Ordinance 21-014 amend comp plan CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.21-014
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Spokane Valley Ordinance No. 16-018, the City of Spokane Valley adopted
the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Spokane Valley(the Comprehensive Plan); and
WHEREAS, comprehensive plans may be amended annually pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130 of the
Growth Management Act(GMA); and
WHEREAS, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning
Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council), citizens, or by the Community and Public Works
Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments;and
WHEREAS,the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations,
including the zoning of all properties in the City that are consistent with land use map designations; and
WHEREAS, the City adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process
for adopting and amending comprehensive plans; and
WHEREAS,the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)provides that amendment applications shall
be received prior to November 1 of each year; and
WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner, or by City staff to amend the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein;
and
WHEREAS,on November 24,2020,City Council approved the 2021 Comprehensive PIan Amendment
Docket; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Protection Act chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA) and
chapter 21.20 SVMC, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental
impacts from the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS,on May 7,2021,after reviewing the environmental checklists,staff issued a Determination
of Non-Significance (DNS) for each of the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, and
where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and
WHEREAS, on May 25., 2021, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant
to RCW 36.70A.106 of the City's intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021 and June 18, 2021, notice of the Commission public hearing was
published in the Valley News Herald; and
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, notice of the Commission hearing had been posted on all the subject
properties; and
Ordinance 21-014:2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page I of 10
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners
within 400 feet of the subject properties; and
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2021, the Commission conducted a study session to review the proposed
amendments; and
WHEREAS,in addition to the minimum legally required notice,the City issued a press release and sent
direct emails to the "Media," "Comp Plan Updates," "City News," and "City Planning Commission
Agenda"email distribution lists; and
WHEREAS, the City also created a rotating banner on the City's homepage that linked to a webpage
about the 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City created and published social media posts on its Facebook,Twitter and Linkedln
accounts about the date, time, and opportunity for public comment at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS,on July 8, 2021, the Commission received evidence, information,public testimony,and a
staff report and recommendation at a public hearing; and
WHEREAS,on July 8,2021,the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2021-0001,CPA-
2021-0002, CPA-2021-0003, and CPA-2021-0004, to Council with a recommendation for approval, with
written findings of fact setting forth the bases for such recommendations to Council; and
WHEREAS,on September 7,2021, Council conducted a briefing to review the proposed amendments;
and
WHEREAS, on September 7, 2021, Council concurred to place CPA-2021-0001, CPA-2021-0002,
CPA-2021-0003, and CPA-2021-0004 in an ordinance for consideration of approval; and
WHEREAS, on September 28, 2021, Council considered a first ordinance reading to approve CPA-
2021-0001, CPA-2021-0002, CPA-2021-0003, and CPA-2021-0004; and
WHEREAS, on October 12, 2021, Council considered a second ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed amendments for CPA-2021-0001, CPA-2021-0002, CPA-2021-0003, and CPA-2021-0004.
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive Plan as
described in CPA-2021-0001, CPA-2021-0002, CPA-2021-0003, and CPA-2021-0004.
Section 2. Findings. Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate
investigation and study and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
Council has read and considered the Commission's findings. Council makes and adopts findings specific
to each Comprehensive Plan amendment as set forth in Section 4 below. The Council hereby makes and
adopts the following general findings applicable to all proposed amendments:
General Findings:
1. On May 25, 2021, the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided a notice of
intent to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
Ordinance 21-014: 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 2 of 10
2. Pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA), enviromnental checklists were required for each
proposed Comprehensive Plan map and text amendment.
3. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment.
4. On May 7, 2021, Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) was issued for the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendments.
5. On May 7, 2021, the DNS was published in the City's official newspaper, the Valley News
Herald, pursuant to chapter 21.20 SVMC.
6. The procedural requirements of SEPA and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled.
7. On June 11, 2021, individual notices of public hearing for the proposed site-specific map
amendments were mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site.
8. On June 11, 2021 each site subject to a proposed site-specific amendment was posted with a
"Notice of Public Hearing"sign, with a description of the proposal.
9. On June 11 and 18,2021,notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley
News Herald.
10. In addition to the minimum legally required notice,the City issued a press release,sent direct
emails to the"Media,""Comp Plan Updates,""City News,"and"City Planning Commission
Agenda" email distribution lists, and provided notice of the public hearing on the City's
Facebook,Twitter, and Linkedln accounts.
1I. The procedural requirements in SVMC 17.80.140 for the amendment process, including
public participation, notice,and public hearing requirements have been met.
12. On July, 8, 2021, the Commission held a public hearing on each of the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendments. After receiving public testimony the public hearing was
closed.
13. On July 8, 2021, the Commission deliberated and voted to forward CPA-2021-0001, CPA-
2021-0002, CPA-2021-0004, and CPA-2021-0004, to Council with a recommendation for
approval.
14. The Commission adopted findings for CPA-2021-0001, CPA-2021-0002, CPA-2021-0003,
and CPA-2021-0004. Such findings were presented to Council. Specific findings adopted and
made by City Council for each Comprehensive Plan Amendment request are contained in
Section 4,below.
15. The Commission and Council have reviewed the proposed amendments concurrently to
evaluate the cumulative impacts. The review was consistent with the annual amendment
process pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140 and chapter 36.70A RCW.
16. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with GMA and do not
result in internal inconsistencies within the Comprehensive Plan itself.
Ordinance 21-014:2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 3 of 10
Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment "A"(2021
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Maps).
Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the
Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as set forth below and in Attachment"A." The Comprehensive
Plan amendments are generally described as follows:
Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendments:
File No. CPA-2021-0001:
Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Multifamily
Residential(MFR)to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU).
Applicant: Homtomi WA01 Partners LP.
Amendment Location: Parcel 45163.0584; SW 1/4 of Section 16,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,
Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington..
Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2021-0001:
I. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,safety,welfare,
and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment changing the land use
designation from Multifamily Residential (MFR) to Corridor Mixed-Use (CMU) bears a
substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the
environment. The adopted Comprehensive Plan describes the CMU designation as
"allow[ing] for light manufacturing, retail, multifamily, and offices along major
transportation corridors. It is primarily used along Sprague Avenue, and the north-south
arterials."The subject property is within 200 feet of Sprague Avenue and is adjacent to CMU
properties fronting Sprague Avenue. CMU properties are located to the west,east,and south.
Changing the land use designation to CMU increases the flexibility of allowed uses and
density on the sites in an area supported by infrastructure,which has benefit to public health,
safety, and welfare.
The amendment area is not covered by critical areas or designated natural resources. The
public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment are promoted by standards
established by the state and the City's regulations.
2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and
with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth
Management Act(GMA) adopts 14 goals to guide the development of local comprehensive
plans and development regulations. The request allows opportunity to provide an expansion
of the multifamily development on the site. There are no transportation improvements
planned adjacent to the site within the planning horizon of 2037. The proposal does not
conflict with any other GMA goals.The amendment is not in conflict with any other portions
of the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property
owner's control.
4. The proposed amendment is not in response to or correct an obvious mapping error.
5. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
Changing the designation from MFR to CMU on the existing developed parcel provides the
opportunity to increase density on parcels with existing infrastructure. The Comprehensive
Plan identifies the following goals and policy that support the proposed change:
a. LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley.
b. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels.
c. H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane Valley's
neighborhoods.
Ordinance 21-014: 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 4 of 10
d. H-P5 Enable a variety of housing types at increased densities within 'A mile of a
funded high performance transit network.
e. CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new
facilities.
6. The change to CMU will allow existing uses as well as commercial, office and higher
residential development of the properties. The properties will have the opportunity to
transition, add density and add a mix of uses to serve the surrounding neighborhood. There
is no concern on effect of physical environment.
7. There are no critical areas associated with the site,such as wetlands,fish and wildlife habitat
areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcels are not located
within shoreline jurisdiction,and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues.
The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas
and adjacent land use are addressed when future development occurs.
8. The 0.68 acre site is currently developed with a multifamily development. The adjacent use
to the north is an apartment complex, to the east, south, and west is a commercial retail
establishment. The CMU land use designation surrounds the amendment site to the east,
south and west. The amendment is consistent with the adjacent land use designations. The
projected impact to the surrounding neighborhood is minimal. Any future development will
be evaluated for compliance with all municipal requirements as it relates to adjacent uses at
the time of development.
9. Skipworth Road is a Local Access street. There are no planned transportation projects in the
area. Balfour Park approximately Y2 mile to the west of the project site is a neighborhood
park and is planned to expand to a community park within the planning horizon. A project
on the site would be considered infill development, as such, the expansion of allowed uses
and increased densities are supported by the infrastructure that is in place.
Sewer is available to the site and the site is within Modern Electric Water Company's service
area.Future development will be required to ensure other community facilities are adequate
at the time of development. There is minimal impact on schools.
10. The proposed change would allow the property to increase density and support infill
development in an area planned for growth. The change will support increased housing
opportunities. The change benefits the neighborhood, City, and region by supporting the
following adopted Comprehensive Plan goal and policy:
a. LU-P 16Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors and near
transit centers and commercial areas.
b. H-G1 Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs of the
community.
c. H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels.
d. H-P5 Enable a variety of housing types at increased densities within ''A mile of a
funded high performance transit network
11. The proposal would add approximately 0.68 acres of CMU property to the 1,666 acres of
existing CMU designated property within the city. While additional demand for CMU
property may be limited, the CMU designation in this location would allow for increased
options for development including an increase in allowed density on a property with an
existing multifamily development.The proposal is limited to a reasonable area and developed
under CMU standards the type of use and density would be appropriate for the location.
12. The proposed change would have little impact on projected population density.
13. The CMU designation will support the goals and policies identified above. The amendment
will have no effect on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan,including Housing,Capital
Facilities and Public Services,Public and Private Utilities,Parks and Open Space and Natural
Resources.
14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80,140(H)are met by the amendment.
Ordinance 21-014:2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 5 of 10
Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel number 45163.0584 to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU).
File No. CPA-2021-0002:
Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Corridor Mixed Use
(CMU)to Parks and Open Space(P/OS).
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley.
Amendment Location: Parcel numbers 45174.9061 and 45174.9062, located north Sprague Avenue,
further located in the SE '/a of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian,
Spokane County,Washington.
Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2021-0002:
1. The proposed amendment to change the designation for 5.5 acres from Corridor Mixed Use
(CMU)to Parks and Open Space(P/OS)bears a substantial relationship to the public health,
safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2013,the City purchased two parcels
to the west of Balfour Park for the purpose of expanding Balfour Park. The expansion of
Balfour Park was indicated in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The expansion
was determined to be a high priority in the Plan. The expansion of Balfour Park is also
included in the Parks 6-year Capital Improvement Plan.These plans were developed through
an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to
maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000
residents.
2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and
with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth
Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local
comprehensive plans and development regulations.The proposal is consistent with the GMA
goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities.
Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted
comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference.
The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the
property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies.
4. The proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error.
5. The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the
Comprehensive Plan.
6. The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less
intensive uses that are currently allowed in CMU reducing the potential effects on the
physical environment.
7. There are no known critical areas associated with the site,such as wetlands, fish and wildlife
habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The parcels are not
located within shoreline jurisdiction,and there are no known surface water quality or quantity
issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical
areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time of future development.
8. The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Balfour Park is an
existing park facility and the area of the proposed amendment is informally used as open
space for nearby residents.Future development of the park space will also provide an amenity
and place to gather for residents.
9. Sewer and water are available to the site.The nearest formal park is Balfour Park immediately
to the east. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the
park system helping maintain the adopted LOS.
The existing and forecast LOS for this area of Sprague Avenue is D which is within the
adopted LOS.A non-motorized capacity improvement project extending the Appleway Trail
Ordinance 21-014: 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 6 of 10
is also planned and a portion will be constructed in 2021. A street preservation project is
planned for 2021 on the surrounding roads of Herald, Main and Balfour. This project will
widen the paved shoulder and install sidewalks.
10. The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing
an opportunity to expand Balfour Park as proposed in the Parks Plan. A master plan for the
park expansion is underway. The expansion of Balfour Park will help the City meet its
adopted LOS for park Iand.
11. The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks
Plan. A neighborhood park at this Iocation furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and
Comprehensive Plan. The site provides easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and
public transit.
12. The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density.
13. The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan as the
properties have been planned for park space since 2013.The Comprehensive Plan anticipates
that the property would be park space. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks Plan the
proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the
Comprehensive Plan:
a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents,
employees, and visitors.
b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces.
c. P-Gl Develop,grow,and maintain a diverse and accessible park,recreation,trail,
and open space system that enhances community character.
d. P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for
pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit.
e. P-P8 Plan for access to parks,trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods.
f. Strategy: Identify opportunities for the expansion of Balfour Park.
14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment.
Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel numbers 45174.9061 and 45174.9062 to Parks and
Open Space(P/OS).
File No. CPA-2021-0003:
Proposal: Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation from Industrial (I)to Parks
and Open Space (P/OS) and to change the Zoning District from Industrial (I) to Parks and Open Space
(P/OS).
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley
Amendment Location Parcel numbers 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and 55075.0218. The
property is unaddressed and is located between the Spokane River and Union Pacific railroad east of Flora
Road,further located in the NW IA of Section 07,Township 25 North,Range 45 East,Willamette Meridian,
Spokane County,Washington.
Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2020-0003:
1. The proposed amendment to change the land use designation from Industrial(I)to Parks and
Open Space(P/OS)bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment.In 2020,the City purchased four parcels between the Spokane
River and Union Pacific railroad east of Flora Road for the purpose of expanding the City's
park system. The property was identified as a priority acquisition area in the 2019 Parks and
Recreation Master Plan. This plan was developed through an extensive community
engagement process. Additionally,the park land is necessary to maintain the adopted Level
of Service(LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents.
Ordinance 21-014: 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 7 of 10
2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and
with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth
Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local
comprehensive plans and development regulations.The proposal is consistent with the GMA
goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities.
Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted
comprehensive plan.The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference.
The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed amendment is not in response to a change in conditions beyond the property
owner's control.
4. The amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error.
5. The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land in the
Comprehensive Plan.
6. The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less
intensive uses that are currently allowed in the Industrial designation/zoning reducing the
potential effects on the physical environment.
7. The site is impacted by frequently flooded areas and is within the shoreline jurisdiction. The
future development of the site will be subject to both the Shoreline Master Program and the
City's adopted critical areas ordinance. The development of the site as a park would have
less effect on the critical areas and shorelines than an industrial development.
8. The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The site is isolated
between the Union Pacific railroad track and the Spokane River. The proposed park will
provide an amenity and place to gather for residents,visitors, and workers.
9. Sewer is available to the site and the site is adjacent to Consolidated Irrigation District#19.
Flora Road at the site is a local access street and turns into a minor arterial north of the site.
The park site is expected to undergo an extensive master planning process to design the site.
The development intensity of the site is unknown at this time and the impacts on water and
sewer are unknown. Adding the property to the City's park's system will help maintain the
adopted LOS for parks. Future development will be required to ensure other community
facilities are adequate at the time of development. There is no impact on schools.
10. The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing
an opportunity to expand the City's park offerings as proposed in the Parks Plan. That plan
calls for the property acquisition and development for a park on the north bank of the Spokane
River between Sullivan and Barker Roads. The site is expected to be included as part of a
trail system from Plante's. Ferry Park, providing a safe and scenic mode of transportation
along the Spokane River corridor. The expansion of the park system will help the City meet
its adopted LOS for park land.
11. The quantity and location of park land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks
Plan. A new community park in this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and
Comprehensive Plan.
12. The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density.
13. The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.In addition
to meeting the goals in the Parks Plan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals,
policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan:
a. LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents,
employees, and visitors.
b. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces.
c. P-G1 Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation,trail,
and open space system that enhances community character.
d. P-P8 Plan for access to parks,trails, and other open spaces in all neighborhood.
Ordinance 21-014:2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 8 of 10
14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment.
Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel numbers 55072.0324, 55072.0318, 55072.0319, and
55075.0218 to Parks and Open Space(P/OS).
File No.: CPA-2021-0004
Proposal: A text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to amend Chapter 2 Goals and Policies to add
goals, policies and strategies regarding homeless services. Amend Chapter 6 Housing to add background
text regarding homeless services
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley,WA 99206.
Amendment Location: Citywide
Council adopts and makes the following Findings for CPA-2021-0004:
1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,safety,welfare,
and protection of the environment. The City and region have seen increasing numbers of
people being unhoused. While the City actively participates as a member of the Spokane
Urban Consortium and the Continuum of Care(CoC),the adopted Comprehensive Plan does
not include any policy guidance that would address how, when and where the City could
support a shelter or other options for the temporary housing of those experiencing the lack of
adequate and permanent shelter. The proposed amendment also supports and recognizes the
CoC's mission to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring. Finally, the proposed
amendment formalizes the City's participation in the regional efforts to end homelessness.
2. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of
local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The GMA does not have a goal that
directly addresses homelessness, but does include a broad goal for cities to encourage the
availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population.The proposed
amendment is consistent with the requirements of GMA.Additionally,House Bill(HB) 1220
amends the GMA requiring jurisdictions to support emergency shelters and housing through
local planning and development regulations.
3. The proposed amendment is not specific to a localized area of land and as such is not in
response to a change in conditions beyond the property owner's control. However, the
proposed amendment will provide policy guidance to assist in addressing the growing
numbers of those experiencing homelessness.
4. The proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error.
5. The intent of the proposed amendment is to fill an existing policy gap in the Comprehensive
Plan. The existing plan is silent on both the need for facilities to accommodate those
experiencing unsheltered homelessness and how and where these facilities might be located.
The proposed amendment will formally recognize the City's participation in regional efforts
in the CoC and other local governments.Additionally,the proposed amendment will provide
for the development of regulations for the provision of supportive housing within the City.
6. The proposed amendment will not have an effect on the physical environment.
7. The proposed policies will not have a direct effect on open space, streams, rivers, or lakes.
The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas
and adjacent land use are addressed for any future development.
8. The policies will not impact adjacent land uses or neighborhoods. The implementing
development regulations will address impacts to adjacent uses. Those development
regulations will be evaluated under their own process.
9. This is not a site-specific proposal.The adequacy of community facilities will be determined
at the time of any future development that may result from the adoption of the policies and
implementing regulations.
10. The proposed amendment will benefit the City and region by formalizing the City's current
commitment and participation in regional efforts to address those experiencing unsheltered
homelessness.The proposed amendment also provides policy support to amend development
Ordinance 21-014: 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 9 of 10
regulations to enable safe,equitable,and efficient provision of supportive housing within the
City.
11. The proposed amendment is policy oriented. Implementing regulations may modify and
allow for supportive housing in appropriately identified areas in the City.
12. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on current or projected population.
13. The proposed amendment will not have impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Future development that may result from implementing development regulations will be
evaluated for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and level of service standards.
14. The criteria of SVMC 17.80.140(H) are met by the amendment.
Council Decision: Change the designation for parcel number 45013.9024 to Corridor Mixed Use(CMU).
Section 5. Map - Copies on File-Administrative Action. The Comprehensive Plan (with maps) is
maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community and Public Works.
The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the
Comprehensive Plan (including maps) in a manner consistent with this Ordinance, including correcting
scrivener's errors.
Section 6. Liability. The express intent of the City is that the responsibility for compliance with the
provisions of this Ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This Ordinance and its
provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health,safety,and welfare of the general public
and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section S. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication
of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this 126 day of October, 2021.
auf
AT Q Ben Wick, Mayor
#401 -1kA ifieikiiiii4-
•• istine Bainbridge, City Clerk 0..__
Approved as to orm:
Office the Citi. orney
Date of Publication: fO r2-2 �d v2/
Effective Date: /0 - 12 ' a2Q
Ordinance 2I-014:2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 10 of 10
Attachment A, Ordinance 21-014
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map
EFrontLn�
E Main Ave
0
E Main Ave - u
a
4OC
� z
0
rE Riverside Ave
CC
cn
0
E Sprague Ave
0
Legend
CMU ' MF POS
II MU RC
IMU f NC SF
0 100 200 300 400 5007
Feet
File: CPA-2021-0001 Request:
Spo° ane
Owner:Nvtvmtl Partners Proposed change:
Parcel:45163.0584 Comp Plan Map: MFR to CMU
400,00
Valley Address:22 N Slcipworth Zoning Map: MFR fo CMU
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map
Ct
L L
E Main Ave a
� I
BalicHw
ct
.o
I w
a
E Sprague Ave
lI
Legend
CMU ® MF I POS
o 1 MU RC
IMU ] NC SF
,
0 100 200 300 400 500 '
Feet
1 .1 1
File: CPA-2021-0002 Request:
SpokaneN
Owner:City of Spokane Valley Proposed change:
.000 Valley Address:
45174.9061 and 45174.9062 Comp Plan Map: CMU to P/OS
l� Address:Unaddressed Zoning Map: CMU to P/OS
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map
E-Dalton Aue
z fi 72
cs
E'-Euclidf Ave ,
11 rip /-
E_Eu.clyd
Ave
% :111111111111111111111
L
0
1
WAAState Parks
I i
`Centennial`Trail
NpAI
la
ill lid
-...01111111
Legend
II
IN
mi
-1
CMU ME POS
E,.+ontg�otne'► A � _ I
1111, j II MU RC
0,„„1„1,000
• .00
® IMU L -_ NC SF
,.., 01-•
0 200 400 600 800 1,000
a Feet
..,rr-immoi= iiiimi
File: CPA-2021-0003 Request:
iaFiv
[��ne Owner.'City of Spokane Valley Proposed change:
Valley Parcels:55072.0324, 55072.0318, Comp Plan Map: I to P/OS
4.00 55072.0319,and 55075,0218 Zoning Map: I to P/OS
Address:unaddressed
/
CHAPTER 2
o
Goals, Policies
J
Strategies
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
s
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
i
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/// .i/ /// i/„/„.„iiiiir„ii.�/„/„f /„.„ iii ///////r�,�iir�i�
Return to Table of Contents
Goals and Policies
The statutory goals and requirements of the GMA,Ch, 36.70A RCW,guide the
development of the City's Comprehensive Plan.This chapter presents the City's
goals,policies,and strategies that will achieve the GMA goals and requirements
and guide the City's efforts in realizing the community's vision.For the purpose
of the Comprehensive Plan, goals are broad statements of purpose, policies
provide specific direction to City staff,and strategies represent initial,concrete
actions to direct implementation.Strategies are not binding components of the
Comprehensive Plan, but rather offer opportunities for action and linkages to
other plans and policies.
Economic Development 2-21
t
In* Land Use 2-23
Transportation 2-25
ill 1 Housing 2-27
r Capital Facilities and Public Services 2-28
4s 4 Public and Private Utilities 2-30
4
. Parks and Open Space 2-31
4 Natural Resources 2-32
2-20
Economic Development
GOALS
ED-G1 Support economic opportunities and employment growth for
Spokane Valley.
ED-G2 Create and cultivate a City brand that supports economic growth
and leverages existing community,economic,and natural assets.
ED-G3 Balance economic development with community development
priorities and fiscal sustainability.
ED-G4 Collaborate with relevant economic development stakeholders,
including the business community, to grow a strong and healthy
regional economy.
ED-G5 Support and encourage the development of a strong workforce that
is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the
workplace.
ED-G6 Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility,
predictability,and stability.
POLICIES
ED-Pi Work collaboratively with the private sector to support catalytic
development projects that are consistent with the City's vision.
STRATEGIES
ED-P2 Identify and encourage business and employment growth in new and
> Undertake a comprehensive
innovative industries and occupations. " branding process to create and
market an identity for Spokane
ED-P3 Encourage businesses that provide jobs and grow local markets. Valley that sells the City's
inherent assets to would-be
ED-P4 Promote key retail, office, and industrial opportunity sites, as residents,employers,and
identified in the City's economic development studies and other j visitors
planning documents(e.g.Certified Sites). O
> Participate in regional tour-
/
% ism-promotion efforts and
ED-P5 Promote Spokane Valley as a great place to work, visit, and do increase the City's presence in
business. % regional events
ED-P6 Promote the development or redevelopment of vacant and > Evaluate the return on
underutilized properties,particularly those with potential to serve as l investment of potential tourism
anchors and allocate available
a catalyst for economic development. funds according to the findings
ED-P7 Implement strategies that are intended to create new attractions and /// /r///// /// /////r /
events that assert Spokane Valley's presence as a tourist destination.
2-21
Reknit to Table of Contents
ED-P8 Provide and maintain an infrastructure system that supports
• STRATEGIES Spokane Valley's economic development priorities.
> Consider usingGIS and ED-P9 Invest in long-term improvements to make the City a more attractive
web-based
business development
es to tourist destination.
assist
ED-P10 Enable the creation and retention of home-based businesses that are
• > Intensify targeted retail consistent with neighborhood character.
recruitment efforts
> Evaluate local interest in ED-P11 Leverage federal, state, and regional economic development
the creation of a Business resources and programs for City economic development purposes.
Improvement District
ED-P12 Leverage community assets (e.g. trails, natural amenities, and
> Conduct a market analysis facilities)to grow the local economy.
and initial business planning
for a local farmers'market ED-P13 Implement strategies that are intended to sustain Spokane Valley's
f////////////J/////J//////JJ/////////J/JJJ/J/J/ existing high value and high volume tourism segments.
ED-P14 Pursue opportunities for creating public-private partnerships that
will advance the City's economic development goals.
ED-P15 Pursue technology-based solutions that improve assistance to
businesses.
ED-P16 Support local educational institutions in the development of
educational and training programs that meet the needs of businesses.
ED-P17 Engage local businesses to understand their needs and to assist in
future growth.
ED-P18 Provide positive, accessible, and customer-oriented City and public
services.
2-22
firth Land Use
GOALS
LU-G1 Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane
Valley.
LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents,
employees,and visitors.
LU-G3 Support the transformation of commercial,industrial,and mixed-use
areas into accessible districts that attract economic activity.
LU-G4 Ensure that land use plans, regulations, review processes, and
infrastructure improvements support economic growth and vitality.
POLICIES
LU-Pi Enable neighborhood-scale commercial uses in residential areas.
STRATEGIES
LU-P2 Support unique,high-quality,and locally-owned retail in appropriate
Streamline permitting
locations. i
procedures based on feedback
from business and landowners,
LU-P3 Preserve the public natural features and amenities that make
developers,etc.
Spokane Valley attractive to residents and business owners.
> Evaluate parking standards and
LU-P4 Enable the creation of common open spaces in neighborhoods. reduce the amount of required
i parking if feasible
LU-P5 Ensure compatibility between adjacent residential and commercial
or industrial uses. i, > Collaborate with the private
sector to ensure the succesful
redevelopment of vacant land at
LU-P6 Support neighborhood efforts to sustainably cultivate produce.
• Mirabeau Point
LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and %///////////////////////
adverse impacts associated with transportation corridors.
LU-P8 Ensure that neighborhoods are served by safe and convenient
motorized and non-motorized transportation routes.
LU-P9 Provide supportive regulations for new and innovative development
types on commercial,industrial,and mixed-use land.
LU-P10 Ensure that freight-intensive operations have convenient access to
designated truck routes and intermodal terminals.
LU-P11 Support the remediation of environmentally-contaminated sites to
return the land to productive use.
2-23
Return to Table of Contents
LU-P12 Maintain a robust supply of productive industrial land.
LU-P13 Work collaboratively with landowners and developers that seek to
provide mixed-use residential projects.
LU-P14 Enable a variety of housing types.
LU-P15 Encourage development in commercial and mixed-use zones by
reducing parking requirements.
LU-P16 Maximize the density of development along major transit corridors
and near transit centers and commercial areas.
LU-P17 Enable voluntary efforts by local home and business owners
to improve energy performance and produce or use sources of
renewable energy.
LU-P18 Enable public open spaces.
LU-P19 Develop criteria to identify, process, and assess the annexation of
land into Spokane Valley.
LU-P20 Identify land designations for potential annexation areas in the
Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent Urban Growth Areas to the
City.
2-24
b Transportation
GOALS
T-Gl Ensure that the transportation system and investments in
transportation infrastructure are designed to improve quality of life
or support economic development priorities.
T G2 Ensure that transportation planning efforts reflect anticipated land
use patterns and support identified growth opportunities.
T-G3 Strive to reduce the number of serious injury/fatality collisions to
zero.
T-G4 Provide for safe and efficient freight mobility.
T G5 Maintain and enhance a comprehensive multimodal transportation
system that promotes,supports,and improves the safe,efficient,and
reliable movement of people,vehicles,and goods.
POLICIES
T-P1 Continue to pursue funding for the BNSF mainline separation STRATEGIES
of Bridging the Valleyprogram to reduce rail/vehicle
projects g g p g j > Coordinate transportation
collisions, improve emergency access, eliminate vehicle waiting planning efforts with other
times,reduce noise,and improve traffic flow.
jurisdictions to ensure that
• Spokane Valley retailers and
T-P2 Consider neighborhood traffic and livability conditions and address neighborhoods are well served
potential adverse impacts of public and private projects during the
planning,designing,permitting,and construction phases. > Identify and fund key areas for
j beaufication and coordinate
T-P3 Ensure that a robust street preservation program is funded and capital improvement projects
implemented. > Work with Spokane Transit
Authority(STA)to provide bus
T-P4 Support voluntary efforts to beautify local and regional % shelters at strategic locations
transportation corridors.
> Seek opportunities to continue
T-P5 Restrict high-speed traffic from residential neighborhoods. to fund grade separations on
• Pines Road and Barker Road
T-P6 Work collaboratively with developers to ensure that areas
experiencing new development are well served by motorized and //. /// //„ /7/mil f�„„/If i
non-motorized transportation options.
T P7 Provide access to sources of current information about
transportation options in Spokane Valley and the region.
T-P8 Support local, regional, state, and federal transportation safety
programs.
2-25
Return to Table of Contents
T-P9 Provide and maintain quality street, sidewalk, and shared-use path
surfaces that provide a safe environment for all users.
T-P10 Develop a citywide trail system that provides improved access and
linkages between Spokane Valley's existing trails, neighborhoods,
and community amenities.
T-P11 Designate appropriate freight corridors to ensure that streets/
intersections are designed to safely accommodate trucks and other
modes.
T-P1.2 Provide alternate truck routes to minimize the effects of congestion
in major commercial and industrial areas.
T-P13 Evaluate opportunities to improve multimodal connectivity in all
transportation planning projects,
T-P14 Identify and implement opportunities to improve data collection and
performance monitoring for transportation in Spokane Valley.
T-P15 Encourage all Commute Trip Reduction employers in the City to
achieve travel reduction goals.
T P16 Provide a supportive transportation network for expansion of
general aviation and freight uses at Felts Field.
T-P17 Use transportation demand management techniques and
technologies to move people, vehicles, and goods safely and
efficiently throughout the City's transportation system.
T-P18 Invest in infrastructure beautification,including landscaping,art,and
walking paths.
T-P19 Coordinate with Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC)
and Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency on actions to reduce vehicle
air pollution emissions through regular vehicle inspections and to
lobby federal agencies for appropriate air pollution standards that
balance public health and economic growth.
T-P20 Consider evaluating multimodal level of service for citywide planning
efforts,particularly focusing on the quality of pedestrian,bicycle,and
transit facilities.
2-26
" Housing
GOALS
H-G1. Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to meet the needs
of the community. STRATEGIES
H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels. /
> Identify low-and moderate-
income housing needs
H-G3 Allow convenient access to daily goods and services in Spokane > Continue to evaluate new
Valley's neighborhoods. housing typologies to meet
market needs
}-I-G4 Work collaboratively with local stakeholders to develop a Homeless
Response System specific to the needs of the Valley. > Develop regulations that
provide for the safe.efficient.
H-GS Work closely with and support the Regional Homeless System and equitable provision of
to ensure continuity of care for community members that are supportive housing services
unsheltered and unstably housed in the Valley and throughout our within the City.
region.
POLICIES
H-P1 Support voluntary efforts by property owners to rehabilitate and
preserve buildings of historic value and unique character.
H-P2 Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by
allowing innovative housing types including tiny homes, accessory
dwelling units, pre-fabricated homes, co-housing, cottage housing,
and other housing types.
H-P3 Support the development of affordable housing units using available
financial and regulatory tools.
H-P4 Enable the creation of housing for resident individuals and families
needing assistance from social and human service providers.
H-P5 Enable a variety of housing types at increased densities within 14 mile
of funded high performance transit networks.
H-P6 Preserve and enhance the city's established single-family
neighborhoods by minimizing the impacts of more dense housing
typologies such as duplexes and cottage development.
H-P7 Work with service providers to bring additional resources to Valley
residents.
2-27
Return to Table of Contents
H-PS Ensure the provision of homeless and housing services have
commensurate on-sate support to maintain the character of
neighborhoods and m inimize public service calls.
H-P9 Support community resource hubs where service providers can
co-locate in areasin close proximity to public transportation.
H-P10 Ensure equal access for Valley residents to publicly funded programs,
transportation.job opportunities and housing,
H-PH Engage in active recruitment of service providers that desire to serve
Valley residents through targeted programs focused on homeless
service delivery.
J-I-P12 Support the implementation of the Continuum of Care Five-Year
Strategic Plan to End Homelessness,
H-P13 Continue as active members on regional committees that address
homelessness and housing instability such as the Continuum of Care
Board and the Housing and Community Development Advisory
Committee.
H-P14 Leverage federal,state and local funds,when appropriate_.to bolster
existingprograms provided to Valley residents.
H-P15 Encourage and support new projects and programs vvbich seek
to assist in maintaining housing stability or provide exits from
homelessness to housing.
H-P16 Analyze and collect data through our local Community Management
Information System and use this data to help drive homeless and
housing policy.
H-P17 Continue to support and participate in the Coordinated Entry
implementation.
2-28
Capital Facilities
GOALS
CF-G1 Coordinate with special districts,other jurisdictions,and the private
sector to effectively and affordably provide facilities and services.
CF-G2 Provide public facilities and services necessary to promote Spokane
Valley's economic development goals and community priorities.
CF-G3 Ensure efficient and cost-effective public safety and emergency
services.
CF-G4 Pursue a diverse set of capital funding sources.
0 STRATEGIES POLICIES
> Identify needed capital CF-P1 Seek a balance between the quality and cost of providing public
facilities improvements facilities and services.
that are critical to economic
development CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new
> Update wayfinding and facilities.
signage for the entire City,
and incorporate a consistent CF-P3 Coordinate the construction of public infrastructure with private
development to minimize costs.
aesthetic or theme based
on the outcome of the City's
branding process CF-P4 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/
pressure for new development within the City.
• > Execute a citizen-supported
vision for the redevelopment of CF-P5 Coordinate with a fire services provider to disseminate information
the area surrounding the new about fire-wise development to property owners and land
City Hall developers.
> Improve new and existing CF-P6 Ensure that facilities and services meet minimum Level of Service
jaccesRivers points to the Spokane standards.
• > Establish criteria for CF-P7 Maintain a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets
prioritization of capital the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency
investments planning efforts.
> Establish a Facilities Condition
CF-P8 Coordinate sewer planning with Spokane County.
7• Index(FCI)to provideinformation for planned
maintenance with set priorities CF-P9 Support continued planning for domestic water needs.
and cost estimates CF-P10 Require new development to connect to public sewer and water.
i/77/7 /J/ 7 /// /7/ /
2-29
Helm o to Tobte of Contents
CF-P11 Identify opportunities to reduce waste and increase recycling in City
facilities and at City-sponsored events.
CF-P12 Plan and build infrastructure to support the development of high
quality retail and commercial projects.
CF-P13 Coordinate with school districts in land use planning processes.
CF-P14 Coordinate with school districts to use school facilities as community
centers and public facilities where appropriate.
CF-P15 Evaluate a variety of capital funding sources including,but not limited.
to, grants, local improvement districts, latecomer agreements, and
impact fees to fund projects and programs.
CF-P16 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in
potential annexation areas,including identifying the fiscal impacts of
providing the facilities,utilities,services,and maintenance.
CF-P17 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in developing capital
improvement programs.
CF-P18 Ensure that adequate library services are available.
CF-P19 Collaborate with Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the
best locations for public and private essential public facilities.
CF-P20 Prioritize public investments necessary to support catalytic
economic development and redevelopment projects.
CF-P21 Support State legislative and municipal water system efforts to
convert irrigation rights to municipal water rights.
CF-P22 Reassess the Land Use Element and relevant goals and policies if
probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs.
2-30
bye Public and Private Utilities
GOALS
U-G1 Coordinate with utility providers to balance cost-effectiveness with
environmental protection,aesthetic impact,public safety,and public
health.
POLICIES
STRATEGIES U-P1 Promote the efficient co-location of new utilities.
> Extend sewer infrastructure
to support industrial U-P2 Promote the development of citywide communication networks
development using the most advanced technology available.
✓
> Extend water infrastructure U-P3 Promote the undergrounding of utility distribution lines.
to support industrial
development U-P4 Coordinate with utility service providers to prevent obstructions to
regional utility corridors.
rirrr//rrrrri✓it✓✓✓i✓r✓✓✓rrriiriirrrriirirri✓r
U-P5 Require the placement of cellular facilities,substations,and antennas
in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on adjacent land uses
and utilizes existing structures.
U-P6 Coordinate with utility providers to ensure that sizing, locating, and
phasing of utility systems are appropriate for planned growth.
U-P7 Participate in regular updates of the Inland Northwest Regional
Pavement Cut Policy.
U-P8 Encourage the construction and maintenance of utility,
communications,and technology infrastructure that will help attract
business and industry.
2-31
Reim to Tolle of-Contents
.24
Parks and Open Space
GOALS
P-G1 Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park,
recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community
character.
P-G2 Recognize and support local artists.
POLICIES
P-P1 Support performing arts,community events and relevant facilities.
STRATEGIES
P-P2 Acquire land for the development of parks or the preservation of
open space within the City's boundaries and adjacent UGAs. > Leverage the Appleway`frail
to improve adjacent business
P-P3 Using the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, periodically assess j opportunities and create
recreational facilities to identify potential gaps and improvements. spillover effects
> Seek funding to develop
P-P4 Implement innovative strategies for park maintenance, park safety, north-south trail connections
and park accessibility to reduce operating costs. between key east-west
corridors
P-P5 Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for
pedestrians,bicycles,autos,and public transit. > Evaluate the feasibility of
constructing a whitewater
P-P6 Seek grants, private land donations, and other funding sources for course on the Spokane River
land acquisition and recreational facilities development.
> Evaluate the feasibility of
P-P7 Identify and protect regional open spaces and natural areas to form a
developing a public park along% the Spokane River
connected network of active and passive recreation areas.
> Evaluate the feasibility of an
P-P8 Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all arts venue in Spokane Valley
neighborhoods.
> Identify locations to
P-P9 Support the inclusion of artwork from local artists in public places.
incorporate public art in new
developments or City facilities
P-P 10 Support the voluntary inclusion of common open space and public art rrr,,rrr,,rrrr,,rirrrrrrr,•rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr��r�r�r
in new development.
P-P11 Partner with public and private entities to encourage, sponsor,
and support a range of public activities and special events within
appropriate open spaces.
P-P12 Identify opportunities to transform land located in neighborhoods
into pocket parks.
2-32
Natural Resources
GOALS
NR-G1 Pursue flood hazard reduction while providing predictability for
landowners.
NR-G2 Protect the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie sole source aquifer
from contamination and maintain high quality groundwater.
NR-G3 Ensure that Critical Areas and Shoreline Master Program regulations
are based on best available science and are consistent with required
environmental policy.
NR-G4 Regularly update stormwater management plans for sensitive
riparian areas.
NR-G5 Enhance riparian and large wooden areas throughout the City on
public lands.
NR-G6 Review, as appropriate and based on changing circumstances, the
need for mineral resource land designation within the urban setting
of the City.
POL
ES
STRATEGIES N1CI 1Model and delineate floodplain/floodway boundaries to correct
inaccurate delineations.
> Expand the trail network in
the former"Walk in the Wild
Zoo"property NR-P2 Prepare and/or regularly update watershed plans for Chester Creek,
Glenrose Channel, Saltese Creek, Forker Draw, and Central Park
."7/ riii Basin.
NR-P3 Prepare an accurate,updated map of areas expected to be inundated
by a 100-year flood, particularly in the Spokane River, Forker Draw,
and Glenrose Channel areas.
NR-P4 Work with state agencies to improve natural resource inventory data
within the City.
NR-P5 Coordinate with regional collaborators to protect and improve
regional water quality.
N R-P6 Ensure that emergency response resources are available in the event
of a spill.
NR-P7 Educate the public about the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie and
Spokane River's susceptibility to contamination.
2-33
Return to Table of Contents
NR-P8 Maintain compliance with state underground injection control and
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit.
NR-P9 Ensure that wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas,
frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, and critical
aquifer recharge areas are identified,designated,and protected.
N R-P1n Maintain stormwater plans to include inventory and maintenance of
stormwater facilities.
NR-P11 The City has determined that a mineral resource land designation
is not appropriate at this time, but the City will enable existing
mineral extraction and mining operations that are currently in lawful
operation within the City.
2-34
Strategies for Implementation Legend
• Economic Development
The strategies included on the previous pages are compiled here for reference.
• Land Use
For each strategy, the implementation matrix provided below also explores
the relationship between each strategy and the various elements of the • Transportation
Comprehensive Plan,designates lead staff or organization for implementation
O Housing
activities, outlines a time table for completion, and provides a rough sense of
relative priority.Though the strategies are not mandatory for the City,they are • Capital Facilities
an important window into Spokane Valley's approach to the implementation Public & Private Utilities
of the Comprehensive Plan and they merit continued evaluation by City staff.
• Parks&Open Spaces
• Natural Resources
STRATEGY PRIMARY LEAD&
RELATED ELEMENT(S) TIMING PRIORITY
ELEMENT PARTNERS
Undertake a comprehensive branding process to
create and market an identity for Spokane Valley • • ® E.D.Division; Ongoing HIGH
that sells the City's inherent assets to would-be Economic Visit Spokane
residents,employers,and visitors. Development
Continue participation in regional tourism-pro- • E.D.ValleyFest,Visit
motion efforts and increase the City'spresence in okan Sports Visit Ongoing Y' Economic • • Spokane, g B HIGH
regional events using space at CenterPlace. Development Commission
Seek opportunities for funding and improvements •
for tourism related improvements such as the Economic • • • • • E.D.Division Ongoing HIGH
CenterPlace West Lawn improvements. Development
Continue to advance GIS and web-based • E.D.Division Ongoing HIGH
technologies to assist business development. Economic •
Development
Continue to implement the Retail Recruitment • E.D.Division; Ongoing MEDIUM
Plan. Economic • • ' • Consultant
Development
Identify opportunities for the formation of a • • E.D.Division; 2019 MEDIUM
Farmers'market at CenterPlace. Economic Parks
Development
Revise and update the City's website to meet
accessibility standards,increase search engine •
optimization,improve user experience and Economic • • • • E.D.Division Ongoing HIGH
streamline and simplify content. Development
2-35
Return to Toole of Contents
STRATEGY PRIMARY LEAD&
RELATED ELEMENT(S) TIMING PRIORITY
ELEMENT PARTNERS
Evaluate and develop criteria to assist in the •
E.D.Division 2019 HIGH
evaluation of annexations. Economic • • 0 •
•Development
Streamline permitting procedures to advance our • Building
business friendly environment based on feedback • 0 Division Ongoing HIGH
from business and landowners,developers,etc. Land Use
Collaborate with the private sector to facilitate the •
•successful redevelopment of Mirabeau Point. Land Use O S E.D.Division 2020 HIGH
E.D.and
Coordinate transportation planning efforts with Engineering
•
other jurisdictions to ensure that Spokane Valley • • 0 0 Divisions; Ongoing HIGH
businesses and neighborhoods are well served. Transportation adjacent
jurisdictions,STA
Evaluate and where feasible,implement traffic
•
impact fees in areas of the City where detailed • • C./ • Engineering 2020 HIGH
traffic studies have been completed. Transportation
Work with STA to improve and expand transit ! E.D.and
service in the City. Transportation • • 0 • Engineering 2022 MEDIUM
p Divisions;STA
Evaluate and consider amendments to the E.D.and
• Engineering
municipal code that enhance grant eligibility for • • 0 • 2019 HIGH
projects that improve safety and accessibility. Transportation Divisions;Health
District
Seek opportunities to continue to fund railroad •
Engineering;
Chamber of 2023 HIGH
grade separation on Pines Road.
Transportation Commerce,GSI
E.D.Division;
0
Identify low-and moderate-income housing needs. • • Spokane Housing 2024 LOW
Housing Authority
Explore and potentially adopt a Multi Family Tax p 0 • ED Division 2020 MEDIUM
Exemption in key areas. Housing
Continue to evaluate new housing typologies to E.D.Division;
meet market needs. 6 * 0 Homebuilders 2024 LOW
Housing Association
Develop regulations that provide for the safe. Administration
efficent.and equitpble provision of sunoortive 0 2022 HIGH
housing within the City Housing E.D.Division
identify any eaos or duplication in services
provided'lithe City and held facilitate community g-p Administration
wide discussion on how to streamline services HousingS •S E.D.Division NIGH
offered
identify siting locations forcommunity resource U • Administration
•
hubs in close oroximity to public transportation Housing —— F.D.Divisjgn
2424 MEDIUM
2-36
STRATEGY PRIMARY LEAD&
RELATED ELEMENT(S) TIMING PRIORITY
ELEMENT PARTNERS
Update wayfinding and signage for the entire City,
and incorporate a consistent aesthetic or theme • E.D.Division;
based on the outcome of the City's branding Capital • • • Downtown 2024 LOW
Facilities Partnership
process.
Identify opportunities for the expansion of Balfour • Parks and Rec
Park. Capital • • • d • Dept.and E.D. 2020 MEDIUM
Facilities Division
Improve new and existing access points to the • Parks and Rec
Spokane River. Capital • • • • • Dept and Dept of 2020 MEDIUM
Facilities Ecology
Create a20-year transportation project list to • Engineering and
inform the 6-year transportation improvement Capital • • • • • E.D.Divisions 2019 HIGH
program. Facilities
Administration,
Implement an asset management program for the • Engineering, 2022 MEDIUM
street and stormwater maintenance programs. Capital • • • • • Street
Facilities Maintenance
Engineering and
Work to extend and improve water,sewer,and • E.D.Divisions;
road infrastructure in the Northeast Industrial public and • • • • Spokane County; 2022 HIGH
Area to support industrial development. Private Utilities Consolidated
Irrigation District
Engineering and
Coordinate with utility providers on the timing of • E.D.Divisions; 2022 HIGH
capital improvement projects. Public and • • • • Spokane County;
Private Utilities Water Districts
Identify and implement opportunities,like
the Parklet and Streeteries ordinance that • E.D.Division;
take advantage of proximity and access to the Parks and Open • • • • adjacent 2020 LOW
Space businesses
Appleway and Centennial Trails.
Parks and
RecIdentify and seek funding to develop north-south • E.D.DIVIsio Deio
h;
trail connections between the Appleway and Parks and Open • • • • and Resource 2020 MEDIUM
Centennial Trails. Space Conservation
Office
Develop an arts master plan that identifies •
locations to incorporate public art in new Parks and Open • • • 0 • E.D.Division 2022 LOW
developments or City facilities. Space
Parks;
Expand the trail network in the former"Walk in • Department 2022 LOW
the Wild Zoo"property. Natural • • • of Natural
Resources Resources
2-37
Return to Table of Contents
CHAPTER 6
..
•
Housing
Introduction
ilj� I II ! I ! !
hI II WHY THE HOUSING ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT
Housing is an important component of the economic infrastructure of a
community because it ensures a balance of land uses and complements employ-
ment-generating uses by providing opportunities for workers to live near their
jobs.The availability of housing types that match Spokane Valley's job profile
and enhance the livability of local neighborhoods is therefore an important
competitive advantage for economic development. The Housing Element
leverages key data to inform the development of goals and policies, which
will set a course toward the City's vision of quality, affordable housing for all
Spokane Valley residents.
PLANNING CONTEXT
The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) stipulates that the
housing element serves to encourage the availability of affordable housing
to residents of all economic backgrounds, promote a variety of residential
densities and housing types, and encourage the preservation of existing
neighborhoods.Countywide Planning Policies(CWPP)for Spokane County for
housing are consistent with these requirements and place additional emphasis
on promoting accessibility for residents to commercial and transportation
REFERENCES KEY centers.
In previous planning efforts, the City acknowledged the abundance of single
• Refers to other section
family housing, and focused on expanding housing options for residents while
x xx in plan
increasing the availability of multifamily housing units centrally located to
/ 0
Refers to other Spokane employment centers and commercial amenities. Additionally, Spokane Valley
Valley plans and official aimed to increase the prevalence of mixed-use retail and residential throughout
documents the City's neighborhoods with the overarching goal of limiting auto-dependen-
cy and improving housing affordability.
Refers to other
0 non-Spokane Valley The Housing Element works in tandem with other elements in this
references for further Comprehensive Plan. It includes a data-rich narrative to document existing
reading conditions that affect housing availability, cost, and quality. These include
demographic trends and market conditions. The findings indicate challenges
and opportunities for housing in Spokane Valley, and ultimately anchor the
{///////////////// ///////////////
goals and policies presented in Chapter 2.
6-97
keturn to Table of Contents
Current Conditions
Spokane Valley has a similar demographic composition as Spokane County
overall. The population in the City will continue to grow in size, and it is
anticipated that the population will continue to"age"—meaning that the share
of the population 65 and older will increase disproportionately compared to
other age segments. Both the average household size and the proportion of
households with children are decreasing in Spokane Valley. Additionally, the
apartment vacancy rate in the City and County are comparably low, and lease
rates for apartments are steadily increasing. Taken together, these recent
trends indicate that demand for single family dwellings is decreasing in relation
to demand for multifamily units.The key data from this section are summarized
below.
• The majority (60%) of housing units in Spokane Valley are single family
dwellings built prior to 2000(Figure 41).
• Spokane Valley's housing growth has been modest, but steady since
it incorporated in 2003, growing at a rate of about 1% per year. About
6,000 new residences were added to Spokane Valley's total housing stock
between 2003 and 2015(Figure 41).
• Spokane Valley's population is aging. Between 2005 and 2014, the
proportion of the population over the age of 75 increased by 2%,from 5%
to 7%.The City's aging trend parallels that of the County—the share of the
population 65 or older totaled 15% in 2014 in both Spokane Valley and
Spokane County(Figure 35).
• Compared to Spokane County as a whole,the number of households with
children is decreasing more rapidly in Spokane Valley. The percentage
of the City's households with children decreased by 5.6%—from 35.6%
to 30%—between 2005 and 2014, while the proportion of households
with children in the County dropped by 1.5%during the same time period
(Figure 35).
• The median household income in Spokane Valley was over $2,000 less
than the average countywide annual earnings. Additionally, almost a
third of Spokane Valley's residents earned between $25,000 and $50,000
annually in 2014(Figure 38).
6-98
• Residents in both Spokane Valley and Spokane County are cost-burdened,
meaning that their housing costs account for more than one-third of
their income. Renters and homeowners are notably cost-burdened,
however,there is a much larger proportion of cost-burdened renters than
homeowners,51%of renters and 26%of homeowners in both locales spend
a third or more of their monthly budget on rent or mortgage payments
(Figure 39).
• The vacancy rate for apartments in the City is low and rents are
increasing. According to an apartment market survey executed by the
Runstad Center for Real Estate Studies at the University of Washington,
the average rent for apartments of any size in Spokane Valley was$827 per
month. Furthermore, the average rent for a one-bedroom, one-bathroom
apartment was$812 per month.The overall vacancy rate for apartments in
Spokane Valley was notably low-0.8%(Studies,2016:Figure 43).
• The City has historically allowed, and continues to allow, other types of
housing to meet community needs, in compliance with state law. These
housing options include government-assisted housing, manufactured
housing,group homes,and foster care.
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
The demographic makeup of an area informs the market demand for housing
size, type, location, and mix. For example, cities with large numbers of
households with children will have high demand for single family housing
near schools. Similarly, housing demand in locations with higher proportions
of single,young adult populations will be skewed towards smaller, multifamily
units proximate to employment centers.As the population of an area evolves
over time, the housing market must also adjust to match the needs of its
residents.
Increasing Population and Continued Growth
The population in Spokane Valley is growing at a slightly slower rate than
the countywide population. Spokane Valley experienced almost 11% growth
between 2003 and 2014 compared to the County's 13% population increase
during the same time period. By 2037, the City is projected to have 14,650
additional residents.Though increasing population is clearly linked to demand
for housing,population trends are only briefly summarized in this element,and
more detailed data is contained in the Land Use Element.
6-99
keturn to Fable of Contents
Cities,counties,and regions can grow through natural increases(i.e.when births
outstrip deaths) and by in-migration.Countywide, births and deaths remained
stable between 2005 and 2015 (Figure 34).Therefore, recent fluctuations in
population are largely attributable to people moving to and from the County.
These"non-natural"fluctuations are referred to as net residual migration,and
have been the driving force behind population growth and loss within Spokane
County since at least 2005.
Figure 34. Population Change by Natural Increase and Net
Residual Migration,Spokane County,2005-2015
Source:Washington State Office of Financial Management(2015)
9,500
Population •Eiet Re.idJai Migralibn
8500 (Change)
7,500 s Natoli!Incrt,atr lr+rths.-Ovath0
6,500
Ss
5,500
4,500
0
2,500
1,500
`5(XJns' W
.500 •-0h?.
5 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
An Aging Population
Overall,Spokane Valley's age segmentation closely resembles that of Spokane
County.One notable trend in both the City and the County is that the population
is aging.The share of the population 65 or older totaled 15% in 2014 in both
Spokane Valley and Spokane County (up from 10% and 12%, respectively,
in 2005) (Figure 35).This trend is reflected in younger age segments as well,
with the residents 19 or younger dropping from 31% (2005) to 26% (2014) in
Spokane Valley.
The decreased prevalence of children in Spokane Valley brings the City in line
with the larger County,where 25%of the population is 19 or younger.The City,
therefore,does not have a significantly larger family presence than the County
as a whole. These trends suggest decreasing demand for large, detached
single family homes and increased demand for the types of housing that are
both desirable and affordable to smaller households, including empty-nesters
that may be less inclined to maintain larger properties. Nevertheless, the City
will still need to provide excellent facilities, such as schools, for families with
children.
6-100
Even with increased demand for smaller and attached housing products,
new single family homes will continue to be developed throughout the
County. However, data suggests that even as all of Spokane County ages,
Spokane Valley's population is aging at a particularly fast rate. Multifamily
units and smaller, attached single family housing products may therefore be
comparatively attractive investments in Spokane Valley for housing developers
that are active in the greater Spokane region. This finding is also supported
by the fact that while Spokane Valley's average household size has slightly
decreased since 2005,the average household size throughout Spokane County
has increased(Figure 36).
Figure 35. Distribution of Population by Age Segment,
Spokane Valley and Spokane County,2005 and 2014
Source:Source:US Census Bureau American Community Survey(2005-2014)
100% S' 6% 6%
90% S% 1131
6% 9% 75+
+D 65.74
70 -
60% 13% 15% 12 ,aid +49
5O3 i31
13% 13 30.39
Q
SgL 2i1-29
5.19
20%
20% 219 19% Under 5
105
2005 2014 2005 2014
Spokane Valley Spokane County
Income and Housing Affordability
In 2005, the median household income in Spokane Valley was roughly $4,000
lower than that of Spokane County as a whole (Figure 38). In 2014, that
difference narrowed—there was just over a $2,000 difference in median
Figure 36. Average Household
Size,Spokane Valley and Spokane household income between Spokane Valley and Spokane County.
County,2005-2014
Source:US Census Bureau American Community Median household income has therefore grown at a faster rate in Spokane
Suivey(2014) Valley than in Spokane County. Despite this trend, median household income
AREA 2005 2014 in Spokane Valley is still lower than in Spokane County as a whole by about
Spokane Valley 2.47 2.44 $2,200. The share of residents within each income bracket has also remained
Spokane County 2.39 2.45 consistent during this time period in Spokane Valley, while in Spokane
6-101
netalrn to Table of Contents
County there has been a marked decrease in the percentage of households
making less than $25,000 (from 36%to 25%) and a significant increase in the
number of households making $50,000 or more (from 38% to 51%) (Figure
37).This may suggest that residents of the County are experiencing increased
upward mobility, or that the County has seen an influx of wealthy residents.
This change could also be attributed to the City's older population retiring,
and subsequently not growing their annual income. In any case, the fact that
increases in median household income in Spokane Valley have not lifted a
significant number of households into higher income segments indicates that
Spokane Valley's housing must remain affordable to a wider range of income
levels.
One of the goals of the GMA is to provide Washington residents with affordable
housing options. According to federal and state guidelines, a household is
considered cost burdened when 30% or more of its gross income is spent on
housing(including rent or mortgage and utility costs).
Figure 37. Income Distribution of Households,Spokane Valley and
Spokane County, 2005-2014
Source:US Census Bureau American Community Survey(2005-2014)
1i 5%
Ht% 12% Figure 38. Median Household
10% .1 ''" TS,UOt3 Income,Spokane Valley and
'1.. .-,
1 , ; , .:, �o�.�- � Spokane County,2005-2014
50% Source:US Census Bureau American
Community Survey(2014)
40
II $75,14C1
30%
20%
+vF
3 _004
4,4
10% $50 $50.000
0%
2005 2014 2005 2014 *Ws.than $40.0,00 fl
Sp kape Valley Spokane County $25,
000
30,000
Renters and homeowners in both the City and the County are notably cost-
burdened-36%and 35% in 2014, respectively (Figure 39).The percentage of
cost-burdened households in Spokane Valley increased by 1% between 2005 $iiaOco
and 2014,while the proportion in the County rose by 3%during the same time
period.This suggests that other locales in Spokane County are disproportion- SO
ately driving the increase, but that affordability challenges persist within the 5 )14 200S14
Spokane Spokane
City. Volley County
6-102
Figure 39. Cost-Burdened Households by Type,
Spokane Valley,2005-2014
Source:US Census Bureau American Community Survey(2005-2014)
G0 54%
3i'% S 1%
Q 35% 36%4G
26 26 I Iz6
I IFE30%10%
2005 2014 2005 2014
Spokarw Valley Spokarfre Coumtw
In both the City and the County, there is a much larger proportion of
cost-burdened renters than homeowners. In Spokane Valley, however, the
share of cost-burdened renters decreased from 54% in 2005 to 51% in 2014
while the percentage of cost-burdened homeowners remained constant.
The opposite occurred on the countywide scale—the share of cost-burdened
renters increased slightly,from 50%to 51%.The proportion of cost-burdened
homeowners countywide also increased by 4%. Given that median household
incomes are increasing throughout the County,this indicates that the average
home price is increasing in Spokane County at a faster rate than in Spokane
Val ley.
Though renters are disproportionately cost-burdened, data suggest that
Spokane Valley and Spokane County residents are increasingly more likely
to rent than buy their housing unit. In the City, the share of renter-occupied
housing increased from 35% to 40% between 2005 and 2014. This trend is
visible countywide (34% to 38%), as well as nationwide (Figure 40). Several
demographic and economic factors—not least the Great Recession—have
shifted consumer preferences toward renting,particularly in urban areas.
6-103
Return to Toble of Contents
Figure 40. Owner and Renter-Occupied Housing,Spokane Valley CoContinuum of Care Program
and Spokane
e Bureau
Amer20�ommo�4Survey(2005-2014) % regional
Source:US unity The Continuum of Care(CoC)Program
•% seeks to promote the
100% - % towards ending homeless effort
homelessness and
Programsensures access to 9t exper encing homelessnes those
s.This
80 % Program has several components
■Ownor / which outline how a jurisdiction
l 65% 60% 66K 62% Oci vpmed implements their own CoC,but one of
60% Housing the most critical is the creation of the
CoC Board.Our CoC is made up of a_
50%. variety of business leaders,homeless
service providers.local government
4 representatives.and individuals that
i0% have experienced homelessness.
/
7,4 35% 41)% 34 38% % The CDC sets local priorities around
•Renter ending homelessness and is the the
10% Occupied % driver of our Five-Year Strategic Plan
06 Flcxrsfirtig % to Prevent and End Homelessness-
2UC�5 2014 2014
There are several responsibilities that
Spokane Valley Spokane County % the CoC must comply with but one
of the key components of the CoC
Homeless Response System in Spokane County j is its responsibility in identifying a
ypane oun Y Collaborative Applicant. The City of
There are several ways that a household experiencing homelessness can access % Spokane is the designated C Ilaborative
/ Applicant for our CoC.and they are
community resources that will help them navigate to temporary and permanent % responsible for applying and managing,
housing. These various pathways depend on where the individual is in the � the various homeless services rg ants
✓ offered by HUD on behalf of the
County and the existing resources embedded in those communities. Our region •• Board.The City of Spokane is also the
helps to alleviate homelessness and housing instability through a coordinated 0 lead organization that manages the
and concerted effort, and we are committed to supporting our Regional
'/� Community Management Information
5vstem(CM15). The CMIS database
Homeless System. We do this through a number of regional boards and is a local technology system that
lj service providers are required to use
committees such as the Continuum of Care and the Housing and Community when collecting client level data when
Development Advisory Committee. homeless individuals access homeless
and housing services in our region. Data
collected through this system is designed
THE SUPPLY OF HOUSING IN SPOKANE VALLEY to help drive regional policy decisions
as it relates to the delivery of homeless
While demographic and economic characteristics of Spokane Valley's services,The data provides opportunities
population provide insight into the demand for housing products in the City and f to course correct current programs or.
in some cases,support new program
the region,the existing supply of housing in the area is essential to identifying offerings.
challenges and opportunities facing current and prospective Spokane Valley j
residents. The CoC governance structure is also
comprised of various Sub Committees
Othat assist in the carrying out of the
The City currently contains about 50,700 total dwelling units. Almost 30,000 0 mission of the CoC to ensure that
of those dwellings were built prior to 1980(Figure 41). Roughly 15%,or 7,845 homelessness is rare,brief and one time,
Each Sub Committee focuses on unique
units,of the total housing stock was built after 2000. 0 suboopulations that are experiencing
/////////////f/// /////////////AY
6-104
housing instability and literal homelessness, Figure 41. Housing Units by Type and Year Built,
These Sub Committees are: Veterans, Spokane Valley,2013
Young Adults.Families with children,and \ p y
Single Adults \ Source:US Census Bureau American Community Survey(2005-2013)
\\\\\*w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\4\\\\\\\\\\ 20.000
16,000 17,604 Mobllc Homes
O 71()Nis
[ ,�DOiS 1 , .u1 Unit
Sru,kane Citv/Sookane County Continuum of Care 14,000
5-Year Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessnes 11,916
12:001-
24 Code ofFfderalRevulatlons Part 578 Continuum ofCare \
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 10,000 y�y
7f�M
6,000 6,000
4,000
2,0c0
0
t3crllt t3etottr Built 1960 tw Built 1?. 0 to F ullt 20040 61
19 s0 19 7t9 1999 later
Spokane Valley's housing growth has been modest, but steady since it
incorporated in 2003, growing at a rate of about 1% per year. Approximately
6,000 new residences were added to Spokane Valley's total housing stock
between 2003 and 2015. This is consistent with the aforementioned data
illustrating the age of housing units,which reports a limited number of dwellings
built after 2000.
REAL ESTATE CONSIDERATIONS
Though the Great Recession negatively impacted the feasibility of real estate
development projects throughout the country,financing for new development
is once again available and development activity is again increasing.
Macroeconomic conditions will always affect local development trends,and are
important since private development will drive any new additions to housing
stock in Spokane Valley and the region. Multifamily units, in particular, were
difficult to finance in many market areas,and the graph in Figure 42 illustrates
this difficulty,as there were no multifamily units constructed in Spokane Valley
between the third quarter of 2009 and the second quarter of 2012. Since the
third quarter of 2012,however,the multifamily development pipeline has been
relatively robust.
Market data also show that,though multifamily vacancy rates are more volatile
in the City than in the County,rates in both geographies are quite low.Vacancies
6-105
Return to Table of Contents
Figure 42. Multifamily Housing Units Delivered by Quarter,
Spokane Valley, 2005-2016
Source:CoStar Group(2016)
350
324
it Units Delivered
300
256 250
200 1a
176
150 144 i3�5 135
100
66
50
28 27 26 26
1 L Ii
0
spiked to almost 15% in Spokane Valley in 2009, but have since decreased
and have remained between 4% and 6%since mid-2010 (Figure 43).Spokane
County, as a larger geography, is more insulated from the volatility found in
smaller markets; still, vacancies increased during and immediately after the
recession, but have since stabilized at about 4/. These rates indicate a tight
rental market regionally and potentially suggest unmet demand for multifamily
products.Even the aforementioned spikes in vacancy appear to be attributable
to concentrated periods of multifamily development, rather than insufficient
demand;though vacancy increased by two percentage points in Spokane Valley
in early 2015, several hundred units had been delivered in the months prior,
and the rapid return to 4% vacancy suggests healthy absorption of the units
delivered.
6-106
Figure 43. Apartment Rent and Vacancy Rates,Spokane Valley
and Spokane County,2000-2015
Source:CoStar Group(2016)
{ $91:0 Countywide Bent 16%
1 i ,lw;rl , , � nd z ,g(}0 eauhtywIdr,l+dc+rraytialte 1+4%
I 0' $700 Spokane' arlev Vataticv Rats 12
$600
10%
Spokane Valley's neighborhoods are —
characterized by a predominance of single family
homes.
$2 — 4%
$100 2%
$0 0%
is cN h! 04 hs r.Y Ca h., W h1 h5 ;NI hah.) Al ra
o 4 2 G t� 4 24 8 Lk v Q w
w i.. a4. La o< W - -..v a — ha W 1. �r
The average apartment rent in Spokane Valley was roughly $100 lower than
Spokane County's average rent between 2000 and 2008. Since early 2009,
the average rent in Spokane Valley and Spokane County have been generally
aligned. As of the first quarter of 2016, the average apartment rent for both
areas was approximately$800 per month.
Approach to the Housing Element
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Several challenges and opportunities arise from a careful analysis of these
housing data. The following summarize obstacles and impediments to quality,
affordable, and diverse housing options, as well as arising opportunities to
improve housing in Spokane Valley,and underpin goal and policy development
in the Housing Element.
Providing For Cost-Burdened Residents
While the proportion of cost-burdened Spokane Valley renters decreased
between 2005 and 2014, more than one-third of all residents—owners
and renters together—qualified as cost-burdened in 2014. This suggests a
substantial need for more affordable housing units in the City, with a focus
on affordable rental units. Smaller multifamily units are less expensive than
stand-alone single family units, and an increase in their availability could
alleviate some of the cost-burden Spokane Valley residents are currently facing.
6-107
Rehlm to Table of Contents
More than 50% of Spokane Valley households earned less than $50,000 in
2014. For households earning$25,000 per year, rent and mortgage expenses
should be less than$694 per month;at$50,000 annually,housing costs must be
less than$1,389 per month.According to an apartment market survey executed
by the Runstad Center for Real Estate Studies at the University of Washington,
the average rent for apartments of any size in Spokane Valley was $827 per
month in 2016,though two and three bedroom units likely exceed this cost by a
significant margin.Moreover,when affordable housing units are located further
fi•om employment centers and daily needs, like grocery stores, pharmacies,gas
stations, restaurants, and other retailers, transportation costs for residents
increase significantly through car ownership, insurance requirements, and
gasoline purchases.These facts point to the need for affordable housing within
walking distance of retailers,employers,and transportation hubs.
Creating Options For Non-Family Households
As the number of households with children decreases,the demand for smaller
housing options will likely increase in Spokane Valley and the County overall.
Quality higher-density housing products, such as apartments, condominiums,
townhouses, tiny homes, or backyard cottages, would be viable opportunities
for residents without children and retirees and may offer the added benefit of
increasing affordability for workers in retail and services.
Accommodating An Aging Population
Aging individuals experience a decrease in mobility—many are unable to drive
or don't feel comfortable operating a vehicle as their reflexes and eyesight
worsen. As a result, aging populations are more reliant upon transportation
services and shorter commute times to amenities and health services.
Additionally, increasing age often requires homeowners and renters to
downsize because of health concerns, physical mobility restrictions, and/or
reductions in income (University, 2014). Taken together, the aforementioned
forces urge consideration of denser housing opportunities in close proximity to
jobs,retail amenities like grocery stores and banks,and public transportation.
6-108
Access to Community Services
The City is largely suburban and.in many areas.lack a robust sidewalk network
and close proximity to public transportation which is often limited to arterial
corridors.The lack of sidewalks and minimal public transit presents a challenge
to those with mobility issues.those that are u s Re - - o_whoJac _ac r.scto
a personal vehicle.The location of facilities that seek to co-locate a variety of
community resources neet�,s to be accessible and connected to public transit to
ensure equal access.
In addition. the City will need to identify the population(s) that a community
resource center seeks to serve. Since the Valley is spread out offering a wide
variety of community resources will likely have the best outcome for our
Community.
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PRIORITIES
Responding To Community Preferences
The housing stock in Spokane Valley is weighted toward single family units
(61%).Low apartment vacancy rates and high rents indicate market demand for
more multifamily units. Residents echoed the market status with a community
desire for innovative types of multifamily housing,such as cottage housing,tiny
homes,and accessory dwelling units.
improving Housing Diversity and Affordability
ENCOURAGE THE CREATION OF MIXED-USE DESTINATIONS
Regionally, Kendall Yards in Spokane has aroused interest as a relatively new
style of development that embraces many of the tenets of a movement called
new urbanism. Residents, as well as investors, have indicated interest in this
type of development,which could anchor new regional retail,attract overnight
visitors,amplify positive publicity,and create new mixed-use housing options.
IMPROVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
Substantial portions of the renter and homeowner population are
cost-burdened by rent and mortgage payments. An increase in multifamily
housing options would reduce the average rent for these units countywide,
improving the livelihood of cost-burdened residents. Furthermore, providing
housing options that meet the needs of local employees is critical to ensuring
that local companies continue to have access to capable workers.
6-109
Hew o to Table of Contents
ENSURE A RANGE OF HOUSING OPTIONS FOR RESIDENTS
As the City's population ages and the proportion of households with children
continues to decrease, the demand for smaller housing options will increase.
During conversations with Spokane Valley residents,the desire for new housing
typologies—including cottages and tiny homes—repeatedly arose. From an
economic development standpoint, these typologies densify existing single
family neighborhoods while enhancing neighborhood character,and therefore
provide a captive audience for neighborhood-serving retailers that create new
jobs in the community and draw visitors from nearby towns.
Neighborhood Character
ENHANCE DISTINCTIVE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER
TheSpokane Valley community expressed a strong desirefor more neighborhood
amenities, such as non-chain restaurants, boutiques, and local entertainment.
These commercial features thrive in walkable, high density residential
communities and may best be provided through mixed-use development,where
multifamily units can improvethe financial feasibility of the development project.
BEST PRACTICES
Coordinate with Human Services
Housing for individuals and families with a need for human services is
important. Planning for these housing types in appropriate areas will reduce
barriers to access for these services and may improve the quality of life for
those individuals and families.
Incorporating Density, Improving Walkability
Coordinating housing development with planning for commercial uses,
transportation improvements, and public space can create vibrant places with
high-quality, high-density housing options. Walkable places have been shown
to create economic benefits for cities and residents alike, and these walkable
destinations may help diversify and improve the City's stock of for-rent
multifamily housing.
6-110
Co-Location of Homeless and Homeless Prevention Services
The City of Spokane Valley has a strong network of various non-profits. faith-based
organizations and school districts that help serve those who are facing housin•
instability as well as households that are unsheltered. What has historically been
missing are Locations in the City where access to these services are easily obtainable.
Specifically, a high degree of reliance has been on the City of Spokane to physically
house these services which in turn requires City of Spokane Valley residents to travel
when resources are needed. The City supports co-location facilities in its jurisdiction
within close proximity of public transportation. These facilities would house various
providers that seek to serve those experiencing homelessness and housing instability.
Additionally,such services should be well connected to existing systems of care within
our region to encourage and support ease of referrals and reduction of duplication in
services.
Supporting Af fordable Housinglor all Households
The provision of Affordable Housing is critical to meet the needs of those households
that have special needs or are on fixed incomes, Any build out of Affordable Housing
in the City should align with existing programs and systems that seek to serve those
that are unsheltered or unstably housed.The City should strive to work with regional
providers to streamline and coordinate the distribution of limited resources.
6-111
Return to Table of Contents