Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CUE-10-02
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: May 23, 2003 TO: John Todd, Current Planner, City of Spokane Valley, Department of Community Development FROM: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHD SUBJECT: CUE-10-02 (Curry) The Spokane Regional Health District will allow nineteen (19) one - bedroom units. If maximum sewage flows exceed 2,280 gallons per day, then sponsor must provide public sewer to the property. C: Robert Curry 13615 E. Trent Spokane Wa 99216 • • To: John Todd (City of Spokane Valley) CC: From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities) Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 Subject: CUE-0010-02 Stage: Technical Review Phase: Aprtment expansion SS03 Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems may be authorized. This authorization is conditioned in compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and the Spokane County Zoning Code Phase One Development Regulations and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. SS06D As per the Spokane County Zoning Code Phase One Development Regulations, each new building shall be double plumbed with a dry side sewer for connection to future area -wide wastewater collection systems. The double plumbed dry side sewer shall be extended to the public right-of-way or as required by the Division of Utilities. To facilitate connection to the future public sewer system. Double plumbing dry side sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities may be required. WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. • TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CURRENT PLANNING Date: May 13, 2003 Department: Spokane Regional Health District Department Contact Person: Steven P. I-I"olderby, R.S. Action: CUE-10-02; Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. TECHNNCAL REVIEW MEETING: May 13, 2003 @ 1:15 P.M. Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies/departments have been contacted —only those who have been determined to have primary interest.) 1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? © YES ® NO b. If no, what is lacking? ct„, ,f D47,1 C-c ai 22y- /3-2Y. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) See attached conditions. • • SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS a. Sewage disposal methods shall be as authorized by the City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department.. b. Water service shall be coordinated through the City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department. c. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. d. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on -site sewage system may be authorized. e. Disposal of effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. f. The sponsor must submit water use figures for all existing units located in the property boundaries. This information will determine current on -site sewage system flows. • �ne Ualley May 13, 2003 Department of Public Works MEMORANDUM To: John Todd From: Sandra Raskell 5 Re: Proposed Condition Use Permit; CUE-10-02 (Curry) Public Works has reviewed the above referenced project. It has been determined that the SEPA Checklist was not complete or correct. Before further review, the following is a list of items to be completed. 1. The SEPA checklist needs to be filled out properly with all information included. If the applicant is unsure of information, he/she shall inquire about the information (i.e. City of Spokane Valley, Department of Health, Spokane County Sewer Department, etc.). The following sections need to be addressed in the SEPA checklist: Section A: 7a, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13; Section B: lb, lc, lg, lh, 2a, 6b(1-3), 6c(1), 6d, 4a, 4d, 5a, 6c, 7b(1-2), 8a, 8h-i, 9a, 10c, l lc, 12a, 14a-d, 14f-g, 15a, 16a. 2. Any work within the City's right-of-way will require a permit. 3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans and a drainage report including calculations that conform to the 2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the 1998 Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management (both adopted by the City of Spokane Valley), and all other Federal, State and Local regulations. Include in the report existing drainage patterns for Trent Avenue and any mitigation that has taken place to separate public and private stormwater drainage flows. Also include any future plans for expansion and treatment capabilities and needs. 4. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentations Control (TESC) plan, prepared by a Washington State licensed Professional Engineer, shall be implemented throughout the duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC plan is to follow Spokane Valley guidelines as found in the 2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the 1998 Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management Spokane County and all other Federal, State or Local regulations. The TESC structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of construction. Each BMP shall be inspected 11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 • (509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008 • • after each rainfall event or every 24 hours during and event. 5. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right-of-way will neither be maintained nor operated by Spokane Valley forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the City Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and Maintenance manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents submitted to the City Engineer for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a calculated replacement cost. 6. A trip distribution and traffic analysis shall be performed for the project area. This study shall be conducted by a Washington State licensed Professional Transportation Engineer. The information acquired from this study will be used in the final design, and a letter will be compiled with this data and will be included in the final project submittal to the City of Spokane Valley for engineering review. 7. The applicant is advised that there may be utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane Valley will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should contact all applicable utility companies regarding the responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 8. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed Washington State Professional Engineer/Land Surveyor, who shall furnish the City Engineer with "Record Drawing" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. All work is subject to inspection by the City Engineer or by his staff. 9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the City Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the City Engineer. 10. Road design, construction and drainage control are the responsibility of the developer. cc: File 11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 • (509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008 MEMO To: From: Date: I. 22-03 Subject: Conditional Use Permit application; CUE-10-02 13615 E. Trent, Spokane Valley, WA J. Todd Bob Ely I visited this site regarding addressing the new portion of the complex. I find the old part of the apartment complex is not in very good shape aesthetically. 10 c of the application proposes an upgrade in this area. I would recommend just that. Without looking very close at the apartment units we could not tell if any safety codes were violated. That can be taken care of with the Building Code Permit. I question the whole area not having any asphalt or hard driveway surface. Maybe that is in the building proposal. We will assign different addresses at building permit time. The left row and the right row will have different addresses with unit numbers. 110 • TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING Date: November 14, 2002 Department: Spokane Regional Health District Department Contact Person: Steven P. H"olderby, R.S. Action: CUE-10-02; Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. TECHINCAL REVIEW MEETING: November 14, 2002 @ 2:15 p.m. Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies/departments have been contacted —only those who have been determined to have trim • interest.) 1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? ® YES ❑ NO b. If no, what is lacking? 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) See attached conditions. • • Spokane Regional Health District Conditions a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. d) Disposal of effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. e) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. f) The sponsor must submit water use figures for all existing units located in the property boundaries. This information will determine current on -site sewage system flows. TO: FROM: DATE: OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER PWK-2 1026 W Broadway Ave (Location) 1116 W Broadway (Mail) Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 477-3600 Fax (509) 477-2243 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Spokane County Division of Pla Division of Engineering & Roads November 14, 2002 PROJECT: APARTMENT NON CONFORMING B-2 & B-3 FILE #: CUE-0010-02/ Hearing: Planner: Review Date Sponsor/Applicant: Section Township Range: Technical/Review Date: JAMES RICHARDSON 11/04/2002 ROBERT G CURRY 03-25-44 {@) RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY NOV 1 4 2002 DIVISION OF PLANNING The Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision " should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. Dedication of 38 feet of right-of-way and a temporary cul-de-sac on the west property boundary of the Rockwell Avenue extension west into the site is required. 2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable standards. The plans and report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. 4. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. CC: Applicant ROBERT G CURRY Engineer/Surveyor Planner JAMES RICHARDSON Page 2 Engineers 11/04/2002 CUE-0010-02 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to county standards and established as county roads. 8. Trent Avenue (SR 290) is a State Highway and is under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The applicant is advised to consult with WSDOT to determine requirements for access to Trent Avenue. 9. Appproach permits are required prior to any access to the county road system. 10. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 11. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Rockwell Avenue, which has frontage on the northern boundary of the proposal and provides access to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 27 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. Improvements to Rockwell Avenue will also require off -site paving consisting of 24 feet of asphalt to the intersection of Rockwell Avenue and Avalon Road 12. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 13. Prior to the release of a building permit or issuance of an approach permit, the applicant must submit road and drainage plans to the Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads for review and approval. Road and drainage plans must be prepared in compliance with Spokane County Road and Drainage Standards. 14. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 15. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." Page 3 Engineers 11/04/2002 CUE-0010-02 16. If the requested conditional use permit is approved, the Spokane County Engineer will issue a Transportation Concurrency Certificate. END to Memo To: Planner: From: Subject: Applicant: Date: RE: Spokane County Public Works, Transportation Engineering Section, Division of County Engineering PWK-2 1026 W Broadway (Location) 1116 W Broadway (Mail) SPOKANE WA 99260- 0170 (509) 477-3600 FAX (509)477-2243 Spokane County Division of Planning JAMES RICHARDSON Greg Baldwin CUE-0010-02 (APARTMENT NON CONFORMING B-2 & B-3) ROBERT G CURRY November 6, 2002 Conditional Use Review 11/04/2002 - Technical Review RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY NOV 0 6 2002 DIVISION OF PLANNING The applicant has been requested to submit a revised site plan. This site plan needs to show the adjacent public road system which provides access to the development. The applicant is notified that the Rockwell Avenue right-of-way shall be extended at a width of 38 feet of right-of-way along the rear frontage of the development. A border easement is also required for the construction of a sidewalk on the south side of the road. Rockwell Avenue shall be constructed to 27 feet of asphalt with -in the development and a strip pave section of 24 feet shall be continued off -site in the Rockwell Avenue right-of-way to connect back on the east to Avalon Avenue. A temporary cul-de-sac will also be required at the west end of the project. After submittal of the revised site plan of record, conditions of approval will be submitted for the record. CC: Applicant ROBERT G CURRY Engineer/Surveyor Planner JAMES RICHARDSON IOW Washington State Department of Transportation Douglas B. MacDonald Secretary of Transportation November 6, 2002 Mr. James Richardson Spokane County Planning 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 Re: CUE-10-02 (Robert Curry) Dear Mr. Richardson, DIVISION Eastern Region 2714 N. Mayfair Street Spokane, WA 99207-2090 509-324-6000 Fax 509-324-6005 TTY: 1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov RECEIVED SPO $ E CO 4 NTY OCT 2002 RECEIVED COUNTY F NOV 12 2002 DIVISION OF PLANNING Thank you for the opportunity to review the above proposal. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has reviewed this proposal and asks the applicant to contact Kevin Hee at (509) 324-6540 to update the access permit for this site due to the change of use. This will need to be completed prior to the release of building permits. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me in our planning office at 324-6199. Sincerely, Greg Figg Transportation Planner cc: Kevin Hee, WSDOT Access Manager Greg Baldwin, Spokane County Engineers Project File • 111, AlI RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING N O V 12 2002 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLAN DIVISION OF PLANNING Date: /a— %- 02- Department: T c,r a waocl i.rr►ga4-. b t.i+. 3 Department Contact Person: in; K. KI c-, ✓l Action: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. File Number #: CUE-10-02 Technical Review Meeting: November 14, 2002 @ 2:15 p.m. Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. The function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies/departments have been contacted --only those who have been determined to have primary interest). 1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet the minimum procedural submission requirements? YES 10 NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) Aclst..(6Vs.4-4_ )c - x for Dome s Tic 6 f ir1 Pre, f t.c4At A $ MEMORANDUM DATE: November 4, 2002 TO: James Richardson, Division of Planning FROM: Lucy Peterschmidt, P.E., Stormwater Utility RE: CUE-10-02 — Curry, Apartments CC: File We have reviewed this Conditional Use Permit application and SEPA checklist. Future construction must comply with the drainage requirements of the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management. For the applicant's information, we have highlighted a few requirements that apply to this proposal: 1. Spokane County does not own or operate a regional stormwater conveyance system. As a result, the project proponent is responsible for providing on -site control of stormwater runoff from newly constructed impervious surfaces. 2. Drainage shall not be diverted and/or released to a downstream property at points not receiving drainage prior to the proposed development. 3. This proposal is located within the Spokane-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). In order to mitigate the potential for groundwater degradation, all stormwater runoff from land developed within the ASA shall be treated prior to discharge to a drywell or other approved disposal point. The preferred method of treatment is through a bio-infiltration swale (formerly referred to as a "208" swale or a grassed percolation area). Thank you for the opportunity to comment. C:\Documents and Settingsljrichardson\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK151CUE-10-02.doc 10-24-02 10:23AM FROM-SCAPCA T-481 P.04/04 F-753 S CI, K . N E SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 5094776828 1011 WEST 1101 COLLEGE, SUITE 403 • SPOKANE, WA 99201 • (509) 477-4727 Fax (509) 477-6828 Date: October 24, 2002 To: James Richardson, Associate Planner Spokane County Division of Planning 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 From: Ron Edgar, Chief of Technical Services RE: SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR: File No. CUE-10-02 Proponent / Project Name: Conditional use permit in the B-2 & B-3 zones a13615 E. Trent. Request for Comments by November 4, 2002 The following is a list of concerns/issues that may need to be addressed for this project as determined from information received by this office. The list is provided as a brief summary of general requirements and does not relieve the proponent from meeting all local, state, and/or federal regulations. For additional information or clarification, contact SCAPCA at (509) 477-4727. Copies of SCAPCA regulations are availab,s for purchase in our office or can be viewed and downloaded from http:/Iwww.scapca.orq. Construction related requirements • Dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects must be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. • Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. • Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning. • SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i.e. ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads, etc.) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions. • If objectionable odors result from this project, effective control apparatus and measures must be taken to reduce odors to a minimum. • Special attention should be given to proper maintenance of diesel powered construction equipment to reduce the impact of diesel exhaust, a suspected carcinogen. Additional requirements • A Notice of Construction and Application for Approval is required to be submitted and approved by SCAPCA prior to the construction, installation, or establishment of an air pollution source. This includes emergency generators rated at 500 hp (375 kW) or higher, natural gas heating equipment units rated at 4 MMBTU/hr or higher (input), and heating equipment units fired with other fuels (e,g. diesel) rated at 1 MMBTIJ/hr (input) or higher. Contact SCAPCA for a Notice of Construction application. • A Notice of Intent must be submitted to SCAPCA prior to any demolition project or asbestos project. An asbestos survey must be done by an AHERA accredited building inspector prior to the demolition or renovation of buildings to determine if asbestos -containing material is present at the site. Contact SCAPCA for a Notice of Intent application Li Fatra0 do ReGC! F,ioe,' 11:4Marys\SEPA\GENERAL COMMENTS FORM. doc 11/12/02 TUE 11.53 FAX 509 892 4125 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPT --» PLANNING 16 006 411) SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire District 1 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WA 99206-3676 - (509) 928-1700 • FAX (509) 892.4125 Mark Grover Chler November 12, 2002 James Richardson Department of Building & Planning 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Conditional Use Permit CUE-10-02 Dear Mr. Richardson: The Spokane Valley Fire Department has no objection to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for this proposal. We will have requirements at building permit time. Sincerely, Kevin Miller Deputy Fire Marshal KM/sz ti • • TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING Date: Department: ea: !d arf fi; Co Department Contact Person: /46 ec , TTGNd Action: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. File Number #: CUE-10-02 Technical Review Meeting: November 14, 2002 @ 2:15 p.m. Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. The function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies/departments have been contacted --only those who have been determined to have primary interest). 1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet the minimum procedural submission requirements? YES )( NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) w SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99260 509-477-3675 Recommended Conditions File Number: CUE-10-02 The applicant should contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements. Commercial Footing h foundation Permit Agreement U2/OS/00 SroK . CanyrY NE COUNTY DIVISION • F BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WA 99260-0050 Site Information Site Address: 13615 E TRENT RD SPOKANE, WA 00000 Parcel Number 45031.2405 Subdivision: UNKNOWN Block: Lot: Zoning: B-2 Community Business Owner: CURRY, ROBERT G Address: PO BOX 1071 CHEWELAH, WA 99109-1071 Building Inspector: DAVE WEISBECK Water Dist: Project Information Project Number: 02008960 Inv: 1 Issue Date: Permit Use: CUE-10-02 CUP NON CONFORMING USE Applicant: CURRY, ROBERT POB 1071 CHEWELAH, WA 99109 Contact: CURRY, ROBERT POB 1071 CHEWELAH, WA 99109 Setbacks - Front: Left: Right: Group Name: Project Name: Phone: (509) 928-0600 Phone: (509) 928-0600 Rear: Permits Conditional Use Contractor: License #: ENGINEER REVIEW CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UTILITIES (INSIDE PSSA) $50.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $448.00 PRE-APP CONFERENCE $100.00 Total Permit Fee: $75.00 $39.00 $712.00 Payment Summary Total Fees AmountPaid AmuuntO« ing $712.00 $712.00 1,0.�i�� Processed By: Ramey, Kathleen Printed By: WENDEL, GLORIA Tran Date 10/18/02 Page 1 of 1 Receipt # 8279 Pa ment Amt $712.00 PAYMENT • NOTICE It is the responsibility of the applicant/permittee, not Spokane County, to see to it that the use described on the front of this permit complies with applicable codes and requirements and that required inspections are requested. Failure to request required inspections and obtain the necessary approvals prior to progressing beyond the point where inspections are required may necessitate removal of certain parts of the construction at the applicant's/permittee's or property owner's expense. At a minimum, the following inspections ARE REQUIRED by County Code: 1. FOOTING - when forms and reinforcement are in place and prior to placement of concrete —all structures, including manufactured homes. NOTE: This inspection includes review of the structure's setbacks from property lines. Minimum setbacks are established by County zoning regulations. Typically, side and rear yard setbacks are measured from property lines, while setbacks for yards abutting streets are measured from the property line or the center line of the roadway right-of-way, whichever provides the greater setback from the center line of the roadway right-of- way. Curb lines and fence lines are not necessarily indicative of property lines. In some residential areas, the County can own as much as 20 feet of right-of-way between your property and the actual improved street/curb. The responsibility to comply with applicable setback provisions lies solely with the permittee—neither Spokane County nor its authorized representatives assume any responsibility for the verification or location of your owner's/permittee's expense. property lines. Please verify their location prior to locating your structure. Failure to properly locate the structure may require its relocation at the 2. FOUNDATION - when forms and reinforcement are in place and prior to placement of concrete. 3. FRAMING - after all framing, bracing and blocking is in place, and prior to concealing. 4. INSULATION - prior to the installation of drywall. 5. PLUMBING - after rough -in, before covering, and final. 6. MECHANICAL - rough -in of piping, before covering, metal chimneys before concealment, and final. 7. FINAL - when complete and prior to occupancy and/or use. Please provide 24 hours notice. All permits require final inspection. NOTE: In addition to inspection of the structure, this inspection includes review of site improvements (typically depicted on the approved site plan) required by ordinance or as a condition of approval of this permit. Items such as the installation of fire hydrants, fire department access, on -site drainage ("208 swales"), road improvements, parking, and landscaping are common requirements of a permit/site plan which must be com- pleted prior to final approval of a building or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 8. MANUFACTURED HOMES - Final inspection required when complete, stairs, handrails, skirting, etc. installed, and prior to occupancy; completed inspection record card must be available on site. 9. SEWERS - prior to cover 10. RIGHT-OF-WAY/APPROACH - prior to placement of concrete, or, if gravel approach, after completion. In addition to the above, any plumbing or mechanical systems or material which would be concealed by framing, drywall, concrete, etc., must be inspected prior to cover. Check with the department for "special inspections" in conjunction with commercial projects. FOR INSPECTIONS: TO INSURE PROMPT SERVICE, PLEASE GIVE ONE WORKING DAY/24 HOUR NOTICE . PARTS OF YOUR PROJECT MAY REQUIRE PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS FROM MORE THAN ONE AGENCY. • Building, plumbing, mechanical and fire inspections, Division of Building and Code Enforcement 477-3675 • Construction in a flood plain, Division of Engineering & Roads 477-3600 • Electrical wiring, State 324-2640 • On -site waste disposal 324-1560 Department of Labor and Industries system, Spokane Regional Health District • Road cuts for utilities or driveways, Division of Engineering & Roads - 48-HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED 477-3600 or State Department of Transportation 456-3000 • Sewer connection, Division of Utilities 477-3604 or City Public Works Department 625-6300 PERMIT EXPIRATION AND REFUNDS Unless otherwise noted, this permit will be considered null and void by limitation if the work authorized by the permit is not commenced or is stopped for a period of 180 days, unless a written request for an extension of the permit is received and approved by the Building Official prior to expiration. At a minimum an inspection should be requested at least once every 180 days to assure the validity of the permit. A permit may be renewed within one year of the date of expiration for one-half the original fee, subject to certain limitations —please call us if you have any questions. All refund requests must be made in writing by the applicant/permittee (shown on the reverse) no later than 180 days after the date of tee payment. Refunds of not more than 80% of the permit fee paid may be authorized when no work has been done under the permit. No refunds may be authorized more than 180 days after fee payment. MISTAKE? If you think we've made an error in processing this permit or in conducting inspections pertaining to it, or find erroneous information in the permit, please bring it to our attention immediately by filing a written request for correction within 10 working days of discovery. All such requests should be directed to the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the below address. Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Phone: (509) 477-3675 Fax: (509) 477-4703 TDD: (509) 477-7133 • ENVIRONMENTAL tC ]H E tC 1fC.1L ]f S'7[' SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230[1] CU 10-02 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1) PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts or your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these question if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON PROTECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 2 of 21 • • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: P/fiE; Fn FJPROJECT NO. 2. Name of a plicant: (5%.6.6: rij Cie ti 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: f?0 x lD7 % WWa'644- 4 /07 92 —(>60o 4. Date checklist prepared: /0%/6/62_ 5. Agency requesting checklist: �L id) JW ° P%-Iw iir 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): '06ti 45 pass J /;1(-c' Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 3 of 21 • •) A. BACKGROUND (continued): 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. T 6ot j Z "Ai/l3 4-7- 4 771‘ b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. y83 .2 //40E A �/P ( c65F 4-1 /59 01 t-: %17ptr S. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. i A.S A 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 4 of 21 • • A. BACKGROUND (continued): 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. QX lr»D LD L/��� 770 ._/1/I_) Of/ !� S turd. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description_ , site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. A-%- I3ef 7-frV7 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Set -vice Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). < '-((5 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 5 of 21 •) • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? _ c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland: J /L d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Evaluation For Agency Use Only Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 6 of 21 • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? g. OJ pirvOW — pCl'V i (of h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. f b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. fA) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 7 of 21 ► • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity- of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /fJ 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 4a 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 8 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. 3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities). Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 9 of 21 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? 5) What protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ld'/ LL , rdi% FF lV ro e'-40-�5 , , 2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a storm water disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? 3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ,Jo Evaluation For . Agency Use Only (D QOP Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 10 of 21 i • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist). 7 g5 I'V GA S /?k Vic. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of ve etation found on the �eciduous tre maple, aspen, evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine shrubs rop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other jf/11 water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation e: -Vve b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ,2 ei g-� ss c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. // d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: V ft- 1r,�nr� c' P A'l Evaluation For Agency Use Only Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 11 of 21 •) Evaluation For . Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or ne, r . e site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbir mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. /`" d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 6 S ,q' ,�1-1//I4 - b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. /70 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 12 of 21 • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control ener impact if any: Z/Ueie C•- % ��[gib/ �I5 —) �1avJ 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? /Ai 64-f; c 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ,Ov" c 1 Lt- Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 13 of 21 • Evaluation For . Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? fi e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? �2 - ,133 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 14 of 21 • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? g. R? — 3 3 If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. ems, 4(0-- i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? J• Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ,BUILD/evr' A//P P OM %T srn L DIvE b �tCt t 11-PA-IPtinClurirS Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 15 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided/ff any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. t5 - 114) wit)-.i/VcomE b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. AM/V Lo 4J - /ve �� c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? d/d/vE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: UP /W-WL 7N t /f°= /1 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 16 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? / to c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? /1//11z= vt.476(\ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: X 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 17 of 21 • • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers, known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. /vo b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 7E,2/7 ),)( h c 3c b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? "z.) Evaluation For Agency Use Only Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 18 of 21 • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? VD 4 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. /00 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g• 1�- ned -v co{n p Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 1 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 19 of 21 • • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. /06 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the sit sanitary sewet�septic systet , of er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 4Jfl-T&7 rc Sys C. SIGNAT'URE • Evaluation For' Agency Use Only I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any wilful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determination of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. Date: Proponent: Proponent: (Signature) Address: Po 425 ,t5)C /O) 1,)4 City, State, Zip: (Please type or print) Phone: - ® 6LjQ Person completing the form: cq/lam/ \ .k�� }�/Z Phone: g2e. DSc Date: Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 20 of 21 ti • • FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nonsignificance (DNS). B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated determination of nonsignificance with conditions (MDNS). C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance (Ds). REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 21 of 21 Date: April 30, 2003 To: • • Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM City of Spokane Valley Engineering Department City of Spokane Valley Community Development/Building Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority; Chuck Studer Spokane County Division of Utilities -Information Services; Jim Red Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby East Valley School District No. 361 Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3 From: John Todd, Planner Subject: Conditional Use Permit, CUE-10-02 to expand an existing nonconforming apartment complex in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) Zone. Parcel No. 45031.2405 TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING May 13, 2003 1:15 PM Current.Planning Office City of Spokane Valley City Hall, Suite 106 11707 E. Sprague Avenue Please review the above -subject proposal and attachments for a Technical Review Meeting. Current Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. If you cannot attend, please forward your written review comments on the attached Technical Review Reply Form to me before the meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. The attached Technical Review Reply Form with your written comments will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Current Planning file. If you have any questions, please contact me at 921-1000, ext. 128. Attachment: Technical Review Reply Form Copy to without attachment: Robert Curry 11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 • (509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008 • • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CURRENT PLANNING TECHNICAL REVIEW REPLY FORM Date: Agency: Contact Person: Proposal/Project Name & File No.: Condition Use Permit, CUE-10-02 Technical Review Meeting: May 13, 2003 @ 1.15pm. Note: The following information is to provide the proposal/project sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal/project. This will occur only after the proposal/project is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies/departments have been contacted --only those who have been determined to have primary interest. 1. a. Does the proposal/project meet re uirements to be placed on the Public Hearing 11 Agenda? ❑ YES NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the proposal/project? (Attach conditions if necessary) •,\N„ • S�kane Va1 Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM DATE: April 18, 2003 TO: City of Spokane Valley Engineering Department City of Spokane Valley Community Development/Building FROM: J. Todd, Planner SUBJECT: Proposed Conditional Use Permit; CUE-10-02 Enclosed is a copy of the above -subject application, maps and SEPA checklist submitted by Robert Curry to Spokane County Division of Planning. The proposal is a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zone. This proposal was previously reviewed and commented upon by Spokane County and various agencies of jurisdiction. Please review this proposal and provide your written comments and recommended conditions to me by April 25, 2003. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact me at 921-1000 ext.128. Enclosures 11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 • (509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921- 1008 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF PLANNING DATE: February 28, 2003 TO: Robert Curry 13615 E. Trent Avenue Spokane, WA 99216 FROM: RE: John Pederson, Planning Supervisor Status of Pending Land Use Action File # CUE-10-02; Conditional Use Permit ",r) k In recognition of formal incorporation of the City of Spokane Valley and to continue processing of pending land use actions, please be advised that the Spokane County Division of Planning will transfer the above -referenced project file to the City of Spokane Valley on April 1, 2003. Prior to April 1, 2003, the Division of Planning will make every effort to complete your project or reach a reasonable milestone under Spokane County Public Works Application Review Procedures For Project Permits. If the pending project is not complete, the project file will be transferred to the City of Spokane Valley for further processing. If you have any questions about your project status or need additional information, please contact me at your convenience. c: Board of County Commissioners Gerry Gemmill, Assistant to Chief Executive Officer James Harris, Interim Planning Director, City of Spokane Valley MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard Spokane County Development Engineering Services; John Hohman Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Ron Hand Washington State DOT, Greg Figg Trentwood Irrigation District #3 Spokane County Fire District #1 East Valley School District # 361 FROM: James Richardson, Associate Planner JR, DATE: November 5, 2002 RE: CUE-10-02 TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING November 14, 2002 @ 2:15 p.m. PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING CONFERENCE ROOM 1A Please review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. If you cannot attend the meeting, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to me prior to the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Planning file for this proposal. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 477-7168. Attachment: Technical Review Form copy w/o attachments to: Robert Curry; P.O. Box 1071; Chewelah, WA 99109 MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133 Spokane County Division of Planning Technical Review Meeting Meeting Date and Time: November 14, 2002 @ 2:15 p.m. Project File No.: CUE-10-02 Project Location: The site is generally located on the north side of Trent Avenue (SR-290) approximately 150 feet west of Avalon Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 3, T 25 N, R 44 EWM. The site address is 13615 E. Trent Avenue. Comprehensive Plan: Mixed Use (MU) Existing Zones: Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) Project Description: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. Parcel Number: 45031.2405 Owner: Robert Curry P.O. Box 1071 Chewelah, WA 99109 (509) 928-0600 Applicant: Same Project Planner: James Richardson, Associate Planner • • Date: TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING Department: Department Contact Person: Action: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. File Number #: CUE-10-02 Technical Review Meeting: November 14, 2002 @ 2:15 p.m. Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. The function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies/departments have been contacted --only those who have been determined to have primary interest). 1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet the minimum procedural submission requirements? YES NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) • • FILE NO: CUE-10-02 DECLARATION OF MAILING I, Jody Fisher, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, do hereby declare: I am a citizen of the United States of America and over the age of 18 years. On the 29th day of October 2002, I caused to be deposited in the United States mail at Spokane, Washington, with correct United States postage affixed, a true and correct copy of NOTICE OF APPLICATION, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers as shown on the Spokane County Assessor's records as of October 16, 2002, who have been found to own or pay taxes on property adjacent to the applicant's/agent's owned, controlled or under -option property, and additionally parcels adjacent to any private access easement road. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses indicated on the attached list, incorporated herein by reference. Dated at Spokane, Washington, this 29th day of October, 2002. HD -DECLARATION OF MLG MSTR gCri461;thA 4 Jody Fisher • • ii4c 1 Aginik SPOK NE COUNTY NOTICE OF APPLICATION TYPE II DIVISION OF PLANNING This Notice of Application is being provided to affected agencies and owners/taxpayers of property located within 400 feet of a proposed land use application received by the Spokane County Division of Planning. This notice is to advise you that the land use application may affect you and to invite your comments on the project. Written comments may be submitted by any person regarding this project. All comments received by November 13, 2002 will be considered by the project planner prior to preparation of a staff report to the Hearing Examiner. The project file may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, except holidays, in the Division of Planning of the Public Works Building, 1' Floor Permit Center West, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. If you have questions, you may call the project planner at the phone number identified at the end of this notice. Please reference the PROJECT FILE NUMBER in all your communications. PROJECT FILE NUMBER: CUE-10-02 PARCEL NUMBERS: 45031.2405 PROPERTY OWNER/ Robert Curry DESIGNATED CONTACT: P.O. Box 1071 Chewelah, WA 99109 (509) 928-0600 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. PROJECT ADDRESS AND LOCATION: The site is generally located on the north side of Trent Avenue (SR-290) approximately 150 feet west of Avalon Road in the NE '/4 of Section 3, T 25 N, R 44 EWM. The site address is 13615 E. Trent Avenue. DATE APPLICATION SUBMITTED: October 18, 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Mixed Use (MU). EXISTING ZONING: Community Business & Regional Business (B-2 & B-3). ADDITIONAL PERMITS: In order for the project to be developed as proposed, additional permits must be obtained including, but not limited to, sewer connection permits, building permits, access permit, etc., State agency permits, permits required by other local jurisdictions, and Federal agency permits. ADDITIONAL STUDIES REQUESTED: None. Type II Notice of Application CUE-10-02 10-29-02 Page 1 of 2 i • ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: This proposed land use action includes an Environmental Checklist prepared in accordance with the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act, WAC 197-11. Review of existing development regulations, existing zoning and typical recommended conditions of approval and mitigating measures indicate the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) threshold determination will likely be a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: The proposed project shall comply with the regulations and development standards identified in the Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, Spokane County Critical Areas Ordinance, Uniform Building Code, Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and the regulations of the Spokane Regional Health District. ACTION: This project is subject to a future public hearing. You will be receiving a Notice of Hearing which will be issued a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A written report, including a staff analysis of the project will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days prior to the public hearing. Participation in the public hearing is encouraged. A copy of the Notice of Decision issued by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, which identifies the findings of fact, conclusion, decision and appeal rights will be provided to those individuals who testify at the public hearing and will be available to all others upon request. ATTACHMENTS: Please find attached a vicinity map and a site plan for your review. REVIEW AUTHORITY: James Richardson, Associate Planner Spokane County Division of Planning 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260-0050 (509) 477-7168 Date Issued: 10-30-02 Date Mailed: I ©^ 2 9 r ©Z Signature: �� Type II Notice of Application CUE-10-02 10-29-02 Page 2 of 2 • DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT As per the Administrative Rules to implement ESHB 1724 Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1-0700, as amended FILE NUMBER: CUE-10-02 PERMIT APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. APPLICATION TYPE: TYPE II OWNER: Robert Curry ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1071; Chewelah, WA 99109 PHONE: (509) 928-0600 APPLICANT: Same DATE OF SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION INFORMATION: October 19, 2002 YOUR APPLICATION IS: X/ Complete The required components of an application are present and are judged by the review authority to be sufficiently professionally and technically accurate to allow the processing of the application. All fees have been paid. This is your Determination of Completeness. Since your application is judged complete, the following is a preliminary determination of consistency: (a) Type of land use: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. (b) Level of development: The site is currently developed for 14 apartment units. Twenty (20) additional apartment units are proposed. (c) Infrastructure: Necessary public services with sufficient and available capacity to serve the subject property either exists, or will be established in accordance with reviewing agency conditions and/or requirements. (d) Character of development: Numerical or other quantifiable performance standards: If the proposed Conditional Use Permit is approved, the applicant will be required to meet all applicable numerical/quantifiable performance standards of the permit prior to obtaining building permits. (ii) Promotes and does not substantially conflict with narrative standards: The proposed wireless communications support tower does not substantially conflict with the narrative standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code or the Goals and Policies for the Mixed Use (MU) designation of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. • • (iii) Includes preparation, completion and approval of required studies, plans or determinations: A complete application and environmental checklist was prepared and submitted with the application on October 19, 2002. (iv) Methods of determining compliance to ensure that mitigation measures will be accomplished: If approved, the subject proposal will be conditioned to include methods to determine compliance and assure that mitigation of impacts will be accomplished. REVIEW AUTHORITY: Spokane County Public Works Department Division of Planning 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Phone: (509) 477-7196 Fax: (509) 477-2243 Division Contact: James Richardson, Associate Planner Date Issued: 10-29-02 Signature: (. A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Division of Engineering and Roads, Transportation Engineering, Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Division of Engineering and Roads, Development Services, John Hohman Division of Utilities, Information Services, Jim Red Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Ron Hand Spokane Regional Health District, Don Copely Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer Washington State DOT, Greg Figg Trentwood Irrigation District #3 Spokane County Fire District #1 East Valley School District # 361 FROM: James Richardson, Associate Planner DATE: October 21, 2002 RE: CUE-10-02: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. Enclosed find a site plan, vicinity map, environmental checklist, and application for the above referenced Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming apartment use in the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones. The site is generally located on the north side of Trent Avenue (SR-290) approximately 150 feet west of Avalon Road in the NE '/4 of Section 3, T 25 N, R 44 EWM. The site address is 13615 E. Trent Avenue. Please review and forward any comments to me by November 4, 2002. If you have any questions you may contact me at 477-7168. Enclosures copy w/o enclosures: Robert Curry; P.O. Box 1071; Chewelah, WA 99109 MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133 • of all regulations or potential issues for a given application. The procedures do not prevent the county from later applying other relevant laws to an application; and c. Provide an opportunity for other agency (county and non -county) staff to become acquainted with a proposed application and generally inform the applicant of other agency rules and regulations. 2) The general procedures for pre -application meetings are: a. A pre -application meeting is reconunended for all applications and required for Type 11 applications, provided the applicant inay request a waiver from a pre -application meeting in writing. The waiver of a pre -application meeting may increase the risk that the application may not be accepted or that processing will be delayed. A pre -application. meeting generally would be waived by the review authority only if an application is relatively simple; b. The applicant or agent must be present at any pre -application meeting. Generally the County does not provide meeting minutes. Any prepared agency written comments will be provided to the applicant; and c. Each County review agency shall develop procedures to implement the provisions of this section. 13.300.106 PROCEDURAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMITTAL A completed application for a project permit, which'meets the procedural submission requirements, shall be submitted to the applicable review authority on forms and/or in a manner provided by that office. Procedural submission requirements are defined in chapter 13.200 of this ordinance and shall be made available by the review authority. The review authority shall make available a printed listing of such requirements for each project permit type. ).108 EXPIRATION OF APPLICATION Absent statute or ordinance provisions to the contrary, any application for which a Determination of Completeness has been issued and for which no substantial step has been taken to meet project approval requirements for a period of 180 days after issuance of the Determination of Completeness, or for a period of 180 days after Spokane County has requested additional information studies, will expire by limitation and become null and void. The review authority may grant a 180 day extension on a one-time basi er application if the failure to take a substantial step .circumstances beyond-t1 1 of the c t. 13.300.110 STANDARD OF REVIEW Absent statute or ordinance provisions to the contrary, the re g I1ations in effect onthe date a complete application is submitted and fees are paid will be the standard of review. Page6 7/31/01 l" `jv 0 � s r' D14 1_.f..l S .MINIMS, 5 < 40N/l.t..) •SOokane August 4, 2003 Robert Curry P. O. Box 1071 Chewelah, WA 99109-1071 • Department of Community Development Subject: Proposed Conditional Use Permit, CUE-10-02 On May 13, 2003, a technical review meeting was conducted to determine the completeness of the subject application and its readiness to proceed to public hearing. At that meeting, it was determined that additional information and corrections to your application were required. To date this office has not received any response or additional information from you to warrant further processing of your application. If the requested additional information and corrections have not been received, and no substantial steps have been taken to meet project approval requirements by November 10, 2003, your application will expire and become null and void. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please don't hesitate to call me at (509) 688-0172. Sincerely, 11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 • (509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008 • CUE-10-02 Vicinity Map • Scale : 1 inch — 1667 ft (rounded) 10/29/02 Vicinity Map CUE-10-02 Site Plan 10/29/02 Site Plan UR :.542442 - 11 7542I42 42 CUE-10-02 Phase I Zoning • Scale : 1 inch — 500 ft (rounded) 10/21/02 Phase 1 Zoning 4111 CUE-10-02 Comprehensive land Use Plan Scale : 1 inch — 667 ft (rounded) 10/21/02 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Subject Property within UGA. t t t t t t t* Subject Property within PSSA. Subject Property within ASA. 1/-•R••ff•ft Subject Property outside NRL & Buffer. kop io CUE-10-02 Aerial View 1995 L I ... ---- rr----'y.E.. dibit r rr- *11 41411 t --------'Pt 1f --r . -- -- -ram Scale :1 inch - 200 ft (rounded) 10/21/02 Aerial View Plialto Off SPOKA'IE COUNTY ASSESS_. cS4 3 'ivK Go .rc L01- S. 34.bo 01 y.oUt tot + - 3g•34' . GCT .18 2002 CUBAENTPfANTWp /633 Fo.r-Ler 3 31.14 Vi4 692 eaSt Y ATP" y4- . 33 . ►as is.I ts• FB.I. A. 2GFt.j �.:.� FOLIO AVE. -Pra— " .) / N/z 3-25-41 M. 04 sia o ? ud dry v - al 0 3 3( 4 C f NQ� J�x\\ 0/ 6 R RIt T C i I4 41'33 T135.9 L 2_59// L. 41T. 0--- A� 9 89"1SE 74+ 01, 8 119+50. S• Q 00 MCC 0 w z CT.MIQ./JF' "Ll P/Nt2,M,w, f t c Icy v' N c 2179 - 4Cy� Sec . 3 T. 25'N.q R 44 E. Q � PH. W0.47.-cep' W E •T•e.MPot2AliY GIASU t P t P '•• • •_r. •T- q.c.. 1ROC%CWE 10 S.P, use-98 'Y IZlt7 -515 0 • . \ • • \• \ • }�M t eagPaE./�u — � YID• tezeekeeo OFFICIAL PLAT �AI•r.ER-{7.VCG1NEER-, SPOKANE COUNTY Pr'i na1 p OfAs1;s!on-f - n. i f.; / Vl V: 11Y.ri CO+Ei COMMUNE -R•50 • "/8 •O fi\ f O 3 11" •p.\ O -r l.7ATE 6 — /5-'7Z D E SCR / P T/C3 ,\.' T H /5 SECT/ON REPRODUCED FROM ,L/ NE/V TO MYLA R• G. Roy m di 0 10 n - 0 16 0 ret el 3 10 5 2.1+6 ?-9 A.P. 12.11 0`Q7` Lf. i4 0 243-r5 ter• �a x� .\� pc. 33*-0-74.b •t 1?.-PT 334+82 O A IIV'32•p} D 57600' R I0O."" T 16c.C+ L 2oa.0 e 1' z 0 1' 1 NOTE: ��A SHADED AREA DE:•:/GNATS ti t"YAC:•! ION`; ee EXISTING/ ///// 64' DRIVE GRASS ERRING FENCE EXISTING FENCE DRIVE DRIVE CARPORT CARPORT 351.0' / 19'-0' WPORT § CARPORT GRASS CARPORT GRASS I --I CARPORT CARPORT k GRASS CARPORT GRASS CARPORT DRIVE GRASS TRENT AVE NOTE 1. SLOPE ALL PARING AREAS TO DRAIN WTO LANDSCAPE PEAS 2. SEPTIC SYSTEM BY OTHERS 1{' ctw z o 01- ai 2A r-L yaw SITE PLAN 1"=30'-0" az et enenl R,4 cc fra , CD rTh LLJ CC Lel 0 Erj z DRAWN MFC DATE 10/16/02 CHECKED JOB NO. 205 SHEET SD-1 Ir SPOKANE COUNT/ APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS CUP'S, VARIANCES, NON-CONFORMINS USES DIVISION OF PLANNING PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION • Property Owner(s): pb13 E12T 6 CU Y Street Address: 136 156, 1REA/- City: S'pb lato Phone: (Home) /2? O60c (Work) State: L(,)/Zip Code: `7,2/-6 APPLICANT/AGENT INFORMATION _ • Applicant/Agent: ;;.ife- 16_ Fax: Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: Phone: (Home) (Work) Fax: REQUESTED ACTIONS(S) (Indicate appropriate action): D Conditional Use Permit U Expansion of a Nonconforming Use ❑ Variance(s) D Other (list): PROJECT INFORMATION • Existing use of property: ,4pmKr/K LAST c • Describe proposed use of the property, noting change from 'existing use': ,f/0/LZ= • If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance sought in comparable terms (i.e., 50 feet from centerline verses required 65 feet): • If a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet all standards? (Y) N If not, has one or more variances been requested: Y N • If home industry, has consultation occurred with the Division of Planning regarding construction of building for intended use? Y N UUEiU-(JZ APPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEG ITEMS 1 CUP, Variance, Non -conforming Uses PAGE 2 of 3 • Size of the subject property Parcel No.(s): • Current zoning of property: • Street address of property (if known): /&2/5,--- /ie. % • Legal description of property (include easement, if appli able) , ' i/ ,- , , / �` -A9M1- • Source of legal: 7;//c--' (_G, • Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: • What interest does applicant hold in the property 4-c1/1 PP s"1/;0 NOTARY State of Washington) SS County of Spokane ) I swear, under penalty of perjury, that: (1) I am the owner of record or authorized agent for the proposed site; (2) if not the owner, written permission from owner authorizing my actions on his/her behalf is attached; and (3) all of the above responses and those on supporting documents are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. Signed: Date Notary Public in and for the Sate of Washington, residing at My appointment expires BURDEN OF PROOF FORM(S) (by applicant) It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the requested action should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor of approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which addresses the criteria which the Hearing Examiner must consider. Please complete the form and return with your application. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Section Township .2,5 Range `/'/ Violation/Enforcement: Y Lot, legal & add'I. ownership checked by: Person doing preapp conf.: 1 Other/previous Division of Planning actin involving this property: Certificate of Exemption No. Application No. ( E "' ( —0 2 Hearing Date Various site plan dimensions check by APPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HAIG ITEMS i PAGE 3 of 3 CUP, Variance, Non -conforming Uses SIGN -OFF BY AGENCIES The applicant must visit each agency whose number is circled below. 1. SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRIC - a. Proposed method of water supply / teA;,�L,f, o c� b. Proposed method of sewage disposal S• A preliminary consul on has been held to scuss the proposal. The applicant has informed of requirements an andards. We req est9nsultation with the Division of Plannin Signs 2. WATER PURVEYOR: Date iy4,, -z- "dm- orot 6)1 tttwi, g a. Proposed method of water supply & r n� b. The proposa is not located within the boundary of our future service area. c. The proposal i is not located within the boundary of our current district. d. We F4are not able to serve this site with adequate water. e. Satisfactory arrangement ave ave not been made to serve this proposal. Signature Date 3. SEWAGE DISPOSAL PURVEYOR: a. Proposed method of water supply b. Proposed method of sewage disposal A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. Signature Date 4. FIRE DISTRICT / FIRE MARSHALL a. Proposed is within Fire Protection District # 1 b. Adequate arrangement have/have not been made to meet our needs in providing for an adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes c. Recommended fire flow: ; or unable to calculate now because use is not definitive and will be determined at building permit application time. d. Requirements include: a4 Fire District # Date App for Public Hearing Items-Ig-10-98 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROOF FORM Name: File: Robert c curry CONDITIONAL USES State Law, Section 36.70.020 (7), clarifies that the County regulations must specify the standards and criteria that shall be applied in the review by the Hearing Examiner. Condition(s) of approval may also be added to assure compatibility with other uses in the same zone. A. Assuming the proposal is listed as a "permitted" conditional use, do you believe the proposal meets all of the required, established and applicable standards? YES B. If you cannot meet the conditional uses required standards, are you seeking relief by applying for an administrative exception or a variance? Yes No x C. What have you done or could you do to: 1. Make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity or zone? Adding to thefourteen nne barirnnm „nits that ay e there n 2. Ensure against imposing excessive demands upon public utilities? ofe p-rson per unit D. Explain how or why the proposal will not be detrimental to: 1. The Comprehensive Plan: By exnandi n� the as it exist now ro er y ; ar,d 2. Surrounding property: The fourteen units that are thara nnw are compatible to the area and the additional units will fill the ow. need for affordable housing. E. What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spirit and intent (health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Code AND mitigate any adverse effect upon the neighboring properties — including but not limited to: 1) time limits; 2) front, side or rear yard greater than minimum stated; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing; 5) off-street parking; and 6) others? The size of the properties will proved in addition try h r es and g ass areaetready in will give additional land scaping and adequate parking. CUP BURDEN OF PROOF REV. 2-r.! 1 10-02 atbgat Project Name: Parcel Number(s): Protect Description This Section to be Completed by Applicant ACC )3Ete e tw LI 5n3 I , Z t) cC 5 General Description of Project: WOK I'1?ITS Water requested: Number of Residential Taps / ; or Commercial Flow CthV1FICATE OF WATER AVAILABILiT!' . 3 gpm Fire Flow Requirements This Section by Spokane County Building and Code Enforcement Name of Water Purveyor / 7?LN / L)»-' PLC 1 C l( Fire Flow Required gpm; at psi; for minutes. Water System Name Yu/No 1. ❑ Certification - By Purveyor / (e,1 rz,c1 Oil WA DOH ID#,SC) c The water system has a current Washington Department of Health Operating permit, allowing the number of new taps or water requested. 2. 0 The proposed project is consistent with the water purveyor's DOH approved water system plan. 3. ❑ The off site source, storage and transmission infrastructure of the water purveyor is sufficient to provide the service required for the proposed project. 4. 0 ❑ NIA If 3 is no, has financial security been provided to insure infrastructure improvements are completed? (Check Not Applicable if 3 is yes.) 5. ❑ The water system is willing and able to provide water, in conformance to minimum levels of service, as requested at this time. If water system is unable, or unwilling to supply water at this time, please describe why: < <' This Certificate of Water Availability is non -transferable to other projects. (For, relevant laws, see RCW 58.17, 36.70A and 19.27.) Further, a new Certificate of Water Availability shall be required if: 1) a project modification results �in greater water demand; or 2) a project extension of time is requested. Certified by:Print Na h I n j� 1 a 1141 e?- r { i� me Trtle / re f•- Date Siggngtb SPOKANECOUNTY OCT 18 2002 CURRENTP1.AZING CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION This Section to be Completed by Spokane County If box 1, 2 and 5 are checked yes, and 3 or 4 is checked yes and all other information is complete and the water purveyor has signed the above Certificate of Water Availability, concurrency is satisfied for water. Otherwise, refer applicant to the Division of Utilities. I Yes No �J 4w ❑ ❑ This development is exempt from concurrency for water service. 0 ❑ This development meets the concurrency requirements for water service. .LU-ue Spokane County Representative Signature Date Cart of Water Avallability.doc 04/03/02 Fact Sheet for Property Number 45031.2405 Data As of 3/22/2003 Reportl Site Address 13615 E TRENT RD TCA 0146 Parcel Status Active Owner CURRY, ROBERT G Taxpayer CURRY, ROBERT G c/o Owner PO BOX 1071 Taxpayer PO BOX 1071 Address CHEWELAH, WA 99109-1071 Address CHEWELAH, WA 99109-1071 Market Values 2003 Acreage Land 110,200 Exempt 0 Land Sq Feet 107,814 Value Impvmts 130,200 Personal 0 Property Class Code 12 Two -to -Four Unit Total Value 240,400 Property Exemption Year Active Exemptions Legal Description TRENTWD ORCH PT OF B54-64 E183FT OF B54 EXC N300FT; E183FT OF B54 Sales Sale Date 05/08/2000 Sale Price Sale Instrument $250,000.00 Statutory Warranty D Excise Number 200006569 Sales History (prior to 1999) Sale Date Sale Price Sale Instrument 04/20/1978 $32,375.00 ASSIGNMENT OF DEED Improvements Improvement ID D D D D D D D D D D D 02 03 Qualified/ Unqualified Unqualified Vacant/ Improved Improved NORMAL SALE FULFILL CONT Transfer Verification Improvement Type Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Other Other Improvement Description Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling General Purpose Bldg x Other General Purpose Bldg x Other Page 1 of 2 Year Built 1925 1925 1925 1928 1949 1949 1949 1925 1925 1925 1925 1974 1974 Unit of Size Measure 432 432 432 1,040 720 864 960 432 432 432 432 784 448 SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF Report Date Monday, August 04, 2003 • • Fact Sheet for Property Number 45031.2405 Data As of 3/22/2003 Reportl 04 Other Residential Detached Garage 1949 452 SF 05 Other Residential Detached Garage 1949 466 SF 06 Other Residential Detached Garage 1949 480 SF 07 Other Carport Flat Roof 1925 1,530 SF C Commercial Service Garage 1974 784 SF 02 Other General Purpose Bldg x Other 1974 784 SF 03 Other General Purpose Bldg x Other 1974 448 SF 04 Other Residential Detached Garage 1949 452 SF 05 Other Residential Detached Garage 1949 466 SF 06 Other Residential Detached Garage 1949 480 SF 07 Other Carport Flat Roof 1925 1,530 SF Features Features Unit of Improvement Type Improvement Description Size Measure Feature Enclosed Frame Porch 78 SF Feature Enclosed Frame Porch 78 SF Page 2 of 2 Report Date Monday, August 04, 2003 Parcel: 45031.2405 Owner: CURRY, ROBERT G CoOwner: Owner Address PO BOX 1071 CHEWELAH WA 99109-1071 Site Address 13615 E TRENT RD SPOKANE Legal Description TRENTWD ORCH PT OF B54-64 E183FT OF B54 EXC N300FT; E183FT OF B54 10-02 •k'v- 1'1� 450 03g101 3 18 56 45116.9043 Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency. kipid SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)NARIANCE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST RE -APPLICATION FORM PPLICATION FORM Application with all questions answered and information filled in and with all signature blocks filled in and signed. Note: Before submitting the application for signature to the various agencies and departments, the application should be completed and a site plan drafted to show the agencies/departments. ❑ BURDEN OF PROOF FORM (❑ ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAPS 5Y 3- o2Jc L141- -- Maps Needed: 1: 200 1: 400 1613 Submi 2',copies of current Spokane County Assessor maps which shows your prope ,'your adjacent ownership and/or adjacent controlled property, and all tax parcel numbers of property within 400' of your property boundaries (being property outside the RED outline, see below). Adjacent property includes property located k8.° across roads and rivers, etc. The maps must show all the tax parcel numbers surrounding your site and adjacent controlled property. On the Assessormaps you must outlined the_subject property with a SOLID REp line and outline ayadiacent ownership and/or controlled property_with a DASHED RED line. Assessor maps are available at the Spokane County Assessor's Office and must be current (less than 30 days old) at the time of submittal. Platted (1 "=200') and range (1"=400') parcel maps must be obtained, as you may need both sets, depending on your property location. The maps are used for legal notification of property owners adjacent to the boundary of the total contiguous ownership and/or controlled property (shown outlined in RED). ENGINEER'S SECTION MAPS Maps ded: 3 - a5- Subm01 urrent copy of the section map(s) showing the subject property. The properrtymust be clearly outlined with a SOLID line. Engineer section maps are available at the Spokane County Engineer's office. ❑ PUBLIC NOTICE PACKET FOR NOTICE OF APPLICATION OiltiA See enclosed instruction sheet ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Variances are exempt from SEPA under WAC 197-11-800. gatcooko to 11125* cup° • • CUPNARIANCE CHECKLIST PAGE 2 of 3 ❑--LEGAL DESCRIPTION The legal description of the property shallbe illustrated onthesite plan ora_a separate sheet of paper. The source of the legal desoriptiortshall-be.oleady dtcated. ❑ )\ SITE P � N — ' Submi 8 opies (10 if a SEPA checklist is required) of the site plan. The site plan shall it ate: a. Scale of drawing / b. North arrow mac. Vicinity map identifying the subject property 7d. Site area, showing property boundaries and dimensions (if a yard variance application, the drawings must be properly dimensioned to show Code standard and comparable, proposed dimension) e. Names and widths of all existing rights -of -way adjacent to the site /f. Location of existing buildings/structures, septic tanks, drainfields, wells or other improvements showing dimensions and distance to property boundaries Location of proposed buildings/structures (including exterior decks and balconies) showing dimensions and distance to property boundaries h. Height of all structures i. Existing and proposed parking areas/spaces/driveways j. Existing and proposed landscaping k. Existing and proposed fencing I. —Topography- ° m. Easement(s)-affecting the use of the-property-and4hatAhose--providing -r-public-of-way u. Dimensions-from-e ' iigh wales _o. _Location and -size , OTHER EXHIBITS, APPLICATIONS OR DOCUMENTS Certificate of Exemption: Easement Documents: Agent/Authorization Letter: CUP development standards verification: Other (nt iIaivV hgb u(3441—GT}; #3 augk nLaudz1 tk1w CUPNariance subm chklst-Revised 3/02-WTC CUPNARIANCE CHECKLIST PAGE 3 of 3 ❑ CONCURRENCY REVIEW: ❑ COUNTY AGENCIES FEES: Division of Planning Conditional Use Permit iance- SEPA Checklist Other Division of Engineering & Roads Division of Utilities . TOTAL DUE AT SUBMITTAL $ 00• on 3 .00 $ 112 . do CUPNariance subm chklst-Revised 3/02-WTC SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE FOR: PARCEL NO. `I 5n 1. ❑ PLAT 0 SHORT PLAT ❑ TEMPORARY USE 0 VARIANCE ❑ ZONE CHANGE 0 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS 0 BINDING SITE PLAN 0 CONDITIONAL USE 0 OTHER (.164 Applicant: P.{�? CL4 2 L Applicant's Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Parcel number(s);: Property Owner(s): J L)JP Milky Project location & address: 1�y a 1 f ,^�, (✓, LT,& L{ / L CJ lkt) o,44 i W ititt €L "101, F-�R General project description:��/����q/��� //.� �� //�{ �� Q IIN //JJ I yl 1 K l J� V► N/ b - Lill I t t ini/ i .VWk � CJ 1 OK 0,64. L41; a byaft cotf (vA, AL 8-1 a I- . Type of Access: qabb-491:(/ Proposed land use: 18 VA 11 4 Sewage Disposal Method: . WO( Proposed # of Tots: Proposed zone (if rezone): Site size: �,�.ad(iO2 CUE-1O-U� SITE INFORMATION Existing Zone: (9 f c - f. J Fire District: Water District: 011h,OC`�Oi 1[lL . Neighborhood Assoc.: Roadway Classification(s): PSSA inside Li outside 0 ASA inside l3i outside 0 IUGA inside I outside 0 Joint Planning Area? Yes 0 No 0 If yes, which city/town? Influence Area? Yes 0 No 0 If yes, which city/town? Environmental or cultural resources? Yes 0 No 0 If yes, which type? t,rr` d, i Comp. Plan Category: School District: Designated shoreline area? Yes 0 No © If yes, which designation? Affected by floodplain? Yes 0 No Within 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural Resource Lands? Yes 0 No 0 Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA)? Yes ❑ No 0 Within Airport Overlay Zone? Yes 0 No 0 CRITICAL AREAS I. Wetlands? Yes 0 No ❑ Category 1 (200 foot minimum buffer) ❑ Category 2 (150 foot minimum buffer) ❑ Category 3 (75 foot minimum buffer) ❑ Category 4 (25 foot minimum buffer) ❑ Unknown Comments: II. Fish and Wildlife Habitat? Yes 0 No Priority Habitat Species: III. Permanent/Seasonal Streams? Yes 0 No 0 ❑ Type I (250 foot minimum buffer area) ❑ Type 2 (100 foot minimum buffer area) ❑ Type 3 (100 foot minimum buffer area) ❑ Type 4 (75 foot minimum buffer area) ❑ Type 5 (25 foot minimum buffer area)* * No buffering requirement for Type 5 streams when there is no connection to Type 1, 2, 3, or 4 streams Comments: Pre -conference form Page2of4 IV. Geologically Hazardous Areas? Yes \ECI No NI If yes, indicate type of hazard(s) ❑ A slope of 30% or greater ❑ Erodible soils ❑ Hydraulic factors (i.e. existing on -site surface and groundwater) ❑ Prone to landsliding ❑ Area of uncompacted fill ❑ Unstable areas due to rapid stream or stream bank erosion Comments: Planning Issues (landscaping, buffer areas, land use compatibility, traffic, etc.): A-7) 'am obto,iiiiut q, wok lL 4V4tIWI ctI49._ era dIaRtit Jg Special project requirements (plans, studies, permit, Certificate of Exemption, etc.): ,I-6 (PA LVV , 4141 General comments: "1724"/Hearing Examiner/Appeal Procedures: Handouts provided: Pre -conference form Page 3 of 4 AGENCIES TO CONTACT A check mark indicates those agencies you are encouraged to contact regarding your proposal: Spokane County Public Works ❑ Division of Building and Code Enforcement 477-3675 ❑ Division of Utilities, Sewer/Water Resources 477-3604 ❑ Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility 477-3604 ❑ Division of Engineering, Drainage 477-3600 ❑ Division of Engineering, Transportation 477-3600 l[ Spokane Regional Health District 324-156Q. ❑ Spokane County Parks 477-4730 ❑ WA State Department of Transportation 324-6000 ❑ WA State Department of Ecology 456-2926 ❑ WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife 456-4082 ❑ Spokane County Fire District No. ❑ Water District No. ❑ Other Agencies: I, the applicant, acknowledge receipt of and understand the content of this document and submittal checklist: Applicant: Date: Staff Planner: /uS Date: fe %i/O,I Amount Paid: 1j ��{� t �,�,��lu (,t-1 t1� f r QJ Receipt No. Jadwatta Pre -conference form, wtc rev. 92601 F/Current Planning Master Forms/App Forms for all Proj/Misc forms for all Applications/Pre-conference form Pre -conference form Page 4 of 4 • • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CURRENT PLANNING TECHNICAL REVIEW REPLY FORM Date: J - I S-U Agency: PU-Y3 i c S Contact Person: -5t_QL \ i c-tin i -e' Proposal/Project Name & File No.: Condition Use Permit, CUE-10-02 Technical Review Meeting: May 13, 2003 @ 1.15pm. Note: The following information is to provide the proposal/project sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal/project. This will occur only after the proposal/project is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies/departments have been contacted --only those who have been determined to have primary interest. 1. a. Does the proposal/project meet reayirements to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? ❑ YES ix NO b. If no, what is lacking? Se k�.A `1 n c e_ t-1 It d O (A c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the proposal/project? (Attach conditions if necessary) Se_ e- es Spokane Val1ey Department of Public Works MEMORANDUM May 13, 2003 To: John Todd From: Sandra Raskell 5^ '_ Re: Proposed Condition Use Permit; CUE-10-02 (Curry) Public Works has reviewed the above referenced project. It has been determined that the SEPA Checklist was not complete or correct. Before further review, the following is a list of items to be completed. 1. The SEPA checklist needs to be filled out properly with all information included. If the applicant is unsure of information, he/she shall inquire about the information (i.e. City of Spokane Valley, Department of Health, Spokane County Sewer Department, etc.). The following sections need to be addressed in the SEPA checklist: Section A: 7a, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13; Section B: lb, lc, lg, lh, 2a, 6b(1-3), 6c(1), 6d, 4a, 4d, 5a, 6c, 7b(1-2), 8a, 8h-i, 9a, l0c, llc, 12a, 14a-d, 14f-g, 15a, 16a. 2. Any work within the City's right-of-way will require a permit. 3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans and a drainage report including calculations that conform to the 2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the 1998 Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management (both adopted by the City of Spokane Valley), and all other Federal, State and Local regulations. Include in the report existing drainage patterns for Trent Avenue and any mitigation that has taken place to separate public and private stormwater drainage flows. Also include any future plans for expansion and treatment capabilities and needs. 4. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentations Control (TESC) plan, prepared by a Washington State licensed Professional Engineer, shall be implemented throughout the duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC plan is to follow Spokane Valley guidelines as found in the 2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the 1998 Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management Spokane County and all other Federal, State or Local regulations. The TESC structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of construction. Each BMP shall be inspected 11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 • (509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008 1 after each rainfall event or every 24 hours during and event. 5. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right-of-way will neither be maintained nor operated by Spokane Valley forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the City Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and Maintenance manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents submitted to the City Engineer for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a calculated replacement cost. 6. A trip distribution and traffic analysis shall be performed for the project area. This study shall be conducted by a Washington State licensed Professional Transportation Engineer. The information acquired from this study will be used in the final design, and a letter will be compiled with this data and will be included in the final project submittal to the City of Spokane Valley for engineering review. 7. The applicant is advised that there may be utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane Valley will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should contact all applicable utility companies regarding the responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 8. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed Washington State Professional Engineer/Land Surveyor, who shall furnish the City Engineer with "Record Drawing" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. All work is subject to inspection by the City Engineer or by his staff. 9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the City Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the City Engineer. 10. Road design, construction and drainage control are the responsibility of the developer. cc: File 11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 • (509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008