2020, 10-06 study session MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Meeting
Study Session Format
Tuesday, October 6,2020
Mayor Wick called the meeting to order at approximately 6 pm. The meeting was held in City Hall with
Council, staff and presenters participating via Zoom.
Ben Wick, Mayor Mark Calhoun, City Manager
Brandi Peetz, Deputy Mayor John Hohman, Deputy City Manager
Pam Haley, Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Tim Hattenburg, Councilmember Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
Rod Higgins, Councilmember Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
Linda Thompson, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks& Rec Director
Arne Woodard, Councilmember Bill Helbig, City Engineer
Adam Jackson, Planning/Grants Engineer
Jenny Nickerson, Building Official
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was proved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to
approve the agenda.
PROCLAMATION: Fire Prevention Week
After Mayor Wick read the proclamation,Fire Marshall Greg Rogers expressed thanks for the proclamation;
he lauded Council and staff and mentioned the great working relationship with the City,and he urged people
to check out the Fire Department's website for tips on fire safety.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. First Reading Ordinance 20-012 Cable Code Amendment--Cary Driskell
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to
advance Ordinance 20-012 amending chapter 3.65 SVMC relating to cable television franchises to a second
reading. City Attorney Driskell stated that there have been no changes since this was discussed last week.
There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion
carried.
2. Motion Consideration: WSDOT/Flora Road Property Acquisition—Cary Driskell, Mike Stone
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to authorize staff to finalize and execute any documents
necessary to acquire Spokane County parcel numbers 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and
55075.0218 from the Washington State Department of Transportation for parks and recreation purposes,
and that any funds used for this purchase that were previously earmarked for use in the Balfour Parkproject
be replenished by the City with the next available access carryover funds in Capital Reserve Fund#312.
City Attorney Driskell said he and Parks &Recreation Director Stone worked very closely with members
of the Department of Transportation, and greatly appreciate their assistance and willingness to work with
us as we consider this purchase, Mr, Stone went through the PowerPoint presentation, and noted this
property was specifically identified by the public as part of the Master Plan process, and is one of the last
remaining parcels in our City.
It was noted four people signed up speak to this issue. Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley: said she is not
in favor of this purchase right now and feels Council should wait as we don't know if the grant will be
Council Meeting Minutes: 10-06-2020 Page 1 of 5
Approved by Council: 10-27-2020
approved; and if funds are taken from Balfour Park what happens if Council wants to develop that later.
Ms, Petra Hoy, Spokane County: she thanked Council for taking this opportunity and is very happy to see
the City go forward with this purchase, and she thanked Mr. Stone and his department as well as others
who worked on this project. Mr. Bob West, Spokane Valley: stated he too is in favor of this purchase as
quality land is rare and funds are available. City Clerk Bainbridge added that e-mails have been received,
copies of which were previously sent to Council, from the following people who are also in favor of the
land purchase: Mr. Curt Craig, Spokane Valley;Ms.Peggy Doering, Spokane Valley;Ms. Susan Delucchi,
Spokane Valley; Ms. Darla Arnold, Spokane Valley; Mr. Dave Boge, Spokane Valley; and Mr. Mike
Geraghty, Spokane Valley. Ms. Diana Wilhite, Spokane Valley, also spoke as she was having technical
problems in joining the meeting earlier, and she voiced her opinion that this is a good opportunity, and if
not purchased, it could likely go to a private developer.
There was discussion on the pros and cons of purchasing this property now, with Councilmember Haley
explaining that this was never an either/or situation,purchase it or lose it,as members from the Department
of Transportation said we could wait until December and still buy the property; and said she feels it is not
fiscally responsible at this time. Councilmember Higgins said we are not out of the Covid business yet and
still don't know the full impact and said waiting won't hurt and we won't lose anything. Councilmember
Woodard added that the Painted Hills area keeps coming up and we never missed anything as we were
asked by two private individual groups not to purchase that; and also noted he feels we don't have to do
anything yet as it is not an emergency as the Department of Transportation is willing to let us wait; said we
all like it and want it but because of the optics and suffering in the community,thinks it doesn't look to the
public now. Councilmember Hattenburg said he spoke to many people in the community who are in favor
of this purchase, and feels we can do this in a financially responsible manner. Deputy Mayor Peetz
mentioned she was privy to the public's concerns during the Parks Master Plan meeting and the number
one priority was park land;said nothing will change between now and December and the funds used would
not be funds to supplement our general fund.
Mayor Wick asked how this would be funded and City Manager Calhoun went over the budget/financial
impact as noted on the Request for Council Action form; and said if the grant is approved, it would still
have to go before the Legislature for approval; said he is hopeful but not counting on it. Vote by
acclamation: in favor of the purchase:Mayor Wick, Deputy Mayor Peetz, and Councilmember s Thompson
and Hattenburg. Opposed: Councilmembers Haley, Higgins, and Woodard. Motion carried.
NON-ACTION TFEMS:
3.Nonconforming Uses Code Text Amendment—Jenny Nickerson
Building Official Nickerson went through the PowerPoint explaining the current regulations, and the
proposal, as shown on slide S and 6, with slide 6 showing the added words 'and zoning classification' to
the recommendation.Councihnembers voiced their agreement that this change captures the Council's intent
and there was Council consensus to move this forward to a first reading with the stated clarification.
4.INFRA Grant Debrief—Adam Jackson
Planning and Grants Engineer Jackson went through the information contained in his Request for Council
Action,debriefing Council on the INFRA 20 grant process,and of some of the issues and ratings associated
with our application which was not selected for funding.
5. Pavement Preservation Surface Treatment—Adam Jackson,Bill Helbig
As Mr. Jackson went through his PowerPoint presentation, he noted staff is looking for discussion of the
various issues; he briefly mentioned the history of our pavements beginning with a proposed utility tax in
2004; he mentioned the current pavement condition index score and the annual cost of $10 million to
maintain that condition;and that based on historical annual expenditures,we have an average annual deficit
of$4 million; he showed local street repair types by miles and costs; and went over some of the methods
Council Meeting Minutes: 10-06-2020 Page 2 of 5
Approved by Council: 10-27-2020
and options for maintaining streets. Mr. Jackson stated that staff will not decide on surface treatments.
without first bringing it before Council. He also noted that some of the street wear fees will be used in
2021 for street improvements around Balfour Park.
Lengthy discussion ensued with comments about the pros and cons of chip sealing as well as chip sealing
on certain streets; critical streets versus noncritical streets; looking for innovative ways to maintain streets;
and funding challenges now and in the future. City Manager Calhoun mentioned that staff is trying to
provide a sense of available options; that the idea of alternate surface treatments is interesting and maybe
we will try to pair some alternate street treatments with specific sections of roadway, then come talk to
Council about those outcomes; and that staff will look into that possibility and return for future Council
discussion. Council agreed.
Mayor Wick called for a recess at 7:44 p.m.; he reconvened the meeting at 7:50 p.m.
6. Cable Franchise TDS—Cary Driskell
After City Attorney Driskell went over the information included in his Request for Council Action
concerning the proposed TDS cable television franchise ordinance. There were no objections from Council
to move this forward for an ordinance first reading.
7. Federal Lobbyist Contract—Cary Driskell
City Attorney Driskell explained about our current federal lobbyist contract with Cardinal Infrastructure,
and that in November 2018,they were awarded a one-year contract with renewable options, and all parties
agreed to renew the contract for 2020. Mr. Driskell said staff is bringing this to Council to see if Council
has an opinion on whether to renew the contract, or consider other options such as advertising again for
another Request for Qualifications. Mr. Driskell also noted that travel is included in the current contract,
but due to Covid, there were no trips this year from staff and Council, or from Cardinal.
Councilmember Woodard said he feels it is too soon to change or cancel as building relationships takes
time, and that he feels this is a good start and we should stay for at least another year and get beyond the
pandemic; and Councilmember Haley agreed. There was also discussion about hearing more from them
and having them more involved, also of having remote meetings. Deputy Mayor Peetz said she would like
to look further at the contract since we are paying them $78,000 regardless of travel; or maybe change a
future contract if something like this pandemic or other issues come up to prevent travel,to perhaps include
a clause to not pay that much when there is no travel involved. Mr. Driskell said staff is sensitive to the
amount of the contract and is weighing the potential cost and benefit, which he said is why this is on
tonight's agenda; and he asked if there is Council interest in talking with Cardinal about a reduction in the
fee this year since there was no travel. Mayor Wick noted he feels it would be reasonable to reach out as a
means to improve relationships, with Councilmember Thompson stating she would like to have reports
about what they have been doing. City Manager Calhoun said he periodically gets e-mails about activities
taking place in Washington, D.C., and he will start forwarding those to Council.
8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick
There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda.
9. Finance Department Monthly Report
This report was for information only and was not reported or discussed
10. Council Comments—Mayor Wick
Councilmember Haley mentioned that concerning the homelessness issues,the grant award process started
through the [Continuum of Care] Board's program funding, but there were only two people who actually
Council Meeting Minutes: 10-06-2020 Page 3 of 5
Approved by Council: 10-27-2020
put in a responsive bid to take it over; that the one being recommended already has a building so it could
start December 1; and then they have the view that it should then be built possibly with a crosswalk near
Spokane Community College; so it is moving forward; that at the last meeting several people commented
they are happy our City is involved and they are happy to work with us and our staff.
Mayor Wick reported there was a conversation last week on CARES dollars; there was a couple homeless
shelters,and the regional partnership,that the City of Spokane applied for County dollars from, and part of
that was to acquire the Mission Street facility and renovate some of Mission and Cannon,but unfortunately
they were way over budgets for those with the City of Spokane about $1.5 million short for continuing
renovations; said they were willing to put forth $750,000 of their own CARES funds but were looking
around to see who else might be able to contribute CARES funds;they heard someone mention on the radio
that we had lots of CARES dollars so they reached out to us; he said he let them know we awarded all our
CARES funds last week; and said that he heard the County was going to consider that as part of their
CARES allocations.
Concerning SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council), Mayor Wick said he distributed copies of
an SRTC Agenda item for that board's October 8 meeting, which discussed legislative regional priority
projects and key discussion points associated with those; said the list of projects has been greatly reduced
from the original list of about 100 projects; that the Chambers had some discussion with the SRTC to
discuss what projects are considered ready in order to put forth from a regional perspective,to be considered
for a revenue package for the next legislative session, and via the GSI (Greater Spokane, Inc.) they are
seeking a quick turnaround of a list of projects,as listed on the information. Mayor Wick noted the Spokane
Valley projects and he asked for Councilmember input. There were no objections from Council to move
forward with this list.
On another matter,Mayor Wick explained that for about the last year and a half,there has been discussion
among members of the Regional Transportation Board regarding tribal membership; said about three years
ago the Spokane Tribe requested membership on the Regional Transportation Council;they were added to
the TCC, which is a staff sub-committee;they reached out again asking for inclusion on the full board and
that request was not carried forward, so the Spokane Tribe approached the state legislature. Mayor Wick
said the state legislature passed a law in 2019 that states that all Metropolitan Planning Organizations,which
includes SRTC, must provide voting rights for tribes that have lands inside the County, or state funding
will be restricted to the organization,and this must be done within two years of the passing of the legislation,
or when the interlocal agreement would be modified. Mayor Wick said this discussion is coming up before
the board with two ways to add members: renegotiate the interlocal agreement which must be approved
unanimously, adding that the last time this occurred it took one year to finally be approved by all
municipalities; and although there appears to be some conflicting information, the other option is to add
membership with a majority vote of the members.Mayor Wick said during last month's meeting the Board
opted to move with the second option to add the tribal membership, but that issue remains controversial,
and he mentioned an e-mail received from the County stating their position; and said the issue might come
before Council concerning amending the interlocal.
City Attorney Driskell said the mentioned letter was addressed by Commissioner Al French and although
he (Mr. Driskell ) does not know for certain,the letter does not appear to be on behalf of the County. Mr.
Driskell said a recommendation will be coming from SRTC to the membership jurisdictions with a request
to consider voting on whether to admit the Spokane and Kalispell Tribes. Mayor Wick said the next SRTC
Board meeting is Thursday. Mayor Wick also noted the International Airport withdrew their membership
from the SRTC;that legal counsel including City Attorney Driskell,feel that the withdraw of the airport is
a modification of the SRTC Agreement and that the law states a deadline of August 1, or whenever the
interlocal agreement is modified; said the airport's withdraw is effective December 31 so our date is more
likely December 31; adding that this issue is rapidly evolving. Councilmember Woodard said this was
Council Meeting Minutes: 10-06-2020 Page 4 of 5
Approved by Council: 10-27-2020
discussed about two years ago and the question remains, how to incorporate another entity that is its own
sovereign nation or government. Mayor Wick said now that the state law has passed, we must provide
voting membership and do so soon;that WSDOT has been frank reminding us they are the keepers of the
state law and funding, and if by the deadline we have not invited tribal membership for voting to the board,
WSDOT will cut our funding.
11. City Manager Comments—Mark Calhoun
Mr. Calhoun had no additional comments.
It was moved by Coln eilmember Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 8:21 p.m.
46... ji
ATT.. Ben Wick, Mayor
•
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Council Meeting Minutes: 10-06-2020 Page 5 of 5
Approved by Council: 10-27-2020
Chris Bainbridge
From: Curt Craig <redcraig@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 5:54 PM
To: Carrie Koudelka; Chad Knodel; Chris Bainbridge
Subject: Public Comment - 10/06/2020
Date of meeting: 10/06/2020
Agenda item Topic: Flora Road Property Acquisition
First and Last Name: Curt Craig
City of Residence: Spokane Valley (Shelley Lake)
Greetings councilpersons and neighbors,
I wanted to share some data with you that should be considered in the context of this investment far our City. We are
woefully under-invested in Park land.
The below shows how Spokane Valley compares with other cities re: Park Acres/Residents:
Spokane Valley= 2 acres/1000 residents
Spokane, City of= 19 acres/1000 residents
Seattle = 6 acres/1000 residents
Tacoma = 12 acres/1000 residents
Similar sized cities:
Everett= 15 acres/1000 residents
Yakima = 2.9 acres/1000 residents
Renton = 13 acres/1000 residents
Federal Way= 12 acres/1000 residents
Kennewick=5 acres/1000 residents
*Generally accepted national practice is 10 acres/1000 residents
Lastly, on a much more subjective note, one often hears that a common denominator to many of our social ills is a "lack
of connection" between ourselves; that we're losing our sense of community.
We have a daughter that moved overseas to a very large city, where she knew no one and has two young children. She
would take a "sanity walk" each day, pushing her stroller to a small park located 4 blocks away. Almost her entire
current circle of friends was developed at that park; she found other people who had similar interests/challenges etc. In
short, she found connection.
We should strive to be such a welcoming City-to provide the space for our citizens to connect.
Thanks for your consideration.
Curt Craig
857 S. Shelley Lake Ln
509.869.2340
PS. Sources for the above data were City Websites(for park acres) and Wikipedia for demographics.
i
Chris Bainbridge
From: Peggy Doering <doeringpeggy@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 1:09 PM
To: Council Meeting Public Comment
Subject: Flora RD Park Acquisition
Attachments: Flora Rd Letter 2.docx
This is for the Comment Section for the October 6, 2020 City Council meeting regarding Flora Rd. acquisition.
Thanks,
Peggy Doering
City of Spokane Valley
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking
links, especially from unknown senders.
a
Letter for the October 6, 2020 City Council Meeting
Comment Section on the Flora Rd property
October 5, 2020
Acquisition of the Flora Rd Property
Dear Mayor Ben Wick and City Council Members,
Thank you for consideration of the purchase of this property on Flora Road. When I sent you a letter in
March enthusiastically advocating for this land purchase, I had hoped that it could happen with the
assistance of WSDOT and financial resources of the City of Spokane Valley.
On October 6, this is coming back to you as a motion to finalize and execute all the documents to
complete the transaction. I support this motion.
As I said in my March comments, "I recommend that you continue the purchase of this property.Apply
for the grant.Visit with the State of Washington. Accept the advice of your City attorney, City manager
and your parks and recreation master plan recommendations. I hope that you vote for the future of your
citizens.
Be bold, have vision and continue forward with this land acquisition."
Thank you for planning for the City of Spokane Valley's future!
Sincerely,
Peggy Doering
E. 11522 Sunview Circle
Spokane Valley,WA 99206
Chris Bainbridge
From: Susan Delucchi <susandelucchi@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 1:28 PM
To: Council Meeting Public Comment
Subject: Written comment for 10/6/2020
Subject: item 2. Acquisition of WSOT Flora property Susan Delucchi
15321 E 23 rd Ave. Spokane Valley
Having an interest in public land use for over forty years, I find it extremely important that as much public space as
possible be preserved within the city limits. In the future, this opportunity will become very rare. Please do not make a
"penny wise pound foolish" decision that we will regret for generations. The money can be found somewhere in the
budget.
Sent from my iPhone
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking
links, especially from unknown senders.
i
Chris Bainbridge
From: Darla Arnold <darfay37@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 8:30 AM
To: Council Meeting Public Comment
Subject: Council meeting of 10/06/2020, Agenda Item #2
Meeting of October 6, 2020
Agenda Item Topic#2
Darla Arnold
Spokane Valley
PLEASE Please please purchase the Washington State Department of Transportation Flora Road Property!?!!
In 2013, the City of Spokane Valley had an opportunity to purchase the Painted Hills Golf Course. Unfortunately, the
Council at the time did not have the foresight or wherewithal to complete that transaction for the good of the
community. Please do NOT allow this to happen again!!
The City of Spokane Valley is a gem and the people of this City deserve a beautiful area like this property that is so close
to so many things and offers a breathing space of peace from the hectic lives we all lead.
PLEASE purchase the WSDOT Flora Road property as an added asset to this amazing Cityl
Thank you for your time,
Darla Arnold
509.998.3950
CAUTION:This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking
links, especially from unknown senders.
Chris Bainbridge
From: DAVE BOUGE <davebouge@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 10:10 AM
To: Council Meeting Public Comment
Subject: Purchase of potential park land
10/6/20
Dear City Council;
Please add me name in support of the purchase of the 45+ acre parcel of land on Flora Road for the
development of a park. No doubt, times are difficult right now, but this land will never be cheaper that
it is now and once developed, the residents nearby will have no recreational outlet. Evidently this
covid mess will subside and we will be able to return to something near normal. I urge you to think
long term and purchase this land for the future of our community/
Thank you
Dave Bouge
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking
links, especially from unknown senders.
Chris Bainbridge
From: Mike Geraghty <mcgerag@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 2:24 PM
To: Council Meeting Public Comment
Subject: WSDOT Flora Road Property Acquisition
1. Meeting Date: 10-06-2020
2. First and Last Name: Michael Geraghty 3. City of Residence: Spokane Valley (Shelley Lake) 4. Agenda Item: Motion
Consideration: WSDOT Flora Road Property Acquisition
City Council Members:
As a resident of Spokane Valley, I add my support for and ask the City Council to pass the motion authorizing staff to
acquire the WSDOT Floral Road Property. I join with all the other Spokane Valley residents and groups such as the
Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce, Friends of the Centennial Trail, Spokane Riverkeeper, Spokane County
Parks and Recreation etc., who support acquisition of this property for the future benefit and enjoyment of our Spokane
Valley residents. Let's not let this opportunity go by the wayside!
Respectfully submitted,
Mike Geraghty
Sent from my iPad
CAUTION:This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking
links, especially from unknown senders.
i
SPOKANE REGIOiVAL +, - Fok: IN'FoRM'A�TO'N]
sR7-4:41 TRANSPORTATION AGENDAITEM9
C O UN C I l 10/08/2020 Board Meeting
4214V,RIVERSIDE AVE SUITE 500 •SPOKANEVGA9920I.509.343.6370.V1IVV SRTC.O RG
To: SRTC Board of Directors October 1, 2020
From: Mayor Ben Wick, Chair
Topic: Legislative Regional Priority Projects
Requested Action:
None. For information and discussion only.
Key Points:
• Last Fall, SRTC staff and member agencies worked in collaboration with the private sector,
led by the three chambers of commerce, to convene a coalition to discuss and develop
synergy around the transportation needs and priorities in our region.
• The SRTC Board was briefed on this work last fail, and individual members have participated
in a variety of these meetings that have occurred since.
• A list of over 100 priority projects, in ail phases and all levels of readiness was developed,
with a systems approach and focus around improving the 1-90 corridor. Projects include all
types of projects from preservation and maintenance,to capacity improvement, transit, active
transportation, to travel demand management.
• As the coalition advocated for the transportation needs of the region, a focus also remained
on the need for fund preservation and maintenance of our existing system as a top priority.
• In mid-September, legislative leadership approached Greater Spokane incorporated (GSI)
and requested"the list" of ready priority projects for the Spokane region, with a very quick
turn-around (less than a week.)
• SRTC staff and Board leadership worked with the existing list developed with member
agencies last fall and used the readiness proxies from the previous process such as design
underway and funding committed to shorten the list and keep it manageable.Combined with
staff local knowledge, this produced the best"ready"factor available with short turnaround.
• The list was quickly vetted for any updates, and some projects were combined into corridors
for simplicity. Where known, cost, schedule,and termini updates were made as well.
• The attached list was provided to the Chambers for their review and distribution to the
requestor, as they wished.
• The SRTC Board may wish to formally adopt the list developed through the inclusive
process to communicate synergy, consistency and for unified messaging.
ige 30
I 'rfI ,/a rl=JI
AGENDA ITEM 9
Attachment
Regional Priority Strategy Projects DRAFT 10/08/2020 Board Meeting
Priority Projects"Ready"and Consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan;Not Listed in Any Particular Order
1st PRIORITY Maintain funding and schedule for projects currently funded in Connecting Washington Package Provided data,analysis,and/or mapping products created and distributed by thespolrane Regional Transportation Council(slice)are for Informational,planning reference,and guidance purposes only.They are b
production.Seicmakes no warranty,express or Implied,related to the accuracy or completeness of the content of base materials and expressly disclaims Ilablllty for any errors oromisslons.Any eypllcatlor or d'.ssere
2nd PRIORITY Maintain and increase funding for maintenance and preservation for investments in our existing transportation system statement that this Is ansnte map/data prodact.Any modification tocRTc data,reappine,or subsequent;
14 Sep,2020 Cost&Funding Status Project Readiness
Project Title Jurisdiction Project Type Funding Status Estimated Project Unfunded Amount Percent Estimate Level Start Year Right-of-Way Right-of-Way
Cost Unfunded Required Started
Bigelow Gulch/sullivan Corridor Spokane County/Spokane Valley Roadway Capital Partial $65,600,000 $36,200,000 55% Engineering 2021 Yes Yes
Pines Hoad/BNSF Grade separation Spokane Valley Reconstruction Partial $29,000,000 $19,500,000 67% Engineering 2023 Yes Yes
Fish Lake Trail,queen Luucas Lake to Fish Lake Spokane Ped/Bike Partial $6,000,000 $5,500,000 92% Engineering 2023 Yes Yes
Argonne:Montgomery to Indiana Concrete Reconstruction Spokane Valley Reconstruction Partial $5,000,000 $2,000,000 40% Engineering 2021 No No
Matching state Funds for West Plains Subarea Study Regional STUDY Unfunded $500,000 $500,000 100% Planning 2021 No No
195 Design on Study Outcomes Regional Roadway Capital/Safety Unfunded $3,000,000 $3,000,000 100% Planning 2022 No No
West Plains Connector Spokane/Airway Heights Roadway Capital Partial $20,883,000 $17,703,000 85% Engineering 2021 Yes No
Riverfront Park Bridge Rehabilitations(3 Total) Spokane Ped/Bike Partial $9,500,000 $8,250,000 87% Engineering 2021 Yes Yes
Sprague Ave Rebuild Phase ll Spokane Reconstruction Partial $8,514,640. $3,000,000 35% Planning 2022 Yes Yes
Hatch Road-Latch Creek Bridge Deck Repair Spokane Bridge Partial $1,622,186 $750,000 46% Planning 2021 - -
SunsetHighwayBikePath-Royal to Deer Heights-Design Spokane Ped/Bike Partial $3,655,584 $3,083,000 84% Planning 2023 Yes -
Sprague Spokane Transit Authority Transit Partial $6,000,000 $5,500,000 92% Planning 2024 - -
Centennial Trail atArgonne Spokane County Ped/Bike Unfunded $415,000 $415,000 100% Planning 2025 Yes -
LindekeSt:16th to Sunset Blvd(Preservation) Spokane Preservation Unfunded $1,200,000 $1,200,000 100% Planning 2021 - -
Barker Read Corridor.Mission south to city limits Spokane Valley Reconstruction/Roadway Capital Unfunded $15,000,000 $15,000,000 100% Planning 2025 Yes -
SpottedRdRealignmentandlnterchangeProject Spokane International Airport Reconstruction Partial $13,000,000 $8,000,000 62% Planning 2021 - -
Brooks Road Spokane County Reconstruction Partial $5,239,000 $2,410,000 46% Engineering 2021 - -
Craig Road sR 2 to SR 902 Reconstruction/Wldnning(Thorpe Intersection) Spokane County Reconstruction/Roadway Capital Partial $6,700,000 $6,700,000 100% Planning 2024 Yes -
57th Ave Rehabilitation:City Limits to Palouse Hwy Spokane County Reconstruction Partial $5,148,000 $4,420,000 86% Engineering 2022 - -
Columbia DrRehab:Argonne to Northwood Spokane County Reconstruction Unfunded $1,775,000 $1,775,000 100% Engineering 2022 - -
Hayford Rd/12th Ave Intersection Airway Heights Safety Unfunded $1,000,000 $1,000,000 100% Planning 2021 Yes -
Transportation Systems Management and Operations(TSMO)Projects
1-90 Traffic Incident Response•System Investments WSDOT TSMO Unfunded $2,000,000 $2,000,000 100% Engineering 2021 -
Regional AatomatedTraffieSionalPerrermanee Measure&Detection Enhancements SRTMC TSMO Unfunded $4,206,000 $4,206,000 100% Planning 2021 -
RegionelCommunicationsInfrastructureExpansion&Gap Fill SRTMC TSMO Unfunded $9,152,000 $9,152,000 100% Planning 2021 - -
Regional Transportation Data Collection,Management,&Dissemination System SRTMC TSMO Unfunded $3,475,000 $3,475,000 100% Planning 2021 -
Safety Projects
I-so/Garden Springs to Broadway-Additional Ramp Meters WSDOT Safety Unfunded $8,500,000 $8,500,000 100% Planning 2021 - -
1-90/Garden Springs to Broadway-Queue Warning Signs WSOOT Safety Unfunded $5,000,000 $5,000,000 100% Planning 2022 - -
SR2/Colbert Rd Intersection Improvements WSDOT Safety Unfunded $2,300,000 $2,300,000 100% Planning 2022 - -
US195/Hatch Rd to Meadowlane Rd Intersection Improvements-i-Turn WSDOT Safety Unfunded $5,000,000 $5,000,000 100% Planning 2022 - -
ProjeelTitle Prated Cost Unfunded Amount
1 Bigelow Golds/Sulk/on Corridor $65,600,000 $36,200,000 24 '.
2 Pines Rood/BNSF Grade Sepmolion $29.000.000 $19,500,000 - �-- _- _-
3 PA Lola Trill,queen Lucas Loke Io Fm Luke $6,000,000 $5,500000 2 :.
4 Argonne:Montgoery la Indiana Connese Reconstruction 45,000,000 $2,000,000IG3 {\�
5 Maichmg Stole Fads for West Plains Submeo Study $500,000 $500,000 Iszz sl
6 US 195/Inieame 90 Slum Owm caes $3,000,000 $3,000,000
7 Ws,IH0ns Com,ecior $20,003,000 $17,703,000 —. ___..._. -__. _ - _
8 Riedronl Pork Bridge Rehabilitations 13 Told) $9,500.000 $8.250,000 -—
9 Sprague Ave Rebuild Phone II $8,514,640 $3,000,000
10 Holds Rood toloh 0i Creek-Royal
Deck Repo r $3,655,I84 $750000083 _
Il SunsetHighway Bike Roth Royal la Deer Heights-Da4gn $3,633,584 E3.DB3,D00 I SPO ANFe_,��
12 Sprague $6,000,000 $5,5000IX1
13 Cenlenmol Trail of Argonne $415,000 $415,000 I m
14 Lindk Sr 161h to 5uesei Blvd $1,200,000 $1,200000 \ -- ®- I e v4uty
15 Bark Rood Co-dor Mission South o Ciy Lints 515,000,000 $15,000,000
16 SeatedRdR Ignmen ondlmard,onge Prgea $13.000,000 18,000,000 Urba�l Area�e}OI�
17 Brooks Rood $5,239,000. $2,410,000 l
18 Cog Rood SR ties SR 902 Recoo4mcion/Wf0ening)Thorpe In./sedan) $6.700,000 $6700,000 -- a �.ne
19 57Ih Are leeks611.k City L s.o Pdouse Hwy $5,140,000 $4,420,000 sa
20 Columbia Or Rehab hgonna to Northwood $1,775,000 $1,775,000
21 Hoylord Rd/12h Ave I n $1,000,000 $1,000,000IIII GaurA>,
22 1-90/Goiden Sp gs B oodwy Additional Romp Meters $8,500,000 $8,500,000 'is 23 I-90/G d Springs.Broadway Gueve Warning Signs $5,000,000 $5,000,000 ------- - _wJ •
24 SR2/Colbert Rdl xenon Improvements $2,300,000 E2,300,000 1
25 US 195/H l h Rd lo Meodoedone Rd Inlersecllon Improvements-I-Turn $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Transportation Systems Management ond°par dons ITSMO)Protects—Not Shown on Map — -- ----
� _ _ �0�
-90ToIB I d 1 R span SyS I simenls $2,000,O110 $2,000,000 _ -. ,y .
Reg IA red Tat SgdP nee Measure&Delecion Enhoncemenu 54,206,000 $4,206,000Reg dC 1! a&pansan&Gap TIl $9,152,000 $9,152,000 / MILLWOOD 1I )Re dTran Oiv Cd edfan,Mon &Oiceminal on54am $3,4]5,000 $3,d7500DAi �_� f ��' "--
gait spananm apemen) V -•'\ ip
v � � 3 R C ` ._._ ____._
7 21 15
11 14 ._ _ _
2
j I __ , v1 VALLEY_.
AIRWAY • SPIUKARE �
HEIGHTS
FAIRCHILD - \\\ _
1/7 AF8 18 5 5P NTlE 7 / 6 —I `- .— _ \�—__..-..—_. \
�/ _.,..,--7 - 19 r—
SPORANEREOIONAL
17-z- �� SRTC =RTATO
n
MEDICAL 9-
LARE - L" - �o — a _. Regional Priority Strategy:
- - •
Ready Projects
/ 1 •
Spokane Metropolitan Planning Area DRAFT
Project Type
] ] i'' \ '195 • Roadway Capital • Ped/Bike
'/p,f \ • Reconstruction • Preservation
A • Bridge • Transit
eon .- \\ • Safety • study
Urban Growth Areas(UGA)
-- N — r_lnelde UGA
—Outside UGA
i 0 1 2 4
/>'CNENEY Mlles
Page 32 / I September 14,2020