ZE-62-83s.�
AGENDA, AUGUST 2, 1984 TELEPHONE NO.: 456 -2205
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260
'ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COM-
MITTEE WILL RECESS FROM 12:00 NOON TO 1:30 P.M. FOR LUNCH AT A PLACE TO BE ANNOUNCED. ITEMS
NOT HEARD PRIOR TO THE 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE DATE
AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE.
9:00 A.M.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
1. ZE -62 -83 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN
(Generally located E i�t of and adjacent to Farr Road,
approximately 400 feet north of Fourth Avenue in
Section 20- 25 -44.1
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Proposed Use: 62 -Unit Apartment Complex
Site Size: Approximately 2.96 Acres
(Approximately 129,000 Square Feet)
Applicant: JOHN R. SCOTT
c/o John T. Sweitzer
Rothrock- Carstens Company
East 715 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA 99202
2. ZE -46 -84 RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL
(Generally located west of and adjacent to Park Road, south
of and adjacent to Interstate 90, and north of and adjacent
to Cataldo Avenue in Section 13- 25 -43.)
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Proposed Use: Warehouse and Office Facility
Site Size: Approximately 231 Acres
(Approximately 100,750 Square Feet)
Applicant: GOLDEN ACRES PARTNERSHIP
c/o John T. Sweitzer
East 715 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA 99202
(continued)
rs
NIXON
e'1
A l ti•.♦ Sl
/991
F0V RTH
. COUNT'
SPOKANE COUNTY CCU RT MOUSE
August 14, 1984
Gentlemen:
Gary Kennaly
Engineer's Office
I _INTEROFFICE MAIL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456 -2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
TO: Board of Spokane County Commissioners
FROM: Steve P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of August 2, 1984.
RECEIVED
AUG 21 1984
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
On August 2, 1984, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. to con-
sider four new zone reclassification applications and one change of conditions
application. Members present: Mr. Kennedy, Chairman; Mrs. Myers, and Mr. Skalstad.
Mrs. Myers excused herself from hearing the following items due to appearance of
fairness: ZE- 62 -83, ZE- 46 -84, and ZE- 158A -79.
Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee.
If not appealed, these decisions will become final on August 20, 1984. All Find-
ings and Order for this hearing were signed on August 9, 1984.
1) ZE-62-83,7Aqricultural Suburban to Multiple Family Suburban: Scott
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to Farr Road, approxi-
mately 400 feet north of Fourth Avenue in Section 20- 25 -44.
Proposal: 62 -Unit Apartment Complex
Action: Approval. (Vote: 2 - 0)
2) ZE- 46 -84, Residential Manufactured Home to Restricted Industrial: Golden
Acres Partnership
Location: Generally located west of and adjacent to Park Road, south of
and adjacent to Interstate 90, and north of and adjacent to
Cataldo Avenue in Section 13- 25 -43.
Proposal: Warehouse and Office Facility
Action: Approval. (Vote: 2 - 0)
(continued)
Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of August 2, 1984 (continued)
3) ZE- 158A -79, Change of Conditions in the Multiple Family Suburban Zone: Calistro
Location: Generally located west of and adjacent to Pines Road, approxi-
mately 1,300 feet south of Trent Road in Section 9- 25 -44.
Proposal: To delete condition requiring condominium development only, and
also to review a site development plan for a two -phase 172 -Unit
Apartment Complex.
,. Action ; Denial. (Vote: 2 - 0)
The Hearing Examiner Committee felt that the approval in 1979
for an 80 -Unit Condominium project was realistic in light of
the adjacent single family residential development to the west
and south of the proposed project; that the present sewering
facilities are not adequate for the amount of density proposed;
and that the increased density would not be appropriate in the
near proximity to a school and adjacent single family residences.
4) ZE- 48 -84, Agricultural to Local Business: American West Realty
Location: Generally located at the southeast corner of Upriver Drive and
Argonne Road in Section 5- 25 -44.
Proposal: Local Service, Convenience Store, and Day Care.
Action: Denial. (Vote: 3 - 0)
The Hearing Examiner Committee felt there is sufficient land
in the area already zoned Local Business and approved for
neighborhood commercial services and currently remains un-
developed.
5) ZN- 53 -84, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office: Linnett
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to the Newport Highway
(PSH #6), approximately one -half mile northeasterly of the
intersection of the Newport Highway with Center Road and
approximately one -half mile southwesterly of the intersection
of the Newport Highway with Mt. Spokane Park Drive in
Section 3- 26 -43.
Proposal: Office Building.
Action: Denial. (Vote: 3 - 0)
The Washington State Department of Transportation indicated
a preference that the site not be allowed access to the Newport
Highway, and the existing access to the Highway is at a point
on the highway curve that could cause sight distance conflicts
with high speed traffic. It was also noted that the proposal
does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan's concept of 'fill -
in0 development and encourages further strip development.
Testimony also indicated that public water may not be readily
available to the proposal.
If further information is desired, contact the Planning Department's office.
SPH:cnrw
3
3PO•APt COUNT CCuRT HOUSE
August 14, 1984
Gentlemen:
5`I -70
tikAi
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456 -2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260'
TO: Board of Spokane County Commissioners
FROM: Steve P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator '
SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of August 2, 1984.
On August 2, 1984, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. to con-
sider four new zone reclassification applications and one change of conditions
application. Members present: Mr.'Kennedy, Chairman; Mrs. Myers, and Mr. Skalstad.
Mrs. Myers excused herself from hearing the following items due to appearance of
fairness: ZE- 62 -83, ZE- 46 -84, and ZE- 158A -79.
Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee.
If not appealed, these decisions will become final on August 20, 1984. All Find-
ings and Order for this hearing were signed on August 9, 1984.
1) I ZE -62 -831 Agricultural Suburban to Multiple Family Suburban: Scott
Location: . Generally located east of and adjacent to Farr Road, approxi-
mately 400 feet north of Fourth Avenue in Section 20- 25 -44.
Proposal: 62 -Unit Apartment Complex
Action: Approval. (Vote: 2 - 0)
2) ZE- 46 -84, Residential Manufactured Home to Restricted Industrial: Golden
Acres Partnership
Location: Generally located west of and adjacent to Park Road, south of
and adjacent to Interstate 90, and north of and adjacent to
Cataldo Avenue in Section 13- 25 -43.
Proposal: Warehouse and Office Facility
Action: Approval. (Vote: 2 - 0)
(continued)
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on
August 2, 1984, and the members of the Committee present being
Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman, and Richard L. Skalstad. Mrs. Myers excused
herself from hearing this item in consideration of appearance of fairness.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, John R. Scott, is requesting approval of a zone
reclassification, File No. ZE- 62 -83, Agricultural Suburban to Multiple
Family Suburban, for the purpose of developing a 62 -Unit Apartment
Complex.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -62 -83
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, abandoned
railroad right of way (sewer trunk line), and vacant.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
Urban development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application
is Agricultural Suburban.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy
Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the
Declaration of Non - Significance.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda
Item have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses
within the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have
substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and
accordingly, the proposed rezone is justified.
8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed approval of the proposed
use.
10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in
harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the
Hearing Examiner Committee:
a) That the proposed area is in transition, and the higher density
project can comply with the "fill -in" development and the "Bonus
Density" concept to be consistent with the guildelines of the
Comprehensive Plan.
b) That special consideration be given in the design of the project
for tenant parking and guest parking to preserve the residential
character adjacent to the property.
2
D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -62 -83
(All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be
binding on the "Applicant ", which term shall include the owner or owners
of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.)
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. That a 6' sight obscuring fence or dense landscaping be provided
along the east and south property lines prior to release of
Occupancy Permits.
2. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior
lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of
such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination
to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties).
3. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access
points is not obscured or impaired.
4. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall
be maintained.
5. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning
Department review and approval prior to issuance of building
permits.
6. All current standards of the Multiple Family Suburban Zone, as
amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site.
7. That the project is subject to Section 4.16A.050, the Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal, spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
3
b) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued)
9. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer,
shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting
Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits.
10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file
appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is
waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners'
Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982.
11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental
Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has
been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the
official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's likely
significant adverse impacts to the physical environment; a
finding is hereby made that no probable significant adverse
impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a
result of the project; and a final declaration of
non - significance is hereby to be issued.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit:
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -62 -83
1. Applicants shall dedicate up to 10 -feet along Farr Road as
required, for right -of -way prior to any use of the property.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the Spokane County Engineer.
3. Applicant shall improve Farr Road in a manner consistent with
Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving
width Collector Arterial Standard.
4. Prior to issuance of building permit applicant shall demonstrate
that adequate sight distance exists at the location of the
proposed driveway intersection along Farr Road.
5. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit on the property.
4
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -62 -83
6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any
building permit on the property.
7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied
or traveled by vehicles.
8. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
10. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
Construction, and other applicable county standards and or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County
Commissioners'Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418,
the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized.
This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules
and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval
and issuance of permits by the Health District.
5
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -62 -83
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (continued)
2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to
future area -wide collections sytems.
5 Plans and specifications for the double plumbing are to be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to
application for a septic tank permit.
6. As information, the Valley interceptor located immediately north
of this proposal should be completed shortly after
January 1, 1985. A connection may be allowed under certain
circumstances at interceptor manholes.
7. That the project shall hook up to the sewer as soon as possible
upon its availability.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan
shallbe approved by the County Engineer and the Health District
prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project.
2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on -site sewage
system may be authorized.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
6
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (continued)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -62 -83
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when
approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of
Social & Health Services.
6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
7. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prohibited.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1. The site is located in Fire District #1.
2. The proposed site plan will require some revisions to provide
for fire department access to all structures.
3. The required fire flow for this proposed project is 5,500
G.P.M. Each hydrant shall be capable of flowing 1,500 G.P.M. at
20 P.S.I. residual when any two (2) hydrants are flowing
simultaneously.
4. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be
installed prior to construction. These hydrants shall be placed
so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175'
from the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest outlet of the
hydrant shall be no less than 18" above grade. A water plan
showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per minute for
each fire hydrant) and meeting the requirements in Chapter 10.04
of the Uniform Fire Code is required prior to construction of
the water service.
5. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and
existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible
and legible from the street or road fronting their property.
Said numbers shall contrast with their background.
6. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible
construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Co., and they will
supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
7
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -62 -83
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
The proponent should be made aware of the following:
1. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during
demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled.
This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or
suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul
roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from
all other construction related activities.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or
spills occur on paved surfaces measures must be taken
immediately to clean these surfaces.
3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking area, access
roads) must be paved and kept clean.
4. It has been determined that fireplaces and wood stoves are a
significant source of suspended particulates. The small
particles (= 10 microns) are respirable and can have an adverse
effect upon the health of the public. We strongly urge that if
wood stoves /fireplaces are used that burning be done as
efficiently as possible. All wood should be seasoned and stored
in a dry place. During periods of poor ventilation or elevated
air pollution levels we request that use of wood stoves and
fireplaces be discontinued.
5. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the
construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using
the site following completion of the project and from occupants
of the proposed project.
6. All air pollution regulations must be met.
h) STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. No Comment.
8
E. ORDER
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -62 -83
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the application of John R. Scott, for a zone reclassification as
described in the application should be APPROVED.
Date:
Motion by: Skalstad Seconded by: Kennedy
Vote: Skalstad - Aye
Kennedy - Aye
ATTEST:
APPROVE to the MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN ZONE - ( 2 - 0 )
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
/
By STEVE P. HOROBIOWSKI
Zoning Administrator
6 -7 I / e%(A /
, J
9
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE
FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE
Chairman — )
i "
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Date: July 1, 1983 Application No: ZE - -
Name of Applicant: John R. Scott
Street Address of Applicant: c/o Rothrock, Carstens Co., 715 E. Sprague Ave.
City: Spokane State: WA Zip Code: 99202 Tele. No. 747 -6160
Name of Property Owner(s): John R. Scott
Authorized Agent representing Owner
(if other than owner): John T. Sweitzer - Rothrock, Carstens Co.
Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural Suburban
Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 1968 Res #31 -
Existing • Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Zone Classification: MFS Multiple Family Suburban
Proposed Use of Property: Apartment Complex
Legal Description of Property: The N. 261.8 ft. of W 1/2 Less R/W of Opportunity
Block 242 together with the N. 340 ft. of E. 1/2 Less R/W of Opportunity, Block 242,
located within Section 20 Township 25 N. Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington.
Assessors Parcels: 20542 -0801, 20542 -0802.
Section: 20
Source of Legal: Spokane County Assessors
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement) 20542 - 0801 & 0802
Property Size: 129,000
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: N/A
Street Address of the Property: S. 200 Farr Road
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your
interest in it? Title Holder
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
None
Township: 25 Range: 44
Frontage: 160 Feet on: Farr
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED:
1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this
proposal warranted? The increase in development in the Spokane Valley; the
development that has occurred in the vicinit" of the site in the past ten
years; the 1980 Spokane Comprehensive Land Use Plan
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent
properties? Create a land use buffer senaratina the higher intensity commercial
uses located west of the site from the residential neighborhood to the east.
Rev. 2/3/81
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION -- continued -2.,
This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat-
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department.
1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
c�J 3 - �� — gy
(Date)
ignature
2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
The designated water purveyor for this site is
(Signature) (Date)
3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME)
a) The proposal (is) (is not) located within the boundary of our service
area.
b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve this
proposal.
c) We (are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
(Signature)
4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
T is pro •'. - -I is located in Fire District # AKdlac-+-4 20 OAS •
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
(Date)
(Signature)
(Date)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant has been informed of our requirements and standards.
(Date)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO-
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF g 4 Date: / — 23 /
(Signed)
(Address, / g //J / U '' L.
- // � , 4.(t�ce Phone: c /AR ., ��
��
dA,i/7,/ f Lp %6> Zip: ! z/
NOTARY SEAL:
NOTARY Date:
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
I ,
l
Date: 7/) /33
Rev. 2/3/81
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R
- - P R E L I M I N A R Y C O N S U LTA T I O N- --
A. Project Name: Z.OpE (L064nr
PROPOSAL • Number of Parcels:
Section ;p_ T. ,)j N., R.
Name: rZkts) `N'nTT --- --
Address: l ry, ,C i4 P,q z. ne 03.
Phone: Business 74 1 (p goo p home
Name: . 41.. /1/0 7 (k)(2:1 4-42- .
DEVELOPER
OWNER
ENGINEER
B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: 3 / 2o/ $i/ By:
Fa.�R- R a
Preliminary a) Right -of -Way /2 .
Conditions b) Curb Ye;
c) Sidewalk pC 5
d) Pave V 5
e) Approaches /2/141T5 Eazctlf ed
f) Drainage 0 ' o /40S .
g) State /City Review Yes () Pb ( )
Remarks:
NOTE: This proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap-
proach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution
No. 80 -1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in-
spection and review of County records.
C. INSPECTION
D. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
Address:
Phone: Business
Name:
Address:
Phone: Business
Date: / / By:
Remarks:
Fee laid: Yes No Aan"ut.l $ r l:n:;lt_____.._ Check__
Planning Application Signed : "_ Dale _____ ______ lid' ____.___._____.__
FINAL PLAT CHECKS
lrc 1'.t L1: bate - 4muuul
Mathematical ,. Sus v'.•ying Checks.
Nu, 1 Nat
N... 2 Ita1
I ;tt.
:1ddI; •.r,tl w.1rI gent .I I,.il ..n•t 1:! :In;l .:I...I.
�.�
!tit e Is _
- i'tt� - s.
i:,:: , 1,
J i l t h
E.W.M.; Quarter 1
Home
Hume
L.n..be rstt 62-83
7i5
:47 ( 2,,-„, )
dash
h�,• A�.:t .nln . -1 _.
I•. t .but , a 111 . t .1 .
s
Stem e
..‘
p---- __—_--Th■
RECEIPT Dote__.32.L2.0____19_Y__ 8810
Received From_. Sev\—.. i__ _ ______________
.Dollors $
For 27„..cLaseci. _ _
_
ACCOUNT HOW AID
P
Air PAID CHCK
--69
DUE
BK80B C
JOHN R. SCOTT
S. 1310 ROBINHOOD ST.
- g
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206
tt. [ - / 19
.1.. 92-31/1231
c :I < •:';.' 0 CV
/ ,OLA (1c L, 1451:.
Peril $ -2 42d-----
. „.., ;....... —,..•,,,,,,:',,,,:i - Dollars
• -i , t;..)";. .
IDAHO FIRST NATIONAL BANK-17:• • .: '•.§: Prf
.POTLATCH OFFICE44..., ..E 1
• Potlatch, Idaho I I 33855. 1•I'!"- - '—•
, f - . Iii,, ...,■ :' is: ,'•e.
Bank “•.. .1 . -c• f. e
For _
L 2 3 L003111: L L011 L10,1045 4 60 LO
2
aitakiltullue" EET0..EEE:00
601
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Spokane County Planning Department
County Engineer's Department
7. Access permits and improvements to
by the City of
(e)
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
O The appl iaanr shall submit for approval by
County H „oith liistri. :. a detailed combined
disposal pid., tI.r Ilse entire project prior
pt'upt;r't ';
(S
Conditions of Approval -Zone Change -- Number• _ -
Applicant's Name SCOTT , _ _ —
Sectton.?D Township ? N, Range_q EWM
The following • "c'ouditions of approval" for the above- referenced zone change are submitted
the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the staff-analysis
findings and order” of the hearing scheduled Qur ¢ Z , 1991.
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit
0 Applicant shall': dedicate 5_ feet on FVere --
for right -of -way prior to any use of the property.
2. Applicant shall dedicate feet on_
-for right -of -way and slope easements as necessary prior to any use of the property..
3. .Applicant shall dedicate a __foot radius on
and prior to any use of the property.
4. Applicant'shall dedicate feet on and
and for right -of -way prior
Access'permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer.
6. Access permits and improvements to
by the Washington Department of Transportation.
(a) Applicant shall.improveliet__ - *el_ G( ___._,_ in a
County TYPICAL roadway section No. / minimum
1AKCIAl2Lt
(b) Applicant Shall Improve _______ in a manner
County TYPICAL roadway section No. _ _ paving width
(c) Applicant shall improve -- __ ---- in a
County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum
•
Jul
a radius on
to any use of the property.
must be approved
consistent with Spokane
I 4/
manner
paving widthey!/6Gtns?
manner
paving
198 -
and
consistent with
width
must be approved
consistent with Spokane
Spokane
(d) Applicant shall improve in a manner consistent with Spokane
County 'TYPICAL roadway Section No. __ minimum paving width
•
Other specific: improvements: Lo
P 4jJ3PILc tit _ - StAIL_ - cdaittarr.57.4XE-__7A_L4 . _ /17 _ _._ _ -..
Si _ d/ A. _ _ . 2.. _At - - ZfrE._ _iev:47ia.rl
of° -- avAi sv— f- _.1croe26oe ttQ&__41,or+ -4 _-- EA%ZIZ. gaAs(_
Applicant shall submit_ for approval by the Spokane: County Engin,:c:r road, drainage, and
accost; plaits prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property.
the Spokane County Engint: :r and the Sp.ol:.mc'
on -site sewage system plan And surface water
10 the issuance of any building permit on t.h,
t o
A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted ,uui approved by the
Spokane county Engineer prior to the Issuance of a building permit on the property. The
design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall he in accordance with standard
traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer,
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by
vehicles.
12 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs,
assigns, and successors.
13. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant nay, with the approval of
the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution
which purpose is the.formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement
pursuant' to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in.the cost of
these improvements.
14. As an alternative method.oI constructing the road improvement stated herein, the appli-
cant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements
stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent
of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of
these improvements.
The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as ap-
proved by the Spokane County Engineer.
All required improvements shall-conform-to- the - current State Of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable county standards
and or adopted' resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in
effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
17; Applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of prior to
any use of the property.
18. Applicant 'shall construct a paved-and delineated access approach(s) to meet the existing
pavement on _ }
19. Access to , Road shall be prohibited until such time as specifically
authorized. by the Spokane County Engineer.
0 1. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage. plan requirements are found iri
Spokane Board of County. Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as'amended.
APPLICATION #: ZE -62 -83
ZONE CLASSIFICATION: AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN
T H R E S H O L D • D E T E R M I N A T I O N
(PROPOSED)FINAL DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
I. Proponent: JOHN R. SCOTT
Contact Person: John T. Sweitzer (509) 747 -6160
2. County Action(s) Requested: Approval of a zone reclassification from Agricultural
Suburban to Multiple Family Suburban tor the purpose or aeveloping d 6e -uni apart-
ment comolex on an aooroximate 2.96 Acre site.
1 .
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8,
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
124.
Z17 -A
Review and Comment
If you wish to comment in writing as provided in WAC 197 -10 -340 (5), please
respond in light of the following information, noting particularly the due date
for written comments.
*********************:*** K: kY:' k: k** X*: 1: *** * * * * * * * **** * * * * * *:K:K * * * * * * * * **
Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance issued:
Written response accepted until: August 1, 1984
A public hearing is scheduled for: August 2, 1984
Contact: Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456 -2205
ATTN: Steve P. Horobiowski
PROPOSED DECLARATION: FINAL DECLARATION:
Name: STEVE 9. HOROBIOW KI Name:
Signature: �y� Q >107 ll.� Signature:
Title: Zoning Administrator Title: Chairman
Dept: Planning Dept: Hearing Examiner Committee
Date: July 18, 1984 Date:
4 .)
e
b8.)
(54.)
(69.)
(44.)
(43.)
(38.)
(16.)
(44 7)
(11.)
(116.)
(145.)
(146.)
(147.)
(150.)
(151.)
MAILING LIST
July 18, 1984
WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
WA State Department of Ecology (Spokane)
WA State Dept. of Social & Health Services
Spokane County Health District
School District - Central Valley #356
Fire District #1
Water District - Modern Electric Water Co.
Office of the Mayor (City of Spokane)
Spokane County Boundary Review Board
Spokane City Plan Commission
WA State Parks & Recreation Comm. (Olympia)
WA State Dept. of Natural Resources (Colville)
WA State Dept. of Game (Spokane)
U. 5. HOusing & Urban Development (Spokane)
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
WA Slate Dept. of Transportation (Spokane)
Fairchild Air Force Base Commander's Office
Spokane International Airport, ATTN: Airports Director.
Town of Airway Heights
City of Cheney
City of Deer Park
Town' of Medical Lake
Town of Millwood
'208' Water Quality
C"4- <Own. cougar Hausa 4
SEC /TWN /RNG: 20 - -
z l . ' 44 ;
Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local
k governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private +g l,'
ri
,, The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions!' /
significantly (and "adversely ", as per WAC 197 -10) affecting the quality of the physical environmentr,TheNci:
tpurpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether Or not a proposal issuch;af
major :action. _ - .- • •• • .
1 ,4Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to
4 you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in ,your opinion, even only slight impacts will result.:.
!;r The'reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking'your'A7,
'Kafor more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe
?cyan explanation would be helpful to government decision - makers, include your explanation in the space provided,;
ittor use additional panes, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which`you'�fif«',
flare aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now wi11;;? 'x4'
' ? all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental 'review without ;unne l,iVs.
..4 c essary _i': j • •;:
7 ,
^cs
•
Auaust, 1981
iinAi'altm.lktiAut
• CHECKLIST;'
a
l it F N i ` i •vc -- g3
Ai I A , .. a,'i,.. ZE 62 ffi
FILE #:
„Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
elements, and other factors, that will give an accurate understanding of
Zone reclassification for a 62-unit apartment complex on a
The building would be oriented to the east of the 'site wit
y
-. . '. • L`ye v hf `
) • 14 a•The following questions apply to your total. proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently -c
1} applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your should include the impacts which wilibe
caused by your proposal when'it'is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the4s.z-;:'
4 This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to ,complete their environmental,review „`''
):;now,' without1duplicating paperwork i n the future.'', - , , • k • .".p;;. ' S . ` 1 application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate
:t;County department. State law requires explanations for every "ves” and "maybe" answer on the checklist:
i �' � zt t .The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for „ "no" answers,,and,in some cases;
;i inoredetailed information to aid in a, threshold determination.,' _. <,i:iy;} +,. `1 -
TE:;.,'This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington 'for:
st•. t :various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. ; If.•a_.question
.- .•.:does not, apply, just answer,it "no ".and continue on to the -next question. ; ::r ' -": •:. ".'3
: :ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
BACKGROUND'
ti,
;Name`of Proponent: ' J ohn R. Phone Number: 747 - 6160 l
' ?a+'f
1
2., Address. of •Proponent. c/o Rothrock, Carstens Co. „mi. , 715 E. Sprague Ave. , Spokane,= WAS'
99202i;'
A , /9 ” tl -' . It .1r3--t: .1r3--t: .;�,•.:�.....1 . ;:i.. . � 's�'`. .�x;71.' "Y '• �
3. ' Date Checklist Submitted: i � Ewa
,if0. • Agency,Requiring Checklist: Spokane County Planning
; 5 .., Name of•Proposal, if Applicable: N/A 20pAT ' eAta►rejt '
to its size, general'design
its scope and nature)__
129,000- square footsite:w
h'allCaccess onto`.Farr "Rd
': , -1 . 4( . "" il •
Location of Proposal '(describe the physical, setting of the Proposal, as well 'as the extent o£
area affected by any'environmental.impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate;;
understanding of the, environmental /setting of the proposal): Site is located in the Spokane '
" feet south of Sprague Ave: Road:'ni°The
4 .
tsite is'129,000'square feet and is relatively flat.-
'Estimated Date _for Completion ; of, ; Proposal: Spring, 1985'.`• • 4-S =i'ti la
9:;•+ List of Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required'for the Proposalz (federal;
, state, % and
•' .a1ocal.<;.including rezones) Zone reclassification; building permits; septic tank':.4
•
approval; ultimate sewer line -up.
' s
.Y. •, ,L: • -S. +, ij '.t •.,7y;,r'. y . "..�:: r. .,.a t S :: n., a . 1 %4T}.•z 'ye(.4
ioa.. Do you, or:the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, any plans for futurewadditions'; r
expansion,' or, further activity •related, to or`connec_ted with.' this ,'proposal? :,If.,yes,.explain: '" ,c. ' •"
•
Possibility of .. expansion when hook -up to the valley'•sewer is , made and - when } a ' - n e w t
zoning ordinance is adopted; this assumes that a higher density'will'bepermitted.
1,J}L4') i..y: -:v ,,,y,r „,,: ., r c " d ' " -
10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adj to this propo location? If yes, explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your
proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been
completed, but is expected to befiled some future date, describe the nature of such application
form: k lvo (tl-uc).e. 1r cEEII 1 7-/10 - e4
I1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? _ _ X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ?. . X
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or
physical features? X
(e) Any increase to wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site? X _
(f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream
or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
Explanation: Construction of road, installation of utility system and site grading
will disrupt a portion of soils. Minimal change in surface relief. Landscaping will
prevent new erosion.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in
climate, either locally or regionally? _ X
Explanation: Introduction of oeoole. autos and heating unitc will racul+ in m;n4m,1
deterioration of air quality; auto emissions may be considered obnoxious.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters? _
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in.any water body _
(e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water
quality, including but notlimited to temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct
injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates,
detergents,waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances
into the ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
2
Yes Maybe No
X
X
%-•
• .
4 ., i t :
See attached
'Ct.\
V„.".
- a Cha nge in t h
e diversity of species, ornumber of any species of
flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and _ 1 -
plants)?
':(b).' Reduction of thenumbers of any unique, rare or endangered.L 41 4
species of flora? ....... . .. ' ......... • .
, j. .
(c) of new species of flora into an area,' or in a
if• barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
.(),Reduction in acreage of.any,agricultural crop? ..... .
— . I
Explanation: The proposed business park would be landscaped: 3 will al
'! of species of native flora; will introduce new species of fl
- :
„ „ „ I ,
• ' 4.f Flora 4 Will the proposal' result in: ;•••-• o Yes Maybe‘z,INo''.-
2 4.
'
into the area.
•
5.., Fauna. 'Will the proposal result lin_
• .
J
c; • .,..,
".; will'beconsumed.
,r4 • . • ,i ''./"' : - ''''' • -
4'-,
'...: 2tf, ' • 4 0 't......,I1 4• •••:-.-,;
, .., 2
I .-1Z7
t
‘15
( tet:44 •
• Yes . Maybe:, No
• • ' •
\?1, I 4 1"
;R.'
. e.,
;
1114 *? ' in c .
-4,;74
'
: .,., ; ''!
• - • •,. (a),.; Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any snecies . • ::. , . „
g. Ir, of fauna (birds, land animals _including reptiles , fish . anci , -.. . : .m.'..V.,'. 2 ...,sy ii•f Ck
/C". shellfish ,•benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? ". .•.. 4 ' :I,v,...,.12
it • , • • ' .
. ':;:. - ' . -. . -I ' '''5 4 4 :' .41,,liel ' 4 •
:'(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered
..w , 4 ..; . ..g...;,...f• it .. x 1
...r.'„. .... ? 4 . . I. .. . • ........ . .4. . ...... 4 . . .,.. . . -..
,.,...- , species of fauna
. r 1 - I. -
---
, ..t: 4 - - , -;,.-.;.•;.• : 1 .,,,::•-
i --',,—:-. - 4:-Itc• , .
e, .',,. t',.. (c),...,Introduction of new species of fauna into an ."
area, or.result . • 'f • '';." , q"f:' 11,s ;'4'x gi-kii4ii... .
in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? 6 . ' ..... . 4 .:...• .._,.____
‘
t.:1 n''''• :(‘-t" -... . . •.,
• ,, 9. • - ,, 2 . ..±. •A .. !p..T
'‘'•.' •'..- (di Deterioration' pf existing fish or wi ldl i fe' heti tat? , ... 2 ...... ' ,..... . -:-.: • + .' • ,'
't+ 't "t't■ .11$ Explanation: Project would result in SOMe decreaSe in the number and/or'
''
-t,'", of wildlife that inhabit the site.
.. .
• 4 4 4 4
4,e41, ■
, , • ots /••••,:irc:
4 , -
A" f';'' i t ",' I t; '. • 1 6; -. c:;" - „ t '
7 r, _
.. (a). Will ' the proposal increase existing noise levels? .-..-. . . v. . . :.'.' 4 ...;-,..7.'• ._&,,''''‘ -.. )111
tl. Vt .1.-'- 6. Noise. • ' ,... t " - • •• ...:
Explanation: On-site construction will temporarily increase noise levels. ;- :i
.‘,. . ,...,._.,
., -:. , :•.' &:i 4 .2 .: l„ :i-,-'4 Y es 11 Meib r ; :E
, , - „ - / • .. r ' ''',
' - 4 .7 . . -, 1. -', .!
..I ll - : •.: -
The addition of People and vehicles on site will result in a minimal
4 2, • A - - . i ":.?.'";' • 1-7. t - 4 4
l ' tit t
increase of noise levels after construction. • el
• '..-
e4 ' •
,-::,-•7.4. Licht and GI ' .' - ::,..• i, r e '!iii.tt,";,, , 6 t „,7,4 4 r,. Yes ,:laybe'1/4 No
' • ^ ,r- -2" ;:.'it, 4, ,, '::'..' " 'I; :it (li — I f, , , it....-
,.. .
" •.',° . •• :. .
44 (a); Will the proposal produce new light or glare? ... '. _, . .!/,.: . . .• . . 1/2 . . . X - • t . r.
,P:lXtrar ..' ..... • . .
1-......W • '". _
4 ?•: 4 4.,, ,, ,,' ,, ,.".:,..txolanation: On-site lighting and vehicl-s
li light.
.i. 4 ,.- ,N: •:-:!`''''' • " t
will produce new sources of'
- •
;:t■ “r rte,
: ' Yes- Maybe.; NoI; c. 1 ,1 ^
" Land Use.,• -.- - .,ks'"e r ,„?.;',: ".r..l. Ct'.
• ' ' " --4TR- , • .:, (." i: , ix.„ , ,
4 " - ( a ):N Will ' the proposal result in the alteration of the present ',01 . '-.÷ 1.7.hcA.- '.---; ,..
,. , ,t
, A..i -,.. ,....,..,,.-., ..„. planned land use of an area? ..,.. .....
• . ,,.
, , .
.
r•V2t.s.tw/i
• J$-. :4 Explanation: ' The proposal will change the present land use (vacant) to
- , ,
„. , ,
• ,.
'41rcy..,., ., „ ‘, .,..:, , : , ;„i •- ,, ,T.1...••-...::
.rtp.0 .. ..
4-
., , ,A,:.
,-„ apartment project. The proposal is consistent with previous zone i
v 1 k,
• it,it
r ;rt.& 4 .- 64 . reclassification requests for the area, and is compatible with surroundinp?-41„t
, :,?..,...
4- ---..‘:• land uses. -,s. -, •
..,9.- Natural Resources 4111 the proposal result in . .44 x ' .. "..1 ' . —.it:. , Yes Maybe t 'et ...
• -• ' 'f — --' t..-vci.
V
:: nit ' ' . t'',9' .;
Ji(a),* in ;.the rate of use of any natural resources?. ''' ' ' X ''''' ''' . 13.? " ''. fd
4 ...... : • 7 . , - .4,:-P' 7.wi-br re'C '
. :.. Vi nonrenewable natural resource? .. '.. . .....; f.'" ''''' i&t, X4 l.."4Vx.
' ti=2441:4 • : .74. I. • . 1 A ,,, , 1 4. 4. 4 . 4 .
d . 2 on: ' Natural' resources will be consumed durino the 'construction'
Explanation: . i. , .
.. .• 4., • 7 .. i 4.;:,. f, .
t-e r`H,;„ 4 „,,, I phase; after project'completion eneray in the form of fossil' fuels andY' .s.04.ilt•;:tirt
- •
. , . ..,. - 't •• "4 .•-41 ' 1.7 e •Thir" 44.
,- • • - , -.4-h% ,- y . ' ,.--r-z.c , ..... , ,,, , k„4„,, i pi.dp ,..;•-, io
,,,, .,.. y,4,7 , 1., '' .4 III •5
• • - : 1 ' ;`.. • : 3 ; •
• • } •(1,- ' • . • r
r
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances ( includinc, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in tne event of an accident or
upset conditions'
Explanation:
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists, or pedestrians?
Explanation: See attached.
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or recuire
the development of new sources of energy? X
Explanation: See attached.
ZE- b1 ° - -83
4
Yes Maybe No
11. Population. Yes Maybe No
Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area? X _
Explanation: The project may have a minimal increase to the area's
population base.
12. Housing. Yes Mavbe No
Will tne proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for
additional housing' X _
Explanation: Project will result in 62 new rental apartment units' and
will helo to reduce the need for additional housino in the Sookane Valley.
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Mavbe No
(a) Generation of additional vehicular move ment X _
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking' X
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems' X - _
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement
of people and /or goods' X
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect uoon, or result Yes Mavbe No
in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of tne
following areas:
(a) Fire protection' X
(b) Police protection' X I
(c) Schools' X
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities' X
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads' X
(f) Other governmental services' X_ —
Explanation: See attached.
15. Enerov. Will the proposal result -in: 'tes 'taut=_ ho
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. Yes Maybe No
or alterations to the following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? X
(b) Communication systems? X
(c) Water? X —
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
(e) Stone water drainage? __L_
(f) Solid waste and disposal? X
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards
or potential health hazard (including mental health)?
Explanation:
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or
vie open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation: Will the proposal result in an impact Yes Maybe No
mpact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X .
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a Yes Maybe No
significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . — — X
Explanation:
[II_ SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made
truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will-
ful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with-
draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist.
Date: Z_I 1 `1 ? LI Proponent:
I
Proponent: 1011 R
Phone: 711 7 - (I b c)
Person completing form:
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
,ised:: August. 1981
T
(Please Print or Type
Address: Clo (?cr ngoc (arts; Ere:. Co
— 71 S SGnquur_ You a
Phone: 7 U 7— (/ (o O Date: 3
Yes Maybe No
Yes Maybe No
nJ
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklis 0 111(lm - 7- /&-&/
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertiment information, the staff:
Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends /issues
a proposed declaration of nonsignificance.
8. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends /issues a
final declaration of significance.
C. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the
nature of the proposal, recommends /issues a final deo}dration of nonsignificance.
X
' 1 /
D .. r .. o e
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS EXPLANATIONS FOR ZE -62 -83
(Explanations to all "yes" and "maybe" answers as required)
3. WATER
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface water runoff?
(f)
(9 )
Construction of parking and driveways will require alteration
of some local drainage patterns; however, major drainage
patterns and basins will not be significantly altered. Impervi-
ous surfaces in the form of paved parking and driveway, sidewalks
and roofs will cover a majority of the site. Construction of a
drywell system will handle the drainage.
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
With the construction of parking and driveway areas,.sidewalks
and building will require minimal changes in the surface relief
features, which in turn may alter the direction or rate of flow
of grand water. Construction of a drywell system will handle
the drainage.
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
or withdrawals by cuts or excavations?
The proposed apartment development will require water for pos-
sible cooking facilities, for restrooms, for landscape irriga-
tion, and for required fire flow. The proposal's water needs
will be serviced by the aquifer and provided by a water purveyor.
The project will require minimal amounts of water and poses no
threat to existing supplies.
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct
injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates,
detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances
into the ground waters?
The creation of impervious surfaces over the soil will disrupt
and alter existing surface water runoff and absorption character-
istics. Surface water runoff from the site will be disposed of
in a system of drywelis and catch basins with no provisions made
for the treatment of this water. Storm water runoff can be
expected to contain minor amounts of ground water contaminants
including suspended solids, petroleum -based hydrocarbons,
dissolved inorganic salts, among others. The majority of the
contaminants are subject to substantial removal as the water
percolates through the soil column above the ground water.
The project is located over the aquifer where the transmissivity
and flow of the aquifer is the greatest. While it is not
Z E 62.
4. FLORA
13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION
anticipated that the proposed project will have any effect on
the geology or the hydrology of the aquifer, the existing con-
ditions will have a bearing on the potential for water quality
degradation from project related effluents.
The proposed project will result in the disposal of waste water
effluent to a sub - surface drainfield located above the aquifer.
If the project is constructed prior to sewer availability, the
project will generate waste water, a portion of which would be
available for percolation to the ground water. Because of the
potential threat to ground water quality through the use of an
on -site sewage disposal system, the project sponsors will be
working closely with the Spokane County Health District to pro-
vide for installation of a system which will meet those require-
ments of the project without posing a problem to ground water
resources.
The County Health District officials have indicated that either
a septic tank system or a sewage treatment plant system would
most likely be appropriate until sewer is available.
The site is located with the Priority Sewer Service Area and
the development will be required to comply with all state and
county regulations.
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
The project site is served by Farr Road, Sprague Avenue
and Fourth Avenue. Traffic generated by the project is
not expected to be significant.
The traffic demand during the operational phase should have
more of an impact on the peak hour and total traffic volumes
in the site vicinity.
In summary, the increased traffic generated by the proposed
project is not expected to be of major significance.
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new
parking?
The project will incorporate parking area, and carports,
and will be required to satisfy the minimum zoning
ordinance requirements.
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems.
As mentioned, the project is served by Farr Road, Valley Way
and Alki Avenue. When fully developed, the traffic generated
by the project is not expected to have a significant impact
on the existing road systems in the vicinity of the site
according to Spokane County Engineers. Farr Road will be
required to be improved as part of the zone change.
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and /or goods?
Once the project is fully operational, it should become a mini-
mal traffic generator within the Argonne Area.
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
An increase in traffic will correspondingly increase the
hazard to vehicular, bicyle and pedestrian travel. The degree
of hazard may be reduced by upgrading Farr Road.
14. PUBLIC SERVICES
Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new
or altered governmental services in any of the following areas?
(a) Fire protection?
The proposal will require additional fire hydrants and will
place more demands on the Spokane Valley Fire Department located
five blocks away.
(b) Police protection?
The proposed apartment development area will require additional
police protection from the Spokane County Sheriff's Department.
(c) Schools?
Any increases to the County population figure resulting from
this proposal will correspondingly increase the demands on
Central Valley School District. Minimal impact is expected as
a result of the proposal however.
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
The anticipated generation of additional vehicular movement to
and from the site will together with the existing vehicular
traffic require maintenance of county and state roadways.
The proposal will require water from Modern Electric Water
Company and maintenance of the new lines.
ZE •62•..g3
(f) Other governmental services?
The proposal will require the extension of postal services as
well as other services associated with an apartment develop-
ment. These public services are mandated by law and would
appear to be capable of being provided without over - extending
the various agencies beyond normal work routines.
15. ENERGY
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop-
ment of new sources of energy?
The proposal will obviously create a demand upon existing
sources of energy. This proposal will require the extension
of current sources of energy. Both fossil fuels and electrical
energy will be required. Minimal demand is expected however.
16. UTILITIES
(a) Power or natural gas?
The proposal will require the extension of power service to the
site by Modern Electric Water Company and Washington Water Power
Company for natural gas. Minimal impact.
(b) Communication systems?
Telephone service will have to be extended by Pacific Northwest
Bell.
(c) Water?
The proposal will require the extension of water service by
Modern Electric Water Company. Mains are adequate to handle
the increased demands.
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
The proposal may be served by individual septic tanks during the
first few years, but will ultimately be served by public sewer.
Either system will require approval by the Spokane County Health
District.
(e) Storm water drainage?
The construction of impervious surfaces will require new storm
drainage facilities to control run -off.
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Garbage and refuse service is offered by two licensed contractors
in the Spokane Valley.
z e 6 2
-t
-:••••••'
• I "
. • Id t; Iv/
,1.
- WIZ/ 01:41.11trad f trognsmen
•.:
it c - 1 ala
. A . 7d Al4
. ItintS ts710 nISItli 19 \ a pdatt. nn •■••••a
_ ___ _ iiii - 4 -----1_ .f.ji_(4.,
i .
5.121C4clav7 P7 .4- ,
•
Ljsli ialil
,... u,...e..t.! ti 4 .t, ;.4.: 13....__ ; ______•_- • t- --••- . -e- -.■_-_,- a .-,- — 1
1 ,..... 7 . .1 *a
It it tli la it • It 5. et 1...
1 441 k, Om
4
vt.
i •
. n 1.tiseloiss islmilu Its i csiti ' oh I I
'los -fr..:
'VW
to • fl 01 a
1
1
6
VOW diad10•114
I 'woman.'
c 1.1
z9
ss -
et
Stade 1.•
SlitottEl • Z2 •
&I 74
1 21/1411114 /.11015 4
t
401"1.1"16410 IJ
ini tit i
71 ?Oa
DATE: AUGUST 2, 1984
STAFF REPORT
TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -62 -83
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT /OWNER: JOHN R. SCOTT
AGENT: JOHN T. SWEITZER
REQUESTED ZONING: - Multiple Family Suburban
EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural Suburban (established in 1968)
(with Airport Overlay - Yes)
(with ASA Overlay Zone - Yes)
PROPOSED USE: 62 -Unit Apartment Complex
EXISTING USE: Vacant
SITE SIZE: 2.96 Acres
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: URBAN
- QDT = 4 Tf p = 24 g
u 33
B r IO -&-{9ta
10 = kDtb
PRIORITY SEWER SERVICE AREA: Yes AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA: Yes
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located east and adjacent to Farr Road
approximately 400' north of 4th Ave. in Section 20- 25 -44.
II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive
Plan indicates this area as appropriate for Urban type development
with an approximate density guideline of 1 unit per acre to 17 units
per acre. This project is consistent with the locational criteria of
being near a heavily traveled street and is used as a transitional
use between commercial and residential uses. Project is also
consistent with the "Fill -in Development" concept; one that is
located between and in close proximity to, at least two existing
developed areas. 'The project lies within the Priority Sewer Service
Area (PSSA), and lies within a category most likely to economically
and practically support connection to the regional sewer system.
II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (continued)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
2) ZONING: North Agricultural Suburban and Multiple
Family Suburban, Established, 1968
and 1939
III. SITE ANALYSIS
East Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1968
West Multiple Family Suburban, Established,
1959
South Agricultural Suburban and Commercial,
Established, 1968 and 1978
3) HISTORY OF LAND USE ACTIONS: The zoning in this area is dated back
to 1939 the residential areas zoned in 1970 and 1978. Since
that time some commercial (dated 1970 and 1978) and Multiple Family
Suburban. dated 1939, 1959 and 1972 have been approved within the area.
4) LAND USE: Site Vacant
North Abandoned Railroad Right -of -Way (sewer
trunk line) and Vacant
East Large Lot Single Family Residential
South Large Lot Single Family Residential
West Vacant
5) NEIGHBORHOOD CONSIDERATIONS: This area is mixed in land uses with
single family residence, commercial and some light industrial type
uses found.
1) SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSIDERATIONS: The site is gently sloping
with natural vegetation and bordered to the north by the main sewer
trunk line, and to the east, and south, by large lot residential.
2) AGRICULTURAL SUMMhRY: This area is committed to Urban type uses by
the Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture.
1
1
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
III. SITE ANALYSIS (continued)
3) SITE PLAN INFORMATION:
SITE SIZE: Approximately 2.96 Acres
EXISTING BUILDINGS: None
PROPOSED BUILDINGS: 3. and Pool with 62 Carports
Total Floor Area: Not Provided
Total Site Coverage: Not Provided
Proposed Structure Height: 3 Stories
PARKING
Parking Required: 93 Spaces
Parking Provided: 62 Carports and 31 Visitor equals 93
Spaces
BUFFERING TECHNIQUES: The submitted site plan is very general, and
does not indicate adequate buffering to adjacent uses. Staff
recommends sight- obscuring fencing or dense landscaping along the
east and south property lines.
OTHER SITE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS: Site Plan indicates the structures
to be located at the eastern portion of site with 3 stories -
landscaping should be tall growing to off -set this impact to
adjoining properties. Farr Road is 2 lanes paved, no curb or
sidewalks and at this location is inclined - County Engineer is
concerned regarding sight distance. Utilities Department suggest
hook -up to sewer may be available in near future.
IV. CONCLUSION: Project exceeds recommended density of Comprehensive Plan
however, Bonus Density concept is applicable because of ready availability
of sewer. Proposal is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and past
decisions in the area. Special consideration should be given by decision
maker regarding buffering to south and east properties.
V. RECOMMENDED AGENCY CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED:
(All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be
binding on the "Applicant ", which term shall include the owner or owners
of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.)
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
1. That a 6' sight obscuring fence or dense landscaping be provided
along the east and south property lines prior to release of
Occupancy Permits.
2. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior
lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of
such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination
to'the area with full consideration to adjacent properties).
3. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access
points is not obscured or impaired.
4. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall
be maintained.
5. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning
Department review and approval prior to issuance of building
permits.
6. All current standards of the Multiple Family Suburban Zone, as
amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site.
7. That the project is subject to Section 4.16A.050, the Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal, spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
b) - County Planning Department (continued)
9. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer,
shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting
Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits.
10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file .
appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is
waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners'
Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982.
11 Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental
Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has
been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the
official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's likely
significant adverse impacts to the physical environment; a
finding is hereby made that no probable significant adverse
impacts upon the physical environ ment are anticipated as a
result of the project; and a final declaration of
non - significance is hereby to be issued.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit:
V�O I
1. Applicants shall dedic a teV feet on Farr Road for right -of -way
prior to any use of the property.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the Spokane County Engineer.
3. Applicant shall improve Farr Road in a manner consistent with
Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving
width Collector Arterial Standard.
4. Prior to issuance of building permit applicant shall demonstrate
that adequate sight distance exists at the location of the
proposed driveway intersection along Farr Road.
5. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit on the property.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any
building permit on the property.
7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied
or traveled by vehicles.
8. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
10. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
Construction, and other applicable county standards and or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County
Commissioners'Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418,
the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized.
This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules
and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval
and issuance of permits by the Health District.
8
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (continued)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to
future area -wide collections sytems.
5. Plans and specifications for the double plumbing are to be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to
application for a septic tank permit.
6. As information, the Valley interceptor located immediately north
of this proposal should be completed shortly after
January 1, 1985. A connection may be allowed under certain
circumstances at interceptor manholes.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan
shallbe approved by the County Engineer and the Health District
prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project.
2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on -site sewage
system may be authorized.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (continued)
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1. The site is located in Fire District #1.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when
approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of
Social & Health Services.
6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
7. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prohibited.
2. The proposed site plan will require some revisions to provide
for fire department access to all structures.
3. The required fire flow for this proposed project is 5,500
G.P.M. Each hydrant shall be capable of flowing 1,500 G.P.M. at
20 P.S.I. residual when any two (2) hydrants are flowing
simultaneously.
4. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be
installed prior to construction. These hydrants shall be placed
so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175'
from the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest outlet of the
hydrant shall be no less than 18" above grade. A water plan
showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per minute for
each fire hydrant) and meeting the requirements in Chapter 10.04
of the Uniform Fire Code is required prior to construction of
the water service.
5. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and
existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible
and legible from the street or road fronting their property.
Said numbers shall contrast with their background.
6. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible
construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Co., and they will
supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
/0
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
The proponent should be made aware of the following:
1. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during
demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled.
This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or
suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul
roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from
all other construction related activities.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or
spills occur on paved surfaces measures must be taken
immediately to clean these surfaces.
3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking area, access
roads) must be paved and kept clean.
4 It has been determined that fireplaces and wood stoves are a
significant source of suspended particulates. The small
particles (= 10 microns) are respirable and can have an adverse
effect upon the health of the public. We strongly urge that if
wood stoves /fireplaces are used that burning be done as
efficiently as possible. All wood should be seasoned and stored
in a dry place. During periods of poor ventilation or elevated
air pollution levels we request that use of wood stoves and
fireplaces be discontinued.
5. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the
construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using
the site following completion of the project and from occupants
of the proposed project.
6. All air pollution regulations must be met.
h) STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
' Not Applicable
i) SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Not Applicable
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
//
j) FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE RASE
Not Applicable
k) '208' STUDY
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -62 -83
1. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
zE /o? 783_
5_ca -
t. \I Sw R--9) R-e_a g 1 sari - ..
07- _E - �2�aZAS
C.. & rz a _. _ (Vl C nit,/ (I out. - -