Loading...
VE-2-60COUNTY OF SPOKANE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION qz Case No. VZ.2 -66 Date: Jan CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR VARIANCE (1) Name: 1 Spokane (2) Mailing Address: &a_t �nF.3� T* pokane (3) Legal Description of Property: � � .t 2p, n� ^ ok g. nmrA Viam-Aoiesv Additions Beginning at the SW corner of Lot 20, thence northerly 91.9 feet, thence eastor t on the cast line that is 84.77 feet nor ther of the SS corner, - fence soutterly to S11 corner, enceewee ei - FOB — . -- _ 9ection E3, fr^ n hip 25 Ft_ Bang g 4k - z.Vz 9 (4) Nature of Variance Requested: -T permit an a = o n to_en ssiatirZ b7dlldl S be- 18 feet from the front property line (established building lino an on the side property line,, where the Zon ing Ordinance requires a fr ont yard of 2 5 feet and a side yard of five feet. (5) Approved by Zoning Adjuster after public hearing on .T_ n uns* A 19bp_ FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Reasons: 1. The difficulty requiring a variance would apply to the property in question regardless of the owner due to the established building line. 2. The difficulty requiring a variance is not the result of an illegal sot upon the aprt of the applicant. 3. The difficulty requiring a variance is not the result of personal conditions of the applicant. 4. The difficulty requiring a variance is due to unique circumstances related to the property in question and is not the general condition of the surrounding and adjacent properties. B. Condition: 1. Defined points of access and.egress must be established, approved, and constructed in accordance with the standards of the Washington State Department of Highways prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. STRUCTURE PERJfllT REQUIMD FROM SPOKANE COUNTY BLDG. CODE,DEPT. ATTEST: WN N. PORTER � rector of Planning Beatrice V. Hills Recording Secretary AGENDA, JANUARY S. 1960 ZONING ADJUSTER, SPOKAIM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Timm: F�riday, January 8, 1960, 1:00 P.M. Place: Annamblg Room, County Court House Via 7latuCP " 2. a. Site investigated by Planning Commission Staff b. Location: Section 8, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. A Portion of Lot 20 of Block 8 of Grandview Acres Addition: Bninning at the SW corner of Lot 20, thence northerly 91.9 feet;.`.hence easterly to a point on the East line that is 84.77 feet northerly of the BE corner, thence southerly to SE corner, thence westerly to POB. o. Applicant: Van °s of Spokane East 10611 Trent Avenue Spokane, Washington d. Site Size: Approximately 11,136 square feet e. Existing Zoning: Commercial f. Variance Requested: To permit an addition to an existing building to be built to within 2 feet of the east property line, whereas the Zoning Ordinance requires a side yard of five feet when a dwelling is located on the abutting property. g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.10, Section 4.10.080=d -(2) p� a j)- WOO N' F NP2TH 2 R GC NG IV E I DEC? 1 1959 Description of the Property: b /1 OUNTY OF SPOKANE wkane, Washington VARIANCE APPLICATION As Provided by Section XX of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance (THIS APPLICATIO IS NOT AC EPT LE UNLESS ALL REQUIRED STATEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE) (1) Name: /�i✓✓� (2j Phone 1 .3'`' (3) Mailing Address: (4) Street Address of the Property in Question: (5) (7) 3 -�/- -- 36 /- CASE NO. DATE in which the Property is Located: - P7' n F- (8) Provision of the Zoning Ordinance from which a Variance is Requested: /(2 . USG % /0 y (9) In what way does applicant wish to vary from above Provision? (10) CONDITIONS FOR A VARIANCE, You must answer ALL of the following questions: (a) Would the difficulty apply to the property regardless of the owner? (b) Is your request for a variance the result of an illegal act on your part? (c) Is your particular difficulty due to unique circumstances suc as lot size or shape, topography which is not the general condition of the neighborhood? (d) Does your request for a variance arise from some provision of the Zoning Ordinance? /Y/1 7� Z�f a _, (Sq. Ft,) (Continued on neat page) (e) Does the difficulty relate to the premises for the benefit of which the variance is sought and not to other premises or personal conditions? (l 1) Who holds title to the Property? If more than one owner, an attached list of names, e'ddresses, and legal descriptions must be submitted with this application, (12) A plot plan or sketch must be attached showing the locations of proposed and existing structures and uses and dimensions. (13) The necessary fee must accompany this application. I, the undersigned, understand that this application must be complete and accurate and that all the above requirements must be complied with before a request may be advertised for a public hearing and that the Planning Commission may request additional pertinent information. Signature of knplicant IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCTION IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL LAkM USE OR BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED BY BUILDING CODE DEPARTMENT. Do not write below this line Application completed. Date Date of Public Hearing before Planning Commission ACTION BY PLANNING COMMISSION: a 1� 3 Page 2 Variance Application July, 1959 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY COURT HOUSE SPOKANE 1, WASHINGTON .. 19 • OEM �•./ l I _' .! /a � / L PROPERTY OWNERS LOOKED UP BY: AGENDAS MAILED BY: DATE; r, Fi • •� - i EWA G '0w- IWO 6W 1 o M Roam N 1l ot, I I r, I Lij �2EAJT