Appendix_CAppendix C. Alternative 2a (Planned Residential Subdivision) v. Standard Subdivision Impacts Summary
Alternative 2a—PRD Impact Summary Standard Subdivision Alternative Impact Summary Comparative Analysis Finding
Natural Environment
Ground water
A series of pipes, swales and basins for
treatment and management of surface water
are installed to manage stormwater before it
reaches the aquifer.
No change is anticipated in volumes of water
that reach the aquifer via the project site.
No impact to the Spokane Rathdrum Prairie
aquifer. Water that currently recharges the
aquifer would continue to recharge through
permeable areas and through the infiltration
pond installed at the northern limits of the site.
Same treatment and management of surface water
before it reaches aquifer as under Alternative 2a.
No change in volumes of water that reach the aquifer
via the project site are anticipated under the
Standard Subdivision Alternative.
No impact to the Spokane Rathdrum Prairie aquifer.
Water that currently recharges the aquifer would
continue to recharge through permeable areas and
through the infiltration pond installed at the
northern limits of the site.
Similar level of impact between
Alternative 2a and the Standard
Subdivision Alternative.
Surface water
Addition of culverts and creation of swales and
ponds to manage floodwater that enters the site
There would be no direct impact to the channel
of Chester Creek from the widening of Thorpe
Road.
Includes 30-acre +/- undeveloped park area in
southern portion of the site available to store
floodwaters
Same addition of culverts and creation of swales and
ponds as under Alternative 2a
There would be no direct impact to the channel of
Chester Creek from the widening of Thorpe Road.
No 30-acre park is provided to store floodwaters.
Similar level of impact between
Alternative 2a and the Standard
Subdivision Alternative.
Built Environment
Land use
42 estate single family residential lots,
206 standard single-family residential
lots
52 cottage-style single family
residential lots,
228 multi-family residential units,
52 mixed use multi-family residential
units integrated with
approximately 13,400 square feet of
retail/commercial use,
9,000 square feet of future stand-
alone retail commercial use
30% greenspace totaling
approximately 30 acres with trails that
include a 10-acre park and wildlife
travel corridor
The southern portion of the site will be filled for
residential lots and would not be available to receive
floodwater because the park in this area would be
omitted from the design—
543-lot subdivision
No new commercial or multifamily
residential development
No greenspace or trails
The Standard Subdivision Alternative
has a greater impact on site land use
due to a reduction in open space (30
fewer acres)
Flood hazard areas
The required loose fill import volume is
approximately 377,532 CY
48 on-site acres and 44 off-site acres will be
removed from 100-year floodplain
Approximately 660,240 CY of fill material would need
to be imported under the Standard Subdivision
Alternative.
Considerably more fill under the
Standard Subdivision Alternative
Transportation
Construction-related truck trips: over a four-
year period or approximately 22.47 truck trips
per day
Alternative 2a is anticipated to generate 380
new AM peak hour trips, with 95 new trips
entering the site, and 285 new trips exiting the
site via the eight access opportunities previously
noted. In the PM peak hour, the project is
anticipated to generate 545 new trips, with 338
new trips entering the site, and 207 new trips
exiting the site.
5,846 ADT and 545 PM Peak Hour Trips
Approximately 40 truck trips (one trip to the site and
one return trip) would occur per day over the
duration of the site grading activities over a 4-year
period.
The Standard Subdivision Alternative would require
more fill than Alternative 2a, primarily due to the
filling of the open space area located just north of
East Thorpe Road. The total required fill volume with
the Standard Subdivision Alternative is approximately
574,122 CY.
5,529 ADT and 573 PM Peak Hour Trips
The Standard Subdivision Alternative generates
approximately 317 fewer average daily trips but
generates approximately 28 more PM peak hour
trips. This is due to the higher PM peak hour trip
generation of the single-family residential units and
the fact that no internalization trip reduction factor is
applied with the Standard Subdivision Alternative
because no commercial uses would be included.
More construction (fill) generated
truck trips under the Standard
Subdivision Alternative
The Standard Subdivision Alternative
generates approximately 317 fewer
average daily trips but generates
approximately 28 more PM peak hour
trips.
Environmental Elements Not Analyzed in Detail
Air quality
Impacts to air quality under the Standard Subdivision
Alternative will be similar to those described for
Alternative 2a with the following exceptions:
The Standard Subdivision Alternative provides a
greater number of single-family residences than
Alternative 2a, with 543 total single-family residences
compared to 300 single family residences in
Alternative 2a. The additional single-family residences
are more likely to be a source of fine particulates from
wood burning stoves.
The Standard Subdivision Alternative does not
incorporate 30% of the gross site area to public open
space, therefore providing less area that can serve as
a “carbon sink.”
Construction-related impacts to air quality will likely
be greater with the Standard Subdivision Alternative
The Standard Subdivision Alternative
is likely to generate more smoke from
wood stoves because it provides more
single-family residences. The Standard
Subdivision Alternative would also
result in greater impacts to air quality
from construction-related exhaust.
due to the greater degree of imported fill material
required.
Aesthetics
Alternative 2a will convert most of the central,
east and northwest areas of the site into a
mixed-use community. Remaining areas of the
property will be retained as community open
space.
Most of the field and open space areas on the site
would be converted to urban development.
The Standard Subdivision Alternative
will have somewhat greater impact on
local aesthetics
Biological Resources
The combined buffer impacts equal
approximately 15,619 SF. Buffer averaging, and
enhancement plantings are proposed to ensure
that these impacts do not result in a reduction
in the ecological function and values of the
riparian area.
Fill material placed on the east stream bank will
cover an approximately 104,132 SF of area. This area
will be replanted with native grasses, trees and
shrubs, representing a significant enhancement over
existing conditions.
The Standard Subdivision Alternative
has considerably more impact to
critical area buffers
Environmental
Health
Dust, noise, and exhaust from construction Dust, noise, and exhaust from construction Similar level of impact between
Alternative 2a and the Standard
Subdivision Alternative.
Geology
Grading may require the movement of up to
450,000 cubic yards of material, with up to
330,000 cubic yards of imported material
Due to the placement of fill and site
development features proposed under
Alternative 2a the opportunity for surface water
and precipitation to recharge the underlying
aquifer will be limited to the proposed
infiltration basin, roadside swales, and dry wells.
574,122 CY of fill material, which will require the
import of approximately 660,240 CY of “loose” fill
material prior to compaction on the site.
Due to the placement of fill and site development
features proposed under Alternative 2a the
opportunity for surface water and precipitation to
recharge the underlying aquifer will be limited to the
proposed infiltration basin, roadside swales, and dry
wells.
Considerably more fill under the
Standard Subdivision Alternative
Historic, Cultural &
Archaeological
Essentially no impacts Essentially no impacts Similar level of (non) impact between
Alternative 2a and the Standard
Subdivision Alternative.
Noise
During the construction phase noise from
construction, land clearing, and fill delivery and
placement equipment as well as structure
construction will increase for the short term.
Following completion of construction, noise will
be generated by residential traffic and other
residential sources including yard maintenance
equipment, domestic pets, occupants, and park
use for the long term.
The increase in population under the Standard
Subdivision Alternative would likely lead to
noise levels that are higher than current levels.
It is unlikely that the increase would be
measurable, but it may be perceived by
During the construction phase noise from
construction, land clearing, and fill delivery and
placement equipment as well as structure
construction will increase for the short term.
Following completion of construction, noise will be
generated by residential traffic and other residential
sources including yard maintenance equipment,
domestic pets, occupants, and park use for the long
term.
The increase in population under the Standard
Subdivision Alternative would likely lead to noise
levels that are higher than current levels. It is unlikely
that the increase would be measurable, but it may be
Similar level of impact between
Alternative 2a and the Standard
Subdivision Alternative.
residents in terms of the frequency to which
they experience noise disturbance.
perceived by residents in terms of the frequency to
which they experience noise disturbance.
Public Services Based on current demographics, it is expected
that approximately 1,377 people would reside in
the project at full project buildout. Further, it is
anticipated that approximately 45 employees
would work in the 22,400 SF of new retail space
that would result with Alternative
The Standard Subdivision Alternative is anticipated to
create 543 single-family residential units, which
would result in approximately 1,358 new residents at
full buildout of the community.
Slightly fewer individuals under the
Standard Subdivision Alternative but
all in Single-family units—more
impacts under the Standard
Subdivision Alternative due to more
single-family units
Recreation
Alternative 2a is anticipated to generate
approximately 300 single-family residential
units, 228 multi-family units and 52 mixed-use
residential units. Based on the 2013-2017
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates,
it is anticipated that each single-family unit
would be occupied by approximately 2.5
residents, and that each of the 280 multi-family
units would be occupied by approximately 2.24
residents. This would result in a total population
of approximately 1,377 residents upon
completion of the project, which is anticipated
to occur over a period of approximately 10 years
or longer as the housing market dictates. Based
on the City’s comprehensive plan level-of-
service target of 1.92-acres of park space per
1,000 residents, the project would create
demand for approximately 2.64 acres of park
space in the community. As noted in the site
plan included on Figure 3-15 of this document,
Alternative 2a incorporates approximately 30
acres of open space, including a 10-acre park
which will fulfill the recreational demands of the
new development.
The Standard Subdivision Alternative is anticipated to
create 543 single-family residential units, which
would result in approximately 1,358 new residents at
full buildout of the community. Based on the City’s
comprehensive plan target of 1.92-acres of parks
area per 1,000 residents, the Standard Subdivision
Alternative would generate the need for
approximately 2.61 acres of park area.
The Standard Subdivision Alternative
would generate need for park areas
that Alternative 2a would not; the
Standard Subdivision Alternative
would result in greater impact than
Alternative 2aa