Loading...
BSP-17-87 (#1)S P O K A N E O U N T - Y - DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Iona- I- J iQ 1 r v ?att� ? VA. 981 ?W: - -•kane Indus-,,---a' man!. C. Dear Sir or Madam: °lease bNe advised that the _`r revocaDle letter nr VG. -E3; d 13 your company as Sur ?ty for installati -nz of roads and a- _°vttated •lralnaye _3C'_li �.� ?- for he above en- D1 : &_ __lined _a' a d ._nuar'.i .'0, 1991. _- the current a ?not;.. oT �t l ! .( 1)f1 may no LZ you + i1aV °_ any - qu ?vt or _oa_ freo � - ! t +r r: -+ -- - _a._ lit.._ _.r__ truly 'vGUr3� Bill Johns, D.E. Spokane County Engineer David A. Berto ?!at Compliance Surve 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-5600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Inter- office Form 327 —C.R. Date 19 F; SEATTLE•FIRST NATIONAL BANK U MEMBER FDIC INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS P.O. BOX 3977 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 U.S.A. CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 Page 1. of 2 Standby LC Number 72321 -G IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT 05 APRIL 1989 LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 -G SPOKANE.x000NTY ENGINEERS N. 811 .JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNT PARTY: SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE. WA 99220 BENEFICIARY: %transmittal memo 7671 B o1 Pages' post-11 From :;�� AMOUNT: USD835,000.00 (ETGHT HUNDRED THIRTY -FTVE THOUSAND AND NO /100 D.S. DOLLARS) WE HEREBY ISSUE OUR IRREVOCABLE. STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOR, WHICH IS AVAILABLE AGAINST PRESENTATION OF THE FOLLOWTNG: 1. YOUR STGHT DRAFT DRAWN ON SF.ATTLF -FIRST NATIONAL RANK, AND STATING THE LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER. 2. CERTIFICATION PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS, N. 811 .JEFFERSON, SPOKANE, WA AS FOLLOWS: "WE CERTIFY THAT THE AMOUNT OF THTS DRAWTNG TS OUR, PURSUANT TO NON- COMPLETTON OF ALI. OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS (INSERT TMPROVEMENT(S) AS STATED IN SPECIAL CONDITION NO. 2 BELOW)." 3. THE ORIGINAL OF THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT EXPIRES AT THE COUNTERS OF SEATTLR- FTP.ST NATIONAL RANK, LETTER OF CREDIT DEPARTMENT, CURRENTLY LOCATED AT 800 FIFTH AVENIJE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 ON 31 DECEMBER 1991. FORM 6034 REV. 3/86 w O SEAME•F/RST NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC _ INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS P.O. BOX 3977 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98124 U.S.A. CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 Page 2 of 2 Standby LC Number 72321 -G SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. PARTIAL DRAITNGS ARE PERMITTED 2. EACH DRAWING TINDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT, COVERS THE ASSURANCE OF COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. INCLUDING GRADING, GRAVEL, PAVING, CORRS, SIDEWALKS, STORM nRATNAGE, DRAINAGE SWALFS, MONUMENTS, STREET SIGNS AND OTHER WORK AS IS INCIDENTAL AND RELATED THERETO TN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPFCTFICATTONS AS SIIRMTTTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE ON MARCH 14, 1989 (RSP 17 -87) AND MARCH 20, 1989 (BSP 21 -88) WE HEREBY AGREE WITH THE DRAWER, ENDORSER AND BONA FTnE HOT.nF.R OF THIS DRAFT NEGOTIATED UNDER ANT) IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT THAT SAID DRAW SHALT. RE T1LY HONORED UPON PRESENTATION TO ITS, AT ANY TIME BEFORE. CQMPT.ETTON OF THE AROVF- DESCRTRED IMPROVEMENTS OR PERFORMANCE, IN WHICH EVENT WRITTEN NOTICE. SHALT, BE GTVFN BY SPOKANE COIINTY TO SEATTLE -FTRST NATIONAL BANK, SEATTLE, WA. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO UCP 1983 REVISION TCC PUBLICATION NUMBER 400. VERY TRULY YOURS, SEATTLE -FTRST NATIONAL RANK BY AIITHO BY 2, 19 . ��L' o�m� AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE ET.WT N RM 6034 REV. 3/86" SEATTLE•F/RST NAT /ONAL BA �, . INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS P.O. BOX 3977 " "tm ; • ' 'z• SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 90124 U.S.A. '` 1 Page 1 Of 1 CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 �^�yl l LC Number 72221 -G Q DATE: 13 APRIL 1989 '"`� RENEFTC ARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNTEE: SPOKANE TNDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. _. P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE. WA 99220 OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321. -G IN FAVOR OF YOURSELVES ISSUED 05 APRIL 1989 IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: UNDER SPECIAL CONDITIONS ADD THE FOLLOWING: 3. IT IS A CONDTTION OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT THAT IT SHALE. BE DEEMED AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED FOR SUCCESSIVE ADDITIONAL PERIODS OF ONE (1) YEAR FROM THE PRESENT OR ANY FUTURE. EXPIRATION DATES HEREOF, UNLESS AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO SUCH EXPIRATION DATE„ WE NOTIFY YOU THAT WE ELECT NOT TO EXTEND THIS LETTER OF CREDIT FOR SUCH ADDITIONAL PERTOD. SHOULD WE ELECT TO EXERCISE. THE OPTION OF DECLINING TO AUTOMATICALLY RENEW THIS LETTER OF CREDIT, BY SO NOTIFYING, YOU AS HEREIN PROVIDED, AND YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVED A SATISFACTORY SUBSTITUTE LETTER OF CREDIT OR COMPARABLE FTNANCTAL INSTRUMENT, YOU MAY THEN DRAW UP TO THE FACE AMOUNT OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT, ADJUSTED FOR PREVIOUS DRAWINGS OR REDUCTIONS IN SAID AMOUNT, IF ANY, BY PRESENTTNG WTTHTN THE THEN CURRENT VALIDITY PERIOD OF THIS LETTER OF CHFiDTT, YOUR DRAFT AND THE ORIGINAL OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 001. THTS AMENDMENT CONSTTTUTFS AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MAST RE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL. CREDIT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, AIL! ORIZED SIGNATURE MONROE FORM 6004 REW 3M6 " SEAME•F/RST NAT / MAL BANK U MEMBER FDIC INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS P.O. BOX 3977 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 U.S.A. CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 Page 1 of I LC Number 72321 -G DATE: 14 APR T I. 1989 BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 .JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNTRE: SPOKANE TNOUSTRTAT. PARK, INC. P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE, WA 99220 OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 -G TN FAVOR OF YOURSELVES ISSUED 05 APRIL 1989 IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: UNDER SPECIAL CONDITION NO. 3 AT THE END OF THE FIRST PARAGRAPH ADD THE FOLLOWING_ OUR NOTTFTCATTON TO YOU WTLI. BE BY CERTIFIED MATT. OR OVERNIGHT COURIER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 002. THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND '.MUST RE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. YOURS FA[THFULLY, ALIT OP, 7T .fin SI 1� ;RE MONROE REV. 3/86 Y O SEArrLE•FIRsrNATIONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC L /C'NO: G072321 PAGE: 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON "98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 DECEMBER 31, 1991 BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 L--- ACCOUNT PARTY: SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE, WA 99220 OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 -G DATED . 5 APRIL 1989 IN FAVOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: il 1. EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO JUNE 30, 1992 2. AMOUNT IS DECREASED BY 755,000.00 U.S. DOLLARS 3. WE AMEND OUR AUTO RENEWAL CLAUSE TO READ: IT IS A CONDITION OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT THAT IT SHALL BE DEEMED AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS FROM THE PRESENT OR ANY FUTURE EXPIRATION DATE HEREOF, UNLESS AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO SUCH EXPIRATION DATE, WE NOTIFY YOU BY CERTIFIED MAIL OR OVERNIGHT COURIER THAT WE ELECT NOT TO EXTEND THIS LETTER OF CREDIT FOR SUCH ADDITIONAL. PERIOD. PLEASE NOTE THAT OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER IS NOW CHANGED TO READ: G072321. PLEASE MARK YOU RECORDS ACCORNDINGLY AND QUOTE OUR NEW REFERENCE NUMBER IN ANY FUTURE CORRESPONDENCE. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 003. * ** CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE * ** Post-It- brand fax transmittal memo 7671 M of pages . Z To From i Co. Co. Dept. Phone M 8 Fez a 7 Fax « 45z - '7 - 7 ( 5 �VNM WI> I /yV i U SEATTLE•F/RST NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC L/C NO: G072321 PAGE: 2 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS . 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DORIS KEMP PLEASE ADVISE US OF YOUR: ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION TO THIS AMENDMENT BY FAX /AIRMAIL. (A THORIZED SIGNAT OF BENEFICIARY) FORM 6075 1 180 J • l - y 1Y i : SEAME•FIRST NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC L/C NO: G072321 PAGE: 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS. 80.0 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 DECEMBER 31, 1991 BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 JEFFERSON. SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNT PARTY: SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE, WA 99220 OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 -G DATED 5 APRIL 1989 IN FAVOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO.JUNE 30, 1992 2. AMOUNT IS DECREASED BY 755,000.00 U.S. DOLLARS 3. WE AMEND OUR AUTO RENEWAL CLAUSE TO READ: IT IS A CONDITION OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT THAT IT SHALL BE DEEMED AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS FROM THE PRESENT OR ANY FUTURE EXPIRATION DATE HEREOF, UNLESS AT LEAST 30'DAYS PRIOR TO SUCH EXPIRATION DATE, WE NOTIFY YOU BY CERTIFIED MAIL OR OVERNIGHT COURIER THAT WE ELECT NOT TO.EXTEND THIS LETTER OF CREDIT FOR SUCH ADDITIONAL PERIOD. PLEASE NOTE THAT OUR LETTER OF.CREDIT NUMBER IS NOW CHANGED TO READ: G072321. PLEASE MARK YOU RECORDS ACCORNDINGLY AND QUOTE OUR NEW REFERENCE NUMBER IN ANY FUTURE CORRESPONDENCE. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 003. * ** CONTINUED ON'NEXT PAGE * ** FORM W75 1 /W O SEATTLE•F/RST NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC L /C,NO: G072321 PAGE: 2 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, A RI ED a SI11 1 N ATURE DORIS KEMP PLEASE ADVISE US OF_YOUR: ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION TO THIS AMENDMENT BY FAX /AIRMAIL. (A RI D SI'NATURE OF BENEFICIARY) O ) FORM W75 1190 kIri:[IVtU O SEAF/RST BANK L/C NO: G072321 PAGE: 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 JULY 30, 1993 BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 FAXED TO: MR. DAVID BERTO FAX NO: 509- 324 -3478 ACCOUNT PARTY: SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. N. 3808 SULLIVAN RD, BLDG N -15 SPOKANE, WA 99216 - o OUR LETTER OFtCREDIT NUMBER G072321 DATED JANUARY 20, 1991 IN FAVOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. AMOUNT IS INCREASED BY 97,500.00 U.S. DOLLARS TO NEW LETTER OF CREDIT BALANCE 177,500.00 U.S. DOLLARS 2. CHANGE SPECIAL CONDITION NUMBER 2 TO READ: 2. EACH DRAWING UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT, COVERS THE ASSURANCE OF'COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING GRADING, GRAVEL, PAVING, CURBS, SIDEWALKS, STORM DRAINAGE, DRAINAGE,SWALES, MONUMENTS, STREET SIGNS AND OTHER WORK AS IS INCIDENTAL AND RELATED THERETO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE ON MARCH 14, 1989 (BSP 17 -87), MARCH 20, 1989 (BSP 21 -88) AND JANUARY 30, 1991 (BSP 22 -88). THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 004. THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, AUG 0 51993_ County E(oneerin; * ** CONTj*jftm "3-qM pAjfEW*lv5.T. •SEAFUS66 •, r O SEAF /RST BANK L/C NO: G072321 PAGE: 2 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 I 'rA� v ✓� ` I J AUTHORIZED SIGNA URE ECKHARD E. SCHIPULL 511 "THIS AMENDMENT REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. PLEASE SIGN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND RETURN TO US THE ATTACHED COPY OF THIS AMENDMENT INDICATING: ( )ACCEPTANCE ( )REJECTION (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) • Telex Number3730000 -S.W. I. F. T. • SEAFUS66 U SEA TTLE -FIRS T NAT IONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC L/C NO: G072321 PAGE: 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 JANUARY 23, 1995 BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNT PARTY: PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 818 W. RIVERSIDE, SUITE 350 SPOKANE, WA 99201 -0910 OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER G072321 DATED APRIL 5, 1989 IN FAVOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. PLEASE CHANGE THE APPLICANT'S NAME AND ADDRESS AS FOLLOWS: PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 818 W. RIVERSIDE, SUITE 350 SPOKANE, WA 99201 -0901 THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 005. THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, O SEATTLE•F/RST NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC L/C NO: G072321 PAGE: 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 MAY 29, 1996 BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS ATTN: DAVID BERTO N 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNT PARTY: PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 818 W. RIVERSIDE, SUITE 350 SPOKANE, WA 99201 -0910 OUR STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. G072321 DATED APRIL 5, 1989 IN FAVOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO DECEMBER 31, 1996. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 006. THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. THIS AMENDMENT RESCINDS OUR NONRENEWAL LETTER OF APRIL 23, 1996. YOURS FAITHFULLY, J� r') oY t LLCju AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE VIA DHL /FAX FORM 6075 REV. 07M U SEA TTLE• FIRS T NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC L/C NO: G072321 PAGE: INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS _ 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 MAY 29, 1996 BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS'%'` ATTN: DAVID BERTO N 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNT PARTY PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 818 W. RIVERSIDE, SUITE 350 SPOKANE, WA 99201 -0910 'OUR STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. G072321 DATED APRIL 5, 1989 IN ' FAVOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO DECEMBER 31, 1996. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS I'S AMENDMENT NUMBER 006. THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. THIS AMENDMENT RESCINDS OUR NONRENEWAL LETTER OF APRIL 23, 1996. YOURS FAITHFULLY, AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE VIA DHL /FAX 1 Q L7 V LI Ivl A 00 HcN F (200 rROLE FORM 5075 REV. 07/95 MAY -29 -96 WED 11:22 A 9EATTLE•F/R8T NATIONAL BANK w�¢a row P, 01 L/C NO; G072321 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS PAGE; 1 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98,124 MAY 29, 1996 BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS ATTN: DAVID BERTO N 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNT PARTY: PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 818 W. RIVERSID €, SUITE 350 SPOKANE, WA 99201 -09.10 OUR STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 0072321 DATED APRIL 5, 1989 IN FAVOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO DECEMBER 31, 1996. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 006. THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. THIS AMENDMENT RESCINDS OUR NONRENEWAL LETTER OF APRIL 23, 1996- YOURS FAITHFULLY, AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE VIA DHL /FAX FORM 6m REV. 07M O SEAME•F/RST NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 APRIL 23, 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 GENTLEMEN: RE: PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WITH REGARD TO OUR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER G072321 ISSUED ON APRIL 5, 1989 IN THE AMOUNT OF USD 177,500.00 FOR THE ACCOUNT OF PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 818 W. RIVERSIDE, SUITE 350, SPOKANE, WA 99201 -0910, FOR WHICH YOU ARE THE BENEFICIARY, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT PURSUANT TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE SAID LETTER OF CREDIT, WE HEREBY ELECT NOT TO _ RENEW SAID LETTER OF CREDIT FOR THE ADDITIONAL PERIOD BEYOND THE PRESENT" EXPPRA't ION °UAPE OF iTUN£ -30y 199 "6:^ -R;_4 1 i l i UNLESS YOU RETURN THE ORIGINAL LETTER OF CREDIT TO US SOONER, FOR CANCELLATION, IT IS OUR INTENT TO TAKE THIS ACTION WHEN THE LETTER OF CREDIT EXPIRES ON JUNE 30, 1996. SINCERELY, - P Q Ct PAULA MORIUCHI, LC OFFICER INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 206/358 -3666 9 FORM 6075 REV. 07195 O,SEATTLE•F/RST NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 APRIL 23, 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 GENTLEMEN: RE: PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WITH REGARD TO OUR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER G072321 ISSUED ON APRIL 5, 1989 IN THE AMOUNT OF USD 177,500.00 FOR THE ACCOUNT OF PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 818 W. RIVERSIDE, SUITE 350, SPOKANE, WA 99201 -0910, FOR WHICH YOU ARE THE BENEFICIARY, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT PURSUANT TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE SAID LETTER OF CREDIT, WE HEREBY ELECT NOT TO RENEW SAID LETTER OF CREDIT FOR THE ADDITIONAL PERIOD BEYOND THE PRESENT EXPIRATION DATE OF JUNE 30, 1996. UNLESS YOU RETURN THE ORIGINAL LETTER OF CREDIT TO US SOONER, FOR CANCELLATION, IT IS OUR INTENT TO TAKE THIS ACTION WHEN THE LETTER OF CREDIT EXPIRES ON JUNE 30, 1996. SINCERELY, PAULA MORIUCHI, LC OFFICER INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 206/358 -3666 FORM 075 REV. 07NS , � BOND ESTIMATE � -------------`~-----------------------------------'`----------^~`------------~- PROJECT BSP 17 NAME JS DATE 09^Dec-88 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 6 1250.00 7500.00 2) Drywell - Type 9 EA 8 1450"00 11600.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 310^00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 330.00 0.00 5) Grate ~ Type 3 EA 14 320.00 4480.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 500 10"50 5250°00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 540"00 0.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia" LF 12.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia" LF 16.50 0.00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia° LF 18,00 0°00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 21.00 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1435.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 300"00 0"()0 14) Ditch Excavation CY 505 7°90 3989.50 15) Sod SF 26269 0"50 13134.50 ~~~~`------------------^^~---------------^-~---------------^-`----------------- NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) 0.00 2) 0"00 3) 0^0V 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 -----~~~~~^~~~--------------------^-^------------~~---------------------------- DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 45954°00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16) Monuments EA 140.00 0^00 17) Barricade LF 32"00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 75,00 0"00 -------------------------------------^---`^--------------`-------------~-'----- OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 4378^4 7.90 34589^36 20) Top Course CY 2694.8 10.60 28564"88 21) Base Course CY 10.60 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 3713,6 37°90 140745°44 23) Curb Type A LF 5"50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 5241"5 7.10 37214.65 25) Curb Type R LF 6,50 0.00 26) Sidewalk SO YD 14°00 0°00 ------~~~~~-~--------------^-^-~-~---------------`''^-------------------------- NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS ^-~~^~~~~~-----------------^`~~-----------------^^-~~~~'---------------------~- 1) RR crossing LS 1 10000.00 10000.00 2) 0,00 3) 0,00 4) 0"00 ----~~~~~~-~---------------------^----^---------------------------------------- -^-~~~~-^-----------------------------------~~^-------------~-^^-^~~~~--------- GRADING AND SURFACING 251114,33 GRAND TOTAL 297068"33 BOND ESTIMATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PROJECT BSP 17 NAME JS DATE 07- Dec -88 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 6 1250.00 7500.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 6 1450.00 11600.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA Tons 310.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA LF 330.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 3 EA 14 320.00 4480.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 500 10.50 5250.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA SO YD 540.00 0.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 12.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 16.50 0.00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 18.00 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 21.00 0:00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1435.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 300.00 0.00 14) Ditch Excavation CY 505 7.90 3989.50 15) Sod SF 26269 0.50 13134.50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 2) 0.00 4) 0.00 5 ) 0.00 6) 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 45954.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16) Monuments EA 140.00 0.00 17) Barricade LF 32.00 0.00 1B) Street Signs EA 75.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 4378.4 7.90 34589.36 20) Top Course CY 2694.8 10.60 28564.68 21) Base Course CY 10.60 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 3713.6 37.90 140745.44 23) Curb Type A LF 5.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 5241.5 7.10 37214.65 25) Curb Type R LF 6.50 0.00 26) Sidewalk SO YD 14.00 0.00 NON- STANDARD ROAD ITEMS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1) 0.0o 2) J 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 241114.33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3Jp�0�`° GRAND TOTAL 287068.33 STREET QUANTITIES I PROJECT NO.- BSP 17 DESIGNER- JERRY SIMS DATE- 1/07/88 PROJECT DESCRIPTION - BINDING SITE PLAN STREET # 1 NAME- EUCLID AVE LENGTH- 2+00 FT. S.F. RAD = BEGINNING STATION = 2900.00 ENDING STATION = INTER # 1 'T' INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 30.00 SK = 0.00 INTER # 2 'T' INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 44.00 SK = 0.00 INTER # 3 FULL INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 30.00 SK = 0.00 TERM # 1 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 100.00 TERM # 2 : CHOPPED .17 FT. 405.0 ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB EXISTING STREET # 2 MEASUREMENT 126465.13 S.F. .67 FT. .43 FT- Ao`r`tic 4 ( y 0.00 FT'--- .2 FT. 0..00 FT. PROPOSED QUANTITY 3122.6 C.Y. 2001.3 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 2831.4 TONS 4603.0 FT. NAME- EUCLID AVE LENGTH- 367 FT. WIDTH- 52FT. BEGINNING STATION = 5200.00 ENDING STATION = 5567.15 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CROSS STREET INCLUDED EW 12.00 PW 12.00 SK 0.00 RAD 30.00 ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB EXISTING MEASUREMENT ------------------------------------------ WIDTH - 52FT. 5200.00 S.F. RAD = 30.00 RAD = 30.00 RAD = 30.00 .67 FT. .43 FT- Ao`r`tic 4 ( y 0.00 FT'--- .2 FT. 0..00 FT. PROPOSED QUANTITY 3122.6 C.Y. 2001.3 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 2831.4 TONS 4603.0 FT. NAME- EUCLID AVE LENGTH- 367 FT. WIDTH- 52FT. BEGINNING STATION = 5200.00 ENDING STATION = 5567.15 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CROSS STREET INCLUDED EW 12.00 PW 12.00 SK 0.00 RAD 30.00 ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB EXISTING MEASUREMENT ------------------------------------------ QUANTITY 18854.08 S.F. SURFACE AREA- .67 FT. „ 4 4 L 465.5 C.Y. .43 FT w ^"'1� 298.4 C.Y. 0.00 FT. 0.0 C.Y. .33 FT. 477.2 TONS 106.00 FT. PROPOSED 638.5 FT. STREET # NAME- WALKWAYS LENGTH- 2667 FT. WIDTH- 12FT. BEGINNING STATION = 2900.00 ENDING STATION = 5567.15 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM EXCAVATION MEASUREMENT QUANTITY SURFACE AREA- 32005.80 S.F. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ROADWAY EXCAVATION .67 FT. 790.3 C.Y. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE .33 FT. 395.1 C.Y. _CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.00 FT. ASPHALT CONCRETE .17 FT. 405.0 TONS CURB ----------------------------------------------------- EXISTING 5334.30 FT. PROPOSED 0.0 ---- ---------------- -- - FT. - -- TOTALS ROADWAY EXCAVATION 4378.4 C.Y. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 2694.8 C.Y. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.0 C.Y. ASPHALT CONCRETE 3713.6 TONS CURB ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5241.5 FT. PROJECT (� i S i P, BOND EST FORM NAME AEI- L.sn41,o,40 , DATE la -6 Item 11 Drainage items Units Quantity I Price I Cost 1) Drywell - Type A EA 2) Drywell - Type B EA 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 4) Grate - Type 2 EA 5) Grate - Type 3 EA / 6) Backfill for DW CY 7) Concrete inlet EA 8) C.M. pipe 10" dia. LF 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. LF 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. LF 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. LF 12) Precast Manhole EA 13) Solid Lid EA. 14) Ditch Excavation CY O 15) Sod SF 2�Z(p� Non Standard Drainage items 1) 7') 4'7 2) 3) 4) Std Bdl DWI Conc _Dia _Dia _Dia OTHER n I' DwI DWI BkF Inlet Pipe Pipe Pipe S o n 1) 4 8 440 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 96/4 O SEATTLE•F/RST NAT /ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS P.O. BOX 3977 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 U.S.A. CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 Page 1 of 2 Standby LC Number 72321 -G IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT 05 APRIL 1989 LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 -f, BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 .JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNT PARTY: SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE, WA 99220 AMOUNT: USDR35,000.00 (EIGHT HUNDRED THTRTY -FTVE THOUSAND AND N01100 U.S. nOLLARS) r .. --1— . .. � i air .1....: I . ..;- . .t. .... WE HEREBY ISSUE OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOR, WHICH IS AVAILABLE AGAINST PRESENTATION OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. YOUR SIGHT DRAFT DRAWN ON SFATTLE -FTRST NATIONAL RANK, AND STATING THE LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER. 2. CERTIFICATION PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS, N. 811 .JEFFERSON, SPOKANE, WA AS FOLLOWS: "WE CERTIFY THAT THE AMOUNT OF THIS DRAWING IS DUE, PURSUANT TO NON- COMPLETTON OF ALI. OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS (INSERT IMPROVEMENT(.) AS STATED IN SPECIAL CONDITION NO. 2 BELOW)." 3. THE ORIGINAL OF THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT THIS LETTER OF CREDIT EXPIRES AT THE COUNTERS OF SF.ATTLF -FTRST NATIONAL RANK, LETTER OF CREDIT DEPARTMENT, CURRENTI, %' LOCATED AT DD FIFTH AVENUE., FLOOR 31, SEATTLE., WASHINGTON 98104 ONN ( ;F,MRFR FORM 6034 REV. 3 /86" f1 I� O SEATTLE•F/RST NAT/ONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS P.O. BOX 3977 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 U.S.A. CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 Fagg 2 of 2 Standby LC Number 72321 -G SPECIAI. CONDTTTONS: 1. PARTIAL DRAWINGS ARE PERMITTED 2. EACH DRAWTNG UNDER THTS LETTER OF CREDIT, COVERS THE ASSURANCE. OF COMPLETION OF TNSTALLATTON OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. INCLUDING GRADING, GRAVEL, PAVTNG, CURRS, SIDEWALKS. STORM DRATNAGE, DRAINAGE SWALFS, MONUMENTS, STREET SIGNS AND OTHER WORK AS IS TNCTDRNTAL AND RELATED THERETO IN ACCORDANCE. WITH THE DRAWTNGS AND SPF.CTFTCATTONS AS SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE ON MARCH 14, 1989 (RSP 17 -87) AND MARCH 20, 1989 (RSP 21 -89) WE HEREBY AGREE WITH THE DRAWER, ENDORSER AND BONA FTDE HOLDER OF THIS DRAFT NEGOTIATED UNDER AND TN STRTCT COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THTS LETTER OF CRFDTT THAT SAID DRAW SHALL HE DULY HONORED UPON PRESENTATION TO ITS, AT ANY TTMF. BEFORE COMPLETION OF THE ABOVE- DESCRTRED TMPROVEMENTS OR PF,RFORMANCF„ IN WHICH EVENT WRTTTF,N NOME SHALL RE GIVEN BY SPOKANE COUNTY TO SEATTLE -FTRST NATIONAL RANK, SEATTLE, WA. ' THIS LETTER OF CREDIT TS SIIR.TFCT TO UCP 1983 REVTSTON TCC PIIRT.TCATTON NUMBER 400. " -- -- - .-I- - - - : ;: - _- VERY TRULY YOURS, SEATTLE -FTRST NATIONAL RANK BY AIJTH 7.•. STGNATITRF. R -12p AUTHMT7E0 STCNATITRF FLWTN � s , Z SEAME•FIRST NATIONAL BANK MEMBER FDIC ' INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS - - - - P.O: BOX 3977 `. . SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 U.S.A. Page 1 nf. 1 CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 LC'Number 72321 -C, DATE: .. 1.3 ... APRTT.' 1989..: BE NF.FJCTARV: ti SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE„ WA 99260 -0170 . ACCOUNTF.F.: - ,PQ! NF TNDIISTRTAI. PARK. T TNC P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE, WA 99220 OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 -13 IN FAVOR OF YOURSELVES TSSUED 05 APRIL 1989 IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: UNDER SPECIAL. CONDITIONS ADD ,THE FOLLOWING: 3. IT IS A CONDTTIQP.OF THFS- LETTER OF CREDIT THAT IT SHALT. BE DEEMED. AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED FOR SUCCESSIVE ADDITIONAL. PERIODS OF ONE (l) YEAR'FROM. THE PRESENT'OR ANY FUTURE. EXPTRATTON,DATES HEREOF, UNLESS -AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO SUCH EXPIRATION DATE, b'F NOTIFY YOU THAT WE F.LF.CT NOT TO EXTEND THIS LETTER OF CREDIT FOR SUCH ADDITIONAL PERIOD'. {•.•- SHOULD WE ELECT TO EXERCTSE THE OPTION OF D'F,CT.TNTNG TO AUTOMATICALLY RENEW THIS LETTER OF CREDIT, BY SO NOTIFYING YOU AS RFRFTN PROVTDFD,-ANT) YOU HAVF NOT RECEIVED A SATISFACTORY SUBSTITUTE LETTER OF CREDIT OR COMPARABLE , FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, YOU MAY THEN DRAW UP TO THE FACE AMOUNT OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT, ADJUSTED FOR PREVIOUS DRAWINGS OR REDUCTIONS IN SAID AMOUNT; IF...,. - -- ANY., BY PRFSENTT:NG WTTH:TN.THE.- THEN.rURRPNT VALIDITY PERIOD:OF J.FTTFR.OF CRRDTT, YOUR DRAFT AND THE ORIGINAL OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE MANNER SPF.CTFTED HEREIN. --� I I THE L6TTF,R 0P CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 001. THIS AMENDMENT.CONSTTTIITFS AN INTEGRAL PART OF AND MUST- RE' ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT `YOIiRS.'PAITHFIIITY; � \\�, O �O ALIT ORT7.FD SIGNATURE 00\ MONROE FORM 6034 REV. 3 /86" - l 1 SEATTLE•FIRST NANONAL BANK - MEMBER FDIC INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS P.O. BOX 3977 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 U.S.A. CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 Page 1 of 1 T.,C Number 72321 -G DATE: 14 APRIL 1989 BENEF ICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS N. 811 .IEPFFRSON SPOKANE, WA 99280 -0170 ACCOIINTEP.: SPOKANE TNDIISTRTAI. PARK, INC. P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE, WA 99220 OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 -G IN FAVOR OF VOTTRSET.VFS ISSUED 05 APRIL 1989 IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: TINDER SPECIAL CONDITION N0�3_AT„ UHF f NTT_ OR T.HE h PjRST,PATZAGREtPH,_AQII FOi.T.OWTNG: OUR NOTTPTCATTON TO YOU WILL RE BY CERTIFIED MATT. OR OVERNIGHT COURIER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 002. THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN TNTFGRAT. PART OF AND MAST RR ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL CREDIT. YOURS FAITHFULLY, AIIT OR 7,ED SIGNATURE MONROE c1\O MAnl6 RF\/ i /R6. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 Date: 1 -7 i 196 Subdivision Name: a 5 i 2 Dear Sir or Madam: One of the requirements set forth by the Spokane County Panning Commis- sion in connection with the above - entitled plat involves the 'fling with this office of a Street Improvement Bond. A preliminary inspection of the plat has been made by this office and the amount of the Street Improvement Bond is found to be: A Street Improvement Bond in the above amount must br filed with this office prior to approval of the final plat. The bond will �e released only upon satisfactory completion of the required street improvement. Please contact this office when work on the improvement is ready for iaspection, or if you desire additional information or advice concerning the work. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer By sa Plat /Forms4 Pnhlir. Worlrc Rnilrlinn / Nnrth Rl l .Iofforcnn .Ctroof / Cnnlcwnp WAchinntnn O WAO -0170 IS091 4SA-'lAnO svo,enc coup. count �ousr BOND ESTIMATE ------------------------------------------------ PROJECT BSP 21 ------------------------------ NAME �S DATE 17-Mar-89 --------------------------------------------------------~-------------`^-------- DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell ~ Type A EA 7 1250.00 8750.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 10 1450.00 14500^00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 310.00 0,00 4) Grate Type 2 GA 330.00 0^00 5> Grate - Type 3 EA 17 320"00 5440^00 6) Backfjll For DH CY 610 10.50 6405^00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 540^00 0,00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 12.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 16.50 0,00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 18.00 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia~ LF 21"00 0,00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1435.00 0.0o 13) Solid lid EA 300^00 0^00 14) Ditch Excavation CY 921 7.90 7275.90 15) Sod nm : -7112760 0^50 1380^00 --------------------------------------- ------------------ NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS _______________________________________________________________________________ 1) 0.00 2) 0"0A 3) 0,00 4) 0"00 5) O^00 6) 0"00 _______________________________________________________________________________ DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 43750^90 _______________________________________________________________________________ 16) Monuments EA 6 140.00 840.00 17) Barricade LF 32.00 0^00 18) Street Signs EA 2 75^00 150^00 _______________________________________________________________________________ OTHER SUBTOTAL 990.00 _______________________________________________________________________________ GRADING, SURFACING, CURB AND SIDEWALK 19> Rough Grade CY 7787.4 7.90 61520.46 20> Top Course CY 3893^7 10.60 41273"22 21) Base Course CY 10^60 0"00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 5155"2 37.90 135382^08 23) Curb Type A LF 5.50 0.00 24) Curb Type 8 LF 6717.1 7"10 47691.41 25> Curb Type R LF 6^50 0.00 26) Sidewalk SO \/D 14.00 0^00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS _______________________________________________________________________________ 1) 0^00 2) 0"V0 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 _______________________________________________________________________________ GRADING AND SURFACING 345867.17 _-__-_____________________-_-__-______________---___________-_-___-_-____-__-__ R 391,0n���� UA-0- GRAND TOTAL 390608.07 STREET QUANTITIES PROJECT NO.- DESIGNER- JS PROJECT DESCRIPTION- BSP 21 STREET # 1 DATE- 03/17/89 NAME- MARIETTA AVE LENGTH- 3363 FT" C. Y. 0.0 BEGINNING STATION = 0,00 ENDING STATION � INTER # 1 'T' INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 30^00 SK - 0,00 INTER # 2 `T` INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 24.00 SK = 0.00 INTER # 3 'T` INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 30.00 SK = 0.00 TERM # 1 : CROSS STREET INCLUDED EW 37,00 PW 37.00 SK TERM # 2 : CHOPPED JTEM SURFACE AREA~ ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB EXISTING STREET # 2 MEASURE --------- 183789.56 1"00 .50 0.00 .33 0"00 --------- WIDTH~ 54FT. 3363.37 RAD = 30^00 RAD = 30.00 RAD = 30.00 0.00 RAD 40^00 1ENT � ------------ - -------- S.F. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT" PROPOSED --------`~`'~-'`----- QUANTITY 6814.4 C.Y. 3407.2 C. Y. 0.0 C. Y. 4656.5 TONS 6717,1 FT. NAME- SIDEWALKS LENGTH- 3284 FT. WIDTH- 12FT. BEGINNING STATION 8O"00 ENDING STATION 3363.67 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM MEASUREMENT SURFACE AREA- 39404.04 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION .67 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE .33 FT" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0^00 FT, ASPHALT CONCRETE .17 FT" CURB -----------------------`---~--`--^^------------------------------------ EXISTING 6567^34 FT" PROPOSED TOTALS ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB QUANTITY 972.9 C. Y. 4R6.5 C. Y. 0.0 C. Y. 498"6 TONS 0.0 FT, 7787,4 C. Y. 3B93.7 C. Y. O.0 C. Y. 5155"2 TONS 6717.1 FT. Q pp BOND EST FORM PROJECT ASP 8 (5 -Z NAME U: r)1— AA) DATE /y/,Q,e, Item # Drainage items Units Ouantitv Price Cost 1) Drywell — Type A EA rf 2) Dryvell — Type B EA (� 3) Grate — Type 1 EA 4) Crate — Type 2 EA 5) Grate — Type 3 EA / -7 6) Backfill for DW CY 6PI D 7) Concrete inlet EA 8) C.M. pipe 10" dia. LF 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. LF 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. LF 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. LF 12) Precast Manhole EA 13) Solid Lid EA 14) Ditch Excavation CY 9z 15) Sod SF 27&0 A1.... C..... A J n ..! 1 1) 2) 3) 4) Std Bdl Owl Conc DWI DWI BRF Inlet 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Dia Dia _Dia OTHER 7, — De Pipe Pi De 96/4 December 23, 1991 Mr. Scott Brown Pentzer Development Corp. N 3808 Sullivan Road Spokane, WA. 99216 -1670 RE: Letter of December 2, 1991 Dear Mr. Brown: We received your letter of December 2, 1991 stating the reasons why you believe Pentzer Development Corporation should not be required to extend surety for roadway and drainage improvements in BSP 17 and BSP 21. 1 now have had time to discuss this matter with the Spokane County Engineer. We do not agree with all items,in your letter, however we have reduced the required surety for all items connected with the two traffic signal systems and the related paving work. It is the position of the Spokane County Engineers Office that the unfinished required improvements not delayed by the signal construction need to be covered by the surety until such time as those items are completed. The updated reduced amount of surety still required would be $80,000.00. This figure is based on the work remaining to be completed on the railroad crossing on Euclid Road, the remaining '208' drainage swale construction and some final adjustments to some of the drywells. Should you wish to post a type of surety other than an "irrevocable letter of credit ", I would be happy to discuss other ol�tions with you. If you have an} questions, feel free to call me at 456 -3600. Very truly yours, M of Pag Post -lt"' brand tax tra nsmittal m emo 7 Fmm7 ✓ F r 36 c)a sla Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. S okane County Engineer En C " -_ :ferry Sims Flat Inspector N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER A DIVISION OFTHE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Honnann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director RECEIVED DEC 3 1 1991 S P (D K A N E DONALD C. BROCKETT PROSECUTING ATTORNEY O u N MrVi iE GOUNrY ENGINEER OFFICE of PROSECUTING ATTORNEY December 30, 1991 transmitted by fax Darcy Hilderbrand International Trade Operations Seattle -First National Bank P.O. Box 3977 Seattle, WA 98124 Re: Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 72321 -G Dear Ms. Hilderbrand: County -City Public Safety Building W, 1100 Mallon Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 -0270 f509) 456 -3662 SCAN 272 -3662 This letter is intended to confirm our telephone conversation of December 30, 1991, whereby you authorized the Spokane County Engineers to present a draw on the above - referenced letter of credit, prior to the close of business on December 31, 1991, to Frankie McCoy at the Spokane and Eastern Branch of Seattle -First National Bank, rather than at the counters of Seattle -First National Bank, Letter of Credit Department, Seattle, Washington, as specified in the letter credit. If the above is not your understanding, please let me know immediately. Thank you for your cooperation in facilitating this matter. Very truly yours, MCD.dmm cc Jerry Sims C nminal Division County -Ciry Public Bafel, llulldin, W. 1100 Mallon Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 -0270 (5091456 -0062 SCAN 272 -3002 Cl Civil Divlalnn W. 1115 Bruadwq- S,ol,ne, WA 99z6e -o27n My) 45b-5764 SCAN Z72 -5764 Michael C. Dempsey Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Family Law 1)e... once. 4q, ea1 Mallon Avenue SPnkme. IVA o92n0 -0:70 15091456 2486 SCAN 272 -Z4 , FTaud1Drue+ Una N. 721 leffrrson S,okane. IVA WZ".0270 150o1 439 6410 SCAN Z: Loa In JAMES P. EMACIO CTwi Eii u y CIARK D. COLIAELL Ora i Criminal O.yury Sntioc Attorney. Norm V. Handbill Rohn B. Binger Michael C. D9mpsey Gerald A. Olinger Knin M. Kommt Patricia A. Thompson D.Puties Doest W. Allen Ronald P. ArWls lames 6 Harlow Jennifer A. mhanu Mary Ana, Brady lackT. Beaks Darlerc A. O,uvan-AOdeuun Frank Urinciff Paul G. Cont Dawn C. Cane, Carol O. Davis Dianne G. Dougheny IoM F. Driscoll Michelle A. PIat D Clinton Franck J6hr Edward o. Hav Arthur K. Havzehi David R. I leancan IM D. I luppin Marc Nl. I lunnn S.mCre L Johnson Carlin hl. Jude Smren I. Kirin Neil 11, Knrhis Audu -w I.. Knukatoll IN'bhv J. Knrbiv NLUk A. Lliminger Suearmc I<n,...o Merl li. undav rlarnhrL C. l.uu,hian Andrew I. Mews Michelle A.Miller Nlaniln Mrrkrrcwnn Cleudc N,nnucuno Aaron R. lieeoeo Sarah A. Plollipwn Willi -11. R—. Martin D. Rollin, I Wd IS Smith In vD.Fo-inm•v. lato., R. 5...,.1er S"' it. J. I rack.+ Sumter I. wall, N'nhrr V. ,Vale. luveo6 [Apv W. 120, Mallon Avenue $p,danc W'A N Z 7 U0 I509I 450-1 SCAN Z72-004i, DEC 30 '91 17:57 SIP .- .`� 0 -7 -. ti PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: P. 2/4 /4 51725 That ,! /rr d /t•:d�2// 7 (Contractor), as Principal, ;�e�r� (Bonding Company) as Surety, and ,Sr:z von, z 7 {srn.nm , a corporation of LiL /IJe ,whose principal office is located at /�•e r /�r J, , r iOew vier J are firmly bound u ❑to '�' zr �zve %F> . 7 (ter jo9v ,-a7 %o^- as Obligees, to fulfill the obligations of the Principal an a ure under a ontract to which reference is hereafter made, in the amount of ,y� Z, 7 -25 =; Dollars ($ W %?`r'o ) (including applicable Washington State e ax') Tor payment w e�reo trTncipal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, Principal has by written Proposal, dated 1991 offered into a Contract with Obligee for Contract No. Bid Schedules X 1,,, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Contract Documents dated ���crc% IS 1`.Yil r NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the Principal shall have faithfully performed all the provisions of the Contract on its part, and pay all laborers, mechanics, subcontractors and materialmen and all persons who supply such person or persons or subcontractors with provisions and supplies for the carrying on of such work, and indemnify and hold harmless the Obligee from all loss, cost or damage which it may suffer by reason of the failure to do any of the foregoing, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise it shall remain in frill force and effect. All persons who have furnished labor, materials or supplies for use in and about the work provided for in the Contract shall have a direct right of action under this bond, to the extent and in the manner set forth in RCW 39.08. The said Surety for value received hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the WORK to be performed thereunder or the SPECIFICATIONS accompanying the PENTZER-.1. ;. DEVELOPMENT ` CORPORATION". AWASMMGL0.V NgLEB PoWFACOMPAfry _ N. 3808 Sullivan Road " Phone' 1509) 9241720 r - . SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK Spokane, WA 99216-1670 ' - FAX` (509) 9243748 c 'spa, ,',v . December 27,.1991 DEC _ 3 -1 ° 1991 { . UNl i GHU�t1CC�t Mr. .Jerry Sims ' Plat Inspector, ` Office of the County Engineer N. 811. Jefferson Spokane, WA "99260 =0180 RE: • Letter of Deceniber 23rd, 1991.. 'Dear Sims: I urn in receipt of your letter dated December 23rd,.1991, wherein you :have asked that Pentzer.Development- Corporation issue an irrevocable letter of credit in the value of . $80,000.00. Please be advised that I had ari,opportunity to discuss this issue with.Park General Manager William E. Butler on December 26th', 1991. Please be advised that Mr. Butler.does not feel - - that a bond is warranted in this instance. I have been instructed to you that the position of Pentiei Development Corporation relative to this issue has not changed from that.referenced in my previous letter of December 2nd; 1991 ; I attempted, unsuccessfully, to contact -you by telephone regarding this'issue on the morning of December 276, f991. Should you'have any additional questions - or comments regarding this issue,.please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK Scott R. Brown :. Property Manager PJn? 'MANAGED BYNlfMLEB HACOOB CO. - - "- �D PRINTEBWl RECYCLED PA PER 31 -91 TU 1 4:42 SEAF -INTL TRADE OPNS FRX NO...206 358 7072 P.01 TaE•F/HSTNAT/ONAL BANK. HEn FDIC L/C NO: G072321 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON . P.O. BOX 3977, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. 98124. PAGE: I 98104 DECEMBER 31, 1991 BENEFICIARY: ' SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS iQ. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0170 ACCOUNT PARTY: SPOKANE. INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. P.O. BOX 3727 SPOKANE, WA 99220 .. OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 -G DATED . 5 APRIL 1989 IN FAVOR OF SPOKANE .COUNTY ENGINEERS IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. EXPIRATION DATE IS EXTENDED TO JUNiF 30, 1992 ' 2. AMOUNT IS DECREASED BY 755,000'.00 U.S. DOLLARS . 3. WE AMEND OUR AUTO RENEWAL CLAUSE TO READ: IT IS A CONDITION OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT THAT IT.SHALL BE DEEMED AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS FROM THE PRESENT OR ANY FUTURE EXPIRATION DATE HEREOF, UNLESS AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO SUCH EXPIRATION DATE, WE NOTIFY YOU BY CERTIFIED MAIL OR OVERNIGHT COURIER THAT WE ELECT NOT TO EXTEND THIS LETTER OF CREDIT FOR SUCH ADDITIONAL. . PERIOD. PLEASE NOTE THAT OUR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER IS' NOW CHANGED TO READ: G072321. PLEASE MARK YOU RECORDS ACCORNDINGLY AND QUOTE OUR NEW REFERENCE NUMBER. IN ANY FUTURE CORRESPONDENCE.. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS OTHERWISE UNCHANGED. THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 003. * ** CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE * ** FORM. 607E ww 1 - yl TUL !4 4'l SLHh IMF INIL AkAK E'UNNS' 'f A X'NU, ZUb , IU(Z F. UL c ALj,_sEAT'nE - F1Rsr - N ATIONAL BANK MFAw6R roro L/C NO: G07232.1 PAGE: 2 INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS 800 FIFTH AVENUE, FLOOR 31, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 P.O. BOX.3977, SEATTLE,;WASHINGTON 98124 THIS AMENDMENT CONSTITUTES AN INTEGRAL PART OF'AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL' CREDIT. YOURS FAITHFULLY,. Z 4 ED AUT IGNATURE DORIS KEr7P PLEASE ADVISE US OF YOUR ACCEPTANCE OR.REJECTION TO THIS AMENDMENT,'BY FAX /AIRMAIL. (AUTHOR.I,ZED SIGNATURE OF BENEFICIARY) FORM 6075 L90 DEC ill '91 1-, : 52 SIP _ m ,: .« ..; « • e e ...pew -�.r?: P.3.'4 same shall in any way affect its obligation on this BOND, and. it does hereby waive notice of any such charge, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the WORK or to the SPECIFICATIONS. No final settlement between the OWNER and the CONTRACTOR shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied. Signed and sealed this /9 74 day of c, r,2-1i - ,19' 9 1. I , c �Z % .i lay L . J E��L igna ure „ Signature Y ped NaIlYe Typed ame FaeT VICE Piz&!L 1 0& r�i C P} o Title �1itle ' (SEAL) J DEC 30 '91 17:58 SIP P. 4/4 For verification of the authentl6ity of in ic Power of Attorney you may call, Collett, 201- 656.9500 and ask for the Power of Attorney clerk. Pleas refer to trio Power M enn•nev numly ,ha.rime. namurl inrlwiAnallcl firm f ain i is of the hnno In which thu Cows, IL ahach ad. In flew YJrk. Nal 212-627- -544:. Q1= F I CE OF - V"IE COLJIVTY EIVEG I IVE�F+ SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON DATE: December 9, 1991. TO. Tom Yake FROM: Jerry Si SUBJECT: BSP 17 K 21 Spokane Industrial Park We have received a request from the sponsor to reduce /release the bond for the above mentioned project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount, if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of the project. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. cc: Ross Kelley 'WIT L31j!s r E ' ATTLt-F1RSTA(AT10NAL BANK MEMBER FDIC INTERNATIONAL TRADE OPERATIONS P.O. BOX 3977 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9024 U.S.A. - I of I CABLE: FIRSTBANK SEATTLE TELEX: 320249 I Nomiihnr I UATF': 12 APPT!, 19R9 I C 0 5 1117NEFTCIARY: SPOKANE CnUNTV FNGTNFFRS N. P'll JEFFERSON SPOKANE. WA 09260-0170 SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK. TNr. P.O. PDX 3727 SPOKANE. WA R0100 OVR LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 72321 G IN FAVOR OF vnuRsFLVFS ISSUED On APR!l 1989 IS HEPFPV AMENDED AS Founws: UNDER SPECIAL cpmmim ADD THE FOI.LnWINP, 2. IT IS A CONDITION OF THIS LFTTFR OF cREnIT THAT IT SHALL RE DEEMED ?HTnMATlCAhLV EXTENDED FOR SHCCESSIVI? %070ONAL PERIOnS OF ONE 111 YEAR FRn!k! THE'. PRPSENT OR !NV FUT"RP VXPIRATln* DATES HERE= UMLPSS,AT LEAST co nAyF PRIOR TO SUCH ENPIRATToN mw WE NnTTPV YOU THAT WE FLFrT NOT'Tn RYTENn THIS LFTTFR OF CRFOIT FOR SUCH ADDITIONAL PERIOD, stiolrr.r) WE FLrrT TO RM9RCISF THE OPTTOM OF nrCLTMrMG 70 AUTOMATICALLY KNEW THTA LETTFR OF FREDTT. AV RD NOTIPVTNG YOU AS HEREIN PROVT;pn, AND YOU mvr NOT RECEIVED A S%TlspArTnRy SURSTrTUTE LETTER OF CREDIT OR COMPARARLE . VINANnIAL INSTRUMENT: YOU MAV THEN Illalf UP TO THE F4rR,AmnUNT OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. ADJUSTED FOR PRFVTO"S DRAWINGS OR REDUCTIONS III SAID AMOUNT, "IF ANY, AV PRPSVNTrWn WITHIN THE THEM CURRPXT VALTnTTV:PFRTon OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT, YOUR DRAFT AND THE ORIGINAL OF THIS LETTER OF CRmTT IN THE M4mNFp SPECIFIED HEREIN. THU r.rTTFR OF CRFnIT IS OT"FRWTSF 04=0=. TOTS IS AMENDMENT NVMRFR DOE. THIS AMENDMENT C.Oj%lSTTTUTFS -N,%' TNTEnR 4T. P RT OF AN J) I T RE . . ATTACHED TO THE, OPT(',INAI. CREDIT. I%T "HIRS FAITHFULLY. MONROE ----------------- w ® ® Taylor Engineering C" Design and Land Planning Spokane County Engineers N 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 RE: Spokane Industrial Park South Expansion Binding Site Plan 17 -87 ATTN: Gary Nelson, P.E. Gentlemen, March 11, 1988 RE EEIVEQ UAR 1 11988 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Upon reviewing the suggested general conditions for approval, we feel that we have taken a step backward in our negotiations. It appears that our discussions and letters have been disregarded in nearly all aspects. Enclosed are previous submittals and replies which exemplify this. Please note the first submittal is dated November 11, 1987. The following is an item by item discussion of the suggested general conditions of approval and our suggested changes. Theron Rust, Vice President and General Manager of Spokane Industrial Park, requests an immediate meeting to discuss these issues and also requests the presence of Mr. Dennis Scott and Mr. Wally Hubbard. 1. Item 1 is acceptable to Spokane Industrial Park (SIP). 2. It is requested that the cross sections be changed as follows: a. That all sidewalks be deleted in lieu of an internal pathway system per our previous discussions and correspondence (See Attachment A and C..) �/ '�{I- '��AN -�/� � G'O d^P/.'`iI.IY�LVN V , .. �1 .. ' �. K✓ b. That the curbing be changed to County Standard Type A. C. That the width of paving on Euclid be 44 feet in accordance with the adopted Spokane County Road Standards for a secondary arte ,¢,� ;!� G 97 S O f f ^4 LJ d. That the width of right of way on Euclid be 64 feet in accordance with the adopted Spokane County Road Standards. This is also requested, since it was the `X same width required less than 1 year ago for Northwest Culvert Company which is part of this binding site and borders Euclid Avenue. �� W ' 7 Gitiw c eQ4 d a 0 •S `V , W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101 Spokane. WA 99201 3283371 Y � :.I 6� • . (509) L¢r � P/ n-c' 3. Item 3 is acceptable to SIP. 4. Item 4 is acceptable to SIP. 5. It is requested that Item 5 be deleted. There are currently five lanes on Sullivan Road which could be redesignated if traffic conditions e ver w a turning ni�ing lane. vaarh 5. This item i acceptable to "S'IP as - far a`sde d of way. However, SIP feels there is no need to construct the roadway until the lots along the new alignment are �� Ow developed in conformance with the definition and intent of a _ binding site plan. SIP also asks that when the new �" alignment is constructed it should be to a 24' pavement �✓ n��`e `width until the RID described in Item 8 is initiated. It was o � also our understanding that this alignment is acceptable with the County Public Works Department. No reference is #t� made to this in your letter. - q m 'G �^^ S a l al a S a c c, u/-Ya.. 7. This will be corrected on the binding site plan. We request clarification on whether you prefer the road name to be Fairview Avenue or Marietta Lane. It has been referred to � H both ways on correspondence to SIP. O's 1 - � Ln S,P ���%, C,lle.d� '1+ hGme, �(m H5 ar e�A or s . p, Y� a is A 1 G,nt — Q� Ls 8. It is requested that Item 8 be cha "nged �s\,Wfollows: c"5��pj6l Z-�� ti "No building permits will be released on p 9 P parcels having � n Apt —G<< irIfrontage on Euclid Avenue, Fairview Avenue, or the Private b j °°if4 Roads until developers sign an agreement with the County not ` Flo ola,fetiee, to protest an RID." This RID would be tied to a traffics T count as mutually agreed upon by the County and SIP. An � escrow account could be set aside by Spokane Industrial Park or developer at the time each building permit is applied for if the County so wishes. v 9. This item is acceptable to SIP, 10. This item is acceptable to SIP. 11. This item is acceptable to SIP, y Nc 12, We will add this statement to the binding site plan. �c 13. We will add this statement to the binding site plan. 4 14. It is our understanding that the proposed binding site plan ^ �s is in conformance with resolution No. 80 -1592. 15. It is requested that this statement be deleted. See `S discussion in Item 5. Sc� (c m GTRR ✓J — c :t r % s;q�w o n 16. This statement will be added to the binding site plan. s 'Naylor Engineering Civil Design and Land Planning o s W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101 • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 3283371 `a 17. The binding site plan will be changed to incorporate these radius's. 18. This item is acceptable to SIP except that it is requested that sidewalks be deleted as previously discussed in Item 2. 19. We will add this statement to the binding site plan. 20. It is requested that the first sentence of this item be changed to read. "Private road plans fronting the property are the responsibility of the developer and are required prior to the release of a building permit." C O l Prior to Filing Binding Site Plan 1. SIP will comply with this item. 2. SIP will comply with this item. It is requested that building permits be allowed while the plans requested in Items 1 and 2 are in progress. f �, t o /'0 ) /,O e 3. It is requested that this item be deleted per our discussion in Item 5. 4. SIP will comply with this item. 5. It is requested that 68' to 64' in co Road Standards for a 6. See Item 8 (previous 7. See Item 8 (previous the right of way width be changed from nformance with currently adopted Spokane secondary arterial. 7- -)' t5'- ✓.-� 1 n , vvt lantit_5 — yo" page). 5�;8 Prior to Release of Building Permit 1. Spokane Industrial Park has an on site sewage system and treatment plant. A plan showing new sewer has been submitted to Spokane County Utilities Department. A(, f s1.6 M1 2, 3, 4. These items are acceptable to SIP. Spokane Industrial Park submitted this project to Spokane County as a binding site plan because it was represented and understood that a binding site plan allows for phased development and improvements in conjunction with land development. Your general conditions of approval seem to be more in line with a final plat than a binding site plan. Expenditures to conform to the general Taylor Engmeenng CPA Design and Land Planning W. 55 Mason Ave,. Suite 101 • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 3203371 .0 I. conditions of approval would be well over one million dollars prior to development taking place. U) hit' ) rN .J Y) - pIcjv Spokane Industrial Park currently has one client ready to begin $oryt development immediately. This client has strongly indicated that they will take their project and 300+ associated jobs to Idaho if accommodations can not be make immediately. SIP also has 2 pages of interested clients from their recent commercials aired during the '88 World Olympics. It is for these reasons we request immediate action. This new industry can be a tremendous boost for Spokane County. New jobs were the first priority goal of Momentum 88 and vie all need to work to a timely and business like completion of the binding site plan. Sincerely, Taylor Bering erry l Tay r P.E. / Owner �t / MAA /kmo cc: Theron Rust 11ZA p— Paul Redmond Dennis Scott Wally Hubbard 00V - � ti Taylor Engineering CM Design and land Plaruwng W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101 • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 3283371 Taylor Fi�gmeering Civil Design and Land Planning January 22, 198 SPokdne County Engineers N 81I Jefferson Spokane, t,ashinyton 99201 A i 1N: Gary Nel.`: oil. P.E. RE: SP0kane Industrial Park South 3inding Site Plan REcriv D JAN 2 5 7988 SPOKANE COL"'TY ENriP!r.FR Exp anSioil 41 Gentlemen: Our analysis combined with historical data indicates 5O% of the existing *traffic on Sullivan is traveling to or from :.he present Industrial Park We conclude. this to be' a very conservative apportionment. In light of this, the 2.5 trips per day p person used for future traffic projections, appears to be morn_ reasunable and historically defensible than the 3.5 trips per day b , W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101. Spokane, WA 99201. (509) 3283371 �o The following letter, design data, and phasing schedule is in response to your traffic review and our follow -up discussion and meeting. We have addressed each area of r.oncern, as depicted and sequenced in your letter. r � n our traffic analysis report we attempted to match the xisting Spokane Industrial Site traffic volumes with historical traffic count data. We projected new volumes by linear Progression based on predicted density of workers acre. The existing Spokane County average annual daily traffic count indicates the following counts: Q Sullivan - South of Euclid - 17360 Sullivan - North of Euclid - 11030 Euclid - East of Sullivan 1480 _ Euclid - East of Flora 1353. Our traffic analysis indicates the following existing and future conditions. IN DUSTRIAL PARR OUTLE EXISTING FUTURE Westbound Exits from o p Industrial Park wt 8000 12,650 on to Sullivan Road C4^^ , Eastbound Exit at Flora and Euclid 2nOO 3,150 Our analysis combined with historical data indicates 5O% of the existing *traffic on Sullivan is traveling to or from :.he present Industrial Park We conclude. this to be' a very conservative apportionment. In light of this, the 2.5 trips per day p person used for future traffic projections, appears to be morn_ reasunable and historically defensible than the 3.5 trips per day b , W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101. Spokane, WA 99201. (509) 3283371 �o referenced in the ITE Manual. (In fact, if 3.5 trips per day were used with current occupancy, it would show that nearly all traffic on Sullivan is to or from the Industrial Park which is surely not the case.) All roads within the park are 1�xpected to he private roads, other than Euclid. 'We hive designed Fai °eiew Aven e and Seccnd Street to conform WILL Spokane County Road Standards so that cr`t i'E turned over —9t some point in the future. We p -opcse th•'- soeec Iir.)it on the private roads he 20 MPH and the speed limit on Euclid set at the established County speed. Figure 21 -1, attached A, Page 9, Section.. 21, of the 1 "Majo- Review Prcgram for the Spokane Comprehensive Pi an" shows Euclid Avenue designated as a collecter. The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and the Spokane County Road Standards are not consistent for typical cross sections. The following table illustrates the inconsistency's: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ROAD STANDARDS Collector Arterial Collector Arteri Secondary Arterial Capacity 7000 500 - 5000 1500 - 40000 (Vehicles Per Day) Right of Ways 70' 60' 64' (f t.) Z w ej 4�` Curb to Curb 40' 40' 44' We proposed a cross section that combined the above data. Our future estimate of 8773 vehicles per day (5610 - outlet # 2 and 3163 outlet d4) exceeds the existing traffic count of 1485 vehicles per day by almost 6 times. We selected the Spokane County Standard Road Plan's secondary arterial for our cross section which is designated to have an average daily traffic design of up to 40,000 vehicles per day.. The 'proposed right of way width is 68' which meets the Spokane County Road Standards requirements for a major arterial, or a traffic volume of up to 40,000 vehicles per day. The curb to curb distance selected was 44' which is also designated as a secondary arterial. Our design is y o 40, quite conservative providing for an ultimate ve is es day when the future fl o ��dlapacirt t per expected ieAl demand is only 8800. However, Spokane Industrial Park has no � II problem with oversiziny r•iuht of ways or ultimate r•cad widths to $� whichever standard you wish to follow. 'p� ..f .. "` � / Our proposed section shows a 20' easement on both sides of the road, outside the right of way. This easement will be utilized for 208 drainage. It should be sufficient to handle runoff from whichever size road width is selectee. Taylor ee ' Tai' �� � ^ ,v� Civil Design and turd Plant t� o W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101 . Spo.ane. vg 9920, . (509) 3283371 X 'i/ \Q$ \L 1 -SA c�- r1FWh4 G& —(,NI I +'��t v`eYQ,�r -.. 4 titi�R, Ong ol�+ �X Z v Standard sidewa1ksar - ; `incIu ed on ou G1 J plan. Our traffic ~' analysis proposes a system of y g g P P Y p athways linking buildings to each 1 other, to parking areas, and to transit stops. The Industr ", Development Handbook by ULI - the Urban Lan,l Institute, E Washington D.C., 1575 recommends this approach as illustrated by �.s F the fol lowing: 17 "In general sidewalks aeon streets in ind st 1 z g u ria areas are not functional except under unusual circumstances. Far more appropriate is a system of pedestrian pathways linking buildings to each other, to parking areas, and to transit stops. Where plans include significant amounts of open space, and residential and conmercia? uses are located within convenient walking distance, this system of walkways will be even more justifiable and desirable. Sidewalks in an industrial area are an unnecessary expense both for first cost and for maintenance." a�a c k A request for design deviation is attached. e°-- " 5 5 The owner agrees with provision for construction of an additional x�e p turning lane on Sullivan Road between Ermina Lane and the k realigned Euclid Road. Spokane Industrial Park will dedicate an pj� -\N- ?ditional 14' of right of ways for that purpose. S � P applicant proposes that the phasing of all County Road development be by an RID and be based on an area development y consideration. Since there is no immediate impact on the Count Road System; and since significant impact will occur as a function of developed property, we propose that the RID for additional turn lanes and Euclid Avenue improvements from bw� Ivb \ k"Su11ivan Street to Flora Street, take place at such time that pNf� Sixty Percent (60 %) , of the land along Euclid Avenue is developed ale 3 a and occupied. Construction plans for the above described RID k would be completed by the owner prior to Binding Site Plan Acceptance. — p 1a. nt d t" h� r.0. s`i�4 F n d w I it U IKAvvT ; f-5 �( We also propose that road improvements, other than Euclid Avenue and the turning lanes, be accomplished by the person or agency requesting a building permit for lots other than those bordering Euclid Avenue. The owner would provide ar overall plan for roads establishing required grade, centerline cury Lure, alignment, and .traffic control measures. — r L.; k% � %a5-{- uL' r �p �v /� n (� t� /a:.s ..l'o� o`fk�+'9a`f r ✓ y� -�r vi. Il'� We request :that the previously issued Determination of Non ti 1 Significance be accepted in view of the agreements contained in this letter,., We are anxious to proceed with this binding site plan in�a ' id mariner. Spokane Industrial Park wishes to �, Taylor Engineering Civil Design and Luid Planning `' V•' W. 55 Knon Ave., Suae 10, . SMm m. WA 99201. (509) 328 -3371 J expedite an agreement with you as soon as possible. If you have further_ questions regarding this letter or would like to discuss impacts further in a meeting, please call. Sincerely, Tayl r ineeri o 4 e LY. Ta to ,P, E. Owner MAN /csm Enclosures Taylor Etigineering Civil Design and Land Mining W. 55 Mission Ave.. Suite 101 • Spowane. WA 99201 . (509) 3283371 Taylor now L ' Design Spokane Cour;ty Eninecrs N 811 V!effe: son Spokane, tashington 99201 ATTN: Gary Nelson. P.E. RE: Spokane Industrial Park South Expansion 8intling Sire Plan 17 - -87 Gentlemen: RECEIVED 'JAN 2 5 1988 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER The following letter, design data, and phasing schedule is in response to your traffic review and our follow -up discussion and meeting. We have addressed each area of concern, as depicted and sequenced in your letter. In our traffic analysis report,. we attempted to match the existing Spokane Industrial Site traffic•volumes• with historical traffic count data. l '. We -projected n'ew vo1um'es -by_ linear ,;r•ogression based on., pr,ed•icted density of "•v;orke'r -per acre:. The existing County average an "nual daily traffic count indicates the following counts: Sullivan - South of Euclid - 17360 Sullivan - North of Euclid - 11030 Euclid - East of Sullivan - 1480 Euclid - East of Flora - 1353. Our traffic analysis indicates the following existing and future conditions. IN DUSTRIAL P ARK OUTL Westbound Exits from Industrial Pari, on to Su.ilivan Road Eastbound Exit at Fl ora and Etic I i A EXIS TING FUTU 8000 12,650 000 3,150 Out analysis combined with historical data indicates 50% of the existing traffic on Sullivan is traveling to or. from `.lie- present: Industrial.Park. 4!e conclude this to be a very conservative apportionment. In light of this, the 2.5 trips per day oor person used for future traffic pr of P tiors, appears to be mo r r- reasonable and historically defensible than the 3.5 trips per day W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101 . Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 328 -3371 � referenced in the ITE Manu:al.- ( In` �.fac't, if 3.5 trips per day were used with current occupancy, it would show that nearly all traffic on Sullivan is to or from the Industrial Park which is surely not the case.) All roads within the park are expected to be private roads, other than EMU. . We have designed Fai nview Avenue and Second Street to conform with Spokane county Road Standards so that they may be turned over.at some point in the future. We propose the :peed Limit on the private roads be 20 MPH and the speed limit on Euclid set at the established County speed. Figure 21 -1, attached A, Page 9, Section 21, of the 1986 "Major Review Program for the Spokane Comprehensive Plan" shows Euclid Avenue designated as a collector-.. The Spokane County Comprehensive 41 an and the Spokane Cohn :;y -Road Standards are not consistent for typical cross sections. The following table illustrates the inconsistency's: COMPREHEN Collector SIVE PLAN ROAD STANDARDS Arterial Capacity (Vehicles Per Day) Right of Ways (ft.) Curb to Curb 7000 70' 40' Collector Arteri 500 - 5000 1500 - 40000 60' 64' 44' ia1 We proposed a cross section that combined the above data. Our future estimate of 8773 vehicles per day (5610 - outlet r 2 and 3163 outlet N4) exceeds the existing traffic count of 1485 vehicles per day by almost 6 times. We selected the Spokane County Standard Road Plan's secondary arterial for our cross section which is designated to have on average daily traffic desia.n of up to 40,000 vehicles per day. The nro.posed right of way width is 68' which meets the Spokane County Road Standards requirements for a major arterial, or a traffic volume of up to 40,000 vehicles per day. The curb to curb distance selected was 44' which is also designated as a secondary arterial. Our design is quite conservative providing for an ultimate capacity of 40,000 vehicles per day when the expected future demand is only 8800. However, Spokane Industrial Park has no problem with eversiziny riuht of ways or ultimate road widths to whichever standard you wish to fA1 ow. Our proposed section shows a 20' easement on both sides of the road, outside the right of way. This easement will be utilized for 208 drainage. It should be sufficient to handle runoff from whichever size road width is selectee'. Taylor Engmeermg Chi Design and Land Pluming W. 55 Mission Ave,. Suite 101 • Swkene, WA 99201 • (509) 3283371 I_ Standard sidewalks are not included on our pla analysis proposes a system of pathways linking other, to parking areas, and to transit stops Dev elopment Handbook by ULI - the Ur -ban Washington D.C., 1975 recommends this approach the follo::ing: n. Our traffic buildings to each The Industrial: Land Institute, as illustrated by "In general, sidewalks along streets in industrial areas are not functional except under unusual circumstances. Far more appropriate is a system of pedestrian pathways linking buildings to each other, to parking areas, and to transit stops. Where plans include significant amounts of open space, and residential and conmercia! uses arle located within convenient walking distance, this system of walkways will be even more justifiabie and desirable. Sidewalks in an industrial area are an unnecessary expense both for first cost and for maintenance." A request for design deviation is attached. The owner agrees with provision for construction of an additional turning lane on Sullivan Road between Ermina Lane and the realigned Euclid Road. Spokane Industrial Park will dedicate an additional 14' of right of ways for that purpose. The applicant proposes that the phasing of all County Road development be by an RID and be based on an area development consideration. Since there is no immediate impact on the County Road System; and since significant impact will occur as a function of developed property, we propose that the RID for additional turn lanes and Euclid Avenue improvements from Sullivan Street to Flora Street, take place at such time that Sixty Percent (60 %) , of the land along Euclid Avenue is developed and occupied. Construction plans for the above described RID would be completed by the owner prior to Binding Site Plan Acceptance. We also propose that road 'improvements, and the turning lanes, be accomplished requesting a building permit for lots Euclid 'Avenue. The owner would provide establishing required grade, centerline traffic control measures. other than Euclid Avenue by the person or agency other than those bordering ar. overall plan for roads curvature, alignment, and We request :that the previously issued Determination o= Won Significance be accepted in view of the agreements contained in this letter. We are anxious to proceed with this binding site plan in a rapid manner. Spokane Industrial Park wishes to Taylor Engineering Civil Design and Land Planning W. 55 Mission Ave., Sute 101 • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 3283371 expedite an agreement with you as soon as possible. If you have further questions regarding this letter or would like to discuss impacts further in a meeting, please. call. Sincere' Tay] r ineeri 4 erry5. Ta �lo ,P,E. Owner M AA/ csm Enclosures Taybr Fng nmfiiw Civil Design and land Plwudng W. 55 Mission Ave., Sude 101 . Spokane. WA 99201 • (509) 3283371 avoid both extra costs.in upgrading under - designed facilities and liabilities resulting from operations on such roads. Geometric requirements for road design include dimensional features such as alignment, sight dis- tances, and clearances. Values for geometric stand- ards range in accordance with the design speed usually given in 10 m.p.h. increments. Sight dis- stance requirements include stopping sight dis- tance, passing sight distance, and corner sight dis- tance. The developer should assure that geometric design requirements are considered in preliminary planning to avoid revisions later by reviewing authorities. Standard drawings, usually available in most agencies, include configurations and details for typical street sections, commercial entrances and private driveways, cul -de -sacs and turnarounds, intersections, interchanges, medians, bridge and bridge approaches, guard rail, signalization, sign- ing, lighting, and others. Standard construction de- tails are usually available for drainage items, curbs and gutters'. erosion control features, sidewalks and paved approaches, pavement joints, traffic control equipment, lighting, signing equipment, and numer- ous others. Care should be exercised in the use of standards to insure that - adequate designs are prop- erly used. Standards are subject to constant revi- sions and may become obsolete rapidly: In general, sidewalks along streets in industrial areas are not functional except under unusual cir- cumstances. Far more appropriate is a system of pedestrian pathways linking buildings to each other, to parking areas, and to transit stops. Where plans include significant amounts of open space, and residential and commercial uses are located within convenient walking distance, this system of walkways will be even more justifiable and desir- able. Sidewalks in an industrial area are an un- necessary expense both for first cost and for main- tenance. In addition, consideration should be given to the value of bicycle paths using similar criteria to that suggested for sidewalks and walkway systems. Bicycle paths in street rights -of -way are being rec- ommended in many areas, but the hazard of heavy truck traffic intermingled with bicycle traffic needs careful evaluation. As ULI Industrial Council mem- ber Lowell Eastman points out, "In industrial areas bicycle paths when appropriate should be taken off the streets whenever possible and placed in the green areas or in the yard setbacks next to col- lector streets or major thoroughfares." He further points out that the introduction - of'bicycle` paths 115 4 -9 Pedestrian pathways are used to integrate recreational and employment areas in Erin Mills Southern Business Park. DEC 27 '91 17:11 SIP Ill 5P®KAME ' PA9K -rRIa�. � p TELECOPY TRANSMITTAL 7 t��ct 'Y1S� T0: _ 1 FAX NUMBER: OW 'e\ FAR NUMBER: 92 -3748 PRONE NUMBER: (509) 924 -17?0 TOTAL 1 PAGES (INCLUDES COVER): DATE: F1' i Itiunedi.ate Reply Requested REMARKS: N. 3808 Svillven RG • Spokane:, `wdshi on 99216 -1670 • (509) 9241120 Managed and OP'''aie.d by 'r;. -mil K Ha ?ood Company P.1 /2 December 20, 1991 Mr. Scott Brown Pentzer Development Corp. N 3808 Sullivan Road Spokane, WA. 99216 -1670 RE: Letter of December S, 1991 R We do not agree with all items in your letter, however we have reduced the required surety for all items connected with - rwe ., y Dear Mr. Brown: Spokane County Engineers ti �,049D rovements Office that t not delayed by the signal LA E im construction . " e[l to b�+G —O� SUret - �L 7/W-se Y We received your letter of December 2, 1991 stating the , reasons why you believe Pentzer Development Corporation should not be required to extend surety for roadway and drainage improvements in BSP 17 and BSP 21. 1 now have had time to discuss this matter with the Spokane County Engineer. Q surety other than an v We do not agree with all items in your letter, however we have reduced the required surety for all items connected with - rwe ., y avin Z 'It is the position of the p gti Spokane County Engineers �- n �,049D rovements Office that t not delayed by the signal LA E im construction . " e[l to b�+G —O� SUret - ::�--- =-- =d _rnt� " such time as 7/W-se are completed. The amount o`t surety regvirLaDwould be g80, - rRLS rLGu&. !S GASC-f] om n4E' v.lo�uc 12E��I�WG "ID 8C r-&+ ,Z% -BLE AL D CJ rprie RC�L/CpOY1 C ss, ✓ 6 da r1 R CUCL40 �4P, 7'NC EM4jU1 ✓G k 2o$S Should you wish to post a type of surety other than an "irrevocable letter of credit ", I would be happy to discuss other options with you. If YOU have any questions, feel free to call me at 456 -3600. Z-� r r a� - v sla` Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hermann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer .Terry Sims Plat Inspector T.QaFr l TE7nS SwA.L- G0^'S'Ti4,1CTronl A.'D EDw1E FIn1 "L A,7,lJSl�1�G'J� T� SDrv.0 DF {`i�'C �2�GJ �LI.S. r oject Name Project File Number �f Sponsor's Name C L--J ( //I , Engineer /Surveyor's Name t Telephone # — 33 7,1 Date Submitted Description Ini�ti NIP e--v_ 0 RF BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR 1/(/l OGF IN THE MATTER OF BINDING ) FINDINGS OF FACT, SITE PLAN NO. BSP -87 -17 ) CONCLUSION AND DECISION �9& THIS MATTER, an application from Spokane Industrial Park has been received a t� decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulations, on the 51h day of May, 1988. The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering the decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION The proposal is to divide 160 acres into 46 lots for the development of industrial lots. 2. The proposal is located in the north half of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, lying north of the railroad between Sullivan and Flora Roads. 3. The current zoning of the property is Manufacturing, established in 1960. The proposed lot sizes, frontage and intended uses are allowed within this zone. 4. The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial. The lots and uses proposed are generally in accord with this planning category. 5. The required public notice was provided for this proposal and agencies having a potential interest in the project were notified and asked for recommendations. 6. There was a recommendation for a more detailed environmental review from the Spokane County Engineers. The sponsor and the Spokane County Engineers have agreed upon necessary road improvements and phasing of development to mitigate potential improvements and phasing of development to mitigate potential adverse traffic impacts. A mitigated Determination of Nonsigniricance is substituted for the original D.N.S.. The mitigating measures recommended by the Spokane County Engineer's have been agreed upon by the sponsor to generally reduce anticipated traffic impacts of the proposal. 7. That in consideration of the recommended conditions and Spokane County development standards, the proposal is not detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. 8. That the project is proposed to have phased development in three stages with necessary improvements constructed to meet the needs of each phase. Such phasing is consistant with subdivision practices. 9. That the provisions of the Manufacturing Zone and other sections of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance apply to the use of the individual lots. DECISION Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact, Binding Site Plan Application BSP. 87.17 is hereby APPROVED subject to conditions noted below which shall be complied with by the applicant and/or sponsor prior to finalization of the binding site plan. 0 Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1 . The preliminary binding site plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 2. That the Final Binding Site Plan be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary binding site plat of record as legally described and advertised. No increase of lot number shall occur without a new application submittal and approval. 3. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Binding Site Plan to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of Approval. 4. That the preliminary binding site plan be given conditional approval for three (3) years to June 1, 1991. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 5. That a Final Binding Site Plan number be indicated before the final binding site plan is filed; such number to be approved by the County Planning Director /Designee. 6. That appropriate road names be Indicated on the binding site plan. 7. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the proposed final binding site plan. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final binding site plan. 8. That 3 current certificates of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final binding site plan. 9. That the following statement be placed in the final binding site plan dedication: "No more than one primary use be placed on any Lot nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships, or building sites without first filing a replat.' 10. The final binding site plan map shall indicate by a clear dashed line, the required setbacks from all private, tract x or public roads. The dedication shall contain a statement that: 'Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested. The setbacks indicated on this binding site plan may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained.' 1 1 . That a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building 8 Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final binding site plan or any phase of the preliminary binding site plan that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the sponsor. 12. The purveyor will also certify on the Water Plan that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule for improvements will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final binding site plan. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. ri Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 3 13. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: 'The public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this binding site plan, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot.' 14 That no building permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Binding Site Plan until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer 'that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Binding Site Plan', signed and stamped by said engineer. 1 5. That a survey is required prior to the filing of a final binding site plan. COUNTY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. That conditions of approval of the Binding Site Plan by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right of Way and approval of the road sytem. In conjunction with phasing of the final Binding Site Plans, specific conditions appropriate to each phase will be specified. 2. The proposed Binding Site Plan shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 3. The applicant shall deed to Spokane County 14' feet of the subject property for Road Right of Way along Sullivan Road and shall construct an additional traffic lane along Sullivan Road from Marietta Avenue northward to the intersection of Euclid Avenue realigned. Construction may be phased as development occurs along the Sullivan Road frontage. 4. The applicant shall deed to Spokane County 48' feet of Right of Way for Marietta Avenue in the alignment as shown on the preliminary Binding Site Plan. 5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington standard specifications for road and bridge construction and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to road standards and stormwater management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 6. Prior to the filing of each phase of the final binding site plan, appropriate plans, profiles and cross sections as determined by the County Engineer for Sullivan Road, Euclid Avenue and/or Marietta Avenue showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted for approval; road plans to be prepared under the direction of licensed professional Civil Engineer. Euclid Avenue road plans and improvement are to include full depth pavement design and construction (includes existing travelway connection to Flora Road). That appropriate road drainage plans and design calculations as determined by the County Engineer showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted for approval. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed professional Civil Engineer. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the release of a building permit a surface water disposal plan for the building site or portion thereof if the development Is phased. Prior to the release of a building permit, a parking plan and traffic circulation plan for each site shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 0 Findings for BSP•17.87 Page 4 9. Construction within the existing or proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with 'As Built' plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 10. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 1 1 . All construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to filing the final binding site plan or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, 'As Built' plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 12. The applicant shall construct Euclid Avenue and Marietta Avenue as shown on the preliminary binding site plan as public roads. These roadways shall be constructed in compliance with the typical roadway cross sections designated and approved by the County Engineer. A copy of those typical cross sections is attached for Inclusion in the 'Conditions of Approval'. All other roadways shown on the preliminary binding site plan shall be private roads. 13, The change in alignment and vacation of current alignment of Euclid Avenue shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the binding site plan containing that particular phase of the development. Prior to Ile acceptance of the new alignment of Euclid Avenue by Spokane County, the right of way for the new roadway must be deeded to the County and the new roadwaay constructed per the approved Typial Roadway Cross Section. The vacation 7/ /pg of the existing Euclid Avenue will not become final until the new alignment is z established by the Board of County Commissioners. The change in alignment and vacation of the current alignment of Euclid Avenue shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the Binding Site Plan containing that particular phase of the realignment. 14 In conjunction with the realignment of Euclid Avenue the applicant is responsible for the reconstruction of the existing traffic signal system at the Sullivan Road and realigned Euclid Road intersection and for the construction of the entire additional traffic lane on Sullivan Road. 15. In conjunction with the requirements of Short Plat 86 -457 the applicant is responsible for the future construction of a new traffic signal system at the intersection of Sullivan Road and Marietta Avenue when the Intersection meets traffic engineering warrants for traffic signal construction. 16. That the minimum curb radii at all street intersections within the proposal shall be 30' feel. Minimum radii at Sullivan Road intersections shall be 40' feel. 17. To construct the road improvements stated therein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvements pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID Is created or any road Improvement project Is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curbs, pathways, drainage control, paving, traffic signal systems, etc.) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. 18. Should an RID be pursued, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide road and drainage plans sufficient for the creation of a Road Improvement District. These plans shall be prepared by a licensed professional civil engineer and shall be prepared in compliance with Spokane County road standards and drainage guidelines. In order to construct required roadway improvements on Sullivan Road, Marietta Avenue and Euclid Avenue the applicant may petition the Board of County Commissioners to create a Road Improvement District R.I.D. The RID must be created by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the binding site plan. Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 5 19. The following statement shall appear on the binding site plan document 'Parking will be prohibited along Euclid Avenue', 20. A statement shall be placed on the binding site plan doucmeni which prohibits direct access from lots to Sullivan Road or Flora Road. 21 Direct access from lots to Marietta Avenue and Euclid Avenue shall be limited to the access points approved by the County Engineer and as shown on the preliminary binding site plan. 22. A minimum 20' foot wide easement shall be provided along the east side of Sullivan Road and each side of the public road right of way on Euclid Avenue and Marietta Avenue. The purpose of the easement is to accommodate pathways, landscaping, and drainage from roadways. 23. A system of pathways, accessible to the public, be constructed along Sullivan Road, Euclid Road and Marietta Avenue. The pathway is to be located within the common pathway, drainage and landscape easement area. That a statement shall be placed on the binding site plan permitting Spokane County to enter within the easement for the purpose of drywell and sign maintenance. Snow removed from the public roadways shall be permitted with the easement. Maintenance of pathways, drainage swales and landscaping areas shall be the responsiblity of the applicant. 24. The proposed private roads as shown on the preliminary binding site plan are approved by the County Engineer. 25. The following statement must appear on the binding site plan document: 'The private roads as shown hereon are easements which provide a means of Ingress and egress for those lots within the binding site plan having frontage thereon.' 26. Private road plans with connections to a public road are the responsibility of the developer and are required prior to the release of a building permit. A statement to this effect shall be placed in the binding site plan document. 27. Private roads be improved to a minimum improved surface width of 30' feet with a minimum 20' fool wide landscaping and drainage easement on either side of the roadway. Subject to approval under section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. 28. All vested owners shall sign and record private road documents as prescribed by the Spokane County Engineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Recording numbers shall be referenced on the binding site plan document. 29. The following statement shall be placed on the binding site plan document: 'WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, Improve, maintain or other wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this binding site plan. By accepting this binding site plan or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. 30 The following statement shall be placed on each phase of the binding site plan: 'The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successors) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successors) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, the object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in 0 Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 6 conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the Issuance of any on -site sewage disposal permit or building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 5. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 6. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 7. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: 'A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized.' 8. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: 'Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.' 9. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: 'The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot.' COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition Includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94'. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Project will connect to existing Park Sewer System Review and Inspection of the sewer plans will be the responsibility of the applicant. BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1 . The required fire flow for any building or property development is determined by building size, type of construction, and proximity of exposures. Required fire flows shall be based on an evaluation of each building at the time of building permit application. 2. Project is located within Fire District No. 1. The required fire flow is determined by the district. Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 7 3. Fire hydrants for commercial and industrial buildings shall be located so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175' feet from the hydrant. 4. Fire hydrants shall be located so as to be accessible to fire apparatus and not be obstructed by any structure or vegetation or have the visibility impaired for a distance of fifty feet in the direction of vehicular approach to the hydrant. 5. Specific location of hydrants shall be determined by the Fire District. 6. The applicant shall provide verification from the Fire District to the Department of Building and Safety that provisions have been made for adequate fire protection prior to the release of building permits. DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY A new water right application for any new wells will probably be required for this project. Please contact Mr. Rynear R. Huffman (509- 456 -6199) of Ecology's Eastern Regional Office for further information. u 1:191 K*J AVLe o 1 . Water main extenslorvwater system expansions require the applicant to complete a Water System Plan and submit plans and specifications for approval before construction of the proposed water mains. Approved on —" da of 1988. DOUGLAS Subdivision Administrator CC: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Sponsor Surveyor File Parties of Record ATTACHMINT 8 FUTURE DAILY TRAFFIC -. 7 OUTLET j C� OUTLET 12 A lr7.' \k AR EAA =U%1D AVE. �4 OUTLET— '3 .... ... ...... ® =) : .......... - EH� O ........... To ET I OF %EHICLES OUTLET PER OAY 5720 02 5610 13 1320 14 3163 ITS o 0 a go 7,2) = Lp 6 1 , mv , wj w T Digineedrig, a PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 RECE /IVED JU( "z 1yy8 CNWY 44w"� TO: Theron Rust as Vice President for Spokane Industri Countv Health District and County Utilities:_ / I ✓1 FR0N: DOUGLAS S. ADAMS, Subdivision Admin RE: Condition #13 of the County Engineer's Department on Spokane Industr Park BSP -17 Enclosed please find a corrected copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision for Binding Site Plan #17 - Spokane Industrial Park Project. Please note that the County Engineer's condition number 13 was originally shorted a paragraph. The corrected copy contains the missing paragraph. Thanks! SIC...( Ca.." LON., .*use J OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: Gary Nelson FROM: Bob Turner DATE: February 26, 1991 SUBJECT: Design Deviation for BSP 87 -17, 88 -21, 88 -22 The approach that Scott Busch has taken can be called the "equivalent asphalt approach" (my term). This approach converts the crushed rock base to equivalent asphalt depth and then analyzes loads on the equivalent asphalt. Based on this approach Scott then applied a design chart that compares asphalt depth to equivalent axle load from a 18,000 lb. vehicle. Scott then reasons that since a 200 lb. man and not a 18,000 lb. vehicle is using the path it is well (implied over) designed and will last 27 years. Conversations with Ed Schlect with the Asphalt Institute and a former D.O.T. employee indicate that Scott's approach is acceptable in theory but in practice anything less than 4" crushed rock base is unacceptable. Mr. Schlect then cited a case where a bike path was constructed for the D.O.T. in Olympia and through error only 2" instead of 9 of base was used. The path was in a deteriorated state in a very short time and has been a continuing problem since it was constructed. Allan Jackson from the D.O.T., here in Spokane, said that even though there are no standards for bike paths in their Design Manual the paths that have been constructed in the District have used 2" of asphalt over 9 crushed rock base. Jim Haines of Spokane County has expressed the same opinions that anything less than 9 of crushed rock base will be detrimental to the longevity and functionality of the project. A final consideration would be to use the Asphalt Institute standards for recreational surfaces. If we assume that the subgrade is good to excellent the suggested standard is 4" of asphalt. The County only requires 2" of asphalt leaving 2 of asphalt extra. Using the reverse of the procedure that Scott Busch used we will convert the 2 of extra asphalt to crushed rock base as follows: (2" ACP) X (1/.2) = 10" of crushed rock base, obviously more than 2 Based upon the conversations that I have had in researching this design deviation I can only suggest a denial of this request. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue Spokane, WA 99204 -0366 P. O. Box 2122 Spokane, WA 99210 -2122 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT To: Theron Rust Spokane Industrial Park N. 3808 Sullivan Rd. Spokane, WA 99216 -1670 cc: Taylor Engineering Our Order No.: C- 188077 -CB Mortgagor /Purchaser: Spokane Industrial Park There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our preliminary report since December 19, 1988, at 8 A.M. Except as set forth below: 1. The legal description is amended to be: All that certain real property located in the North half of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 12; thence North 89 ° 36 1 55" East, along the North line of the North- east quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 70.88 feet; thence South 0 °21'00" West, a distance of 47.00 feet, to the true point of beginning; thence continue South 0 0 21 1 00" West, 724.10 feet; thence South 89 0 49'03" East, 692.92 feet; thence South 0 0 21'00" West, 613.86 feet; thence South 74 0 59'50" West, 990.79 feet; thence South 15 0 00 1 10" East, 250.00 feet, to the North right of way line of The Burlington Northern Railroad; thence North 74 0 59 1 50" East, along said North line, a distance of 2896.19 feet to the West line of deeded Flora Road; thence North 0 0 20 1 55" West, along said West line a distance of 1105.74 feet to a point that is 47.00 feet South of the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12; thence South 89 0 36'55" West, parallel with the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 2583.23 feet to the true point of beginning, EXCEPT that portion conveyed to Spokane County for Euclid Road by deeds recorded under Auditor's File Nos. 633555C and 8401090249, being 60 feet wide and extra widths at Flora Road. J /jb C- 188077 -CB Second Supplemental - 2 - 2. Title is now vested in James L. Hatfield and Connie Hatfield, husband and wife, as to an undivided 1/2 interest; and, J. Kent Hatfield and J. Lynn Hatfield, husband and wife, as to an undivided 1/2 interest in the following property described property: All that certain real property located in the North half of Section 12- 25 -44, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 12; thence North 89 °36 East, along the North line of said Section 12, a distance of 70.88 feet; thence South 0 °21'00" West, a distance of 47.00 feet; thence North 89 °36'55" East, 1758.14 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continue North 89 0 36 1 55" East, 225.02 feet; thence South 0 °21 West, 676.74 feet; thence North 89 0 49'03" West, 225.00 feet; thence North 0 0 21 1 00" East, 674.51 feet to the true point of beginning. 3. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount : $90,000.00 Dated : December 29, 1988 Recorded : December 30, 1988 Auditor's No. : 8812300208 Grantor : James L. and Connie Hatfield, husband and wife; and J. Kent and J. Lynn Hatfield, husband and wife Trustee : Ticor Title Insurance Company of California, a corporation Beneficiary : Spokane Industrial Park, Inc., a Washington corporation Affects : All that certain real property located in the North half of Section 12- 25 -44, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 12; thence North 89 °36'55" East, along the North line of said Section 12, a distance of 70.88 feet; thence South 0 0 21'00" West, a distance of 47.00 feet; thence North 89 0 36'55" East, 1758.14 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continue North 89 °36'55" East, 225.02 feet; thence South 0 0 21'00" West, 676.74 feet; thence North 89 °49'03" West, 225.00 feet; thence North 0 °21'00" East, 674.51 feet to the true point of beginning. J /jb C- 188077 -CB Second Supplemental - 3 - 4. Agreement to Subordinate RE : Deed of Trust recorded under Auditor's File No. 8812300208 will be subordinated to a future mortgage or deed of trust to be obtained for constructing improvements Executed By : Spokane Industrial Park, Inc. Dated : December 29, 1988 Recorded : December 30, 1988 Auditor's No. : 8812300209 5. Aquifer protection fees that may be due and payable in accor- dance with Chapter 36.36 RCW. (Specific amounts may be obtained from the County Utility Department, phone #458 - 2538). 6. Taxes for 1989, which cannot be paid until February 15, 1989, Code 212: Old Parcel # New Parcel # General Weed 12541 -9032 45121.9032 $6,275.52 $.60 01546 -9089 45016.9089 $544,139.88 $50.17 801546 -9089 845016.9089 $153.40 S01546 -9089 545016.9089 $435.80 T01546 -9089 T45016.9089 $6,449.84 U01546 -9089 U45016.9089 $2,440.48 Said taxes affect said premises and other property. Note: Said taxes as billed for the current year reflect an exemption as allowed under Chapter 84.36 RCW. Any change in ownership of said premises during the current calendar year may result in a full assessment. For further information, the County Treasurer must be consulted. Dated as of the 13th day of February, 1989, 8 A.M. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Washington State Division By J /jb o y 6 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY FEB 8 1989 West 521 First Avenue P. 0. Box 2122 Spokane, WA 99204 -0366 Spokane, WA 99210 -2122 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT To: Theron Rust Spokane Industrial Park N. 3808 Sullivan Rd. Spokane, WA cc: Taylor Engineering Our Order No.: C- 188077 -CB Mortgagor /Purchaser: Spokane Industrial Park There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our preliminary report since May 19, 1988, at 8 A.M. Except as set forth below: 1. Title is now vested in James L. Hatfield and Connie Hatfield, husband and wife, as to an undivided j interest; and, J. Kent Hatfield and J. Lynn Hatfield, husband and wife, as to an undivided j interest, as to that portion of the Northeast half of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 12; thence South 0 °20'55" East, 47.00 feet; thence South 89 °36'55" West, 855.10 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 0 36'55" West, 225.02 feet; thence South 0 0 21'00" West, 672.28 feet to the North line of Euclid Avenue; thence South 89 0 49'03" East along said North line, 225.00 feet; thence North 0 °21'00" East, 674.51 feet to the true point of beginning. 2. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount : $60,000.00 Dated : November 14, 1988 Recorded : November 16, 1988 Auditor's No. : 8811160170 Grantor : James L. and Connie R. Hatfield; and, J. Kent and J. Lynn Hatfield Trustee : Ticor Title Insurance Company of California, a California corporation Beneficiary : Washington Trust Bank, a corporation Affects : That portion vested in Hatfields D /jb C- 188077 -CB 1st Supplemental - 2 - 3. Deed of Trust to secure ar. indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount : $90,000.00 Dated : November 14, 1988 Recorded : November 16, 1988 Auditor's No. : 8811160171 Grantor : James L. and Connie Hatfield, husband and wife; and J. Kent and J. Lynn Hatfield, husband and wife Trustee : Ticor Title Insurance Company of California, a corporation Beneficiary : Spokane Industrial Park, Inc., a Washington corporation Affects : That portion vested in Hatfields The lien of said Deed of Trust has been subordinated to the lien of the Deed of Trust noted in Paragraph No. 2 above, by agreement recorded November 16, 1988, under Auditor's No. 8811160172. 4. 1988 taxes are paid in full as to parcel nos. 45121.9032, 545016.9089, 845016.9089, 45016.9089 and T45016.9089. 5. General taxes for 1988, in the sum of $00, on land with an assessed value of $(not disclosed), and improvements assessed at $(not disclosed). (Assessor's Parcel No. U01546 -9089 (old), 045016.9089 (new), Code 212 ) Dated as of the 19th day of December, 1988, 8 A.M. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Washington State Division D /jb By D /jb TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue Spokane, Washington 99210 Telephone: (509, 838 -5281 v REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Refer to: C- 188077, Unit 3 RE: Spokane Industrial Park CC: Planning Commission CC: County Engineer Spokane Industrial Park CC: Taylor Engineering ATTN: Theron Rust N. 3808 Sullivan Rd. Spokane, WA This is a report for plat certificate as of May 19, 1988 at 8:00 a.m., covering the following property: All that certain real property located in the North half of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 12; thence North 89 0 36'55" East, along the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 70.88 feet; thence South 0 0 21'00" West, a distance of 47.00 feet, to the true point of beginning; thence continue South 0 0 21'00" West, 717.10 feet, to the South line of deeded Euclid Road; thence South 89 0 49 1 03" East, along said South line, 692.92 feet; thence South 0 0 21'00" West, 620.86 feet; thence South 74 0 59 1 50" West, 990.79 feet; thence South 15 0 00'10" East, 250.00 feet, to the North right of way line of The Burlington Northern Railroad; thence North 74 0 59'50" East, along said North line, a distance of 2896.19 feet to the West line of deeded Flora Road; thence North 0 0 20'55" West, along said West line a distance of 1105.74 feet to a point that is 47.00 feet South of the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12; thence South 89 °36'85" West, parallel with the North line of the Northeast of said Section 12, a distance of 2583.23 feet to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT Euclid Road. VC126 /mca C- 188077, Unit 3 Plat Certificate "Record title is vested in Helical Control Washington Corporation as to that portion quarter of Section 12, Township 25 North, in Spokane County, Washington, described - 2 - Systems, Inc., a of the Northeast Range 44 East, W.M., as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Northeast quarter which bears South 89 0 36 1 55" West a distance of 1469.6 feet from the Northeast corner of Section 12; thence South 0 0 21 1 0 ", West a distance of 47.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 89 0 36'55" East a distance of 390.06 feet; thence South 0 °21 West a distance of 672.27 feet to a point on the North line of Euclid Road; thence North 89 0 49 1 02" West along said North line of Euclid Road a distance of 369.97 feet to the point of curve of a 20 foot radius, curve right, whose central angle is 90 °10 "; thence along the arc of said curve right which central angle is 90 0 10 1 02 "; thence along the arc of said curve right 31.47 feet to the point of tangent; thence North 00 °21'00" East, a distance of 648.35 feet to the true point of beginning. AND Spokane Industrial Park Inc., a Washington Corporation, as to the remainder. SUBJECT T0: Last half general and weed taxes for 1988, in the respective sums of $501.78 and $.30; $259,378.44 and $25.09.; AND, $3,094.31 and $.00 (Assessor's Parcel Nos. 12541 -9032, 01546 -9089; and, T01546 -9089 (old), 45121.9032, 45016.9089; and, 745016.9089 (new), Code 212) Delinquent general taxes for 1988, in the sum of $147.19, plus interest and fees. (Assessor's Parcel No. 801546 -9089 (old), 845016.9089 (new), Code 212) Said taxes affect: A portion of said premises and other property. 2. Lien of real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. 3. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount : $350,000.00 Dated : August 11, 1987 Recorded : August 13, 1987 Auditor's No. : 8708130051 Grantor : Helical Control Systems, Inc., a Washington Corporation Trustee : Ticor Title Insurance Company Beneficiary c Washington Trust Bank, a corporation Affects : That portion of real estate under search vested in Helical Control Systems. VC126 /mca C- 188077, Unit 3 Plat Certificate - 3 - 4. Assignment of Lessor's Interest in Lease for Security. Dated : August 11, 1987 Recorded : August 13, 1987 Auditor's No. : 8708130052 By : Helical Control Systems, Inc., to Washington Trust Bank Affects : That portion vested in Helical Control Systems 5. Notice to the Public By : Helical Control Systems, Inc., a Washington Corporation Dated. : August 17, 1987 Recorded : August 24, 1987 Auditor's No. : 8708240149 Agreement To : Join and participate in the formation of a County Improvement District (RID) pursuant to RCW 36.88, at such time as a district may be formed or any Road Improvement Project sanctioned by Spokane County, which involves the lands herein described. The owners, their heirs, and assigns further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for said Road Improvement District (RID) estab- lished pursuant to RCW 36.88. It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. Affects That portion vested in Helical Control Systems 6. For easements, restrictions, and other exceptions, see Schedule "B -1" attached. NOTES: 1. General taxes for 1988, in the sum of $418.15, are paid in full. (Assessor's Parcel No. 501546 -9089 (old), 545016.9089 (new), Code 212.) Said taxes affect: A portion of said premises and other property. VC126 /mca C- 188077, Unit 3 Plat Certificate - 4 - This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. FEE: $150..00 TAX: $ 11.70 G TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office By V �& 4'A Authorized Signat VC126 /mca C- 188077, Unit 3 Plat Certificate SCHEDULE "B -1" - 5 - 1. Reservations contained in deed under which title is claimed, recorded under Auditor's File No. 737559B, as follows: (1) Right of the public to use, occupy and maintain the public roads now constructed and located along the exterior boundaries of the property. (2) Existing easements, if any, for utilities, irrigation, or drainage. (3) There is reserved to the grantor a permanent and perpetual easement affording the grantor the right of joint use of the railroad trackage within the property which now services the GSA area in the most direct manner. (4) There is reserved to the grantor a permanent and perpetual easement affording the grantor the joint use of the westerly 630 feet of "B" Street (which street adjoins the Army Reserve area on the South) for access to the Army Reserve area. 2. Utility easement 35 feet in width over the North 35 feet of that portion of property vested in Helical Control Systems, Inc., as disclosed in survey recorded under Auditor's File No. 8708100277. (End of Schedule B -1) VC126 /mca A a' .. V_1liJ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 January 24, 1989 Taylor Engineering W. 106 Mission Ave. Suite 106 Spokane, Wa. 99201 RE: Spokane Industrial Park Expansion Dear Mark, We have reviewed your January 12, 1989 letter regarding the Spokane Industrial Park (S.I.P.) expansion. We agree with the dimensions quoted in your letter regarding the cross sections for Euclid and Marietta. The following responses correspond with those comments numbered in your letter: (1) Spokane Industrial Park will need to have easement documents executed and submitted prior to filing the B.S.P. (2) Spokane Industrial Park will need to have documents from the Union Pacific Railroad submitted to Spokane County prior to fili the final R.O.W. and to Spokane County the final approval executed and ng the B.S.P. (3) Once we have approved the road plans for the B.S.P (17, 21, and /or 22), we will calculate a bond amount needed for each phase. It is our understanding that you want us to send this amount directly to Theron Rust. Please indicate what address to use for this letter. Once the plans for each phase have been approved, the S.I.P. can apply for an R.I.D. petition for the street improvements. The exact limits and timing of the R.I.D. can be determined through that process, however, the responsibility for these road improvements lies with the S.I.P. Should the S.I.P. desire to pass these responsibilities along to property purchasers,'it is S.I.P's responsibility to make these arrangements at a private level. Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 51011.1[ �10.SC Some of the information contained in this letter and your January 6, 1989 letter supersedes the general conditions of approval for B.S.P. 17 dated March 31, 1988. Specifically, those items deal with the approved cross sections, R.O.W. dedication requirements, and the location of approaches. Please prepare typical cross sections in the format of the previously approved typical cross sections, have Theron Rust sign them, and submit them for our approval. At that time we will prepare the appropriate new conditions and send them to the Planning Department to update the Conditions of Approval. We have attempted to answer all the questions contained in your letter. If we can answer any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours'I,^ -/W . ) AIL Gary S g Nelson, P.E. Planni g Engineer 'aylor Engineering Civil Design and Land Planning Spokane County Public Works Department Office of County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 RE: Spokane Industrial Park Expansion Gentlemen: AN 1 3 1989 lE .., SPVftR7 �t,u,lffY c ..,.ur ui January 12, 1989 This letter is in response to your letter of January 11, 1989 regarding Spokane Industrial Park Expansion. We agree with your request to maintain 2 feet of right of way behind all curbs. We will adjust the Binding Site Plan accordingly. We will also maintain a 20 foot drainage easement along each side of the roadway rather than,6e 18 foot you have shown. Therefore the cross section for uclid Avenue will be.70 feet back of curb to back of curb, foot right of way and foot drainage easement on both sides. This is a total rig t of way and easement i��dth of 114 feet on Euclid Avenue. The cross section of Marietta Avenue will be 58 feet back of curb to back of curb, 62 feet right of way width and 20 foot drainage easements on both sides. This is a total right of way and easement width of 102 feet on Marietta Avenue. Regarding other questions raised in your letter; (1) Spokane Industrial Park is in the process of obtaining additional right of way from properties previously sold. Theron Rust does not anticipate any problems. (2) We have been in contact with Union Pacific Railroad to obtain addition right of way /easement for the Euclid Avenue crossing. From our conversations with them we anticipate that this also will progress well. (3) It is the objective of Spokane Industrial Park to submit Binding Site Plans No. 87 -17 and No. 21 (Phase I and II) to Spokane County in the next 2 weeks. We request that a letter be sent to Theron Rust indicating required bonding amounts for each phase. C . Ife� MAak A C_ ' t. SO) ra n tu ,, ....'s cc., r e When these 2 Binding Site Plans have been approved and accepted by Spokane County, Spokane Industrial Park will apply for a R.I.D. for roadway improvements for B.S.P. No. 87 -17, B.S.P. No. 21, and B.S.P. No 22. It is the intent of the Industrial Park that the R.I.D. will be for road improvements including grading, paving, 208 areas, curbing and traffic signalization. Landscape easements and pathways will be constructed by Spokane Industrial Park and will not be part of the RI.D. During this application period B.S.P. No. 22 (Phase III) will be submitted to the County. W. 106 Mission Ave. • Svile 206 • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 328 -3371 Also, per discussions with County Staff during the preliminary phases, we propose that the KI.D. language indicate that the R.I.D. construction will not he started until 70% of the land frontage in the Binding Site Plan is developed. Spokane Industrial Park will maintain a minimum 50% ownership in all the land in the R.I.D. area until the R.I.D. petition is approved by the County Commissioners. I hope this clarifies the issues addressed in your letter. If these conditions are acceptable, then we request that these clarifications supersede the General Conditions of Approval for B.S.P. 17 -87 dated March 31, 1988. Sincerely, Taylor Engineering Mark Aronson, P.E. Project Engineer BRS /kmo cc: Theron Rust Taylor Engineering Civil DesiM and Land Planning W. 166 Miss, on AVe. • Suite206 • Spokane, WA99201 - (569328 -3371 s... g. i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 January 11, 1989 Taylor Engineering W. 106 Mission Ave. Suite 106 Spokane, Wa. 99201 RE: Spokane Industrial Park Expansion "Driveway Accesses" Dear Mark, We have reviewed your January 6, 1989 letter regarding the proposed new typical cross sections for Euclid and Marietta in Binding Site Plans 17, 21, and 22. We have also reviewed your proposal for driveway accesses in conjunction with these new typical cross sections. Attached please find a marked up set of the proposed typical sections. We are requesting that you maintain the 2 feet of Right of Way behind the curbs (see attacehd cross sections) as was originally approved on the B.S.P. #17 sections. We are also requesting that the pathways and drainage be included inside an easement on Euclid rather than in the R.O.W., again as they were originally. The new total width of the easements and R.O.W. on Euclid will become 110 feet with your new proposal, which is 10 feet wider than the original cross section. This leads us to ask the following questions: 1. What arrangements have been made to obtain the necessary easements and R.O.W. from Tract E? Your new cross section will require that 7 feet of additional R.O.W. be obtained from this parcel, together with an 18 feet easement. If this R.O.W. and easement cannot be obtained, the design will have to be modified to move the road to the south around Tract E 2. What arrangements have been made with the other prospective purchasers of these lots? We have recently received a new proposed site plan for E. 16715 Euclid, which is Lot 3 & 4 of B.S.P. 17. This site plan shows only 60 feet of R.O.W. and a 20 feet easement on both sides of the R.O.W. We are going to send this plan back to Rob Randall, and ask him to make it consistent with your proposed cross sections. Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 SPOnwNC coon*." COUP' House We also have some questions of a general nature related to this development, which are as follows: 1. What arrangements have been made with the B.N.R.R. for the widening of Euclid as it crosses their tracts? At the recent meeting on this B.S.P., Theron Rust indicated that the B.N.R.R. had complete control of this crossing. The Washington Utilities and Transprotation Commission may have to approve the widening. 2. What is being proposed for the construction of Euclid? We provided you with a bond amount for the improvements included in B.S.P. 17, however, at our recent meeting you indicated that the road was going to be improved by R.I.D., and any widening of Euclid to include a two way left turn lane would in turn cost the adjacent land owners more in assessments. We have no knowledge of any R.I.D. for this part of Euclid, although there are several ways this could be worked out. The B.S.P. map which you submitted doesn't include any R.I.D. language for this portion of Euclid, therefore future purchasers would not be bound to participate in an R.I.D. for this portion of Euclid. Finally, we have also reviewed the proposed language regarding driveway access to each lot. We could agree with the language as proposed, with the following exception: 2. Each individual lot be permitted one driveway access OXd# /aka This provisional agreement is based on the assumption that all the questions regarding Euclid Avenue can be satisfactorily answered. We have attempted to answer all the questions contained in your letter. If we can answer any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours n ) 0 Gary Nelson, P.E. Planning Engineer Lg R/W 3 3 F EASEMENT PATHWAY,DRAINAGE,LANDSCAPE 6' PATHWAY Ari /W� 8 ' EASEMENT. i PATHWAY,DRAIN AGE, LANDSCAPE 2' 8' 12'. 7 '. 7. 12' NOTE: PATHWAY SYSTEN CAN MEANDER IN EASEMENT AND SHALL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 2% MIN 2% MIN L SURFACING DEPTH TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON TRAFFIC AND SOILS MIN. 4" A.C.P. Z' 6' PATHWAY. f' Ie� 5ASfi►.nENr , DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPE PATHWAY, DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPE �• PAT K PATHWAY 2 ' 14' 1 T 7 7' - 12' t i' T 27.. - NOTE: - -• - - -- - - - SURFAgNC DEPTH TO BE PATHWAY SYSTEM CAN MEANDER AND Sr.AIU BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC DETERMINED BASED ON TRAFFIC AND SOILS JI ' MIN. 4' A.C.P. Ie� 5ASfi►.nENr , DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPE DRA BY.' DAM SCALE OFFICE OF APPROVED: HAYFORD ROAD S HEET SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER : HORIZONTAL NONE N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. APPROVED: - GEIGER BLVD. - NORTH PROJECT BOUNDARY V12=AL NDNE SPOKANE , WA. 99280 2CO � T YPICAL SECTION OF 458 -3800 DATE January 10, 1985 Taylor Engineering W. 106 Mission Ave. Suite 106 Spokane, Wa. 99201 RE: Spokane Industrial Park Expansion "Driveway Accesses" Dear Mark:, We have reviewed your January 6, 1589 letter regarding the proposed new typical cross sections for Euclid and Marietta in Binding Site Plans 17, 21, and 22. We have also reviewed your proposal for driveway accesses in conjunction with these new typical cross sections. Attached please find a marked up set of the proposed typical sections. We are rq ue V tin�that ,,you �d tain the 2 feet of Right of Way behind the cur[?S'� was oraginay approved on the R.S.P. #17 sections. We are also requesting that the pathways and drainage be included inside an easement on Euclid rather than in the R.O.W., again as they were originally. The new total width of the easements and R.O.W. on Euclid will become 110 feet with your new proposal, which is 10 feet wider than the original cross section. This leads us to ask: the following questions: 1. What arrangements have been made to obtain the necessary easements and R.O.W. from Tract E? Your new cross section will require that 7 feet -if additional R.O.W. be obtained from this parcel, together with an 18 feet easement. If this R.O.W. and easement cannot be obtained, the design will have to be modified to move the road to the south around Tract E 2. What arrangements have been made with the other prospective purchasers of these lots? We have recently received a new proposed site plan for E. 16715 Euclid, which is Lot S 14 4 of B.S.P. 17. This site plan shows only 60 feet of R.O.W. and a 20 feet easement on both sides of the R.O.W. We are going to send this plan back to Rob Randall, and ask him to make it consistent with your proposed cross sections. We also have some questions of a general nature related to this development, which are as follows: 1. What arrangements have been made with the B.N.R.R. for the widening of Euclid as it crossel their tracts'? Atthe recent meeting on this B.S.P., Theron Rust indicated that the B.N.R.R. had complete-control of this crossing. - FPS UTiur /eS p.ip TiLq"SP.n.rgT. � -/ Nom - (5 - r. R'OP'w ✓C 7Fl- u /OE ✓ /NG. 2. What is being proposed for the constr'I_iction of Euclid? We provided you with a band amount for the improvements included in B.S.P. 17, however, at our recent meeting you indicated that the road was going to be improved by R.I.D., and any widening of Euclid to include a two way left turn lane would in turn cost the adjacent land owners more in assessments. We have no knowledge of any R.I.D. for this part of Euclid, although there are several ways this could be worked out. The B.S.P. map which you submitted doesn't include any R.I.D. language for this portion of Euclid, therefore future purchasers would not be bound to participate in an R.I.D. for this portion of Euclid. Finally, we have also reviewed the proposed language regarding driveway access to each lot. We could agree with the language as proposed, with the following exception: 2. Each individual lot be permitted one driveway access OYdUtPI tird¢1 fkY�i✓ �Y/ dYid��izt/ j/ AEL���/ f1, Y/ tE�+ tY/ 2�i0 / ?�e�k /df /f�`�✓�k��� /1 /zi MtkMAIX,MI00f!/ This provisional agreement is based on the assumption that all the questions regarding Euclid Avenue can be satisfactorily answered. We have attempted to answer all the questions contained in your letter. If we can answer any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours Gary S. Nelson, P.E. Planning Engineer f(. Taylor Engineering. Civil Design and Land Planning Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers _ West 811 Jefferson 4 V� W Tww, Spi kane, WA 99201 e- a, ( �t o Q„ R.E: Spokane Industrial Park Expansion "Driveway Accesses" I Dear Gary, Spokane County Engineering Dept. currently requires that all driveway accesses be designated on the Binding Site Plans. The Binding Site Plan conditions have stated that no other driveway accesses will be allowed. This predesignation requirement puts the developer in the position of predesignating what lot access configuration a future purchaser will need. This offer limits the optimum use of each lot thereby limiting the market. I We feel that an alternate solution can be achieved that will meet the requirements of the county and still allow reasonable flexibility to potential industrial developers. To achieve this ggoal we propose the predesignated driveway accesses be eliminated in! favor of the followingy additional requirements to the Spokane Industrial Park So uth Expansion Binding Site Plans NO. 17, 21 & 22: 1.1 The public streets be widened to accommodate a 14 ft. center turn lane at the developers exsperice i 2. Each individual lot be permitted one driveway access plus an additional driveway access for each 20OFT of frontage or a fraction thereof. 3. The individual LOT developer negotiate driveway access on an individual I basis, subject to review and approval of the Spokane County Engineering Dept. 4.1 That 208 areas be increased in size to allow for two 30 ft. driveway accesses where 208 areas cover entire lot frontage. 5. Lot developers be required to increase 208 areas to compensate for any area lost to driveways above the (2) 30 ft. accesses. Enclosed are sketches of the proposed sections of Euclid and Marrietta, with these changes we believe all parties will receive the protection and flexibility needed to permit the orderly development of the Spokane Industrial Park. I I January 6, 1989 W. 106 Mission Ave. • Suite 206 • Spokane. WA 99201 • (509) 326 -3371 Your timely response to this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Taylor Engineering V� 14' Mark Aronson, P.E. Project Engineer MAA /yev Taylor Engineering Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. • Suite 208 • Spokane. WA 99201 • (509) 328-3371 Z, �v MIN. 4' A.C.P. EASEMENT PATHWAY,DRAINAGE,LANDSCAPE 6' ' _ 2. PATH WAY t t 29' Pei „ 2% MIN' "K /, NOTE PATHWAY SYSTEN CAN MEANDER IN EASEMENT AND SHAH. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. SURFACING DEPTH TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON TRAFFIC AND SOILS MIN. 4" A.C.P. /W 0 20' EASEMENT. PATHWAY,DRAINAGE,LANDSCAPE 6 ' PATHWAY. y_ The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible, (2) That the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW, and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners affirming the final assessment roll. The improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID include (a)•construction of an additional traffic lane along Sullivan Road from Marietta Avenue northward to the proposed intersection of Euclid Avenue realigned, (b) reconstruction of the existing traffic signal system at Sullivan Road and the proposed intersection of Euclid Avenue realigned, and the construction of the entire additional traffic lane on Sullivan Road, all in conjunction with the realignment of Euclid Avenue, (c) construction of a new traffic signal system at the intersection of Sullivan Road and Marietta Avenue, and (d) the proposed realignment of Euclid Avenue as shown on the preliminary Binding Site Plan 17 -87, said improvements referred more particularly in the "Conditions of Approval" for Binding Site Plan 17 -87, on record with Spokane County Planning Department. It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the above required improvements will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns without participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. However, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree that if said RID waiver expires without construction of the required improvements, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree to construct the required improvements at their own expense; pay to Spokane County the then estimated cost of the required improvements to enable the County to complete the same; or furnish a bond or other secure method suitable to the County, providing for or securing to the County the actual construction of the improvements. All of the requirements of this agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their successor(s) or assign(s). bsp /jerry l? f , RP AD )II hN -)MM �; i Q ! 5 41 , nR) r,FW PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 September 20, 1988 To: Gary Nelson, Land Development E eer From: Ross Kelley, Project Managem in r RE: Euclid Road, Sullivan to Flora We have tested the above section of road with the Road Rater and make the following observations and recommendations. Euclid Road was constructed in 1973 by County forces as a light bituminous treatment on 2 -4" of crushed rock. The roadway tests out fairly strong and is reasonably consistent throughout the one mile segment. Seal coat treatments were applied in 1977 and 1988. For present traffic conditions deflection analysis using Asphalt Institute Manual MS -17 requires a 3" AC overlay. Using traffic generation estimates for the proposed Spokane Industrial Park the new construction roadway section required is 4" AC over 6" CSTC. 129c J � I Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 SPOKANE COONTY COURT HOUSE I K L;a.te -Ti_me : 08 -10 -1936 15 : 29 Sensors: 4 ' Hertz: 25 Location: EUCLID RD- SULLIVAN TO FLORA Tema: operator: TE Force: 1. Comments: MP 0.00= ECG AT SULLIVAN Temp: 110F Note: MP 0.00 1 1 1.13 25.4 1.28 0.55 0.25 0.17 2 1 1.16 24.9 2.04 0.68 0.24 0.16 3 1 1.16 24.9 1.46 0,40 0.24 0.17 4 1 1.13 25.0 1.69 0.93 0.55 0.40 5 1 1.14 24.9 1.44 0.45 0.26 0.24 Note: MP 0.25 6 1 1.19 24.9 2.68 0.92 0.53 4.45 7 1 1.17 24.9 2.48 0.86 0.45 0.5 8 1 1.15 25.1 2.76 0.89 0.45 0.17: 9 1 1.16 24.9 2.51 0.91 0.44 0.29 10 1 1.16 25.0 2.12 0.77 0.35 0.24 Note: MP 0.50 11. 1 1.16 24.9 2.16 0.75 0.34 0.24 12 1 1.17 25.1 2.34 0.94 0.42 0.26 13 1 1.16 25..1 1.58 0.58 0.27 0.18 14 1 1.16 25.0 1.76 0.78 0.43 0. 15 1 L.14 25.1 1.71 0,75 0.44 0.34 Note; MP 0.75 16 1 1.15 25.1 l.Bi 0.8" 0.52 0.41 17 1 1,.16 25.0 1.85 0.74 0.46 0.75 18 1 1.14 25.1 1.71 0.69 0.41 0.•2 19 1 1.15 25.0 1.74 0.67 0.' o.25 20 1 1.16 25.0 1.7b n,70 0,32 0.21 No te: MP 1.00 21 1 1.16 24.9 2.75 1.57 0.42 0.30 Note: MP 1M0 EO AT FLORA 212 1.14 24.9 1.6u 0.71 0.31 0.21 20 2 1.17 24.8 1.79 n.8' . 0.4 -6 0.:34 19 2 1..13 25.1 1.45 0.55 0 .28 0.21 18 2 1.17 25.0 1.60 0.60 0.37 0.29 17 2 1.10 24.9 1.39 0.70 0.43 0.32 Net &: MP 0.7'_� 16 2. 1.i5 25.0 1.67 n.70 0.42 0.37 15 2 1.13 24.3 1.38 0.68 0.4.1 0.31 14 __ 1.11' 25.0 1.61 0.67 0.13 0. ".'_ 13 ._ 1.= 25.1 1.44 0.54 0.2 0.15 12 2 1.14 25.1 1.82 0.65 0.31 0.21i NOt'C: HP 0.51? 11 2 1.14 25.0 1.78 0.56 0.26 0.17 10 2 1.14 25.0 1.79 0.70 0.32 0.21 9 2 1.15 25.0 2.13 0.78 0.43 0.0O 8 2 1.16 24.8 2.37 0.94 0.52 0.38 7 2 J..1:_ 25.0 1.97 0.84 0.51 0.W Note: MP 0.25 6 2 1.7.5 24.7 1.95 0.8 2 0.50 0.40 5 2 1.14 25.0 1.57 0.54 0.29 0.25 4 2 1.14 24.9 2.24 0.90 0.49 0.34 2 1.14 24.9 1.98 0.71 0.37 0.23 2 1.13 24.9 1.65 0.61 0.23 0.16 Nate: MP 0.0i: 1 2 1.1i 24.8 1.47 0.85 0.37 0.25 ,e_st ci_ocumentatie Operator......... Date - Time...... Temnerature...... Test location.... Comments ......... n, file -LID TE 08 -10 -1988 15:12:29 110F EUCLID RD- SULLIVAN TO FLORA MP 0.00= EO AT SULLIVAN Number of tests..... 42 Mean Stiffness...... 0.64 KIPS /MIL Standard Deviation.. 0.12 Mtvci.mum Stiffness... u.88 Minimum Stiffness... 0.42 y� 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m r eD t� o - - - - J-. C � -a ,7 v+ c_rl eJ7 o t� I'D n y CM 12D &Pk oa T a+ 11201 C C C C d C Co L1.} C!D 112M 11201 CMI 11201 � '] C+ r__1 e—n aA Ky+ &Ph- Cb LS6ti - 1 1 1 _________ - - - f— - - -- 1 mac -� Pp - - — _ _ - Cx ' S r� Cr y� / J rf' - - 7 � - - OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington Date: I V �� l 19 i 0 TO ( FROM : / Lw . 1/ g. l— S ON RE Standard Drainage Language for the Dedication on (1) Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon; - which are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted.. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public right -of -way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. (2) . The owners of Lots , , 6 , of Block , and Lots , & , of Block , shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the path of the natural or. man -made drainage flow over and across the property. (3) The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said easements. (4) Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. (5) Development within this subdivision shall conform to the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and Chapter 3.20 of the Spokane County Code. The lowest floor, including basement floor, for any structure shall be constructed according to the requirements of the Spokane County Flood Zone regulations in effect at the time a building permit is issued. Purchasers of property in this subdivision warned of possible flooding or ponding and the potential requirement to purchase Flood Insurance. This warning shall be carried in each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all property within this plat in the Area of Special Flood Hazard. (6) An approved lot grading plan exists for Lots and Block , and Lots , b , Block Grading must conform to said plan on file in the County Engineer's office. (7) Spokane County shall not be responsible to maintain ingress or egress across the flood plain area. (8) The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County approved Stormwater Management Program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining,' or operation of stormwater control facilities. (9) A statement must appear in the dedicatory .language of the plat that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a. building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. This approach shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plan on file in the County Engineer's office. 0035p r r r I i O ♦ I I 2 I RAC 9 16 I 17 20 I F TRACIT 0 TRACT E 21 22 23 2411 � RACT C 1 13 C I�,�� ^� 10 1 ` _ 14 IS IB 19 i i 7 1"^ 42 31 70 27 _ 26 25 41 40 �- I TRACT 8 S 44 46 29 28 1 32 C - ' 45 Tn ACT 33 1 2 3 4 34 35 36 P08UC IZDADS - 39-1— 70 ® LOT ACCESS .... . SCALE: 1'•200' SOUTH EXPANSION WATER OVERALL V' Tryler Eginwlry I/ I / .....w :w.n ..ru .... PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260 DATE: June 28th , 1988 am. : To i . Enclosed is a plat map for (FINAL) BINDING SITE PLAN NO. BSP- 17 -87. Please review this proposal and return any comments and recommendations you may have by Ju1Y 13th, 1988. DSA:jp Enclosure �F JG 4 SPOKANE COUer. Couvi O.St 00 T � j M 0 m x m c O 0 r r r Ln r 0 0 0 D3 En W m r N t O � m soN c� C-. CD. .c y t❑ z R. �D Z �m m oz- Lk m m Zip Z i p . N - •_ tit o CD N (D J Q 00 ti O' O r2 4- V :L= • c Z.g� .m T M y y:a oo k 00 0 Q a 9 D O I � tp o ro �� F 0 n - � E -1 � 0 C� m �. o u f7 Efl rn R _ f �_. W LL—L — V i O 0 r r r Ln r 0 0 0 D3 En W m r N t O � m soN c� C-. CD. .c y t❑ z R. �D Z �m m oz- Lk m m Zip Z i p . N - •_ tit �L I 00 ti i� z m to ° m 0 7 o 7 � EoD zf -9 mz- _ �p "Z D occ z m N a n r o a 2 n � a v Q = Z a+ m y D N (A A N z C Z -Ni 0 > z x z 0 N ti a 0 VII a m t: = � Zip i p 00 CAM O' O r2 4- V :L= • Z.g� .m y:a oo k 00 z 0 N ti a Rt- TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue Spokane, Washington 99210 Telephone: (509) 838 -5281 REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Refer to: C- 188077, Unit 3 RE: Spokane Industrial Park CC: Planning Commission CC: County Engineer Spokane Industrial Park CC: Taylor Engineering ATTN: Theron Rust N. 3808 Sullivan Rd. Spokane, WA This is a report for plat certificate as of May 19, 1988 at 8:00 a.m., covering the following property: All that certain real property located in the North half of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 12; thence North 89 0 36 1 55" East, along the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 70.88 feet; thence South 0 0 21'00" West, a distance of 47.00 feet, to the true point of beginning; thence continue South 0 °21'00" West, 717.10 feet, to the South line of deeded Euclid Road; thence South 89 0 49'03" East, along said South line, 692.92 feet; thence South 0 0 21'00" West, 620.86 feet; thence South 74 0 59'50" West, 990.79 feet; thence South 15 °00'10" East, 250.00 feet, to the North right of way line of The Burlington Northern Railroad; thence North 74 0 59'50" East, along said North line, a distance of 2896.19 feet to the West line of deeded Flora Road; thence North 0 0 20'55" West, along said West line a distance of 1105.74 feet to a point that is 47.00 feet South of the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12; thence South 89 0 36'55" West, parallel with the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 2583.23 feet to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT Euclid Road _P v S - l o ll ' �o P VC126 /mca C- 188077, Unit 3 Plat Certificate - 2 - "Record title is vested in Helical Control Systems, Inc., a Washington Corporation as to that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Northeast quarter which bears South 89 0 36 1 55" West a distance of 1469.6 feet from the Northeast corner of Section 12; thence South 0 0 21'0 ", West a distance of 47.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 89 0 36 1 55" East a distance of 390.06 feet; thence South 0 °21'0" West a distance of 672.27 feet to a point on the North line of Euclid Road; thence North 89 0 49'02" West along said North line of Euclid Road 'a distance of 369.97 feet to the point of curve of a 20 foot radius, curve right, whose central angle is 90 0 10 1 02 "; thence along the arc of said curve right which central angle is 90 °10'02 "; thence along the arc of said curve right 31.47 feet to the point of tangent; thence North 00 °21'00" East, a distance of 648.35 feet to the true point of beginning. AND Spokane Industrial Park Inc., a Washington Corporation, as to the remainder. SUBJECT T0: 1. Last half general and weed taxes for 1988, in the respective sums of $501.78 and $.30; $259,378.44 and $25.09.; AND, $3,094.31 and $.00 (Assessor's Parcel Nos. 12541 -9032, 01546 -9089; and, T01546 -9089 (old), 45121.9032, 45016.9089; and, T45016.9089 (new), Code 212) Delinquent general taxes for 1988, in the sum.of $147.19, plus interest and fees. (Assessor's Parcel No. R01546 -9089 (old), 845016.9089 (new), Code 212) Said taxes affect:.A portion of said premises and other property. 2. Lien of real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. 3. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount $350',000.00 Dated August 11, 1987 Recorded August 13, 1987 Auditor's No. 8706130051 Grantor Helical Control Systems, Inc., a Washington Corporation Trustee Ticor Title Insurance Company Beneficiary Washington Trust Bank, a corporation , Affects That portion of real estate under search vested in Helical Control Systems. VC126 /mca C- 188077, Unit 3 Plat Certificate 4. Assignment of Lessor's Interest in Dated : August 11, 1987 Recorded : August 13, 1987 Auditor's No. : 8708130052 By : Helical Control Trust Bank Lease for Security. - 3 - Systems, Inc., to Washington Affects That portion vested in Helical Control Systems 5. Notice to the Public By : Helical Control Systems, Inc., a Washington Corporation Dated : August 17, 1987 Recorded : August 24, 1987 Auditor's No. : 8708240149 Agreement To : Join and participate in the formation of a County Improvement District (RID) pursuant to RCW 36.88, at such time as a district may be formed or any Road Improvement Project sanctioned by Spokane County, which involves the lands herein described. The owners, their heirs, and assigns further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for said Road Improvement District (RID) estab- lished pursuant to RCW 36.88. It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created . or any Road'Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. Affects That portion vested in Helical Control Systems 6. For easements, restrictions, and other exceptions, see Schedule "B -1" attached. NOTES: 1. General taxes for 1988, in the sum of $418.15, are paid in full. (Assessor's Parcel No. 501546 -9089 (old), 545016.9089 (new), Code 212.) Said taxes affect: A portion of said premises and other property. .P VC126 /mca G- 188077, Unit 3 Plat Certificate - 4 - This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. FEE: $150.00 TAX: $ 11.70 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office By Authorized Signat � VC126 /mca Ci- 188077, Unit 3 Plat Certificate - 5 - SCHEDULE "B -1" 1. Reservations contained in deed under which title is claimed, recorded under Auditor's File No. 737559B, as follows: (1) Right of the public to use, occupy and maintain the public roads now constructed and located along the exterior boundaries of the property. (2) Existing easements, if any, for utilities, irrigation, or drainage. (3) There is reserved to the grantor a permanent and perpetual easement affording the grantor the right of joint use of the railroad trackage within the property which now services the GSA area in the most direct manner. (4) There is reserved to the grantor a permanent and perpetual easement affording the grantor the joint use of the Westerly 630 feet of "B" Street (which street adjoins the Army Reserve area on the South) for access to the Army Reserve area. 2. Utility easement 35 portion of property disclosed in survey 8708100277. feet in width over the North 35 feet of that vested in Helical Control Systems, Inc., as recorded under Auditor's File No. (End of Schedule B -1) VC126 /mca 'pofa . a � y ` t The Co7;r..y ht; s,%. aar:.; td the ptand¢t shachca. _ i Ih: .:a•L= :t "/ I^ the pwpate :AJ aid pwnirt , u V I If) .E'o.�, ) C.R. P.. /,20¢ l G3�rSr. 3 I L 07" / 9 p,Iq t7 .lvtj J n n t � 1 . b _ 1 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON March 31, 1988 TO: Taylor Engineering Inc. FROM: Spokane County Engineer SUBJ: BSP- 17 -87i Site plan of record As was :indicated by us at our last meeting we would like the Binding Site Plan of Record to reflect those items which were agreed upon by S.I.F. and the County. We are requesting that the Site Plan of Record depict the following: 1. The Road Right of Way widths should be changed to reflect those shown an the Typical Roadway Cross Sections. 2. The Site Plan must depict both Public and Private road alignments. 3. Show the 20 ft. wide landscape, drainage and pathway easements adjacent to Marietta Avenue, Sullivan Road and Euclid Avenue. 4. The easement along the West 40 ft of parcel 09 is a Private Road Easement (Pioneer Lane> which serves parcels within Spokane County Short Plat 86 -457. The easement depicted on the Short Plat extends southward from Marietta Lane to the North right of way line of the Spokane International. Railway. The easement depicted on the Preliminary Binding Site Flan Map is not consistent with that shown on the Short Flat. The Binding Site Plan Document shall depict the 40 ft, wide access easement as it is represented an the Final Short. Plat. 5. Show the access locations to the Public Roads as approved by the County Engineer. 6. Change Lhe name of Fairview Avenue to Marietta Avenue. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 1.ot S March 31, 1988 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SUBJ: BINDING SITE PLAN 17 -87 The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted for inclusion in the findings and order for the above referenced Binding Site Plan. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. That conditional approval of the Binding Site Plan by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right of Way and approval of the road system. In conjunction with phasing of the final Binding Site Plans, specific conditions appropriate to each phase will be specified. 2. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. 3. The proposed Binding Site Plan shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 4. The applicant shall deed to Spokane County 14 ft of the subject property for Road Right of Way along SULLIVAN ROAD and shall construct an additional traffic lane along Sullivan Road from Marietta Avenue northward to the intersection of Euclid Avenue realigned. Construction may be phased as development occurs along the;Sullivan Road frontage 5. The applicant shall deed to Spokane County 48 ft. of Right of way for Marietta Avenue in the alignment as shown on the preliminary Binding Site Plan. 6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. BSP -17 -87 page 2 o i- S 7. Prior to the filing of each phase of the Final Binding Site Plan, appropriate plans, profiles and cross sections as determined by the County Engineer for Sullivan Road, Euclid Avenue and /or Marietta Avenue showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted for approval; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. Euclid Avenue road plans and improvement are to include full depth pavement design and construction (includes existing travelway connection to Flora Road). That appropriate road drainage plans and design calculations as determined by the County Engineer showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted for approval. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer 8. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the release of a building permit a surface water disposal plan for the building site or portion thereof if the development is phased 9. Prior to the release of a building permit a parking plan and traffic circulation plan for each site shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 10. Construction within the existing or proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the-County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 11. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 12. All construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final Binding Site Plan or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 13 The applicant shall construct Euclid Avenue and Marietta Avenue as shown on the Preliminary Binding Site Plan as Public Roads. These roadways shall be constructed in compliance with the Typical Roadway Cross Sections designated and approved by the County Engineer. A copy of those Typical Cross Sections is attached for inclusion in the "Conditions of Approval ". All other roadways shown on the Preliminary Binding Site Plan shall be private roads. BSP -17 -87 14.. The change in alignment and vacation of current alignment of Euclid Avenue shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the Binding Site Plan containing that particular phase of the development. page 3 OF S Prior to the acceptance of the new alignment of Euclid Avenue by Spokane County, the right of way for the new roadway must be deeded to the County and the new roadway constructed per the approved Typical Roadway Cross Section. The Vacation of the existing Euclid Avenue will not become final until the new alignment is established by the Board of County Commissioners. The change in alignment and vacation of the current alignment of Euclid Avenue shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the Binding Site Plan containing that particular phase of the realignment. 15.. In conjunction with the realignment of Euclid Avenue the applicant is responsible for the reconstruction of the existing traffic signal system at the Sullivan Road and realigned Euclid Road intersection and for the construction of the entire additional traffic lane on Sullivan Road. 16.. In conjunction with the requirements of Short.Plat 86 -457 the applicant is responsible for the future construction of a new traffic signal system at the intersection of Sullivan Road and Marietta Avenue when the intersection meets Traffic Engineering Warrants for traffic signal construction. 17.. That the minimum curb radii at all street intersections within the proposal shall be 30 ft. Minimum radii at Sullivan Road Intersections shall be 40 ft. 18. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purposes is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvements pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curbs, pathways, drainage control, paving, traffic signal systems, etc.) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. 19. Should an R.I.D. be pursued, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide road and drainage plans sufficient for the creation of a Road Improvement District . These plans shall be prepared by a Licensed professional Civil Engineer and shall be prepared in compliance with Spokane County Road Standards and Drainage Guidelines. In order to construct required roadway improvements on Sullivan Road, Marietta Avenue and Euclid Avenue the applicant may petition the Board of County Commissioners to create a Road Improvement District R.I.D. The R.I.D. must be created by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the binding site plan. BSP -17 -87 page 4 OF S 20. The following statement shall appear on the Binding Site Plan Document "Parking will be prohibited along Euclid Avenue ". 21. A statement shall be placed on the Binding Site Plan Document which prohibits direct access from lots to SULLIVAN ROAD or Flora Road. 22. Direct access from lots to Marietta Avenue and Euclid Avenue shall be limited to the access points approved by the County Engineer and as shown on the Preliminary Binding Site Plan. 23.. A minimum 20 ft wide easement shall be provided along the East side of Sullivan Road and each side of the Public Road Right of Way on Euclid Avenue and Marietta Avenue. The purpose of the easement is to accommodate pathways landscaping, drainage from roadways. 24.. A system of pathways, accessible to the public, be constructed along Sullivan Road, Euclid Road and Marietta Avenue. The pathway is to be located within the common pathway, drainage and landscape easement area. That a statement shall be placed on the Binding Site Plan permitting Spokane County to enter within the easement for the purpose of drywell and sign maintenance. Snow removed from the public roadways shall be permitted within the easement. Maintenance of pathways, drainage swales and landscaping areas shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 25. The proposed private roads as shown on the preliminary Binding Site Plan are approved by the County Engineer. 26. The following statement must appear on the Binding Site Plan document: "The private roads as shown hereon are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the Binding Site Plan having frontage thereon." 27. Private Road Plans with connections to a Public Road are the responsibility of the developer and are required prior to the release of a building permit. A statement to this effect shall be placed in the Binding site plan document. 28. Private roads be improved to a minimum improved surface width of 30 ft. with a minimum 20 ft wide landscaping and drainage easement on either side of the roadway. Subject to approval under section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. 29. All vested owners shall sign and record private road documents as prescribed by the Spokane County Engineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Recording numbers shall be referenced on the Binding Site Plan Document. BSP -17 -87 page 5 OF S 30. The following statement shall be placed on the Binding Site Plan Document: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or other wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this Binding Site Plan. By accepting this Binding Site Plan or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. 31. The following statement shall be placed on each phase of the Binding site plan: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their names(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessments(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. 'r/4SC5 Ce"y'71d'd S A cc4 -pT'�-O 35y &- / O kM,6 /-Mu-STAMC 1 I've, RECEIVED 'SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 20' EASEMENT PATH WAY,DRAINAGE.LANDSCAPE R/W EASEMENT PATHWAY, DRAINAGE,LANDSCAPE 6 'ATHWAY Drawn By. Dace: SOS 3 6a SCALE OFFIC o f APPROVED: EUCLID AVENUE SHEET Designed By. HORIZONTAL SPOKANE COUNTY ENGRiM OP g Og 3 BM 388 NONE N. 817 JEFFERSON ST. APPROVE BINDING SITE PLAN NO. 17 -87 Checked Bp VERTICAL- SPOKANE, AA 99260 UNTY, ENGINEER TYPICAL SECTION NONE 488 -9600 ^ 0_� Date: - I NOTE: TRAFFIC AND SOILS PATHWAY SYSTEM CAN MEANDER MIN. 4' A.C.P. IN EASEMENT AND SHALL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. R/W EASEMENT PATHWAY,DRAINAGE,LANDSCAPE PATHWAY Q 24' EASEMENT PATHWAY, DRAIN AGE,LANDSCAPE PATHWAY SD By Dam: SCALE OFFICE of A VED:hI SHEET Designed B HORIZONTAL SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER P MARIETTA AVENUE 2 of am 388 NONE N. Su JEFFEMN ST. APPROVE BINDING SITE PLAN NO. 17 -87 — — Checked Bp. VERTICAL SPOHAM RA. 99260 CO GINEER TYPICAL SECTION NONE 468 -WDO Date: - n PATHWAY SYSTEN CAN MEANDER TRAFFIC AND SOILS IN EASEMENT AND SHALL BE MIN. 4" A.C.P. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 42' 14' �`4 1. 20' MIN EXISTING NEW R/W I EASEMENT EXISTING' DEDICATION IPATHWA 6' PATHWA Drawn Bp. Date: 3 OFFICE OF APPROVED: SHEET Designed Bp. HO RIZON N 1'AL SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER PE SUWVAN ROAD BM 3/88 NONE N. 011 JEFFERSON ST. APPROVED BINDING SITE PLAN N0. 17 -87 3 of Checked By VERTICA SPOKANE 8 9800 200 0 GINEER TYPICAL SECTION Date: i TRAFFIC AND SOILS NOTE: MIN. 4" A.C.P. PATHWAY SYSTEM CAN MEANDER IN EASEMENT AND SHALL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR IN THE MATTER OF BINDING ) FINDINGS OF FACT, SITE PLAN NO. BSP -87 -17 ) CONCLUSION AND DECISION THIS MATTER, an application from Spokane Industrial Park has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulations, on the 5th day of May, 1988. The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering the decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION 1 . The proposal is to divide 160 acres into 46 lots for the development of industrial lots. 2. The proposal is located in the north half of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, lying north of the railroad between Sullivan and Flora Roads. 3. The current zoning of the property is Manufacturing, established in 1960. The proposed lot sizes, frontage and intended uses are allowed within this zone. 4. The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial. The lots and uses proposed are generally in accord with this planning category. 5. The required public notice was provided for this proposal and agencies having a potential interest in the project were notified and asked for recommendations. 6. There was a recommendation for a more detailed environmental review from the Spokane County Engineers. The sponsor and the Spokane County Engineers have agreed upon necessary road improvements and phasing of development to mitigate potential improvements and phasing of development to mitigate potential adverse traffic impacts. A mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Is substituted for the original D.N.S.. The mitigating measures recommended by the Spokane County Engineer's have been agreed upon by the sponsor to generally reduce anticipated traffic impacts of the proposal. That in consideration of the recommended conditions and Spokane County development standards, the proposal Is not detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. That the project is proposed to have phased development in three stages with necessary improvements constructed to meet the needs of each phase. Such phasing is consistant with subdivision practices. That the provisions of the Manufacturing Zone and other sections of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance apply to the use of the individual lots. DECISION Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact, Binding Site Play Application BSP- 87-17 is hereby APPROVED subject to conditions noted below which shall be complied with by the applicant and/or sponsor prior to finalization of the binding site plan. Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 2 1 . The preliminary binding site plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 2. That the Final Binding Site Plan be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary binding site plat of record as legally described and advertised. No increase of lot number shall occur without a new application submittal and approval. 3. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Binding Site Plan to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of Approval. 4. That the preliminary binding site plan be given conditional approval for three (3) years to June 1, 1991. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 5. That a Final Binding Site Plan number be indicated before the final binding site plan is filed; such number to be approved by the County Planning Director /Designee. 6. That appropriate road names be indicated on the binding site plan. 7. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the proposed final binding site plan. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final binding site plan. 8. That 3 current certificates of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final binding site plan. 9. That the following statement be placed in the final binding site plan dedication: "No more than one primary use be placed on any Lot nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships, or building sites without first filing a replat." 10. The final binding site plan map shall indicate by a clear dashed line, the required setbacks from all private, tract x or public roads. The dedication shall contain a statement that: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested. The setbacks indicated on this binding site plan may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 1 1 . That a olan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire p r otection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building & Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final binding site plan or any phase of the preliminary binding site plan that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the sponsor. 12. The purveyor will also certify on the Water Plan that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule for improvements will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final binding site plan. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 3 13. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this binding site plan, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 14. That no building permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Binding Site Plan until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Binding Site Plan ", signed and stamped by said engineer. 15. That a survey is required prior to the filing of a final binding site plan. • � � _ � •7• .I`I�IY�L•I:l`9 The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. That conditions of approval of the Binding Site Plan by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right of Way and approval of the road sytem. In conjunction with phasing of the final Binding Site Plans, specific conditions appropriate to each phase will be specified. 2. The proposed Binding Site Plan shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 3. The applicant shall deed to spokane County 14' feet of the subject property for Road Right of Way along Sullivan Road and shall construct an additional traffic lane along Sullivan Road from Marietta Avenue northward to the intersection of Euclid Avenue realigned. Construction may be phased as development occurs along the Sullivan Road frontage. 4. The applicant shall deed to Spokane County 48' feet of Right of Way for Marietta Avenue in the alignment as shown on the preliminary Binding Site Plan. 5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington standard specifications for road and bridge construction and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to road standards and stormwater management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 6. Prior to the filing of each phase of the final binding site plan, appropriate plans, profiles and cross sections as determined by the County Engineer for Sullivan Road, Euclid Avenue and/or Marietta Avenue showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted for approval; road plans to be prepared under the direction of licensed professional Civil Engineer. Euclid Avenue road plans and improvement are to include full depth pavement design and construction (includes existing travelway connection to Flora Road). That appropriate road drainage plans and design calculations as determined by the County Engineer showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted for approval. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed professional Civil Engineer. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the release of a building permit a surface water disposal plan for the building site or portion thereof if the development is phased. Prior to the release of a building permit, a parking plan and traffic circulation plan for each site shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 4 Construction within the existing or proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 10. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 11 . All construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to filing the final binding site plan or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 12. The applicant shall construct Euclid Avenue and Marietta Avenue as shown on the preliminary binding site plan as public roads. These roadways shall be constructed in compliance with the typical roadway cross sections designated and approved by the County Engineer. A copy of those typical cross sections is attached for inclusion in the "Conditions of Approval ". All other roadways shown on the preliminary binding site plan shall be private roads. 13. The change in alignment and vacation of current alignment of Euclid Avenue shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the binding site plan containing that particular phase of the development. $ee �' � /- 8 S 14. In conjunction with the realignment of Euclid Avenue the applicant is responsible for the reconstruction of the existing traffic signal system at the Sullivan Road and realigned Euclid Road intersection and for the construction of the entire additional traffic lane on Sullivan Road. 15. In conjunction with the requirements of Short Plat 86 -457 the applicant is responsible for the future construction of a new traffic signal system at the intersection of Sullivan Road and Marietta Avenue when the intersection meets traffic engineering warrants for traffic signal construction. 16. That the minimum curb radii at all street intersections within the proposal shall be 30' feet. Minimum radii at Sullivan Road intersections shall be 40' feet. 17. To construct the road improvements stated therein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvements pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID is created or any road improvement project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curbs, pathways, drainage control, paving, traffic signal systems, etc.) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. 18. Should an RID be pursued, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide road and drainage plans sufficient for the creation of a Road Improvement District. These plans shall be prepared by a licensed professional civil engineer and shall be prepared in compliance with Spokane County road standards and drainage guidelines. In order to construct required roadway improvements on Sullivan Road, Marietta Avenue and Euclid Avenue the applicant may petition the Board of County Commissioners to create a Road Improvement District R.I.D. ' The RID must be created by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the binding site plan. 19. The following statement shall appear on the binding site plan document "Parking will be prohibited along Euclid Avenue ". 20. A statement shall be placed on the binding site plan doucment which prohibits direct access from lots to Sullivan Road or Flora Road. Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 5 21. Direct access from lots to Marietta Avenue and Euclid Avenue shall be limited to the access points approved by the County Engineer and as shown on the preliminary binding site plan. 22. A minimum 20' foot wide easement shall be provided along the east side of Sullivan Road and each side of the public road right of way on Euclid Avenue and Marietta Avenue. The purpose of the easement is to accommodate pathways, landscaping, and drainage from roadways. 23. A system of pathways, accessible to the public, be constructed along Sullivan Road, Euclid Road and Marietta Avenue. The pathway is to be located within the common pathway, drainage and landscape easement area. That a statement shall be placed on the binding site plan permitting Spokane County to enter within the easement for the purpose of drywell and sign maintenance. Snow removed from the public roadways shall be permitted with the easement. Maintenance of pathways, drainage swales and landscaping areas shall be the responsiblity of the applicant. 24. The proposed private roads as shown on the preliminary binding site plan are approved by the County Engineer. 25. The following statement must appear on the binding site plan document: "The private roads as shown hereon are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the binding site plan having frontage thereon." 26. Private road plans with connections to a public road are the responsibility of the developer and are required prior to the release of a building permit. A statement to this effect shall be placed in the binding site plan document. 27. Private roads be improved to a minimum improved surface width of 30' feet with a minimum 20' foot wide landscaping and drainage easement on either side of the roadway. Subject to approval under section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. 28. All vested owners shall sign and record private road documents as prescribed by the Spokane County Engineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Recording numbers shall be referenced on the binding site plan document. 29. The following statement shall be placed on the binding site plan document: "WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or other wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this binding site plan. By accepting this binding site plan or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. 30. The following statement shall be placed on each phase of the binding site plan: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, the object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 6 conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any on -site sewage disposal permit or building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 5. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 6. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and Individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 7. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 8. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 9. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot" 1 . The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94 ". 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Project will connect to existing Park Sewer System Review and inspection of the sewer plans will be the responsibility of the applicant. BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1 . The required fire flow for any building or property development is determined by building size, type of construction, and proximity of exposures. Required fire flows shall be based on an evaluation of each building at the time of building permit application. 2. Project is located within Fire District No. 1. The required fire flow is determined by the district. Findings for BSP -17 -87 Page 7 3. Fire hydrants for commercial and industrial buildings shall be located so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175' feet from the hydrant. 4. Fire hydrants shall be located so as to be accessible to fire apparatus and not be obstructed by any structure or vegetation or have the visibility impaired for a distance of fifty feet in the direction of vehicular approach to the hydrant. 5. Specific location of hydrants shall be determined by the Fire District. 6. The applicant shall provide verification from the Fire District to the Department of Building and Safety that provisions have been made for adequate fire protection prior to the release of building permits. DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1 . A new water right application for any new wells will probably be required for this project. Please contact Mr. Rynear R. Huffman (509- 456 -6199) of Ecology's Eastern Regional Office for further information. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES 1 . Water main extension/water system expansions require the applicant to complete a Water System Plan and submit plans and specifications for approval before construction of the proposed water mains. � Approved on -�2 day of 1988. (0, 4 4 .0 Z �� = IX12 DOUGLAS Subdivision Administrator CC: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Sponsor Surveyor File Parties of Record `t . & Ta 10� e "' Y Fns e Civil Design and Land Planning March 11, 1988 Spokane County Engineers N 811 Jefferson RECEIVEV Spokane, Washington 99201 !Af,R I 1 1988 RE: Spokane Industrial Park South Expansion Binding S i t e Plan 1 7- 8 7 SPOKANE COt'r :Ty ENCINEER ATTN: Gary Nelson, P.E. Gentlemen, Upon reviewing the suggested general conditions for approval, we feel that we have taken a step backward in our negotiation's. It appears that our discussions and letters have been disregarded in nearly all aspects. Enclosed are previous submittals and replies which exemplify this. Please note the first submittal is dated November 11, 1987. The following is an item by item discussion of the suggested general conditions of approval and our suggested changes. Theron Rust, Vice President and General Manager of Spokane Industrial Park, requests an immediate meeting to discuss these issues and also requests the presence of Mr. Dennis Scott and Mr. Wally Hubbard. 1. Item 1 is acceptable to Spokane Industrial Park (SIP). 2. It is requested that the cross sections be changed as follows: a. That all sidewalks be deleted in lieu of an internal Siiltw4le- nae R_� pathway system per our previous discussions and /g F-&,c aaT� /A/s. -%n correspondence (See Attachment A and C.) w nik" 1 iN Inr�L14TAyA/ AM 4. 5/a./ /d 7BCt LKS/ f �I� /a+/ ♦ WAS /N,�y+r/sr6.✓ of �/.FieESS .vil l.✓ G✓C /J>G7 /liilJi n^'m. A 5y5Te..'+ 4 5 ecles %n'4Y�gl 1.x 9" b. That the curbing be changed to County Standard Type A• be a.00 ,y' Ojht EgNe_ i5 H9� Si%r/ That the width of paving on Euclid be 44 Feet in R , g k t � u weer vl accordance with the adopted Spokane County Road t„A�Q, _ Standards for a secondary arterial. N1a �5 r+ cp 111e s Qs 14'. w � C h9s . That the width of right wa ht of on Eucl id be 64 feet in N Y bee.✓ dele7v'1 *, /5accordance with the adopted Spokane County Road B.S.P. Standards. This is also requested, since it was the same width required less than 1 year ago for Northwes / 1 Culygr ±_C-Qmpany which is part of this binding site and borders Euclid Avenue. W,d / W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101 . Spokane, WA 99201 . (509) 3283371 Qn " /I 1 Ay f 3. Item 3 is acceptable to SIP. , e1gM 7Hr.� k � ' � jru 4. Item 4 is acceptable to SIP. / v�"97 e ,,� Su � 5. It is requested that Item 5 be deleted. There are currently � five lanes on Sullivan Road which could be redesignated if traffic conditions ever warrant a turning lane. 6. This item is acceptable to SIP as far as deeding the right � ""5 of way. However, SIP feels there is no need to construct blow v)v the roadway until the lots along the new alignment are �& $It,;v developed in conformance with the definition and intent of a � binding site plan. SIP also asks that when the new o� N1 alignment is constructed it should be to aL2_4' p.avemen.t_:-;y,7 width until the RID described in Item 8 is initiated..It was also our understanding that this alignment is acceptable Ta9P{•� with the County Public Works Department. No reference is Vev made to this in your letter. ( r_z J r s �Tus Ijj.lw ,ia� a/ /ok) 7. This will be corrected on the binding site plan. We request clar_i_f_ic.a.t_ion on whet you refer the road name to be [Fairview Avenue or �Mari`etta Lane It has been referred to oth wa'y's — on correspondence to SIP,.. VlAM A5 5c" 41 5A1r,d/'�2� �— 5h~, Al A5 5ucti ntJ PRe /imi /any �5 0 8. It is requested that Item 8 be changed as follows: "No building permits will be released on parcels having frontage on Euclid Avenue, Fairview Avenue, or the Private Roads until developers sign-an agreement with the County not to protest an RID." This RID would be tied to a traffic �= count as mutually agreed upon by the County and SIP. An escrow account could be set aside by Spokane Industrial Park or developer at the time each building permit is applied for if the County so wishes. 9. This item is 'acceptable to SIP. 10. This item is acceptable to SIP. 11. This item is acceptable to SIP. 12. We will add this statement to the 13. We will add this statement to the 14. It is our understanding that the is in conformance with resolution 15. It is requested that this sta discussion in Item 5. binding site plan. 1� binding site plan. u proposed binding site pl n No. 80 -1592. L D /4Mw % /rrr�c�rts tement be deleted. See 16. This statement will be added to the binding site plan. 'Naylor Engineering CM Design and Land Planning W. 55 Mission Ave.. Suite 101 . Spokane. WA 99201 . (509) 3283771 J f . 17. The binding site plan will be changed to incorporate these radius's. 18. This item is acceptable to SIP except that it is requested that sidewalks be deleted as previously discussed in Item 2. 19. We will add this statement to the binding site plan. 20. It is requested that the first sentence of this item be changed to read. e� _ a Q d "Private road plans fronting the prop y are the responsibility of the developer and are required prior to the release of a building permit." Prior to Filino Binding Site Plan 1. SIP will comply with this item. ` n1 2. SIP will comply with this item. Y is requested that building permits be allowed while the plans ( 11 requested in Items 1 and 2 are in progress. C" /3. It is requested that this item be deleted per our discussionv� in Item 5. 4. SIP will comply with this item. 5. It is requested that the right of .way width be changed from 0 68' to 64' in conformance' with currently adopted Spokane Road Standards for a secondary arterial. 6. See Item 8 (previous page). / 7. See Item 8 (previous page). Prior to Release of Building Permit 1. Spokane Industrial Park has an on site sewage system and treatment plant. A plan showing new sewer has been submitted to Spokane County Utilities Department. 2, 3, 4. These items are acceptable to SIP. Spokane Industrial Park submitted this project to Spokane County as a binding site plan because it was represented and understood that a binding site plan allows for phased developm6 t a d improvements in conjunction with land development. Your genera conditions of approval seem to be more in line with a final 1 than a binding site plan. Expenditures to conform to the - nea 1�Q/� CM Design and Land 14anning W. 55 Mism. Ave.. Suite 101 . Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 3283371 W A167 Y� conditions of approval would be well over one million dollars prior to development taking place. Spokane Industrial Park currently has one client ready to begin development immediately. This client has strongly indicated that they will take their project and 300+ associated jobs to Idaho if accommodations can not be make immediately. SIP also has 2 pages of interested clients from their recent commercials aired during the '88 World Olympics. It is for these reasons we request immediate action. This new industry can be a tremendous boost for Spokane County. New jobs were the first priority goal of Momentum 88 and we all need to work to a timely and business like completion of the binding site plan. Sincerely, Taylor ' eering erry I4! T y r P.E. Owner MAA /kmo cc: Theron Rust Paul Redmond Dennis Scott Wally Hubbard 7013 W. 55 Mission Ave., Suite 101 . Spokane. WA 99201 . (509) 3283371 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON March 4, 193E TO: SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR( FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SUBJ: BINDING SITE_ PLAN 1.7 -E7 The following " Conditions of Approval" are subrcitted for inclusion in ;: findi.regs and order for the above rLferenced Binding Site Plan. GENERA (CONDIT= ON- _OF_APPROVAL 1O That cordilionai approval of thr_ P•indinq Site Plan by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and appro of the road system. _• 7hat Fairview Avenue and Euclid AV nue shall be constructed as Public Roads. These roadways shalt. be constructed in compliance with, the Typical Roadway Cross Sections designated and approved t:•, the County Engineer. A copy � ^f these ,ypical. Cross Sections i attached for inclusion r e the "Conditions of Approval ". Faivix Avenue ..ill function as Colle•.:tor Arterial and Euclid AVenUe wi) function as a Secondary (Minor) Arterial. O That direct access to Fairview Avenue and Euclid 'Avenue shall t limited to the access points approved by the County Engineer. Th lacaI- of these access points shall be depicted an the Pindi.ng Site elan Document. Access control. is necessary to enhance traffic safety along the Public Roads within the development. © The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. �. That the applicant shall construct a deceleration - right turn lanr= along Sullivan Road from Fairview Avenue northward to the Intersection of Euclid Avenue realigned. b. That prior to the acceptance of the new alignment of Euclid Avenue by Spokane County, the right of way for the new roadway must be deeded to the County and the new roadway constructed per the approved Typical Roadway Cross Section. The Vacation of the existing Euclid Avenue will not become final until the new alignment is established by the Board of County Commissioners. The change in alignment and vacation of the current alignment of Euclid Avenue shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the Binding Site Plan _f Wc_:st 4r: f , f Ros,d r.- :a= :cm«nt. (Pi.or eer Lane) which se• c,a;rr..els within Spokane Count•✓ Short Flat P6 -- 457. The aza, e:n�.r;t r +.rtii._ted on th:_+ Shc,r.i Plat extends southward from Marietta = to the North right of wG;y line Cl the Spoi<:.ne Ini.ernational Railway. The easement depicted on the= 'rc- liminar Finding SiiEe Flan Mep is not. eonsistant with that shown on the Short Flat. The Binding Sita Plan Document shall depict the 40 ft. wide access easement as it is Flat. represented on the Final Short S. No building permits will be released on parcels having frontage on Euclid Avenue, Fairview Avenue or the Private Roads dependant upon those roadways for access until these roadways have been constructed in conformance with the approved Typical. Roadway Cross Sections and established for maintenance. Spoleane Coi!nt,� will accept a surety in an amount estimated by the County Engineer which will warranty the r_onstruction of the required roadway improvements. Surety acceptability is to be determined Ly the Counity Engineer. 9 The proposed private roads as shown on the preliminary Binding Site Plan (excepting Fairview Avenue; are approved by the County Engineer. 0. That private roads be improved to a minimum improved surface width Of 7 - 0 ft. Witt Z 20 ft ride landscaping and drainage easement on di ther Side of the roadway (as dep;,.ted in the "Transportation Analysis Report "). The minimum easement wid''lh for the= proposed Private Roads shall be GO ft. nub ect to approval under section 10. of the Spokane County Fire Code. 1;. All vested owners shall sign and r-c -cord private road documents as prcascriGed by the Spok<.,ne County Engineer. Th' =;;e documan{s shall Gea reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Recording numbers shall be referenced on the Binding Site Pian Document. A statement shall be placed on the Binding Site Plan Document which prohibits direct access from lots to SULLIVr,f_: - ROAD _or_ Flora _Road_ That the following statement be placed on the Binding Site Flan Document: 14ARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or other wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to'the property described in this Binding Site Plan. By accepting this Binding Site Flan or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, sc.rccessors or assigns including the obligation to participate i the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. 14. The proposed Binding Site Plan shall be improved to the standards set. forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolc!tion No. SO -1592, as amended, which establishes rcgulat. ions; for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in ne;-, construcl ion. W V _..,. �:7E} �. (:)l:r.t`.: f G•fi I` ti• - '_ i:'J, 6,T� nE2il i •:��} ,. •ietermin; =d i..i':at - - � pl ::posal an c! tl.e impac of 1- 1. Fi - ' -,t ?f: v;arr tq �� 5 �'' ='p o sa.1 uFic,n :_hi? c ' nn tl"; C _i:�ii...-:t iJn r ?i addit5r_rrl..z= Ri. rlf;t- ':7f —W.__ - r ,.'..dwa;✓ i:nprovi- me:'Its i�erein' sper_ifieo' and the re•.`.�:_I;,ldin a.ru . \ y � ..... reconstr of c cJ i ' thr_ e::1.s• i _; f.raf f i... signal at the EuC:"id Sullivan ^oad inLersectlon• L USi.s of improvements and traffic Signal upgrading are f -he responsibility of the applicant. l:J That the following statement must appear on the Binding Site Plan document: "The_ private roads as shown hereon are easements which: provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the Binding Site Plan having frontage thereon." O That the minimum curb radii at all street intersections within tl.e proposal shall be =O ft. Mini radii at FiUll.ivari Road Intersections' shall be 40 ft. 18 That a. 'co ft wide easement shall be provided along each side of the Public Road Right of Way on Euclid Avenue and Fairview Avenue. ?'he purpose of the easement is to accommodate lands drainage fror, roadways, and sideways. That a statement shall be placed on the Binding Site Flan permiti.ng Spokane Cc_Int to enter r within t;,e easement for purposes of the placement of sign and utilities and for purposes of roadway, sign and utilities maintenance. Snow r �- emov_ from the pl_Ib;."_c roadways shall be ermitted within, G the easernerr_. Mainten._nce of drainage sidewalk and landscaping areas shall be the responsibility of :. :.e applicant. That the following Statement tement shah appear on the Binding Site Document "P,:rking is prohibited along Euclid Avenue ". O. Private road plans are the responsibility of the developer and a: required prior to the release of a building permit. A statement tr, this effect shall. be placed in the Binding site plan document. THAT PRIOR TO THE FILING OF THE BINDING SITE PLAN THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED. That plans, profiles standards for Euclid center line and curb approval; road plans licensed Professiona and cross sections as designed to County and Fairview Avenues showing proposed street grades be submitted to the County Engineer for to be prepared under the direction of a L Civil Engineer. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of ca licensed Professional Civil Engineer. Deed to Spokane County 14_ft_of the subject property for Road Right or Way along SULLIVAN_FOAD for an additional traffic lane. 4 Dced to Spokane County 60 ft of right or way for Fairview Avenue, Pub I it Ru a Ci R ig'iit Gi aV fCi6i ;gVeain_:@ r Su 1.7. iva:' i:o . .or`a in arm al igrnaient approved by the Carint.y Enginec:�p ii.nr-t: ;_!i.nr in front O Tr ">= "i. �,• Ir'r order to construct required rua[lway imp:•avments cn Sullivan Road.. Fa. irview Avenue anii F_uci.id Avenue the a 1i.cant -nay Y Petition the Board of County Commissioners to create a Road Irnprovernent District R.I.D. The R.I.D. must be created by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the binding site plan. 7. Should an R.I.D. be pursued, it shall t?e tho responsibility of the applicant to provide road and drainage plans sufficient for the crr-_., =ai.on or a Road Improvement District . These plans shall bc-? prepared by y License) professional Civil Engineer And shall be prepared in compliance with Spo'•::anr Ccui;_y Road Standards and vrainage Guidelines. THAT PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: The applicant shall submit for approval b' ? ' tins, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health Dist- ri.r.t a detailed combined on - site sewage system plan and surface water disposzl plan for the canti.re project or portion thereof if thc= development- is phased. O A parking plan and traffic circulatior; plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane COLWIL)' Engineer. The design, location nd eirrangemernt of parking stalls shall be i:n accordance w �; r- with standard en, veering practices. Pa.vi ar facing- as approved by the County Enoineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles All required improvements shall ConfOrrnl to th;e Current State of Washington Standard Speci(i.catiuns :or Road 0..nd Bridge construction and other applicable county standards; and/or adopted resolutions pert a.ininq pertaining to Road Standards a.nd Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construct.io:r. unless otherwise- approved by the County Engineer. O Access permits for`_ approachres to the County Road 'c ;ystem small be obtained from the County Engineer. ATT G ® IF Taylor Erigft,.xing Civil Design and Land Plaruzing January 22, 1900 "8 Spokane County Engineers N 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 ATTN: Gary Nelson, P.E. RE: Spokane Industrial Park South Expansion Binding Site Plan 17 -87 Gentlemen: The following letter, design data, and phasing schedule is in response to your traffic review and our follow -up discussion and meeting. We have addressed each area of concern, as depicted and sequenced in your letter. In our traffic analysis report, we attempted to match the existing Spokane Industrial Site traffic volumes with historical traffic count data. We projected new volumes by linear P. - Ogression based or: predicted density of workers per acre. The existing Spokane County average annual indicates the following counts: daily traffic count Sullivan - South of Euclid - 17360 Sullivan - North of Euclid - 11030 Euclid - East of Sullivan - 1480 Euclid - East of Flora - 1353. Our traffic analysis indicates the following existing and future conditions. IN DUSTRIAL PARK OUTLETS Westbound Exits from Industrial Park on to Sullivan Road Eastbound Exit at Flora and Euclid Our analysis combined with historical data existing traffic on .Sullivan is traveling Industrial Park. We conclude this to be apportionment. In light of this, the person used for future traffic projections, reasonable and historically defensible than EXISTING FUTURE 8000 12,650 2000 3,160 indicates 50% of the to or from the present a very conservative 2.5 trips per day per appears to be more the 3.5 trips per day W. 55 Mission Ave.. Suite 101 . Spokane, WA 99201 . (509) 3283371 rs referenced in the ITE Manual. (In fact, if 3.5 trips per day were used with current occupancy, it wou.ld sho +r that nearly all traffic on Sullivan is to or from the Indus.trial Park which is surely not the case.)' A.11 roads within the park are expected to he private roads, other than Euclid. lie have designed FairvSew Avenue and Second Street to conform with Spokane County Road Standards so that they aay be turned over at some. point in the future. We propose the _peed limit on the. private roads be 20 MP 11 and the speed limit or. Euclid set at the established County speed. Figure 21 -1, attached A, Page 9, Section 21, of the 1986 '',Major Review Program for the Spokane Comprehensive Plan" shows Euclid Avenue designated as a collector. The Spokane %ounty Comprehensive Plan and the Spokane County-Road Standards are not consistent for typical cross sections. The foIIowing table illustrates the inconsistency's: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Collector Arterial ROAD STANDARDS Collector Arterial Secondary Arterial Capacity 7000 500 - 5000 1500 - 40000 (Vehicles Per Day) Right of Ways 70 60' 64' (ft.) Curb to Curb 40' 40' 44' We proposed a cross section that combined the above data. Our future estimate of 8773 vehicles per day (5610 - outlet ° 2 and 3163 outlet #4) exceeds the existing traffic count of 1485 vehicles per day by almost 6 times. We selected the Spokane County Standard Road Plan's secondary arterial for our cross section which is designated to have an average daily traffic design of up to 40,000 vehicles per day. The proposed right of way width is 68' which meets the Spokane County Road Standards requirements for a major arterial,. or a traffic volume of up to 40,000 vehicles per day. The curb to curb distance selected was 44' which is also designated as a secondary arterial. Our design is quite conservative providing for an ultimate capacity of 40,000 vehicles per day when the expected future demand is only 8800. However, Spokane Industrial Park has no problem with eversiziny right of hays or ultimate road widths to whichever standard you wish to follow. Our proposed section shows a 20' easement on both sides of the road, outside the right of way. This easement will be utilized for 208 drainage. It should be sufficient to handle runoff from whichever size road width is selected.. Taylor Engineering Civil Design and Lana Planning W. 55 Mission Ave.. Su to 101 . Spokane. VA 99201 . (509) 328-3321 Standard sidewalks are not included on our pla analysis proposes a system of pathways linking other, to parking areas, and to transit stops Development Handbook by ULI - the Urban Washington D.C., 1975 recommends this approach the following: n. Our traffic buildings to each The Indust Land Institute, as illustrated by "In general, sidewalks along .streets in industrial areas are not `unctional except under unusual circumstances. Far more appropriate is a system of Pedestrian pathways linking buildings to each other, to parking areas, and to transit stops. Where plans include significant amounts of open space, and residential and commercial uses are located within convenient walking distance, this system of walkways will be even more justifiable and desirable. Sidewalks in an industrial area are an unnecessary expense both for first cost and for maintenance." A request for design deviation is attached. The owner agrees with provision for construction of an additional turning lane on Sullivan Road between Ermina Lane and the realigned Euclid Road. Spokane Industrial Park will dedicate an additional 14' of right of ways for that ;•urpose. The applicant proposes that the phasing of all County Road development be by an RID and be based on an a-ea development consideration. Since there is no immediate impact on the County Road System; and since significant impact will occur as a function of developed property, we propose that the RID for additional turn lanes and Euclid Avenue improvements from Sullivan Street to Flora Street, take place at such time that Sixty Percent (60 %), of the land along Euclid Avenue is developed and occupied. Construction plans for the above described RID would be completed by the owner prior to Binding Site Plan Acceptance. We also propose that road improvements, and the turning lanes, be accomplished requesting a building permit for lots Euclid Avenue. The owner would provide establishing required grade, centerline traffic control measures. other than Euclid Avenue by the person or agency other than those bordering an ove *"all pla.n for roads curvature, alignment, and We request :.that the previously issued Determination of Non Significance be accepted in view of the agreements contained in this letter. We are anxious to proceed with this binding site plan in a rapid manner. Spokane Industrial Park wishes to Taylor Engineering Civil Design and Land Planning W. 55 Misson Ave.. Swie 101 . Spokane. WA 99201 . (509) 3283371 expedite an agreement with you as soon as possible. If you have further.questions regarding this letter or would like to disco s impacts further in a meeting, please call. Sincerely, Tayl r y� i • neeri rye Perry Ta to ,P,E. Owner MAA /csm Enclosures Taylor Engineering Civil Design and Land Planning W. 55 MISSIon Ave.. SuBe 101 • Spokane. WA 99201 . ffiIMi bH.av1 �i �r l I•. ATT. B - ��.191"�` �K�.JS iF! D "J:�'•ti) �y.2�V �t.i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT sl OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER - SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99250 -0170 December 15, 1987 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY P NING ECTOR FROM: SPOKANE COUNT ty� SUB.1: BINDING SITE PLAN 17 -87 A review of the above referenced proposal Analysis Report" has been completed by 'this comments are submitted for your consideration. 'RECEIVED DEC 16 1981 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT and the associated "Traffic department. The following The "Traffic Analysis Report" projects the average daily traffic generated by the proposed Binding Site Plan to be 15,813 vehicle trips. This figure appears to be low. We project that the site will generate aooroximately 22,4CO trips per day (based upon 3.5 trios per day per employee ref ITE Manual). The applicant makes reference to peak hourly traffic volumes which are provided by Spokane County Traffic Data. Peak hourly traffic studies and trip distribution studies have not been undertaken for the Industrial Park by Spokane County. 'Peak hourly traffic data and trip distribution determinations cannot be generated when the only traffic data available are 24 hour traffic counts. The applicant does not indicate if there are to be any private roads within the proposal. If the roadways depicted on the preliminary document are to be public roads they must be constructed in accordance with County Standards and must be signed accordingly. The applicant is proposing a 20mph speed limit for the site. This will take a special resolution by the Board of County Commissioners to set the desired speed limit. The establishment of special speed limits on public roadways is at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. The Typical Roadway Cross Sections provided by the applicant do not depict sidewalks .which are required by County Standards. Stormwater disposal areas (208 swales) have not been included in the cross sections. The Typical Cross Suctions depicted in the document may not be sufficient for projected traffic volumes. The Typical Cross Sections do not comply with County Standards. The right of way widths are consistent with Spokane County Road Standards but are not consistent with the widths depicted in the Spokane County Comprehensive plan. Typical Cross Sections are not .consistent with those identified in the Comprehensive Plan. SIOIA +& coom. count .0v5, Page 2 During preliminary discussions with we indicated that we would prefer that the the 208 swales located between the curb sidewalk from the curb and provides an area from the streets. This recommendation Typical Roadway Cross Sections submitted by representatives of Taylor Engineering arterial streets be designed with and the sidewalk. This separates the for storage when snow is plowed has not been incorporated in the the applicant. The traffic volumes associated with the development of the industrial park will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road. The construction of an additional lane along the east side of Sullivan Road to accommodate turning movements into the site is required. This will require the dedication of an additional 14 ft. of right of way along Sullivan Road from Ermina Lane to The realigned Euclid — Sullivan Road Intersection. The applicant has not provided a phasing schedule for the development of the property. We are assuming that a schedule has not been developed and that the property. will be developed as prospective clients come forward. It is for this reason that the Improvement to Sullivan Road must be made in advance of the filing of the binding site plan. This will be required of the applicant unless a schedule for phasing of development and measures to mitigate traffic impact on a phased basis are submitted for review and approval by the County Engineer. Interim scheduling of roadway improvements within the development may also be desirable. From the information presented in the Traffic Report we are able to determine that the proposed development will have a significant impact upon the County Road, System. We do not concur with much of the information presented in the Traffic Report. Adequate measures to .mitigate the traffic impacts of the development have not been identified in the Environmental Checklist or the associated Traffic Report. We are requesting that the Determination of Non Significance be withdrawn by the Planning Department and that the applicant be directed to work with the County Engineer's Department to identify measures whereby the traffic impacts of the the development may be mitigated. Once those mitigating measures are identified and agreed upon by the developer and appropriate County Agencies, a Mitigating Determination of Non Significance could then be issued. � PLANNING DEPARTMENT O ROADWAT CENTRE NPR DING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHQNC 456 -2205 SPOKANE WA SHINGTON 99260 December 18, 1987 Theron Rust, Vice President and General Manager Spokane Industrial Park North 3808 Sullivan Road Spokane, WA 99216 Re: File BSP -17 -87 Spokane Industrial Park Binding Site Plan Dear Mr. Rust: Enclosed please find a copy of the Spokane County Engineer's response to our proposed Declaration of Non - Significance. As you can see they believe that more detailed information needs to be provided to them before they can support this project. I would appreciate it if you would consult with the County Engineer's Office to resolve their concerns so that this project could proceed in a timely.fashion. Please note that the Planning Department is inclined to accept the County Engineers recommendations on environmental compliance unless they can be shown to be clearly without substance. If you have any questions please contact me at 456 -2205. For the time being we will hold any decision on BSP -17 -87 until this issue can be resolved. Si9Eerply, DOUGLAS A. ADAMS Subdivision Administrator DSA:jp Enclosure cc: Wally Hubbard Taylor Engineering, W. 55 Mission, Suite 101, Spokane, WA 99201 1>1...I m..�I• cc ool .��u r' f _r PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 December 15, 1987 Tb: SPOKANE COUNTY P NING ECTOR v ` FROM: SPOKANE COUN N SUBJ: BINDING SITE PLAN 17 -87 -. A review of the above referenced proposal and the associated "Traffic Analysis Report" has been completed by this department. The following comments are submitted for your consideration. The "Traffic Analysis Report" projects the average daily traffic generated by the proposed Binding Site Plan to be 15,81.3 vehicle trips. This figure appears to be low. We project that the site will generate approximately 22,400 trips per day (based upon 3.5 trips per day per employee ref ITE Manual)l . The applicant makes reference to peak hourly traffic volumes which are provided by Spokane County Traffic Data. Peak hourly traffic studies and trip distribution studies have not been undertaken for the Industrial Park by Spokane County. Peak hourly traffic data and trip distribution determinations cannot be generated when the only traffic data available are 24 hour traffic counts. The applicant does not indicate if there are to be any private roads within the proposal. If the roadways depicted on the preliminary document are to be public roads they must be constructed in accordance with County Standards and must be signed accordingly. The applicant is proposing a 20mph speed limit for the site. This will take a special resolution by the Board of County Commissioners to set the desired speed limit. The establishment of special speed limits on public roadways is at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. The Typical Roadway Cross Sections provided by the applicant do not depict sidewalks which are required by County Standards. Stormwater disposal areas (208 swales) have not been included in the cross sections. The Typical Cross Sections depicted in the document may not be sufficient for projected traffic volumes. The Typical Cross Sections do not comply with County Standards. The right of way widths are consistent with Spokane County Road Standards but are not consistent with the widths depicted in the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. The Typical Cross Sections are not consistent with those identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street,/ Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 " Page 2 During preliminary discussions with representatives of Taylor Engineering we indicated.that we would prefer that the arterial streets be designed with the 208 swales located between the curb and the sidewalk. This separates the sidewalk from the curb and provides an area for storage when snow is plowed from the streets. This recommendation has not been incorporated in the Typical Roadway Cross Sections submitted by the applicant. The traffic volumes associated with the development of the industrial park will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road. The construction of an additional lane along the east side of Sullivan Road to accommodate turning movements into the site is required. This will require the dedication of an additional 14 ft. of right of way along Sullivan Road from Ermina Lane to The realigned Euclid - Sullivan Road Intersection. The applicant has not provided a phasing schedule for the development of the property. We are assuming that a schedule has not been developed and that the property will be developed as prospective clients come forward. It is for this reason that the Improvement to Sullivan Road must be made in advance of the filing of the binding site plan. This will be required of the applicant unless a schedule for phasing of development and measures to mitigate traffic impact on a phased basis are submitted for review and approval by the County Engineer. Interim scheduling of roadway improvements within the development may also be desirable. From the information presented in the Traffic Report we are able to determine that the proposed development will have a significant impact upon the County Road System. We do not concur with much of the information presented in the Traffic Report. Adequate measures to mitigate the traffic impacts of the development have not been identified in the Environmental Checklist or the associated Traffic Report. We are requesting that the Determination of Non Significance be withdrawn by the Planning Department and that the applicant be directed to work with the County Engineer's Department to identify measures whereby the traffic impacts of the the development may be mitigated. Once those mitigating measures are identified and agreed upon by the developer and appropriate County Agencies, a Mitigating Determination of Non Significance could then be issued. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 sro..nc cou m. cou n. eou sc December 15, 1987 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY P 'NING ECTOR FROM: SPOKANE COUN , SUBJ: BINDING SITE PLAN 17 -87 A review of the above referenced proposal and the associated "Traffic Analysis Report" has been completed by this department. The following comments are submitted for your consideration. The "Traffic. Analysis Report" projects the average daily traffic generated by the proposed Binding Site Plan to be 15,813 vehicle trips. This figure appears to be low. We project that the site will generate approximately 22,400 trips per day (based upon 3.5 trips per day per. employee ref ITE Manual). The applicant makes reference to peak hourly traffic volumes which are provided by Spokane County Traffic Data. Peak hourly traffic studies and trip distribution studies have not been undertaken for the Industrial Park by Spokane County., Peak hourly traffic data and trip distribution determinations cannot be generated when the only traffic data available are 24 hour traffic counts. The applicant does not indicate if there are to be any private roads within the proposal. If the roadways depicted on the preliminary document are to be public roads they must be constructed in accordance with County Standards and must be signed accordingly. The applicant is proposing a 20mph speed limit for the site. This will take a special resolution by the Board of County Commissioners to set the desired speed limit. The establishment of special speed limits on public roadways is at the - discretion _of the Board of County Commissioners. The Typical Roadway Cross Sections provided by the applicant do not depict sidewalks which are required by County Standards. Stormwater disposal areas (208 swales) have not been included in the Cross sections. The Typical Cross Suctions depicted in the document may not be sufficient for projected traffic volumes. The Typical Cross Sections do not comply with County Standards. The right of way widths are consistent with Spokane County Road Standards but are not consistent with the widths depicted in the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. The Typical Cross Sections are not consistent with those identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Public Works Building/ North 811 Jefferson Street/ Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509)456-3600. /1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 sro..nc cou m. cou n. eou sc December 15, 1987 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY P 'NING ECTOR FROM: SPOKANE COUN , SUBJ: BINDING SITE PLAN 17 -87 A review of the above referenced proposal and the associated "Traffic Analysis Report" has been completed by this department. The following comments are submitted for your consideration. The "Traffic. Analysis Report" projects the average daily traffic generated by the proposed Binding Site Plan to be 15,813 vehicle trips. This figure appears to be low. We project that the site will generate approximately 22,400 trips per day (based upon 3.5 trips per day per. employee ref ITE Manual). The applicant makes reference to peak hourly traffic volumes which are provided by Spokane County Traffic Data. Peak hourly traffic studies and trip distribution studies have not been undertaken for the Industrial Park by Spokane County., Peak hourly traffic data and trip distribution determinations cannot be generated when the only traffic data available are 24 hour traffic counts. The applicant does not indicate if there are to be any private roads within the proposal. If the roadways depicted on the preliminary document are to be public roads they must be constructed in accordance with County Standards and must be signed accordingly. The applicant is proposing a 20mph speed limit for the site. This will take a special resolution by the Board of County Commissioners to set the desired speed limit. The establishment of special speed limits on public roadways is at the - discretion _of the Board of County Commissioners. The Typical Roadway Cross Sections provided by the applicant do not depict sidewalks which are required by County Standards. Stormwater disposal areas (208 swales) have not been included in the Cross sections. The Typical Cross Suctions depicted in the document may not be sufficient for projected traffic volumes. The Typical Cross Sections do not comply with County Standards. The right of way widths are consistent with Spokane County Road Standards but are not consistent with the widths depicted in the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. The Typical Cross Sections are not consistent with those identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Public Works Building/ North 811 Jefferson Street/ Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509)456-3600. 4 Page 2 During preliminary discussions with representatives of Taylor Engineering we indicated that we would prefer that the arterial streets be designed with the 208 swales located between the curb and the sidewalk. This separates the sidewalk from the curb and provides an area for storage when snow is plowed from the streets. This recommendation has not been incorporated in the Typical Roadway Cross Sections submitted by the applicant. The traffic volumes associated with the development of the industrial park will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road. The construction of an additional lane along the east side of Sullivan Road to accommodate turning movements into the site is required. This will require the dedication of an additional 14 ft. of right of way along Sullivan Road from Ermina Lane to The realigned Euclid - Sullivan Road Intersection. The applicant has not provided a phasing schedule for the development of the property. We are assuming that a schedule has not been developed and that the property will be developed as prospective clients come forward. It is for this reason that the Improvement to Sullivan Road must be made in advance of the filing of the binding site plan. This will be required of the applicant unless a schedule for phasing of development and measures to mitigate traffic impact. on a phased basis are submitted for review and approval by the County Engineer. Interim scheduling of roadway improvements within the development may also be desirable. From the information presented in the Traffic Report we are able to determine that the proposed development will have a significant impact upon the County Road System. We do not concur with much of the information presented in the Traffic Report. Adequate measures to mitigate the traffic impacts of the development have not been identified in the Environmental Checklist or the associated Traffic Report. We are requesting that the Determination of Non Significance be withdrawn by the Planning Department and that the applicant be directed to work with the County Engineer's Department to identify measures whereby the traffic impacts of the the development may be mitigated. Once those mitigating measures are identified and agreed upon by the developer and appropriate County Agencies, a Mitigating Determination of Non Significance could then be issued. L. B S P—_. -° I I RECUVE9 SPOKANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE DEC 0 3 1987 (WAC 197 -11 -970) Section 11.10.230(3) Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER D E T E R M I N A T I O N O F N 0 N- S I G N I F I C A N C E "D N S" FILE NUMBER(S): BSP -17 -87 PROPONENT: Theron Rust, V. P. /Gen. I•Igr., Spokane Industrial Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal is a 46 -lot Binding Site Plan. The site is approximately 160 acres and lots average a5out 2.5 acres eacn, Ine property Is zoned for industrial use and industrial us e would be anticipated on each lot. Applicant In tenas to seek minor lot line adjustments it necessar t o TaC LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, including street address, if any: The north 112 of Section 12, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM, lying north of the railroad and between Sullivan and Flora Roads. LEAD AGENCY: , SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environments Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL DOUGLAS S. ADAMS Position /Title - Spokane County Subdivision Administrator Phone - (509)456 -2205 Address - Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 DATE ISSUED: /j� SIGNATURE: This "DNS" is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead aqency wi 1 not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from the date iss (see above )j. COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN by 5:00 P.M. 1 ##################################################### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## APPEAL of this Determination may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99260. This appeal deadline is the same as the above proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the Findings and Order. This appeal must be written and must be prepared pursuant specific criteria on offical appeal forms. Contact the above Responsible Official to assist you with the specifics for a•SEPA appeal. ##################################################### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## * This "DNS" Form was mailed to agencies and departments as noted below. 1. WA. State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA. State Department of Social & Health Services 3. WA. State Department of Transportation (Spokane) 4. Spokane County Engineers/ 5. Spokane County Utilities 6. Spokane County Building & Safety 7. Spokane County Health District 9. Fire District 10. Water District ••y 1 IIII )ii01IVl JOi {il .eez• :3�r�s •_ ...• O ' O .. _ _ ....., p 00 0 p Ml....... •l�.l•NNll�vl p _ YMIi•1 N•Y�•1 Y• • M '11 �1JY _ �••,_ o ••_ .,n -,«_ _.. _......, - o i ... .. .. «. 0 0 0 ..... _.• - � i r 1�r 1 _ Lc f` 9c 0 sc F� 1,C l i l, i i cc - te zc 82 ..,-. • f 1 ! 1 � ' - eL j •� j' •• � ),J B 1DYd1 �4.. Net 1� Its' t ! •' (' 92 ij ' -`•`' i rI IC is Zt I.`. ' •• ct ` e i+ 9 -- - o o 6 1 S I ! 1 t l a i i . ;�_ O I i i t _ x :12 rcz =3 CI 1 ' e e j i :. 22 [ 12 1Jrd1 .-.._ ... - ::, 1 .... ' F ; a 13r.d1 .. a ez ; Ll�i yl .. _:.�. •1 .1 it k " '' Yi1CY vim qm" 9.mm ma wm T___4 %M7 'MILT tam" WPW 1wr our BSp -17 - 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230(1) SPOSA ENVIROHNFHTAL 0"INA,; 1 7 � V 7 (VAC 19) - 11 - 960) Sec Nen 11 .10.}10(1) If J� Cn vl ronae n,d Checklist purpose of Checklist' File No. The Sale iset dntolesa.` An Envi nai r.n.mcal policy Act (Sent) chapter <), }I[ RN rrequires all &everomm,al agencies to ,...Joe' the environmental Imp.,,, of proposal the quality lty Impact Statement (CIS) must be prepared for all prop... la with probable significant advun mpaclr On propo.sa I ity Qnd the .. of the envl ranee n[. The pulp--. of this checklist la to proved. Information to help You and the . &rnry IdtntlfY Impactg from your to r,do.. -1 avoid Impact- from the proposal, If It can be done) an d to help the San,, decide whether an CIS 1, required. IvtrwIllona for Appllca...: This environmental checklist asks you to describe spot ball, Information about your Plop I' Coverruental whether the envlrenmencal Impsua of your proposal era significant, requiring pre An... 4he a use nM1ts r i e fly. determi p rev L< Inlom non known, or give [he beat description You can, p'u Uan of meat [IS. r the qua Ilona brief lY. with the sort You .wt answer each question accurately and carefully, a the beat of your knowledge, In Bost au, You should be able [o Use Pue nlana to your Proposal, write from your own ca observeclan. or project plans vichout the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the sliver, or It a quutlo' do., no[ apply - do not know' or "does not .pp1Y.. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid u... cc I, delay. later. he.. e . Problems. ask about .overnmental uguL[lo aonl n&, a. and landmark designations. Ana.,, , hue qua ttenr It low c . It Problems. ch. gave ana <ntd ns, such as h.,,Iln, ago ncles tan ...I., you, art You Attach the .kips, qua sl So-- apply to all At Paris of your proposal, even It You plan ,a d0 them over a period of lime or on different P,ce6 of I.nd. At ea any additional Information that will describe Your proposal or Its environmental effects. The agency to which you --bolt this rht, list uv ask you to ma p' - " Y anawera .r provide addiclonal Inlormatlan reasonably related to detenlning'if .hue may be significant adverse I,ct. Use of checklist for n.np ro ]act propo Complete this ch<tkllst for nonproj,.t proposal$, even thou M1 question. may IN ADDITION, con air the SUPPL[NCNTAL SHEET FOR NONPAOACT & ARIONS(Part D), be answered "does not apply". tar nonproject act Ions, the references In the checklist to the words "project, ".ppllunt, and "Property or $Ire should be read n - pro Puu 1, - proposer, and "affected geographic arcs, respectively. A. RACRGROUHD I. Hear Of Proposed project, If applecabl.: Spokane Industri Park Binding Site Plan }- Name of Appllc..t: _Theron Rut- Vic o pros •rl r R G _ T I. Auldrau and phone number of applicant me cents.' Mark Aronson – Suite 101, Spokane Washington 99D 509 t. Do le checklist prepared S. Agency re Paten I.& check Coun Planni Industrial Park ng _ W. 55 Mission 6. proposed train& .r schedule (InCluding Phasing, If .PPi,c.b,.): Lots are currently being marketed. The proposed development tim ing is 1987 through 1991. ]• Do you have any plan. for future addt,lonr, expansion, or further accivit r ela Any future additions or expansions would likely beaeto to - r the Northeast a adjacent to this property b. Do you awn or have .odor- en land n ... by or .dj.c.pt to this pespo.all If Yes, ..pl.ln, App i cant h a s la ownership both to the North and Nor theast of this site. Lt., .ray esvl r.nesent., lnfonatlon You know .bout ,he, he. '.an prepared, or well be The existing Spokane Industrial Park directly north of been app roved for in dustrial use. ' SPOKANE [HVI0.0HMCKTAL OAD INASC` (vAC 191- 11 Section 11.10.730(1) B 97 A. SACKCROOD (contl road) go , 7 9. Do you know whether •Dp\ltatlom ere pending for gavern... 1.1 sort... la of .Cher p,.pog.l. directly •ff,clin, the Drapery ra.,red by your proposal? If Y es, rapl.in. None that we are aware of 10. List any government approval. or P.rmita that will be needed for Your proposal. If known. App roval of street, sewer, water, and stormwater plans. Building Permits. 11. Olve brief, empiric description of your prop... 1, Including the proposed u a,. and the .f.e of the proj,cl and •Ile. There tai question. let., in this checklist has ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repast .h... ....... an v t his P•ge. I is a lots average about 2.6 acres each. ik!� g :}4>t.ts(7fvt a�i{S�yca Pe 11. Location of the proposal. Cive sufficient Information to a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project. Including •veer add,..., It any. and ....term, rovnshlp •M ran,, It knoun. If • pr.p.al would occur ever . 'ante of .re., provide the ..... or boundaries of the site (.). Provide • legal description, sit. pI... vicinity esp, •n! topogrsphtt mp, Id son.bly •v. t l able. vhll. y.0 should submit any plan. r<qul red by the agency, you are not required to dupllastr maps or detailed plans .nteluedwith any permit application related to this checklist. Thp north 11 of Section 12. T 5N R 44 EWM. lying north of the railroad and between Sullivan and Flora Roads. 13. Uoas the proposed •alarm 11• within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)l Th. Qnerml Sever S.,vlce Aral The Priority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spok...I (Sea: Spok... Com.ty'a ASA Overlay Ion. Atlas for bow M.rlas ). _It is within the Aquifer Sensitive Area, the General Sewer Service Area and the Priori Sewer Service Area. It is proposed that the plat be privately sewered. See Attached TO SC CONPLMD ST APPLICANT sewer report. 1. SNVIRONIQNTAL ELL?GI 1. [AATH .. Gnarul description of the site (circle one), Fla. tau lnf. hilly. steep slopes, mountainous, other, L/ H b. .het 1s the steepest slope on the site (approximate "seats slope)? Le ss than 5% c. vh.t .ea ral types Of -oils are found on the sit. (for .sample, clay, and, gravel, pest, muck)l It you know the classification of agricultural -oil-, .,.city them and note any prime farmland. GgA — Garr Gravelly L . GnB — Garrison Very Stony Loam d. Are there surface Indication. or history of unstable 90119 In the Immediate vicinityl If so, d uvlb.. No E v alu ation enc yt ion for A / v s..<r va onl 1i;V- ?7 dracury (VAC 197 - 11-960) 5.<tion 11,10.270(1) cNVIROWINrAI. OROINANC L IwV1RON N2Al. LUMENTS(contlnued) [. I .crlbc the purpose, typ e sM apprortu to qua nt flu e! y (11 II ng er gn din ""c'" sou rte of 1311. ^ rading and fi � I WO Ild hP a min prop ..ed. nt to shape drainage ] and build roads and structures, m Fill would normally be less than 1 foot and come from a local so urce, L Cauld erosion occur as • ramsalt of claaring, construction, or use? It ao, generally de...lbs. J. About whet percent at the site will be covered With ImM miou. surfaces after project construc- tion (far example, Asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 65% including roads parking areas driveways and roofs. h. proposed measure. to reduce .r emntrml Remain", or other impact. to the earth, . it any: New drainage and runoff patterns will reduce erosion Lawn paving & curbing will control surface erosion. AIR a. Vnst type of emission$ to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, safer. 1 ndu RLl, woad smoke) during construction and When the project Is completed? If any, gene ally describe and give approalmstx quentfte. If know. Emissions associated with typical Industrial areas. New businesses must con mein to current A and A requirements. b. Are there any off -site source. of emission. or odor that.may affect your propeult 1( so, generally d... alb.. e. prmpmaad measures to redo.. or .."feel utu long or ether Impact. eo air, If any: None — other than required by building permits and the _ on —ooing vehicle emission ins program for Spokane Area ). VAM a. surface: (1) 1. there any surface water body on or In the Immedlmee vicinity of the the tncludl nR yes. - round and seasonal at rues, me ltwater, lake-, panda, wetlands)? I( yam, describe type and provide names, It app,apr .,., .tau what ..ream or river tt flow. Into. No (2) Will ch. ".J." require any war% oust, In, or ad jaunt to (within 200, feet) th< dsscrl bed wat.,. ? I( yes, please describe and attach available plan.. N/A � � a• lu. mm� m F. R 7 f Atury W[ Only V (2) Will ch. ".J." require any war% oust, In, or ad jaunt to (within 200, feet) th< dsscrl bed wat.,. ? I( yes, please describe and attach available plan.. N/A SFOL l !\YIMMl6)nL odDlnnsC[ (VAC 19]-11 - 960) L ltlon 11.10.270(1) y1. 1. [wVIgOW ]'A MLN [L[HCNT9 (eontlno<d) B C ry• ap e ' .II w il u the amount .r fill and dredge material gn a b< b ldC e In et .d Iron .., the( se at., c ar ..flood. and Indicate he 1re1 at cite .Ile . t hat wo b< afl«ud In dicate dlesu n nr inlr the aw of ace of (111 material. N/A p �7 d / (t) Will the prop.ul re,ulr. rvrtece vats withdraw.). or dlo.r.lon.) CIv. ee ne ral d..crly- 11nn. pulp.... and Approximate quantities If known. No (s) Does the proposal Its within a too -year flood plain: 1( ., note location on the .Ile plan. No (6) Does the proposal Involve any discharge. of waste materials to surface voterA If ao, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ✓ No h. LPCVKD: (/ (1) Will If ... d weter be withdrawn, or will w.tor b. al.rh gad }n gr.tnd .r' Civ! ao.r rlptlon, vrpo v, and .pp,..I..tC q ... title. If known. �urTa e �r(in 1. Off wi� • f •r... be di sc h arged into the groundwater via gras percolation and drywells. Groundwater is withdrawn through Priva water wells in the existing SIP System. T Spokane Aqui has surplus capacity. (2) Describe waste material the, will be discharged Into the ground from septic look. or ether. unitary Waste treatment facility. Describe the general sl:e of the s•uee, the number of houses te be served (if .ppll:sblq) or the Crusher of persons the system(.) a..'capect, to off, None — Project will he sewerefi (7) Describe may systems, other than thou designed tar the disposal of unitary waste. Installed for the purpose of di.charging fluids below the 11ouM wrAte (1.11.4. quilt ouch u thou for the disposal Of atom water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of •fate., the amount .f material to be disposed of through the system end the types Of materials Ilke]y to be Attested of (locladl rag met.I.la which .a rotor the get. Inadvertently through •Pill, .r ma • Ault of fir. fighting activities). Nothing other than that described in Item #1 (d) Will any chemical. (especially oganit 161.1t, or petrol.m fuel,) be «.red to above e roil std a r ,(� nd,rg roil at or. tenk.) 1f sal, hat rypea Ind q anti[!. of mate r lilt will be .told) Yg$a161V — .)commend i building permit process. Occupants will be required to (VAC 1.91 - 11-960) Section 17.10.1300) SrOWT LNVIRONWNTAL OUINMCC P ���ay�(ppp tNVIRONIQNTAL [LLh2NTS (contlnuad) (5) bhat protective ouaures will 'be taken to insure that last& or #pill$ of any Chemicals /ry scored or used on site will not b< allowed to percolate to ground water (this Includes mu mru to keep chemlc.lr oat of disposal .yet... described In Jb(1) aM 3b(5)? If used, recommend that this be addressed in building permit process. Voter Runoff (including .caret water), (1) Describe the source of runoff (including states water) and method of eellectlon and disposal If any (include yusntitleo, If knoyq), �N(C Fe y)11 this u ca "Zi (l 4} Il t�4 va ter ow Into other war to n ?. If .o, deecr lbs. pnO rOm roads Wl l I f IOW in gras percolation areas with excess flowing into drywells per County standards. Runoff from building roofs and private parking areas will be to grass percolation areas designed when the building permit is applied for (1) Will any chemicals be .tared, handled or used an the site in • location whet. • .pill or leak will deal. eo aurfau or g,..M water er to • .term water disposal system discharging to wrfau ar grow" water? Possibly — We recommend t is be ad sees permit process. 4.1 nee_ Ll tvalw 7 ,U, 1 Ate n Us 1 / — k (J) could w..t. maurl.l. ..... ... u" or surface wat.,.? If .o, t.n...11y describe. Only in a leak or spill situation. If this occurs the local Fire Department is to be contacted for containment of the spill and the Department of Ecology is to clean up the spill as per the toxic waste clean —up plan provided by the owner. d. prope.ad manure. 1. r.due. or control surface, group /, am rvnoff wat.r I.p.ct.. If any (If 'the proposed action lies within the Aau lfer Sena live Area be up.cl.11y .1... on esplentto ne r IAtlsg to facilities concerning Statlon# 5b(t), )b(5).." Jc(J) of this checklist). Only that as described in Item " and monitQrjag individu site uses via the building Permit pro Psc t, rvdlys •. Check or circle tM of vgetacton found nn the aIt.: X d.ctduou. treat elder. maple. upon, oth.r. X .1.Wt4n treat fir ceder, pin•, other. X .h.b.. X...... X p..t.... crop or grin. wat all 'last., estcall, batter,., bullru.h, kuek < bb.S.. oth.r. w.t.r plait water July, sag..... slltoll, other. ether type. of veSetn/on. b. What kind e" smounc of viprtion will be, moved or rIt..d? Grass some shrubs and trees. C. List threatened or endangered #peel•# kawn to be an or dear the .Ito. Non d, erapoeed it.. I V17 L C $ °` s flrub$ `O s y n the .lr. a .n t $ dn rdSS ° ° W1 I lvgastlon be planted. S. "N S •. Circle Any birds and Animals vhlch have been obaerved on or near the Its or are \noun to be on or n the Nu: bl ra m: M1.uk, heron, e. p., engbirds other: Upland Game Rirdc, Song Rirtk S parrowS .... deer, bur, elk. beaver others Rodents b..., .Almon, trout. n,,,, .halfl.n, other: NSA ether: b. List Any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. r. Is the site part of a migration route? If sa, explain. No d. ?cap ... d ....mar.. to preserve at eM.oce .11411(.. if Any: None 6. LNLRCY AND NATVRA USOURCES f-� LI ✓ L .. "at kind& of energy (electric, natural p., weed at o... alas) vlll be ...d so .eat th. the completed pro¢e['s enacgy me 4.7 De.trlbe uheth.r 11 will be used for heating, ..nufvc- luring. atc. Possibly all of the above types of energy As heating and manufacturing requirements. b. generally your escr affect the potential v.e of solar energy bl adjacent pro P rtlut I(so. poneu ne lll du <rl be be. No c. War kinds of energy conservation future. are Lncludsd in the plans of this proposal? List ether proposed measure. to reduce of central energy [.pact., If Any: None 7. CNVIRONMNTAL MCALTN e. Are there any envlra:s.esesl health hazard.. Including exposure to toxic changes L, r/.k of fl to .red explosion, Pill, or hazardous vases, that could aster ae a result of this proposal? If so, ducrlb.. Possibly — Recommend that this be addressed in h ildinn- permit process. (1) Ds.crlbs spat Ll uargenry e.nlcrs that .1 ht be g W r1. • 1 Fire hydrants will be installed p of J i_X-// .o iii._ s_ SYO..M'l kNVIrOFYlNtAL OiD IHANCI: (vaC 197-d1-960) SeeU nn 11.10.210 !. CNVIRO H7ffNTA1 CIS16Ni3 (nom lose.) � me an Is' Ven7Use Only S. "N S •. Circle Any birds and Animals vhlch have been obaerved on or near the Its or are \noun to be on or n the Nu: bl ra m: M1.uk, heron, e. p., engbirds other: Upland Game Rirdc, Song Rirtk S parrowS .... deer, bur, elk. beaver others Rodents b..., .Almon, trout. n,,,, .halfl.n, other: NSA ether: b. List Any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. r. Is the site part of a migration route? If sa, explain. No d. ?cap ... d ....mar.. to preserve at eM.oce .11411(.. if Any: None 6. LNLRCY AND NATVRA USOURCES f-� LI ✓ L .. "at kind& of energy (electric, natural p., weed at o... alas) vlll be ...d so .eat th. the completed pro¢e['s enacgy me 4.7 De.trlbe uheth.r 11 will be used for heating, ..nufvc- luring. atc. Possibly all of the above types of energy As heating and manufacturing requirements. b. generally your escr affect the potential v.e of solar energy bl adjacent pro P rtlut I(so. poneu ne lll du <rl be be. No c. War kinds of energy conservation future. are Lncludsd in the plans of this proposal? List ether proposed measure. to reduce of central energy [.pact., If Any: None 7. CNVIRONMNTAL MCALTN e. Are there any envlra:s.esesl health hazard.. Including exposure to toxic changes L, r/.k of fl to .red explosion, Pill, or hazardous vases, that could aster ae a result of this proposal? If so, ducrlb.. Possibly — Recommend that this be addressed in h ildinn- permit process. (1) Ds.crlbs spat Ll uargenry e.nlcrs that .1 ht be g W r1. • 1 Fire hydrants will be installed p of J i_X-// .o iii._ s_ a. th VlhuFnXR7U LLEe n, (cenilnvre)' - LNVIdOhhINTAL xLALTII V (yj Propo.td ....u... ,o reduce or cone rol en vl re n.enul health Direct sewerina_ huoda. It any: b. Noise: ( 'shat type. o[ nol.e --let 1.,the are. <4'I P.ent, opt r. t ion, oth"I uhlph .a affect your project (for ..a.pl.: ical indus a (]) Uh.t tYPts and level, of nol.< 'o-ld be ere.. <d b .AOrt -te rs or • lond -zero b.. 1. (for . Y or u.oc la ttd vlth the -her hour. nof.t ue.ld en.a trw the alt. pl r. uafl!<, conrtrue tier., o . Dr on . T _ P r. tto n, ether! Indicate th industrial (]] Prepo..d .umre to .due. or eonrro1 nolae Lpaeu. If any: None, other than those imposed as health and safety irements to individual tennants and r Bert owners. D. LARD -D SPORILIAC USE .. Uhat I. the current u.. of the al'e and adjacent Oropert l <.f Vacant land and c urr e_ nt industrial usp_ b. xa the .Ice been ...d [or aj,jc.I .... t If .e, de.erlb.. No C. Descrlbe any 'tru<.ereeen.he.lt. Industrial Buildings d. Ulll any structure. b. d ... 1j.h.dt It .e, uhIchl No •• Uh't I. the rue,... eon I's el ... lt Metal" at ch..1'.1 Industrial e f• Uhat Is the current cropr.h.n.ly. pLn dea dn.[l.n of the .It.? Industrial d• 11 .ppi Mat 1. the current .AOn1im cage. NIA predr.. d..ldmtlon o, the aIt.l h, xu any part of the elr< been cl...lf .peclly, led a an '. nvl ro.r.otai ly ..n.MW aru i I No 'o, L t �1 Q d n n `_ for A Y • On)Y 6� �9- 11_2J_ h 1. Appro.L.tAY hew any P..Ple would reside o er4 In the to Pleted preject! 2,000 People V (WAC 197-11 -960) Seetlon 11.10.7300) A. ENVIeONNEHTAL tUtILNTS (tontimed) SporA%J ENVIEON NTAL DADINANCE BSP J. Approx Wtely how many people would the completed project dlsplaee7 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement I.p.ct.. If any: None M �y(/ n 1 �Evclu.. ro A, C, L On y 1. Proposed ........ to ensure the propo..1 1. co.p.tlbl. with ..l.tl.l •nd projected land us., and plan., If .^'mare Proposal is in substantial conformity to surrounding industrial use and history. 9. HOUSING •. Approximately how many units would be provided, It any) Indicate whether high, middle, or low -lncoe# howly. None b. Approximately haw many unit.. if any. would be eu.lnatedf Indicate whether high..Iddl...r low-Incme h...1". None C. Proposed measure# to reduce or control have", Impacts, If any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS A. What Is the tallest height of any proposed otncture (a), not lncludlng antennae; what Is chi principal exterior building waterfalls) proposed? " Structures would meet Industrial Zoning Requirements. b. What views In the Immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None C. Proposed measure. to reduce or control aeoth.tit impact., It any: The site will be developed per land planning and landscape guidelines' as prepared by Mitchell, Nelson Group, Inc. 11. LIGHT AHD C M •. What type of light er glare .111 the propoesl produce? What time of day would It mainly occur? Typic building lighting. mainly during the dAy b. Could light or glen from the finished p,. Ject M • gaiety h .... d or Interfere with el.w.l _ No C. What existing off-lit. source of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. proposed .n..... to '.duce ., control light amd U... Impua, if any: None DA �I ?D -Y7 (VAC 197-11 -960) Sect Ion 1 1.10.770(1) IPORANO LMVIRONALNTAL OROINANCL I. LMVIRONNINTAL LLCMLMTS 17, RLCRLATION .• What dealtr.ted and lofon.l car .... " -I aPPnqunitlas ere In the la.ed1.rely rlelnftyl b. Would the proposed pro ject displac any ""[lot recrutloml .reel if so, describe. No E. ?top ... 4 ..asses to reduce or control Lpacta no recrertlon fncl.dlnt recru glen opportunities to be provided by the project or appllesnt, If any: None 11. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL FUSCRVATION a. Are there any pLee.. or .bj.". 11.1.4 nn, or Propoud for national, state, or local P,...... if.. rag Lten known to be an or nest 10 the site) If so, geneully describe. No b. Generally describe any landesrks or evidence of historic archaeological. scientific .r culluul lapertanee known to be on or neat to the alt.. None C. PI.POaed aurora [o reduce or central lapacta. If any 14. TRANSPORTATION ' a. Identify public streets and hlghways sawing the site, and describe Proposed access to the ez1.ting street systos. Show on site plans, it any. Euclid will serve as a major arterial with private streets serving as collectors to Euclid See Separate Traffic Analysis Report. b. fa site cwrnn13y --led by public transit? It not, Mat 1. the spproxlu is dfr Once t. the ..rest tesn.lt stops The site is se rved by bus. C. Now .any P&t%IRZ spaces wow14 the tweeted project hay.t Now ---7 "Old the project -Ilsioacei Parking would be as required by each individual site We anticipate 7500 parking stalls. d. Will the proposal ra R.lrn any new read. or sense-, or l.provea-nla to --tart., road. or serest. not locludlnL drlv.wsya? If - , g.nenlly describe (lndicsre whether public or pr hate)._ Yes — Euclid Avenue will be upgraded and private roads built. See Road Design Report and Road Plan. as At n �r Apnp Uu ONy texuirz_ //- ,�o _g e. Will the yroj... u • (or occur In the Immediate vicinity oO water. fall. air tnn.port rtlpn} If so, ge ne tally describe. Yes — Rail lines will extpnd into the property to service the sites. • 51'OrANI: INt'IYOF'y (.N iAI. OY O:':Ati[1: A. I VRO"E Section 11.10.1)0(1 w * d g, CNVlAOhri[NTnL [L[NLNTS (cant fnued) - - J_ -- ��[• ~ Y 1 + In for Use Gay I. Nov .ny vehlc pear would per aped Rene by the let d lrn ehi II kn.-n, l �'✓ — _'_ 1..� v`-' ` lndlt$ ll .hen peak -oleo are - , r . . fur ' a estimat e is 3� ObO cle trim per day. The peak would be between 4.00 PM and 6.00 PM 7 By using already implemented staggered rplpaep times th / / 2D �� peak hourly volume would be about 2500 vehicles. A. Proposed sessurss to reduce or control transportation lopecu, If any: Staggered release times have already been implemented and would continue to be in the future 15. PUBLIC SCAVICCS e. would the project ruull In an Increased need for public services (fore Asple. Pere prolectlon, Police ptsrctlan, health care, schools. other)} If so, generally describe. Yes — Fire protection lines will be installed. Other services would be compatible with current reguireme b. Proposed menu rs. 1. reduce or control direct Impact$ on public service., If any: Tax rates and utility rate Sc hedules are ctrurtlrpd to provide for such services. 16. UTIL:TICS a. Circle -little-- curvently .,.liable al In. seer. service, e.lepho... can leery sever, septic cyst,. electricity. natural gas, vater. .efuse 'DrTr b. basin be the utilities that are Dt ... a far the project, the utility providing the ..;rice and Ih. tan., I tru [( a t)rl ties on 1A mete or In the Issedlae r[ <Inlg vhlch t,ht be needed• A`17 u�i1i�)es it fed ahnvp will hp p tended to service the site. See Overall Sewer and Water Plans C. SICNAMM 1, the undersigned away ends the Penalty of perjury that the .boy rs.pon..s are ad, truthfully am to the best of OF knevledge. 1 else under• udW that should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on y part, the •Ag=cy pay withdraw any dster.lnotlon of nonalgnlflunce that tt mlght Issue In reliance upon this / checklist. Data, ' — .30 — ■roponent Ts/Citn.✓ t/• /C ✓• i ✓ P 1 L6.V M SPA.e. (rl case hunt ar Type) P .... n,t, (/ d ....... North 3808 Sullivan Road, Spok WA 99216 -1670 Phone, ( 509 ) 924 -1720 Peron compl.tln{ form: ph ... 1 ( 509 ) FOR STA/P USE ONLY Staff Ne.ber(.) Rerle plate Checklist: 1 �G Date, 1/ e taed aq hue .tdf fe Ylew of the enrlropPereal checklist T' other pertinent Infarction, the staff( A Concludes that there are so probable significant adverse Isparta and stressed• a de to rleallen of non. lgnlflunce. B. Conclude. 'net probable significant adre see savI,avzn1.l I.P.cl. do eslar for the curnu Propose' 'M "creaser" • eltltated detu- steatite of ....1 {nlflunce -Ith conditions. C. Concludes that there are probable. significant adverse environmental I.pact. end recamt<nda • doteN sea [eon of .1 {nlflunce. rILINC FCC - 1)5.00 � IU�9 t3� (� 2 � •' ... ' Fes- I� ✓/ �L.J � 21�"dTe S. ` 15 ,mow, -o s l.}�a� tWa�lS - cam woof 7 RECEi11E9 7 SPOKANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE DEC 0 2 1987 (WAC 197 -11 -970) Section 11.10.230(3) Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DETERMINATION OF N0N SIGNIFICANCE "DNS" FILE NUMBER(S): BSP -17 -87 MUSS e <o- , 6u c- !1s r "r, C-9 T.J a4 ✓vwwJ PROPONENT: Theron Rust, V.P. /Gen. Mgr. Spokane Industrial Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal is a 46 -lot Binding Site Plan. The site is approximately 160 acres atid lots average ou for industrial use and industrial use would be anticipated on each lot. Applicant in ens o see minor lot—line a Sus en s i neces a y Le oeveloprorT LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, including street address, if any: The north 112 of Section 12, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM, lying north o the railroad and between Sullivan and Flora Roads. LEAD AGENCY. . SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environments Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL DOUGLAS S. ADAMS Position /Title - Spokane County Subdivision Administrator Phone - (509)456 -2205 Address - Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 DATE ISSUED: �y/y,�Q� SIGNATURE: This "DNS" is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead a wi 1 not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from the date iss (see above)ti COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN A by 5:00 P.M. dd # ## # # # # # # # ######### ########## ####YYdYdk##### `dNNq NN###########################NN APPEAL of this Determination may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99260. This appeal deadline is the same as the above.proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the Findings and Order. This appeal must be written and must be prepared pursuant specific criteria on offical appeal forms. Contact the above Responsible Official to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. ##F################ #N # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # ### ########### # ## ##N # ## # ## ###### ############ ## # • This "DNS" Form was mailed to agencies and departments as noted below. 1. WA. State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA. State Department of Social & Health Services 3. WA. State Department of Transportation 4, Spokane County Engineers/ 5. Spokane County Utilities 6. Spokane County Building & Safety I 7. Spokane County Health District V0 C—, M(2e4 9. Fire District 10. Water District T 9 _oposa.� . Z a ," I `C (GG1 -V6 i o Y0rv\ u� AwtS, r �nou - 91n�t �4T .� WGU (C� r,e All ro��;, 51��e - P_e5p(n1Se_ Tme- shod*- 7 . ,.,. fu, raaoi 1-3 1011,1 ,aez•.t :3�r�s p .. +.. .. «_ p .+ ._ ... p .. .. +.. ..... p ... _+ ...._ O .. _.. �. _.. O ... .., .... .. O u•noa v n u•. N mu .. .. ++ ..... p .. .. ... _... _ O N Nu .Yau a eu•ama N \\•n +. _.. ..« _ p +.• ++ n.a„ Q. 1. }ll.l )I. >aY•\ i• 'la•.I.N '.III.Y _.. ..... p __ i c o ... _. ...._ O c 6c I l 1i l' LC i O .�I _� ~~ +r I i -_Ia' \ SC j ��� _ ._ • •...• ' "" ! rC �•i r - _ CC i ez _ _ { •• S2 - 'i° L2 p 9 it .v� � .L • 1 I !i �! Li i .1';•- \. �r ii I bl 81 SI i l t ` 1 3 CI i l a `C2 " 22: ` 12 17ra1 .. «._ ... ... :k 7 1Jrtl1 �:« '\. ;1 ! ' Ll ! 91 °! -•� I Olartll lovu ' !I .l Ij i teW.:_,.�rY � t�A��.• `.��s��9�F.a �� -�>•� �#f.R!'w � z .1 ASP -)7 87 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230(1) t ry GC 4C,.�Pfr`r`2 us✓�.Y. kv ,{l �¢_yr. irtnYU .p l.` `l. Lt; 4C :iT' 1 2 - � .t �' gpOK ENYIRONNLNTAL ORDIMAN� V par � • m . -(VAC I9) -11 -160) Section 11 .10.730(1) 7 Envlronseensel Checklist pulps.. of Chec\llrtt fl le No. The rs a i nrl Cem " Cemen t" F-IUY AC[ (SVA) thapr -r 43.21C RN requires al Casters u41n{ detlrlanr. An Lnvlrenmencal la l Bewar for 11 p roposal* to .. aid" ehe 1. ro naenul "pacts the quellty of [hr enrl ro The purp.aa of a l his < te he CCC at b. pampered far all proposeis with pro ba bit 51 • prppm.l rr.peasl (One se reduce or Ire -Ida Information le help you and t [nlllum thane of In H en .told bpaW (too the proposal, 1! It tan M dens) stk to h<l qen,. Identify It ;arms from your p the A&Cety decide whether n CIS Ir required. Iast rvctlena for AppllCants: This environmental checklist asks You se deacrlbo •o.e basic info n a[lon whether the abw[ our enrl ro n.e n[al bpecea of Your prop...! a •Ignlflu nt, nqut slag pY...... proposal. Cowern.enul .,antler use [Ms Ch.ckllrt den rmlne p'"I" ln(emtlen th-un, er [Iv. In. bear d-- c1Ip[len you can. len of an [35. Aaswer the question• briefly, ulen the most You .Cart answer each qutatlon ercuntely and Carefully, to the beat el Your knowledge. In CC.. your own eb-enatlonl or project plans ultheat the need to hire e. t tort ...... You should be to your propose 1, YrITe "ee not \new" or 'does no[ 1 pens. If q u<ulom now Car avoid unne You really do nor knew the a ueq er bit to am Carr rte quo stlpns app y. Ca PICIt answers to th< re • cn wry delays eer. . It's,. do., at apply Sees qua Uona ask abw, g.e.,..rs.I Peg ulrc to ns, such • -.ning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questlona 11 You sac, If hart problems, Che geve rn.entsl genctu Can ... I., You, a you The checklist gwtule ^a apply Cc all Attach any addlttonel Infonetion Ch., wlll°ducrlbgropymal, evn If you plan to do them over • Period of it.* or on different Y ou y proposal or fu envy Hrcela of land. u\ ou [a .glaln year answers er provide , Oreeneal effects. T addlrlonsl Infona[lon naaeasbl agency Co which you wbp It this cMckllu r related to determining If Thar- may be .Ignlflunt ad wen. .;,at, Use of chat \!bt for non proJ.at proposals: Caplet• Chia checklist for nonpra lace rr.puals, even Chow [ h IN ADDITION, apprise- The SUPPLEMENTAL SNEEt TOR ROHMACTACTIONS(r.rt °D).M an. we aced 'doe. net apply ter onpro Je C[ action., the references In the check llrt to the word• - project.- - rootmer," and "affected geographic area," r sp...IvelY. appll<ant," aM "pro pert, or sit." should be read a• "pro putsi, A. BACKGROUND I, Na me of pr.pe..a pr -J-CC, If appucab,r: Spokane Industrial Par Binding Site Plan 1. No. of Appll .... : ). Aloe... aM he" a,.Mr of gpliunt or Conte[[ person: Suite 101, Spokane Washington 99 a, Due chrckuot ). Agency rtque.tinS theckltat: Spokane Coun Planning Department d• pre posed hate, or 'ah ga.te (Inalwdl ^I ph•al ng, if .pplla.bl.): Lots are currently being marketed. The proposed development timing is 1987 through 19-,. ). o. Do you hew. any plan. for future s Car Case., y future additions or exp jacent to this property. sganalee, or further aCrI.Ity related to or Conn.ct.d with this propose lT If Ysa, ... ].I nsions would likely be to the Northeast and would not be C. Do you we or he.. options e. Iae1 .as AT er °dJ•c.nc to Chit both to the North and No rtheast of thispsite�If Applicant has land ownership D. List easy malt. -aecal !-formation You \new about that Me been prepared, The existing Spokane Industrial Park directl for indust use. r oxane Industrial Park - Tailor Engineering - W 55 Mission I) er -111 be prepared, directly related to Chim p...... 1. Y north of this plan ha been approved yi'( frftY'.( .,C t t" . . ' r � iJ�.:'1* tc �t�� 'r:. k . �....i'.'':C � i - Y ` T"tc - G.:. 1 . c•`. ♦ . -t LOAANL IMVIROWENTAL ORDIHAY. A. SACSCRDIIPD .o Clewed) C8 (VAC 191-11-960) Settle. tl 10.7,0(!) , - 17 - �l I f. De you knew whether application@ are pending tar {ova rnas.ul app rove le el ether prep... 1. di.... ly af(..tlnt the ...pert. ..rend ky you. . proposal It y.., eep ldn. None that we are aware of 10. List any govero.ent approval. or penlu that will be needed lee your pro you 1, If known. Appro of street, sewer, water, and stormwater plans. Building Permits. 11. Dive brlef, cmpltte description of your proposal. Including the ...... ed u • end the else of the Iraj.C, and al,.. )here e V .. 1 svea tlen. Is ter In thla check l let the ask you Is de« uhe certain up.cu el your proposal. I.0 do net nerd to r. put the,. ....... en.Al. Page. Proposal is a 46 lot Bindinn Sir. Plan The, e;r ;r _ __..___._, irn .-A lots average about 2.6 acres each. �- 5 - }o k. ts(7j vL o dc ��. 12. "Carlos of the proposal. clv, auf llclent Infenallen to a Person to underscores the precis* lor@nnn of your pro"%ad project. Includln{ street address, It any. and section, tewahlp and ru {e. If knew. If • proposal ...led occur over ante e( else. provide the singe at kounderlec of the site (a). Provide a legal description. site plan. vicinity sap. and topographic top. II ..nably available. llhlle you should ..belt soy pl... required by the .I..1y. you .r. net r.a.lrd n t. duplila ..p. e. detailed p1.....tentedwith my Pe nit .pplic.u., related to Chia checklist. The north 112 of Section 12 T 25N Re 44 EWM lying north of the railroad and between Sullivan and Flora Roads. 11. Data the prepared sctl.. 11. with!. the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)l The Csnsenl Stwar Servlce Ana? The Priority Sewer Service Ate&? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Loos Atlas for twwdartu). It is within the Aquifer Sensitive Area, the General Sewer Service Area and the Priori Sewer Service Area. It is proposed that the plat be privately sewered. See Attached TO S[ CO"UnD ST APPLICAItT sewer report. ). f11VIRD10V1ISAL IJ.SIQJ.TS 1. [.AllT71 c. Gneral description of the site (circle ene)? Pla ro111H. hilly, Steep slops, aa.nralnou., .then v >•c .1 b. 111C.e 1. the steepest dope an the 'It. (epproaluce percent a1.')? Less than 5% C. Vh.t S ..... I types of .our .n foed an the .It. It.. sae. pie. day, asd, gravel. pe.1. sack)? It yaw k... the classification of ydCUltu..l .ells. ."City the. end nera any prior 1•n1aM, GgA — Garrison G Loam . GnB — Garrison Very Stony Loam J. Ate there surface indication. or hlstory o f un.takle .all. In the lsnedl.te r1,1.1tyl It go d .... lb.. No [ l u ua ! f en O er A, C; nly / F7 M sari be the wrpoae, ly" sM apyrosiure q.a nt lea al / (tiling or ll."ng propo.ed Ind l ea t. aew.ce of fw. Grading and fi �ti wo old b a minimum -m to shape drainage and build roads and structures. Fill would normally be less than 1 foot and come from a local so urce Could erosion ...us .. A result of cl•. r lag. cone tructlen, or ua.i It aa. p.ne telly describe. No S. About wh.t peaune of the al,e will be covered with Ieparvl... ...is,., it,, tl preJ- en (for ....pie, --Ph- or buildings)! .ct <omtruc A, proximately 65% including roads parkin areas driveways and roofs, h. Iropend .0 mna to reduce or control create., or other i.pacar to the earth, If sari New drainage and runoff patterns will reduce erosion Lawn paving & curbing will control surface erosion. 2. AIR s. war type of emissions to the air would rem It frs eh. propoul (1.e., duo,, smooe oblla Mon LMustelsl, .eM smoke) during construction ant unto the project Is caplee.dt if any, genarel1Y d.acribe and give appeaf.ate quentlue If know. Emissions associated with typica l Industrial areas. New businesses must con orm to current A and A A requirements. b. As. there any elf -site aoerua of .-lesions or time tnttap affect Your If pro pool} a A... rally dcacrlbe. , No C. F"P eea.-rea to reduce or ...reel .-/n lesa ar .char impacts ae air. If any None other than required by'building permits and the on —oo_- ino vehicle emissions teLtino program far Spokane Area ]. WATER .. surface, (1) 1. [hero ear au r I... uatar body on or In the Ir.d"" vicinity of the site Including year - reuM .M ..,..-teal a[nua, ul[vats pro ride mss.. If r, lake., Pont nd No l a, ntlaMa)l If yea, describe type a .pprolrlsta ate what stres. er slue, It flora Into. .lea eien rer A.tarr Ure Onir (I) V111 the pre )ee[ require an vork ov.r. In er Njam nt to (within 100 feat she described vau rei If yo, rluu taillike AM .....A sea lla blc pia na. ) N/A 1 _ ' t S .f.. rl "uF i�r. •f. r-r N.r t'.' 't" r.. `1 :- +•�, 4 t - .(WAC If) -11 -960) Section ll.l0.I70(1) I. [MVI lOX16 NTA1 IIS,a XTg(c nu.d) SCOSNfC CNV2CONIQMiA1 OEDIMANC - - i1 a- - 87 M sari be the wrpoae, ly" sM apyrosiure q.a nt lea al / (tiling or ll."ng propo.ed Ind l ea t. aew.ce of fw. Grading and fi �ti wo old b a minimum -m to shape drainage and build roads and structures. Fill would normally be less than 1 foot and come from a local so urce Could erosion ...us .. A result of cl•. r lag. cone tructlen, or ua.i It aa. p.ne telly describe. No S. About wh.t peaune of the al,e will be covered with Ieparvl... ...is,., it,, tl preJ- en (for ....pie, --Ph- or buildings)! .ct <omtruc A, proximately 65% including roads parkin areas driveways and roofs, h. Iropend .0 mna to reduce or control create., or other i.pacar to the earth, If sari New drainage and runoff patterns will reduce erosion Lawn paving & curbing will control surface erosion. 2. AIR s. war type of emissions to the air would rem It frs eh. propoul (1.e., duo,, smooe oblla Mon LMustelsl, .eM smoke) during construction ant unto the project Is caplee.dt if any, genarel1Y d.acribe and give appeaf.ate quentlue If know. Emissions associated with typica l Industrial areas. New businesses must con orm to current A and A A requirements. b. As. there any elf -site aoerua of .-lesions or time tnttap affect Your If pro pool} a A... rally dcacrlbe. , No C. F"P eea.-rea to reduce or ...reel .-/n lesa ar .char impacts ae air. If any None other than required by'building permits and the on —oo_- ino vehicle emissions teLtino program far Spokane Area ]. WATER .. surface, (1) 1. [hero ear au r I... uatar body on or In the Ir.d"" vicinity of the site Including year - reuM .M ..,..-teal a[nua, ul[vats pro ride mss.. If r, lake., Pont nd No l a, ntlaMa)l If yea, describe type a .pprolrlsta ate what stres. er slue, It flora Into. .lea eien rer A.tarr Ure Onir (I) V111 the pre )ee[ require an vork ov.r. In er Njam nt to (within 100 feat she described vau rei If yo, rluu taillike AM .....A sea lla blc pia na. ) N/A u� , .r te ', Ft •. ; �i: 1 , X.. L {q _.. , fj � ;, . -. ...:'.....::.SIN * r' �' �' ) '• • 10.1)0(1) 10 5 5kMt L♦f l {OYNLh A ? Ut OLD Ie CI T - f •a '1 r ' •• " (VAC �p / -I1 -960) Sr<tlon 11 - r A. [NVIRONNLN]'AL [L[IQNTS (contlmed) C A rc J Lr.lu ` *� ' (1) Cetla.te the amount el fill aM dredge .aurlal that veld be placed Ia or r . d I Ch - H• ^<. Co. • our h <s wtu sr wtlasd. and Indicate the area or 41. 111. that would be #(facts,. Indicate the uur<e e/ /111 --urlal. N/A (A) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or dlr... Jana? CI.. Deno cal daaCrlp- tlan, pulp..., and aPPre.bate cwantltlea If known. AI.. (5) Do.. the proposal 11, within a 100 -rear flood plain) if Ia. not. location en the Its Plan. No (6) De.. the Prepotal Invel re any discharge. of west. --ter1•la to .urfa<a mote,$? If u, describe the pas of vast# and anticipated values of discharge. ✓ No h. CRCUKD:' 5 p (I) will 21—M water be withduwn, or will wafer k dlathkgCe to run O f d<arrlPtlen, ,+vr pose, and ...... oate quantities If known. 7 be discharged into the groundwater via grass percolation and drywells. Groundwater is withdrawn through Privat water wells. in the existing SIP System. T Spokane Aqui ha surplus capacity. (7) C. al rite wale --facial that -111 M dl..har{N Inge the groats frua $spite toots or ether ..a usy ..et. ff.. t ... I facility. De.crlb. the {erui alas of Ch. .•arse, the .mbar of Muses to be .. rrd (I( applicable) er the r,wher of persons the sy$t ..p) tee upoalN to vrwe. None — Project will hP CPWPrPri (3) Wstt(N any systems, ether than thos. dsaltrl for the disposal Of unit afy -fate, l--ulld far the prpo. of Uscha r {Ing fluids below [ha ground car fate (Carted.. spate.. ..<h u these for that disposal of sun rater or drainage fro (leer dr$las). Describe the life. of .Yalu, that a -- a $.unt of Car /el be dlspo..d of threagk the sy..es sod the typ of --terlala Il k.ly to M Usposed a! (l rlwdl n{ pCerL is which --y ..Car Chat eye,.. ludr.rt.ntly thrmo {k .pill. er .. • re wlC .( Ill. /ghtlN activttlse ). Nothing other than that described in Item 91 .:. • (.) Will any ahem ica la (os P.c or nasal.. fuel.) be .I ... a 1. We. grewnd or ,, {rev ate r. task.? If a, hat qP#e and qua ntlUas of --terlals will be gt orNt YOSS1bIV — KPcommenfl that R ,, i. 1... ,.1,1 ..-_ in building permit process Occupants will be required to conform to local contrnle: an,( . «, d__ _ C -_ ds___ /1-44-F7 4 / w���°t� '� f� n y.: f .a.'.4 y ...� 1 f ir• ,,r L + Z M A .I 3„ _ 1 a .,f sass. 1 1 '. t . �1. a Pa INYIrD r). -� + • - }S t MN[NTLL O[DIMANC[ ` A. t NVI 12 11 -160) Section 11.10.1J0(I) . A. MY3lOpCMTLL [LU¢MTS ('sntlr.d) (]) What pro tact$eau o ten. sll sy- -seen eo Issue. hot 11-k- -1 .,ill. of any <huu Are l 1. 1 car mod en mitt will not M allowed to percolate to !reuM water (this Include'..sue. ' to 4.p chemical, Out el f disposal psdu du crl Md In )h(I) .M ]h(])1 If used, recommend that this be addressed in building permit process. <. W.eer tuneff (lncludl nt stern wa ter,. (1) Ducrlke the sour'. mf rural (Incite dl n[ ten wuo) .M ....N of cell.ctlen .M dles ... I If am (Include tu...ltlu, II Oneyq). VIy a 11 thlr u te flew, t o . ester flow Into o-h.r ee (es, da.c rl k <. KUnol TrOm roa0s wi 1 I f IOW in gras percolation areas with excess flowing into drywells per County standards. Runoff from building roofs and private parking areas will be to grass percolation areas designed when the building permit is applied for (J) Could wog esterL 1. ester bound car .ter face utters? If so, rcases", du erlh.. Only in a leak or spill situation. If this occurs the local Fire Department is to be contacted for containment of the spill and the Department of Ecology is to clean up the spill as per the toxic waste clean —up plan provided by the owner. d, proposed '..sure' to reduce car control muncCt trewat, and runoff wee l.pactm. If any (If the propea.d action 11 <. within th. Aquifer S.ndtlrs Area M especially clear on upl.na Uens ralatlej to facilities coe<.r.in[ Actlon. b(6). U(S). and ]c(2) of this <h.ckli.c). Only that as described in Item " C' and monitDring individu site uses via the building Permit orotess [kAMT[ .. Check or circle qq of ..Israel.. found en the 'It.; X dac N.... tee.I alder, eagle, tends, ether. X ....[run tn.t X ahru M. X X patuu. trop or [V.I.. fir. <N er pine. ether. " 'oil plane, 'off"" Wturcwp, owllr'ah, tkwak calk.[-, ether. wear plant., wear filly. aNt rao, 'fits$,, ach.., __ ether typ.. of rq aa[/on. k. Wh., kind and seount of vi pea -lee will M rese.d or dterNt Grass some shrubs and trees. t. Gist thcmattntd OF endcndertd species known to W en or our the alto. None d. [reposed I.Macglsl. an the de. if any, be planted. 'th r p ...toe or .'h. •o rs tetlen sli rulis ;' a nd qrass wifl >1 -ZQ `S 7 (y) Will any 'Mole 1. be .tend. h.Ml.d car and an 1%. .11. In . location where ..pill at leek will dteln to ..,I.e. or [reuM ....r or te ..tarn water 41 .0... 1 ey. u' dl.'h.rp., to .unc" car [reuM nt.rl L+.f f� CtJi p'T.: st:..'d rf.t -•:. t... 1. :, - 'S`6'U'.� .: ..';n ♦ SPOKANE CMVILON)if M1AL ORLINANCC ._ n1I ~ (WAC 19) -111 -960) Sacalo 11.10.2)0(1 r E. LMVIKONIQNTAL LLC1¢MTS (canU nuad) 9 J ' `� I ■ n�u.r Onlr ). ANIMALS Vr a. Circle .ny bled. A" enbd. uhlch h.0 barn obaet*J an at at., the .11. or .r. knout to ba on the .Iry bled.: MWk, Meer, .utic, and bled. ether: _Upland 6amP Rirdg, Song irlic S parro ww. s ,. ..... d.. r, bur. r ecu ery .,her, he R odents .... ..b (LA: 6 on, trout. . be Mrrinl. * .Mill lrn, ..bees NSA I � .IMr: b. Lbt .ny thus nne1 or .ndrnP nA .D eU.. known to be as ar n.. r tM .Ito. :None <. 1. ch. .1t. p.rt of . .ltutl.n .ours! It ... ...let.. No d, pro POOd .arsurcs to pt...rv..r .ahance Wlldllfe, It any. None d. MALT AND NATUML Ut OU<CLS j_� (/ Y d-- A. Wh.t kind. of . up (.l<[tr lc, e.r Wr.l p., wad .1 .... ..1..) .111 6c u..d to .a.< ch. ch. cogl.t.d p..J.cl n.d.l Describe Whuh.r It Will 64 u.cd for hr.tlat. "rl.y. .tc. _Possibly all of the above types of energy ac heating and manufacturing requirements, p' It. Would your project .ite<t the petcetl<1 m. of ..let e.w y] by .dj.c..t .robe..... 2f c l...r.11y d..crlbe. No C. Whet kid. at anus, <o......... t ....... ... Secluded le tbe pbn. of chlr pupoull Llrt other pn.ocod .....r.. to reduce er ream nearly l.,.eu, It ..yt None 7. clrllorn¢MTU. N[ALTM e. Ara then ......d rsmuel M.1[b MuN., l.cbdi nl ..pun to earl. <hei..L, clot, of the .nd upl s.,.e, .,ill, ter b .... d w. ...... coat could oeu i r or • ro..It of chi. '. -pan. It a, Zcrlbe. _Possibly — Recommend that this be addrecced in building— permit process. Fire hydrants will be installed. rer ,rl '- J 1 / V /� T / / .UfQLJ �s 1 tIS b�Ixv1.UNALNTAI CL[MLxfS lc nerd ;��. Y[ ( ': 3'4.T i Sx• t; - ): .� t -., - : • • y [NpIWNNCNTAL M[ALTN , •, -, l ` d � ft 1 [r r r A O — Dire nly • - (y) /rect s ewe r. to reduce er tactical anvl ro wnul health A.ee rye• I( n ct ewerinq, b, Roger: alai peen[, t ypes ep ntlon other t et In the .n- vhlcA uy a((at Jeer Iropc[ ((er eu.pl r. tra /(Ic. Noise associated with typical industrial areas. �)u Mhat tYP-. end levale or note u A rt-te r. ar • lone -[ere ld b. c... tad by beat, eu ar uaec le[d vl [A tAr uArt hour ..fee ( a'a.. r. tnf(Ie, eomtrue NOn, a project sn a would ewe (rw he .1'.. p-rrtlen, othrrl lndlu I. TVn i r - - - fiat are U) Irepe..d ......... reduce Of control note Iq.ct, If any: None, other than those imposed as health and safety 1 a, `-e" "D SNOULINC USE a -Tat 1. [h. cu... nt ....1 the .11. end .dj.c.rt pr •wrtl..t Vacant land and current industrial use. b. me. the alt. been uvd lar grttd tun! 1( . a• W-erlb- any - I"al.r.... the .It, Industria Buildings e. vul any .rre<t.ra. ba d...u.n.dr a ... .bl<nr No <• ITat la the ....... ..airy elual(lutte' of tAa e14t Industrial f• Vhat t the cu rraat <p.pn M..... plea de. tan. q.a d tM .ttA Industrial a• if a1111ub1r. Met t tM <urnnt -Aenita . . NIA eater Irean. deg ltnat len at ch..lt.r b. Mee any part .1 the at,. barn .1..a /lyd a .n 'anal re -pacify, ' une litre• N a •re.) a ae, 1. App... l..[aly any p.ellr veuld '.aid. .r cork �O eoele In tb, capl.[.d payec[1 p r �y4 a. .t r,a. 1_ k.i ._ �a 1 . u' � +.•` y <Ix .i r 1 ;:fi 'rr .. ... L =. .. '- _ - SPOKw.K INVlFONMMTAL OFD IMANG[' - • �(vAC 177 -11 -160) Section I1.10.230(t) • -, 1. "VIFONNLNTAl to HINTS (eontlad) _ Q * S . 7 �p / A {e n<Y 1. Aplc..lUtely how .any pedals would the completed project dl.pi¢el L Proposed measures to .void or reduce displacement Impact.. If any: None 1. Prdp ....uru 1. ..auto the propse.1 1. compatible with eml.tln{ and Pre }cud Land seem . nd pim. It any: Proposal is in substantial conformity to surrounding industrial use and history. NOOSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided. If raft lore -THOU housing. None b. Approximately how many unit.. if any, wind be eliminated[ hellcate whether high. middle.., low -Inca. h... 11. None C. Prep ... d .esemru .. reduce or central neu.lp Impacts, If ..,z N/A 10. ALSTNCTICS m. Ohat S. the tallest height of any proposed structure (r), not Including ante Mss, whet 1. the 'principal seurler building ..cartel(.) propo.edl Structures would meet Industrial Zoning Reouir meets. b. "at views to the trndtsee vicinity would be deerd or obstructed? None C. proposed measures to reduce or comical aesthetic Impact., If any, The site will be developed per land planning and landscape guidelines' as prepared by Mitchell, Nelson Group, Inc. I . LIGHT A.YC CI.UI ' a. "at type of light or Clan will the pro Ul praducel Obst the of dy would It mainly occur[ Typical building lighting. mainly du the day b. Could light or {lame feom the finished project b • .afar, a.esd me inn r(Lse with .1... I No C. What ttltllng ofl - lilt .turn. of light or {late oy affect your ptepo.sll None d. hop red me sewn. .o redmee or control light rnd Slate Impact.. 11 .nit Indicate whether high, middle, or �I D ZW - Y"7 None j}�z c t�x„7�. _ ��. ! ;'1 ". ti. +. Q.1 y :.x' ' •S r �ti'•_. �. 1 Y.� Y>vti 't ". t' e ` 3 (Ve[�117- 11-960) section II.lO.S)O(1) 3rORAM TMVIRO1111LMTAL OLOIMAMCL ■, .IMVI.OMMLMTAL LLy X.T3 ( <on[l sued) ' 17. ■CC LL ATION n 3 P •. Vh.t de.lsn.<.d end lnfoml tetra lloul epporlunitlea are In the Is.edlstely vicinity! b. V the proposed . project displace any ealttlN utnalo cal ueti if sa, deicrlbe. C. yropO.(d u.sure• to reduce or coot rel bp.,,. on rec'..tien, Incl.dlns r.Creatl on ..pert unlUe. to M provided by the project or .p,llC..,. If .sy: 13. MISMKIC AND CULTUML FUSL3VATIOM •. Are there any PL4. ar akp Ctt listed e n , or ,.". (.I .e [lov1. ...... or local pr...'.- pr...'.- ties ..st ... r. known to be on or neat to th. .IUI If lly duCrl M. 4 tee re lly du CrlM cry 1.n ... ka or <ei4..C. of historic .,Ch ... l.pul, selentifl< er <ultu cal l.portmce known [o be an or nett to the .It.. None e. ?cap ... d ........ eo reduce al <enrral lapacts, It any: 14. TWSMITATIOM .. Identify public .t..... . M hlshups unites the mitt. •re dcaerlM prop Cast seen to the e.l.ting street Cysts.. shot to U. pit nt, If ray. Euclid will serve as a major arterial with private streets serving as collectors to Euclid See Separate Traffic Analysis Report. II. It sit. era nau ly mend by abitc treo.ltl If asst, Nut It the ass. r..c tran.tt stop} •gre.lu to Hu.nc. is [M The site is served by bus. C. Meu ...I p.,kl -g tI.e.. wV11 he ewpind project Mvet Pow easy .mu11 the project elbluttl Parking would be as required by each individual site We anticipate 7500 parking stalls A. Vlll the propoul r.q.1C. aq tea cud. or entreat.. ar Improveuet. to e.l.tlets rub or at nett net IulV1(nt IdbeV.pT If .., generally dutrl be (imitate Vhather publlt sr priests)._ Yes — Euclid Avenue will be upgraded and private roads built. See Road Design Repor and Road Plan. or Caelu r Ase ncy Us O Ny 47 I'll s. Vlll the pr.jstt cats (.r .etsr In tM Iudlue vlalnity d) -,a,, tell, or It ton. If s., 1---lolly describe. rortttlent Yes — Rail lines will extend into the groperty to service the sites. r v...C -:,: -_ :.' sroun[ •k. i' .. _kt [xvuat:[N TAi Dip: dxu: 197y1-f6o) Seul.n It. 0.230(1) < .- E, 1. 1. [NVIgDh11CMTAL [LCMCMTS (tom lm,N) �' ■ �en� len far Uq Cnly (, Nov .. elhl cola, trip. prr Lr .raid ha Re hero tad by the IrI d pro Jectj II the n, Indicate when pest w..ld .rc.r, Mr estjmate is `3� MO vehicl 'trigs_ p er day. The peak would be between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. BY using already implementpd st&gg eyed rplpacp timpc the peak hourly "volume would be about 2500 vehicles. 1. ?,.pored .enure. to nduc. er control transportation i.p.era, If any: Staggered release times have already been implemented and would continue tg in the flturP IS. rU1LIC 3[IVICES a. V.uld the ploj.(. nwlt In an Ineru..4 nerd fee public re rvins (fare .a pia: rlre pro sect l.n, relic. pwr.ulon, hulrh car.. school.. et n. r)I If .e, ....r. ray describe. Yes - Fire protection lines will be ins allpd 0 hpr services would be compatible with current reguir m nts, b. ?,epeard ouo.... to nave. or control dl.... Iq.cts en "bit, ur• ice., It •nr: Tax rates and utility rate h dules arp ctrurtl d t provide for such services. 16. UTIUTIES C9 evIC . i cur s anity y ever, at rh. •stet elect .ICty, n.0 col le@, u..or, .draw. rt .vise. rat. ph o n e, unlury .ever, •ep[I< prtco, b. Describe the welllt/es that are proposed for the project, the utility pre•Idlnl the urvin .M the 'Ia roar 1 t trw t{ . .j• I. on th sit. er In .ha lu.dlrt. Hclnity vn$ch I,ht b n..e.d. u�i�iJes cis Sped &hoop will h + seed to service the site. See Overall Sewer and Water Plans C. SIDNAMPX bA- 1 8 1, the .Maratgnd, .war rand., the Mselt, of ",Jet, that the above res"ases are seat truthfully and to the best of Ny knowledge. 1 •I.o I nderstand that, .he.la the,. M asp vlllful .lnq..... sa or vtllf.l lack of full dl•d eaun se or part, the •s. nc♦ o.y uItm nu I oter.lnn Nn of nenlgnlfltan.e that It sight taaw In ?allot. urn this chackllat. • "r D.t. t - 30 - F p. 7s•�it r.✓ y �c t. • 1/ P. 1 Cc..t. fu.y rr. n..` irint .r T � SPcar-0..c y ri I K 1 „..,,, Worth 3808 Sullivan Road, Spok WA 99216 -1670 p ( 509 ) 924 -172 Far... capl.tlnl font :22;v ( ' C-� - Due@ ph..., (509) 328 -3371 ?OC 1T"r USE ony Staff N..bor(.) lavl..ing M.ctll.tt Iq .d .o q /r { his .t.(( reyla. of the onvlroonent.l checklist f -char pertinent Were .uon the ataff� Conclude@ that then see w'tabour .Ignlflc... .1•.n. I. Pact. and sac o.ae Me . Inenlm[Ien of nonsllnlflcon<e. It- — Cendu /u thaw Vassal. el[elflunt adae, '. seal roirennl Iq•cu de rain for 11.......E e.peul sM race... Ma . elts..td ..nr- 'I.uUen of hens llnl(IUnct .lth conditions. C. Conelwdco that there are probable. allnlflcont adverse •nvlroneend I.pacU and recoo.t Mr • dote olseasn of alpl /1 e@nv, � I _ _, _ _ .`. ., _ _ rILINC rEE - 125.00 eul - 1 , 15 06-.e . �6. 6 9 7 SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK INC!" WASHINGTON TRUST 13ANK WORKING FUND SPOKANE, WASHINGTON N. - - • - 3808 SULLIVAN ROAD. 924-1720 28-8/1251 SPOKANE. WA 99216 BF I N ,, - TO INDUSTRIAL PARK ORDER OF, r SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS' RECEIPT Date Received Fram Address rAM ACCOUNT CASH AMT. PAID I ' ' " I ' I CHECK - MONEY ORDER ' E3 ®® �.CHECK F NO' Nov. 23, 1987 -$465.00''