2023-06-22 - Agenda PacketS okane
jValley
Notice and Agenda For Special Meeting
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 6:00 p.m.
Remotely via ZOOM meeting and In Person at:
CenterPlace Regional Event Center in Room 212, 2426 N Discovery Place
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special Spokane Valley Planning Commission meeting will be held June 22,
2023, beginning at 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be held in Room 212 at CenterPlace Regional Event Center, 2426
N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, Washington. The purpose of the meeting is to consider the items listed below
on the Agenda.
NOTE: Members of the public may attend Spokane Valley Planning Commission meetings in -person at
CenterPlace at the address provided above, or via Zoom at the link below. Members of the public will be allowed
to comment in -person or via Zoom as described below:
Public comments will only be accented for those items noted on the agenda as "Public comment' or "public
hearine." If making a comment via Zoom, comments must be received by 4:00 pm, the day of the meeting
Please email planninizaspokanevallev.org or call the Planning Commission Secretary at 509-720-5112 to be
added to the Zoom speaker list. Otherwise, comments will be taken in -person at the meeting, as noted on the
agenda below:
LINK TO ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION:
httDs:Hsr)okanevallev.zoom.us/i/86262747051
One tap mobile
US: +12532158782„ 86262747051# or+16699006833„86262747051# US
Dial by your location
US: +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
Meeting ID: 862 6274 7051
AGENDA:
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 8, 2023
6. COMMISSION REPORTS
7. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
8. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda.
9. COMMISSION BUSINESS:
a. Public Hearing: CTA-2023-0002: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations Update (Presented By
Lori Barlow)
b. Public Hearing: CPA-2023-0001: 2023 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Presented By
Levi Basinger)
10. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
11. ADJOURNMENT
Special Meeting Minutes
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Room 109 — Centerplace Regional Event Center
June 8, 2023
I. Planning Commission Chairman Karl Granrath called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting
was held in person and via ZOOM meetings.
H. The Commissioners, staff, and audience stood for the Pledge Of Allegiance.
III. Administrative Assistant Marianne Lemons took attendance, and the following members and staff
were present:
Susan Delucchi
Kelly Konkright, Contract Attorney
Val Dimitrov, absent
Chaz Bates, Planning Manager
Karl Granrath
Lori Barlow, Senior Planner
Walt Haneke
Chad Knodel, IT Specialist
Bob McKinley
Marianne Lemons, Administrative Assistant
Nancy Miller
Daniel Wilson, absent
There was consensus from the Planning Commission members to excuse Commissioner
Dimitrov and Commissioner Wilson.
IV. AGENDA: Commissioner Delucchi moved and it was seconded to approve the June 8, 2023
agenda as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero
against, and the motion passed.
V. MINUTES: Commissioner Haneke moved and it was seconded to approve the May 11, 2023
minutes as presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was four in favor, zero
against, and the motion passed. Commissioner McKinley abstained from the vote because he was
not present at the meeting.
Commissioner Haneke moved and it was seconded to approve the May 25, 2023 minutes as
presented. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion was five in favor, zero against, and the
motion passed
VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Delucchi reported that she has been looking at other
Cities land uses while traveling. She commented that she thinks that Spokane Valley could update
their code in a way that doesn't sacrifice the beauty of the Valley for economic growth.
VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Chaz Bates reported that the City Council
passed the Street Vacation for Oaks Academy that was reviewed by the Planning Commission. He
also mentioned that there was a parcel that was missed during the noticing of the Comprehensive
6-08-2023 Planning Commission Minutes
Page 2 of 4
Plan Amendment Update so that item will be reheard by the Planning Commission at the next
meeting.
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS:
a. Motion Consideration: Planning Commission Rules Of Procedure Amendment
Contract Attorney Kelly Konkright presented a proposed amendment to the rules of procedure. He
explained that City Hall remediation work is currently underway in the Council Chambers. To
accommodate the work, it is necessary to temporarily relocate the regular meetings of the Planning
Commission to CenterPlace.
The Planning Commission Rules of Procedures includes the date, time, and location of its meetings.
The proposed amendment to the Rules of Procedure will change the location of the regular meetings
from City Hall to CenterPlace Regional Event Center, 2426 N. Discovery Place, Spokane Valley,
Washington. The dates and times of the meetings will remain the same, the second and fourth
Thursday of each month beginning at 6:00 p.m. This change will benefit the public by increasing
efficiency of Commission business and will alleviate staff time associated with setting special
meetings.
Commissioner McKinley moved and it was seconded to waive the rules and recommend approval to
the City Council to amend the Planning Commission Rules of Procedure to change the location of
meetings to Centerplace Regional Event Center. There was no discussion. The vote on the motion
was four in favor, one against with Chairman Granrath dissenting, and the motion passed
b. Study Session: CTA-2023-0002 — Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Regulations Update
Senior Planner Lori Barlow presented a staff report. She stated that CTA-2023-0002 is a city -
initiated code text amendment to revise Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40.030 as it
related to ADU standards. The proposed regulation change will eliminate the requirement that the
property owner occupy the primary dwelling unit or the ADU and other matters related. Pursuant to
SVMC 19.30.040 modification to SVMC Titles 17 through 24 are classified as a Type IV
development application and require the Planning Commission to provide a recommendation to the
City Council.
Ms. Barlow explained that the reason for the change is that the requirement creates a barrier for the
construction of ADU's to be constructed at the same time as a new home build. It also negatively
impacts opportunities to provide affordable/flexible housing options.
Ms. Barlow stated that the premise for the regulation was that ADU's were historically intended to
allow for family members needing care. There are also some apprehensions about noise and
negative impacts that may be caused by unsupervised renters. It allowed cities to limit the frequency
of ADU's.
6-08-2023 Planning Commission Minutes
Page 3 of 4
Ms. Barlow said that the Washington Department of Commerce has identified a housing crisis and
has provided a breakdown of future housing needs. The breakdown estimates that Washington will
need 1.1 million housing units in the next 20 years.
Ms. Barlow explained that the City developed a Housing Action Plan (HAP) that stated that the City
would need 6,660 additional dwelling units by 2037 for a forecasted population of 109,913 people.
However, the City is already at 107,100 people as of April 1, 2022 which is 97% of the 2037
forecasts. There have been 3401 dwelling units built since the HAP was approved so the City needs
3,059 additional dwelling units to meet the proposed need for the current population of the City.
Ms. Barlow explained that there has been more of a demand for the ability to build an ADU in the
Single -Family Residential neighborhoods without the restriction of one of the units being occupied
by the owner of the property. This change would allow an additional opportunity to help fill the gap
of needed units and allow residents in the lower median income bracket to live in single-family
home neighborhoods.
Commissioner Haneke stated that he would be in favor of changing the code to allow an ADU to be
built simultaneously with a new build home. However, he is opposed to removing the owner
occupancy requirement because it would allow for two rentals on one property.
Ms. Barlow outlined that the proposed draft regulations:
• One ADU per parcel.
• One off-street parking space per ADU.
• The ADU must be at least 300 SF but less than 50% of the primary structure.
• The footprint of the ADU cannot exceed 10% of the lot area or 1000 sf, whichever is greater.
• The ADU cannot have more than 2 bedrooms.
• The entrance must be located on the side or rear of the primary structure.
• The ADU must be set behind the front building setback line and meet all side yard setbacks.
• The ADU will only be allowed on lots with a single-family dwelling unit.
• A title notice is required.
Ms. Barlow highlighted that the only change to the code would be to remove the owner occupancy
requirement. She also noted that Spokane County and the City of Spokane do not currently have the
owner -occupied requirement for ADU's.
Ms. Barlow stated that the benefits of the change to the code would add diversity in housing options,
provide a housing type that blends in with existing single-family neighborhoods, would cater to
changing demographics such as seniors or smaller households, would provide housing that is
typically more affordable than single family homes, would remove a known barrier to ADU
production and would be a gentle approach to accommodating the housing demand. She explained
that the purpose of the proposed amendment would increase the overall housing supply and variety
of housing, would encourage infill development, would reduce the need for additional land because
the ADU's would utilize available area within established neighborhoods, and would provide for a
greater opportunity for housing options.
Ms. Barlow stated that the Public Hearing will be held on June 22, 2023.
6-08-2023 Planning Commission Minutes
Page 4 of 4
Commissioner Granrath asked what prohibits a property owner from building an ADU at the time of
a new build. Ms. Barlow answered that the staff interpretation of the code is that an ADU cannot be
built until there is a "primary" residence.
Commissioner Delucchi left the meeting at 7:04 p.m.
Commissioner Granrath commented that he thinks it could be a good idea to allow some speculation
builders to build ADU's at the time of new build. But he also thinks it might be good to keep ADU
construction under the current more stringent requirements until the new legislation goes into effect
in the year 2026.
Commissioner Haneke stated that allowing developers to build ADU's along with new build Single -
Family homes would force the City to look at traffic, utility capacity, parking, and infrastructure
development. He pointed out that allowing double the number of units could be a huge impact.
Commissioner McKinley commented that he feels that property owners should be allowed to
develop their property as they see fit but he doesn't want to see every single-family home become a
rental property with the addition of an ADU.
Commissioner Miller stated that the change will encourage more rentals in single-family
neighborhoods, and she doesn't think it is necessary to make that change currently.
X. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Granrath stated that he will not be at the June 22, 2023
meeting and may have to miss the first meeting in July.
XI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner McKinley moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:23 p.m. The vote
on the motion was five in favor, zero against, and the motion passed.
Karl Granrath, Chairman Date Signed
Marianne Lemons, Secretary
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: June 22, 2023
Item: Check all that apply ❑ old business
❑ information
® new business ® public hearing
❑ study session ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: CTA-2023-0002 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Regulations Update Public
Hearing
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106, SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040.
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: May 11, 2023 — Study Session; May 251— Study Session
deferred to June 81; June 8' — Study Session
BACKGROUND: CTA-2023-0002 is a city -initiated code text amendment to revise SVMC 19.40.030 as
it relates to ADU standards. The proposed regulations eliminate the requirement that the property owner
occupy the primary dwelling unit or the ADU and other related matters. Pursuant to SVMC 19.30.040
modification to SVMC Titles 17 through 24 are classified as a Type IV development application and require
the Planning Commission to provide a recommendation to City Council.
On May 11, 2023 the Planning Commission conducted a study session proposed amendment and requested
additional information that included the number of residential permits issued by type, analysis of the
number of permits issued and its relationship to the number of units needed, and a prediction of the increase
expected if the owner occupant criteria were removed. The second study session was scheduled for May
25`s. However, due to noticing issues the item was moved to the June 8' meeting and the public hearing
was subsequently rescheduled to June 22, 2023.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Conduct the public hearing and deliberate on the proposed
amendment. The Planning commission may recommend approval, approval with modifications, or denial
of the proposed draft regulations.
STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Presentation
2. Draft CTA-2023-0002
3. Staff Report
RPCA Public Hearing for Code Text Amendment CTA-2023-0002 Page 1 of 1
N
O
O
O
1
M
N
O
N
4-0
E
D
b�A
7
0
2
ci
UO
U)
0
i
Q
-�j
_
0
b0
Q
U
Q)
(f)
rr
U
4--
X
O
C6
L
Q)
a_
C)
Z
m
WE
v
+
U
Ln
C-
L
Q
O
C-0
a�
M
t�i� N
N N O
cn O N
N
-I
N1 I
P::
M
bloo
L N
m
N
= N
a
C
O
M
N
O�bio
N
N
C:
O
�
c
NC
fV
C
I
C
�
`m
iz
E
x�
O
U
�
o
p[
a
a
r�]
10
M
N
O
N
N
N
M
C;
U
Q
�
�
�
U
Q
U)
a
a
g
9yy'
s
vDle
g
@
Bi
a
�
Is
4
g
w
N
O
9
CI)
N
O
N
F
U
a0
c
N
U
1?
a'
U
a
N
O
N
N
N
N
Ca
i
9A
i
0
L
E
U
I
co
L
v
4w E
M v
� L
E
w�
E
C
C
C
m
cc
m
m
LntA
Ln
a
0
0
O
-O
cu
U
a)
o
c
i
LJ
to
a,
+.
u
L
N
L
m
—
m
4�
a
a)
E
Qi
CD
Ln
�
r
(o
'�
>
ci
i
fl
U
Vf
v
L
a
4,
t
3
N
(O
cu
L
cu
u
m
Q
++
a)
+�
�+
w
O
a)
Ln
O
M
(o
a)
+�•+
U
H
i
M
E
O
O
ri
L
to
a1
0
O
O
L
r
m
as•+
N
L
O
O
d
-0
aJ
O
O
-0
4O
m�
u
-0Y
0O
-0
O
:E(Lp
++
'^
-O
a1
ai
u
c
O
1
co
a
N
N
in
M
L
O
w
u
0
0)
C
m
Ln
D
0
>'
C
aJ
oA
r-
Ln
(o
.3
Ln
4+
0
C
O
C
O
a
O
:i
a)
E
V)
rJ�
V '1
O
00
r�1
4-0
W
E
W
vs!
a x
a
a
a
•
i5
E
8
a •S 3
ggE
3
pi�
a�a
x
e
A
sA7
z
g
E
fl
�
U
O
+�
C
O
O
cn
U)
E
E
O
O
U
O
L
O
O
cc
d
N
U
�
�
co
i
C
Q
U
•U
00
r-I
s!
i
AW
■
co
C6
cn
4
U)
m
i
(B
m
■
co
C
N
N
N
S.•'
00
C
cc
a.
Uj
T
Q.
o
uo
O70
O
a)
U
U
U
i
N
cuQ
E
>
N
E
.c
_
c
>
_
}J
Q)
p
�
(B
(n
�
O
i
O
O
U
T
Q
Q)
Co
O
U
•�
O
+�
N
Q)
>
O
U
�O
N
^—
m
m
+�O
�
M
•>
�O
�
Q)
Q)
N
T
�
ate-+
/
2
Q
(n
Q)
-0
�
>
O
Z
Q)
(n
Q)
co
Z
U
w
a
>,
70
a)
E
a)
w
C-
N
U
O
j:--
W
�O
_
vcn—
X
—O
V
.�
00
(6
a)
(1) N
m
N
a
Oo
W
a
(6
O
CL
E
Q)
v--
w
=
O
(n
t10
0
N
aC
Q
��
(n
-
U)
Q
cc
s`0
�
���
�(U
E
O=
O
X
C
=
U
•�
m�
Q
°�
a)
Q
ca
(n
a
O
a)
U a
L)
(6
i
(n
70
�
O
Q
L10
-
L
�
a)
Eb
(6
O
O
O
>,
O
O
0
■■
N
C)a)
j
�
f-
O
M
a)
O(0O
=
p+CN+
UT
T_0
�
,
O
Q
+Q
■
L
O
Q
+
�
c
n
/I
O
w
E
.bQ
Q)
V
Q)
C
m
�
W
5--
uj
U
O
.�
N
Z3
O
CoT
w
O
mCL
L.
Q
N
>
U
V
�
��
(6
()
Q>
a)
C..)
O
>
O
-0
O
C
Q)
O
O
N
Q)
O
ca
O
Q)
+�
3
jo
+�
�'
Q)
���
+,
O
(1]
O
N
E
�
._
'M
U
U
M
U
a�(u
U)
o
.Q
0
o
3
0
c
a
a-
(Uw�
.Oj
)ab
�
U)
p
^
U
rl
C7
N
C7
f—
O
r-I
N
N
N
•�
m
N
^
a-
OL
ii
O
J
J
J
(0
J
S
S
S
.E
L
S
S
U
Q
�
N
N
N �
E 7 O
i -O
442) cA OO to
._ O N
i Cl) _O O U
LLI � c6
CO w
a) a--+ O i
70
fl.
co
O �
(6 U
D 2 _076
i
� Q ♦ V c� tl� �O
cn
70
L
4-- }� a
O O
it L Q O
i C O =
0i . CoO 0-� � (B O O Qa)O '�
CL
O (6 + + U > 7r)
•� i ' (� 70
O U o c) `+— 0 0 N
Q ol (D — .— U C) c6
Q
c
O
■�
4w
m
E
E
O
a
LL
O
LO
O
oq
ti
17-1
4-
O
I
O
.E
E
O
U
70
W
E
E
^O
W
L
l�
Co
W
U
O
U
U
W
4-j
m
+-j
W
0
W
u�
CN
O
N
v
4-
U
N_
�
a-1
iB
L
�
Q
O
c-I
4J
cu
M
T
NN
O
N
O
N
�
�
00
N-.,,
N
�
�j
�
"o.
L 1
M
�
qA
N
C
U
C
O
p
i
N
4-
d
N
bA
�4 9 s ��i�Si u
1
H
V
CL
Ln
X
Z
M
N
O
N
M
N
rl
Cl)
N
O
N
N
N
E
CTA-2023-0002 — ADU Update - Draft Page 1/2
19.40.030 Development standards —Accessory dwelling units.
A. Site.
1. An ADU may be developed in conjunction with either an existing or new primary dwelling unit;
2. One ADU, attached or detached, is allowed per lot; and
3. One off-street parking space for the ADU is required in addition to the off-street parking required for the
primary dwelling unit.
B. Building.
1. The ADU shall be designed to meet the appearance of a single-family residence and shall be the same or
visually match the primary dwelling unit in the type, size, and placement of the following:
a. Exterior finish materials;
b. Roof pitch;
c. Trim; and
d. Windows, in proportion (relationship of width to height) and orientation (horizontal or vertical);
2. The entrance to an attached ADU shall be located on the side or in the rear of the structure or in such a
manner as to be unobtrusive in appearance when viewed from the front of the street. Only one entrance may be
located on the facade of the primary dwelling unit in order to maintain the appearance of a single-family
residence;
3. The ADU shall not exceed 50 percent of the habitable square footage of the primary dwelling unit, nor be
less than 300 square feet;
4. The footprint of the ADU shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot area or 1,000 square feet, whichever is
greater; and
5. The ADU unit shall not have more than two bedrooms.
C. Additional Development Standards for ADUs.
1. ADUs shall be located behind the front building setback line and placed on a permanent foundation;
2. ADUs shall preserve all side yard and rear yard setbacks for a dwelling unit pursuant to Table 19.70-1;
3. ADUs shall not be allowed on lots containing a duplex, multifamily dwelling, or accessory apartment
contained within the principal structure; and
4. Existing detached accessory structures may be converted into detached ADUs; provided, that all
development standards and criteria are met, including side yard and rear yard setbacks.
D. Other.
12. Prior to issuance of occupancy, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Spokane County auditor to
indicate the presence of an ADU, the FORHiFORIORt of , and other standards for maintaining the
unit as described in the SVMC.
CTA-2023-0002 — ADU Update - Draft
23. Home businesses are prohibited in the ADU.
Page 2/2
34. Approval of an ADU may be revoked if the ADU is no longer in compliance with the development
standards and criteria outlined in the SVMC.
0. The owner may cancel an ADU's registration by filing a letter with Spokane County auditor. The ADU
may also be cancelled as a result of an enforcement action.
COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING & PLANNING
CM Spokane
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE
,,;oo0; Va11eV
PLANNING COMMISSION
CTA-2023-0002
STAFF REPORT DATE: June 14, 2023
HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: June 22, 2023 beginning at 6:00 p.m.. This hearing will be conducted
in person and remotely using web and telephone conference tools. A link to the Zoom meeting is
provided on the agenda for the Planning Commission and posted to the City's webpage:
www.spokanevalley.org/planningeommission.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A city -initiated code text amendment (CTA) to eliminate the requirement that
the property owner occupy the primary dwelling unit or the accessory dwelling unit (ADU), and other
related matters.
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, SVMC 17.80.150, and 19.30.040.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS: Staff concludes that CTA-2023-0002 is consistent with the criteria for
review and approval, and consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner
REVIEWED BY: Chaz Bates, AICP, Planning Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Proposed Amendment
Exhibit 2: Public Comment
APPLICATION PROCESSING: Chapter 17.80 SVMC, Permit Processing Procedures. The following table
summarizes the procedural steps for the proposal.
Procedural Action
Date
Published Notice of Public Hearin 1' Notice):
May 12, 2023
Department of Commerce 60-day Notice of Intent to Adopt
Amendment
May 12, 2023
Published Rescheduled Notice of Public Hearing (2°d Notice)
May 19, 2023
Published Rescheduled Notice of Public Hearing (31 Notice)
May 26, 2023
Background:
SVMC 19.40.030 establishes the development standards for accessory dwelling units (ADU). Standards
address specific site and building requirements for setbacks, lot coverage, building size and height, etc.
Additional requirements stipulate that the owner must occupy either the primary dwelling unit or the ADU
as their permanent residence for at least six months of each year without collecting rent, prohibit ADUs on
lots containing a duplex, multifamily dwelling or accessory apartment contained within the principal
structure, and also prohibit a home business in the ADU.
Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2023-0002
Chapter 19.60 SVMC regulates the uses allowed in each zoning district. The zones where ADU's are
allowed are found in SVMC 19.60.050. ADU's are allowed in all zones except the MFR, I and POS zones.
ADU's are defined in Appendix A. The ADU definition is as follows:
"Dwelling, accessory unit: A freestanding detached structure or an attached part ofa structure that
is subordinate and incidental to the primary dwelling unit located on the same property, providing
complete, independent living facilities exclusively for a single housekeeping unit, including
permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking, and sanitation. "
In April 2023, City Council had discussions regarding the owner occupancy requirement applicable to
ADUs. Discussions noted that new developments proposed were not able to construct an ADU simultaneous
with a home unless it was owner occupied. As a result, Council directed staff to initiate a CTA to remove
the owner occupancy requirement.
Although not discussed by Council, land use trends indicate increased demand for ADU's for a variety of
reasons that include a desire for smaller homes that fit the needs of single person and single parent
households, smaller family size, more affordable housing options in single family neighborhoods, housing
for friends and family, and a means to increase personal wealth.
In 2017, the City of Spokane Valley Housing Action Plan estimated that the City would need an additional
6,660 housing units by 2037 for a forecasted population of 109,913 people. However as of 2023, the city's
population has grown to 107,100 which is 97% of the 2037 population forecast. The unexpected growth
rate has resulted in an existing deficit of over 3,000 housing units affecting all income levels of the City.
The Code Text amendment to remove the owner occupancy requirement associated with an accessory
dwelling permit will remove a potential barrier to development of ADUs and allow the development of
more housing types in the City.
ANALYSIS:
The owner occupant requirement only applies to accessory dwelling units associated with a single-family
dwelling. The analysis does not affect industrial accessory dwelling units, or cartetaker's dwellings
which are allowed in the non-residential zones.
The proposed amendment:
1. Increases opportunity for ADU's to be constructed in areas served with utilities and infrastructure
consistent with the needs for affordable housing and smaller households.
SVMC 19.60.050 Permitted Use Matrix allows ADU's to be constructed in the residential zones and
mixed use zones. SVMC 19.40.030 establishes the development standards ADU's must meet to receive a
permit. Removing the requirement that the owner must live in either dwelling at least 6 months out of the
year does not change the zones that allow ADU's nor change any bulk or performance standards. ADU's
use existing housing resources and typically cost less to build than new comparably sized housing units
since they do not require development of new land. Lower construction costs increase opportunity to
provide affordable housing consistent with the needs of smaller households. Removing the owner
occupant requirement promotes infill and reduces the need for additional land for housing construction.
2. Development standards ensure that neighborhood character is maintained.
The existing bulk standards ensure that detached and attached ADU's are consistent with scale and
character of the existing single family residential neighborhoods by maintaining the primary dwelling as
the largest structure on the property and placing the ADU in locations that are less visually intrusive.
Setback standards ensure that the privacy of the adjacent property owners are no more impacted than that
of a single family structure. Attached ADU's which convert internal space, such as lower and upper
Page 2 of 5
Staff Report and Recommendation
CTA-2023-0002
levels, garage conversions, etc, into a separate ADU often create a new dwelling without any visual
changes to the structure other than adding a new exterior door.
3. Removes a requirement that is difficult to enforce.
SVMC 19.40.030 requires the owner to live in either the ADU or primary dwelling at least 6 months of
the year and also requires the City to record a title notice identifying the requirement. However, once the
ADU permit is issued the city does not monitor the ownership of the property or determine if the ADU is
continuing to be rented. While the ownership requirement is determined at the time an ADU permit is
requested, continued compliance is assumed. If the city were to receive a complaint regarding the
occupancy status of an ADU primary dwelling, the Code Enforcement department would determine if the
owner is living on the premise. Once the ADU is established, new owners are likely to rent the properties
as they see fit, which may include living on the premise for a period of time and then retaining the
property while moving to another location to increase their personal investments. While the renting of
both the primary dwelling and the ADU would be a violation of the City's code, without a complaint
about the property it would be virtually impossible to determine if the owner -occupancy requirement is
being violated.
4. Provides housing suitable for the changing demographics (seniors and smaller households)
The decline in average household size has resulted from several factors, including a growing elderly
population, increasing numbers of single -person households and decreasing family size preferences.
Households with single persons under 65 make up almost 17% of the households in the state of
Washington (MRSC, pg 3, Accessory Dwelling Units, Issues and Options). Many families do not need or
cannot afford large homes. The decline in household size has left empty nesters and other homeowners of
homes that were designed for large families with unused, surplus housing space. The increase in demand
for smaller homes creates an efficient and low cost opportunity to convert existing housing stock into
affordable housing opportunities.
A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT
1. Compliance with Title 17 SVMC (General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code
a. Findings:
SVMC 17.80.150(F) identifies the approval criteria for an amendment to Titles 17-27 SVMC.
The City may approve a Municipal Code Text amendment if it finds that:
i. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan:
Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is supported by the Comprehensive Plan
and is consistent with the following Comprehensive goals and policies:
LU-GI Maintain and enhance the character and quality of life in Spokane Valley.
LU-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents,
employees, and visitors.
LU-P7 Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible land uses and adverse
impacts associated with transportation corridors
LU-P15 Enable a variety of housing types.
Page 3 of 5
Staff Report and Recommendation
CTA-2023-0002
HGl Allow for a broad range of housing opportunities to mee the needs of the
community.
H-G2 Enable the development of affordable housing for all income levels
H-P2 Adopt development regulations that expand housing choices by allowing
innovative housing types including tiny homes, accessory dwelling units, prefabricated
homes, co -housing, cottage housing, and other housing types.
H-P3 Support the development of affordable housing units using available financial
and regulatory tools.
H-P6 Preserve and enhance the city's established single-family neighborhoods by
minimizing the impacts of more dense housing typologies such as duplexes and cottage
development.
CF-P2 Optimize the use of existing public facilities before investing in new facilities.
ii. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the environment:
Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment bears substantial relation to public health,
safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. The City is experiencing
significant population growth resulting in a housing shortage to meet housing
demand. ADUs are currently allowed in all residential zones. The existing
regulations for ADUs ensure they are compatible with the existing character of the
neighborhood. The proposed removal of the owner -occupancy requirement does not
change any of these compatibility standards; however, it does allow for more
opportunities for infill development in a manner that fits into the neighborhood.
The requirement is difficult to enforce. Smaller household sizes have created a need
for affordable smaller housing types in single family neighborhoods. The City is
committed to protecting community character while ensuring continued growth in
housing opportunities for all community needs and income levels.
b. Conclusion(s):
The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC
17.80.150(F).
2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments
a. Findings:
One public comment has been received to date in support of the code text amendment. On May
25, 2023 a number of persons spoke to the Planning Commission opposing the text amendment
voicing concerns that included:
• The illegal conversion of the ADU to a business
• Increasing the rentals in the neighborhood
• Opposition to growth and impacts to schools, roads, services, etc
• General confusion about the recently passed legislation and the parameters of the code
text amendment
• Support of owner occupancy requirement
Page 4 of 5
Staff Report and Recommendation
CTA-2023-0002
The impacts of an ADU are marginal as the use is consistent with the existing land uses allowed and
development regulations will ensure compatibility with the existing neighborhood. The city has permitted
17 ADU's over the last 5 years located throughout the city and is unaware of any associated issues. The
City does not regulate owner, versus non -owner, occupancy of any other residential land use. Infill
development takes advantage of existing services and infrastructure creating less demand on service
providers.
b. Conclusion(s):
Adequate public noticing was conducted for CTA-2022-0002 pursuant to adopted public
noticing procedures.
3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments
a. Findings:
The City has not received any substantive agency comments to date.
b. Conclusion(s):
No concerns noted.
B. CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth in Section A the proposed code text amendment to eliminate the requirement that
the property owner occupy the primary dwelling unit or the ADU, and other matters related is consistent
with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.150(F) and the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 5 of 5
CTA-2023-0002 — ADU Update - Draft Page 1/2
19.40.030 Development standards— Accessory dwelling units.
A. Site.
1. An ADU may be developed in conjunction with either an existing or new primary dwelling unit;
2. One ADU, attached or detached, is allowed per lot; and
3. One off-street parking space for the ADU is required in addition to the off-street parking required for the
primary dwelling unit.
B. Building.
1. The ADU shall be designed to meet the appearance of a single-family residence and shall be the same or
visually match the primary dwelling unit in the type, size, and placement of the following:
a. Exterior finish materials;
b. Roof pitch;
c. Trim; and
d. Windows, in proportion (relationship of width to height) and orientation (horizontal or vertical);
2. The entrance to an attached ADU shall be located on the side or in the rear of the structure or in such a
manner as to be unobtrusive in appearance when viewed from the front of the street. Only one entrance may be
located on the facade of the primary dwelling unit in order to maintain the appearance of a single-family
residence;
3. The ADU shall not exceed 50 percent of the habitable square footage of the primary dwelling unit, nor be
less than 300 square feet;
4. The footprint of the ADU shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot area or 1,000 square feet, whichever is
greater; and
5. The ADU unit shall not have more than two bedrooms.
C. Additional Development Standards for ADUs.
1. ADUs shall be located behind the front building setback line and placed on a permanent foundation;
2. ADUs shall preserve all side yard and rear yard setbacks for a dwelling unit pursuant to Table 19.70-1;
3. ADUs shall not be allowed on lots containing a duplex, multifamily dwelling, or accessory apartment
contained within the principal structure; and
4. Existing detached accessory structures may be converted into detached ADUs; provided, that all
development standards and criteria are met, including side yard and rear yard setbacks.
D. Other.
12. Prior to issuance of occupancy, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Spokane County auditor to
indicate the presence of an ADU, d other standards for maintaining the
unit as described in the SVMC.
CTA-2023-0002 — ADU Update - Draft
23. Home businesses are prohibited in the ADU.
Page 2/2
34. Approval of an ADU may be revoked if the ADU is no longer in compliance with the development
standards and criteria outlined in the SVMC.
43. The owner may cancel an ADU's registration by filing a letter with Spokane County auditor. The ADU
may also be cancelled as a result of an enforcement action.
Marianne Lemons
From:
Levi Basinger
Sent:
Friday, May 5, 2023 12:34 PM
To:
Marianne Lemons
Cc:
Lori Barlow; Chaz Bates
Subject:
FW: 5/11 study session on ADUs owner occupancy
Marianne,
It appears we received this public comment in the email chain below regarding CTA-2023-0002, which is the study
session item at the 5-11-23 Planning Commission meeting.
Levi Basinger I Planner
10210 E. Sprague Avenue I Spokane Valley, WA 99206
(509)720-5332 1lbasinger@sookanevallev.org
��� has! ,tom
This email and any attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to Washington State's Public Record Act, chapter 42.56 RCW.
From: eastman.lara <eastman.lara@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 1:28 AM
To: Planning <planning@spokanevalley.org>
Subject: 5/11 study session on ADUs owner occupancy
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening attachments or
clicking links.
Can I publicly comment for this? I can't tell from the agenda but I would like to.
My partner and I are homeowners of a house with an old and new section and the city permitting Department had
talked to us about watching this proposal. We are planning to split our current home into an old and new side which will
be a 2 bedroom 2 bath apartment and a 2 bedroom 1 bath ADU that is 50% of total square footage. This law change is
pivotal to us being able to rent this house as 2 separate units to provide affordable middle range multi housing.
We are advocating for this change and would love to speak up. We meet this exact situation and want to help secure the
ability to split and rent this home that is not affordable as 1 house but affordable as 2 smaller homes. We would meet all
other stipulations beyond owner occupancy as we plan to buy property out of town and only rent these once complete.
The ADU could be rented to families or made fully handicap accesible as it single level with a no stair entry, Also.
Thank you
Lara Eastman & Keven Bolinger off 8th and pines.
253-509-2334
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: June 22, 2023
Item: Check all that apply ® old business ❑ new business ® public hearing
❑ information ❑ study session ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2023 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments— Public Hearing.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010.
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: On March 9, 2023, the Planning Commission held a Study
Session on the 2023 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA). On April 13, 2023, the Planning
Commission held a public hearing on the proposed CPA, and on April 27, 2023, the Planning
Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to approve CPA-2023-01.
BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to consider
amendments to their Comprehensive Plans once each year. The City codified this process in Section
17.80.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). On November 22, 2022, the City Council
approved the 2023 Docket. The Docket includes one proposed site -specific map amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan.
On December 9, 2022, the City issued a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) for the proposed
comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to Title 21 SVMC, Environmental Controls. Comments on the
determination have been incorporated into the staff report where appropriate and no appeal of the DNS was
received.
On March 24 and 31, 2023, a Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed amendments was published. On
March 27, 2023, the site -specific map amendment was posted on site. On March 29, 2023, a notice of public
hearing was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the proposed amendment sites.
After the Planning Commission made their recommendation to that the City Council approve the CPA, it
was identified that proper mailing notice for the public hearing was not provided. To ensure that the
Planning Commission has the opportunity to hear new and relevant public testimony, staff has reissued the
public notice for CPA-2023-0001. On June 2 and 9, 2023, a second Notice of Public Hearing for the
proposed amendments was published. On June 6, 2023, a second notice of the public hearing was posted
on site, and on June 7, 2023, a second notice of public hearing was mailed to property owners within 400
feet of the proposed amendment.
On March 9, 2023, staff presented the proposed 2023 Comprehensive Plan amendments to the Planning
Commission for their review and discussion. Tonight's meeting will include a public hearing on the
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discuss the proposed amendments and provide staff
direction to prepare the findings. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, approval with
modifications, or denial of the proposed amendments.
STAFF CONTACT: Levi Basinger, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Presentation
2. Staff Report dated June 15, 2023
RPCA Public Hearing for 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page I of I
Spokan` new
jValley,
STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 2023
COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & PLANNING DIVISION
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA-2023-01
HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: June 22, 2023, beginning at 6:00 p.m., at CenterPlace Regional Event
Center and remotely via Zoom. Due to an error in the notification process, the City of Spokane Valley is
holding a second public hearing on the comprehensive plan amendment described below.
Project Number:
CPA-2023-01
Application Description:
A request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning for
19.45 acres Single Family Residential (SFR) and 4.41 acres Neighborhood
Commercial (NC) to Parks/Open Space (P/OS), for a total of 23.86 acres.
Location:
Parcels 46351.9143, 46352.9149, 46354.9150, and 46355.9151; Section 35,
Township 26 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,
Washington
Applicant:
City of Spokane Valley
Owners:
City of Spokane Valley
Date of Application:
November 1, 2022
Staff Contact:
Levi Basinger, Planner, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA
99206
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Title 17 Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC) General Provisions, Title 19 SVMC Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 SVMC Environmental
Controls.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1:
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map
Exhibit 7:
Environmental Determination
Exhibit 2:
Proposed Zoning Map
Exhibit 8:
SEPA Checklist
Exhibit 3:
Vicinity Map
Exhibit 9:
Notice of Public Hearing
Exhibit 4:
Aerial Map
Exhibit 10:
Agency Comments
Exhibit 5:
Existing Comprehensive Plan Map
Exhibit 11:
Public Comments
Exhibit 6:
Existing Zoning
/41
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Size and Characteristics:
The property consists of four vacant parcels totaling 23.86 acres,
located between Bigelow Gulch Road, Forker Road, and Progress
Road.
Comprehensive Plan:
Single Family Residential (SFR), Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
Zoning:
Single Family Residential (R-3), Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
Page 1 of 8
Staff Report
CPA-2023-01
Existing Use: Vacant (within floodplain and adjacent to drainage area for adjacent
subdivision)
SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES
Comprehensive Plan: Rural Conservation (RCV, Spokane County)
North
Zoning: RCV (Spokane County)
Uses: Church, single-family residences
Comprehensive Plan: SFR
South
Zoning: R-3
Uses: Single-family residences
Comprehensive Plan: NC, SFR, Urban Reservce (UR, Spokane County)
East
Zoning: NC, R-3, UR (Spokane County)
Uses: School, single-family residences
Comprehensive Plan: SFR, RCV (Spokane County)
West
Zoning: R-3, RCV (Spokane County)
Uses: Single-family residences
APPLICATION PROCESSING:
Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application
procedures for the proposal.
Application Submitted:
November 2, 2022
SEPA DNS Issue date
December 9, 2022
End of Appeal Period for DNS:
December 27, 2022
Date of I" Mailed Notice of Public Hearing
March 29, 2023
Date of I" Published Notice of Public Hearing:
March 24 & 31, 2023
16' Public Hearing
April 13, 2023
Date of Initial Findings of Fact
Apri 127, 2023
City Council Administrative Report
May 23, 2023
Date of 2°d Mailed Notice of Public Hearing
June 7, 2023
Date of 2nd Published Notice of Public Hearing:
June 2 & 9, 2023
SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
If adopted the amendment will change the comprehensive plan land use designation and zoning to P/OS
which would largely limits development of the site to passive and active recreational uses. The current
zoning of P/OS does not permit residential development and only allows limited commercial uses.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
1. Findings:
Pursuant to Title 21 SVMC, the lead agency has determined that the proposal does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The City issued a Determination of Non -
Significance (DNS) for the proposal on December 9, 2022. The determination was made after
Page 2 of 8
Staff Report
CPA-2023-01
review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Titles 19, 21, and 22 SVMC, a
site assessment, public and agency comments, the Comprehensive Plan and associated
Environmental Impact Statement.
2. Conclusion(s):
The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Title 21 SVMC
have been fulfilled.
C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT AND AREA -WIDE REZONE
The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments
if it finds that compliance with the approval criteria in SVMC 17.80.140.H.
(1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the environment;
Analysis. The proposed amendment to change the designation for 19 acres from Single
Family Residential (SFR) and 4 acres from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to
Parks and Open Space (P/OS) bears a substantial relationship to the public
health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. In 2021, the City
acquired four parcels (46351.9143, 46352.9149, 46354.9150, 46355.9151)
west and south of Progress Road and east ofForker Road. The purpose behind
the city acquiring this land was to preserve open space within the 100 year
floodplain and to expand the city's park lands. This area was generally
identified as New Park Area 1 in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
These plans were developed through an extensive community engagement
process. Additionally, the expansion is necessary to maintain the adopted Level
of Service (LOS) 3.25 acres of park land for every 1, 000 residents.
(2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and
with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A
RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the
amendment. The Growth Management Act (GMA) adopts fourteen goals to guide
the development oflocal comprehensive plans and development regulations. The
proposal is consistent with the GMA goals to enhance recreational opportunities
and develop parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, the GAM requires a
Parks and Recreation element to be a part of the adopted comprehensive plan.
The City's Comprehensive Plan adopts the Parks Plan by reference.
The proposed amendment will not have unanticipated impacts on other areas of
the Comprehensive Plan.
(3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the
property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
Analysis: The proposed amendment does not respond to a substantial change in
conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within
which the subject property lies.
(4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
Analysis: The proposed amendment is not in response to or corrects an obvious mapping
error.
Page 3 of 8
Staff Report
CPA-2023-01
(5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
Analysis: The proposed amendment will address a documented deficiency of park land
and open space in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies
the following goals and policy that support the proposed change:
P-GI Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park, recreation, trail,
and open space system that enhances community character.
P-P2 Acquire land for the development of parks or the preservation of open space
within the City's boundaries and adjacent UGAs.
P-P3 Using the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, periodically assess recreational
facilities to identify potential gaps and improvements.
P-P7 Identify and protect regional open spaces and natural areas to form a
connected network of active and passive recreation areas.
NR-Gl: Pursue food hazard reduction while providing predictability for landowners.
NR-P9: Ensure that wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently
flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, and critical aquifer recharge
areas are identified, designated, and protected.
ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan
amendments:
(6) The effect upon the physical environment;
Analysis: The change to P/OS will not impact the physical environment. The change will
result in less intensive uses than are allowed in SFR and NC zones, reducing
the potential effects on the physical environment.
(7) The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes;
Analysis. According to the City's Critical Areas map, most ofthe property is located in
the 100 year floodplain. The primary flood zone designation that applies to
the site is AO, which is defined as an area of shallow flooding, usually in the
form of sheet flow, with an average depth ranging from 1 to 3 feet. Pursuant
to SVMC 21.30.090.9, all structures in Zone AO shall are required to be
elevated to one foot or more above the specified flood depth or flood -proofed
with watertight construction methods. Given the strict requirements applied to
structures in the floodplain, open fields allowing for passive or active
recreation, with no or few structures, are ideal for locations such as these.
There is also a seasonal stream (DNR Type F) located on the property that
flows into a drainage channel, which is deposited into a stormwater storage
basin where it infiltrates into the soil. The stream type and its route were
identified in a 2015 Water Type Modification. The parcels are not located
within shoreline jurisdiction, and there are no known surface water quality or
quantity issues. The City's critical areas ordinance will ensure that adequate
protection of the critical areas and adjacent land use are addressed at the time
offuture development.
(8) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods;
Analysis: The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Future
development of the park space will provide a documented need and location
identified in the 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
Page 4 of 8
Staff Report
CPA-2023-01
(9) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public
transportation, parks, recreation, and schools;
Analysis: Sewer and water are available to the site. The nearest formal park is Plante's
Ferry Park (Spokane County Parks) approximately 2 miles to the southwest.
The proposal will increase park land and faure development will enhance the
park system helping maintain the adopted LOS.
The site is served by Progress Road and Forker Road, both Minor Arterials, on
the north and west exteriors of the site. The site also has frontage along Bigelow
Gulch Road to the east. A realignment of Bigelow Gulch Road and an extension
of Sullivan Road has recently finished construction. There are no
determinations for Levels of Service (LOS) of roadways adjacent to the site
since these are located outside municipal boundaries.
(10) The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region;
Analysis: The proposed amendment will provide benefits to the neighborhood and City
by providing an opportunity to provide park space to the neighborhood
without the need to leave the area. Plante's Ferry Park, the nearest formal
public park, is outside municipal boundaries and maintained by Spokane
County; therefore, it is not considered in determining the LOS for park land.
This will provide new City -owned and maintained park space for residents
underserved by the municipal park system. The expansion of park space in
this area will help the City meet its adopted LOS for park land.
(11) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and
the demand for such land;
Analysis: The quantity and location ofpark land is planned for and needed as identified
in the Parks Plan. A park at this location f others the goals of the Parks Plan
and Comprehensive Plan. The site provides easy access for pedestrians,
bicycles, and automobiles.
(12) The current and projected population density in the area; and
Analysis: The proposed change would have minimal impact on projected population
density. Development of the property is severely limited due to being in the
100 year foodplain and being encumbered by an easement for Bonneville
Power Administration (BPA).
(13) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Analysis: The proposal will not have an impact on other aspects of the Comprehensive
Plan. In addition to meeting the goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan
the proposed amendment addresses the following goals, policies, and strategy
of the Comprehensive Plan:
L U-G2 Provide for land uses that are essential to Spokane Valley residents,
employees, and visitors.
LU-P18 Enable public open spaces.
P-Gl Develop, grow, and maintain a diverse and accessible park,
recreation, trail, and open space system that enhances community
character.
P-P2 Acquire land for the development of parks or the preservation of
open space within the City's boundaries and adjacent UGAs.
Page 5 of 8
Staff Report CPA-2023-01
P-P3
Using the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, periodically assess
recreational facilities to identify potential gaps and improvements.
P-P5
Design parks and community facilities to provide easy access for
pedestrians, bicycles, autos, and public transit.
P-P8
Plan for access to parks, trails, and other open spaces in all
neighborhoods.
NR-GI
Pursue flood hazard reduction while providing predictability for
landowners.
NR-P2
Prepare and/or regularly update watershed plans for Chester
Creek, Glenrose Channel, Saltese Creek, Forker Draw, and Central
Park Basin.
NR-P3
Prepare an accurate, updated map of areas expected to be
inundated by a 100 year flood, particularly in the Spokane River,
Forker Draw, and Glenrose Channel Areas.
NR-P9
Ensure that wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas,
frequentlyflooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, and critical
aquifer recharge areas are identified, designated, and protected.
Conclusion(s):
For the reasons outlined above the proposed amendment is consistent with SVMC 17.80.140(I-I).
D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Findings:
Staff has received three public comments to date.
Date
Name & Address
Comment(s)
April 1, 2023
Inna Goleta
Summarized:
innachka og letaahotmail.com
1. Parcels are home to many species of birds and
wildlife.
2. Natural areas should be set aside for wildlife.
3. Should be planned in a way to benefit both
community and wildlife.
4. Sidewalks and paved pathways should be
installed for walking and bicycling more safe
and enjoyable.
April 6, 2023
Christine Beirouty
Summarized:
cbeirouty@gmail.com
1. Understanding that development is not
possible in specified location.
2. Opposed to any new homes being built in
specified location.
April 13, 2023
Susan Brunemeir
Summarized:
14717 E Caprio Avenue
1. In favor of natural park.
suebru72 ail.com
2. Wetlands ideal habitat for birds.
Page 6 of 8
Staff Report
CPA-2023-01
Comments received following the date of this staff report will be provided to the Planning
Commission at the June 22, 2023 meeting.
2. Conclusion(s):
An initial Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) was published March 24 and 31, 2023. The NOPH
was posted on site on March 27, 2023 and mailed to property owners within a 400 foot radius of
the site on March 29, 2023.
After the public hearing and after the Planning Commission made their recommendation to City
Council, it was identified that the mailing notice for the public hearing was inadequate. The buffer
created to generate the mailing list excluded Parcel Number 46354.9150, meaning property
owners within 400 feet of the proposal were not notified by mail. To ensure that the Planning
Commission has the opportunity to hear new and relevant public testimony, staff has reissued the
public notice for CPA-2023-0001.
On June 2 and 9, 2023, a second Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed amendments was
published. On June 6, 2023, a second notice of the public hearing was posted on site, and on June
7, 2023, a second notice of public hearing was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the
proposed amendment.
E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS
1. Findings:
Agency
Received Comments
Comments Dated
City of Spokane Valley Senior Traffic Engineer
City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering
City of Spokane Valley Building & Planning
City of Spokane Valley Parks & Recreation
Spokane Valley Fire Department
Yes
12-07-22
City of Millwood
City of Liberty Lake
City of Spokane
City of Spokane Valley Police Department
Spokane County,Building and Planning
Spokane County,Wastewater System Division
Yes
12-12-22
Spokane County, Clean Air Agency
Spokane County, Fire District No. 1
Spokane County, Fire District No. 8
Spokane County Regional Health District
Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency
Spokane Aquifer Joint Board
Spokane Transit Authority STA
Spokane Regional Transportation Council SRTC
Washington State Dept of Commerce
Washington State Dept of Ecology OI m is
Washington State Dept of Ecology (Spokane)
Washington State Dept of Fish & Wildlife
Washington State Dept of Natural Resources
Washington State Dept of Transportation
Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission
Page 7 of 8
Staff Report
CPA-2023-01
WA Archaeological & Historic Preservation
Avista Utilities
Inland Power & Light
Modem Electric Water Company
Conoco Phillips Yellowstone Pipeline)
Yes
12-07-22
Central Valley School District #356
East Valley School District #361
West Valley School District #363
Century Link
Comcast
Model Irrigation District #18
Consolidated Irrigation District #19
East Spokane Water District #1
Vera Water & Power
Spokane County Water District #3
Spokane Tribe of Indians
2. Conclusion(s):
No concerns are noted
F. CONCLUSION:
For the reasons set forth in Section C above, the proposed amendment to amend the Comprehensive Plan
and adopt the area -wide rezone to change the land use designation and zoning to of parcels 46351.9143,
46352.9149, 46354.9150, and 46355.9151 to P/OS complies with the requirements of SVMC 17.80.140.H
and the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 8 of 8
BmM.. Rd
B
C�
c
�
w
a'
X
w
h
N SullivamQ'a
C
C
O 0
a u
0
�l ou0 N 00�d N
.N 8`9e\ P21 alRanl N
Q
w
� � o
v „ap C
>
om
4
d
Qc� � Gna
a�
�0.
v �
0
a u
=
N
g
m
O
N
z
o
0 d
'a
en
r
N
v
/0� 1 0 -
°
o
N
0
"
a
d
xvgwA
N
a
�a
Gn a
2
Rd
mUEoa
>
P P P P �
O hhh ul m
m
N
Kea
t o.
Q!
Lu
W22ma
N SullivanQ'a
m
Gn�a
a
hp9 i3
Pb ��
M
a
P
M
�O
i
v
c
� (Y
L�9
Pb�yrygpq
a
' o�
cm
�
3
�
�
M j
O
N
�
d
d
3
Pa scab
N Sullivan
yy y
AN
Ty i
R '•
iA
j
t., A .oljp•
i
¢� E i
K W \
\
,¢L►,' _ � G. � :a, is A¢
v N.
�W . FbaN _
see
< k4
ate• Rbk35�a9tN
v ¢ m
E
y o,, m4
IN
V
V1
✓
O
d
'
O O
_
I
uN
N
-0 '
ry
e a •�U:7l��ry�:y��
o
• o' °
ry�
Ir'l°J "Iw U UJ
�
0
o
d
3
Q
aQ,h
b�'b
a
� n
CV
P
G9 ftup
_
f'l
-
H
e
Q
O
�5ry.
c
c c
0
N N
',
a
A
O P O
m
vW
v vv-r a
s
�iJ
J�� 44 A �
` •
u
<
�E
w
d
w�
G]a
Exhibit 7
/\ COMMUNITY & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SpO-�n� e ` DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
10210 East Sprague Avenue • Spokane Valley WA 99206
.;000%Hey. 509.720.5000 • Fax: 509.720.5075 • planning@spokanevalley.org
PROJECT: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for 2023:
File Number 1Applicant/Owner
CPA-2023-01 A request to change land use Parcels 46351.9143, 46352.9149, City of Spokane
designation and zoning for 46354.9150, and 46355.9151; Valley
approximately 23.86 acres Single Section 35, Township 26 North,
Family Residential and Range 44 East, Willamette
Neighborhood Commercial to Meridian, Spokane County,
Parks/Open Space. Washington
LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley
DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance is issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-
I1-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 18 days from the date issued. Comments must be received
by 5:00 p.m. on December 27, 2022. Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC), the lead agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement is not required under Revised Code of Washington 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
STAFF CONTACT: Levi Basinger, Planner, City of Spokane Valley, Planning Division, 10210 E Sprague Avenue, Spokane
Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5332/FX (509) 720-5075, [basin ger(a).spokanevallev.ong
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Chaz Bates, AICP, Planning Manager, City of Spokane ey, 1021 ast S e Avenue,
Spokane Valley, WA 99206, PH: (509) 720-5033, cbates s okanevallev.or
DATE ISSUED: December 9. 2022 SIGNATURE:
APPEAL: An appeal of this determination shall be submitted to the Community & Public Works Department within
fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and specific factual objections made to the
City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with SVMC 17.90 Appeals, and any required
fees pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at the time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-
680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination.
City of Spokane Valley Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) Page 1 of I
File No. CPA-2023-01
Exhibit 8
STAFF USE ONLY
Date Submitted: Received by: Fee:
PLUS #: File #:
PART I — REQUIRED MATERIAL
"THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT
PROVIDED"
❑ Completed SEPA Checklist
❑ Application Fee
❑ Reduced Site Plan of proposal in W" by 11" or 11" by 17" size
❑ Trip Distribution and Generation Letter, if requested by Development Engineering.
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
The State Environmental Policy AM (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider
the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must
be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The
purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal
(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whetheran EIS
is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental
agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,
requiring preparation of an EIS. Answerthe questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the
best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you
should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire
experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not
know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations.
Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on
different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its
environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply."
IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D).
Exhibit 8
For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CPA-2023-01. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the
2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan.
2. Name of applicant: City of Spokane Valley
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 10210 E. Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA
99206. Contact: Levi Basinger, Planner, Community and Public Works Division. (509) 720-533,
I basinger@spokaneval ley.ors
4. Date checklist prepared: November 2, 2022
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipated adoption June 2023
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? Yes. If yes, explain. The property is planned for future park space. Future development may
require a separate SEPA process.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed for the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The document is titled 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) and supporting Development Regulations.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? None. If yes, explain.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by City
Council.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and
site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your
proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to
include additional specific information on project description.) The amendment is to change approximately
19 acres of Single Family Residential (SFR) designated land and approximately 10 acres of Neighborhood
Commercial (NC) designated land to a designation of Parks, Recreation and Open Space (P/OS). The change
Exhibit 8
would formally recognize the public ownership and intended use of the property.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans
required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applications related to this checklist. The proposal is generally located west and south of N Progress Road
and east of N Forker Road. The property is vacant and unaddressed. The parcel numbers are 46351.9143,
46352.9149, 46354.9150, and 46355.9151 and can be further located using these coordinates: 47.708267, -
117.206544. The property is located adjacent to the northern city boundary.
13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)?
The general Sewer Service Area? Yes.
Priority Sewer Service Area? Yes.
(See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries).
14. The following questions supplement Part A:
a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA).
1. Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the
purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the
disposal of stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of
materials to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of
(including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of
firefighting activities). This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future
development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process.
2. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or
underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored?
This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be
analyzed under a separate SEPA process.
3. What protective measures will betaken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used
on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals
out of disposal systems. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future
development would be analyzed under separate SEPA process.
4. Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain
to surface or groundwater or to a stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or
groundwater? This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development
would be analyzed under separate SEPA process.
b. Stormwater
1. What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Unknown
Exhibit 8
2. Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts.
This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. Future development would be
analyzed under separate SEPA process.
B. Environmental Elements
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: floodplain.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Unknown
What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, much)?
If you know the classification of agricultural souls, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a
non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the
application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a
separate SEPA process.
Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No. If so, describe.
Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Also indicate
source of fill. Not applicable.
c. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Not applicable.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? Yes. If so, generally
describe. The site is accessed from Forker Road and Progress Road, both considered minor arterials,
from the west and north respectively. The site also has frontage along Bigelow Gulch Road to the east.
Wellesley Avenue is located further south. These are all sources of vehicle emissions affecting the site in
question. A realignment of Bigelow Gulch Road directly north of the site and an extension of Sullivan
Road southeast was recently completed.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not Applicable.
3. Water
a. Surface:
Exhibit 8
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A seasonal stream (DNR Type F) is located on
the property in question and flows into a drainage channel, which is deposited into a stormwater
storage basin where it infiltrates into the soil. The stream type and its route were identified in a
2015 Water Type Modification. The stream also appears as a riverine wetland on the National
Wetland Inventory.
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans. This is a non -project action changing the future land
use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future
use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process.
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected and the source of fill
material. Not applicable.
4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,
and approximate quantities if known. Not appliable.
5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? Yes. If so, note location on the site plan. Almost
the entire property is located in the 100-year floodplain. This property was subject to a Letter of
Map Revision in 2018 (LOMR 18-10-1264P), amending the Flood Insurance Rate Map in this
location. As a result, most of the property is located in the floodplain, flood zones AE and AO. The
flood zone designations that apply to the site are Zones AE and AO.
6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Not applicable.
b. Ground:
1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities known. Not applicable.
2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,
if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to
be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
Not applicable.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
1. Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If
so, describe. This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently
undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will
Exhibit 8
be reviewed under a separate SEPA process.
2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the
application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a
separate SEPA process.
4. Plants
a. Circle types of vegetation found on the site:
1. Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
2. Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
3. Shrubs
4. Grass
5. Pasture
6. Croporgrain
7. Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
8. Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
9. Other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any: Not appliable.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near
the site:
1. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
2. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
3. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known.
c. Is the site part off a migration route? Not applicable. If so, explain.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable.
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable.
Exhibit 8
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. Not applicable.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable.
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
This is a non -project action changing the future land use map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the
application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any future changes will be reviewed under a
separate SEPA process.
1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable.
2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable.
b. Noise
1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)? The site is adjacent to a residential neighborhood and an arterial road. Future
development may account for these noises in design.
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise
would come from the site. Not applicable.
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable.
8. Land and shoreline use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently owned by the City of
Spokane Valley and Spokane County.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown.
c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on site.
d. Will any structures be demolished? No. If so, what?
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single -Family Residential (R-3) and Neighborhood
Commercial (NC).
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single -Family Residential and
Neighborhood Commercial.
Exhibit 8
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive' area?
If so, specify. The site is located in the 100-year floodplain and contains a seasonal stream onsite.
I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable.
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans.
If any: Not applicable.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provide, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing. Not applicable.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing. Not applicable.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas?
What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable.
11. Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?
What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The nearest
formal park is Plante's Ferry Park approximately 2 miles to the southwest. East Valley Middle School
and East Valley High School are located 0.4 miles to the south and both provide recreation
Exhibit 8
opportunities.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?
If so, describe. No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any: This is a non -project action changing the future land use
map. The site is currently undeveloped, and the application does not evaluate a specific future use. Any
future changes will be reviewed under a separate SEPA process.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? No. If so, generally describe.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site. Unknown.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently undeveloped. There are informal access points
from N Forker Road and N Progress Road.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? No. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop? The nearest transit stop is located 0.3 miles south at Progress and Wellesley.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?
Not applicable.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? Not applicable. If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). While
the land use change does not require improvements, future site development will improve access to
new park space established on site.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation?
If so, generally describe. Not applicable.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The city's adopted comprehensive
plan adopts a level of service for transportation services. There are ongoing improvements to the
transportation system in the vicinity, but these improvements were not due to future development of
Exhibit 8
Spokane`
jUalley
the site in question.
15. Public services
SEPA CHECKLIST
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? No. The city's adopted comprehensive plan adopts a level of
service for public services. Future development will be analyzed under a separate SEPA process for
impacts to those services. If so, generally describe.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
1. Electricity
2. Natural gas
3. Water
4. Refuse service
5. Telephone
6. Sanitary sewer
7. Septic system
8. Other -describe While the site is undeveloped, it has access to a variety of utilities including water,
sewer, refuse service, and electricity.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying
on them to make its decision.
Signature: /d//� Date: Submitted:
l
D. Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions
(Do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements
of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result
from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not
implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Traffic generated from future park use on
site causing increased vehicle emissions and discharge of vehicle pollutants to watercourses and
Page 10 of 12
PL-22 V1.0
Exhibit 8
groundwater.
a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Development of the site would require
pollutants from vehicles in storm runoff be treated in stormwater basins. Increase in vehicle emissions
in the immediate vicinity generated by future use of the site would be mitigated by improved traffic
circulation applied at development of the site.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Increase in human activity
onsite.
a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Maintain water and
drainage courses, preserve open spaces, and enhance vegetation with future landscape plans.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Electricity used on site to power
facilities on site.
a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Limit hours of public use for
the site during normal operations and implement seasonal restrictions for public use of site
facilities (i.e. restrooms).
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands? Increase in human activity on site and development of the site for public access and recreation.
a. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Review of
environmentally sensitive areas during future SEPA process and at time of site development. All
development on site would be required to meet requirements for development in the floodplain, which
includes a requirement for net loss in flood storage capacity.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not applicable; no shoreline areas
present.
a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
Additional traffic generated from future park use on site.
a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Review impacts to roadway level of
service at time of site development. Necessary improvements to the adjacent transportation network
would be made at time of site development to maintain levels of service and maintain vehicle
circulation.
Exhibit 8
Spokan��
�Ualley�
SEPA CHECKLIST
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment. The proposal will not conflict with any local, state, and federal laws or
requirements for environmental protection. Future development of the site will be reviewed for
compliance with all applicable laws and requirements.
E. Signature
I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of
my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure
on my part, the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this
check list.
Date:
Please print or type: Levi Basinger
Proponent: City of Spokane Valley
Address: 10210 E Sprague Avenue
Phone: (509) 720-5332
Signature:y '/ zlc
Person completing form (if different from proponent):
Name:
Address:
Phone:
DISCLAIMER: By accepting this permit and proceeding with the work, the applicant/permittee and owner
acknowledges and agrees that: 1) If this permit is for construction of or on a dwelling, the dwelling is/will be served by
potable water. 2) Ownership of this City of Spokane Valley permit inures to the property owner. 3) The
applicant/permittee is the property owner or has full permission and authority to represent the property owner in this
project and carry out the work specified in the permit. 4) All construction is to be done in full compliance with the City
of Spokane Valley Municipal Code. The applicable codes are available for review at the City of Spokane Valley Permit
Center. 5) The applicant/permittee further declares that they are either: (A) a contractor currently registered and
properly licensed in accordance with Chapter 18.27 RCW; (B) the registered or legal owner or authorized agent of the
property for which I am applying for permit and not a licensed contractor; or (C) otherwise exempt from the
requirements set forth in RCW 18.27.090 and will abide by all provisions and conditions of the exemption as stated. 6)
The City of Spokane Valley permit is a permit to carry out the work as specified therein and is not a permit or approval
for any violation of federal, state or local laws, codes or ordinances. 7) Compliance with all federal, state, and local
laws shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/permittee and property owner. 8) Plans or additional information
may be required to be submitted and subsequently approved before this application can be processed. The City is not
responsible for any code violation through the issuance of this permit. 9) Failure to request and obtain the necessary
inspections and inspection approvals may necessitate stoppage of work and/or removal of certain parts of the
construction at the applicant's/permittee's or property owner's expense.
Page 12 of 12
PL-22 V1.0
Exhibit 9
Hearing Date
Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.120, Notice of Public Hearing, the Building
& Planning Division is sending notice of a public hearing to all property owners within 400 feet of project
number CPA-2023-01. The public hearing for this project is scheduled for Thursday, April 13, 2023
beginning at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, in Room 109; Centerplace Regional Event
Center; 2426 N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, WA 99216.
Meeting Details: The hearing will be conducted in person, with the option to attend remotely using web
and telephone conference tools. A link to the Zoom meeting will be provided on the agenda and posted to
the City's webpage: www.spokanevallev.org(planninecommission.
Project Information
Project Number:
CPA-2023-01
Application
A request to change land use designation and zoning for approximately
Description:
23.86 acres Single Family Residential and Neighborhood Commercial to
Parks/Open Space for parcels 46351.9143, 46352.9149, 46354.9150, and
46355.9151.
Location:
The property consists of four vacant parcels located between Bigelow Gulch
Road, Forker Road, and Progress Road, Section 35, Township 26 North,
Ran a 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington.
Owner/Applicant:
City of Spokane Valley
Staff Contact:
Levi Basinger, Planner, 10210 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA
99206; hone: 509 720-5332; email: Ibasi er s okanevalle .or
Hearing Process and Appeals
The Planning Commission will conduct the hearing pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted in SVMC
Title 18 (Boards and Authorities). Any appeal of the Planning Commission's decision will be based on
the record established before the Planning Commission, pursuant to SVMC 17.90 (Appeals). The
Planning Commission will forward a recommendation on the request to the Spokane Valley City Council.
Providing Comments
The public is encouraged to provide comment in person at the hearing, or to submit written comments prior
to the hearing by sending the comments to Levi Basinger, 10210 E Sprague Ave, Spokane Valley, WA
99206, or email to lbasineerna spokanevalley.org. Comments will need to be submitted no later than 4:00
PM on April 13, 2023 in order for them to be received and prepared for submission into the record.
Comments received will be entered into the record at the time of the public participation portion of the
Public Hearing. Comments received through US Mail will be included if they are received prior to the
hearing.
All interested persons may testify at the public hearing in person or via the zoom meeting address and/or
phone number. Interested persons will need to sign up via ZOOM to speak no later than 4:00 p.m. on April
13, 2023 at the link provided in the agenda posted at the link referenced above. Use the link above to sign
up for oral public comments. The link will direct you to directions to sign up for oral public comments.
This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person.
Written comments and documents may only be submitted prior to the hearing.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to Title 21, Environmental Controls of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), the lead
agency has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. A
Exhibit 9
Determination of Non -Significance was issued under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-
340(2) on December 9, 2022. The comment period for the determination ended December 27, 2022.
Staff Report and Inspection of File
A staff report will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. The staff report
and other associated documents may be inspected by searching under "Current Agenda" at this web address:
www.spokanevalley.org/t)lanningcommission. If you have any questions, please contact Levi Basinger,
Planner, Building & Planning Division, at (509) 720-5332 or Ibasinyer(asookanevalley.org.
December 7. 2022
FRANK SOTo JR, FIRE CHIEF
2120 N. Wilbur
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
(509) 928-1700 Main
(509) 892-4125 Fax
spokaneva I leyfi re.com
Permit #: CPA-2023-0001
Project Address: West & South of Progress Road and East of Forker Road
Project Description: Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 2023/SEPA — Environmental Checklist
Levi Basinger
10210 E. Sprague Avenue
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
RE: Technical Review Comments
The Spokane Valley Fire Department has completed a review for the above referenced project and has
no comments on the SEPA checklist. All specific Fire Department requirements shall be conditioned on
associated commercial permits.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call
Sincerely,
Traci Harvey
Fire Protection Engineer
Spokane Valley Fire Department
Exhibit 10
From:
To:
Subject: FW: SEPA Determination for 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Date: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 12:31:09 PM
Attachments: imaoe001.ioa
Threshold Determination CPA-2023-01.odf
Como Plan Amendment Map-adf
SEPA Checklist CPA-2023-0001,odf
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening
attachments or clicking links.
Good Afternoon Levi,
There is no impact to the YPL pipeline and we do not have any questions.
Sincerely,
Chad M. Polak
Agent, Real Estate Services
0: (+1) 303.376.43631 M: (+1) 720.245.4683
3960 East 56th Avenue I Commerce City, CO 80022
Phillips 66
From: Levi Basinger <Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 12:04 PM
To: Bart Sistek <bart_sistek@comcast.com>; Central Valley School District #356 <j rowel I @cvsd.org>;
Centuryl-ink <Karen.Stoddard@centurylink.com>; Polak, Chad M <Chad.M.Polak@p66.com>; Chad
Riggs <criggs@spokanevalley.org>; Chelsea Harris (Chelsea. Harris@PARKS.WA.GOV)
<Chelsea.Harris@PARKS.WA.GOV>; Christina Janssen (City of Millwood)
<planning@millwoodwa.us>; City of Liberty Lake <LKey@libertylakewa.gov>; Comcast
<Ryan_Engles@comcast.com>; connor.lange@avistacorp.com; Consolidated Irrigation District #19
<consolidatedirrigation@comcast.net>; David Moore (David.J.Moore@usace.army.mil)
<David.J.Moore@usace.army.miI>; Deborah Johnson <SEPA.reviewteam@doh.wa.gov>;
DJELLIS@spokanesheriff.org; East Spokane Water District #1 <distl@comcast.net>; East Valley
School District #361 <smithLO@evsd.org>; Felts Field - Ryan Sheehan
<rsheehan@spokaneairports.net>; Hallie Ladd (hallie.ladd@ecy.wa.gov) <hallie.ladd@ecy.wa.gov>;
Henry Allen <hallen@spokanevalley.org>; Hutchinson Irrigation District
<hutchinsonidl6@gwestoffice.net>; Inland Power& Light<connien@inlandpower.com>; Irvin
Water District <irvinwater@windwireless.net>; James Stuchell (james_stuchell@comcast.com)
<james_stuchell@comcast.com>; Jamie Short Qaime.short@ecy.wa.gov) <jaime.short@ecy.wa.gov>;
Jason Beesley (jbeesley@modernelectricwater.com) <jbeesley@ modern electricwater.com>; Jazdzyk,
Eric (Parks) <Eric.Jazdzyk@PARKS.WA.GOV>; Jeney Jr., Dennis <dennis.jeneyjr@fema.dhs.gov>;
Jenny Nickerson <jnickerson@spokanevalley.org>; Jerremy Clark <jclark @spokanevalley.org>;
jfields@verawaterandpower.com; John Bottelli <jbottelli@spokanevalley.org>; Jordan, Dale J (Jess)
NWS <Dale.J.Jordan@usace.army.mil>; Kelly Williquette <kwilliquette@scwd3.org>; Lara Gricar
<Lara.Gricar@Parks.wa.gov>; Limon, Tara <tlimon@spokanetransit.com>; Louis Acosta
<lacosta@spokanesheriff.org>; Lynn Schmidt (Lyns461@ecy.wa.gov) <Lyns461@ecy.wa.gov>; Marty
Exhibit 10
To Ibasinger@spokanevalley.org
From: Dawn Dompier
Date: 12/12/2022
Subject: CPA-2023-01
Project Name: 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Stage: DNS
Description: Change land use from SFR to Parks/Open Space
Site Address:
The Spokane County Public Works Wastewater
FA01
System Division has no objection to the finalization of
the above mentioned project.
If your project requires a sewer plan submittal, please refer to the requirements here:
• Development Plan Review Checklist
Additional General Commercial Sewer information can be found here:
• General Commercial Sewer Info I Water Usage Estimate Form
Sewer Planning and Design webpage
• Sewer Planning & Design
Exhibit 11
From: Innachka Goleta
To: Levi Basinger
Subject: Project# CPA-2023-01
Date: Saturday, April 1, 2023 7:50:39 PM
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening
attachments or clicking links.
Hello,
I am writing in regards to the project # CPA-2023-01 in favor of changing the land use from
Single Family Residential and Neighborhood Commercial to Parks/Open Space. The four vacant
parcels are home to many species of birds and other wildlife. American Goldfinches, House Finches,
Dark -Eyed Juncos, Song Sparrows, Northern Flickers, Red-tailed Hawks, and the Great Horned Owls
are just a few of the many birds that call the vacant parcels "home." I believe that wildlife should be
preserved in any and every way possible. Creating a Park/Open Space instead of new developments
would ensure that the wildlife will not be forced to move elsewhere. The park should be planned in a
way that benefits the community and the wildlife as well; perhaps even sectioning off parcel
46355.9151 and parcel 46352.9149 as natural areas for wildlife. Sidewalks and paved pathways
would make bicycle riding and walking more safe and enjoyable. In conclusion, I am FOR the parcels
to be Park/Open Space parcels.
Thank you for your consideration.
Inna Goleta
Exhibit 11
Levi Basinger
From: Christine Beirouty <cbeirouty@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 11:18 AM
To: Levi Basinger
Subject: RE: Project Number CPA-2023-01
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening attachments or
clicking links.
Good Morning
I am one of the homeowners in the new development next to the proposed project area.
Last year, when we selected our lot for our new build, we were told by the builders that nobody would be able to build
behind us - and that is the main reason we chose the lot that we did.
My mother in law spoke to one of our neighbors today to which the neighbor said she was told the exact same thing -
and I am certain we have more neighbors who were told the same thing.
We do NOT want any homes built behind us - and the area itself doesn't seem to make sense to build homes. It's too
close to Bigelow/Forker and too close to the power lines.
New homes don't need to fill up every single empty space. LEAVE IT ALONE.
Thankyou
Christine
Exhibit 11
From: Sue Brun
To: Levi Basinaer
Subject: Project CPA-2023-01 application to change
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:51:20 PM
[EXTERNAL] This email originated outside the City of Spokane Valley. Always use caution when opening
attachments or clicking links.
Proposed zoning change to park
I'm all for a natural park on my back fence. This is a good location and since it is really wet in
the fields there .... there might be some nice birds that will make it their habitats if some of the
marshy parts are left.
Thank you spokane valley for giving wildlife a place and humans to be able to share and learn
with the changing community.
Susan Brunemeier
14717 E Caprio.
E
W
E
Q
co
W
^W
i
0
Y
a
E
O
U
M
N
O
N
�i
ca
L
cq
(1)
W
W
U
0
�
�
�
�
�
E
�
�
�
E
Q
�
�
CL
e
Lj
\\
\§
z
);
-.9
f�
§9
u!
)u
0
@
\
a
U
U
�
W
-0
E
Q
>
O
Z
E
O
�
U
■
E
»-
«!
,
E,2t
|y
�
}}
\
)
|
E
$'
\\$
,
\}
!!!!
!f§
)
|
!f
hE
(
;�
�
/!|
/!{}/
�
�
�
Q
$
�
�
�
�
?
0
?
e
a
o
7y
g
/
/
q
\
•—
_cz
g
�
i
5
(
_
=
o
C7
3
O
70
0
0
/
o
M
i
E
0
0
M
N
0
N
Ln
O Ln
n\ O
o a
Y O
U
LL_LI) U
E Z
O E
' O
� L
a
U a)
m U
Ln M
.Zt r-i
Q1
ci
t1D t10
C C
� t
U U
K
ilw
0
M
N
0
N
W
■co
2
■
z
w
S�Ih.;an Rtl
■
E
E
/♦
c
•�
y /�;puu
,.Pbsaaa ay
07)A))�
PN ig
■��))?L���r���1■i
wis
1F:!!_
N
T" i
O
1
M
N
O
N
a.
U
L•
E
E
Q^
cu
i.i
2
] AJ
W
0
a�
u
i
Q
zt
O
O
Q
cn
C
U)
o
�
CU •Q
a)
C
N
Yx0
o
0
Q
O0QcncnU��
co
N
O
N
N
N
O
CL
Ccc
G
i
CD
E
W
/
r �y
a
Cl)
N
O
N
N
(V
0
0
I
TA
O
M
O
N
CL
U
CLO
�+
U
E
�O
�
M
CB
O
E
C�
—,<
cB
U
(o
p
N
�
—
U
m
N
C
L
U)
—
m
Q
O
Q
�
°'
O
n
C
E
a
70
a�
a)
E
�
m
�,
cz
Q
�
Q
w
O
U
OU)
U
N
co
N
Q
.
.
.
I
Mal
N
E
E
O
U
H--
U)
1
N
O
N
I
om—
+�-1
N
E
E
O
U
m
m
V
.�
LL
co
4—
O
CN
o
CO
-imp
X
•�
Z
LL