ZE-59-81 & ZE-59A-81 & ZE-59B-81 5 '4 _ I1-1
•
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 27, 1981 C/ Q
TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE z S / - V l
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-59-81
I . GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: D. J. Hume Co.
STATUS OF APPLICANT: Project Designer & Representative
PROPERTY OWNER: T. G. Gunning
REQUESTED ZONING: Freeway Commercial
EXISTING ZONING: Multiple Family Suburban (established in
1970)
PROPOSED USE: Motel Space
PROJECT LOCATION: This site is generally located along Cataldo
Avenue approximately 50 feet west of
Sullivan Road in the Valley.
II . SITE PLAN INFORMATION
SITE SIZE: Approximately .7 acres
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is currently a 12 unit multiple
family complex located adjacent to other commercial property on the east
and other residential property to the north and west.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Considering the whole area including
Sullivan Road, the neighborhood consists primarily of well landscaped
single family structures, with spotted commercial activities occurring along
Sullivan Road. One large motel is located east of and adjacent to Sullivan
Road.
AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: Urban
ZONING: North Residential Office/Local Business,
established, 1979, 1980/1978.
East Freeway Commercial, established, 1970.
West R-2, established, 1954
South Freeway Commercial, established, 1970
•
LAND USE: Site 12 unit Multiple Family complex
North Vacated commercial lot
East Vacated commercial lot
West Single Family Residential
South Single Family Residential
II . SITE PLAN INFORMATION
1981 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Major Commercial
NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 2 including garage
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: No change
Total Square Feet Approximately 4,900 sq. ft.
•
( 10B) 1
ZONE RECLASSIFICA1 , .N NUMBER: ZE-59-81
•
Total Percent of. Site Covered 22 %
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 2 storys
• PARKING REQUIRED: 12 spaces
PROVIDED: 24 spaces including 8 spaces
in garage
III . BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The site falls within the Major Commercial Category of the Comprehensive
Plan making the proposal appear compatible with the Plan. The fact that
the site is currently used for 12 multi-family residences and that single
family residences are adjacent to the proposal makes it necessary to rely
upon the Comprehensive Plan's Decision Guideline 6.1 .1 which calls for
buffers to insure compatibility between adjacent uses. Those single family
residences north of the proposal may experience heavier traffic volume
should the 12-unit motel eventually have as -ss to the future adjacent
motel and restaurant uses. In light of the above, the Planning Department
would therefore recommend approval of this zone change. In addition,
staff finds that this proposed zone change is consistent with the Zoning
Ordinance requirements for Freeway Commercial, i.e. Section 4.08A.040 -
Development and Traffic Control Plan. However, 4.08A.060 requires a five
(5) foot setback from properties for fencing adjacent to residential zones;
the existing fence along the west property line does not comply.
IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 . The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior
lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such
lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the
area with full consideration to adjacent properties).
2. No free-standing sign on the premises shall exceed forty (40)
square feet in area or thirty-five (35) feet in height. All signs
may be illuminated provided that they shall not be animated nor
flashing and shall be of low intensity, not exceeding the equi-
valent of four hundred twenty-five (425) milliamperes flourescent
tubing behind plexiface, spaced on seven (7) inch or more
centers, or of exposed neon not exceeding thirty (30) milli-
amperes.
•
3. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of
any building permits.
4. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning
Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the
' following . changes: Building location, landscape plans, and
general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be
maintained.
( 10B ) 2
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION UMBER: ZE-59-81
5. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
6. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on-site improvements.
7. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
Guidelines (WAC 197-10) and the Spokane County Environmental
Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non-significance
has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the
official file, written comments and/or public testimony contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse
impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made
that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical
environment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a
final declaration of non-significance is hereby to be issued.
•
8. Landscaping of the property shall not be significantly altered in
order to maintain the adequate buffering which exists between
existing and future commercial activities and existing residential
activites.
9. That no more than 12 motel units be permitted with this zone
change.
10. Should the proposed 12-unit complex be combined with the in-
dicated future motel to the south, access to the 12 units from
Cataldo Avenue shall be limited to emergency vehicles. Such
limitation of access shall be accomplished by landscaping the
current driveway access 6 feet south from the proposal's
property line.
11 . All current standards of the Freeway Commercial zone as
amended shall be complied with in the development of this site.
12. That this action shall apply to only the portion of land
requesting the zone change and any future development as
designed on the development plan must, be addressed by a
separate action.
b) . COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1 . Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County
Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit or any use of
the property.
2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building
.permit on the property.
( 10B) 3
ZONE RECLASSIFICAT , .N NUMBER: ZE-59-81
•
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be re=
quired for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or
traveled by vehicles.
4. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1 . Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby .
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with
all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District
and is further conditioned and subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
•
2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in
any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a
utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW,
Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and
successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal
assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID)
established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County.
4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to
future areawide collection system.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1 . Water service must be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
2. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply
when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State De-
partment of Social and Health Services.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
4. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site sewage
disposal systems may be authorized.
5. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall
be approved by the County Engineer and. the Health Officer
prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot.
( loB ) 4
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION JMBER : ZE-59-81
•
6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1 . Mains and hydrants to be installed, in accordance with the
Spokane County Department of Building and Safety.
2. Recommend approval with condition that prior to development of
this property that an engineered water distribution system plan
shall be submitted to the Spokane County Department of Building
and Safety. This distribution plan shall include water main size,
flows, locations, fire hydrant type and locations, water storage
tanks size, and location and design criteria.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1 . The proposal is located in Vera Water and Power District.
Although the water district has indicated they are capable of
servicing the proposal, they have also indicated that satisfactory
servicing arrangements have not been made.
( los ) 5
• — rile No. ZE-59-81 '7
•
SPOKANE COUNTY
• HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS •AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on August 27, 1981 and
the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Chairman, Kenneth
Kennedy and Ron McVicker.
B . PROPOSAL
The sponsor, D. J. Hunie Co. is requesting approval of a zone reclassification,
File No. ZE-59-81 , Multiple Family Suburban to Freeway Commercial , for the
purpose of changing existing apartments to motel use.
C . FINDINGS OF FACT
1 . That the existing land use in the area is a 12 unit multiple family complex.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
commercial development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is
Multiple Family Suburban.
•
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
• have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Declaration of
Non-Significance.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertise!irent of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled .
6. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed
use.
7. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That the application be continued until such time as building permits
are issued for the anticipated motel use adjacent to this application . .
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of D. J. Hume Co. , for a zone reclassification as described in the
application should be continued .
Motion by: Kennedy Seconded by: McVicker
Vote: 2-1 to Continue
1
File No. ZE-59-81
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Chairperson
ATTEST:
WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Dit -ctor
•
Date: September Y, 1981
2
J i • Set --fq
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
NORTH 811 JEFFERSON as• �/Cl
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 dA\
VC,// 509-456-3600 \o
. _._ �REP�T �`
;;: ' R.1. ;c1� '171
02) ;;
Date ,' 4 q 2 -S -(7:i _ Project NameN Q =�u/>;%Jy /R-iffer}r
Inspector,. ;,;•.' Project No:-CRELRID
Weather Report No.
Time Charged Contractor this Day -1/2 or 1 Contractor and/or Sub(s)
Other County Personnel
Equipment List Hrs. Used Standby
1
2
3
4
5
6
"? ...., Contractor Personnel Classification Number
1
2
3
4
5
._.. 6
l' Diary Section
,CC mments:a £s% ^ c, u . f.,A.Itn., .
pi I r�,4 r't�h -5 'd c 4..34//: 9's!�.So// LJuf RA.
r C7-
•
•
INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE;'?:---22—,A
AGENDA, ,._ -Y 8, 1982 TELEPHONE NO. : 456 - 2205
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place : Broadway Centre Building , Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane
ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
WILL RECESS FROM 12:00 NOON TO 1 :30 P.M. FOR LUNCH AT A PLACE TO BE ANNOUNCED. ITEMS NOT
HEARD PRIOR TO THE 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE. NEXT AVAILABLE DATE AS
ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE.
9:00 A.M. •
A. LONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
1 : ZE -59A-81 MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO FREEWAY COMMERCIAL
(Continued from August 27, 1981 )
(Generally located just west of Sullivan Road and south of the
intersection of Cata1do and Mission Avenues . Section 14-25-44)
Proposed Use: Existing Apartments to change to
Motel Use.
Site Size: 30,840 Square Feet
Owner/Applicant: THEODORE and DIANE GUNNING/D.J.HUME CO.
East 5805 Sharp, Suite 1
Spokane, WA 99206
•
2. 7E-30-82 AGRICULTURAL TO COMMERCIAL and/or LOCAL BUSINESS
(Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection
of Evergreen and Third Avenue. Section 23-25-44)
Proposed Use: Retail and Warehouse.
Site Size: Approximately 2.2 Acres
Owner/Applicant: JAMES W. CROW/D. J. HUME COMPANY
East 5805 Sharp, Suite 1
Spokane, WA 99206
3. 7-W-16-82 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN WITH RADIO AND
TELEVISION BROADCASTING DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE
VW-112-82 REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION:TO HEIGHT RESTRICTION OF OVERLAY ZONE
. (Generally located east of and adjacent to Dowdy Road and
approximately 3/4 of a mile north of the intersection of
Euclid Road and Dowdy in Section 5-25-42)
Proposed Use: Transmitter Site
• Site Size: Approximately 10 Acres
Owner/Applicant: ' RICHARD and PEGGY CANNON/WM. J. CARTER CO.
West 1047 Garland Avenue
Spokane, WA 99205
(continued) :
•
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Date: May I1, 1982 Application No: ZE-59A-81
Name of • Applicant: ' D. J. Hume Company
Street Address of Applicant: E. 5805 Sharp, Suite 1
City: Spokane State: WA Zip Code: 99206 Tele. No. 535-5302
Name of Property Owner(s): Theodore Cunning and Diane Cunning
Authorized Agent representing Owner
(if other than owner): Dwight J. flume
Existing Zoning Classification: Multi Family Suburban
Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 1970
Existing. Use of Property: 12 unit apartment building
Proposed Zone. Classification: Freeway Commercial .
Proposed Use of Property: Addition to Motel Complex adjacent to said property.
Legal Description of Property: see attached
•
Section : 14 _ Township: 25 Range: 44
Source of Legal : (ZE-59-81.)
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement) 14541-0138
Property Size: 30840 sq. ft. Frontageappx.230Feet on: Cataldo Ave.
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor; 69,696 sq. ft .
Street Address of the Property: E. 15408 Cataldo Ave.
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your
interest in It? Consultant to owner.
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
see Findines and Order (ZE-59-8i) ; a subsequent building permit was issued for the
50 unit motel in March of 1982.
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED:
( 1 . ; What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you eel make this
proposal warranted? ZE-59-81 Finding of Fact , item 7 a; the request for rezone
for rezone was continued pending the issuance of a building permit on the .adjacent F.
pro 2rty for the 50 unit motel. (see this item #1 on application for ZE-59-81 )
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent
properties? The change of site plan orienting traffic circulation and use of
this site to ilk,. 50 unit motel southeasterly of this site will eliminate traffic
_ncn GaltaldnAve. Furtliermcre , occupancy as a motel should not result in as full
an occupancy is a Pull time rental appnrl1r1:nt status.
Rev. 2/3/81
s_l - ., • .. ,
"APPLTATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIF'r ∎TION--contin '.
This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff w $i ,
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the" h: })
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat 'Nish c'
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. ' ,"4
1 . COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . Our
requi.r_ements-_ Isu rnittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
i-' t. -7-1--,/_ �.,.. C.7 7
— _� c� L; 1 �.•)y> < `may •- - / A-7' / /2 /7f2_
-CSigrature / (Date) // /
L; L
2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied .
Tfie-"\designated water purveyor for this site is Jiro .
•q// .4 / . liter 1:✓t S ,-/ z —t
(SigriatuFe.) Lr (Date)
1J/
3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME) ■,' RA 0///kiGn.-- 4; po ..,.ciz
a) The proposal (is) (its---net) located within the boundary of our service
area. .•
b) Satisfactory. arrangements (1;ie) (have not) been made to serve this
proposal.
c) We (are) (arc- not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
-7 15) : ;1
(Signature) (Date)
4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
This ,proposal is located in Fire District. # //� .
E
(Signature) /%" / ' (Date')
r,
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . The
appleapt has been informed of our requirements and standards.
•
(Signature) (Date) v
I , THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO-
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF.
(Signed) Ecktne,,-r`y yorsra? Date: J-,-7:2- ce.c."
(Address) / 5-G/4 � j ‘„...wey Phone: f�24/— 713 0 L `/
(-7 cKt�c _--
zip: l%CUO
NOTARY 422 -r' - . -/ 1 e/-/c7 • Date: S--/0--)i".2-
, -
NOTARY SEAL: ,
SIG TUR OF APPLICANT OR A ENT
•
/ Rev, 2/3/81
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Date: May I I , 1982 Application No: ZE-59A-81
Name of • Applicant: D. J. Hume Company
Street Address of Applicant: E. 5805 Sharp, Suite 1
City: Spokane State: WA Zip Code: 99206 Tele. No. 535-5302
Name of Property Owner(s): Theodore Cunning and Diane Gunning
Authorized Agent representing Owner
(if other than owner): Dwight J. Hume
Existing Zoning Classification: Multi Family Suburban •
Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 1970
Existing Use of Property: 12 unit apartment building
Proposed Zone Classification: Freeway Commercial
Proposed Use of Property: Addition to Motel Complex adjacent to said property.
Legal Description of Property: see attached
•
Section: 14 Township: 25 Range:
44
Source of Legal: (ZE-59-81)
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement) 14541-0138
Property Size: 30840 sq. Et. Frontageappx.230Feet on: Cataldo Ave.
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 69,696 sq. ft.
Street Address of the Property: E. 15408 Cataldo Ave.
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your
interest in it? Consultant to owner.
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
see Findines and Order (ZE-59-81) ; a subsequent building permit was issued for the
50 unit motel in March of 1982.
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED:
What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this
proposal warranted? ZE-59-81 Finding of Fact , item 7 a ; the request for rezone
for rezone was continued pending the issuance of a building permit on the adjacent
property for the 50 unit motel . (see this item #1 on application for ZE-59-8] )
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent
properties? The change of site plan orienting traffic circulation and use of
this site to the 50 unit motel southeasterly of this site will eliminate traffic
onto Calt.aldo Ave. Furthermore, occupancy as a motel should not result in as full
an occupancy as a ful1 time rental appart.ment status.
Rev. 2/3/81
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION--continued-2
This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat-
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department.
1 . COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
re uir_ements-__f.Qr-ls mittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
(Signature) (Date) /
L
2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for re ne have been satisfied.
T�ie�designated w ter p rveyor for this site is V t.
(Signature) J . (Date)
3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME) Vc_2i1 V(/Nr'en. POwr-R.
a) The proposal (is) (Ia not) located within the boundary of our service
area.
b) Satisfactory arrangements (ian-a) (have not) been made to serve this
proposal.
c) We (are) (are-not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
i
(Signature) ` (Date)
4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
This _proposal is located in Fire District # C/e
c sj,zt' , '.- L `?'ac, /a - 8Z-
nature) 7' .,, (Date')
/
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
appli t has been informed of our requirements and standards.
(Signature) (Date
I , THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO-
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION , OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF l,
•
s% i9(
•
\ AGENDA , August 27 , 1981 TELEPHONE : 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
TIME : Thursday , August 27 , 1981 - 1 : 30 P . M .
PLACE : Broadway Centre Building , 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE
AND AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' S OFFICE .
1 . ZN-42-80 , CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
( Generally located at the northeast corner of State Highway
#395 and Dalton Road , south of Deer Park) .
Proposed Change : To approve variation of the site plan from
original approval
Site Size : 7 ..2 acres
Applicant : D . J . HUME CO .
E 5805 Sharp , Suite # 1
/2. 111-0D003/.. MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO FREEWAY COMMERCIAL
- � ( Generally located just west of Sullivan Road south of
the Intersection of Cataldo and Mission ) .
Proposed Use : Existing Apartments to change to Motel use .
Site Size : 30 ,840 sq . ft .
Applicant : D . J . HUME CO .
E 5805 Sharp , Suite #1
3 . ZE-75-81 , AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE
(Generally located in the Spokane Valley at the northwest
corner of Boone Avenue and Stout Road ) .
Proposed Use : Professional Office
Site Size : 10 , 004 sq . ft .
Applicant : DAN MECKEL
N 1210 Argonne Road
Except when an Environmental Impact Statement ( EI,S ) has been prepared , a
proposed declaration of non-significance ( a preliminary decision , which
may be reversed , that an EIS is not needed ) has been administratively
issued . This insures the applicant of a timely processing of his/ her
proposal at tht time of the public hearing . BUT , a major purpose of the
public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision
makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implemen-
tation of the proposal , thus resulting in the need for an EIS . However ,
most " change of conditions " are exempt from the provisions of SEPA ; check
with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists .
- 10 -
g . 1...`,N
6 jd
N s'.
I BRIDGE 2 ' ' =.0 Sar� �
—= l N64507 : �J
•
•
`, •,
,Nnl
fbr �\ AGE •
��...'`� s' � te, I .i
- LARDER .
M 10
U •
�: •1 zE 59 81
AV E. o/ 1 Jj :
- BROAD WAY AV E
W =`ogr. Station
N o i Se
'S >•411,IVE I` 0 a .Sc I I j
°r
.Q : c <�Q
s Ci VALL E`*(. WAY
MIXON
�°^ q
y
• IN tp / M.iw Z1MAIN AV[.■
•
Z.
J S S r_ s i �z/
a,�� O. s
r D/9L•y
. . • .. . -- PRAGUE AV N
.. , •. uua,.;: •-cam . ,. �. nornniwnraysc..�-.,.��awvn�re� . _ ��.�-.
cr
5
•'3 a I.
,��
�.
- ` VE• ALE I
�... . .n..r �� i. (C.M. [ 4 /GO..P1
__ —'�� : -- — , ^n ^,-- -Tr.-.-- 1 -.1000 .
tt � zwo StM r i un 'yT_ a'
41 9 10
Pa rochi.
r'
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 27, 1981
TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-59-81
I . GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: D. J. Hume Co.
STATUS OF APPLICANT: Project Designer & Representative
PROPERTY OWNER: T. G. Gunning
REQUESTED ZONING: Freeway Commercial
EXISTING ZONING: Multiple Family Suburban (established in
1970)
PROPOSED USE: Motel Space
PROJECT LOCATION: This site is generally located along Cataldo
Avenue approximately 50 feet west of
Sullivan Road in the Valley.
II . SITE PLAN INFORMATION
SITE SIZE: Approximately .7 acres
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is currently a 12 unit multiple
family complex located adjacent to other commercial property on the east
and other residential property to the north and west.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Considering the whole area including
Sullivan Road, the neighborhood consists primarily of well landscaped
single family structures, with spotted commercial activities occurring along
Sullivan Road. One large motel is located east of and adjacent to Sullivan
Road.
AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: Urban
ZONING: North Residential Office/Local Business,
established, 1979, 1980/1978.
East Freeway Commercial, established, 1970.
West R-2, established, 1954
South Freeway Commercial, established, 1970
LAND USE: Site 12 unit Multiple Family complex
North Vacated commercial lot
East Vacated commercial lot
West Single Family Residential
South Single Family Residential
II . SITE PLAN INFORMATION
1981 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Major Commercial
NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 2 including garage
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: No change
Total Square Feet Approximately 4,900 sq. ft.
( 10B) 1
•
•
ZONE 'RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-59-81
•
Total Percent of Site Covered 22
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 2 storys
PARKING REQUIRED: 12 spaces
PROVIDED: 24 spaces including 8 spaces
in garage
III . BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The site falls within the Major Commercial Category of the Comprehensive
Plan making the proposal appear compatible with the Plan. The fact that
the site is currently used for 12 multi-family residences and that single
family residences are adjacent to the proposal makes it necessary to rely
upon the Comprehensive Plan's Decision Guideline 6.1 .1 which calls for
buffers to insure compatibility between adjacent uses. Those single family
residences north of the proposal may experience heavier traffic volume
should the 12-unit motel eventually have access to the future adjacent
motel and restaurant uses. In light of the above, the Planning Department
would therefore recommend approval of this zone change. In addition,
staff finds that This proposed zone change is consistent with the Zoning
Ordinance requirements for Freeway Commercial, i.e. Section 4.08A.040 -
Development and Traffic Control Plan. However, 4.08A.060 requires a five
(5) foot setback from properties for fencing adjacent to residential zones;
the existing fence along the west property line does not comply.
IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 . The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior
lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such
lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the
area with full consideration to adjacent properties).
2. No free-standing sign on the premises shall exceed forty (40)
square feet in area or thirty-five (35) feet in height. All signs
may be illuminated provided that they shall not be animated nor
flashing and shall be of low intensity, not exceeding the equi-
valent of four hundred twenty-five (425) milliamperes flourescent
tubing behind plexiface, spaced on seven (7) inch or more
centers, or of exposed neon not exceeding thirty (30) milli-
amperes.
3. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of
any building permits.
4. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning
Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the
following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and
general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be
maintained.
( 106 ) 2
F
ZONE 'RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-59-81
5' Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
6. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on-site improvements.
7. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
Guidelines (WAC 197-10) and the Spokane County Environmental
Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non-significance
has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the
official file, written comments and/or public testimony contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse
impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made
that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical
environment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a
final declaration of non-significance is hereby to be issued.
8. Landscaping of the property shall not be significantly altered in
order to maintain the adequate buffering which exists between
existing and future commercial activities and existing residential
activites.
9. That no more than 12 motel units be permitted with this zone
change.
10. Should the proposed 12-unit complex be combined with the in-
dicated future motel to the south, access to the 12 units from
Cataldo Avenue shall be limited to emergency vehicles. Such
limitation of access shall be accomplished by landscaping the
current driveway access 6 feet south from the proposal's
property line.
11 . All current standards of the Freeway Commercial zone as
amended shall be complied with in the development of this site.
12. That this action shall apply to only the portion of land
requesting the zone change and any future development as
designed on the development plan must be addressed by a
separate action.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1 . Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County
Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit or any use of
the property.
2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building
permit on the property.
( 10B) 3
ZONE'RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-59-81
•
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be re=
quired for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or
traveled by vehicles.
4. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1 . Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with
all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District
and is further conditioned and subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in
any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a
utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW,
Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and.
successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal
assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID)
established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County.
4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to
future areawide collection system.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1 . Water service must be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
2. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply
when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State De-
partment of Social and Health Services.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
4. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site sewage
disposal systems may be authorized.
5. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall
be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer
prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot.
( 1GB ) 4
•
ZONE, RECLASSIFICATIL NUMBER: ZE-59-81
6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1 . Mains and hydrants to be installed, in accordance with the
Spokane County Department of Building and Safety.
2. Recommend approval with condition that prior to development of
this property that an engineered water distribution system plan
shall be submitted to the Spokane County Department of Building
and Safety. This distribution plan shall include water main size,
flows, locations, fire hydrant type and locations, water storage
tanks size, and location and design criteria.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1 . The proposal is located in Vera Water and Power District.
Although the water district has indicated they are capable of
servicing the proposal, they have also indicated that satisfactory
servicing arrangements have not been made.
( 10B ) 5
r,4 ,
-i- F
- - �. .a ) _
• . . •
BASIN DESIGNATION PROJECT 41 E.VOEcel rC w
CALC � " DATE //// CHECK . DATE "
SOIL GROUP_ ..3 . -.. - AREA. 2- 7 "(Acres) -SLOPE -, I %
CURVE NUMBER: PRESENT.CONDITION- d FUTURE CONDITION �'
LAND USE. -% CFI - PRODUCT
oiC -_,-7-• 6 5.= b _: 4-2. 9 "
:1AS/0 4LrNT/.4L .. �_ �� 2 : 7
1344.61:01:" / . BS
WEIGHTED CN: 43. 9 .1st d¢`
RUNOFF .DEPTH: (Q) i •
P2 in. Q2 in. "
P10 • 2 : 0 - in. Qin ./ 34- in.
P5n in ?Q50 in
ion in. • Q100
PEAK DISCHARGE: -
.HYDRAULIC LENGTH. 2 0 0 0" ft. EQUIV. . AREA • 9-¢ Acres
EQUIV. X. SLOPE '= ADJ. EQUIV.. PEAK
CHART. PEAK DISCHARGE . . FACTOR . . DISCHARGE .
FLAT (0-2%) . cfs/in.
MODERATE (3%-7%) cfs/in. X , 9 7 = 4 5: 59'" cfs/in.
STEEP (>8%) 47 cfs/in;
• ADJ. EQUIV. PEAK. DISCHARGE X ACTUAL AREA = ADJ. PEAK DISCHARGE
EQUIV. AREA . '
. 4-f 6 cfs/in. X ?7 " Acres = 2 7. 98 cfs/in.
.1¢. Acres .
ADJ. PEAK DISCHARGE (cfs/in. ) X Q (in. ) = DESIGN DISCHARGE .
2R cfs/in. X Q2 in. = D cfs.
Q10 - / 3 4- in. D10 3 . 8, cfs.
Q50 • in. 050 cfs. •
Q100 in. 0100 cfs. -_I
• FIGURE 10 ,
6-15 .. . .
• •
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Date Aiirnist. 'PA
Inter-office Communication
To 7fW14 VI AA-11 -1.AT. 912119/
From County- Engineer
Subject ZE1-59-81
•
#5 '
#19
#20
#21
Form 327-C R
f..
ll File No. ZE-59-81
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION -
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on August 27, 1981 and
the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Chairman, Kenneth
Kennedy and Ron McVicker.
•
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, D. J. Hume Co. is requesting approval of a zone reclassification,
File No. ZE-59-81 , Multiple Family Suburban to Freeway Commercial, for the
purpose of changing existing apartments to motel use.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1 . That the existing land use in the area is a 12 unit multiple family complex.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
commercial development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is
Multiple Family Suburban.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Declaration of
Non-Significance.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
6. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed
use.
7. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That the application be continued until such time as building permits
are issued for the anticipated motel use adjacent to this application. .
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned,, finds that. the
application of D. J. Hume Co. , for a zone reclassification as described in the
application should be continued.
Motion by: Kennedy Seconded by: McVicker
Vote: 2-1 to Continue
1
File No. ZE-59-81
•
.1\ •
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
. ) l'41
Chairperson '
■
. • • -
ATTEST:
WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Di ctor
By: 42deited.
Date: September ,.1! 1981
3 to-Psi--
2
aj •- „
to
•
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Date: ;;:•/ Application No: Z-E--3-9:--0
Name of Applicant:
(-)
Street Address of Applicant: .777
•).
City: '- . /71(f.-1',I f State: (4..-:-.._ Zip Code: er)'-',7?0(,..- Tele. No.
Name of Property Owner(s): ,/ d. • 6c.i
Authorized Agent representing Owner
(if other than owner): /1.?
Existing Zoning Classification: AILQ7--741E /29/,q/,.-•/ ,ew,nu,C/3A,^J
Date Existing Zone Classification Established:
Existing Use of Property: (J4 ;
Proposed Zone Classification: ( ("%111 f--1,1:•• (..•?}/'
' 1•:" r 7
./ .
Proposed Use of Property: ,• e.- •---:/7,• (.1/42 ?v.41
gir,6c;ts t-e° , to Li ,
• Legal Description of Property: r:/ 7.7
112: `1-/ /1'f,r7 , e:4fe 5 /1 : e. 74,4
6tur
(.3(C--; 3 3 (X !Ye (-) a/3- //,,L;k% • P,4c./
LLZ-
*1 (Nat 4 icirl
Section: /4 Township: Range: 44-
Source of Legal : 7 ,2
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement) 7 7\-(//-
Property Size: ..isV) (/6 Frontage:-2/0 Feet on: K-7,-.
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: ',7(-1,,?Oc0
Yr
Street Address of the Property L. ( ti:%/.:) e -
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your
interest in it? jcj r .
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
• /(? ?19 „cr.! I di 77
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: •
1 . What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this
proposal warranted? 7,4 . 9• rA /-1
1/I /
,-; )0-14 -7 t• v") z' nri ?
1'I
?21t C k '7 / f:y!..1 LI. up?, 1"--; •
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent
properties? , /,*; 1 7 -7 vl,) 7c:c. 3. 4,7 •-?..4 r
_ ,
•/;;(1,-/I 4;5, , / — /
,
ft/ s . / 2 / 7)7) ,f
Rev. 2/3/81
•
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION--continued-2
This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat-
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department.
1 . COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
(Signature) ,/ (Date)
2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
The designated water p rveyor for this site is V2.40- � .
,i
a • 5-..„- -ay
(Sii ture) (Date)
MWAT�TEER PURVEYOR (NAME) \,' (-: 2ia WArEla C, TC.
a) The proposal (is) (is-=4;4) located within the boundary of our service
area.
b) Satisfactory arrangements (ha•• ) (have not) been made to serve this
proposal.
c) We (are) (ace-aot) able to serve this site with adequate water.
(Si
�nature) // (Date)
4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
Th' proposal is located in Fire District # ince
�,2" z� /i/Ay' /5,- fri8/
()Signature) : (Date)
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
A • - iminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal . . The
app - t ha b -n ief•f med of our requirements and standards.
/ ,
': / 5. t t4R /
Si•naturtur- , (Date
I , THE UND -SIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO-
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEH • _/
(Signed) /, ...A7i ;. . ,c>, I Date: 6%f-���
(Address) C 6-15-0% $/ ,,cA„we- 'hone: 5t53OZ,
Sreiteartt. Lau,. . Zip: qq2Oco
NOTARY Date:
NOTARY SEAL: --Th
ZN S AT U/RE OF APPL CAN O AGENT
•
- t
Date: S--2.5-- e
Rev. 2/3/81
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION--continued-2
This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat-
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. �j
1 . COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE z5 — s 7- 6
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
cesia-c; ./�? f �, . 5 —/
(Signature) -f (Date)
(
2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE j�jjrnv�.rrP�r,TS /y
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
The designated water purveyor for this site is
(Signature) (Date)
( 3.\ WATER PURVEYOR (NAME) ' t, t&A VL'Arnrc c, Pcwc{Z
a) The proposal (is) (i not) located within the boundary of our service
area.
b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve this
proposal .
c) We (are) (are-not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
` 2 j
2 2
--[ e)
g5 /// c I3 - 8 I
(Si nature) (Date)
4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
This proposal is located in Fire District #
Signature) (Date)
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT •
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant has been informed of our requirements and standards.
(Signature) (Date)
I , THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO-
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF.
(Signed) Date:
(Address) Phone:
Zip:
NOTARY Date:
NOTARY SEAL:
SI9NATURE OF APPLICANT 07 AGENT
- / ) d
..';, ,r ( . o . - n Date: S /) ' gl
//
Rev. 2/3/81
Gary Kennaly t p
“ineer's—Office
-vs
iE
sm.
\a .NTEROFfC EM{1I. ''' `
M1
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ui BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
7aiNa { t
71111I,! m D 42S; PHONE 4562205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANE COUNT/ COURTHOUSE
RECEIVED
March 15, 1985
MAR 2 0 1985
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
TO: Board of Spokane County Commissioners \, y��/
FROM: Steve P. Horobiowski , Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Committee Actions of March 7, 1985.
Gentlemen:
On March 7, 1985, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. , to
consider four new zone reclassification applications and one change of conditions
application. One additional change of c mditions application was withdrawn by
the applicant. Members present: Mrs. Myers, Chairperson, Mrs. Tennican and
Mr. Skalstad.
Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee.
If not appealed, these decisions will become final on March 25, 1985. All Find-
ings and Order for this hearing were signed on March 14, 1985.
1 ) ZE-59B-81 , Change of Conditions in the Freeway Commercial Zone
and
VE-205-84, Variance from the Setback Requirements of the Freeway Commercial
Zone: Gunning
Location: Generally located south of Cataldo Avenue, approximately
150 feet west of Sullivan Road in Section 14-25-44.
Proposal : Addition of 14-Units to an existing Motel
Action: Approval . (Vote: 3 - 0)
The Zoning Adjustor also approved the requested Variance to
allow a 32-foot from Cataldo Avenue, whereas Section
4.08A.050-(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires
a 50-foot setback.
2) ZE-130-84, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban
and
VE- 1-85, Variance from the Frontage Requirement of the Multiple Family
Suburban Zone: Finch
Location: Generally located northeast of the intersection of Woodlawn Dr.
and Fancher Road in Section 24-25-43.
Proposal : 40-Unit Apartment Complex
Action: Approval for a 35-Unit Apartment Complex. (Vote: 3 - 0)
(continued)
Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of March 7, 1985 (continued)
2) ZE-130-84, Agricultural to Multiple Family. Suburban and VE-1-85, Variance
Request from the Frontage Requirement (continued)
The Hearing Examiner Committee was concerned with the
proposed density of the project and its compatibility with
the existing multi-family developments in the immediate area.
The Zoning Adjustor approved the requested Variance to allow
• an apartment complex on a lot with 30-feet of public road
frontage, whereas Section 4.07.060 of the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance requires 90-feet of frontage. (note: . The
applicant has additional frontage through a private easement.) -
3) ZW-132B-78, Change of Conditions in the Mining Zone; Central Pre-Mix Concrete
Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Fort Wright Road,
and approximately 1 ,600 feet easterly of the intersection of
• Fort Wright Road and Government Way in Section 11-25-42.
Action: _ Withdrawal Accepted. (Vote: 2 - 0)
The application was withdrawn by the applicant by a letter
dated February 14, 1985.
4) ZE-106-84, Agricultural Suburban to Commercial : East Bannen Properties
Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue
and Bannen Road in Section 14-25-44.
Proposal : Retail Building
Action: Approval . (Voter 3 - 0)
5) ZE-120-84, Agricultural to Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban:
Wyatt
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to the intersection of
Buckeye Avenue and Pines Road in Section 10-25-44.
Proposal : 270-Unit Multi-Family Complex
Action: Approval for the Multiple Family Suburban Zone at a density
of 9 dwelling units per acre (Site Size - Approximately 14.54
Acres) . The Residential Office Zone request was denied.
(Vote: 3 - 0)
The Hearing Examiner Committee felt that the proposal was too
dense for the advertised property north of the Freeway, con-
sidering the impacts to the Aquifer and the uncertainty as to
timing of availability of sewers in the area; therefore, it
was felt that the dwelling units allowed should be reduced in
number. The Residential Office Zone request was denied as
future use for offices does not appear practical at this time
until an areawide sewer would be more readily available.
- 2 - (continued)
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59b-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 . Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during
demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled.
This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or
suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. haul
roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from
all other construction related activities.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or
spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken
immediately to clean these surfaces.
3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access
roads) must be paved and kept clean.
4. Some objectionaDle odors will likely result during the
construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using
the site following completion of the project and from occupants
of the proposed project.
5. All air pollution regulations must be met.
Prcivern e.ul ;
%, \\curse soa Cc\wNtbta 3wlkAinq - foe_ p;slrict * 1 h 5" Pit royea( •l'F • Vlar"
\1e wit\ cmltyke costs
2ecornL_ Ero encot AcceS 159Gcce
2 vit.� W-wo Vh {
S vyv ace_ erne-r(,
\\7s o Ac1�e e}��a�_ \)A.0 uvi ce- Za r- 3 •
2 1`°71 W(,L 0.+.0 pa.�P-�� t AUa�fi d(-g• Pr-61-e G� (laud, UA..2i 0.1tce reel tA-yes-t'.
•P`C e`Q C�� V \ e5 118 NCC- C - 1`-Ol"Y1 s-tIi1D6 • 6raf7o..S;,# %S .77e7er�e
-Th G.;fi tnn Gcvne
•
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. ZE-205-84
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (continued)
2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
All Conditions apply which are contained in Zoning File No.
LE-59A-81 , as approved previously.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1 . The site is located in Fire District # 1 .
2. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible
construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves.
3. A land use permit will be required for each structure.
4. Installation of fire hydrants shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the Spokane County Department of Building and
Safety.
5. Reclassification of an existing building shall require an
application for change of occupancy permit and subsequent
inspection for approval .
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1 . Water Purveyor is Vera Irrigation District #15, and they will
supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
9
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-2U5-84
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued)
8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.08O RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on-site improvements.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
•
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit:
1 . The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any
building permit on the property.
2. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied
or traveled by vehicles.
3. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
4. Access to Cataldo Avenue shall be prohibited.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1 . Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health
District and is further conditioned and subject to specific
application approval and issuance of permits by the health
District.
S
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
V. RECOMMENDED AGENCY CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED:
(All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be
binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners
of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors. )
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTmENT
1 . That all conditions from File ZE-59A-81 , except as modified
herein, shall continue to apply to this site.
2. That Condition #9 from File ZE-59A-81 , limiting the site to only
12 motel units, be deleted.
3. That no more than 26 motel units be permitted on the described
site.
4. That the applicant work with and obtain Zoning Administrator's
approval of a buffering design along the west and north property
lines that meet the standards of Section 4.08A.060 of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access
points is not obscured or impaired.
6. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the hearing Examiner
Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall
be maintained.
7. That the project is subject to Section 4.16A.050, the Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal , spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
7
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
III. SITE ANALYSIS (continued)
e) SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued)
PARKING AREA:
Parking Required: 76 Spaces for Total Motel Complex
(14 Spaces just for New Addition)
Parking Provided: 79 Spaces Total
BUFFERING TECHNIQUES: Applicant has proposed to provide new 5-foot
high fence along west property line, in area where garage structure
is removed, to continue the existing fence line. The existing fence
in 1982, was declared non-conforming to the provisions of Section
4.08A.060. That standard requires that all new fences maintain a
5-foot setback from property lines, and that the setback be heavily
landscaped.
Staff suggests that the fence be installed as indicated. However, to
meet the buffering intent of Section 4.08A.06O, the applicant must
receive approval from the Zoning Administratror for buffering
techniques along both the west and north property lines that meet the
standards of the Freeway Commercial Zone.
VARIANCE REQUEST: The setback variance requested is to allow the
motel addition to have the same 32-foot setback from Cataldo right of
way that the existing structure maintains. The Freeway Commercial
Zone would require new structures to be set back 50-feet from public
streets. The existing structure predatesd the Freeway Commercial
Zone and, therefore, is non-conforming regarding the required 50-foot
setback.
IV. CONCLUSION: The zoning of the property was decided in 1982 and was found
to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and past actions. If
approval is granted for the addition of 14-units, then guidance from the
Comprehensive Plan and the Freeway Commercial Zone suggest that extensive
buffer techniques be installed to mitigate conflicts between freeway
commercial uses and residential areas. The applicant must work with the
Zoning Administrator to design a buffer along the west and north property
lines to meet the screening standards of the Freeway Commercial Zone.
Other conditions from the 1982 rezone approval should remain in force,
including the prohibited access to Cataldo Avenue.
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NU. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (continued)
5) NEIGHBORHOOD CONSIDERATIONS: Areas immediately adjacent to this site
on the north and west are residential . The abrupt change in land use
was mitigated by the various conditions imposed on site development
by the 1982 Freeway Commercial Zone approval .
III. SITE ANALYSIS
1 ) SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSIDERATIONS: The site with the existing
12-unit motel and garages, is accessed only from Sullivan Road by way
of the motel 's parking lot. Access, except emergency vehicles, was
prohibited to Cataldo Avenue by the 1982 rezone. Construction of the
14-unit addition would be another physical barrier to Cataldo Avenue
access, including emergency access through the site.
Residential type landscaping currently exists between the building
and Cataldo Avenue. This area would require additional buffering
treatment to comply with the intent of Section 4.08A.060 which
requires specific buffering techniques adjacent to residential
zones.
2) AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: Site committed to commercial use.
3) SITE PLAN INFORMATION:
SITE SIZE: Approximately 31 ,900 Square Feet
EXISTING BUILDINGS: Two - (An Existing 12-Unit Motel
(An Existing Garage Structure to
be removed)
PROPOSED BUILDINGS: One - (A 14-Unit Addition to Existing
Motel )
Total Floor Area: 7,875 Sq.Ft. Footprint
(3,087 Sq.Ft. Footprint of Addition)
Total Site Coverage: Approximately 25 %
Maximum Structure Height: 20 Feet (2 Stories)
•
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
1 ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is in a transition area between Major
Commercial and Urban categories of the Comprehensive Plan; though
only a small portion is within Urban. The original Freeway •
Commercial rezone approval found that the Comprehensive Plan
encouraged buffering techniques between the commercial and
residential uses. Buffering, at that time, included landscaping,
fencing, and spatial separation. Separation from building to
property line will be reduced from nearly 60 feet down to 10 feet.
If approved, continued or increased buffering between uses is still
encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan.
2) ZONING: North Two-Family Residential , Estab. 1954
Residential Office, Estab. 1983 and 198U
Local Business, Established, 1978
East Freeway Commercial , Estab. 1970 and 1968
West Two-Family Residential , 'Estab. 1954
South Freeway Commercial , Established 1970
3) HISTORY OF LAND USE ACTIONS: Most frontages on Sullivan Road have
been rezoned for commercial uses. Areas generally 300 feet west of
Sullivan Road remain zoned and used for residential purposes. This
site was rezoned to Freeway Commercial , with a specific site plan, in
1982 subsequent to construction of the main 5U-unit motel building
adjacent to the south. The rezone approval allowed the existing
apartment house to be converted to a part of the motel . Conditions
limited the conversion to a maximum of 12 units, prohibited access to
Cataldo Avenue, and required landscaping and fencing.
4) LAND USE: Site Twelve Unit Motel Annex, Swimming Pool ,
Garages, and Parking Lot
North Single Family Residential , Offices, and
Vacant
East Convenience Store, Gas Station, and Red
Lion Motel
South Quality Inn Motel (50 Units)
West Single Family Residential
•
•
•
STAFF REPORT
•
DATE: MARCH 7, 1985
TO: NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE and ZONING ADJUSTOR
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NUMBER: ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NUMBER: VE-205-84
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: D. J. HUME
PROPERTY OWNER: Ted Gunning (Northwood Properties, Inc. )
REQUESTED ChANGE OF CONDITIONS: Change to an approved Site Plan and
hearing Examiner Committee conditions of
approval in the Freeway Commercial Zone
to allow a 14-Unit addition to an
existing Motel .
EXISTING ZONING: Freeway Commercial (established in 1982)
(with ASA Overlay Zone - Yes)
REQUESTED VARIANCE: To allow the 14-Unit Hotel Addition a
32-foot setback from Cataldo Avenue (the
same setback that the existing structure
maintains) , whereas Section 4.08A.050-(2) of
the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires
a 50-foot setback.
EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE: Motel
•
SITE SIZE: Approximately 31 ,900 Square Feet
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MAJOR COMMERCIAL and URBAN
PRIORITY SEWER SERVICE AREA: Yes AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA: Yes
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located south of Cataldo Avenue,
approximately 150 feet west of Sullivan Road in Section 14-25-44.
S
4
Z4
c______„--if_
R\, r'I i
I I
/ ., : `E
- =.. �
T . c4j8
der
.1 Z E
a
err— 2 � ..i ����` ; `.. _�R�F�Y,q
fig 1 I
r I
Ir fG;;: 3� - cti i °•:
�
.. P l �: •I "RIDGE
4 a ,•
cS- ' c p
3 I -
pv
AVE. ' II 1• � EROADv.Ar' AV E. i
0..A1 -M/. lV.-i.I.wP'JM.�..r.' ...
fi It Fire
i co! in ' 'ogfes;i ` 5+a+i On `
i Y $f h00 I:[
•124( a it
.. ed ygo. ::Sect• ra �i'�> '
9; � Sc !LJI..
a 2
D s .
V • IN 1 m ♦•� TtLLi 4 I
q.�e c� ( 1:1000 p Snip
�- - O/9•'•! SPRAGUE AVENUE J.
•i 1'
-L - - .I____ _ — -_.1 . __. Ls__ _ .. :t74._A I
[ A air— — — 1-
•
'3 AV NOISSIIN
/
(di
.
4". -
a
i •
0
a 0
4 a
v.IzO e%0
0 a
P• ,r :7 13 ,
, 0,...4 i• .0.1 4
% .. 1, t.Z: iz•
• 1 ,7,4 4 E... O.
04 • •
)1( .8•1•1. 4 .-
1.• 5 4
0 ,\
' •.5 So..- . . % ., ...
ra 0
. tek 6:7. ..*. ...0,t.
.. 4 C:0•-•‘ :.t•-•• z' 4
.1, •i t;..L. - - -ts f •
t,it •••• ,.-,- t:-..-------1.-4 0 '
••4 "..- . .Jr's- •
. .
'4.7.1 II
A., 4,4 • . • l'
ijiet I
tak ts . •■ 9 \...ip . ::
.1.•-,•I
it - \1 m lji X 1
3 1, fcc21 I 4‘ r-
;
t
, e . i L -s
.. . ...
, .xr ..,
•b..mi.,
. .LreQ1, --, It % 1. 74: .ftf-.11 11
, , . , .P. • ■ % 1-* t. '. - c i:1 t'-'t 4'''''''411.4.'`'S.-/14 ' >
7, .- :•.!, • f• _.... ' :.?:-...t_, ,. ,:•.-'• 'A. -- •. - ' z •' •••'-*.-'11;)Are • .
1
2 :, 44_1 -ic.:--•
eirt• 0
......4.1 U)
. -% I''.:...: ,.- ■ r . .41
... t
•-) ,
. r
I"- 1 . •. .1 - j
A. 1 cc.
4 . , .-4.' -rrgqie.x.m: ei;L:r4
10. r:V :-.-*--- , f, .
,c.,,t Z-1,..;i• -%..,,itt:1:4:..7 ....Sr
-• •.4 -.44:5,1 44-2..t.7.4.., . . t
. . . .
„$u. aF.1 i.., •sotri24,,'N Ay ..0,•.1-1
'14 '4.. gal"Vere •
im. AL.
Ip■
1 N
N
• —t
at
; AGENDA, MARCH 7, 1985 TELEPHONE NO. : 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260
ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER
COMMITTEE WILL RECESS FROM 12:00 NOON TO 1 : 30 P.M, FOR LUNCH AT A PLACE TO BE ANNOUNCED.
ITEMS NOT HEARD PRIOR TO THE 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT AVAIL-
ABLE DATE AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE.
9:00 A.M.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
1 , €ZE_59Bz8:1 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS IN THE FREEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONE
eVE=205,:843 VARIANCE FROM THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE FREEWAY
COMMERCIAL ZONE
(Generally located south of Cataldo Avenue, approximately
150 feet west of Sullivan Road in Section 14-25-44. )
Comprehensive Plan: Major Commercial and Urban
Proposed Use: Addition of 14-Units to an
Existing Motel
Proposed Variance: To allow a 32-foot setback from
Cataldo Avenue; whereas Section 4.08A,050-(2) of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a 50-foot
setback.
Site Size: Approximately 31 ,900 Square'Feet
Applicant: TED GUNNING
c/o D. J. Hume
500 Columbia Building
Spokane, WA 99204
2. ZE-130-84 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN
VE- 1-85 ' VARIANCE FROM THE FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT OF THE MULTIPLE FAMILY
SUBURBAN ZONE
(Generally located northeast of the intersection of Woodlawn Dr.
and Fancher Road in Section 24-25-43. )
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Proposed Use: 40-Unit Apartment Complex
Proposed Variance: To allow an apartment complex on a
lot with 30-feet of public road frontage, whereas
Section 4.07.060 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance
requires 90-feet of frontage. (note: The applicant
has additional frontage through a private easement. )
Site Size: Approximately 1 .92 Acres
Applicant: GORDON FINCH
c/o Rose Company
East 9611 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA 99206
i .
•
•
SRIDGE r %.•1:14- —
*
Z
•
•
■
I , /
•
�`: " G4R0FR> . .
,2E- 5 9B - 81
- vE
k .. VE - 2O5 - 84 :
i iltitt....,,,, -iic J
P re s RIDGE
vt 6
ii al i
3 I a
t•o BROADWAr• AvE.vas Nina,r.Mr.r. 0 . y alf s'+-
q...•—'y..a✓aw es.._ .-. .---
' [[ XFire f • 0 ' .1 .i ?.;t t. Station `
I� a:t },O.•'.:J.c t • r.o !' .
7; °: Sc•• 131 Li i
E I ai a: i
ni
- ��.._.._ r...... ..r... _
9
.i+ N40M 2 N z • 1
"'++. Yt
•__ •....
IN op./ t r
P
r ..,i • .J I -� C. •• • Z• • �.
1:1000
o' . _ 0/9i'd t SPRAGUE AVkI E J.
" TlI'v0.:•.... ../.4^C4t(h n. .tSAtllwt • ---. . ... —a.t.. 7.��'•Nww
.. .• , 1
V
-.r {1 . i :�_ _;vt vE� •'DALE
E` c AI
-_�_ , — -- �._ -_J .— r
. Au - a Ec— n- — — -
- ' Ili ' 36`i'ot7s i IE1 " '] 11M1 iv' 7'
,.'e•
11 'e PLANNING DEPARTMENT
II r '
t ; BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET
?> afr .o•�' R.
. r Ml " two' •1P% ri PHONE 456-2205
^ "~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANE COUNT/COURT HOUSE
March 15, 1985
TO: Board of Spokane County Commissioners
FROM: Steve P. Horobiowski , Zoning Administrator _
SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Committee Actions of March 7, 1985.
• Gentlemen:
On March 7, 1985, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. , to
consider four new zone reclassification applications and one change of conditions
application. One additional change of c mditions application was withdrawn by
the applicant. Members present: Mrs. Myers, Chairperson, Mrs. Tennican and
Mr. Skalstad.
Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee.
If not appealed, these decisions will become final on March 25, 1985. All Find-
ings and Order for this hearing were signed on March 14, 1985.
1 ) ZE-59B-81 , Change of Conditions in the Freeway Commercial Zone
and
VE-205-84, Variance from the Setback Requirements of the Freeway Commercial
Zone: Gunning
Location: Generally located south of Cataldo Avenue, approximately
150 feet west of Sullivan Road in Section 14-25-44.
Proposal : Addition of 14-Units to an existing Motel
Action: Approval . (Vote: 3 - 0)
The Zoning Adjustor also approved the requested Variance to
allow a 32-foot from Cataldo Avenue, whereas Section
4.08A.050-(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires
a 50-foot setback.
2) ZE-130-84, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban
and
VE- 1-85, Variance from the Frontage Requirement of the Multiple Family
Suburban Zone: Finch
Location: Generally located northeast of the intersection of Woodlawn Dr.
and Fancher Road in Section 24-25-43.
Proposal : . 40-Unit Apartment Complex
Action: Approval for a 35-Unit Apartment Complex. (Vote: 3 - 0)
(conti
Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of March 7, 1985 (continued)
2) ZE-130-84, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban and VE-1-85, Variance
Request from the Frontage Requirement (continued)
The Hearing Examiner Committee was concerned with the
proposed density of the project and its compatibility with
the existing multi-family developments in the immediate area.
The Zoning Adjustor approved the requested Variance to allow
an apartment complex on a lot with 30-feet of public road
frontage, whereas Section 4,07,060 of the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance requires 90-feet of frontage. (note: The
applicant has additional frontage through a private easement.)
3) ZW-132B-78, Change of Conditions in the Mining Zone; Central Pre-Mix Concrete
Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Fort Wright Road,
and approximately 1 ,600 feet easterly of the intersection of
Fort Wright Road and Government Way in Section 11-25-42.
Action: Withdrawal Accepted. (Vote: •2 - 0)
The application was withdrawn by the applicant by a letter
dated February 14, 1985.
4) ZE-106-84, Agricultural Suburban to Commercial : East Bannen Properties
Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue
and Bannen Road in Section 14-25-44.
Proposal : Retail Building
Action: Approval . (Vote: 3 - 0)
5) ZE-120-84, Agricultural to Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban:
Wyatt
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to the intersection of
Buckeye Avenue and Pines Road in Section 10-25-44.
Proposal : 270-Unit Multi-Family Complex
Action: Approval for the Multiple Family Suburban Zone at a density
of 9 dwelling units per acre (Site Size - Approximately 14.54
Acres) . The Residential Office Zone request was denied.
(Vote: 3 - 0)
The Hearing Examiner Committee felt that the proposal was too
dense for the advertised property north of the Freeway, con-
sidering the impacts to the Aquifer and the uncertainty as to
timing of availability of sewers in the area; therefore, it
was felt that the dwelling units allowed should be reduced in
number. The Residential Office Zone request was denied as
future use for offices does not appear practical at this time
until an areawide sewer would be more readily available.
- 2 - (continued)
•
•
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on
March 7, 1985, and the members of the Committee present being
Jane E. Myers, Chairperson, F. Lynn Tennican and Richard L. Skalstad.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Ted Gunning, is requesting approval of a change of
conditions, File No. ZE-59B-81 , Freeway Commercial Zone, requesting
approval for the addition of 14-units to an existing Motel ; and-Variance
No. VE-205-84, to allow a 32-foot setback from Cataldo Avenue, whereas
Section 4.08A.050-(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a
50-foot setback.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1 . That the existing land use in the area is motels, residential ,
offices and vacant.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
Major Commercial and Urban development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application
is Freeway Commercial .
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy
Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the
Declaration of Non-Significance.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda
Item have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use.
•
•
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued)
7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have
substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and
accordingly, the proposed change of conditions is justified.
8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area,
if properly conditioned.
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor
disapproval of the proposed use.
10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in
harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the
Hearing Examiner Committee:
a) It is possible that the proposed expansion and continued-use of
the property that fronts on Cataldo Avenue will be a more quiet
use than the former multi-family use which was in existence.
b) That the emergency access to Cataldo is not needed at the
present time as indicated by the Fire Districts review and
approval of the proposed site plan.
c) That landscape buffering treatment which is to be provided will
be protection for the adjacent residences.
D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
(All Conditions imposed by the Zoning hearing Examiner Committee shall be
binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners
of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors. )
1 . That the sponsor supply a copy of the approved site plan by Fire
District #1 prior to signing of the Findings and Order by the hearing
Examiner Committee.
2. That no exterior lighting along the north and west property lines is
allowed, except low level lighting which may enhance the landscaping
is allowed.
3. That no commercial advertising sign is allowed within the yard area
along Cataldo, neither detached nor attached.
2
•
•
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. That all conditions from File ZE-59A-81 , except as modified
herein, shall continue to apply to this site.
2. That Condition #9 from File ZE-59A-81 , limiting the site to only
12 motel units, be deleted.
3. That no more than 26 motel units be permitted on the described
site.
4. That the applicant work with and obtain Zoning Administrator's
approval of a buffering design along the west and north property
lines that meet the standards of Section 4.08A.060 of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access
points is not obscured or impaired. A significant portion of
the landscaping along Cataldo should be in Evergreen trees that
should be planted at no less in height than eight (8) feet.
6. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall
be maintained.
7. That the project is subject to Section 4.16A.050, the Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal , spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
3
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. VE-205-84
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued)
8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project.
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on-site improvements, or file
appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is
waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners.;
Resolution #82-0458 dated May 4, 1982.
9. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease, or
transfer, shall comply with RCW 58.17 and the Spokane County
Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit:
1 . The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any
building permit on the property.
2. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied
or traveled by vehicles.
3. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
4. Access to Cataldo Avenue shall be prohibited.
4
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. ZE-2O5-84
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1 . Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health
District and is further conditioned and subject to specific
application approval and issuance of permits by the Health •
District.
2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
4. Double-plumbing is recommended of each unit, if extensive
disruption is done to the site.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
All Conditions apply which are contained in Zoning File No.
ZE-59A-81 , as approved previously.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1 . The site is located in Fire District # 1 .
2. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible
construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves.
3. A land use permit will be required for each structure.
5
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-598-81
VARIANCE NO. ZE-205-84
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT (continued)
4. Installation of fire hydrants shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the Spokane County Department of Building and
Safety.
•
5. Reclassification of an existing building shall require an
application for change of occupancy permit and subsequent
inspection for approval .
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1 . Water Purveyor is Vera Irrigation District #15, and they will
supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 . Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during
demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled.
This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or
suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul
roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from
all other construction related activities.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or
spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken
immediately to clean these surfaces.
3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access
roads) must be paved and kept clean.
4. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the
construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using
the site following completion of the project and from occupants
of the proposed project.
5. All air pollution regulations must be met.
6
ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-59B-81
VARIANCE NO. ZE-205-84
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the application of Ted Gunning for a change of conditions as described in
the application should be APPROVED.
Motion by: Tennican Seconded by: Skalstad
Vote: Tennican - Aye
Skalstad - Aye
Myers - Aye
Unanimous to APPROVE the Change of Conditions - (3 - 0)
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE
FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE
of a rper in /
• Si
ii
ATTEST:
•
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
By 'TEE P. HOROBIOWSKI
Zoni ng Admi ni strator
Date: ,i j
NOTE:
See File VE-2O5-84 for Zoning Adjustor decision on Variance request for a
32-foot setback from Cataldo Avenue of the advertised property.
7
•
•
•
' \ - CEIVE
p •
L UN • d 982
OFFICE. OF
T.: .`3- ,I P COUNTY ENGINEER
•�» • t',�t NT
��f t 1101.11∎7111 1p, � _ ROBERT S. TURNER
+tea COY. COUNTY ENGINEER
:4L)
Srosan ,R'asazxo'rox 99260
5POH..NC COUnn COURT KOUS(
June 29 , 1982
ENGINEER'S ANALYSIS : ZE59A-81 Gunning
Applicant is proposing that a "CRASH GATE EMERGENCY ACCESS"
for ingress and egress be provided at the driveway approach
on Cataldo Avenue. It is the County Engineer ' s recommendation
that a concrete curb be installed to match existing curbing
on Cataldo. This will discourage use of the drive by vehicles
and provide a means of emergency access.
Curb shall be constructed to Spokane County Standards.
A permit must be obtained from the County Engineer prior to con-
struction.
Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456-3600
( .ile No. ZE-59A-81
•
•
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on July 8, 1982, and the
members of the Committee present being Ron McVicker, Chairman, Jane Myers
and Richard Skalstad.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Theodore and Diane Gunning, is requesting approval of a zone
reclassification, File No. ZE-59A-81, Multiple-Family Suburban to Freeway
Commercial for the purpose of conversion of existing apartments to motel units.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1 . That the existing land use in the area is developed apartment complex and
residential uses.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for major
commercial development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is
Multiple-Family Suburban.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Declaration of
Non-Significance.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
6. That the land In this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within
the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially
changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the pro-
posed rezone is justified.
8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area.
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed
use.
10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony
with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Z15-Q 1
• ( mile No. ZE-59A-81
D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1) The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting
plan for the approved area prior to installation of such lighting. (Such
plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full consider-
ation to adjacent properties).
2) There shall be no signing on Cataldo Avenue relating to the motel use.
3) Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing
plan for the described property prior to the release of any occupancy
permits.
4) The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance
within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee.
Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted,
including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location,
landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All
variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall
be maintained.
5) Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning storm-
water runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
6) That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter
43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners
Resolution 4177-1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty
(30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any
on-site improvements, or file appropriate documents to the effect that
the NOTICE OF ACTION is waived in accordance with Spokane County
Commissioners' Resolution No. 82-0458, dated May 4, 1982.
7) Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guide-
lines (WAC 197-10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance
(SCEO), a proposed declaration of non-significance has been issued at
least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written
comments and/or public testimony contain information regarding assess-
ment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a
finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts
upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project;
and a final declaration of non-significance is hereby to be issued.
8) Landscaping of the property shall not be significantly altered in order
to maintain the adquate buffering which exists between existing and
future commecial activities and existing residential activities.
9) That no more than 12 motel units be permitted with this zone change.
10) All current standards of the Freeway Commercial zone as amended shall
complied with in the development of this site.
Z1S-Q 2
�. :ile No. ZE-59A-81
11) That curb cut on Cataldo Avenue shall be replaced with a standard
curb and access shall be grassed a minimum of 6' south of the pro-
perty line. That the curb shall be constructed to standards of Spokane
County. Permit to be obtained from the County Engineering
Department.
12) Accesses shall be unobstructed.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1) No conditions.
c) COUNTY UTILIES DEPARTMENT
1) Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418,
the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This
authorization Is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations
of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and
subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the
Health District.
2) The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any
petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local
improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94, as
amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not
to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improve-
ment district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as
amended.
3) Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with
the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County.
4) Plans and specifications for double plumbing are to be reviewed and
approved by the County Utilities Department prior to construction.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1) No conditions.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1) The site is located in Fire District #1 .
2) Mains and hydrants to be installed, in accordance with the Spokane
County Department of Building and Safety.
3) In order to meet fire flow requirements for this portion of the motel, a
new fire hydrant needs to be installed on the north side of the
complex on Cataldo Avenue; location to be determined by developer,
water company and fire department.
4) That access from the existing motel to the site shall be designed to
accommodate emergency vehicle access approved by the Fire District.
Z15-Q 3
I ?He No. ZE-59A-81
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1) The proposal is within Vera Water and Power.
2) Satisfactory arrangements with the water purveyor for service to this
site must be made prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1) Dust control measures must be taken during the construction phase to
control fugitive dust emission.
2) Parking areas must be paved and kept clean.
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of ZE-59A-81, for a zone reclassification as described in the
application should be approved.
Motion by: Skalstad Seconded by: Myers
Vote: Unanimous to Approve (3-0)
HEARING E INER COMMITTEE
Chairman
ATTEST:
b4-14--e.—/
WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
By: �C / 11 DI
Date: 775--eZ
Z15-Q 4
r J
• OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER .
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
I
TO: Spokane County Planning Department � ,, ��
PROM: County Engineer 's Department O-CIJI"''
SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval-Zone Change--Number : ze Sct E5- 81
Applicant 's Name Gt..nnin
Section 14 Township a5 N, Range ../y EWM
the following "conditions of approval" for the above-referenced zone change are submitted to
:he Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the staff analysis and
"findings and order" of the hearing scheduled th p .CAW '1 .. 19
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit
I. Applicant shall dedicate feet on
for right-of-way prior toany use. of the property. •
2. Applicant shall dedicate feet on
for right-of-way and slope easements as necessary prior to any use of the property.
3. Applicant shall dedicate a foot radius on
and prior to any use of the property.
4. Applicant shell dedicate feet on
and a foot radius on•
and for right-of-way prior to any use of the property.
5. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer.
6. Access permits and improvements to
must be approved
by the Washington Department of Transportation.
7. Access permits and improvements to
must be approved
by the City of .
B. (a) Applicant shall improve in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum paving width
(b) Applicant shall improve in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum paving width
(c) Applicant shall improve in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum paving width
(d) Applicant shall improve in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway Section No.__ minimum paving width
(e) Other specific improvements: __
9. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage , and
access plans prior to the issuance of a building •permit on the property.
10 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane Q,unty Engineer .unl the Sp.oktnie
0
County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan .rnd surface water
disposal plan fur the entire project pr i,,r to the issuance of .ury building, permit on the
property.
V.
?age 2
11 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan :mall be
submitted and approved by the •
n
Spokane Ginty Engineer prior to the issuance of it building permit on the property. The
design, location , and arrangement of parking stalls shall he in accordance with standard
traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer ,
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by
vehicles. .
112 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs ,
assigns, and successors.
13. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, wh therappruvaln of
the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition
pursuantrtosRCWa36.88, asaamended.a Imrovement said e the formtion of c stof
these improvements.
14. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the appli-
cant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements d
ofathe herqeuiirn
roavned Cion
will paPrrotjieccipt
tto h
these improvements.
45. The construction of he road
d improvemimprovements stated herein shall be accomplished as ap-
' proved by the Spokane
d
'16. All required improvements shall conform to the current State Of shngtuntStandardrde
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable
t .: and or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in
effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
, ' prior to
37. Applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of
�Y, any use of the property.
0.8. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated access approach(s) to meet the existing
' pavement on
19 Access to Ct3X Av
A\do e, Road shall be prohibited
20. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended.
21. This plat or development proposal is located within a drainage basin which has been •
identified by the Spokane County Engineer 's Office as having stormwater runoff problems.
Since this plat or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater
flows, property owners should participate in the planning and implementation of a future
basinwide stormwater management system. The following "Condition of Approval" shall be
required: That the owner(s) or successor(s) in interest to cjoineinaany County
approved approved Stormwater Management Program and to pay planning, design,be fixed
public, mi hearings, orroservice
erationoof benefit
stormwaterobtained
control facilities.g�
strutting, maintaining, P
911/4
•
t
t
I
I
E
SEC. 1 �- , T . � \ �, � y
��4.� R.�o.�1508
SCALE: I't= 4OO s4 C.P,P'N°/«o-B)
rh/
oh�,S�O I �'
' 4' .4' i 11' N '
aU / lilt „ \-- `
i. ii _ -
a..xst «� -- - - 5 t 02. _ �i
2.77, - R TON _
'4 V E n r-.,,.�-- a?/ 1 p
,
yy 11= h
, ritiE, .ii ,y .s:;, , •r,..• ,.'r ry r O I ;;, %yea L. --
7 Jt:� 3 L 1 ,Q_::.o $ 6 r�! a• ..1:(''
r7 r•rz 150 0 '°b _1,?. •{.i;'s. M N. .� .� / :� '"r f‘t�.• .. Gerd ,�l�b(/ 'o•
i .;0 miH a•!, , i3 - �� . 1 2 t `t7 �e/'. _(O :1',3.40F4' ol I ,'S sd + s f' e 'r ! sz „ ` 0 M\(Q- ;:itl‘.11./
/ o/ ° Z P.t�;'£•,4o+o s:a ,L. : t. 7%s•: ♦ 'f•/`2 D� 14 i '•.1 „ • 4, ' ,:c:,'.' '''
eQ
a ( // k. g � i .R• / "e � 0 7;,t" • SN R�rS:: ..: 'a24 26 E8 29 3° •31 ... _ p - �, ; /
NQD /
-a nto. -40; - ,. • Z ) 25 �j A R L'' 1• w'U 7 ..a. 5 4./ ro G•/ Td
3 N Yr.. {.:.. 2 .•, r•.°. zug .. Xm I �' C7 t4.( --,..., •r.Z p r r s , h 2 � I so 2 r/ � .•.���r 44•;,t Z � � c r � cnrr r mry � o �•�• ! ;•� � 2 Q � 1 I � ..+�,.. � 6Li � I' +s.0 • . _ N 07 ® a A a N •i1 8,.L-,> /1AK 3 :. ::: C / �' {► Y mar. _ ..., ;,, ;h r}f' .5 / / te `„•
i ` r 14' 13 i2 11 : hkoh �. ' ® � I z , 226 5'• /,'• De I 0 9 8 ,12 Z Q ti�� f • t l4ii� ° " N to
•
- met A enu �;
ill v
2
•
V• 3 f � 9 o r ®� �� gin
°�.. I
.s
:.:
'
�•i:.r 3i-•u,t.t,.'_cg _.
", O
€+.. n;
.r :$: ® a al ®®�� $ • � H -� r + iti � ;11.1 •, i ® bW, ' \" - y � T'ii
"v_ 4�.. � r• , � 6p, $..,,,,,,, . (c)
,1 . c } T r � . t6 glifilti igib f�o
=au J`O
.
. a t
t I ) ®Ii' .1 :,..9 R7thig , CI� � m / j i t: 4'y3•�Il Va T a .t1' t � t •` D l YA ® ,'CC .(t s, 4' brLU y5 -: Z 56,4-¢z /o 0 4/m2 � . p o v /5 I°
Q 14±0T
o 22 - � .1'744 3 , 2 0
/,■
-. -",.,9_ , _ Y r' -- 4 4. I :404-60 ro� t '�^ Neil?: ®®® / °-
' .ta+•�
,ak rt 9ar'1a
_. -- ,., ,.._ ..,;_,., •...._ iii" �ssf1�E.*•S� ---
I;, i.•• / ;1; .. a 6/'. 6./, 5 `v,p•. T g
�I
o�{• {e 443/ + 2 S r ( r• �. R1 i Iffitilli..,:ii„, i I kcl. �!'�k t s. 1 a 1- I 2 a o -3:, .t,. 5,-,,,,,,,,,N.
1 1 L. I it i.` _ 25 , k
2u 6: .aii.�� 1a r ...- '51:0i ✓!'/ / �-G9
Iiii 1 iit ...1140.. 3'i't3 -2 1.iTi4 I -Y2:: , r1 J 4.2^G, ! C /O / I . t' Q �!) r °° ¢ �o'r+ I► ot6YCn
I
Q '' nit .1 F.,...7:.i....... CU, .. 11 i4
N°22i-4- �� 0 r Z (y�
it
..,., as o' r r
w Int. -Jr PI OE1/' i (� 0 I I. �� U 1
0 till ilk '
hya O 4
O1 i a r a' I '` - I
i.. , Q N I 3 d o 1
• 1
zo zo' " ' �/• rb ti .�{ T�'l L.,•. 'Ta//,,e.,.., :i:
S U
. sq
r
I\, VA I-1..E.Y W S ER S c N � i 1• E WAY s y 1�
•
.G��:` - '2iG7- Sow/ ,-45 r5' ,A•.' s�{o.21 C>7 -4 O' .0S 'Az'X10, ..r 20
{44rr -_ (1.
�)° $,'1[a �!IG S lC" Sr'' I Lt 0 2e OxVA� L �___ W�aY I vas. s_ _ wn1.
YAr t wtY- �c
* � ,p z°' No.t2o1 40' i, • No.12o1 s �, No,1201 - ��'
'•. o 2
- • ,... p Z w rr° • t °° O
I 0 7 .a el-----"T ; igt14,, ,t .5-7 `
° Z �o v SC 1- ILA 17 Z ctZ Co ( I\',73 w p a I 4, I
•v c �tt° m a 0 issue A Q I
a'r���
Q i! u 6 e +�Sok O G lY I iv
,N. ,9 ,. 2G0 5ar Z wain l (17:11 t^ n.ra/
3, 12 0 w'Mglt� 4 ° • ,, �`')^•� �Y° ✓r 7 ?i 1�/ ' - e>6 . O,
7y N 0 O V�'.Ny2260-50 .�� . .v';Yf=11- ,y. _ _ p.1 j 1r.i G'S.2
I i Q 0 Itf `."' :.:III�'"o .Q T I. to p 4
Rrvcresrr�u 1; Q �°aN * d 0. '� 9 ( U � �� Job 0°Z�?� ,
. d z ro ro na /o� Q a�1oE �t wiry° 01z I
d tr �, z.: : iii......._,...4;_ii;....._, a QZWJ3py,oZ Z I
o+o -i"i. Z { M o e a0 • „ s°+�t71 . Z } U1 1� �Q - Q
ba tie 1(j 0` /O ° U w Q Q !. i o q a J�o •
I o'q ^1 Q) d ��ttC'r i 60 , pf•U)•p 64- Q-
° P ill' Z ro � ; N /, Gy. �aJy lZ7 63 A .O
•
�' E b •-= 5 < Wu Q r► oc sia¢ Z�l11�QZ0� t
�:. / d ... -in,,,.':',"
o W \ T. .g Q r -0o j 1 tQ y
_� ro VyO� -; s0 ( -. /.1.Jrv7rO ;' ., 4 "er";±;! tiQ Z��Za 14 .c.° ( o'°°
m ia'rara
R+ iJ illve `'"5.•C 1� _ ,,,.1316 X fir; Ir m 6 7 3,QP 30�47N0 ` /8
/ 1�I-.. J� - ' 0 d. �.._; N 8 9° s' L7t'3 7' 4 4.5-./ Rlw-.. _ ''} 00+ 09��I P j i J-
5.55-b KAN'E U^N 1'Y R 231 is 3
�a�_�r.�r,tstss 'b Oo=LP. pPL E- is -s-g-6----s.-5•-t- l�as� --- a .. _ls
L
r'4 -- - - 92 2&F6.i i :� i °„)O CO OAD 1 Od°_ 2 o'9 r '65E a
n , 1I -i 24
-a,.• ..?-3 o.4 SPRAGUE mm`° ,O ^° a t$e O o Ili 1 ;I O " '1,..�c,� see
s1 9A i `'i.. r al 0 4 q�Ia AVENUE q�•6� p 3/�•
O f 40 m r'0 r-,-,...,.s DasHSDLrvc' ;vcs I o x ' /o
0 I co QC. C+• THE .5. 4/)mil/ LINE •F 5C K.AtJ 6, I 01 rR• ,tj M.. :�- M k'� .' cocci z l'D A -E" RY, wt-1tc,-1 tS '1'' c Crt �� 0 0 19
f1t N + m(4 .4_ ,vp t...o t'I rry C .447/o i1 . + °I
i}1.Zptp +(•y - ( EE OR'G•, 4-1 NE h. '.-L A 7-.) al`s �6 Is , �N 'I' 1' ml Itn
- _ Q
+6 , . r, eiorb /74 Co r/s 1 S I P 7--/ ° o
'I
Q -w rt
W z a 7
7.4z. Coy, For tfit.. L4'. ../14z74v024ir this.Career /SSr,/-/f ro.,,r as//1O1 : r.r,'/ 7X x/4 m ' . W. oc0., X al 1`-a a ../Ti+'l tnaR� /v/4r:19o� ,
�t W ®, ' �/ / /' ri ,- 4 X/6.X 3'0' . S . „ .. ,, „ r. "
J
1% /.$/ 7 S ill! // -(, ' . oG .�i % moavm t,..._ ei 9/�. -.e.- ronif 4x6 .,. S9S°E4a•�4cy,xonlo,,e_ppp-€, 4X6x/;''/1N4.5°4'41;"0-,4 7 G/-'•3yr.z .7,,„0 ,O7_,-„•
.
u W / -- /8 - S l� /, .4r... 1. , .. .. ' R l..n /�• z .. X/�- ,. ♦ -._ . " .. V(
•
W /8/63 1,6"' IF ,, 71-/1 x " 4 V ft /AI ir 07 24 42 ..� a 4 /%i- '
.. /1/ >� /. „ ■ Pi 0� 4.0 /y..42°�- 2 2. - /9i7 p 2 4,,. /Ys4°4- 7- a-. PI"? 4X0 8¢ fl, 70
- v /r /4. 4. ,Corf/i_ 7704/ 0' e d//fr
TH /5 SEcTIC/v RSPRDDli"CEID /-ROni/ L//1GN TG !»Y �A ,2 C-. Roy 6//s/72
' - I
NO'T E"
rr
,r,,,g,01,1,,,' S-HAO E'D AREA DES'/GA/A TES' vAcAT/o/V Jr t - ';.
•