 (Signature) The (Date) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT J AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PROPOSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. (Signed): .V a. ' Date: ILA" 1 1 I 1 i (Address): Phone: Qate L{Bcj3 0,,�� 6? l�j �� _ Zip: `t-I1a(`�`(' NOTARY• v gNni JC 1 _� kX_ l c 1 1 O( Date: t J SIG TURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENTin 1\16,03)TE -7-3-91 E. 8504 BROADWAY EXISTING ZONING - AS-UR-12 FILE NO. CU-195-90 ALL BUILDINGS SHOWN ARE EXISTING AND SHALL REMAIN NO PROPOSED BUILDINGS % OF BLDG. COVERAGE - 8% % OF OPEN SPACE - 92% BESSIE - 25' WIDE BROADWAY - 43' WIDE VISTA BESSIE ARGONNE w 0 0 1-4 7 GRHSS GRR95^1 AREA HE 55Jg 5Z G RASS iGo' ZE-8a91 A 3T `36 35 '2 o A 41 44-, 71- T2 -ff,-T 73 (zl A , A..G, D V /17 L L E Y -97- 6 �z I � c fo ILL 8 -T -, 4 nj ��l -.fft 3T `36 35 o A 41 44-, , A..G, D V /17 L L E Y -97- 6 �z I � c fo ILL 8 -T -, 4 nj ��l -.fft