1991, 04-23 Permit App CUE-7-91 Home IndustrySPOKANE COUNTY PLA.NNNG DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR
/
Certificate of Exemption No.: i'l t
Name of Applicant: A,vo.sr46/4/Tvo
Street Address: A• -soy' U,vn vssrr,'
City: SPolsysl ,-
Application No.:
Agent Y
Zip
State: LA) 4 Code:
Name of Property Owner(s): uGd &//1i1/4-s rs/,9
Street Address: N • 36 U,v/ v&e
City:
/n•
Zip
State: w/,- Code:
REQUESTED AC .lION(S) (Circle appropriate action):
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Phone - Home: -3 '3 7
l920 Work: 9,zy-5•4/3 7
Agent's No.:
Phone - Home: pzY-SY3 7
9 Fz. Work: 7z v-s-y3 7
Expansion of a
Nonconforming Use
Violation/
Section / 6 Township a S Range V Y Enforcement: Y
•Lot and legal checked by: •Easement legal checked by: 'e J
''
•CWSSA Water (purveyor): ° e" £�''` WW Al`° ••ULID Agreement needed: Y
•Existing zone: UR3 • S Cite Applicable Section; N. 6114, 9'30 - 4 L ri1►tci i st .
P
•Arterial Road Plan designation: ' `e' ./4=c•Comp. Plan designation !/le gl;Ai **I
•Fire District: F- •Personnel doing preapp conf.: c'R c j
-Other/previous Planning Department actions involving this property: -1'1 on,t---'
•Hearing Date: , /a / - •Maint. agreement checked by: --
ABOUT THE PROPERTY
•Existing use of property: /€5SID. 77,5zc / ve,71o4sr iey
-Describe proposed use of the property; ,egs/Q SA., r/ UJ,0/7/0c s r“Y (%41•a_ ,4d,,d-yJ
•If a variance application, state the Code stand d and d scribe the variance ought in comparable�e
terms: Cc,/ f/� L >9,�ich,.17 -,e- us-f -. (7urf dozy
•If a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet all standards? l/ N.
If not, has one or more variances been requested? - v
•What is the size of the original parcel if this prop i a recent or proposed division? /5-5 W14 ,
j3 r�rlir�/7 L
•Street address of property (if own): g• 36y
•Legal description of property (inclu e easement, • plicable): 740_, f3 44 ,v6,' / .3/3. 6 P • .
a¢ 7 Wz t /53 • as' A. 4,7cBlac-I" 13? o 1= Opp, vn<�j/1 a m,- /o .a o f ree4rclad 1 va/Vm � K •
004 Pla f�, paws 2--'
•Parcel No 3_oVas
•Source of
•Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: tio,oE
•What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? ow,tizes
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORI7FD AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION
FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3)
ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPOR 'G, DOCUMENT, S ARE j E
64"bz::, v�'sa`•CT)-! Signed. 4/1..'
N .: w'''°�G.�'d Addre a '
�-3 Y U.L.�sir e.0
kin 9Qzo!-
TRUTHF ._. N1? TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
-
T;
o 4r.e�,
ao
z; n �Pr, e No.: 72v-sv37 Date: 4'-x3-9/
0
lUNE\%::•c„ r
ublic in and for the state of Washington, residing/
. My appointment expires:
page 1 of 2
7V13
A. BURDEN OF PROOF
It is necessary for the applicant or hilrer representative to establish the reasons why the
N-shouldbe approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor
of approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which
addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return
it with your application.
SIGN -OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
a) Proposed method of water supply:
No Li-) clef' Uc , IS✓try/ ryl ;/.e.2 re.
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: p tiI /,'c Ste__ A\
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the propojl The applicant has been infonned
(Signature) (Date) / (Sign -off Waived)
of requirements and standards.
�2.. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the. proposal. The applicant
tined of requirements and standard
(Si azure) ate)
(Sign-off Waived)
'G. -SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waive
if outside WWMA)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
sof requirements: and standards.
44,*47
(bate! (Sign-of`f Waived by Planning?)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of water system
requirements and standards. (See #4 below) ,a� //
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with /1
to become informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards. (See #5 below)
WATER PURVEYOR:
The proposal ids not located within the boundary of our future service area.
The proposal ids not located within the boundary of our current district.
We are/are not able to serve this site with adequate water.
Satisfactory arrangements have/have not been made to serve this proposal.
(Signature)
(Signature) (Date)
, SEWERAGE PURVEYOR:
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of requirements and standards.
APP
REv: 1,91
(Signature) (Date)
page 2 of 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROOF FORM
Name: i7,,r'9 A ,e / t/7117
File: C E - 7 _
V. CONDITIONAI, USES State Law, Section 36.70.020 (7), clarifies that the County
regulations must specify the standards and criteria that shall be
applied in the review by the Zoning Adjustor. Additionally,
condition of approval may be added to assure compatibility with
other uses in the same zone.
A . Assuming the proposal is listed as a "permitted" conditional use, do you believe the
proposal meets all of the required, established and applicable standards?
Po /34x. /,r'v E 7N/97 7»E PAO JoSAL 13 w,e A4.-
fy /tI1,,J /9RtP /c,.3.4 S7/4,110/'t,oJ
B . If you cannot meet the conditional uses required standards, are you seeking relief by
applying for an administrative exception or a Variance? Yes No (Circle One)
C. What have you done or could you do to:
1. Make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity or
zone?
i}'u/<o„v 6 /3.C"" J3i.(/s.7
/' y/5 r, O /,•/C64s/',
i/i..0 .te% /I-N/J
7e> m47z // d,t g/ A.A.2 o w/ 7/7/
%//
/)' w, A < /9g /2" /,�/2 ic.< F��r✓>- / f/Y o,,v 7//.E 3lc,c- o"j-
,'/HL. 52. /.//.✓O SC' ". O 3 B /fS re, /-',v/7n.✓Ce 7/,'4' ,2/2c,c y///-'O.
2. Ensure against imposing excessive demands upon public utilities?
T/,-;F✓t� w/ / 4J av o /J/.0&,7/0' //.L rAfl/c , t/E 2 , a/t,
7- A,C 7,c/c//
Explain how or why the proposal will not be detrimental to:
1. The Comprehensive Plan: f?S /N 7//.e /'.x/9,i //-//; /27o/I/:A/y w/h.�/z4A, ✓ -
?' Y ALs,o,c,.r/4� usk ‘,1/t'/f ?//,C (=u-,, cl/c.✓ 01' ,'? //�:n /`� '"cartl(i 1.'c .w/1/cr
?//41 "AA -Al // ,i .foe A /O AA ,..o.,<sri: y /o e Y r/v,.A4<,c7 S F rS.
r/1/s Pam•°'L,•r i. &/// /h.-it5 f,ao,r' S/44.//41 6(Au. // '✓,,:r,r (r ,/%'../a y /-ign:,.Ea
2. Surrounding property: 7H,C/c L av /i & -6E49' /u o / /,/c $ / /. ✓, o/SC /24 x'
7" /.///S ./rr-9/u/ry /ivyo j/};Z 4:42,4///t /1-.-.1C' Sl/'1.�� S7%y
E. What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spirit and intent
(health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Code AND mitigate any adverse
effect upon the neighboring properties - - including but not limited to: 1) time limits; 2)
front, side or rear yard greater than minimum stated; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing;
5) off-street parking; and 6) others?
7u5/n/$5f W/AA-
d/v/.y
oOf t-G/?G
,itN, /66t7fO ,i7119 6d ✓/ s,'/zE
9 ✓O I-2S/A,7E S t AS le) !J t-, 0 /rA< r//c
4,4
/i//-1 how if, 5V s7/'di-✓,055 '7t/ff /%'7-/CIE
59.
w/A . IA' C.7 /%%7-✓ V 0-i� 57-AA-X./ %4,,/</.✓(^ /T /S /
//./A I k 75-; :.0 / .r7/1 , S7f of G.1c ./aA'4- 7D
s / of . W '= ?2//JL 0u4-/Sh z, L/29--.✓G
7 72Z
/
%� �✓/cam
/✓E/GSt_ S -
o✓/A4- 177 7/Zoomto i246A4//12-/ 'fl "71/4- .7/2.;A054;/}N/�/s
f/G•'n {A'/L•r,l/7< t/ ✓I LTIilz.t /SF Tvw. zA-A. 7t//4
CUT, BCADE: OF PROOF FORM
REV; 1,91