1984, 10-17 WVE-41-84 Findings of FactZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF WVE-41-84: BARTLE
WAIVER OF VIOLATION FOR SIDE YARD
SETBACK
FINDINGS OF FACT,
DECISION AND
CONDITIONS
THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane
County, in hearing application WVE-41-84, hereinafter referred to as the
"Proposal", and the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County having held a public
hearing on October 10, 1984, and having fully considered all testimony
presented thereat, and further having visited the site and vicinity in
question, and having rendered a decision on the 17th day of October, 1984,
APPROVING said proposal, does hereby make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the proposal is generally located north and adjacent to 6th
Avenue, west of Blake Road and east of McDonald Road in Section 22-25-44.
Parcel #22541-0424.
2. That the proposal consists of allowing the continued location of a
carport to be within one (1) foot of the east property line.
3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land Use
Plan indicates Urban usage of the area encompassed by the proposal. That the
proposal generally does conform to the density and use guidelines of the
County Land Use Plan.
That the site is zoned Agricultural which would allow this use upon
of this application.
the existing land uses in the area of proposal include
single family residences which do appear compatible with the
4.
approval
5. That
predominately
proposal.
6. That
applicant havi
location.
the carport in its current location was established without the
ng a building permit or approved variance for its current
7. That the carport is of compatible design with the existing single
family residence and neighborhood.
That the property owner to the immediate east, Mr. Les Jordan, whose
is most affected by the proposal spoke in favor of the proposal
with other area residents.
8.
property
together
9. That other area residents more removed from the proposal objected to
it because they felt it would weaken the covenants in the development and that
the applicant should have sought a building permit prior to construction as is
required.
10. That the various County Departments reviewing the proposal did not
indicate any problems with it. The applicant is required to seek further
review from the Department of Building and Safety.
11. - That no significant problems are apparent with the current location
of the carport which cannot be adequately addressed by the Department of
Building and Safety.
12. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing
before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been met.
CONCLUSION
Following review of the Planning Department file, consideration of the
public testimony, and circumstances in the area, the Zoning Adjustor concludes
that the proposal is not detrimental and is compatible to the public health,
safety and welfare.
FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS WVE-41-84 PAGE 2
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings, the Zoning Adjustor hereby in APPROVING the
proposal, establishes the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1) Should this application be approved, compliance with Section 504 of the
Uniform Building Code will have to be demonstrated. The applicant should
be required to contact to contact the Department of Building and Safety
for further review.
2) Applicant shall not further improve or increase ara of the carport without
approval of Spokane County Building and Safety Department and other County
departments if requird.
3) The applicants use of the carport must be consistent with those uses
allowed within the Agricultural zone.
DATED THIS 17th DAY OF October, 1984.
D .. ADAFIS, ZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
NOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN
(10) DAYS OF THIS DATE.
8/17/84
OU AS