Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PE-1701-93
Date to Review Time Date to AA & DR 3-10-93 Time 1:15 Date Received 3 -5 -93 Contact person FLOOD ZONE Project Name PHEASANT PARK EST SITE ADDRESS N 8TH/W BAKER Applicant's Name BUD MORRISON Address 22305 E EUCLID - SPOKANE WA 99207 ✓ NO Planning Contact Person STACY BJORDAHL I Date Submitted I Description ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# Related File # ( ) W S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name No. Lots 22 No.Acres 10 Work # Date Conditions mailed Phone # Initials Section n - Township - Range PARCEL # 19551 -0637+ Phone # 928 -6427 MIKE PHILLIPS SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC 909 N ARGONNE RD SPOKANE WA 99212 926 -1322 Phone # 456 -2205 AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMIT IED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS HEARING EXAM APPROVED DENIED - APPEALED BBC _APPROVED DENIED Contact person FLOOD ZONE Planning Contact Person Date Submitted ✓ NO Project Name PHEASANT PARK EST SITE ADDRESS N 8TH -W BAKER Applicant's Name BUD MORRISON Address 22305 E EUCLID - SPOKANE WA 99207 ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# Related File # ( ) Date to Review 5 - - Time # 4 Date to AA & DR 3 -10 -93 Time 1:15 Date Received 3 -5 -93 W;,\ S l SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name STACY BJORDAHL I Description PE- 1701-9, No. Lots 22 No.Acres 10 eton - Township - Range PARCEL # 19551 -0637+ I Initials Phone # 928 -6427 Work # Date Conditions mailed .0 -10 - jr Phone # MIKE PHILLIPS SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC 909 N ARGONNE RD SPOKANE WA 99212 926 -1322 Phone # 456 -2205 /_ AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING / / FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING J / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED _/_/ DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED / / ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS _ / /_ HEARING EXAM _APPROVED /DENIED- APPEALED BBC _APPROVED _DENIED No. 93 1346 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MA'ITER OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ) PE- 1701 -93, PHEASANT PARK ESTATES WITH EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL -3.5 (UR -3.5) ZONE ) SPONSOR: BUD MORRISON FINDINGS OF FACT FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS THIS MATTER, being the consideration by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board ", of an appeal of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee decision of May 21, 1993 denying Preliminary Plat File No. PE- 1701 -93, known as Pheasant Park Estates, for the purpose of developing 22 lots for single family dwellings on approximately 10 acres of land, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal"; and the Board of County Commissioners having held a de novo public hearing on August 16, 1993, and having fully considered all testimony presented and documents in the record, and further having individually visited or being familiar with the site and vicinity in question and having rendered an oral decision on the 7th day of September, 1993 denying the appeal and denying said proposal, does hereby enter the following: 1. The proposal is generally located north of and adjacent to Eighth Avenue, approximately 320 feet west of Barker Road within the NW 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 2. The proposal consists of a preliminary plat to divide approximately 10 acres into 22 lots for single family dwellings with existing Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zoning. 3. The Hearing Examiner Committee held a public hearing regarding the proposal on May 20, 1993, subsequent to which by the Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision dated May 21, 1993, it denied the proposal without prejudice. 4. The applicant filed a written appeal with the Board on May 28, 1993, and listed the following as the basis for appeal of the Hearing Examiner Committee decision: the proposal met County requirements; the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision was inconsistent with other land use decisions in the area, and County staff recommended approval. 5. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled. 6. The Board conducted a de novo public hearing on the proposal on August 16, 1993. The record for the hearing included the testimony and documents submitted to the Board at the August 16, 1993, public hearing, additional documents submitted to the Board through August 31, 1993, and the public record files of the Planning department and Board of County Commissioners on the proposal. 7. On appeal, the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision comprised only a recommendation to the Board regarding the approvals sought by the applicant. The oral testimony submitted to the Hearing Examiner Committee on the proposal was not part of the record before the Board and was not considered by the Board. 8. The issues raised at the public hearing included concerns regarding density, incompatibility with surrounding land uses, adequate infrastructure existing in the area, including public sewers, roads, schools and other public services, and environmental concerns regarding on -site sewage disposal in the proposal. 93 1346 BOCC FINDINGS PE- 1701 -93 Page 2 9. The Board takes notice of the provisions of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, the Spokane County Zoning Code and the Spokane County Code. 10. The Comprehensive Land Use plan designates the area encompassed by the proposal as Urban, which recommends a residential density range of 1 to 17 units per acre. 11. The original zoning of the property was established as Agricultural (A) under the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance in 1957. The Agriculture (A) zoning for the site was redesignated by Spokane County on January 1, 1991 to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5), pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. 12. The net density of the proposal is 2.5 units per acre. 13. The property is surrounded by large lots or tracts with single family residences ranging in size from 1 to 160 acres. A 160 acre parcel used primarily for • agricultural purposes is located south of the proposal. Large animal keeping and agricultural activities are common in the area, which can best be described as semi - rural. 14. The proposal is generally inconsistent with the density and land uses of the surrounding properties and the area. While a few plats with urban densities have been approved by the County in the general area of the proposal in the past (e. g. Moen Addition, Meadowview Ranch Estates), more recently the Board of County Commissioners has denied preliminary plat proposals in the area. The Board takes notice that the proposed preliminary plat of Hitchcock Addition was denied by the Board on August 16, 1993, after rehearing, for similar reasons as the present proposal was denied. The proposed preliminary plat of Irish Estates, located in the north Greenacres area, was previously denied by the Board in December, 1992 (the Board's decision was recently affirmed on appeal in Spokane County Superior Court Cause No. 93- 200363 -8). The Board also takes notice that the proposed preliminary plat of Flora Meadows located in the north Greenacres area, was denied by motion of the Board on August 24, 1993. Irish Addition was recently approved, but the preliminary plat had not been appealed to the Board from the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision. 15. The single family uses in the proposal will conflict with the agricultural uses and large animal keeping in areas adjacent to the proposal. 16. Eighth Avenue is designated by Spokane County as a local access street, with improvement standards recommended of 30 feet of asphalt and curbing. While the County Engineer has recommended improvement of Eighth Avenue to such standards along the frontage of the development east to Barker Road, this would leave Eighth Avenue west to Long Road as a gravel road of narrow width. 17. Testimony from residents of the area indicates that the proposal would increase traffic on the graveled portion of the road west to Long Road; and that the graveled portion of the road is used by school children walking to Greenacres Elementary, located at Long Road and Fourth Avenue, and also to drive children to school. 18. The applicant indicated in the SEPA checklist that approximately 70 people would reside in the proposal if developed. 19. The Central Valley School District's elementary schools are overcrowded and are currently using portable facilities, school capacity will continue to be exceeded in the future, and the proposal will negatively impact the District's ability to provide adequate student housing. The District requested that the Board either deny the proposal or require the applicant to enter into a voluntary agreement with the District to pay impact fees to mitigate the impacts from the proposal on the District. 20. There is not a park in the area, although the applicant is willing to enter into a voluntary agreement with the County Parks Department to pay impact fees. 21. Public transit is not available in the area of the proposal. 22. The property is located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area and the Priority Sewer Service Area designated by the County. However, public sewer is not expected to be extended to the area for a period of approximately 15 years or longer. • 93 1346 BOCC FINDINGS PE- 1701 -93 Page 3 23. Effective January 1, 1994, the Washington State Board of Health, on June 9, 1993, reimposed density restrictions of one unit per acre for properties located east of Sullivan Road in the Spokane Valley, and relying on on -site sewage disposal. The Board has also indicated its intent to further restrict the allowed densities for such properties proposing to develop with on -site sewage systems to one unit per five acres, pursuant to amendment of the Priority Sewer Service Area boundaries. 24. While the proposal is not subject to the above - referenced density restrictions because of the application date of the proposal, the surrounding properties will be subject to one (1) acre density restrictions as of January 1,1994. This will have the effect of preserving the semi -rural character and large densities of the properties surrounding the proposal, as well as the lack of infrastructure needed to support the proposal and similar urban development in the area, until public sewer becomes available. 25. The Board recognizes that the Aquifer Sensitive Overlay Zone currently authorizes on -site sewage disposal in the Priority Sewer Service Area. However, such • allowance was premised on public sewer being extended to the area within a short range of time, while the facts indicate that such time frame has passed and that several more years will expire before public sewer will be extended to the area. 26. The State Board of Health's action indicates that on -site sewage disposal at urban densities poses water quality concerns in the area of the proposal, especially when considering the potential for cumulative impacts from other proposals that have been authorized or that make application for approval prior to January 1, 1994. 27. The Declaration of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the project by the Planning Department on April 29, 1993, did not take into account the action or proceedings by the State Board of Health of June 9, 1993. The Board's action represents significant new information on the proposal's potential impacts on water quality that was not available to the responsible official at the time the DNS was issued or during the DNS comment period, notwithstanding the expert evidence submitted by the applicant on such issue. 28. The proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan in several respects. The proposal is inconsistent with the intent of the Urban category to provide for residential development in a "city- like" environment, with a full range of public services. The record indicates that the necessary infrastructure for such urban density does not exist in the area of the proposal, particularly for schools and roads, nor is it likely that it will be present when the proposal is finally developed, even with the conditions recommended by the various agencies. 29. The Urban category anticipates the presence of public sewer, or at a minimum interim sewage disposal systems that protect water quality. The Water Quality element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages "fill -in development" that will have the effect of increasing the cost effectiveness of extending public sewer while maximizing protection to the County's sole source aquifer. Due to the effect of the State Board of Health action on adjacent development and the length of time before public sewer will be extended to the area, the proposal does not constitute "fill -in development ". 30. The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan encourages buffering between proposed residential development and existing development, where land use conflicts exist. There is no buffer provided between the proposal and the 160 acre tract used for agricultural purposes to the south. 31. There is substantial public opposition to the proposal from the surrounding area. 32. The proposal does not make appropriate provision for the public health, safety and welfare, and for schools, roads and for planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school, within the meaning of RCW 58.17.110. The public use and interest will not be served by the proposed preliminary subdivision, within the meaning of RCW 58.17.110. 33. Since the Board has decided to deny the proposal, it is unnecessary to make a decision on withdrawal or reconsideration of the Declaration of Nonsignificance issued for the proposal. 93 1346 BOCC FINDINGS The Board does hereby deny the appeal and thereby denies approval of the proposal. BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 192$. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A 1"1 EST: WILL ^ E. DONAHUE of the Board Ro nne Montague, Deputy Clerk (3) PE- 1701 -93 Page 4 DECISION Vote of the Board of Spokane County Commissioners as follows: Commissioner Patricia A. Mummey - Aye to deny the proposal Commissioner Steven Hasson - Nay Commissioner D. E. "Skip" Chilberg - Aye to deny the proposal Bv: OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR DATE AND PLACE FOR COMMENCING AN APPEAL NOTE: Pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 680(5), notice is hereby given by the Board of County Commissioners in conjunction with the approval of the above - referenced matter that: (1) Pursuant to Section 14.402.180 of the Spokane County Code, the time limit for commencing an appeal of the approval of the above - referenced matter is thirty (30) calendar days from the Board of County Commissioner's execution of the above Findings of Fact, Decision and Conditions. (2) The time frame for appealing any SEPA issues with respect to the approval of the above - referenced matter is thirty (30) days after the execution of the above Findings of.Fact, Decision and Conditions. A notice of intent to raise SEPA issues by judicial appeal is required and must be filed with Wallis D. Hubbard, Director of Planning West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, within thirty (30) calendar days after execution of the above Findings of Fact, Decision and Conditions. The appeal of either the approval of the above - referenced matter or any SEPA issues must be filed in the Spokane County Superior Court or a court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law. SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER INTRODUCTION This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on May 20, 1993. The members of the Committee present are Frank Yuse, Chairperson, and Jane Myers (Jan Reuter and Verona Southern voluntarily excused themselves from hearing this item). PROPOSAL The sponsor, Bud Morrison, requests approval of a 22 lot Preliminary Plat of Pheasant Park Estates, PE- 1701 -93, with existing Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zoning within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The property is generally located north of and adjacent to 8th Avenue, approximately 320 feet west of Barker Road within the NW 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. • 2. The committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record. The Planning Department has recommended that the proposed plat be approved subject to conditions. 3. The existing land uses in the area are large lot single family residences and agriculture. 4. The proposed use could be compatible with the existing uses in the area if timing were appropriate, provisions for sewer, roads and compatibility with the neighborhood need to be addressed. At the present time public sewers are not available, area arterials have not been improved and adjacent land uses include large animal keeping and farming activities. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban. The Urban category is for the purpose of creating a "city- like" environment with various land uses, including residential densities of 1 - 17 units per acre or 2.2 units per acre for this proposal. 6. The existing zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The Arterial Road Plan designates 8th Avenue as a Local Access Street; with a recommended right of way width of 60 feet. 8. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) previously established as Agricultural zoning in 1957 and redesignated to DNA- Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to ant Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Mpy 2tl 1\9'33 E.IikO t i HEC Order for PE- 1701 -93 Page 2 9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The Suue Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with and a Determination of Nonsignificance was issued. The Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS. 10. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled. 11. The owners of adjacent land and the surrounding area submitted a petition opposing the preliminary plat. Concern was expressed regarding on -site sewage disposal and soil composition, inconsistency with surrounding land uses, sewer availability and overcroAding in Greenacres Elementary. 12. The proposed use may not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies. 13. The subdivision is not in strict conformance with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. At this time, the preliminary plat may not adequately provide public facilities as cited in RCW 58.17.110(2). Specifically: a. Sanitary waste disposal b. Public and/or private rights of way, nor have area arterials been improved. HEC Order for PE- 1701 -93 Page 3 ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findin of Fact and Conclusion, DENIES the application of Bud Morrison for the 22 lot Preliminary Plat as described in the application PE- 1701 -93 known as Pheasant Park Estates. Motion by: Myers Seconded by: Yuse Vote: (2 -0) TO DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PHEASANT PARK ESTATES HEARING EXAMINER COMMI f"I'EE HEREBY A 1 ZEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE AT1EST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director Date 6(2 7gdeAdorgc- PAUL F. JENSEN enior Planner Chair man Pursuant to County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners, W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a $200 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. NO. J 93 0923 IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY 4 SUBDIVISION PEA 70:1 PHEASANT =PARK) ESTATES_WITTHINS'E)(I TI UR =3:5 ZONE c APPL - ICANT —_BUD VORRISONT3 Pat Harper County Engineerffice BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Bud Morrison has filed Notice of Appeal of the denial by the Hearing Examiner Committee of the above captioned application for Preliminary Subdivision PE- 1701 -93; and NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will conduct a public hearing MONDAY. AUGUST 16. 1993. AT 4:30 P.M. COMMISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE, WA 99260 to consider this proposal to develop approximately 10 acres into a 22 lot subdivision for one single family residence and 21 new single family residences and one nonbuildable lot for a park and those uses permitted in the Urban Residential -3.5 zone on property Generally located north of and adjacent to 8th Avenue approximately 320 feet west of Barker Road in the northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 N, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may bel any environmental documents prepared in conjunction with the proposal. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony verbally or in writing in support of or in opposition to this application. The Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as deemed necessary. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN this AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING chana_ es the hearing date from July 27. 1993 to August 16. 1993. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 27 day of July, 1993. PUBLISH: Review - 7/30 WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD B RO NTAGUE, DEPUa PE1701 an.0727 2 relay ST OFF • Of A F , y r n q U 1 SG • M FQURT EIGHTH AVE PE- X701 -93 TA_ J J.1-J is J V • w a S /q.'t HFC Staff Report for PF_1701_q3 FOUR Tr-• Av[ ITEM # /\ OF /� tt 1 NO. 93 -0657 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONE=1701 =99 PHEASANT PARK GESTATES N/ITHIN 'EXISTING UR.3.5 ZONE CAPPLICANT: BUD MORRISON NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Bud Morrison has filed Notice of Appeal of the denial by the Hearing Examiner Committee of above captioned application for Preliminary Subdivision PE- 1701 -93; and NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will conduct a public hearing TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993, AT 5:30 P.M. (or as soon as possible thereafter) COMMISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE, WA 99260 to consider this proposal to develop approximately 10 acres into a 22 lot subdivision for one single family residence and 21 new single family residences and one nonbuildable lot for a park and those uses permitted in the Urban Residential -3.5 zone on property Generally located north of and adjacent to 8th Avenue approximately 320 feet west of Barker Road in the northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 N, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be any environmental documents prepared in conjunction with the proposal. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony verbally or in writing in support of or in opposition to this application. The Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as deemed necessary. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 8 day of June, 1993. PUBLISH: Review - 6/18 WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD B ROSA NE MONTAGUE, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PE1701 N O r of P p ' ' I S OFF IG FQURTHi:: EIGHTH AVE • - .:.R•ar yr 0 • I . ' U 11%c 2 rdA 0 1» 2 : ties" 5/93 HFC Staff Raoort. for PF- 1701 -93 Y33NIB;l3 liVICI MMUUS 1 £66L L 0 lnr 1 03A133311 PE- 1701 -93 �yuJ O 0 o CY SELOr -+r. A FOURTH AV I:. ITEM # 3 /� OF _� L _ 4 J.V. i i Y. t-u 1 LL 1 • S).,,. . } n, c o FROM 4Y iN I FAX TO: SPOHAnc COUNTr COUAT NOUSC FROM: DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL: COMMENTS: all TO:SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING qs 1. 1993 10 :23AM P.01 ** FAX TRANSMITTAL ** NAME: ern-r-4:772,---7_,2.> COMPANY: l " DEPARTMENT: FAX NUMBER: NAME: / PHONE: ' / %6 .. ate /0 TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER: DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS: in HIGH PRIORITY - DELIVER IMMEDIATELY LD PLEASE CONFIRM RECEIPT BY 0 PHONE 0 FAX 111 PLEASE RESPOND AT YOUR CONVIENCE SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE W. 1116 BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA. 99260 -0100 PHONE (509) 456 -2265 FAX: (509) 456 -2274 DATE: -; 6 /h 1 -- 456 =07zz FROM:OMNIFRX N TO :SPOKRNE COUNTY PLRNNING 414 1, 1993 10 :21RM P.02 TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Appeal Fee - D0-- // .00 Name: UL / Zl 2,�Stt Today's Date 6— e /73 Address: 2-230f 44:46, &4 (n- 4Zip Code: 1 Home Phone: ?27-6, V Business Phone: Hearing Examiner Committee Action Bet... Appealed - T i t l e: er44. mu_'< II J °t!/— Pk:a- r Preliminary Subdivision NumbSa Bti Zone Reclassification Number: Date o H ring xaminer Committee Action: U4 Signature: Signature of Authorized Representative: Address: YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL -- - .. (z) nie" *VS re -N= reds / N s / er,!ti -- C 17 1 Fr C CO lee fr CAM' (\C31 it 1' , ,e00 Afeir t frni 4e no co 0el c yr OFFICE USE ONLY Copies to: Planning Engineers Environmental Health Fee Received: Check Cash ` Receipt Number_ Hearing Date: PE- 1701 -93 Jr Ili Wells 2038 4` 12 3 + 2000 -.Greenacres Q: 7130:4! , a30 • L — PE- 1701 -93 . . :.ii. 7 CC + L • n .ru. 17 • I1! Park WT • : \ •sn BM •Q j f 208J I ' R URBAN (U) / 'OOU �'WARY J '� \ UUUN 'NY h.) 1160NUARY• \ / II / r 'I^ I LANZ / •.O / I � • / / • • • ./�1 205 PE- 1701 -93 R /02 urr c+aff Rannrt fnr PF- 1701 -23 -�1 ' - Pane 54 u .o:• 211 u,NPLATTE[ PROPERTY IE.SCP,IP7 /0N REM ARI PRELIM. I RY PLAT OF PHEASAA T PAPIi ESTATE .4 PLAT IN A PORT /ON OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 19, T25N, P45 PEN POE IN/: COUNTY, NA II IA'CTON 1�40ENCE GI SLAFSON ENGINEENS, INC '1 909 A0GONNE ROAD PH 926 - 137? SPOKANE, WASNINGION 99242 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: MAY 20, 1993 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PHEASANT PARK ESTATES, PN- 1701 -93, WITH EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL - 3.5 (UR -3.5) ZONING WITHIN THE AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA (ASA) OVERLAY ZONE. I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Surveyor: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT Bud Morrison E. 22305 Euclid Otis Orchard, WA 99027 Simpson Engineers N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99212 Contact Planner: Stacy Bjordahl Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to 8th Avenue, approximately 320 feet west of Barker Road within the NW 1/4 of Section 19 , Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: A twenty -two lot subdivision including one existing single- family residence and twenty -one new single - family residences and one unbuildable lot for a park and those uses permitted in the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zone. II. SITE INFORMATION 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 56 A . Site Size: Approximately 10 acres Gross Density: 2.2 units per acre or .45 acres per unit B . Comprehensive Plan . 1. Land Use Plan: The property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a "city- like" environment which includes various land uses and intensive residential development. Urban areas will have public water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems and other public services available. This category promotes "fill -in" within established development areas where utilities, arterial, schools and community facilities have already been established. Residential net densities in this category will range from 1 to 17 units per acre. The proposed density of this project is in accord with the density guidelines of the Urban category. 2 . Arterial Road Plan: The site fronts 8th Avenue, which is designated by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as a local access street. The County Engineer is not requesting dedication or future acquisition area for this proposal, however road improvement must be made prior to finalization. 3 . County Parks Plan: The Spokane County Parks and Recreation Plan does not identify any parks within the immediate vicinity of the site. The applicant is proposing an unbuildable lot for recreational use by the residents in the subdivision. (See also item "P" of this report) C . Site Characteristics: The site is relatively flat with native grasses and pasture covering the area. There is an existing single - family residence on the site along'. with accessory structures. The existing home will be made a part of the plat. D. Neighborhood Characteristics: The surrounding neighborhood is a mixture of large lot single - family residences and open agriculture land. Large animal keeping and agricultural activities are found in the vicinity. Parcel sizes within 1/4 mile range from less than 1 acre to 80 acres. A preliminary subdivision, Meadowview Ranch Estates, is located east of the proposal on the southeast comer of Barker Road and 8th Avenue. E. Zoning Analysis: The zoning of the property surrounding the proposal is zoned Urban Residential -3.5. Prior to the county -wide zone redesignation on January 1, 1991 the site and surrounding area was zoned Agricultural under the former Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code specified that areas zoned Agricultural (A) and within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan were to be redesignated Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5). The applicant is not requesting a rezone with this proposal but is seeking to create twenty-one (21) new single -family lots pursuant to the existing Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zone. North: Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) established in classifies as Agricultural (ZN- 286 -57). South: East West: 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) established in classified as Agricultural (ZN- 286 -57) Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) established in classified as Agricultural. (ZN- 286 -57) 1991, previously 1991, previously, 1991, previously Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (ZN- 286 -57). Page 57 Approximately 1 to 2 miles east of the proposed site lying between Barker and ' Henry Roads, is the area that was submitted for an area -wide rezone from Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) to Suburban Residential -1 (SR -1) by the Mica View , Landowners Association in 1991. (LE- 42 -91). The rezone request included 670 acres, however only 150 acres was approved by the Board of County Commissioners to Suburban Residential -1 (SR -1). The remainder is still Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5). Additional rezone requests for the area north of this site have been submitted. A rezone request from the existing Urban Residential - 3.5 to Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) approximately 1/2 mile north on Sprague Avenue was denied by the Hearing Examiner Committee as well as the Board of County Commissioner's on appeal based on inconsistency with the surrounding area. F . Land Use Analysis: The area surrounding the proposal is largely made up of single - family residences on larger lots and agricultural activity is dominant to the south. There is large animal keeping in the area which indicates a "semi -rural" . lifestyle that existed prior to the cross -over zoning in 1991. The proposal is one of the first to develop in the area at a density consistent with the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zone. Site: The existing land use is a single - family residence and vacant pasture. The proposed land use is a twenty -two lot single - family residential subdivision. North: The land to the north is primarily used for single - family residences on lot sizes ranging from 12,000 square feet to 5 acres. Approximately 1/4 mile northwest of the proposal the Moen Addition Plat. Typical lot sizes in this subdivision are 11,000 square feet. South: The 160 acre parcel south of the proposal, while zoned for residential use, is used primarily for agricultural pursuits. Fast: Unplatted property with parcels of 1 acre to 5 acres in size. A preliminary plat of Meadowview Ranch Estates is located approximately 400 feet east of the proposal. Meadowview was approved in 1991 for 35 lots with lot sizes of 11,000 to 20,000 square feet. West: Single- family residences on parcels between one (1) and five (5) acres. Also northwest of the proposal is a proposed preliminary plat of Hitchcock First Addition (PE- 1651 -92) with existing Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zoning Hitchcock is located approximately 1/4 mile northwest of the site on 4th Avenue, just east of Long Road. Hitchcock was given preliminary approval for 29 single- family lots on approximately 8 acres with a density of 3.2 units per acre. Average lot sizes are 10,400 square feet. The project was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee and Board of County Commissioners on appeal. The project was further appealed by the Mica View Landowners Association to Superior Court, State of Washington. -As of the date of this report , the Superior Court judge has remanded the case back to the Board. 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 58 G . Circulation: The proposed subdivision will be served by two new public roads. The three lots which abut 8th Avenue will have direct access to 8th. The internal lots will be served by both a cul -de -sac and temporary cul -de -sac that may provide future access to property north of the site. All internal roadways serving the site will be constructed with a 50 foot right -of -way which includes 36 feet of asphalt and curb. H. Design: The plat is designed with lots that range in size from approximately ' 11,000 to 24,000 square feet. Duplexes are allowed in the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zone on a lot of 20,000 square feet or greater. The applicant is not proposing duplexes on any of the lots. Most of the lots are rectangular in shape and all lots have frontage on a public road. The common open space lot located along the eastern property line allows direct access by all lots in Block Two. A fifteen (15) foot pedestrian ingress /egress strip will provide access from the lots in Block One to the common open space. The common open space along the 1 eastern boundary and the larger lots along the western boundary provide for a buffer to the adjacent land uses. The common open space cannot be used for storage purposes or residential structures. 1. Preliminary Plat Data Buildine Setbacks: R uir Front yard 30 feet Flanking yard 30 feet Side yard (R) 5 feet @ story Rear yard 20 feet NOTE: The preliminary plat does not illustrate any building setbacks. All lots within the subdivision will be required to meet the minimum setbacksof the underlying zone. The final plat submitted shall indicate all required setbacks. Proposed Buffering /Landscaping Techniques: The preliminary plat is designed with a common open space lot along the east property boundary. The lot will serve as a buffer between the proposed plat and adjacent land uses. I. Density: The net density (excluding roads) is 2.5 units per acre. J. Drainage: A drainage plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer's Department prior to development. K. Power Transmission Lines /Other Known Easements: An existing easement is shown on the preliminary plat between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 2. Any additional required easements or recorded easements will be disclosed during final plat process. 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 59. L . Water Supply: The proposal is within the Consolidated Irrigation Water District #19. An approved water plan will be required prior to finalization of the plat. M. Sewage Disposal: Individual on -site septic systems will be utilized for sewage disposal. Double plumbing and a dry sewer line will be installed as required by the County Utilities Department. N . School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No. 356. The school district has submitted to the Planning Department a request that the plat sponsor be required to negotiate with the school district to reach a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impact of the development on the school district. This request is reflected in the conditions of approval of this report. O. Parks and Recreation: The Spokane County Parks Department has responded to the proposal and has requested that approval of this project be subject to the condition that the Owner negotiate with the parks department to , reach a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impact of this proposal on the Parks! department. This condition is included in the Conditions of Approval of this report. P . Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. The Fire District and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plat. Q. Wetlands: Spokane County Wetland Inventory Maps do not indicate any wetlands on the site. R . Cultural Resources: None have been identified. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department has determined that No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsie nificance ("DNS"). The "DNS" was circulated to 12 other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends May 18, 1993 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The ' Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearing. 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 60 IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed plat conforms to the Spokane County Subdivision and Zoning Codes. The proposal is also in conformance with the Urban category density guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. Past land use decisions however, have considered the availability of sewers and the impact of on -site sewage disposal systems on the Aquifer. The density of this proposal is similar to the Meadowview Ranch Estates subdivision that was approved east of the site in 1991. As conditioned, the preliminary plat will make appropriate provisions for schools, roads, open space and parks as required by RCW 58.17.110. The Planning Department recommends approval subjec to conditions of reviewing agencies. V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i . All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant ", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.' ii. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) and Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zones as amended. 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 3. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 4. A final plat name /number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 6. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the Planning Director /designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 7. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to June 1, 1996. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 5 /931 -IEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 6P 8. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. ' Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 9. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat . The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 10. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 11. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 12. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "Lots 1,2,3,10, and 11 of Block 1 and Lots 4 -11 of Block 2 are located on a temporary cul -de -sac. This temporary cul -de -sac may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate." 13. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 14. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 15. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 16. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 62 binding site plan, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 17. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a ! Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 18. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 19. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 20. Prior to approval of road and drainage plans, the applicant is required to coordinate with the United States Postal Service to determine type and location of central mail delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of three or more homes. 21. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public schools prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and school district. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 22. The Owner shall negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public parks prior to fmalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and Spokane County Parks Department. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and Spokane County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. , 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 63 23. The following conditions are applicable to Lot 12, Block 2: a. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Any residential development on ' Lot 12, Block 2 is prohibited. Any. structures or improvements erected within Lot 12, Block 2 shall be for recreational purposes only." b. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The common areas shown on this plat cannot be sold or transferred, regardless of any provision in the covenants to the contrary, and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein." c. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the homeowners association created by document recorded under State document No. d. A copy of the homeowners /property owners' association articles of incorporation i and/or bylaws and/or covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Department prior to finalizing. e. Subject to approval by the Planning Department, Lot 12, Block 2 may be retainedi under private ownership by the "applicant" subject to the condition that the lot is used by the residents of the subdivision for recreational purposes only. Appropriate provisions for maintenance shall be submitted for approval by the department. If the "applicant" so chooses to maintain private ownership of Lot 12, Block 2, conditions (c) and (d) above are not applicable. 24. The plat dedication shall contain a statement that duplexes are prohibited. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to deification of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross- sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 6411 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing, each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following - described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: a one (1) -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the subdivision boundary. (Temporary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the subdivision boundaries.) 8. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 9. A statement shall be placed in the plat dedication providing for future slope easements as required by Spokane County along 8th Avenue. 10. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to Spokane County standards. 11. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 12. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. 13. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of all internal streets, which are to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of 36 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing is also required. 14. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Eighth Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 30 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development and extending to Barker Road The construction of curbing is also required. 15. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 16. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined . that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the dedication of additional right -of -way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 65 17. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 18. The applicant shall construct a 30 ft strip paved section on Eighth Avenue from the east property line to Barker Road. A 30 ft. section and curbing shall be constructed along the Eighth Avenue frontage of the development. The trip generation of this development and its urban density will impact on the existing gravel road this warrants the improvement of Eighth Avenue to Barker Road. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation' of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. The dedication shall state: Each new dwelling unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems." 5. A dry sewer connection to the future area -wide sewerage system shall be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection shall be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 66 Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County /City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots except Lot 3 in the easternmost Block. 11. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that the existing on -site sewage disposal system serving the residence located on Lot 3 is wholly located within the boundaries of the lot. 12. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of (an) individual on -site sewage disposal system(s) may be authorized. 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 67 13. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of (an) on -site sewage system(s) may be authorized." 14. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 15. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." DIVISION OF BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT 1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the, State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANTS /FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; EXISTING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. WATER PURVEYOR 1. An approved water system plan will be required. Adequate water supply is available for both domestic and fire protection. SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DISTRICT #1 1. This plat will require the installation of two new fire hydrants. The hydrants shall be designed to deliver 1000 G.P.M. Contact the Spokane Valley Fire Department for the desired location of the new hydrants. CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. See Planning Department condition No. 21 above. SPOKANE COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT " 1. See Planning Department condition No. 22 above. 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 68.1 SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. 1 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinlders or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads • should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction - related activities. 3. All traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e construction waste, etc.) 6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc.) must comply with local, state, and federal rules and regulations. 5/93 HEC Staff Report for PN- 1701 -93 Page 69 r OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: Spokane County Engineers Department n O ml SUBJ: Subdivision Conditions May 6, 1993 Name Pheasant park Estates | � Number PE 170 1 - 93 re: Subdivisions The following "Conditions of Approval'/ for the above reference subdivision are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examinpr Committee for inclusion in the "Planning Report" and "Findings. and Order'/ for the public hearing scheduled May 20, 1993. E 1 The conditional approval of the plat is given by the Countj Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of, record. E 2 That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and cu'rb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Ci il E i ' v Engineer. � E 3 That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 5 Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision pf a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County, Engineer with "As Built" nd a certificate in writing neer w s u plans and g that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. E 6 No construction work is to be performed within the er:.isting or proposed Public Right -of -Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. E12 The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E15 That a statement be placed in the plat dedication providing for future slope easements as required by Spokane County along 8th Avenue. E16 Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to Spokane County standards. E17 That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. E1 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. page E 7 All construction within the existing or proposed Public Right-of -Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements. construction certification, "As Built" plans and rnonumentinq_ the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. Ell That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when ' streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) E23 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, standard for the improvement of all internal streets which are to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of 218 ft. of asphalt. The construction of curbing is also required. E24 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Eighth Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 30 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development and extending_to_Eiar4;er_Rc__'ad. The construction of curbing is also required. E32 The proposed plat shal 1 be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. E33 The County Engineer has examined this development proposal' and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. E90 The applicant should he advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. Special. Conditions: page 3 The applicant shall construct a 30 ft strip paved section on Eighth Avenue from the east property line to Barker Road. A 3p ft. section and curbing shall be constructed along the Eighth Avenue frontage of the development. The trip generation of this development and its urban density will impact on the existing gravel road this warrants the improvement of Eighth Avenue to Barker Road. , OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON March 10, 1993 TO: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: Spokane County Engineers Department F O... SUBJ: Subdivision Conditions, Name Pheasant Park Estates Number Unassigned re: Subgivi The following '/Conditions of Approval'/ for the above referenced subdivision are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design Review Meeting scheduled March 10, 1993" E 1 The conditional approval of the plat is given by the Count' Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of' record. E 2 That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat; � road plans to be prepared under the direction of a license" Professional Civil Engineer. E 3 That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 1 E 5 Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision r of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with '/As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced" E 6 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right -of -Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. E 7 All construction within the existing or proposed Public Right -of -Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements. construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. Ell That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) E12 The applicant should be advised that individual driveway . access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. I E15 That a statement be placed in the plat dedication providing for future slope easements as required by Spokane County along 8th Avenue. E16 Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to Spokane County standards. E17 That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. page E19 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. E23 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two Local Access standard for the improvement of al l internal streets which are to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of OF ft. of asphalt. The construction of curbing is also required. E24 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two local Access standard for the improvement of Eighth Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 30 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development and extending to Barker Read. The construction of curbing is also required. E32 The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth i.n,Spokane County Hoard of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. Special Conditions: page 3 E33 The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or' set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangement's for any necessary work. The applicant shall construct a 30 ft strip paved section on Eighth Avenue from the east property line to Barker Road. A 30 ft. section and curbing shall be constructed along the Eighth Avenue frontage of the development. The trip generation of this development and its urban density will impact on the existing gravel road this warrants the improvement of Eighth Avenue to Barker Road. UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM4Report ViewerCMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB 3PAGE 4 10:32:16 27 JUL 1993 3 3Road# Road Names MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info,,.„,.,,, 3 03.330 MARCUS RD U 16 PAVED 223 3 03.380 MARIGOLD RD U 16 PAVED 22 03.450 BURNS RD U 16 PAVED 223 3 03.540 PROGRESS RD U 16 PAVED 22 3 03.800 SULLIVAN RD 1 3 305867 8TH AV 00.000 BMP of road U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 3 00.240 18CHIRLIY RD I 3 3 c5Sc -�9��1.{-.�� 00.000 BMP of road U 19 GRAVEL 14 3 L'. L._.3Lt1.1_UAt Q b1 KW t o 17 b 1 I um . 1 n 0 3 01.010 HODGES RD U 17 LIGHf BITUM. 18 3 01.' 11? COLONIAL DR U 17 LIGHT BITUM 183 3 01.330 GLENBRODK: ST U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18 3 01.510 HENRY RD 1 3051365 8TH AV (LIBERTY LAKE 00.000 BMP of read R 09 GRAVEL 1 12 3 00.020 MCKINZIE RD (LIBERTY R 09 GRAVEL 123 3 00.150 CARRY RD (LIBERTY LA R 09 GRAVEL 18 3 1 35 Records Processed T 0(4(4(4(4(4(4(400(10(40(40(4(4(4(4(4(4(4(4(4(4(4(4 (4000(40000000(400(4(4/4(4000(400000000/400000(4(4 3List 3 3Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [El] for help) 1 3 CD 02)02) Di) 02)02)2) Pi DVP0Z)000DD 2) DDE) 52)02) D DVZ)VDO0DDVDDVD0VDDVDDDD0000DVDO 02)000002)2)2)2)2)004 3Esc - Exit Enter - Next Page 3 UMMMMMMMMr1MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM4Report Vi. ewerCMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMS 3PAGE 1 10:33:12 27 JUL 1553 3 3Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Lag Info 300433 BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #1 00.000 BMP of road R 09 PAVED 1 403 3 00.020 JACKSON DR R 09 PAVED 40 300434 BARKER CUL -DE -SAC #2 00.000 MONTGOMERY DR R 09 PAVED 403 300435 BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #3 00.000 MONTGOMERY DR R 09 PAVED 40 300230 BARKER RD 00.000 32ND AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM 183 3 VJ1.oVU 71fi AI CCM l-1b1 tii. Lii&'i. 1E� 3 02.140 4TH AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 183 02.270 2ND AVE LI 16 LIGHT BITUM: 18 3 02.400 SPRAGUE AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM: 223 3 02.580 LABERRY DR U 15 PAVED 36 3 02.600 BOW AV U 15 PAVED J 363 3 02.630 APPLEWAY AV U 15 PAVED 36 02.790 ALKI AV U 15 PAVED 363 3 02.860 BROADWAY AVE U 15 PAVED � 36 3 03.1:;'(1 CATALDO RD U 15 PAVED 1 363 3 03.140 BOONE AV U 15 PAVED 36 3 03.150 BOONE AV U 15 PAVED 363 3 03.210 SHARP AV U 15 PAVED 36 T0000000000000000000MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM000000000000000M MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 3List 3 3Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press CFI] for help) 3 CPDPPPPADODDDDAPPPPPPPPPPPDPDPPPPPDDPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPDPPPPDPPDPPPPPPPPPPP4 3Esc Exit Enter -Next Page 2 UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM4Report ViewerCMPIMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB 3PAGE 2 10:34:58 27 JUL 1993 3Road# From MP To_MP. Road Name Jur FFC FedRt PT PW Ln ADT.. 305866 2.030 2.280 8TH AV 5 16 4040 I 22 02 01500 3 305866 2.280 2.470 8TH AV 5 16 4040 I 22 02 01104 305866 2.470 2.540 8TH AV 5 16 4040 1 22 02 01000 3 305866 2.540 2.700 8TH AV 5 16 4040 I 30 02 01000 305866 2.700 2.790 8TH AV 5 16 4040 I 22 02 01000 3 30586E 2.790 3.170 8TH AV - 16 4040 I 22 02 01018 305866 3. 170 3.240 8TH AV 5 16 4040 I 32 02 00900 3 305866 3.240 3.290 8TH AV 5 16 4040 I 22 02 00800 305866 3.290 3.790 8TH AV 5 16 4040 I 22 02 00800 3 305867 .000 .010 8TH AV 5 19 F 20 02 00100 305867 .010 .150 8TH AV 5 19 F 20 02 00100 3 305867 . 150 .160 8TH AV 5 19 F 20 02 00100 305868 .000 .330 8TH AV 5 19 E 14 02 00200 3 C7 , 568 .:::::u .4'0_) HiM_�PO4 ( i.7 P- t- Ulr %i)�9 L»8Fi'J 0)00) 630 81 H AV (LIBERTY LAKE) 5 05 E 12 02 00300 305869 .030 .100 8TH AV (LIBERTY LAKE) 5 09 E 16 02 00300 3 305869 .100 .160 8TH AV (LIBERTY LAKE) 5 09 E 18 02 00300 TMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM> 3List 3 3Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press CF1] for help? CD00D00N DDDDDPHD0P00000000D000000000000000DDII 000000000000000D00000000000P0000004 3Esc - Exit Enter- Next Page 3 UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMIReport ViewerCMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMS 3PAGE 1 10 :36:16 27 JUL 1993 3 3Road# From MP To_MP. Road Name Jur FFC FedRt PT PW Ln ADT.. 300230 .000 1.820 BARKER RD 5 16 4123 F 18 02 00300 3 :I 1 02?0 1.. g2t _ 1_SPJ HP.. Eli RD4 .:r l6 41 ''. - ' iz IMP JLU'30 2.070 2.320 BARKER RD 5 16 4123 F 18 02 02000 3 300x230 2.320 2.510 BARKER RD 5 16 4123 F 22 0 02400 300230 2.510 2.570 BARKER RD 5 16 4123 F 22 02 02500 3 v _ - 2.730 v 3 3 - - _ 5 _ - 300230 L.. Js V BARKER RD 5 15 4123 1 6 02 05000 300230 2.730 2.830 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 05000 3 300 2.830 2.900 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 05000 300 2.900 2.940 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 J 24 02 03921 3 300 2.940 3.050 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 05100 300230 3.050 3.670 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 G4700 300230 3.670 3.750 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 04700 300230 3.750 3.840 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 J 26 02 04700 3 300230 3.840 4.080 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 04700 300230 4.080 4.180 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 04700 3 300230 4.180 4.370 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 04600 300x230 4.370 4.380 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 04600 3 300230 4.380 5.230 BARKER RD 5 15 4123 I 36 02 02700 TMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNNMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM> 3List 3 3Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press CF1] for help) ? CDD000OM000000A00000000002)0000000P000000000000000000000000000000000001)0000000004 3Esc - Exit Enter - Next Page 3 FILE NUMBER(S): PE- 1701 -93 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Preliminary Plat of Pheasant Park Estates with existing Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zoning inside the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone. APPLICANT: Bud Morrison E. 22305 Euclid Spokane, WA. 99027 (509) 928-6427 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, Generally located north of and adjacent to 8th Avenue approximately 320 feet west of Barker Road in the northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is no( required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., May 18, 1993, if they are intended to alter the DNS. ############################## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR By: Phone: Address: DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197 -11 -970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Stacy Bjordahl, Planner I (509) 456 -2205 Spokane County Planning Department West 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 DATE ISSUED: & I% � , 1993 SIGNATURE: � !?� /7 A COMMENTS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELC ME AT THE HEARING. # ### # ## #lit t # # # ## # # # # ##fl## #8f t## # # #tt# ####tilt# #Itt l####################tF#####tf# APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. ## fttf ##ti # # # # # # # #tl# # # #tKt # # # # # # # #### flit##### tt# #Mt # # # #tNt # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA State Department of Health 3. Spokane County Health District 4. Spokane County Division of Engineering 5. Central Valley School District No. 356 6. Fire District No. 1 7. Consolidated Irrigation District 8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 9. Spokane County Parks Department 10. Spokane County Boundary Review Board 11. WA State Department of Transportation 12. Spokane Transit Authority RECEIVED APR 3 0 1g93 NOME OOIINIYENGINEER PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION A. GENERAL INFORMATION: NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: R i rl r`1 n r i s n MAILING ADDRESS: 22- 3 o C E . E i 1 r. I Jr( CITY: O-I-i .<, n .- Ln v-rl PHONE:, 9 Z S - 42 7 (work) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT: TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: S n, uA. c> MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 9 . ( A r ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) un u F ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 19,SS=h -nh tq,c5 =to t4 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED �G �.tn u E STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL -. a, : EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATIONS) (DATE ESTABLISHED) n 2 - EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY I s P 2 r - - FrnP P- -1,. i , yea. r n r . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAIEGORY rhea 1 SCHOOL DISTRICT C.V. FIRE DISTRICT C) i # - 1 WATER PURVEYOR co v snit rkeAr PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings (r Duplexes ( ) Multifamily dwellings ( ) Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: rl P B . LEGAL INFORMATION: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: S E ) /4-- n-F -i-L is E 1 / 4- n R SEQ. IION l9 Sfkkoratisi Con PLANNING DEPARTMENT PART I STATE: sn/ A - ZIP: 9 c/ O 7 7 TOWNSHIP ZS NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: S £ va. (home) PHONE: RANGE 4 - S WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: A 3 R I < - : I DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ('j YES ( ) NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS 5R Avg LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Survey INCL LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVTp,ED @ PRELIMTh YSUEDIVISION ��ff u I--.n : I4-- S. 1S CiLnr_L� Z, lisC elAn t 4-‘D GY�cb.a.cra . 'A I so. 4 -Lee F• 4ao-F Ln+ 13 I3In IC- 2- 53 n'1' C.rorh 4Art. En !iareP4Y:rCrS ' ✓ SRJBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? The. n .pp rn va, t n - r a P re t i m t nc. t- 'p la+ et S TA Ref v14 P. r I WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? NIn11 WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? Zn,>ed rr ea. - B F vw r.-(- pin ., en in Dr.p+ Cr;-1- rlo. AI>nre \r._e' 17, r- IirN) ennn / pI.4 e.,�+t,it., n. re inn eai,.xi_Y An WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? r ?It .1 i v i s iei Y I A ) l 1 1 hn„vr- .o vt .4L. e C. PRELIMINARY STJBDTVTSTON GENERAL INFORMATION: NUMBER OF LOTS: ' 2 o GROSS AREA: 9 . ( n . TYPICAL LOT SIZE: 12 .r,n o ..n FT: PROPOSED NET DENSITY *: 2 . 2. SMALLEST LOT SI7F• ti Go 0 54 , FT. MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 8 S t PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: Individual wells ( ) Public system (5 Private Community System ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public sewer ( ) Community system ( ) Double Plumbing ( ) Dry Sewer ( ) Describe: Septic lank and drainfield ( Other ( ) UTILITY COMPANIES AND /OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL: Electricity: 'Ay W P Sewer: P.rwa r Gas: w w D Water: __ _ t An -! . ,,1 Phone: t) 5 DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL? Yes ( ) No ( IF YES, EXPLAIN: D. PRELIMINARY STJBDIVTSION IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION: LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads ( ) Public roads (t .— Arterial roads ( ) Tract X roads ( ) DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE: ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION: 2 YL2_S IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes ( ) No (9— IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CON 1 EMPLA 1 ED (Parks, schools, etc.)? Yes VI ( ) IF YES, DESCRIBE: A sv�..4 rn.>wts 1)1A 14"%c ,. I >r ht, LYN. 4 p ia ` + * NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND /OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA. g 20 9 -! 60 {- 6 x 11 So SCIBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRI1 1EN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL /FIRE DISTRICT A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DI I T NO. B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) HAVE NO BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER S TEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: / 6 en • OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: e K l/ r' ic 1 71 2 �r slS I two. L (/ y �' - �( �ti:., u r l- ?2 -`(a FIRE DISTRICT L SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A . SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DQ1 WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) AVE NO BEEN MADE. B. REQUIREMENTS /COMMENTS: - Ay Ou, cL247 p Icep CAL 1( (1AJ2 ' be "a2e c,oG"p i ('vex /,doa CO 1 PQ.. D4-041 TS t 10 u 12; 1 WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/11 LE DATE COUNTY ENGINEER • A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE A. COMMENTS: A. COMMENTS: lo. S IGNATURETITLE COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TITLE HEALTH DISTRICT HA VE NOT) SIGNATURE/TITLE SEWER PURVEYOR 11)1 /2/,Z (Sr 5 0— S I G NATURE/IITLE DATE DATE RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BEEN SATISFIED. A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. /-l3 D ATE , SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION ' I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION 1 REQUESTED. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR UNDE?, UPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY A • U /SUB 3 REGUL TIONS AND WS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. re D: IO r • ? . _ DATE: 2/1 A 3 h / r ES S AI 90 9 A 261a,U/.Jd ,r A,0 PHONE: 9'2 (s - /13 Z S ` ` E6 L4,4 &se WA ZIP: i ,. 4� EXPIRES 09/09/93 I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF TIE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH 1S WRI 11EN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. SIGNED: ADDRESS: 22. 30 0744 ,1911 2Z SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE n ^ PIJELiCi • • y o 4r • J e • OT O 4 ` 'is OP W ASS`\ o • "gjgf PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) C st tc4 d4d Gv c. 97027 ) • ) s s: SIGNED AND SWORN TO /AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS 1/4.12n t G � { , 1992, BY K t ', ,so E 1 a • ' J j4s,,'i S / �s�'�� 6 o P:OTAf1Y�N O2 It tit DATE SUBMITTED DATE ACCEPTED: -7 )1 11 / 2 ) TOTAL FEES: I 1i0 7 i I e D <� 0.r ZIP: Z 8 +ti A. t4 C r'r 1 S p A f . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at: S o 1C. c My appoinunent expires: 0/ l / 9R PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) BY: l< RECEIPT 41: ID/ Page 4 of 4 DATE: I 1/43 HONE: / DAT _ DAY OF 2 1 Cilia/Cilaff3T SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 [1] P E - a - (VAC 197 -11 -9601 Section 11.10.230(1) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Environmental Checklist File No. Purpose of Checklist: The State d a Engi esons Policy v (SERA) chapter StateC RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider bah environmental adverse of a proposal before mating decisions. An Environmental Thempurpl em of ct Statement (EIS) must be prepared for alt l proposals andh probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the educeir d ore at. The purpose of this 1 infor oposal,si is to provide e)f anmd tide to help you and the agency identify impacts from your 'proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe sone basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. 1 von m, answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your r own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply . , to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not apply.' Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Sorge questions ask about governmental regulations, such as toning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can.' If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even If you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that .1'1 describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply'. IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part 0). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'appl(cant,' and 'property or site should be read as 'proposal,' 'proposer,' and 'affected geographic area,' respectively. BACKGROUND ^ /Ian / /I S V /� IN �� ' � / - sent / 'lame of proposed project, if applicable: . h 1, L- t OL(I` 2. flame of Applicant: Ri, r-1 }sw4c'sv' r sSnk/� 3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: 2t 71 n.T i . pore -ierl S, o ,. w 99n q 1S - L427 4. Date checklist prepared: I/ 1 as/9 /I 5. Agency requesting checklist: Spn km. ee C..,t ken 4-. ,, < Pie in n :Inca ne +fi t , f. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 1 V V^ S hln O �1La KCj b. Do you own or have options on , land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain 17 vYJ_O e v^ i. Y v' r a .r . k. I f B. list any environmental Information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Nr N 6 Rev.2 /1 /88 1 VC- c ip ("maws n ) r/. 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal If yes, explain. N 0 (WAC 197 -11 -960) Section U.10.230(1) A. BACRCZOOND (continued) Do know whether r / you r [ions • e pending for governmental app rove le of other proposals l• Gl re ct ly affecting the property covered by you r proposal? x( yes, ezy lain. 1. N n • SPOKANE ENVIROMPLICAL ORDINANCE 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, I if known. -kit" ? f " r - r u In 4 -y e. p 2'ro v o _t s 0.N.rl t) a vw W, i 4- . 11. Give a brief, complete description o f your proposal, including the proposed ua e s and the sire of the project and site There arei several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on :his page. Tke re Bc 4L .v. C. O. J's ' cue :,� 1 Lr, ll � c. rr.5 Ie w1.;Iy / 11 1 )� �O Tea n 'nf'l t trs r ."a,.a nA ( l y ` hex Vr I` t 1 12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, Lsluding a scree[ address, if any, and section. township and range, if known. If • proposal would occur over a range -of arcs provide the range o r boundaries of the sitefs). Provide • legal description, site plan, vicinity map. and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required co duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. a t' 4- L ..-l-s 14- s. iC I Le) r, t9 nFc dn trblvs. /add. I-0 G - ervaee°.r -1--k . i S c‘,1-3"t Wcs± o� Ra.r e. R ed.ov. 15 1-1-f tk. 4- P. S F /4- 23F . ea kJ t /l+. o f Se^.c. t9 1. EAR:l1 a. General description of the site (circle one). IL other: 1). Does the proposed action Ile within the Aquifer Sensitive Area City of Spokane' (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for . ound•ries). To BE C010'IP'ED BT APPLICANT B. EI!VIR0 orurAL E xer:s b. That is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent elope)' ,al %y Nn hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, c. 'That general types of molls are found on the elite (for example, clay, saod,(gravel)peat, muck)' If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d Ire there surface Indications or history of unstable of le in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 2 The General Sever Se rvlc (S S A 25;i4- he 'S ii- he Priority Sever Service Area' The Evaluation For Agency Use Only A (WAC 197 -11 -9601 Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS(continued) e. f. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces after project construc- tion (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 28. 1 % I In c-... . ree�-S f RI, IrLtlne J h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any rrite, nr.-.,o,., r,ev - l >t will 1, ,. o l,w ,r P_nl •,7r*, 1 1 II t i � 1\l) 4-i, S +Ne.r.TL a ..r& ? ("fin Yn 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and g give approximate quantites if known. 11 {Jr>,4 �a�C �"11,�T n.t rt he'nYy e'.r NT r.ws.sslnNS cti nNS �f1 1cTY'1'X' - , - ;o w iv -rro Sr'r� $„11Tn VIA" (motI rw.l iSlov, - t J Pt b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. 140 NI C c- Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 1`n N ) WI I t Inn sa .. -t ■ ,> tins 1 1, 0.' .-Lo v, P • .-,.a I r fl n r-I 5 nv- t 2 .. Q J,... Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N Proposed measures to recuce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any n• IL rnc.r4 + IAJ1 s- ?-r{ � t.) N In Y r.r'll 'e. 3. WATER a. Surface. (11 Is there any surface water body on or in the Immediate vicinity of the site Including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)'' If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river It flows into. Ain tin 3 ■ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 203 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Evaluation For Agency Use Only rl (AA ( Eurcc,( act, v' 1-13 i - V; v1 ✓L Go,) t ✓i Comp !iavicc W/ SL,tPGA Yt'r.\tA ti pi tit v') n aj (.t-vi Sivuctier) (JAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRON?aNIAL ELDaFrS (continued) Urn N 1^ tIn 11 l n SPOKANE ENVIRONMLtrrAL ORDINANCE (3) Estimate the amount of (ill and dredge material that v uld be placed in or removed from the surface water o wetlands,and indicate the area of the site o that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill materiel. ( 4 ) Will the proposal require surface rarer withdrawals or diversions? Give • v e eral de.crip- [ton, purpose, end approximate quantities, if known. (5) Does the proposal lie within a loo -year flood plain' If so, note location on the site plan M n (5) Does the proposal involve any discharge. of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: (1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will voter be discharged to groundwater' Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general sire of the system. the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or the number of per.on. the ryrtem(s) are expected to en r le tin- it 1 inn v e. 1L. n, nlal SA_r4 r. -1- n._.1.t i.;11 hP (2) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of •nit•ry wiatq initialled for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (Includes system. such ae those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system. the amount of material to be disposed of through the synem and the type. of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). ) n la Pray..els u L rlvytUre c, twill l bit il., t�lr>4 kn r. �.v— r a to IA. 4r �Wnw acv e c t• rtrsv r.a,n,ayS n rr�� o .� [[ I a• PS.: v. / r .1iR i yq::. TI - F7 ki : L. .r ± n (4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground o r underground storage tanks? if so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? Evaluation For Agency Use Only (WAC 197-11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMHP[AL ELn41CS (c ontlnued) (5) What protective measures vill be taken to Insure chat leaks or spills of any chemicals stored o used on mite will not be alloyed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemical. out of disposal systems described in )b(2) and )b( 3)' f ILI K U/v..... c. Mater Runoff (including storm ...ter): (1) Describe the • urce of r noff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal if any (include quanticte•, if known). Where will this wa ter floe? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. a. v.. ,sae a- ter r rs Fv n F A1- rr.r. o.. c1 rl r,vr Lt (1.1 4 I v. -/- r. 2- e') on.s.-1 a .rPA re .� 1 1 tle)* -rIn L4 1 .1 41+0 n4 Le r 1s Is5A.4r.rt ( e) 'will any chemicals be stored, ndter or used on for site in a location where or surf, will drain to te anr(e or groundwater or to • story waxer disposal eel sysystem dLChsr4tn rging to surface or groundwater' SPOT-ME ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (3) Could waste materials enter ground or surf ice waters? If so, generally describe. ) oeO a-� w n�r.r.n 1c �...n... n � . -1-n. .-J -o 1 ors e SN C.P. O V' 11.. ctrl V r es ed Y C r•_e. r{ .^es_4G10.. e oa� -r d. Proposed 'senores to reduce or an ti u ontrol surface, ground, d r noff eater lopec, i any (If t the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on emplana t ton. r relating to facilities concerning Section. 36(4), )6(5), and )c(2) of this checkli•t): .1 nA y 2 pntn.-1� 1_ .1t / I he- Snaa•_ri• w g re, hS 4-n -F 14. r 1r 1. 4.c -l-r r5 Fm r-cOr' G P H4 err! nC 3 'e n 1 1 I rl 4 PLANT a. Checl or circle type of vegatation found on the a ice - 49 " --- dec Iduous tree: alder, maple, semen, other. evergreen tree: fir. cedar, pine. ocher shrubs. rare. pasture crop or grain wet soil plants, cattail. buttercup, bull rue h, skunk cabbage, other. water plane. water 11.11y, eelgrasa, airfoil, other. other types of vegetation. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered' j kr V VT, U es_v'b `j 1 S T0A.n5 4-1wa re)r , rlt , 1 - Ed -6 4-i vv.p - L1 . r .S r 1.,T11 l)r rr wAnYe -d ec4-5 ., i.. ,-1 h url.(; en c ' List threatened or endangered specie. known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping. e of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation T ea Sur, nat... 1.. r on the site, if any- t, w... -L,.., „ �, I r l ))P 17.. . a gr.n rl IPAl11[.rl to.11 P.r'lv n.. 1. r v. :F n. l.lr Pln..AS ,...I 1 1. r r 1)S-cL f . 5 Evaluation For Agency Use Only 'I (WAC 197 -11 -9601 Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued( ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: awk heron, eagl ,(S ongblyis) other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: other: List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. .L1,n Id ✓_ c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wi Idlife, If any: ham F' 5. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the the completed project's energy needs' Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufac- turing, etc. AlI err J-L. 1 cs.�nv P_ is a ()r t) to. I ot's 41 . -✓--„� n ro .A-4 [Y N r4 I I C IA t 1 in. a.. t) J b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties' If so, - generally describe. it 'r) c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal' List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: 1)1..LtcK1 R) W AI ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal' If so, describe. rT (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. SPOKANE ' ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE 6 Evaluation For Agency Use Only (WAC 191 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. LNVIRORMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Ain AIi (3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: hint-1 F d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which' N ,Jn SPOKANE P.NVIRON`CNIAL ORDINANCE ENVIROM1811:AL HEALTH (continued) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control :.uonmenul hull. hazards, if any: . 1 . 1 0 F Noise: (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffle, equipment, oper•tion, other? (2) That types and levels of noise would be created by or of laced with the project on a short -text or a long -term basis (for example: Graff it, cnnatruction, opeution, other)' Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 11 11 DI 7Y V . , a rem), k Ito j b. .+t� o f r nit. tiTY"I1GT krl In re. bolA }I l )i e. t.tn, h � e d rl �n ! v (fi ei gefN� e v. " hr, c lta r. c.rr�a"4- e_r-1 . �' V ✓l i �" Ant( d Nv e ° i '1 6 '1 — 8. LA'n0 AND SHOP.ELIIIE USE 1 1 1 a. What 1s the current use of the site and ad lea t� nt properties' 1 5 E" re- n v.. T A r c,4 r "4-L e_ n t S+ 1 5 vac.a.v•+ I vtcJ utl. l v.5 aa{ J atE -{- n.• the site been axed for agriculture' If so, describe. Y es ht. v, -I— Year rt 1 ri vra.v"S Describe any structures on the site H MO SP C4.4 Irn p_e Lai ∎ - •4 - <e. w.e r>rt-I ht, ft{1/71 cS e. 1J1 Ls the current zoning clewt(Seatlon of the site? I) IZ — - 3. tr f What 1. the current conprehenetve plan designation of the site' R. B.A LI g. If applicable, whet is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N A h. nu any part Of the site been claaelf led a an enxi ro ®entelly sensitive" area. If so, specify. 1 Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project) '--'T rsrnx t 70 pen? e._ 7 'iv a L! to 8V1 � d a ce* k 5r4 0-s (WAG 197 -11 -960) Section 1.1.10. 230(1) 6. ENVIROMRNrAL ELLHENrS (continued) J. Ailip vt ye ri l l Fns rtyn 1- U., -n.lc l., 4-1, a Approximately how any people would the completed project di •p lace' (7 Proposed .measures to avoid or reduce displacement impact•, if any I4rn -1 F' r- x 4- n .ur-nw pn rn xe it- el. -l- IA r r.X1 5411A c \nmi, r. • i'n4 - n r &e ar t e- SPOKANE ENVIRO:Pfl NTAL ORDINANCE 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plane, if any: 17 In .• PI 7• p � 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any' Indicate whether high -, middle -, or 1ov income housing. - 2I 1 =1 /OfL Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated' Indicate whether high -, middle - , or low- income housing. 1.1014 E Proposed yea Bursa to reduce or control hou•ing Imp•t', if any: Slnti 1= 10. AESTHETICS a. Whet is the tallest height of any proposed . ucture('), not including antenna' What is the principal exterior building m•teri•l(.) proposed? R 1..n ne1, b :mac views in the immediate vicin icy would be altered or obstructed? IJhL F • c. Proposed measurer to reduce or control aesthetic Impacts , if any: l7 r A( e ' !) C 1ln 5 11. LICIIT AND GLARE a. What type of ' light or glare will the proposal produce? 'mar time of day would it mainly occur' ,s4rtr -T 5 uovrc.L �i L-♦-c a v„1 ;e. dC r- is I ei J < I. •v i)h n in e &RV r_1(1:1AC 1 n1, en y b. Could light or glare (too the finished project be • safety hazard or inter( ere with views' _ 111) c What existing of - ' ire sources of light or glare may effect your proposal' Lin 11 F_ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: �tJ .nation For Agency Use Only J • (VAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.210(1) B. ENVIRONNIATAL ELEIINTS (cootieued) SPOKANE ENVIRONNENIAL ORDINANCE 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are In the Immediate vicinity? Link( F Would the proposed project displace any existing r creational uses? If so, describe. LIP c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any • tin UP: Is site currently served by public transit nearest transit stop? t`(rh Approxi mei,4I I/ i. nL; [et .I-a How many parking spaces would the completed project have? 0.10114' gR II i{-1, n .r.e I . 1 a N �. c Proposed m e asures to reduce or control imp•cts on recreation, including recreational opportuni- ties to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A � pnv-k. I'Til 1 br - ever +ke Pia-+ pre,l,vr4. "Fe, Ys rrc rn A -1,- l tJ Vs. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION • a. Are there any places or objects hated o n or proposed for national, state or local preserva- tion registers known to be on or next co the site? If so, gene•lly describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological, scfenttflc or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. _1\l tn.( F 14. TrANSPORTATION a Identify public streets and htghvaye • rving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show -on site plans, if any. , s_4 c 1c, rv'F - F n R T µ nv P_ . 1 ... .j. 3n_r'L e r t2 rt.. , jinn to 16 • e R.d }-n .4-Lto 1C + ,e,h0r.L. k,4-L b)7 t. let esti -l-n s0VCI 0LIP • f not, what is the •pproxlnate distance to the -LI et. L1a -.1-k. Nov many would the project elioiutel d'fly is Ott . hR K P d Will pnr - rrl require any new rude or streets, or improvements to existing roads or s treets not including dri vevays' If so, generally describe (ind re whether public or private). A VI es,a, c v.-1-<. a, la,1( hr. ja I T i i-LP ` ?ex.+ 17I P{' Kt". I _ vv. e „_...-,„-„,....- e „_...-,„-„,....- v.'T` . m 1 5-� V..0 K.e4 s - . J e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) eater, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describes 9 Evaluation For Agency Dee Only ow ,tdl RDA' c , Canbit pc/M-6147i i FS i 1) (VAC 191 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) D. ENVIRONMENTAL ELOffATS (continued) g. Proposed measures to reduce or ontrol transportation impacts, if any: hips/ 5= D k/ b m 1 w We.....n. -�� - i(70 .5 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. 'Would the project result in an Increased need for public services (for example, fire protection, police protection, health care, school., other)' If • , generally describe. b. Proposed measures co reduce or control direct impacts on public services, 1' any IJ n ni r; 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site' C. SIGNATURE Proponent. Phone: A. Now many vehicular tripe per day voud be generated by the,Soppleted project? If known, indicate when peak would occur. b1y,_(I i,.TLt,ww, Z 7 (') ' T iL" ( „--t I JK.tinW61 Q o., rr C b ( tun_ . 6In (te lcphohe unitary •,'er, septic system, other. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the aarvice and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. F lrr - J_v - ;e•. 4rdrr{.i,vCel Date: 1 / 2 9 .3 (Signature) 97,8 -64- 2.7 Person completing form Phone: 97.- A - 1 3 2. "L FOR STAY? USE ONLY Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: SPOKANE ENVIRON'RNTAL ORDINANCE (electricity) %7IJAA eit Ai 1 0 natural gas I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the beat of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful Lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determlnatlon.of nonsigniflcance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. Proponent (31) el h./ Or r 1 Sri Ln (Please Print or Type) Address: 2,Z3o s E Ev cal .rl sgokn N nrA 9q 2-7 00/AF-1 F LIEL_T /SfvnaSnyt Fnttheeve, Based on this staff review of the environmental che'k and other pertinent information, the staff: Date. Evaluation For Agency Use Only ✓wools C va (16y v eV weasu (es - / 7. o 9 3 Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse Lm pact. and recommends a determination of nonsi gnifice nce. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental Impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated deter- mination of nom ignlficance with condition. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance. PILING YBE - II5.00 S P 0 K A NT F TO: C O L1 N TI..t PLANNING DEPARTMENT • WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Bill Wedlake, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Ted Trepanier, Department of Transportation Connie Brady, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Central Valley School District No. 356 Consolidated Irrigation District Fire District No. 1 FROM: Paul F. Jensen, Senior Planner DATE: March 5, 1993 • RE: Preliminary Plat of Pheasant Park Estates with existing Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR -3.5) zoning; Applicant: Bud Morrison APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING MARCH 10. 1993 AT 1;15 COUNTY PLANNING HEARING ROOM Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND I DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Stacy Bjordahl for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Stacy Bjordahl of the Planning Department at 456 -2205. c: Bud Morrison, E. 22305 Euclid, Spokane, WA. 99027 Mike Phillips, N. 909 Argonne, Spokane, WA. 99212 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan WEST1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456 -2205 RECEIVED MAR : 3 5 1993 .a%F A CGtilifY ERGIREER March 10, 1993 @1:15 Pheasant Park Estates /Bud Morrison Generally located north of and adjacent to 8th Avenue approximately 320 feet west of Barker Road in Section 19, Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban within the Priority Sewer Service Area 1 (PSSA) EXISTING ZONING: Existing Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zoning. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Twenty -two (22) lot subdivision for one single family residence and 21 new single family residences and one unbuildable lot for a park, within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay i zone. PARCEL NUMBER: 19551 -0637, 19551 -0619. SITE SIZE: Approximately 10 acres. APPLICANT: Bud Morrison E. 22305 Euclid Spokane, WA. 99027 (509) 928 -6427 AGENT: Mike Phillips N. 909 Argonne Spokane, WA. 99212 (509) 926-1322 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Stacy Bjordahl PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION a�'I Irani IfSlrir PLANNING DEPARTMENT PART I A. GENERAL INFORMATION: NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: R. - M r r r i c n n MAILING ADDRESS: 22 3 o •S' E - t r I i A CITY: 0 4 - i c n - r.L r ,r, STATE: v./A. ZIP: qqn? 7 PHONE: 92.8 - 4,4.27 (work) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT'TO SERVE, AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: S 2,u P • PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: ' CITY: STATE: ZIP: PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 9 . r ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) I.Je ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT /PROPOSAL tgss'r -nh37 t4,rF1 -At,t9 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED t,tn STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL 4 r $ E— EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) n 2 - 3 . K' EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY I t Ir a .•.s - 4. C� prIspar� , ti vn r e, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY t Nrbn .vim SCHOOL DISTRICT C.V. FIRE DISTRICT n # 1 WATER PURVEYOR Co n so I; c'lq-Cr rl PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings ( Duplexes ( ) Multifamily dwellings ( ) Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: B . LEGAL TNFORMATTON: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SECTION tq S 8 l /G. n - L I. r°_ M E I/ 4 n F TOWNSHIP z.S' RANGE 4- S NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: S A. WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: G, 3 St 1 DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ('j YES () NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS SR= - Av e. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. e. Lnt s t¢ £ t i-nr tc. Z$ c4 ce,rlhti,, inn "I en n ref , r,a_c.r c- 5 I so 4-Le E 1Q. Lev ' -1 Ex oe-P p� filer,IC - 2.51 nfC' fly- b iti A, -Irl. +n (wepmc , SUBDIVISION APPLICATION IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? Page 2 of 4 WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Th P, n P P v ivn l err a P rp.l i m i nn v T Fla+ n -(— WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? !,I n tt F_ WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? Zn ned O2 ^L... wire r 4-s PIn. Htin rDr.p +. cr..; 4.e.ri Arrrnve.d. Pre •rnINncy P1a4 -4rl.) t inn 'o-coa -Y WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? r'.... s.•hA.iviSic... I,t;l 17 /we.. a. I�nrt o.w 11., P i1 r." P.r•ty G I C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION GENERAL INFORMATION:, NUMBER OF LOTS: 2, 0 GROSS AREA: 9 . [ o c_ . TYPICAL LOT SIZE: _i 7 c nn n to F r, PROPOSED NET DENSITY*: 2. SMALLEST LOT SIZE' .� I teo in 50 . FT. MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 8 S I PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: Individual wells ( ) Public system ( Private Community System ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public sewer ( ) Community system ( ) Double Plumbing ( ) Dry Sewer ( ) Describe: D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION: LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads ( ) Public roads (9 Arterial roads ( ) Tract X roads ( ) DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE: Septic tank and drainfield ( Other ( ) UTILITY COMPANIES AND /OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL: Electricity: w W P Sewer. Pri\ea„ r Gas: va w • Water. Covt nnf t ,to_+,. 4 Phone: t 1 s lntl -.c, T DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL? Yes ( ) No ( IF YES, EXPLAIN: ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION: 2 Y1 a IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes () No ( IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.)? Yes ( ( ) IF YES, DESCRIBE: A sr...oi l r� vt.v . t N l { �r l l lw h, sit 4 - Lt"... 4L cam. p 14.4• * NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND /OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA. 26o „o SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTIO 1 is NO. / B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS 4- (HAVE) 4 HAVE NO BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER S M AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: �© ren ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. �1 D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: (KSI 4/ / 2 -I-""vlr_ LpQ..a4 Soak ,. _t)ade, e_ . �G.` __,,,,0,...2,_ T t-- a?-qt FIRE DISTRICT, ; , I SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE A. COMMENTS: PART II FIRE MARSHALL /FIRE DISTRICT WATER PURVEYOR A . SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR D! TIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) Y 4 ' AVE NO BEEN MADE. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: tea, i ✓ad a/A7n- P 11% (AL l( 114/e 'to be 'fl 2804 Ja3 / Fcr, ren �� — ,(//lti 4h //2-7/7z WATER DISTRICT " SIGNAI URE/II E DATE COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. 4 HEALTH DISTRICT ■ +60 r ?0x71 ' 2// �9 DATE COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TITLE SEWER PURVEYOR DATE A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE .,SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION I REQUESTED. TI-EE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPER VISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING /SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. NOTARY SEAL SIGNED: DATE SUBMIT TED: ADDRESS: STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. SIGNED: C.. 914 - ^ DATE: / /Z S / HONE: 223o4 4'., €.4.412- . zIP: 01 CMC4 - 4i 02 ` 2 7 A J SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE • ADDRESS: 4T7.c_? /j t(J4 j4 L $ ) ss: • DATE ACCEPTED: BY TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT N: DATE: PHONE: ZIP: / 2 T r/1 DA SIGNED AND SWORN TO /AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF , 1992, BY Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at My appointment expires: „' PART V • (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) !h;`. / 0 ` /`^!) ` D..:tiC Ja t o "w14'; 9 I on DOLLAR FOR. \ ` y ` / 14' �j!� !CFa`,. f .� r 7NNN?ACCODN T'1�7Yrii ..y, r�J 'I•Y,'�k?�+:; HOW) PAID} r.r}i^ril��r'j}}�r3 :1'.Y>•Y ;Y0401 BEGINNING, V4,Si: ✓R° 'CASH;.}t .P c {i:rl ttiUl Y {4.'1}jt �f'1�'r'. {S"'J'{•)tC Qr;V BALANCED . r.. ' I A /'1,'. . " ^'•�,r, l - �' 7 4 .- 3 41 :. ! . -. a : ice M �. 9B- 57411251 •I AMOUNT 1 {'t 1i, i••. - PAID. t;!' �� xiAOEwuSA { +BAUINCE;'.3 io wu.anwv.',aeo.r. � DUE ". ltv ;r7 U M: B E R DAiF ., — er -3 RECEIPT -19.2 &'74" RECEIVED FROM Y lita i `a `"^'" \- ddre 1 ' ?22305.— ,r «. MORRISON CATTLE ;.INC :1/47, ; ' • • 'EAST 22305'EUCLID T 926 -6427t 7 OTIS ORCHARDS, WA 99027 •.' ROCkIO OB,ca • P 0. Box 79, RocxbN, WA 99030 iOb-U 1:.• -11 V v13'> CHEC4 MONEYr ORDER hr.) ML1 1-ITi -C eY,TT4C.. —.L 1/40" 3417 4 00034L70 9.1 :L251,0574LI: LOOS 2 L97870 PE- 1701 -93 wuw. srr¢[ r.u„ so is x Dmo, 28 CC89 600:110:1 GI; CPIS RNPLA11EO SITE DM: VICINITY MAP :6 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION RDAARKS PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PHEASANT PARK ESTATES A PLAT IN A PORTION OF TIIE NE I/4 OF SEC.19, T25N, R45 EN'M SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON h FLARENCE L SIMVSON ENGINEERS, INC. N 909 ARGONNE ROAO PH 926 -1022 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 9921? o.... „. �...... a L. _,..,. ....rn.. 1 I 1 5 2 5 n1 3..`a. C. 1 Z 1. 1 0 1 ro • CC tr N, °:x:2111 }S8' IL 9 0 4 0 ft z G 1 • 5 GREENACRES ELEM e SEPT '7E 4 2. N I - /c' 5 . 1 1 • 1 =R er . '*J I _d_ 205 — s_ — t? - 075 - VS - Pheasant Park states BLOC.' 25 cwem Acert:�, TO (cccn.cass UNPLA TIED 3 ON- BUILDABLE LOT 12 PARK DVf ED EY HDVE O \SNERS ASSOC!. TiON 51 .. VICINITY MAP PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .[v.. e. ,44.c n en� n nw .,p 35 • swa• 5'S[ DATA T >. )...1-1 .441E04 PRE LIMIN.4RY PLAT OF PHEASANT PARK ESTATES A PLOT IN A PORTION OF IRE NE I/4 OF SFC.19, T25N, R45 EH ".Y SPOA'4NE COUNTY, NASJIIA'GTON Cdtmpsz ingmters, Int ca: w2*.rn5 • , ...x,: 4 5 . - ..es n. • St.