VE-85-601.
ARIANCE
VF Rear Yard Seth k (Double Pion
Zoning Adjuster Decieione Approved for the following reasons and
subject to the following conditions.
A. Reasons:
1. The difficulty requiring a variance would apply to the property
in question regardless of the owner due to the double frontage lot.
2. The difficulty requiring a variance is not the result of an
illegal act upon the part of the applicant.
3. The difficulty requiring a variance is not the result of personal
- conditions of the applicant.
4. The difficulty requiring a variance ie duo to unique circumstances
related to the property in question and is not the general
condition of the surrounding and adjacent properties.
H. Conditions
C. General Dates
1. Locations Section 139 Township 25 N., Range 43, E.W.M.
Lots 8, 9, 10, and 11, and vacated alley,
Block 2 of Standards Subdivision
2. Applicants The Haskins Company
P. 0. Box 4215, Station B.
Spokane, Washington
3. Site Sias 20,900 square feet
4. Existing Zonings Manufacturing
5. variance Requested: To construct a building on the property
line on -Olive Street, whereas the Zoning
Ordinance requires a setback of 35 feet.
Application of Zoning'Provisione Chapter 4.12, Section 442.040 -0-(1)
35/
1. The variance is granted to July 1, 1961, and if the applicant
has not secured a building permit by such date, the variance
permit shall become null and void.
to
MINUTES, SEPTEr.R 6, 1960
ZONING ADJUSTER
AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 6, 1960
ZONING ADJUSTER, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Time:
Place:
SCALE l =40d
Tuesday, September 6, 1960, 1 :00 P.M.
Assembly Room, County Court House
VARIANCE
1. VE - - 60. Rear Yard Setback (Double Frontage Lot)
a. Site investigated by Planning Commission Staff
b. Location: Section 13, Township 25 N., Range 43, E.W.M.
Lots 8, 9, 10, and 11, and vacated alley,
Block 2 of Standards Subdivision.
c. Applicant: The Haskins Company
P. 0. Box 4215, Station B
Spokane, Washington
d. Site Size: 20,900 square feet
e. Existing Zoning: . Manufacturing
f. Variance Requested: To construct a building on the property line on
Olive Street, whereas the Zoning Ordinance requires
a setback of 35 feet.
g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.12, Section 4.12.040 -c -(1)
j I 1 1 L
VALLEY WAY
cc
.4
SPRINGFIELD
cc
a
OLIVE
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
Spokane, Washington
SPOKANE COUNTY CASE NO. VE - 60
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE
VARIANCE APPLICATION
As Provided by Section XX of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance
(THIS APPLICATION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE UNLESS ALL REQUIRED STATEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE)
T
(1) Name: ! 4e , - 1851) J5 �-O, (2) Phone: ICE C-2.918
(3) Mailing Address: l?o ho x 42.1S` ski B. Y!"V k2uP .
(4) Street Address of the Property in Question: 62/ Z4 E .4/I i
(5) Legal Description of the / ProPer'cy: �o 'f S �, 9 // /0,
� 1 p l/ Vo a re�
dfle ,N Block Z- o4 siaKdovds Jolru,s,o.h
(6) Site Size: Z o, 9—'
(7) Zone in which the Property is Located:GJ,
(8) Provision of the Zoning Ordinance from which a Variance is Requested: Wi' /e
Cl afMzr• 4 / , c,Cc c lido 4 / 2, 0 V0 C - (
(9) In what way does applicant wish to vary from above provision? aci/Vd CO
'of/ //f r. J'. t Zei er / f �e" - o c4 y?z 6' / F2? -f 4 ( Sethe‘
o/ 2a
(10) CONDITIONS FORA VARIANCE.
You must answer ALL of the following questions:
(a) Would the difficulty apply to the 1 property regardless of the owner?
dL c co-4 014) / a_ i
(b) Is your � ;7 is for a variance the result of an illegal act on your part?
/Y o 7` / i s No T.
(c) Is your particular difficulty due to unique circumstances such as lot size or
shape, 1/1-/CC which is not the general condition of the neighborhood?
It d/ 1- /tr rStb 1 CC/ due o , /�f / twit
G L j i.act � �t.�l
(d) Does y our request for a variant arise frog some ovision of the Zoning
Ordinance?
(Continued on next page)
(Sq. Ft.)
(e) Does the difficulty relate to the premises for the benefit of which the
variance is sought and not to other premises or personal conditions?
c
(11) Who holds title to the Property? -d i Co. 2 Nc .
U more than one owner, an attached list of names, addresses, and legal descriptions
must be submitted with this application,
(12) &plot plan or sketch must be attached showing the locations of proposed and existing
structures and uses and dimensions.
(13) The necessary fee must accompany this application.
Page 2
Variance Application
July, 1959
Signature of Applicant
Do not write below this line.
m DO
I, the undersigned, understand that this application must be complete and accurate
and that all the above requirements must be complied with before a request may be
advertised fora public- hearing and that the Planning Commission may request
additional pertinent information.
/4. Z>gifri en<
"de / / 4s1i4;s Ca.
IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCTION IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL LAND USE OR BUILDING PERMIT
IS ISSUED BY BUILDING CODE DEPARTMENT.
"!!'_m__ "°.,s.e__ ..._a Ma o__ .e .� �a �o _� . ___o. _______
Application completed. Date
Date of Public Hearing before Planning Commission
ACTION BY PLANNING COMMISSION:
NAME
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIP ON OF PROPERTY
) A,51 )
ic"
Z-2
23 L5 9) 10-Lvt)
w 9 10 <fr 71 A
r
/,
6 a/ f
c 7 j
TILL i. .,.., '
i2,
Z 6 all (1t
Z 4a
,
A
I.
304
•
f ric,U L L
g/ 04/ t , .
° _ 9 —
IL.,)
4 kr
Jr /4 Jt�n.r.
J : efou
C; air-,,A
an„ )
- Itia,,,,Libyit E “icq
APPLICATION: g - 60
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COUNTY COURT HOUSE
SPOKANE 1, WASHINGTON
ti
PROPERTY OWNERS LOOKED UP BY: (Ti01
AGENDAS MAILED BY: DATE:
la