VE-6-61O U NT T Y OF S P O K A N E--
S PO KANE, WA SHIPTGTOPT
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
(1)
(2) Mailing Address:
(3)
(5)
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR VARIANCE
Fame: Glass Service Company
North 351.2 Calispel, Spokane, Washington
Case \To. 17-7a4,61
Date: March 10. 196 ,
Legal Description of Property: That portion of Uices Sub of Assessor's Plat No. 1
described as follows: Beginning 20 feet south and 13 feat east of the NW corner
of Lot 14, thence south parallel to the W line of Lots ik and 13 to southerly line
of Lot 13, thence Ely along Sly line of Lots 13 and 12 for 59 feet, thence N a
parallel with the E line of Lot 12 to a point 20 feet south of the North line
of tot 14, thence W to P013, Section 12, Township p 25 T'., Range 43, L'.W.I.
(4) ''ature of Variance Requested:
To cover 45% of the lot area, whereas the Zoning Ordinance permits 355 coverage.
Also to construct a building 15 ::eet from the flanking etrect, whereas the
Zoning Ordinance requires a 20 foot setback.
Approved by Zoning Adjuster after public hearing on February 27, 1961
REASONS:
1. The difficulty requiring a variance
regardless of the owner due to topography and shape of the
2. The difficulty requiring a variance
the part of the applicant.
3. The difficulty requiring a variance
of the applicant.
4. The difficulty requiring a variance
the property in question and is not
and adjacent properties.
CONDITIONS:
would apply to the property in question
is not the result of an illegal act upon
is not the result of personal conditions
`is due to unique circumstances related to
the general condition of the surrounding
1. The variance is granted to J- 7 1, 1:7:61 and if the applicant has not secured
a building permit by such date, the variance permit shall become null and void.
ATTEST:
-ei_0€7AL<A_
Beatrice V. Hills, Recording Secretary
yt J0 . PORTER, Direc or of Plan
ning
VARIANCE
1.. VE -6 -61, Area Coverage and Flanking Street Setback
A. Reasons:
C. General Data:
e • r
Is1
MINUTES, FEBRUARY 27, 1961
ZONING ADJUSTER
Zoning Adjuster Decision: Approved, for the following reasons and subject
•• to the following condition.
1. The difficulty requiring a variance would apply to the property
in question regardless of the owner due to topography and
shape of the lot.
•
2. The difficulty requiring a variance is not the result of an
illegal act upon the part of the applicant.
3. The difficulty requiring a variance is not the result of an
personal condition of the applicant. „
4. The difficulty requiring a variance is due to unique circumstances
related to the property in question and is not the general
condition of the surrounding and adjacent properties.
B. Condition:
1. The variance is granted to July 1 • 1961 and if the applicant
has•not secured a building permit by such date, the variance
permit shall become null and void.
1. Location: Section 12, Township 25 N., Range 43, E.W.M.
That portion of Alice's Subdivision of
Assessor's Plat No. 1 described as follows:
Beginning 20 feet south and 13 feet east of
the NW corner of Lot 14, thence south parallel
to the west line Lots 14 and 13 to southerly
line of Lot 13, thence easterly along southerly
line of Lots 13 and 12 for 59 feet, thence
N parallel with the E line of Lot 12 to a
point 20 feet south of the north line of Lot 14,,
thence west to FOB.
2. Applicant: Gl Service Company
North 3512 Calispel
Spokane, Washington
3. Site Size: 10,625 square feet
4. Variance Requested: To cover 45% of the lot area, whereas the Zoning
Ordinance permits 35% coverage. Also to construct
the building 15 feet from the flanking street,
whereas the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20 foot
setback.
5. Application of Zoning Provisions: Chapter 4.10, Section 4.10.020
and 4.10.080 -d -(3)
AGENDA, FEBRUARY 27, 1961
ZONING ADJUSTER, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Time: Monday, February 27, 1961, 1 :00 P.M.
Place: Assembly Room, County Court House
VARIANCE
1. VE.$$1. Area Govorrute and 1�1 on §ingStreot Setbe it
as Site investigated by Planning Co mission staff.
b. Location: Section 12, Township 25 N. Range 43, E.W.M. That portion of Alice's Subdivision of Assessor's
Plat No. 1 described as fellows: Beginning 20 foot
mouth and 13 foot oast of the NW corner of Lot 14,
thence south parallel to the west line of Lots 14
and 13 to southerly line of Lot 13, thence easterly
along southerly line-of Lots 13 and 12 for 59 feet,
thence north parallel with east line of Lot 12
to a point 20 feet south of the north line of
Lot 14, thence Trost to POB.
o. Applicant: Glass Service Company
North 3512 Calispol
Spokane, Washington
d. Site Size: 10,625 square feet
e, Existing Zoning:. Commercial
.
f. Variance Requested: To cover 45% of the lot area, whereas the Zoning
Ordinance permits 35% coverage. Also to construct
the building 15 feet from the flanking street,
whereas the Zoning Ordinance requireo a 20 foot
setback.
g. Application of Zoning Provisions: Chapter 4.10, Section 4,10.020 and
4.10.080 -d-(3)
RTH
SCALE r=loo
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
No
yp.
CASE NO.
DATE
N
As Provided by Sec =. - - = - linty Zoning Ordinance
(THIS APPLICATION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE UNLESS ALL REQUIRED STATEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE)
(1) Name: a) A.5 S 5 P YV I e. o Co. 12) Phone: rd, 7,90 )s
(3) Mailing Address: /V. 3 5 /1 (l) s po
(4) Street Address of the Property in Question: �e ht n.kd goWkttA
(5) Legal Description of the Property: g c e /ti . stet /2 - 13 a ne) pa'rtol
(6) Site Size: 14 2,S (Sq. Ft.)
(7) Zone in which the Property is Located: � m y» ni t,f'ai a�
(8) Provision of the Zoning Ordinance from which a Variance is Requested:
5�. /0. 0 2O /O. C7 ao (3)
•
(9) In what way does applicant wish to vary from above provision? C o Vtr - /d of
/are 4ev f %C Zan /ri o ,.ice '74 Cff ' C ®xsoL)t/
«4 /C' 400 / 2 /th,F y 7 Cale ilortst5 20
(10) CONDITIONS FORA VARIANCE. .
You must answer ALL of the following questions:
(a) Would the difficulty apply to the property regardless of the owner?
(b) Is your request for a variance the result of an illegal act on your part?
(c) Is your particular difficulty due to unique circumstances such as lot size or
shape, topography which is not the general condition of the neighborhood?
(d) Does your request for a variance arise from some provision of the Zoning
Ordinance?
y2 4
(Continued on next page)
(e) Does the difficulty relate to the premises for the benefit of which the
variance is sought and not to other premises or personal conditions?
i; 5
J ; D, /.1c Vd y
If more than one owner, an attached list of names, addresses, and legal descriptions
must be submitted with this application,
(11) Who holds title to the Property?
(12) A plot plan or sketch must be attached showing the locations of proposed and existing
structures and uses and dimensions.
(13) The necessary fee must accompany this application.
I, the undersigned, understand that this application must be complete and accurate
and that all the above requirements must be complied with before a request may be
advertised fora public hearing and that the Planning Commission may request
additional pertinent information.
Signature of Applicant
IF APPROVED, CONSTRUCTION IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL LAND USE OR BUILDING PERMIT
IS ISSUED BY BUILDING CODE DEPARTMENT.
�aaa.aal,»,.»_ o. emmw ema.,... e_ a �,. a. a aaa»»® aaa.. a00om oaaAOOOaaa»e ®. ®o ».
Page 2
Variance Application
July, 1959
Do not write below this line.
Application completed. Date
Date of Public Hearing before Planning Commission
ACTION BY PLANNING COMMISSION:
NAME
ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OP PROPERTY
/711/'
49a -- - '- s
' , _2-.-;J:.) / �,,
,° , �..,,Jk),
-2 tidj.
Tor
P ici /a /.3 ,.._ 4i / .4,u
o2 A5 A
l�7/ ✓
,40,A. V., • L
1 oz50 dity ,frf 1 ., ,,, .,t) /
' l it -. ry ( -
. o eJL.,
1
cd i
X �
SA P
cams , ,
e 0 g LO-Ob
I
s � �
t_N .
aaa 6
o u..1. 1. -6 -/ iXs
8 c
t
4 ° * 4
71 aL, /JS 1
•
g ij 1 vtdt
7( CR C P C3 4 t
r 1 L,
t .1
1 , ', ,
•
� � _ is / i 1 it
•
33a
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COUNTY COURT HOUSE
SPOKANE 1 WASHINGTON
APPLICATION: —' — 6
PROPERTY OWNERS LOOKED UP BYa
AGENDAS MAILED BY:
- iU L<ajC b
, \ /
�
. a_ 1 £%4
1-14. S, .., f
-
02/6 e oc-42._1
..c2a___
e
i
I
ati
i a /
; ,
PQ /.S'�
! , .r , , . ��
, ,
a •
2 a Li - b
A ..,
S 6 / , 4 .,X12--- 1 ->
,,L
e i , 7
41.0saLt.
-1a VF - b - &t -c Coo./
T -
1/21 _ .
; '_IES'EM °VET)
r.
15LACT, TO .
'RunAIN
ADDITiork)
2.
Doors
SCALE -
n 7--
1 =q111 E-
- -FIRTDroT
1 112 hti
ii1 1..1111 cm I
T
4 10
r--)1 DoolS
O.H. Do OR
I
g E n Proj
l 23 +71 -0
11 +01.7 T P
N
4')
r
o Q
.0
t
s End.St rya
#7 + 847
m
N
d
a u
et
N .LL
W. G
1
\ l�
858' W
j � - - ..°
1 ,F r
f
2 I
J —� 1 r J
a�
I0
a6 37. 3
1793. C'S -
5 .90
of \ og'�
�� Gj4 �ti
o
FJF JJ f--\
CD 2(5
2.0
11111111111N
/i1111111
6 ,,
11,1111
611111'1 11 ■3
� ; TRCtV7' ROl1D
°11111 s i t� 1, 1 1:
} 11111111,1P1 .' } '' ' I
< 0 1 DALDWIN
MONTGOMERY °
SHANNON
MISSION
5ECOND.ARY
5
a EkiRV ew
i t> 1 l 1 l 59 '
66'
22+ 4.4 7' P
,
44 3 i
:
0 4 AP.
V
6 9J A. F
3 2
/
o
r 1 03
1 a
co l■ 1z1 4
o
zl. Z
7 a1 1 i \\i } I 1
min S �.
01: ,r
4 r Z;
m' 1 1
1
L' V
I 8
i *�e ;
9
/v
0
LK
- 4c
•
147 • . ''°"°11 r,.
' v
. � - - ': Y:
r O 'er
z T F - o ff -�'` / r
e � - c , . 2
6 +72,2 A. P . I ° - oo I '.
v 57 L
6 +•0 1. . � • ,
168 169 ISO 171 72 173 174 175 17
0 0
AVE. • No.2100 -47
I5 7 1.5 E)
*72„74.8
2 «
z
O'C^N N OR'S 5 ACRE,
T RACTS
# 143
School '
01 s1"ric1
� ) •
rl\r�J
ROAD • N- '51 W. ''.--k3(`,/
eL
Q +
A
I z . Q ,
tom 107 a los 1091
[81
c 1E3. t3.
NGINEER- SPOKANE
-- =rr' :J .• - -i - - - --
:_tpal Assistant'
loo i 9 �+ .36 I -. g 7
j O
110
3
'\''n
COUNTY
DA,LTo r�
k +zo,4 Ro.-r
of tdohoS+
3Z +85 P.O.T. =
3•4+ WcSt df Sec.(
z 5
ix. •
D 0 , of Sc.—
g 6;.c.
-..
6 +44.2: / P. •
O ° O5 R
67'Wes+ of. 4 Cor.
193