Loading...
ZE-82-84File No. ZE-82-84 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on September 6, 1984, and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman, Kathleen M. Carstens and F. Lynn Tennican. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Brian T. Butler, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE-82-84, Residential Office to Restricted Industrial, for the purpose of developing General Industrial Uses (No Site Plan). C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, grain storage, railroad tracks, and vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Industrial development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Residential Office. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Declaration of Non -Significance. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area, especially along the west side of Park Road, is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification, but is not necessarily compatible with the adjoining residences east of Park Road. 7. That the applicant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of Residential Office in 1973 of this area and can only be justified with site specific mitigating measures. 8. That the proposed use can be made compatible with existing uses in the area, if adequate buffering techniques are imposed. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-82-84 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed strong disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use may be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, if appropriately conditioned. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That this parcel serves as an unique transitional buffer between existing industrial uses west of Park Road and residential areas to the east of Park Road. The residential area is well established and predates most industrial development in the area; including the several rezone attempts on this site. Testimony from the applicant's representative indicated that extensive buffering techniques and mitigating measures could be very expensive in terms of material and loss of developable land. However, the Comprehensive Plan, past land use actions, and public testimony indicated the need to protect the residential area from encroaching industrial development. Approval of the zone change from Residential Office to Restricted Industrial can only be justifiable if all mitigating measures, as recommended by Staff, are imposed on the property. D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL (All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant', which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.) a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 2 u1 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-82-84 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 4. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All current standards of the Restricted Industrial Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 6. That the project is subject to Section 4.16A.050, the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff. 7. That the present proposal is not detailed enough to determine whether or not the use of or materials stored on the site are in compliance with Chapter 4.16A (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. Accordingly, as a condition of approval, the sponsor/applicant shall be required to file with the Spokane County Auditor, within thirty (30) days of the signing of Findings and Order of the final decision in this matter, a "Notice to the Public" which shall provide in material as follows: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 4.16A (AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA OVERLAY ZONE). THE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS NOTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS• " 8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 9. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. 3 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-82-84 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners' Resolution #82-0458 dated May 4, 1982. 11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197-10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non -significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and/or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's likely significant adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no probable significant adverse impacts upon the physical environ ment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declaration of non -significance is hereby to be issued. 12. That all areas within the front yard setback off Park Road be planted and maintained in dense landscaping, except access point, as approved by the Zoning Administrator. 13. That no parking, storage, or loading dock be allowed on the Park Road (eastern) portion of the site. Also, that all traffic and activity be oriented to the western portions of the site. 14. That only one access point be allowed from the site to Park Road, to be as approved by the Zoning Administrator and the County Engineer. b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 2. Other specific improvements: Applicant shall construct Portland Cement concrete sidewalk along Park Road per Spokane County standards. 4 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-82-84 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. 4. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 5. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 6. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 7. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended. 5 V ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-82-84 c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1 The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Each unit shall be double -plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems. 4. This action be conditioned with the performance criteria of Section 4.16A.050* for all future uses. * Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on -site sewage system may be authorized. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 6 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-82-84 d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (continued) 5 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. 6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 7. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # 1. 2. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be installed prior to construction. These hydrants shall be placed so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175 feet from the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest outlet of the hydrant shall be no less than 18 inches above grade. A water plan showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per minute for each fire hydrant) and meeting the requirements in Chapter 10.04 of the Uniform Fire Code is required prior to construction of the water service. 3. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 4. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves. f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Water Purveyor is Spokane Suburban Water Company, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. 7 g) ORDER ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-82-84 COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from all other construction related activities. 2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the construction phase of a project and from motor vehicles using the site following completion of the project and from occupants of the proposed project. 5. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IV requires registration with this Agency. 6. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article V requires that a Notice of Construction and Application for Approval be submitted to and approved by our Agency prior to the construction, installation or establishment of an air pollution source. 7. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article VI and SCAPCA Regulation II, Article IV addresses emission standards. All emission standards must be met. 8. All air pollution regulations must be met. The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Brian T. Butler for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be APPROVED. Motion by: Tennican Seconded by: Carstens Vote: Tennican - Aye Carstens - Aye Kennedy - Aye Unanimous to APPROVE to the RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL ZONE - ( 3 - 0 ) E. ORDER (continued) ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director 2 y Zoning Administrator Date: 9 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-82-84 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE