Loading...
ZE-23-94S P O K A N E 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR TO: MEMORANDUM Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Brenda Sims, Storm Water Utility Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Greg Figg Department of Transportation Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Central Valley School District No. 356 Vera Water and Power Fire Protection District No. 1 FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner 12 DATE: February 11, 1994 RE: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR - 3.5) to Urban Residential - 7 (UR - 7) ZE . 3 --q/ APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FEBRUARY 23. 1994 AT 1:15 p.m. COUNTY PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM. 2ND FLOOR Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Stacy Bjordahl for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Stacy Bjordahl of the Planning Department at 456-2205. c: Richard Allison, 13618 E. 8th Ave., Spokane, WA 99216 Sara Marks, 1801 W. Broadway Ave., Spokane, WA 99201 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan wtc-Allison-February 11, 1994 WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 • (509) 456-2205 February 23, 1994, at 1:15 p.m. Richard Allison Generally located north of and adjacent to 3rd Avenue and approximately 480 feet east of Evergreen Road in Section 23, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban, and within Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR - 3.5) to Urban Residential - 7 (UR - 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification to allow development of 5 duplexes on 5 existing platted lots. PARCEL NUMBER: 23541-0101, 0102, 0103, 0104 SITE SJ7F• Approximately 2 acres APPLICANT: Richard Allison 13618 E. 8th Avenue Spokane, WA 99216 (509) 924-9005 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Stacy Bjordahl wtc-Allison-February 11,1994 Allison Rezone IS 1 i6 1 /7 • • Jai S S S S 1 44 /( L 1, rr_ i�i 0 II I/ zn- 7' . -r'• Oi�c .mot-ina •I� r Lc.n N+n-of•cnff .-qti 444 ' `'4'('d 3SJ rrC 1 3 RJ, ^I • C ./ —JI J ��l1J/%l i i/c1: r i w � „I 4 J 0L _�— r 'EX .1.7 EE I L G 55.9i a 1�Cp r3 h 7 `' n n4;112 Cp ✓Irk 'II .!j, J`-J� ,C ���:1! N 1M1. L /.?/, 1� 23 4 S JO' 347 $ g S s ri t / /s �• nnyy L321 6�, , 4 21 5ti 6 4 .47':e a Sri- 74 i '\3) v) it r` s' fri as as a �0®3 �a }u °4 sots m/.r ,44/ 1G 5 yins L /4/9 1 zcz.9 yo /,'00/ Tr ;' 1 ,a t — nr. i 7J/ /// 7273 3 f,Th-_- og 2 AR /zs a /., 9404 J0.3< 6 © "4/4B.B9 2 D 5©e /rest 4 ® 8 /40.. t4 2117120NM211-7 1, CIERCZISIT SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 [1] (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(11 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Environmental Checklist File No. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCN, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases. you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not apply.' Complete answers to the questions nw may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do theta over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply'. IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'applicant,' and 'property or site' should be read as 'proposal," 'proposer,' and 'affected geographic area,' respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. 'lame of proposed project, if applicable: In en 7 dA 2. wame of Applicant: i( 1 C lalf r 5 3. Address and phone comber of applicant or contact person: r_- 17 6l <$ �' r4 ,4 ci< 1jr fR!✓< 11-44( ? t :9 i C 50C 5- 4. Date checklist prepared: /- 5. Agency requesting checklist: /748,u.✓:;v J r 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): f/ ., n 1P it O Y 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain._ 2,>8 u-S7 It-2 �GJ/JC b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes. explain. nn 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared. directly related to this.proposal. � f fit. 5 ,S 4+4Z Pc 1 / 246 G� ,J .22 /-^4.2.8- 2 D:J/� C �.•5 `+ Rev.2/1/88 1 SPOKANE ENVIRONMITAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) 1, BAOCCg0u D (continued) Do you taw whether applications ere pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. / 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. if know. r' o-..c.✓-{y A_ 0 itbo✓4-( 11. Give a brief. complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. fit cc2 'n/S t0 j1t? 4U'C 312../✓I/(. 42-i, 5 C4I2 - 7 l 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a etre<t address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal vould occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity nap. and topographic nap, 1f reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. 11. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Ares (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Ares? The Priority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for bounder/es). TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ENVIRON!1ER'.AL ELE4ENTS EART11 a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: r (4 b. ''past is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? f /4' r 'fiat general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the claseificariom,of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. r)�}-%✓' x Ali/i<YWe�� v Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. AL 7-Lc r S'iw Evaluation For Agency Use Only 2 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIROIMENTAL ELEMENTS(continued) e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. .1-'t pk>epzn... v f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. _ r c R'2�/-..fc S/oae.)1 f -- 9- About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construc- tion (for example, asphalt or buildings)? n0 6 to v(vvS USt .�C - ZO i1i vxh � J h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other inalacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (1.e., dust, automobile. odors industrial, wood snake) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantltes if known. BSc FAc`5 ilL..4 S b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Na c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, 1f any: 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river It flows into. ,V C p'.c./1.-{-lrcz Wyf-c,i (2) Wi11 the project require any work over, In, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Ai 1 lrt1 q /ciF-v%J le / ( 7 Evaluation For Agency Use Only SFOTANE ERVIROIQ&NTAL ORDINANCE (WAG 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) E. ENVIRONIdNLL g1.QeR_5 (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only (9) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface eater or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. (4) Will the proposal require surface ,ester withdrawals or diversions? Give a general descrip- tion, purpose, and approximate quantities, if knows. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of dischargee. PLO� P�?, 5c,,,,a ,/ i .u✓u c "-/ V 1.k./'/ Vtakte, ©re- VNt CeiCer v' ec�i Ground: (1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, If known. lr'c wA-4hc., ,i✓si eft_ (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into dm ground from septic tanks or other sanitary vote treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the umber of houses to be served (if applicable) or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. /-4 Sal h/el tot QU/l-f %t s yzwe,t1 (1) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of storm eater or drainage from floor drains). Deecribe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). d ys 46-7 c (4) Wi11 any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? N d 4 SPOEANE ER711.011KERtAI. ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) ENVIRONMENTAL ELBffir5 (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only (5) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? v Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm eater) and method of collection and disposal if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water floe into other wate�r)s? If so, describe. (2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a storm water disposal systm discharging to surface or groundwater? (3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If • , generally describe. jyleCaw d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff eater tapacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist): Pti G4 .e4-4 w a 75 n , c ; c.T >?lo�c/ i 74//...rT / S r PLANTS a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, ocher. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. shrubs. grass. _ crop or grain. vet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other. water plants: water lilly, eelgrass, ail£oil, other. _ other types of vegetation. What kind and amount of vegetation v111 be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species know to be on or near the site. /v c.v { G. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, Sr per measures to__p .erve or enhance vegetation on the Bite, if any: AY/ n t.4.z. 6 /ice C r- /(��/✓ • a V'� 5 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (PAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.Z30(1) 6. ENYIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ff birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ,owl 4 LaL 5'/ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: /% 7 5 E cq-fS fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: iJ O - 5 other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. AT J d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 3 /o e i5 .1,7 5. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the the completed proje$t s energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufac- turing, etc. r_. Pe L n-a ./f—S b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. „AU 0 , �.� ss .¢I.c. ii-o4- /we_ /Is --1 A Iti2y �. ,. r l''tot may/ Fs .z. Re ��.„i c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measurrees to reduce �or control energy impacts, if any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. y1%GRJ C. 6 SPOKA)E ERVIfo[gaNTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) ENMIRONHZ1PLL KLEM S (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only ENVIRONHENTAL HEALTH (continued) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: a-lX Ntih< J7i S -145" Noise; (1) Whet types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, eguipnent, operation. other? / R./ti 'We C *zc'o (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. /06,Jf tiLC5 :S ✓2f 2-. o.,u< [' (3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 6. um AND SHORELI?R USE E 6 I Swam C%(Gr-. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? L "3, t)-3 co w\ v.\2\r \ Has the site been used for agriculture?? If so, describe. 9t,v:.4,41 h L c r\ cam (-i`C 1 d as 1.6n5 a 4 c avv (e Rrlvb-ei- 7 e-V-5 c. Descc!ribe an structure• he site. \M\ Kl,` 2 ! wa�' �ci�1� - \A..lc i11 k- ✓V± Q It463 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? ' \ Vc-e- 4 y • \ 01/4.- r'`� e. What is the current zoning elanification of the site? a a - 7. �(5y`�re `,` 'r q�n What 1s the current comprehensive Alan designation of the site? ��'u `O$ '\ VICY"��Zq�em �O U �2 cxv\m �\e(G � ��� ai �eC. S�t�� o Ems,\�nae I � fLe If applicable, what is the current//shoreline master program designation of Ste? %10 f ,4 n (F c?-/O Has any part of the site been classified as an 'environmentally sensitive' area? If so. specify. N0 i. Approximately how many people would reside or wort in the empleted project? ;()O.v C SPOT NE ENVI MOSRLL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) E. ENOIRONTSNYAL ELEM MS (continued) i k. Evaluation For Agency Use Only Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Nb.L t /2. e` acf %Lc� Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ge 9. HOUSING Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units if any would be elimimcmd? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. / C U c Proposed mese{yres to reduce or co trol housing impacts, if any: )7c JN e'c it(' s 0 yr 5 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennae? What is the principal exterior building materials) proposed? JJDa/e What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? tIeye cis 'kr met 0i.t75.1 J Proposed measures to reduce or control sthetic impacts, if any: ,v v,:/ e /L e, r� 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. That type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur'. JOU C b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N° c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? /U t" Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: O•C/Z. /2-.et Lc 8 SPOUSE ulVtaO?lMEN'TSL ORDINANCE (WAG 197-11-9A0) Section 11.10.230(1) S. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) 12. RECREATION a. Whet designated and informal recreational opportunities ere in the inediate vicinity? r ,'!i„MrJ1 r//�i'1C .a+ g N/ %Eizhgc< Uri:u0 k mne a yNee 7(7 tdt co 'Inn . . J° rz/csj /2h,'j'C/ fA 4' - /CP 41.4 Cee'S4.17.�' -'t`'�`)C Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. /' 6 n. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, inc using recreational opportuni- ties to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for national, state or local preserva- tion registers know to be on or nest to the site? If so, generally describe. Nv tie k.u� b. generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological, scientific or cultural importance Lwow to be on or next to the site. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: e /1. el wryn<d/ 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access co the existing street system. Show -on site plena, if any. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 3 6 loo-ks now many ?spicing spaces would the couple ed project have? Sow many would the project eliminate?? bh—li et W111 the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private)._ f� 4 c «/G,,7 1)0s(,.dlY Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) eater rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. 1.0 Evaluation For Agency Use 0n1y SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Dace: Proponent: Evaluation For Agency Use Only f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak would occur. 8• Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: e 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example, fire protection, police protection, health car/re, schools. ocher)? If so, generally describe. �% 4LJ✓K e14 r! �.c lot la �2�'lririL�"4 v b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, is any: -e."7- u- g.9 C 16. f,:ILITIES _ ---- -. a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:, electricity, natural gas, ervi'ee„celeDhon�--sauifary scwei, septic system,` other.__ -.- - tea"; refuse� b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. D `-f d `L. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determination of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. 1 `(9 RA0y6 ,C11. 01c) Proponent (P1s.s nt or Typpe))' x(� /7/'� Addrsas: r ! (3(:J :J �� I2c)kao 1 \f•-/V! 2%C !y� (Signature) Phone: Person comp1 ing form: Phone: 1 LIB ( V v5 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff members) reviewing checklist: Based,on this staff review of the environmental checklist and ocher pertinent information, the staff: Date: 1 S 14 I A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nomsigaificance. B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated deter- mination of oonsignificance with conditions. C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance. FILING pm - $75.00 10 iir‘A John Pederson Spokane County Planning Department 1026 West Broadway Spokane WA 99260 RE: Allison Zone Reclassification Dear Mr. Pederson: Central Valley School District 356 An Equal Opportunity Employer East 19307 Cataldo Greenacres, WA 99016 (509) 922-6700 This is in response to your request for comments regarding the proposed Allison zone reclassification. The development will be located in the Spokane Valley and will produce five new duplexes. The Board of Directors of Central Valley School District has adopted a resolution which directs the administration to take necessary action to mitigate impacts upon the School District created by housing developments. The authority for this action is SEPA, RCW 82.02.020 and RCW 58.17.110. Under these statutes, the County, prior to approving a subdivision, must determine whether adequate provisions exist for public school service. The Central Valley School District has determined that added dwellings envisioned by this project will adversely impact the District's ability to provide adequate student housing. We ask that Spokane County not approve the proposed zone reclassification unless the developer and Central Valley School District agree to voluntary means of mitigating its adverse impact on the Central Valley School District. The School District seeks a fee or other measure which would mitigate the impact by partially funding cost of space to adequately house students residing in the proposed new housing. This determination is based on the following: 1. The District's elementary schools are overcrowded. We are currently using portable facilities. We have need for additional classroom space. 2. Enrollment projections indicate that the capacity of our schools to house students will continue to be exceeded. Enrollment projections are based on a cohort survival model which predicts future enrollment based on the past three years' enrollment growth by grade level. 3. A number of housing developments have been submitted for preliminary plat approval within the Central Valley School District during the past three years. Many of these approved developments have not been completed. Students from these developments will contribute to the overcrowding of our schools. RCCEIVED MAR 11994 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT To: OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Spokane County Administrator) From: Spokane County Subject: Conditions of re: Zoning February 23, 1994 Planning Department (Current Planning Engineer's Department - Approval Zone Change No:Unassigned Applicants Name Allison Section 23, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design Review Meeting scheduled February_23, 1994. Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. E44 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased. E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles E4S The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. page 2 E50 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Third Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 30 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development and extending to Evergreen Road. Curbing is required along the frontage of the development. E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and ether applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. E54 Access to the South Valley Arterial shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution SO-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer, All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. E5S All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer, E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies the South Valley Arterial as a controled Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width of bit ft. is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 50 ft. in width along the South Valley Arterial frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to South Valley Arterial. ESO There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County page 3 assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant should check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. be57G�0 vQ.) �-- li304_ Ms✓r wne crlavjz 02 - 3.. 5 fo - nr:sor)' IoVV 7u-Ckv h(i a1,4 ' Le aitm 5f r251 CPS HDi5yl v c s_e.ct.cx / co, u h 1 s Goo 00 - si CC Sy (� S c `( ivrp d h/e -)/c nh lc dG'pce x- if Nr, T 6e 1be todeava ded Er SvPk-- trc,( 5 JG r rv& d) n C -Ctt7i;r1P71-47 a C J tG'/I paL,''-Pity 3°` a.lt�v 01/4).1al -i-ierla-ed &,,,nyytei , cL-y,t,ti,/v1. eco r'\ Svf 30< ---�� MP i S pipbS-(sa I ct,t4J2M ac,KI t -/ aipl ti -tom PUC (& eot Se Pl .n 19eye ,s APPLICA'I'ION ACCEPTANCE ANI) DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: Department: 11 Department Contact Person: )44t /69 Action: 452-f o10/I O/oL / 0/o3 Olo APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: from to at the Plnnninp Denali mea Note• The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner Committee. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after We proposal is accepted and placed on the Public I -Tearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on thte Public Hearing Agenda is We primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of We application fonn and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the infommtion (not all agencies/departments have been contacted --only those who have been determined to have primary interest. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? YES ❑ NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. To schedule the next public hearing, a complete application must be received no later than or before the agenda is full. The next public hearing is 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) TO: Spokane County Planning - Design Review FROM: Spokane Cot 9 Utilities - Jim Red DATE: 2- A 3 ` ? SUET: 45232. OIol, oro2, oio3, CIO'' Recommendations are as circled: Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution. No. 80-0418, the use of on - site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned in compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVWED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a. ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. .Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4.) There are no recommendations concerning the method of sewage disposal as the project is outside of the 201 sewer study area. 5.) Water service as approved by the Spokane County Health District and/or Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. (To Tl,,.2 *.'.) 7.) A dry sewer connection to the future area -wide Sewerage System is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. 8.) Located within the Critical Water Supply Service Area but not within any purveyor's district. May be serviced by an individual well owned and operated by the lot owner. 9.) Any sewerage service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 10) Sewerage facilities are not affected by this proposal therefore no recommendation. 11) Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. Plans and Specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. 12) This project lies within the Sewer Service Area. Applicant us required to notify them of this proposal. 13) Applicant is required to sign a Developer Connection Agreement. 14) Individual service should be provided to each lot, but if a single stub is to be shared, a maintenance agreement must be approved by the County. C:\wpdoc ltoraslplan APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: February 23, 1994 Department: SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT At Department Contact Person: Steven P. Holderby, R.S. Action: Zone Reclassification - UR-3.5 to UR-7 (Allison) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: 2/23/94 from t • t sto 7 • on at the Planning Department Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner Committee. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies/departments have been contacted --only those who have been determined to have primary interest. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements of your agency to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? ® YES ❑ NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. To schedule the next public hearing, a complete application must be received no later than or before the agenda is full. The next public hearing is 2. After a preliminary review of the application what comments do you have, or what recommended "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? See attached SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS a. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. b. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. c. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. d. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. e. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. R NAME 1..!SER= :NI -------------------- RARCEL NAXE/ADDRES9 vR= 94 RIL= RE RARCE'L= ' A PENNSLVNIA_...— AVE NV DC 20202—, 1_TSA EDT:77? V 77.V eK/F(T.E? DEED E.7REE7 ! :T..7.562C ACIUEL:NE ...,:T DS.:M=VY—..• ::::DDREE. ET.LVER SRRIMES MD .2()904 ED:7? N %I.:VNERS'H:7 ADDREES ...INKNIVN _ ArD7:7:2: 7Y ::::DRESE T 9RIKANE 7AX D7.E7RIC7:: 7D40:::', 9 —A7.70.:IR .f',: 7:EL7 3COTst 1Dr CO74 R SCRFEN NAME '_.5SERID :NI • • ----------- 7:JAR:IL NAME/AD:REC.7 YR— 94 RILL= RE PARIEL AVE NTIA' ! DO 20202.— '28A EDFT? ---------------- 0I—EXXR E7E9.7 ECT.LVr-7R 2R3:N22 'MD . . . ........ , .2:S77=f! 2ILLE —.- • --- DEE: : DEED •::_...7‹."EV EDIT? N .7!=NT7T7:7' ' SUECIV:7:71. =El •-• ..... - • •• •-•• • - •-•-.- - • . • • _ - • • _ - . "": •:::: . - - _ _ ... . - 41111111111111111M111111Niiimft, • .., - - . - - I:::K/R2? • DEED. ADDPESS SPO':(ANE 7AX IETRC7 7D1z.i-CO•F7A7/O: • PIHLE 7: .v.7F-3.;':-..77 AC77.. 7:ELD 00784 CP R :SCREEN:: NAME USERID INQ -------------------- PARCEL NAME/DDRESS • • - :RI9.7IOTInN= YR= 94 ROLL= RE PARCEL= SAXPLE : *J.L00“, A PENNSYLVANIA__ AV= NN 127_ i OLD PID =RES'S i WASHINGTON__ DC 20202_, USA 7717? AL.KEY I SPOKANE ! 14019 3RD SPOKANE -99216 2K/PS? DEED :73:</P7 DEED. AL7'.‹E AVE E 7..ca(x=7. EDIT? Y AVE , ACTIV:7Y TAX DISTRICT,,,. 7D1400 SPECIAL ! SILLING CODE ADDPESS EDIT? FIELD 7320K-.i.j.: RELATION2,___ •,rs, :f - . 00784 OP jYR JYR. TD. ACTION RSCFN NAMX USERIZ CVNER NAME CROSS-REFERENCE --------------------------- URISDICTION= 11 YEAR= 94 ONNER NAME NUM ROLL FAR, -EL -:D / ADDRESS ============================== === = 01- FFTERnN, DAVID L 001 RF 37343.90:.1 14:30: DEFP 301 RE 75a,1:340222 23:.27 VALLEY 001 RE 37509413,0 0024:4 XARSH: 001 RE 4Z232.011 1:73,20 001. RE 4=752C:!.02 111111111111111111111011MIN ,---- 111.11111111.11111111111111111111111.11** iimaimmmamonV r SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire Protection District No, 1 EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE, WA 99206 • (509) 928-1700 • FAX (509) 927-2227 Rod Tedrow Chief February 17, 1994 FEB 1 81994 Spokane County Planning 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 Attn: Stacy Bjordahl Re: Allison Zone Reclassification The Spokane Valley Fire Department has no objection to this zone reclassification. Sincerely, Kevin Miller Inspector KM/bd —+r /v 7z-/ /d2 218 1,5 fl zys i.. 00g4rhi,iBan:gnu.,�i urrpr: C GQ- 04 30 - 82C Asa N &7'1 NN'R 81• 57 c �4 Qt + $ /714- i- or a zl'a �,,� I <a I�. v1F /32 8 z o®3 2: /so * v 5 00 /3aoi '9 Iso --0'•ce 7,o _sPo. cc.%vM"1r 240. ., UR-7 20-90C 4. cc 39A 1 3a aka` a or Land Non-o�creitinq 661- 6 42,,5 9.VA. 9'2.5 9•z,S l HEI L_ re 6A I I •� . A� /O/.i N /O r /0/ `r" 511 5 �! /O, c D/1/0/0 `-r /0/. t -. .� rr /a/S n 74®4 /ZF.F9 1 / �N.v�$ /50 1 .,, l0 6- ii , O 0 /5'1 i mais' • & A /3 o 3 /4 • /y1 /5 ao'� /6 - 0 /7 = 0® /8 ; / 4 = �( .i._,-. 0• zo o®3 /so • / /r iv /sao/ f p 'S98 f 7 8 •A, 00e. S474 4 S Ei yy neJ t I 1 0 •o /32.8 I 9? I I I PP /02.34 S. CCUIvry- C ae. 1.1 .. c..E_ /, �)ci biso�� (e) 6 rH Ave. �/o N No 1' 72.98 00 o-©z 9.9 s 33 `®q fk 93 a N®5 73. °z'' v O 93 Zt 0 Z o /p s. \ 7.l.az a 90Io 9 93 n CO 8 ,i ®�© NinI 7" 9, 5'3 a NJ 6 72.9OJ 0� z 7 rHAve. Rzo 5D w7� 6 c 5%. :8637:775.5::2)3.1: a9A oI•® / J, .� 84.6/ OG 66: Qo o7. 676.50 CC so5.4 qi) Noflorw '.4 Co/7, ID _J 41 ON i {2 " re 91 I 84.14 70. _ 86•5o ' 6.50 d6s036.50 d6.5o 6 RA ®V ��® 3 2 ,,; 9 R`� ,Q /2, I�66Sz a6. so 66.so (56.50 eG'.sn 8650 6c5462) ,FL"L' 7 ' ---41, iQ c' 6. so e&. S' cp6 So l d6. so 4�� 3. I j .8. 7.5 6 4 2 S Po. Co/Wry ti (L /o ! 69 `i V /b . 1 ��4.2 1 FOURTH r'>?;eV G (/E 273.94'. 'Q( c' f Z ETE 2 / V o 93 79.e7T S N ©o 3 ©� /0067 95.1.0 75.54 / 70 4, /330.2' 27S•/4 ( SGNOOL J L0T 4 - /Y• //n. o riOKA /4t.1 tq r` / 90.69 99.4o ° �x / 7s6 No �•2 (N t 4,.9_J►aa- �' I �3 1 1 ` 1 ,7 ?; , >~ (i6 /•3 7. /43 6 !� �z O N g �` 438 80.3s 1 43 a8 © 0 1 r----- \$ m j, A I 1 ai l I F a9 aS 44.3.s 1 1 a•} 3.s 0• m NI 23 - 2<5' -.4yt N. PI ( N F. 0 AP Jf C . .., lf If if o o M t / 3e� 4 5 1 N "� 1 Dr�`1S he 7. J sl r . IH ,�s I �►� I) I00 s 0 • 1'44 V4fr: biz n.cs1 /7,47/ l say^ro W' �rn,r,f� r/ ie N. . #t ay.?. s V) 0 /z9 of f /2.L g4. M - DEED Tr niCQ 2(0 190 rr0 ,. /less 2 /50.34. /49 n /46.89 n 4'2 4.E •I .'69 V)I /4c 0 #'d� g v g © /48.7 PI 24'6 iJ 7 . 3 RD . 0.7'Se:I A , ,.(3) so 1.3 ITN 181.93 0. 110 • wee No. 4,54- ''`• ! .1.:. ADAMS oo R oG,P. Fss I L 1,./ 7- Li X? se u)* 5-. 2 6 2 7 i 2.674.4./ N BOLIVAR LANE I....q..i... P - 1 e •,1 1\51 • ' W BE Sr;0•••RO D.- % .... vAc.. tly 2469 Artr, Al 10 - ;;E. saz 780 5. /:20 G R RD% .;HE• RRY zd-r 0,58 _74!), At c.c.s S u NC No.2100 9 BU NS 5°1_. 1.; (/*1 •,,12344 c 0,40a Pit E Is in A 5- C.N 0 ceNrruoar. Pq <' (`.1•Vr LJ L- L-. / . RI e.-1/ ..-. 7 - ,,,, a• ...... A) • Es 51 5 - AR4 MA CO S 420 BURNSiRD pr.,40G[7.ESS 944 id-F--* C.: e „Iv T R.4 L VA LL E golf 5cio0 £- EYER.GReEN -rraersvit--c0 So REE 5 5 R10. Pin ar \\\\\\\\\S\ . ROA6 ., ..... la 6.-7 1- - ---: --., ,SES-1" 23C,, Ft 0 el? -E.S'S 0 .frirrtftr ! _L. . a DA. /-:!! r in 3 +.5c.; 3? ,c cor 3174-56,i kr.:4 6'10' Wk. 0.1ZiOti-40/ Roc/ AR (9. c1.3 t 0 • 0 0 r'l • n• i11 -t) P.ANMEN n N. 1493-40 1. 41. 0.) 440443E6+00 ,,xkozolGAZ EF rn r‘) H *KW 3-17176 End of Pr oject 353+oe Beginning of Project 34400 L11‘ A107.4111 (P • 7- ! 5 044,4 49 vr,464 r..1 15 5.04 • 4/ . 7" '001g- 4gft244,- 04 ft/ v., avdp., / 5 ..5/0 5rItor 5515. / . sqx,a, 1.1",ft C.- / /5 0 • S.0 LL I VA N R OA tY 14 ea. I 2- 01 i11cte.i771:tneernefr,