Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-130B-78 (2)
Date to Revie' 10 -21 -93 Time # 5 Date to AA & DR 8-4 -93 Time 1:15 Date Received 7 -26 -93 Project Name C OF C UR -22 BONUS DENSITY 17 UNIT APT SITE ADDRESS S 3RD /E UNIVERSITY Applicant's Name GEORGE PARAS Address 3124 S REGAL STE 160 - SPOKANE WA 99223 Contact person FLOOD ZONE Planning Contact Person Date Submitted II :ApU \review.lor J NO ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET n BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# F,- 130B -7R_ W S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name DUNSMORE SURVEYORS 1115 N PINES SPOKANE WA 99206 924 -9748 STACY BJORDAHL/STACY BJORDAHL Phone # 456 -2205 I Description I Initials / / AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING / / FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING / / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED / DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMIT TED / ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS 1 Q / N /_e HEARING EXAM ]APPROVED _ DENIED._APPEALED BBC ✓! II. / i i Related File # ( SP- 636 -A) Work # Date Conditions mailed Phone # Phone # 535 -8377 / PROJECT _APPROVED DENIED 78 No. Lots No.Acres .6 e� - Township - Range PARCEL # 21542 -0520 448 -7928 INTRODUCTION PROPOSAL SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS OF FACT. CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER RECEIVED OCT 271913 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on October 21, 1993. The members of the Committee present are Phil Hams, Chairperson, Verona Southern and Frank Yuse. The sponsor, George Paras, requests approval of a Change of Conditions to allow bonus density, File No. ZE- 130B -78, to existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone and within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The property is generally located south of and adjacent to Third Avenue, approximately 600 feet east of University Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 2. The committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record. 3. The existing land uses in the area include single family residences, apartments, Valley Transit Center and commercial uses. 4. The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban. The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a "city -like" environment which includes various land uses and intensive residential development. 6. The existing zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The Arterial Road Plan designates Third Avenue as a Local Access Street, with a recommended right of way width of 60 feet. 8. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential - 22 (UR -22), previously established as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) zoning in 1978 and redesignated to Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. 9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with and a Determination of Nonsignificance was issued. The Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS. '10. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled. HEC Order for 7F-13t,--78 4 Page 2 11. The owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 12. The applicant has demonstrated that the bonus density request is justified. Specifically, a public sewer system will serve the proposal and shopping and public transit are within walking distance as required per Chapter 14.820 of the Spokane County Zoning Code. 13. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies. 14. The Committee additionally finds /concludes: a. The applicant should continue negotiations with Central Valley School District No. 356 to mitigate impacts of the proposal on the Central Valley School District. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL 1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors -in- interest. 2. The following Conditions of Approval apply to the real property described below: A portion of Tract 173 as per Plat of OPPORTUNITY as recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, on page 20, records of Spokane County, Washington and more particularly described as follows: Tract "A" of SHORT PLAT 646 -90 as recorded in Short Plat Book 7, on page 77. AND INCLUDING A portion of Tract 174 as per Plat of OPPORTUNITY as recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, on Page 20, records of Spokane County, Washington and more particularly described as follows: The West 115.02 feet of said Tract 174 lying Southerly of the former Railroad Right of Way. EXCEPT the North 291.5 feet thereof: AND EXCEPT the South 147.00 feet thereof. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE 1. Spokane County Planning Department Condition No. 7 shall be deleted. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone and Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zones as amended. HEC Order for ZE=13u,.7-78 .7 • SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Property As Proposed: Page 3 2. The proposal sha11 comply with ZE- 130-78 and ZE- 130 -78A conditions of ..approval, as herein modified. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the Planning Director /designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on October 21, 1993, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE- 130B -78 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. 7. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of the agreement making appropriate provisions for public schools prior to the issuance of building permits. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and the School District shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter. (DELETED AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITION NO. 1) 1. Access permits for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. HEC Order for ZE- 130d -78 Page 4 2 2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access plans. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 6. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on Third Avenue. 6. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 7. No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right -of -way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. Applicant will make connection to a Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. Plans and Specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of L. Hides, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities. Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 4) 4. A public system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department, e.g., State Building Code Act regulations, such as requirements for fire hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access roads, street address assignment, barrier -free regulations, energy code regulations and general coordination with other aspects of project implementation. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction- related activities. 3. All traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (construction waste, etc.) 6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc..) must comply with local, state, and federal rules. CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT See Planning Department condition No. 7. SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 Page 5 1. We will require the addition of one fire hydrant on the south side of Third Avenue. HEC Order for LE-1,—.3-78 - Page 6 ORDER' The Hearing Examiner Committee, purstiant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, APPROVES the application of George Paras for the Change of Conditions to allow bonus density as described in the application ZE- 130B -78. Motion by: Verona Southern Seconded by: 'Frank Yuse Vote: (3 -0) UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS HEARING EXAMINER COMMI 11 hE HEREBY Al PEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE A 1' 1 EST: For WALLIS D. F-IUBBARD Planning Director Ii. :'y ' JO 1 . ' DERSON enior Planner /fir /�-- , /9.3 Date Pursuant to County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners, W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a $200 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. CD A 01\ cts.3 - - SzttA__ti_ _ce_oastkAnst CeIvvviA _1G - .130 i3 (31 .A.a.a atitAxnro- - -Q - mbsaL3N. too .a4 ntere ntvar&s2-C;' )Ktacs)_) Qstatatz akik-e & _ Subject: re: Zoning OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON From: Spokane County Engineer's Department October 8, 1993 To: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) Conditions of Approval Zone Change No;Zlg �E Applicants Name Para> Section 21, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM The following "Conditions of Approval" f'_'r the above referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the "Planning' Report" and "Findings and Order" for the public hearing scheduled October 21, 1993. Prier to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access plans. E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will he required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. E53 The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on Thi E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. page E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. To: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) Subject: Conditions of Approval Zone Change No:ZE_l30:B_7 Applicants Name paras Section 21, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON From: Spokane County Engineer's Department`�r~������ . re:_Zoning September 8, 1993 The following "Conditions of Approval' for the above referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the "Planning Report'/ and "Findings and Order" for the public hearing scheduled September 23, 1993. Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer" E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access plans" E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer" The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Hoard of County Commissioners resolution 80-159' as amended and are applicable to this proposal. page 2 E53 The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach Cs) to meet the existing pavement on Thii_d_Aven.ig. E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON August 4, 19 To: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) From: Spokane County Engineer's Department 3k Subject: re: Zoning Conditions of Approval "Lone Change No :Unassigned Applicants Name Paras Section 21, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced _one change are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design Review Meeting scheduled August 4, 1993. Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access plans. E4 t .licant shall submit for approval . spc&ane County Engineer a he Spokane ealth District a detailed combined on -s e system plan and surface water disposal plan for - ent projec, r portion thereof if the dev- :opment is phaseo. E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approver) by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. E51 All required .Improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in, effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. page E53 The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on Third Avenue. E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan ' requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 30-1532 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON To: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) /��� From: Spokane County Engineer's Department \������� August 4, 1993 Subject: Conditions of Approval Zone Change No:Unassigned Applicants Name Paras Section 21, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM re: Zoning The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design Review Meeting scheduled August_4v 1993. Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer" E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access plans. E44 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased. E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer" The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in. effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. E53 The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on Third Avenue. E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 80- 1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. page 2 E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public: road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. PLANTING SCLIEDULE X7Tf 3rd AVE. T - r- -- --a-- - ©. oo jj2 — ___---- • s • • Ent ,;0 r :D I : 3rd AVE. _ ____•,••,._______ _ ____ i r _t_(__i___n__4"--I..f--i I n --' I d L 1 ■ l i i-F-1 , — : r. I H. A .,. . t ri : 1 LANDSCAPING PLAN I ' I • SITF PLAN 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-130B-78 Page 56 LI) z t - w - • 2 o r= o w o CC w : 2 0 AO.:: 2. E 8-7 ZE- 130B -7* NI XON Riv Rs ;D[ c\ EL. /98 ROAD 'Ns. 2 312+ . Lve AVE M /LWAUKE£ RAILROAD SEvENTH FOURTH AV z 0 2 AIN EIGHTH AYE, 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 Page 57 NIxx0N . MAI SEVENTH V'Cdz 6... 011 tabor, i ■ ® �L f • I .. 9114 it 1f111'K IOTH UR -3.5 wild!!? -22 .3.5 COUNTY 3 .Sr Ot v B O ZE- 13 0B -78 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-130B-78 Page 58 R -2 EL.19 -.v...to..., • VM • 1120 - Ae .b /n I5 I CerrMrerjn 4 � EL.Z0 Pines C¢mefa• ij e - , r4) a�zT' ! NKr _ r 10/93 NEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 ZE- 130B -71 9 T ,2- North Pines j Jr High:kh Page 59 •s40 OPPORT wei 5h^. ,N"� ac „ 10/J • e PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: OCTOBER 21, 1993 SUBJECT: ZE- 130B -78; CHANGE OF CONDITIONS TO EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL -22 (UR -22) ZONE AND REQUEST FOR BONUS DENSITY WITHIN THE AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA (ASA) OVERLAY ZONE I GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: George Paras South 3124 Regal, Suite 160 Spokane, WA 99223 (509) 535-8377 Contact Planner: Stacy Bjordahl Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Third Avenue, approximately 600 feet east of University Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone to allow 17 multi - family dwellings through bonus density provisions. II. SITE INFORMATION A. Site Size: 28,142 square feet Gross Density: Approximately 26.3 units per acre B . Comprehensive Plan 1 . Land Use Plan: The property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a "city -like" environment which includes various land uses and intensive residential development. Urban areas will have public water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems and other public services available. This category promotes "fill -in" within established development areas where utilities, arterials, schools, and community facilities are existing. 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 Page 60 C . Site Characteristics: The site is undeveloped and covered with deciduous trees, weeds and brush. Proposal: Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) established in 1991, previously classified as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS). (ZE- 130 -78 /LE 130 -78A) North: Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) established in 1991, previously classified as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) (ZE- 130 -78) South: Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) established in 1991, previously classified as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) (ZF- 130 -78) Fast: Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) established in 1991, previously classified as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) (LE- 130 -78) 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 Page 61 The proposal is located adjacent to existing multi - family developments with public services including water, sewer, transit and other services available. 2 . Arterial Road Plan: The site is adjacent to Third Avenue which is identified as a Local Access Street by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. The County Engineer is not requesting dedication or Future Acquisition Area (FAA) for this proposal. The nearest arterials are Fourth Avenue and University Road which are designated as a Collector Arterial and Principal Arterial respectively. 3 . County Parks Plan: The Spokane County Parks and Recreation Plan identifies Castle Park and Balfour Park as the nearest park facilities. Castle Park is located approximately 2 miles south of the site at University and 33 rd Avenue. Balfour Park is located northwest of the proposal at Balfour and Main. D. Neighborhood Characteristics: The surrounding area consists of multi- family, single family, and commercial uses. The Valley Transit Center is also located west of the proposal at the University Road and Fourth Avenue intersection. University City Mall is located northwest of the site along Sprague Avenue and University Road. E. Zoning Analysis: This site and the surrounding area comprising approximately 11 acres was originally zoned Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) for apartments in 1978 (ZE- 130 -78). This area has developed for multi - family use since that time and the subject property is a portion of what remains to be developed. The average density of existing multi- family uses in the area is approximately 22 units per acre which is lower than the proposed density of 26 units per acre. Although the project proposes a higher density than those established in the area, multi - family uses at various densities may be found compatible. The area west of the proposal along University Road is zoned for commercial uses and the areas to the north, east and south are generally zoned for residential uses including single family, duplexes and multi- family. West: Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) established in 1991, previously classified as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) (ZE- 148 -78C) F. Land Use Analysis: The existing land uses in the area are residential, nonresidential and commercial. Residential uses are primarily apartments and condominiums. Single family residences are also located south of the proposal along Fourth Avenue. The Valley Transit Center is located west of the site and commercial uses including the University City Mall are located northwest of the site. Nonresidential uses in the area include professional offices and a retirement home. Site: Vacant and undeveloped North: University East Apartments South: Single family residences Fast: Apartments and condominiums West: Vacant land and apartments G . Circulation: Third Avenue will provide direct access to the site. Two ingress /egress approaches from Third Avenue are illustrated on the proposed site plan. All internal travel ways and parking areas will be paved. H . Design: The site plan illustrates two (2) structures of approximately 2,000 square feet each. The proposed structure height is 2 1/2 stories. The structures will be located in the interior of the lot and carports and parking areas will be located along the east and west property lines. Landscaping will be installed along all property lines and a berm will also be planted around the perimeter of the structures. (See Landscaping section of report.) Proposed Site Plan: Use: 17 unit apartment complex Proposed Buildings: Two (2) structures Building(s) Footprint Area: Approximately 4,000 square feet Site Coverage: Approximately 14% building coverage Maximum Structure Height: 2 1/2 stories proposed, or approximately 36 feet Total Floor Area: Approximately 4,000 square feet Building Setbacks: Proposed R uir Front yard 23 feet 25 feet Side yard (E) 75 feet 5 feet @ story Side yard (W) 75 feet 5 feet @ story Rear yard 15 feet 15 feet Parking 34 spaces 26 spaces 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZF- 130B -78 Page 62 Note: The applicant applied for and received an Administrative Exception (See AEE- 62 -93) to permit the 23 foot front yard setback as illustrated. Proposed Buffering/Landscaping Techniques: The proposed landscaping meets the requirements of the Zoning Code with a twenty (20) foot wide strip of Type III landscaping along Third Avenue and five (5) feet of Type III landscaping along the east, west and south property lines. The site plan also illustrates a six (6) foot high sight obscuring fence along that portion of the south property line which abuts the parking area. Other Site Plan Considerations: The site plan submitted generally conforms to the development standards of the existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone. The site plan submitted for review by the Hearing Examiner Committee is general in nature. Detailed review to determine compliance with all Code regulations and conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and to occur at the Building Permit stage. I. Density: The proposed density is approximately 26 units per acre. The Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone allows 22 units per acre which may be increased through bonus densities as permitted under Chapter 14.820 of the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to Chapter 14.820, additional units per acre may be permitted for: 1) direct hookup to a sanitary sewer ( 3.5 units /acre) 2) availability of public transit within 1/4 mile walking distance (.5 units /acre) ; 3) shopping facilities within walking distance (.5 units/ acre). The maximum density permitted for this proposal is 17 units. A public sewer will be made available to the project and the Valley Transit Center and University City Mall are within 1/4 mile walking distance as required by Chapter 14.820: Bonus Density for Sewer Hookup. Summary Under the existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) density guidelines, the site - could be developed with 14 units per acre. The proposed 17 units per acre is consistent with the bonus density provisions of Chapter 14.820. J. Drainage: A drainage plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the County Engineers Department prior to development. K. Power Transmission Lines /Other Known Easements: The site plan submitted does not illustrate any easements. Any required or recorded easements will be disclosed during the building permits process. L. Water Supply: -The proposal is within the Modern Electric Water District. Appropriate provisions for connection to a public water system will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 10/93 HEC Staff Report for 7F- 13013-78 Page 63 M. Sewage Disposal: The project will be served by a public sewer system. Plans and specifications shall be approved by the Spokane County Utilities Department prior to the issuance of building permits. N . School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No. 346. The Central Valley School District has responded to the proposal and is requesting that the applicant enter into a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impact of the proposal on the school district. This request is included as a condition of approval. O. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1 . The Fire District and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to the issuance of building permits. P . Wetlands: Spokane County Wetland Inventory Maps do not indicate the presence of wetlands on the site. Q. Cultural Resources: None have been identified. R . Transit: The proposal is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA) boundary. The Valley Transit Center is located west of the site at University Road and Fourth Avenue. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department has determined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsienificance ( "DNS "). The "DNS" was circulated to 12 other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/ departments' affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends October 19, 1993 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearing. IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed Change of Conditions is consistent with the development standards of the Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone and the Goals, Objectives, and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. Public services available to the proposal support the increase in density pursuant to Chapter 14.820; Bonus Density for Sewer Hookup. The proposed density could be considered compatible with developments in the area and provide "fill -in development. The Planning Department recommends approval as conditioned. 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 Page 64 V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i . All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant ", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. ii. The zone reclassification applies to the following real property: A portion of Tract 173 as per Plat of OPPORTUNITY as recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, on page 20, records of Spokane County, Washington and more particularly described as follows: Tract "A" of SHORT PLAT 646-90 as recorded in Short Plat Book 7, on page 77. AND INCLUDING A portion of Tract 174 as per Plat of OPPORTUNITY as recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, on Page 20, records of Spokane County, Washington and more particularly described as follows: The West 115.02 feet of said Tract 174 lying Southerly of the former Railroad Right of Way. EXCEPT the North 291.5 feet thereof: AND EXCEPT the South 147.00 feet thereof. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. • The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone and Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zones as amended. 2. The proposal shall comply with ZE- 130-78 and ZE- 130 -78A conditions of approval, as herein modified. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the Planning Director /designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 Page 65 Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Tide Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ 1 is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on October 21, 1993, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE- 130B -78 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. • 7. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of the agreement making appropriate provisions for public schools prior to the issuance of building permits. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase said property that pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the applicant and school district. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and the School District shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Pronertv As Pronosed:, 1. Access permits for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access plans. • 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 Page 66 6. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on Third Avenue. 6. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 7. No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public mad right -of -way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Applicant will make connection to a Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. Plans and Specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. • Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department, e.g., State Building Code Act regulations, such as requirements for fire hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access roads, street address assignment, barrier -free regulations, energy code regulations and general coordination with other aspects of project implementation. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 Page 67 sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction - related activities. 3. All traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (construction waste, etc.) 6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc..) must comply with local, state, and federal rules. CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT See Planning Department condition No. 7. 10/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE- 130B -78 Page 68 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER File No. ZE- 130A -78 A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on April 19, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Ken Kennedy, Abby Byrne and John Culler and there being the following person present who wish to request approval of a Change in Conditions; Grant Groesbeck, for the purpose of reconsidering changes in the plot plan and in the areas of Phase I and Phase II. B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Multiple Family Suburban. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion or intent of adopted policies. 7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 1 File No. ZE-130A -78 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. a. County Engineer's Office: The County Engineer's Office has requested the following be considered if the rezone is approved: NOTE: All required improvements shall be built to meet or exceed minimum County construction standards. 1. Applicant shall dedicate 60 feet on 3rd Avenue for right -of -way. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 50 feet on Pierce Road and a twenty (20) foot radius on Pierce and 4th for right -of -way. 3. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and pave to existing pavement on 3rd, 4th and Pierce. 4. Applicant shall construct five foot wide cement concrete sidewalk on 3rd, 4th and Pierce. 5. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, 5 foot wide sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on 4th as directed by the County Engineer or be a willing participant in any future LID, RID or CRP. 6. Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off -site drainage and access plans before issuance of building permits. 7. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on 4th Avenue for right -of -way b. Spokane County Health District: The applicant shall comply with rules and regulations of the Health District in providing for adequate sewage disposal. All necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance. 2 File No. ZE 130A -78 Approval of sewage disposal facilities by the Spokane County Health District. c. County Fire Marshal's Office: Fire District 41 Installation of fire hydrants to be in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Fire Marshal. Access and circulation plans for emergency vehicles to be approved prior to building permit issuance. d. Water Purveyor: MODERN ELECTRIC COMPANY We are able to supply this proposal with adequate water. e. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments' above. f. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, building materials, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance The original intent of the development plans . shall be maintained. g. A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance' bond shall be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prior to building permit issuance. h. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution 477 -1392 be accomplished " by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board, as instructed by the Planning Department staff. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. 3 Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Grant Groesbeck for a Change of Condition as described in the application should be approved. Motion by: Byrne Seconded by: Culler Vote: Unanimous ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: 4 File No. ZE- 130A -78 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE sic .ge 1 i Ch rman f STAFF ANALYSIS April 19, 1979 ZE- 130A -78, CHANGE OF CONDITIONS (AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN GROESBECK 3. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and pave to existing pavement on 3rd, 4th and Pierce. 4. Applicant shall construct five foot wide cement concrete sidewalk on 3rd, 4th and Pierce. 5. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, 5 foot wide sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on 4th as directed by the County Engineer or be a willing participant in any future LID, RID or CRP. 6. Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off -site drainage and access plans before issuance of building permits. 7. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on 4th Avenue for right -of -way. Applicant shall construct a 45' minimum radius for cul -de -sac at the east end of Third Avenue. b. Spokane County Health District: The applicant shall comply with rules and regulations of the Health District in providing for adequate sewage disposal. All necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance. Approval of sewage disposal facilities by the Spokane County Health District. c. County Fire Marshal's Office: Fire District #1 Installation of fire hydrants to be in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Fire Marshal. Access and circulation plans for emergency vehicles to be approved prior to building permit issuance. d. Water Purveyor: MODERN ELECTRIC COMPANY We are able to supply this proposal with adequate water. III. CONDITIONS If the Zoning Hearing Examiner approves this request, the following conditions should be considered: a. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments above. (continued) At said time and place, any interested person may appear, for or against, the granting of this application. AGENDA, APRIL 19, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Time: Place: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION a. Location: Section 21,Township 25 N. ,Range 44,E.W,M, The E 229.79 feet of Block 173, Opportunity, except the N 371.5 feet; and, all of Block 174, Opportunity, lying south of the Milwaukee Railway r /w; and the West 160 feet of Block 175, Opportunity, lying south of the Milwaukee Railway r /w. EXCEPT, The South 200 feet of the East 76.68 feet of the West 268.38 feet of Block 174, Opportunity. b. Vicinity Location: c. Applicant: d. Existing Zoning: e. Requested Amendment to a Condition: f , Environmental Impact: has adequate information to proposal. - 1 - Thursday, April 19, 1979, 8:30 A.M. Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane - RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITION ON PREVIOTTSLY APPROVED APPLICATION North of Third Avenue, approximately 600 feet west of Bowdish Road, Grant F. Groesbeck North 909 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 Multiple Family Suburban. This zoning became effective November 17, 1978, after hearing by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. To approve a development plan of Phase II for a proposed condominium complex to be situated on the South 1/2 of the property of the originally approved development plan. A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee assess the adverse environmental impacts of the The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197 -10- 330(2) provides that: ", , , In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E.I.S. shall be prepared." STAFF ANALYSIS ZE- 130A -78, CHANGE OF CONDITIONS (AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN GROESBECK I. FINDINGS OF FACT a. Zone Classification 1. North: 2. West: 3. South: 4. East: b. Land Use 1. Site: 2. North: 3. West: 4. South: 5. East: c. Development Plan Property area: Proposed building area: Existing building area: Parking area (Spaces): d. Regional Comprehensive Plan - 1968 The Plan Map has designated this area appropriate for development. e. Compliance with SEPA: The Planning Department staff has circulated a proposed declaration of non - significance and received no comments from Agencies of Expertise, therefore, a recommendation that a final declaration of non- significance be issued. II. REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: a. County Engineer's Office: April 19, 1979 Restricted Industrial, established, 1955 Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 - Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1975 Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 Single Family Residences and vacant land Vacant and Commercial businesses Single Family Residence and apartments Single Family Residences and vacant land Single Family Residences and vacant land 11.7A 7.47 A./325,626 sq. ft. (158 units) Approximately 3,300 sq. ft. (3 Single Family Residences) Required - 240 Actual - 256 The County Engineer's Office has requested the following be considered if the rezone is approved: NOTE: All required improvements shall be built to meet or exceed minimum County construction standards. 1. Applicant shall dedicate 60 feet on 3rd Avenue for right -of -way. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 50 feet on Pierce Road and a twenty (20) foot radius on Pierce and 4th for right -of -way. (continued) TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Gentlemen: 1) ZE- 130A -78, Location: Proposal: Action: Location: Proposal: Action: Location: Proposal: Action: PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 9 2R E C E I V E D IPOLANI COUNT? liNGINEtt APR2 6 1979 April 23, 197! N 721 JEFFERSON STREET Board of Spokane County Commissioners Jerry Litt, Zoning Administrator Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of April 19, 1979. On April 19, 1979, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 8:30 A.M. to consider nine new zone reclassification applications and one reconsideration of conditions application. Members present: Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. Byrne, and Mr. Culler. Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee. If not appealed, these decisions will be final on April 30, 1979. Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban: Groesbeck. North of Third Avenue, approximately 600 feet west of Bowdish Road. Approve a development plan of Phase II for a proposed condominium complex to be situated on the South 1/2 of the property of the originally approved development plan. Approval. (Vote: Unanimous) 2) ZE- 170 -78, Agricultural Suburban to Local Business and Multiple Family Suburban: Unicume. West of Pines Road, south of Maxwell Avenue. Offices, with apartments in rear. Continued to the May hearing. (Vote: Unanimous) 3) ZN- 211 -78, Agricultural to Residential Mobile Home: Meadowbrook Estates Location: North of Deer Park -Milan Road, west of Findley Road. Proposal: Mobile Home Park Action: Denial. (The vote on the motion to approve was 0 to 3.) 4) ZE- 10 -79, Agricultural to Commercial or Restricted Industrial: Scherschligt South of Alki Avenue, west of Barker Road. Warehouse, Wholesale Distributor. Approval to Restricted Industrial. (Vote: 2 to 1) • (contd.) y ' , A. INTRODUCTION SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND D -ORDER i 1 ile No. ZE-130 -78 This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 17, 1978, and the members of the Committee pre ent being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Ted McCoury, and John Culler and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Mr. Groesbeck for a zone change, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban for the purpose of apartments. B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is generally residential with commercial and vacant land. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal is in conflict with the provisions of adopted regulation or intent of adopted policies. 7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. (f 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed approval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Plese and Groesbeck for a zone change, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban as described in the application should be approved. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: a. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments above. b. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, building materials, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. c. A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance bond shall be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prior to building permit issuance. 2 ,le No. ZE- 130-78 U d. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution #77 -1392 be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed by the Planning Department staff. e. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. f. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 9. That, if after one year from the date of the Hearing Examiner Committee's action, the applicant has not received final adoption of the zone change, the application is void. Motion by: Culler Seconded by: McCoury Vote: 3 yes ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: ∎ %4 ( Chairman rile No. ZE- 130 -78 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FILE NUMBER(S): ZE- 130B -78 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197 -11 -970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone. APPLICANT: George Paras 3124 South Regal, Suite 160 Spokane, WA 99223 (509) 535 -8377 • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located south of and adjacent to Third Avenue approximately 600 feet east of University Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is ❑ d required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., October 19, 1993, if they are intended to alter the DNS. ############################## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR By: Stacy Bjordahl, Planner I Phone: (509) 456-2205 Address: Spokane County Planning Department West 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 f � DATE ISSUED:6,146nbil1 3o 1993 SIGNATURE: c I U �-c�.4 / �i' vz/ di t V ' COMMENTS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELOOM AT THE HEARING. ## t######################################## # ##### ######## #it# #ff ########### APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. ######## tttt############################### ################# # ### ########## This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA State Department of Health 3. Spokane County Health District 4. Spokane County Division of Engineering 5. Central Valley School District 6. Fire District No. 1 1 7. Modern Electrict Water District 8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 9. Spokane County Parks Department' 10. Spokane County Boundary Review Board 11. WA State Department of Transportation 12. Spokane Transit Authority SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PART I A. GENERAL, INFORMATION; NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE (� r'( 3KH S C2 Re 4 ?"9 MAILING ADDRESS: c C/ XF(4 L / C.? CJ CITY: )1D7.).K4AJ!* STATE /D/la . PHONE: C S c37 (work) 2 41,IS 7 v/2S' (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRFSEN'TATIVE: /J LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: � (2/7 (-/- l/-7/I/ /7/.r-/? PHONE: `� j 77& - 7(r %5 MAILING ADDRESS E. / /0 q 0 / C/ Ti // `� I c CITY SPOKAa-A /F_ STATE. (A/Ya . ZIP: (7 6%.2 ()CO PROJEC I/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) - (,'/& i9( i;F_ C ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED Icres or sq. ft) /J ASSESSOR PARCEL liS OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL ASSESSOR PARCEL WS OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED k / AJF STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL F . 1')R /lc) c E. /G .s' EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) Z. - 7 7 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY I/AC/Jn,' lA; nr- 1 rc L p &n J o A _ PROPOSED ZONING / /. ,AOAvr.t S DrnI;, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Pi f7/"V \' SCHOOL DISTRICT C F )T Yk1( 1 / (i rc FIRE DISTRICT - _S2oK /4 NIF \/i ? 1 , V WA I ER PURVEYOR MGtic.xnl .k( E('_TR PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings ( ) Duplexes ( ) Manufactured homes ( ) Busncss ( ) Other ( ) - Describe• WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD. <v7 .9;2. Multif dwellings' Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMIN'I' ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY l_c 1 = At E — L; 2 1 j B. J,EGAIJZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORIVIAI'ION: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: i, //1 qui) ,(.{/ 7 r_K //ii SYC K,g7A /r- J�i4 l.i r_ SECTION -Z / TOWNSHIP C RANGE L7CI NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS. \ cid3 -L 'O B -78 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ( ) YES NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED. EXISTING ZONE(S) (A -77 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) (, /2 -Z• uhr/-1 An A) l L�1�LT / FOR TILE FOLI.QWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR 012 PROVIDE. BELOW. IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO TIIE PROPERTY, WFIAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? t .r.IAACA/ /( e6- 7(,r//mAlc„ /�,r {c/a Sr /MC T-I LPR °P6,R n1 NO WHAT ARE THE CHANGED C NDITIONS OF TI 1E, AREA W I ITCH YOU FEEL .MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? ,6 I E!✓TPLS /7711a ALLr)i/ I /? n 2/CE • . ."3 /5 MU; L EA .6 r#n;n » Pei Lin r/z" .A,co TO ( V kiw a <' Ib s . /ic A) 4-Dn;n 4Lunic-, WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECL.A.SSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? 7ff= 4130 inn Al riG H / r ,p_ - (7A 1 / ,r S , ) 2ni- r9 /q p/7r 7 - , 7 7 , 5 7 - , 7 7 , 5 A , 7 - , 7 7 , 5 A , 7 7 I A iV / r s (.J 1 CI_ 4,4 of /0 Av/ /-7/Z,SAZT / n 7 / / / 4- L r C / ■' 4n, lrac 62T Rec/Prej7Es , WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? ,4 DU/ - ?CEA / % /I /uc / 'p!n/c P 6 ) e i 1 7 'TS 114 iii /I Al / T P P P f o 1 / / i 4 ; F r . _ .2/ c / A, / T1 / f /.J , ci1'C /rY. /1 10 c/t Ma s (a4A>c-,�n Si,t rt, T41=.s4 ;27zn,//�r•7S (c)cxi�. F /7A1 V > T r/C 7 /, 7C0 �jE/' ACK, O, 1� 1 TL' �/ „r: ceI k-'R /-1 NIG?I77Fa DFIII S /T/. WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PR5POSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LANE) USE? , /4 :P/J S,b! / S 0 9//7f 2 /9T213Ld__ /I /7 ",//- 5;0 /u /A;( 2/a S �Gi /) /P('7 CJ/u CO r1 Ate (/))7 SPCK17 ( aAin f rr AAi/ 22c77/7ATti7�n Xi Jun S/°4P //VG, F /D c/ //?li / / 1 A/T S Z6- 1308 --18 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE TILE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF \ \'Till WRII LEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, FIRE MARSHALL /FIRE DISTRICT A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN , FIRF PROTIION DISTRICT NO. B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATEVVATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. • C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: 4K C OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: A- �„ .2 re,-;,. S kmuz_ ��4l /c �; +�e, i )) t. FIRE DISTRICT U SIG:`:,gTURE/ITTLE DATE WA'T'ER PURVEYOR A . SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND EIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS ' (iA) ( NOT) BEEN MADE 8. REQUIREMENTS /COMMEN'T'S L n(aiv -C , i n .*r ".. J. 112o , beet t1)aS' 6 . t4., . !� � , J � 7� 7/ 4 93 WATER DISTRICT SCGN`(`I'URE /TITLE DA E COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH TIIE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: A COMMENTS: HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLA SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) A. COMMENTS SIGNATURE /11 7/jE DATE COUNTY 1 ° Z UI'II,ITIES yl �0- A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NAT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS /Gi - olr SIGNATURE /TITLE SIGNATURE /TITLE ' SATE SEWER I'UP.'VEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE. AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: / /, /t c j O cc -e r _ SIGNATURE/ TITLE 7 - /`1 DATE AL REQUIREMENTS FOR EEN SATISFIED. DATE 30 f', — ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of el 4 EXPIRES 02/09/ 9• PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHOR ELATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWFII I IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON /HER BEHALF. �e rancd An se SIGNED: ( �L Qe� St. DATE , y3 ADDR SS. 7 /0 S f PHONE: - 765 "L7 /fC C i:��1 NATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN TO /AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS /S DAY OP �C� , 1993, BY L7 irn 2- /LGIhI��P C NOTARY SEAL 1 SED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION ‘7} S /..•�.- 1 - DATE: 7,//55,4 / /5 ? a 'FL PHONE: < 974 S _ /Ii1 r ZIP. c_VaC WGg 972676 2 < /2 Notary Public in and Tort c State or Washington Rrsiilin4 :n. 0 & L/ �7 My appointment cspires: 9'e_2? . %s PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) DATE SUBMITTED: FILE u: 2 t- "/ .)') / � ('%1 /6 . /);_ DATE ACCEI�ED: / '//� 13 BY �� � /��r/. i'%�lc &L( / ■ TOTAL FEE 6 /2 . 0 ),l RECEIPT I/ %r = ,,, &-/ ZIP- ;/ / DATE i ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of :4 I, THI REQL NOTARY SEAL PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE SED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION ..;MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATE - 7//-S /S PHONE 97$- 974 ZIP: ll.OL PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HERF.WITI I IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTE RIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS /HER BEHALF. SIGNED: ` " I� ()ATE _/-5-/7/- ADDRESS E. /OC' /7 /42✓p PHONE % A- 3 /, 944 ZIP 97,0.4 0-4 C 4 ATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE SIGNED AND SWORN TO /AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS 1993, 13Y Wer-( Y2�1/Ll it e Notary Public in and tor th Rrsitling:it: _ My appointment expires: SLalc of Washington aczn 9.,27 PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) DATE SUBM1TTED FILE N: DATE ACCEPTED: BY, TOTAL FEES RECEIPT a S , j9Z5 DATE' �J DAY O: FILE NUMBER(S): ZE- 130B -78 DETERMTNATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197 -11 -970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Change of Conditions for bonus density with existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zoning for 17 unit multi - family project. APPLICANT: George Paras S. 3124 Regal Suite 160 Spokane, WA. 99223 (509) 535 -8377 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, generally located south of and adjacent to Third Avenue, approximately 600 feet east of University Road in Section 21, Township 25 N., Range 44 E.W.M., situated in Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is RiA required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2); the Lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., September 21, 1993, if they are intended to alter the DNS. ############################### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR By: Phone: (509) 456 -2205 Stacy Bjordahl, Planner I Address: Spokane County Planning Department West 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 DATE ISSUED: !W&/fil/ / , 1993 SIGNATURE:8 C C COMMENTS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCGMEATTHE HEARING. aiyhdtv APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT,West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. #### tf# W## it### tr### tttt#### tttrnit# frnn# nitftnf# #ntr »nn # # #nnf»#nfrtttttrnn# # #tf #nnfn # # #n This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA State Department of Health 3. Spokane County Health District 4. Spokane County Division of Engineering 5. Central Valley School District No. 356 6. Fire District No. I 7. Modern Electic Water Company 8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 9. Spokane County Parks Department 10. Spokane County Boundary Review Board 11. WA State Department of Transportation 12. Spokane Transit Authority RECEIVED SEP 0 1 1993 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PART I A. GENERAL INFORMATION: NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE. ;J, , -t ft l; FI 5 ( c,&2 6e'ft,QAS MAID ING ADDRESS: c. A'F(_,4L < . h CITY: ,f /tn /F STATE. /JJJ . ZIP: C I`7.,R PHONE: ,C 0. J.S , 7 7 (work) /tR 7 "7)_S" (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. / n LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: /Gin fl (. /l Nf -7/U,n/j g PHONE: 76.;SY MAILING ADDRESS: E. /0 4c>/ 4 I /4 , /E CITY SPOKA-A)P STATE: 01,1 ZIP 9 e/c,? (7Cv PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) . CD t /Cc /10 ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) �, tir ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED /tai; AJP STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL E . /(,)8 /( ci J_-, /02.10 <2, ,5-7g EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFTCATION(S) (DA FF fSTAIILISI n :n) (.1,4 - 7 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY I/ACAn'r IA)n /- I /- t P,SD / a PROPOSED ZONING /,I - ?? (:7,T/+ , AntiO S ilrn /c,/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY L rPRN SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ;l P4( \ I (,(_t- FIRE DISTRICT - _SPCV/i n!F \I/11 r r=V WATER PURVEYOR MOCIGX/J LI.E C,7R/C' PROPOSED USE OFPROPERTY• Single family dwellings ( ) Duplexes ( ) Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Other ( ) - Dcscnbc LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: 2- /05-9 C._h » �(i /- L0 c/� B LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INPORN'IA'I'ION LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: F ; In kon A / /7r itz, /ni <PCK /7A /,= VA C.! I: y SECTION / TOWNSHIP C RANGE at/ NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: �'7j ha WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTI.NG ON PUBLIC ROAD. .07 (O 7 .9 Multifamily dwellings Industrial ( ) _ Mixed Use ( ) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ( ) YES .( NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED. EXISTING ZONE(S) (A -7 7 TO PROPOSED ZONE(5)_ (LC ZZ Awl] S is- ALS /FS FOR TIE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE. BELOW. c p r 1-r-na r k// / IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? ��Il ( ,(I KRcn/rC.N /vc(6,rrAT /Alc �C /a Sc fitc 7- /r_ -PA cP6tZ7'/ NO WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF TI IF AREA W I IICI I YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? L l/Z4 /j riEI✓D1_ =f3 /_4p11Ep [ci_LXti /A) /Z /CE, Lib; vi=•A s /ry /-lea s 73 cid /J/atE/0r1- Fi cr ,L_zz: oar n 5 - 3. / /gr End (N/Mn (r/J b/zo n 4 P €wnr7, I,:,w 7LW ( /n/TY {5 L/ Cr 14czei //xs fl-Da-57) >1417/06 -, _q `= WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? 1 17 4/Y� /rinA. r T r, /.r - ()Air: R n ,z„r- r-f 4P/+r, rn - 227=n /7 /AN/ (.iJl 1 /V/) Al //" /=/ /e A./T /P7 / 6_7 Ah, 111CFN 717,e6Pt.C77ES. WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? ,4/1c/,4c EA/ 1 /J / /', /c 1 Pgotkerc L1,q ✓E /4/I/ MMP!'/ioX /m » t/&/ /A(A;E 12r4Lc / r% /11001 /A ('Alt; /)6- n S/Air, .1 j 2;12/). h=(' &kik /'/ / 1.0 uCr •n /- a /r l T %tin F! FcA' RI /-!/c, /tri- ipi=NUS/TY. WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PR TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSALS IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? ;�AOP'i cif/ L / (`p.y//)/q j/p,/ r /f/ /T ,4- �u /?Rnran n1n;i L /,/.SA 14/ S r -CJ /c./ � 99 U I/Jg(V /( ;/rLf SPOK 4A 1 r ( Ai Y yAJN /it /( » »P.4rtTAn /T 7q1(219 4 P/NG fir oai, ?Jr'/-1 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATIO> Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDETIII PLANNING DEI'ARIT11INTSI: \IT WI 1 11 WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL /FIRE DISTRICT A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRF BRO- - TION DISTRICT NO. B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATEWATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: IN &. • OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NO \V BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE, AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: /LU re-r ^ , 1 ..e3,3,2,,t S > pC- ' 7- FIRE DISTIfICT SIGNATURE/ITLE DATE A. COMMENTS. A. COMMENTS: WATER PURVEYOR A . SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOhIISTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS ( t) (NAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. " n 13. REQUIREMENTS /COMMENTS. -- y y+- lcsr'-z&±tti Lt 4 J� - 722.26e .6 . - . 7/a t at . — 7 %57 WATER DISTRICT S .N, f I E /TITLE DA 1'E COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: • I �, 4-J }7I. / ��!/)/ / - (VT - o-e - SIGNATURE/II7YE I DATE • SIGNATURETITLE If EALTII DIST'RIC'T' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLA SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) SEWER PURVEYOR COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE T) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS //t - W e 7 DATE L REQUIREMENTS FOR • EEN SATISFIED. i SIGN'ATURE/TITLE / A T A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION IIAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE �U BY THE APPLICANT A. COMMENTS. " /1�h /I c / / ./i�- 7 -71-7 .5 SIGNATURE/ TITLE DATE ' SIG ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATIO;CI Page 4 of 4 I, THI REQL EXPIRES 02/09/91 SIGNED. NATURE 0 L4 4 I OR REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE NOTARY SEAL . DATE SUI3MITI ED: DATE ACCEP TOTAL FEE 1993, BY A keevi dair ADDRESS, / 7 / 5 20 4'97W Wt9 99 2o6 ) ss. PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION SED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION. PART 1V (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR T11 I: PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY AC IONS ON HIS /HER BEHALF. D AND SWORN TO /AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS /J n £ rhGlh/,/ /P� ZIP: Notary Public in and fort e Suite of Washington R enling :11 PLL My appointment es pires• 9,2-2 . %s DATE. PHONE. ZIP DATE 7 765 c, /S /79 d DATE / DAY OF PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT). FILE n ? r - ( 2 4' 7* (/2 /G - );-. B Y R1 (‘aiti RECEIPT 4- xA5 /9 '924 9 7c 10. B zn,/,=-27-7,76 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICAIJGN Page 4 of 4 „EXPIRES 02/091 (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OP AUTHORIZATION) 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE 1 FURTHER SWEAR THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTE RIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS /HER BEHALF. SIGNED: / // / � / DATE (d /.- // T� ADDRESS E. /Or / T' Xi PHONE ' /�i�- 3 /, s� -/ /1 �6 ' ZIP 9.7cA o/ / 6 ATURE APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED / p AND SWORN TO/AFFIRMED I3 'BEFORE ME ON THIS ,5 DAY OF n l/ -eA , 1993, BY f\Obt'r L . Y"O vi, F j rr i711Ps n A o S e NOTARY SEAL DATE SUI3M1'I ED. DATE ACCEPTED TOTAL FEES SED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INPORN1ATION MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION. � ii ' .4l �-... -- .,.� .— DATE: '7//5/93 /i / /5 77,-,Z,-., Zl. PHONE. €27 974° . C,. z r ZIP IC966 PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION PART IV ra , 0 /� Notary Public in an for Ih Suuc of Washington Residing :u. My appointme expires: FILL / BY: RECEIPT ;t. 9. s02 . �s 94/ PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) / J /? DATE' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Tract 173 as per Plat of OPPORTUNITY as recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, on Page 20, records of Spokane County, Washington and more particularly described as follows: Tract "A" of SHORT PLAT 636 -90 as recorded in Short Plat Book 7, on page 77. AND INCLUDING A portion of Tract 174 as per Plat of OPPORTUNITY as recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, on Page 20, records of Spokane County, Washington and more particularly described as follows: The West 115.02 feet of said Tract 174 lying Southerly of the former Railroad Right of Way. EXCEPT the North 291.5 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the South 147.00 feet thereof. EXPIRES 02/09/ y4 211 n. SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 [1] (VAC 197 -11 -9601 Section 11.10.230(ll Purpose of Checklist: . The State Environmental Policy Act ISIPAI chapte- 4 3.21C RCV, requires all governmental agencies to consider the enviromertal v»acts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental imaac: Statement (EISI must be prepared for all Proposals with probable signit•:snt adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify Impacts "rem your proposal and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if It can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an i $ is required. Instructions for Applicants: ' Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: SPOKANE ENYIR0NesENTAL ORDINANCE Env Iromentel Checklist This environmental checklist asks you to describe scot basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use o.is checklist to determine whether the environeental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions gneflr, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able answer the questions from your own observations or project plans wltnwt the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or i e question goes not aooly to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does rout apply.' Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary o■ays later Some questions ask about governmental regulation, such as zoning, shoreline. and landmark designations. Answer these questions .' you can If you have problems, the goverrnental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do the over a period of time or on dlff. -ent parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or Its envlromiental effects. The agency to which you sabmlt :his checklist ,say ask you to explain your answers or provide additional Information reasonably related to determining if there may be 5Ignl''cant ',verse impact. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply' IN ADDITION, coaple to the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NDNPROJECT ACT ION51 Pa rt 01. For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'pro.ie0t.' 'applicant,' and 'property or site' snout: Pe read as 'proposal,' 'proposer,' and 'affected geographic area,' respectively. me /1 ' �j A. BACKGR OUMO \I fl 2 1 k � -- � ( ,` f3D -- ( S //� -{ 1. v a of proposed project. If applicable: `J�'�'Y1 Q� b4T / 1i? 1'n -r s (,14 AN\ /o De" CO c+ fl • 1 -uNrr A PA ( 1I' > r C / T / , 2. Name of Applicant. L ; ice. D. 1� -S ( az g/oC ET: i F— j- ra 7. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: S _ 2 ) 1 ( -4' \ .00TAL_ 0mi.l i 1 t, 1 o_ f ��i�n�tat�f ,D g et' 7Z3 (sc7 i\ - 31'7 A. Date checklist prepared: I /I S I'i 3 � +^ 5. Agency requesting checklist: s Dr7 •' 3E efoptA (_sT ' � 6. Proposed timing or schedule (Including phasing, if applicable): AuC II t ST 1 w — t (7-y 1 C I C i b. CM you own or have options on lend nearby or adjacent to this proposal' If yes, explain. Rev.2 /1/88 1 File vp PI ,A,-SS k0 C I) _0,.W7 hick\ 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further eetivity related to or connected with this orooaal' yes , explain._ IV �J 8. L st any environmental information you know about tnat nos been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to Irs proposal e Ic z�T w ,o tA3 (VAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10. 230(1) A, nAQLIOQND (coo ct oued) SPO[ARE ENVItONMt?CSL OgnINANCE Do you taw whether application. are ?coding for seven - mental tpprov.1• of other pronosal. p rope • al• [ryes, erp l.to. 92- 4 .1(4 %llCi 10. List any government approv 1. r permits chat will M needed for mom o r your pro po.al. :! t I f 111 rJ G-, Yy12M ) /mil J) C-, \...; 17-14 ' CZ - c Co D s i it Lt. c T I () s P,O nJUS Pt) R. UAl STS 'To 7W L-1.1n1 & 1 11. Give • brief, complete de.crlpcio s < of e r proposal. Including the propoeea . he : and the .See of tpro l< and ': e s several al o• quest lo later In this checklist that e ask you to de.erlbe ce tn up. t• o(, p r rool T _ls page. psa w o not p need co w ,n tho. a nmuers on -Ul fu iT APA\2Tmr t"i S1TF 6OTJTY}1 t"Iti,C —, Cc. Tu ')(i &loo U N 1T AN 11 11 CetiE_ r n12c:o1—t LA1-)1T ON SrrG �42v L n- C { t2 . 11 �/1QP ZT� l•• I Li o row, pro`e..l. Give •u( iclecr inlet for • person to uMer.cand the precise loc•t ion of your pro • project, Inc lud:ng any, and . ec m o n m an w tovhlp d range, 1f kronen. If proposal would, over • nogg of provide the bounder le• of the site(.). Provide • lags. description. site pla sa t n. vie int cy p. and opot .p, I u. o( il ' 1 ,va table 1ege or you .M submit ubmlt aoy plans required by :he agency, you are not required to dupi cu der .•i oap• or del led plan. .um hied wl c• any permit app Ica clan related to thl. checklist. IC> 9,1 c o fkNfl 1= 1u»i7C% 1,1'!' 1- 2.s -Litt NL6 1 /mil 1). Doses the proposed action lie within the Aqui!er Sensitive Area (ASAP The Gener•1 Sewer Service Area The Priority Sewer Service Ar•' The City of Spokane' (See: Spokane County'• ASA Overly Tone AtLso for boundarle.). TO BC cPVlt.[n 1ST Amlu'rr e. pit' itO9MrrJL ❑.DCY:S J 1. EAPm11 � a. General description of the .Ste (circle one)( A?) Trolling, hilly. steep .lope., mountainous, other: �,� b. 'that 1. the •t .pea •lope on Or a:e (•pproaaa c. < par nt t. '$•t general typn of ml Is . e found on the site (for ezesple, clay, sand, gravel, pest, suck): 1( you know the cl•••If Sutton of agricultural eel Is, specify thee and note any prime (.reland. ,1 CI- `( � tu t] l37 2ocJL Are there surface Indicatlom or history of un••bl. .oils in eM lm.dl. to vicinity! 2( de.erib,. directly al act top, - 7 ll IQ( TIS the Vine rcv covered py your oe.7 - in I k oro CPSS rr Ora Y .� -5a1 I li' S S(:;_t ,s,-N A PP\2( � or--1 IBC_. nn"Y71-111J Zvi:we:ion For Ages, ,.e Only 66{ war r p loam • (VAC 197 -11 -9601 Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIR @MENTAL ELEMEMTSI:ontinuec) e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any dl lung or grading propose°. Indicate source o' fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or uses If so, generally describe. Iii C� g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construc- tion (for example, asphalt or buildings)' h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other Impacts to the earth, If any. AIR - 70% SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE 2.0 1t)A -T;;P CoaciA143mCr' C Vhat type Of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile. odors industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project Is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantltes if known. ssl«l 4w \. c-r nm . 12, 11 C_. 5--. - CA - t ll�; b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so. generally describe. C. Proposed measures to reduce o fiE�\\ control emissions or other Impacts to air. If any: �1ra e1/4 - i G_ 1. VATER a. Surface. (1) Is there any surface water body on or In the immediate vicinity of the site including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater. lakes, ponds, wetlands)/ If yes, describe type and provide names. If approDnatc, state what stream or river It flows Into. o Lig (2) Mill the project require any work over, In, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3 Evaluation For Agency Use Only O &W1 C0 cry', I tox (• /AC l9) -11 -960) Section 1: :0.130(1) D. MN IROHI¢HEAL CLD.¢1C5 ;. antlnued) (3) Eectu.te the ...omit of fill and dredge materiel that would be placed in or ved from :he •urf ace eater or :ands and indicate the ea of the mite that vould be affected. Indicate the source of ill) area s rcert•l. (1) Will the propc.al r•qul re surf sc. us ter withdrawals or dire r• lon.t clue • general descrip- tion, purpose, and eoproxlomte quantities. If known. (5) Does the p[p7 =•41. lie within • 100 -year flood plain' If •o, note location on the site plan. 1K1 l %n (-V ( 5 ) Does the prop': -I involve •ny discharges o f waste u rial• to surface v•cers If so, describe the type s: nice and •n plctp+ud volume of di•ch•rse. b. Ground' (1) Will groundva.er be vlthdr•vn, or will Inter be discharged to groundwater' Clue general description, purpose, end •pp In ce quanutle. if known. (2) Describe vas,e uteri.' that will be discharged Into the [round from septic tanks or other ▪ anit•ry usste r c f•ciltp .p um . Describe the general site a( the t as, the Dber of houses to be •ervY (if applicable) or the somber of persona the g•em(.) ere erected .o n sPOtAa LAYS R0RmruL o*DIHAACZ I. (3) Describe any r• rtes• , other [tan thou dui goad for che dispose( of anti ry was c., Installed for the wrpo•e of dl•harging fluids below the ground surf ate (Includes eyefuls. such u the•• Inc the d: u .pel of •c g of drainage from floor drain.)• Describe the type of • y•ten, the •aount of ma t.rl.l to be disposed of through the sy•t m• and 1M pp. of erl•1• likely to be d•pos.d of (including matiri•ia which may •o•r the spite ludeerunt ly through •pill• or .a a r. suit of f ire: ighrlas •[f•Itl•)• 2 - 0 f5 Ro2 Sri L°P (4) Will soy chew-al. (•specially organic solvents or petroleum f oaf.) be stored in •beve- sround r un so derg +d •cor•ge tank.' If .o, whet . t typo and quaoticl of .at•rt•la vt11 he stored? o Evaluation For Agency use only (SAC 197-11 - 960) Section 11.10.370(1) 1. D07110MILIITAL GILICfDRS (continued) . (5) "sr protective mason* will be taken to Insure that leak, spill. of any chemicals stored or and on site will not be alloyed to pert oleic to groundwater (this Includes manures co keep chemicals out of disposal .yarn.. described to 36(1) and 16111: N UJG_ - 1 ( F_rntl./l' L l n nil !IL) S 1 TE_- c. ' Lter Runoff (including .corm v er): (1) Diatribe the source of r aotf (including storm water) and .etbd of collection and disposal if •ny (include quantities. if known). Vhere v111 this um ear fLovr VIll :his r ter :low into other carters' If u, describe ( 1 T K ? 1 Ru a..) „TEA 1.; I a V 114 (I F-30 SC-1. t2 rF_{T Cam , S LL C, • (2) )1111 any actin], be stored, h•ndled or wed on the site In a locution where • spill or leak will drain to 'urine or groundwater or to • storm water di spout sy.ce. discharging to surface or groundwater' (1) Could w materials enter ground or .ur(.ct waters' It .o. &enerally lest rib. N CF d Proposed measures reduce o control surf.ce, ground, and rune. water Lanacti, if any (1t the proposed action l-'u within the kaolin S.n.leto. Ar.. bo wpect•lly clam •rylanat lora r•lrting to facilities concerning Section. 16(6). 36(5). and 3c( 2) of rhl• c'.ckll.c) PLATS • !Tick or circle type of ...intuition found on the site: d• td vows tree: alder, maple. Arpin eeeeeeee n tree: fir, cedar, pine. other. . hrwbs . grass t l 11 IA 9' � -O? A L') v ruIL SPorAM two. R¢3 tAL ORDISAA6 • crop or grain. t soil plants, •tt•lt. buttercup. bullru•h, skunk cabbage, other. acer plants( wain Illly selg rua, .lit ell. ocher. other types of vegention. II b )(hat kind end amount of negate Lion will be rmaowed or alt•r.dl / --A \lL \II -C_ IT / 1IL'N c. Llet threatened or eod•ng•red •pectes known to b. on or near tae alts. d. Propo.ad land.c•ping, use of natlw• plant., or other ..sum ED pre.. roue or enhance eet.ut sun the site, if any: on CO A) (,) ITI-I- tfCt S A/0 C> 14tZ u f 'Evaluation For agency U•e Only IVAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) 3. ENYIRONIENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain, d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, If any: SPOKANE EMYiRO51ENTAL ORDINANCE ANIMALS A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds' hark, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk. beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the slte C. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the the completed project's energy needs' Describe whether It will be used for heating. manufac- turing. etc. VI -LOT ra - > - A O A\a (c : 1.) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties' If so. generally describe. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included In the plans of this proposal' List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Impacts. If any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals. risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal' If so, describe. U (1) Des ribe special emergency services that might be required. Fx-Th i c i 1 n;C.,, Ern i j7c. -, 1=-7-,0_0(c(7.` Ar.(5 /3_ Li LA._ ?- c), IT/A Imo_ II ? C- M1?�UL/�NLr£. ( \�c7 LIGl 6 Evaluation ror Agency Use Only (vAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. r.VIROM¢RCLL ELa r!S (continued) ENVIRoEneur L REALTN (continued) 1\ d. Will any structures be deaoll.h.dl If •o, which' C -, 1 pl'1 AX' -SN \) E . e. Nut 1. the current coning classification of the .rte! (. Thar is the current comprehensive plan d..tgnattoo of the ace' SnLAFE INVIIOHKENTAL ORDINANCE (2) Propeeed manure reduce or control eovlro .ntal hank turerde, l( eny. rj b. Noise: (1) Mist typo of nofa• ex let In the area which v •((•t your project (for en.pl.: cud fic', equipment, eper•tlon, other (2) Nut types sod level. of noise would be created by ••oci.ted with tb. project on • short-ter. or • long-ter. basis (for example traffic, con. tract ton; operation, other)' Indicate what hours noise vould core from the site. r dal 1 l 17 (a C 1 (U ti t- 7. 5 ?- 3 = .4 - C=' '� M (3) Proposed a•..ur. to reduce or cons l ot.. L.pacts, if any' \\O � 1� Zh Iv Cir /A-T ° r) LAID ANC SHORELI'IL USE • whet I. th• current use of the site end •dj.cent properties? ) 11 II' I \I/4CAfa1 , A\ (S. c6 1 Y7\ U 1_TI - Fnml U SE_ b IV. the site been used for agriculture' If . , describe. 0 C.) Demerit. any structure. on the site. CIAO / X. "R C)' '\A1 nmTh SHn(l \t7 / (' n IJ /.tZ g.1 - 5 Fnc.tn3lf O'rt-I cprJ 1\2 -7.7 U R _ 'At I g. '1f •ppllc•ble whet 1. the current .bat.l tee mast•r progress de•Ign•t1on of the •lte• II.s any part of the site barn classified s. .o - enetroom.ntal)y ..n.ttive •••) If so, •pectfy 1. Approximately how many people would r•ide or verb in the completed project! Eve. iron For Agency Use Only (VAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) 11. LIl9IR0MO:I9PAL 6.D¢lrtS (continued) 5 POKANL Er071y11:06RL1 ORDI (AACL J. Approximately how many people would the completed project d1•pl..ce. 1 \' 1.1 1� IV O 1-L, k. Proposed measure. to •void or reduce displacement lap•cts, if any: Proposed measures to ensure the propoul Is compatible with exi'tlag and projected land a.i end plane, if •ny: At L «5 ■ to 5-,A \--I r_ /A cta fa \ -, � - I MLA 1 - 1 9. HOUSING •• Approala•rtly how many units wor pro. ld W tded, if any' low -1 ncome housing. \ �- U rN \ TS 1 VPn n ( \Nr.nM° 1- c-)Inl Approximately row many units, If any, would be eltminat•d' Indicate whether high -. addle -, or low - Income housing. c Proposed measure• to reduce or l housing Smp•ct., If , o�� ro D Indicate whether high -, middle -, or 10 ALS cS •. Vh•t is the [•lam height of •ny propane eproposed' a O(.). not ircledlce ant 0'a 'What to !h- principal exterior building naterl•l(•) u ( 11 ^ O Co 0 C--) I 0 11`1 C�—r • b 'met view• In the t ®ed1•te vicinity would he altered or obecructed c Proposed manures to reduce or control aesthetic lap•ct•• If any: K1 11. LICHT AND GLAD a. 'that type of light or ;Lace vill the proposal produce' 'Out flag of day would It saloly occur! IQ It-- Could light or afar• tram the ±tn1•had project Le • Macy hax•rd or lntert or with •LVe1 Vh•t existing off-site sources of light or pare say •f(.ct your proposal' 1<,) n�G d. Proposed as•ures to duce o control light and tare inp•¢•, if aay' to ear . e valu•tlon For Agency Use Only f (VAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.210(1) B. EI1171R0RPA[AL mamas (cootlontd) 11. RECREATION a, What designated and informal recry n. tloosl opportunities • e In chw iedl•te atrinity! / ! n1 Ak:T`{ K.PC fi0 arn c3'ti C I( ITIIS S A tcn Af1-1111 T)6.` b. Would the proposed pra •ct dt•plac• •ny existing recreational us•• If go, describe. fl 0 SN[Al2 RVIROIOItirGL ORDINANCE c. proposed .u• . to reduce o a • control impact. o n u cation, including crclon•1 opportunl- tfee co be pro•tded by the projects or applicant, if any 1\ U Iri'1 13. HISTORIC AND COLTIIAAL FRLSEAVAC:ON a. Are there any places or objects llama on or proposed for estlon -1, tics or local ornery.- tlon registers clew to be on or next to the .lt•7 If •o, g•n•r•117 describe Generally ducrlbe any lanaaark• or evidence of ILL.torlc •rchaeologital, scientific or cultural taoort•ncc tarot to be on or next to the alt•. N l\ O 'N Y c proposed measure. to reduce or control impacts, if any, it TRANSPORTATION •. Identify public streeti an< highway. . wing the .it. end de•crib. existing re e. systn. ,Show-on at plans, if any .: l R-PAV h_ . S>,= 0.0 tom- L i l - Ic 9 K) 0 - P_ Proposed •rues to the b. I. sire rv.d b+ public tr•a•it? If not, what is the •pproxiaece dle•nce to the eeareet transit .top \AO IT H I iJ Vi ED m I I.t= c. no many perking •puts would the creepier.) project have? Ro. espy would the project eli.los re' 111/4: nc,1 I Czu AP P y I M AT&T. Y 1- 3.2 ?c K&T .Li rYINAT F_ AN -/. Will the proposal r.9ul r• any new rude or •tr.e•, or tapro•. .nta to exi•11ng road• or err ..r• not Including drive . ..7! If •o, centrally describe (Solt u v c• whether public or prite). Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oft eater. rail, or air trauporc•tlon7 If so, generally describe. Evlua elan For Agency Ore Only . flick ii- ( Ca LC) (WAC 197 -11 -960) _Section 11.10.230(: e. [NV t ROhf(Llr'J.L aDmrrs (cocci oiled) SPOKANE GMT EOenfrr.AL 0R01RANCE (. (low many vehicular tripe per day would be gener•ced by the completed project' If known. indlc•te when peak would occur. APPQ&Y 170 `Nol c t— �‘te.- 1 e 1 1C (Do% of g. Proposed *enures [o reduce or control tr•neport•tlun iep•cte, if any: 0 ad 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would tKe project r .. n. t. r. •ult to en Increased need for public rvtce• (for eple. fire proc[to, police protection, health care, schools, other) If •0, genera Ill describ. N o b. Propo ee•eures to reduce or control direct Smp•ct• on public services, I' any 1 \Y O 1 Fr 1b. UTILITIES /'�� ✓ . a. Circle utttl urtentl• (table •1 the site: ((Corry iu turd gas, EtterC[e •ervlce, ale phone r(!<.n r<we<<l ep tic •y•te., NrL� 3( F- i . ll . n Describe the marma nta• taut ire proposed for the proj•cc, thu utttt:). providing t4 service and the general con.truct ton act:write• on the 'ice or to the t.medl• vicinity which sight be needed to C. SIGNATURE S ec J,: P 1r_ A-t c (JA (Si R I .11, (2 J In 1 =1Z oa[• 1 / /9 Proponent R , /... Proponent, (51g r (( #.a tore) Phone — ry 7 Person completing for.: pp ( 7 11 m A fL IA A 0 S Phone: �3S — . !valuation For kgenry U.e Only I. the under• lgned, evear under the pevlq of perjury that the •Wile reepa .. • r made truthfully and to the `a« of an kw L nledge 1 .o underrund that, should there be •oy ra.'u1 ml arepre•ent•t Son o willful lack of full dlaclmau« on my part, ire glen, mail withdrew •cy determination of nonagnIf Ic•nce Out tt .Sght l•ue in relt•rea upon [n1s checklist l 1011 SiA77 USE ONLY Staff member(.) revtevtng checklist geed on this eta(` revlev of to enetron:o•l chetklier and other pertinent 1nt ormattau, the •t•f! Concludes that there arc no probable eigol(Sunt advert. 1. pact • and recm.end• • detemina [ton of oon.lgplftcmce e. Conclude• that probable :gni!ic•nt •Ever•• envtmnaot•1 l.p•e• do ezl.t for the Curren propo•_ end recommend. • mitigated decor - mina ion of oowlgnlftctcce with conditions. C. Concludo that there •r probable .Ignlf Kane adverse enwlromeent.l Impact. and [•amend. a deremto•tloe of .Ifni. - cane.. FILING r!I - t75.CO 10 P/- S 6C0R6EJ T pi's - P<) /2t( / / r-, ( c � err_ t 0 •I'f✓kWti7 1 I.)(a. r ig 223 0 O VRTH r AVE GE- 1308 -78 F* NI XON U <, y CC F Ni I N n AVE. Q Rrvc0.sior ~ Q c\ EL. /98 ROAD It TH MILWAUKEE RA /LROAD a v .. rap! 'rr!',, Ng 2312+ SEVENTH OPFCPTUN ITV SCHOOL EIGHTH AVE, A L K I A L- L. Y WAY he Get C 6 35 ir Jee b /4 .. ' . N •' ,� So Ay EMEINNIN vl 0- , OM��,,( PebTh 2 '3 NM T 4 3 4 8 0 C 5 6 l ;pm 5 W N " d 4 TN rI it nI 2 / - IL �.viw 73 3r s O 3 3 h co I lµ APPLE WAY 1 Ale 1 2 01 - H to 9 1 n b t . N V 0 IN SEC. 21, T.2 1 o I p C O fr b= SIXTH �o- o Q.. o " SEVENTH AVE 199 /Frr: r8 Jk .,CAI COLI — r i9 • ryY 1 Rv I 1 „:7 3"2. ;# • 20 - TYPE TEL 1-Au0SciaPtLIC. r fl N • -; :7 3 4 - : Thi b i " . : 1/217 , A ... - c s i i E s .-A o l ; C O H: T . / e r r , (Ci" r-: .„ • GUEE-/T I 26- o 2.0 - \ • D ;2° 0 NiM Rq .-1(=e P SPOKANE COUNTY COURT XOUSC TO: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Robert Payne, E. 10821 4th Ave., Spokane WA 99206 Willard Boatwright, Box 921, Post Falls, ID 83854 -0921 FROM: John W. Harrington, Planner II DATE: July 26, 1990 RE: SP- 636 -90 Findings of Fact Conclusions and Decision July 20, 1990 Attached is a copy of the above - referenced Findings which were recently mailed to you with a corrections as initialed in Planning Department Condition No. 13 and County Engineer's Conditions No. 3, 5, 14. Please let this serve as the official copy. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. mo c: file Attachment ISIIPLCaNIE CID PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF ) FINDINGS OF FACT, SHORT PLAT NO. SP- 636 -90 ) CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION THIS MATTER, an application for subdivision of land, from Robert Payne has been rece ved and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulations, on the ZOtkday of July, 1990. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering the decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The proposal is to divide .9 acres into 3 lots for the development of one additional single family residence. 3. The proposal is located south of and adjacent to 3rd Avenue and north of and adjacent to 4th Avenue approximately 500 ft. east of University Road. 4. The current zoning of the property is Multiple Family Suburban. The proposed lot sizes, frontage and intended uses are allowed within this zone. 5. The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Urban. The development and uses proposed are generally in accord with this category/designation. 6. The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan designates 4th Avenue as a Collector Arterial with a planned right of way widtkof 70 feet. 7. The required public notice was provided for this proposal and agencies having a potential interest in the project were notified and recommendations solicited. 8. No one in the area commented on the proposal. 9. The width of improved roadway along the frontage of 3rd Avenue is 40 ft. of asphalt from curb to curb and a sidewalk is constructed. The functional classification of 3rd Avenue is Local Access, and is improved beyond local access requirements. 10. Recognizing the recommended conditions and Spokane County development standards, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by platting the subdivision. 11. The project is exempt from environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -800 (6) (a). DECISION Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Short Plat Application SP- 636-90 is hereby APPROVED until August 1, 1990, subject to conditions noted below. Most of the conditions of approval shall be accomplished by the applicant and/or sponsor prior to finalization of the short subdivision. This decision is final unless appealed in writing, consistent with adopted appeal procedures. These Conditions of Approval apply to applicant(s), owner(s) of the property, heirs, assigns or any successors -in- interest to property. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS C 1. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. SP- 636 -90 2 The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. No increase of density or lot number shall occur without a new application submittal and approval. 1 3.1 The Spokane County Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to August 1, 1993. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. r •r 5. A final plat number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such number to be approved by the County Planning Director /designee. l 7: Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8 Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 9: The following statement shall be placed in the final plat dedication: No more than one (1) dwelling structure shall be placed on any lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships or building sites without first filing and receiving approval of a replat." The final plat map shall indicate by a clear dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement that: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." I '11. No water plan is required and a simple tap is needed at the time of building permit -.. release. 12 A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 13. Spokane County Planning Department is required to record with the County Auditor a • "Title Notice," as prepared and signed by the applicant, for a future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities to run with the land, and the future acquisition area reservation shall not be removed without prior approval by the Spokane County Planning Department. Notice shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit and shall provide the following: a. 5 feet of future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing right -of -way dedication required by the County Engineer, along 4th Avenue. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. b. Building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured 25 ft. from the northern edge of the Future Acquisition Area that is resgrved for road right -of -way and utilities along 4th Avenue. c. The %5 ft. Future Acquisition Area, until acquired by Spokane County, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfields, signs or others) shall be considered "interim" uses. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said Future Acquisition Area. d. This "Title Notice" shall be signed by the applicant to serve as official notice and acknowledgement of said Future Acquisition Area for road right -of -way and utilities. SP- 636 -90 3 COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS t,1.4, The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to .. dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. Fyn 1.. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county mad system. :3.: Dedication of 10 ft. of additional right -of -way alon /l4th Avenue is required. (4' Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 5. Sidewalks are required along the arterial on /4th Avenue. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvements, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns. This is applicable to 4th Avenue. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvements. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns. This is applicable to 4th Avenue. The following statement be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s)' property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, to the formation of an RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s)' property. If an RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (a) that the improvement(s) or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible; (b) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceed the cost and expense of formation of the RID; and (c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of an RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW, and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners affirming the final assessment roll. It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns without participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. However, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree that if said RID waiver expires without construction of the required improvements, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree to construct the required improvements at their own expense, pay to r 3: „At 4 , 6` {12. SP- 636 -90 4 Spokane County the then estimated cost of the required improvements to enable the County to complete the same, or furnish a bond or other secure method suitable to the County (which may include the execution of another RID waiver agreement) providing for or securing to the County the actual construction of the improvements. All of the requirements of this agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their successor(s) or assign(s). This is applicable to 4th Avenue. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Collector Arterial standard for the improvement of 4th Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 10 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the dedication of additional right -of -way and the roadway improvements herein specified. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies 4th Avenue as a Collector arterial. The existing right -of -way width of 40 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along the 4th Avenue frontage shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to 4th Avenue Applicant must demonstrate, per short plat 63 90, that 60 ft. of dedicated right -of -way exists on the 3rd Avenue frontage of the plat. There appears to be a 20 ft. discrepancy between the County Engineers map and the designed short plat which would leave lot I of the short plat without frontage on 3rd Avenue. Applicant shall dedicate the additional 20 ft. of property to provide for a 60 ft. right of way along the frontage of 3rd Avenue. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS (17, Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by (the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities Spokane County. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that a suitable site for on -site sewage disposal system are available on tract 1. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that the existing on -site sewage disposal system serving the residence located on tracts 2 & 3 are wholly located within the boundaries of the tract. '10.\ Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. Note: There may not be adequate area available on tract 1 for the development of 4-5 multiple family residences. r 11: 112, 3'1 „• e' SP- 636=90 5 The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage systems may be authorized." The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as approved by County and state health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service, as well as fire protection, to each tract prior to sale of each tract." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS a . Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2.' • The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which the petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit.shall be double - plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems." BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS :•, We have no requirements for this proposal - existing conditions. MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY .1. Water service valve boxes serving the existing residences fronting 4th Avenue shall be updated to traffic model style. SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT NO. 1 ( 1 SP- 636 -90 meets all Fire District #1 requirements as submitted. Approved the 2O of July, 1990. HN W. HARRINGT N JR. Planner II Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing SP- 636 -90 6 will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $100 processing fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. pc: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Robert Payne, E. 10821 4th Ave., Spokane, WA. 99206 Willard Boatwright, Box 921, Post Falls, Id. 83854 -0921 File 1 BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF ) FINDINGS OF FACT, SHORT PLAT NO. SP- 636 -90 ) CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION THIS MATTER, an application for subdivision of land, from Robert Payne has been rece ved and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulations, on the ZOtkday of July, 1990. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering the decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The proposal is to divide .9 acres into 3 lots for the development of one additional single family residence. 3. The proposal is located south of and adjacent to 3rd Avenue and north of and adjacent to 4th Avenue approximately 500 ft. east of University Road. 4. The current zoning of the property is Multiple Family Suburban. The proposed lot sizes, frontage and intended uses are allowed within this zone. 5. The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Urban. The development and uses proposed are generally in accord with this category/designation. 6. The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan designates 4th Avenue as a Collector Arterial with a planned right of way width of 70 feet. 7. The required public notice was provided for this proposal and agencies having a potential interest in the project were notified and recommendations solicited. 8. No one in the area commented on the proposal. 9. The width of improved roadway along the frontage of 3rd Avenue is 40 ft. of asphalt from curb to curb and a sidewalk is constructed. The functional classification of 3rd Avenue is Local Access, and is improved beyond local access requirements. 10. Recognizing the recommended conditions and Spokane County development standards, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by platting the subdivision. 11. The project is exempt from environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -800 (6) (a). DECISION Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Short Plat Application SP- 636 -90 is hereby APPROVED until August 1, 1990, subject to conditions noted below. Most of the conditions of approval shall be accomplished by the applicant and/or sponsor prior to finalization of the short subdivision. This decision is final unless appealed in writing, consistent with adopted appeal procedures. These Conditions of Approval apply to applicant(s), owner(s) of the property, heirs, assigns or any successors -in- interest to property. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. J ctiem,vG o,u E,,,4, cwt. 1, S , 14 as- IA 7/0 /to SP- 636 -90 2 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. No increase of density or lot number shall occur without a new application submittal and approval. 3. The Spokane County Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 4. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to August 1, 1993. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 5. A final plat number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such number to be approved by the County Planning Director /designee. 6. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 9. The following statement shall be placed in the final plat dedication: "No more than one (1) dwelling structure shall be placed on any lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships or building sites without first filing and receiving approval of a replat." 10. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement that: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 11. No water plan is required and a simple tap is needed at the time of building permit release. 12. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 13. Spokane County Planning Department is required to record with the County Auditor a "Title Notice," as prepared and signed by the applicant, for a future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities to run with the land, and the future acquisition area reservation shall not be removed without prior approval by the Spokane County Planning Department. Notice shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit and shall provide the following: a. 5 feet of future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing right -of -way dedication required by the County Engineer, along 4th Avenue. b. Building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured 25 ft. from the northern edge of the Future Acquisition Area that is reserved for road right -of -way and utilities along 4th Avenue. c. The 25 ft. Future Acquisition Area, until acquired by Spokane County, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfields, signs or others) shall be considered "interim" uses. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said Future Acquisition Area. d. This "Title Notice" shall be signed by the applicant to serve as official notice and acknowledgement of said Future Acquisition Area for road right -of -way and utilities. SP- 636 -90 3 COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. ,3. Dedication of 10 ft. of additional right -of -way alongNelth Avenue is required. 4. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. �5. Sidewalks are required along the arterial on\4th Avenue. 6. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. 7. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvements, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns. This is applicable to 4th Avenue. 8. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvements. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns. This is applicable to 4th Avenue. 9. The following statement be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s)' property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, to the formation of an RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s)' property. If an RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (a) that the improvement(s) or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible; (b) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceed the cost and expense of formation of the RID; and (c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of an RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW, and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners affirming the final assessment roll. It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns without participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. However, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree that if said RID waiver expires without construction of the required improvements, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree to construct the required improvements at their own expense, pay to SP- 636 -90 4 Spokane County the then estimated cost of the required improvements to enable the County to complete the same, or furnish a bond or other secure method suitable to the County (which may include the execution of another RID waiver agreement) providing for or securing to the County the actual construction of the improvements. All of the requirements of this agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their successor(s) or assign(s). This is applicable to 4th Avenue. 10. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Collector Arterial standard for the improvement of 4th Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 10 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 11. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 12. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the dedication of additional right -of -way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 13. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies 4th Avenue as a Collector arterial. The existing right -of -way width of 40 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along the 4th Avenue frontage shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to 4th Avenue. 14. Applicant must demonstrate, per short plat 63390, that 60 ft. of dedicated right -of -way exists on the 3rd Avenue frontage of the plat. There appears to be a 20 ft. discrepancy between the County Engineers map and the designed short plat which would leave lot 1 of the short plat without frontage on 3rd Avenue. Applicant shall dedicate the additional 20 ft. of property to provide for a 60 ft. right of way along the frontage of 3rd Avenue. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 2. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by (the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 7. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. 8. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that a suitable site for on -site sewage disposal system are available on tract 1. 9. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that the existing on -site sewage disposal system serving the residence located on tracts 2 & 3 are wholly located within the boundaries of the tract. SP- 63690 5 10. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. Note: There may not be adequate area available on tract 1 for the development of 4 -5 multiple family residences. 11. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage systems may be authorized." 12. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 13. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: 'The public water system, as approved by County and state health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service, as well as fire protection, to each tract prior to sale of each tract." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which the petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems." BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. We have no requirements for this proposal - existing conditions. MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY 1. Water service valve boxes serving the existing residences fronting 4th Avenue shall be updated to traffic model style. SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT NO. 1 1. SP- 636 -90 meets all Fire District #1 requirements as submitted. Approved the 2-0 of July, 1990. W. HARRINGT N JR. HN Planner II Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing SP- 636 -90 6 will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $100 processing fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. pc: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Robert Payne, E. 10821 4th Ave., Spokane, WA. 99206 Willard Boatwright, Box 921, Post Falls, Id. 83854 -0921 File ideddeddedddddeddeddddddddedddedegReport, ViewerOdeddeddeddedededededeeeeeeeeeee; °PAGE 1 09:07:11 28 JUL 1993 ° °Road# Road Names MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info °05825 3RD AV 00.000 DAVID ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20° 00.060 THIERMAN ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 O 00.120 ELIZABETH RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20° O 00.180 BRADLEY RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 o 00.250 DORA ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20° O 00.310 COLEMAN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.430 GIRARD RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20° 00.560 PARK RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 °05826 3RD AV 00.000 BMP of road U 19 PAVED 25° ° 00.110 ROBIE RD U 19 PAVED 25 °06018 3RD AV 00.000 BMP of road U 19 PAVED 40° ° 00.060 NEWER RD U 19 PAVED 40 °06051 3RD AV 00.000 BLAKE RD U 19 PAVED 40° ° 00.060 LEATHA LN U 19 PAVED 40 °06052 3RD AV 00.000 FLORA RD U 19 PAVED 30° ° 00.050 COACH DR U 19 PAVED 30 00.110 BELL ST U 19 PAVED 30° 00.140 ARC ST U 19 PAVED 30 aeeeeeeedddeeddddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef °List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) 0 ilaaaaaaeaaaeaeeeddeeeeeeaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag °Esc -Exit Enter -Next Page 0 S P O K A N PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM C o u N T Y TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Bill Wedlake, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Ted Trepanier, Department of Transportation Connie Brady, Spokane Transit Authority Central Valley School District Modem Electric Water Company Fire District No. 1 Department of Ecology Post Office FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: July 27, 1993 RE: Change of Conditions Bonus Density Request for George Paras APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING AUGUST 4, 1993 AT 1:15 p.m. COUNTY PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM. 2ND FLOOR Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Stacy Bjordahl for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Stacy Bjordahl of the Planning Department at 456 -2205. c: George Paras, 3124 S. Regal, Suite 160, Spokane, WA 99223 Lawrence Dunsmore, 1115 N. Pines Road, Spokane, WA 99206 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456 -2205 August 18, 1993 at 1:15 p.m. George Paras Generally located South of and adjacent to 3rd Avenue, approximately 600 feet east of University Road in Section 21, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban within Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: Urban Residential (UR -22) and Urban Residential (UR -22) with bonus density. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Change of Conditions and Bonus density request within existing Urban Residential (UR -22) zone. PARCEL NUMBER: 45212.0520 SITE SIZE Approximately .646 acres APPLICANT: George Paras 3124 S. Regal, Suite 160 Spokane, WA 99223 (509) 535 -8377 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Stacy Bjordahl B. A GENFRAI, INFORMATION; NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE' %-1 i rI � 74 . fj _ 6& MA 7 ING ADDRESS: g ,KF(f--7 q L <1.-t irz_ her) CITY I�7� L�i1JG STATE: 7:0)4 • ZIP: `7 ( 7., ,R PHONE: C 3 cT € - 7 7 (work) L /c /X 7 2g (hom IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: /qn/7 (: / -lA7V 7 PHONE MAILING ADDRESS: E. /o q / Z/7 4 N ;r CITY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PART r STATE: IA 1/4 . ZIP: 9„20(0 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) o Cn c /(L /90 RF_ ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft-) ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL Ej. l(If; /(n c /_ , /G.tC:261 EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ES"LARLISHED) (J/- - 7 'z EXISTLNG USE OF PROPERTY (JC��/ T OAmi= I /i - P67D PROPOSED ZONING /J -7 ? i ,/ o,u Si COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY bQI (7/ SCHOOL DISTRICT 0—E Nit / \ -Lt = 4-? FIRE DISTRICT 41 / '— SPCl//a njE \/41 i r V WATER PURVEYOR /2/0/1C.xAJ kt EC 7R I(' PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings ( ) Duplexes ( ) Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Other ( ) - Descnbc: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT A l IONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY. p- X05 -93 J,ECA[, /7,ONE RPCI,AS WICA'I'ION IINI'ORMA'FIOIN: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: C /i SSC() SECTION / TOWNSHIP -2 . C NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Multifamily dwcllmgs Industnal ( ) Mixed Use ( ) / i7T K, /A; _6- e, A? r= /4L r; y' WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD. ,-2 (v 7 -9 RANGE / /Vii Ail= ,Z•07 LI / 1)) 61 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN AR I ERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ( 1 YES <NC NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED. EXISTING ZONE(S) /J P -77 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) ( (2,1/77i Al; A1 // 715 / 7 ma Ti rE FOLL OWING DI-.SCRIRCD PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE BELOW. IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? l .l /ggc nlrL /1. /Y77 A_IC /t c /ara St n c Tf r_ WHAT ARE THE CIIANGED C NDITIONS OF ?HIE AREA WI !ICI I YOU FEET, MAKE TIES PROPOSAL WARRANTED? S/ % -(2 /r/i 1/7 l?Z /CE Ah ✓ //I / 7 - '/ L{t2 S AirCit) /c/(! /L /�,� cico 777 Zl Z /7- A/i�S 3. .� T'=� iha,c J. EA) »n ii n rn i'7 $ /inn n TD ( ,,ij V >g% . u)6JR gtki .A s_n) )4D/7); 4ccon.16-7 WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? AIYJ I'T/n 11 YR r'iG 7I / r FT - ( A i /= ./2i=n 2ni r9 4PAr 7 sh'T / AA) I rs WILL / V F_ APPi9 /7,5A.2 /P7P 4-G7IT OA) Al7r' I RgL 54/7 Re °Peer /ES WHAT AT FACTORS S SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICA I'IOiN''? ,q/Yc / FA/ 2- 2/ /JLD - lain/ t R y 2Gry//= /-14 tit A/l. A4"I9I7l5cKl/17 /fif_ , 2 /c.//J /T /A1(1 -CF_ /.4"A Lc / T`/. /1 CH 1!� S �<I 4 A)6.7L -n S , urP' .rest 26(/ (' -s Lc%; t p 7 Al STA' (/ CT/'n / Wit/- niz, l V T� A[ /nc FCR /4 / /IC7 /frg /' U S /r WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PRAPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND US ES OP(icp( / c, ('ci „7 ?H% /:1/7 - SU/g R(%U/11/ //i1 G., Al ALO LSE -1/.S AC'c/f=CT lC-' /c( CO/;1 /Y(Y /I PO KAIAIL C . 1L / r/ c/ .621V / t//tl &ZL_C --, ;J,_ / /7 /:T,r /T 'S A 7= /1./0 S(” P /NG, XF. (Jta / / ?Ic /Li F: T S ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATIO?}' ; Page 3 of 4 THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE TI IE PLANNING DEI'AR'IMENT STAFF WITH ' WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/EIRE DISTRICT • A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRP -ROTE ION DISTRICT NO. B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS HA1'E (IIAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OURINEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: k4 k OR UNABLE TO CALCULA I L NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE, AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: /2 ref t , ^ ,' .b . teme. V 1 1lC� Pt. ��6 r � �✓^-�( � �x iWc , • City 7 z « � 3 FIRE DISTRICT SIGN.ATURE/TITLE DATE A . SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (ice) (JLAVE NOT) BEEN.MADE. 8 REQUIREMENTS /COMMENTS: - Wade amia- 711.oleiti Gatti; WATER DIS 1 RICT COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE . T) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGN TED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS /Jn'o✓i A. COMMENTS: A. COMMENTS: PART II WATER PURVEYOR HEALTH DLSTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLA SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) r 7� 5//12 N. T UIE /TITLE DA ciA 4/ � l TV L� SIGNATURE /II E DATE Lom- SIGNATURE /TITLE 7 - /y j DATE /7i l" AL REQUIREMENTS FOR EEN SATISFIED. /J ,cT SIGNATURE/TITLE AT SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: h / Sc� %%� ./ /� 7- /1 Y� SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION I Page 4 of 4 EXPIRES 02)09/ 99 SIGNED: -Y ,4ey7(g.i C 1 / ' f-7 NATURE OF OR REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE NOTARY SEAL 1993, BY ) ss: DATE SUBMITTED. DATE ACCE ED: 'I / ) / "7 i /yn PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION 1. THE SED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION REQL S3 F�'� Ztv ; )MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAR'[' Iv (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF A UTHORIZA"I'ION! 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT TEIE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY ANDTO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT 1 AM THE OWNER Or RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, fF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED f1EREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY AC IONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF r� c� re c> ' l2 ' DATE ADDRR SS /0t l &42C/c PHONE: 1 ; - 76sy Zn - G Wig 97206 ' SIG D AND SWORN TO /AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS (' ha nd /P r Notary Public in and for t c State Residing al' �/�0. My appointment expires: /3 DALE PHONE: ZIP • ZIP 01 Washington PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) FILE n: =_C- � ( 3', 7/ (4/6 TOTAL FEE / a 3 / O 7) RECEIPT / /1 / c 6.% B Y: 7/7.0 3 off¢— 9 74 S DATE DAY OF ..76; 121 ec ✓✓7 /Gras , 7 / " ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION I, TI -1 REQC,. S 1 o EXPIRES 0209/ 99 t ATURE APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE NOTARY SEAL DATE SUBMIT"I'ED DATE ACCEPTED: TOTAL FEES: PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION SIGNED AND SWORN TO /AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS 0 ./� , , 1993, BY IOber L. � e Page 4 of 4 SED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATE: � //-S /f PHONE l7 .7¢— 9747 v, ZIP 9 ( 2?DG PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE .ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE I RUTHFULLY AND TO THE'BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH iS WRl f IEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUT RIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS /HER BEHALF. �y SIGNED. / ?� � � �� DATE r 4. 7 , // ADDRESS: L t . /dC /7 T M��' ' - 6f PI IONE. /4 '" / /J1` / M4 . i4 ZIP- 99-70!6 'PA F 1 e Notary Puhlic ni anc IIc:ih SLilc of \Pasitalgum I:. tailing .ii 9.02 .9s My appomlmcnl cxpiics: PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) FILE !I: B Y. RECEIPT'! ls %9,25 D.A F_ / 5 DAY OF :15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Tract 173 as per Plat of OPPORTUNITY as recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, on Page 20, records of Spokane County, Washington and more particularly described as follows: Tract "A" of SHORT PLAT 636 -90 as recorded in Short Plat Book 7, on page 77. AND INCLUDING A portion of Tract 174 as per Plat of OPPORTUNITY as recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, on Page 20, records of Spokane County, Washington and more particularly described as follows: The West 115.02 feet of said Tract 174 lying Southerly of the former Railroad Right of Way. EXCEPT the North 291.5 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the South 147.00 feet thereof. EXPIRES 0209/ 5'4 N 0 5 1 RF 1-o( rofa HAP 51 1 E AREA - Z8, 14-L A. F. = .6o4c2 4G. . . x 22 14.2' uU r5 + 4. WITS /P, Bo4uy = ?. �7 -�U1r5 MAX. -_ AVE. 2u5.o2. 2 312 . - 790 t.F. • 3. 632 (I-VIC. 3 -1 B2 590 «.F.: . -SCE E PL a kl A. 17 - .U1.11T', �1v -I 4 . 5 2c -9 1!_! • 1. F5eo Roo - Cv 5' 2 BED Roo .� b Z 1345 9 _IE Ct MI'.: I'I' al-112CEIST SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 [1] SPOKANE ENYIROMMENTAL ORDINANCE (MAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.270(11 T. • Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: , Date checklist prepared' Rev .2/1/88 Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPAI enapte- a7.21C RC:, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environme-tal a »acts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement INS/ must be prepared 'or all proposals witn probable signifi :ant a erse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of pis cneckllst is to provide information to help you and the agency 'dent ` uapaz :s from your proposal land to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal. if it can be done) and to help the agency oec ide whether an 1:5 is revel -ed. Instructions for Applicants. This environmental checklist asks you to describe same basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use :'.'s cnea li r to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions brief;:, with the most precise information known. or give the best description you can. rou must answer each question accurately and carefully, to Ine best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able :: answer the questions from your own observations or project plans witnwt the need to hire experts. t f you really do not know Inc answer, or 0 s question toes not apply to your proposal, write, 'do not know' or 'does not apply.' Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary deist's later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning, shoreline. and landmark designations. Answer these atwit Ions " you can. you have problems, the goverrnental agencies can assist you The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even If you plan I0 0o them Over a period of time or on Olf`e parcels of land. Attach any additional Information that will describe your proposal or Its environmental effects inc agency to which you submit :Nis checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional Information reasonably related to determining If there may be slgnt''cant e:ve ^.e Impact. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply' IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR MOMPROJECT ACTIONSIPart DI. For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words ' project." "apps leant.' and 'property or site' snout: be rem:. as 'proposal," 'proposer,' and 'affected geographic area,' respectively. A. 6ACKGR0UN0 /f L� LL1 - 1 • f -?& - • �r� �� 1. 'lase of proposed project, if app llcab le % ; 1-1 F Qom. K_T /-i C)41)7.17 C)41)7.17 ('✓(rr N:17 S !-i/; U Vr: U� CO D {-� ( :Io I7 -CA N T A PAPTYk1± rr PP C'c11=r"� Ma! of Applicant: ( L,A , i,'o D . ` ' / pEEZ) 1f R k E J • (2 1 r Address and phone number of applicant or contact person' c) • _ 7 7I 7 -Y R1: =cries c-:-,LA I I f (C,o c -,Po4F - A U)A. q / 4 ?.z3 ( SC c - a S. Agency requesting checklISti Cn(1 : /c NI e_ COO iN\ 6. Proposed timing or schedule (Including phasing, If applicable)* A C,I c-I (t S i ) Ci 3 — 7-1- r'->r 17 I `I C 1 L\ PI A tit. -= CA DE.pArz F1E 01_ 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion. or further activity related to or comecled with this proo :tat' ,f yes, erplain b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal' If yes, explain. rite to. 8. L i�t any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, Or will be prepared, directly related to tt :s proposal. ID 1,s LT d-, w lC"C' l,v (VAC 197- 11-960) Section 11.10 230(11 A. RACEGVAHD (continued) Do you Ino• vMChar appll•clona ere pendlny for governmental •pprovale of other Dronosals directly affcct lag the your proposal' If ye., explain. .r -.. rry covered by fil:I I�1 otla Be 1Y), f (— r7n7 a ✓'Ji 1cc-1!S J t 1 10 List any government epprov 1 or permits that krill be needed for your propo..l, If moon. dr'i'lls 3 Jcicv' 4 OP J/33 y � aTti 2i!\I )_-rL � 0 , i - - , - c - t i f l i t t l C . , - D R Al.f: 1.'�C. -1 \..:,1T1-� /�l( c i r r i ; t\', onRn 1"A.I �C_. P (JI-I ITS 1--i) 'fL (-O latt c T- I C) rJ 1:3otJu S Pn2. ' 0 k117 5 ToTYt u.,1 17 uMIrS 11 Give a brief, complete d•.crlptlon of r proposal, Including the proped a a. uses the et of the project end . _ There are of ns g.trons later to this checklist that •tt oa you to describe cet.ln ..pacts of, your proposal. You do not need to ep tno.e a Dage nsw <n on :hie I.� — Cot 1:, IT A 0Ak2T rn r> lc S,1T r CO tcn,1 N'i , c; �C�3Go UN 5 AIN \1 \I 6NE. IQ, Fni2i:Z _, Lk1J,TS. OA 5 (111 S1T V 7,<=1/4 L IT14 Col? 6 -12 F. 1`l Cif -■2 Pr} tZT'c--, 1:. ingot ion of the proposal Give na .uf: tc:ant tnfort ion for • person to under.r.nd the prvctee loc.t ion of your cn prop-. pro)ect I n a .. street •ddre, if any, and d r ct tovosMC and rang., if know n . If : proposal would r o • nge o. . provide tn. `. bounded.. of the .1t.(•). Provide • l.g•l description, .it. plan. etclni r, ac map. •nd topoeraphtca p. .. o i( :c nabb "vat labl. : tangs or should submit any plans required by :he agency. you e not required to duplt . mops or derailed plans .um i you hed wls• .r permit app. lcstton related to this checklist. -F_. InRI flNn F . 10 Si7C9 2,�!' I\U-6 . I- 2,S -ciL1 tvl_G 1 /c-1 13. Does the propoaed a :. n lie within the Aquifer Sensitive tree (ASA)' The General Sever Service Area! The Priority 4. Service Ares' rho City of Spokane' (Inc s Spokane County s ASA Overlay Zone etW for bound•rle e). h:S F 4 f c - )S..3 r; TO be COPL2‘.20 eY A IGA:et B. nry 1 I0,-.Rta 61.rCYrS 1 EA it .. General de•crtptlon of the .Its (circle one) �d, rolling. hilly, steep .lope.. .ounutnw., other' b. 'lh.t 1. the .teepee .lope on the .St. .•pproaaae percent atop.)' ( y -A what g•n.ral typos of moll. •s found on ch. a nand, )' rice (for exa.ple, clay, nd, grovel, peat, Huck If you know the cL.a1('carton of •grtcultural .oils, opacity than and note •ny prise f•r.l.nd. L i' SA ND l3/ 2r , r.l d. Ire there surf •ce tnditactona or Minor) of mumble mils in the lined late vicinity! If dearibe. o ' SPO[AIa CRVIAONl4Yti, ORDINANCE Eva.._ :: men, Only 6 h tISVO 61r?aJe! ICSy✓i (WAC 197-II -9601 Section Ii.10.230(I) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTSI contl nued) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use' if so. generally describe. fu C� 9. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construc- tion (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures :0 reduce or control erosion, or other Impacts to the earth, if any: C ; I ti to TW -P CO p--"3\ /1 I4S ten f>.f\o~r AIR Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any ("'ling or grading proposed. Indicate source o' fill. Q.,0 tif— What type of Nlss,ons to the air wokild result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile. odors industrial. wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed' If any. generally describe and give approximate ou If known CM a- L Cr 1 ( ) t.3 0. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal' If so, generally describe C. Proposed measures to reduce 00 control emissions or other imoacts t0 air, If any, hb) I's ', _ j. 'WATER a. Surface. 11) Is there any surface water body on or In the immediate vicinity of the site including year - round and seasonal streams. saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)' it yes, describe type and provide names. I' aporoy la te , stars what stream or river it flows into. O NJ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 203 feet) the described voters' If yes, please describe and (tech available plans. 6 ' 3 Evaluation For Agency Use Only to Li) 60 (WAG 197-11-960) Secclnn ::.:0.2)0(1) E. ENVIR0mR2 NILI. CLoai :s : ant Sneed) 5 P0[ANC ENVI Ronne. IAL ORDINANCE (3) Estimate the s of ft11 and dredge materiel that would be placed in or removed ! :he aurface V •t • wnd• and Indicate the are. of the •tse that would be .erected. Indicate the source of fill material. %J d ,.-)r_ (4) will the praper.l require surf .c. vter withdrew•1e or diver. lone' Give a general de•crlp_ clan, purpa.e, inc uprox tam quentltle., if known ,.'` '� (1) Doe• the p\ t 1C0-year ' lie within • 100 flood plain? If so, note location on the site plea ' F (f) G GC- (h) 0oe. the prop ,.I .t invo the •w dl•ch.rge• of .• t. to •urt ace wean It o, describe the type 4' wane and •o lcipat.d volume of dl•churg. b Ground (1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will 'dater be discharged to groundwater' d..crtptton, purpose, and .ppraptleute quantities, If known. Give general (2) Demribe (aset( aatertsl chat will be diacharg•d into the ground from saptic sanks or other •oltary vette tr.saeot faculty. 0.•crlb* the g•ner•1 sire of that system., the number o holm. to be serve_ rt( •ppllubl•) or the number of persona the p•tem(.) •re erpect•d to (3) Deacrtbv any ..r other than those de•tgn.d for the disposal of anIt•ry (Jute, Installed for the ,srpa•e of d•Charging fluids below the ground surface (includes sy•tn. such as [hoist t fa the L,posal of •t water or drainage from floor drains) De•crtbe the type of , the . a ry t .f material to be disposed of through the item and the type. of material. likely to be dl.po•ad of (including macerYals which may •nc.r the ••tm ln.dvertantly through spill. or u • r•.c, of f ire! iinting •tivltt..)• !L-V J l —v�1 -r � . ` -(717 5.1_.1 c'Q V'11 \ l�n I-' - ■A N O l F (4) Will ivy cha_sls (•specl•lly organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be storied Ia above- ground o r wdergrosn4 storage tanks? If so, what types and quaocltl•• of mat•rlsl. wdll be stored? Evaluation For Agency Use Only (VAC 197-11 -960)' Section 71.10.230(1) R. DIVIRONISITTAL CL LINTS (continued) (5) 'That protective yin be tikan that le. spill. of any chemicals stored or used on site trill not be allowed to percolate to Rround•rer WI/. Includes n•nure• to keep chemicals out of dt•poaal sy•tems described in lb(2) and lb( 3) N D (J F_ - n r 1 -1 G th 1 « -U C n r? l7 nCh S 1 1 Wet:. Runoff (including storm w er): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm voter) and method of collection end disposal If •nY (Include quantities, If known). %There will this h. mar low' VS11 :!d v car floe into other w ter•' If so, describe I A) ATE Suet (Az I (n o f 723 1 1 \-2 n C`.) ti% ! \et I 1A- P A fJC SC tz. 0 rF_l c S LL (1) trill any chealc•1s be scored, handled a u n e•d a the site • location .here • spill or Ink will duln surface or groundv•tsr or to • •ton master disposal e. discharging to surface or groundwater? / \ „cur. N �. (l) Could waste ma t.riol. enter ground or surface v ten' If •o, gene r•117 l.,cribe. Proposed n a s to reduce o come/ surface, ground, and rv.of water tan-acts, if .07 (If :he propo•ed action I!t. nit h10 the •tulle' S•nalctu• Ana b ••p-oci•117 clear on •rpinn tion. relating to L.cilltl e• cones rning Sections 3b(4), 26(5), and lc(1) of chi checklist): PLATS a T\eckk or circle type of veget•rion found on the site: V dec 1d uou• trot: alder, maple, aspen other. / evergreen tree: fir, c•d.r, pint, oth• crop or grab. wet soil plants, c•tt•11, buttercup, bullru•h, •kuek cabe.ge other hater plants: water l4ny. •elgr•e•, unroll, other _ other types of vegetation. ALL Is .mat kind and amount of .eg•t•tlon will be r.aoo•d or sitered' A \'1 _CY- Il%/ T U a l a i l A 2. 47. 1C Jdt < I - Th c. List threatened or endaog•r•d species known to b. on or neer the site. 5 SPOKANE INVILOmcrrsl 0tDt'ANQ d. Proposed landsc•ping, use 0f matin plants or ocher manures to press r•e or enhance v.g. •t ion on the site, if any: /A 10 LJIn* (-: AA.) S b; Initiation nor Agency Use Only IWK 197 -i) -9601 Section 11.10.270(1) 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) ANIMILS • A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed an or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds' hawk, heron, eagle. songbirds, other: mammals. deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish' bass, salmon, trout, herring. shellfish, other: other: Last any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. - I ..ice:•�_ c. Is the site part of a migration route' If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: generally describe. VJ—ELT 0.1C 1•; t De.; ' r V)Pr IV (1) De scribe special emergency i=hc2_0 lc E TA ITY\ -RI 1 — SPOKANE ENVIRgOtEKTAL ORDINANCE 6 / n- 5. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds Of energy (electric, natural gas. rood stove, soled will be used to meet the the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufac- turing, etc. 1� r_A A sci 3 A ■ Q (o t) � h. Would your project affect the potential use Of solar energy oy adjacent properties' If so, c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal' List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Impacts. If any' 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal' If so, describe. services that might be required. Fu�(� 11 ,c, ry\ i7G Tlfis. Aroliyl tn,% F11 ?E , A 13 Lk L/1 n.CF_ Po ou Evaluation For Agency Use Only ' 4 , 111 1 7 it (VAC 191 -11 -960) Section 11.10.270(1) B. CRRROMP*".LL ULRmf[S (coocinued) srORA1R 4(V1R0Ht6NTkL 09.13tHANCL e :rv1 ROM1CIrrAL HEALT (continued) (1) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental heath haearde, 1y •ay' 1 \1) O 1 f.% 6. Nolte (I) Vh• type. of nein exin In the arts which v• a(f•ct you role t (for fleapit equipment, opeut ton. ocher h) 0 (1) 'That types sod levels of note would be created by or cl. tad with the project on a short-tens or s long-term bola (for eumple• traffic, eon.[ruction; operation, other)" indlute what hour. noise would tome from the 'Ste. e'Y) el �T l A Cr ( U ■ ` 7 - A 1---1 — QS f�-M (3) Proposed manure to reduce or control o1.e tap.ct•, If any: I C-l_ QL3T 2,F3 \ ()pay.) N C,-i /A -T G iJ C7 c. Describe •ny rructure• en the •It•. a. Vol any .true tore. be demoll•h•e1 If •a, which' Ax-'J > _ . 1. Approximately how many people would reside or wore In cbe completed project? toll lc. 1 U/ C n (eAz Fr (103( 'RE h. Nu •ny parr of the •its been classified •• .n - eorlrommentally seulti,. vest If so, •pacify. g. If applicable, whet 1• the current .horeluu nester program designation of the sue' t. Nr.r 1z the current comprehensive plan d•.lgn.unn of the tilt' ( /K5At B LADD AND SHORELINE USE e, ti ✓r' er is the current use of the site .nE adjacent .ropertle•' " 11 r 1 -D IC C: \. \(RC -A f31 , A \ 1 c 1 1 Fra111It_ { (.I SE_ , 6 ices the site been w.used ter .grlem are' v •o, describe O 1L vOL k. Enluscion Agency [he Only e. trtmt 1s the current toning cL.sific•tloo of the site' I1 a — z 7 U (ID''— 2'e'5 ! G (VAC 197 -11 - 960) Section 11.10.:)0(1) B. C114IA0N4WtAL rro lrI5 (dont loved) SKIP-AM srv[e171cc4'ai 0 Di APCS j_ Approximately how any people would the completed project displace' k. Proposed ..a.ure• to aoold or reduce displacement impacts. cf . Propeeed assures to eneure the proposal Ir compatible with existing aM pro)ec[ed plane, if env: ALL LA-lv.o LLSr_ \ tv — A-i ) jz._ 2U f=1 �c mP7aT ) t?,l.r — YY\ Cr) - ( 1 i 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any' Indicate ,whether 1ov-i come housing. 0f"F t Proposed measure. to reduce or control hove tng impact., 1.1 any a ti t > Uhat views In :he Immediate vicinity would M altered or obstructed! c Proposed measure. to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. If any: d Propo.ed ....ure• to A.educe or control light and glare tap•cta, if any: high-, middle -, or %ra Appromlvtely tow many unit., if any, would M eliminated' Indicate whether Mgh -, middle -, or low - Income hole mg. 10 ALS-HL-ICS a What is the caller! Might of any propouc a ur her, nor .rclud :ne antennae 0 to :h• principal exterior building ma ^- :11(s) proposed' 11. LICHT AND CLARE • That type of light or gl. re will the proposal produce' •th.r time of day would It mainly occur N b 1.) b Could light glare Iron the ftolehel project ne e safety hazard or interfere with sieve? C7 c What existing off -site source. of light or glare say affect your proposal' !valuation Fe: Agen a 'd.e Onlr � j ' I S1�V c ) wu aM 1 1 ! 1 I V 1 ! 1��_ 1\ `,b(. ( \)J 1 I r � fL ;( , p: r (JAC 19)- 11 -9W) Sect to 11.10.:30(1) B. 01V1R0r(errtAL CLEW, S (cootinsd) 11. RECREATION s vbac deetgnsted end informal recreational opportuntcle• • e In the immediate vicinity' /fiett()t7 b. Would the proposed project displace any extain8 recreationel ueu If o. describe. c. Proposed w•urre co reduce or control Lpat• oo recreation, Including ncrntionl upportunl /�lr� 1 . tin to be prortded by :he project or eppuunt, if any: 11(( I 1J a ti I J L ri'\ Pte. I gay LP ' i (7 ,1A 1 � � te r- 3 0 13. HISTORIC ANTI CVLTL'R.0 PRESERVATION a Are there •ny p!•cee or objects Meted a n or proposed for national, ur o r local pre• tton reg t a ten e-wm to o a e n or next rtb. site? !r •o, generally der tbe \ n n 1 n b. Gne•lly d•cr'.Se any larl.ark• or evidence of hlet orlc •«tu.nloglcal, aLnctftc or cultural import•nce knot to be on or next to the rite. Iv Y c. Proposed .enures to reduce or control :sprit., if ny. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public strew and hit hv•ye • ¢u rvtng the site and describe proposed u to existing e. m. ShOrop site plen if soy. 2P . 9Ch Mc- SPO[ARC UoVI ROMO:MAL ORDINANCE cm( tt IT S As-in I� o b le air •rv.d bry pub] lc trenelt. If not ghat t. rn. .pproa late dl •r•nte nee re et tr•mt . op• k,l) \TH I /ro mlt i. = _ . cA l— Th \A (-_ A P P fzvu 1 in A -Tr7. Y' ;; tv rDT C' L t m I N AT At-.3 �( L. Inn/ p•rlint space vould tM co.pl••d project Inns Be. eny would th. protect elt.inc•` d. Oill the proposal require Roy wee eed• or street., or t.pro..aot• t o ext. ag o. tida o s treets not including driveways? (\ If m b het , g.n.rslly d.scris (Indicat. vherpublic or private). t e- e. pill the project nee (or Dour in the tmedLte vicinity of) n t.r, rail, or air tr.eeportacion! If .o, ge••llr describe. 1 ,� Ev•lu•tton For Agency Lee Only ( f , u (cam vil 'AL 1, (MAC 199 -11 -960) Section 11.10 2301C ENvIRONfmr_AL at:1rrs (coociouedi f Ilow many vehicular :rip• per !•y would be gene•[ed by the completed pro ject' If known, Indlc•te when peak would occur A 27cay 17 CD SPOKANE E1VIe0PHfIrAL oRDISANa g Proposed manure. to reduce or control crane port• inn Ivp•ct•, •ny: v f1,J E, `I I— C." i 15 PUB110 SERVICES Would the project r e•ult in m ex S reseed need for public services (for trample, fire protection. police protect ion, health u, , schools, ocher)? If • , genera Ily doe<rlb.. N � b Propos measures cv reduce or control direct tap¢[• on public •irvtca. 1' any: K1 0PJ (z 16 L' - IL: TIES . a. Circle uti currently aral Lb1e •1 the alt.: glad, v.ur 1 g•• er :dust. •stake, etephone.� eepttc system, mr _' � ( /a t31 . Y \.) 6. Describe the ut 11lr. that proposed or r the pro J•c the utility providing the service and the B rat construction act:.it construction on the . t ce or In the ivmedl.t e vic Unity which might be needed. F( ,�: c:17 1 J P vnCir ct t,i R 1 • i , C. SIGNATURE (� tC)..f IQ 1 =1J /93 r t (1 6 .C t PAett -S r C_9 Proponent/ r. %'— - (sigMiure) / ' Phone- � '7 - /� �Pu Y -N N� , (J/4 • % e ) /7 23 I \ 'J Per•nn completing fors \ \•w m p p PA Ut�y _A _ [ -, lute: Phone. undo re lgned, .wear under the noelny of perjury that the floret reap-oven are made truthfully and to the be •t of of knowledge. I Also n n . dervtn ha d [t, •hould [het a any +111:1.11 ean ^ l eLl.repre t ion or vl llful lack of full dl Pcloeur< o determination of no igniflc•nce that it might !moue In reliance upon this check' •t. part • tie .gees n withdrew •ny �1(\ TOR sTAn use ONLY /- 'I / j 1 A l� bdri 'I �� 1' (/ j 1 Gl St• n be (•) evleving ehee<liat `V�,vV ('�`- ti fied n this •calf review of :he eorironzncal cteckllet`ind o her pertinent information, the .ff: A rs io Conn iude• chat there are no probable slam}( iumt adverse La pact• and racma.d. • de renal:. :ion of nooai gai f Stance ! Concludes that probable e:gviich•c[ dd verve environmental }.paces do exist for the current Cropo ••- end recommend. • m1 [Ifie cad deter - miea mIgnif v1 clues of nvijnitnrce with co Mit:ow. Concludes that there •re probable el gnif LUnt •dvene environmental impacts sod recmve Me • de Ee sL Nation of A 1gn t: lcooce. TILI:C roc - 175.00 10 _vlu•t ion For Agency Use only George PLA as Change of :onditions c u., • • S Y i 35? • �� Yf 2 Q RIvtRsIDC MILWAUKEE RAILROAD ,rd Avg. rd - f S {:}( T S EVENTH oeasPYUHITY SCHOOL FOURTH AV /.!!.4 a U R TH A VE /99/ F ire totion III i lea S RO_t A R cat 61 CC COUNTY AVE iRCS: A ALLEY WAY d he Cer. APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE, AND DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: Department: Department Contact Person: Action: APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: from to at the Planning Department The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner Committee. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceutance of the aoolication and scheduling of the aoolication on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application fotut and site plan by the Departlnents and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies /departments have been contacted—only those who have been determined to have primary interest. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? ❑ YES E NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. To schedule the next public hearing, a complete application must be received no later than or before the agenda is full. The next public hearing is After a oreliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PART I A. GENERAL INFORMATION• J NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: N /,/ /11 N �1 ,42E 5 MATT LNG ADDRESS: C. 'L.2c / -/ ,a'S F /L, 4C_ <u,TC_ �j ,(P 0 CITY: �AhiK >; STATE: 7v .1/4 • ZIP: `7 qc:2a.3 PHONE: C c fS3 7 (work) 4/cIX 7 9 :S (home) 13. IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY STATE: ZIP: PROJEL I/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) . ox 4 /(2 /q/+ ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) Airy iv6 ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL F . JOR 1(o cI .e. / O _q, R4 EXISTLNG ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) II (DATE ESTABLISHED) l./, - V IN ? 7 EXISTG USE OF PROPERTY AC_AAir (�JA)I7ti V )= LL Pip 1,0r PROPOSED ZONING t1R- ? LA ncn)CrrY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY // SCHOOL DISTRICT «E Nit P I X 11 I 41.! FIRE DISTRICT yy�� WATER PURVEYOR //rOl1F)c A) E c,rp l(' PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings ( ) Duplexes ( ) Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Other ( ) - Descnbc: WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD. .? (677 .9;2, / Multifamily dwellings Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: AJD? )45 /un//l LEGAL/ZONE, RECLASSIFICATION INFORMA'T'ION: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: & , /() $S()() L //)r K /nl S PCKia r— ��AU " y SECTION .2 / TOWNSHIP ;2 C RANGE el NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: �L2 TRANSACTION NUMBER: T93O1187 DATE: 07/14/93 APPLICANT: GEORGE PARAS ADDRESS: 3124 S REGAL ST 160 SPOKANE WA 99223 CONTACT NAME: JAMES PARAS PHONE= TRANSACTION: ZONE CHANGE REVIEW, LAND USE ACTION REVIEW DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) ITEM DESCRIPTION ZONING PERMIT LAND USE ACTION REVW PROCESSED BY: KATHY SQUIRES PRINTED BY: KATHY SQUIRES RECEIPT SUMMARY FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT TOTAL DUE = TOTAL PAID= BALANCE OWING= PHONE= 1 200.00 1 20.00 220.00 220.00 .0 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 07/14/93 00006666 5043 220.00 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** THANK YOU ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 0 PLANTING SCHEDULE UOL OONV. gr a.04 , E SIZE i POT NOTE SrSTUJ POI � B \ \ / \/ mm • mmomm —4 0 o 0 3rd AVE. /_. - BLS • A • BUM 'B' 3rd AVE. 0 11 BLDG r 0 0 d1 1 ' 0 LANDSCAPING PLAN sc&LC•r -Kr 0 En.,.»wml -I SITE PLAN •CALF • r • L (n w a F Z v p w 04 C W ; F — « i ■ V a Y Q ' 0 CL , LL N Q F w Ix w 2 0 N M ii =lL 13199 . `..l[ F AO.3 Zt - l368 -7$"