Loading...
2021-06-24 Agenda Packet000'� Spokane ,,,;0o$;Valley Spokane Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda City Hall Council Chambers, 10210 E. Sprague Ave. June 24, 2021 6:00 p.m. 1. PLEASE NOTE: Meetings are being held electronically in response to Governor Inslee's March 24, 2020 Proclamation concerning our recent State of Emergency, which waives and suspends the requirement to hold in -person meetings and provides options for the public to attend remotely. 2. Public wishing to make comments will need to email plannina_spokanevalleo rg prior to 4: 00 pm the day of the meeting in order to be to speak during the comments period during the meeting. Comments can also be emailed. Send an email to planninaawspokanevalley.ora and comments will be read into the record or distributed to the Commission members through email. 3. LINK TO ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION: https://spokaneval ley.zoom.us/i/93950793161 One tap mobile US: +13462487799„93950793161# or+16699006833„93950793161# Dial by your location US: +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) Meeting ID: 939 5079 3161 4. CALL TO ORDER 5. ROLL CALL 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 10, 2021 8. COMMISSION REPORTS 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 10. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. 11. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Findings Of Fact: CTA-2021-0001 — Batch Code Text Amendment b. Study Session: 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 12. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER 13. ADJOURNMENT Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall June 10, 2021 I. Planning Commission Chair Bob McKinley called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. The meeting was held remotely via ZOOM meeting. II. Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard took roll and the following members and staff were present: Fred Beaulac Cary Driskell, City Attorney Karl Granrath Jenny Nickerson, Building Official Walt Haneke Martin Palaniuk, Planner Bob McKinley Taylor Dillard, Administrative Assistant Nancy Miller Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant Paul Rieckers Sherri Robinson III. AGENDA: Commissioner Robinson moved to approve the June 10, 2021 meeting agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IV. MINUTES: Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve the May 27, 2021 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Haneke requested that a discussion be held at a future meeting regarding the possibility of allowing shipping containers in certain circumstances. There was a consensus from the Planning Commission to have the discussion on a future meeting agenda. Commissioner Miller commented that condominium legislation has been signed by the Governor and there is a developer interested in doing a development in Spokane Valley. VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Administrative Assistant Taylor Dillard explained the best way of joining the webinar zoom meeting. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Public Hearing: CTA-2021-0001— Batch Code Text Amendment The public hearing was opened at 6:19 p.m. 06-10-2021 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 City Planner Martin Palaniuk gave a presentation on the proposed City -initiated text amendment to Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). He stated that the amendment is to clarify that cargo containers are not allowed in residential zones as an accessory structure and referenced the R-4 zone in applicable sections of the zoning code that were intended to address all residential zones. Mr. Palaniuk explained that SVMC 19.40.030(D)(6) has details regarding cargo containers under the Development Standards — Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) section of the code. He stated that staff feels that the current code location causes ambiguity as to whether the provision applies to cargo shipping containers throughout all residential zones or only shipping containers used as an ADU. The proposed amendment will move the provision to SVMC 19.65.130 — Supplemental Use Regulations, Residential. This section of the code provides supplemental regulations that apply to accessory structures in all residential zones and will clarify that shipping containers are not permitted as an accessory structure in residential zones. Mr. Palaniuk also explained that in 2020, the City Council adopted a comprehensive plan amendment that created the R-4 zoning district. The amendment also included changes to Title 19, Zoning Regulations, which added development standards for the new zoning district. He stated that since the adoption of the amendment, staff has found that several sections relevant to all residential zones were overlooked including sections related to battery charging stations, transitional regulations, adult uses, and marijuana uses. The proposed amendment will fix these items throughout the residential zones. He stated that there are no regulatory requirements being added to the zones and the proposed change is to keep the code consistent. There was no public comment. The public hearing was closed at 6:28 p.m. Commissioner Miller moved to recommend City Council approve CTA-2021-0001 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. IX. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Beaulac commented that he would like the Planning Commission meetings to be held in the Council Chambers. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Haneke moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:39 p.m. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Bob McKinley, Chair Date signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: June 24, 2021 Item: Check all that apply ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ study session ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Findings & Recommendation, Batch Code Text Amendment File no. CTA- 2021-0001 GOVERNING LEGISLATIO: RCW 36.70A.106, SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: Study Session conducted on May 27, 2021 and Public Hearing on June 10, 2021. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: CTA-2021-0001 is a batch code text amendment to relocate the regulations governing cargo containers from the Alternative Residential Options section of the code to the Supplemental Use Regulations section and add a reference to the R-4 zone in applicable sections of the zoning code that were intended to address all residential zones. BACKGROUND: On May 27, 2021 the Planning Commission (Commission) conducted a study session. On June 10, 2021 the Commission conducted a public hearing. Following public comment, the public testimony portion of the hearing was closed. The Commission deliberated and voted 7-0 to recommend to the City Council that CTA-202 1 -0001 be approved as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve the Commission's Findings and Recommendation for CTA-2021-0001 or provide staff with further direction. An example motion for approval of the proposed amendment is: Move to approve the Findings and Recommendations for CTA-202 1 -000 1. STAFF CONTACT: Martin Palaniuk, Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings & Recommendation 2. Proposed Amendment Language RPCA Public Hearing for Code Text Amendment CTA-2021-0001 Page I of 1 19.65.150 Transportation. Battery Charging Station. Battery charging stations are allowed only as accessory to a permitted use in the R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and P/OS zones. 19.70.020 Residential standards. Residential development shall meet the standards shown in Table 19.70-1. Standards for alternative residential development are set forth in Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options, and standards for planned residential developments are set forth in Chapter 19.50 SVMC, Planned Residential Developments. Table 19.70-1 — Residential Standards R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 MFRO) Front and Flanking 35' 15' 15' 15' 15' Street Yard Setback Garage Setback(z) 35' 20' 20' 20' 20' Rear Yard Setback 20' 20' 10, 10, 10, Minimum Side Yard Setback 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' Open Space N/A N/A N/A N/A 10% gross area Lot Size 40,000 sq. 10,000 sq. 5,000 sq. 4,300 sq. N/A(4) ft. ft. ft. (6) ft. Lot Coverage 30.0% 50.0% 50.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Density 1 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 10 du/ac 22 du/ac Building Heights) 35' 35' 35' 35' 50' (1) Where MFR abuts R-1, R-2, er-R-3 - zones, development shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.75 SVMC, Transitional Regulations. (2) Attached garages, where the garage door does not face the street, may have the same setback as the primary structure. (3) Open space requirement does not apply to single-family development in the MFR zone. Single-family residential development in the MFR zone shall have a minimum lot size (4) of 2,000 square feet per dwelling unit. Only one single-family dwelling shall be allowed per lot. (5) The vertical distance from the average finished grade to the average height of the highest roof surface. (6) Duplex development in the R-3 zone shall have a minimum lot size of 14,500 square feet. 19.70.030 Mixed -use and nonresidential standards. A. Development in the RC, CMU, MU, IMU, and I zones shall meet the requirements set forth in SVMC Title 24 and Chapter 19.75 SVMC, Transitional Regulations. B. Nonresidential development in the NC zone adjacent to residential uses shall comply with the following dimensional standards: 1. Maximum building height of 35 feet; 2. Minimum front yard setback of 15 feet; 3. Minimum side yard setback of 10 feet; and 4. Minimum rear yard setback of 10 feet. 19.70.040 Setback designation and measurement. A. Except as provided in SVMC 19.70.040(B), each lot shall contain only one front setback and only one rear setback. Any other setback shall be considered a side setback. B. Where lots have double frontage, running through from one street to another, the required front yard shall be provided on both streets. C. The city manager or designee is authorized to designate front, rear, and side setbacks. In situations where the city manager or designee cannot establish a front and rear setback due to the orientation of the lot, the city manager or designee shall establish these setbacks based upon orientation of the lot as compared to surrounding lots and to any existing development pattern. All other setbacks shall be defined in relation to the established front and rear setback. D. The setback shall be measured from the property line unless there is a border easement, in which case, the setback shall be measured from the border easement. E. Setbacks, when adjacent to a private street or driveway easement, shall be measured from the inner edges of the street or driveway and are established pursuant to Table 19.70-1 except the flanking street which is five feet. 19.70.050 Additional standards. A. Structure intrusions into setbacks are prohibited except: 1. The ordinary projections of window sills, belt courses, cornices, and other architectural features projecting not more than 12 inches and roof eaves projecting not more than 24 inches. 2. Minor features of a structure, such as chimneys, fire escapes, bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation of the structure, uncovered stairways, wheelchair ramps, and uncovered decks or balconies, may extend into a required setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback. However, these features may not be within three feet of a lot line when a setback is required. 3. Attached mechanical equipment such as heat pumps, air conditioners, emergency generators, and water pumps are allowed to project not more than 24 inches into the side or rear setback only. 4. Fences that meet the requirements set forth in SVMC 22.70.020. 5. Walkways and driveways, including parking in the driveway, are allowed in the front yard setback of R-1, R-2, aPA-R-3. ! zones only. 6. Canopies, marquees, awnings, and similar features in mixed -use or nonresidential zones may fully extend into a front yard setback subject to the requirements of SVMC Title 24. B. Supporting member of any garage, carport, portable carport, or other automobile storage structure shall not be located within the required front yard. C. Accessory structures shall not be erected within five feet of any rear or side property line, or be located within the front yard or any public or private easement. D. Where applicable, structures shall not be erected to a height in excess of that permitted by SVMC 19.110.030, Airport hazard overlay. E. In R-1, R-2, a4;4-R-3 iicf zones, cooling towers, roof gables, chimneys, and vent stacks may extend for an additional height, not to exceed 40 feet, above the average finished grade of the building. Water stand pipes and tanks, church steeples, domes and spires, and school buildings and institutional buildings may be erected to exceed maximum height requirements; provided, that one additional foot shall be added to the width and depth of front, side, and rear yards for each foot that such structures exceed the required height. F. Open space required pursuant to Table 19.70-1 shall be accessible to all residential units and shall be suitable for active and passive recreational purposes, subject to the following: 1. The required open space area shall not include required yards, parking areas, required landscaped areas, stormwater facilities, or required spacing between structures; 2. The amount of open space may be reduced by up to 25 percent where at least two of the following amenities are provided: a. Play or sports courts; b. Playgrounds with equipment; c. Trails or pedestrian walkways not required for access to residential units or parking areas; d. Swimming pools; e. Gazebos; or f. Clubhouses; 3. The required open space shall not be reduced by more than 50 percent. G. Residential development in nonresidential zones shall comply with the density and dimensional standards of the MFR zone in Table 19.70-1, except single-family development in the NC zone, which shall comply with the density and dimensional standards of the adjacent single-family residential zone. Where the NC zone abuts multiple single-family residential zones, the zone with the higher density shall apply. Where there are no single-family residential adjacencies to the NC zone, the density and dimensional standards of the R-2 zone shall apply. H. New development exceeding three stories in height shall be served by paved service lanes that are at least 16 feet in width. I. The following design standards apply to all outdoor lighting in residential zones: 1. All new development shall provide lighting within parking lots, along pedestrian walkways, and accessible routes of travel. 2. Lighting fixtures shall be limited to heights of no more than 24 feet for parking lots and no more than 16 feet for pedestrian walkways. 3. All lighting shall be shielded from producing off -site glare, either through exterior shields or through optical design inside the fixture, and shall not emit light above 90 degrees. 4. Street lighting installed by the City or other public utilities is exempt from SVMC 19.70.050(I). J. Principal or accessory structures shall not be located within the clearview triangle pursuant to Chapter 22.70 SVMC. 19.75.020 Applicability. A. General. 1. The ground level setback requirements shall apply to any portion of a property located in the: a. MFR, RC, CMU, or MU zone that abuts a property located in the R-1, R-2, e-r-R-3 Dr R or b. I or IMU zone that abuts any property not zoned I or IMU. 2. The upper level setback requirements shall apply to any portion of a property located in the MFR, RC, CMU, MU, I, or IMU zones. 3. Nonresidential development in the NC zone adjacent to residential zones shall comply with the provisions of SVMC 19.70.030(B). B. Exemptions. Wireless communications facilities are not subject to Chapter 19.75 SVMC. C. The application of transitional regulations may be modified by the city manager or designee consistent with Chapter 19.75 SVMC. 19.75.030 Transitional regulations. A. General. The transition shall be provided in the form of a ground level setback of 10 feet, or the applicable setback pursuant to Chapter 19.70 SVMC, Density and Dimensions, whichever is greater, and an upper level setback as provided in SVMC 19.75.030(A)(2) and illustrated in Figure 19.75-1. 1. All transitional ground level setback areas shall be landscaped pursuant to the provisions of SVMC 22.70.070. 2. Upper Level Setback Calculation. a. Starting at a height of 15 feet at the boundary of an R-1, R-2, er-R-3 .)�r R-rt zone, the building height may be increased at a ratio of one foot of height for every one foot of horizontal distance from the nearest R-1, R-2, or R-3 zone boundary. Figure 19.75-1 provides a graphic illustration of this requirement. b. Where the protected zone boundary is the centerline of a right-of-way, the horizontal distance calculation in SVMC 19.75.030(A)(2)(a) shall be measured from the property line of the zone providing protection. Figure 19.75-1 provides a graphic illustration of this requirement. Figure 19.75-1 72 1 cl m �I 0 45' o tv J I oca a� e a l 25' 15, Protected Zones f—� 10' min. Zones Providing Protection setback B. The following regulations shall apply to the ground level transitional setback areas: 1. Outdoor sales, outdoor seating, or outdoor displays or signage are prohibited within 30 feet of any R-1, R-2, or-R-3. - zone. 2. Parking, drive aisles, and/or queuing areas in the RC, CMU, MU, IMU, and I zones are prohibited within 20 feet of any R-1, R-2, or-R-3. r zone. All parking and drive aisles shall be landscaped and screened pursuant to SVMC 22.70.050 and 22.70.070. 3. Loading areas in the RC, CMU, MU, IMU, and I zones are prohibited within 30 feet of any R-1, R-2, or--R-3. -= zone. 4. Any mechanical equipment, building vents, and exhausts within the transitional setback areas shall be visually screened pursuant to SVMC 22.70.070. All building vents and mechanical equipment exhausts shall be directed away from adjacent R-1, R-2, of-R-3, o - zone. 5. All outdoor lighting in the transitional setback areas shall be shielded and not produce off -site glare pursuant to SVMC 22.60.030 and shall be limited to 16 feet in height above grade. 19.75.040 Ground level transitional use limitations. A. In the MFR zone ground level transitional setback areas, only the following uses are permitted: 1. Open space and landscaping. 2. Outdoor recreation areas accessory to residential uses. 3. Parking and parking structures. 4. Club houses. B. In the ground level transitional setback areas of RC, CMU and MU zones, only the following uses are permitted: 1. Open space and landscaping. 2. Pedestrian pathways. 3. Outdoor recreation areas accessory to permitted uses on site. C. In the ground level transitional setback areas of the I and IMU zones, the following uses are prohibited within 20 feet of a NC, RC, CMU, or MU zone: 1. Agriculture and animal uses located outside of an enclosed building; 2. Heavy industrial uses conducted outside of an enclosed building; 3. Warehouse, wholesale and freight movement uses outside of an enclosed building; and 4. Transportation uses located outside of an enclosed building. D. In the ground level transitional setback areas of the I and IMU zones, the following uses are prohibited within 30 feet of a R-1, R-2, R-3, or MFR zone: 1. Agriculture and animal uses; 2. Heavy industrial uses; 3. Warehouse, wholesale and freight movement uses outside of an enclosed building; 4. Transportation uses located outside of an enclosed building; and 5. Outdoor storage accessory to any of the above uses unless visually screened pursuant to SVMC 22.70.070. 19.80.030 Adult use development standards. A. There shall be five existing acres of contiguous (includes across streets) zoning classified Regional Commercial. B. The use shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line of the use listed in SVMC 19.80.030(B)(1) through (6). Distance shall be measured from the nearest property line of the adult retail use establishment or adult entertainment establishments) to the nearest property line of the following preexisting uses: 1. Public library; 2. Public playground or park; 3. Public or private school and its grounds of kindergarten to twelfth grade; 4. Nursery school, mini -day care center, or day care center; 5. Church, convent, monastery, synagogue, or other place of religious worship; 6. Another adult use subject to the provisions of SVMC 19.80.030. C. An adult retail use establishment or adult entertainment establishment(s) shall not be located within 1,000 feet of an urban growth area boundary or within 1,000 feet of any of the following zones: 1. R-1, Single -Family Residential Estate; 2. R-2, Single -Family Residential Suburban; 3. R-3, Single -Family Residential; 4. R-4, Single -Family Residential Urban: 45. MFR, Multifamily Residential; 56. MU, Mixed Use; 67. CMU, Corridor Mixed Use; or 7-8. NC, Neighborhood Commercial. (Ord. 16-018 § 6 (Att. B), 2016). 19.85.060 Marijuana production and processing in residential zones. Washington State law authorizes qualified patients and designated providers to produce marijuana and to process marijuana in dwellings, residences, domiciles, and similar housing units under limited circumstances and with limited processing methods. Subject to applicable federal, state, and local laws, any owner, lessor, or leasing agent may request or require disclosure of a renter's or lessee's desire to produce or process marijuana within a rented or leased dwelling unit. In addition to compliance with any applicable state or federal laws and regulations, lawful production or processing of marijuana by any person in a dwelling, residence, domicile, or other similar housing unit shall be subject to all locally applicable land use, development, zoning, and building regulation requirements including, but not limited to, all applicable requirements set forth in SVMC Titles 17 through 24 as the same are now adopted or hereafter amended, and the following regulations: A. Any home production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law shall not be permitted outside of the dwelling or accessory structure; B. Any home production or processing of marijuana by any person or allowed by state law in a dwelling or accessory structure shall be enclosed, blocked, or sight -screened from the public right-of-way and from adjacent properties so that no portion may be readily seen by normal unaided vision or readily smelled from such locations. Accessory structures shall be permanent structures enclosed by a roof and walls on all sides and connected to a permanent foundation. For purposes of SVMC 19.85.060, accessory structures shall not include cargo containers, recreational vehicles, or other similar types of structures. Accessory structures shall be completely opaque in addition to necessary sight -screening; C. Home processing of marijuana shall not involve any combustible method and shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and rules, including all standards adopted by the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board; and D. Production or processing of marijuana by any person pursuant to state law in a dwelling or accessory structure shall only be allowed in the R-1, R-2, a4+dR-3 zones. 19.40.030 Development standards —Accessory dwelling units. A. Site. 1. An ADU may be developed in conjunction with either an existing or new primary dwelling unit; 2. One ADU, attached or detached, is allowed per lot; and 3. One off-street parking space for the ADU is required in addition to the off-street parking required for the primary dwelling unit. B. Building. 1. The ADU shall be designed to meet the appearance of a single-family residence and shall be the same or visually match the primary dwelling unit in the type, size, and placement of the following: a. Exterior finish materials; b. Roof pitch; c. Trim; and d. Windows, in proportion (relationship of width to height) and orientation (horizontal or vertical); 2. The entrance to an attached ADU shall be located on the side or in the rear of the structure or in such a manner as to be unobtrusive in appearance when viewed from the front of the street. Only one entrance may be located on the facade of the primary dwelling unit in order to maintain the appearance of a single-family residence; 3. The ADU shall not exceed 50 percent of the habitable square footage of the primary dwelling unit, nor be less than 300 square feet; 4. The footprint of the ADU shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot area or 1,000 square feet, whichever is greater; and 5. The ADU unit shall not have more than two bedrooms. C. Additional Development Standards for ADUs. 1. ADUs shall be located behind the front building setback line and placed on a permanent foundation; 2. ADUs shall preserve all side yard and rear yard setbacks for a dwelling unit pursuant to Table 19.70-1; 3. ADUs shall not be allowed on lots containing a duplex, multifamily dwelling, or accessory apartment contained within the principal structure; and 4. Existing detached accessory structures may be converted into detached ADUs; provided, that all development standards and criteria are met, including side yard and rear yard setbacks. D. Other. 1. The owner, as established by the titleholder, shall occupy either the primary dwelling unit or the ADU as their permanent residence for six months or more of the calendar year and at no time receive rent for the owner -occupied unit. The application for the ADU shall include a letter from the owner affirming that one legal titleholder lives in either unit, meeting the requirement of owner occupancy. 2. Prior to issuance of occupancy, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Spokane County auditor to indicate the presence of an ADU, the requirement of owner occupancy, and other standards for maintaining the unit as described in the SVMC. 3. Home businesses are prohibited in the ADU. 4. Approval of an ADU may be revoked if the ADU is no longer in compliance with the development standards and criteria outlined in the SVMC. 5. The owner may cancel an ADU's registration by filing a letter with Spokane County auditor. The ADU may also be cancelled as a result of an enforcement action. c CaFge shipping eestaineFsand gimihr ed S�a.. ��. ,.a•...�. 19.65.130 Residential. A. Accessory Structures. The combined building footprint of all accessory permanent structures in residential zoning Formatted: Indent Left 0.5" districts shall be: _-1Up to 1,000 square feet for parcels up to 10,000 square feet in size; or Formatted• Indent First line: 0.5" _-2-.-Up to 10 percent of the lot size for parcels greater than 10,000 square feet in size. B. Dwelling, Accessory Units. Accessory dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. C. Dwelling, Caretaker's Residence. A caretaker's residence is limited to custodial, maintenance, management, or security of a commercial property and is only allowed accessory to another permitted use on site. D. Dwelling, Cottages. Cottages shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. E. Dwelling, Duplex. Duplex dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. F. Dwelling, Industrial Accessory Dwelling Units. Industrial accessory dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. G. Dwelling, Townhouse. Townhouse dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. H. Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots. Manufactured homes on individual lots shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. I. Manufactured Home Park. Manufactured home parks shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC, Alternative Residential Development Options. J. Recreational Vehicles. 1. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units in any residential zone, except as permitted pursuant to Chapter 19.40 SVMC; 2. A recreational vehicle shall not be parked within a required front yard setback for more than 15 consecutive days and not more than 30 days cumulative in any 12 consecutive months; and 3. Guests may park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12-month period. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-20214001 Proposed Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Pursuant to SVMC 17.80.150(E) the Planning Commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the City Council following the public hearing. The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation. Background: 1. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, Spokane Valley adopted its 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update and updated development regulations on December 13, 2016, with December 28, 2016 as the effective date. 2. CTA-2021-0001 is a City -initiated text amendment to relocate the regulations governing cargo containers from the Alternative Residential Options section of the code to the Supplemental Use Regulations section and add a reference to the R-4 zone in applicable sections of the zoning code that were intended to address all residential zones. 3. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and conducted deliberations on June 10, 2021. The Commissioners voted 7-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt the amendment. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150(F) Approval Criteria a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Findings: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the following goals and policies: Goal LU-G4: Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. Policy LU-P5: Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial or industrial uses. Policy LU-P7: Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. Policy LU-P9: Provide supportive regulations for new and innovative development types on commercial, industrial, and mixed -use land. Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the goals and policies. b. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. Findings: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The amendment ensures that the transitional regulations are applied to all instances in which non-residential development occurs adjacent to residential development in the R-4 zone and ensures transportation, adult and marijuana use regulations will be properly applied in the R-4 zone. The amendment additionally clarifies that cargo shipping containers are not allowed in residential zones to protect the quality and character of residential neighborhoods. Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2021-0001 Page I of 2 Conclusion: The proposed text amendment is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. 2. Recommendation: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council approve CTA-2021- 0001 as proposed. Attachment: Exhibit 1 — Proposed Amendment CTA-202 1 -0001 Approved this 24th day of June, 2021 Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST Marianne Lemons, Office Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission CTA-2021-0001 Page 2 of2 City of Spokane Valley 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Index Index Tab No. File Number Map or Text Summary of Amendment RPCA and Presentation. CPA-2021-0001 Land Use A request to change the land use 1 Map designation for parcel 45163.0584 (approximately 0.68 acres) from Multiple Family Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. CPA-2021-0002 Land Use A request to change the land use Map designation for parcels 45174.9061 and 2 45174.9062 (approximately 5.56 acres) from Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) to Parks and Open Space (P/OS). CPA-2021-0003 Land Use A request to change the land use Map designation for parcels 55072.0324, 3 55072.0318, 55075.0218 and 55072.0319 (approximately 45.8 acres) from Industrial to I to Parks and Open Space (P/OS). CPA-2021-0004 Text Add policies and discussion regarding 4 homelessness to Chapter 2: Goals, Policies and Strategies and to Chapter 6: Housing. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: June 24, 2021 Item: Check all that apply ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® study session ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2021 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Study session GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: None BACKGROUND: The GMA allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on August 21 and 28, 2020, advising the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2021 cycle through October 30, 2020. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in amending the comprehensive plan. On November 24, 2020, the City Council approved the 2021 Docket. The Docket includes four proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: three map amendments and one text amendment. Two of the map amendments are City initiated and one map amendment is privately initiated. The text amendment is City initiated. On May 7, 2021, the City issued a Determinations of Non -significance (DNS) for the proposed comprehensive plan amendments pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Comments on the determination have been incorporated into the staff reports where appropriate and no appeal of the DNS was received. A public hearing on the proposed amendments is scheduled for July 8, 2021. The Notice of Public Hearing was published on June 11 and 18, 2021. The site -specific map amendments were posted on site and a notice was mailed to residents within a 400-foot radius of the subject property on June 11, 2021. Tonight staff will present the proposed comprehensive plan amendments for review and discussion. On July 8, 2021, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action recommended at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager; Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; Arielle Anderson, Housing and Homeless Coordinator ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Yellow Binder 12PCA Study Session for 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page I of 1 a i a� 0 U N O N a .0 ch ch �D /1BID v♦ r. O .Cl) E E O U `QA /u 13. V `O i CL lo .Yn Y o h � �• � v y N r u — O ..1 n o Es U ° V c o $ n ` E o _ m o Ltl Vi I-� 2 O + 7z 00 o J o m cc E n � Fw c c r oRl (n c E n o ��f( O U w w °•• O E.c Y• N E m o E 3 0— n'^a E � • vv „a cm E N o o W . E u 3 m @I > Egvp oon O c E E cnao. E o o-- N % E ° C O V ° o m ^� ` N « O J C N N> J> N C •a V Ecr—• E 5 ^ � v E E o o� I, eovu vo r ^ v J nD ate-' O O +—) U Q) o > _70 •� 4-J o -� b"0 j, -U �vo O c� � o can �- Q � � U • — O � Q� 70 • L � � N cn � � p • Q, c6 v C6 C6 � i uj O Q. cn •� U .Q N U� Q Q 0-U O N • U O O C6 Q. U U 1 1 9 Q I I U ■ L N r-I N 70 N \ 70 \ N ti N ONO Co N 17-1 \ rr O � n � Q � N N +� N Cn Cn 0 n� W \ •CN J U o o6 No o °° N U �i L'UO N � N M f� 75 0\0 N U � J N 70 o � � U Q N o N 0 0 M 0 l m ■ L cu 4- 0 LO 'ni i 0 a i CL a� co 0 0L Qr1 �� N N N N 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 -� rl 06 70 rl 70 rl N r-I N r-1 Cq C� � C9 M N O N d\' N 0 LO ■ ca L 4-J cu 5: O E E O C.) i cu ■ O cts N O N 4 N 0 O lqt TA C5■ 00 TA 0 L CU L ri1 L i 0 C6 O 70 Q 0 0 i > E m Q) U) N U E C O .> Q N O c C: O O O � w w a N O N Q0 QJ LnLri U O Q w c � u O x v O L bo Y U co .Q I_ V) ) Ua 4� vi V N •U � O O Q vi O m +' a°A 1 L a� CB > U � U � U Q cccB ca a' Q cn Y L d L O +�+72 L Q OL � v � N aJ z N N � m L _O LL Q c-I N m It 0 0 0 0 O O O O N N N N 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q U U U U N O N N 0 O O O 1 N O N cu ■ O E VJ E \V Off' O W wjv'� W LL O X U .� _ ca .a 70 _V Q O Q U 0 0 N N QD 0 _31 U 00 �-_� _0 QD C�6 E O � � � O 0 Q 0 U) U C6 N -0 .� 0 N � 0 0 co 0 0 D 0 0 .� 0 0 Q U Q _ Q. Q cn Q Q = 0- +- N >G 0 ::3 4-- n 0 N 0 cn wzv).ccnC- cn U� N O N 4 N 0 N O O O O N O N U cu c� E _ o > A o c� o U CD i '0 O Cif .Q 0-E O a� O C) 9 U) cu Q 0 cu V 0. all N O O O O N 0 N Q U LO L6 n O a_ 70 c6 Q w co U O z I 4— O tle) O 0 0 N O N Q1 I n� W E E Q CL cu L� \ Ra r— O \ E N p C6 >, 4^-, U W ^> J1 W�•�f Q C6 � c6 O , , c O �- Cf) c i -0a -� Q z3 Q E 71 I EkA U) ca Q O 4-0 cu 0 CL CL o M O O O O N O N 1 Q U U bu0 QD 4-- d' > 1 t � O N O O ) O o Q c� 70 4 c� 0 •i Q U Q � i X O Z3 O N C6 O w z c/) cn z o- ff] 11 El 0 O O O 1 O N O N m U U) a� N U .O 1�u0 +-J -N . W C6 �7- O E E Q O L o O U O O C6 N O O O 7 >1O m C.) El O L V cc m O CL O +, c� o O 'cn Co 0 N o O NN 4-- N� }, O (6 N U ' U � 'v O IDS 'O^ ^; C Q. ( N U) -0 0 E Q) O •� O O U 070 •� U > 70 70 _N m . ov Q) p + N V U mC6 Q) O 70 L'iA }' u) Q }' Q _ Q) (n O U� c a> w >1 -o M n %-.. c O U) 4. O Q) O 0 .0 Q) '�aA 70 Q) N O N N O N N V 1 T %C oac '�k �Ye 8 F tl�F 6; eF O C . U - C7 O Q. O 7CD Q) CCi � Lo -N E U U Co bu0 -0 O O �- U) .U) Q U) c U c U LV y- C6 r1 W\ n/ W O O � � O p O U — U N O U � � � � U 1_ Q 4-J LL O a O O U iff N O N d\' N •9 J V cu a C O 4-0 cc O O 0 O N O N U U) N O 4-' � � .� O > 70 U) cn .V Q � N N U p O 72 C: U O O U 7 � N U o Q E70 U 0 O Q Q . _ z -a _ U) cn ti N O N N O Spokane ,,;0o0;Va11ey' STAFF REPORT DATE: June 24, 2021 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2021-0001 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: July 8, 2021, beginning at 6:00 p.m., remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2021-0001 Application Description: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Multifamily Residential (MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Multifamily Residential (MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Location: Parcel 45163.0584; SW '/4 of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Applicant: Homtomi WA01 Partners LP Owners: Homtomi WA01 Partners LP Date of Application: October 5, 2020 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTAPU 1 NTS' Exhibit 1:v Proposed Amendment (Maps) Exhibit 7: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 2: Application Exhibit 8: Environmental Determination Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearin Exhibit 4: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Zoning Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Aerial A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map amendment is a privately -initiated request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation of parcel 45163.0584 (0.7 acres) from Multiple Family Residential (MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and to change the Zoning District from Multiple Family Residential (MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU). The parcel is developed with an existing 14-unit apartment complex. The application indicates the requested change is to allow the construction of four additional units on the property. The site is flat and does not contain any critical areas. The property is approximately 200' north of Sprague Avenue on Skipworth Road. North of the site is a multiple family dwelling unit complex, south and east are commercial buildings fronting Sprague, and immediately to the west is a commercial building. Page 1 of 8 Staff Report CPA-2021-0001 The property is served by the local access street of that has a sidewalk on both sides just south of the property. Sprague Avenue, a Principal Arterial, is 200' to the south of the property. The Average Daily Traffic for this segment of Sprague Avenue is approximately 27,500. The property is served by three public transit routes. The closest public transit stop is approximately 700' to the south and west on Sprague. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Characteristics: The property consists of one parcel totaling 0.7 acres in size with frontage on Skipworth Road. Comprehensive Plan: Multiple Family Residential (MFR) Zoning: Multiple Family Residential (MFR) Existing Land Use: A 14-unit apartment complex SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES: Comp Plan: MFR North Zoning: MFR Uses: Apartment complex Comp Plan: CMU South Zoning: CMU Uses: Commercial retail Comp Plan: CMU East Zoning: CMU Uses: Commercial retail Comp Plan: CMU West Zoning: CMU Uses: Commercial APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 5, 2020 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance Issue date May 7, 2021 End of Appeal Period for DNS: May 14, 2021 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: June 11 and 18, 2021 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposal on May 7, 2021. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Page 2 of 8 Staff Report CPA-202 1 -0001 Comprehensive Plan and EIS associated with the Comprehensive Plan. The DNS was not appealed. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone Approval Criteria The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it finds that: (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment changing the land use designation from Multiple Family Residential to (MFR) to Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The adopted Comprehensive Plan describes the CMU designation as "allow[ingj for light manufacturing, retail, multifamily, and offices along major transportation corridors. It is primarily used along Sprague Avenue, and the north -south arterials. " The subject property is within 200 feet of Sprague Avenue and is adjacent to CMU properties fronting Sprague Avenue. CMUproperties are located to the west, east, and south. Changing the land use designation to CMU increases the flexibility of allowed uses and density on the sites in an area supported by infrastructure, which has benefit to public health, safety, and welfare. The amendment area is not covered by critical areas or designated natural resources. The public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment are promoted by standards established by the state and the City's regulations. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The Growth Management Act (GAM) adopts 14 goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to provide an expansion of the multiple family development on the site. There are no transportation improvements planned adjacent to the site within the planning horizon of 2037. The proposal does not conflict with any other GAM goals. The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions of the comprehensive plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Page 3 of 8 Staff Report CPA-2021-0001 Analysis: The amendment does not correct a mapping error (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment adds little capacity to the CMUdesignation; there is an existing multiple family development on the site. Changing the designation from MFR to CMU on the existing developed parcel provides the opportunity to increase density on parcels with existing infrastructure. While the proposal does not address a direct deficiency, the Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policy that support the proposed change: LU-GI Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for- all income levels. H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane Valley's neighborhoods. H-P5 Enable a variety of housing types at increased densities within '/_� mile of a funded high performance transit network. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to CMU will allow existing uses as well as commercial, office and higher residential development of the properties. The properties will have the opportunity to transition, add density and add a mix of uses to serve the surrounding neighborhood. There is no concern on effect of physical environment. (2) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis: There are no critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed when future development occurs. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The 0.7 acre site is currently developed with a multiple family development. The adjacent use to the north is an apartment complex, to the east, south, and west is a commercial retail establishment. The CMU land use designation surrounds the amendment site to the east, south and west. The amendment is consistent with the adjacent land use designations. The projected impact to the surrounding neighborhood is minimal. Any future development will be evaluated for compliance with all municipal requirements as it relates to adjacent uses at the time of development. (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: Skipworth Road is a Local Access street. There are no planned transportation projects in the area. Balfour- Park approximately % mile to the west of Page 4 of 8 Staff Report CPA-2021-0001 the project site is a neighborhood park and is planned to expand to a community park within the planning horizon. A project on the site would be considered inftll development, as such, the expansion of allowed uses and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place. Sewer is available to the site and the site is within Modern Electric Water Company's service area. Future development will be required to ensure other communityfacilities are adequate at the time of development. There is minimal impact on schools. (5) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support inftll development in an area planned for growth. The change will support increased housing opportunities. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goal and policy: H-GI Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. H-P5 Enable a variety of housing types at increased densities within % mile of a funded high performance transit network. LU-P16 Maximize the density ofdevelopment along major- transit corridors and near transit centers and commercial areas. (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The proposal would add approximately 0.7 acres of CMU property to the 1,666 acres of existing CMU designated property within the city. While additional demand for CMUproperty may be limited, the CMU designation in this location would allow for increased options for development including allowing an increase in allowed density on a property developed with multiple family development. The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and developed under CMU standards the type of use and density would be appropriate for the location. (7) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have little impact on projected population density. (8) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The CMU designation will support the goals and policies identified above. The amendment will have no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Housing, Capital Facilities and Public Services, Public and Private Utilities, Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Findings: The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan describes the CMU designation as "allow[ing] for light manufacturing, retail, multifamily, and offices along major transportation corridors. It is primarily used along Sprague Avenue, and the north -south arterials." The subject property has CMU on three sides and MFR on the remaining fourth side. Access is provided by Skipworth Road via Sprague Avenue. Sprague Avenue is a Page 5 of 8 Staff Report CPA-2021-0001 Principal Arterial. Changing the land use designation to CMU increases the flexibility of allowed uses and allows increased density on a site with existing infrastructure. Additionally, the amendment is supported by the following adopted Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: H-GI Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane Valley's neighborhoods. H-P5 Enable a variety of housing types at increased densities within % mile of a funded high performance transit network. LU-GI Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU-P16 Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors and near transit centers and commercial areas. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities. Conclusion(s) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan 3. Adequate Public Facilities a. Findings: The Growth Management Act (GMA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy. The area is currently served with adequate public facilities and services. Modern Electric Water Company, Spokane County Environmental Services, Spokane Valley Fire District, and Central Valley School district provide water, sewer, and fire protection and schools services in this area. The proposed change is expected to have minimal impact on the transportation system. No planned capacity improvement projects are planned within the planning horizon of 2037 and the forecast LOS for Sprague Avenue in this location is A-C. It is expected that sufficient roadway capacity exists to accommodate the uses resulting from the CPA. Urban services are available. Specific site needs will be addressed at the time a development is proposed for the site. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development. D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the July 8, 2021 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): The City published the Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) on June 11 and 18, 2021 in the Spokane Valley News Herald. The applicant posted the site with a NOPH sign that included time and location of the public hearing and nature of the proposal. The City mailed the NOPH to all property owners within a 400-foot radius of the project site. Page 6 of 8 Staff Report CPA-202 1 -0001 Additional notice beyond the minimum legally required notice included a direct email to the Media, Comp Plan Updates, City News, and City Planning distribution lists. Prior to the public hearing, the City created a rotating banner on the City's homepage and published social media posts on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn that linked to a story in the "NEWS" page of the City website about the public hearing. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: 2. Staff has received comments from agencies as noted below. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering No City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning No City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation No Spokane Valley Fire Department No City of Millwood No City of Liberty Lake No City of Spokane No City of Spokane Valley Police Department No Spokane Sheriff No Spokane County, Building and Planning No Spokane County, Environmental Services No Spokane County, Clean Air Agency No Spokane County, Library District No Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 No Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 No Spokane County Regional Health District No Spokane County, Parks No Spokane County, Public Works No Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency No Spokane Aquifer Joint Board No Spokane Transit Authority STA No Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) No Washington State Dept of Commerce No Washington State Dept of Ecology Ol m is No Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) No Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife No Washington State Dept of Natural Resources No Washington State Dept of Transportation No Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission No WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation No Avista Utilities No Inland Power & Light No Irvan Water District No Orchard Avenue Irrigation District No Modern Electric Water Company No Central Valley School District #356 No East Valley School District 4361 No Page 7 of 8 Staff Report CPA-2021-0001 West Valley School District #363 No Century Link No Comcast No Model Irrigation District #18 No Consolidated Irrigation District #19 No Hutchinson Irrigation District - QWest No Carnho e Irrigation District No. 7 No East Spokane Water District # 1 No Vera Water & Power No Spokane County Water District #3 No Spokane Tribe of Indians No Yellowstone Pipeline Company Yes 5/7/2021 3. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted from the comments received. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above staff finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H) — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria. This proposed 2021 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and will promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map File: CPA-2021-0001 Request: SpokaOwner: Hotomti Partners ne Proposed change: N Parcel. 45163.0584 Comp Plan Map: MFR to CMU %%ley Address: 22 N Skipworth Zoning Map: MFR to CMU Proposed Zoning Map FM E Front Ln E Main Ave 40 FM�E F1 Z cc Z .� 1 E Main Ave 0 - CO Z 0 E Riverside Ave c i Z E Sprague Ave - CC Legend Zoning 1 Pos CMu R2 NC IMu R3 Mu I R4 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet l File: CPA-2021-0001 Request: S�"YO�T Re Proposed change: N ��liu�ii Owner. H 163.0 Partners Va11ey Parcel: : 22 N05 p Comp Plan Map: MFR M CMU Address: 22 N Skipworth Zoning Map: MFR to CMU A I Project CPA-2021-0001 COINIPI2EHENSIV E PLAN P E (_', E I'd E D ��„•��:--_, A�IENDJ-IL'NTAPPLICATION OCTOBER 5TH, 2020 Spokane SVMC 17.80.140 � jW1ey CSV PER t4E7 : ENTEn 10210F, Spra—ue A SUB ;F F�-.:;` Phone: (509) 720-5240 ♦ Fax: (509)720-507`._._..____.—._ Year 2021 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS The City of Spokane Valley is accepting applications for map and text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for the annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows Comprehensive Plan amendments only one time per year. Any interested person, organization, agency or business may submit suggestions, proposals, or requests to the City for changes to the Comprehensive Plan, including maps and text. PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. Applications are due by November 1:t of each year to be considered during the next calendar year amendment cycle. Submittals received after the deadline will be considered during the next annual amendment cycle. 2. Staff Review and Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will review all applications and will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report will analyze how each proposal addresses amendment criteria established by Spokane Valley City Council. All application documents and staff reports will be available for public review. 3. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission will consider amendments individually and will examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission will prepare one recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. 4. City Council Review and Decision. Within 60 days of receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation; City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to substantially modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or referthe proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. 5. Notice. Each year, the City will provide notice of the annual amendment cycle at least 60 days prior to the application deadline via display ads in local newspapers, email to interested parties and on the City'swebsite. Notice of public hearings and public meetings will be provided to the public as set forth in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At a minimum, notice will be provided to surrounding properties within 400' for site -specific Land Use Map amendments at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Notice will also be posted on -site at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Legal notice will also be published in the newspaper. 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.290(2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Chaz Bates, Senior Planner (cbates a(),spokaneva[ley.org), 509-720-5333. PL-06 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 Spokane ®Valley COMPREHENISVE PLAN AM ENDMENTAPPLICATION PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL —THE PLANNING DIVISION WILL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED' A. Submit the following for ® Pre -Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) ® Completed Application Form ® Application and SEPA Fee • SEPA Checklist: One (1) copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including option Non -Project Action supplemental form. (Note: Any previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project should be included and may be adopted by reference.) ❑ Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification. (Please note: DO NOTsubmit the notice of public hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses must be current within 30 days of the Planning Commission public hearing.) X One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason forthe Comprehensive plan Map Amendment. 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change inconditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors; a. The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. B. Submit the following for TEXT AMENDMENTS: ❑ Pre -Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ One (1) copy of the text proposed to be changed, showing deletions by ethreugh and additions by underline. ❑ One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the change is needed and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyondthe property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. PL-06 V1.0 Page 2 of 5 Spokane j Valley STAFF USE ONLY COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENTAPPLICATION Date Subm itted: Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File#: PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION 0 Map Amendment; or ❑ Text Amendment APPLICANTNAME: Lindsey A Goodman, AIA, Managing Partner MAILING ADDRESS: 102 E Baldwin Avenue CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99207 PHONE: 805-340-3881 FAX: 509-328-5341 CELL: NA lindsey.goodman@ EMAIL: homtomi.com PROPERTY OWNER: Homtomi WA01 Partners LP MAILING ADDRESS: 102 E Baldwin Avenue CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99207 PHONE:509-325-2127 FAX: 509-328-5341 CELL: NA I EMAIL: NA SITE ADDRESS: 22 N Skipworth Road PARCEL NO.: 45163.0584 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MFR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: CMU ZONING DESIGNATION: MFR PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: CMU BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TExT AMENDMENT (attached full explanation on Separate Sheet Of paper): See Attachment PL-06 V1.0 Page 3 of 5 Spokane Valley COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENTAPPLICATION We are requesting a Land Use Change from the Comprehensive Plan designation of MFR Multi -Family Residential to CMU Corridor Mixed Use. The applicant desires to change the Comprehensive Plan designation to accommodate a future project application for the construction of four apartment units and six carports, adding to the property's existing fourteen apartment units and uncovered surface parking. PL-06 V1.0 Page 4 of 5 Spokane�`'' jUalley COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PART III — AUTHORIZATION �} (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I, LI�ASo.� A GOO�M4-v% , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully a d to the best of my knowledge. goZ—,- la 8ig r@Wre) — (Date) STATE OFWASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me NOTARY SEAL NOTARY SIGNATURE Notary Public In and for the State of Washington Residing at: My appointment expires: , 20_ LEGAL OWNER AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement: I, owner of the above described property do hereby authorize _ / to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. I-C'�2�'✓C ( - PL-06 V1.0 Coll %/-ICO— Page 5 of 5 CIuFORMna ALL-RU2- POSE1 /aCtMOWLEDOMEEM 7 CIVIL CODE 0 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual :vho signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California r p County of =e72,-Z On ,Date Personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. ELIZ KYUCHUKYAN Notary Public - California Los Angeles County Commission # 2331732 " My Comm. Expires Sep 13, 2024 Place Notan,1 Seal Above I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. i WITNESS my� ndiaE seat- - Signature i Signature 9t Notary Public OPTIMAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Doc,j i t Title or Type of Document., it Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Kamed Above: Capaci-Mies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: i_1 Corporate Officer — Tit] (s): ;_! Partner — U Limited I General ,U\Individual I I Attor y in Fact I. 1 Trustee I__J Guardian or Conservator L I Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: Signer's Name: I i Corporate Officer — Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited O General CJ Individual 1_1 Attorney in Fact Trustee 171 Guardian or Conservator 1-1 Other: Signer Is Representing: ©2016 National Notary Association • www.NationaiNotary.org - 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 Ara(-_v.5 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Narrative Date: October 2, 2020 From: MC 17.80.140 (H) & CPA Application Reqmts Reference: G2014 Skipworth Project — Phase 2 22 N Skipworth Road, Spokane Valley, Washington CPA Narrative 1. The reason for the Comprehensive plan Map Amendment: Project , CPA-2021-0001 RECEIVED OCTOBER 5TH, 2020 CSV PERIN11T CENTER SUB 4 = :-iF_V. l� We are requesting a Land Use Change from the Comprehensive Plan designation of MFR Multi -Family Residential to CMU Corridor Mixed Use. The applicant desires to change the Comprehensive Plan designation to accommodate a future project application for the construction of four apartment units and six carports, adding to the property's existing fourteen apartment units and uncovered surface parking. Describe how the proposed change meets the approval criteria below: a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Yes, the proposed land use change may allow a multi family or business services in fill project utilizing existing public services and facilities in an urban growth area, while not consuming natural lands. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Yes, and among other elements is consistent with the intent of RCW 36.70A.090 "Innovative Techniques" including an opportunity for increased housing density. C. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Yes, allowing a built response to an increased need for workforce housing. d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or modifies the land use designation, reflecting surrounding designations on three adjacent sides of subject property and complementary to the fourth side. e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Yes, modifies the land use designation, reflecting surrounding designations on three adjacent sides of subject property and complementary to the fourth side. \201002-G2014-P1.02 CPA Narrative (Final) Page 1 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Narrative 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors: a. The effect upon the physical environment; The proposal may allow a small increase in neighborhood density, with a consequential small increase in general activity, traffic and noise. b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; NA, the proposed land use designation is situated in an urban growth area. C. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; The proposed land use designation change matches the designations on three adjacent sides of the subject property and is complimentary with the designation on the fourth side and surrounding neighborhoods. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; The potential uses arising from the land use designation change is consistent in use and scale with existing public services, facilities and amenities. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; The neighborhood would benefit from a built response to an increased need for workforce housing. f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; The site area measures 0.65 acres, in an urban growth area near the Sprague Avenue corridor, of which approximately 75% is presently utilized for a multi family building and the vacant balance will allow the construction of an additional four apartment units and six carports. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and Current: 2,749* pax/sqm; Projected: 2,757 pax/sqm (*www.worldpopulationreview.com (2020]) h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan The proposed land use designation change will enhance, in the applicant's humble opinion, the City's Comprehensive Plan by complementing the various Plan elements for the surrounding neighborhoods. \201002-G2014-P1.02 CPA Narrative (Final) Page 2 EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4 Exisitng Comprehensive Plan Map E Front Ln J E Main Ave z � EMain-Ave cr_ mo 0 E Riverside Ave CC I E Sprague Ave 0 00 Legend i CMU MF POS j I MU RC IMU NC SF 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet File: CPA-2021-0001 Request: N crrvpokane Owner: Hotomti Partners Proposed change: Parcel: 45163.0584 Comp Plan Map: MFR to CMU Valley Address: 22 N Skipworth Zoning Map: MFR to CMU EXHIBIT 5 Zoning Map File: CPA-2021-0001 Request: Spokane Owner: Hotomti Partners Proposed change: N Parcel: 45163.0584 Comp Plan Map: MFR to CMU Valley Address: 22 N Skipworth Zoning Map: MFR to CMU EXHIBIT 6 2020 Aerial E Front Ln= +i �__ . � _{ "� �i: �..•' �' m;1in Ave' . Y R►�erside Aye` It a E Sprague -Ave fF ; I .0 — - —F --1t - VIT F trTV r' ;p E-2nd Ave 'i:. ._ - -_. --.. .__. __. ____ -•' � � Tom'-".^�� _ j 1 =3 • File: CPA-2021-0001 Request: Spo°F*pe Proposed change:N Owner. H 163.0 Partners Comp Plan Ma Parcel: 45163.0584 p p: MFR to CMU Wley Address: 22 N Skipworth Zoning Map: MFR to CMU EXHIBIT 7 Spokane ,;*0 Va11ey , STAFF USE ONLY SEPA CHECKLIST SA'itIC 21.20 Phone: Project t CPA-2021-0001_ RECEIVED OCTOBER 5TH, 2020 10210 E Spl (-; i91 72ti-j24ft ♦ Fax: (i09) IVCSC! PERMIT CENTER SUB # ± Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File #: PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED— ❑X Completed SEPA Checklist ® Application Fee X❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 8%" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. HEV. # ❑ PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Page 1 of r-1 Spokane jVa11ey, SEPA CHECKLIST For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable Skipworth Project - Phase 2 2. Name of applicant: Homtomi WA01 Partners LP 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 102 E Baldwin Avenue, Spokane, WA 99207 P:509-325-2127 F:509-328-5341 4. Date checklist prepared: 10/02/2020 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 2021 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes If yes, explain. Addition of four apartment units and six carports. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? No If yes, explain. NA 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. None 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Land Use Change PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of CITY P ,,;vo;FVa11ey- SEPA CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 22 N Skipworth Road, Spokane Valley, WA 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes The general Sewer Service Area? Yes Priority Sewer Service Area? No (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). None 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? No 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. Does not apply 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? No PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of Spokane ,,;o4*Va11ey' b. Stormwater SEPA CHECKLIST What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Not known at this time 2. Mill stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. Land Use Change, Does not apply B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1) Earth a. General description of the site (check one): ❑x flat, ❑ rolling, ❑ hilly, ❑ steep slopes, ❑ mountainous, other What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? 3-4% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Land Use Change, Does not apply (Have not yet been determined) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not aware of any e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Land Use Change, Does not apply Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Land Use Change, Does not apply If so, generally describe. NA g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Land Use Change, Does not apply PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of S;01 SEPA CHECKLIST PO,,;0o*valley h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2) A I r EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Land Use Change, Does not apply b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that mayaffect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not aware of any c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Does not apply 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals ordiversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Land Use Change, Does not apply PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of Spokane SEPA CHECKLIST ,,;0of W1ey' EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? No If so, note location on the site plan. Does not apply 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Does not apply b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? No Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Does not apply 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Land Use Change, Does not apply c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flaw intootherwaters? If so, describe. Land Use Change, Does not apply 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Land Use Change, Does not apply d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply PL-22 W .0 Page 6 of Spokane ~" SEPA CHECKLIST ,,;o.$valley EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1K deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ® shrubs grass pasture crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed oraltered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not aware of any. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply 5) Animals a. Cirde any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: 0 birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. ❑ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not aware of any c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None at this time PL-22 W .0 Page 7 of SanO` SEPA CHECKLIST P Va11ey EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Land Use Change, Does not apply b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Land Use Change, Does not apply 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Land Use Change, Does not apply 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of Spokane Valley 8). Land and shoreline use SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site: Multi -Family Residential; North: Multi -Family Residential; East, South & West: Commercial b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge, but otherwise unknown c. Descdbe any structures on the site. One, two story apartment building d. Will any structures be demolished? No If so, what? NA e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MFR f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MFR g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not to our knowledge i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Land Use Change, Does not apply j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NA I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: PL-22 V1.0 Proposal includes no measures, however a land use analysis of adjacent Page 9 of properties was undertaken prior to this application, and is noted above. San mil e, SEPA CHECKLIST pokan 4m;o0oValley. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Land Use Change, Does not apply b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Land Use Change, Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Land Use Change, Does not apply b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Land Use Change, Does not apply b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Land Use Change, Does not apply c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 Spokane SEPA CHECKLIST ,,;ooOValley EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Applewood Trail, Balfour Park b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? No If so, describe. NA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. Land Use Change, Does not apply 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next tothe site? If so, generally describe. None to our knowledge b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to thesite. None to our knowledge c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Land Use Change, No measures proposed 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Local collector, Skipworth Road services the site and leads directly to a major arterial, Sprague Avenue b. Is site currently served by public transit? Yes If not, what is the appro)amate distance to the nearest transit stop? (STA Bus Service, Route 98 on Sprague Avenue) c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Land Use Change, Does not apply PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of Spokane �jValley- d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Land Use Change, Does not apply e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Land Use Change, Does not apply f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Land Use Change, Does not apply g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Land Use Change, Does not apply 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Land Use Change, Does not apply b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Land Use Change, No measures proposed 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: [x] electricity, [] natural gas, lXJwater, [ refuse service, [X-1 telephone, Dx sanitary sewer, septic system, (] other -describe b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Land Use Change, Does not apply C. SIGNATURE SEPA CHECKLIS'r EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 67 �" r !`r' 'l V'000L—'- N- /V I012/go7-0 PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of S�"P okane ..;,oOValley- Date D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECTACTIONS SEPA CHECKLIST Submitted: (Do not use this sheet for proiect actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in generalterms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal is not expected to increase discharge to water, emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous materials. There may be a small increase of noise related to some additional residential activity a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Site planning will include maximizing buffering distances 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The site is in an existing urban growth area. A slight amount of disruption may affect existing plants and animals a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Site planning will include an analysis of existing trees and plants with an objective to minimize impacts 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Energy and materials utilized from non-renewable resources are expected to be consumed during construction and habitation of future structures a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourcesare: During construction, Best Management Practices (BMP) will be implemented. The building design and specification will incorporate energy and natural resource conservation objectives. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? There is no expectation of impacts on environmentally sensitive areas a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No measures proposed 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? There is no expectation of impacts on land use, and no expectation of allowing or encouraging incompatible uses PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of Spokane 4,00Val ley , SEPA CHECKLIST a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are Does not apply 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? There is an expectation of an increase in demand for transportation and public services. The amount would be commensurate with an increase of an estimated eight new residents at the site. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures proposed 7. Identify. if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts are expected E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: (01—Ab D ZQ Signature: /d,�� "'d, pcc�—,- M. 49 Please print or type: Proponent: hlomtomi WA01 Parbners LP Address: 102 E Baldwin Ave, Spokane, WA 99207 Phone: 509-325-2127 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name' Lindsey A Goodman, AIA, Managing Partner Address: 102 E Baldwin Ave, Spokane, WA 99207 Phone: 805-340-3881 PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of I \% I� � I `)' L � L �:_ a � � �i �'i L COMMUNITY & PuBLIC WORKS.DEPARTMENT Spokane DETERMII�TA3'ION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE 0210 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley: WA 99206 .6;00%Ueyx 509 720 5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@ spokanevalley.org PROJECT: Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2021: -Description CPA-2021-0001 Map amendment to change the Parcel 45163.0584; SW '/4 of Lindsay A. designation for .68 acres from Section 16, Township 25 North, Goodman/ Multifamily Residential to Corridor Range 44 East, Willamette Homtomi Partners Mixed Use. Meridian, Spokane County, LP Washington CPA-2021-0002 Map amendment to change the Parcels 45I74.9061 and Spokane Valley/ designation for 5.56 acres from 45174.9062; SE'/ of Section 17, Spokane Val ley Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Open Space. Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2021-0003 Map amendment to change the Parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Spokane Valley/ designation for 45.8 acres from 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; N %2 Washington Industrial to Parks and Open Space. of Section 7, Township 25 North, Department of Range 45 East, Willamette Transportation Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2021-0004 Text amendment to add goals, Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ policies, strategies, and background Not applicable text regarding homeless services. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on May 21, 2021. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates a.spokanevalley.ore RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasineer a,spokanevallev.org DATE ISSUED: May 7.2021 - SIGNATURE: APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & Pub is Works Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal mast be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page 1 of I File Nos. CPA-2021-0001; CPA-2021-0002; CPA-2021-0003; CPA-2021-0004 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak, and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home, Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools, as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: July 8, 2021 beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokaneval lev.ora/plannineconunission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE NO. CPA-2021-0001: A map amendment to change the designation for .68 acres from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use for parcel 45163.0584; further located in SW %4 of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE NO. CPA-2021-0002 A map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space for parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062; further located in SE %4 of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE NO. CPA-2021-0003 A map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial to Parks and Open Space for parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; further located in N % of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE NO. CPA-2021-0004 Text amendment to add goals, policies, strategies, and background text regarding homeless services. This amendment is not site specific and applies citywide STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; (509) 720-5337 cbates a spokanevallev.ora ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) on May 7, 2021 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to cbates a spokanevallev.ora. Comments will need to be submitted no later than 4:00 PM on July 7, 2021 in order for them to be received and prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. If you would like to deliver comments to City Hall you may contact City Hall at (509) 720-5000 prior to 4:00 PM on July 7, 2021 to schedule an appointment for delivery and allow staff to scan and include in the report. Comments received through US Mail will be included if they are received prior to the hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 8, 2021. Please visit the Planning Commission webpage (see link above) to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.ora/CP. If you have any questions, please contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, at cbates a spokanevallev.ora. Carrie Koudelka, CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish: June 11, 2021 and June 18, 2021 EXHIBIT 10 From: Taylor Dillard To: Chaz Bates Subject: FW: SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Date: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:30:44 AM Attachments: imaoe003.inQ imaQe004.onQ imaae001.ona Fyi Taylor Dillard (she/her) I Economic Development Administrative Assistant 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5333 1 tdillard@sookanevallev.or� Where Tradition Meets Ambition This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Polak, Chad M <Chad.M.Polak@p66.com> Sent: Friday, May 07, 20219:26 AM To: Taylor Dillard <tdillard@spokanevalley.org> Subject: FW: SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Good Morning Taylor, Based on a review of the projects, there is no impact to the YPL pipeline and we do not have any questions. Sincerely, Chad M. Polak Agent, Real Estate Services 0: (+1) 303.376.43631 M: (+1) 720.245.4683 3960 East 56th Avenue I Commerce City, CO 80022 Phillips 66 From: Taylor Dillard <tdillard(tspokanevalley.org> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 10:07 AM Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates(@spokanevalley.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL]SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments ME The City is issuing a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2021, file numbers CPA-2021-0001, 0002, 0003, and 0004; further described below: CPA-2021-0001: A map amendment to change the designation for .68 acres from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. Located on parcel 45163.0584; SW % of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 2) CPA-2021-0002: A map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space. Located on parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062; SE of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 16) CPA-2021-0003: A map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial to Parks and Open Space. Located on parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; N % of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 32) CPA-2021-0004: Text amendment to add goals, policies, strategies, and background text regarding homeless services. (PDF page 48) The appeal period ends at 5:00 pm on May 21, 2021. Taylor Dillard (she/her) I Economic Development Administrative Assistant 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5333 1 tdillard@sookanevalley.org Where Tradition Meets Ambition This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. EXHIBIT 11 Public Comments (Inserted as received) Spo,,,;oo0;kane Valley STAFF REPORT DATE: June 24, 2021 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2021-0002 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: July 8, 2021, beginning at 6:00 p.m., remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2021-0002 Application Description: A comprehensive plan land use and zoning map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space. Location: 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 (west of Balfour Park) Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Owners: City of Spokane Valley Date of Application: October 31, 2020 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Amendment (Maps) Exhibit 7: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 2: Application Exhibit 8: Environmental Determination Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearin Exhibit 4: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Zoning Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Aerial A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION In 2013, the City purchased three parcels (45174.9063, 45174.9061 and 45174.9062) totaling approximately 8.5 acres at the northeast corner of Dartmouth Road and Sprague Avenue. The southwestern parcel (45174.9063) approximately 2.8 acres was purchased in agreement for Spokane County Library District (District) to be used for a new library. The remaining two parcels (45174.9061 and 45174.9062) are approximately 5.6 acres and are planned to be used by the City for an expansion and renovation of Balfour Park. The Distict has secured the funding to build the new library and the City is in process of formalizing the master plan for the expansion and renovation of Balfour Park. The proposal is to amend the Comprehensive Plan land use map and zoning map for the City owned parcels to match the planned and intended use of the properties. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Page 1 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0002 Size and Characteristics: The property consists of two parcels totaling 5.56 acres in size. The property is flat with frontage on Main Avenue, Dartmouth Road and Sprague Avenue. Comprehensive Plan: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Zoning: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Existing Land Use: Vacant. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES: Comp Plan: Multiple Family Residential (MFR) North Zoning: Multiple Family Residential (MFR) Uses: Apartments Comp Plan: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) South Zoning: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Uses: Civic use(City Hall Comp Plan: Parks and Open Space (P/OS) East Zoning: Parks and Open Space (P/OS) Uses: Park Balfour Park) Comp Plan: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) West Zoning: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Uses: Vacant, commercial service, single family home APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 15, 2020 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance Issue date May 7, 2021 End of Appeal Period for DNS: May 14, 2021 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: June 11 and 18, 2021 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposal on May 7, 2021. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and Environmental Impact Statement associated with the Comprehensive Plan. The DNS was not appealed. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0002 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone Approval Criteria The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it finds that: (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2013, the Citypurchased two parcels to the west of Balfour Park for the purpose of expanding Balfour Park. The expansion of Balfour Park was indicated in the 2016 Parks and Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. The expansion was determined to be a high priority in the Plan. The expansion of Balfour Park is also included in the Parks 6-year Capital Improvement Plan. These plans were developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1, 000 residents. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The Growth Management Act (GAM) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GAM goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GAMrequires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment will designate the property P/OS to allow for the future implementation of the Ba four Park master plan. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: Page 3 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0002 (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses that are currently allowed in CMU reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. (2) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time offuture development. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses. and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Balfour Park is an existing park facility and the area of the proposed amendment is informally used as open space for nearby residents. Future development of the park space will also provide an amenity and place to gather for residents. (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Balfour Park immediately to the east. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. The existing and forecast LOS for this area of Sprague Avenue is D which is within the adopted LOS. A non -motorized capacity improvement project extending the Appleway Trail is also planned and a portion will be constructed in 2021. A street preservation project is planned for 2021 on the surrounding roads of Herald, Main and Balfour. This project will widen the paved shoulder and install sidewalks. The proposed amendment will have no impact on schools. (5) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to expand Balfour Park as proposed in the Parks Plan. A master- plan for the park expansion is underway. The expansion of Balfour Park will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A neighborhood park at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The site has good access to transit, non - motorized access, and vehicles. (7) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. Page 4 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0002 (8) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan as the properties have been planned for park space since 2013. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates that the property would be park space. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. P-G] Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. Strategy: Identify opportunities for the expansion of Balfour Park. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan a. Findings: The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The City has an adopted Parks and Recreation master plan which is adopted by reference by the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Parks and Recreation plan identifies the expansion of Balfour Park as a recommended project to improve the City's park system. The planned improvments and expansion will contribute to meeting the adopted level of service for parks in the City. b. Conclusion(s) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan 3. Adequate Public Facilities a. Findings: The Growth Management Act (GMA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy. The City has adopted minimum LOS standards for water, sewer, transportation, stormwater, law enforcement, libraries, parks, street cleaning, public transit, fire, and schools. The proposed amendment will have minimal impact on public services and as part of the proposed expansion project, accessibility improvements are planned to support the development of the park. These improvements include sidewalk and stromwater improvements. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development. Page 5 of 7 Staff Report D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: CPA-2021-0002 Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the July 8, 2021 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): The Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published on June 11 and 18, 2021 in the Spokane Valley News Herald and posted on the site with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign with a description of the proposal. The NOPH was posted on site on June 11, 2021 and mailed to property owners within a 400 foot radius of the proposed amendment. Additional notice beyond the minimum legally required notice included a direct email to the Media, Comp Plan Updates, City News, and City Planning distribution lists. Prior to the public hearing, the City created a rotating banner on the city's homepage and published social media posts on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn that linked to a story in the "NEWS" page of the city website about the public hearing. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received comments from agencies as noted below. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering No City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning No City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation No Spokane Valley Fire Department No City of Millwood No City of Liberty Lake No City of Spokane No City of Spokane Valley Police Department No Spokane Sheriff No Spokane County, Building and Planning No Spokane County, Environmental Services No Spokane County, Clean Air Agency No Spokane County, Library District No Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 No Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 No Spokane County Regional Health District No Spokane County, Parks No Spokane County, Public Works No Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency No Spokane Aquifer Joint Board No Spokane Transit Authority STA No Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) No Washington State Dept of Commerce No Washington State Dept of Ecology (Olympia) No Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) No Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife No Washington State Dept of Natural Resources No Page 6 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0002 Washington State Dept of Transportation No Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission No WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation No Avista Utilities No Inland Power & Light No Irvan Water District No Orchard Avenue Irrigation District No Modern Electric Water Company No Central Valley School District #356 No East Valley School District #361 No West Valley School District #363 No Century Link No Comcast No Model Irrigation District #18 No Consolidated Irrigation District #19 No Hutchinson Irrigation District - Qwest No Carnho e Irrigation District No. 7 No East Spokane Water District #1 No Vera Water & Power No Spokane County Water District #3 No Spokane Tribe of Indians No Yellowstone Pipeline Company Yes 5/7/2021 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted fi-om the comments received. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above staff funds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H) — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria. This proposed 2021 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and will promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. Page 7 of 7 "�x7 A Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map - - - - - - - - - - Ict z a; cr_I E Main Ave _ CO Z Z - I Balfour Park` a i i — m 1 Z I � E Sprague Ave Legend a __ CMU ® MF POS 1 MU RC 0 IMU �� NC SF cB 0 100 200 300 400 50 Feet File: CPA-2021-0002 Request: Spo'w@ a Owner.- City of Spokane Valley Proposed change: N Parcel(s): 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 Comp Plan Map: CMU to P/OS Address: Unaddressed Zoning Map: CMU to P/OS Proposed Zoning Map z i Cr. E-.M-ai.n Ave o _� cB Z � Z -; Balfour Park m i z E Sprague Ave Legend Z/o/ning POS CMu M RI MF RC Ct Ct R2 NC IMu s O R3 Mu I i R4 cB N 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet File: CPA-2021-0002 Request: N ` o°Fkane Owner.' City of Spokane Valley Proposed change: Parcel(s): 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 Comp Plan Map: CMU to P/OS Valley Address: Unaddressed Zoning Map: CMU to P/OS EXHIBIT 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SCITY O* AMENDMENT APPLICATION pokane SVMC 17.80.140 �Svalley, 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 ♦ Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ Perm itcenter a,spokanevaIIey.org Year ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS The City of Spokane Valley is accepting applications for map and text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for the annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows Comprehensive Plan amendments only one time per year. Any interested person, organization, agency or business may submit suggestions, proposals, or requests to the City for changes to the Comprehensive Plan, including maps and text. PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. Applications are due by November 1st of each year to be considered during the next calendar year amendment cycle. Submittals received after the deadline will be considered during the next annual amendment cycle. 2. Staff Review and Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will review all applications and will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report will analyze how each proposal addresses amendment criteria established by Spokane Valley City Council. All application documents and staff reports will be available for public review. 3. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission will consider amendments individually and will examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission will prepare one recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. 4. City Council Review and Decision. Within 60 days of receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to substantially modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. 5. Notice. Each year, the City will provide notice of the annual amendment cycle at least 60 days prior to the application deadline via display ads in local newspapers, email to interested parties and on the City'swebsite. Notice of public hearings and public meetings will be provided to the public as set forth in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At a minimum, notice will be provided to surrounding properties within 400' for site -specific Land Use Map amendments at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Notice will also be posted on -site at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Legal notice will also be published in the newspaper. 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.290(2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Chaz Bates, Senior Planner (cbates(c�spokanevalley. oro), 509-720-5333. PL-06 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL —THE PLANNING DIVISION WILL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED — A. Submit the following for MAP AMENDMENTS: ❑ Pre -Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ Application and SEPA Fee ❑ SEPA Checklist: One (1) copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including option Non -Project Action supplemental form. (Note: Any previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project should be included and may be adopted by reference.) ❑ Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification. (Please note: DO NOT submit the notice of public hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses must be current within 30 days of the Planning Commission public hearing.) ❑ One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive plan Map Amendment. 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change inconditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors; a. The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. B. Submit the following for TEXT AMENDMENTS: ❑ Pre -Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ One (1) copy of the text proposed to be changed, showing deletions by StFiketh.. ugh and additions by underline. ❑ One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Whythe change is needed and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyondthe property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. PL-06 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 Spokane ST SE' ONLY COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File #: PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION XMap Amendment; or ❑ Text Amendment APPLICANT NAME: City of Spokane Valley MAILING ADDRESS: 10210 East Sprague Avenue CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA ZIP: 99206 PHONE:509-720-5000 FAX: CELL: EMAIL: cbates@spokanevalley.org PROPERTY OWNER: Same as applicant MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: Unassigned PARCEL No.: 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) ZONING DESIGNATION: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT (attached full explanation on separate sheet Of paper): The properties were purchased bV the city in 2013 for the purpose of expanding Balfour Park. The designation and zoning have not been changed since that time. The request will allow the designation and zoning to match the intended purpose. See response to criteria below. PL-06 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Proposal Summary The proposal is to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 from Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) to Parks and Open Space (P/OS). The parcels are approximately 5.56 acres and are located north of Sprague east of Dartmouth and west of Balfour Park. The properties are owned by the City and are part of intended for the expansion of Balfour Park. f t� R t Ili ` � ! r� � _ • �. ;R:�^- •_�' ��'. cif k�.... r fit f iP.ri. Q t i ii "all In—f �` mn ww ' Below in bold text are the approval criteria, in italic text is the staff analysis in responding to criteria. a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The proposed amendment does bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2013 the City purchased two parcels to the west of Balfour Park for the purpose of expanding Balfour Park. The expansion of Balfour Park was indicated in the 2016 Parks and Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. The expansion was confirmed as a high priority in the 2019 PROS Plan. The expansion of Balfour Park is also included in the 6-year Capital Improvement Plan of the 2019 PROS Plan. These plans were developed using robust community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the PROS Plan by reference. The proposed amendment reduces the amount of Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) property within the City; however, the property has been owned by the City since 2013 and has been excluded from land capacity analyses. The conversion of the proposed properties will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control PL-06 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. b. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or The amendment corrects an obvious mapping error. c. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. While there is a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan, the amendment does not directly add park land to the City's inventory as the property has been planned for the expansion of Balfour Park. However, the amendment will increase the development opportunities of the property for park amenities; in this sense, the amendment does address the deficiency of access to parks in the community. Additional factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses allowed in the CMU reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time of future development. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Balfour Park is an existing park facility and the area of the proposed amendment is informally used as open space for nearby residents. Future development of the park space will impact surrounding neighborhoods but will also provide an amenity for nearby residents. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Balfour Park immediately to the east. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. The existing and forecast LOS for this area of Sprague Avenue is D which is with the adopted LOS. There no vehicle capacity increasing transportation projects in the area; a non -motorized capacity improvement project extending the Appleway Trail is planned for 2028. A street preservation project is planned for 2021 on the surrounding roads of Herald, Main and Balfour; the project will widen paved shoulder, install curb and sidewalks. The proposed amendment will have minimal impact on schools. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing opportunity to expand Balfour Park as proposed in the 2019 PROS Plan. That plan call for the expansion of Balfour Park to include mini amphitheater, meandering paths, multi -purpose shelter with restroom, stage, performance seating space, open field/play area, reconfigured parking lot, splash pad, new basketball court, and expansion of existing play area. While primarily a neighborhood park, the expansion will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the adopted PROS Plan. A neighborhood park at this location furthers the goals of the PROS and Comprehensive Plans. The site has good access to transit, non -motorized access, and vehicles. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and PL-06 V1.0 Pagel of 5 COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Across the entire city the proposed change would have little impact on population density. While currently designated CMU, the property because it is owned by the City, does not impact the City's ability to accommodate projected population. The proposal will not result in the development of additional housing units or employment opportunities. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan as the properties have been planned to be park space since 2013. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates that the property would be park space. In addition to meeting the goals in the PROS Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces P-G1 Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhood. Strategy- Identify opportunities for the expansion of Balfour Park. PL-06 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 Spokane '` Valley COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION ,;,oO PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I, , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. (Signature) STATE OFWASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this NOTARY SEAL NOTARY (Date) ay of 20_ NOTARY SIGNATURE Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing My appointment expires: LEGAL OWNER AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; I, owner of the above described property do hereby authorize — to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. PL-06 V1.0 Pagel of 5 EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4 Exisitng Comprehensive Plan Map z a cc E Main Ave i z CI zl Balfour Park 4 M m z I i E Sprague Ave Legend CC CMU MF POS 4� I - MU - RC 0 IMU NC SF 0 100 200 300 400 50 Feet 7T� File: CPA-2021-0002 Request: S#m o7 Gne, Owner.- City of Spokane Valley Proposed change: N Parcel(s): 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 Comp Plan Map: CMU to P/OS �s galley Address: Unaddressed Zoning Map: CMU to P/OS EXHIBIT S Existing Zoning Map cc u- z a ct - - - - -- - E in Ave L Z cc Z Balfour Park cT5 m i Z E Sprague Ave Legend Zoning POS CMU -0 R1 MF RC s --->� R2 NC IMU O R3 MU I R4 m 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 0--� File: CPA-2021-0002 Request: S#0 6Fk lie Owner. City of Spokane Valley Proposed change: N Parcel(s): 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 Comp Plan Map: CMU to P/OS 1 .;,00 galley Address: Unaddressed Zoning Map: CMU to P/OS EXHIBIT 6 2020 Aerial Aj ,iowl ` ` jY�Ia}� 'l t f�Z��.Y�!? {i i ,1 :. Y '•r . i:a� Yb"aWur.. E Main e rm7 - I 75 , s _ E Spragu Aye. C tv ✓ r. A�- � � "'fin '` •i ,' E 'f1E (f' #!# 4 .c _:b . r _ r '. _e•' n Y tv - 5 h File: CPA-2021-0002 Request: *o%�Re Owner., City of Spokane Valley Proposed change: N Parcel(s): 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 Comp Plan Map: CMU to P/OS �� Valley Address: Unaddressed Zoning Map: CMU to P/OS EXHIBIT 7 S"" okane 000011� SEPA CHECKLIST 40;p Valle svlvlc 21.20 004010210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 ♦ Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ permitcenter@.spokanevalley.or7 STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: October 30, 2020 Received by: Fee: Not Applicable_ PLUS#: File#: CPA-2021-0002 PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 8'/2" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, Complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Pagel of 14 Sokan'� e\� P W Is1ey, SEPA CHECKLIST For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2021-0002. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: October 22, 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption October 2021. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? No. If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment is to change approximately 5.5 acres of Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) designated land to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). The change would formally recognize the public ownership and intended use of the property. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 S�T'okan,,;oo;F�' P W1ey- SEPA CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is located between Sprague and Main Avenues between Dartmouth and Balfour Roads. The property is vacant and unaddressed. The parcel numbers are 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 and can be further located using these coordinates 47.658486, -117.267686. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? No. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of 14 S°„ok001010 an` P Valley Is SEPA CHECKLIST What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1) Earth a. General description of the site (check one):❑ flat, El rolling, ❑hilly, El steep slopes, Mountainous, other The site is flat and developed. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? 0 percent. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 S°„okan�� P ,,;oo*W1ey' SEPA CHECKLIST 2) Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, EVALUATION FORAGENCY USE ONLY automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? Yes. If so, generally describe. The site is adjacent to Sprague Avenue a principal arterial which has approximately 13,300 average daily trips. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Not applicable. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 000 9#61 ane ,,;,OP Valley, 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The site is currently undeveloped. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under stormwater regulations in place at time of development. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non -project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. SEPA CHECKLIST PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 S"T'Olii�n� e _► SEPA CHECKLIST P ,;oSW1ey- EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non -project action development of any future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: none observed ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ❑ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a non -project action. Future re -development of the site will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 001 S�t��1�0 e ! SEPA CHECKLIST P ,,;oo*Valley EVALUATION FOR 6). Energy and natural resources AGENCY USE ONLY a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: The proposal is a non - project action changing the land use designation from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks, Recreation and Open Space, there are no known environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. The development of the park will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is adjacent to an existing park (Balfour) and Sprague Avenue a principal arterial. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 S"r'�k�n� SEPA CHECKLIST P ,,;oo0Valley EVALUATION FOR 8). Land and shoreline use AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently owned by the City of Spokane Valley and is unused formally. Adjacent is Balfour Park, the property will become part of a larger Balfour Park expansion. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Corridor Mixed Use f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Corridor Mixed Use g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 S�t�O II SEPA CHECKLIST P Valley Is EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 S°T,okan�� P Valley, .j 12) Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Balfour Park is immediately to the east of the subject properties. The properties are planned to be part of a larger Balfour Park expansion in the future. Balfour Park offers play equipment, sand volleyball court, and grassy areas. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. SEPA CHECKLIST EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for park space. The city has an adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan that provides strategies meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. The expansion of Balfour is identified as part of those strategies. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently undeveloped. The existing Balfour Park is accessed via Balfour Road. The property is also adjacent to Darthmouth Road and Main Avenue. b. c. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, the site is served by Spokane Transit Route 90 by a stop adjacent to the site. d. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of 0010 S°"Okan P y� IS%11e SEPA CHECKLIST e. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to EVALUATION FOR existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, AGENCY USE ONLY generally describe (indicate whether public or private). While the land use change does not require improvement, future site development will improve access to the new park space. f. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. g. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. There are no planned capacity improvements to the transportation network in this area. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA for impacts to those services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe. While the site is undeveloped it has access to a variety of utilities including water, sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of S°i'Oriiin� SEPA CHECKLIST ,,;,o0Wane D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendment is not likely to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley at that time. PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of an cr Spokane ,d 00%11ey' SEPA CHECKLIST 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed amendment will not impact environmentally sensitive areas as none exist on the site. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment will not affect any shorelines as none are near or on the site. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment may increase demand on transportation and public services if the site is redeveloped or developed more intensively. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level -of -service for transportation and public services. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6- year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during the development of the site will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: Signature: Please print or type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of 09-0-0 r-la" -0— e '_ SEPA CHECKLIST 3DPC),;,oWvalley, Phone: (509) 720-5000 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of ;KkT COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spokane DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 ;o*Valley 509.7-20.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5015 - planning@spokaiievalley.org PROJECT: Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2021: DescriptionLocation Applicant/Owner CPA-2021-0001 Map amendment to change the Parcel 45163.0584; SW'/ of Lindsay A. designation for .68 acres from Section 16, Township 25 North, Goodman/ Multifamily Residential to Corridor Range 44 East, Willamette Homtomi Partners Mixed Use. Meridian, Spokane County, LP Washington CPA-2021-0002 Map amendment to change the Parcels 45174.9061 and Spokane Valley/ designation for 5.56 acres from 45174.9062; SE'/o of Section 17, Spokane Valley Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Open Space. Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2021-0003 Map amendment to change the Parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Spokane Valley/ designation for 45.8 acres from 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; N'/2 Washington Industrial to Parks and Open Space. of Section 7, Township 25 North, Department of Range 45 East, Willamette Transportation Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2021-0004 Text amendment to add goals, Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ policies, strategies, and background Not applicable text regarding homeless services. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on May 21, 2021. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbatesOspokanevalley.ora RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasinser s okanevallev.ora DATE ISSUED: May 7. 2021 SIGNATURE: - APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & Pub 1e Works Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal mast be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page I of 1 File Nos. CPA-2021-0001; CPA-2021-0002; CPA-2021-0003; CPA-2021-0004 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak, and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home, Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools, as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: July 8, 2021 beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.spokanevalley.ora/planningcommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE NO. CPA-2021-0001: A map amendment to change the designation for .68 acres from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use for parcel 45163.0584; further located in SW ''A of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE NO. CPA-2021-0002 A map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space for parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062; further located in SE %< of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2021-0003 A map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial to Parks and Open Space for parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; further located in N % of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE NO. CPA-2021-0004 Text amendment to add goals, policies, strategies, and background text regarding homeless services. This amendment is not site specific and applies citywide STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; (509) 720-5337 cbates nspokanevalley.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) on May 7, 2021 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to cbates@spokanevalley.org. Comments will need to be submitted no later than 4:00 PM on July 7, 2021 in order for them to be received and prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. If you would like to deliver comments to City Hall you may contact City Hall at (509) 720-5000 prior to 4:00 PM on July 7, 2021 to schedule an appointment for delivery and allow staff to scan and include in the report. Comments received through US Mail will be included if they are received prior to the hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 8, 2021. Please visit the Planning Commission webpage (see link above) to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.orp-/CP. If you have any questions, please contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, at cbates a,spokanevalley.org. Carrie Koudelka, CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish: June 11, 2021 and June 18, 2021 EXHIBIT 10 From: Taylor Dillard To: Chaz Bates Subject: FW: SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Date: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:30:44 AM Attachments: imaae003.ioo imaae004.r)no imaae001.ono Fyi Taylor Dillard (she/her) I Economic Development Administrative Assistant 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5333 1 tdillard@sookanevalley.org Where Tradition Meets Ambition This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Polak, Chad M <Chad.M.Polak@p66.com> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 9:26 AM To: Taylor Dillard <tdillard@spokanevalley.org> Subject: FW: SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Good Morning Taylor, Based on a review of the projects, there is no impact to the YPL pipeline and we do not have any questions. Sincerely, Chad M. Polak Agent, Real Estate Services 0: (+1) 303.376.43631 M: (+1) 720.245.4683 3960 East 56th Avenue I Commerce City, CO 80022 Phillips 66 From: Taylor Dillard <tdillardftspokanevalley.org> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 10:07 AM Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates(@spokanevalley.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL]SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments an The City is issuing a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2021, file numbers CPA-2021-0001, 0002, 0003, and 0004; further described below: CPA-2021-0001: A map amendment to change the designation for .68 acres from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. Located on parcel 45163.0584; SW % of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 2) CPA-2021-0002: A map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space. Located on parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062; SE of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 16) CPA-2021-0003: A map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial to Parks and Open Space. Located on parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; N % of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 32) CPA-2021-0004: Text amendment to add goals, policies, strategies, and background text regarding homeless services. (PDF page 48) The appeal period ends at 5:00 pm on May 21, 2021. Taylor Dillard (she/her) I Economic Development Administrative Assistant 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5333 1 tdillard@sookanevalley.org Where Tradition Meets Ambition This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Public Comments (Inserted as received) jC-I Spokane ,,;0o*%11ey STAFF REPORT DATE: June 24, 2021 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2021-0003 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: July 8, 2021, beginning at 6:00 p.m., remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2021-0003 Application Description: A comprehensive plan land use and zoning map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial (I) to Parks and Open Space (P/OS). Location: Parcel numbers 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218. The property is unaddressed and is located between the Spokane River and Union Pacific railroad east of Flora Road. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Owners: City of Spokane Valley Date of Application: October 31, 2020 Staff Contact: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Amendment (Maps) Exhibit 7: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 2: Application Exhibit 8: Environmental Determination Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearin Exhibit 4: Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Zoning Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Aerial A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION In 2019 the City adopted an update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Parks Plan). The Parks Plan identified the area north of the Spokane River between Sullivan and Barker Roads as an area for potential acquisition to help meet the park adopted level of sevice (LOS). In 2020, the City purchased four parcels (55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218) totaling approximately 45.8 acres for the purpose expanding its park land. The property is currently vacant and was formerly owned by the Washington State Department of Transportation and was used for minor gravel extraction. In 2021, the City received a $1 million grant from the Washington State Recreation and Conversation Office (RCO). The grant will reimburse a portion of the purchase price of the property. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Page 1 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0003 Size and Characteristics: The property consists of four parcels totaling approximately 45.8 acres. The site is gentley sloping toward Spokane River and is vacant with forested grass lands and riverine landscape. Comprehensive Plan: Industrial (I) Zoning: Industrial (I) Existing Land Use: Currently vacant, use previously for minor gravel mining by Washington State Department of Transportation SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES: Comp Plan: Industrial (I) North Zoning: Industrial (I) Uses: Union Pacific Railroad Comp Plan: Parks and Open Space (P/OS) South Zoning: Parks and Open Space (P/OS) Uses: Informal recreation trails Comp Plan: Industrial (I) East Zoning: Industrial (I) Uses: Vacant Comp Plan: Industrial (I) West Zoning: Industrial (I) Uses: Mining APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 25, 2021 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance Issue date May 7, 2021 End of Appeal Period for DNS: May 14, 2021 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: June 11 and 18, 2021 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The city issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposal on May 7, 2021. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan EIS associated with the Comprehensive Plan. The DNS was not appealed. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0003 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONE 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone Approval Criteria The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it finds that: (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2020, the Citypurchased four parcels between the Spokane River and Union Pacific railroad east of Flora Road for the purpose of expanding the City's park system. The property was identified as a priority acquisition area in the Parks Plan. This plan was developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the park land is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service 3.25 acres ofpark land for every 1, 000 residents. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The Growth Management Act (GAM) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GAM goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment will designate the property P/OS to allow for- the future implementation Parks Plan. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency ofpark land in the Comprehensive Plan. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: Page 3 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0003 (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses that are currently allowed in the Industrial designation/zoning reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. (2) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis: The site is impacted by frequently flooded areas and is within the shoreline jurisdiction. The future development of the site will be subject to both the Shoreline Master Program and the City's adopted critical areas ordinance. The development of the site as a park would have less effect on the critical areas and shorelines than an industrial development. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The site is isolated between the Union Pacific railroad track and the Spokane River. The proposed park will provide an amenity and place to gather for residents, visitors, and workers. (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: Sewer is available to the site and the site is adjacent to Consolidated Irrigation District 919. Flora Road at the site is a local access street and turns into a minor arterial just to the north of the site. The park site is expected to undergo an extensive master planning process to design the site. The development intensity of the site is unknown at this time and the impacts on water and sewer are unknown. Adding the property to the City's park's system will help maintain the adopted level of service for parks. Future development will be required to ensure other community facilities are adequate at the time of development. There is no impact on schools. (5) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to expand the City's park offerings as proposed in the Parks Plan. That plan calls for the property acquisition and development for a park on the north bank of the Spokane River between Sullivan and Barker Roads. The site is expected to be included as part of a trail system from Plante's Ferry Park, providing a safe and scenic mode of transportation along the Spokane River Corridor. The expansion of the park system will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A new community park in this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. (7) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have little impact on projected population density. (8) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Page 4 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0003 Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. The properties have been planned for park space since 2019. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhood. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan a. Findings: The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The City has an adopted Parks Plan which is adopted by reference in the Parks and Recreation element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Parks Plan identifies the property as a potential acquisition area for a new park. The acquisition and future development will contribute to meeting the adopted level of service for parks in the City. b. Conclusion(s) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan 3. Adequate Public Facilities a. Findings: The GMA and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy. The City has adopted minimum LOS standards for water, sewer, transportation, stormwater, law enforcement, libraries, parks, street cleaning, public transit, fire, and schools. The proposed amendment is likely to have minimal impact on the demand on public facilities. The demand for public facilities was analyzed in Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Comprehensive Plan for industrial development. The impact on facilities are not expected to be more than those analyzed for industrial development. Additionally, impacts on transportation and public facilities are implemented at the project level through concurrency. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development. D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the July 8, 2021 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): The Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published on June 11 and 18, 2021 in the Spokane Valley News Herald and posted on the site with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign with a description of the proposal. The NOPH was posted on site on June 11, 2021 and mailed to property owners within a 400 foot radius of the proposed amendment. Page 5 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0003 Additional notice beyond the minimum legally required notice included a direct email to the Media, Comp Plan Updates, City News, and City Planning distribution lists. Prior to the public hearing, the City created a rotating banner on the city's homepage and published social media posts on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn that linked to a story in the "NEWS" page of the city website about the public hearing. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received comments from agencies as noted below. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering No City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning No City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation No Spokane Valley Fire Department No City of Millwood No City of Liberty Lake No City of Spokane No City of Spokane Valley Police Department No Spokane Sheriff No Spokane County, Building and Planning No Spokane Co nty, Environmental Services No Spokane County, Clean Air Agency No Spokane County, Library District No Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 No Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 No Spokane County Regional Health District No Spokane County, Parks No Spokane County, Public Works No Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency No Spokane Aquifer Joint Board No Spokane Transit Authority STA No Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) No Washington State Dept of Commerce No Washington State Dept of Ecology (Olympia) No Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) No Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife No Washington State Dept of Natural Resources No Washington State Dept of Transportation No Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission No WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation No Avista Utilities No Inland Power & Light No Irvan Water District No Orchard Avenue Irrigation District No Modern Electric Water Company No Central Valley School District 9356 No Page 6 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0003 East Valley School District #361 No West Valley School District #363 No Century Link No Comcast No Model Irrigation District #18 No Consolidated Irrigation District 419 No Hutchinson Irrigation District - Qwest No Carnho e Irrigation District No. 7 No East Spokane Water District #1 No Vera Water & Power No Spokane County Water District #3 No Spokane Tribe of Indians No Yellowstone Pipeline Company Yes 5/7/2021 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted fi-om the comments recieved. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above staff finds compliance with SVMC 17.80.140(H) — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria. This proposed 2021 Comprehensive Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, and will promote the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT 1 Ave I Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map L CC ZI uclid Ave Legend CMU MF POS I MU=RC IMU NC SF 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Feet File: CPA-2021-0003 Request: n�s� Proposed change: N /°1okane Owner: City of Spokane Valley Parcels: 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Comp Plan Map: I to P/0S %Iley 55072.0319, and 55075.0218 Zoning Map: MFR to P/0S Address: unaddressed Proposed Zoning Map Ave 1® 15 ZIP cr_ UCH Legend Zoning POS CMu %ffiR1 L IMF RC i% R2 NC IMU R3 MU I R4 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Feet File: CPA-2021-0003 Request: Spo°ane Proposed change: N I IOwner: City of Spokane Valley galley Parcels: 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Comp Plan Map: t to P/OS ,;wO 55072.0319, and 55075.0218 Zoning Map: MFR to P/OS Address: unaddressed EXHIBIT 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN S�• AMENDMENT APPLICATION pokane SVMC 17.80.140 jValleyr 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 ♦ Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ permitcenterRspokanevallev.org Year 2021 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS The City of Spokane Valley is accepting applications for map and text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for the annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows Comprehensive Plan amendments only one time per year. Any interested person, organization, agency or business may submit suggestions, proposals, or requests to the City for changes to the Comprehensive Plan, including maps and text. PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. Applications are due by November Vt of each year to be considered during the next calendar year amendment cycle. Submittals received after the deadline will be considered during the next annual amendment cycle. 2. Staff Review and Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will review all applications and will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report will analyze how each proposal addresses amendment criteria established by Spokane Valley City Council. All application documents and staff reports will be available for public review. 3. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission will consider amendments individually and will examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission will prepare one recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. 4. City Council Review and Decision. Within 60 days of receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to substantially modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission forfurther consideration. 5. Notice. Each year, the City will provide notice of the annual amendment cycle at least 60 days prior to the application deadline via display ads in local newspapers, email to interested parties and on the City's website. Notice of public hearings and public meetings will be provided to the public as set forth in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At a minimum, notice will be provided to surrounding properties within 400' for site -specific Land Use Map amendments at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Notice will also be posted on -site at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Legal notice will also be published in the newspaper. 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.290(2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Chaz Bates, Senior Planner (cbates @spokanevalley.orp), 509-720-5333. PL-06V1.0 Page 1 of COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE PLANNING DIVISION WILL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED — A. Submit the following for MAP AMENDMENTS: ❑ Pre -Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ Application and SEPA Fee ❑ SEPA Checklist: One (1) copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including option Non -Project Action supplemental form. (Note: Any previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project should be included and may be adopted by reference.) ❑ Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification. (Please note: DO NOT submit the notice of public hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses must be current within 30 days of the Planning Commission public hearing.) ❑ One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive plan Map Amendment. 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change inconditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors; a. The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. B. Submit the following for TEXT AMENDMENTS: ❑ Pre -Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ One (1) copy of the text proposed to be changed, showing deletions by strikethFo gh and additions by underline. ❑ One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the change is needed and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyondthe property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. PL-06 V1.0 Pagel of 5 Spokane `" �VSL' ONLY COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Date Submitted: 10/31/2020 Received by: CNB Fee: N/A (City initiated) PLUS #: File #: CPA-2021-0003 PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION X Map Amendment; or El Text Amendment APPLICANT NAME: City of Spokane Valley MAILING ADDRESS: 10210 East Sprague Avenue CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA ZIP: 99206 FPHONE:509-720-5337 FAX: CELL: EMAIL: cbates@spokanevalley.org PROPERTY OWNER: WA Department of Transportation (authorized to be purchased by City) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: Unassigned PARCEL No.: 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial (1) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial (1) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: Parks Recreation and Open Space (P/OS) BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT (attached full explanation On separate sheet Of paper): The properties were purchased by the city in 2020 for the purpose of expanding the City's park system. The request will allow the designation and zoning to match the intended purpose. See response to criteria below. PL-06 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Proposal Summary The proposal is to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218 from Industrial (1) to Parks Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). The combined parcels are 45.8 acres and are located between the Spokane River and Union Pacific railroad east of Flora Road. The property is currently vacant and is under contract to be purchased by the City from the Washington State, Department of Transportation. Ogg _r— Below in bold text are the approval criteria, in italic text is the staff analysis in responding to criteria. a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2020, the City purchased four parcels between the Spokane River and Union Pacific railroad east of Flora Road for the purpose of expanding the City's park system. The property was identified as a priority acquisition area and in the capital improvement plan in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Parks Plan). This plan was developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the additional park land is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive PL-06 V1.0 Pagel of 5 COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. b. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or The amendment will designate the property P/OS to allow for the implementation of the Parks Plan. c. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the Comprehensive Plan. Additional factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses that are currently allowed in I designation reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; The site is impacted by frequently flooded areas and is within the shoreline jurisdiction. The future development of the site will be subject to both the Shoreline Master Program and the City's adopted critical areas ordinance. The development of the site as a park would have less effect on the critical areas and shorelines than an industrial development. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The site is isolated between the Union Pacific railroad track and the Spokane River. The proposed park will provide an amenity and place to gather for residents, visitors, and workers. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Sewer is available to the site and the site is adjacent to Consolidated Irrigation District #19. Flora Road at the site is a local access street and a minor arterial just to the north of the site. The park site is expected to undergo an extensive master planning process to design the site. The development intensity of the site is unknown at this time and the impacts on water and sewer are unknown. Adding the property to the City's park's system will help maintain the adopted level of service for parks. Future development will be required to ensure other community facilities are adequate at the time of development. There is no impact on schools. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to expand the City's park offerings as proposed in the Parks Plan. That plan calls for the property acquisition and development for a park on the north bank of the Spokane River between Sullivan and Barker Roads. The site is expected to be included as part of a trail system from Plante's Ferry Park, providing a safe and scenic mode of transportation along the Spokane River Corridor. The expansion park system will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A new community park in this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. f. The current and projected population density in the area; and The proposed change would have little impact on projected population density. g. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. PL-06 V1.0 Page 1 of COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. The properties have been planned for park space since 2019. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. P-G1 Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhood. PL-06 V1.0 Pagel of 5 EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4 Existing Comprehensive Plan Map zI-Z cc U uclid Ave Legend ------ ---r-�-T - - E,Montgomery A4i cMu L 1 MF POS ---- -- I MU = RC IMu NC SF 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Feet File: CPA-2021-0003 Request: ` Proposed change: N oI'IY°Fkane Owner: City of Spokane Valley Parcels: 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Comp Plan Map: I to P/OS Valley 55072.0319, and 55075.0218 Zoning Map: MFR to P/OS Address: unaddressed EXHIBIT 5 Zoning Map ziz udid Legend Zoning POs CMu R1 MF = RC E Montgomery A► R2 NC ! IMU - ---- R3 MU I R4 m 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Feet File: CPA-2021-0003 Request: Spo°Fkane Owner.' City of Spokane Valley Proposed change: N Parcels: 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Comp Plan Map: 1 to P/OS ®s Valley 55072.0319, and 55075.0218 Zoning Map: MFR to P/OS Address: unaddressed 11 EXHIBIT 6 2020 Aerial _�„ .. _ i4 ,. • •�:�'.. s. ].�'YS.'.'.i�6:': �.. �I^ NF7.%G I,_. ILL 3efirti�Cu�ls`ST�9 • 1 w 'i Rif File: CPA-2021-0003 Request: 9#6;a e Owner.- City of Spokane Valley Proposed Change: N `/�Parcels: 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Comp Plan Map: 1 to P/OS ♦aley 55072.0319, and 55075.0218 Zoning Map: MFR to P/OS Address: unaddressed EXHIBIT 7 Sokane SEPA CHECKLIST P Valle SVMC 21.20 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 1 Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ permitcenter@spokanevalley.orQ STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: October 29, 2020 Received by: Fee: Not Applicable_ PLUS File#: CPA-2021-0003 PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 8'/2" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Pagel of 14 S��okan,,;,0� P Valley, SEPA CHECKLIST For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2021-0003. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: October 22, 2020 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption October 2021. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? No. If yes, explain. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment is to change approximately 45.8 acres of Industrial (1) designated land to Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). The change is in response to the City's recent purchase of the property for park purposes. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 SClT1O7 P j�&ln ,,oo*W1ey- SEPA CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is for City of Spokane Valley parcel numbers 5072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218. The property is unaddressed and is located between the Spokane River and Union Pacific railroad east of Flora Road. The property is currently vacant and was formerly owned by the Washington State Department of Transportation. The property can be further located using these coordinates 47.682519,-117.169979 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Yes. The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? No. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of 14 an cr Spokane ,,;o0% ley, SEPA CHECKLIST What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown. 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1) Earth a. General description of the site (check one):❑ flat,[] rolling, ❑hilly, ❑ steep slopes, ❑ mountainous, other The site is moderately hilly and flat in locations. The site was previously used for minor gravel extraction from WSDOT. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? 10 percent. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The exact soil type is unknown but is expected to be gravelly and well -draining. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently vacant, and any future development will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 0010 0ln— e _ SEPA CHECKLIST W,,;oo4FValley 2) Air EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that mayaffect your proposal? No. If so, generally describe. While adjacent to many industrial uses, during the many on site visits no noticeable odors or emissions were noted. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. The site is near the Spokane River and at the eastern end touches the Spokane River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Not applicable. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 oo n �* SEPA CHECKLIST Spokane ,,j%11ey' 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. There are minor areas on the east and south that are within the 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? No. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The site is currently undeveloped. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map and does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under existing stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non -project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. Any future development will be subject to critical area, shoreline regulations, and stormwater regulations in place at the time of development. Future develop may also be subject to SEPA review. PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 S°TP 61 n' e SEPA CHECKLIST ,,,00*val1ey' EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non -project action development of any future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, ❑ other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ❑ other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposal is a non -project action. Future development of the site will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 S�T�Oriilll' _ \ SEPA CHECKLIST P alley, Is EVALUATION FOR 6). Energy and natural resources AGENCY USE ONLY a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: The proposal is a non - project action changing the land use designation from Industrial to Parks, Recreation and Open Space, while the amendment does not contemplate a specific use the intended use is a community park. The development of the park may be analyzed under a separate SEPA. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is adjacent to an existing industrial uses. The on -site visits not observe noticeable noise from these uses. The railroad would likely result in noise, but now trains were observed. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 S"i'okan� SEPA CHECKLIST P ,,;oowalley, , EVALUATION FOR 8). Land and shoreline use AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently owned by the City of Spokane Valley and is unused. Adjacent is Washington State Park land along the Spokane River, there are informal trails on that property. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban Conservancy h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, portions of the site are within the 100-year floodplain. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 t� 0000� SEPA CHECKLIST Spokane Is Valley 9) Housing EVALUATION FOR a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate AGENCY USE ONLY whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 000� S°T'��nSEPA CHECKLIST P ,,jW1ey, EVALUATION FOR 12) Recreation AGENCY USE ONLY a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Washington State Park land is adjacent to the site, a number of informal trails and beaches seem to be used. Sullivan Park is approximately 1.5 miles downstream. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for park space. The city has an adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan that provides strategies meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. The expansion acquisition and development of a park in this area is a strategy in the parks plan. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently undeveloped. Currently there is no formal access as the site is gated. Flora Road, a local access street provides access to the existing gated area. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of 00,00, S°nokan` P %11ey- I� SEPA CHECKLIST d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to EVALUATION FOR existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, AGENCY USE ONLY generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. The city has an adopted 20-year Transportation Improvement Plan that identifies projects to meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. The proposed down designation from I to P/OS will not increase the need of public services. However, future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA for impacts to those services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe. While the site is undeveloped it has access to a variety of utilities including sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of S"nQs n� SEPA CHECKLIST ,,;oo*P YQ1ey- D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendment is not likely to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourcesare: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of O 09 e "'� SEPA CHECKLIST 90,,,;o**Valley 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed amendment anticipated not to have impacts on environmentally sensitive areas. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect environmentally sensitive areas. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme, including the critical areas ordinance and shoreline master program have been identified as sufficient to protect the environmentally sensitive areas on the site. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment will increase access to the shoreline consistent with the adopted shoreline master program. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: On a planning level, the adopted shoreline master program has been identified as sufficient to protect the shoreline areas of the site. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment may increase demand on transportation and public services if the site is redeveloped or developed more intensively. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level -of -service for transportation and public services. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6- year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during the development of the site will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of SP"Tokan ,,;ooWW1ey' E. SIGNATURE SEPA CHECKLIST I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: Signature: Please print or type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: _10210 East Spraque Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of EXHIBIT 8 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION OF NoN-SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 •�1 ,Y. 509,7210.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT: Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2021: i Description CPA-2021-0001 Map amendment to change the Parcel 45163.0584; SW'/ of Lindsay A. designation for .68 acres ft•om Section 16, Township 25 North, Goodman/ Multifamily Residential to Corridor Range 44 East, Willamette Homtomi Partners Mixed Use. Meridian, Spokane County, LP Washington CPA-2021-0002 Map amendment to change the Parcels 45174.9061 and Spokane Valley/ designation for 5.56 acres froth 45174.9062; SE'/4 of Section 17, Spokane Valley Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Open Space. Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2021-0003 Map amendment to change the Parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Spokane Valley/ designation for 45.8 acres from 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; N'/2 Washington Industrial to Parks and Open Space. of Section 7, Township 25 North, Department of Range 45 East, Willamette Transportation Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2021-0004 Text amendment to add goals, Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ policies, strategies, and background Not applicable text regarding homeless services. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on May 21, 2021. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates rr spokanevailey org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasinaer a,spokanevallev.org DATE ISSUED: May 7. 2021 SIGNATURE: - /ALentJ APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & Pub tc Works Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page 1 of I File Nos. CPA-202 1 -000 1; CPA-2021-0002; CPA-2021-0003; CPA-2021-0004 EXHIBIT 9 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak, and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home, Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools, as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: July 8, 2021 beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.sookanevallev.ora/alanninacommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE NO. CPA-2021-0001: A map amendment to change the designation for .68 acres from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use for parcel 45163.0584; further located in SW '/4 of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2021-0002 A map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space for parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062; further located in SE '/4 of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2021-0003 A map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial to Parks and Open Space for parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; further located in N %Z of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2021-0004 Text amendment to add goals, policies, strategies, and background text regarding homeless services. This amendment is not site specific and applies citywide STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; (509) 720-5337 cbatesna,spokanevallev.ore ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) on May 7, 2021 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to cbates a,spokanevallev.org. Comments will need to be submitted no later than 4:00 PM on July 7, 2021 in order for them to be received and prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. If you would like to deliver comments to City Hall you may contact City Hall at (509) 720-5000 prior to 4:00 PM on July 7, 2021 to schedule an appointment for delivery and allow staff to scan and include in the report. Comments received through US Mail will be included if they are received prior to the hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 8, 2021. Please visit the Planning Commission webpage (see link above) to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.spokanevalley.ore/CP. If you have any questions, please contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, at cbatesp_spokanevallev.org. Carrie Koudelka, CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish: June 11, 2021 and June 18, 2021 EXHIBIT 10 From: Taylor Dillard To: Chaz Bates Subject: FW: SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Date: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:30:44 AM Attachments: imaQe003.ina imaae004.ono imaae001.ono Fyi Taylor Dillard (she/her) I Economic Development Administrative Assistant 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5333 1 tdillard@spokanevalley.org i Ila Where Tradition Meets Ambition This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Polak, Chad M <Chad.M.Polak@p66.com> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 9:26 AM To: Taylor Dillard <tdillard@spokanevalley.org> Subject: FW: SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Good Morning Taylor, Based on a review of the projects, there is no impact to the YPL pipeline and we do not have any questions. Sincerely, Chad M. Polak Agent, Real Estate Services 0: (+1) 303.376.43631 M: (+1) 720.245.4683 3960 East 56th Avenue I Commerce City, CO 80022 Phillips 66 From: Taylor Dillard <tdillard(@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 10:07 AM Cc: Chaz Bates <cbatesl@spokanevalley.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL]SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments "AM The City is issuing a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2021, file numbers CPA-2021-0001, 0002, 0003, and 0004; further described below: CPA-2021-0001: A map amendment to change the designation for .68 acres from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. Located on parcel 45163.0584; SW % of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 2) CPA-2021-0002: A map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space. Located on parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062; SE of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 16) CPA-2021-0003: A map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial to Parks and Open Space. Located on parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; N % of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 32) CPA-2021-0004: Text amendment to add goals, policies, strategies, and background text regarding homeless services. (PDF page 48) The appeal period ends at 5:00 pm on May 21, 2021. Taylor Dillard (she/her) I Economic Development Administrative Assistant 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5333 1 tdillard@sookanevalley.or Where Tradition Meets Ambition This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. EXHIBIT 11 Public Comments (Inserted as received) 000 Spokane ,,;0o0%11eyx STAFF REPORT DATE: June 24, 2021 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2021-0004 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: July 8, 2021, beginning at 6:00 p.m., remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2021-0004 Application Description: Amend Chapter 2 Goals and Policies to add goals, policies and strategies regarding homeless services. Amend Chapter 6 Housing to add background text regarding homeless services. Location: Citywide Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 E Sprague, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Date of Application: October 30, 2020 Staff Contact: Arielle Anderson, Housing and Homeless Services Coordinator, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Amendment Exhibit 5: Notice of Public Hearin Exhibit 2: Application Exhibit 6 Community Survey Report Exhibit 3: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 7: Agency Comments Exhibit 4: Environmental Determination Exhibit 8: Public Comments A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION In 2020, the City identified the need to include goals, policies and strategies related to homelessness. While the existing Comprehensive Plan has goals related to affordable housing, it does not contain goals, policies, or strategies for the development of zoning or development regulations for the siting or provision of homeless services. More recently the Housing Action Plan also identified the need to update the Comprehensive Plan to address the homeless services. Homelessness is a growing challenge in the City. According to the most recent point -in -time counts there are 1,310 people experiencing homelessness in Spokane County. These individuals represent 1,070 households including over 300 families with children. The number of individuals experiencing homelessness has increased by over 21 percent since 2013. In addition to those experiencing homelessness, many households in our City also face housing instability and are at risk of becoming homeless. Page 1 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0004 The number of unsheltered households in the City has increased throughout the years. Currently, there are no homeless service facilities, day drop -in centers, or emergency shelters offered within the City limits, and the majority of those services are located in the City of Spokane. The proposed amendment provides policy guidance and strategies for the City that will help identify gaps in community resources, and encourage regional participation to address homelessness and housing instability. The amendment also provides clear steps to ensure that City households have equal access to services. Ensuring that these services are available to provide the opportunity to connect our residents with the support system they need to maintain housing to reduce the number of homeless in our community. In May of 2021, the Housing and Homeless Coordinator and Economic Development Department prepared a homeless services survey to garner feedback from City residents. There was a total of 318 responses over the course of seven -days. Overall, the community is supportive of introducing a number of different services for the benefit of those that are both unsheltered and unstably housed. There were strong responses on where these resources should be located and the scope of the number of individuals served. There was consistency among respondents that siting community resources in close proximity to public transportation will be key during the planning process. SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: These amendments will formalize the City's commitment and participation in regional efforts to address homelessness and housing instability. The amendment provides policy support that enable safe, equitable, and efficient provision of services throughout the City. APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: October 30, 2020 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance Issue date May 7, 2021 End of Appeal Period for DNS: May 14, 2021 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: June 11 and 18, 2021 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the proposal on May 7, 2021. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 of the SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and Environmental Impact Statement associated with the Comprehensive Plan. The DNS was not appealed. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0004 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17 (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone Approval Criteria The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it finds that: (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City and region have seen increasing numbers ofpeople being unhoused. While the City actively participates as a member of the Spokane Urban Consortium and the Continuum of Care (CoQ, the adopted Comprehensive Plan does not include any policy guidance that would address how, when and where the City could support a shelter or other options for the temporary housing of those experiencing the lack of adequate and permanent shelter. The proposed amendment also supports and recognizes the CoC's mission to make homelessness rare, brief, and non -recurring. Finally, the proposed amendment formalizes the City's participation in the regional efforts to end homelessness. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The Growth Management Act (GAM) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The GMA does not have a goal that directly addresses homelessness, but does include a broad goal for cities to encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements ofGAM. Additionally, House Bill (HB) 1220 amends the GAM to require jurisdictions support emergency shelters and housing through local planning and development regulations. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment is not specific to a localized area of land and as such is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. However, the proposed amendment will provide policy guidance to assist in addressing the growing numbers of those experiencing homelessness. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment is not in response to a mapping error and would not correct any error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The intent of the proposed amendment is to fill an existing policy gap in the Comprehensive Plan. The existing plan is silent on both the need for facilities to accommodate those experiencing unsheltered homelessness and how and where these Page 3 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0004 facilities might be located. The proposed amendment will formally recognize the City's participation in regional efforts in the CoC and other local governments. Additionally, the proposed amendment will provide for the development of regulations for the provision of supportive housing within the City. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment will not have an effect on the physical environment. (2) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis: The proposed policies will not have a direct effect on open space, streams, rivers, or lakes. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed for any future development. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The policies will not impact adjacent land uses or neighborhoods. The implementing development regulations will address impacts to adjacent uses. Those development regulations will be evaluated under their own process. (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: This is a non -site specific proposal. The adequacy of community facilities will be determined at the time of any future development that may result from the adoption of the policies and implementing regulations. (5) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will benefit the City and region by formalizing the City's current commitment and participation in regional efforts to address those experiencing unsheltered homelessness. The proposed amendment also provides policy support to amend development regulations to enable safe, equitable, and efficient provision of supportive housing within the City. (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The proposed amendment is policy oriented. Implementing regulations may modify and allow for supportive housing in appropriately identified areas in the City. (7) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed amendment will not have an impact on current or projected population. (8) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will not have impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development that may result from implementing Page 4 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0004 development regulations will be evaluated for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and level -of -service standards. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan a. Findings: The proposed amendment seeks to fill an existing policy gap in the Comprehensive Plan. The existing plan does not identify the need for facilities or services to accommodate those that are homeless or facing housing instability. b. Conclusion(s) The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan 3. Adequate Public Facilities a. Findings: The Growth Management Act (GMA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy. The City has adopted minimum Levels of Service (LOS) standards for water, sewer, transportation, stormwater, law enforcement, libraries, parks, street cleaning, public transit, fire, and schools. The proposed amendment does not directly increase demands on public facilities. Future site -specific development that may result from implementation measures will be addressed at the time of development. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development. D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received no public comments to date. Comments received following the date of this report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the June 8, 2021 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): The Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published on June I 1 and 18, 2021 in the Spokane Valley News Herald. Additional notice beyond the minimum legally required notice included a direct email to the Media, Comp Plan Updates, City News, and City Planning distribution lists. Prior to the public hearing, the City created a rotating banner on the city's homepage and published social media posts on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn that linked to a story in the "NEWS" page of the city website about the public hearing. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments of significance to date. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering No City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning No Page 5 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2021-0004 City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation No Spokane Valley Fire Department No City of Millwood No City of Liberty Lake No City of Spokane No City of Spokane Valley Police Department No Spokane Sheriff No Spokane County, Building and Planning No Spokane County, Environmental Services No Spokane County, Clean Air Agency No Spokane County, Library District No Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 No Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 No Spokane County Regional Health District No Spokane County, Parks No Spokane County, Public Works No Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency No Spokane Aquifer Joint Board No Spokane Transit Authority STA No Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) No Washington State Dept of Commerce No Washington State Dept of Ecology Ol m ia) No Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) No Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife No Washington State Dept of Natural Resources No Washington State Dept of Transportation No Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission No WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation No Avista Utilities No Inland Power & Light No Irvan Water District No Orchard Avenue Irrigation District No Modern Electric Water Company No Central Valley School District #356 No East Valley School District #361 No West Valley School District #363 No Century Link No Comcast No Model Irrigation District #18 No Consolidated Irrigation District #19 No Hutchinson Irrigation District - Qwest No Carnho e Irrigation District No. 7 No East Spokane Water District # 1 No Vera Water & Power No Spokane County Water District #3 No Spokane Tribe of Indians No Yellowstone Pipeline Company Yes 5/7/2021 Page 6 of 7 Staff Report 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: CPA-2021-0004 For the reasons set forth in Section C, the proposed city -initiated text amendment that incorporates policies, goals and strategies relating to the City's commitment and participation in regional efforts to address homelessness and housing instability, is consistent with the requirements of the SVMC 17.80.140(H) and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT 1 Keturn to Table of Contend The statutory goals and requirements of the GMA, Ch. 36.70A RCW, guide the development of the City's Comprehensive Plan. This chapter presents the City's goals, policies, and strategies that will achieve the GMA goals and requirements and guide the City's efforts in realizing the community's vision. For the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, goals are broad statements of purpose, policies provide specific direction to City staff, and strategies represent initial, concrete actions to direct implementation. Strategies are not binding components of the Comprehensive Plan, but rather offer opportunities for action and linkages to other plans and policies. Economic Development..........................................2-21 LandUse...................................................................................2-23 Transportation...................................................................2-25 ' Housing .....................................................................................2-27 i� Capital Facilities and Public Services ....... 2-28 Public and Private Utilities..................................2-30 �- Parks and Open Space..............................................2-31 Natural Resources.........................................................2-32 2-20 (N) Economic Development GOALS ED-G1 Support economic opportunities and employment growth for Spokane Valley. ED-G2 Create and cultivate a City brand that supports economic growth and leverages existing community, economic, and natural assets. ED-G3 Balance economic development with community development priorities and fiscal sustainability. ED-134 Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders, including the business community, to grow a strong and healthy regional economy. ED-135 Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. ED-G6 Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility, predictability, and stability. POLICIES ED-P1 Work collaboratively with the private sector to support catalytic development projects that are consistent with the City's vision. XX STRATEGIES ED-P2 Identify and encourage business and employment growth in new and j > Undertake a comprehensive innovative industries and occupations. j branding process to create and jmarket an identity for Spokane ED-P3 Encourage businesses that provide jobs and grow local markets. j Valley that sells the City's inherent assets to would-be ED-P4 Promote keyretail, office, and industrial o opportunity sites, as residents, employers, and identified in the City's economic development studies and other j visitors planning documents (e.g. Certified Sites). j > Participate in regional tour- ism -promotion efforts and ED-P5 Promote Spokane Valley as a great place to work, visit, and do j increase the City's presence in business. / P regional events ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and j > Evaluate the return on underutilized properties, particularly those with potential to serve as % investment of potential tourism a catalyst for economic development. anchors and allocate available jfunds according to the findings ED-P7 Implement strategies that are intended to create new attractions and events that assert Spokane Valley's presence as a tourist destination.//////////////////////////////////////////� 2-21 Kehirn to Table of Contend STRATEGIES > Consider using GIS and web -based technologies to assist business development > Intensify targeted retail recruitment efforts > Evaluate local interest in the creation of a Business Improvement District > Conduct a market analysis and initial business planning for a local farmers' market ED-P8 Provide and maintain an infrastructure system that supports Spokane Valley's economic development priorities. ED-139 Invest in long-term improvements to make the City a more attractive tourist destination. ED-P10 Enable the creation and retention of home -based businesses that are consistent with neighborhood character. ED-P11 Leverage federal, state, and regional economic development resources and programs for City economic development purposes. ED-P12 Leverage community assets (e.g. trails, natural amenities, and facilities) to grow the local economy. ED-P13 Implement strategies that are intended to sustain Spokane Valley's existing high value and high volume tourism segments. ED-P14 Pursue opportunities for creating public -private partnerships that will advance the City's economic development goals. ED-P15 Pursue technology -based solutions that improve assistance to businesses. ED-P16 Support local educational institutions in the development of educational and training programs that meet the needs of businesses. ED-P17 Engage local businesses to understand their needs and to assist in future growth. ED-P18 Provide positive, accessible, and customer -oriented City and public services. 2-22 8 Land Use GOALS LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-G3 Support the transformation of commercial, industrial, and mixed -use areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity. LU-G4 Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality. POLICIES LU-P1 Enable neighborhood -scale commercial uses in residential areas. STRATEGIES LU-P2 Support unique, high -quality, and locally -owned retail in appropriate Z, locations. i Streamline permitting procedures based on feedback LU-P3 Preserve the public natural features and amenities that make jfrom i business and landowners, Spokane Valley attractive to residents and business owners. developers, etc. > Evaluate parking standards and LU-P4 Enable the creation of common open spaces in neighborhoods. X reduce the amount of required parking if feasible LU-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial i or industrial uses. > Collaborate with the private sector to ensure the succesful LU-P6 Support neighborhood efforts to sustainably cultivate produce. i redevelopment of vacant land at p Mirabeau Point LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors. LU-P8 Ensure that neighborhoods are served by safe and convenient motorized and non -motorized transportation routes. LU-P9 Provide supportive regulations for new and innovative development types on commercial, industrial, and mixed -use land. LU-P10 Ensure that freight -intensive operations have convenient access to designated truck routes and intermodal terminals. LU-P11 Support the remediation of environmentally -contaminated sites to return the land to productive use. 2-23 Keturn to Table of Contents LU-P12 Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land. LU-P13 Work collaboratively with landowners and developers that seek to provide mixed -use residential projects. LU-P14 Enable a variety of housing types. LU-P15 Encourage development in commercial and mixed -use zones by reducing parking requirements. LU-P16 Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors and near transit centers and commercial areas. LU-P17 Enable voluntary efforts by local home and business owners to improve energy performance and produce or use sources of renewable energy. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. LU-P19 Develop criteria to identify, process, and assess the annexation of land into Spokane Valley. LU-P20 Identify land designations for potential annexation areas in the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent Urban Growth Areas to the City. 2-24 Transportation GOALS T-G1 Ensure that the transportation system and investments in transportation infrastructure are designed to improve quality of life or support economic development priorities. T-G2 Ensure that transportation planning efforts reflect anticipated land use patterns and support identified growth opportunities. T-G3 Strive to reduce the number of serious injury/fatality collisions to zero. T-G4 Provide for safe and efficient freight mobility. T-G5 Maintain and enhance a comprehensive multimodal transportation system that promotes, supports, and improves the safe, efficient, and reliable movement of people, vehicles, and goods. POLICIES T-Pi Continue to pursue funding for the BNSF mainline separation projects of Bridging the Valley program to reduce rail/vehicle collisions, improve emergency access, eliminate vehicle waiting times, reduce noise, and improve traffic flow. T-P2 Consider neighborhood traffic and livability conditions and address potential adverse impacts of public and private projects during the planning, designing, permitting, and construction phases. T-P3 Ensure that a robust street preservation program is funded and implemented. T-P4 Support voluntary efforts to beautify local and regional transportation corridors. T-P5 Restrict high-speed traffic from residential neighborhoods. T-P6 Work collaboratively with developers to ensure that areas experiencing new development are well served by motorized and non -motorized transportation options. T-P7 Provide access to sources of current information about transportation options in Spokane Valley and the region. T-P8 Support local, regional, state, and federal transportation safety programs. STRATEGIES > Coordinate transportation planning efforts with other jurisdictions to ensure that Spokane Valley retailers and neighborhoods are well served > Identify and fund key areas for beaufication and coordinate capital improvement projects > Work with Spokane Transit Authority (STA) to provide bus shelters at strategic locations > Seek opportunities to continue to fund grade separations on Pines Road and Barker Road 2-25 Keturn to Table of Contents T-P9 Provide and maintain quality street, sidewalk, and shared -use path surfaces that provide a safe environment for all users. T-P10 Develop a citywide trail system that provides improved access and linkages between Spokane Valley's existing trails, neighborhoods, and community amenities. T-P11 Designate appropriate freight corridors to ensure that streets/ intersections are designed to safely accommodate trucks and other modes. T-P12 Provide alternate truck routes to minimize the effects of congestion in major commercial and industrial areas. T-1313 Evaluate opportunities to improve multimodal connectivity in all transportation planning projects. T-P14 Identify and implement opportunities to improve data collection and performance monitoringfor transportation in Spokane Valley. T-P15 Encourage all Commute Trip Reduction employers in the City to achieve travel reduction goals. T-P16 Provide a supportive transportation network for expansion of general aviation and freight uses at Felts Field. T-P17 Use transportation demand management techniques and technologies to move people, vehicles, and goods safely and efficiently throughout the City's transportation system. T-P18 Invest in infrastructure beautification, including landscaping, art, and walking paths. T-P19 Coordinate with Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) and Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency on actions to reduce vehicle air pollution emissions through regular vehicle inspections and to lobby federal agencies for appropriate air pollution standards that balance public health and economic growth. T-P20 Consider evaluating multimodal level of service for citywide planning efforts, particularly focusing on the quality of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. 2-26 I ICY�s�ng GOALS H-G1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the community. STRATEGIES H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. j � > Identify low- and moderate- jincome housing needs H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane j Valley's neighborhoods. > Continue to evaluate new housing typologies to meet j market needs H-G4 Work collaboratively with local stakeholders to develop a Homeless j Response System specific to the needs of the Valley. ! > Develop regulations that provide for the safe. efficient. H-G5 Work closely with and support the Regional Homeless System and eauitable provision of to ensure continuity of care for community members that are suonortive housing services unsheltered and unstablv housed in the Valley and throughout our within the City. region. POLICIES H-P1 Support voluntary efforts by property owners to rehabilitate and preserve buildings of historic value and unique character. H-P2 Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by allowing innovative housing types including tiny homes, accessory dwelling units, pre -fabricated homes, co -housing, cottage housing, and other housing types. H-P3 Support the development of affordable housing units using available financial and regulatory tools. H-P4 Enable the creation of housing for resident individuals and families needing assistance from social and human service providers. H-P5 Enable a variety of housing types at increased densities within %2 mile of funded high performance transit networks. H-P6 Preserve and enhance the city's established single-family neighborhoods by minimizing the impacts of more dense housing typologies such as duplexes and cottage development. H-P7 Work with service providers to bring additional resources to Valley residents. 2-27 neturn to Table of Contents H-P8 Ensure the provision of homeless and housing services have commensurate on -site support to maintain the character of neighborhoods and minimize public service calls. H-P9 Support community resource hubs where service providers can co -locate in areas in close proximity to public transportation. H-P10 Ensure equal access for Valley residents to publicly funded programs, transportation. job opportunities and housing. H-P11 Engage in active recruitment of service providers that desire to serve Valley residents through targeted programs focused on homeless service delivery. H-P12 Support the implementation of the Continuum of Care Five -Year Strategic Plan to End Homelessness. H-P13 Continue as active members on regional committees that address homelessness and housing instability such as the Continuum of Care Board and the Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee. H-P14 Leverage federal state and local funds. when appropriate. to bolster existing programs provided to Valley residents. H-P15 Encourage and support new projects and programs which seek to assist in maintaining housing stability or provide exits from homelessness to housing. H-P16 Analyze and collect data through our local Community Management Information System and use this data to help drive homeless and housing policy. H-P17 Continue to support and participate in the Coordinated Entry implementation. 2-28 _ii Capital Facilities GOALS CF-G1 Coordinate with special districts, other jurisdictions, and the private sector to effectively and affordably provide facilities and services. CF-G2 Provide public facilities and services necessary to promote Spokane Valley's economic development goals and community priorities. CF-G3 Ensure efficient and cost-effective public safety and emergency services. CF-G4 Pursue a diverse set of capital funding sources. STRATEGIES POLICIES > Identify needed capital CF-P1 Seek a balance between the quality and cost of providing public facilities improvements facilities and services. that are critical to economic development CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing g public facilities before investing in new > Update wayfindingand facilities. signage for the entire City, and incorporate a consistent CF-P3 Coordinate the construction of public infrastructure with private aesthetic or theme based development to minimize costs. on the outcome of the City's branding process CF-P4 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/ pressure for new development within the City. > Execute acitizen-supported vision for the redevelopment of CF-P5 Coordinate with a fire services provider to disseminate information the area surrounding the new about fire -wise development to property owners and land City Hall developers. > Improve new and existing access points to the Spokane CF-P6 Ensure that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service River standards. > Establish criteria for CF-P7 Maintain a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets prioritization of capital the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency investments planning efforts. > Establish a Facilities Condition CF-P8 Coordinate sewer planning with Spokane County. Index (FCI) to provide information for planned CF-P9 Support continued planning for domestic water needs. maintenance with set priorities and cost estimates CF-P10 Require new development to connect to public sewer and water. 2-29 rtetum to Table of Contents CF-P11 Identify opportunities to reduce waste and increase recycling in City facilities and at City -sponsored events. CF-P12 Plan and build infrastructure to support the development of high quality retail and commercial projects. CF-P13 Coordinate with school districts in land use planning processes. CIF-P14 Coordinate with school districts to use school facilities as community centers and public facilities where appropriate. CF-P15 Evaluate a variety of capital funding sources including, but not limited to, grants, local improvement districts, latecomer agreements, and impact fees to fund projects and programs. CF-P16 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in potential annexation areas, including identifying the fiscal impacts of providing the facilities, utilities, services, and maintenance. CF-P17 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in developing capital improvement programs. CF-P18 Ensure that adequate library services are available. CIF-P19 Collaborate with Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. CF-P20 Prioritize public investments necessary to support catalytic economic development and redevelopment projects. CF-P21 Support State legislative and municipal water system efforts to convert irrigation rights to municipal water rights. CIF-P22 Reassess the Land Use Element and relevant goals and policies if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs. 2-30 STRATEGIES a ra Public and Private Ut]H-';1e7 GOALS U-G1 Coordinate with utility providers to balance cost-effectiveness with environmental protection, aesthetic impact, public safety, and public health. POLICIES U-Pi Promote the efficient co -location of new utilities. Extend sewer infrastructure to support industrial U-P2 Promote the development of citywide communication networks development using the most advanced technology available. Extend water infrastructure U-P3 Promote the undergrounding of utility distribution lines. to support industrial development U-P4 Coordinate with utility service providers to prevent obstructions to regional utility corridors. U-PS Require the placement of cellular facilities, substations, and antennas in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on adjacent land uses and utilizes existing structures. U-P6 Coordinate with utility providers to ensure that sizing, locating, and phasing of utility systems are appropriate for planned growth. U-P7 Participate in regular updates of the Inland Northwest Regional Pavement Cut Policy. U-P8 Encourage the construction and maintenance of utility, communications, and technology infrastructure that will help attract business and industry. 2-31 aeturn to Table of Contents (9 Parks and Open Space GOALS P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-G2 Recognize and support local artists. POLICIES P-Pi Support performing arts, community events and relevant facilities. STRATEGIES P-132 Acquire land for the development of parks or the preservation of i open space within the City's boundaries and adjacent UGAs. % > Leverage the Appleway Trail to improve adjacent business P-P3 Using the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, periodically assess opportunities and create recreational facilities to identify potential gaps and improvements. spillover effects > Seek funding to develop P-P4 Implement innovative strategies for park maintenance, park safety, north -south trail connections and park accessibility to reduce operating costs. between key east -west jcorridors P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for i pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. 91, > Evaluate the feasibility of ZZ constructing awhitewater P-P6 Seek grants, private land donations, and other funding sources for course on the Spokane River land acquisition and recreational facilities development. > Evaluate the feasibility of P-P7 Identify and protect regional open spaces and natural areas to form a j / developing a public park along the Spokane River connected network of active and passive recreation areas. i > Evaluate the feasibility of an P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all j arts venue in Spokane Valley neighborhoods. > Identify locations to P-P9 Support the inclusion of artwork from local artists in public places. incorporate public art in new developments or City facilities P-P10 Support the voluntary inclusion of common open space and public art in new development. P-P11 Partner with public and private entities to encourage, sponsor, and support a range of public activities and special events within appropriate open spaces. P-P12 Identify opportunities to transform land located in neighborhoods into pocket parks. 2-32 4 Natural Resources GOALS NR-G1 Pursue flood hazard reduction while providing predictability for landowners. NR-G2 Protect the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie sole source aquifer from contamination and maintain high quality groundwater. NR-G3 Ensure that Critical Areas and Shoreline Master Program regulations are based on best available science and are consistent with required environmental policy. NR-G4 Regularly update stormwater management plans for sensitive riparian areas. NR-G5 Enhance riparian and large wooden areas throughout the City on public lands. NR-G6 Review, as appropriate and based on changing circumstances, the need for mineral resource land designation within the urban setting of the City. POLICIES STRATEGIES NR-P1 Model and delineate floodplain/floodway boundaries to correct > Expand the trail network in inaccurate delineations. the former "Walk in the Wild Zoo" property NR-P2 Prepare and/or regularly update watershed plans for Chester Creek, Glenrose Channel, Saltese Creek, Forker Draw, and Central Park Basin. NR-P3 Prepare an accurate, updated map of areas expected to be inundated by a 100-year flood, particularly in the Spokane River, Forker Draw, and Glenrose Channel areas. N R-P4 Work with state agencies to improve natural resource inventory data within the City. NR-P5 Coordinate with regional collaborators to protect and improve regional water quality. N R-P6 Ensure that emergency response resources are available in the event of a spill. NR-P7 Educate the public about the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie and Spokane River's susceptibility to contamination. 2-33 neturn to Table of Contents NR-P8 Maintain compliance with state underground injection control and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. NR-P9 Ensure that wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, and critical aquifer recharge areas are identified, designated, and protected. NR-P10 Maintain stormwater plans to include inventory and maintenance of stormwater facilities. NR-P11 The City has determined that a mineral resource land designation is not appropriate at this time, but the City will enable existing mineral extraction and mining operations that are currently in lawful operation within the City. 2-34 0 0 Z)" ra,��91�S . 'Dr � r nPJ,e � e- 4,� 110n Legend • Economic Development The strategies included on the previous pages are compiled here for reference. For each strategy, the implementation matrix provided below also explores • Land Use the relationship between each strategy and the various elements of the • Transportation Comprehensive Plan, designates lead staff or organization for implementation • Housing activities, outlines a time table for completion, and provides a rough sense of relative priority. Though the strategies are not mandatory for the City, they are • Capital Facilities an important window into Spokane Valley's approach to the implementation • Public &Private Utilities of the Comprehensive Plan and they merit continued evaluation by City staff. STRATEGY PRIMARY ELEMENT RELATEDELEMENT(S) • Parks & Open Spaces • Natural Resources LEAD& TIMING PRIORITY PARTNERS Undertake a comprehensive branding process to create and market an identity for Spokane Valley E.D. Division; that sells the City's inherent assets to would-be Economic Visit Spokane Ongoing HIGH residents, employers, and visitors. Development Continue participation in regional tourism -pro- E.D. Division; motion efforts and increase the City's presence in Economic ValleyFest, Visit Spokane, Sports Ongoing HIGH regional events using space at CenterPlace. Development Commission Seek opportunities for funding and improvements for tourism related improvements such as the Economic > E.D. Division Ongoing HIGH CenterPlace West Lawn improvements. Development Continue to advance GIS and web -based technologies to assist business development. Economic E.D. Division Ongoing g g HIGH Development Continue to implement the Retail Recruitment E.D. Division; Plan. Economic D Consultant Ongoing MEDIUM Development Identify opportunities for the formation of a ' E.D. Division; 2019 MEDIUM Farmers'market at CenterPlace. Economic Parks Development Revise and update the City's website to meet accessibility standards, increase search engine optimization, improve user experience and Economic J E.D. Division Ongoing HIGH streamline and simplify content. Development 2-35 Keturn to Table of ContenE5 STRATEGY PRIMARY ELEMENT RELATED ELEMENT(S) LEAD & PARTNERS TIMING PRIORITY Evaluate and develop criteria to assist in the Economic _i J E.D. Division 2019 HIGH evaluation of annexations. Development Streamline permitting procedures to advance our Building business friendly environment based on feedback Division Ongoing HIGH from business and landowners, developers, etc. Land Use Collaborate with the private sector to facilitate the ) _ E.D. Division 2020 HIGH successful redevelopment of Mirabeau Point. Land Use E.D. and Coordinate transportation planning efforts with Engineering other jurisdictions to ensure that Spokane Valley ) Divisions; Ongoing HIGH businesses and neighborhoods are well served. Transportation adjacent jurisdictions, STA Evaluate and where feasible, implement traffic impact fees in areas of the City where detailed ) Engineering 2020 HIGH traffic studies have been completed. Transportation Work with STA to improve and expand transit E.D. and Engineering 2022 MEDIUM service in the City. Transportation Divisions; STA Evaluate and consider amendments to the E.D. and municipal code that enhance grant eligibility for , Engineering Divisions; Health 2019 HIGH projects that improve safety and accessibility. Transportation District Seek opportunities to continue to fund railroad Engineering; Chamber of 2023 HIGH grade separation on Pines Road. Transportation P Commerce, GSI E.D. Division; Identify low- and moderate -income housing needs. Spokane Housing 2024 LOW Housing Authority Explore and potentially adopt a Multi Family Tax EDDivision 2020 MEDIUM Exemption in key areas. Housing Continue to evaluate new housing typologies to E.D. Division; Homebuilders 2024 LOW meet market needs. Housing Association Develop regulations that provide for the safe Administration efficent, and equitable provision of supportive -• J , J 2022 HIGH housing within the City, Housing E.D. Division Identify any gaps or duolication in services orovidedinthe City and help facilitate community discussion how to , � Administration E.D. Division 2021 HIGH wide on streamline servicesHousing— offered. Identify siting locations for community resource J J Administration 2024 MEDIUM hubs in close Droximitvto public transportation Housing — — E.D. Division 2-36 STRATEGY PRIMARY RELATED ELEMENT(S) LEAD & TIMING PRIORITY ELEMENT PARTNERS Update wayfinding and signage for the entire City, and incorporate a consistent aesthetic or theme j based on the outcome of the City's branding Capital --' process. Facilities Identify opportunities for the expansion of Balfour Park. Capital Facilities Improve new and existing access points to the Spokane River. Capital Facilities Create a 20-year transportation project list to ; inform the 6-year transportation improvement Capital program. Facilities Implement an asset management program for the street and stormwater maintenance programs. Capital Facilities Work to extend and improve water, sewer, and road infrastructure in the Northeast Industrial public and % Area to support industrial development. Private Utilities Coordinate with utility providers on the timing of capital improvement projects. Public and Private Utilities Identify and implement opportunities, like the Parklet and Streeteries ordinance that take advantage of proximity and access to the Parks and Open Appleway and Centennial Trails. Space Identify and seek funding to develop north -south trail connections between the Appleway and parks and Open Centennial Trails. Space Develop an arts master plan that identifies locations to incorporate public art in new developments or City facilities. Expand the trail network in the former "Walk in the Wild Zoo" property. Parks and Open Space j Natural -' Resources E.D. Division; Downtown 2024 LOW Partnership Parks and Rec Dept. and E.D. 2020 MEDIUM Division Parks and Rec Dept and Dept of 2020 MEDIUM Ecology Engineering and E.D. Divisions 2019 HIGH Administration, Engineering, 2022 MEDIUM Street Maintenance Engineering and E.D. Divisions; Spokane County; 2022 HIGH Consolidated Irrigation District Engineering and E.D. Divisions; 2022 HIGH Spokane County; Water Districts E.D. Division; adjacent 2020 LOW businesses Parks and Rec Dept.; E.D. Division; and Resource 2020 MEDIUM Conservation Office E.D. Division 2022 LOW Parks; Department 2022 LOW of Natural Resources 2-37 Keturn to Table of Contents 59999� 00i ml i�4 Housing Ir fq, N-E, >r>4i'". i �f' JI'`-...V .'. JJ xr- - e;4R`fO M ...Yl Introduction WHYTHE HOUSING ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT Housing is an important component of the economic infrastructure of a community because it ensures a balance of land uses and complements employ- ment -generating uses by providing opportunities for workers to live near their jobs. The availability of housing types that match Spokane Valley's job profile and enhance the livability of local neighborhoods is therefore an important competitive advantage for economic development. The Housing Element leverages key data to inform the development of goals and policies, which will set a course toward the City's vision of quality, affordable housing for all Spokane Valley residents. PLANNING CONTEXT The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) stipulates that the housing element serves to encourage the availability of affordable housing to residents of all economic backgrounds, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage the preservation of existing neighborhoods. Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) for Spokane County for housing are consistent with these requirements and place additional emphasis on promoting accessibility for residents to commercial and transportation centers. REFERENCES KEY Refers to other section In previous planning efforts, the City acknowledged the abundance of single x-xx in plan family housing, and focused on expanding housing options for residents while increasing the availability of multifamily housing units centrally located to Refers to other Spokane employment centers and commercial amenities. Additionally, Spokane Valley SV Valley plans and official aimed to increase the prevalence of mixed -use retail and residential throughout documents the City's neighborhoods with the overarching goal of limiting auto-dependen- Refers to other cy and improving housing affordability. Onon -Spokane Valley The Housing Element works in tandem with other elements in this references for further Comprehensive Plan. It includes a data -rich narrative to document existing reading conditions that affect housing availability, cost, and quality. These include demographic trends and market conditions. The findings indicate challenges and opportunities for housing in Spokane Valley, and ultimately anchor the goals and policies presented in Chapter 2. 6-97 Keturn to Table of Contents Current Conditions Spokane Valley has a similar demographic composition as Spokane County overall. The population in the City will continue to grow in size, and it is anticipated that the population will continue to "age" —meaning that the share of the population 65 and older will increase disproportionately compared to other age segments. Both the average household size and the proportion of households with children are decreasing in Spokane Valley. Additionally, the apartment vacancy rate in the City and County are comparably low, and lease rates for apartments are steadily increasing. Taken together, these recent trends indicate that demand for single family dwellings is decreasing in relation to demand for multifamily units. The key data from this section are summarized below. • The majority (60%) of housing units in Spokane Valley are single family dwellings built prior to 2000 (Figure 41). • Spokane Valley's housing growth has been modest, but steady since it incorporated in 2003, growing at a rate of about 1% per year. About 6,000 new residences were added to Spokane Valley's total housing stock between 2003 and 2015 (Figure 41). • Spokane Valley's population is aging. Between 2005 and 2014, the proportion of the population over the age of 75 increased by 2%, from 5% to 7%. The City's aging trend parallels that of the County —the share of the population 65 or older totaled 15% in 2014 in both Spokane Valley and Spokane County (Figure 35). • Compared to Spokane County as a whole, the number of households with children is decreasing more rapidly in Spokane Valley. The percentage of the City's households with children decreased by 5.6%—from 35.6% to 30%—between 2005 and 2014, while the proportion of households with children in the County dropped by 1.5% during the same time period (Figure 35). • The median household income in Spokane Valley was over $2,000 less than the average countywide annual earnings. Additionally, almost a third of Spokane Valley's residents earned between $25,000 and $50,000 annually in 2014 (Figure 38). 6-98 • Residents in both Spokane Valley and Spokane County are cost -burdened, meaning that their housing costs account for more than one-third of their income. Renters and homeowners are notably cost -burdened, however, there is a much larger proportion of cost -burdened renters than homeowners, 51% of renters and 26% of homeowners in both locales spend a third or more of their monthly budget on rent or mortgage payments (Figure 39). © The vacancy rate for apartments in the City is low and rents are increasing. According to an apartment market survey executed by the Runstad Center for Real Estate Studies at the University of Washington, the average rent for apartments of any size in Spokane Valley was $827 per month. Furthermore, the average rent for a one -bedroom, one -bathroom apartment was $812 per month. The overall vacancy rate for apartments in Spokane Valley was notably low-0.8% (Studies, 2016; Figure43). ® The City has historically allowed, and continues to allow, other types of housing to meet community needs, in compliance with state law. These housing options include government -assisted housing, manufactured housing, group homes, and foster care. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS The demographic makeup of an area informs the market demand for housing size, type, location, and mix. For example, cities with large numbers of households with children will have high demand for single family housing near schools. Similarly, housing demand in locations with higher proportions of single, young adult populations will be skewed towards smaller, multifamily units proximate to employment centers. As the population of an area evolves over time, the housing market must also adjust to match the needs of its residents. lrr, n cirlr, !fin,-)rl(C The population in Spokane Valley is growing at a slightly slower rate than the countywide population. Spokane Valley experienced almost 11% growth between 2003 and 2014 compared to the County's 13% population increase during the same time period. By 2037, the City is projected to have 14,650 additional residents. Though increasing population is clearly linked to demand for housing, population trends are only briefly summarized in this element, and more detailed data is contained in the Land Use Element. 6-99 Keturn to Table of Contenio Cities, counties, and regions can grow through natural increases (i.e. when births outstrip deaths) and by in -migration. Countywide, births and deaths remained stable between 2005 and 2015 (Figure 34). Therefore, recent fluctuations in population are largely attributable to people moving to and from the County. These "non -natural" fluctuations are referred to as net residual migration, and have been the driving force behind population growth and loss within Spokane County since at least 2005. Figure 34. Population Change by Natural Increase and Net Residual Migration, Spokane County, 2005-2015 Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management (2015) 9.5 r Net Residual Mi?r ion Population h •' 8.5m (Change) hah:aal Imrex:e Ia+rths-Dcath;,� 7,_ipm 6.500 5. 1-300 4,500 315W 2.500 1, 50D -5U) 200S 2006 2€G-1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 203-1 2015 L1n A7in,q Poreciorion Overall, Spokane Valley's age segmentation closely resembles that of Spokane County. One notable trend in both the City and the County is thatthe population is aging. The share of the population 65 or older totaled 15% in 2014 in both Spokane Valley and Spokane County (up from 10% and 12%, respectively, in 2005) (Figure 35). This trend is reflected in younger age segments as well, with the residents 19 or younger dropping from 31% (2005) to 26% (2014) in Spokane Valley. The decreased prevalence of children in Spokane Valley brings the City in line with the larger County, where 25% of the population is 19 or younger. The City, therefore, does not have a significantly larger family presence than the County as a whole. These trends suggest decreasing demand for large, detached single family homes and increased demand for the types of housing that are both desirable and affordable to smaller households, including empty -nesters that may be less inclined to maintain larger properties. Nevertheless, the City will still need to provide excellent facilities, such as schools, for families with children. 6-100 Even with increased demand for smaller and attached housing products, new single family homes will continue to be developed throughout the County. However, data suggests that even as all of Spokane County ages, Spokane Valley's population is aging at a particularly fast rate. Multifamily units and smaller, attached single family housing products may therefore be comparatively attractive investments in Spokane Valley for housing developers that are active in the greater Spokane region. This finding is also supported by the fact that while Spokane Valley's average household size has slightly decreased since 2005, the average household size throughout Spokane County has increased (Figure 36). Figure 35. Distribution of Population by Age Segment, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005 and 2014 Source: Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (2005-2014) lU7`?r 7.54 8t1S 65 -74 7c� 5 a9 e 20% y � J 10% 61n1 der 5 cf, 2005 2014 2005 201.1 Spokane Valley Spokane County Income and Housing Affordability In 2005, the median household income in Spokane Valley was roughly $4,000 lower than that of Spokane County as a whole (Figure 38). In 2014, that Figure 36. Average Household difference narrowed —there was just over a $2,000 difference in median Size, Spokane Valley and Spokane household income between Spokane Valley and Spokane County. County, 2005-2014 Source: US Census Bureau American Community Median household income has therefore grown at a faster rate in Spokane Survey (2014) Valley than in Spokane County. Despite this trend, median household income AREA 2005 2014 in Spokane Valley is still lower than in Spokane County as a whole by about Spokane Valley 2.47 2.44 $2,200. The share of residents within each income bracket has also remained Spokane County 2.39 2.45 consistent during this time period in Spokane Valley, while in Spokane 6-101 Keturn to Table of Contenin County there has been a marked decrease in the percentage of households making less than $25,000 (from 36% to 25%) and a significant increase in the number of households making $50,000 or more (from 38% to 51%) (Figure 37). This may suggest that residents of the County are experiencing increased upward mobility, or that the County has seen an influx of wealthy residents. This change could also be attributed to the City's older population retiring, and subsequently not growing their annual income. In any case, the fact that increases in median household income in Spokane Valley have not lifted a significant number of households into higher income segments indicates that Spokane Valley's housing must remain affordable to a wider range of income levels. One of the goals of the GMA is to provide Washington residents with affordable housing options. According to federal and state guidelines, a household is considered cost burdened when 30% or more of its gross income is spent on housing (including rent or mortgage and utility costs). Figure 3Z Income Distribution of Households, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2005-2014 Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (2005-2014) 109 — �100�000, + 80m Figure 38. Median Household 70-A Income, Spokane Valley and 60% $100.000 Spokane County, 2005-2014 50% Source: US Census Bureau American $50 000- Community Survey (2014) $75,000 30%PD 3 a.4a} a 2G% =525.s�tx7 U 4g Zb 10% $50,000 2005 2014 2005 2014 fttessthatl $4CLA00 � Spokane Valley Spokane Canty i 0i $34,000 Renters and homeowners in both the City and the County are notably cost- burdened-36% and 35% in 2014, respectively (Figure 39). The percentage of cost -burdened households in Spokane Valley increased by 1% between 2005 $101)00 and 2014, while the proportion in the County rose by 3% during the same time period. This suggests that other locales in Spokane County are disproportion2005 - ately driving the increase, but that affordability challenges persist within the��� 2oc�514 5pd-karwe Spokane City. villcy CAiray 6-102 Figure 39. Cost -Burdened Households by Type, Spokane Valley, 2005-2014 Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (2005-2014) 6.0% 54% S1% 50% S1% 50% 35% 36% 35% 4t1� 26 2b9� 3296 269d:. 22*. [ l vCla., 30% 2W,: ■ C?.�.n s IQ%3 Renter=. 17u 2005 '4014 2005 2014 Sg kane Valley Spakar�-_ Crxjnty In both the City and the County, there is a much larger proportion of cost -burdened renters than homeowners. In Spokane Valley, however, the share of cost -burdened renters decreased from 54% in 2005 to 51% in 2014 while the percentage of cost -burdened homeowners remained constant. The opposite occurred on the countywide scale —the share of cost -burdened renters increased slightly, from 50% to 51%. The proportion of cost -burdened homeowners countywide also increased by 4%. Given that median household incomes are increasing throughout the County, this indicates that the average home price is increasing in Spokane County at a faster rate than in Spokane Valley. Though renters are disproportionately cost -burdened, data suggest that Spokane Valley and Spokane County residents are increasingly more likely to rent than buy their housing unit. In the City, the share of renter -occupied housing increased from 35% to 40% between 2005 and 2014. This trend is visible countywide (34% to 38%), as well as nationwide (Figure 40). Several demographic and economic factors —not least the Great Recession —have shifted consumer preferences toward renting, particularly in urban areas. 6-103 Keturn to Table of Contend Figure 40. Owner and Renter -Occupied Housing, Spokane Valley ContinuuM Care Pro of gram g and Spokane County, 2005-2014 Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (2005-2014) j The Continuum of Care (CoC ) Program jseeks to promote the regional effort 100% % towards ending homelessness and ensures access to orograms to those 9M. j experiencing homelessness. This B jProgram has several components ■ Chyitr�r j which outline how a iurisdiction 7 Crwa • "' Occu�.yd j implements their own CoC, but one of Housing j the most critical is the creation of the 617ro jCoC Board. Our CoC is made up of a 30%, j variety of business leaders. homeless service providers. local government 4 j representatives, and individuals that 30%, j have experienced homelessness. 20% L " % The CoC sets local priorities around ■ Renter 1% ending homelessness and is the the OctuP'ci % driver of our Five -Year Strategic Plan j to Prevent and End Homelessness_ 2005 2014 2005 2014 j There are several responsibilities that Spokane Val ley Spokane County j the CoC must comply with but one jof the key components of the CoC jis its responsibility in identifying a Collaborative Applicant. The City of There are several ways that a household experiencing homelessness can access j Spokane is the designated Collaborative Applicant for our CoC. and they are community resources that will help them navigate to temporary and permanent j responsible for applying and managing_ housing. These various pathways depend on where the individual is in the j the various homeless services grants offered by HUD on behalf of the County and the existing resources embedded in those communities. Our region j Board. The City of Spokane is also the helps to alleviate homelessness and housing instability through a coordinated % lead organization that managesthe and concerted effort, and we are committed to supporting our Regional Community Management Information System (CMIS). The CMIS database Homeless System. We do this through a number of regional boards and j is a local technology system that committees such as the Continuum of Care and the Housing and Community j service providers are required to use when collecting client level data when Development Advisory Committee. j homeless individuals access homeless jand housing services in our region. Data THE SUPPLY OF HOUSING IN SPOKANE VALLEY j collected through this system is designed help drive decisions to regional policy as it relates to the delivery of homeless While demographic and economic characteristics of Spokane Valley's j services. The data provides opportunities population provide insight into the demand for housing products in the City and j to course correct current programs or, the region, the existing supply of housing in the area is essential to identifying j in some cases, support new pro rg am / offerings. challenges and opportunities facing current and prospective Spokane Valley j The CoC governance structure is also residents. j comprised of various Sub Committees jthat assist in the carrvin2 out of the The City currently contains about 50,700 total dwelling units. Almost 30,000 j mission of the CoC to ensure that of those dwellings were built prior to 1980 (Figure 41). Roughly 15%, or 7,845 j homelessness is rare, brief and one time. j Each Sub Committee focuses on unique units, of the total housing stock was built after 2000. j subpogulations that are experiencing 6-104 housing instability and literal homelessness These Sub Committees are: Veterans. Young Adults. Families with children. and Single Adults \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ o Spokane City/Spokane County ContinuumofCare 5-Year Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Ho m le cc 24 Code of Federal Regulations part 578 Continuum of Figure 41. Housing Units by Type and Year Built, Spokane Valley, 2013 Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (2005-2013) 2C}=0 18.000 16.00 14,000 12.000 10.000 8,0010 6,00 0 ».0111 2,000 0 17,604 11.916 13,363 Mobile_. Mons* w7Uni 7,845 &rill B e'ore Boil[ 1960 to Built 1980 to Built 2000 or 1960 197el 1999 late Spokane Valley's housing growth has been modest, but steady since it incorporated in 2003, growing at a rate of about 1% per year. Approximately 6,000 new residences were added to Spokane Valley's total housing stock between 2003 and 2015. This is consistent with the aforementioned data illustratingthe age of housing units, which reports a limited number of dwellings built after 2000. REAL ESTATE CONSIDERATIONS Though the Great Recession negatively impacted the feasibility of real estate development projects throughout the country, financing for new development is once again available and development activity is again increasing. Macroeconomic conditions will always affect local development trends, and are important since private development will drive any new additions to housing stock in Spokane Valley and the region. Multifamily units, in particular, were difficult to finance in many market areas, and the graph in Figure 42 illustrates this difficulty, as there were no multifamily units constructed in Spokane Valley between the third quarter of 2009 and the second quarter of 2012. Since the third quarter of 2012, however, the multifamily development pipeline has been relatively robust. Market data also show that, though multifamily vacancy rates are more volatile in the City than in the County, rates in both geographies are quite low. Vacancies 6-105 keturn to Table of Contend Figure 42. Multifamily Housing Units Delivered by Quarter, Spokane Valley, 2005-2016 Source: CoStar Group (2016) 30 x Units Wivered 3�+3 250 200 176 256 144 1-50 100 50 28 0 ^h 1Sa 3• u i:• 'CJ W W 2 '2 '17 �^ 2 l- .� 324 66 27 4C• 4 4 �+ ,•+ W N i spiked to almost 15% in Spokane Valley in 2009, but have since decreased and have remained between 4% and 6% since mid-2010 (Figure 43). Spokane County, as a larger geography, is more insulated from the volatility found in smaller markets; still, vacancies increased during and immediately after the recession, but have since stabilized at about 4%. These rates indicate a tight rental market regionally and potentially suggest unmet demand for multifamily products. Even the aforementioned spikes in vacancy appear to be attributable to concentrated periods of multifamily development, rather than insufficient demand; though vacancy increased by two percentage points in Spokane Valley in early 2015, several hundred units had been delivered in the months prior, and the rapid return to 4% vacancy suggests healthy absorption of the units delivered. 250 188 135 135 26 26 8 7 .1 h b 2 IQI' IR 6-106 Spokane Valley's neighborhoods are characterized by a predominance of single family homes. Figure 43. Apartment Rent and Vacancy Rates, Spokane Valley and Spokane County, 2000-2015 Source: CoStor Group (2016) S900 5800 $700 $600 $500 S400 $30+0 $200 $100 �W Countywide Rent C��ntyt�•idt V�r �n-y (ti,,rr- 50-bkane Villey Yxtancy Rate 1636 144% + 12� 1J V N ' • FJ iJ C3 tJ •�? FJ tJ FJ tJ FJ �J M C a b a The average apartment rent in Spokane Valley was roughly $100 lower than Spokane County's average rent between 2000 and 2008. Since early 2009, the average rent in Spokane Valley and Spokane County have been generally aligned. As of the first quarter of 2016, the average apartment rent for both areas was approximately $800 per month. Approach I i CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES Several challenges and opportunities arise from a careful analysis of these housing data. The following summarize obstacles and impediments to quality, affordable, and diverse housing options, as well as arising opportunities to improve housing in Spokane Valley, and underpin goal and policy development in the Housing Element. r' -oviding ,"-C)i- i:usc-dUJ'dened Resident, While the proportion of cost -burdened Spokane Valley renters decreased between 2005 and 2014, more than one-third of all residents —owners and renters together —qualified as cost -burdened in 2014. This suggests a substantial need for more affordable housing units in the City, with a focus on affordable rental units. Smaller multifamily units are less expensive than stand-alone single family units, and an increase in their availability could alleviate some of the cost -burden Spokane Valley residents are currently facing. 6-107 tteturn to Table of Contenb More than 50% of Spokane Valley households earned less than $50,000 in 2014. For households earning $25,000 per year, rent and mortgage expenses should be less than $694 per month; at $50,000 annually, housing costs must be less than $1,389 per month. According to an apartment market survey executed by the Runstad Center for Real Estate Studies at the University of Washington, the average rent for apartments of any size in Spokane Valley was $827 per month in 2016, though two and three bedroom units likely exceed this cost by a significant margin. Moreover, when affordable housing units are located further from employment centers and daily needs, like grocery stores, pharmacies, gas stations, restaurants, and other retailers, transportation costs for residents increase significantly through car ownership, insurance requirements, and gasoline purchases. These facts point to the need for affordable housing within walking distance of retailers, employers, and transportation hubs. As the number of households with children decreases, the demand for smaller housing options will likely increase in Spokane Valley and the County overall. Quality higher -density housing products, such as apartments, condominiums, townhouses, tiny homes, or backyard cottages, would be viable opportunities for residents without children and retirees and may offer the added benefit of increasing affordability for workers in retail and services. Aging individuals experience a decrease in mobility —many are unable to drive or don't feel comfortable operating a vehicle as their reflexes and eyesight worsen. As a result, aging populations are more reliant upon transportation services and shorter commute times to amenities and health services. Additionally, increasing age often requires homeowners and renters to downsize because of health concerns, physical mobility restrictions, and/or reductions in income (University, 2014). Taken together, the aforementioned forces urge consideration of denser housing opportunities in close proximity to jobs, retail amenities like grocery stores and banks, and public transportation. 6-108 ,ccer iim�lr�ir>> Service, The City is largely suburban and. in many areas lack a robust sidewalk network and closel2roximity to public transportation which is often limited to arterial corridors. The lack of sidewalks and minimal public transit presents a challenge to those with mobility issues. those that are unsheltered or who lack access to a personal vehicle. The location of facilities that seek to co -locate a variety of community resources needs to be accessible and connected to Dublic transit to ensure equal access. In addition. the City will need to identify the population(s) that a community resource center seeks to serve. Since the Valley is spread out offering a wide variety of community resources will likely have the best outcome for our Community. COMMUNITYAND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES � SE CiI-li;io Conni,jL11liry ;-eference._= The housing stock in Spokane Valley is weighted toward single family units (61%). Low apartment vacancy rates and high rents indicate market demand for more multifamily units. Residents echoed the market status with a community desire for innovative types of multifamily housing, such as cottage housing, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. U �l't c: �; �' ti1Ci/�f fOf'C�CafJ11JI)/ ENCOURAGE THE CREATION OF MIXED -USE DESTINATIONS Regionally, Kendall Yards in Spokane has aroused interest as a relatively new style of development that embraces many of the tenets of a movement called new urbanism. Residents, as well as investors, have indicated interest in this type of development, which could anchor new regional retail, attract overnight visitors, amplify positive publicity, and create new mixed -use housing options. IMPROVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY Substantial portions of the renter and homeowner population are cost -burdened by rent and mortgage payments. An increase in multifamily housing options would reduce the average rent for these units countywide, improving the livelihood of cost -burdened residents. Furthermore, providing housing options that meet the needs of local employees is critical to ensuring that local companies continue to have access to capable workers. 6-109 Keturn to Table of Contents ENSURE A RANGE OF HOUSING OPTIONS FOR RESIDENTS As the City's population ages and the proportion of households with children continues to decrease, the demand for smaller housing options will increase. During conversations with Spokane Valley residents, the desire for new housing typologies —including cottages and tiny homes —repeatedly arose. From an economic development standpoint, these typologies densify existing single family neighborhoods while enhancing neighborhood character, and therefore provide a captive audience for neighborhood -serving retailers that create new jobs in the community and draw visitors from nearby towns. ENHANCE DISTINCTIVE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER The Spokane Valley community expressed a strong desire for more neighborhood amenities, such as non -chain restaurants, boutiques, and local entertainment. These commercial features thrive in walkable, high density residential communities and may best be provided through mixed -use development, where multifamily units can improve the financial feasibility of the development project. BEST PRACTICES Housing for individuals and families with a need for human services is important. Planning for these housing types in appropriate areas will reduce barriers to access for these services and may improve the quality of life for those individuals and families. Incorporating Density,. lmprovimT, Wolkobilit, Coordinating housing development with planning for commercial uses, transportation improvements, and public space can create vibrant places with high -quality, high -density housing options. Walkable places have been shown to create economic benefits for cities and residents alike, and these walkable destinations may help diversify and improve the City's stock of for -rent multifamily housing. 6-110 Co-Locotion of Homeless and Homeless .Service. The City of Spokane Valley has a strong network of various non -profits faith -based organizations and school districts that help serve those who are facing housing instability as well as households that are unsheltered What has historically been missing are locations in the ON where access to these services are easily obtainable Specifically, a high degree of reliance has been on the City of Spokane to physically house these services. which in turn requires City of Spokane Valley residents to travel when resources are needed. The City supports co -location facilities in its jurisdiction within close proximity of public transportation These facilities would house various providers that seek to serve those experiencing homelessness and housing instability. Additionally. such services should be well connected to existing systems of care within our region to encourage and support ease of referrals and reduction of duplication in services. ri ; i Ur Lh i useholcls The provision of Affordable Housing is critical to meet the needs of those households that have special needs or are on fixed incomes Any build out of Affordable Housing in the Citv should align with existing programs and systems that seek to serve those that are unsheltered or unstably housed. The City should strive to work with regional providers to streamline and coordinate the distribution of limited resources 6-111 Keturn to Table of Contents EXHIBIT 2 COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Scm AMENDMENT APPLICATION pokane SVMC 17.80.140 Valley, 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 ♦ Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ permitcenterpspokanevalley.org Year ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS The City of Spokane Valley is accepting applications for map and text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for the annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) allows Comprehensive Plan amendments only one time per year. Any interested person, organization, agency or business may submit suggestions, proposals, or requests to the City for changes to the Comprehensive Plan, including maps and text. PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. Applications are due by November 1"of each year to be considered during the next calendar year amendment cycle. Submittals received after the deadline will be considered during the next annual amendment cycle. 2. Staff Review and Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will review all applications and will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report will analyze how each proposal addresses amendment criteria established by Spokane Valley City Council. All application documents and staff reports will be available for public review. 3. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission will conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission will consider amendments individually and will examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission will prepare one recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. 4. City Council Review and Decision. Within 60 days of receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to substantially modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or referthe proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. 5. Notice. Each year, the City will provide notice of the annual amendment cycle at least 60 days prior to the application deadline via display ads in local newspapers, email to interested parties and on the City'swebsite. Notice of public hearings and public meetings will be provided to the public as set forth in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At a minimum, notice will be provided to surrounding properties within 400' for site -specific Land Use Map amendments at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Notice will also be posted on -site at least 14 days prior to any public hearing. Legal notice will also be published in the newspaper. 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.290(2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Chaz Bates, Senior Planner (cbates anspokanevallev.org), 509-720-5333. COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL -THE PLANNING DIVISION WILL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED - A. Submit the following for MAP AMENDMENTS: ❑ Pre -Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ Application and SEPA Fee ❑ SEPA Checklist: One (1) copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including option Non -Project Action supplemental form. (Note: Any previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project should be included and may be adopted by reference.) ❑ Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification. (Please note: DO NOT submit the notice of public hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses must be current within 30 days of the Planning Commission public hearing.) ❑ One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive plan Map Amendment. 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change inconditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors; a. The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. B. Submit the following forTEXT AMENDMENTS: ❑ Pre -Application Meeting Request (include copy of staff worksheet from meeting) ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ One (1) copy of the text proposed to be changed, showing deletions by strikethFOUgh and additions by underline. ❑ One (1) copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Whythe change is needed and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed changed meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyondthe property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File #: PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION ❑ Map Amendment; or X Text Amendment APPLICANT NAME: City of Spokane Valley MAILING ADDRESS: 10210 East Sprague Avenue CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA ZIP: 99206 PHONE: 509-720-5337 FAX: 509-720-5075 CELL: N/A EMAIL: cbates s okanevalle .or PROPERTY OWNER: Applies citywide MAILING ADDRESS: N/A CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: Applies Citywide PARCEL NO.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Various PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A ZONING DESIGNATION: Various PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT (attached full explanation on separate sheet of paper): The proposal is to add goals, policies, and/or strategies to Chapter 2: Goals Policies and Strategies to articulate the city's policy position on homelessness These goals policies and/or strategies will apply citywide This is a policy oriented change and will not directly result in any development. Currently there is no policy guidance on homelessness. COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Proposed Text Amendments to Chapter 2: Goals, Policies and Strategies The proposed amendments below shall be considered preliminary draft text. As a city initiated text amendment, it is expected that the goal and policies presented below are placeholders only and should be expected to change as the amendment flows through the adoption process. Goal H-G4 Strive to reduce and eliminate the number of people experiencing homelessness in Spokane Valley. Policies H-P5 Continue to participate in the Continuum of Care assisting in their mission to make homelessness rare, brief, and non -recurring. H-P6 Collaborate with local governments and the Continuum of Care to gather and share quantitative and qualitative data about the region's needs, facilities, and programs related to preventing homelessness. H-P7 Cooperate with local governments and the Continuum of Care on the development of criteria for locating supportive housing services, including but not limited to permanent supportive housing and emergency shelters. H-P8 Develop regulations that provide for the safe, efficient, and equitable provision of supportive housing services within the City. Response to Criteria Below in bold text are the approval criteria, in italic text is the staff analysis in responding to criteria. a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City and region have seen increasing numbers of people being unhoused. While the City actively participates as a member of the Spokane Urban Consortium and the Continuum of Care (CoC), the adopted Comprehensive Plan does not include any policy guidance that would address how, when and where the City could support a shelter or other options for the temporary housing of those experiencing the lack of adequate and permanent shelter. The proposed amendment also supports and recognizes the CoC's mission to make homelessness rare, brief, and non -recurring. Finally, the proposed amendment formalizes the City's participation in the regional efforts to end homelessness. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The GMA does not have a goal that directly addresses homelessness, but does include a broad goal for cities to encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of GMA. b. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; The proposed amendment is not specific to a localized area of land and as such is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. However, the proposed amendment will provide policy guidance to assist in addressing the growing numbers of those experiencing homelessness. c. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION The proposed amendment is policy oriented and does not correct a mapping error. d. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The intent of the proposed amendment is to fill an existing policy gap in the Comprehensive Plan. The existing plan is silent on both the need for facilities to accommodate those experiencing unsheltered homelessness and how and where these facilities might be located. The proposed amendment will formally recognize the City's participation in regional efforts in the Continuum of Care and other local governments. Additionally, the proposed amendment will provide for the development of regulations for the provision of supportive housing within the City. Additional factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; The proposed amendment will not have an effect on the physical environment. b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; The proposed policies will not have a direct effect on open space, streams, rivers, or lakes. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed for any future development that may be permitted in the future. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; The policies will not impact adjacent land uses or neighborhoods. The implementing development regulations that will occur later will seek to minimize and impacts to adjacent uses. Those development regulations will be evaluated under their own process. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; This is a non -site specific proposal. The adequacy of community facilities will be determined at the time of any future development that may result from the adoption of the policies and implementing regulations. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; The proposed amendment will benefit the City and region by formalizing the City's current commitment and participation in regional efforts to address those experiencing unsheltered homelessness. The proposed amendment also provides policy support to amend development regulations to enable safe, equitable, and efficient provision of supportive housing within the City. f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; The proposed amendment is policy oriented. Implementing regulations may modify and allow for supportive housing in appropriately identified areas in the city. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and The proposed amendment will not have an impact on current or projected population. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment will not have impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Future development that may result from implementing development regulations will be evaluated for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and level -of -service standards. EXHIBIT 3 Spokane ,,,;oo;FValley, STAFF USE ONLY SEPA CHECKLIST SVMC 21.20 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5240 ♦ Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ permitcenten0spokanevalley.org Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File#: CPA-2021-000X PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL **THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED** ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 8'/z" by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). PL-22 V1.0 Pagel of 14 SOMRa- nne P I0Valley, SEPA CHECKLIST For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2020-000X. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 4. Date checklist prepared: April 14, 2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption October 2021. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes. If yes, explain. The proposed amendment provides policy guidance and associated text related homeless services. These guiding policies provide the framework for future implementing development regulations. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The environmental document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan FEIS (FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposal is to add goals, policies, and strategies to Chapter 2: Goals, Policies and Strategies to articulate the city's policy position on homeless services. Additional background and supportive text is included in Chapter 6 Housing. These text amendments apply citywide. This is a policy oriented change and will not directly result in any development. PL-22 V1.0 Page 2 of 14 000, S°no' n� P %11ey- I0 SEPA CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is a non -project action. Projects that might result in impacts were analyzed in the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan FEIS and supporting Development Regulations. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? Not applicable. The general Sewer Service Area? Not applicable. Priority Sewer Service Area? Not applicable. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of Stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). Not applicable. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? Not applicable. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. Not applicable. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a Stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? Not applicable. b. Stormwater What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Not applicable. 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 3 of 14 S�,t,01�1� SEPA CHECKLIST P �a11ey� �S EVALUATION FOR B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS AGENCY USE ONLY 1) Earth a. General description of the site (check one):❑ flat, ❑ rolling, ❑ hilly, ❑ steep slopes, ❑ mountainous, other Varies citywide. The proposal is a non -project action. Any development of individual sites will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percentslope)? Not applicable. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Not applicable. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable." If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable PL-22 V1.0 Page 4 of 14 SOMane ,,;oo*P %11ey' 2) Air SEPA CHECKLIST a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, EVALUATION FOR automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the AGENCY USE ONLY project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that mayaffect your proposal? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. 3) Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Not applicable. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not applicable. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 5 of 14 S°�okan� P IOValley= 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not applicable. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? Not applicable. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Not applicable. Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): SEPA CHECKLIST 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not applicable. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposal is a non -project action and does not have a direct effect on the surface, ground or runoff water. PL-22 V1.0 Page 6 of 14 S"nOriAn� a _` SEPA CHECKLIST P,,;oo*W1ey' EVALUATION FOR 4) Plants AGENCY USE ONLY a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑ shrubs ❑ grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation A variety of plants exist citywide. The proposal is a non -project action. Any development of individual sites will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Not applicable. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposal is a non -project action any development of individual sites will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance vegetation. 5) Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ❑ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ❑ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ❑ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: A variety of animals exist citywide. The proposal is a non -project action. Any development of individual sites will be analyzed under a separate SEPA. The city has adopted development standards to preserve and enhance fauna. PL-22 V1.0 Page 7 of 14 S°nokan`` SEPA CHECKLIST P ,,;,o*Valley, EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 6). Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7) Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? Not applicable. If so, describe: 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 8 of 14 S"nQs n� SEPA CHECKLIST A ,••`Valley, EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8). Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposal is non -project action that applies citywide. Land use varies across the city. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Areas within the city have been historically used for agriculture; the city has no designated agricultural lands. c. Describe any structures on the site. The proposal is non -project action that applies citywide. A variety of structures exist across the city. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? There are a variety of zone classifications across the city, ranging from low density single-family to industrial. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? There are a variety of land use designations across the city, ranging from single-family to industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? There are a variety of shoreline designations across the city. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes the city has critical areas within its jurisdiction. The proposal is a non -project action and will not impact these area. Any development of future sites will be subject to the adopted critical areas ordinance as applicable. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This is a non -project action; the comprehensive plan forecasts that the city will have a total population of 109,913 by 2037. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 9 of 14 SOriilll' e `,• SEPA CHECKLIST P %11ey- IS EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10). Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11). Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 10 of 14 C"n� n� SEPA CHECKLIST $0" ,,,;oSW1ey' EVALUATION FOR 12) Recreation AGENCY USE ONLY a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of recreational opportunities across the city. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The city's comprehensive plan has a level of service for park space. The adopted Park and Recreation Master Plan provides strategies to meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. 13). Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The proposal applies citywide. Places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers will be identified at the time of any development of specific sites and will be evaluated under a separate SEPA process. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to thesite. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14). Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Not applicable. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. PL-22 V1.0 Page 11 of SOUR&n' e� P ,,;oo;FValley, SEPA CHECKLIST d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to EVALUATION FOR existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, AGENCY USE ONLY generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not applicable. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. The city has a 20-year Transportation Improvement Plan that identifies projects to meet adopted levels of service for projected growth. 15) Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? Not applicable. If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The city's comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Any development specific sites and will be evaluated for its impact on LOS standards. 16) Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑ electricity, ❑ natural gas, ❑water, ❑ refuse service, ❑ telephone, ❑ sanitary sewer, ❑ septic system, ❑ other - describe. All utilities are available throughout the city. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PL-22 V1.0 Page 12 of S"n01 ` nSEPA CHECKLIST P ,,;0001FW1ey- D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for protect actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed amendments are not anticipated to increase emissions to air, production of noise, and discharge to water. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the FEIS for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid and reduce impacts to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed amendment is not anticipated to have impacts on plants and animals. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the FEIS for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to the natural environment including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve plants and animals. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed amendment is not anticipated to have impacts on energy and natural resources. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the FEIS for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. On a planning level, the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to protect and conserve energy and natural resources. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated PL-22 V1.0 Page 13 of S�nokanSEPA CHECKLIST p Valley IS (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed amendment is not anticipated to have impacts on environmentally sensitive. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the FEIS for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Consistent with the FEIS of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan, the city adopted implementing regulations while mitigating impacts to environmentally sensitive areas including an updated critical areas ordinance. On a planning level the adopted regulatory scheme has been identified as sufficient to avoid, protect and reduce impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. Site specific impacts will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations within the Spokane Valley. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed amendment does not have foreseen impacts to shoreline areas. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the FEIS for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: The city has an up-to-date shoreline master program. The recent comprehensive plan and FEIS are consistent with the SMP. Any future development within shoreline jurisdiction will be reviewed and mitigated at the time of development based upon adopted regulations and policies. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed amendment is not anticipated to increase demands on transportation and public services. The amendment is within the scope of impacts analyzed in the FEIS for the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan and supporting development regulations. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Comprehensive Plan adopts a level -of -service for transportation and public services. The FEIS for the 2017- 2037 Comprehensive Plan and the 6-year Transportation Improvement Program identifies the necessary projects to maintain the adopted LOS. These transportation and public service projects are implemented both by the city and state and at the project level through concurrency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Any specific issues that may arise during any development of individual projects will be identified and addressed based upon regulations within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. E. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of PL-22 V1.0 Page 14 of S°nokan' e�'` P W �jJey- Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this check list. Date: Please print or type: Signature: SEPA CHECKLIST Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 10210 East Sprague Avenue: Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Division Address: 10210 E10210 E Sprague Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206Ave Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509-720-5337 PL-22 V1.0 Page 15 of EXHIBIT 4 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SpOl� 0 DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE 10210 East Sprague Avenue - Spokane Valley WA 99206 • �eyR 509.720.5000 - Fax: 509.720,5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT: Annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2021: Number DescriptionFile Location Applicant/Owner CPA-2021-0001 Map amendment to change the Parcel 45163.0584; SW '/ of Lindsay A. designation for .68 acres from Section 16, Township 25 North, Goodman/ Multifamily Residential to Corridor Range 44 East, Willamette Homtomi Partners Mixed Use. Meridian, Spokane County, LP Washington CPA-2021-0002 Map amendment to change the Parcels 45174.9061 and Spokane Valley/ designation for 5.56 acres from 45174.9062; SE'/ of Section 17, Spokane Valley Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Open Space. Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2021-0003 Map amendment to change the Parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, Spokane Valley/ designation for 45.8 acres from 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; N'/2 Washington Industrial to Parks and Open Space. of Section 7, Township 25 North, Department of Range 45 East, Willamette Transportation Meridian, Spokane County, Washington CPA-2021-0004 Text amendment to add goals, Citywide; Spokane Valley Spokane Valley/ policies, strategies, and background Not applicable text regarding homeless services. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC)197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on May 21, 2021. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.2I C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5337; cbates@..spokanevalle r�org RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mike Basinger, AICP, Economic Development Manager, City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5333, mbasinaer cr spokanevallev.org DATE ISSUED: May 7. 2021 SIGNATURE: APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community �Publc Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal mast be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page I of I Pile Nos. CPA-2021-0001; CPA-2021-0002; CPA-2021-0003; CPA-2021-0004 EXHIBIT 5 Notice of Virtual Public Hearing City of Spokane Valley 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Due to the restrictions on public gatherings arising from the covid-19 outbreak, and pursuant to Governor Inslee's Stay Home, Stay Healthy Proclamation (No. 20-25) and Proclamation 20-28 (and associated extensions), this hearing will be conducted remotely using web and telephone conference tools, as described below. HEARING DATE AND TIME: July 8, 2021 beginning at 6:00 p.m. ZOOM MEETING DETAILS: Join Zoom Meeting A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the Planning Commission webpage: www.sr)okanevalley.ore/planninecommission. HEARING BODY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests and make a recommendation to the City Council on each of the following applications: FILE No. CPA-2021-0001: A map amendment to change the designation for .68 acres from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use for parcel 45163.0584; further located in SW '/a of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2021-0002 A map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space for parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062; further located in SE ''A of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE No. CPA-2021-0003 A map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial to Parks and Open Space for parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; further located in N %2 of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington FILE NO. CPA-2021-0004 Text amendment to add goals, policies, strategies, and background text regarding homeless services. This amendment is not site specific and applies citywide STAFF CONTACT: Chaz Bates, AICP, Senior Planner; (509) 720-5337 cbates(ibspokanevallev.org ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) on May 7, 2021 pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and chapter 21.20 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). HEARING PROCEDURES: The Planning Commission will conduct the remote hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). The public is encouraged to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Chaz Bates, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to cbates(ibspokanevalley.org. Comments will need to be submitted no later than 4:00 PM on July 7, 2021 in order for them to be received and prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. If you would like to deliver comments to City Hall you may contact City Hall at (509) 720-5000 prior to 4:00 PM on July 7, 2021 to schedule an appointment for delivery and allow staff to scan and include in the report. Comments received through US Mail will be included if they are received prior to the hearing. All interested persons may testify at the remote public hearing via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 8, 2021. Please visit the Planning Commission webpage (see link above) to sign up for oral public comments. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected by visiting the Comprehensive Plan webpage at www.svokanevallev.org_/CP. If you have any questions, please contact Chaz Bates, Senior Planner, Economic Development Division, at cbatesaspokanevallev.org. Carrie Koudelka, CMC Spokane Valley Deputy City Clerk Publish: June 11, 2021 and June 18, 2021 EXHIBIT 6 Homeless Services Survey Q1 What area in the City do you currently reside by ZIP code? Answered:309 Skipped:9 99206 99207 99016 99212 99216 99037 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 99206 33.33% 103 99207 5.50% 17 99016 16.18% 50 99212 17.80% 55 99216 14.24% 44 99037 12.94% 40 TOTAL 309 1/18 Homeless Services Survey Q2 How often do you come upon unsheltered individuals in our City? Answered:309 Skipped:9 1-3 times per week 4-6 times pe wee Daily Never 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 1-3 times per week 46.28% 4-6 times per week 17.15% Daily 30.42% Never 6.15% TOTAL 143 53 94 19 309 2/18 Homeless Services Survey Q3 Please prioritize the following statements by importance? (1 being least important - 6 being most important) Answered:241 Skipped:77 Temporary/Emer ency Housin Transitional Housing/Brid... Homeless Prevention/D... More Affordable... Mental Healt ` t`i_ and Substanc - Y Centralized Hub offering... 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL SCORE Temporary/Emergency Housing 14.60% 18.14% 19.91% 15.49% 17.70% 14.16% 33 41 45 35 40 32 226 3.54 Transitional Housing/Bridge (medium term 8.81% 20.26% 15.42% 22.91% 20.70% 11.89% housing that does not require check-out in the 20 46 35 52 47 27 227 3.38 morning like traditional emergency housing) Homeless Prevention/Diversion Dollars 17.39% 16.96% 15.65% 15.65% 19.57% 14.78% (financial assistance and case management 40 39 36 36 45 34 230 3.53 that diverts households from entering the homeless system) More Affordable Housing (workforce, senior, low 21.05% 15.35% 14.91% 15.79% 11.84% 21.05% to middle income) 48 35 34 36 27 48 228 3.55 Mental Health and Substance Use Facilities 19.31% 14.59% 15.88% 13.30% 13.73% 23.18% 45 34 37 31 32 54 233 3.43 Centralized Hub offering a variety of community 20.00% 13.91% 17.39% 16.96% 15.22% 16.52% resources for all City residents 46 32 40 39 35 38 230 3.57 3/18 Homeless Services Survey Q4 Would you support small (less than 20 individuals) separated emergency or temporary housing throughout the City in locations served by public transit? Answered:240 Skipped:78 Yes No Other(please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 57.92% No 34.17% Other (please specify) 7.92% TOTAL 139 82 19 240 4/18 Homeless Services Survey Q5 Please rank your preference for locating emergency shelters for families. Answered:236 Skipped:82 Small_. - facilities i...l� 0 In a facility® that can... Wherever a- service... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 (least preferred) 0 2 3 �.__� 4 (most preferred) 5/18 Homeless Services Survey Small facilities in existing neighborhoods a single-family house, duplex, or apartment unit In a facility that can accommodate many families along a corridor served by transit Wherever a service provider wants to build and/or locate the facility Other 1 (LEAST 2 3 4 (MOST PREFERRED) PREFERRED) 25.95% 36.22% 20.54% 17.30% 48 67 38 32 6.22% 18.18% 30.62% 44.98% 13 38 64 94 48.06% 27.18% 17.48% 7.28% 99 56 36 15 36.59% 9.76% 17.07% 36.59% 15 4 7 15 TOTAL 185 209 206 41 6/18 Homeless Services Survey Q6 Please rank your preference for locating emergency shelters for young adults. Answered:233 Skipped:85 Small facilities i... ■ In a facility that can... Wherever a�.1 service... Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 (least preferred) N 2 3; 4 (most preferred) 7/18 Homeless Services Survey Small facilities in existing neighborhoods a single-family house, duplex, or apartment unit In a facility that can accommodate many people along a corridor served by transit Wherever a service provider wants to build and/or locate the facility Other 1(LEAST 2 3 4 (MOST PREFERRED) PREFERRED) 22.65% 36.46% 24.31% 16.57% 41 66 44 30 7.77% 17.48% 26.21% 48.54% 16 36 54 100 46.00% 31.00% 14.50% 8.50% 92 62 29 17 45.16% 3.23% 19.35% 32.26% 14 1 6 10 Itell am- 181 206 200 31 8/18 Homeless Services Survey Q7 Please rank your preference for locating emergency shelters for adult singles/couples. Answered:231 Skipped:87 Small�- facilities i... In a facility that can... Wherever a service... Other ■ 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 (least preferred) M 2 03 0 4(most preferred) 9/18 Homeless Services Survey Small facilities in existing neighborhoods a single-family house, duplex, or apartment unit In a facility that can accommodate many people along a corridor served by transit Wherever a service provider wants to build and/or locate the facility Other 1 (LEAST 2 3 4 (MOST PREFERRED) PREFERRED) 29.05% 30.73% 25.14% 15.08% 52 55 45 27 4.41% 20.59% 30.39% 44.61% 9 42 62 91 44.44% 31.82% 14.65% 9.09% 88 63 29 18 42.86% 7.14% 14.29% 35.71% 12 2 4 10 TOTAL 179 204 198 28 10 / 18 Homeless Services Survey Q8 Please rank your preference for locating a Day Drop in Center (a facility devoted to providing day time shelter and resources for those currently unsheltered) Answered:231 Skipped:87 ■ Clos proximity to.. Clos��proximity to.. Other 0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 (least preferred) ® 2 3 (most preferred) 1 (LEAST PREFERRED) 2 3 (MOST PREFERRED) Close proximity to emergency shelters 9.00% 34.50% 56.50% 18 69 113 Close proximity to known encampments 25.38% 40.10% 34.52% 50 79 68 Other 57.50% 7.50% 35.00% 23 3 14 TOTAL 200 197 40 11/18 Homeless Services Survey Q9: When thinking about locations in areas served by public transit, where do you think a Community Resource Hub should be available? Answered Skipped 204 114 Respondents Responses 1 Auto Row between Sprague and Appleway or near Walmart 2 anywhere on sprague or trent 3 Near the valley transit center. 4 unsure. not next to schools/ youth centers or the outdoors. 5 Along Sprague, or division, Wellesley ave. Would also be good 6 U-city mall 7 Ponderosa 8 Along mission 9 Downtown STA Plaza 10 city hall 11 Near the Valley Transit Center 12 close to city hall 13 Near medical and stores 14 Downtown 15 University and appleway 16 No Opinion 17 in a downtown environment, somewhere near the resources needed to get on your feet 18 Sprague and University area 19 not sure 20 Along Sullivan North of Broadway 21 Somewhere along Sprague 22 Nowhere 23 Pines area 24 Sprague near the city buildings 25 Somewhere aong Appleway that is close to the Transit Center as well as grocery/gas station facilities. 26 The old Ucity mall/ or by winco 27 Near the transit center 28 Close to shopping 29 A central location on a public transit corridor 30 Near the university transfer station. Sprague 31 In Oregon. If it has to be here in spokane valley, next to the public transit building. 32 Need examples 33 Close to city hall, so they can receive all necessary resources 34 Anywhere on East Sprague/Appleway 35 Near busier bus stops Homeless Services Survey Q9: When thinking about locations in areas served by public transit, where do you think a Community Resource Flub should be available? Answered 204 Skipped 114 Respondents Responses 36 Between Pines and Sullivan and Sprague and Mission 37 Sprague near pines or city hall 38 Along Sprague Ave or just off Sprague since it has the most frequent bus runs along it. 39 1 don't know 40 Not sure 41 Sprague 42 Closest to services away from schools 43 Close to public transit stations! 44 U City area 45 Area around old University city between Sprague and Appleway or the old zoo site in Maribeau park. 46 Unknown 47 shelly lake 48 Where the largest homeless population is currently 49 Old shopko 50 STA transit center on University 51 Sprague and Barker 52 Near a transit center (University, Valley Mall) 53 Public transit should not be taken into consideration for locations. 54 Out in east valley between Sullivan and Flora Rd 55 Sprague 56 On Sprague Ave, maybe near Dishman and another near Evergreen area 57 Across from the city hall 58 Away from residential areas 59 no opinion 60 Not sure 61 Appleway, somewhere reasonable close to transit hub 62 Opportunity 63 Industrial Park Area near public transit 64 Along Sprague or Division 65 Near the mall -they already hang out there for day shelter 66 Nonresidential area 67 AS FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE 68 That assumes we should have one. If we subsidize, we invite more. 69 Somewhere on Sprague Homeless Services Survey Q9: When thinking about locations in areas served by public transit, where do you think a Community Resource Hub should be available? Answered 204 Skipped 114 Respondents Responses 70 Others will have better knowledge than I, but I would think Sprague area closer to Spokane? 71 Not sure 72 On or near a bus line and close to other community resources. 73 along Sprague Ave. 74 Pines and Sprague 75 Indiana by Ymca 76 I'm not very familiar with what areas are served by public transit. 77 Along the Sullivan corridor, Sprague and Pines area, Sprague and University area 78 Near a park or city/public service building 79 Near emergency facilities 80 Near city hall/new library. Or Spokane Valley Partners 81 don't know 82 University & Sprague 83 On Sprague near walmat 84 Fairgrounds 85 Somewhere along Sprague. Maybe near the corner at Pines, centrally located 86 City Center 87 University City 88 Around Havana area which covers Valley & city 89 sprague/freya 90 Near city hall 91 Don't know 92 Just that a hub. A main hub then smaller hubs in community centers 93 city of spokane, not the valley 94 Not in Spokane or the Valley 95 No where 96 Sprague & Pines 97 Along main transit routes, and/or near homeless resources 98 Utilize the vacant large buildings in town like the Shopko 99 NEXT TO CITY HALL 100 close to city hall. 101 by the warehouses 102 Probably along Sprague. Near the resources, whatever they are? 103 Away from residential areas 104 Not in the city. I don't believe the such a HUB is the answer. 105 in the area by the city hall to grow services in one area Homeless Services Survey Q9: When thinking about locations in areas served by public transit, where do you think a Community Resource Hub should be available? Answered Skipped 204 114 Respondents Responses 106 not sure 107 The MORE government "provides" the MORE problems there will be, but then, that's the PROGRESSIVE GOAL, isn't it. 108 Close to Spokane city boundary 109 close to Wal Mart/ Lowes Spokane Valley 110 Away from the city of the Valley. How about Seattle. 111 Close to the Sprague Ave. corridor. 112 by University City 113 IDK 114 Near box stores, retail stores 115 not sure, maybe vacated commercial buildings, the old U City?? :) 116 Not near residential areas 117 No 118 Close to an area where they can buy food (like the lot behind Opportunity First Presbyterian Church - Pines and Sprague), close to donation stores (for clothes), close to a major bus line or transit center (like bus line 98, 32, 95 Valley Transit Center) 119 Unsure 120 On Sprague would be most centralized 121 Downtown or next to the city hall so the impacts can be witnessed and felt by the city council 122 Not in Spokane Valley. 123 Near the sta park and ride 124 Downtown Spokane 125 in a secluded location away from existing neighborhoods and business 126 Not sure 127 Sprague and Farr area 128 Downtown 129 Away from neighborhoods 130 find a large area that doesn't have many businesses or personal homes. Out by the airport. 131 City Hall 132 Undecided 133 Some place where the homeless can get to 134 - 135 Sprague 136 No idea Homeless Services Survey Q9: When thinking about locations in areas served by public transit, where do you think a Community Resource Hub should be available? Answered Skipped 204 114 Respondents Responses 137 Don't know 138 Near a commercial area, not a residential area 139 In existing unused buildings 140 would need to research that 141 A WA state ghost town. Put our massive amount of services and taxpayer money there and move them out of the main corridors so we can earn more money to pay taxes. 142 Out of city limits 143 Away from neighborhoods 144 The old Albertsons location on Pines/Sprague 145 University plaza center 146 University Sprague Area or further west 147 everyone needs to be served 148 Downtown Spokane 149 Near Costco 150 Close to existing hospitals and mental health facilities 151 Near City Hall or somewhere on the Sprague corridor. 152 Argonne/Broadway, Sprague /Pines, Sullivan/Indiana 153 WHERE THEY ARE LIKELY TO BE USED APPROPRIATELY 154 Valley Partners 155 You should have taken over the Shopko store 156 Near a food bank or emergency shelters 157 near hospital 158 Sprague 159 Probably a long main roads or industries so can find work 160 Pines, Sprague, evergreen 161 Don't know 162 center of the city or the STA hub 163 Downtown Spokane 164 City hall 165 NEAR TRANSIT LINES, IN A COMMERCIAL AREA SUCH AS INDUSTRIAL 166 CLOSE TO THE CITY OF SPOKANE CITY LIMITS 167 Nowhere in Spokane Valley, WA -- send them to Seattle 168 East Sprague, close to border of City of Spokane 169 somewhere on Sprague. 170 University City 171 Spokane Valley Homeless Services Survey Q9: When thinking about locations in areas served by public transit, where do you think a Community Resource Hub should be available? Answered 204 Skipped 114 Respondents Responses 172 Off or on Sprague. Not Greenacres. Too far out. 173 Central to business and healthcare 174 1 don't know 175 1) University/Sprague area. 2) Pines/Sprague. 3) Park/Sprague. 4) Park/Trent 5) Sullivan/Sprague 176 Somewhere along Sprague 177 City hall area commercial property 178 some place where people can get to it easily, that will not find them being shamed for entering, probably Sprague but nearer to the river would make sense to me because I think may stay near there. It should be where the people are and can find it with little trouble. If it isn't easy, then they won't use it. 179 No idea 180 Military depot on Sullivan road 181 Major arterials 182 210 W 3RD AVE - Old Ichiban building/parking lot 183 Dear industrial zones 184 Central accessible location 185 no 186 Downtown 187 In the Sprague Avenue corridor, between Pines and McDonald. Hospitals are close by, as are grocers, dentists, clinics, etc. 188 somewhere along sprague - purpose for folks almost leaving their residence or for foks already homeless may be different locations 189 Sprague ave. 190 Near our busiest shopping centers and most dense housing areas, likely on our busier streets. 191 Sprague Ave - but away from grocery stores & restaurants - those locations may encourage more panhandling 192 On Sprague west of Hwy 90 193 Adjacent City Hall 194 No 195 Havana 196 away from schools, in main corridors, not in neighborhoods 197 Near City Hall - that way the folks who are in charge have to see what needs to be fixed 198 downtown and east of downtown, sprague and pines/evergreen 199 By all STA sub stations are located Homeless Services Survey Q9: When thinking about locations in areas served by public transit, where do you think a Community Resource Hub should be available? Answered 204 Skipped 114 Respondents Responses 200 Sprague and Pines 201 Near Sprague Corridor NOT in single family zoning 202 Downtown 203 Along Trent or Sprague 204 Police department Homeless Services Survey Q10 What should the City's role be in response to homelessness and/or housing instability? Answered:230 Skipped:88 The Cit should conti. The Cit should only.. The City should partn... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES The City should continue to participate in the existing regional system The City should only offer services for those living in the City The City should partner with the County TOTAL RESPONSES 29.13% 25.65% 45.22% 67 59 104 230 13 / 18 Homeless Services Survey Q11 Do you own a business in the City of Spokane Valley? Answered:235 Skipped:83 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 25.53% No 74.47% TOTAL 60 175 235 14 / 18 Homeless Services Survey Q12 What area in the City is your business located by ZIP code? Answered:61 Skipped:257 99206 99016 99212 99216 99037 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 99206 40.98% 99016 8.20% 99212 19.67% 99216 19.67% 99037 11.48% Total Respondents: 61 25 5 12 12 7 15 / 18 Homeless Services Survey Q13 What is your level of interest in having a person to contact if you have concerns about an unsheltered individual at your place of business? Answered: 50 Skipped:268 0 10 20 30 40 50 ANSWER CHOICES AVERAGE NUMBER TOTAL NUMBER RESPONSES Total Respondents: 50 32 1,581 50 16 / 18 Homeless Services Survey Q14 Would you have an interest in attending a training on: - Answered: 34 Skipped: 284 availabl resources in de-escalatio tip when to call the police what to do with persona... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES available resources in our community for those that are unsheltered de-escalation tips when to call the police what to do with personal items left on your business property Total Respondents: 34 RESPONSES 50.00% 20.59% 41.18% 52.94% 17 7 14 18 17 / 18 EXHIBIT 7 From: Taylor Dillard To: Chaz Bates Subject: FW: SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Date: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:30:44 AM Attachments: imaae003.ioQ imaae004.ona imaoe001.ono Fyi Taylor Dillard (she/her) I Economic Development Administrative Assistant 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5333 1 tdillard@spokanevalley.or Where Tradition Meets Ambition This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Polak, Chad M <Chad.M.Polak@p66.com> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 9:26 AM To: Taylor Dillard <tdillard@spokanevalley.org> Subject: FW: SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Good Morning Taylor, Based on a review of the projects, there is no impact to the YPL pipeline and we do not have any questions. Sincerely, Chad M. Polak Agent, Real Estate Services 0: (+1) 303.376.43631 M: (+1) 720.245.4683 3960 East 56th Avenue I Commerce City, CO 80022 Phillips 66 From: Taylor Dillard <tdillard (@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 10:07 AM Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates(@spokanevalley.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL]SEPA Determination - Comprehensive Plan Amendments /_1M The City is issuing a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) for the annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2021, file numbers CPA-2021-0001, 0002, 0003, and 0004; further described below: CPA-2021-0001: A map amendment to change the designation for .68 acres from Multifamily Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. Located on parcel 45163.0584; SW % of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 2) CPA-2021-0002: A map amendment to change the designation for 5.56 acres from Corridor Mixed Use to Parks and Open Space. Located on parcels 45174.9061 and 45174.9062; SE of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 16) CPA-2021-0003: A map amendment to change the designation for 45.8 acres from Industrial to Parks and Open Space. Located on parcels 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218; N % of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. (PDF page 32) CPA-2021-0004: Text amendment to add goals, policies, strategies, and background text regarding homeless services. (PDF page 48) The appeal period ends at 5:00 pm on May 21, 2021. Taylor Dillard (she/her) I Economic Development Administrative Assistant 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5333 1 tdillard@sookanevalley.org Where Tradition Meets Ambition This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. " COO-) Public Comments (Inserted as received)