The URL can be used to link to this page

2023-04-13 - Agenda PacketSpokan� a Valley - Notice and Agenda For Special Meeting Spokane Valley Planning Commission Thursday, April 13, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. Remotely via ZOOM meeting and In Person at: CenterPlace Regional Event Center in Room 109, 2426 NDiscoveiy Place NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special Spokane Valley Planning Commission meeting will be held April 13, 2023, beginning at 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be held in Room 109 at CenterPlace Regional Event Center, 2426 N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, Washington. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the items listed below on the Agenda. NOTE: Members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Planning Commission meetings in -person at CenterPlace at the address provided above, or via Zoom at the link below. Members of the public will be allowed to comment in -person or via Zoom as described below: Public comments will only be accented for those items noted on the agenda as "Public comment" or "public hearing." If making a comment via Zoom, comments must be received by 4:00 pm, the day of the meeting. Please email planning Owsookanevalley.ofg or call the Planning Commission Secretary at 509-720-5112 to be added to the Zoom speaker list. Otherwise, comments will be taken in -person at the meeting, as noted on the agenda below: LINK TO ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION: littps://spokanevallcv.zoom.us/i/87146597722 One tap mobile US: +12532158782„ 87146597722# or+13462487799„87146597722# US Dial by your location US: +1 253 215 8782 US AGENDA: 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 9, 2023 6. COMMISSION REPORTS 7. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 8. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. 9. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a. Public Hearing: 2023 Amoral Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Presented By Levi Basinger) b. Study Session: STV-2023-0001— 22nd Ave & Glenview Circle (Presented By Levi Basinger) 10. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER 11. ADJOURNMENT Meeting Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers — City Hall March 9, 2023 I. Planning Commission Chair Karl Gramath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held in person and via ZOOM meetings. H. The Commissioners, staff, and audience stood for the Pledge Of Allegiance. HI. Administrative Assistant Marianne Lemons took attendance, and the following members and staff were present: Susan Delucchi Tony Beattie, City Senior Deputy Attorney Val Dimitrov Chaz Bates, Planning Manager Karl Granath Levi Basinger, Planner Walt Haneke Greg Bingamin, IT Specialist Bob McKinley Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant Nancy Miller Daniel Wilson IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Haneke moved to approve the agenda for March 9, 2023 as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. V. MINUTES: Commissioner Delucchi moved to approve the February 9, 2023 minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Haneke and Commissioner Miller commented the HB1110 is moving through legislation and encouraged the Planning Commission to continue to track its progress. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates stated that an open house was held to discuss the City's plan to address homeless issues within the City limits. He also mentioned that the City has implemented a multi -factor authentication program for all City email addresses. He informed the Planning Commission that they would be receiving instructions and the proper hardware for accessing their email. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: 3-9-2023 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 3 a. Study Session: 2023 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Planner Levi Basinger gave a staff report. He explained that the Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once a year. The City received one proposed site -specific map amendment during the application timeframe. Mr. Basinger stated that the applicant/owner of the proposed property change is the City of Spokane Valley. The requested amendment is to change the zoning from Single -Family Residential (SFR) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Parks, Recreation, & Open Space (P/OS). The amendment will expand the P/OS zone by 23.9 acres. Mr. Basinger stated that the area is identified in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan. The change will provide new park space for residents in an area of the City that is lacking in park space. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses. The change will also preserve open space in the flood plain/critical areas. He stated that the City has determined that the site is not conducive for building but will serve well as park/open space land. Commissioner Haneke asked about surrounding parks in the area and why the area is considered "lacking" in parks and open space. Mr. Basinger answered that the City's Parks & Recreation Department has a level of service of 3.25 acres of park space for every 1000 residents. Based on the level of set -vices, the Parks department has determined that this area is deficient according to that level. (Plants Ferry Park is two miles away from the proposed change but that park is in Spokane County and does not count towards the level of service for the City.) Commissioner Delucchi asked if the property was donated specifically for park space. Mr. Bates answered that it was donated with the intention of being used as park space. Commissioner Haneke commented that it makes sense to use the property as park space because it's not really suited to any other use. However, the additional park space will create an additional financial burden to the City in maintenance and development. Commissioner Wilson asked if an environmental impact study has been performed on the property. Mr. Basinger responded that the City did a State Environmental Policy Act review specifically on the land use change. It was determined that there is no significant impact based on the change of use. A more in-depth impact study will be performed at the time of development. Commissioner Dimitrov asked if there is a definitive park development plan and timeline for the property. Mr. Basinger answered that that there is no specific park plan or proposed timeline yet. The public hearing for this item will be held on April 13, 2023. 3-9-2023 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 3 X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner McKinley stated that he would like a quantified home price for "affordable housing." Commissioner Delucchi stated that she is teaching a class on Traumatic Stress Disorder beginning in April at the Elks Lodge. XI. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman McKinley moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:33 p.in. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed. Karl Granrath, Chairman Date Signed Marianne Lemons, Secretary CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: April 13, 2023 Item: Check all that apply ® old business ❑ new business ® public hearing ❑ information ❑ study session ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2023 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Public Hearing. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: On March 9, 2023, the Planning Commission held a Study Session on the 2023 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section 17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). Consistent with state law and the SVMC, staff published notice on September 2 and 9, 2022, notifying the public of the annual amendment process and that the City would accept applications for the 2023 cycle through November 1, 2022. The notice was also sent to all agencies, organizations and adjacent jurisdictions that may have an interest in amending the comprehensive plan. On November 22, 2022, the City Council approved the 2023 Docket. The Docket includes one proposed site -specific map amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. On December 9, 2022, the City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) for the proposed comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to Title 21 SVMC, Environmental Controls. Comments on the determination have been incorporated into the staff report where appropriate and no appeal of the DNS was received. On March 24 and 31, 2023, a Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed amendments was published. On March 27, 2023, the site -specific map amendment was posted on site. On March 29, 2023, a notice of public hearing was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the proposed amendment sites. On March 9, 2023, staff presented the proposed 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments to the Planning Commission for their review and discussion. Tonight's meeting will include a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discuss the proposed amendments and provide staff direction to prepare the findings. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, approval with modifications, or denial of the proposed amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Levi Basinger, Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Critical Areas Map 3. Easements Map 4. Staff Report RPCA Public Hearing for 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page l of l Spokan�� jValley° STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 2023 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2023-01 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: April 13, 2023, beginning at 6:00 p.m., at Spokane Valley City Hall and remotely via Zoom. Project Number: CPA-2023-01 Application Description: A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for 19.45 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) and 4.41 acres Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Parks/Open Space (P/OS), for a total of 23.86 acres. Location: Parcels 46351.9143, 46352.9149, 46354.9150, and 46355.9151; Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington Applicant: City of Spokane Valley Owners: City of Spokane Valley Date of Application: November 1, 2022 Staff Contact: Levi Basinger, Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 APPROVAL. CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 7: Environmental Determination Exhibit 2: Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 8: SEPA Checklist Exhibit 3: Vicinity Map Exhibit 9: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: Aerial Map Exhibit 10: Agency Comments Exhibit 5: Existing Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 11: Public Comments Exhibit 6: Existing Zoning A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The property consists of four vacant parcels totaling 23.86 acres, located between Bigelow Gulch Road, Forker Road, and Progress Road. Comprehensive Plan: Single Family Residential (SIR), Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Zoning: Single Family Residential (R-3), Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Page l of 7 Staff Report CPA-2023-01 Existing Use: Vacant (within floodplain and adjacent to drainage area for adjacent subdivision) SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ZONING. AND LAND USES Comprehensive Plan: Rural Conservation (RCV, Spokane County) North Zoning: RCV (Spokane County) Uses: Church, single-family residences Comprehensive Plan: SFR South Zoning: R-3 Uses: Single-family residences Comprehensive Plan: NC, SFR, Urban Reservice (UR, Spokane County) East Zoning: NC, R-3, UR (Spokane County) Uses: School single-family residences Comprehensive Plan: SFR, RCV (Spokane County) West Zoning: R-3, RCV (Spokane County) Uses: Single-family residences APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: November 2, 2022 SEPA DNS Issue date December 9, 2022 End of Appeal Period for DNS: December 27, 2022 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing TBD Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: TBD SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT: If adopted the amendment will change the comprehensive plan land use designation and zoning to P/OS which would largely limits development of the site to passive and active recreational uses. The current zoning of P/OS does not permit residential development and only allows limited commercial uses. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to Title 21 SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) for the proposal on December 9, 2022. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 SVMC, a site assessment, public and agency continents, the Comprehensive Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2023-01 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND AREA -WIDE REZONE The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments if it finds that compliance with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140.H. (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Analysis: The proposed amendment to change the designation for 19 acres from Single Family Residential (SFR) and 4 acres from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Parks and Open Space (P/OS) bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City acquired four parcels (46351.9143, 46352.9149, 46354.9150, 46355.9151) west and south of Progress Road and east of Forker Road. The propose behind the city acquiring this land was to preserve open space within the 100 year floodplain and to expand the city's park lands. This area was generally identified as New Park Area I in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These plans were developed through an extensive community engagement process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres ofpark land for every 1,000 residents. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCA' and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide the development of local comprehensive plans and development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GMA requires a Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference. The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts oil other areas of the Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The proposed annendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land and open space in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goals and policy that support the proposed change: P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible pork, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. Page 3 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2023-01 P-P2 Acquire land for the development of parks or the preservation of open space within the City's boundaries and adjacent UGAs. P-P3 Using the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, periodically assess recreational facilities to identify potential gaps and improvements. P-P7 Identify and protect regional open spaces and natural areas to form a connected network of active and passive recreation areas. NR-Gl: Pursueflood hazard reduction while providing prediclabilityfor landowners. NR-P9: Ensure that wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, and critical aquifer recharge areas are identifed, designated, and protected. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (6) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis. The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will result in less intensive uses than are allowed in SFR and NC zones, reducing the potential effects on the physical environment. (7) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Analysis. According to the City's Critical Areas map, most of the property is located in the 100 year floodplain. The primary flood zone designation that applies to the site is AO, which is defined as an area of shallow flooding, usually in the form of sheet flow, with an average depth ranging from 1 to 3 feel. Pursuant to SVMC 21.30.090.9, all structures in Zone AO shall are required to be elevated to one foot or mare above the specified flood depth or flood proofed with watertight construction methods. Given the strict requirements applied to structures in the floodplain, open fields allowing for passive or active recreation, with no orfew structures, are ideal for locations such as these. There is also a seasonal stream (DNR Type F) located on the property that flows into a drainage channel, which is deposited into a stormwaler storage basin where it infiltrates into the soil. The stream type and its route were identified in a 2015 Water Type Modification. The parcels are not located within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time offuture development. (8) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future development of the park space will provide a documented need and location identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. (9) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; Analysis: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Planters Ferry Park (Spokane County Parks) approximately 2 miles to the southwest. The proposal will increase park land and future development will enhance the park system helping maintain the adopted LOS. Page 4 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2023-01 The site is served by Progress Road and Forker Road, both Minor Arterials, on the north and west exteriors ofthe site. The site also hasfrontage along Bigelow Gulch Road to the east. A realignment ofBigelow Gulch Road and an extension of Sullivan Road has recently finished construction. There are no determinations four Levels of Service (LOS) of roadways adjacent to the site since these are located outside municipal boundaries. (10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City by providing an opportunity to provide park space to the neighborhood without the need to leave the area. Plante's Ferry Park, the nearest formal public parr is outside municipal boundaries and maintained by Spokane County, therefore, it is not considered in determining the LOSfo• park land. This will provide new City -owned and maintained park space for residents undersetved by the municipal park system. The expansion ofpark space in this area will help the City meet its adopted LOSfor park land. (11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The quantity and location ofpark land is planned for and needed as identified in the Parks Plan. A park at this location furthers the goals of the Parks Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The site provides easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, and automobiles. (12) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population density. Development of the properly is severely limited due to being in the 100 year floodplain and being encumbered by an easement for Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). (13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation MasterPlan the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy of the Comprehensive Plan: LU-G2 Providefor land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents, employees, and visitors. LU-P18 Enable public open spaces. P-G] Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community character. P-P2 Acquire land for the development of parks or the preservation of open space within the City's boundaries and adjacent UGAs. P-P3 Using the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, periodically assess recreational facilities to identify potential gaps and improvements. P-PS Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit. P-P8 Plan for access to parks, wails, and other open spaces in all neighborhoods. NR-GI Pursue flood hazard reduction while providing predictability for landowners. Page 5 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2023-01 MR-P2 Prepare and/or regularly update watershed plans for Chester Greek, Glenrose Channel, Saltese Creek, ForkerDraw, and Central Park Basin. NR-P3 Prepare an accurate, updated map of areas expected to be inundated by a 100-year flood, particularly in the Spokane River, Forker Draw, and Glenrose Channel Areas. NR-P9 Ensure that wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequentlyflooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, and critical aquifer recharge areas are identified, designated, and protected. Conclusion(s): For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(H). D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has received two public comments to date. Date Name & Address Comment(s) April 1, 2023 Inna Goleta Summarized: imiachka og leta a hotmailxom 1. Parcels are home to many species of birds and wildlife. 2. Natural areas should be set aside for wildlife. 3. Should be planned in a way to benefit both community and wildlife. 4. Sidewalks and paved pathways should be installed for walking and bicycling more safe and enio able. April 6, 2023 Christine Beirouty Summarized: cbeiroutvna.¢mail.com 1. Understanding that development is not possible in specified location. 2. Opposed to any new homes being built in specified location. Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the April 13, 2023 meeting. 2. Conclusion(s): Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published March 24 and 31, 2023. The NOPH was posted on site on March 27, 2023 and mailed to property owners within a 400 foot radius of the site on March 29, 2023. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning Page 6 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2023-01 City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation Spokane Valley Fire Department Yes 12-07-22 City of Millwood City of Liberty Lake City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Police Department Spokane County, Building and Planning Spokane County, Wastewater System Division Yes 12-12-22 Spokane County, Clean Air Agency Spokane County, Fire District No. 1 Spokane County, Fire District No. 8 Spokane County Regional Health District Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Spokane Aquifer Joint Board Spokane Transit Authority STA Spokane Regional Transportation Council SRTC Washington State Dept of Commerce Washington State Dept of Ecology Ol nr is Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane) Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife Washington State Dept of Natural Resources Washington State Dept of Transportation Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation Avista Utilities Inland Power & Light Modern Electric Water Company Conoco Phillips Yellowstone Pipeline) Yes 12-07-22 Central Valley School District #356 East Valley School District #361 West Valle School District #363 Century Link Comcast Model Irrigation District #18 Consolidated Irrigation District #19 East Spokane Water District #1 Vera Water & Power Spokane County Water District#3 Spokane Tribe of Indians 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. F. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth in Section C above, the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan and adopt the area -wide rezone to change the land use designation and zoning to of parcels 46351.9143, 46352.9149, 46354.9150, and 46355.9151 to P/OS complies with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.140.H and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 7 of 7 iF A C o O o L LLo _ •o a u � o M _^ , O Yf O a 9 � O o h Y 3 oa CN a P O CN ) O.• `D QII\I `O � s Q w c o a ° ° u d o r hPq r 4Q• O � o „ a0 Z rc , IB°,k4Rd IM11 U -_.. , a � v _ . ° ° _ a ryl-- _ UI c � 'I 1 III * � O •n �•Onv P P P P -OO 7 �. �L � i O ,vj .- V •^�i O a :00 °e tea• i ?, N SuWyJanf � Id i w _ \ 17, er . r eul•o7]O Nam,. Q- ,--.....��Pa ssaa6o�d�N�._ e\o GVAo � 1 I T.l:s :N"B�g a um , P21 II �7,N— +`11,1 L .�',' f'y v ^ • v 1Q y Yl' � "v r• u \ �eCt E �t P v � w , Bums�Rd. \" c� v —'� v` NJ p2J�UIGIpJ Iv i �� - saa�{;N;-w >III" v do, t � R21e1sagwNM r � 7 LT uauueg � �• �w .. - vV v �, jaw � r--a�—• NMoli Rid v P21ej-e g.N— •� ��. �� f . ("I ,rr"� 1 e / L C O LL C Y O LL O � O 0 u F'AQA v/ O M 0 O e � a Y r O 3 q,6 u gyp. Pb� �o" O d M 10 (V U W o 0 m Ile j • / M V e �. °. OEM a pax I Bar Rd m pb Yl °III 1.�.1 O V h 4 -gyp y.11 II\ h v N o 3 s 4 V IpV, Q d d G (01 Q , s Exhibit 7 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DE, PARTME Sp0'"kaII� e ` DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE �� Valley East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206 y 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org PROJECT: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for 2023: LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley. DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197- 11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 18 days from the date issued. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on December 27, 2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.2 1 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. STAFF CONTACT: Levi Basinger, Planner, City of Spokane Valley, Planning Division, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5332/FX (509) 720-5075, Ibasineeracsookanevalley.ore RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Chaz Bates, AICP, Planning Manager, City of Spokane Yqey, 1021 ast S e Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5033, cbates s rokainevalle .oI. 9� DATE ISSUED: December 9, 2022 SIGNATURE: APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & Public Works Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination. City of Spokane Valley Delenninalion of Non -Significance (DNS) Page I of I Pile No. CPA-2023-01 Exhibit 8 STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File #: PART I— REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED" ❑ Completed SEPA Checklist ❑ Application Fee ❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in 8YP by 11" or 11" by 17" size ❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agencydecide whetheran EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2023-01. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan. 2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 10210 E. Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. Contact: Levi Basinger, Planner, Community and Public Works Division. (509) 720-533, Ibasineer@spoka nevalley.ore 4. Date checklist prepared: November 2, 2022 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption June 2023 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes. If yes, explain. The property is planned for future park space. Future development may require a separate SEPA process. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? None. If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City Council. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment is to change approximately 19 acres of Single Family Residential (SFR) designated land and approximately 10 acres of Neighborhood Commercial (NC) designated land to a designation of Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). The change Exhibit 8 would formally recognize the public ownership and intended use of the property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is generally located west and south of N Progress Road and east of N Forker Road. The property is vacant and unaddressed. The parcel numbers are 46351.9143, 46352.9149, 46354.9150, and 46355.9151 and can be further located using these coordinates: 47.708267, - 117.206544. The property is located adjacent to the northern city boundary. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The general Sewer Service Area? Yes. Priority Sewer Service Area? Yes. (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 14. The following questions supplement Part A: a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). 1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of materials to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under a separate SEPA process. 3. What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. 4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. b. Stormwater 1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown Exhibit 8 2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process. B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: floodplain. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Unknown What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, much)? If you know the classification of agricultural souls, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate source of fill. Not applicable. c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable. 2. Air What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? Yes. If so, generally describe. The site is accessed from Forker Road and Progress Road, both considered minor arterials, from the west and north respectively. The site also has frontage along Bigelow Gulch Road to the east. Wellesley Avenue is located further south. These are all sources of vehicle emissions affecting the site in question. A realignment of Bigelow Gulch Road directly north of the site and an extension of Sullivan Road southeast was recently completed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not Applicable. 3. Water a. Surface: Exhibit 8 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A seasonal stream (DNR Type F) is located on the property in question and flows into a drainage channel, which is deposited into a stormwater storage basin where it infiltrates into the soil. The stream type and its route were identified in a 2015 Water Type Modification. The stream also appears as a riverine wetland on the National Wetland Inventory. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected and the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not appliable. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? Yes. If so, note location on the site plan. Almost the entire property is located in the 100-year floodplain. This property was subject to a Letter of Map Revision in 2018 (LOMR 18-10-1264P), amending the Flood Insurance Rate Map in this location. Asa result, most of the property is located in the floodplain, flood zones AE and AO. The flood zone designations that apply to the site are Zones AE and AO. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Not applicable. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities known. Not applicable. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will i0m be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. 4. Plants a. Circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1. Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other 2. Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other 3. Shrubs 4. Grass 5. Pasture 6. Crop or grain 7. Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other 8. Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other 9. Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not appliable. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: 1. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other 2. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other 3. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part off a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. Exhibit 8 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7. Environmental health Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is adjacent to a residential neighborhood and an arterial road. Future development may account for these noises in design. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently owned by the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on site. d. Will any structures be demolished? No. If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single -Family Residential (R-3) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single -Family Residential and Neighborhood Commercial. Exhibit 8 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The site is located in the 100-year floodplain and contains a seasonal stream onsite. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. If any: Not applicable. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provide, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The nearest formal park is Plante's Ferry Park approximately 2 miles to the southwest. East Valley Middle School and East Valley High School are located 0.4 miles to the south and both provide recreation 1:3i1101M opportunities. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? No. If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Unknown. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently undeveloped. There are informal access points from N Forker Road and N Progress Road. b. Is site currently served by public transit? No. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest transit stop is located 0.3 miles south at Progress and Wellesley. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Not applicable. If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). While the land use change does not require improvements, future site development will improve access to new park space established on site. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. There are ongoing improvements to the transportation system In the vicinity, but these improvements were not due to future development of Exhibit 8 Spokane j%11ey- the site in question. 15. Public services SEPA CHECKLIST a. Would the project result in an Increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA process for Impacts to those services. If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: 1. Electricity 2. Natural gas 3. Water 4. Refuse service 5. Telephone 6. Sanitary sewer 7. Septic system B. Other -describe While the site is undeveloped, it has access to a variety of utilities including water, sewer, refuse service, and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the Immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency Is relying on them to make Its decision. Signature: 7 Date: I I — `I ^ c� Submitted: D. Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the Item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than If the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and In general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Traffic generated from future park use on site causing Increased vehicle emissions and discharge of vehicle pollutants to watercourses and Page 10 of 12 PL-22 V1.0 = Impla.] groundwater. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Development of the site would require pollutants from vehicles in storm runoff be treated in stormwater basins. Increase in vehicle emissions in the immediate vicinity generated by future use of the site would be mitigated by improved traffic circulation applied at development of the site. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Increase in human activity onsite. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Maintain water and drainage courses, preserve open spaces, and enhance vegetation with future landscape plans. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Electricity used on site to power facilities on site. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Limit hours of public use for the site during normal operations and implement seasonal restrictions for public use of site facilities (i.e. restrooms). 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Increase in human activity on site and development of the site for public access and recreation. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Review of environmentally sensitive areas during future SEPA process and at time of site development. All development on site would be required to meet requirements for development in the floodplain, which includes a requirement for net loss in flood storage capacity. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not applicable; no shoreline areas present. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Additional traffic generated from future park use on site. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Review impacts to roadway level of service at time of site development. Necessary improvements to the adjacent transportation network would be made at time of site development to maintain levels of service and maintain vehicle circulation. Exhibit 8 Spokane jVa11ey- SEPA CHECKLIST 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal will not conflict with any local, state, and federal laws or requirements for environmental protection. Future development of the site will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws and requirements. E. Signature [,the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignlficance that It might issue In reliance upon this check list. Date: / i � —A C}— Please print or type: Levi Basinger Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address:10210 E Sprague Avenue Phone: (509) 720-5332 Signature: v Person completing form (if different from proponent): Name: Address: Phone: DISCLAIMER: By accepting this permit and proceeding with the work, the appllcant/permittee and owner acknowledges and agrees that: 1) If this permit Is for construction of or on a dwelling, the dwelling is/will be served by potable water. 2) Ownership of this City of Spokane Valley permit inures to the property owner. 3) The applicant/permittee is the property owner or has full permission and authority to represent the property owner In this project and carry out the work specified in the permit. 4) All construction Is to be done in full compliance with the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code, The applicable codes are available for review at the City of Spokane Valley Permit Center. 5) The applicant/permiltee further declares that they are either: (A) a contractor currently registered and properly licensed in accordance with Chapter 18.27 RCW; (B) the registered or legal owner or authorized agent of the property for which I am applying for permit and not a licensed contractor; or (C) otherwise exempt from the requirements set forth In RCW 18.27.090 and will abide by all provisions and conditions of the exemption as stated. 6) The City of Spokane Valley permit is a permit to carry out the work as specified therein and Is not a permit or approval for any violation of federal, state or local laws, codes or ordinances. 7) Compliance with all federal, stale, and local laws shall be the sole responsibility of the appllcant/permlttee and property owner. 8) Plans or additional Information may be required to be submitted and subsequently approved before this application can be processed. The City Is not responsible for any code violation through the Issuance of this permit. 9) Failure to request and obtain the necessary Inspections and Inspection approvals may necessitate stoppage of work and/or removal of certain parts of the construction at the applicant's/permiltee's or property owner's expense. Page 12 of 12 PL-22 V1.0 40Im. • Hearing Date Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.120, Notice of Public Hearing, the Building & Planning Division is sending notice of a public hearing to all property owners within 400 feet of project number CPA-2023-01. The public hearing for this project is scheduled for Thursday, April 13, 2023 beginning at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, in Room 109; Centerplace Regional Event Center; 2426 N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, WA 99216. Meeting Details: The hearing will be conducted in person, with the option to attend remotely using web and telephone conference tools. A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the City's webpage: www.si)okanevalley.org/planniiigcommission. Project Information Pro'ectNumber: CPA-2023-0t Application A request to change land use designation and zoning for approximately Description: 23.86 acres Single Family Residential and Neighborhood Commercial to Parks/Open Space for parcels 46351.9143, 46352.9149, 46354.9150, and 46355.9151. Location: The property consists of four vacant parcels located between Bigelow Gulch Road, Forker Road, and Progress Road, Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washin on. Owner/Applicant: City of Spokane Valley Staff Contact: Levi Basinger, Planner, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99206; hone: 509 720-5332; email: lbasinger@spokanevalley.org Hearing Process and Appeals The Planning Commission will conduct the hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council. Providing Comments The public is encouraged to provide comment in person at the hearing, or to submit written comments prior to the hearing by sending thre comments to Levi Basinger, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to lbasingerOwsookanevalley.org. Comments will need to be submitted no later than 4:00 PM on April 13, 2023 in order for them to be received and prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. Comments received through US Mail will be included if they are received prior to the hearing. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing in person or via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up via ZOOM to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on April 13, 2023 at the link provided in the agenda posted at tine link referenced above. Use the link above to sign up for oral public comments. The link will detect you to directions to sign up for oral public conmrents. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written commnents and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Environmental Determination Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the'environment. A Exhibit 9 Determination of Non -Significance was issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11- 340(2) on December 9, 2022. The comment period for the determination ended December 27, 2022. Staff Report and Inspection of File A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and other associated documents may be inspected by searching under "Current Agenda" at this web address: www.spokanevalley.ot.a/planninecommission. If you have any questions, please contact Levi Basinger, Planner, Building & Planning Division, at (509) 720-5332 or lbasingelf(bspokanevalley.or. December 7, 2022 FRANK SOTO JR, FIRE CHIEF 2120 N. Wilbur Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 928-1700 Main (509) 892-4125 Fax spokanevalleyfire.com Permit 4: CPA-2023-0001 Project Address: West & South of Progress Road and East of Forker Road Project Description: Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 2023/SEPA — Environmental Checklist Levi Basinger 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 RE: Technical Review Comments The Spokane Valley Fire Department has completed a review for the above referenced project and has no comments on the SEPA checklist. All specific Fire Department requirements shall be conditioned on associated commercial permits. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call Sincerely, L Traci Harvey Fire Protection Engineer Spokane Valley Fire Department Exhibit 10 From: Polak. Chad M To: Levi Basinger Subject: FW: SEPA Determination for 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Date: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 12:31:09 PM Attachments: imaoe001.ioa Threshold Determination CPA-2023-01 odf Como Plan Amendment Mao odf SEPA Checklist CPA-2023-0001 odf [EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon Levi, There is no impact to the YPL pipeline and we do not have any questions. Sincerely, Chad M. Polak Agent, Real Estate Services 0: (+1) 303.376.4363 i M: (+1) 720.245.4683 3960 East 56th Avenue i Commerce City, CO 80022 Phillips 66 From: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 12:04 PM To: Bart Sistek <bart_sistek@comcast.com>; Central Valley School District #356 <jrowell@cvsd.org>; CenturyLink <Karen.Stoddard@centurylink.com>; Polak, Chad M <Chad.M.Polak@p66.com>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Chelsea Harris (Chelsea.Harris@PARKS.WA.GOV) <Chelsea. Harris@ PARKS.WA.GOV>; Christina Janssen (City of Millwood) <planning@millwoodwa.us>; City of Liberty Lake <LKey@libertylakewa.gov>; Comcast <Ryan_Engles@comcast.com>; connor.lange@avistacorp.com; Consolidated Irrigation District #19 <consolidatedIrrigation@comcast.net>; David Moore (David.J.Moore@usace.army.mil) <David.l.Moore@usace.army.miI>; Deborah Johnson <SEPA.reviewteam@doh.wa.gov>; DJELLIS@spokanesheriff.org; East Spokane Water District #1 <distl@comcast.net>; East Valley School District #361 <smithLO@evsd.org>; Felts Field - Ryan Sheehan <rsheehan@spokaneairports.net>; Hallie Ladd (hallie.ladd@ecy.wa.gov) <hallie.ladd@ecy.wa.gov>; Henry Allen <hallen@spokanevalley.org>; Hutchinson Irrigation District <hutchinsonidl6@qwestoffice.net>; Inland Power & Light <connien@ inland power.com>; Irvin Water District <irvinwater@windwireless. net>; James Stuchell (james_stuchell@comcast.com) <james_stuchell@comcast.com>; Jamie Short (jaime.short@ecy.wa.gov) <jaime.short@ecywa.gov>; Jason Beesley (jbeesley@modernelectricwater.com) <jbeesley@ mode rnelectricwater.com>; Jazdzyk, Eric (Parks) <Eric.Jazdzyk@PARKS.WA.GOV>; JeneyJr., Dennis <dennis.jeneyjr@fema.dhs.gov>; Jenny Nickerson <jickerson@spokanevalley.org>; Jerremy Clark <jclark@spokanevalley.org>; jfields@verawaterandpower.com; John Bottelli <jbottelli@spokanevalley.org>; Jordan, Dale J (Jess) NWS <Dale.l.Jordan@usace.army.mil>; Kelly Williquette <kwilliquette@scwd3.org>; Lara Gricar <Lara.Gricar@Parks.wa.gov>; Limon, Tara <tlimon@spokanetransit.com>; Louis Acosta <lacosta@spokanesheriff.org>; Lynn Schmidt (Lyns461@ecy.wa.gov) <Lyns461@ecy.wa.gov>; Marty Exhibit 10 To Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org From: Dawn Dompier Date: 12/12/2022 Subject:CPA-2023-01 Project Name: 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Stage: DNS Description: Change land use from SFR to Parks/Open Space Site Address: The Spokane County Public Works Wastewater FA01 System Division has no objection to the finalization of the above mentioned project. If your project requires a sewer plan submittal, please refer to the requirements here: • Development Plan Review Checklist Additional General Commercial Sewer information can be found here: • General Commercial Sewer Info i Water Usage Estimate Form Sewer Planning and Design webpage • Sewer Planning & Design Exhibit 11 From: Innachka Goleta To: Levi Basinger Subject: Project# CPA-2023-01 Date: Saturday, April 1, 2023 7:50:39 PM [EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello, I am writing in regards to the project # CPA-2023-01 in favor of changing the land use from Single Family Residential and Neighborhood Commercial to Parks/Open Space. The four vacant parcels are home to many species of birds and other wildlife. American Goldfinches, House Finches, Dark -Eyed Juncos, Song Sparrows, Northern Flickers, Red-tailed Hawks, and the Great Horned Owls are just a few of the many birds that call the vacant parcels "home." I believe that wildlife should be preserved in any and every way possible. Creating a Park/Open Space instead of new developments would ensure that the wildlife will not be forced to move elsewhere. The park should be planned in a way that benefits the community and the wildlife as well; perhaps even sectioning off parcel 46355.9151 and parcel 46352.9149 as natural areas for wildlife. Sidewalks and paved pathways would make bicycle riding and walking more safe and enjoyable. In conclusion, I am FOR the parcels to be Park/Open Space parcels. Thank you for your consideration. Inna Goleta Exhibit 11 Levi Basinger From: Christine Beirouty <cbeirouty@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 11:18 AM To: Levi Basinger Subject: RE: Project Number CPA-2023-01 [EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Morning I am one of the homeowners in the new development next to the proposed project area. Last year, when we selected our lot for our new build, we were told by the builders that nobody would be able to build behind us - and that is the main reason we chose the lot that we did. My mother in law spoke to one of our neighbors today to which the neighbor said she was told the exact same thing - and I am certain we have more neighbors who were told the same thing. We do NOT want any homes built behind us - and the area itself doesn't seem to make sense to build homes. It's too close to Bigelow/Forker and too close to the power lines. New homes don't need to fill up every single empty space. LEAVE IT ALONE. Thank you Christine i E i E Q M N O N N E OtNFFii W � O � L 2 � pC e O Q S °YN rY '°•� 2'S0 °j�g o i tl o c E t E E ai 3 0$ g E E. _d12 1 1 EE9 .R E $ 15's iO Sn$ Q^ Y C FL U) +J 3• - N co o o •E > CcCo ._ > Q o U) U z .22 �O Q N p v .v70 O i Cfl -0 7 Co O N (A O i Q O (6 Q U CT C6 U N (� U U (B a + V O O (6 }, d U U Q Z Z cB N E E Q U N O N m a M CD 0 O E i E a^ Y M ^L i^^ ``— ��W./ IL w c , ^/U }j 4-1 v LL N � i aj Q i- L • • C p bz 4-1 p .c 0 en N +-i N E i,.y� 0 4-J .._.� M 0 O N M c-I V O ra 401 0 V O 0 A� Q E W E Q^ Y M EL Y^, W LA i E O 0 M N O N V) o tn a o a o +' cr o 41 - N U E z o E L O y_ L U l0 U Ln fo -* H Cl :� qD 40 C C C c6 U GJ OW ci NN 0 N 1 T" 4 O 1 M N O N am U (/ 0 C� i co Q > a� O � m i (D� - o m > -0^ o C) O � U Z _0 = W co ^ - ZFlo Cn O U O O LL O�Qcn�Uo° O Q ■ ■ LO co O a 0 CL 5cu 4-1 E v / W cc r cu 0 cu ■ V �r ,t 1 r- M N O N M rl a 0 i t" 0 M O N (L) 70 O U 4— 70 �1 m N O� i C6 U Co O N C� (B � s . U . U) QCN 70 M LD 2i Q. \ 4- O N O � O Q N 70 U) (1) � i C 70 CO (6 Q (13 M U E 0 a- w O O � cn U O O a Q I 70 O ti M N O N M c-I V O IN N E E O U cu -0 v O 1 M N O N (6 co 0 4— L U c 0 U z0 0 0 U OL �A (■i ca •� LL 0 ^/I W � Y x Z V- Spokane Valley 213/2023, 1:48:57 PM City of Spokane Valley AH 1:4,514 0 0.04 0.07 0.14 ml Streets !� AO t FEMA 2019 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km _ National Wetlands Inventory Eerl GIS. gy Maps CmNbulors, Spokane County, WA blase 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD parka GIG, O Gechadoele% Inc.METI Eea, HERE. Bureau of — DNR Streams SaleGraph, EeoTachndaglea, I, METIIIJNSA, USES, Bureau of A Land Management, EPA NIPS, US Census Bureau. USDA, CSV FOA 0 Valley Parcels A ValleyMmer Map Spokane Vagey I CSV I Earl Community Maps Contributors, Spotters County, WA Slate Parka GIs, o GpenSSeemap, Microsoft, Esrl. HERE, Garmin. SoNGraph. GeoTechaologles, Inc, METIMASA, USES, Bureau of Spokane Valley 2l312023, 1:49:44 PlA M City of Spokane Valley _._. Utility and Drainage Easement 1:4,514 Easements --�UlililY Easement 0 0.04 0.07 0,14 mi r I Access Easement ' �Water Easement 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km Border Easement Estl Community Maps Cortrbulom, Spokane County. WA Slate Right Of Way Perks GIS, a OpensimMap, Mkmsoh, Estl. HERE, Gemllq — --� Drainage Ees¢m¢GI EPA Easement SafeGmph, GeoTechnologles, Inc, METIMASA. USGS, Bureau of Land Management. EPA NPS, US census Bureau, USDA. CBV ..- IngressfEgresslUlilily/Sewer Easement O Valley Parcels ValleyMmer Map Spokane Valley I CSV I Estl Community Maps Conalbutom, Spokane County, WASlete Perks GIS, ®Op mpunsatMap. Mlcrosoi Earl, HERE, Gamin, SefeGraph. GOoTecbnulogles, Inc, MEfIMASA, USGS, Bureau of CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: April 13, 2023 Item: Check all that apply ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® study session ❑ pending legislation FILE NUMBER: STV-2023-0001 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Study Session for STV-2023-0001 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Privately initiated street vacation request to vacate 6,970- square feet of public right-of-way south of the intersection of 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 22.140 Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC); RCW 35A.47.020 and chapter 35.79 RCW BACKGROUND: The Oaks Education Association has requested the vacation of 6,970 square feet (0.16 acres) of public right-of-way in the alignment for Glenview Circle, located south of and adjacent to 22nd Avenue. The right-of-way proposed to be vacated comprises the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle. The right of way was originally dedicated as part of the plat for Glenview Acres 3rd Addition in 1968. This leg of Glenview remains unimproved and does not extend further south. The right-of-way is adjacent to two properties, Parcels 45281.2104 and 45281.2802. Both parcels are owned by Oaks Education Association. The property owner has requested the 6,970 square feet of right-of-way be vacated because they believe it is no longer required for public access and the Oaks Academy expansion, located immediately to the south, prevents a possible extension of Glenview Road further to the south. On April 1, 2023, City Council passed Resolution 23-005 to set a public hearing date with the Planning Commission on April 27, 2023. Tonight, staff will discuss the project and the process. OPTIONS: Discussion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None. STAFF CONTACT: Levi Basinger, Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. PowerPoint presentation 2. Application File 3. Draft Staff Report RPCA Study Session for STV-2023-0001 Page 1 of I COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING & PLANNING SCITY OF� pokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE jValleyu PLANNING COMMISSION FILE: STV-2023-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 2023 FILE NO: STV-2023-0001 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Request to vacate 6,970-square feet of public unimproved right- of-way located south of to the intersection of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle. STAFF PLANNER: Levi Basinger, Planner APPLICANT: Oaks Education Association PROPERTY OWNER: Oaks Education Association PROPOSAL LOCATION: The piece of public right-of-way proposed to be vacated is located south of the intersection of 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle. It is adjacent to parcels 45281.2802 and 45281.2104; further located in the northeast quarter of Section 28, Township 25 North, Range 44 East Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington. BACKGROUND: On April 4, 2023, City Council approved Resolution No. 23-005 to set the public hearing date for April 27, 2023, to consider the privately initiated request to vacate 6,970-square feet (0.16 acres) of public right of way. The right-of-way requested to be vacated comprises the fourth leg of the intersection between 221d Avenue and Glenview Circle., The right of way was originally dedicated by the Glenview Acres 3rd Addition Plat in 1968. This leg of Glenview remains unimproved and does not extend further south. There is an existing curb return at the point where the unimproved right of way intersects 22"d Avenue. In addition, a driveway approach serving 11706 E 22"d Avenue (Parcel 45281.2104), is located within the curb return at the southeastern corner of the intersection. The right-of-way is adjacent to two properties, Parcels 45281.2104 and 45281.2802. Both parcels are owned by Oaks Education Association. The property owner has requested the 6,970 square feet of right-of-way be vacated and aggregated into the adjacent properties because it is their belief it is no longer required for public access. Furthermore, the future location for he Oaks Academy, currently under construction and located immediately to the south, prevents the extension of Glenview Road further to the south. DRAFT Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Pagel of 6 April 6, 2023 As a condition for vacating the unimproved right of way, Development Engineering will require the existing curb returns be removed and a new curb be installed along the southern portion of 22nd Avenue, across the vacated right of way. The existing driveway approach for 11706 E 22nd Avenue will be modified to match the new curbing. Construction in the right of way will require permits be issued and inspections performed by the City. Both the Applicant and staff contacted utility providers to determine whether existing utilities will be affected. According to comments received, utilities pass through the piece of right-of-way in question. Lumen has indicated a buried copper cable that they maintain passes east -west across the southern portion of the right of way, and Modern Electric Water Company has identified an overhead power line traversing east -west at the southern end of the right of way. The City will need to dedicate utility easements prior to the vacation to allow utility providers to access and maintain their facilities. APPROVAL CRITERIA: 1. Chapter 22.140 SVMC —Street Vacations 2. City of Spokane Valley Street Standards ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Application packet Exhibit 2: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 3: Staff Comments Exhibit 4: Agency Comments I. PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics of The area to be vacated is the unimproved fourth leg of proposed vacation: an existing street intersection and totals approximately 6,970 square feet (0.16 acres). Adjacent Comprehensive Plan Single Family Residential (SIR) Designation: Adjacent Zoning: R-2, Single Family Residential Suburban Adjacent Land Use(s): North & East — residential; South & West — vacant/future school H. STAFF ANALYSIS OF STREET VACATION PROPOSAL A. COMPLIANCE wrTH SVMC 22.140.030 Findings: 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is surrounded on three sides by private property. Although it is unimproved, the City is obligated to maintain and prohibit encroachments into the right-of- way. The adjacent property owner desires to take ownership and maintenance of the area and improve it as part of their private property. The vacation of this right-of-way will better serve DRAFT Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 2 of 6 April 6, 2023 the public by reducing maintenance obligations and allowing full development of the adjacent private property. The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The area proposed to be vacated is currently unimproved and is not being used for public access. Development immediately to the south precludes the extension of the public street in its current alignment. It is not required for current or future public access or use. Improvements within the vacated right of way will be conditioned at time of future development. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? There is no substitution being proposed as part of the vacation. The City's review has determined there is no need for a new or different public way. The right of way was originally dedicated as part of the plat for Glenview Acres 3rd Addition in 1968 as the fourth leg of the intersection between 22"d Avenue and Glenview Circle. The south leg of the intersection, and the large tracts of land south of 22"d Avenue have remained largely undeveloped. As a result, the intersection between. 22"d and Glenview has functioned as a three-way intersection since its initial construction. No additional right of way is needed to substitute the subject right of way to be vacated. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? Development immediately to the south precludes a future extension of the public street. It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future that would require the use of the subject right-of-way for public access. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? Notice of the public hearing was made by posting written notice at City Hall, CenterPlace, and the Valley library; publishing notice in the Spokane Valley Herald; and posting at the right-of- way to be vacated. A direct mailing was provided to the property owners adjacent to the proposed vacation, which in this case included the applicant because their property surrounds the right-of-way on three sides. To date, no objections by the public or governmental agencies have been received. Conclusion(s): The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met. B. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 21 SVMC — ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(2)(i) and SVMC 21.20.040 from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). III. PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: DRAFT Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 3 of 6 April 6, 2023 No public comments were received following the notice of public hearing. A Notice of Public Hearing sign was posted on April 7, 2023 in the area proposed to be vacated. Notices were posted in the Spokane Valley Public Library, City of Spokane Valley main reception area and CenterPlace Event Center on April 5, 2023. The public hearing notice was mailed to all owners adjacent to the area proposed to be vacated on April 6, 2023. Staff and agencies were notified of the request on March 15, 2023 and noticed again on April 5, 2023. The notice was published in the Spokane Valley Herald on April 7, 2023 and April 14, 2023. Conclusion(s): The City has met the noticing requirements for street vacations as required in SVMC 22.140.020(F). IV. AGENCY COMMENTS Request for comments from agencies and service providers was sent on March 15, 2023 as part of the initial assessment of the street vacation. Notice of the public hearing was provided to agencies and service providers again on April 5, 2023. Comments, were received from the following agencies and are attached as exhibits to this staff report. Where necessary, comments have been incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval in Section V. Agency Received Comments Comments Dated City of Spokane Valley Public Works - Engineering Yes 3-1-2023 City of Spokane Valley Public Works — Stormwater Yes 3-1-2023 City of Spokane Valley Public Works - Traffic Yes 3-1-2023 City of Spokane Valley Public Works — Maintenance Yes 3-1-2023 Spokane Valley Fire District No.l Yes 3-16-2023 Spokane County Public Works - Wastewater Yes 3-16-2023 Spokane Regional Health District No Spokane Transit Authority No Modern Electric Water Company Yes 1-23-2023 Avista Utilities Yes 1-18-2023 Lumen Yes 3-17-2023 Comcast No Findings: The application was routed to jurisdictional agencies, utilities, and public districts for review and comment. According to comments received, utilities are located within the right of way to be vacated. Utility easements will need to be dedicated, allowing utility providers to maintain facilities. As long as easement rights for utilities are retained, no public agencies or utility providers are opposed to the proposed vacation. Conclusion(s): Staff concludes that jurisdictional agencies, utilities, and or public districts have no concerns regarding the proposed vacation of public right-of-way. DRAFT Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 4 of 6 April 6, 2023 V. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS Staff concludes that STV-2023-0001 as proposed is consistent, or will be made consistent, through the recommended conditions of approval based on the approval criteria stated herein. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request to vacate approximately 6,970 square feet of right of way south of the intersection for 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle and adjacent to parcel numbers 45281.2802 and 45281.2104 subject to the following conditions: 1. Initial work to satisfy conditions of the street vacation (File No. STV-2023-0001), including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within 90 days following the effective date of approval by the City. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred one half to each owner of the abutting parcels, parcel numbers 45281.2802 and 45281.2104, as shown on the record of survey created and recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office pursuant to condition 3. Such property shall become part of each abutting parcel. 3. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington, including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be completed. 4. The City shall establish an easement acceptable to Lumen and Modern Electric Water Company for access and maintenance of existing utilities within the area to be vacated. The location and recording number shall be shown on the record of survey. S. The existing curb returns at Glenview Circle shall be removed and Type 'A' curb shall be installed along 22ad Avenue across the vacated portion of Glenview Circle per Standard Plan R- 102 prior to recording the record of survey. The applicant shall meet the following requirements during and after construction: a. Construction within the public right-of-way shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed Washington State Professional Engineer and in accordance with the Spokane Valley Street Standards. All work is subject to inspection by the City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Construction Inspector. b. Upon completion of the improvements, a Construction Certification package per Spokane Valley Street Standards (SVSS) Chapter 9 shall be submitted and approved prior to recording of the Street Vacation Ordinance. c. A Warranty Surety shall be provided for the public improvements per SVSS Chapter 9. 6. The existing driveway approach for 11706 E. 22ud Avenue shall be extended to the required Type 'A' curb and installed per Sid. Plan R-110 prior to recording the record of survey. 7. Any unpaved area located north of the required Type 'A' curb within the proposed vacated area shall be paved per Std. Plan R-120 prior to recording the record of survey. 8. All direct and indirect costs of the title transfer of the vacated right-of-way from public to DRAFT Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 5 of 6 April 6, 2023 private ownership, including but not limited to, title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees, shall be paid by the proponent. The City shall not, and does not, assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 9. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended over the entirety of the vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 10. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. it. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. DRAFT Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2023-0001 Page 6 of 6 April 6, 2023 Exhibit 1 Spokane ,;,,Iial ley STAFF IIRF nNl v STREET VACATION APPLICATION SVMC 22.140 Phone: (509)720-5240 'roj(;cis i!61 V 21Z Irl_�_.I__IVED 10 E SpQI� 3AL&JffQ pokane Val (509) 720-5075 4 penniteentgaspa COSY 111-1 :11.9i 1 (.rF. I LR Date Submitted: Received by: Fee: 00 PLUS #: File #: PART I — REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED" ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ Application Fee "TO BE PAID AT TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL ❑� Notice of Application Packet (17.80.110) — Adjacent Property(tes) Written Narrative — A written narrative describing the reasons for the proposed street vacation, the physical limits of the proposed street vacation and the public benefit of the proposed street vacation. ❑� Written Correspondence from Utility Purveyors 9Firelephone Cable Electric _fJlher(Specify)_ aler District District Gas Utility Sewer Utility ❑� Vicinity Map — Submit a map showing the general area of the proposed vacation iN Record of Survey, If available, for the subject street and/or alley proposed for vacation, and abutting properties, streets and alleys within 100 feet on all sides of the proposed vacation. X Written Evidence of all easements, allowances or reservations, if available, pertaining to the street and/or alley proposed for vacation. APPLICANT NAME: Simpson Engineers Inc. (Nick McGill) MAILING ADDRESS:909 N. Argonne Rd. CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: VVA ZIP:99212 PHONE: (509)926-1322 FAX: CELL: I EMAIL: nmcglll@slmpsonenginsers.com PROPERTY OWNER NO. 1:Oaks Education Association I MAILING ADDRESS:2303 S Bowdish Rd I CITY:Spokane Valley I STATE: • •A I ZIP:99206 WA 99206 PLA5 V1.0 Page 1 of Exhibit 1 Spokane` Valley - STREET VACATION APPLICATION PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER NO. 2:She)la VIgue MAILING ADDRESS: 11706 E 22nd Ave CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: ' •�/�� A zIP; 99206 PHONE: FAX: CELL: I EMAIL: It more than two (2) abutting property owners, include information and written authorization on a separate sheet of paper for each. NAME OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: E Glenview Rd DIMENSIONS OF STREEVALLEY TO BE VACATED:(130 FT LONG) X (50 FT WIDE) SQUARE FEET OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: 6,800 SQFT A LnOA nA1]1. L4 Z./ 1. 1 ABUTTING TAX PARCEL NOS .- � Z8 0 rn'-zg44'I ,L' A Ave. A Inn_ r nn-,.l ADDRESSES OF ABUTTING PARCELS: Ave- 114-11 E ZONING DESIGNATION: R-2 THE FOLLOWING IS CRITERIA EVALUATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN FORMULATING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS SHALL BE ANSWERED IN A DETAILED MANNER; -ALL QUESTIONS ADDRESSSED BY SIMPSON ENGINEERS IN AT'TACEHD APPENDIX. 1. HOW DOES A CHANGE OF USE OR VACATION OF THE STREET/ALLEY IMPROVE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC? 2. IS THE STREET OR ALLEY NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC ACCESS? EXPLAIN. 3. WOULD SUBSTITUTION OF ANEW AND/OR DIFFERENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER SERVE THE PUBLIC? EXPLAIN. 4. HOW WILL USE OR NEED FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY BE AFFECTED BY FUTURE CONDITIONS? EXPLAIN. 5. WILL EASEMENTS BE RETAINED FOR ALL UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES? THE REQUESTED VACATION IS LOCATED IN THE SERVICE AREA OF WHAT UTILITY COMPANIES. (SPECIFY)? 6. DOES THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INCLUDE STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES(SPECIFY)? PLEASE NOTE: PER RCW 35.79.040 (TITLE TO VACATED STREET/ALLEY), THE PROPERTY WITHIN A PUBLIC STREET OR ALLEY VACATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL BELONG TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS, ONE-HALF (1 /2) TO EACH. THEREFORE, PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN THE STREET VACATION APPLICATION. PL-15 V1.0 Page 2 of Exhibit 1 S#gkannee 1 � ey STREET VACATION APPLICATION PER RESOLUTION 07-009 OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, THE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE CHARGES FOR STREET/ALLEY VACATION PURSUANT TO RCW 36.79.030 PART III —AUTHORIZATION (Signature of owner or authorized representative) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON) that the above responses are made Z11012o 23 (Dale) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) tN SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this I D day of rvt bw vo ry , 20 Z. 3 NOTARY SEAL ,*a'"`eI Matthew James Kelly Notary Public in and for the State of Washington i . 4" state of Washington ,� '•- Notary Public "••` Commission No. 205270 My Commissbn Expires 011f4Y2027 Residingat: S�o kavee..r fin/A My appointment expires: 1114 12 7 LEGAL OWNER NO. 1 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; —)Ili.9beT , owner of the above described property do hereby authorize Alikk Me.�211to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. LEGAL OWNER NO. 2 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; PL•15 V1.0 Page 3 of Exhibit 1 S01161 ane STREET VACATION APPLICATION jValley, II I,�Nar�lb Dpts&/'S ,owner of the above described property do hereby authorize AM /l(&It to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. PL•15 V1.0 Page 4 of Exhibit 1 APPENDIX 1. HOW DOES A CHANGE OF USE OR VACATION OF THE STREET/ALLEY IMPROVE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC? a. THE VACATION OF THIS STRET LEG WILL REDUCE PUBLIC RISK BY TRANSFORMING A 4-WAY INTERSECTION INTO A 3-WAY INTERSECTION. Z. IS THE STREET OR ALLEY NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE OF PUBLIC ACCESS? EXPLAIN. a. NO, THIS STREET LEG NO LONGER SERVES, OR HAS POTENTIAL TO SERVE, THE PUBLIC AS PUBLIC ACCESS. 3. WOULD SUBSTITUTION OF ANEW AND/OR DIFFERENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER SERVE THE PUBLIC? EXPLAIN a. NO, THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD IS ADEQUATELY SERVED BY THE REMAINING RIGHT-OF-WAYS. 4, HOW WILL USE OR NEED FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY BE AFFECTED BY FUTURE CONDITIONS? EXPLAIN. a. FUTURE, AND CURRENT, DEVELOPMENT OF THE OAKS ACADEMY LESSEN THE NECESSITY FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE LAND WOULD BE BETTER SERVED AS A PORTION OF THE OAKS SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FOR PARKING OR OPEN SPACE. S. WILL EASEMENT BE RETAINED FOR ALL UNDER GROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES? THE REQUESTED VACATION IS LOCATED IN THE SERVICE AREA OF WHAT UTILITY COMPANIES. (SPECIFY)? a. YES, ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES SHALL BE RETAINED. b. THE FOLLOWING UTILITY COMPANIES SERVE THIS AREA: • MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY (WATER & POWER) • AVISTA (GAS) • SPOKANE COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM DIVISION (SEWER) • CENTURY LINK • COMCAST 6. DOES THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INCLUDE STORMWAT'ER DRAINAGF FACILITIES (SPECIFY)? a. NO STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES PRESENT. Exhibit 1 Project Narrative The Oaks Education Association is requesting to vacate that potion of Glenview Road lying south of 22"'' Avenue and north of parcel #45281.2802, parcel owned by Oaks Education Academy, and totaling to approximately 0.I6-acres. Said portion of Glenview Road is a dead-end ROW that terminates at said parcel. Said parcel is currently being developed as a private school, City of Spokane Valley permits BLD-2022-1 142 and EGR-2022-0051. The development plans are not conducive to extending Glenview Road through said parcel which will leave it as a dead-end ROW. Said portion of Glenview Road currently is unimproved. No demo is required to vacate said portion, and a vacation allows the Oaks Education Academy to extend sidewalk along 22"d Avenue and additional 70 feet across the existing said portion of Glenview Road. No existing lots take access firom said portion of Glenview Road. The adjacent properties are zoned R-2. This area is served by Modern Electric Water Company (water), Spokane County Environmental Services (sewer), Spokane Valley fire Department (fire), Avista (electric/gas), and Century Link (telephone/cable) per One -Call design information request. All other adjacent land is developed as single-family homes. The applicant feels Ihis project is in compliance with the applicable sections of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code and other applicable regulations. l'IUjL(:i: Y V 1 CL1 1 O 2ijr� Go,-,)VI'I I-.I:�lli 'Exhibit 1 Nick McGill From: Lange, Connor <Connor.Lange@avistacorp.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 3:25 PM To: Nick McGill Cc: Aaron Simpson Subject: RE: (External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Attachments: Screenshot2023-01-18 152405jpg We only have gas and its within 22nd Ave (see attached). From: Nick McGill <nmcgill@slmpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 3:01 PM To: Lange, Connor <Connor.Lange@avistacorp.com> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@slmpsonengineers.com> Subject: RE: [External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Connor, Below is a copy of the original email and Image sent to Jason: "Does Avlsta have any comments or recommendations regarding the proposed street vacation of Glenview Rd lying south of 22nd Ave and north of parcel #45281.2802 (shown below)? Also, could you please send me any utility maps that you have in this location, and I will add them In our CAD drawing and show them In all of our submittals moving forward." 'Exhibit 1 Avista has reviewed this potential street vacation and notes that we don't have any facilities within the ROW,. Thank you From: Ren, Jason <lason.ren@avistacorp.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 12:27 PM To: Lange, Connor <Connor.Lange @avistacorp.com> Subject: FW: [External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Connor I received this email about a Vacation in the Spokane Valley from Simpson Engineers Could you contact them and do the sign off. It out side of my scope of work. Jason Jason R Ren GIS Analyst PO Box 3727 MSC-1 G Spokane, WA 99220 1411 E Mission 13 509.495.21 15 litip://www.iivistautilities.coiii It's easier to think outside the box when you don't know where "The Box" Is From: Nick McGill <nmcaillCasimpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 11:48 AM To: Ren, Jason <lason.ren@avistacormcom> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@simpsonengineers.com> Subject: [External] RE: Glenview Clr - Street Vacation Request You don't often get email from nmcglllPsimpsonenglneers.com. Learn why this is important We are finally getting back around to this. Can you please respond stating whether or not there any no conflicts with this street vacation? If so, please state what they are and we will work to address them. For now, all we need is to show that we had correspondence. Thanks, 6 1 14 - nFe Y } I r a<f r V t Exhibit 1 Nick McGill From: ES Plan Review <ESPIanReview@spokanecounty.org> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 11:24 AM To: Nick McGill Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Has this; already been run through the city and been assigned a planning number? Typically the City would forward us the application packet for comments but I don't thinkswe have seen anything:. We; will most likely have no commentas, there Isno public sewer in the area noted. Sincerely, Adam Smith Engineering Tech III Spokane County Public Works— Wastewater System Division 1026 W. Broadway Ave, 4th Floor Spokane, WA 99260 From: Nick McGill <nmcglll@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 9:48 AM To: ES Plan Review <ESPIanReview@spokanecounty.org> Subject: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Environmental Services, Does Spokane County Environmental Services have any comments or recommendations regarding the proposed street vacation of Glenview Rd lying south of 22nd Ave and north of parcel g45281.2802 (shown below)? We already have your utility maps for this location, and I will show them In all of our submittals moving forward. ,Exhibit 1 Nick McGill From: Jason Beesley <jbeesley@modernelectricwater.com> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 10:54 AM To: Nick McGill;joey@tiltonexcavation.com Cc: Aaron Simpson; Chris Wafstet Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Nick, Joey and I spoke about this already. There is no water Infrastructure going south on Glenview Cir from the22nd Ave mainline. Confirming no conflicts for water. JASOVI Beesley Water Superintendent Modern Electric Water Company 904 North Pines Rd Spokane Valley, WA 99206 0:509-928-4540 d: 509-755-9009 c,509-879-6417 ®MODERN MODERN Vic W�tu Campmy Call before you d1g. From: Nick McGill <nmcgill@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 11:47 AM To: Jason Beesley <jbeesley@modernelectricwater.com>; Chris Wafstet<cwafstet@modernelectricwater.com> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@simpsonengineers.com> Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Jason and Chris, We are finally getting back around to this. Can you please respond stating whether or not there any no conflicts with this street vacation? If so, please state what they are and we will work to address them. For now, all we need is to show that we had correspondence. Thanks, ,Exhibit 1 Nick McGill From: Chris Wafstet <cwa(stet@modernelectricwater.com> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 12:26 PM To: Nick McGill; Jason Beesley; Gus Laramie Cc: Aaron Simpson;joey@tiltonexcavation.com Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Good afternoon Nick: The only; conflictwith the electric is a single-phase overhead line that is at the southern portion.of the proposed.street vacation. Besides that, there is nothing underground in the way of electric that wouid'pe a confiict/issue: 11706 / 7716M 13653 IK.ACSlt I l 7PVt , Any other questions, please let me know. Thank You Clwi sl Wafvt- GIS Operator Modern Electric Water Company Phone: (509) 928-4540 Direct: (509) 755-9006 cwafstet@mewco.com M MODERN fi5T 1Y05 Electric Water Company reliably ■er inp the Spoken* Valley dnco 1905 Call Is betore you dlg. F ' Exhibit 1 8/2/2022 Simpson Engineers Attn: Nick McGill, E.I.T 909 N. Argonne Rd. Spokane Valley, WA 99212 All r& .A 1�1 CenturyLink SEP-2022-005- The Oaks Academy No Reservations/No Objection SUBJECT: Request to Vacate/Abandon a portion of road right of way, known as Glenview Cir., South of 22n' Ave and north of parcel 45281.2802 located in Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington. To Whom It May Concern: Qwest Corporation d/b/a CENTURYLINK QC ("CenturyLink") has reviewed the request for the subject vacation and has determined that it has no objections with respect to the areas proposed for vacation as shown and/or described on Exhibit "A", said Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. It is the Intent and understanding of CenturyLink that this Vacation shall not reduce our rights to any other existing easement or rights we have on this site or in the area. This vacation response is submitted WITH THE STIPULATION that if CenturyLink facilities are found and/or damaged within the vacated area as described, the Applicant will bear the cost of relocation and repair of said facilities. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this action further, please contact Matt Reese at matthew.reese(a)Iumen.com. Sincerely yours, Mary Hutton Network Infrastructure Services CenturyLink P842575 1 Exhibit 1 EXHIBIT $'A" 0 I Mal ZZ 00 F.F N O 00 N 1' {1114 �{ i -i "- 1. rl, � a ✓�� C C (n § 3 � � ya3 d tl �E 9€ E w n! W 1409 W 1 jo o o o U I U fi g� 46 O_2 O $ y s SS5 Y e3g Xi 5 a eg@y g N 14 ry� a 3g i 79e pp aaFFFF a3£ h3 a pp pg E� `V ]`3ff^&8 dgg`4�a d 'SgBa�gctlStlYo`eba6 Kgg�®g4"e jy. tl B aen�5 tl@ R3 gq 3"3 �Et1F 9$�i ��i Rg- a�b �e�.�.Rtl s @rEb§ggggae§gF$e•;g & c ngeF x4� 5 _� gg O tgy gg f 9 "apasq'eaWcagr ¢gg4d�e$l y,F ye se-g® 8� py 8 �Q " gaa�xgd@. m4@�$�gI��a��bY''IR -sag 4 =a �gg �4 �� N� n� $'^. '3^6A%e�Yn$a o ag ®^ a"D@[[l441 e'sR9 n^ [p k€ ..".a §t .e qio N P E 3gb@tg}@toeyy`@`"yJRastlYi 3snsEg yg�n$e$E€RR$. a egg c n g w . .. = 3 sk �" 3 ��s ai bs,ng� S� a ry $RvR4oE. as a 119 �'YY nn °aad }3"3iE , oo 11 4 �—:ga4 �` g� g e S �: 1�:"�°�§ s;•n$na�� $��e pp pa�;3e 'e�QQet69��OC" ��"ag. $ana��g G4�A�YC �62�e �� b �kA � 0 idYgySS C b "g35C d a e=a€.$�t s a:Eu� C 99 g u e; ag€e .s g s�a`a^ as n ;n" �` ek'�; ;@ k`€ eg. ga� & § ^ 3 F a §9 @es€�.,�� §t Fs��tl�g=gg. ag$o^n2 ;g, i' y gg �a1 y ¢ d g snL-g o. s�gg31gnlga Y:al�8s"i€Etl ��€s+F�e€€e& rfJ'r'1�'�J',�U�_L, W 1 � � � � u ♦ � ra s pp n 3 i g6 I I yfi � Y� g ee K =S �BgB> d Hid ga i Hid 156-Z h tlA 2 p�yyR a' atlas I I �n fit$ 1 241' s:sy^a 33i �s5 a ANj 7egn�3i g'o Rat [ �A Aj ��Po g b�nb§ a�Cb�@¢ e9C .ag Cl gr T.2 5 Y U r d�$ ti 9 € �J 2R AR m gs ..�[ry §b MHO 3A,,gp cq B�E� g�qp$ in p,req a o tF �r-Fammmr"—�mr UJIM-30 11AN3d nsoo CZOZ p 1 97J GDA) OMM a W 0 �� 1 e ,s e spppy o G p ry N N I `ggg3�y° s a "d'S �d�ugnS�y=F� S LOCG 9q CCee 7a�3� �aa: eoaa 3 aRypp j m'�41d m� R m # NI, p g39 6 _rouMvpvrraaau ]W 11 $a �YwFW WYY� Sq/M!M/ONR6gp qR S � � me Auun I QQI mow%mx C puE&F5€"a "s I ' I I sag n 3 qPA@" QBpe I F5R,6Pn��_F�. 4i I�I w I--- I—�----- I VcaoaonP sn�� II I t � 4 r—I------- I wome•. • I I I ' __ I I lip :Y I� ------+------- �ovur�i I a� aUMBOWd "D Sew EMI, I W h Z h 6 .aar+y�.r•e I J O °a � 0y • a Mb¢vm J RO J 4 V � N V 4� y iv raal,� sb m Exhibit 2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING For Street Vacation THE SPOKANE VALLEY COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS IS SENDING THIS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS ABUTTING THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO BE VACATED BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS FROM THE SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OR TREASURER'S OFFICE. Hearing Date, Time, and Location: The required public hearing for Street Vacation Application file no. STV-2023-0001 shall be conducted before the Spokane Valley Planning Commission in such manner as provided by law on Thursday, April 27, 2023 beginning at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, in Room 109; Centerplace Regional Event Center; 2426 N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, WA. Meeting Details: The hearing will be conducted in person, with the option to attend remotely using web and telephone conference tools. Join Zoom meeting by computer, smartphone, or tablet at: A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to the City's webpage: www.spokaneval[CV.Org/planningcommiSSlon. Application/Description of Proposal: Request to vacate 6,970-square feet of public right of way in the alignment for Glenview Circle, located south of and adjacent to 22nd Avenue. Applicant: Simpson Engineers, Inc. 909 N Argonne Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Adjacent Property Owner: Oaks Education Association. 2303 S Bowdish Road, Building 3, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Location of Proposal: The right-of-way to be vacated comprises the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle, approximately 315-feet east of Sunview Circle; adjacent to parcels 45281.2104 and 45291.2802; further located in the NE quarter of Section 28, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington. Environmental Determination: The Planning Division has reviewed the proposal/project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 21 (Environmental Controls) from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Approval Criteria: Chapter 22.140 (Street Vacations) SVMC; Title 21 (Environmental Controls) SVMC; the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards; the Regional Stormwater Manual; and the Spokane Regional Health District regulations. Hearing Process: The Planning Commission will conduct the hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in Title 18 (Boards and Authorities) SVMC. The Planning Commission holds the public hearing to receive comments and forwards a recommendation to the City Council for an ordinance adoption. The public is encouraged to provide comment in person at the hearing, or to submit written cormnents prior to the hearing by sending the comments to Levi Basinger, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, or email to lbasingei•cspokanevalley.org. Comments will need to be submitted no later than 4:00 PM on Apri127, 2023 in order for them to be received and prepared for submission into the record. Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the Public Hearing. Comments received through US Mail will be included if they are received prior to the hearing. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing in person or via the zoom meeting address and/or phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up via ZOOM to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on April 27, 2023 at the link provided in the agenda posted at the link referenced above. Use the link above to sign up for oral public comments. The link will direct you to directions to sign up for oral public continents. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing. Any appeal Exhibit 2 of the decision will be based on the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to Chapter 17.90 (Appeals) SVMC. Staff Report and Inspection of File: A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and other associated documents may be inspected by searching under "Current Agenda" at this web address: www.spokanevallev.org/planningcommission. If you have any questions, please contact Levi Basinger, Planner, Building & Planning Division, at (509) 720-5332 orlbasingerOwspokanevalley.org. Exhibit 3 Spokan� Community & Public Works Department Valley ` 10210 E Sprague Avenue ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: (509) 720-5000 ♦ Fax: (509) 720-5075 ♦ www.spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Levi Basinger, Planner From: Chad Riggs, Senior Engineer Date: March 1, 2023 Re: STV-2023-0001: Glenview Circle Street Vacation DE Comments Development Engineering requires the following items to be addressed prior to street vacation finalization: General 1) The existing curb retums at Glenview Circle shall be removed and Type `A' curb shall be installed along 22"d Avenue across the vacated portion of Glenview Circle per Standard Plan R-102. 2) The existing driveway approach for 11706 E. 22"d Avenue shall be extended to the required Type `A' curb and installed per Std. Plan R-110. 3) Any unpaved area located north of the required Type `A' curb within the proposed vacated area shall be paved per Std. Plan R-120. 4) Construction within the public right-of-way shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed Washington State Professional Engineer and in accordance with the Spokane Valley Street Standards. All work is subject to inspection by the City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Construction Inspector. 5) Upon completion of the improvements, a Construction Certification package per SVSS Chapter 9 shall be submitted and approved prior to recording of the Street Vacation Ordinance. 6) A Warrant Surety shall be provided for the public improvements per SVSS Chapter 9. Exhibit 3 From: Gloria Martz To: Levi Basinaer Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road SN-2023-0001 Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 2:58:03 PM Attachments: imaae001.ioa No concerns from me other than what was brought up Chad Riggs From: Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 2:57 PM To: Aaron Clary <aclary@spokanevalley.org>; Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org>; Gloria Mantz <gmantz@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org> Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Levi, No concerns from Streets. Thank you. Shane From: Aaron Clary <aclary(@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 1:55 PM To: Levi Basinger <lbasinger(a)sookanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates(aDspokanevalley.ore>; Gloria Mantz <gmantz(nspokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkiro(@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criees(caspokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarltPspokanevalley.ore> Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Levi, Stormwater has no comments or concerns. Thanks. From: Levi Basinger<lbasingerPspokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:15 AM To: Gloria Mantz <gmantz(@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criees(@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkioo(@spokanevalley.org>; Aaron Clary <aclary(@spokanevallev.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt a(�spokanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbatesPspokanevalley.org> Subject: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 To Whom it May Concern: We have received a petition for street vacation (file no. STV-2023-0001) to vacate the portion of Glenview Road right of way south of 22nd Avenue. The portion of right of way in question would be the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle, east of Bowdish Road Exhibit 3 From: Shane Arlt To: Aaron Clarv; Levi Basinger Cc: Chaz Bates; Gloria Mangy; Ryan Kipp; Chad Rioo' Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 2:57:02 PM Attachments: innaae0ol.ion Levi, No concerns from Streets. Thank you. Shane From: Aaron Clary <aclary@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 1:55 PM To: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org>; Gloria Mantz <gmantz@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sa rl t@ s poka n eva I I ey. o rg> Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Levi, Stormwater has no comments or concerns. Thanks. From: Levi Basinger <lbasinger(c sookanevalley org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:15 AM To: Gloria Mantz <gmantz(oDspokanevalle)Iorg>; Chad Riggs <criggs(@sookanevalley org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp(cDsnokanevalle)Iorg>; Aaron Clary <aclaryPsookanevalley org>; Shane Art <sarlt(aspokanevalley org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbatest7a spokanevalley org> Subject: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 To Whom it May Concern: We have received a petition for street vacation (file no. STV-2023-0001) to vacate the portion of Glenview Road right of way south of 22nd Avenue. The portion of right of way in question would be the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle, east of Bowdish Road (see vicinity map). The vacation is adjacent to the site for the Oaks Academy project on 22nd Avenue east of Bowdish Road (BLD-2022-3764 and EGR-2022-0051). I believe the applicant intends to use the area of the proposed vacation for parking and/or access from 22nd Avenue. Both properties that abut the proposed vacation are under the same ownership. The complete street vacation file can be found in the link below or on SmartGov. Exhibit 3 From: Aaron Clary To: Levi Basinaer Cc: Chaz Bates; Gloria Mantz; Ryan Kipp ; Chad Man ; Shane Arlt Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 1:55:09 PM Attachments: imaae001.ioa Levi, Stormwater has no comments or concerns. Thanks. From: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:15 AM To: Gloria Mantz <gmantz@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; Aaron Clary <aclary@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org> Subject: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 To Whom it May Concern: We have received a petition for street vacation (file no. STV-2023-0001) to vacate the portion of Glenview Road right of way south of 22nd Avenue. The portion of right of way in question would be the fourth leg of the intersection between 22nd Avenue and Glenview Circle, east of Bowdish Road (see vicinity map). The vacation is adjacent to the site for the Oaks Academy project on 22nd Avenue east of Bowdish Road (BLD-2022-3764 and EGR-2022-0051). I believe the applicant intends to use the area of the proposed vacation for parking and/or access from 22nd Avenue. Both properties that abut the proposed vacation are under the same ownership. The complete street vacation file can be found in the link below or on SmartGov. PACommunity Development\1 CD Projects\2023 CD Projects\STV\STV-2023-0001\Application Are there any concerns from DE, Public Works, Streets, and Stormwater regarding the proposed right way vacation? Please send your comments to me by next Wednesday, March 8. Thank you, Levi Basinger i Planner 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5332 1 Ibasineer@sookanevalley.ore Exhibit 3 From: Ryan Kioo To: Chad Riau s; Levi Basinger; Gloria Mantz; Aaron Clarv; Shane Ar Cc: Chaz Bates; Jerremv Clark Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:52:49 AM Attachments: imaae001.ona imaoe002.ioo Levi, Traffic doesn't have any additional comments to add. Thanks, Ryan Kipp, PE, PTOE I Engineer: Traffic 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5016 1 rkiooPsookanevalley.org From: Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:48 AM To: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org>; Gloria Mantz <gmantz@spokanevalley.org>; Ryan Kipp <rkipp@spokanevalley.org>; Aaron Clary <aclary@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sa rlt@ spoka neva I ley.org> Cc: Chaz Bates <cbates@spokanevalley.org> Subject: RE: Street Vacation Glenview Road STV-2023-0001 Levi, Please see the attached DE comments for STV-2023-0001. Thank you, Chad Riggs, P.E. I Senior Engineer 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5033 1 crjggs(ryspokanevalley.ore This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Levi Basinger <Ibasin eg r(@spokanevalley.org> March 16, 2023 Levi Basinger City of Spokane Valley 10210 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 FRANK SOTO ,JR, FIRE CHIEF 2120 N. Wilbur Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 928-1700 Main (509)892-4125 Fax spokanevalleyfire.com RE: STV-2023-0001 Street Vacation Vacation of 6,970sq.ft. of public ROW at intersection of 22n' Ave and Glenview Cir. RE: Technical Review Comments The Spokane Valley Fire Department has completed a review for the above referenced project and takes no exception to the "Street Vacation" as proposed. 1. Only for the matter of awareness, there are improvements being made to parcel 45281.2802 (11711 E 241^ Ave) that is immediately SW of the intersection of 22"d Ave and Glenview Cr. Improvements are being made as part of EGR-2022-0051. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, '44J ir¢ W vle& Austin Morrell Fire Protection Engineer(EIT) Spokane Valley Fire Department Exhibit 4 To Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org From: Andrew Cripps Date: 3/16/2023 Subject:STV-2023-0001 Project Name: Stage: Vacation of ROW/Street Description: Vacate right of way south and adjacent to 22nd st. Site Address: 11711 East 24th Avenue The Spokane County Public Works Wastewater FA01 System Division has no objection to the finalization of the above mentioned project. If your project requires a sewer plan submittal, please refer to the requirements here: • Development Plan Review Checklist Additional General Commercial Sewer information can be found here: • General Commercial Sewer Info I Water Usage Estimate Form Sewer Planning and Design webpage • Sewer Planning & Design Exhibit 4 Levi Basinger From: Stoddard, Karen <Karen.Stoddard@lumen.com> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 3:03 PM To: Levi Basinger Subject: RE: STV-2023-0001 Agency Review Routing [EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Levi, The only conflict Lumen has would be a buried copper cable we have that runs along the south side of the vacation area. Please see picture below. The buried copper cable is the blue line circled in red. Lumen would like to retain the utility easement rights. These rights should provide for maintenance, construction and reconstruction as needed. Thanks, Karen Exhibit 4 Karen Stoddard Capacity Provisioning Specialist 1020 E Cataldo Ave, Spokane, WA 99202 e let: 509-666-8534 LUMEN Karen.Stoddard(a),lu men. com From: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 2:02 PM To: Bill Helbig <bhelbig@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Phillips <cphillips@spokanevalley.org>; Jerremy Clark <jclark@spokanevalley.org>; Shane Arlt <sarlt@spokanevalley.org>; Chad Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Austin Morrell<MorrellA@SpokaneValleyFire.com>; Traci (HarveyT@SpokaneValleyFire.com) <HarveyT@spokanevalleyfire.com>; Spokane County Public Works - Wastewater Division <planningactions@spokanecounty.org>; Paul Savage <psavage@srhd.org>; Jason Beesley (jbeesley@modernelectricwater.com) <jbeesley@ mod ernelectricwater.com>; Modern Electric Water Co. <transmittals@mewco.com>; engin_ataman@comcast.com; Stoddard, Karen <Karen.Stoddard@lumen.com> Subject: STV-2023-0001 Agency Review Routing All, Please review the attached application material for a proposed street vacation (file no. STV-2023-0001) of a 6,970- square foot piece of right of way adjacent to the intersection of 22"a Avenue and Glenview Circle. Submit your written comments that include any conditions or easements required to preserve utilities or access. COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 @ 5:00 p.m. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Levi Basinger 1 Planner 10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5332 1 Ibasineer@sookanevalley.ore a d@ SX40;00% . This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW. This communication is the property of Lumen Technologies and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. 0) i E i E Q \V W i Q E O 0 M N O N ,is M O a. E 0 E a^^ �V Ii w ° °dEa°c dry 6'z LZ F c 2gY E�i$a• 0 0 �u �EgE $° . gk Ea '�y5 ig O 41 E LL° o o l pEp 70 U C 2 i i ^` co U O > p 7C3 i i c Co � U L QA Q z M N C O i 7,?CL U U O O i CO C 70 .13 N M U U C6 N � o i Q 70 C O (6 N U C7 M O Q (6 N Q C6 U U N +' N +� V O p-0 L a 0 a +�' •, U Z Z E U Q c6 Q U N O N m M C� O CL W L E 0 EO +-+ L- CL v W D c I E' UO UO cu V) N • uo bn:Ej C m cr- L U L L C/) ra, M N O cl a 0 M N O N V) o tn a o o a cr o LL U U) ZC o C i p i) of U � m U Ln M Tt r-I 61 W W C C to m U U i-� U IZ m i ri O M N O N N 0 N M O M N O N U I E .a E Q cu 2 14- El L a� O 76 -O ui i m Q p 0 O �O Q — Z V i N .Q O (n C N bu0 U O O�Qcn�Uoa O LL Q W CL ca f� E W cu a) ca V i .J 0 M O N Q U W 70 O U 70 �1 ca C6 O� C0 co O U (� c6 a Q cn c6 CIA CL >1 -0 7 o C� C >� > > > Q ` N 0 -0 i 70 c6 (� Q Q CU > o cn N W N x p Q 0-U 0- . . I OL O N O N m a V N i N E E O 0 v O N O N E E 0 U I V um M-- O U) Y LL S,nrur �` STREET VACATION APPLICATION pokane SVMC 22.140 jVa11ey Phone: (509)720-5240 STACC I ICF flu, v 'rojocl i'161V 2DZ � D/ I I�*Li .ICIVL0 10 E Spr",i 34441[*Q pokane Val] y WA 99206 (509) 720-5075 ♦ erinitce ter s n valle or C OSV P!I . tL . Date Submitted: Received by: IvIfFee: ? 0 PLUS #: File #: f " T V - ZO?-'7,0001 PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED" ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ Application Fee -To BE PAID AT TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL © Notice of Application Packet (17.80.110) —Adjacent Property(les) Written Narrative — A written narrative describing the reasons for the proposed street vacation, the physical limits of the proposed street vacation and the public benefit of the proposed street vacation. ❑o Written Correspondence from Utility Purveyors kphone Cable Electric _f�ther(Specify)_ er District Fire District Gas Utility Sewer Utility ❑ Vicinity Map — Submit a map showing the general area of the proposed vacation on Record of Survey, if available, for the subject street and/or alley proposed for vacation, and abutting properties, streets and alleys within 100 feet on all sides of the proposed vacation. Written Evidence of all easements, allowances or reservations, if available, pertaining to the street and/or alley proposed for vacation. APPLICANT NAME:Simpson Engineers Inc. (Nick McGill) MAILING ADDRESS; 909 N. Argonne Rd. CITY, Spokane Valley STATE: VV,/�, A nn ZIP:99212 PHONE: (509)926-1322 FAX: CELL: I EMAIL: nmcglll@slmpsonengineers.com PROPERTY OWNER No. 1:0aks Education Association MAILING ADDRESS:2303 S Bowdish Rd I CITY: Spokane Valley I STATE: • • A I ZIP, 99206 I PL-15 V1.0 Page 1 of Spdkan�` Valley - STREET VACATION APPLICATION PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER No. 2:Shella Vlgue MAILING ADDRESS: 11706 E. 22n" Ave C,TY: Spokane Valley STATE: ' •1n' A Z,P; 99206 PHONE: I FAX, CELL: I EMAIL: Ifmore than two (2) abutting property owners, include information and written authorization on a separate sheet of paper for each. NAME OF STREETIALLEY TO BE VACATED: E Glenview Rd �/ DIMENSIONS OF STREETIALLEY TO BE VACATED: (130 FT LONG/\ X (50 FT WIDE) SQUARE FEET OF STREETIALLEY TO BE VACATED: 6, 800 SQFT O ABUTTING TAX PARCEL NOS .. 6 N SZ pQ1• Z O OZ A •1 4 -inn ��rl" n ) - I E Z1 * A Ve, ADDRESSES OF ABUTTING PARCELS: ZONING DESIGNATION: R-2 THE FOLLOWING IS CRITERIA EVALUATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN FORMULATING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS SHALL BE ANSWERED IN A DETAILED MANNER; -ALL QUESTIONS ADDRESSSED BY SIMPSON ENGINEERS IN ATTACE14D APPENDIX. 1. HOW DOES A CHANGE OF USE OR VACATION OF THE STREET/ALLEY IMPROVE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC? 2. IS THE STREET OR ALLEY NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC ACCESS? EXPLAIN. 3. WOULD SUBSTITUTION OF A NEW AND/OR DIFFERENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER SERVE THE PUBLIC? EXPLAIN. 4. HOW WILL USE OR NEED FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY BE AFFECTED BY FUTURE CONDITIONS? EXPLAIN. 5. WILL EASEMENTS BE RETAINED FOR ALL UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES? THE REQUESTED VACATION IS LOCATED IN THE SERVICE AREA OF WHAT UTILITY COMPANIES. (SPECIFY)? 6. DOES THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INCLUDE STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES (SPECIFY)? PLEASE NOTE: PER RCW 35.79.040 (TITLE TO VACATED STREET/ALLEY), THE PROPERTY WITHIN A PUBLIC STREET OR ALLEY VACATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL BELONG TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS, ONE-HALF (1/2) TO EACH, THEREFORE, PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN THE STREET VACATION APPLICATION. PLA5 Vi.0 Page 2 of s0 Mane j � STREETVACATION APPLICATION PER RESOLUTION 07-009 OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, THE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE CHARGES FOR STREET/ALLEY VACATION PURSUANT TO RCW 36.79.030 PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of owner or authorized representative) (print name1 swear or affirm that the above responses are made to the best of my NOTARY STATE OFWASHINGTON) 'Z1lo/2oz3 (Date) SS: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this I O tM day of rt- by J0.ry , 20 Z 3 NOTARY SEAL ,. Matthew James Kelly Notary Public in and for the Stale of Washington �4'..•.,,�. State of Washinglon Notary Public "••`O Commission No. 205270 My ConenlssiM Expires 011W2027 Residing at: Sao k ame.. 0 W A My appointmentexplres:1 119 12 % LEGAL OWNER NO. 1 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; ij&eS , owner of the above described properly do hereby authorize Ab'c<< de-6111 to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. LEGAL OWNER NO. 2 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; PL-15 V1.0 Page 3 of Spkan� STREET VACATION APPLICATION jUalley owner of the above described property do hereby authorize Alkk H LU—to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. PL-16 V1.0 Page 4 of APPENDIX 1. HOW DOES A CHANGE OF USE OR VACAfION OF THE STREET/ALLEY IMPROVE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC? a. THE VACATION OF THIS STRET LEG WILL REDUCE PUBLIC RISK BY TRANSFORMING A 4-WAY INTERSECTION INTO A 3-WAY INTERSECTION. 2. IS THE STREET OR ALLEY NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE OF PUBLIC ACCESS? EXPLAIN. a. NO, THIS STREET LEG NO LONGER SERVES, OR HAS POTENTIAL TO SERVE, THE PUBLIC AS PUBLIC ACCESS. 3. WOULD SUBSTITUTION OF ANEW AND/OR DIFFERENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER SERVE THE PUBLIC? EXPLAIN. a. NO, THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD IS ADEQUATELY SERVED BY THE REMAINING RIGHT-OF-WAYS. 4. HOW WILL USE OR NEED FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY BE AFFECTED BY FUTURE CONDITIONS? EXPLAIN. a. FUTURE, AND CURRENT, DEVELOPMENT OF THE OAKS ACADEMY LESSEN THE NECESSITY FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE LAND WOULD BE BETTER SERVED AS A PORTION OF THE OAKS SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FOR PARKING OR OPEN SPACE. 5. WILL EASEMENT BE RETAINED FOR ALL UNDER GROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES? THE REQUESTED VACATION IS LOCATED IN THE SERVICE AREA OF WHAT UTILITY COMPANIES. (SPECIFY)? a. YES, ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES SHALL BE RETAINED. b. THE FOLLOWING UTILITY COMPANIES SERVE THIS AREA: • MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY (WATER & POWER) • AVISTA (GAS) • SPOKANE COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM DIVISION (SEWER) • CENTURY LINK • COMCAST 6. DOES THE RIGHT -OF --WAY INCLUDE STORMWATER DRAINAGF FACILITIES (SPECIFY)? a. NO STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES PRESENT. Project Narrative The Oaks Education Association is requesting to vacate that portion of Glenview Road lying south of 22"d Avenue and north of parcel #45281.2802, parcel owned by Oaks Education Academy, and totaling to approximately 0.16-acres. Said portion of Glenview Road is a dead-end ROW that terminates at said parcel. Said parcel is currently being developed as a private school, City of Spokane Valley permits BLD-2022-1142 and EGR-2022.0051. The development plans are not conducive to extending Glenview Road through said parcel which will leave it as a dead-end ROW. Said portion of Glenview Road currently is unimproved. No demo is required to vacate said portion, and a vacation allows the Oaks Education Academy to extend sidewalk along 22"d Avenue and additional 70 feet across the existing said portion of Glenview Road. No existing lots take access from said portion of Glenview Road. The adjacent properties are zoned R-2. This area is served by Modern Electric Water Company (water), Spokane County Environmental Services (sewer), Spokane Valley Fire Department (fire), Avista (electric/gas), and Century Link (telephone/cable) per One -Call design information request. All other adjacent land is developed as single-family homes. The applicant feels this project is in compliance with the applicable sections of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code and other applicable regulations. IitUjt`ri FIR 10 2023 COSV H RP:i11 Cl 1.111,P. Nick McGill From: Lange, Connor <Connor.Lange@avistacorp.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 3:25 PM To: Nick McGill Cc: Aaron Simpson Subject: RE: [External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Attachments: Screenshot2023-01-18152405.jpg We only have gas and Its within 22nd Ave (see attached). From: Nick McGill <nmcgill@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 3:01 PM To: Lange, Connor <Connor.Lange @avistacorp.com> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@simpsonengineers.com> Subject: RE: [External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Connor, Below is a copy of the original email and Image sent to Jason: "Does Avista have any comments or recommendations regarding the proposed street vacation of Glenview Rd lying south of 22"d Ave and north of parcel #45281.2802 (shown below)? Also, could you please send me any utility maps that you have in this location, and I will add them in our CAD drawing and show them In all of our submittals moving forward." Avlsta has reviewed this potential street vacation and notes that we don't have any facilities within the ROW.. Thankyou From: Ren, Jason <iason.ren@avistacorp.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 12:27 PM To: Lange, Connor <Connor.Lange@avistacorp.com> Subject: FW: (External] RE: Glenview Cir -Street Vacation Request Connor I received this email about a Vacation In the Spokane Valley from Simpson Engineers Could you contact them and do the sign off. It out side of my scope of work. Jason Jason R Ren GIS Analyst IN NO Box 3727 MSC -I( Spokane, WA 99220 1411 E Mission 1' 509.495.21 15 http://www.avislaulili[iCS.Com It's easier to think outside the box when you don't know where "The Box" is From: Nick McGill <nmczill@simpsonenzineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 11:48 AM To: Ren, Jason <Jason.ren@avistacorp.com> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@simpsonenRineers.com> Subject: (External] RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request You don't often gel email from nmcgill@simpsonengineers.com. Learn why this is important We are finally getting back around to this. Can you please respond stating whether or not there any no conflicts with this street vacation? If so, please state what they are and we will work to address them. For now, all we need is to show that we had correspondence. Thanks, w 4 i` I �pP M1 � fa , 1�n I� 4 l� I h W � Nick McGill From: ES Plan Review <ESPIanReview@spokanecounty.org> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 11:24 AM To: Nick McGill Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Has this already been run through the city and been assigned a planning number? Typically the City would forward 41 , the application packet for comments bull don't.thinks we have seen anything. We, will most likely have no commeriI:4' there Is -no public sewer in the area noted. Sincerely, Adam Smith Engineering Tech III Spokane County Public Works— Wastewater System Division 1026 W. Broadway Ave, 4th Floor Spokane, WA 99260 From: Nick McGill <nmcglll@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 9:48 AM To: ES Plan Review <ESPIanReview@spokanecounty.org> Subject: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Environmental Services, Does Spokane County Environmental Services have any comments or recommendations regarding the proposed street vacation of Glenview Rd lying south of 22nd Ave and north of parcel #45281.2802 (shown below)? We already have your utility maps for this location, and I will show them In all of our submittals moving forward. Nick McGill From: Jason Beesley <jbeesley@modernelectricwater.com> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 10:54 AM To: Nick McGill;joey@tiltonexcavation.com Cc: Aaron Simpson; Chris Wafstet Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Nick, Joey and I spoke about this already. There is no water infrastructure going south on Glenview Cir from the22"d Ave mainline. Confirming no conflictts1or water. Jason Deeslq Water Superintendent Modern Electric Water Company 904 North Pines Rd Spokane Valley, WA 99206 o:509-928-4540 d:509-755-9009 c:509-879-6417 ©MODERN Call Is before you dig. From: Nick McGill <nmcgill@simpsonengineers.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 11:47 AM To: Jason Beesley <jbeesley@modernelectricwater.com>; Chris Wafstet<cwafstet@mod ernelectricwater.com> Cc: Aaron Simpson <aaron@simpsonengineers.com> Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Jason and Chris, We are finally getting back around to this. Can you please respond stating whether or not there any no conflicts with this street vacation? If so, please state what they are and we will work to address them. For now, all we need Is to show that we had correspondence. Thanks, Nick McGill From: Chris Wafstet <cwafstet@modernelectricwater.com> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 12:26 PM To: Nick McGill; Jason Beesley; Gus Laramie Cc: Aaron Simpson; joey@tiltonexcavation.com Subject: RE: Glenview Cir - Street Vacation Request Good afternoon Nick: The only conflict with the electric is a single-phase overhead line that is at<the southern portion,of the proposed street vacation. Besides that, there is nothing underground in the way of electric that would.be a; conflfct/Issue: f Put Any other questions, please let me know. Thank You ak,r •1, lnlamo- GIS Operator Modern Electric Water Company Phone: (509) 928-4540 Direct: (509) 755-9006 cwafstet@mewco.com M MODERN Electric Water Company ssr twos reliably •e"In5 the Spoken* Valley since 1905 Call Isbefore you dig. 8/2/2022 Simpson Engineers Attn: Nick McGill, E.I.T 909 N. Argonne Rd. Spokane Valley, WA 99212 0 Flo CenturyLink SEP-2022-005- The Oaks Academy No Reservations/No Objection SUBJECT: Request to Vacate/Abandon a portion of road right of way, known as Glenview Cir., South of 22nd Ave and north of parcel 45281.2802 located in Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington. To Whom It May Concern: Qwest Corporation d/b/a CENTURYLINK QC ("CenturyLink") has reviewed the request for the subject vacation and has determined that It has no objections with respect to the areas proposed for vacation as shown and/or described on Exhibit "A", said Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. It is the intent and understanding of CenturyLink that this Vacation shall not reduce our rights to any other existing easement or rights we have on this site or in the area. This vacation response is submitted WITH THE STIPULATION that if CenturyLink facilities are found and/or damaged within the vacated area as described, the Applicant will bear the cost of relocation and repair of said facilities. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this action further, please contact Matt Reese at matthew.reeseCaZlumen.com. Sincerely yours, Mary Hutton Network Infrastructure Services CenturyLink P842575 EXHIBIT "A" Ell a 5 ,a N A o qpqp lam„ g0 �pn � V � t a'• " ys� � � : P� rrcuvk.' °e"6€ a W M1 T O yN N j£Z C W p Q I—£ U 5gppg3 5 Z Y Y Q O O CO) tk 27a i z o x xg9@ Ugg ° o o $Bq a d � U � � V1 a � U) to a9a€s E ,a a #e @ 5ef@g $ d9pi n00MN01! 3§g�z3.g�a" x�xag��9@A y°��@r #i.@asaS gab'a€A�°gpbgs,ae�.ni%°°kg"3�gd. �ng�ic aea"3abg$F�E�` B@3"ex,z,• s`p.: 8;py3biyiacaac'Ae3°"i pg � l g €R q'61Wn. sg 9g23PI" Eab}aag IN Yell Pa i xr g"E$ r` e• e c k Qn1 s A = §$ u�Yg$$tl'g, 2Me P�Pya�y�"� # ?w3 3� y tl�m F E b-j g a U Y�#"@6i # i Mel y� b. `3ara �#5s�g�$ a. €3gn ;e j - s- rn a3.�' T pg g39bgi $a3 3"k $p;"p ' #a A Nz," � q k$EPZ'p.§25E. U �qq4 gg p�pY-Ybg I� age akl�s$"#o'. ? €9gPEgc�Et4g3 Baa at kiE e x k "€�XW "a ' B e 8$ EE x G ..... y� & `s a"s ak k @33.0 M S.. I y r u r q a €s=a s e§ y9 )aG 511 b� a g �' y ns ra;?ga 's` g� tl k LLI H ,x gg#. e F � a€rox. s tlrt Mj a C� Yx iaya s c� 9 :n ° d 5#g ;x, # E S qEL° b.b 5 lox b �k&i Yy YU -.9 x § 5 i.k Z C ��9` bn: b E b 3 c'�kc .� n"@n" b° a ° �x C g 9 C.i€ pyn ..� Z E_ 'y K a B3 bg'e5 . E�qr e2 P 4c@ � tg� ei ; € s gg° P9 icq' _N 6 qt 6 6"j®$ p€ §b tq€EY eq€ p IB O 3P.¢ i� b i° S1§ O C 3itl El 8EE M tl M C� TIrRTT Tf--� T� 1= .Y'AM =uons �J71FOO.I.IV0,1 dASOO UN a H I J (177nI70:` I ry N m N I\\ C pef< pgig 8u "a p$ b g�Igab gphgb Ra Oe $b�. y Ypp�$@m Y�g. 4pg��a4g@d��9b��@3y.N3q�b{2 A $88 /.s��9 C �¢ bAla,, •`�`i9 1h � bgq�S�Ub&�ab� hd=.bE�•g�p„R �; � # xfb �� 2v�gNO—W tY1A N �gf' g�q qI � 60ulNPl/�SRMo � SWDIYYY NN]) g9$y i sgg?psa-^se^ 3I 0 I # Fgr R�7_F? S N � R �I hgg fd 9RY T�g� .— — — — — -S99D85 9 _— 31 1. NORM z5s m. — i0l mod. 3 t--Ag------� s i eggg®® O ee R��EPSa----- � Ee �.�— — »zzz e pp xhx g e J aiz=s I 1 18R s I — 0R 8B8g2 7q g Y p �y pI V WY I ".`s �ia:e5 a. o I III I �, _-:owl------�-�------ _.�� s N e ab 521.M Y�I � ry � - NDRDP'OD tiBu aYva or a SOI/1lIBdYA'3HRMD Ne).N q b� q pa \w a ul 41 --------------- ................ ................ ...................... pot ----------------- --------- ------- -- - --- _ ............ pay Is ------------------ CIZ, 171 ---- - - --------- .7 ------------------- iz --- ----- ----- ----------------- ------------ -- — ---------- Als i PHU .. Rt vkkt kit 2 VP a'! h. 2 < I- %I �,M t z, is 1 11 q li'Mal'o, I , ag I 'i pall