Loading...
2021, 10-19 Study Session MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Study Session Format Tuesday, October 19, 2021 Mayor Wick called the meeting to order at approximately 6 pm. The meeting was held in City Hall with Council, staff and some members of the public participating in person; and some members of the public participating remotely via Zoom meeting. Ben Wick, Mayor John Hohman,Deputy City Manager Brandi Peetz, Deputy Mayor Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Pam Haley, Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney Tim Hattenburg,Councilmember John Bottelli, Parks,Rec&Facilities Director Rod Higgins, CounciImember Dave Ellis,Police Chief Linda Thompson, Councilmember Kevin Richey,Assistant Police Chief Arne Woodard, Councilmember Morgan Koudelka, Sr. Administrative Analyst Jerremy Clark, Sr Traffic Engineer Bill Helbig, City Engineer Chaz Bates, Senior Planner Mike Basinger, Economic Development Mgr. Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll, all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda. ACTION ITEMS; A.Motion Consideration: Expo Expansion Project Grant Opportunity—Mike Basinger [added item] It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply for the ARPA Tourism grant for the Expo Center Expansion Center project in conjunction with Spokane County. Mr. Basinger said he had some good conversations with the County today; and through his PowerPoint briefly explained about Economic Development Administration's (EDA) ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) for Tourism, and of the total ARPA funds available; said the application due date is January 31, 2022, and that the County is required to be a co-applicant; and that the expenditure date of the tourism funds is expected no later than September 30,2027. Mr.Basinger noted the estimated $10 million project cost for the Expo Expansion Project with our ARPA request of$3 million; our own funds of$1 million, 2022 Lodging Tax Recommendation of$3.5 million, Washington State Legislature funding of $750,000, and Spokane County potential $1,250,000; said that with these funds, the project could be $500,000 shy of being fully funded. Mr. Hohman said that in discussions today, County Commissioner French suggested they might have some additional leftover funds from re-financing PFD bonds that the County might be able to apply to this. Mr. Basinger added that the County wants to sign on with this application, and he continued through the remaining slides showing some of the Expo expansion details and layout renderings. In reference to the west elevation slide showing a possible Bar&Grill,Mr.Hohman explained that we will make sure this is a family-oriented project with a family atmosphere, and that we can modify that rendering. Councilmember Thompson also mentioned we would want a family engaging restaurant. There was discussion about the amount of ARPA funds to seek with Mr. Basinger explaining that the EDA stressed we need to be careful how much we ask for as there is great competition, and that we don't want to ask for too much and risk not receiving any funds.There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. Council Meeting Minutes Study Session: 10-19-2021 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: 11-09-2021 1.Motion Consideration: Sullivan Park Waterline Interlocal Agreement Bill Helbig It was moved by Deputy Mayor Peetz and seconded to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Interlocal Agreement with Trentwood Irrigation District #3 regarding the Sullivan Road Waterline Project. Mr. Helbig went over the background of this project and of the need for the construction of the waterline. There were no public comments. Vote by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried. NON-ACTION ITEMS; 2. SCRAPS Update—Morgan Koudelka, SCRAPS Director Lindsey Soffes Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka said it has been a while since we have had an update on SCRAPS, and he introduced SCRAPS Director Lindsey Soffes. Mr. Koudelka mentioned our twenty-year contract began 2014 so will continue through the end of 2033; said our cost debt service element allows us to take advantage of the new facility as we pay $45,000 annually toward that; adding that the $242,000 first-year operating cost is adjusted annually for CPI(Consumer Price Index) changes. Ms. Soffes went through her PowerPoint showing the animal impounds and save rates over about the last six years as well as the animal impound rates for Spokane Valley; she showed a chart of field service requests; and briefly discussed law enforcement reform, animal licensing,veterinary services and challenges due to Covid. Deputy Mayor Peetz brought up some complaints that she has received about dangerous dogs, and lose animals,and of the difficulty in getting someone at SCRAPS after hours, as well as the issue of people who want to report anonymously. Ms. Soffes explained that they have an after-hours service which is reachable 24/7; and that officers respond to any public safety dangers; she said they take anonymous complaints but enforcement might vaiy as in the absence of the one making the complaint, they are somewhat limited. Councilmember Woodard asked about barking dogs. Ms. Soffes stated that barking dogs also present a challenge and there are times when the complainant will be asked to keep a log showing when the problem occurs; adding that often times without such a log, any citation might not be enforced by the courts; she said officers go out for nuisance circumstances but a citation doesn't always mediate the concern; said they don't have any heavier authority and at some point it becomes a civil issue. She was also asked about nuisance regulations.Ms. Soffes said there would need to be something put in place specifying barking and potential consequences in order to allow officers to enforce such an ordinance. City Attorney Driskell said that we also have an interlocal agreement that requires that we have animal control regulations identical to that of the County, so changing regulations is not something we could easily do on our own unless the County were also to discuss making similar arrangements. 3. Spokane Valley Police Department Vehicle Replacement—Morgan Koudelka, Assistant Police Chief Kevin Richey Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka stated that we are currently in a five-year contract for Law Enforcement Services that expires the end of 2022, which interlocal agreement could terminate with 24- hour notice within the first three years of its term,and that we are currently in that window.In going through his PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Koudelka mentioned the number of Spokane Valley Police Department dedicated officers and the number of Spokane Valley Police Department vehicles, motorcycles, and their cost; he went over the history of County funding for vehicles, and that our City usually pays for 42-45% of vehicles;that we receive eleven new vehicles per year under the current budget,and that the eleven vehicles for 2021 have not yet been received. Mr. Koudelka explained that we currently pay depreciated costs for vehicles and that the County buys the vehicles and contributes the entire funds at the time of purchase and that we only pay for vehicles as we use them. However, he explained that we have negotiated terms with the County,subject to Council approval,that would have us pay for vehicles up front for dedicated Spokane Valley positions; and he further explained the process as shown on slide 6. There was some discussion about the replacement schedule; what would occur if we were to terminate the contract;salvage costs,maintenance with mention that the Sheriff's Office has their own garage with repair Council Meeting Minutes Study Session: 10-19-2021 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: 11-09-2021 personnel, and we have our own garage at the precinct. Concerning ownership, City Attorney Driskell mentioned that there is some complexity because of insurance. Mr. Koudelka said staff is working on an amendment to the law enforcement agreement which will be brought forward to Council;he also stated that we have asked about implementing fleet management software so we can track the vehicles so we can be made aware of the right time to replace a vehicle; and that this will hopefully save us money and keep the officers in well-maintained cars. Council had no objection to bringing forth an amendment to the interlocal. 4. Housing Action Plan Implementation Measures—Chaz Bates Senior Planner Bates went through his PowerPoint presentation explaining the background of the Housing Action Plan (HAP), including the Plan's strategies and recommended actions including a recommendation to modify the zoning code to encourage production of townhomes and cottages; to evaluate the idea of a multiple family tax exemption program for the City;and to modify regulations for accessory dwelling units. Councilmember Woodard said that he likes the word `evaluate' as he is not a big proponent for exemptions, but would like to see the evaluation,and other members of Council agreed.There was also some discussion about bonus density, what it is, and that we don't have bonus densities now. Council agreed they are open to hearing more and exploring other options,and there was no objection for staff to come back with farther information. Mr. Hohman said more work needs to be done for the multi-family tax exemption as staff wants to give Council an overview of how that works;that staff will further develop some of the other ideas and will return to Council with at least one more touch before the issue goes to the Planning Commission. 5. Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)Process Update—Chaz Bates After Mr. Bates gave a brief synopsis of the CDBG and our three-year participation agreement, as shown on the PowerPoint slides, he discussed the objective of CDBG, mentioned the partners and their roles, discussed the project types and funding limits, noted our revised agreement which among other things, increased our representatives to four, went over the timeline for 2022 funding, and noted the upcoming Council meetings in January. Councilmember Woodard suggested we submit a project because if we don't have a project, the one who submitted will get fully funded and the balance will go toward the rest of the County's project; said he brought this up at yesterday's Agenda meeting; that he also suggested we should submit a project, and mentioned the idea of Mr. Hohman checking with Tim Crowley, Manager of the County's Housing and Community Development Division, to see if there is a need on Barker Road; he also mentioned that just because there is a set-aside,doesn't mean that it has to go to our projects; and said we should make sure we have something for Spokane Valley. Mr.Hohman said staff looked at the possibility of coming forward with a project;that in the agenda meeting yesterday,we spoke about an opportunity to see if any other residents along the Barker homes sewer project that were under construction for the last two years, that needed sewer; said he will discuss this with Mr. Crowley but has not connected with him. Mr. Hohman stated that staff have identified three sidewalk gaps that we can bring forward, and said we have just enough time to have those discussions with Council and to have a public hearing; said the projects include two sidewalk gaps on Park Road in the vicinity of Broadway and Mission, that there is one just north of the sidewalk we put in, and one just south of the sidewalk we put in;said those two are very viable connection points; and said that the third possible project is on 4th west of Thierman where there is a gap in that sidewalk near an affordable housing complex; he noted there is no sidewalk on the north side of 4th Avenue; said he thinks those are very viable sidewalk projects that will fit within the criteria and budget that we'd be looking for, and that with Council concurrence, staff will bring these forward at a future meeting. There were no objections. Mayor Wick said that the last time we renewed our agreement for CDBG,we also included HHAA funding; and as a vote to choose or have a conversation about options comes forward, he wants to make sure we highlight that, and Mr. Hohman agreed. Council Meeting Minutes Study Session: 10-19-2021 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: 1 I-09-2021 b. No-Parking Regulations and Procedures—Cary Driskell,Jerremy Clark City Attorney Driskell explained the background leading up to tonight's discussion on no-parking; he mentioned past discussions with Council including Council's request that staff obtain a full inventory of all posted signs restricting or prohibiting parking; he said various signs were posted by the County prior to incorporation and the City has had various signs posted after incorporation; but it appears. there is no comprehensive record of where all signs are located or the rationale for their placement. Mr. Driskell also mentioned the scanning of all streets as part of the City's pavement management program, and to use the scanning company to compile a full inventory of all signs in the rights-of-way; he noted staff learned that the contracted company's estimated time to provide the sign inventory was the end of July, 2021; but apparently that will take longer because all of the video would need to be reviewed by someone, with each sign categorized manually and marked in the geographic information system. Mr. Driskell stated that once we get the full inventory, it will be transferred to a master list;but in the meantime,Council needs to decide whether to have the no-parking issue included in the City's code. Mr. Driskell noted that we have adopted the Model Traffic Ordinance (MTO), which gives the traffic engineer certain authority, as noted in the PowerPoint slides. Mr. Driskell then offered three options for Council consideration: (I) assert full Council authority; (2) delegate full staff authority; or (3) a hybrid approach, and he noted what each option would entail. After discussing the options, there was Council consensus to prove forward with the hybrid approach which is that the traffic engineer would continue to exercise the limited authority granted by Council in adopting the MTO to establish no parking zones; that Council would by ordinance grant itself broad authority to determine whether to add or remove no parking' zones except for the authority delegated to the traffic engineer. Mr. Driskell noted that any determination by Council must include a traffic engineering analysis of surrounding traffic conditions which forms the recommendation to Council as to whether the no parking zone is appropriate at that location from an engineering standpoint. 7. Advance Agenda—Mayor Wick Mayor Wick said that this is the time of year for the AWC Community Scholarship awards and he would like this topic brought forward on a future agenda.A majority of Councilmembers agreed. 8. Council Check-in—Mayor Wick There were no additional comments from Council. 9. City Manager Comments—John Hohman Deputy City Manager Hohman stated that we closed on the White Elephant property yesterday and he extended thanks to City Attorney Driskell for his diligence in getting the property closed. Mr.Hohman said that a building evaluation will b.e upcoming and once that is completed, staff will report back to Council. It was moved by Councilmember Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. (,,),P 6/3A Ben Wick, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Meeting Minutes Study Session: 10-19-2021 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: 11-09-2021 New Item: Item A CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: October 19, 2021 Department Director Approval: lrt Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business CI new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Expo Expansion Project Grant Opportunity GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Sections 209 and 703 of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 3121 et seq.) (PWEDARCW) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: • On March 8, 2016, Council heard a report from Community Attributes, Inc. (CAI) on the Retail Improvement Study, as well as the Tourism Enhancement Study. • On August 16, 2016, Council authorized staff to move forward with the analysis of six potential tourism enhancement projects. • On December 20, 2016, Council heard a report from CAI on an update to the Tourism Enhancement Study, including analysis of the six projects approved by Council as well as the Plante's Ferry expansion and the HUB Complex. • On November 17, 2017, Council heard that staff was having CAI perform an analysis on expanding the outdoor venue at CenterPlace in addition to the other projects in the Tourism Enhancement Study. • On July 10, 2018, Council approved a motion to limit future discussions of this topic to the fairgrounds and stadium district, a sports complex, and CenterPlace west lawn expansion. • On August 14, 2018, Council heard an administrative report which went into greater detail on the economic analysis of the fairgrounds and stadium district, a sports complex, and CenterPlace west lawn expansion. • On April 9, 2019, Council heard an administrative report that updated Council on the status of the preferred alternatives including the expansion at the Fairgrounds. • On May 26, 2020, Council heard an update on tourism venues and projects, including financial benefits and impacts of the Expo Expansion at the Fairgrounds. • On September 22 and October 20, 2020, Council and staff discussed a capital request for a new facility at the Fairgrounds, and there was Council consensus on October 20 to include it on the 2021 State Legislative Agenda, with a capital request of$4 million in state funds toward the project. • On November 17, 2020, the Council adopted the State Legislative Agenda that included the new facility at the Fairgrounds. BACKGROUND: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) issued a funding opportunity through the American Rescue Plan Act Travel, Tourism and Outdoor Recreation grant program (ARPA Tourism). There are two components to the grant program 1) State Travel, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation Grants (State Tourism Grants) and (2) EDA Travel, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation Competitive Grants (EDA Competitive Tourism Grants). The proposal is to apply for the EDA Competitive Tourism Grant. Under the grant program, the EDA will fund travel, tourism, and outdoor recreation projects that include non-construction and construction activities. The grant is intended to fund projects that are focused on new and expanded infrastructure, projects with a multi-state or national focus, and Page 1 of 3 New Item: Item A projects in regions most adversely affected by damage to the travel, tourism, and outdoor recreation sectors from the coronavirus pandemic. Critical program details are: Total Available Program Funds: $57.7 million for Seattle Region' Award Range (Min-Max): $500,000 - $10 million Match Amount: 80% Federal maximum 20% Non-Federal minimum Application Due Date: January 31, 2022 Application Award Date: Ongoing, no awards after Sept. 30, 2022 Obligation Date (if awarded): Not specified, expected project delivery 12-48 months EDA Tourism Funds Expenditure Date: No later than September 30, 2027 Staff recommends applying for the Expo Center Expansion project for the following reasons: • The Expo Expansion has been identified as a priority project from City Council • The City is actively budgeting dollars to fund professional engineering toward the project • The City received a legislative earmark in the amount of$750,000 • The City is actively seeking other grant opportunities to complete the project • The project has undergone extensive public outreach The total estimated cost for the design and construction of the Expo Center Expansion is $10 million. Under existing and proposed budgets, including a pending lodging tax grant request, the City is estimated to contribute $4.5 million toward the project with an additional $2 million in non- city funds. The City is proposing a $3 million ARPA request based on our need and the competition for these funds. A minimum 20% non-federal match is required, any non-federal matching amount beyond 20% will be favorably received during the application review process. �� rf r; ,t; ARPA Tourism 3,000,000 32% :4.11 pil:'I lhg; )irGrlg�i Capital Reserve Fund $1,000,000 11% 2022 Lodging Tax Recommendation $3,500,000 37% IN,41_it Cin.r ih,l9i_�oR Washington State Legislature $750,000 8% County/Public Facilities District (potential) $1,250,000 13% Project Current Funding $9,500,000 OPTIONS: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply for the ARPA Tourism grant for the Expo Center Expansion Project or take other action. 1 Seattle Region includes AIaska, Arizona,California,Hawaii,Idaho,Nevada, Oregon, Washington,American Samoa,Northern Mariana Islands, Guam Federated States of Micronesia,Republic of Marshall Islands, and Republic of Palau, Page 2 of 3 New Item: Item A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee, to apply for the APRA Tourism grant for the Expo Center Expansion Center project in conjunction with Spokane County. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The tabulated funding breakdown is consistent with the City's current project budget and does not increase the City's financial responsibility beyond the current project budget. Regarding the City's application for lodging tax funds towards this project, the application will request the fund balance of Fund #104 as of December 31, 2020, in the amount of $2,986,573 plus future revenue collections in and allocations to Fund #104 until this project is fully funded. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager; Chaz Bates, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Page 3 of 3 Build for the Future Spokane County Expo Expansion: EDA Travel and Tourism Grant Mike Basinger, Economic Development Manager Spokane ,...0Valley- What is ARPA Tourism? American Rescue Plan Act Travel, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation Economic Development Administration (EDA) • Accelerating the recovery of travel, tourism and outdoor recreation • $57.7 million for Seattle Region • Projects can include non-construction and construction activities, focused on new and expanded infrastructure. 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-EPA Tourism Grant 2 1 ARPA Tourism Funding Details Total Available Program Funds: $57.7 million for Seattle Region Award Range (Min-Max): $500,000 - $10 million Match Amount: 8O% Federal maximum 20% Non-Federal minimum Application Due Date: January 31, 2022 (County required to be co-applicant) Application Award Date: Ongoing, no awards after Sept. 30, 2022 Obligation Date (if awarded): Not specified, expected project delivery 12-48 months EDA Tourism Funds Expenditure Date: No later than September 30, 2027 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-EDA Tourism Greut 3 Expo Expansion Project Funding Estimated Project Cost: $10,000,000 Federal Fa :_ ARPA Tourism Request: $3,000000 T- ; ,if W1lL _- Available City Funds Capital Reserve Fund: $1,000,000 _.2022 Lodging Tax Recommendation: $3,500,000 - _ Sub-total: $7,500,000 Am' Spokane County(potential) lL r, +; $1,250,000 Ti l T1 -r State Washington State Legislature: $750,000 Projected Current Funding: $9,500,000 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-EDA Tourism Grant 4 2 Expo Expansion Project Origins c. ..r. ;. ,,r,• a Fr . •�i l L • .•,�r',t ' ` t 15 ' ° • 2015 Retail Study or. ' r1 c �e `td • 2016 Tourism Study { L .� rr it , _ A Ce terplaee City/ County initiate discussions nas ea 1 - 2019 Conceptual l Design irwounds b1. t `-' c�i 417 t r- xe.re s , L e ', i = Legislative11r " 1p 2021•= ,wry 'C5tyFiz. I appropriation ii}\ _ • 2021 City Capital reserve �, Requested LTAC / �! ir �r•t ,Spokane 2022 1- �,sr':r'', �k '! FAIR&EXPO funding Spokane County , E N T E � ��Ta11ey 10/15/2021 City Councll Admin Report-EDA 7ourisin Grant 5 Expo Expansion- Details ■ 30,000 sf addition - " �l . . _: • $10 million il . .. i 1 ' • ' IT— 1 • Interior space layout r . u P dig - rrr�.% ■ Rendering of facility '. f LW ' w ocaoc�acresvvv �N�� 1�. � .c srom f i i ii C.55'' iry ��b i smrt; i. 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-EDA Tourism Grant 6 3 Expo Expansion - First Floor .,. ... • .. .;, ir k• ) 1 en III. 155Fal ..__ , _____ _.stiL___57-,..,1 „,--- - _Outdoor Seallog ,: • ... ..P_"''" am al n Ert fljill I Existing apnoea to b demolished and -crated In the now building i • . ., El Willy Spaces •.. . I I - - —- FIRST FLOOR 1- t. 1 ------ 41----.etr-, —- - _ „ • . ., . ja... .. •j i_ I iivalL 4i- --......, - , .!)i• . L:—.- - 1 / .7- _-_.1 _,•1!!--7_-_ 1- _ 10/19/2021 City Council Malin Report-EDA Tourism Grant 7 Expo Expansion - Second Floor . ._ . u_ 1,. • .._ le re- 1.-,,--,,›- iiIII‘' Seoond Level .--• - i Outdoor Sealing Open A Lobby/TractoL Eloirow pr .__: !....., Room 01 -i—• 1 - 4,001:1 el gra sun ril Open lo Below III operable Pealtien Existing spaces le bet demolished ....iillia11111 and ro-created Fro the nOW building _r •t I.T.1: - MselSng Room if 4 .‘,'4 IIPP1 plai i 1 :.........4-111111111 Meeting Room 112 f, , .. ..._____ 1,100.1 ApPv SECOND FLOOR I.- . - -1----- 4.---'1 It ••••tv Room•s -1...): : _ • I I . ... Meeting Ileum 83 q- et" ,.— .. -. , . .0/ ,.. 1,30001 : ...,-.' •••'-,',Li; It T4,. '.--; 1 T ,.. 1' ?. J • ' •• : 7.-:":'.l'e-.;hk‘..6%.If '' . • i' • i . 1 C.:1•4L1 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-WA Tourism Grant 8 4 Expo Expansion T North Elevation �.e. •I - - • _41111*- 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-EDA Tourism Grant Expo Expansion - Northwest Elevation k ii - - ,11 1 1.'IIS, ����� ' k _ � Y � JIB 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-EDA Tourism Grant 10 Expo Expansion - North Elevation E' _ _-- If- rnsoignoottiftw HAIL 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-EDA Tourism Grant 11 Expo Expansion - West Elevation -bliFt ArT. LL - T Fib-1 k �t1i� � -- 10/19/2021 4 City Council Admin Report-EDA Tourism Grant 12 Benefits of New Building • Attract/accommodate events that need tradeshow & meeting space • Provides the opportunity for existing events to expand • On-site restaurant will enhance offerings and visitor experience • Accommodate private parties/corporate events/celebrations • Area dining options are limited to fast food establishments • Used to meet future public health needs (health testing/inoculation) • Consistent with the 50-year Plan calling for more versatile space 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report-EDA Tourism Grant 13 Collaborative Effort • Greater Spokane Incorporated Spokan "' • Spokane County �f � ` Walley° ount • akane County Spokane Valley S p-- w•sureeciox �Nr. l,'.lI �. err'► fi, • Spokane Valley Chamber Po NE Q�` 1 Commerce VALLEY in , CHAMBER • Spokane Valley Fire Department OF COMMERCE • Visit Spokane GRE'TER Spok ARM OKNE 10/19/2021 City Council Admin Report EPA Tourism Grant 14 7 Questions? • 11111 i r- , ,., ..., .., ,,,,H,„,..„.._,_.., ,,,...... .. - . ,....„--.. __.,- ..7:, --. .- . .,, - :-..r,7' ' "" —.. - r rtrki, 1 -.,' ,1 '_,," -J, ,, _ • -- 1 • • Itii 6 10 1 a,'_021 cll;.C: u•ell'.,JJl rrI?v„9r:-LD..Foul urn Gi iii:. 8