Loading...
25-073.00Union PacificRailroadMillwoodRailroadSignalCrossingUpgradeAtVista AGREEMENT REGARDING RAILROAD SIGNAL CROSSING UPGRADE AT VISTA ROAD IN CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of Millwood, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 9103 E. Frederick Avenue, Millwood, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "Millwood" and the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 10210 E Sprague Ave., Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "Spokane Valley," jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties." Millwood and Spokane Valley agree as follows. SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS A. Millwood has planned improvements known as the Argonne Road Empire to Liberty Congestion Relief Project (the "Millwood Road Project"). B. As a result of the Millwood Project, Union Pacific Railroad ("UPRR") is requiring improvements to the railroad crossing signals where UPRR's tracks cross (i) Argonne Road in Millwood (USDOT Crossing No. 662514H) and (ii) Vista Road in Spokane Valley (USDOT Crossing No. 662512U). The UPRR crossing at Vista Road is referred to herein as the "Vista Road/UPRR Crossing." C. UPRR intends to submit a petition to the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission ("WUTC") for an order authorizing the railroad signal improvements at the Vista Road/UPRR Crossing and identifying the responsibilities for payment of the improvements. The draft petition is attached hereto as Exhibit A. D. Millwood and Spokane Valley agree that the improvements to the Vista Road/UPRR Crossing are necessary solely because of the planned improvements of the Millwood Argonne Road Project. E. Millwood desires Spokane Valley to waive its right to a hearing before the WUTC, and Spokane Valley desires to have no financial responsibility for the signal improvements at the Vista Road/UPRR Crossing necessitated by the Millwood Argonne Road Project. F. Absent either agreement between Millwood and Spokane Valley, or Spokane Valley asserting its rights at a hearing before the WUTC, the WUTC may enter an order requiring Spokane Valley to pay for a portion of the Vista Road/UPRR Crossing signal improvements. Page 1 of 4 G. The Parties enter into this Agreement in order to delineate who, as between the Parties to this Agreement, is responsible for the costs of the Vista Road/UPRR Crossing signal improvements allocatable to a municipality under RCW 81 .53.261 — .295. SECTION NO. 2: PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the Parties' understanding as to the terms and conditions under which Millwood will pay for all costs associated with the Vista Road/UPRR Crossing signal improvements that are the responsibility of local jurisdictions per RCW 81.53.261 — .295. SECTION NO. 3: DURATION This Agreement shall commence on the date the last signature is affixed hereto, and shall expire after the Vista Road/UPRR Crossing signal improvements have been completed and all costs assessed against either Millwood or Spokane Valley by the WUTC or UPRR, or another agency or court having lawful jurisdiction, for installation of said improvements have been paid by Millwood. SECTION NO. 4: PARTIES RESPONSIBILITIES: A. In consideration for Spokane Valley's commitments herein, Millwood agrees to pay for all costs that have been or could have been allocated to Spokane Valley under RCW 81.53.261 — .295 in relation to the Vista Road/UPRR Crossing signal improvements. B. In consideration for Millwood's commitments herein, Spokane Valley agrees to waive its right to a hearing before the WUTC regarding the petition for Vista Road/UPRR Crossing signal improvements, provided the filed petition is in substantially the same form as attached Exhibit A. SECTION NO. 5: NOTICE All notices or other communications given hereunder shall be deemed given on: (1) the day such notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or (2) the third day following the day on which the same have been mailed by first class delivery, postage prepaid addressed to Millwood or Spokane Valley at the address set forth below for such Party, or at such other address as either Party shall from time to time designate by notice in writing to the other Party: Millwood: City of Millwood Mayor or his/her authorized representative 9103 E. Frederick Avenue Millwood, WA 99206 Page 2 of 4 Spokane Valley: City of Spokane Valley City Manager or his/her authorized representative 10210 E Sprague Ave. Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 SECTION NO. 6: ASSIGNMENT No Party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written approval of the other Party. SECTION NO. 7: MODIFICATION This Agreement may be modified in writing by mutual written agreement of the Parties. SECTION NO. 8: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN/BINDING EFFECT This Agreement contains terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. The Parties agree that there are no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. No changes or additions to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the Parties unless such change or addition is in writing, executed by the Parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, their successors and assigns. SECTION NO. 9: DISPUTES — CHOICE OF LAW This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each party that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. The prevailing party in any legal action to enforce any term(s) of this Agreement shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorney fees and costs. SECTION NO. 10: SEVERABILITY The Parties agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision. Page 3 of 4 SECTION NO. 11: HEADINGS The section headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. SECTION NO. 12: EXECUTION AND APPROVAL The Parties warrant that the officers executing below have been duly authorized to act for and on behalf of the Party for purposes of confirming this Agreement. SECTION NO. 13: DISCLAIMER Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that would limit either Party's authority or power under law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures. City of Spokane Valley Date: �- - 2 J n Hohman, City Manager City of Millwood Date: 4/01/2025 Kevin M. Freeman, Mayor Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A i UTC Wosnington Utihliot t.,_.- Gn4 T:on.porloUon ... Cignm:itipl WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DOCKET NO. TR- PETITION Union Pacific Railroad TO MODIFY WARNING DEVICES AT A HIGHWAY- Petitioner, RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING vs. City of Spokane Valley USDOT:662512U Respondent The Petitioner asks the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission to approve modifications to warning devices at a highway-rail grade crossing. Section 1—Petitioner's Information Union Pacific Railroad Petitioner Signature [4315 E Sprague Ave. Street Address Spokane Valley, WA 99212 City, State and Zip Code Mailing Address, if different than the street address Amber Stoffels Contact Person Name 720-243-0759, Amber.stoffels@up.com Contact Phone Number and Email Revised 04/2023 1 Section 2—Respondent's Information LCity of Spokane Valley Respondent 10210 E Sprague Ave Street Address Spokane Valley, WA 99206 _ City. State and Zip Code same Mai 1 i ng Address, if different than the street address Robert Blegen Contact Person Name (509) 720-5320, rblegen@spokanevalley.org Contact Phone Number and Email Section 3—Crossing Location 1. Existing highway/roadway:Lvista Rd 2. Existing railroad: Union Pacific Railroad 3. USDOT Crossing No.: 662512U 4. GPS location: -117.293, 47.686 5. Railroad mile post(nearest tenth): 6.15 6. City: Spokane Valley County: Spokane County Revised 04/2023 2 Section 4—Highway Information 1.Name of highway:Vista Rd 2. Road authority: [City of Spokane Valley 3.Average annual daily traffic (AADT):[1,617 4. Number of lanes: 2 5. Roadway speed: 25 6. Is the crossing part of an established truck route? 1 Yes P 1 No 7. If so,trucks are what percent of total daily traffic? 9 8. Is the crossing part of an established school bus route? 1 Yes No 9. If so, how many school buses travel over the crossing each day? 1 10. Describe any changes to the information in 1 through 9, above, expected within ten years: Note that the number of school buses at this crossing decreases from 12-15 per day to —1 per day in the summer. June 13th, 2025 will be the last day of school. The work at this signal is likely to take place after June 13th. 11. What is the available sight distance from the stop bar(or 25 feet from the tracks if no stop bar) on both approaches to the crossing? FEB: 500 ft WB: 1000 ft 12. If the sight distance is less than 400 feet, describe the structures,roadway or track curvature, visual obstacles or other characteristics that limit sight distance. N/A Revised 04/2023 3 Section 5—Railroad Information 1. Railroad company: Union Pacific Railroad 2. Type of railroad at crossing: 1 Common Carrier Logging Industrial Passenger Excursion 3. Type of tracks at crossing: 1 Main Line Siding or Spur 4.Number of tracks at crossing: 1 5. Average daily train traffic, freight:6 Authorized freight train speed: 20 Operated freight train speed:I20 6. Average daily train traffic,passenger:0 Authorized passenger train speed: Operated passenger train speed: 7. Describe any changes to the information in 1 through 6 above, expected within ten years: n/a Revised 04/2023 4 Section 6—Current Warning Devices Provide a complete description of the warning devices currently located at the crossing (vehicle and pedestrian), including signs, gates, lights, train detection circuitry, and any other warning devices. The existing warning devices at this location consist of: NB: Crossing Gate, pole mounted flashing lights, overhead flashing lights, railroad crossbuck. SB: Crossing Gate, pole mounted flashing lights, overhead flashing lights, railroad crossbuck. Section 7—Description of Proposed Changes Describe in detail the number and type of proposed automatic signals (vehicle and pedestrian), gates, other warning devices, and/or changes to train detection circuitry. (RCW 81.53.271) Please describe any other proposed changes at the crossing, including changes to the crossing surface, signage, pavement markings, etc. If sidewalks are being installed, please provide information on who will maintain them. Attach additional information sheets, if needed. The proposed modifications to the Vista Road crossing result from the City of Millwood's Argonne Road Reconstruction project that includes proposed improvements to the nearby Argonne Road crossing (USDOT 662514H). A new railroad signal house will be installed to accommodate overlapping approaches due to the increased approaches at Argonne Road. The approaches for Argonne Road are increasing due to the 21 seconds of Advance Preemption requested by the City of Millwood related to its Argonne Road Reconstruction project. Changes at the Vista Road crossing are limited to changes to track circuitry as well as upgrades inside the signal house located at the intersection, to accommodate for the Advance Preemption at Argonne Road. The Vista Road crossing will operate the same as it does today and no other modifications to the signal system or crossing are proposed. Revised 04/2023 5 Section 8—Illustration of Crossing Attach a detailed diagram, design drawing,map,or other illustration showing the current and proposed layout of the road, crossing surface, and railway in the vicinity of the crossing, including shoulders, sidewalks, lanes of travel,bike lanes,warning devices,pavement markings and any other applicable crossing conditions. Section 9— Traffic Signal Preemption Are the railroad signals currently interconnected with a traffic signal(s)? Yes ✓ No Will this project interconnect railroad signals with a traffic signal(s) or modify the existing traffic signal preemption timing? Yes ✓ No If yes, attach documentation supporting the proposed traffic signal preemption timing calculations (e.g., TXDOT Guide for Determining Time Requirements for Traffic Signal Preemption at Highway Rail Grade Crossings or similar preemption worksheet/plan), which must be certified by a professional engineer. Section 10—Description of Public Safety Need Describe and support the public safety need for the proposed changes. (RCW 81.53.261) The proposed modifications to the Vista Road crossing result from the City of Millwood's Argonne Road Reconstruction project that includes proposed improvements to the Argonne Road crossing (USDOT 662514H). The City of Millwood will file a separate petition related to those proposed improvements. The crossing at Vista Road is located one half mile west of the crossing at Argonne Road. Proposed signal modifications at the Argonne Road crossing will require extended train detection circuits.Additional equipment is needed at the Vista Road crossing to accommodate this.Therefore, a larger/newer/better bungalow is needed. This project is receiving funding from CMAQ; Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality and is a part of Washington's State Transportation Improvement Program(STIP). Section 11—Approximate Cost of Installation and Related Work Provide the approximate cost of installation and related work for the proposed changes to signals and/or warning devices. (RCW 81.53.271) The total cost for the work that will be done to the railroad is estimated to be approximately $139,036. The City of Millwood is using federal funding to pay for these improvements. The City of Spokane Valley is not responsible for any of these costs. Revised 04/2023 6 Section 12—Approximate Cost of Annual Maintenance Provide the approximate cost of annual maintenance for the signals and/or warning devices. (RCW 81.53.271) The approximate cost of annual maintenance is $11,730. Because this project is funded by the City of Miliwood's federal-aid highway funds, this annual maintenance cost will be borne by UPRR, per RCW 81 .53.295. Section 13—Cost Apportionment If the commission directs the installation of or changes to the warning devices requested in this petition,it will apportion installation and maintenance costs in accordance with the applicable statutes. (RCW 81.53.261-295) Interested parties may instead enter into an agreement providing for the installation of signals or other warning devices or for the apportionment of the cost of installation and maintenance. (RCW 81.53.261)If the parties to this petition have reached an agreement related to apportionment of costs,please sign here to confirm: Petitioner Signature: Respondent Signature: 7 Revised 04/2023 Section 14— Waiver of Hearing by Respondent Waiver of Hearing The undersigned represents the Respondent in the petition to modify highway-rail grade crossing warning devices at the following crossing. USDOT Crossing No.[62512 U We have investigated the conditions at the crossing. We are satisfied the conditions are the same as described by the Petitioner in this docket. We have reviewed and have no objection to the proposed traffic signal preemption timing calculations as submitted with this petition. We agree the warning devices should be modified and consent to a decision by the commission without a hearing. Dated at , Washington, on the 1 day of select month 2023. Gloria Mantz Printed Name of Respondent Signature of Respondent's Representative LPub10 Works Director Title 509-720-5014 Phone Number rblegen@spokanevalley.org Email 10210 E. Sprague Ave. Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Mailing Address 8 Revised 04/2023 Checklist prior to submitting petition: ✓ Ensure all petition fields are completed. ✓ Ensure parties sign Section 13 regarding any Cost Apportionment agreement, if applicable. ✓ Obtain signature on Waiver of Hearing (Section 14).If respondent fails to sign Waiver, advise UTC staff upon submission. ✓ Attach copies of: o Illustration of crossing(described in Section 8). o Proposed traffic signal preemption timing calculations,if applicable (described in Section 9), and identification or documentation that the calculations are certified by a professional engineer. o Any other relevant documents to support the petition, including but not limited to support of public need,project information, etc. Submitting the petition: To officially file the petition, send the petition form and supporting documents via EFiling. Questions: For questions,please contact: Mike Turcott Tyler Whitcomb Transportation Planning Specialist Transportation Planning Specialist mike.turcott@utc.wa.gov tyler.whitcomb@utc.wa.gov (360) 764-0572 (564) 669-0943 Revised 04/2023 9 Attachment A - Crossing Illustrations UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1 . • I ONE-CALL NUMBER tip- �A D \ I IT-- •I, CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS 1 1 I BEFORE YOU DIG 1 T I A 1 � f SEE SHEET C6 T 1 I FOR FREDERICK AVE. e40 a �11 II �I ISTA 200+08.63 1 <Ie' ), SINGLE DIRECTION CURB RAMPL__ - PROVIDE CAST-IN-PLACE �1 117 RADIUS DETECTABLE NING S RFACE WAR -W- 1I ��. �-_ �-- OL E i=" -fT--FO---. -- _G--.-G--G1'E T - �0--, ---G---G---G Q 8" CEMENT CONCRETE ___G--- G---'' TRAFFIC CURB -G--- - X G- -GCEMENT CONCRETED ARGONNE RD. 23+00 ® + 1 21+00 TRAFFIC CURB _22+ - _ I_ + -I O` SAWCUT-- C5 U _ _.�y-- „ -w-- -w---w--w- W---- w -- w_ _ I T --__aTo^ -0�OP- flT L -- 1 -- - , _. 201+00-- RW RW 1 :�. _ I ;-/1- L_----J �� - - 1 I BUILDING J \N -i'-1 \`: - _ -I AlIDOCEMENT _ '`` �1 G - - CONCRETE i H il' r I I i . . - . SIDEWALK 2 MILLWOOD Q ��� f I I I -STA 201+06.53 2 CEMENT CONCRETE • CITY HALL CEMENT CONCRETE �T UNDERDRAIN S A 200+00.00 + SALVAGE EXISTING I r� TIE INTO EXISTING 1 b E 1 DRIVEWAY1 RB 4� CITY OF MILLWOOD -o I SAWCUT AT NE. I 1I SIGN TO THE CITY I I CEMENT CONCR. D 'n CITY TO PROVIDE I CONCRETE RELOCATED TO NORTH SIDE OF G\ , v I S�EWALK I BUILDING BY PROPERTY OWNER. m SALVAGE EXISTING CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE I 70 POLE SIGN TO THE I I I WITH PROPERTY OWNER AND I ® � 0 CITY I I SCHEDULE RELOCATION.AVISTA TO ACCOMMODATE AND A E I \ \-------- NOTES c 1. ADJUST ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO GRADE. WORK CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO PAVING. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CITY'S EXISTING IRRIGATION CONNECTION TO FEED IRRIGATION ,1 IN BUFFER. INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION INCLUDES DESIGN OF SYSTEM. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 0 j UNE TABLE CURVE TABLE `c UNE NO. BEARING LENGTH CURVE NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH L4 S022'57"E 53.63' C5 1.00' 17525'48" 3.06' N87'19'57"E 2.00' L5 N4'57'09"W 53.63' C6 1.50' 92'18'35" 2.42' 54112'09"W 2.16' 6 5 L6 N87'21'26"E 3.28' C7 1.50' 92'15'37" 2.42' N46-30'45"W 2.16' L7 N87'25'28"E 4.41' C8 1.50' 85'59'14" 2.25' S49'34'54"E 2.05' L8 S2'38'34"E 6.50' C9 1.50' 85'10'34" 2.23' N44'50'11"E 2.03' 0100 6" CO, WITH I i L9 N2'38'34"W 4.98' C10 99.50' 4'53'28" 8.49' NO'11'50"W 8.49' E L10 S86'19'59"W 5.00' Cif 99.50' 3'56'43" 6.85' S4'36'56"E 6.85' L11 N8613'33"E 8.00' C12 1.50' 91'01'27" 2.38' N48'09'17"W 2.14' 4 L12 N2'38'34"W 1.93' C13 1.50' 88'58'33" 2.33' 541'50'43"W 2.10' L13 S2'38'34"E 2.04' C14 4.00' 180'00'00" 12.57' S8721'26"W 8.00' c c C I 1 1 14 I I i p I 1 y1 £ E < n m � ' A5 d d We � I v 01011) CONCRETE SIDEWALK ( 1 / CONCRETE 010111) A _ SIDEWALK * L . - `�,m..„. t: iof E 1 , _ � —.its -- !!. . G F9 G-G6��- Ir►I . •Y - 0 _Fo—T_- . . _ r ��——G— —G—--G—• —G———G—— I _ G-.--G--- INSTALL IRRIGATION IN ' - - I e, -G- go CEMENT CONCRETE STA 25+84.50, 22.60 LT 01 BUFFER. SEE NOTE 2 U -— I 4 I 14" PAVEMENT MATCH PEDESTRIAN RAMP AND SPECIF1CATIONS ARG INTO EXISTING PANELS 27+00 LI I- u 25+00 26+00 _ —.} - — i 1-1_ ,® C) \ '--- I TA 75.000• STA 301+2 5.000CURB CUT Z ' I ,111 i STA 300+35.89 I PEDESTRIAN + I - CURB CUT -- RI:___ JI I • e — : L a \ � _UI , I I -OT- 3 1+00 • . - ` f--- O -- . Rpm � �...-., I.T iir:"...:.!..!: lium.4.&. li____Bp-_r_Bp_ _lip_ \ tiati :ITi,44 ate-ot I � f ` --\ gm, Ilf •.,ems ss t._..,,. tu,,... si.rxr.�ws:F-»e' ".. ... I sir. u — — I — f1 _. \ p INSTALL SINGLE O PEDESTRIAN 4 � oo f i DEPTH DRYWELL HANDRAIL S� STA 300100.00 n J i , INSTALL FIRE �11 HYDRANT ASSEMBLY® MATCH INTO 1 1 1 EXISTING URB STA 300+40.85, 13.22' RTQ CUT AND CAP EX x I £ BEGIN CHAIN LINK CV COORDINATE WITH FENCE EXISTING IRRIGATI SEEDING AND IRR I ni RET-IN AND PROTECT XD ?� EXISTING MONUMENT DONE BY PROPER I \ Ili< '7, AND POLE OG tT1 CEMENT11CONCRETE m z I SIDEWALK rAIIPI` SAWCUT 2 3 2 TOP OF I TRANSITION TRANSITION EXI ��gC 3:1 CURB m - MAX - cr- D U`q O 4" PORTLAND I/�/�j��j////////////�j CEMENT CONCRETE NOTE: CURB DROP APRON SLOPE TO MATCH c SWALE (3:1 MAX) SECTION A-A SECTION B-B M. c 81 f j A<- 2 ®CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB EXTEND APRON TO BOTTOM OF SWALE B B 4 L 4 NOTE 1 jr. 1. CURB CUT IS CONSIDERED A4- INCIDENTAL TO CURB. 2' 3' 2' c i CEMENT CONCRETE CURB CUT DETAIL 40 NO SCALE i' s 0 0 GRAPHIC SCALE ■ W10-2 W10-2 o o m 30"X30" 30"X30" ■ 4 ( @I FEES) 11,17 SCALE r= 40 ft 22X54 SCALE r= 20 ft. ROUGH ROUGH CROSSING CROSSING 0 CO II W70-1 �•� � � � � RW tsw RW_j FIRE 30" DIA TRUCK OSTA 19+36.75, 11.00' LT� ARGONNE RD. O24"x19' MATCH INTO EXISTING —2' FROM STRIPING BOTH SI R4-7"X1W10-15P0"X24" ROUGH ` 24"X18" 30"X24" CROSSING 19+00 I © 20+00 W11-8 1 I /�' 36"X36" STA 19+36.75, 0.50' LTJ n MATCH INTO EXISTING OF n STRIPING -- `l O1 STA 19+36.75, 10.50' RTJ DO NOT MATCH INTO EXISTING STOP ‘114) t a"R9-3x24 ~� STRIPING Rw ON " LOOK Rw Iw_r_. TRACKS IXI R9-3bP R15-8 `� ._ tts r__ STA 20+80.02, R8-8 18"X12" 36"X18" . L I j 24"X30" 0 1 n STA 21+ () DO NOT 0 MARKING sra� DO NOT OPTION I FOE al w10—aRED BLOCK Ti 30"X30" IN>FRSEcnoN 6 R10-6 R10-7 24"X36" 24"X30" I L 1 I LEGEND 1 OSKIP LANE STRIPE (4' WHITE 12' SOLID/24' SKIP) I O SCUD DOUBLE CENTER STRIPE (4' SCUD YELLOW) I STA 24+58.98, 0.64' L OSKIP LANE WITH SOLD LANE CENTER STRIPE(4" SKIP I YELLow, 4•SCUD YELLOW) STA 24+41.76, 11.64' LT 04 LANE LINE(6' SOLID WHITE) OSTOP BAR (WHITE), SEE DETAIL 2/ST04 O1 STA 24t3210, 11.55' LT Ij LT o I ,r 0TURN ARROW(SCUD WHILE)) r I L_ - _ s- , 0CROSS WALK (WHITE), SEE DETAIL 2/STD4 " " ' _______ IL I RW —in, O O LANE ONE(6' SCUD YELLOW) 0 u '' \ c Q EXISTING SIGN N') © Co- c O RELOCATED EXISTING SIGNI— 4imoNIIIIMIIMINIE CV Ilk 24+00 (/) i LLIZ 0 ©1_. NOTES = STA 24+28.14, 21.30' RT 1. ALL STRIPING SHALL CONFORM TO M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS. 0 I- 111 2. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE LOCATED ACCORDING TO MUTCD STANDARDS. ;�, a,. :,.. ,t .2 SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET SD1_ IL '� 3 BUILDING 2 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE 7' MIN. HEIGHT PER DETAIL 1 SHEET SD1. s 4. NEW REGULATORY SIGNS SHALL CONFORM WITH RETROREFLECTIVITY I I 1 REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT EDITION OF MUTCD. I c 5. ALL RELOCATED AND NEW SIGNS WILL BE STEEL PER DETAIL 1 SHEET SD1.1 6. ALL EXISTING SIGNS THAT ARE REMOVED AND NOT BEING REUSED I ? SHALL BE SALVAGED TO THE CITY OF MILLWOOD. I I 1 7. REMOVE ALL EXISTING STRIPING THAT CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED STRIPING. I F..' C I -", l GRAPHIC SCALE p 0 D 10 p W11 ( IN FEET) ca 11z17 SCALE 1'= 40 ft r 22X34 SCALE I' = 20 ft —I O Z I L—.] DL _Rw a.- — RN--R1f-------Rw a ®STA 27+72.43, 5.50' RT 0 © c c c c c c c c {l} 11—fc—STA r C 26+85.53, 0.00' T 0 STA 27+78.11, 11.00' LT STA 29+35.76, 0.00' LT c129+00 t` STA 27+78.11, 0.00' T 1'd_ I I IARGONNi00 -- �--'"- 26+00 ©H - © 1STA 29+78.39, 11.00' STA 27+78.11, 11.00' RT STA 28+75.27, 6.00' RT O STA 27+3293, 11.00' RT Rw —R'M —RM RW W Rx Z RM —RM-� RN J STA 29+78.39, 22.0C I- STA 28+35.51, 22.00' RT Q STA 27+78.11, 2200' RT _ - -------- --- 3fw— Q STA 30 I J MOUNT ARGONNE RD AND DALTON AVE [Argonne Rd, D3-1 LIGHT POLE LEGEND D3-1 SIGNS ON OSKIP LANE STRIPE (4'WHITE 12' SOUD/24'SKIP) Dalton Ave D3-1 ® SCUD DOUBLE CENTER STRIPE (4' SCUD YELLOW) OSKIP LANE WITH SOLID LANE CENTER STRIPE(4'SKIP YELLOW, 4'SOLID YELLOW) 0 LANE UNE (8' SOUD WHITE) mi OSTOP BAR (WHITE). SEE DETAIL 2/STO4 inimm I 0 I ® TURN ARROW(SCUD WHITE) r 1 23 O CROSS WALK (WHITE). SEE DETAIL 2/STO4 IIIIII m .9 I Q EXISTING SIGN 0 \ 71 1 ® RELOCATED EXISTING SIGN I X' __jr I ( O RELOCATE EXISTING (T1 SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN \ \` RIM__—RR RW�—RW EN------ �'' O I C c C-�--C cc: c c c C�-c c STA 34+59.31, 18.84' LT-� c G Q c <. STA 34+59.31, 7.84' LT i N — ARGONNE RD. +M 33+00 34+00 I I I I I I I I f='~ — RT� 1 w W —RW i Z RW —RV RNA RW PM Q C L L GENERAL NOTE SEE CONTRACT FOR LOCATION AND MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS. ) I ,I r ® ,�, R R :To 0 -Ns\ STOP LINE rep 1 MPH 9 fl 25 50 30 10C 35 15C 40 22! 45 30C N 50 37! 55 45C 60 55C 65 65C 0 *DIMENSIONS Si ARE APPROXIE SEE CONTRAC SYMBOL DETAIL GRID IS 1" SQUARE "R" DETAIL LANE LINE OR EDGE LINE ROADWAY CENTERLINE LAYOUT Fp TOTAL MARKING AREA c (PER 12'WIDE LANE) i =109.75 SQ.FT. c STANDARD SYMBOL a RAILROAD CROSSING LAYOUT ND SCALE Attachment B - Traffic Signal Preemption Timing Calculations ® RESET Texas Department of Transportation Form 2304 Texaa GUIDE FOR DETERMINING TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR (Rev.7/17) of T� TRAFFIC SIGNAL PREEMPTION AT HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS City Millwood CSJ Date 10/09/2020 County Spokane Completed by Cody Hodgson District District Approval Crossing Street I(+) Parallel Street Name Euclid Ave.and Empire Ave. Show North Arrow Traffic Signal 0 Parallel Street ''('T - Crossing Street Name u Phase Argonne Rd. IIIIII11 III II II IIII III II II 'X Warning Device Railroad Union Pacific Railroad Contact Peggy Ygbuhay Crossing DOT# 662514H Phone (917)789-5033 NOTE: After approval by the District,a copy of this form,along with the traffic signal design sheets and the phasing diagrams for normal and preempted operation,shall be placed in the traffic signal cabinet. See Section 7 for traffic signal timings. SECTION 1: GEOMETRY DATA&DEFAULTS DvcD L ` 16 , CSD MTCD SBD DVL CSD=Clear storage distance(ft) b... �� MTCD=Minimum track clearance distance(ft) SBD=Stop bar setback distance(ft) DVL=Design vehicle length(ft) Ose t II►A L=Queue start-up distance, also stop-line distance(ft) O 1 11 I�JI D I DVCD=Design vehicle clearance distance(ft) Os.=Offset distance to Left-turn stop bar(ft) B B=Distance from curb line to center of nearest ( ? ) lane receiving left turns(ft) 0=Angle of turn(degrees) GEOMETRIC DATA FOR CROSSING Remarks 1. Clear storage distance(CSD,feet) 1. 25 2. Minimum track clearance distance(MTCD,feet) .. 2. 23 3. Stop bar setback distance(SBD,feet) 3. 27 Enter"0"if no stop bar is present 4. Width of receiving approach(B,feet) 4. 37 5. Offset distance of left turn stop bar(OSB,feet) 5. 18 6. Approach grade. %(0 if approach is on downgrade) 6. 0.0 7. Angle of turn at Intersection(0,degrees) 7. 92 DESIGN VEHICLE DATA 8. Select Design Vehicle ❑School Bus ❑Intermediate Truck ❑� Interstate Semi-Truck ID Other 9. Default design vehicle length(feet) 9. 75 Based on selected Design Vehicle a.Additional vehicle length, if needed(feet) 9a. 0 use only if"Other"selected as Design Vehicle 10. Total design vehicle length(DVL,feet) 10. 75 Sum of line 9 and 9a 11. Centerline turning radius of design vehicle(R,feet) 11. 41 Based on selected Design Vehicle 12. Passenger car vehicle length(LV,feet) ... 12. 19 Default value Page 1 SECTION 2: RIGHT-OF-WAY TRANSFER TIME CALCULATION Preempt verification and response time Remarks 13. Preempt delay time(seconds) 13. 0 14. Controller response time to preempt(seconds) 14. 0.0 Manufacturer: Intetight Firmware Version: Maxtime 2.1.5 15. Preempt verification and response time(seconds):add lines 13 and 14 15. 0.0 Remarks Worst-case conflicting vehicle time Value may be adjusted to meet local 16. Minimum green time during right-of-way transfer(seconds) 16. 0 conditions 17. Other green time during right-of-way transfer(seconds) 17. 4 Trailing Green Overlap 18. Yellow change time(seconds) 18. 4.0 19. Red clearance time(seconds) 19. 1.0 20. Worst-case conflicting vehicle time(seconds):add lines 16 through 19 20. 9•0 Remarks Worst-case conflicting pedestrian time Value may be adjusted to meet local 21. Minimum walk time during right-of-way transfer(seconds) 21. 0 conditions 22. Pedestrian clearance time during right-of-way transfer(seconds) 22. 19 Refer to instructions for pedestrian truncation guidance 23. Vehicle yellow change time, if not included on line 22(seconds) 23. 0.0 Yellow&Red time will overlap with ped 24. Vehicle red clearance time, if not included on line 22(seconds) 24. 0.0 phase. 25. Worst-case conflicting pedestrian time(seconds): add lines 21 through 24 25. 19.0 Worst-case conflicting vehicle or conflicting pedestrian time 26 Worst-case conflicting vehicle or conflicting pedestrian time(seconds): 26. 19.0 maximum of lines 20 and 25 27. Right-of-way transfer time(seconds):add lines 15 and 26 27. 19.0 SECTION 3: QUEUE CLEARANCE TIME CALCULATION Remarks 28. Are there left-turns towards the tracks? Q Yes 0 No 29. Distance traveled by truck during left-turn(LTL,feet): 29. 66 LTL=ff55/180 30. Travel speed of left-turning truck(SLn, mph): 30. 10 Default value 31. Distance required to clear left-turning truck from travel Equation:(line 4+line 5+line 12-line 11)+line 29+ 31. 174 line 10 lanes on track clearance approach(feet): 32. Additional time required to clear left-turning truck from Equation: [(line 31'3600)/(line 30"5280)-line 18- 32. 6.9 line 19] travel lanes on track clearance approach(seconds): 33. Worst-case Left Turning Truck time(seconds): 33. 6.9 if Line 28='Yes', use line 32; otherwise Use 0 34. Queue start-up distance,L(feet): add lines 1 through 3 34. 75 35. Time required for design vehicle to start moving(seconds):calculate as 2+(L+20) ......... 35. 5.7 36. Design vehicle clearance distance, DVCD(feet):add lines 2,3 and 10 36. 125 37. Time for design vehicle to accelerate through the DVCD(seconds), level terrain 37. 15.0 38. Factor to account for slower acceleration on uphill grade ........................................ 38. 1.00 39 Time for design vehcle to accelerate through DVCD(seconds), adjusted for grade: 15.0 multiply lines 37 and 38 39 40. Queue clearance time(seconds):add lines 33,35 and 39 40. 27.6 SECTION 4: MAXIMUM PREEMPTION TIME CALCULATION Remarks 41. Right-of-way transfer time(seconds): line 27 41. 19.0 42. Queue clearance time(seconds):line 40 42. 27.6 43. Desired minimum separation time(seconds) 43. , 4.0 Typical Value 44. Maximum preemption time for Queue Clearance(seconds):add lines 41 through 43 44, 50.6 Page 2 UNION PACIFIC Highway Rail Grade Crossing Traffic Signal Preemption I III Request Form The purpose of this form is to document the preemption operation and timing parameters being requested by the Agency responsible for the traffic signal and convey the information to Union Pacific Railroad. Union Pacific Railroad recognizes that the Agency is the final authority regarding the design and operation of the preemption system in accordance with the 2009 MUTCD Chapter 8C,Section 8C.09. In addition, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Safety Advisory 2010-02 details recommendations for annual joint testing of interconnected Railroad and Traffic Signal Systems. MUTCD 4D.02 also provides operation and maintenance guidance. UPRR would like to continue to work with the Agency to ensure that the interconnected traffic signal continues to operate as agreed upon and that any future changes are discussed and jointly approved in a collaborative manner. Please provide the following information in order to process your request : Date of Request: 06/07/2021 Agency: City of Millwood Requested by(Name/Title): Paul Allen/Public Works Director Phone: (509)924-0960 Email: publicworks@millwoodwa.us Grade Crossing Information: State: Washington DOT fa: 662514H City: Millwood RR Subdivision: Spokane County: Spokane Mile Post: 6.660 Crossing Street Name: N. Argonne Rd. Parallel Street Name: Euclid Ave. and Empire Ave. RR Interconnection Information: 1) Requested Interconnection Configuration: ❑x Single Break Circuit El Double Break Circuit 2) Is this request for Simultaneous Preemption ❑ Yes If"Yes"what is the requested Additional Operation? E] No Warning Time? Sec 3) Is this request for Advanced Preemption D Yes If"Yes" what is the requested Additional Operation and Circuitry? ❑ No Preemption Time (APT)? 21 Sec 4) Is this request for Advanced Pedestrian Ej Yes If"Yes"what is the requested Additional Preemption Operation and Circuitry?' ❑ No Pedestrian Preemption Time(APPT)? 10 Sec *Note:Pedestrian Detection is required when using Advanced Pedestrian Preemption Operation. 5) Indicate below which additional circuits are being requested: a Supervised Circuit ❑x Yes ❑ No b. Gate Down Circuit ❑- Yes ❑ No c. Crossing Active Circuit(XR) x❑ Yes El No d. Traffic Signal Health Circuit 0 Yes ❑ No 6) Indicate the interconnection wire size and number of conductors: 14 AWG and 14 conductors Comments/Additional Info: If you have additional or enhanced preemption operation/interconnect requirements, please submit a detailed description with this request form. A circuit drawing or additional information should be provided to assist designers in accommodating your needs. UPRR will provide Agency UPRR circuit design for Agency approval prior to finalizing UPRR design. Agency agrees to provide traffic signal timing and wiring diagram for traffic controller unit to UPRR. Please sign,scan this page,and submit electronically along with support documentation to appropriate UPRR Industry and Public Projects Representative. Ql 06/07/2021 Signature of Agency representative Date Paul Allen Print or Type Name of Agency representative last Updated:November 2017 1 WARNING TIME = 25 SECONDS TO EASTPORT ► 2,597'25+5 SEC.Iz 59 M.P.H. 4I Fe II E.EUCLID AVENUE DAX A WARNING TIME = 25 SECONDS m i MARGUERITE STREET �� :' I M.P.6.52 " ,0 1 2 5 6 Y 0 1 D I a PRE-DAX B WARNING TIME = 46 SECONDS A 0 o PED-DAX C WARNING TIME = 56 SECONDS 8 ARGONNE ROAD I i' uAu 1 37'± M.P.6.66 a a I 89w(s)p 1 r 5 6 in 525HZ B5HZ RT 5' �1 I 8.3kHZ 13.2kHZ SW. j ` „ I 4.500'± Cp N BS L #9'3 I 1 /111 ia E(N)T X 0 285HZ 4.9kHZ1111 T • T El terX 0 X „B.,$#15' - - S3 S2 T :/: 5 s R B/R B/R R o n _i_ W(S)0 I IRECT.1 I REC T1 I 0 E(N) 25' I 7 8 RDu 6'# �I I -I !=_4_T /\ ^ I F v �nxI S&L 217D S&C 217D I I 6 5 6 1 2 ,2�POK I P.S. P.S. P.S. 9 - J 1 I I 408'± 1,208' 285'± 658'±-►{t-52'±-+{ I 'XB' I # 14-3D'-1-4 I B'±—014--18'± Ir I N IVE I Lp a � I I O NOTES: 1-- ** = PLACE NBS AT 2706'FROM 1.J.TO COVER FULL In APPROACH DISTANCE FOR M.P.6.66. u w * = PLACE NBS AT 2637'FROM NORTH TRACK LEADS SO o THAT IT IS OUTSIDE OF THE ISLAND AT M.P.6.66. v MATERIAL NOTES:DELETE UPON 'AC" 6X8 ALUMINUM CABIN I U.P.PART e52D-0185 J ICTION NOTES: EXISTING GATES,CANTILEVERS,FLASHERS,AND BELLS. AND INSTALL (I)PAIR OF INSULATED JOINTS. 'IELO VERIFY DIMENSION. LAND DISTANCES 3 BY FIELD r.E(N) NEW SHEET D..,g.dlo/29.2t MODIFICATION LEVEL CIRCUIT DATE: 10/29/21 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD sH. 1 STALL NEW GATES, D.A. LAST LEVEL CHECKED DW MODIFICATIONS ASHERS,CWT AND ARE NOT TO BE DES: NST SPOKANE, W A S HI N G T O N DOT 662512U PREEMPTION. LAST LEVEL MOD THIS TYPICAL DW MADE WITHOUT ARGONNE ROAD AUTHORITY FROM VISTA ROAD M.P.6.66 LAST LEVEL BY DESI GNER OW THE OFFICE OF MC; NOR M.P. 6.15 : Inn 62246 SIGNAL DESIGN SPOKANE SUBDIVISION MDR CHANGED FROM TYPI CAL? Y ID=0680615.IX / /NST/KPM ...,AN.23.16 AKIT1cBGC.t A.F.E. 62246 Of lice of SOP Enginesrtng - Signal O=ohe.Nebraska I INSTRUMENT HOUSE -...„. ......a, TB j I �0615-06520AX 0—1 (8) OUT B3 391 1.2 N0615-0652DAX L (8) CD 041 0615-0666PRE L (8) • JUT CONN. CONN. OUT 83 43 Q TO M.P.6.52 Li SHT.3 SHT.3 2.1 N0615-0666PRE L e (8) 0 045 0615-0666PED L (8) OUT 83 47 T 2.2 N0615-0666PED L (8) 49 'El u INSTRUMENT HOUSE ti / w / 03 ® TB T (9) 38 2-EIN)NWTP� 3C ' y 3E 1 O I. I 19) N2 E(NIN4IFL04(13 80 — CP (9) 38 3-E(N)NWTP TO 3C 13E 81 L. M.P.6.24 (9) N3-E(N.BWTP ,,L.D . 82 E(N) (9) LAR E(N)WLAP 1 _ ,. 2 83 (9) NE(N)WLAP I�_ 4 7/BD CABLE TABULATION ABLE NO.7 7C"14 U.G.B.T.HOUSE TO M.P.5.63 ABLE NO.8 7C014 U.G.B.T.HOUSE TO M.P.6.52 ABLE NO.9 7C"14 HOUSE TO M.P.6.24 NEW SHEET O.,,g,.e,10n4i21 MOM F1 CAT]ON LEVEL CIRCUIT DATE: 10/29/21 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD SM. IA STALL NEW GATES.. O.A. LAST LEVEL CHECKED DW MODIFICATIONS CWT AND ARE NOT TO BE PREEMPTION. LAST LEVEL MOD THI S TYPICAL OW MADE WITHOUT DES: NST SPOKANE, WASHINGTON DOT 662512U ARGONNE ROAD AUTHORITY FROM VISTA ROAD M.P.6.66 LAST LEVEL BY DESIGNER OW THE OFFICE OF CHIC: NOR M.P. 6.15 i r0•:62246 CHANGED FROM TYPICAL? Y SIGNAL DESIGN SPOKANE SUBDIVISION i /NST/KPH per es.23.IS 4K I YKIIGC.I A.F.E. 62246 Off we of AYP Ena,neenna -S:gnol Omaha.Nebreeka ID=0880615.1AX