Loading...
1994, 06-17 Conditional Use Permit, Beauty SaloncA ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL ) FINDINGS OF FACT, USE PERMIT FOR A HOME INDUSTRY ) CONCLUSIONS, OF A BEAUTY SALON ) AND DECISION APPLICANT: Linda D. Hoover -Bailey FILE: CUE-9-94 COMPANION FILE(S): CE-94-94 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct an 11 foot by 24 foot beauty salon within an existing 24 foot by 30 foot building. An existing residence and garage also are on the site. Section 14.616.240.4 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County allows this use upon issuance of a conditional use permit. Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to section 14.404.100 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County and Spokane County Board of County Commissioners resolution No. 89 0708, as may be amended. PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located 800 feet north of Sprague Aveue and 1,200 feet west of Pines Road, on the northeast corner of Union Road and Main Avenue, in the SE 1/4 of Section 16, Township 25N, Range 44EWM; 11901 E. Main. Parcel No.: 45164.0331 OPPONENTS OF RECORD: NONE PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all available information on file, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the public hearing held on May 25, 1994, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on June /7o, 1994 to APPROVE the application. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Testimony was taken under oath. 2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained in the file; more particularly, the site plan dimensions with respect to the property lines and the existing accessory building were inaccurate. Correct measurements were submitted prior to the hearing and are reflected in red on file site plans. 3. The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the proposal as Urban. The proposal is generally consistent with the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and complies with RCW 36.70.450. The concept of non-polluting, non-intervention "cottage" industries and home professions is addressed favorably. 4. The site is zoned General Agriculture (GA), which allows the proposed use upon approval of this application. 5. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal are mostly small lot residential. Typically, uses listed as a conditional use are assumed as permitted in the underlying zone, subject to the listed standards and any other conditions needed to assure compatibility in the CASE NO. CUE-9-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2 given instance. But, pursuant to 14.404.101, the requested conditional use permit may be denied if the Hearing Body cannot find that the requested use will be compatible with other permitted uses. Section 14.616.240.4 lists certain standards to achieve compatibility, some of which the Hearing Body may exercise nominal discretion over in order to achieve the overall intent of compatibility with surrounding properties. Clearly, 14.404.102 allows the Hearing Body to impose any and all manner of additional conditions and requirements in an effort to achieve maximum compatibility. In the instant situation, parking on the property and out of the Right -of -Way needs to be erected on the Union Street side of the property. 6. The following is true with regard to the proposal: a. The existing building to be partially converted to a beauty salon has long existed at the site. Such buildings are not uncommon throughout the area. b. The residential appearance and character of the area is not altered by the proposal. 7. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, the environmental checklist and other data have been reviewed and the project has been found to not have any probable significant adverse impacts to the physical environment. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on May 4, 1994 and sent to 3 agencies. The agencies reviewing the checklist neither indicated that a more detailed environmental review should be provided nor commented that the DNS should be reconsidered. Comments regarding the environmental matters were not made at the public hearing. There was not sufficient evidence presented pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) to withdraw the DNS. 8. The proposal is listed in the Zoning Code of Spokane County as a conditional use allowed in the GA zone, and the proposal does meet the established and applicable criteria described for that conditional use. 9. The property is served by municipal sewer. 10. No adverse testimony or written comments were received regarding the proposal. 11. The proposed site plan indicates that setbacks, parking and height of the structure(s) will conform to the Zoning Code of Spokane County. For parking, it may be necessary to alter the ground cover, fencing and turf area to accommodate the parking. 12. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of various County agencies reviewing this project and has indicated those recommendations are acceptable. 13. The proper legal requirements for advertising the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been met. 14. The Zoning Adjustor may require such conditions of approval as necessary and appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public interest and general welfare. 15. Various performance standards and criteria are additionally needed to make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity and zone and to ensure against HD/CUE-9-94 Bailey CASE NO. CUE-9-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3 imposing excessive demands upon public utilities, and these shall be addressed as conditions of approval. 16. The proposal will not be detrimental to surrounding properties. 17. The proposal does not impose excessive demands on public utilities. 18. The proposal, as conditioned, is compatible with uses permitted outright in the zone. DECISION From the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the proposal, subject to compliance with the following CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. GENERAL 1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in interest and shall run with the land. 2. Failure to comply with any of the conditions of approval contained in this decision, except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code for Spokane County and be subject to such enforcement as is appropriate. 3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or the conditions of approval as may be judged by the Zoning Adjustor to be within the context of the original decision. II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The proposal shall comply with all applicable standards of section 14.616.240.4 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County unless deviations, variances or exceptions have been lawfully granted. This permit expires on July 1, 1995 unless renewed under the following terms: a. Approximately 30-45 days prior to expiration of this permit, the applicant may apply for an extension of the permit or perpetual status. b. Such fees as required at the time shall be collected by the Department at renewal. BDiC.=-9-94 Baiky CASE NO. CUE-9-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4 c. A search of the records of complaints will be undertaken to see if complaints and/or violation of the standards or conditions exist. 3. If the Planning Department believes there are extenuating circumstances associated with the renewal of the permit, it may cause there to be a public hearing and reconsideration of the pemut; the notification expense shall be that of the county if such reconsideration takes place. 4. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the Planning Director/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Zoning Code for Spokane County, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 5. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on , imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. HI. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS 1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. IV. DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. NOTE: Possible additional general facilities charges may be involved. HD/CUE-9-94 Bailey CASE NO. CUE-9-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 5 V. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. VI. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS 1. Dedication of 5 feet of additional right-of-way along Union Street is required. 2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project, or portion thereof, if the development is to be phased. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 5. The applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 6 which specifies the following: (a) The improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible; (b) The benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID; and (c) The property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the HD/ :UE-9-94 Bailey CASE NO. CUE-9-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 6 improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of the RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. This provision is applicable to Union Street, from which the subject parcel takes access. 6. An approach permit shall be obtained from the Division of Engineering and Roads prior to the construction of any new driveway approaches. This shall be done prior to the release of a building permit, change of use permit or certificate of occupancy. 7. Off-street parking shall be situated so that no vehicle shall overhand into the Union Street Right -of -Way. NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS MAY BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL. DATED this // day of June, 1994. a '°'iti P MOSHE • , AICP Adjustor Spo . e Co ty, Washington FILED: 1) Applicant (Certified/Retum Receipt Mail) 2) Opponents of Record 3) Spokane Division of Engineering and Roads 4) Spokane County Health District 5) Spokane County Division of Utilities 6) Spokane County Division of Buildings 7) Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 8) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY $210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING, 1026 W. BROADWAY AVENUE, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Section 14.412.042 of the Zoning Code for Spokane County). BD/CUE-9-94 Bailry