ZONING-75 GSAMr. Ric Darden
Staff Assistant to
Thomas S. Foley, M.C.
574 U. S. Courthouse
Spokane, WA 99201
Dear Mr. Farden:
April 16, 1975
It would appear from the correspondence you enclosed with your letter of
April 10, 1975, that GSA officials have gleaned an incomplete or erroneous
impression of the application of our Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan
from my letter to Mr. V. L. Barnes dated March 10, 1975. The main purpose of
my present letter is to provide information which may serve to correct that
impression.
My letter of March 10 was prompted by an oral inquiry made of me in our
office by two GSA representatives on March 10. I frankly do not recall the
representative's names but do recall that they were a man and a woman. It may
be that one of the representatives was Cindy Brown.
The inquiry was with regard to zoning of certain property containing ware-
houses located Just east of Sullivan Road and immediately north of the Spokane
International Railway tracks within Section 12- 25-44. After locating the property
on the zoning map, I advised the officials that the property was located in a
"Manufacturing Zone" and further that the property was located in an area indicated
on our Comprehensive Plan as being appropriate for industrial use The represen-
tatives were desirous of obtaining a letter from me while they were In town, so I
dictated the letter and they took the original with them that day (March 10). I
enclosed a copy of the Manufacturing Zone classification section of our Ordinance
with the Letter.
The inquiry was, of course, oral and I cannot recall all details of the
conversation. My recollection is of a routine inquiry as to the zoning of the
property and as to whether industrial uses were permitted. I can say with virtual
certainty that no inquiry was made as to whether the Ordinance would allow a trade
school, nor, indeed, any mention of such a contemplated use.
Mr. Ric Farden - 2 April 16, 1975
As you are, I believe, aware Comprehensive Plans under the enabling statues
of this State designate broadly defined and generally located land use categories.
Zoning ordinances on the other hand actually prescribe permitted uses and standards
within precisely, located zones. To learn whether or not a particular use is allowed,
one must direct one's attention to the language of the Zoning Ordinance.
Our "Manufacturing Zone" (copy enclosed) does indeed, allow a broad range
of industrial uses (See 4.12.030). The zone is essentially cumulative; that is, it
allows almost the complete range of uses allowed in more restrictive zones with the
important exception of certain prohibited uses listed in Section 4.12.150. You will
note (Section 4.12.150 -f) that "public and parochial schools, except trade schools"
are prohibited in the zone. It is apparent that the framers of the Ordinance regarded
the listed prohibited uses as being inappropriate in a zone in which primary permitted
uses included a broad range of heavy industrial uses. It is also apparent that trade
schools by specific reference were not regarded as being inappropriate in the zone.
Assuming that the facility contemplated by Spokane Community College is, indeed,
a "trade school" rather than a "public or parochial school" (I enclose the Ordinance
definition of the latter, 4.03.020 -48), then it is clear that the facility would be a
permitted use in the zone.
You ask additionally in your letter for me to express my "expert opinion as to
how the surplus property. in this matter could best be utilized". I must reply in
general that I feel that much more appropriate,and informed local expert opinion would
be available among the school officials making the proposal and among the manage-
ment of the Spokane Industrial Park. It is quite conceivable to me that a trade school
could complement and enhance the further development of industrial uses in that
general area. It is also conceivable that there might be serious problems of use of
the buildings for school rather than warehouse use. It would appear, for example,
that considerable modification of the structures would be necessary to comply with
building and fire codes for such an occupancy. I am sure that if the matter is pursued,
our own department as well as the Building Codes Department and the Traffic Engineer
would be happy to advise the principles with respect to the specifics of a proposal.
Enclosures - Z.O. Manufacturing Zone
Z. O. Definition Section
CLH:cmw
cc: Mr. V. L. Barnes, Auburn
Sincerely,
CHARLES L. HUGGINS
Director of Planning
THOMAS 5. FOLEY
• 5TH DISTRICT. WASHINGTON
OFFICES:
HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515
AREA CODE 202 225 -2006
574 U.S. COURTHOUSE
SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201
AREA CODE 509. 456-4680
MARCUS WHITMAN HOTEL
WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON 99362
AREA CODE 509, 529 -6111
Dear Mr. Huggins:
CongreooftbetlinitebOtateS
jbou9e of tepre9entatibeg
ltt$jington, ;.€. 20515
April 10, 1975
Mr. Charles L. Huggins
Director of Planning
Spokane County Planning Commission
Public Works Building
N. 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE
CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMTTEE
ON LIV ESTOCK AND GRAINS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON FORESTS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON DOMESTIC MARKETING
AND CONSUMER RELATIONS
COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND
INSULAR AFFAIRS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON WATER ANO
POWER RESOURCES
SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMEN
SUBCOMMITTEE ON MINES ANO MINING
SUBCOMMITTEE ON TERRITORIAL
ANO INSULAR AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS
OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT
Persuant to your conversation today with Mr. Arthur Hansen,
I am enclosing to you the correspondence that basically outlines
and explains this case.
Enclosed please find (1) introductory letter by Community College
District 17 President Walter S. Johnson, (2) Arthur Hansen's letter
to GSA Regional Administrator David L. Head, (3) Mr. Head's response,
(4) Joint letter by Congressman Foley and Senator Magnuson and Jackson
to GSA Administrator Arthur F. Sampson, and (5) GSA Acting Assistant
Administrator Young's response.
On April 10, 1975 after receiving the GSA's response (item #5),
representatives from our office and Senator Magnuson's office met
with GSA officials in Washington D.C. At that time, GSA officials
agreed to a public meeting in Spokane to determine how the GSA
warehouses should be disposed of, in regard to the best interests
of the community. Senator Magnuson's letter to the GSA, (item 6
enclosed) confirms this meeting.
We would very much appreciate it if you could provide us with
your expert opinion as to how the surplus property in this matter
could best be utilized. It would also be of great help if you could
detail the meeting in March with GSA officials. I understand that
this meeting prompted your letter to Mr. Barnes with the GSA in Auburn,
Washington.
As we are anticipating a public meeting with GSA next week, we would
deeply appreciate it if you could supply us with this information as soon
as conveniently possible.
Page 2
I will keep you. informed as to when and where this meeting will be
held in hopes that you can make a personal appearance.
Thank you for your time and assistance in this matter.
RF /ewf
RECEIVED
APR 111975
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
Ric Farden
Staff Assistant to
Thomas S. Foley, M.C.
4.
•
THOMAS 5. FOLEY
5TH DISTRICT. WASHINGTON
OFFICES:
HOUSE Orricc BUILDING
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20515
AREA CODE 202, 225 -2006
574 U.S. COURTHOUSE
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
AREA CODE 509, 456-4690
MARCUS WHITMAN HOTS.
WALLA WALLA, WADHIHGTON 99362
AREA CODE 509, 829 -6111
Cotcgrm of the Waiteb'tates‘
3ou8e of Itepre!•tentatibe0
Masijington, Ate. 20515
April 10, 1975
Mr. Charles L. Huggins
Director of Planning
Spokane County Planning Commission
Public Works Building
N. 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear Mr. Huggins:
COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE
CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMITTEE
ON IJV E_STOCK AND GRAINS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON FORESTS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON DOMESTIC MARKETING
MID CONSUMER RELATIONS
COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND
INSULAR AFFAIRS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON WATER AND
POWER RESOURCES
SUBCOMMITTEE ON EIWIRONMENT
SUBCOMMITTEE ON MINES ANO MIMNO
SUBCOMMITTEE ON TERRITORIAL
ANO INSULAR AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS
OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT
Persuant to your conversation today with Mr. Arthur Hansen,
I am enclosing to you the correspondence that basically outlines
and explains this case.
Enclosed please find (1) introductory letter by Community College
District 17 President Walter S. Johnson, (2) Arthur Hansen's letter
to GSA Regional Administrator David L. Head, (3) Mr. Head's response,
(4) Joint letter by Congressman Foley and Senator Magnuson and Jackson
to GSA Administrator Arthur F. Sampson, and (5) GSA Acting Assistant
Administrator Young's response.
On April 10, 1975 after receiving the GSA's response (item #5),
representatives from our office and Senator Nngnuson's office met
with GSA officials in Washington D.C. At that'time, GSA officials
agreed to a public meeting in Spokane to determine how the GSA
warehouses should be disposed of, in regard to the best interests
of the community. Senator Magnuson's letter to the GSA, (item 6
enclosed) confirms this meeting.
We would very much appreciate it if you could provide us with
your expert opinion as to how the surplus property in this matter
could best be utilized. It would also be of great help if you could
detail the meeting in March with GSA officials.. I understand that
this meeting prompted your letter to Mr. Barnes with the GSA in Auburn,
Washington.
As we are anticipating a public meeting with GSA next week, we would
deeply appreciate it if you could supply us with this information as soon
as conveniently possible.
Page 2
1 will keep you informed as to when and where this meeting will be
held in hopes that you can make a personal appearance.
Thank you for your time and assistance in this matter.
RF /ewf
R EC w.
APR 1 1 1975
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
erely��
Ric Farden
Staff Assistant to
Thomas S. Foley, M.C.
': 7 GENERAL SERVICES 4DN INISTRATIOrc
APR
Honorable 'Barren G. `-.aggnuson
Unites. States 'Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Magnuson:
W4544t o&si. DC
Thank you for your letter of March 5 on behalf of the interest of the
Spokane Community College in acquiring two warehouses near Spokane,
Washington, for educational use.
Pursuant to your request, we contacted the Spokane Count_ Planning
Commisslon. Their letter of March 10 to our Auburn, Washington,
. gionai Office states that the General Comprehensive Plan for the
Spokane Metropolitan , area indicates that the warehouse property is
contemplated in the future for industrial use. We construe this as
a determination by the Count; Planning Cce,mission that the property
is in "an area public development plan." A copy of this letter is
enclosed as requested.
Keep Freedom in roar Future MTh US. Sa.ingi Bonds
in addition, our letter of January 1 1975,'to Ir, George E. Boops,
Director, 0ffice of Surplus r op rty Utilization, Department of Health,
l
Education, and Welfare rti /
fi) (copy enclosed), stated that our deter
' mination of nonavailability of the property for educational use was
..used on the nature of the property, its Gish. value, and potential uses
as related to the relative benefits to the Goverarent from disposal of
the property; that inasmuch as we had determined the property had a •
Greater potential benefit to the Government from sale for industrial uses
rather than for other uses, our notification of nonavailability was issued.
This determination is in accordance with the last sentence in paragraph 2,
Re 1 of she Memorandum of Understanding, ° ..
�.. dipped July t�, l�0(7, ZY'r+.2e..
'✓.'.I.M and the General S r which states that "it � -;2 2112.r 2.J. Services nd:i L Stratio.. '�7h +^.... & 3 n -� 1 is ...156
recognized that the determination whether surplus real ropeTtl shall he
assigned for transfer for educational or public health purposes, be sold
to private enterprise, or be otherwise disposed of, can best be made only
upon consideration of the nature of the property, its value, potential
uses, and the relative benefit to the Government, from its disposition,"
These warehouses are an integral art of e. highly active and successful
industrial complex. Although we are sympathetic to .the needs of the
Community College, we are firmly of he opinion that sale of these
warehouses tor industrial use would be in the best interest of the local
Community in that such disposal would generate additional jobs thereby
helping the Local economy. In addition, the property would be placed on
the local tax rolls - which will increase the county tax base. 5
P
n
fi
fi
2
2
We '' :vs„ t:... i rfornation explains to your satisfaction the reason
. that .. h.� i
for our actions in tbis disposal. If very be of further service,
please l us know. We are sending identical replies to Senator Henry M.
Jackson end Congresses 'Thomas S. Foley.
Sincerely,
2 Enclosures
Donald P. Young
Aet;ng Attsistant Adrjstrator
jJirr:' tr c R;J ?ropt-ty
c.s,. c:::r
W14 98002
:.•r. Er;.cz;
sr✓;:A::Z co:T? pL'.>:a:;C co,:;5tQ.
Eij;•C Y.SS t-v ‚ N. u fl j' ' .i EfltT
rid,,t .4V-:7t
s'1Y rt.:-,,!.Q'
C, :a7$
nqu;rad :s't.?Ct :o prcpirty :o:.i'.t:r; c' t:.e c!ctt of
SU' :; •t; :n:;: :i.it&i;' ;;C-IL.t C t; ;;t;te t:.)ts
- % 1
:
- :ilctu.rL:; Lf
C;:';j:;':. C;: i fl::; c C3CSn:t tct pt'r ; C:c:r:;;. O;
Cc:;pr;.:.i;'a F3an :07 t:;u S;-c::e ;.:c:.
: popti.y s cotr;p3tt: ir. tic ut :fr; sriJ us
v:..::: V S
S:r;cc:-iy ycu:s,
f:2rr
Di;c.c,: ti ?itru.
Mr. Arthur F. Sampson
Administrator
General Services Administration
Washington, D. C. 20405
WARREN G. MAGNUSON, U.S.S.
b Sties ...)cnasc
wASM,NGTON, G.C, aCIP
April 10, 1975
Dear Mr. Administrator:
We are pleased that GSA has deferred its decision on disposal of
the fonrer.C.ivil Defense Center near Spokane and that it will hold an
open meeting soon in Spokane to obtain the views of all interested
local parties as to how that property should be used to serve the best
interests of the community.
We requested that GSA defer its decision and hold the reefing after
reviewing the Acting Assistant Administrator's letter of April 7 to us
wherein he indicated the agency was denying Spokane Community College's
request for the property for use in its industrial education program.
We were struck, particularly, by the following statement in his letter:
"Although we are sympathetic to the needs of the Couminity
College, we are firmly of the opinion that sale of these
warehouses for industrial use would be in the best interest
of the local community in that such disposal would generate
additional jobs thereby helping the local economy. In addition,
the property would be placed on the local .tax rolls which will
increase the county - tax base."
That statement indicated a commendable intent on GSA's part to base
its disposal decision in substantial part on the basis of what is in the
local community's best interest. However, we feel strongly that only
the community- -and not GSA - -can really decide what is in its own best
interest.
We believe the forthcoming meting will give the local corrrnunity a
proper opportunity to advise GSA as to what is, in fact, in its own best
interest. We trust that GSA will give substantial weight to the views
expressed at that meting in arriving at its final disposal decision and
will continue to follow this ratter with much interest.
Sincerely,
THOMAS S. FOLEY, M.C.
HENRY M. JACKSON, U.S,S.
r
V. L. Barnes
Director of Real Property Division
General Services Administration
G.S.A. Center
Auburn, WA 98002
Dear Mr. Barnes:
March 10, 1975
Your agency has inquired with respect to property located on the east of
Sullivan Road immediately north of the Spokane International Railway tracks
within Section 12- 25 -44.
This property is zoned in the Manufacturing classification of our Zoning
Ordinance and I am enclosing that chapter of the Ordinance. Our General
Comprehensive Plan for the Spokane metropolitan area likewise indicates
that the subject property is contemplated in the future for industrial use.
Encl.
CLH:vls
Sincerely yours,
CHARLES L. HUGGINS
Director of Planning
V. L. Barnes
Director.of Real Property Division
General Services Administration
G.S.A. Center
Auburn, WA 98002
Dear Mr. Barnes:
Encl.
CLH:vls
Sincerely yours,
March 10, 1975
Your agency has inquired with respect to property located on the east of
Sullivan Road immediately north of the Spokane International Railway tracks
within Section 12- 25 -44.
This property is zoned in. the Manufacturing classification of our Zoning
Ordinance and I am enclosing that chapter of the Ordinance. Our General
Comprehensive Plan for the Spokane metropolitan area likewise indicates
that the subject property is contemplated in the future for industrial use.
CHARLES L. HUGGINS
Director of Planning
WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITv "OLLEGE DISTRICT 17 N2000 GREENF 'TREET SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99207
January 16, 1974
The honorable Tom 8. .Foley
Rouse of Representatives
Washington, D. C.
Sir:
I wish to bring to your attention the following situation. Presently,
Genera]. Service Administration is planning to sell two warehouse
buildings at the Industrial Park six miles east of Spokane. The square
footage of these two buildings is approximately 250,000; there is also
about ten acres of enclosed, flat, fenced land. This land would be
ideal for operating engineers to move and relocate earth; furthermore,
shooting grades and elevation work would, and could, be done under
close instructional supervision:
I would like to see this property be referred to health, Education and
Welfare, and, in turn, acquired by the Community College for the
'purpose of education, and,'specifically, for the many apprenticeship
programs that need sound educational housing.
The Industrial Park facility is well located, and is in the heart of
future and potential job training and upgrading for several existing
firms, i.e.,. Columbia Electric, Pacific Trail (whose people we now
train). •
The following are apprenticeship programs which would be housed in the •
proposed facilities request: bricklayers, carpenters, pile drivers,
electricians, northwest linemen, operating engineer mechanics, paving
and grading, iron workers, machinists, plumbers and fitters and sheet
metal workers. The following are programs that would be relocated at
the facility or development in the near future: Truck driving, power
sewing, industrial first aid, training and upgrading for present
companies now located in the Irdustriil Park who would wish to improve
employees training. The training of employees for Pacific Trail was
at one time housed at the Industrial Park, but the firm soon had to
use the space for production, and the college had to move its training
of the future employees from the Park to the Spokane Community College.
Your support and action is needed to help obtain these buildings for
what I consider sound, educational facilities.
Very truly your
i
Walter S. ohn ^•n
- President District 17
ps
cc: Rick rraden /Ass't /Tom Foley
Bill Julius /State Board Community College
SPOKANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE E3403 MISSION AVENUE 0 SPOKANE FALLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE W3410 FORT GEORGE WRIGHT DRIVE
B'r. David L. Head
Administrator
Regional Headquarters Building
GSA Center
Auburn, Washington 93002
Dear lir. Head:
z January 16, 1975
In the past week this office has been contacted by a number of
individuals who are deeply concerned about the disposal of some
surplus property in the Spokane Industrial ?aril. •
These individuals include state senator Say:; Guess, Coaunity College
District 17 President Walter Johnson, his a siscant.Don Kolb, Capitol
Budget Officer Bill Julius and Don Anderson, an apprentice coordinator.
These gentlemen feel that the property in question would be highly
suitable as an industrial education facility for Spokane Community
,College. •
I understand that at the present time industrial education, along
with vocational training and rehabilitation, is severely restricted
in the Spokane area due to limited training facilities. Don Kolb
advises me that the Industrial Marl: property would be ideal for a
number of apprenticeship progra!s including operating engineers,
painting, masonry, carpentry and ironworkin,;.
It appears that the initial GSA decision on this property was to
conclude that it has no educational value. As a result, T understand
that the property has not been screened through the established HEW
chennels but has remained with GSA for disposal.
Ibis decision has left all of the parties mentioned above dismayed
and disappointed.
I would deeply appreciate it if you could advise me as to the status
of this clatter and whether a re- evaluation of this property is
possible.
Sincerely,
Arthur 11. Hansen
District Assistant to
Thomas S. Foley, M.C.
574 U. S. Courthouse Building
Spokane, Washington 99201
3 v i
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ■
C,"dERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRA'11oN
Region 10
Auburn, WA 98002
.- ;caorabie Thomas S. Foley
Attn : - rti.ur i:a. liansert
:District Assistant to
Thomas S. Foley, 1\ C.
574 U.S. Courthouse vulidin ;
Spokane, 0920"1
Dear Ifir, Foley:
-.. ash-
Thane you for your letter of January ry 16, 1975, ei:piossiil the
concern of certain individuals re` ardi'ng our planned disposal of two
warehouses in the Spokane industrial Par::. +
Upon completion of the Federal requirements for the property,
serious consideration was given to its highest and best use, and
after consi k ring all pertinent factors, it was determined the best
United 1 d by offering interests of the lrt.ite:: States would ,i'Lti iJ ^c served � ,.. . -tl..g til Ei •
buildings for public sale for the purposes for which they were con -
structed. That determination tion :'Jas based on the nature of the
property, its location, its high value, and potential uses. It was
8 ause C that "� 1- y 1 Department b& cause ewe Oi eil... determination we informed tGl�i ) � ,.li't�:i1- -171' UI Health,
Education, and Vielfare the property would not be made available for
educational use. •
We are Very mindful of the concern expressed by the individuals
named in your letter and wish to assure you full consideration was
given to potential educational uses; however, our final determination
was the best use of the facilities should be for the purposes for whiich
they were designed and constructed. Accordingly, it is our plan to
Keep Freedom in Your Future With U.S. Savings Bonds
2
offer the property for sale by public auction within the next few
months.
We trust the above has been helpful to you.
Sincerely,
DAVID L. HEAD
Regional Administrator
cc:
Honorable Thomas S. Foley
House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
NOw no w.C.NNON. NEV.
ERN/ GE NCS. s.C.
OAN!FI K. INOUY C. HAWAII
AMA! L STEVENSON 111. 1U
WGM:msw
Enc.
lr0 bT EV( NS. ALASKA
I. GLENN CALL NA, MO.
/MCOCNICK J. LOSOAN. STAPP DI RECTOR
MICHAEL PCATSCHUKI CHIC/ COUNSEL
Cn is fales Zonate
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 2O51O
March 5, 1975
Honorable Caspar W. Weinberger
Secretary
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Washington, D. C. 20201
Dear Mr. Secretary:
The enclosed is a copy of a letter Senator Jackson,
Congressman Foley, and I have written to the Administrator
of General Services. Since the problem outlined therein
is of direct interest to the Department of HEW, I would
appreciate your looking into the problem also.
Best personal regards.
Sincerely,
WARREN G. MAGNUSON, U.S.S.
Honorable Arthur F. Sampson
Administrator
General Services Administration
18th and F Streets, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20405
Dear Mr. Administrator:
4 'n>enatC
WASHINGTON. D.G. 20510
March 5, 1975
_ This is to request your review of action taken by your Region X
Office on the disposal of a former Civil Defense Center near Spokane,
Washington.
The property was declared surplus last December. It includes some
17 acres of land along with two warehouses and three special storage
buildings. Spokane Community College, a two -year institution, has been
seeking to obtain the property through the Department of HEW for industrial
education courses including apprenticeship programs for operating engineers;
painting; masonry, carpentry, and ironworking. By letter of December 18,
1974 (enclosed), your Region X office notified the Region X HEW Office
that:
"Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding dated July 16,
1966, between the Secretary (of HEW) and the Administrator
of General Services, page 2, paragraph 3, it has been
determined that the property is not suitable for health or
educational purposes because it has been zoned for industrial
use."
Paragraph 3 of the Memorandum does not, however, make reference to
"zoning" or "industrial" use. Rather; it refers to "an area public develop—
ment plan of a State or a political subdivision." We request that GSA write
to the State and to all relevant political subdivisions and request their
written reports as to whether or not the land in question falls within
an area public development plan." Please forward to us copies of your
request and of any replies.
If the land is not within such a "plan ", then,we would expect GSA
to proceed in accordance with the Memorandum wherein it states (pp.2 -3)
that "This predetermination will not be made with respect to any other type
of property without notifying the Department and affording it an opportunity
to request such property be made available for screening."
__/
Honorable Arthur F. Sampson -'2 - March 5, 1975
It is disturbing that your Region X office has not cooperated with
the Department of HEW on this matter and that it has relied upon tenuous
interpretation "of the Memorandum of Understanding. We trust you will
want to remedy this situation and assure that the property is disposed
of in accordance with the law and within the spirit of cooperation
emphasized in the Memorandum. The Secretary of HEW has been asked to
look into this matter, also.
Best regards.
� � )
c ? A-6,(/ 2/1
WARREN G: MAGNUSON, U.
Enc.
•
THOMAS
Vim
CKSON, U.S.S.
' 1
aiww
DEC 1 8 1974
Mr. George E. Hoops
Director, Office. of Surplus Property Utilization
Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare -••
1321 Second Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Dear Mr. Hoops:
The General Services Administration has reported as excess to its
requirements five : improvements known as. the former GSA /CD ware -
houses located approximately.s x.tiles: east- of•Spokane, .Washington ;•-:�_
GSA Control Number G Wash- 534A':" . •
..Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding - dated July 16,'1966;:c.ii,
between the Secretary of. the Department•of Health, Education, and
Welfare and the Administrator of the General Services, page 2,
graph 3, it has been deterrnined that the property is not suitable for
health or educational purposes because it has been zoned for industrial
use. A copy of our GSA Form 1432, . Determination of Surplus, is: ...:
enclosed for your file information.
•
Sincerely, _ .
• 5. 131-i OWN
ti
Realty Specialist
Real Property Division •
▪ Public Buildings Service
Enclosure •
•
ii •, S7A; LS u. AMejR;CA-
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Region 10
Auburn, A'4 98002'
•
RE: G- Wash- 564..9
Nap Frcalori1 iu tour Future Willi t /.S. Snciuri Toudr
� v
9 .
1 1 r� ..
`
% %1161920 2/
J'l ~ bcc +'•-, j
•
RECEIVED ;'.• 'i -.
cp OSPD•Sa /,lrtc
—
�
�9v -