Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
VE-17-60
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF SPOKANE SPOKANE,, WASHINGTON Case N©Q 11E-17410 Date: May 13, 1960 CERT-IV:CATE OF APPROVAL FOR VARIANCE Name oaZZLie Mailing Address: East 6517 Sprague Avenue, lokane, Washington Legal Description of Property° ......J0.14...114..228.. and 13, Block 1 of `i' ier 's Subdivision of Block 24, of East Spokane Addition. Section 13, TovnahiEL/1L , Range 411 E.W.I. 14) Nature of Variance Reque ste& __To construct a. fence.--1-foot. fa -thee flan king street, whereas the Zoning Ordinance requires a flanking street setback of 20 feet (5) Approved by Zoning Adjuster after public hearing can May 2, 1960 FOR TIE FOLLOWING REASONS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Reasons: 1. The difficulty requiring a variance would apply to the property in question regardless of the owner due to industrial zone cimensional standards. 2. The difficulty requiring a variance is not the result of an illegal act upon the part of the applicant. 3. The difficulty requiring a variance is not the result of personal conditions of the applicant. k. The difficulty requiring a variance is due to unique circumstances related to the property in question and is not the general condition of the surrounding and properties. Condition: 1. The variance is granted to July 1, 1961 and if the applicant has not secured a building permit by such date, the variance permit shall become null and void. A "EST: JOY N ., PORTER Df.:ector of Planning Beatrice v . :ci its RacC!dingg Secretary • . . . VARIANCE • H. Conditions C. General Data: Minutes, Zoning Adjuster May 2, 1960 1. VE- 17-60, Flanking Street Setback . Zoning Adjuster Decision: Approved for the following reasons and subject to the following condition. A. Reasons: 1. The difficulty requiring a variance would apply to the property in question regardless of the owner due to industrial zone dimensional standards. 2. The difficulty requiring a variance tenet the result of an' ' illegal act upon the part of the applicant: 3. The difficulty requiring a, variance :is not the result of personal conditions of the'applicant. The difficulty requiring a varianio is One to unique circumstances related to the, property in question and is not the general condition of the surrounding and adjacent properties. 1. The variance is granted to July 1, 1961 and if'the applicant has not secured a building permit by such date, the variance. permit shall become null and void. 1. Location: Section 13,'Township 25 I7., Range 43, E.W.M. Lots 11, 12, and 13, Block lof Thierman•s Subdivision of Block.24 of East Spokane Addition. 2. Applicant: Hansen Motors E. 6517 Sprague Avenue Spokane, ttshington 3. Site Sizes Approxiaate].y 15,180 square feet 4., Existing Zoning: Manufacturing. 5 . . Variance Requested: To construct a fence 1 foot from the flanking street, whereas thh'Zoning.Ordinance requires a a flanking street setback of 20 foot. 6. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 442, Section 4.12.040 -c -(3) AGENDA MAY 2 1960 ZONING ADJUSTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CO'SKLSSION Time: Monday Kay 2, 1960 1:00 P.M. Place: Assembly Room County Court House VARIANCE 1. VE-1Z.•60,_Flankinfr Street Setback a. Site investigated by Planning Commission Staff b. Location: Section 13, Township 25 N,,, Range 43 E.W.M. Lots 11 12, and 13 Block 1 East Spokane addition Tbicrman's Subdivision Block 2$ including South 1 of vacated strip north of and adjacent. c. Applicant: Hansen Motors E. 6517 Sprague Avenue Spokane, Washington d. Site Size: Approx. 15 square feet e. Existing Zoning: Manufacturing f„ Variance Requested: To construct a fence 1 foot from the flanking street property line iherecs the Zon ing Ordinance requires a flanking street setback of 20 feat. go Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter h.12.040_c• -(3). is= 4-oot SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF SPOKANE Spokane, Washington VARIANCE APPLICATION As Provided by Section XX of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance (THIS APPLICATION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE UNLESS ALL REQUIRED STATEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE) (1) Name: /XAISt - k ! D /7' R. (2) Phone: //�� .( .'�-b °97 1� (3) Mailing Address: (o sf, - /Q U D" (4) Street Address of the Property in Question: /3 7/Y /1 /4#fl/ (5) Legal Description of the Property: . L 67 /1- (' - / 3 A 2 lir 1 S O t - 7 /y r S ) /tjc S 7)° /y oF14 A724 (6) Site Size: /37 5 0 (7) Zone in which the Property is Located: M 4 N U 676 T //R / nl lr (8) Provision of the Zoning Ordinance from which a Variance is Requested: g ket4r bet n A'T 1 irtf( FRD M ,y/YI(/ c .5rQFEr N/ /T/ / FEA1 e. (9) In what way does applicant wish to vary from above provision? Az, 4 yEss CASE NO. - / 7 —6 0 DATE 11“..„ ,Q 17 hi U , (10) CONDITIONS FOR A VARIANCE. You must answer ALL of the following questions: (a) Would the difficulty apply to the property regardless of the owner? 45y 14ac A 6 /N Est G 7— RN D th'S ' D Lh R Co(rLp d V4 9'ijg a 6 e (b) Is your request for a variance the result of an illegal act on your part? (c) Is your particular difficulty due to unique circumstances such as lot size or shape, topography which is not the general condition of the neighborhood? (d) Does your request for a variance arise from some provision of the Zoning Ordinance? (Continued on next page) (Sq. Ft.) (e) Does the difficulty relate to the premises for the benefit of which the variance is sought and not to other premises or personal conditions? Y5S (11) Who holds title to the Property? ?qf y s &W i ' / o 7o Pz s ij ply R-7_0 ),9 '4' RN1- F V,ywsc ,- pati,y/o If more than one owner, an attached list of names, addresses, and legal descriptions Must be submitted with this application. (12) A plot plan or sketch mast be attached showing the locations of proposed and existing structures and uses and dimensions. (13) The necessary fee must accompany this application. I, the undersigned, understand that this application must be complete and accurate and that all the above requirements must be complied with before a request may be advertised for a public hearing and that the Planning Commission may request additional pertinent information. Page 2 Variance Application July, 1959 Signature of Applicant _,__/ _ Do not write below this line. IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCTION IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL LAND USE OR BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED BY BUILDING CODE DEPARTMENT. Application completed. Date Date of Public Hearing before Planning Commission ACTION BY PLANNING COMMISSION: ' . • ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY a--4,3 - 4 4.3 X a. i . , ..J ., , " 1/45"- • -S. .I. - , 1 l) APPLICATION: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY COURT HOUSE SPOKANE 1, WASHINGTON PROPERTY OWNERS LOOKED UP BY: )" AGENDAS MAILED BY: DATE: 7t r -No A N I x ieA/ p z • ., -, a . , ALLEY WAY 4 , C4te q lo A14701/ FC=:rifsir4;:q yo.//73 I No. //70-GOT1 _ , .. az_ /VI 2/84 . ALlIt N I `■ FIRINGf1a141 SHARP s t Z i CATA LD 0 '.. u) Lll La . fr.', • Z.> n 1....*: / fry, t.); 4> 12° CO 29 T.I26.2' L. a4G E3C311=111P :P RIVERSIDE POAGUE - F Vac . NI XoN ria.1712 - 60' A L_ I - • Zki. /88 I.885-40" 21 84 VALLEY WAY & N. Co. • 1 81"PLEk/R.4 C I 0 ' 672:1=031=GtV lr \ p NI • N O + Cr) ° 1 . i PIC I 4S■ L. 0 L A 4 R , SPOKANE .cpp N1 7 i. ' :' . 2 1. PrincIpaly/ T e-f. 89 , C4te q lo A14701/ FC=:rifsir4;:q yo.//73 I No. //70-GOT1 _ , .. az_ /VI 2/84 . ALlIt N I `■ FIRINGf1a141 SHARP s t Z i CATA LD 0 '.. u) Lll La . fr.', • Z.> n 1....*: / fry, t.); 4> 12° CO 29 T.I26.2' L. a4G E3C311=111P :P RIVERSIDE POAGUE - F Vac . NI XoN ria.1712 - 60' A L_ I - • Zki. /88 I.885-40" 21 84 VALLEY WAY & N. Co. • 1 81"PLEk/R.4 C I 0 ' 672:1=031=GtV lr \ p NI • N O + Cr) ° 1 . i PIC I 4S■ L. 0 L A 4 R , SPOKANE .cpp N1 7 i. ' :' . 2 1. PrincIpaly/ T e-f. 89