2022, 07-26 Formal Meeting AGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
FORMAL FORMAT
Tuesday,July 26,2022 6:00 p.m.
Remotely via ZOOM Meeting and
In Person at 10210 E Sprague Avenue
Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting
NOTE:. In response to Governor Inslee's announcement reopening Washington under the "Washington
Ready" plan, members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Council meetings in-person at City Hall at
the address provided above,or via Zoom at the link below.Members of the public will be allowed to comment
in-person or via Zoom as described below. If wishing to make a comment via Zoom, comments must be
received by 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. Otherwise,comments will be taken in-person at the meeting in
Council Chambers,as noted on the agenda below.
• Sign up to Provide Oral Public Comment at the Meeting via Calling-In
• Submit Written Public Comment Prior to the Meeting
• Join the Zoom WEB Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION: Pastor Darrell Cole,Living Hope Community Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORT
PROCLAMATION:National Night Out
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY [1]: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on
any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated.
Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity
for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks will
be limited to three minutes per person.To comment via zoom:use the link above for oral or written comments
as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak but it is not
required. A sign-in sheet will be provided in Council Chambers. Whether in person or via zoom, speakers
should indicate if they want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2] and may only
speak at one or the other,but not both.
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Consent Agenda: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of
Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda.
a.Approval of Claim Vouchers on July 26,2022,Request for Council Action Form: $704,799.16
b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period ending July 15,2022: $473,689.01
c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 12,2022, Regular Formal Meeting
Council Agenda:July 26,2022 Page 1 of 2
2. Second Reading Ordinance 22-010,Nuisance, Code Enforcement—Cary Driskell,Erik Lamb, Bill Helbig
[public comment opportunity]
3.Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunity,Transportation Improvement Board—Adam Jackson
[public comment opportunity]
4.Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunity,Railroad Crossing Elimination—Adam Jackson
[public comment opportunity]
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY [21: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on
any subject except agenda action items, as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated.
Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the City Government. This is not an opportunity
for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome but please keep remarks civil. Remarks will
be limited to three minutes per person.To comment via zoom:use the link above for oral or written comments
as per those directions. To comment at the meeting in person: speakers may sign in to speak but it is not
required. A sign-in sheet will be provided in Council Chambers. Whether in person or via zoom, speakers
should indicate if they want to speak at General Public Comment Opportunity [1] or [2] and may only
speak at one or the other,but not both.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
5. Midilome Neighborhood Swales—Gloria Mantz
6. Law Enforcement Contract—Erik Lamb,Morgan Koudelka
7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley
INFORMATION ONLY(will not be reported or discussed):
8. Department Monthly Reports
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT
Council Agenda:July 26,2022 Page 2 of 2
Spokane
Valley Trodamation
W1�ationa(f1� fi t Out Against Crime
City of Spokane Valley Washi ;'ton
WHEREAS: National Night Out was founded in 1981 by Matt Peskin, Executive Director of
the National Association of Town Watch; and was established in 1984 with
funding from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice as a
crime prevention program that emphasizes building a partnership between the
police and the community; and
WHEREAS: Matt Peskin's dedication to the development, maintenance, and promotion of
community watch programs led to the creation of the highly successful National
Night Out, which takes place annually on the first Tuesday of August; and
WHEREAS: The National Night Out campaign provides an opportunity for city neighbors to
take part in National Night Out along with over 38 million other neighbors across
16 thousand communities from all 50 states, U.S. territories and military bases
worldwide; and
WHEREAS: National Night Out is a community-building campaign that promotes police-
community partnerships and neighborhood camaraderie to make our
neighborhoods safer, more caring places to live and work; and
WHEREAS: Neighbors in our city will be assisting the local law enforcement agency through
community-building efforts as they join to support National Night Out; and
WHEREAS: We support, applaud, and look forward to this annual event where neighbors
can come together with police and work together to build a safer, more caring
community.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Pam Haley, Mayor of the City of Spokane Valley, on behalf of the
Spokane Valley City Council and the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, do hereby
proclaim Tuesday, August 2, 2022, as
NATIONAL NIGHT OUT
in the City of Spokane Valley, and I urge our citizens to join in the celebration of and support
for National Night Out.
Signed this 26th day of July, 2022.
Pam Haley, Mayor
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: July 26, 2022 Department Director Approval: Ej
Check all that apply: /1 consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT
07/07/2022 57198-57231 $85,714.60
07/07/2022 9471-9458 (park refunds) 8,154.00
07/08/2022 57232-57256,wire 17095258 512,167.32
07/11/2022 57257 3,005.63
07/12/2022 9459-9500 (park refunds) 5,665.00
07/13/2022 57258 950.00
07/13/2022 57259-57277 13,267.68
07/13/2022 57278-57298 75,763.81
07/14/2022 57299 111.12
GRAND TOTAL: $704,799.16
Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists
#001 - General Fund 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services
001.011.000. City Council 001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay
001.013.000. City Manager 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Roads/Streets Capital
001.013.015. Legal
001.016.000. Public Safety Other Funds:
001 A 16.016. Precinct Shared Expenses 101 —Street Fund
001.018.013. Deputy City Manager 103 —Paths &Trails
001.018.014. Finance 104—Tourism Facilities
001.018.016 Human Resources 105—Hotel/Motel Tax
001.018.017. Information Technology 106—Solid Waste
001.033.000. Facilities Administration 107—PEG Fund
001.033.033. Facilities--City Hall 108—Affordable & Supplemental Housing Sales Tax
001.033.034. Facilities—Other 120—CenterPlace Operating Reserve
001.040.000. Community/Public Works- 121 —Service Level Stabilization Reserve
Administration 122—Winter Weather Reserve
001.040.041. Engineering 204—Debt Service
001.040.042.558. Economic Development 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects
001.040.042.565. Housing/Homeless Services 302—REET 2 Capital Projects
001.040.043. Building 303—Street Capital Projects
001.040.044. Planning 309—Parks Capital Grants
001.076.000. Parks &Rec—Administration 310—Civic Bldg. Capital Projects
001.076.300. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 311 —Pavement Preservation
001.076.301. Parks &Rec-Recreation 312—Capital Reserve
001.076.302. Parks&Rec- Aquatics 314—Railroad Grade Separation Projects
001.076.304. Parks&Rec- Senior Center 315 —Transportation Impact Fees
001.076.305. Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 316—Economic Development Capital Projects
001.090.0.00.511. General Gov't-Council related 402—Stormwater Management
001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 403 —Aquifer Protection Area
001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 501 —Equipment Rental &Replacement
001.090.000.518. General Gov't- Centralized Serv. 502—Risk Management
001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 632—Passthrough Fees &Taxes
001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural &Eco.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers.
[Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.]
STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
07107/2022 11:07:35AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount
57198 7/7/2022 000921 ATO Z RENTAL&SALES INC 496819-1 001.076.302.576 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 159.81
497104-1 001.076.302.576 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:TERRACE VI 364.82
497215-1 001.076.302.576 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:TERRACE VI 52.27
497821-1 001.076.302.576 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:TERRACE VI 255.92
Total : 832.82
57199 7/7/2022 008009 ALSC ARCHITECTS PS 2022-022-01 001.076.000.576 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,540.00
Total : 3,540.00
57200 7/7/2022 007365 ALTITUDE TRAMPOLINE PARK 21148 001.076.301,571 EVENT 6/22/2022 1,234.93
Total : 1,234.93
57201 7/7/2022 007808 AMENTO GROUP INC 052245 001.000.322.518 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:CITY I- 3,821.49
052246 001.000.322.518 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:CITY F 3,209.50
052247 001.000.322.518 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:CITY F 10,429.50
Total : 17,460.49
57202 7/7/2022 007718 APPLETREE 000025-554-541 001.076.305.575 ANSWERING SERVICE FOR CENT! 59.74
Total : 59.74
57203 7/7/2022 003337 ARROW CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 338887 001.076.302.576 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:TERRA1 70.08
Total : 70.08
57204 7/7/2022 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 0361462 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 374.23
0363349 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 536.33
0365224 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYATC 203.17
S0292312 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 157.21
S0292381 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYATC 173.24
S0293729 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLYATC 660.36
S0294388 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 148.26
S0294427 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 619.07
Total : 2,871.87
57205 7/7/2022 002226 CENTRAL PREMIX 3431309 001.076.302.576 REPAIR SUPPLIES: SWIMMING PO 51.19
Total: 51.19
57206 7/7/2022 000823 DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRIES 350583 001.076.305.575 BOILER/PRESSURE VESSEL INSPE 198.80
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
0710712022 11:07:35AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher _ Date Vendor Invoice FundlDept Description/Account Amount
57206 717/2022 000823 000823 DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRIES (Continued) Total : 198.80
57207 7/7/2022 007673 DIBBLE ENGINEERS INC 33196 001.000.322.518 CITY HALL STRUCTURAL REVIEW 3,682.50
Total : 3,682.50
57208 7/7/2022 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 643488 001.013,000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 22.50
643489 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 31.60
643490 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 48.19
643493 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 82.16
644332 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 12.64
644333 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 81.37
644334 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 80.58
645188 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 77.25
645189 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 76.50
645190 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 27.65
645191 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 105.07
645192 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 78.21
645193 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 81.37
645194 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 78.21
645196 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 16.59
Total : 899.89
57209 7/7/2022 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 52994 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 98.60
52995 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 55.25
52996 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 38.25
52997 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 77.55
53015 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00
53016 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 97.75
53038 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 176.00
53039 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 96.90
53040 001.040.044.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 90.10
53041 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00
53042 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 34.00
Total: 814.40
57210 7/7/2022 002201 HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS 986512 001.076.302.57E SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 43.54
Total : 43.54
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
07/07/2022 11:07:35AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57211 7/7/2022 007695 HATTENBURG,TIM EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 671.82
Total : 671.82
57212 7/7/2022 007825 HERC RENTALS 32953337-001 001.076.302.576 EQUIPMENT RENTAL:AQUATICS 194.36
Total: 194.36
57213 7/7/2022 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 1624383 001.076.305.575 JUNE 2022 MONTHLY CLEANING A 8,085.09
Total : 8,085.09
57214 7/7/2022 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS 329771 001.076.305.575 ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE 1,240.00
Total : 1,240.00
57215 7/7/2022 003185 LAMB, ERIK EXPENSES 001.018.013.513 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 952.89
Total : 952.89
57216 7/7/2022 001944 LANCER LTD 0482944 001,040,043.524 BUSINESS CARDS 76.25
Total : 76.25
57217 7/7/2022 007907 LEMONADE GRAPHIC DESIGN 062201 001.040.042,558 THE VIEW SPRING/SUMMER 2022 3,750.00
Total : 3,750.00
57218 7R/2022 001002 M&L SUPPLY CO INC 8100492452.001 001.076.302.576 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 33.04
Total : 33.04
57219 7/7/2022 008029 MCKINSTRY CO LLC 10177862 001.076.302.576 TERRACE VIEW POOL REPAIRS 9,390.00
10177865 001.076.302.576 REPAIR:VALLEY MISSION POOL 9,390.00
10177867 001.076.302.576 REPAIR: PARK ROAD POOL 9,390.00
10177882 001.076.302.576 REPAIR:TERRACE VIEW-VALLEY h 3,286.50
Total : 31,456.50
57220 7/7/2022 000283 NRPA 93303-2022 001.076.000.576 MEMBERSHIP 9/1/22-12/31/22 675.00
Total : 675.00
57221 7/7/2022 008691 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 238380200002 001.076.000.576 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 44.81
251136547001 001.076.305.575 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 98.06
251141226001 001.076.301.571 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PARKS/RECRE 27.11
Total : 169.98
Page: 3
vehlist Voucher List Page: 4
07/0712022 11:07:35AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57222 7/7/2022 008622 PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS INTEGRATIO 64133 001.076.305.575 ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSPECTION 419.81
Total : 419.81
57223 7/7/2022 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2W94496 001.016.016.521 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 16.30
Total : 16.30
57224 7/7/2022 002592 PURE FILTRATION PRODUCTS 75150 001.033.033.518 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:CITY HI 537.88
Total : 537.88
57225 71712022 007741 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST 16290939-00 001.076.305.575 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 62.29
Total : 62.29
57226 7/7/2022 008728 ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC 60228827 001.076.305.571 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE: D.SCHN 1,263.60
60279233 001.076.305.571 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE: D. SCHN 1,010.88
Total : 2,274.48
57227 7I712022 004099 SPOKANE VALLEYACE HARDWARE 029993 001.076.300.576 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE 48.91
Total : 48.91
57228 7/7/2022 007120 TSHIMAKAIN CREEK LABORATORY F000249- 001.076.300.576 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AT PAF 30.00
Total : 30.00
57229 7/7/2022 007231 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY 23129290 001.016.016.521 PEST MGMT SERVICES: PRECINC- 198.96
23129291 001.033.033.518 PEST MGMT SERVICES: CITY HALL 169.23
Total : 368.19
57230 7/7/2022 002651 WOODARD,ARNE EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 56.25
EXPENSES 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 23.40
Total : 79.65
57231 7/7/2022 004961 ZOME INC ZDM-76215 001.076.301.571 SUMMER DAY CAMP&STAFF CLO 1,273.96
ZDM-76962 001.076.301.571 SUMMER DAY CAMP&STAFF CLO 1,009.39
ZDM-76963 001.076.301.571 SUMMER DAY CAMP&STAFF CLO 428.52
ZDM-77067 001.076.301.571 SUMMER DAY CAMP&STAFF CLO 100.04
Total : 2,811.91
34 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 85,714.60
Page: 4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
07/0712022 9:47:22AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
9417 6/30/2022 004002 ARC OF SPOKANE,THE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME 75.00
Total: 75.00
9418 6/30/2022 006707 BARNHART, KIRA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 76.00
9419 6/30/2022 007161 BARTLETT TREE EXPERTS PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: LARGE MEETIII 52.00
Total : 52.00
9420 6/30/2022 008749 BROOKS, CIERA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:WEST LAWN P 500.00
Total : 500.00
9421 6/30/2022 008731 BUNCH, PATRICK PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00
Total : 75.00
9422 6/30/2022 008732 CADY, MICHAEL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PARk 75.00
Total : 75.00
9423 6/30/2022 008750 CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00
Total: 210.00
9424 6/30/2022 008733 COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 300.00
Total : 300.00
9425 6/30/2022 008734 COX, RACHEL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PL 75.00
Total : 75.00
9426 6/30/2022 008751 DEWITT,JANAE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUT 210.00
Total : 210.00
9427 6/30/2022 003074 DIERKS,EMILY PARK REFUND 001.237,10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:BROWNS PARk 75.00
Total : 75.00
9428 6/30/2022 007563 DIMOV,VADIM PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:VALLEY MISSIC 75.00
Total: 75.00
9429 6/30/2022 008735 FILIPINO AMERICAN NW ASSN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: BROWNS PAR. 75.00
Page: 1
5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
07/07/2022 9:47:22AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
9429 6/30/2022 008735 008735 FILIPINO AMERICAN NW ASSN (Continued) Total: 75.00
9430 6/30/2022 008752 GUILL,AMANDA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:SMALL MEETIN 52.00
Total : 52.00
9431 6/30/2022 008736 GUINN,TONI PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:VALLEY MISSIC 75.00
Total: 75.00
9432 6/30/2022 001729 HALME CONSTRUCTION, INC. PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
9433 6/30/2022 003755 HOLDREN, CAROLYN PARK REFUND 001.237,10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:TERRAC 175.00
Total: 175.00
9434 6/30/2022 008737 HUMPHREYS, NICOLE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: NORTH I 500.00
Total : 500.00
9435 6/30/2022 008738 IMPACT REAL ESTATE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
9436 6/30/2022 008739 KEATING, NICOLE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU MEN 75.00
Total : 75.00
9437 6/30/2022 008740 KOPETS,VEN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
9438 6/30/2022 004692 KUBAS,JENNIFER PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PA 75.00
Total : 75.00
9439 6/30/2022 008753 KUZMENKO, LILIIA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GREAT ROOM 500.00
Total : 500.00
9440 6/30/2022 008741 LEO'S PHOTOGRAPHY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:VALLEY MISSIC 75.00
Total: 75.00
9441 6/30/2022 008754 LEOS,BERTHA PARK REFUN❑ 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: GREAT F 1,775.00
Total : 1,775.00
9442 6/30/2022 008755 LOE,RORY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUT 500.00
Page: "`.
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
07107/2022 9:47:2.2AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account _ Amount
9442 6/30/2022 008755 008755 WE, RORY (Continued) Total : 500.00
9443 6/30/2022 008582 MATUTINO, LAAKEA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 160.00
Total : 160.00
9444 6/30/2022 008756 MCCANNA, SHANNON PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 210.00
Total: 210.00
9445 6/30/2022 008743 NACM COMMERCIAL SERVICES PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 105.00
Total : 105.00
9446 6/30/2022 008744 NEER,MIKE PARK REFUND 001237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
9447 6/30/2022 006639 NIEHUSER,TERESA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PA 75.00
Total : 75.00
9448 6/30/2022 004816 NUMERICA CREDIT UNION PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:SMALL MEETIN 52.00
Total : 52.00
9449 6/30/2022 008745 POLELLO,JENNY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLLATION REFUND:TERRA 175.00
Total : 175.00
9450 6/30/2022 008746 POPE,AMANDA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY Pl. 75.00
Total : 75.00
9451 6/30/2022 008758 ROWAN, JAMIE PARK REFUND D01.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GREAT ROOM 210.00
Total : 210.00
9452 6/30/2022 008747 SCHU, MARY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUI 80.00
Total : 80.00
9453 6/30/2022 008759 SHIRSHIN, SAMUEL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 500.00
Total : 500.00
9454 6/30/2022 002301 SPOKANE RIVER FORUM PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GREAT ROOM 126.00
Total : 126.00
9455 6/30/2022 005409 ST JOHN VIANNEY SCHOOL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:VALLEY MISSIC 75.00
Page:
11
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
07/0712022 9:47:22AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund!Dept Description/Account Amount
9455 6/30/2022 005409 005409 ST JOHN VIANNEY SCHOOL (Continued) Total : 75.00
9456 6/30/2022 001627 STCU PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: LARGE MEETII+ 52.00
Total : 52,00
9457 6/30/2022 008748 STOLZ, JARED PARK REFUND 001.237.1 0.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: DISCOVERY PI. 75.00
Total : 75.00
9458 6/30/2022 008760 WA ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY PARK REFUND 001,237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: GREAT ROOM 210.00
Total : 210.00
42 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 8,154.00
42 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 8,154.00
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page: 'ti4.
g
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
0710812022 10:21:20AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57232 7/8/2022 000648 ABADAN REPROGRAPHICS 129820 303.000.205.595 CIP 0205:PRINT SERVICE 2,480.07
Total: 2,480.07
57233 7/8/2022 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 14PL-7QLG-4JQG 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES:IT 15,71
17T4-9CR4-GNJL 001.090.000.518 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT: IT 44.61
1JKM-YKLV-KGLY 001.090.000.518 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT:IT 129.05
1T13-4M3W-9LC1 001.040.041.543 CPW ENGINEERING DISPLAYS 742.78
Total: 932.15
57234 7/8/2022 000796 BUDINGER&ASSOCIATES INC M21697-3 403.000.308.531 0308-REGIONAL DECANT FACILITY CA 622.00
Total: 622.00
57235 7/8/2022 001888 COMCAST 4466 6126-7/25/22 001.090.000,518 INTERNET&PHONE:CITY HALL 362.25
Total: 362.25
57236 7/8/2022 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 81335787 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-022 423.88
81335788 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-018 651.56
81335789 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-019 52.66
81335790 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-020 638.80
81335791 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-021 503.76
B1335808 001,090,000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-011 806.78
81335809 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-012 266.18
81335610 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-013 986.55
81335811 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-014 142.27
81335812 001,090,000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-015 176.38
81335813 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-016 409.18
81335814 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE:001-8922117-017 487.31
Total: 5,545.31
57237 7/812022 007997 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH 94271169 001.040.041.543 ARCGIS ONLINE CREATOR LICENSE 1,106.42
Total: 1,106.42
57238 7/8/2022 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS INC 0525-1272 303.000.300.595 0300 PINES AND MISSION 484.60
Total: 484.60
57239 7/8/2022 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC 643492 314.000.223.595 CIP 0223:RFQ 57.67
Page: s't.
9
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
07/08/2022 10:21:20AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57239 7/8/2022 003274 003274 EXCHANGE PUBLISHING LLC (Continued) Total: 57.67
57240 7/8/2022 007710 GRANICUS LLC 152813 001.013.000.513 FOIAMODULE NON ENTERPRISE 13,149.68
Total: 13,149.68
57241 7/8/2022 002684 HINSHAW,CART EXPENSES 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 42.88
Total: 42.88
57242 718/2022 008573 INLAND INFRASTRUCTURE LLC PAY APP 3 311.000.333.595 0333-EVERGREEN RD PRES BROADW 171,355.66
Total: 171,355.66
57243 7/8/2022 008726 INTERMAX NETWORKS 13146-1 001.090.000.518 NEC PHONE SYSTEM 2022 42,915.31
Total: 42,915.31
57244 7/8/2022 003238 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 427919 403.000.308.589 PROJECT 308 CONSTRUCTION SERVII 3.128.58
Total: 3,128.58
57245 7/8/2022 008542 OAC SERVICES INC 143506 001.033.034.518 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,592.18
Total: 2,592.18
57246 7/8/2022 008542 OAC SERVICES INC 143505 315.000.336.575 0336 PROJECT MGMT&OWNER'S REF 239.20
Total: 239.20
57247 7/8/2022 007730 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS 1N172305 001.040.043.558 JUNE 2022 COPIER COSTS 542.64
Total: 542.64
57248 7/8/2022 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC_ 34591 101.043.000.542 PROFESSIONAL SVCS 20-005 2,698.00
Total: 2,698.00
57249 7/8/2022 004535 SHRED-IT USA LLC 8001874160 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 171.45
Total: 171.45
57250 7/8/2022 000459 SPOKANE CO TITLE CO 5-SP38382 001.040.041.543 PLANT INFORMATION GUARANTEE 327.00
5-SP38383 001.040.041.543 PLANT INFORMATION GUARANTEE 327.00
Total: 654.00
Page: "2-
Jo
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
07108/2422 10:21:24AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57251 7/8/2022 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3512102625 001.090.000.518 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 116.10
3512102626 001.090.000.518 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 336.64
3512102627 001.090.000.518 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 7.78
Total: 460.52
57252 7/8/2022 007625 T LARIVIERE INC PAY APP 6 403.000.317.595 0317-APPLEWAY STORMWATER IMPR 62,339.13
Total: 62,339.13
57253 7/8/2022 000167 VERA WATER&POWER JUNE 2022 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:JUNE 2022 4.985.12
Total: 4,985.12
57254 7/812022 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE LTD 85722 303.000.205.595 GIP 0205:POSTAGE SERVICES 2,588.77
86062 303.060.249.595 CIP 0249:POSTAGE SERVICES 1,050.83
86077 311.000.339.595 CIP 0339:POSTAGE SERVICES 330.35
86148 303.000.318.595 CIP 0318:POSTAGE SERVICES 183.94
Total: 4,153.89
57255 7/8/2022 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0076158-1518-5 402.402.000.531 VACTORING WASTE JUNE2022 3,851.05
Total: 3,851.05
57256 7/8/2022 000255 WFOA 062022-0816 001.018.014.514 WFOA 2022 CONFERENCE 775.00
062022-0817 001.018.014.514 WFOA 2022 CONFERENCE 550.00
062022-0818 001.018.014.514 WFOA 2022 CONFERENCE 550.00
Total: 1,875.00
17095258 7/1/2022 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER JUNE 2022 001.016.000.512 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 185,422.56
Total: 185,422.56
26 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 512,167.32
26 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 512,167.32
Page:
11
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
07/11/2022 9:53:42AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57257 7111/2022 000508 CONOCOPHiLLIPS FLEET 82224871 001.033.000.518 JUNE 2022 FLEET FUEL BILL 3,005.63
Total : 3,005.63
1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 3,005.63
1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 3,005.63
1,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page:
whilst Voucher List Page: 1
07/1212022 4:21:22PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
9459 7/12/2022 008763 ABBOTT, CHRISTINE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 312.00
Total : 312.00
9460 7/12/2022 008764 ADAMS,JASON PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:BROWN 350.00
Total : 350.00
9461 7/12/2022 008765 BLACKNALL,JESSICA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:EDGECLIFF PA 75.00
Total : 75.00
9462 7/12/2022 008766 BOND,WENDY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
9463 7/12/2022 008767 BORDAK,TIM PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF PA 75.00
Total : 75.00
9464 7/12/2022 008768 BROADBENT, CRYSTAL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
9465 7/12/2022 008769 CALL, SAMATHA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SPECIAL EVENT PERMITAPP REFI 50.00
Total : 50.00
9466 7/12/2022 007413 CARLISLE,PAUL PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:TERRACE VIE/ 75.00
Total : 75.00
9467 7/12/2022 008770 CLICK,GERALD PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: MIRAGE, 550.00
Total : 550.00
9468 7/12/2022 008771 CRADDOCK, KAYLA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 156.00
Total : 156.00
9469 7/12/2022 007336 DANIELSON,AMBER PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
9470 7/12/2022 008772 DYKES,ARIELLE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SHELTER FEE/DEPOSIT REFUND:I 175.00
Total : 175.00
9471 7/12/2022 008773 ELLIS,MEGAN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Page:
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
07/1212022 4:21:22PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
9471 7/12/2022 008773 008773 ELLIS, MEGAN (Continued) Total : 75.00
9472 7/12/2022 008774 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT PARK REFUND 001.237.10,99 CANCELLATION REFUND:MIRABE, 175.00
Total : 175.00
9473 7/12/2022 006894 F5 NETWORKS INC PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 REISSUE DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRA 75.00
PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 REISSUE DEPOSIT REFUND: BROI 75.00
Total : 150.00
9474 7/12/2022 008612 FLETCHER, LAURA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 312.00
Total : 312.00
9475 7/12/2022 008775 GODOY, NIKAI PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:DISCOVERY PL 75.00
Total : 75.00
9476 7/12/2022 008273 GOLL, KRISTIN PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 40.00
Total : 40.00
9477 7/12/2022 008600 HAASE, MANDEE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND:TERRAC 175.00
Total : 175.00
9478 7/12/2022 008776 HARRISON, LINDA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: MIRABE 175.00
Total : 175.00
9479 7/12/2022 008777 HATCH,ANDREA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM TEAM REFUND 60.00
Total : 60.00
9480 7/12/2022 008778 IRISH,STACY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM TEAM REFUND 60.00
Total : 60.00
9481 7/12/2022 008779 JAMES,JANE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 35.00
Total : 35.00
9482 7/12/2022 008780 KLINE, MICHAEL PARK REFUND 001.237,10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:TERRACE VIEV 75.00
Total : 75.00
9483 7/12/2022 008781 KNODEL,TAMI PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 80.00
Total: 80.00
Page: -2-
iii
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
07/12/2022 4:21:22PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
9484 7/12/2022 008782 LASHKAY,VALENTINA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 CANCELLATION REFUND: EDGECL 175.00
Total : 175.00
9485 7/12/2022 008783 LE,AMIE PARK REFUND 001.237.10,99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
9486 7/12/2022 008784 LUCAS, CHRISTINA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:BROWNS PAR. 75.00
Total : 75.00
9487 7/12/2022 008785 MAGGIO, GINA PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 322.00
Total : 322.00
9488 7/12/2022 008742 MAYO, HEATHER PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 35.00
Total: 35.00
9489 7/12/2022 008786 OLONGDA,GRACE PARK REFUND 001.237.10,99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 312.00
Total : 312.00
9490 7/12/2022 008787 PFURSICH, KELSEY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND 156.00
Total : 156.00
9491 7/12/2022 008757 RIDER, LARRY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:FIRESIDE LOUI 210.00
Total : 210.00
9492 7/12/2022 008788 ROEGELE,JULIE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM TEAM REFUND 120.00
Total : 120.00
9493 7/12/2022 008789 ROOME,ADOLPHE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: MIRABEAU ME, 75.00
Total : 75.00
9494 7/12/2022 008790 SALINA,ROCHELL PARK REFUND 001.237.10,99 SWIM TEAM REFUND 20.00
Total : 20.00
9495 7/12/2022 008791 SLY,CINDY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SHELTER FEE/DEPOSIT REFUND:' 175.00
Total : 175.00
9496 7/12/2022 008792 SNEDIKER, MELANIE PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 80.00
Total : 80.00
Page: '3-
15
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
07/12/2022 4:21:22PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
9497 7/12/2022 007355 SPOKANE HOME BUILDERS ASSN. PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND: EDGECLIFF 75.00
Total : 75.00
9498 7/12/2022 008793 SUDOL,TERRY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:MIRABEAU ME+ 75.00
Total : 75.00
9499 7/12/2022 008794 SWICEGOOD, KODY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 DEPOSIT REFUND:GREENACRES 75.00
Total : 75.00
9500 7/12/2022 008211 TAYLOR,MARY PARK REFUND 001.237.10.99 SWIM LESSON REFUND 80.00
Total : 80.00
42 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 5,665.00
42 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 5,665.00
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page:
Po
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
07/13/2022 11:17:51AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57258 7/13/2022 006723 CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE APPEAL FEE 001.013.015.515 APPEAL FEE:NEIGHBORLY VENTL 950.00
Total: 950.00
1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 950.00
1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 950.00
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page: 4.
17
vchiist Voucher List Page: 'l
07/13/2022 2:54:27PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57259 7/14/2022 000197 ACRANET 20666 001.018.016.518 EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECk 194.00
Total : 194.00
57260 7/14/2022 001081 ALSCO LSP02537160 001.016.016.521 FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC 30.43
LSP02541477 001.016.016.521 FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC 30.88
Total : 61.31
57261 7/14/2022 007136 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 17HR-WXQ7-J97J 001.033.033.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 35.10
1JF3-FPP9-H3MV 001.040.043.558 SAFETY SUPPLIES: BLDG 93.02
Total : 128.12
57262 7/14/2022 007240 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 75743294 001.018.016.518 EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL 160.00
Total : 160.00
57263 7/14/2022 000278 DRISKELL,CARY EXPENSES 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 6.44
Total : 6.44
57264 7/14/2022 007871 EMPIRE SPRAY SERVICE INC GH06291 001.033.034.518 BARE GROUND TREATMENT:WHI- 884.81
Total: 884.81
57265 7/14/2022 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL June 2022 1042 001.011.000.511 GOVERNMENTALAFFAIRS SERVIC 5,225.00
Total : 5,225,00
57266 7/14/2022 004850 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS, HRA PLAN 10483061 001.018.016.518 FLEX SPENDING ADMINISTRATION 408.00
Total : 408.00
57267 7/14/2022 004130 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 76965 001.090.331.514 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RE: CL 1,573.00
Total : 1,573.00
57268 7/14/2022 003431 PIN CENTER,THE 0522107 001.013.000.513 CITY COINS 689.00
Total : 689.00
57269 7/14/2022 001860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2X03127 001.016.016.521 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PRECIN 170.22
Total : 170.22
57270 7/14/2022 007133 PRUNTY, CAITLIN EXPENSES 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 54.35
Page: s1.
18'
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
07/13/2022 2:54:27PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57270 7/14/2022 007133 007133 PRUNTY,CAITLIN (Continued) Total : 54.35
57271 7/14/2022 004133 ROE BACKFLOW TESTING 2616 001.033.033.518 BACKFLOW TESTING:CITY HALL 8 500.00
Total : 500.00
57272 7/14/2022 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 2415 S CALVIN LN 001.013.015.515 COURT FILING 240.00
Total : 240.00
57273 7/14/2022 000658 SPOKANE CO SUPERIOR COURT 10811 E VALLEYWAY 001.013.015.515 COURT FILING 240.00
Total : 240.00
57274 7/14/2022 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3509111246 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: BLDG DEPT -222.86
3509111249 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: BLDG, PLANNII 93.64
3509111251 001.040.043.558 OFFICE SUPPLIES: BLDG, PLANNII 93.64
3512102614 001,013,000.513 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY MGR 125.35
3512102615 001.033.033,518 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY HALL 13.48
3512102616 001.033.033.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY HALL 10.33
3512152617 001.033.033.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 57.41
3512102618 001.033.033.518 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY HALL -13.48
Total : 157.51
57275 7/14/2022 002092 THOMPSON, CHRIS EXPENSES 001.040.043.558 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 12.40
Total : 12.40
57276 7/14/2022 008067 TK LANDSCAPE&LAWN SVCS LLC 3389 001.016.016.521 LAWN SERVICE:PRECINCT&CITY 2,005.94
Total ; 2,005.94
57277 7/14/2022 006178 WALTER E NELSON CO 474115 001.013.000.513 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EXECUTIVE 557.58
Total : 557.58
19 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 13,267.68
19 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 13,267.68
Page:
11
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
07/13/2022 4:36:53PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57278 7/13/2022 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 113482 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES: 133.95
Total: 133.95
57279 7113/2022 003076 AMSDEN,ERICA EXPENSES 001.040.041.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 71.37
Total: 71.37
57280 7/13/2022 002326 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS P52190954 001.090.000.518 SMALLTOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT:IT 103.54
P52191029 001.090.000.518 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT:IT 18.46
Total: 122.00
57281 711312022 008572 CDA METALS 896113 101.043.000.542 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 84.58
Total: 84.58
57282 7/13/2022 002920 DIRECTV INC 051738547X220705 101.042.000.543 CABLE SERVICE FOR MAINTENANCE: 79.99
Total: 79.99
57283 7/13/2022 008762 ECAD INC SO22-8857 001.040.041.543 CLASS REGISTRATION 1,250.00
Total: 1,250.00
57284 7/13/2022 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4330130 001.040.041.543 FUEL FOR MAINTENANCE SHOP VEHII 1,839.20
Total: 1,839.20
57285 7/13/2022 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. AR244184 001.011.000.511 COPIER COSTS:WEST WING/COUNCII 133.28
AR244185 001.018.017.518 COPIER COSTS:IT 7.20
AR244186 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS:HR 87.31
AR244187 001.013.000.513 COPIER COSTS:OPS/ADMIN 402.89
AR244188 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS:LEGAL 123.95
AR244189 001.040.043.558 COPIER COSTS:MAILROOM 109.63
AR244190 001.040.041.543 COPIER COSTS:CPW ENGINEERING 408.18
AR244191 101,042,000.542 COPIER COSTS:MAINTENANCE SHOF 8.30
AR244192 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS:PARKS 329.11
Total: 1,609.86
57286 7/13/2022 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 JUNE 2022 001,076,300.576 UTILITIES:PARKS JUNE 2022 333.63
Total: 333.63
57287 7/13/2022 001035 NDM TECHNOLOGIES INC 31844 001.090.000.518 WATCHGUARD TRADE UP T20 WITH 1 394.25
Page: -4.
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
07/13/2022 4:36:53PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57287 7/13/2022 001035 001035 NDM TECHNOLOGIES INC (Continued) Total: 394.25
57288 7/13/2022 003090 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 105286/3 101.042.000.543 REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES 166.56
FINANCE CHARGE 101.042.000,543 FINANCE CHARGE 2.54
Total: 169.10
57289 7/13/2022 004621 OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 2862-183464 001.040.043.524 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES: 116.24
2862-186026 001.040.043.524 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES: 67.27
2862-186647 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES: 37.61
2862-186679 101.042.000.542 VEHICLE REPAIR&MAINT.SUPPLIES: 43.67
2862-187896 501.000.000.548 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 17.40
Total: 282.19
57290 7/13/2022 005049 PEDERSON,MICHAEL ROY JUNE 2022 101.042.000.542 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVER 1,275.00
Total: 1,275.00
57291 7/13/2022 005968 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1037651 402.402.000.531 DATA PLAN 299.75
Total: 299.75
57292 7/13/2022 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 57391 001.016.000.521 RADAR UNIT DECALS 65.34
Total: 65.34
57293 7/13/2022 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC_ 12767075 402.402.000.531 TREE REPLACEMENT 2,195.00
12685277 402.402.000.531 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 7,154.23
12964360 402.402.000.531 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 10,708.23
13057812 402.402.000.531 895 CONTRACT MANTENANCE 7,154.22
13057813 101.042.000.542 895 CONTRACT MAINTENANCE 531.43
Total: 27,743.11
57294 7/13/2022 000202 SRCAA 18218 001.090.000.553 3RD QTR 2022 ASSESSMENT 37,048.45
Total: 37,048.45
57295 7/13/2022 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC 6302022 001.011.000.511 BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS 1,146.00
Total: 1,146.00
57296 7/13/2022 006846 US LINEN&UNIFORM INC 2946963 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 18.49
2950703 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 31.60
2954373 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 18.49
Page: S.
9r
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
07(1312022 4:36:53PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
57296 7/13/2022 006846 US LINEN&UNIFORM INC (Continued)
2958100 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 31.60
2961739 101.042.000.543 SUPPLIES:MAINTENANCE SHOP 18.49
Total: 118.67
57297 7/13/2022 002363 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO IN002063021 101.000.000.542 VEHICLE MAINT.SUPPLIES 513.04
Total: 513.04
57298 7113/2022 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC 2022070003578 001.090.000.518 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTUREACCES: 291.57
2022070005522 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICES 526.70
2022070025710 001.090.000.518 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTUREACCES 266.06
Total: 1,184.33
21 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 75,763.81
21 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 75,763.81
Page: '3,
ry'
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
0711412022 1:27:37PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice FundIDept DescriptionlAccount Amount
57299 7714/2022 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 6419.14 JUNE 2022 402.402.000.531 UTILITIES 50,65
6419.15 JUNE 2022 402.402.000.531 UTILITIES 60.47
Total: 111.12
1 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 111.12
1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 111.12
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Council member reviewed:
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page: �3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: July 26, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Pay Period Ending 7/15/2022
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Employees Council Total
Gross: $ 399,399.04 $ - $ 399,399.04
Benefits: $ 74,289.97 $ - $ 74,289.97
Total payroll $ 473,689.01 $ - $ 473,689.01
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of
the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.]
STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri
Draft
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Formal Meeting
Tuesday,July 12,2022
Mayor Haley called the meeting to order at 6 p.m. The meeting was held in person by Council and staff in
Council Chambers,and also remotely via Zoom meeting.
Attendance:
Councilmembers Staff
Pam Haley,Mayor John Hohman,City Manager
Rod Higgins,Deputy Mayor Erik Lamb,Deputy City manager
Tim Hattenburg, Councilmember Chelsie Taylor,Finance Director
Laura Padden,Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Brandi Peetz, Councilmember John Bottelli,Parks,Rec&Facilities Dir.
Ben Wick,Councilmember Dave Ellis,Police Chief
Arne Woodard,Councilmember Tony Beattie, Sr.Deputy City Attorney
Bill Helbig, Community&Public Works Dir.
Gloria Mantz, City Engineer
Adam Jackson,Planning/Grants Engineer
Mike Basinger,Economic Development Dir.
Susan Nielsen,Economic Dev. Specialist
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
INVOCATION: Pastor Zac Minton of the Rock Church gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council,staff and the audience stood for the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present.
APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and
unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda.
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS
COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS
Councilmember Wick:reported that the Association of Washington Cities(AWC)CEO will be in town this
week and he will be hosting a 'meet and greet' this Friday. City Manager Hohman reminded Council that
if any Councilmembers plan to attend,that no more than two others can attend along with Councilmember
Wick so that there will not be a quorum. Councilmember Wick mentioned that there will also be some
representatives from others cities such as Liberty Lake and Airway Heights.
Councilmember Woodard: mentioned Council's tour of Avista Stadium, and said the Valley News Herald
had a nice article explaining the proposed updates to the stadium.
Councilmember Hattenburg: said that he enjoyed touring the stadium; said the STA meeting discussed the
line update of the transit route of Spokane Community College to Browns' addition; and said the awards
banquet for STA is this Sunday.
Councilmember Peetz; said she also enjoyed touring the stadium; said the Chamber of Commerce
Government Action Committee met and saw two presentations, one about proposed SB 5371 which deals
with a statewide sweetened beverage tax, and the other about the Snake River Dam Report, and said she
left copies on the counter in Council Chambers for those who might be interested.
Councilmember Padden: said she no report.
Deputy Mayor Higgins:reported that the Clean Air Board meeting had a discussion about cost recovery for
agency services, said it was generally accepted marijuana growing has moved from a cottage industry to a
more corporate business, and that complaints have steadily decreased to the point that annual permit fees
Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-12-2022 Page 1 of 7
Approved by Council:
Draft
are carried by indoor growers and processors, and it was suggested that a conference with those business
be organized to discuss how self regulation could minimize compliance costs thus reducing overall
regulatory fees;he said that Washington is only one of two states that doesn't clarify marijuana growing as
agricultural; said that Spokane's Waste to Energy Plant is the only plant of its kind in the state,and that the
Clean Air agency here in Spokane, writes the permitting parameters for Department of Ecology's (DOE)
Municipal Waste Combustor Emission Guidelines, and the DOE just approved and adopted our agency's
plan for statewide use.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Haley reported that she attended the Performance Monitoring External Relations Committee for
STA where they discussed the construction contract for the Monroe-Regal high performance transit route
phase 2 and that most of the construction contract bids are coming in below the engineer's estimate; said
they are also working on the final Division Street stops, and working on the disadvantaged business
enterprise program, which is business owners/contractors that can do work for STA that would be
considered disadvantaged; said the problem is most of those companies and very small and most STA
projects are big so they will try to break down some of their projects to bring more people in to bid; said
they recommended to the Board to revise the fare policy to not charge for riders up to age 18 and said this
will likely pass; said they received a clean 2021 audit from the State Auditor;and that STA is working with
Spokane Public Schools to address some of the school's shortage of bus drivers; and that she attended a
meeting about the Department of Commerce,which will be discussed later tonight.
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY Ill: After Mayor Haley explained the process,she
invited public comment.
Mr.Dan Allison, Spokane Valley: spoke about junk cars; said there were about 500 cars at the Fairgrounds
for a swap meet and according to our City's terminology, all those would be junk; said these cars start out
as junk and are restored; said he feels the City is on the wrong track and that we can't come on someone's
property and tell them they have junk cars and haul them off; suggested sending out a flyer to those we
think have junk cars and give them the name of haulers that the City would pay to have them hauled off.
Mr.John Harding, Spokane Valley: spoke about crime; said that is supposed to be the number one priority
of Council but so far he's not convinced; said we spend money on road maintenance and on parks
maintenance and infrastructure; said there are about 800 to 1,000 individuals in gangs; and said Council
needs to check its priorities.
Mr. Joseph Price, Spokane Valley: said he cleans up all the meth labs and that manpower is the problem,
and that we are not picking up any taxes on it; suggested cutting down some services for the homeless or
let them all be in one area as most homeless people don't move too far; said in Jacksonville Florida they
deputize people to help with these types of situations.
Mr. Dan Smith, Spokane Valley: said he heard gunfire in his neighborhood about four days ago and
discovered that it is part of police training; said his neighborhood did not receive any notification; that he
also heard there will be canine training on this site, which he identified as at First and Progress; said he
would like appropriate action taken as initially he thought they were being attacked and said more
information to the public would be good.
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Consent Agenda: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of
Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda.
a.Approval of Claim Vouchers on July 12,2022,Request for Council Action Form: $2,908,491.33
b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period ending June 30,2022: $636,915.41
c.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 14,2022, Special Meeting,Budget Workshop
d.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 28,2022,Regular Formal Meeting
e.Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 30,2022, Special Meeting
f.Approval of Council Meeting minutes of July 5,2022, Study Session
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins,seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda.
Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-12-2022 Page 2 of 7
Approved by Council:
Draft
2. Second Reading Ordinance 22-013,Amending SVMC 3.48 Vendor List,Purchase Orders—Tony Beattie
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title,it was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins and seconded
to approve Ordinance No. 22-013 adopting amendments to Chapter 3.48 SVMC. After Mr.Beattie's brief
explanation of the amendments, Mayor Haley invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote
by acclamation: in favor: unanimous. Opposed: none. Motion carried.
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY 121: Mayor Haley invited public comment
Ms. Barb Howard, Spokane Valley (via Zoom): spoke about a problem with the Opportunity Post Office
having late and/or mail delivery problems; said she spoke with Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers'
office and said people should contact her to issue complaints; that apparently the problem is with all the
deliveries of Amazon.
Mr.Jim Hose,Spokane Valley:referenced his neighborhood at 16th and Pines;expressed thanks for Council
addressing some of the issues he spoke to last time and for getting his neighborhood into the Six Year Plan;
said he would like to see justice for all neighborhoods that have experienced similar neglect and that his
neighborhood has had a great deal of neglect;mentioned the array housing types nearby Browns Park and
that is good to see people using the park; said he listened to the information from the street department that
it is important to take care of the roads but in his neighborhood, it's just not worth it to spend he money;
said he understands that there may be proposal for a tax after 35 years of neglect.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
3.Washington Economic Development Finance Authority Revenue Bonds—Susan Nielsen,Mike Basinger
After Mr. Basinger introduced newly hired Economic Development Specialist Susan Nielsen,Ms.Nelsen
explained the background of the request from WEDFA and that they would like Council to consider
approval of a resolution in support of the project and financing before the end of July 2022. Council had no
objection that staff bring forth a resolution at the next meeting.
1. Recreation Programs Update Kendall May, John Bottelli
This item was previously removed from the agenda.
5. RCO Greenacres Update—John Bottelli
Via his PowerPoint presentation,Director Bottelli explained about Phase 2 of the Greenacres Park update;
he mentioned the estimated $2 million preliminary grant application concept which included
tennis/pickleball courts, basketball court, baseball/softball field, and expanded parking; he showed the
public outreach results of ranking of amenities;he showed a list of the amenities to be included on the final
grant application concept, also at an estimated $2 million; then went over the timeline showing what has
been completed, and what the next steps are, adding that to obtain the $1.5 million grant, the City would
need to provide at least $500,000 in match. Discussion included use of the shelter, partnerships with
Hoopfest and other organizations, the much-needed shade for the park, and an idea of reduced disc golf.
Mayor Haley expressed how positive this will be to have the park finished. Councilmembers were in
agreement to continue as noted in the Request for Council Action.
6. Potential Grant Opportunity,Transportation Improvement Board—Adam Jackson
Mr. Jackson went through the PowerPoint discussing the potential grant opportunity through the
Transportation Improvement Board; he showed the areas of the four recommended projects: three under
the Urban Arterial Program, and one under the Active Transportation Program; and said staff is seeking
Council consensus to proceed with the proposed projects in a motion consideration for the July 26 meeting.
There were no objections from Council.
7. Pavement Management Program: Local Access Streets—John Hohman,Bill Helbig,Adam Jackson
Mr. Hohman said that this is about the 57th discussion on pavement management; and tonight we are
responding to previous public comments from a few weeks ago and again tonight,concerning local access
streets; he again stated that there is a lot of grant money for arterials, but not for local access streets; that
Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-12-2022 Page 3 of 7
Approved by Council:
Draft
currently several neighborhoods are showing either `yellow' or 'red' condition and that maybe Council
could provide what is important and what should be staff's focus. It was noted the streets shown in red are
bad, yellow are fair, and green are good or better. Mr. Helbig added that the red streets are not for
preservation, but require full reconstruction. After Mr. Jackson went through the PowerPoint, there was
lengthy discussion. In response to a Council comment about doing some yellow and some red streets with
available funds. Mr. Jackson said the challenge is addressing the 10% of the red streets while 90% of the
other streets keep aging; and as we put off that work,the problem grows; that the red are bad and will get
worse, but relative to the green, it would be worse to let a green street get even worse. Councilmember
Padden said we have to do both good and bad roads; that the City government is infrastructure which is a
top priority; said she saw a newspaper article of 15 years ago and we had the same message; said we need
to reassess our spending priorities and use existing funds and not new taxes; said in the last two years we
spent $8.7 million on park land acquisition; said parks are important but there must be balance; she
mentioned the idea of sales tax on auto sales and parts and using that for roads, or setting aside a certain
amount from the general fund for roads.
City Manager Hohman said there are many concerns which have been talked about for many years,and not
a lot has changed;he mentioned the implementation of a telephone utility for streets,but that has dwindled
significantly; said we are fighting a reduction in revenue; that the utility tax on phones does not apply to
the data portion of cell phones (because federal law prohibits the taxing of data); said that over the years
Councilmembers have robbed every piece of surplus funds and all has been taken and used to try to extend
what our program is doing;he noted we also pay quite a bit for snow plowing,de-icing that occurs on those
local access roads at a cost of about$1 million versus not plowing and waiting for the roads to clear up with
warmer weather; said during the great recessions, we spent many years trying to keep the overall budget
increase to 1% and we got there by looking at every expenditure; and now the general fund subsidizes the
streets; said we went in detail for the last five years of how much money was transferred from general to
street fund, and this year was over $3 million just to keep the basic operations going; said we are also
struggling with public safety costs; for 2022 there was about a 9%increase which equated to another$2.6
million,which budget is already 62%of our overall budget; said a lot of that surplus money was also used
as local match money for the larger projects, such as the Barker Grade Separation Project,the Pines Grade
Separation Project,and other safety projects; said we have to identify city funds to be able to go after these
grants, and it is very much a balancing act; but he feels we are at a critical point and staff needs to know
how does Council want us to proceed, focus on street preservation or maintenance; and that although we
have discussed this over 57 times,there is still a need for a lot of conversation.
Deputy Mayor Higgins said that the $16 million is probably not enough; that we have to talk about
additional revenue and how to raise additional funds to fix roads and keep them maintained; that we are
probably in a recession now which is probably not a time to be talking about that,but the problems are not
going away;things are getting very tight;re-prioritization is nice but it doesn't solve the local access street
problems; said maybe Council should be talking about letting the roads go to gravel; said if people want
good roads,it will cost more.
Councilmember Peetz mentioned that we spend money on parks but our city is growing and the amount of
park or vacant land isn't; said it is a balancing act and we can't fund everything; she asked about using the
funds set aside for repairing City Hall.Mr. Hohman said there are some funds in an account we are going
to use to try to jump-start city hall repairs; that there is a potential settlement in the future, and while we
could use some of those funds he would not recommend all of it as we want to start on some repairs; that
is a small portion of the$30 million required to repair all the red roads;he asked what process does Council
want to use to prioritize; what kind of public input does Council want; and what should be tackled.
Councilmember Peetz asked if there is a way to get more public input other than ways we have already
tried, to see how citizens wants us to spend the money. Mr. Hohman said he is sure there are all kind of
things we can do; that we went in-depth last year; it was in the newspapers all the time; we took out ads;
had info on social media,lots of earned media;local TV stations and newspapers had inform;the input was
large, but yes, not large for our overall population; and he again asked Council what input do they want;
Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-12-2022 Page 4 of 7
Approved by Council:
Draft
what is the priority; said the public feels local access and arterials should be equally weighed but we don't
get equal funding so we are limited to funding the arterials; said staff needs more guidance from Council
on where Council wants to go; said we have done all the technical and financial analysis; and we also
understand the state of the economy.
Councilmember Woodard stated that the road system is perpetual; we have always kept roads in good to
fair condition; that it takes $55 million to do all the red and yellow streets that require reconstruction, and
that same $55 million keeps the green roads in great condition; if you do the red and yellow,by the time
you finished,the green will be in the red and yellow; said taxes should be a last resort and surplus funds are
not necessarily surplus;he too stated there are no grants for local access roads and we need a separate source
of funding;that if we didn't have that street wear fee we'd have nothing;maybe we should have some roads
go back to gravel; and said maybe we should have special meetings but then have the courage to do
something.
Mayor Haley said she thinks Council realizes we have to do preservation until we have the money to do
more otherwise we'd be spending almost double to do the roads; and by a show of hands, it appears that a
quorum agreed with Mayor Haley.Mr.Hohman said prioritizing preservation versus reconstruction doesn't
mean you do all of one or the other. Mr. Jackson further explained that the $6.5 million for local streets,
that doesn't remove all the red streets; so if we start today with $6.5 million and work for ten years on it,
by averages they'll just be other streets that have degraded to red; so 10% of our streets are in the
reconstruction zone and 90%were not; and the June 21 discussion about fixing particular neighborhoods,
said he wants to make sure if we are committed to the red streets or do we try to holistically look at the
90% of the other streets. Mr. Helbig added that system-wide,our backlog to get everything up to standard
for all roads is about$120 million;so about half of that would go to about 10%of our streets;so the question
is, are we doing okay with the process now by trying to keep more from going into the red and preserving
what we can, and picking up the reds when we can,such as we did with the $1.5 million street wear funds.
Going back to the Request for Council Action,the questions to be considered are:
1. Should projects focus on the 10% of the existing local streets that require reconstruction or focus on
preserving the remaining 90% of the existing local streets. Mayor Haley re-worded the question to state:
should the projects focus on the remaining 90% of the existing local streets. By a show of hands, all
Councilmembers agreed with this statement.
2. What criteria should be used to prioritize neighborhoods higher than others?Should staff conduct public
outreach to help Council prioritize which streets are repaired first?
Mr. Hohman said this question is the crux of the issue, and we need feedback and guidance on how to
evaluate one neighborhood over the over; and how do we take that$1.5 million and try to address that over
time. Deputy Mayor Higgins stated that not all streets are in the same red level and perhaps we could save
some, but we rely on the technical people to tell us which of those red streets are more salvageable. Mr.
Hohman replied that it appears the idea is to go into some neighborhoods and work on some areas and patch
them up at a cheaper cost; he said that might be true but we need to look at each individually and try to
come up with a plan for each one. Mr. Hohman said that one thing to keep in mind is tackling these
holistically like we have done typically results in a better overall value for what we do out there because
getting a contractor to show up is a large cost;so if they come to an area,they can do the neighboring streets
as well all at a very efficient cost; said staff can look at that and bring that back. Deputy Mayor Higgins
agreed,and said the question is,what can we fix realistically.A question came up about how the Midilome
project was selected, and Mr. Jackson said that was selected because the water district was not planning to
work on those streets;there was no utility work planned;because we do not want to build a new street and
have a utility company do something a few years later.However,Mr. Jackson stated,west of Bowdish did
have a five to eight year plan to put water lines through from University to 33'or 34th, into Bowdish; so
that was a deterrent; said the next opportunity was CDBG funds and Spokane County work for the sewer
expansion into the Barker Road homes, and we could use the funds to supplement the new streets there.
Mr. Jackson further explained that we have rebuilt two neighborhoods with our pavement management
Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-12-2022 Page 5 of 7
Approved by Council:
Draft
program; how can we try to reconstruct roads as doing that is like fixing the worse streets first which is
opposite to a perpetual plan; so this 4th and Coleman neighborhood was an attempt to find a geographically
different location,and streets that were clustered where we could maximize the mobilization of a contractor.
Mr. Hohman said there was also some feedback from Council about spreading this work out equitably on
different income levels of the city as we didn't want to focus on higher income levels only but spread it
around to some of the lower income as well which is one of the reasons that neighborhood was selected.
Councilmember Peetz agreed with partnering with other entities in working on the streets; also if there is a
safety aspect to the streets,or a safe-route-to-school; and asked if it would be an option to work to get the
smaller projects out of the way first.Mr. Jackson said that is an option,but doing the smaller projects first,
means that the sacrifice would be that$1.5 million will go further if applied to non-red streets and prevent
those yellow streets from getting worse.Councilmember Wick said in trying to find ways more and the best
way to do this;that ideally fix the yellow streets before they get red so prioritize the ones you think will go
worst faster; said he agrees with doing the partnerships with utilities and suggested we stay the course with
the $1.5 million street wear fee; said he likes the identifying of the ten different neighborhoods, future
projects as shown on the slide 7, and continue talks with neighborhoods and get out to speak to citizens in
venues such as Farmers Markets, and use of the city's newsletter; but we can't take care of it all at the
moment. Mayor Haley said she agreed with Councilmembers Peetz and Wick on how to prioritize the
neighborhoods.
3. How to fund the proposed local access street project?
Mayor Haley said it doesn't look like staff will get an answer o this tonight;that most citizens think we get
a lot from the property taxes but it is mostly sales tax which a lot of comes from auto row; said Council
needs to determine what those future funding sources are before deciding how to fund those projects.
Councilmember Hattenburg said he agrees that Council needs the courage to go to the public; said he'd be
willing to have town hall meetings in particular neighborhoods or a general town hall meeting at City Hall;
said when it comes up he tells constituents that overall we have good road systems; said he personally is
not worried about his political future if somethings needs to be passed to keep those roads in good shape;
said Council needs solutions and at what cost and how to pay for it.
Mr.Hohman said staff can look at those options for discussing more with the community; and maybe even
determine what type of work would be required in each of those neighborhoods; reminding Council that
that is just the reconstruct neighborhood and there are other neighborhoods that we need to keep from falling
into a reconstruct neighborhood.Mr.Hohman said he appreciates tonight's conversation with Council;that
he also wants to share the perspective that since the recession,the Council was really focused on economic
development; and that all those economic development efforts such as the infrastructure that went in the
northeast industrial area,and focus on various other projects including the park projects,that allows us from
an economic development standpoint, to have a more attractive community to the businesses that have
moved into this area; and that we are in the center of this region, from Airway Heights to Medical Lake,to
Coeur d'Alene;and it is very attractive for companies to be here;and that those efforts have led to Councils'
ability to keep the taxes as low as possible. He noted that no other city especially in this region, has only
one utility tax and for us that is the telephone utility tax; that the City of Spokane is up to 20% and they
have maxed out everything, that every tax that could be assessed is; but our city has been completely
different;but with sales tax,when it's good it's good and what it's bad,it's really bad; so those are things
to continue discussing. Councilmember Padden said that even though Spokane had a lot of money, they
didn't prioritize their roads and they have horrible roads; and said she hopes we can prioritize our local
roads a little more.
Councilmember Peetz said he need to talk with our legislators as there were several missed opportunities
where we could have received funds for projects and in turn we've had to take either general fund or surplus
funds to prop up either Barker or Pines or other projects; said she is aware there has been some legislation
proposed for preservation and maintenance but maybe we could talk with our legislators and get their idea
of what they're hearing from not only their peers but from western Washington and what we could do to
Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-12-2022 Page 6 of 7
Approved by Council:
Draft
bring back some of those funds here; that we are paying those taxes but they are not coming back to our
community,so we could use some of those funds for roads instead of having to use them for capital projects.
Mr.Hohman mentioned that we compete very well on those grant opportunities but the state does not have
allocations for local access streets as most of those programs are directed to arterials,and that we have done
very well on that especially with Mr.Jackson's expertise.Mr.Hohman added that he met with an individual
last week who related a comment from one of the Eastern Washington Directors for a Congresswoman,and
the comment was that Spokane Valley punches above its weight when it comes to the state and federal
lobbying efforts in bringing money back into the community;which was good to hear;that we try hard but
we can always do better. Councilmember Wick said that freight is changing; and local access streets are
now used for deliveries from stores and groceries; said it will change our community,and how do we adopt
to those new trends; we will have to think of local access streets as freight networks as well. Mr. Jackson
said that the 2021 Street Committee went in-depth on available funding mechanisms; we used the
committee's expertise to help shape and inform the public; so we have that information; said we are in a
very enviable position as our streets are manageable;that we have a lot of green streets,and we are focusing
on a small, although valid and important, percentage of those streets; that it is not an easy task but it is a
manageable one.
Mayor Haley called for a recess at 8:20 p.m.; she reconvened the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
8. Depaitinent of Commerce, Camp Hope Update—Erik Lamb,Eric Robison
Mr. Lamb referenced the two letters distributed at the dais prior to the meeting: one from the County and
one from Spokane City with the focus on the City of Spokane as fiscal agent for all funds awarded for right-
of-way purposes in Spokane County.Mr. Lamb also noted that if Council agrees,we could submit a letter
similar to the one provided by Spokane County, which also mentioned that none of the shelters would be
operated by us. There was Council consensus that we provide such letter.Mr. Lamb said that we will also
have to come up with a proposal for the entire amount; that meetings are ongoing and he will be coming
back with more information on how to use that 70% remaining funds, and in looking realistically at the
timing, we could not do the appropriate due diligence so we don't recommend putting in for use of those
funds at this time.
9.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley
There were no suggested changes for the Advance Agenda.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
Concerning ARPA,City Manager Hohman mentioned the previous proposal from our Police Department,
and that one item that was discussed was the surveillance trailer, similar to a speed trail, but this has a
camera to help support some of the policing efforts;said he would like Council to consider advancing with
that one purchase, either with or without the license plate reader; he noted the cost is about $77,000 with
the license plate reader and a little less without.There was Council consensus to purchase the trailer without
the license plate reader.
10.EXECUTIVE SESSION: [RCW 42.30.110(1)i)] Potential Litigation
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Higgins, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into executive
session for approximately 15 minutes to discuss potential litigation, and that no action will be taken upon
return to open session. Council adjourned into executive session at 8:46 p.m. At 9:04 p.m.,Mayor Haley
declared Council out of executive session, at which time it was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed
to adjourn.
ATTEST
Pam Haley,Mayor
Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk
Council Meeting Minutes,Formal:07-12-2022 Page 7 of 7
Approved by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: July 26,2022 Department Director Approval: El
Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ®new business ❑public hearing
❑information ❑admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second reading - Ordinance 22-010 amending chapters 7.05, 19.65,
and 19.160 SVMC.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapters 7.05, 19.65,and 19.160 SVMC.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
2003 - 2018: Adoption of chapter and amendments to 7.05 SVMC relating to nuisances;
2019- SVMC 7.05.045 was added as a new section to address chronic criminal nuisance properties;
June 1,2021 -code enforcement program overview;
June 29,2021 - administrative report on code enforcement-policy discussion on Council preferences;
October 5, 2021 - administrative report on code enforcement program follow-up — Topic #1 Parking;
October 12, 2021 - administrative report on code enforcement program follow-up — Topic #2 Camping;
May 3,2022 - administrative report on parking and related nuisances on private property;
June 14,2022-first reading of Ordinance 22-010;
June 28, 2022 - second ordinance reading of Ordinance 22-010 resulted in Council requesting additional
discussion and opportunity for public feedback; and
July 19,2022—administrative report on additional options relating to camping on private property.
BACKGROUND: Following extensive discussions, the following proposed Ordinance 22-010 would
amend the Spokane Valley Municipal Code in the following ways:
(1)Amends SVMC 7.05.020 Definitions to add "unlicensed vehicle," "vessel," and a minor technical
change to the junk vehicle definition;
(2)Amends SVMC 7.05.040(D)Nuisances Prohibited to add broken/inoperable golf carts to the types
of machinery and equipment as a prohibited nuisance;
(3) Amends SVMC 7.05.040(N) Nuisances Prohibited to add a new section generally prohibiting
camping on private property;
(4) Amends SVMC 7.05.040(0) Nuisances Prohibited to add a new section regulating improper
vehicle/vessel parking and storage on private property;
(5) Amends SVMC 7.05.040(P) Nuisances Prohibited to change the prohibition on junk vehicles to
also include vehicles unlicensed for more than 45 days; excludes application of this section to a
licensed vehicle repair business; removes the old subsection (3) which currently allows the repair of
junk vehicles at the exterior of a structure on private residential property; and amends the new
subsection (3)to reduce the number of junk or unlicensed vehicles on residential property from up to
two,to now one so long as it is completely sight-screened by maintained landscaping,berm,or fence;
(6)Amends SVMC 7.65.130(J)Recreational Vehicles to limit camping in an RV or similar vehicle on
private residential-zoned property to no more than 30 days, which would also require obtaining a
temporary use permit (TUP) from the City. This would allow the City to finally track how long
people are living in recreational vehicles on private residential property. This amendment also
authorizes use of an RV associated with construction of a house under a current building permit from
the City. Lastly,this section authorizes the City Manager to allow use of RVs as temporary dwelling
units on private property for quarantine or similar emergency purposes for up to 180 days, or as
otherwise established by the City Manager. In such cases, a TUP will still be required but there
would be no cost for the application; and
(7)Amend SVMC 19.160.040 by adding a new subsection (D)to establish a new TUP for temporary
uses associated with residential visitation as contemplated in the other changes in Ordinance 22-010.
It establishes that the limit shall be 30 days in any 12-month period,that the cost of the TUP shall be
as established by Council in the Master Fee Schedule, that Council has indicated an amount for
consideration at a later date of up to $25, and also sets several criteria for issuance based on potential
risk to the surrounding properties. Once Council has adopted Ordinance 22-010, staff will bring
forward proposed amendments to the Master Fee Schedule to formally establish this TUP amount.
OPTIONS: (1)Approve Ordinance No. 22-010 as drafted; or(2)take other action as appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we approve Ordinance 22-010 as drafted adopting
amendments related to junk and unlicensed vehicles, vehicle and vessel parking/storage, and camping
nuisances.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager; Bill Helbig, Community & Public
Works Director; Jenny Nickerson,Building Official; Cary Driskell, City Attorney.
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 22-010.
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.22-010
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 7.05 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO NUISANCES AND OTHER UPDATES,AMENDING CHAPTER 19.65 OF
THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
USE, AMENDING CHAPTER 19.160 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE, AND
OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS,pursuant to RCW 35A.11.020 and RCW 35.22.280(30),the City of Spokane Valley
(City) is authorized to "declare what shall be a nuisance, and to abate the same, and to impose fines upon
parties who may create,continue,or suffer nuisances to exist"; and
WHEREAS, the City previously adopted chapter 7.05 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC) in order to maintain a safe and healthy environment by regulating nuisance conditions that
contribute to injury,illness,devaluation of property, and the incidence of crime; and
WHEREAS,pursuant to chapter 7.48 RCW,the City is authorized to obtain an order for a warrant
of abatement of public nuisances that may exist within the City; and
WHEREAS,the City Council has identified certain other conditions, including but not limited to
storage of unlicensed and junk vehicles on private property,camping on private property,improper vehicle
parking and storage on private property,and recreational vehicle use on private property,which contribute
to injury, illness, devaluation of property, and the incidence of crime and it desires to regulate such
conditions as nuisances; and
WHEREAS, in establishing a temporary use permit requirement for RV use associated with
residential visitation up to 30 days,Council may impose an application fee of up to $25; and
WHEREAS,the City Council desires to amend the applicable nuisance provisions in the SVMC to
provide necessary updates for the public health, safety,and welfare.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washington,ordains as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The City Council hereby finds it appropriate to amend the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code provisions related to nuisances and to update other appropriate Code provisions related to nuisances
and nuisance abatement procedures.
Section 2. Amendment. The following sections of chapter 7.05 SVMC are hereby amended as follows.
Any section of chapter 7.05 SVMC not identified herein shall remain unchanged.
7.05.010 Purpose and intent.
The purpose and intent of Chapter 7.05 SVMC is to create and maintain a safe and healthy environment
for the citizens of the City by identifying and eliminating the conditions that contribute to injury,illness,
devaluation of property, and the incidence of crime through the existence of nuisance conditions on public
and private property.
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 1 of 11
DRAFT
7.05.020 Definitions.
In addition to any definitions contained in Appendix A, the following words shall, for the purposes of
Chapters 7.05 and 17.100 SVMC,be defined as:
"Days" are counted as business days when five or fewer days are allowed to perform an act required by
Chapter 7.05 SVMC. "Days" are considered calendar days when more than five days are allowed to
perform an act required by Chapter 7.05 SVMC. "Days" are counted by excluding the first day,and
including the last day,unless the last day is a holiday, Saturday,or Sunday,pursuant to RCW 1.12.040, as
now adopted or hereafter amended.
"Determination of compliance"means a written determination by the city manager or designee that the
violation(s) stated in the warning,voluntary compliance agreement,notice and order, stop work order,or
other applicable order have been sufficiently abated so as to comply with the SVMC.
"Graffiti"means an unauthorized marking, symbol,inscription,word,figure,design,or other inscribed
material that has been placed upon any property through the use of paint,ink,dye,or any other substance
capable of marking property.
"Impound"means to take and hold a vehicle in legal custody pursuant to law.
"Inoperable"means incapable of being operated legally on a public highway,including,but not limited
to,not having a valid,current registration plate or a current certificate of registration.
"Junk vehicle"means a vehicle meeting at least three of the following criteria:
1. Is three years old or older;
2. Is extensively damaged,such damage including but not limited to any of the following: a broken
window or windshield,or missing wheels,tires,motor,or transmission;
3. Is apparently inoperable;
4.Has an approximate fair market value equal only to the approximate value of the scrap in it.
"Nuisance"means a person's unreasonable or unlawful use of real or personal property,or unreasonable,
indecent,or unlawful personal conduct or omission of conduct which materially interferes with,obstructs,
or jeopardizes the health, safety,prosperity,quiet enjoyment of property,or welfare of others,offends
common decency or public morality,or obstructs or interferes with the free use of public ways,places,or
bodies of water.
"Ongoing criminal activity related to the premises"means that(1)criminal activity is or has been
occurring at the premises; or(2)criminal activity is or has been occurring near the premises and such
activity has a reasonable and proximate connection to the premises,whether by owners,occupants,or
persons visiting such owners or occupants. Examples of conduct or actions that constitute criminal
activity occurring at or near the premises of the subject property include,but are not limited to,the
following:
1. Service of a search warrant by law enforcement personnel; or
2.Arrest of one or more individuals by law enforcement personnel during any 24-hour period;or
3. Commission of a misdemeanor,gross misdemeanor,or felony at or near the premises and where
there is a reasonable and proximate connection between the crime or criminal and the premises,
including those visiting the owner or occupants of the premises;or
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 2 of 11
DRAFT
4.Visits by law enforcement personnel which occur based upon a reasonable belief by law
enforcement that a crime is occurring or has occurred,but which do not result in any of the actions
identified in subsections(1)through(3) of this definition; provided,that visits alone may not form
the sole basis for determining a premises to be a chronic nuisance premises.
For purposes of this definition, service of warrants, arrests,or commission of misdemeanor or felony
domestic violence shall not be considered criminal activity.
"Person"means any public or private individual, sole proprietorship, association,partnership,
corporation,or legal entity,whether for-profit or not-for-profit,and the agents and assigns thereof.
"Person(s)responsible for a junk vehicle nuisance violation"means any one or more of the following:
1. The land ownerlandowner where the junk vehicle is located as shown on the last equalized
assessment roll; or
2. The last registered owner of the vehicle,unless the owner in the transfer of ownership of the
vehicle has complied with state law; or
3. The legal owner of the vehicle.
"Person(s)responsible for a nuisance violation"means the person or persons who caused the violation,if
that can be determined, and/or the owner,lessor,tenant,or other person(s)entitled to control,use,and/or
occupancy of the property and the abutting public rights-of-way.
"Unlicensed vehicle"means a vehicle that is not displaying a valid license plate and/or current
registration tabs,or which has a license plate but registration that has an expired registration of more than
45 days.
"Vehicle,"for the purposes of SVMC 7.05.040(114,includes every device capable of being moved upon a
public highway and in,upon,or by which any persons or property is or may be transported or drawn upon
a public highway,including bicycles. The term does not include devices other than bicycles moved by
human or animal power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks,pursuant to RCW 46.04.670.
"Vessel"for purposes of SVMC 7.05.040 shall have the same meaning as set forth in RCW 79A.60.010.
7.05.030 Compliance, authority and administration.
In order to discourage public nuisances and otherwise promote compliance with Chapter 7.05 SVMC,the
city manager or designee may,in response to field observations,determine that violations of Chapter 7.05
SVMC have occurred or are occurring, and may utilize any of the compliance provisions set forth in
Chapter 17.100 SVMC.
7.05.040 Nuisances prohibited.
No person,firm,or entity shall erect,contrive,cause,continue,maintain,or permit to exist any public
nuisance within the City including on the property of any person,firm,or entity or upon any public
rights-of-way abutting a person,firm,or entity's property. Prohibited public nuisances include,but are not
limited to:
A.Vegetation.
1.Any vegetation,or parts thereof,which hang lower than eight feet above any public walkway or
sidewalk; or hang lower than 14 feet above any public street;or which are growing in such a manner
as to obstruct or impair the free and full use of any public walkway, sidewalk,or street; or violate
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 3 of 11
DRAFT
City clearview triangle regulations. The City shall be responsible for maintaining all vegetation
placed by the City adjacent to a public walkway, sidewalk,or street.
2.Any growth of noxious weeds or toxic vegetation shall be subject to Chapter 16-750 WAC as
currently adopted and hereafter amended.
B. Buildings, Structures,Fences.Buildings or portions thereof which are deemed dangerous or unfit
pursuant to the SVMC(including all building and property maintenance codes and regulations as
currently adopted and hereafter amended).
C. Sidewalks.
1.Any protrusion, awning,or overhang that inhibits or obstructs use of a public walkway or
sidewalk.
2.Any object,construction,or damage that inhibits or obstructs the surface use of a public walkway
or sidewalk.
3.Accumulations of dirt or debris not removed from a public sidewalk.
D.Accumulations of Materials, Garbage,Recyclables,Furniture,Machinery.
1.Building and Construction Materials.Any accumulation, stack,or pile of building or construction
materials,including but not limited to metal,wood,wire,electrical,or plumbing materials,not
associated with a current,in-progress project and not in a lawful storage structure or container. This
provision does not apply to a designated contractor's yard.
2. Garbage,Recyclables, Compost,and Infestations.
a. Garbage or recyclables not properly stored in a receptacle with a tight-fitting lid.
b.Any accumulation of broken or neglected items,litter, salvage materials,or junk not in an
approved enclosed structure.
c. Creating or maintaining any accumulation of matter,including but not limited to foodstuffs or
dead vegetation(excluding properly maintained residential compost piles).
3.Furniture,Appliances,Furnishings,and Equipment.
a.Any broken or discarded household furniture, furnishings, equipment, or appliance not in an
approved enclosed structure.
b.Any enclosure which may entrap a human or an animal,including accessible refrigeration
appliances that have not had the doors secured or removed.
4.Machinery and Equipment.Any broken or inoperable accumulation of,or part of,machinery or
equipment not in an approved enclosed structure. SVMC 7.05.040(D)(4) shall include such
machinery and equipment as boats,jet-skis, snowmobiles, aircraft,golf carts,and the like,but shall
not include junk vehicles,which are regulated pursuant to SVMC 7.05.040(NP).
E.Fire Hazards.Any stack or accumulation of newspapers,dead vegetation(excluding properly
maintained compost piles),overgrown vegetation,cardboard,or any other paper,cloth,or wood products
left in a manner that poses a substantial risk of combustion or the spread of fire, as determined by the fire
marshal.
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 4 of 11
DRAFT
F. Toxic or Caustic Substances. Improper storage or keeping of any toxic,flammable,or caustic
substances or materials.
G. Smoke, Soot,or Odors.Allowing the escape or emission of any harmful smoke, soot, fumes,gases,or
odors which are offensive or harmful to a reasonable person.
H. Bodies of Water.
1.All stagnant,pooled water in which mosquitoes,flies,or other insects may multiply,excluding any
City-approved structure related to storm drainage systems.
2. The polluting of any waterway,well,or body of water which is not subject to the jurisdiction of
another federal, state,county, special purpose district or city agency.
I.Holes.Any excavated or naturally occurring uncovered holes which are not marked,guarded,or
otherwise secured,and which constitute a concealed danger.
J.Attractive Nuisances.Any accessible nuisance which is attractive to children including,but not limited
to,unattended machinery or equipment,unsecured abandoned or vacant buildings,open and unattended
vehicle trunks,or other unguarded conditions or situations that could injure or trap a child.
K.Noise.
1.Any noise or sound that,originating within a residential zone,intrudes into the property of another
person that exceeds the maximum permissible noise levels pursuant to Chapter 173-60 WAC, as
currently adopted and hereafter amended. Such noise or sound may include,but is not limited to,
noise or sound created by use of a radio,television set,musical instrument, sound amplifier,or other
device capable of producing or reproducing noise or sound; or in connection with the starting,
operation,repair,rebuilding,or testing of any vehicle,off-highway machinery or equipment,or
internal combustion engine.
2. The following shall be exempt from the provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1):
a.Normal use of public rights-of-way;
b. Sounds created by motor vehicles when regulated by Chapter 173-62 WAC;
c. Sounds originating from aircraft in flight and sounds that originate at airports which are
directly related to flight operations;
d. Sounds created by surface carriers engaged in commerce or passenger travel by railroad;
e. Sounds created by warning devices not operating continuously for more than five minutes,or
bells,chimes,or carillons;
f. Sounds created by safety and protective devices where noise suppression would defeat the
intent of the device or is not economically feasible;
g. Sounds created by emergency equipment and work necessary in the interest of law
enforcement or for health, safety or welfare of the community;
h. Sounds originating from officially sanctioned parades and other public events;
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 5 of 11
DRAFT
i. Sounds created by watercraft,except to the extent that they are regulated by other City or state
regulations;
j. Sounds created by motor vehicles licensed or unlicensed when operated off public highways,
except when such sounds are made in or adjacent to residential property where human beings
reside or sleep;
k. Sounds originating from existing natural gas transmission and distribution facilities;
1. Sounds created in conjunction with public work projects or public work maintenance
operations executed at the cost of the federal government, state or municipality;
m. Sounds created in conjunction with the collection of solid waste;
n. Sounds created in conjunction with military operations or training;
o. Sounds originating from organized activities occurring in public parks,playgrounds,
gymnasiums, swimming pools, schools, and other public facilities and public recreational
facilities during hours of operation;
p. Sounds originating from agricultural activities.
3. The following shall be exempt from provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1)between the hours of
7:00 a.m.and 10:00 p.m.:
a. Sounds originating from residential property relating to temporary projects for the repair or
maintenance of homes,grounds, and appurtenances;
b. Sounds created by the discharge of firearms on authorized shooting ranges;
c. Sounds created by blasting;
d. Sounds created by aircraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operations;
provided,that aircraft testing and maintenance shall be conducted at remote sites whenever
possible;
e. Sounds created by the installation or repair of essential utility services.
4. The following shall be exempt from the provisions of SVMC 7.05.040(K)(1)between the hours of
7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.,or when conducted beyond 1,000 feet of any residence where human
beings reside and sleep at any hour:
a. Sounds originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity;
b. Sounds originating from the quarrying,blasting and mining of minerals or materials,
including,but not limited to, sand,gravel,rock and clay, as well as the primary reduction and
processing of minerals or materials for concrete batching, asphalt mixing and rock crushers;
c. Sounds originating from uses on properties which have been specifically conditioned to meet
certain noise standards by an appropriate City hearing body.
L. Dust.Any disturbance of any land area,or permitting the same,without taking affirmative measures to
suppress and minimize the blowing and scattering of dust,which unreasonably interferes with the peace,
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 6 of 11
DRAFT
comfort,or repose of a reasonable person. This provision does not include permitted agricultural
activities.
M.Yard Sales. The holding or permitting of either:
1.A yard sale on the same lot for(a)more than seven consecutive days; (b) more than two
consecutive weekends; or
2.More than three separate yard sale events in one calendar year.
The prohibition under this Section SVMC 7.05.040(M) shall only apply to dwellings,including but not
limited to single family,multifamily,and duplex dwellings.
N. Camping on Private Property. Camping on private property,including the use of tents and similar
membrane structures, sheds and similar rigid structures,trailers,vehicles, and recreational vehicles, and
similar items for the purposes of sleeping,eating,cooking, sanitation,or other activities consistent with
dwelling on private property. When determining whether an RV or trailer is being used for camping,the
City may consider use of a power cord,use of a water or sewer hose,use of any awnings,use of
retractable stairs,whether any sliders or other extensions are out,or other similar facts typically present
when such vehicles are used for their intended purpose. SVMC 7.05.040(N)does not apply to:
1. Legally established campgrounds and RV parks.
2. Temporary use of recreational vehicle with a valid City of Spokane Valley Temporary Use Permit
pursuant to SVMC 19.65.130 and SVMC 19.160.040.
3. Periodic short-term use of a tent for recreational camping purposes by minor children when a
parent or legal guardian is the primary resident of a legally established habitable dwelling on the
parcel.
O. Improper Vehicle/Vessel Parking and Storage. This section shall not apply to legally established
parking lots,outdoor storage areas,self-storage facilities, and similar permitted uses pursuant to chapters
19.60 and 22.50 SVMC,nor where a Temporary Use Permit has been issued pursuant to chapter 19.160
SVMC. This section does not apply to junk vehicles or unlicensed vehicles,which are subject to SVMC
7.05.040(P).
1.Vehicle/vessel storage and parking areas are permitted on a parcel in a single-family residential
zone as an accessory use to a legally established dwelling.
2.Except as provided in subsections 7.05.040(0)(3-4),parking or storing more than five total
operable vehicles on a parcel with a single-family dwelling is prohibited. A property owner or a
tenant may park or store more than five operable vehicles when they provide sufficient proof of more
than five licensed drivers currently residing at the property.
3. Parking or storage of more than one recreational vehicle on a single-family residentially zoned
property is prohibited,which is not included in the maximum of five allowable operable vehicles
pursuant to SVMC 7.05.040(N)(2).
4. Parking or storage of more than one vessel on a licensed trailer on a single-family residentially
zoned property is prohibited,which is not included in the maximum of five allowable operable
vehicles pursuant to SVMC 7.05.040(N)(2).
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 7 of 11
DRAFT
PN. Junk Vehicles and Unlicensed Vehicles.All junk vehicles and unlicensed vehicles,or parts thereof,
placed, stored,or permitted to be located on private property within the City limits. SVMC 7.05.040(PN)
does not apply to:
1.Any vehicle or part thereof that is completely enclosed within a lawful structure so that it is not
visible from the street or other public or private property;
2.Any vehicle or part thereof that is stored or parked in a lawful manner on private property in
connection with the business of a licensed dismantler or licensed vehicle dealer,and the private
property is fenced pursuant to RCW 46.80.130,or a legally established vehicle repair business;
3. A junk vehicle does not include a vehicle which is in the process of being repaired, as evidenced
by the good faith efforts of the vehicle owner. This exception shall include having up to one"parts"
vehicle,from which parts are being salvaged concurrent with the repair process for the vehicle being
excepted from compliance in this section. Good faith efforts of repair may include producing
invoices showing work or parts purchased for repair or renovation within 30 days prior to issuance of
the notice of violation, or a declaration under penalty of perjury that the vehicle is in the process of
being repaired and has been worked on within 30 days prior to issuance of the notice of violation.
This exception allows up to 60 days for good faith repair. Upon good cause shown, the city manager
or designee shall have the discretion to grant one additional 60 day exception period pursuant to
SVMC 7.05.010(N). Under no circumstance shall any good faith efforts of repair extend for more
than 120 days, after which time this exception shall no longer apply. This exception shall apply to
one vehicle and one parts vehicle per parcel of land per calendar year;
43. There shall be allowed as exceptions to SVMC 7.05.040(NP)up to twoone total junk vehicle or
unlicensed vehicles in R-1,R-2, and R-3, and R-4 zones, so long as they areit is completely sight-
screened by maintained landscaping, a maintained landscaped berm,or fencing, as allowed pursuant
to any currently adopted SVMC landscaping,berm,or fencing requirements pursuant to chapter
22.70 SVMC.
QQ. Graffiti.Any graffiti on public or private property.
RP. Development Code Violations.Any violation pursuant to SVMC Titles 19,20,21,22,23,24, and/or
25.
Section 3. Amending SVMC 19.65.130. SVMC 19.65.130, Supplemental Use Regulations, is hereby
amended as follows:
19.65.130 Residential.
A.Accessory Structures.
1. The combined building footprint of all accessory permanent structures in residential zoning
districts shall be:
a.Up to 1,000 square feet for parcels up to 10,000 square feet in size;or
b.Up to 10 percent of the lot size for parcels greater than 10,000 square feet in size.
2. Cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a permitted accessory structure in any
residential zoning district.
B. Dwelling,Accessory Units.Accessory dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter
19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options.
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 8 of 11
DRAFT
C. Dwelling, Caretaker's Residence.A caretaker's residence is limited to custodial,maintenance,
management,or security of a commercial property and is only allowed accessory to another permitted use
on site.
D.Dwelling,Cottages. Cottages shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative
Residential Development Options.
E. Dwelling,Duplex. Duplex dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,
Alternative Residential Development Options.
F. Dwelling,Industrial Accessory Dwelling Units. Industrial accessory dwelling units shall comply with
the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options.
G.Dwelling,Townhouse. Townhouse dwelling units shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40
SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options.
H.Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots.Manufactured homes on individual lots shall comply with
the provisions of Chapter 19.40 SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options.
I.Manufactured Home Park.Manufactured home parks shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 19.40
SVMC,Alternative Residential Development Options.
J. Recreational Vehicles.
1. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units in any residential
zone,except as permitted pursuant to Chapter 19.40 SVMC;
2.A recreational vehicle shall not be parked within a required front yard setback for more than 15
consecutive days and not more than 30 days cumulative in any 12 consecutive months; and
3.Upon issuance of a Temporary Use Permit pursuant to chapter 19.160 SVMC, gGuests may park
and/or occupy a recreational vehicle on private property while visiting the occupants of a dwelling
unit located on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12-month period.
4.Upon issuance of a Temporary Use Permit pursuant to SVMC 19.160.040, applicants may utilize a
recreational vehicle as temporary living quarters over the duration of construction activities related to
a residence or otherwise legally permitted use of right,provided the applicant has an active building
permit on file with the City of Spokane Valley.
5. The City Manager or designee may temporarily allow the use of a recreational vehicle as a
temporary dwelling unit on private property for quarantine or similar purposes during emergency
events. A temporary use permit is still required pursuant to SVMC 19.160.040,but there shall be no
charge for an application pursuant to this subsection(5) for up to 180 days,or as otherwise set by the
City Manager.
Section 4.Amending SVMC 19.160.040. SVMC 19.160.040,Decision Criteria,relating to temporary use
permits is hereby amended as follows:
A. Interim Uses. The department may issue a TUP to allow an owner,developer,contractor,tenant,
lessee,or other occupant to conduct an otherwise permitted use on their property at the same time they are
improving the property to the required City standards pursuant to the following conditions:
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 9 of 11
DRAFT
1. The TUP may be issued for a period up to six months and may be extended for an additional
three months if the applicant has acted in good faith towards compliance of the original permit.
2. The depaitinent may issue the permit only if the proposed use is consistent with the following
findings of fact:
a. The request is reasonable and there is no other practical alternative;
b.Adverse impacts associated with the temporary use are appropriately mitigated and such
temporary use will not cause a hazard to the occupants or to neighboring properties;
c. A hardship is involved that cannot otherwise be reasonably resolved; and
d.A performance surety in the amount of any required improvements shall be posted
guaranteeing the completion of the project.
B. Seasonal Uses and Short-Term Recreational and Economic Development Uses. The department may
issue a TUP to allow sales of seasonal goods in any nonresidential zone for a period not to exceed six
months in any 12-month period. The use may not meet the standards normally associated with a
permanent use if the department finds that the temporary use is consistent with the following:
1. The use shall be consistent with the permitted uses in the zone;
2. The use shall be an appropriate use of the property pending the permanent long-term use;
3. The use shall not result in significant traffic,parking,drainage, fire protection, or other adverse
impacts that cannot be appropriately mitigated;
4. The use shall provide a sanitary facility if the department determines it is necessary to do so; and
5.Failure to comply with the conditions of the permit shall result in suspension or revocation of the
TUP.
C. Temporary Uses Associated with Construction Permits. The department may issue a TUP for activities
associated with construction projects including,but not limited to,equipment storage yards,job shacks,
materials storage yards,or living quarters which are not otherwise permitted outright by City ordinances
or regulations. The depaitinent may issue a TUP if it finds the proposal is consistent with the following:
1. The use shall not pose a hazard or be a detriment to the surrounding area;
2. The use shall not result in significant traffic,parking,drainage,fire protection,or other adverse
impacts;
3. The temporary use shall be reviewed every six months to determine if the temporary use is still
valid; if not,the department shall terminate the TUP; and
4. The temporary use shall be vacated upon completion of the associated construction project or
pursuant to SVMC 19.160.040(C)(3).
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 10 of 11
DRAFT
D. Temporary Uses Associated with Residential Visitation. The department may issue a TUP for activities
associated with guests parking and/or occupying a recreational vehicle on private property while visiting
the occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12-
month period. The cost for a TUP issued pursuant to this subsection(D) shall be established by Council in
the Master Fee Schedule. The department may issue a TUP if it finds the proposal is consistent with the
following:
1. The use shall not pose a hazard or be a detriment to the surrounding area;
2. The use shall be contained entirely on the lot where the dwelling unit is located and shall not be
on public right-of-way; and
3. The use shall provide a sanitary facility if the department determines it is necessary to do so.
Section 5. Other Sections Unchanged. All other provisions of chapter 7.05 SVMC and chapter 19.65
SVMC not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall
not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause,or phrase in this Ordinance.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of
this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided
by law.
Passed by the City Council this day of July,2022.
City of Spokane Valley
ATTEST:
Pam Haley,Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 22-010 Regarding Nuisances Page 11 of 11
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: July 26, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing
[' information [' admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration — Potential Grant Opportunity—Transportation
Improvement Board (TIB)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• July 12, 2022 —Administrative Report on the 2022 TIB call for projects and staff
recommended project applications.
• Annual —Adoption of the 6-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
• Annual —Submittal of grant applications to TIB, most recently the City's 2021 applications to
the Urban Arterial Program for Sullivan Improvements (Sprague to 8th) and to the Sidewalk
Program for 8th Avenue Sidewalk (Park to Coleman).
BACKGROUND: On June 1, 2022, the Washington State TIB issued a Call for Projects for the
Urban Arterial Program (UAP) and the Active Transportation Program (ATP). The UAP has
historically funded Spokane Valley street-related projects. The ATP replaces TIB's Sidewalk
Program. The new ATP program is intended to deliver more holistic transportation projects, as
related to non-motorized users, rather than sidewalk-only improvements.
Critical program details are:
Total Funds: UAP: $65 million statewide, $7.3 million NE Region
ATP: $8 million statewide, $1.7 million E region
Award Range (Min-Max): UAP: $1 - $2 million (Median: $1.2 million)
ATP: $200,000-$450,000 (Median: $260,000)
Match Amount: 20% min (additional points for match up to 40%)
Application Due Date: August 19, 2022
Application Award Date: December 2, 2022
Staff has reviewed the grant scoring criterion and proposes the projects in Table 1 for City
Council consideration. A description of each project follows Table 1.
Table 1. Proposed TIB Projects, Costs & Funding Requests
Project Name Total Estimated Cost Grant Request (%) City Match (%)
Urban Arterial Program (UAP)
1. Broadway & Park $2,000,000 $500,000
Concrete Intersection $2,500,000 (80%) (20%)
2. Barker Roundabouts $2,400,000 $3,100,000*
@ 4th & 8th Ave. $5,500,000 (44%) (56%)
3. Pines Road/BNSF GSP $2,800,000 $700,000
(non-federal RAISE match) $3'500,000 (80%) (20%)
Active Transportation Program (ATP)
4. 8th Ave. Bike & Sidewalk $425,000 $425,000
Improv. (Fancher to Park) $850,000 (CN Only) (50%) (50%)
*Note: City match assumes$500,000 impact/mitigation fees, $1 million congressional directed spending (CDS), and
$1.6 million REET.
UAP: Broadway & Park Concrete Intersection
The City has a planned 2023 construction project for the pavement preservation of Broadway
Ave. between Fancher Rd. and Park Rd. The project received $1 million from a Federal
Highways Administration grant awarded by Spokane Regional Transportation Council in 2021.
As part of the preservation project's design, concrete reconstruction of the intersection and new
traffic signal infrastructure were both identified as project needs. The added cost of this scope
will be the focus of the TIB request.
UAP: Barker Road Roundabouts at 4th & 8th Avenues
The City will use its impact fee revenues, a portion of the awarded $3 million of CDS sponsored
by Senator Murray, and local REET revenues, to leverage existing funds against a TIB request
that will result in full funding for the two roundabouts at 4th & 8th Avenues. This project would be
planned for 2024 construction if funded.
UAP: Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project (GSP)
The City has a non-federal match requirement for its RAISE application that was submitted in
April 2022. Awards for RAISE will be announced on August 12, 2022, one week before the TIB
application due date. If the City is successful in its RAISE request, staff proposes to not submit
either of the two previous project applications, Broadway/Park Intersection and Barker Road
Roundabouts, and instead submit the Pines GSP request to TIB to fund the project's non-
federal match amount. If unsuccessful with RAISE, staff will not submit the Pines GSP
application to TIB for consideration.
ATP: 8th Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements
This project provides 1,300 feet of new infill sidewalk between Thierman Rd. and Coleman Rd.
and 140 feet between Fancher Rd. and 6th Ave. Further, the project restripes the north half of
8th Ave. between Park Rd. and Fancher Rd to add a new bicycle lane. Ultimately, the project
will provide one mile of continuous sidewalk and bicycle lane on the north side of 8th Ave.
between Park Rd. and Fancher Rd., helping fulfill the pedestrian and bicycle elements of the
city's Comprehensive Plan. The existing vehicle lanes will remain in their current location. Over
the length of the project, the westbound lane's width varies from 10' to 15' and the east bound
lane's width varies between 10' to 11'. The proposed project will provide lane widths between
10' and 11' for both directions of vehicular travel.
OPTIONS: Proceed with the proposed motion as written or take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to
apply for TIB Grants for the projects identified in Table 1.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Upon coordination with the City's Finance Dept., REET balances are sufficient to fund one UAP
and one ATP applications, if awarded.
STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, P.E. —Sr. Engineer— Planning & Grants
ATTACHMENTS: None
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: July 26, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing
[' information [' admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Potential Grant Opportunity Railroad Crossing
Elimination Program FY22
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010: Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• July 19, 2022, Council authorized staff to submit a funding request to the Washington State
Dept. of Transportation's (WSDOT) Move Ahead Washington Railroad Crossing Grant
Program (MAW RCGP).
• Since 2018, the City has submitted an annual application to the RAISE program requesting
project funding for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project.
BACKGROUND: On July 6, USDOT announced its 2022 call for projects for the Railroad
Crossing Elimination (RCE) grant program. This is the first year of the new program that was
primarily sponsored by Washington State Senator Maria Cantwell and was included in the 2022
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The purpose of the RCE program is to fund highway-
rail or pathway-rail grade crossing improvement projects that focus on improving the safety and
mobility of people and goods. This is a similar application to previous RAISE applications by the
City. Projects are scored based on their merits with respect to the following criteria:
• Safety
• Equitable Economic Strength and Improving Core Assets
• Equity and Barriers to Opportunity
• Climate Change and Sustainability
• Transformation of our Nation's Transportation Infrastructure
• Eliminating crossings and Marking Corridor Wide Improvements
• Geographic Diversity
Critical program details are:
Total Available Program Funds: $573,264,000 nationwide (20% max to one state)
Award Range (Min-Max): $1 million minimum, no maximum
Match Amount: 80% Federal max., 20% Non-Federal min.
Application Due Date: October 4, 2022
Application Award Date: Not specified. Estimated Spring 2023
Staff recommends submitting the Pines Road/BNSF GSP to this call for projects. In 2018, the
Federal Railroad Administration partially funded the preliminary engineering phase through the
CRISI program, and the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) fully funded the
right-of-way phase. To date, the City has secured $9.75M for the project and is awaiting an
additional $6.4 million of federal funds awarded by SRTC on July 14..
Table 1 shows the projected application funding breakdown for future eligible costs and
captures the July 2022 updated cost estimate. The increased project cost will require the City to
identify the non-federal match amounts required by the RCE program.
Page 1 of 2
Table 1. RCE Application Funding Summary
Future Eligible Project Costs Total ($) Total (%)
Federal Funding
Requested RCE Program (This Program) $ 19,053,697 53.68%
Committed STBG Program (Available SRTC Funds)' $ 9,344,600 26.32%
Subtotal $ 28,398,297 80.00%
Non-Federal Funding
Committed City of Spokane Valley (Fund#312) $ 2,431,917 6.85%
Other Non-Federal: City, RCGP, TIB $ 4,367,658 12.30%
Expected
BNSF2 $ 300,000 0.85%
Subtotal $ 7,099,575 20.00%
total Future Eligible Project Cost $ 35,497,871 100.00%
1 Includes July 14 award from SRTC for $6.4M
2 BNSF contribution is antici•ated, based on 23 CFR 646.210.
Previously Incurred Project Costs $ 4,668,514
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 40,166,385
For RCE program purposes, the total project cost was updated in July 2022 to capture recent
cost escalations in construction and accounts for previous costs associated with the Bridging
the Valley Study($394,385) and the recent land donation from Avista Utilities ($790,500). The
updated estimate is higher than the estimated cost for the City's legislative agenda and the
Rebuilding American Infrastructure Utilizing Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant application.
The February 2022 project cost estimate totaled a $35 million.
OPTIONS: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to apply for the Railroad Crossing
Elimination Program (RCE) grant for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project or take
other action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee, to
apply for the RCE grant for the Pines Road/BNSF Grade Separation Project.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City has approximately $2.4 million of available local
funds to put towards the program's non-federal match amount of$7.1 million. Approximately
$4.4 million of non-federal funds would be needed to satisfy federal funding requirements.
These funds can be supplemented with any non-federal funding source, such as the MAW
RCGP or the Transportation Improvement Board's Urban Arterial Program. The City will be
notified by end of August 2022 if it is successful in its application request of$5 million from the
MAW RCGP). If successful, these funds can be used to secure the non-federal funding
requirement for RCE.
In lieu of MAW RCGP funds, the Finance Dept. has confirmed that the City is likely to have
available matching funds should RCE funds be awarded; however, it may require the
reallocation of certain capital reserve funds set aside for other future City priorities. If awarded
RCE, staff would return to City Council for a discussion of available options to satisfy non-
federal match requirements.
For updates to the existing project application, staff contracts with an outside consultant. The
consultant cost for creating a new application for this program is estimated not to exceed
$25,000 and is covered by the department's existing approved 2022 budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Adam Jackson, Sr. Engineer— Planning & Grants
ATTACHMENTS: N/A
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: July 26, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Admin Report: Midilome Neighborhood Drainage Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
• 01/30/2018: Motion Consideration —Waste Management Contract Amendment, Street-wear
Fee (#17-089.01), authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract amendment, which
included the street-wear fee, equal to approx. $1.5 million per year.
• 3/12/2019: Administrative Report— Midilome Neighborhood Street Preservation Project
Update
• 4/23/2019: Motion Consideration — Bid Award of Local Access Street (Midilome) project
BACKGROUND:
The Midilome First addition neighborhood was platted in 1979. The stormwater runoff for the
neighborhood was designed to flow via dipped driveways to swales located within 10 to 14 foot
drainage easements along parcel frontages. Per the plat language, the owner of each lot is
responsible for any damage if they obstruct, artificially collect or discharge, the natural drainage flow
across or adjacent to their property. There are many neighborhoods within the City with similar
drainage designs and responsibilities.
In 2019, the City reconstructed the pavement of the Midilome neighborhood. Project limits were
generally bound by Bowdish Rd., Pines Rd., 24thAve/Loretta Ave. and 37th Ave. Prior to the project,
the pavement was in poor condition and exhibited numerous cracks and settlement. The pavement,
due its poor condition, typically allowed most of the stormwater to infiltrate prior to reaching the
dipped driveway and swales. As part of the pavement reconstruction, the project also graded the
pavement to provide a positive slope towards the drainage swales as per the original plat design to
eliminate puddles in the pavement. After the project was completed, property owners in the
neighborhood have experienced more stormwater accumulation in their driveways because the
pavement cracks and settlement were remediated with the project. Additionally, over the years,
sediment has accumulated in the drainage swales and the top of sod within the swale is higher than
the adjacent dipped driveway which prevents stormwater from reaching the swales. Since the
stormwater cannot get to the swales, it ponds in the dipped portion of the driveway.
To remediate this issue, the accumulated sediment in the swale needs to be removed, the swales
regraded, and the sod needs to be lowered to allow stormwater to reach the swale from the dipped
driveways. The property owners, per the plat language, are responsible for these repairs.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
OPTIONS: Discussion only
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only
STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, City Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation
Midilome Neighborhood Background
___
Platted in 1979 — Midilome First Addition Drainage Design: ---_ i CURVE Data
P2 2 , }}6:11. °•C 1 2400. 8 ;V f E
m'elf"4lmt,toad:1x�o' ��'.�yat 3!•!2� a
10 to 14'drainage easements along the frontage of all parcels.e*,,,,;,J,�q ,.� 140•2441 C d m� " 4��^ " 6,6crt°,26 i
se s A '^s` 4 •_�$a , }7 a 16aso 171.W 31s.41 966 13.L59
4 f.,_ is., 1 4 $240 , ,- ' ''vac•• L 30SK➢ 66,.a. 5�.3a 03•81
Dipped driveway approaches convey stormwater runoff to swales located ----'J•`---- }G0� O p ,6 �a'`
da el6y'K� a ..
within drainage easements P' s: :,~'m� �, .'
r
26 r ,M'Sf tY 110,IV 7 �'° .A*..,V 4a'V, a P F.6 4},
Over the last 40years, swale elevation is higher than dipped driveways "" '�" ` .� ��
9 pp Y 1 . , 6,. °.^�. , a 'S• ,'
due to: P} w _ • ea .°,.„•-1 f° s�+..., ••,,,-. 4.,'k,,g.c
• Accumulated sediment " •LL,, * \T l • ► ^
S. SST m AVr 2 �, •' •_ $ 6 � �•=8• a
• High unmaintained sod " , ; rg , , ° `� . N,• *`• % 1° •,'ai z� a•, } .' ''dV Y•."«a•
----af Ft ° 5 '.,p r. • e q • p • h et• ; 3'e::'P
�o0 6Lac,r ea• ,w „ - v. a' .g -': y •
•' •s.ps'x'''
Tree root-balls &other vegetation �22 t'= 3 2 :$'„. ..p • °�,� e •b
__�•~IN _., 3' aiµ is '$.g.;.�;°a• s'.y • 1 `P .,° .z- 84,-, • r NI,
Settlement of some driveways '_! a } ,�; ^->� �ra,' � .4 / r/�. ;�,
Prior to 2019, pavement had many cracks that infiltrated stormwater ,, ax..•-' 2 .� 7 , �,g #0.t ; •'
I } ¢ Su + S 8b r13' *T A.r. ,a4C"
Plat Language: ® , VS} �a▪ ti 4 2„. ,• 1
The owner of each lot shall be held responsible for obstructing, artificially �'a 'aN `vt."`to °`� "/{�` ,.
collecting or discharging, the natural drainage flow across or adjacent to " ,E° ' 5 .' .�j.'• 1 " -% , #$• .1°
their property, and shall assume full responsibility for damage to their or • = N� / M1• s.$
any other property as a result of their obstructing, artificially collecting or ,}°� . --°' ."�' : ... . " ^'` .....,
discharging, the drainage flow. •.. ,3 ' N $ pz • ''R,. ,;•
Spokane County (City of Spokane Valley) does not accept the '• } a
responsibility of maintaining the drainage course nor the responsibility for L ,. -'Q. "':,',4-•-' ;'t,;; „w..•
2 any damage whatsoever... ___ - - „IA::: ,..,44
2019 Local Access Street Project
(Midilome Neighborhood)
.._• The Midilome neighborhood was selected as a reconstruction . ' _
project using Fund 106 (Streetwear Fee) - -
• PCI < 50 for all streets
• Significant cracking & settlement
• Stormwater was infiltrating through pavement cracks and not reaching - `
drainage facilities (swales)
• Relatively flat grades < 1%
..
Y v
1 . ' r ,,.4. 0 . ...r I ji*: ,
4111141111
3
2019 Local Access Street Project
(Midilome Neighborhood)
• Project Design & Scope
• Pavement Reconstruction, new 3" HMA F3tize
• Graded streets to provide positive drainage to existing drainage yi '. a - '
facilities .`� - — s�`sao:
•
• After project was completed:
• No more pavement cracks — no infiltration through pavement - �, •
— -
• Stormwater reaches dipped driveways as originally designed , c�
`
d 4
e+ .,e
x
- •
.. ",
s.,
S"T`okan�
4 �
P Valley
June 10 2022 Rain Event
, t, i P I
I, III ' F �:y=
11805 1 1 3if '
11725 -- — ------ --:.:.:-54
s -
11721 -
t
1717
11709 ‘le ii 11805 11708
11705 1��P
`3 11726
11722
ppw
11720 °�
11806 _ - -
5 11725
Typical Drainage Issue
. . .
. • . .... .
. . .
.,. ... ..
. , .:_."
_:;--..- - , -,:. ...... _. _ ._: .. .,,_ -: - - ... , rr , , ,, .
. , :::.
....
•
. . .„,„....,. .,:,.,,,..:,-1...-,, ,N
,,.,.vxr f�7fi
Spokane
6 Walley`
Midilome Neighborhood Drainage System
• Numerous homeowners have complained regarding the designed
"dipped" driveway approaches and front yard drainage swales since
incorporation
• There are several neighborhoods in Spokane Valley with similar drainage design
• Property owners have not properly maintained the swales
• Sod is too high and prevents stormwater from reaching swales
• Per plat language, City of Spokane Valley is not responsible for maintaining the
drainage course nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever...
• Solution:
• Remove accumulated sediment, regrade swale, cut sod down and potentially
remove other landscape to provide positive drainage towards the swale
Spokane
7 Valley
QUESTIONS
sO� �8 jv��ya
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: July 26, 2022 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing
[' information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement— Renewal Discussion
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City of Spokane Valley Interlocal Agreement 17-104
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Interlocal Agreement for Law Enforcement Services
as Provided by the Spokane County Sheriffs Office to the City of Spokane Valley, contract
number 17-104, adopted by Council on July 25, 2017. Administrative report on March 29, 2022.
Council approved the most recent Amendment on April 12, 2022. Administrative Report on May
3, 2022. Administrative report on June 7, 2022. Significant discussion at the Budget Workshop
on June 14, 2022.
BACKGROUND: The current interlocal agreement (ILA) with Spokane County for the provision
of law enforcement services was adopted by Council in July 2017 for the 5-year period January
1, 2018, through December 31, 2022. The agreement is subject to renew at the end of 2022 for
another five-year period with Council approval.
This is a continuation of the discussion regarding the renewal of the interlocal agreement.
During past discussions, staff provided extensive information regarding the staffing and services
provided under the interlocal agreement. Ultimately, City Council will need to determine
whether to renew the interlocal agreement or not, as well as any desired amendments to the
agreement if it is renewed.
As part of the renewal information, staff have conducted an initial analysis that compares the
costs the City pays for Law Enforcement services with five other similarly sized cities. The
analysis is attached to this RCA.
Below is a summary of some of the key terms of the current interlocal agreement and some
considerations and opportunities identified by staff regarding those terms.
Staffing
Current Agreement: Dedicated Commissioned Officers
• Dedicated Officers are identified in Exhibit 3. Only City Council can change the number
of dedicated officers.
• A change requires prior consultation between the Sheriff and the City.
• Police Chief can temporarily move dedicated officers to a different unit for up to 90 days
with notification to the City Manager. Moves longer than 90 days must be approved by
the City Manager and be accompanied by a demonstrated need.
• Patrol staffing must be maintained with a minimum of one officer per district at all times.
Exhibit 5 identifies six districts with the City. Changes to the number of patrol districts
shall be authorized by the City Council and Sheriff.
• Dedicated commissioned officers will be under the supervision of the Police Chief and
be located in the Spokane Valley Precinct Building unless otherwise specified.
• Patrol staffing per shift is a required performance measure. The goals for each
performance measure, including patrol staffing per shift, are to be established by the City
Manager and Police Chief. Failure to meet goals shall result in progress reports on
causes of deficiency and responsive action taken or plan to address the deficiency.
• Sheriff and Police Chief jointly determine how to best fill dedicated positions.
• Sheriff and City Manager shall discuss anticipated openings and how best to fill those
vacancies.
Opportunities:
1. Require a list of filled and unfilled positions at the end of each quarter along with a
current organizational chart. Include information regarding status of filled positions (i.e.
in training or in active duty on street) as well as timelines for those in training to complete
their training.
2. Require equitable filling of open positions on City and County side with provided
filled/unfilled position list for entire Sheriff's Office along with list of recently filled
positions.
3. Study on number of districts needed and/or minimum staffing needed.
4. Establish goal for average patrol staffing per shift.
Current Agreement: Shared Officers
• Sheriff can make permanent adjustments to the number of shared officers after 30 days
advanced notice to the City accompanied with a cost impact estimate and service level
impact statement.
• Sheriff can temporarily shift shared personnel to meet emerging needs.
Opportunities:
1. Apply notification requirement to any shift of officers between units or change in ranks
within units regardless of change to total number of officers.
2. Require notification and estimated timeframe for temporary moves as well as quarterly
updates until return to normal.
Current Agreement: Civilian Staff
There are currently no contract requirements pertaining to civilian staff.
Opportunities:
1. Require an annual list and organizational chart of civilian positions.
2. Require notification of any changes to civilian positions.
Current Agreement: Vehicles and Equipment
• Beginning in 2022, City has established a program to pay for entire cost of dedicated
vehicles at the time of purchase. These vehicles will be transferred to the City at the
time the agreement is terminated. City pays depreciation amounts on vehicles
purchased prior to 2022.
• Equipment purchased by County is owned by County. Most equipment has been
purchased by County.
• Capital purchases over $50,000 may be billed to City at time of purchase contingent
upon prior City authorization.
• Capital equipment not billed to the City at the time of purchase will billed to the City
based on depreciation over the useful life of the equipment.
• County must consult with City prior to committing to capital purchases over $200,000.
• At termination, City has option to purchase all vehicles and equipment used to provide
service to the City, except those vehicles being purchased under the new process
beginning in 2022.
Opportunities:
1. County to provide annual asset list to identify assets already paid for by City and to
prevent duplication of charges.
Current Agreement: Costs
• Monthly payments are made throughout the year based upon estimated costs calculated
according to the current year's budget.
• City staff reviews estimated costs and both City and Country agree on final amount to be
paid.
• Estimated costs are reconciled to actual costs at year-end. Contract establishes timeline
for settle and adjust activities (e.g., when County provides actual costs, City provides
review response, etc.), but these may be delayed if information is not timely provided.
Generally, the County must provide the actual costs by September 30 of the following
year (e.g., for 2021, the County must send the costs by September 30, 2022). The City
then has 30 days to respond with questions or comments and the County has 15 days to
respond to those questions or comments.
• Costs for dedicated units are billed 100% to City and segregated from other costs.
• Costs for shared units are billed according to an allocation basis agreed to by both City
and County staff.
• County is required to notify the City of any budget amendments during the year that are
expected to increase the City's costs by more than $200,000.
• Estimated costs paid by City for specific items such as patrol cannot be diverted to other
expense items without City authorization.
Opportunities:
1. Require quarterly report of overtime costs including the reasons for overtime.
2. Enhance language to specify that City will only pay for services and equipment that
specifically serve the City of Spokane Valley and will not subsidize costs for services or
equipment that benefit other jurisdictions or agencies that are not properly accounted for
in the cost allocations.
3. Add language to allow adjustment of estimate due to substantial vacancies.
Current Agreement: Services
• All services contracted for are listed in an exhibit to the Agreement.
• Services can only be changed by mutual written agreement of the Parties.
Opportunities:
1. Define services being contracted for to make it clear what is acceptable and to prevent
unapproved expansion. Will likely require an evaluation of specialty units.
2. Evaluate calls for service and define service expectations regarding call types (future).
This would likely require a study by an independent third party and could include review
of levels of service (staffing), service calls, and costs to provide a recommendation for
future service needs and responses.
Non-Renewal
• Upon determination of non-renewal, City would have two years to set up own internal
police, including hiring sufficient police, civilian, and other City-support staff, purchasing
equipment and vehicles for all police and staff, and establishing appropriate procedures
and process for LE.
• Costs and details of process to establish police have not been studied in detail at this
point and are unknown.
Staff are not seeking a final decision at this time. However, staff are seeking direction on
whether to discuss potential amendments in anticipation of renewal, as any such amendments
and renewal would need to be agreed to and approved by late 2022.
OPTIONS: Discussion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: 2022 Budget for Law Enforcement Agreement is $24,958,601
STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Manager; Morgan Koudelka, Senior
Administrative Analyst; Dave Ellis, Police Chief.
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint; Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement
Sp"&kane ROLICk
stiokane
.�, Valley'
2O2 LAW ENFORCEMENI 2003
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT mo
RENEWAL DISCUSSION
City of Spokane Valley
July 26, 2022
HISTORY OF AGREEMENT
• 2003 - Original Contract
• 2003 - SCOPE Contract
• 2009 - ICMA Study: evaluation of contract services and in-house estimate.
• 2010 - New Interlocal Agreement including revised cost methodology and
adding Precinct Commander.
• 2014 - Added 2 deputies, eliminated patrol corporals; created Power Shift and
dedicated Spokane Valley Investigative Unit focused on property and drug
crimes.
• 2017 - Current Interlocal adopted incorporating Council Public Safety Goals.
• 2021 - Homeless Services Deputy and Behavioral Health Deputy added to
dedicated Spokane Valley officers.
• 2022 - Final year of first five-year term for current Interlocal. Council approval
required to renew agreement and start a new five-year term.
2
COMPARISON OF COSTS TO
LIKE-SIZED CITIES
Patrol #of Commissioned CFS per
2022 2022 Police $per #of Patrol Calls for
Cities Officers per Commissioned Officers per Patrol
Population Budget Capita Officers Service
1,000 Pop Officers 1,000 Pop Officer
Everett 113,300 $ 42,001,143 $ 371 88 0.78 215 1.90 145,000 1,648
Renton 107,500 $ 37,797,852 $ 352 56 0.52 129 1.20 69,144 1,235
Spokane Valley 107,100 $ 25,107,127 $ 234 47 0.44 111 1.03 51,038 1,086
Federal Way 101,800 $ 28,092,449 $ 276 52 0.51 137 1.35 76,000 1,462
Yakima 98,200 $ 29,427,513 $ 300 59 0.60 143 1.46 88,160 1,494
Kirkland 93,570 $ 29,133,9454 $ 311 48 0.51 109 1.16 48,030 1,001
Property Tax Criminal
Fines and Franchise
City (Not Sales Tax Justice Sales B&O Tax Utility Tax LE Sales Tax REET Impact Fees TBD
Forfeits Fees
Equalized) Tax
Everett' $ 49,016,611 $ 35,689,327 $ 2,360,000 $ 17,476,593 $13,023,570 $ - $ 1,112,400 $3,000,000 $ - Unknown $1,572,511
Renton $ 21,709,653 $ 26,972,205 $ 3,421,440 $ 9,500,000 $15,815,967 $ - $ 3,829,782 $4,600,000 Unknown $ 1,659,950 $ -
Spokane Valley $ 13,199,900 $ 27,720,000 $ 3,520,000 $ - $ 932,000 $ - $ 929,200 $3,000,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,215,000 $ -
Federal Way $ 11,357,280 $ 15,949,755 $ 3,027,361 $ - $15,177,606 $ - $ 1,012,671 $3,640,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,198,/M'l $ -
Yakima $ 22,228,251 $ 18,419,160 $ 8,667,840 $ 11,983,104 $ 9,889,036 $ - $ 1,518,000 $3,184,000 $ - $ 634,000 $1,725,000
Kirkland $ 32,917,304 $ 23,932,560 $ 2,478,140 $ - $13,511,270 $ 1,960,000 $ 2,583,862 $4,500,000 $2,700,000 $ 4,028,886 $ -
COMPARISON OF COSTS TO
LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
Patrol
#of Commissioned Dispatch Dispatch
2022 2022 Police $per #of Patrol Officers
Cities Commissioned Officers per Incidents Incidents per
Population Budget Capita Officers per 1,000
Officers 1,000 Pop (CAD) Patrol Officer
Pop
Spokane 230,900 $68,614,433 $ 297 208 0.90 336 1.45 218,800 1,052
Spokane County 162,715 $22,883,365 $ 141 67 0.41 123 0.75 42,484 634
Spokane Valley 107,100 $25,107,127 $ 234 47 0.44 111 1.03 53,169 1,131
Liberty Lake 12,870 $ 3,222,258 $ 250 11 0.85 18 1.40 7,325 666
1. Liberty Lake added three patrol officers and six total officers from 2018 to 2022
2. Liberty Lake Patrol Officers perform all functions such as traffic enforcement,domestic violence
Property Tax Property Sales Tax Utility Tax Fines and B&O Tax State Shared
City Property Tax Sales Tax Utility Tax B&OTax
Per Capita Tax Rate Per Capita Per Capita Forfeits Per Capita Revenues
Spokane $ 31,884,779 $ 138 $ 1.22 $59,968,041 $ 260 $45,810,000 $ 198 $2,078,650 $23,708,000 $ 103 $ 3,968,000
Spokane County $ 65,421,064 $ 119 $ 1.00 $68,500,000 $ 421 $ - $ - $7,354,312 $ - $ - $ 7,799,487
Spokane Valley $ 13,199,900 $ 123 $ 1.02 $27,720,000 $ 259 $ 932,000 $ 9 $ 929,200 $ - $ - $ 1,995,500
Liberty Lake $ 1,472,908 $ 114 $ 0.73 $ 4,361,000 $ 339 $ 850,000 $ 66 $ 67,150 $ - $ - $ 223,084
1. Property Tax Dollars were equalized,removing amounts for fire and library.
2. Property Tax Rates were equalized,removing portion for fire and library.
3. Spokane passed a Lid Lift in 2019 for adding police and fire staff of$.30/$1,000 not to exceed the full City rate of$3.60
4. Spokane levies a B&O tax on private utilities.
5. Spokane county includes property tax penities in fines and forfeitures.
6. Spokane County gets 1.0%sales tax rate in unincorporated areas(compared to.85 for cities)plus.15%of sales tax in cities. Special taxes are also counted(Mental Health,Emerg.Comm.)
7. Spokane County general property tax is levied in every jurisdiction,total county population of 550,700
8. Spokane County also has a separate Road Tax that generates another$28.2M in revenue.
KEY TERMS - STAFFING
Current Agreement - Dedicated Officers
• Dedicated Officers are identified in Exhibit 3. Only City Council can change the
number of dedicated officers.
• Change requires prior consultation between the Sheriff and the City.
• Police Chief can temporarily move dedicated officers to a different unit for up to
90 days with notification to the City Manager. Moves longer than 90 days must
be approved by the City Manager and be accompanied by a demonstrated need.
• Patrol staffing - minimum of one officer per district at all times. Exhibit 5
identifies six districts with the City. Changes to the number of patrol districts
shall be authorized by the City Council and Sheriff.
5
KEY TERMS - STAFFING
Current Agreement - Dedicated Officers
• Dedicated commissioned officers under the Police Chief and located in the
Spokane Valley Precinct Building unless otherwise specified.
• Patrol staffing per shift is a required performance measure. Goals for each
performance measure, including patrol staffing per shift, are to be
established by the City Manager and Police Chief. Failure to meet goals
shall result in progress reports on causes of deficiency and responsive
action taken or plan to address the deficiency.
• Sheriff and Police Chief jointly determine how to best fill dedicated positions.
• Sheriff and City Manager shall discuss anticipated openings and how best to
fill those vacancies.
6
KEY TERMS - STAFFING
Opportunities - Dedicated Officers
1. Require a list of filled and unfilled positions at the end of each quarter
along with a current organizational chart. Include information regarding
status of filled positions (i.e. in training or in active duty on street) as well
as timelines for those in training to complete their training.
2. Require equitable filling of open positions on City and County side with
provided filled/unfilled position list for entire Sheriff's Office along with list
of recently filled positions.
3. Study on number of districts needed and/or minimum staffing needed.
4. Establish goal for average patrol staffing per shift.
KEY TERMS - STAFFING
Current Agreement - Shared Officers
• Sheriff can make permanent adjustments to number of shared officers after 30
days advance notice to the City with a cost impact estimate and service level
impact statement.
• Sheriff can temporarily shift shared personnel to meet emerging needs.
Opportunities
1. Apply notification requirement to any shift of officers between units or change in
ranks within units regardless of change to total number of officers.
2. Require notification and estimated timeframe for temporary moves as well as
quarterly updates until return to normal.
8
KEY TERMS - STAFFING
Current Agreement - Civilian Staff
• There are currently no contract requirements pertaining to civilian staff.
Opportunities
1. Require an annual list and organizational chart of civilian positions.
2. Require notification of any changes to civilian positions.
9
KEY TERMS - VEHICLES AND
EQUIPMENT
• Beginning in 2022, City has established a program to pay for entire cost of
dedicated vehicles at the time of purchase. These vehicles will be transferred to
the City at the time the agreement is terminated. City pays depreciation amounts
on vehicles purchased prior to 2022.
• Equipment purchased by County is owned by County. Most equipment has been
purchased by County.
• Capital purchases over $50,000 may be billed to City at time of purchase
contingent upon prior City authorization.
KEY TERMS - VEHICLES AND
EQUIPMENT
• Capital equipment not billed to the City at the time of purchase will billed to the City
based on depreciation over the useful life of the equipment.
• County must consult with City prior to committing to capital purchases over
$200,000.
• At termination, City has option to purchase all vehicles and equipment used to
provide service to the City, except those vehicles being purchased under the new
process beginning in 2022, which will be transferred without additional cost.
Opportunities
1. County to provide asset list annually to verify assets already paid for by City and
prevent duplication of charges.
KEY TERMS - COSTS
Current Agreement - Costs
• Monthly payments made throughout year based upon estimated costs according to
current year's budget.
• City staff reviews estimated costs and both City and Country agree on final
estimated amount to be paid.
• Estimated costs are reconciled to actual costs at year-end. Contract establishes
timeline for settle and adjust activities (e.g. , when County provides actual costs,
City provides review response, etc.). Final S&A may be delayed if information is
not timely provided. Generally, the County must provide the actual costs by
September 30 of the following year (e.g., for 2021 , the County must send the costs
by September 30, 2022). The City then has 30 days to respond with questions or
comments and the County has 15 days to respond to those questions or
comments.
KEY TERMS - COSTS
Current Agreement - Costs
• Costs for dedicated units are billed 100% to City and segregated from other costs.
• Costs for shared units are billed according to an allocation basis agreed to by both
City and County staff.
• County is required to notify the City of any budget amendments during the year
that are expected to increase the City's costs by more than $200,000.
• Estimated costs paid by City for specific items such as patrol cannot be diverted to
other expense items without City authorization.
13
KEY TERMS - COSTS
Opportunities - Costs
1. Require quarterly report of overtime costs including the reasons for overtime.
2. Enhance language to specify that City will only pay for services and equipment that
specifically serve the City of Spokane Valley and will not subsidize costs for
services or equipment that benefit other jurisdictions or agencies that are not
properly accounted for in the cost allocations.
3. Add language to allow adjustment of estimate due to substantial vacancies.
4
KEY TERMS - SERVICES
Current Agreement - Civilian Staff
• All services contracted for are listed in an exhibit to the Agreement.
• Services can only be changed by mutual written agreement of the Parties.
Opportunities
1. Define services being contracted for to make it clear what is acceptable and to
prevent unapproved expansion. Will likely require an evaluation of specialty
units.
2. Evaluate calls for service and define service expectations regarding call types
(future). This would likely require a study by an independent third party and
could include review of levels of service (staffing), service calls, and costs to
provide a recommendation for future service needs and responses.
15
NON-RENEWAL
• Upon determination of non-renewal, City would have two years to set up
own internal police, including hiring sufficient police, civilian, and other
City-support staff, purchasing equipment and vehicles for all police and
staff, and establishing appropriate procedures and process for LE.
• Costs and details of process to establish police have not been studied in
detail at this point and are unknown.
16
NEXT STEPS
NO22 - 03 9 6 -
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF EXECUTING AN )
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMONG SPOKANE )
COUNTY, THE SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF, ) RESOLUTION
AND THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY )
REGARDING LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES )
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of Washington, Spokane County,
Washington is a class A county duly organized and existing; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.01.030, the powers of Spokane County can
only be exercised through the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington ("Board"
or"Board of County Commissioners"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board has the care of County
property and the management of County funds and business; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW, the Spokane County Sheriff is the Chief Law
Enforcement Officer and Conservator of the Peace of Spokane County; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW ("Interlocal Cooperation Act"), public agencies may
contract with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of the Spokane County
Sheriff to provide law enforcement services within its jurisdiction.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington, that either the Chairman of the Board, or a majority of the Board, be and is hereby
authorized to execute that document entitled "INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR LAW
ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AS PROVIDED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO
THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY" pursuant to which, under certain terms and conditions,the Spokane
County Sheriff will provide certain law enforcement services to the City of Spokane Valley.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this /t ay of 2022.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
.F GOMM/SS,%
la
�.Qo E cpG��Dy�
o MAR K , Cha'
sEaL '.
ATTEST:
AL FRE , ice Chair
•
inna Vasquez, Clerk of the B rd G JOSH KERNS, Commissioner
0. Io . btj
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
AS PROVIDED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO THE
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into among Spokane County, a political
subdivision of the state of Washington,having offices for the transaction of business at 1116
West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as
"COUNTY," the Spokane County Sheriff, a separate elected official of Spokane County,
having offices for the transaction of business at 1100 West Mallon Avenue, Spokane,
Washington 99260,hereinafter referred to as "SHERIFF"and the City of Spokane Valley, a
municipal corporation of the state of Washington, having offices for the transaction of
business at 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter
referred to as"CITY,"jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties" and individually referred
to as "Party".
COUNTY, SHERIFF and CITY agree as follows.
SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS
1.1 Under RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
acting on behalf of Spokane County, has the care of County property and the management of
County funds and business.
1.2 Under chapter 39.34 RCW ("Interlocal Cooperation Act"),public agencies may contract
with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform.
1.3 Under chapter 36.28 RCW, the Spokane County Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement
Officer and Conservator of the Peace of Spokane County.
1.4 The City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of the Spokane County Sheriff s
Office to provide law enforcement services.
1.5 The direct and indirect costs for law enforcement services will be set forth in the Law
Enforcement Cost Allocation Plan ("LECAP"), described in Section 6 and incorporated
herein by this reference.
1.6 The Parties, in providing these law enforcement services, seek to make the CITY a crime-
free city.
SECTION NO. 2: DEFINITIONS
2.1 Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement among Sheriff, City and
County regarding the provision of law enforcement services.
Page 1 of 24
2.2 City: "CITY"means the City of Spokane Valley.
2.3 County: "COUNTY"means Spokane County.
2.4 Dedicated CITY Officers: "Dedicated CITY Officers" means those commissioned
officers (SHERIFF Deputies) listed in Exhibit "3" that are 100% dedicated to providing
service to the CITY and who work under the supervision of the CITY Police Chief.
2.5 Services: "Services"means those services identified in Exhibit 1.
2.6 Sheriff: "SHERIFF"means the duly elected sheriff of Spokane County possessing those
general duties set forth in chapter 36.28 RCW.
2.7 Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following
events: riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and
floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are
performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services.
SECTION NO. 3: PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the Parties' understanding as to the
terms and conditions under which SHERIFF will provide Services to CITY. The Services
will be consistent with the City's council/manager form of management pursuant to chapter
35A.13 RCW.
SECTION NO. 4: DURATION AND TERMINATION
4.1 Initial Term and Renewal. The initial term of this Agreement shall commence as of
12:01 A.M. on the date of execution, and run through midnight, December 31, 2022, for all
provisions except for the cost methodology, which shall be implemented beginning on
January 1, 2018. Thereafter, this Agreement shall automatically renew for five-year time
frames, unless the termination process outlined herein is invoked. The Automatic renewal
shall not occur unless the CITY provides notice to the COUNTY that the City Council has
authorized the renewal.
4.2 Process for Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by any Party by providing
written notice after December 31, 2020 to all other Parties. COUNTY shall consult with
SHERIFF prior to providing written notice of termination under this subsection. SHERIFF
shall consult with COUNTY prior to providing written notice of termination under this
subsection. This termination shall be effective (24) twenty-four months after written notice
is provided as long as such written notice is provided prior to midnight December 31, 2022.
The same time intervals for terminations shall apply to future terms if the termination process
is not invoked during the initial contract period.
Page 2 of 24
4.3 Implementation of Termination. When notice of termination is given, SHERIFF and
CITY agree to jointly prepare a Transition Plan and complete by a mutually agreed date.
4.3.1 Transition Plan. The Transition Plan shall identify and address, among other
items (i) personnel issues; (ii) workload; (iii) ongoing case assignments; and (iv) the
transfer of records. If the SHERIFF and CITY cannot mutually agree to the terms of
the Transition Plan, either Party can request arbitration as provided in Section No. 18.
SHERIFF and CITY shall equally share the cost of said arbitration.
4.3.2 Implementation of Transition Plan. Parties agree to use all best efforts to
create and effectuate a mutual implementation of the Transition Plan.
4.4 Termination of the Agreement-Vehicles and Equipment. At the termination of this
Agreement, CITY shall have the option to purchase, subject to agreement of SHERIFF and
COUNTY, COUNTY-owned vehicles and/or equipment used to provide Services.
Ownership of dedicated vehicles that have been fully paid for by CITY shall be transferred to
CITY without cost if City choses to exercise this option.
4.5 Waiver of Statutory Terms. To the extent that it is applicable to law enforcement
Services, the Parties hereby waive the statutory termination rights of RCW 39.34.180(3)
and elect instead to follow these contractual termination procedures as the sole method of
terminating this Agreement, the terms of which are detailed in this section.
4.6 Termination of the Agreement and Settle and Adjust. The Parties recognize that
Costs for Services under the Agreement are calculated utilizing the LECAP. Charges for
the current year are based on estimated costs and are subject to a settle and adjust
reconciliation to actual costs after the year is complete. As such, in the event this
Agreement is terminated as provided for in Subsection 4.2 hereinabove, the Agreement
will be subject to a settle and adjust for any years that have not yet been reconciled. In the
event of termination, the Parties shall follow the process set forth in Section No. 6 to
determine the settle and adjust as well as the process to object to the final adjustment(s) as
set forth in Subsection 6.4 set forth hereinafter.
SECTION NO. 5: SERVICES
5.1 Services Provided and Service Levels. The SHERIFF shall provide those Services
set forth in Exhibit "1," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. These
Services shall only be changed by mutual written agreement of Parties.
5.1.1 Dedicated CITY Officers. CITY may unilaterally adjust the number of
Dedicated CITY Officers set forth in Exhibit "3" only after meaningful prior
consultation between the SHERIFF and the CITY. Written notice of such an
adjustment shall be provided by CITY to COUNTY and SHERIFF.
Page 3 of 24
The Police Chief shall have the ability to move Dedicated CITY Officers to different
service units or convert to a shared resource on a temporary basis, not to exceed 90
days, to meet current workload demands, with notification to the City Manager.
Moves that exceed 90 days must be approved by the City Manager and be
accompanied by a demonstrated need. A change from a dedicated resource to a
shared resource shall be communicated to the County Budget Office and, if
necessary, an adjustment will be made to the final LECAP to equitably distribute
costs to all users of the resource and remove those costs from the CITY dedicated
costs for the time period matching the move or change.
CITY patrol staffing shall be maintained at a level that allows for a minimum of
one patrol officer per patrol district per shift.
5.1.2 Shared Services. SHERIFF shall provide shared Services listed in Exhibit
"1" to CITY. SHERIFF shall ensure that shared service units work with the Police
Chief and Assistant Police Chief to provide case updates, information, and data as
requested. SHERIFF shall have the ability to make permanent adjustments to the
number of commissioned officers providing Services listed under shared units in
Exhibit"4"after 30 days advanced notice is provided to the CITY and accompanied
with a cost impact estimate and service level impact estimate. The SHERIFF'S
ability to temporarily shift shared personnel to meet emerging needs shall not be
limited.
Any adjustments in Services under this section shall only be operative after relevant
notice and impact bargaining negotiations for reductions in force are satisfied with
the relevant collective bargaining units but in no event shall the delay in
implementation exceed 60 days after the SHERIFF has satisfied his good faith
bargaining obligations pursuant to chapter 41.46 RCW for reductions. Additions
will be filled in 60 days unless staffing shortages delay implementation, in which
case, SHERIFF shall provide to CITY an estimated time to fill new positions added
by CITY, and will continue to provide quarterly updates until the positions are filled.
Any permanent adjustments that take place under this section after the original cost
estimate has been prepared shall result in the COUNTY recalculating the annual
cost estimate and then adjusting the remaining monthly payments unless otherwise
mutually agreed upon by the SHERIFF and City Manager.
Notwithstanding the above, SHERIFF'S ability to fulfill his statutory obligation to
provide law enforcement Services to COUNTY and CITY shall not be limited.
5.2 Periodic Reporting Requirements. SHERIFF shall provide to CITY quarterly
reports,within 30 days from the end of each quarter,that identify statistics used to calculate
CITY'S cost in the LECAP referenced in Section No. 6 below. Those statistics which are
only available to COUNTY on an annual basis shall be provided annually within 30 days
of the end of each calendar year unless the statistics are provided by an outside agency, in
Page 4 of 24
which case they shall be provided within 15 days after they are provided to COUNTY.
These reports will allow CITY to monitor service consumption and cost accrual throughout
the year.
5.2.1 Performance Measures and Workload Indicators. Available data for the
indicators and measures listed in Exhibit"2" shall be provided by SHERIFF to CITY
on a quarterly basis subject to availability of data, unless otherwise mutually agreed
upon by SHERIFF and the City Manager. The indicators and measures shall be
modified jointly by the City Manager and SHERIFF as needed to provide the most
accurate assessment of the Services provided to CITY.
Goals for each performance measure shall be established by the City Manager and the
Police Chief SHERIFF and CITY shall work together jointly to provide the necessary
support and resources to achieve established goals. Failure to meet established goals
on a quarterly basis shall result in progress reports provided by the Police Chief to the
City Manager. The reports shall indicate the causes of the deficiencies and provide
responsive action taken or recommendations by the Police Chief to correct the
deficiencies as well as progress made toward achieving the goals. The progress reports
shall continue until the deficiency has been corrected.
SECTION NO. 6: COST OF SERVICES
6.1 Cost Methodology. CITY costs will be determined by utilizing the LECAP. The
LECAP will allocate costs through a combination of direct dedicated CITY officer costs;
and shared and indirect costs allocated through mutually agreed upon allocation bases.
Salary and Benefits for Dedicated CITY Officers will be segregated into separate budget
units and costs will be tracked separately.
The allocation bases will be reviewed by the COUNTY and CITY as needed. Any changes
to the allocation bases will be made by staff of the CITY and COUNTY and mutually
agreed upon by the SHERIFF, COUNTY CEO, and the City Manager.
Indirect costs will be applied from the Countywide Cost Allocation Plan,the COCAP. The
COCAP will be prepared in accordance with OMB U.S. Office of Management and Budget
Circular 2 CFR 200.
The CITY shall not be charged for costs unrelated to the provision of law enforcement
Services in the current year, including but not limited to, costs for tax assessor and treasurer
tax collections. CITY shall receive a credit for COCAP building charges and associated
maintenance and utility costs, in recognition of CITY-owned facilities (precinct/garage).
CITY shall also receive a credit for Services paid through other revenue sources and
Services that have been pre-paid by CITY.
Page 5 of 24
6.2 Estimated Costs. The LECAP will be used to estimate CITY cost for Services for a
contract year based upon the contract year's budget. Estimated indirect costs will be
calculated by applying an indirect rate derived from actual indirect costs from the most
recently completed year. CITY shall have 30 days to review the estimated costs and ask
questions. Should the estimate not be provided or not be finalized by the time the invoices
for a new contract year are due, CITY will continue to pay at the previous year's monthly
rate until the estimate is finalized. If the CITY has paid one or more months at the previous
year's rates, the COUNTY will calculate the difference between the previous year's rates
and the current year's monthly estimate for those months and add the difference to the first
monthly payment at the current year's estimate.
COUNTY shall notify CITY of any budget amendments expected to increase CITY'S law
enforcement costs by more than $200,000.
Estimated costs paid by CITY for specific items such as dedicated patrol salary shall not
be diverted to other expenses without prior authorization by the City. CITY will work with
Police Chief and Assistant Police Chief to process such requests expeditiously.
This section does not diminish the SHERIFF'S state constitutional and statutory law
enforcement powers pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW,nor his ability to expediently respond
- to emergencies.
6.3 Settle and Adjust. The LECAP will be used to calculate the actual CITY cost for the
contract year based upon the contract year's actual expenses. After calculating the CITY'S
actual costs for a contract year, any overage or underage from the estimated billed amount
will be applied to the next invoice. Should the contract no longer be in effect, payment by
either Party will be due within 30 days of agreement of the final amount.
COUNTY shall provide CITY with the actual cost calculations for the contract year in writing
via the LECAP no later than September 30th of any calendar year for the preceding year's
costs. CITY will have thirty (30) calendar days from its receipt of the LECAP to provide
COUNTY with any written objections to the amounts set forth therein. COUNTY agrees to
consider all written objections received from CITY and reply to CITY no later than fifteen
(15) calendar days of receipt of CITY'S objections. In the event the Parties cannot mutually
resolve any written objection(s) submitted by CITY within an additional fifteen(15) calendar
day time frame, or such other time frame as the Parties may mutually agree to, the objections
shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in Section No. 18.
6.4 Retroactive Salary Adjustments. The Police Chief will inform the CITY of the
commencement and settlement of applicable collective bargaining agreements, as well as
inform CITY of the status of any pending negotiations as to tentative agreements. Should
any applicable bargaining agreement not be settled in time to include any salary adjustments
granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement in the cost
estimate for a given year, and that collective bargaining agreement is settled, and the
settlement contains a retroactive salary adjustment, COUNTY will bill CITY for the full
Page 6 of 24
amount of CITY'S portion of the retroactive payment. CITY will be responsible for paying
COUNTY within thirty(30)days of the billing date. Additionally,COUNTY may recalculate
the estimated Interlocal Agreement amount employing the cost of living or wage increase(s)
granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement and adjust the
remaining monthly payments.
6.5 Capital Purchases. Capital equipment deemed necessary for all commissioned
officers, excluding vehicles, with a cost greater than $50,000, may be billed to CITY at the
time of purchase contingent upon prior CITY authorization. CITY will be billed according
to its proportionate share. COUNTY will bill CITY for this cost at the time of the purchase
and payment will be due within 30 days of the billing date. As part of the settle and adjust
reconciliation, COUNTY will give CITY credit for the full amount paid for capital
equipment in that year. The Parties may also jointly agree to apply this language to capital
purchases of any amount on a case-by-case basis.
All capital items purchased by COUNTY will become the property of COUNTY. All items
purchased by CITY will become the property of CITY. Capital items that have been
purchased with grant funds by either CITY or COUNTY, or other funding sources, and
capital items that are not utilized in providing law enforcement Services to CITY, will not
be charged to CITY. All capital items that are utilized in providing law enforcement
Services to CITY, and which are not immediately billed to CITY according to the terms
stated in this section, and that were not purchased with other funding sources, will be
incorporated as fixed assets in the (COCAP) and reimbursed through depreciation.
County shall consult with CITY prior to committing to capital purchases that exceed
$200,000. Typical recurring expenses such as vehicles are exempt from this requirement.
Beginning in 2022, CITY will be billed for the entire cost of dedicated vehicles in the year
the vehicles were purchased and received. Vehicles purchased prior to 2022 will continue
to be billed through depreciation in the COCAP. Orders related to CITY dedicated vehicles
and the subsequent disposition of those vehicles shall require prior written approval by
CITY. Shared vehicles will typically be supplied through the equitable transfer of vehicles
from dedicated units from CITY and COUNTY once the dedicated vehicles are replaced
by new vehicles. In some cases, new vehicles may need to be purchased for shared units;
efforts will be made to utilize existing revenue sources but if these sources are not available
the COUNTY will purchase the vehicles and depreciate the CITY'S share of costs
according to current allocation bases. Additionally, salvage value received through the
sale of CITY dedicated vehicles will be placed into a combined CITY/COUNTY reserve
to be used to replace wrecked vehicles, purchase atypical needs such as transport trailers,
and purchase specialty vehicles as funds allow. Use of the CITY/COUNTY reserve funds
shall require prior written approval from the SHERIFF and CITY, which shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
6.6 Billing Procedure. COUNTY will bill CITY for one-twelfth of calculated estimated
contract amount during the first week of each month. Regular monthly payments by CITY
Page 7 of 24
will be due by the end of the month in which they are billed. Should the bill be received at a
later date,the City shall have 21 days to process the payment.
6.7 Penalty. At the sole option of COUNTY, a penalty may be assessed on any late payment
owed by CITY in an amount equal to lost interest earnings had the payment been timely paid
and invested in the Spokane County Treasurer's Investment Pool.
Any resolution of a disputed amount through use of the arbitration process identified in
Section No. 18 shall include at the request of any Party, a determination of whether interest
is appropriate, including the amount.
SECTION NO. 7: MUNICIPAL POLICE AUTHORITY
CITY shall retain all police powers and,by virtue of this Agreement, CITY confers municipal
police authority on the SHERIFF.
SECTION NO. 8: OFFICER ASSIGNMENT, RETENTION, DISCIPLINE AND
HIRING
COUNTY is acting hereunder as an independent contractor as to:
8.1 Hiring. The SHERIFF shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees according
to applicable collective bargaining agreements, civil service rules, and state and federal laws.
8.2 Standards of Performance Governed by the SHERIFF. Control of personnel,
standards of performance, discipline and all other aspects of performance shall be governed
by the SHERIFF. Provided,however that only qualified, trained personnel meeting all of the
requirements of applicable state laws or regulations shall be utilized in the performance of
Services.
8.3 Assignment of Dedicated CITY Officers. SHERIFF or his designee and Police Chief
shall work together to determine the personnel assigned to fill Dedicated CITY Officer
positions. SHERIFF and CITY will work together to encourage Dedicated City Officer
retention and fill open positions to provide continuity of Services. SHERIFF or his designee
and the City Manager shall discuss anticipated openings due to retirements and transfers to
other agencies and jointly determine how to best prepare to fill those vacancies.
8.4 Patrol Districts. Patrol districts for the CITY are established in Exhibit"5". The patrol
districts will coincide within CITY limits.A patrol district is a geographical area of a size and
configuration designed to minimize response times to citizen's calls for Services. Response
is typically measured from the time a call is received to the time the unit arrives on the scene.
If the boundary of the CITY limits change, the SHERIFF will work together with the City
Manager and the Police Chief to determine if a change to the number of patrol districts is
necessary. The Police Chief will also periodically evaluate the calls for Service and other
impacts to response times and make recommendations to the City Manager, if necessary,
Page 8 of 24
regarding changes to patrol districts. All changes to the number of patrol districts in CITY
shall be authorized by the Council and SHERIFF.
8.5 Dedicated CITY Units and Officers, Mutual Aid. SHERIFF recognizes that he is
providing sworn police Services dedicated to CITY. Dedicated CITY Service units,
established in Exhibit "1", and the Dedicated CITY Officers, established in Exhibit "3",
shall work under the supervision of the Police Chief and be located at the CITY Precinct
Building except the Domestic Violence Detective who works in a shared unit under the
Shared Investigative Lieutenant. CITY dedicated officers shall be provided in the number
of officers shown in Exhibit"3". Service units identified as "Shared Resources" in Exhibit
"4"shall be shared between the CITY and COUNTY and costs shall be allocated according
to bases mutually agreed upon by staff.
8.5.1 Mutual Aid. Dedicated CITY Officers shall provide mutual aid to other local
law enforcement agencies, when possible, for emergency requests. Additionally,
Dedicated CITY Officers and COUNTY Officers shall continue to assist each other
and work together, sharing information and resources when mutually beneficial.
Dedicated CITY Officers may be assigned to regional task force units and directed
by the Police Chief to assist with investigations outside of the CITY limits for cases
that have a regional impact and benefit the CITY as well as other local jurisdictions.
This section does not diminish the SHERIFF'S State Constitutional and statutory law
enforcement powers pursuant to chapter 36.28 RCW, nor his ultimate authority over all
SHERIFF'S Office employees.
SECTION NO. 9: CITY POLICE CHIEF AND ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF
SELECTION, REMOVAL AND DUTIES, AS WELL AS CITY MANAGER'S AND
SHERIFF'S RESPONSIBILITIES THERETO
9.1 Selection of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief. When, for any reason, there
occurs a vacancy in the position of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief, the SHERIFF
shall designate three or more SHERIFF Deputies of the rank of Lieutenant or higher, or as
otherwise agreed by the parties, as candidates for each of the positions of Police Chief or
Assistant Police Chief. The positions of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief shall be
appointed from said lists of qualified candidates by the City Manager.
9.2 Removal of Police Chief or Assistant Police Chief.
9.2.1 Removal by SHERIFF. The SHERIFF may remove the Police Chief or
Assistant Police Chief at any time after consultation with the City Manager.
9.2.2 Removal by City Manager. The SHERIFF shall remove the Police Chief or
Assistant Police Chief at any time after the written request and consultation of the
City Manager.
Page 9 of 24
9.2.3 Reduction of Assistant Police Chiefs Rank Due to Economic Conditions.
A reduction in SHERIFF'S Office Civil Service Rank due to economic necessity
shall not be the sole basis for the removal of the appointed Assistant Police Chief
by either the City Manager or the SHERIFF.
9.3 Duties of Police Chief. The Police Chief shall report to the City Manager or his/her
designee and to the existing command structure within SHERIFF'S Office.
The duties of the Police Chief shall include:
9.3.1 Working with the City Manager or his/her designee to establish goals,
objectives and performance measures for CITY police Services which reflect specific
needs within CITY;
9.3.2 Coordinating police activities within CITY, including hours of operation and
CITY-specific protocols and procedures, attending meetings and providing reports as
requested by the City Manager and such other duties common to a city police chief
including enforcement of CITY codes and ordinances;
9.3.3 Reviewing the performance of all Dedicated CITY Officers. Reporting to City
Manager or his/her designee and SHERIFF any serious recommendations for
performance improvement;
9.3.4 Identify duties of all Dedicated CITY Officers as specific needs arise or as
requested by the City Manager or his/her designee within the context of established
policies and procedures. Reporting to SHERIFF any changes in duty of Dedicated
CITY Officers;
9.3.5 Overseeing implementation within CITY of all SHERIFF policies and
procedures. Maintaining a copy of SHERIFF procedures on file at City Hall for
CITY'S reference. SHERIFF shall be notified of any public record requests to view
or obtain a copy of the policies and procedures on file;
9.3.6 Notifying and providing electronic access to the City Manager or his/her
designee of any change in SHERIFF procedures or policies, or resource as permitted
by this Agreement;
9.3.7 Identifying areas of supplemental training for Dedicated CITY Officers. Making
recommendations to SHERIFF for supplemental training. Making recommendations
to the City Manager or his/her designee for training not provided by SHERIFF;
9.3.8 Providing supervision and direction to all Dedicated CITY Officers as well as
other assigned personnel, and acting as liaison with SHERIFF Command Staff;
Page 10 of 24
9.3.9 Maintaining communication between the City Manager and SHERIFF command
structures to ensure that changes in SHERIFF policies are agreeable to CITY and that
change in CITY policies are agreeable to SHERIFF. In the event a CITY procedure,
policy, goal or operation differs from the SHERIFF'S, City Manager or his/her
designee, SHERIFF and COUNTY shall meet and mutually determine which policy
will prevail;
9.3.10 Notifying the City Manager or his/her designee of any significant criminal
occurrence or civil emergency within CITY or region that would impact the public
safety or operations of CITY, and
9.3.11 Coordinating with City Manager regarding maintenance and capital
improvement needs of the CITY Precinct Building.
9.4 Duties of the Assistant Police Chief. Assistant Police Chief shall act as Police Chief in
his/her absence and under the Police Chief as CITY Police Department's primary
administrative assistant, and also work with CITY staff to provide data as requested and
complete information required for CITY planning documents.
9.5 Duties of the City Manager. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the
responsibility of providing general direction and supervision to the assigned Police Chief
relative to the furnishing of law enforcement Services to CITY as set forth in chapter 3 5A.13
RCW and the terms of this Agreement.
9.6 Duties of the SHERIFF. The SHERIFF or his designee shall make regular visits to the
CITY Precinct Building and ensure that SHERIFF policies and procedures are being followed
and that law enforcement Service is provided to CITY according to the terms of this
Agreement and according to the standards of the SHERIFF. At the request of the City
Manager, SHERIFF will make presentations to the Council and appearances at CITY
functions as his schedule permits.
9.7 Quarterly Meetings-Sheriff and City Manager. The SHERIFF and the City Manager
shall meet on a quarterly basis to ensure regular communication and to seek joint
consideration of all matters of concern regarding this Agreement. Either party may invite
representatives from their respective organizations to attend. It is intended that the Parties
in these meetings review the Interlocal Agreement and discuss matters of mutual interest;
monitor cost trends, work jointly on potential cost savings, revenue sources and other
budgetary matters that may impact Service levels; seek long-term sustainability of contract
terms; consider changes in labor contracts, review allocation of resources or other items
that may impact either party. The dates of these meetings will be determined by mutual
agreement but should coincide with the budget cycles of each party.
9.8 Quarterly Meeting—Financial and Contract Administration Representatives. At
the request of CITY, COUNTY, or SHERIFF, representatives shall meet to discuss
potential changes to the COCAP, the LECAP, or other items that may impact the CITY'S
Page 11 of 24
law enforcement costs or Service levels. If possible, CITY shall be notified of such
changes prior to implementation, allowing CITY an opportunity to comment.
SECTION NO. 10: OBSERVATION OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
CITY may participate with other cities that contract with COUNTY for law enforcement
Services to select no more than two (2)representatives from the contracting cities to observe
labor negotiations between COUNTY, SHERIFF and the collective bargaining units
representing the employees of the SHERIFF, provided that such observers adhere to rules
established by COUNTY, the SHERIFF and the bargaining units for the negotiations.
SECTION NO. 11: PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING
11.1 Ownership of Property and Equipment. The ownership of all property and
equipment utilized in association with either SHERIFF or CITY meeting their responsibilities
under the terms of this Agreement, shall remain with the original owner at all times to include
termination, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed upon in writing by the Parties
to this Agreement.
11.2 Stationery, Notices and Forms. CITY shall supply at its own cost and expense
any special supplies, logos or patches, stationery,notices, forms where such must be issued
in the name of CITY.
11.3 Additional Technology. CITY desires to maintain a police force that is trained and
equipped with the latest technology. SHERIFF agrees to provide police service personnel
providing Services under this Agreement that are trained and equipped with such
technology as is customarily provided to deputies providing law enforcement Services in
the unincorporated areas of the County. Any technology not currently in use or not
customarily provided to patrol deputies, may be requested by CITY or SHERIFF. Parties
agree to meet and confer over the need for the acquisition, training, or use of new
technology with the final decision regarding the acquisition and use of new technology
resting solely with the SHERIFF so long as CITY and COUNTY have the necessary
financial resources to acquire such technology and train Dedicated CITY Officers in its
use. Such costs shall be born solely by the CITY.
11.4 Additional Training. CITY has indicated that it may desire to have the Dedicated
CITY Officers providing Services to CITY under the terms of this Agreement attend
additional or supplemental training. The SHERIFF agrees not to unreasonably withhold
approval of any written request(s) by CITY for Dedicated CITY Officers providing
Services under the terms of this Agreement to attend additional or supplemental training.
The SHERIFF may also require Dedicated CITY Officers assigned to provide Services to
CITY under the terms of this Agreement to participate in necessary state and federal
training and conferences that focus on the prevention of crime and the protection of
CITY'S citizens. The costs of any additional or supplemental training requested by CITY
Page 12 of 24
under this section and approved by the SHERIFF, or determined necessary by the
SHERIFF shall be born solely by CITY.
11.5 Police Department Building, Maintenance, and Janitorial. CITY will provide
offices, to include sufficient parking, for the City of Spokane Valley Police Department
located at 12710 E. Sprague Avenue, City of Spokane Valley, 99216 or at such other
location mutually agreed to between the CITY and SHERIFF. CITY shall provide all
operation, maintenance and janitorial services for said offices.
SECTION NO. 12: COMMUNITY IDENTITY
12.1 Vehicles. Patrol, Traffic, School Resource Officer, and Community Service vehicles
that are assigned to CITY shall display the color, identification and logo of CITY at CITY'S
sole expense. Additionally, the vehicles will indicate that they are SHERIFF vehicles.
SHERIFF and CITY will determine the form of identification jointly. Detective and
Supervisor vehicles may be left unmarked.
12.2 Uniform. SHERIFF maintains a uniform directed by state law. It is a uniform that
carries a great deal of pride. CITY recognizes that the assigned personnel will retain the
uniform of the Spokane County Sheriff's Office; however, SHERIFF agrees that assigned
personnel shall wear additional identification in the nature of a patch, clearly indicating
affiliation with CITY on uniforms,jackets, and jumpsuits. Jumpsuits shall include the word
"Police"in large type on the back. The nature and design of any additional identification will
be determined jointly by SHERIFF and CITY and provided to SHERIFF by CITY at CITY'S
sole expense.
SECTION NO. 13: RECORDS
All records prepared, owned,used or retained by COUNTY or SHERIFF in conjunction with
providing Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed COUNTY property
and shall be made available to CITY upon request by the City Manager subject to the records
retention schedule set forth by the Washington State Secretary of State,the attorney client and
attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case law. The Parties agree
to cooperate in complying with the provisions of chapter 42.56 RCW. Should the Agreement
terminate, the Parties will meet, and discuss the nature and extent of records required to be
transferred to the successor agency. The COUNTY agrees to effect the transfer no later than
the last day of the contract. The cost of any transfers of records to the control of the CITY
under this provision shall be assumed solely by the CITY.
SECTION NO. 14: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY
A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement
resulting from Uncontrollable Circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this
Agreement.
Page 13 of 24
A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement
resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which
renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally
impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the SHERIFF,which render
legally impossible the performance by the SHERIFF of its obligations under this
Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 15: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES
For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include SHERIFF.
The Parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this
Agreement. COUNTY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of
CITY, that CITY is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control
the particular manner,method and means in which the Services are performed is solely within
the discretion of the SHERIFF. Any and all employees who provide Services to CITY under
this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the SHERIFF. The SHERIFF shall be
solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any
liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of
CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the SHERIFF
or COUNTY for any purpose.
SECTION NO. 16: LIABILITY
For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include the
"PROSECUTING ATTORNEY."
(a) COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, agents, and
employees,from any and all claims,actions,suits,liability,loss,costs,expenses,and damages
of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of
COUNTY,its officers,agents and employees,relating to or arising out of performing Services
pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or
damages is brought against CITY, COUNTY shall defend the same at its sole cost and
expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against CITY, and its officers, agents,
and employees, or jointly against CITY and COUNTY and their respective officers, agents,
and employees, COUNTY shall satisfy the same.
(b) CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY and its officers, agents, and
employees,from any and all claims,actions,suits,liability,loss,costs,expenses,and damages
of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of
CITY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services
pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or
damages is brought against COUNTY, CITY shall defend the same at its sole cost and
expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against COUNTY, and its officers,
Page 14 of 24
agents, and employees, or jointly against COUNTY and CITY and their respective officers,
agents, and employees, CITY shall satisfy the same.
(c) If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause
of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the
Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall
apply to such proportion.
(d) Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the
other Party,the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or
omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or
employee's negligence.
(e) Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of this
Agreement.
(f) The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's
immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the
other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full
and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The Parties
acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them.
(g) COUNTY and CITY agree to either self insure or purchase polices of insurance covering
the matters contained in this Agreement with coverages of not less than $5,000,000 per
occurrence with $5,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability and auto.
SECTION NO. 17: INITIATIVES AND LOCAL BUDGET REDUCTIONS
The Parties recognize that revenue-reducing initiative(s)passed by the voters of Washington
and/or local revenue reductions (i.e. loss of sales tax) and/or local government mandates may
substantially reduce local operating revenue for CITY, COUNTY or both Parties. The Parties
agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this
Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of State-wide
revenue-reducing initiative(s) and/or local revenue reductions and/or local government
mandates. If such an event occurs, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a
mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion.
SECTION NO. 18: DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Any dispute regarding the interpretation of, failure to perform, or the costs for Services
assessed under the terms of this Agreement between the SHERIFF, COUNTY or CITY shall
first be reduced to writing and considered by the COUNTY CEO("Chief Executive Officer")
and the City Manager if it is a monetary dispute. If it is a non-monetary dispute, it shall be
reduced to writing and considered by the SHERIFF and City Manager. The City Manager
and the COUNTY CEO or SHERIFF shall agree to develop a corrective action plan to address
Page 15 of 24
any dispute covered in this section. The action plan shall be completed within 30 days of
agreement to develop the action plan unless the Parties agree to extend this timeline. The
action plan shall be implemented by the SHERIFF within 30 days of completion of the action
plan. If the SHERIFF or CEO fails to complete or implement an action plan, discontinues the
action plan without agreement by the City Manager, or the dispute otherwise remains
unresolved,the dispute may be submitted to arbitration by any Party.
COUNTY or SHERIFF, respectively, and CITY shall have the right to designate one person
each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third
arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the Parties and shall be
subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04A RCW.
The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the respective Parties.
SECTION NO. 19: ASSIGNMENT
No party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written
approval of the other Parties. Nothing in this section shall prohibit COUNTY or SHERIFF
from contracting with third parties for Services provided for in this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 20: NOTICES
All notices called for or provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and must be served
on any of the Parties either personally or by certified mail, return-receipt requested, sent to
the Parties at their respective addresses herein above given. Notices sent by certified mail
shall be deemed served when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid.
SECTION NO. 21: VENUE STIPULATION
This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within
the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each Party that this
Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to
interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for
the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts
of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington.
SECTION NO. 22: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The Parties shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the
extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 23: DISCLAIMER
Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that
would limit either Party's authority or powers under law.
Page 16 of 24
SECTION NO. 24: HEADINGS
The Section and subsection headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely
for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall
not be deemed to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they
pertain.
SECTION NO. 25: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other
understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be
deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties. Parties have read and understand the whole of
the above Agreement and now state that no representations, promises or agreements not
expressed in this Agreement have been made to induce either to execute the same.
SECTION NO. 26: COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in any number of multiple signed originals, each of which,
when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together
constitute but one and the same.
SECTION NO. 27: AGREEMENT TO BE FILED
COUNTY shall file this Agreement with such offices or agencies as required by chapter 39.34
RCW.
SECTION NO. 28: TIME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT
Time is of the essence of this Agreement and in case any Party fails to perform the
obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the
respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other respective Party may, at its
election, hold the other Party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay.
SECTION NO. 29: CHAPTER 39.34 RCW REQUIRED CLAUSES
A. Purpose. See Section No. 3 above.
B. Agreement to be Filed. See Section No. 27 above.
C. Duration. See Section No. 4 above.
D. Termination. See Section No. 4 above.
Page 17 of 24
E. Organization of Separate Entity and Its Powers. No new or separate legal or
administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement.
F. Responsibilities of the Parties. See applicable sections within Agreement.
G. Property upon Termination. See Section Nos. 4.4 and 11 above.
SECTION NO. 30: SEVERABILITY
The Parties agree that if any parts,terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts
to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the
rights and obligations of the Parties shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the
Agreement. If it should appear that any part,term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict
with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision
thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may
be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such
statutory provision.
SECTION NO. 31: THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES.
This Agreement is intended for the benefit of COUNTY, CITY and SHERIFF and not for
the benefit of any third parties.
SECTION NO. 32. SURVIVAL
Without being exclusive, Section Nos. 16, 20, and 21 of this Agreement shall survive any
termination, expiration or determination of invalidity of this Agreement in whole or in part.
Any other sections of this Agreement which, by their sense and context, are intended to
survive shall also survive.
SECTION NO. 33. MEDIA RELEASES AND CONTACT
Media releases concerning law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement will
be prepared by the SHERIFF'S Public Information Officer. Any such release of
information to the media that is deemed to be sensitive or likely to cause concern or alarm
shall be provided to the City Manager before its release. CITY shall not issue any media
releases regarding law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement without prior
approval of the SHERIFF unless otherwise agreed by the Parties. SHERIFF will endeavor
to have the Police Chief or designee interact with the media when appropriate. SHERIFF'S
ability to interact with the media on CITY'S behalf shall not be limited by this section.
SECTION NO. 34: MODIFICATION
This Agreement may only be modified in writing by the mutual written agreement of the
Parties.
Page 18 of 24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date and year opposite their respective signatures.
DATED: (1 . (U• 2012_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
� • SPOKANE OUNTY WASHINGTON
of coM4 f/ ‘,11
r MAR t ,Y, C it
ATTEST: % ' �' I i ;.; • -
•
CLERK OF,II-IE B�#t• ': •g'' '.ter
ii1‘, 'Eco - AL FRENC , Vice-Chair
BY:Jrh/�/L(lit.
GINNA VASQ
'JOSH KERNS, Commissioner
22 -- O ! 96 -
**********
DATED: nb 1 151 2.Z SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF:
� arr:#9.4
EZOVICH
**********
DATED: APn` )O �O�l CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
IHN HOHMAN, City Manager
Attest:'
l.w1M-t- kC1�u-�(..
CI IRISTINE BAINBRIDGE
City Clerk
Approved as to form only:
A4-4/1/
Office e City mey
Page 19 of 24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date and year opposite their respective signatures.
DATED: l9 • 1u" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SP•KA COUNT , WASHINGTON
C O M4949 ".1
� • .I,D�E COG• )OZ 111 /L J
, o �° , y • ego MAR` j �� EY, air
ATTEST: m
F THE B 4� • ' • i
/
CLERK O � _• ? —
'Ilk�' yE�� ' : AL FRENC , Vice-Chair
BY: IA),(C
I GINNA VASQUEZ
2 2 _ 0 3 g 6 OSH KERNS, Commissioner
**********
DATED: SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF:
OZZIE KNEZOVICH
**********
DATED: jApir I (:,)O CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
HN HOHMAN, City Manager
Attest:, � 4
'I/V4,tt c
CHRISTINE BAINBRIDGE
City Clerk
Approved as to orm only:
Off ce h Ci �A• • e
� y
Page 19 of 24
Exhibit 1 — Services Provided to CITY by SHERIFF
CITY Dedicated Service Units
CITY Police Department Administration (Chief, Assistant Chief, Sergeant)
Patrol
Traffic
Community Services
Domestic Violence
School Resource Officers
K-9
Property and Drug Crimes Investigations
Shared Service Units
Major Crimes
Sex Crimes
Spokane County Investigative Unit
Joint Terrorism Task Force
Safe Streets (Drug Task Force and Gang Enforcement)
Emergency Operations Team
Public Information Officer
Training/Professional Standards
SHERIFF'S Community Oriented Policing Effort/ SHERIFF'S Incident Response Team
Spokane Regional Emergency Communications services—Radio Dispatch, Crime Check,
Computer Aided Dispatch, Communications
Helicopter
Forensics
Records Management
Property Storage
Explosive Disposal
Regional Investigative Group 9 - Crime Analysis
Garage
Firing Range
Fleet
SWAT/Hostage Negotiation
Tactical Unit
Extra Duty Employment
Reservist and Explorer Units
Civilian Administrative Support
Regional Services
Civil
Marine Patrol
SHERIFF
Sex Offender Registration
Page 20 of 24
II
Exhibit 2 —Performance Measures and Workload Indicators
Workload Indicators
Total incidents per Dedicated CITY Patrol Officer per shift
Total citizen initiated Calls for Service
Total citizen initiated Calls for Service with Dedicated CITY Patrol Officer response
Total Dedicated CITY Officer initiated incidents
Total Dedicated CITY Officer involved incidents
Total incidents requiring written documentation
Total incidents resulting in custodial arrest
Total traffic non-criminal infractions/citations issued
Total traffic control requests worked
Total traffic collisions investigated
Total Major Crime investigations
Total Sex Crime investigations
Total Property/Drug Crime investigations
Behavioral Health Deputy—To match 2021 WASPC Grant Report
Performance Measures
Average patrol staffing per shift
Citizen complaints per 1,000 Dedicated CITY Officer incidents
Outcome of complaint investigations (% sustained, not sustained, exonerated, unfounded,
pending, changed to inquiry)
Complaints per 1,000 Dedicated CITY Officer incidents
Outcome of use of force incidents (%within policy and not within policy)
Average response time for priority 1, 2, and 3 Calls for Service
Percentage of Calls for Service with deputy response
Percentage of incidents that were deputy initiated
Percentage of solvable property crime cases assigned
Percentage of assigned cases solved by investigative unit
Percentage of assigned cases solved by charges filed by investigative unit
Collisions per capita
Percentage of traffic complaints worked
Actual to Budget Cost Comparisons for all Dedicated and Shared units (Salary, overtime,
fuel)
Behavioral Health Deputy —Time Saved
Page 21 of 24
Exhibit 3 - Dedicated CITY Officers
Administrative
Police Chief/Undersheriff 1
Assistant Chief/Inspector 1
Sergeant 1
Patrol
Lieutenant 2
Sergeant 9
Deputies 47
K-9 Deputies 3
Traffic
Sergeant 1
Detectives/Corporal 1
Deputies 5
Community Services
Deputy 1
Behavioral Health
Deputy 1
Homeless Services
Deputy 1
Domestic Violence
Detective/Corporal 1
School Resource Officer
Deputies 4
Property and Drug Crimes
Sergeant 1
Detectives 10
Deputy 1
Total Dedicated Officers 91
Page 22 of 24
Exhibit 4 - Combined Number of Officers in Shared Units
Investigations
Undersheriff 1
Lieutenant 1
DEA Deputy 1
Major Crimes
Sergeant 1
Detectives 8
Sex Crimes
Sergeant 1
Detectives 7
Investigative Task Force Spokane County Investigative Unit(SCIU)
Lieutenant 1
Regional Intelligence Group
Detective 1
Joint Terrorism Task Force
Detective 1
Safe Streets(Drug and Gangs)
Sergeant 1
Detectives 3
Deputies 1
Emergency Operations Team
Deputy 2
Public Information Officer
Corporal 1
Professional Standards
Lieutenant 1
Training
Sergeant 3
Corporal 1
Deputies 1
Total Shared Officers 37
Page 23 of 24
Exhibit 5 - CITY Patrol Districts
1-.
El ` _l '- "
Francis �, 4 `T- <-^ l +
nP I SQ�\�95 r fi:l`_ � --, I� r - :"u -leaby ?r r r�t4 r
`°
LL }:cl `Ei�'`ice- r
- T
f
w I -1 ! _
City of Spohaao -5 n' a - - -;- LibC(,1�t+4
‘ f x '� '` �• ern•
L-,
s. 11th t L-„=„„,'4 f
S� „
fr,s
ill
c a1
,� 3 - tr-- i /
,oII 10 �` r L
-P c t itr `i Y
I
u__ LJ ,
r•
' Jackson 7-1
.-,-- ;Miles Valley Police Districts 1-6 �•��- -�
Page 24 of 24
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
as of July 20,2022; 3:30 p.m.
Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative
To: Council&Staff
From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
August 2,2022,Study Session, 6:00 p.m. —meeting cancelled(National Night Out)
August 9,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 2]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.Admin Report: Surplus Equipment—Dan Domrese (10 minutes)
3.Admin Report: Sprague Avenue Stormwater Project—Gloria Mantz,Jerremy Clark (10 minutes)
4.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
August 16,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 2]
ACTION ITEMS:
1.Motion Consideration:Council Goals&Priorities for Use of Lodging Tax—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes)
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
2.Homeless Program Update—Eric Robison et al (45 minutes)
3.TPA Update—Mike Basinger (15 minutes)
4. Street Vacation,Right-of-way from Mission Ave to Park Road(STV-2022-001)—Lori Barlow (10 minutes)
5.Council 2023 Budget Goals—John Hohman Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes)
6.Gang Task Force—Chief Ellis (15 minutes)
7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 120 mins]
August 23,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 16]
1.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.First Reading Ordinance 22- Street Vacation,ROW Mission to Park(STV-2022-001)-Lori Barlow (10 minutes)
3.First Reading Ordinance 22- Re TPA—Mike Basinger (20 minutes)
4.Resolution 22- Declaring Items Surplus—Dan Domrese (10 minutes)
5.Admin Report:2023 Budget,Estimated Revenues&Expenditures—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes)\
6.Admin Report:Mercer International Inc.—Mike Basinger (10 minutes)
7.Admin Report: Snowplow Replacement Discussion—Bill Helbig (15 minutes)
8.Admin Report:Fire Department Monthly Report—Chief Soto (10 minutes)
9.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
10.Info Only:Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 100 mins]
August 30,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 23]
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Second Reading Ordinance 22- Street Vacation,ROW Mission to Park(STV-2022-0001)—Lori Barlow(10 min)
NON-ACTION ITEMS;
2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
Sept 6,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Aug 30]
1.Pavement Management Funding Discussion—Bill Helbig Adam Jackson (25 minutes)
2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
Sept 13,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 6]
1.PUBLIC HEARING#1: 2023 Budget: 2023 Revenues,Includes Property Taxes (10 minutes)
2.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes;motion to set Budget Hearing for 10/11) (5 minutes)
3. Second Reading Ordinance 22- Re TPA—Mike Basinger (10 minutes)
4.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting:30 mins]
Sept 20,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 13]
1.Outside Agency presentations(5 minutes each)—Dan Domrese (-110 minutes)
2.Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2023 Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
3.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 125 mins]
Draft Advance Agenda 7/21/2022 8:17:37 AM Page 1 of 2
Sept 27,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 20]
1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
October 4,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Sept 27]
1.City Manager Presentation of 2023 Preliminary Budget—John Hohman (25 minutes)
2.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
Oct 11,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 4]
1.PUBLIC HEARING#2:2023 Budget: Preliminary Budget (10 minutes)
2.First Reading Property Tax Ordinance 22- —Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
3.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
4.Admin Report:2022 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
5.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
Oct 18,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 11]
1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
Oct 25,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 18]
1.PUBLIC HEARING: 2022 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (5 minutes)
2.First Reading Ordinance Amending 2022 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
3.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
4. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
5.First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2023 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
6.Motion Consideration:Outside Agency Grant Awards—Dan Domrese (10 minutes)
7.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
8.Info Only:Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 55 mins]
Nov 1,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Oct 25]
1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
Nov 8,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 1]
1.PUBLIC HEARING#3:2023 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (5 minutes)
2.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
3. Second Reading Ordinance Amending 2022 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
4. Second Reading Ordinance Adopting 2023 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
5.Admin Report:LTAC Recommendations to Council—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes)
6.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
7.Info Only:Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 50 mins]
Nov 15,2022,Study Session,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 8]
1.Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
Nov 22,2022,Formal Meeting,6:00 p.m. [due Tue Nov 15]
1.Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2.Admin Report:2023 Fee Resolution—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes)
3.Admin Report:Advance Agenda—Mayor Haley (5 minutes)
4.Info Only:Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: mins]
Nov 29,2022—meeting cancelled—Thanksgiving holiday
*time for public or council comments not included
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Appleway Trail Amenities Gov.Auth.Emergencies(info) Residency
Basement space Mirabeau Park Forestry Mgmt. SCRAPS Update
Castle Park Neighborhood Restoration St.Illumination(owners,cost,location)
CDBG Interlocal NLC Summit Nov 16-19 St.O&M Pavement Preservation
Consolidated Homeless Grant Park Lighting Vehicle Wgt Infrastructure Impact
Continuum of Care(info item) PFD Presentation Water Districts&Green Space
Core Beliefs Resolution Property Tax Discussion Way Finding Sign
Gang Activity Prosecutor Services
Draft Advance Agenda 7/21/2022 8:17:37 AM Page 2 of 2
City of Spokane Valley
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Page Title
1 Cover Sheet
2 Pre-Application Meeting Requested
3 Construction Applications Received
4 Engineering Applications Received
5 Land Use Applications Received
6 Construction Permits Issued
7 Engineering Permits Issued
8 Land Use Applications Completed
9 Inspections Performed
10 Code Enforcement
11 Revenue
12 Building Permit Valuations
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 1 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Pre-Application Meeting Requested
A Pre-Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code
requirements related to their project proposal
Community & Public Works Department scheduled a total of 16 Pre-Application Meetings in JUNE 2022
Spokane Valley Pre-Application Meeting Requests
25
20
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
•Commercial Pre-App Land Use Pre-App ** NOT SUBMITTED
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Commercial Pre-App 4 7 18 7 3 5
Land Use Pre-App 6 9 5 3 16 11
** NOT SUBMITTED 2 0 0 0 0 1
Monthly Totals 10 16 23 10 19 16 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual-To-Date: 94
**NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 2 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Construction Applications Received
The applications recevied are those that include projects for New, remodeled, and accessory
buildings; Signs, Factory Assembled Structures (FAS), Trade, Roofs, and more.
Community & Public Works Department recevied a total of 542 Construction Applications in JUNE 2022
Spokane Valley Construction Applications Received
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
•Commercial New Commercial MFR Commercial TI
•Commercial Trade Commercial Accessory •Residential SFR/Plex
•Residential Remodel •Residential Addition •Residential Trade
•Residential Accessory Demolition Sign
•Re-Roof Factory Assembled •Other Construction
*Other Construction applications include,Adult family Home Inspections,Cell tower modifications,solar panels,swimming pool/hot tub
IL Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun I Jul A Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Commercial New 2 3 2 5 3 3
Commercial MFR 2 5 2 11 2 4
Commercial TI 13 12 24 16 15 19
Commercial Trade 47 23 28 34 25 127
Commercial Accessory 7 1 3 7 12 2
Residential SFR/Plex 22 15 7 28 23 14
Residential Remodel 18 12 23 16 19 17
Residential Addition 6 7 8 8 4 7
Residential Trade 150 163 181 218 172 189
Residential Accessory 9 5 15 9 12 14
Demolition 3 3 8 3 7 8
Sign 10 10 4 9 14 9
Re-Roof 31 46 89 78 86 108
Factory Assembled 2 0 3 1 2 0
AFH Inspection 0 5 3 3 5 3
Other Construction 8 11 6 15 12 18
** NOT SUBMITTED 29 47 42 53 52 55
Monthly Totals 330 321 406 461 413 542 0 0 0 Ir 0 0 ir 0
Annual-To-Date: 2473
**NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for review
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 3 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Engineering Applications Received
The applications received are those that include projects for all site work projects, such as Grading
permits, Right-of-Way (ROW), approaches, and more.
Community & Public Works Department received a total of 113 Engineering Applications in JUNE 2022
Engineering Applications Received
160
140
120 —
—
�
100
80
60
40
20
0 �
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
■Engineered Grading Regular Grading Right-of-Way m Approach ■Clearing Et Grubbing ■**NOT SUBMITTED
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun II, Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J
Engineered Grading 8 5 9 8 12 9
Regular Grading 1 2 2
Right-of-Way 63 90 92 95 117 103
Approach 9 14 6 10 10
Clearing&Grubbing 1 0 0 0 1 1
**NOT SUBMITTED 0 2 2 3 1 12
Monthly Totals I P 81 109 108 115 142 113 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual-To-Date: 668
**NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 4 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Land Use Applications Received
The applications received are those that include projects that involve land development, such as
Platting actions, Boundary Lines Adjustments, Zoning, SEPA and Exceptions
Community & Public Works Department received a total of 48 Land Use Applications in JUNE 2022
Spokane Valley Land Use Applications Received
150
100 -
50
—
0 — —
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov De;:
•Boundary Line Adj Short Plat Long Plat •Binding Site Plan •Final Platting
■Zoning/Comp Amend •Accessory Dwelling SEPA Admin Exception ■Admin Interpretation
Home Business Lic •Other Development ** NOT SUBMITTED
**Other Development could include,Zoning Letter,Floodplain,Shoreline,Alterations,Variances,Small Cell,CUP,Street Vacations,etc...
LJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Boundary Line Adj 6 2 4 4 5 5
Short Plat 3 1 3 5 4 0
Long Plat 1 1 1 1 1 1
Binding Site Plan 1 0 1 0 0 0
Final Platting 4 4 6 3 12 4
Zoning/Comp Amend 0 1 0 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling 1 1 2 1 1 0
SEPA 1 0 2 0 2 2
Admin Exception 2 0 3 0 2 0
Admin Interpretation 0 0 1 0 0 0
Home Business Lic 52 62 56 43 52 31
Other Development 2 2 8 6 18 5
**NOT SUBMITTED 4 9 6 12 9 4
Monthly Totals 'F 7 74 87 63 97 48 0 0 0 011 0 0
Annual-To-Date: 442
**NOT SUBMITTED is a new category created by SmartGov which separates permits that have not entered details or provided documents for reviev
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 5 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Construction Permits Issued
The applications issued are those that include projects for New, remodeled, and accessory
buildings; Signs, Factory Assembled Structures (FAS), Trade, Roofs, and more.
Community & Public Works Department Issued a total of 580 Construction Permits in JUNE 2022
Spokane Valley Construction Permits Issued
800
600
400 _ .
200 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ =
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
•Commercial New •Commercial MFR Commercial TI
•Commercial Trade Commercial Accessory •Residential SFR/Plex
•Residential Remodel Residential Addition •Residential Trade
•Residential Accessory Demolition Sign
•Re-Roof Factory Assembled •Other Construction*
*Other Construction applications include,Adult family Home Inspections,Cell tower modifications,swimming pool/hot tub
LJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Commercial New 2 14 12 6 5 16
Commercial MFR 4 1 11 2 3 4
Commercial TI 17 11 15 14 16 10
Commercial Trade 46 24 29 33 25 125
Commercial Accessory 9 0 5 2 5 2
Residential SFR/Plex 17 28 12 15 10 64
Residential Remodel 11 17 15 14 18 14
Residential Addition 4 7 5 6 9 5
Residential Trade 153 163 156 184 176 179
Residential Accessory 4 5 13 8 11 14
Demolition 3 4 7 4 3 11
Sign 7 9 6 7 13 8
Re-Roof 32 44 91 76 86 104
Factory Assembled 1 0 3 1 0 3
Other Construction* 6 1 1 10 19 12 21
Monthly Totals I 316 338 390 391 0 392 580 0 0 MI 0 0
Annual-To-Date: 2407
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 6 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Engineering Permits Issued
The applications issued are those that include projects for all site work projects, such as Grading
permits, Right-of-Way (ROW), approaches, and more.
Community & Public Works Department issued a total of 112 Engineering permits in JUNE 2022
Engineering Permits Issued
160
140
120
r-
100
80
60
40
20
0 — 1 MI �
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
■Engineered Grading Regular Grading Right-of-Way ■Approach ■Clearing Et Grubbing
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Engineered Grading 4 5 13 12 9 7
Regular Grading 0 1 1 1 0 0
Right-of-Way 68 78 91 104 116 97
Approach 0 8 11 10 11 7
Clearing&Grubbing 1 0 0 0 1 1
Monthly Totals 73 92 116 127 137 112 0 I®®®®
Annual-To-Date: 657
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 7 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Land Use Applications Completed
The applications completed are those that include projects that involve land development, such
as Platting actions, Boundary Line Adjustments, Zoning, SEPA and Exceptions
Community & Public Works Department completed a total of 53 Land Use Applications in JUNE 2022
Spokane Valley Land Use Applications Completed
120
100
11
80 _ _
60 '
40
20 i� M
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
•Boundary Line Adj Short Plat •Long Plat •Binding Site Plan
■Final Platting ■Zoning/Comp Amend •Accessory Dwelling SEPA
Admin Exception •Admin Interpretation THome Business Lic ■Other Development
**Other Development could include,Zoning Letter,Floodplain,Shoreline,Alterations,Variances,Small Cell,CUP,Street Vacations,etc...
LJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Boundary Line Adj 4 6 9 5 3 2
Short Plat 4 2 7 3 3 3
Long Plat 0 0 0 0 0 0
Binding Site Plan 1 0 1 0 0 0
Final Platting 2 2 5 3 0 5
Zoning/Comp Amend 0 0 0 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling 1 0 2 1 1 0
SEPA 1 1 0 1 0 1
Admin Exception 2 1 2 2 1 1
Admin Interpretation 0 0 1 0 0 0
Home Business Lic 47 58 62 32 62 36
Other Development 4 1 7 6 8 5
Monthly Totals 1 r-66 71 96 53 78 53 1 r 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual-To-Date: 417
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 8 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Development Inspections Performed
Community & Public Works Department performed a total of 1915 Development Inspections in JUNE
2022. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW
Spokane Valley Development Inspections Performed
2500
2000
1500 '
1000 — 11.11r
111.111111.,
500
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
t 2020 2021 2022
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Totals
2022 1078 1253 1845 1830 1680 1915 9,601
2021 927 991 1625 1758 1661 1533 1617 1550 1253 1345 1473 1372 17,105
2020 1011 1215 1260 857 1503 1745 1846 1622 1489 1461 1173 1104 16,286
IMonthly
Totals 1078 1253 1845 1830 1680 1915 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,601
Annual-To-Date: 9,601
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 9 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Code Enforcement
Code Enforcement Officers responded to 72 citizen requests in the month of JUNE 2022. They are
listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must
be investigated
Code Enforcement Complaints Investigated
80
70 I
I-111-
60
50
40 -
30 - M
20 -
10 -
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
•CE-Stop Work Order Complaint (Non-Violent) Environmental General Nuisance •Property
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
CE-Stop Work Order 0 0 0 0 0 0
Complaint(Non-Violent) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Environmental 1 0 1 1 0 0
General 3 0 0 1 1 0
Nuisance 34 29 57 26 46 47
Property 6 7 15 11 11 25
Monthly Totals 1 Pr 44 36 73 39 58 72
Annual-To-Date: 322
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 10 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Revenue
Community & Public Works Department Revenue,which are fees taken in on all applications, totaled $277,917 in
JUNE 2022.
Spokane Valley Revenue Received
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
t 2022 2021 5-Yr Trend
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals
2022 $173,509 $139,945 $171,413 $210,513 $217,237 $277,917 $1,190,534
5-Yr Trend $366,357 $218,434 $271,256 $264,059 $285,589 $266,794 $282,184 $284,416 $244,563 $282,804 $255,050 $246,424 $3,267,931
2021 $1,087,310 $196,293 $364,569 $459,905 $239,948 $367,253 $433,461 $430,383 $323,636 $396,162 $292,643 $329,244 $4,920,807
2020 $230,256 $402,862 $371,956 $237,120 $402,525 $309,668 $226,943 $188,990 $268,487 $254,775 $246,368 $223,685 $3,363,635
2019 $162,441 $228,717 $265,529 $195,244 $241,906 $233,496 $355,943 $304,988 $228,157 $294,794 $299,906 $349,821 $3,160,942
2018 $177,431 $117,425 $220,845 $206,090 $234,009 $158,168 $260,179 $362,478 $253,342 $270,649 $204,016 $169,751 $2,634,383
2017 $174,349 $146,874 $133,382 $221,935 $309,558 $265,383 $134,394 $135,242 $149,194 $197,639 $232,319 $159,618 $2,259,887
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 11 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
6/1/2022 - 6/30/2022
Building Permit Valuation
Community&Public Works Department building permit valuation,which include,residential,commercial,reroof,FAS placed,totaled
$48,521,183.00 in JUNE 2022.
Spokane Valley Permit Valuation
$200,000,000
$180,000,000
$160,000,000 —
$140,000,000$120,000,000
$100,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000 ——- —
$40,000,000
$20,000,000 —$0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals
•5-Yr Trend 2021 —9-2022
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals
2022 $20,182,361 $31,376,013 $14,935,549 $32,649,784 $24,027,391 $48,521,183 $171,692,281
5-Yr Trend $14,662,000 $49,352,000 $71,170,000 $22,362,000 $28,434,000 $26,908,000 $33,764,000 $17,058,000 $16,542,000 $21,406,000 $34,474,000 $18,254,000 $263.30
2021 $8,860,000 $179,080,000 $16,720,000 $32,820,000 $22,430,000 $27,700,000 $65,190,000 $24,390,000 $18,160,000 $42,670,000 $17,710,000 $13,480,000 $469.21
2020 $22,130,000 $20,750,000 $36,690,000 $27,670,000 $51,380,000 $29,930,000 $17,950,000 $7,610,000 $20,620,000 $15,270,000 $26,890,000 $21,380,000 $298.27
2019 $5,660,000.00 $22,210,000.00 $19,460,000.00 $12,460,000.00 $23,150,000.00 $15,020,000.00 $46,650,000.00 $18,800,000.00 $14,360,000.00 $17,160,000.00 $35,210,000.00 $32,930,000.00 $263.07M
2018 $12,840,000.00 $6,350,000.00 $276,000,000.00 $7,870,000.00 $9,550,000.00 $26,260,000.00 $29,250,000.00 $25,440,000.00 $20,690,000.00 $21,880,000.00 $25,460,000.00 $6,700,000.00 $219.89M
2017 $23,820,000.00 $18,370,000.00 $6,980,000.00 $30,990,000.00 $35,660,000.00 $35,630,000.00 $9,780,000.00 $9,050,000.00 $8,880,000.00 $10,050,000.00 $67,100,000.00 $16,780,000.00 $2573.09M
Created On: 7/8/2022 Page 12 of 12
Community & Public Works Department
Monthly Report
06/01/22 — 06/30/22
MAINTENANCE
AgrLeements for Services Adopted and In Operation (**Does not include June)
Contract Total % of Contract
Contract Name Contractor
Amoun Expended Expended
et Maintenance IIMIII3oe Asphalt 11111 $1,530,307.70 $546,683.47 35.72% III
[Street Sweeping EVA Sweeping $584,875.20 $219,077.60 37.46% III
Storm Drain Cleaning II'AAA Sweeping $211,586.44 $49,353.97 23.33% III
'andscaping Senske $94,136.00 $27,211.68 28.91%
[Weed Spraying Clearwater A $39,000.00 $20,085.00 51.50%
imergency Traffic Control Senske. $15,000.00 $3,188.58 21.26%
Litter and Weed Control GeigerWINE $70,000.00 $14,535.25 20.76% 0
itate Highway Maintenance WSDOT 11111 $209,000.00 $62,890.15 30.09 111
%
5-raffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $700,000.00 $172,047.13 24.58% III
Animal Coke Pederson $20,000.00 $6,675.00 33.38%
now Season - October 2021 - April 2022
n a ra ers Multiple $550,000.00 $116,265.90 21.14%
JDn Call - Plow Driver Multiple ■ $620,000.00 $247,404.83 39.90%
kin Call - Sidewalk Operator Valley LandscapU $40,000.00 $17,458.14 43.65%
Citizen Requests T717b11771c7ine 76121
Request Submitted In Progress Resolved
/Waiting
Froken Sprinkler J 2 0 2
Construction - CPV‘till 14 0 14
Construction - Deve 1 1 0
Construction - Private I 1 0 1
Dead Animal Removal 5 0 5
Downed Tree / Branch 3 1 2
General Street Maint 1 12 4 8
Graffiti on City Property 1 0 1
Gravel Shouldering 1 2 0 2
Nina rd on Street I 4 0 4
(legal Dumping - Objects I 5 1 4
Report a Pothole ill 19 0 19
Scooters I. 2 0 2
Shopping Cart 1 0 1
Sidewalks - repair 41 3 2 1
Street Sweeping 4 0 4
ke.getation /Weeds 22 9 13
®LID WASTE dil 1 0 1
',VIWATER 14 2 12
Traffic ill= 34 4 30
25 0 25
1 175 '
1
STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY
The following is a summary of Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for June 2022:
• Geiger Work Crew—Vegetation management, litter, and garbage pickup.
• Pothole patching, tree trimming, graffiti removal, cracksealing.
• Poe Maintenance Contract -Asphalt grind and inlay, Sullivan from the Spokane River to Marietta, Pines Road
from 32nd to 22nd and Park Road from Valleyway to Broadway,gravel shoulder grading and stormwater repairs.
• AAA sweeping Contract—Arterial maintenance sweeping continues along with residential sweeping.
• AAA Sweeping Vactor Contract—Cleaning arterial catchbasins,drywells,sidewalk underdrains and swale inlets.
WASTEWATER
Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/,
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm,
http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and
http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/
STORMWATER UTILITY
The following is a summary of City Stormwater Utility activities for June 2022:
• Drywell Retrofit with Pavement Preservation (Dept.of Ecology grant)—Remaining funds project to be used
in association with the Sullivan-Sprague to 8th preservation project. Proceeding with 90%design for future
submittal to Ecology for approval.
• Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Canopy project (Dept. of Ecology grant): Substantial completion
was granted on May 19t". Physical completion was granted on June 3rd. Project closeout coordination with
Department of Ecology continues.
• Appleway Stormwater Improvement project (Dept. of Ecology grant): Physical completion was granted on
June 17th. Project closeout coordination with Department of Ecology continues.
• Sprague Ave. University to Park Stormwater Improvement Project—Elevated costs and a clearer indication
of the scope of project has resulted in internal discussions regarding the viability of the project. Council
recommendation regarding this project is expected in July.
• Stormwater Utility has embarked on a comprehensive program study and rate study. Osborn Consulting is
the lead consultant. EvergreenH2O is sub-consultant leading the regulatory gap-analysis. FCS Group is sub-
consultant leading the rate study element. Project coordination with consultant regarding program
elements continues.
• Continue process to identify the merits for jurisdictional coverage under the UIC program. Primary focus is
on the City-wide hydraulic analysis. Initial subbasin modeling results have been identified. Remaining
subbasin modeling continues.
• Effectiveness study (Bioretention soil media study) — The Department of Ecology has selected this
project/study for funding. This project/study meets a requirement of the Phase II Municipal Stormwater
Permit and is a collaborative effort between the City of Spokane Valley, City of Spokane, Spokane County,
and EvergreenstormH2O Consultant. City of Spokane is the lead entity. Continued coordination of this
effort continues and includes preparation to submit to a Detailed Design Proposal by 9/30/2022,
distribution of a draft Memorandum of Understanding between jurisdictions to share cost, and
development of RFP to secure consultant services.
• Continue updating the Stormwater Utility 0 & M plan for both UIC and MS4 areas.
• Participation and support Glenrose, Central Park Flood Insurance Study.
• Continued annual management and/or participation of the following service contracts:
o Roadway Landscape Maintenance Contract—Senske.
o Street Sweeping Contract—AAA Sweeping.
o Storm Drain Cleaning Contract—AAA Sweeping.
o Roadway Weed Control Contract—Clearwater Summit.
• Continue working on the following tasks:
o Responded to stormwater related issues, 14 sites. Recorded in QAlert.
2
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
The following is a summary of Development Engineering activities for June 2022:
• Assisted Building and Planning Division with preparation of design requirements for (3) Commercial and (16)
Land Use Pre-Application meetings.
• Prepared multiple Recommended Conditions of Approvals for preliminary plats and Dedication Languages for
final plats. Reviewed multiple final plats and submittal packages to record final plats.
• Reviewed civil plans and drainage reports for Engineered Grading Permits associated with commercial and land
use projects. Coordinated with private Engineers and Developers.
• Spoke with and emailed citizens and developers to answer inquiries and discuss design requirements for
potential commercial and land use projects.
• Conducted preconstruction meetings, performed site visits, prepared punch lists, reviewed surety estimates,
and reviewed and approved construction certification packages to finalize final plats and to issue commercial
building certificates of occupancy.
• Reviewed civil plans for the following projects:
o Ridgemont Estates No. 5—Phase 1 o Broadway Apartments
(EGR-2019-0017) (EGR-2022-0050)
o Barajas Short Plat—5 lots o The Oaks Academy
(EGR-2021-0108) (EGR-2022-0051)
o Station Junction—Phase 2 o Ridgemont Estates No. 5—Phase 2
(EGR-2022-0028) (EGR-2022-0052)
o Olive/Valleyway Short Plat—3 lots o Pines and 3rd Apartments
(EGR-2022-0030) (EGR-2022-0054)
o Dishman Estates—21 lots o Burlakov Short Plat—2 lots
(EGR-2022-0031) (EGR-2022-00056)
o Saw Vercler Short Plat—9 lots
(EGR-2022-0032)
o 10th and 12th Short Plat—8 lots
(EGR-2022-0035)
o Novelis Marietta Development
(EGR-2022-0037)
o FMI Trent Building
(EGR-2022-0045)
o Flora Road Short Plat—2 lots
(EGR-2022-0043)
o Muhsen Short Plat—2 lots
(EGR-2022-0045)
3
CAPITAL PROJECTS
Public Works Projects
Monthly Summary-Design &Construction
r� June-2022
Bid % Estimated Total
Proposed
Project# Design&Construction Projects Funding Open Complete Construction Project
Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost
Street Projects
0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation FHWA-STP(U) 11/30/20 01/13/21 100 60 12/31/22 $26,000,000
0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement FHWA-CMAQ 04/26/22 05/20/22 100 0 12/31/22 $ 2,300,000
0249 Sullivan&Wellesley Intersection Improv FHWA-STP(U) 10/21/21 11/17/21 100 1 12/31/22 $ 1,370,000
0275 Barker Rd Widening-River to Euclid FHWA-STP(U) 06/12/20 07/08/20 100 99 12/31/21 $ 3,850,141
0299 Argonne Rd Concrete Pvmt Indiana to Mont TIB-UAP 04/30/21 05/14/21 100 99 12/31/21 $ 2,800,000
0300 Pines&Mission Intersection Improvement FHWA-CMAQ TBD TBD 80 0 12/31/22 $ 588,000
0313 Barker Road/Union Pacific Crossing FMSIB 08/20/21 09/10/21 100 99 12/31/22 $ 1,434,000
0318 Wilbur Sidewalk:Boone to Mission STBG-SA TBD TBD 100 0 12/31/22 $ 80,000
0335 Mission Ave over Evergreen Rd Deck Repair FHWA-BR TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/23 $ 35,248
0344 Park Rd Sidewalk-Broadway to Cataldo CDBG TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/23 $ 60,500
0345 Park Rd Sidewalk-Nora to Baldwin TIB-SP TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/23 $ 60,500
Street Preservation Projects
0320 Sullivan Preservation:Sprague-8th COSV TBD TBD 75 0 12/31/23 $ 138,000
0323 Evergreen Road Preservation Project COSV 04/30/21 05/14/21 100 99 12/31/21 $ 1,900,000
0333 Evergreen Rd Pres Broadway to Mission COSV 02/11/22 02/25/22 100 99 12/31/22 $ 1,341,000
0334 Sprague Ave Preservation STBG 03/18/22 04/08/22 100 5 12/31/22 $ 142,540
0339 2022 Local Access Streets:Summerfield E COSV TBD TBD 50 0 12/31/22 $ 1,377,400
0341 Broadway Preservation-Fancher to Park FHWA-STP(E) TBD TBD 0 0 12/31/23 $ 140,000
0343 Buckeye Avenue Sewer Extension CLRF 03/18/22 04/08/22 100 10 12/31/22 $ 500,000
Traffic Projects
0293 2018 CSS Citywide Reflective Signal BP HSIP N/A N/A 100 97 12/31/21 $ 180,000
0294 Citywide Reflective Post Panels HSIP N/A N/A 100 99 12/31/21 $ 78,000
0326 2020 Citywide Reflective Post Panels HSIP TBD TBD 70 0 12/31/22 $ 164,100
0330 WTSC 2021 School Zone Beacons WTSC N/A N/A 0 0 12/31/22 $ 60,000
0342 WTSC 2022 School Zone Beacons WTSC N/A N/A 0 0 12/31/22 $ 225,000
Parks Projects
0314 Balfour Park Frontage Improvements COSV 03/19/21 04/09/21 100 99 12/31/21 $ 1,003,215
0316 Balfour Park Improvements-Phase 1 COSV 2/18/2022 3/11/2022 100 0 TBD $ 217,500
0328 Sullivan Park Waterline COSV TBD TBD 85 0 TBD $ 152,858
0338 Loop Trail Project COSV TBD TBD 0 0 TBD $ 10,000
Stormwater Projects
0308 Regional Decant Facility Canopy Dept of Ecology 02/05/21 02/19/21 100 90 12/31/21 $ 595,535
0317 Appleway Stormwater Improvements Dept of Ecology 04/30/21 05/21/21 100 99 12/31/21 $ 2,002,256
0327 Sprague Avenue Stormwater Improvements Dept of Ecology TBD TBD 35 0 12/31/22 $ 150,000
Design % Total
Project# Design Only Projects Funding Complete Complete Project
Date PE Cost
Street Projects
0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF&Trent FHWA-STP(U) 12/31/21 30 $ 7,295,000
0311 Sullivan Rd./SR 290 Interchange Project COSV 12/31/23 20 $ 500,000
0321 Argonne Corridor Imprv-North of Knox COSV 12/31/21 10 $ 30,000
0329 Barker Road Imp-City Limits to Appleway IMPACT FEES 12/31/21 10 $ 250,000
0340 8th Ave Sidewalk(Coleman to Park) TIB/COSV 03/31/22 0 $ 434,400
0346 Bowdish Sidewalk 12th to 22nd FHWA/COSV 12/31/23 0 $ 1,983,900
Street Preservation Projects
0286 Broadway Preservation:Havana to Fancher COSV On Hold 70 $ 67,600
Sewer Projects
0332 NE Industrial Area-Sewer Extension COSV 12/31/21 15 $ 80,000
4
PLANNING AND GRANTS
Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS)
In 2021, Senator Murray sponsored the South Barker Corridor or projects and the City was named as a recipient of $3
million. WSDOT Local Programs is continuing to coordinate with FHWA regarding the disbursement of these funds. To
date,the $3 million has not been received by the City.
In 2022, Senator Murray, Senator Cantwell, and Representative McMorris Rodgers, have all announced updated calls for
funding via the CDS budgeting process. On March 29, Council authorized staff to submit its four Legislative Agenda
projects. The City's four CDS requests were submitted to each of our federal delegates April. In May, it was announced
that both Senator Cantwell and Representative McMorris Rodgers selected the Sullivan/Trent Interchange for further
consideration. Also, Senator Murray selected the Pines Road/BNSF GSP for further consideration. Congress will develop
the 2023 budget for the remainder of 2022 and a funding decision is not expected until early 2023.
Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Regional Call for Projects
On April 4, SRTC closed its open application period for its 2024-2026 regional call for projects.The City submitted 11
projects. Overall, SRTC received 51 applications requesting$152 million total. In June, City and SRTC staff coordinated on
what potential funding award could be granted to the Pines Road/BNSF GSP. Funding option#1 would award the City
$11,935,000 across three projects (Pines Road/BNSF GSP would receive$9.27 million). Funding option#2 would award
the City$10,153,000 across four projects (Pines Road/BNSF GSP would receive $6.4 million). SRTC's technical committee
recommended funding option#2 to the Board for its July meeting.
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Each year, the City is required to adopt its TIP, which includes planned capital projects that will utilize Real Estate Excise
Tax (REET) revenues. On June 14, City Council adopted the 2023-2028 TIP via Resolution 22-010. The TIP includes 68
projects over the next six years, totaling$187 million.
Overall Grants Summary
Through June 2022, the City has submitted 31 unique grant applications to eight different funding programs. Awards for
these grants are anticipated in late-summer or fall 2022. Current and anticipated grant programs that staff are considering
submitting applications include the following:
1. Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)— not likely a CoSV application. Possibly an SRTC regional application.
2. Railway Crossing Elimination Program—NOFO released July 6, staff is evaluating.
3. Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI)— NOFO to be released August 2022
4. Reconnecting Communities Pilot Program (RCP)— NOFO released July 7, not likely a CoSV program
5. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)— Not yet released
6. Transportation Improvement Board (TIB)— Released June 1. Staff to bring to council in July.
5