ZE-06A-62 (2)Date to Review 11 -18 -93 Time # 2
Date to AA & DR 9 -15 -93 Time 3:00
Date Received 9 -3 -93
Project Name COC 4 UNIT APT ADD EXISTIN 21 UNIT
SITE ADDRESS E WILLOW /N SPRAGUE
Applicant's Name KENNETH GUDGEL
Address 3718 S RIDGEVIEW DR- SPOKANE WA 99206
Contact person
FLOOD ZONE J NO W S SCHOOL
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name
Planning Contact Person
1 Date Submitted
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET nnL
BLDG. PERMIT # - or I FILE# ZE- 006- 62A -67
Description
Related File # ( )
No Lots
I Initials
No.Acres .9
Section - Township - Range
PARCEL # 17543 -1505
Phone # 924 -9616
Work #
Date Conditions mailed 1/
Phone #
JOHN KONEN
ADAMS & CLARK INC
1720 W 4TH
SPOKANE WA 99204
747 -4600
STEVE HOROBIOWSKI /STEVE DAVENPOR Phone # 456 -2205
/ / AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
/ / FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
/ / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
/ / DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED
/ / ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
11 / Jr HEARING EXAM ( APPROVED DENIED- APPEALED BBC
-4i
PROJECT _ APPROVED _ DENIED
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
Date to Review Time #
Date to AA & DR 9 -15 -93 Time 3:00
Date Received 9 -3 -93
Project Name 4 UNIT APT ADD/ EXISTING 21 UNIT
SITE ADDRESS E WILLOW /N SPRAGUE
Applicant's Name KENNETH GUDGEL
Address 3718 S RIDGEVIEW DR SPOKANE WA 99206
Contact person
FLOOD ZONE V NO W S SCHOOL
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name
Planning Contact Person
Date Submitted
STEVE HOROBIOWSKI
I Description
BLDG. PERMIT # - or - FILE#
Related File # ( )
No. Lots No.Acres .9
e - Township - Range
PARCEL # 45173/1505
Work #
Date Conditions mailed
Phone #
Phone # 924 - 9616
JOHN KONEN
ADAMS & CLARK INC
1720 W 4TH
SPOKANE WA 99204
747 -4600
I Initials
7 E
Phone # 456 -2205
/ / AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
/ / FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
_J / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
HEARING EXAM _APPROVED DENIED- APPEALED BBC APPROVED DENIED
J
1
1
INTRODUCTION
PROPOSAL
T
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS OF FACT. CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER
This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on November 18,
1993. The members of the Committee present are Verona Southern, Chairperson,
Phil Harris and Jan Reuter.
The sponsor, Dr. Kenneth Gudgel, requests approval of a Change of Conditions,
ZE- 6A -62, to an existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone to allow a four unit
addition to an existing 21 unit apartment complex. The additional units are applied
for under the Bonus Density provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code, based
on availability of sewer, mass transit, and shopping facilities as specified in the
Zoning Code.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
2. The committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record.
3. The existing land uses in the area are single family residences, undeveloped property
and commercial uses including offices and retail stores.
4. The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area, and provides a
transitional use between the commercial uses to the south and the low density
residential uses to the north.
NOV 1 9 1993
1. The property is generally located east of and adjacent to Willow Road, approximately
250 feet north of Sprague Avenue in the SW 1/4 of Section 17, Township 25 North,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban and within the Priority Sewer,
Service Area (PSSA). The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for
development of a "city- like" environment which includes various land uses and
intensive residential development. Urban areas will have public water systems,
sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems and other public services available.
This category promotes "fill -in" within established development areas where utilities,
arterials, schools and community facilities are existing. The proposal is consistent
with the Urban category, specifically with Goal 1.1 which encourages a variety of
housing types and densities.
6. The proposed zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan. The
proposal can be defined as fill in development and is consistent with the Goals and
Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Amr
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
7. The Arterial Road Plan designates Willow Road as a local access street, and the County
Engineer has requested dedication of an additional 5 feet of right -of -way along Willow
HEC Order for ZE -6A -62 Page 2
Road. Sprague Avenue, located approximately 250 feet to the south of the proposal, is
designated as a Principal Arterial.
8. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -22
(UR -22), previously established as Multi Family Suburban (MFS) zoning in 1962 and
redesignated to Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the
Program -to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The proposal does conform to
the requirements of the existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone.
9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Determination of Nonsignificance was issued. The Committee,
after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS.
10. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled.
11. The owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval or disapproval of the
proposed use.
12. The applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the
original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed zone reclassification is
justified. Specifically, changed conditions include the availability of public sewer,
mass transit and shopping facilities.
13. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or
welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies.
CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the
"Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs,
assigns, and successors -in- interest.
2. The following Conditions of Approval apply to the real property described below:
Lot 3, Block 142, Opportunity in Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East,
W.M., Spokane County, Washington
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone as
amended.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the
Planning Director /designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All
variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. Approval is required by the Planning Director /designee of specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits.
HEC Order for LE- 6nn -62 Page 3
4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance
bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be
installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of
special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title
Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the
property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject
of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Official on [ ], imposing a variety of
special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department.
7. The Owner shall negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department and submit
a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public parks prior
to issuance of building permits. The agreement shall provide a written description
of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar
amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures.
Voluntary agreements between the Owner and Spokane County Parks Department
shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter
82.02.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
Prior to issuance of a building permit of at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction
with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever action comes first:
1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Willow Road for right -of -way.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed:
2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road,
drainage and access plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of
the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
HEC Order for 7F -6A -62 Page 4
4. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the
approval of the County Engineer, join in and be willing to participate in any
petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement
District (RID) for said improvement, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended.
Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This is
applicable t6 Willow Road.
5. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the
applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road
improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project
(CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not
participate in the cost of these improvements. This is applicable to Willow Road.
6. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Local
Access standard for the improvement of Willow Road, which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 10'- 12 feet
of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and
sidewalk is also required.
8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and other applicable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are
found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as
amended and are applicable to this proposal.
10. No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public
right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work
within the public road right -of -way is subject to inspection and approval by the
County Engineer.
11. Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 6 which
specifies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by
the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the
owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the
formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW,,
which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If an RID is formed by either the
petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s)
or successor(s) further agree:
(a) that the improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is
feasible;
•
HEC Order for LE- 6.. -62 Page 5
(b) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property
included therein, together with the amount of any County participation,
exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID; and
(c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed.
Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as
authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment on the property as a
result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of the RID
by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW.
This requirement applies to Willow Road, from which the subject parcel takes
access.
12. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition.
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work.
SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
2. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit
is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the
Utilities Department.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will
be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of authorized on -site sewage disposal
systems shall not be authorized.
5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
HEC Order for ZE -6n -62 Page 6
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in
order to be informed of code requirements administered /enforced as authorized by the
State Building Code Act. Design /development concerns include: Addressing, fire '
apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building
accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, exterior wall
protection, and energy code regulations. (Note: The Department of Buildings reserves
the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.)
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met.
2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction
and excavation projects be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads
should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen materials must be
controlled as well as emissions from all other construction related activities.
3. All traveled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) should be
paved and kept clean.
4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces
onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be
taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.).
6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc...) must comply with
local, state, and federal rules and regulations.
HEC Order for ZE- 61, -62 Page 7
ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and
Conclusion, APPROVES the application of Dr. Kenneth Gudgel for Change of
Conditions to an existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone to allow a four unit
addition to an existing 21 unit apartment complex under the bonus density provisions
of the Spokane County Zoning Code based on the availability of sewer, mass transit
and shopping facilities, as described in the application ZE- 6A -62.
Motion by: Phil Harris Seconded by: Jan Reuter
Vote: (3 -0) UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
HEARING EXAMINER COMMIIIEE
HEREBY Al 1'EST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE
Chairman
A 1 1 EST:
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
l l / ""zi47 -17cr '
/ y JOHN W. PEDERSON
Senior Planner
i1 /Du, /7, 7993
Date
Tf�4/lr✓
Pursuant to County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written
decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar
days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be
scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal,
preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners,
W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a $200 processing fee payable to the
Spokane County Treasurer.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205.
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62
ZE-6A-62
Page 15
ZE- 6 -.62
•.• •. ... wNw.Y V{L L+Y.YL A .Y... ..
•
-w. a..Fa..w.ri
RCN Rr
YEA PVC
,.. r:21 .
UR -22
8 TH AVE. I
UR -22
UR -22
UR -22
AV
GA
O L
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62
0
0
r R T 1-1
0
natares
N
8 .
J
W!
LL
DESY/CT -
UR7l,}1 '
UR -'
Page 16
Cou
0-3 .
.37 P t !0`4°'4
I
‘.
ZE-6A-62
4,
z •Wat -
t ,g Tank
re
T tc—
r
lorwreh
7,
i
velPIts •-• i „ ,- _. .----.,
jir' •-•• T -
i i
c- d. -r. - t - fl . g.
AV
acts an'
)A,r
KNOW
4S.
11/93 NEC Staff Report for ZE-6A-62
R
' 770,
1L
9
mai wl
'kb
•-• I
_isr47
• il
IHi
,32nsi
Page 17
72nn 1, T'el'l n,
- •xe) n ,n
• fl"' y T ^
4J.i 9 19.
1 ' eI -r 1
z
- r
n .n•d -_YnJ fe J:a1
y Ll p
1 t 9L I iry ":0'.7
1..014 -2 I 41' nn •7 I � ,b __ - __ - - I f
Oole 7111 cy.Od ^na
On
deva �!In
_I C I' =\r'
- 1
r
SOGI'fLI s• • '.Jlbld
271 - 7..G '2 iO� x_•nnyn �.,�o
n0lid P6) 30 TV7 =_1
.vO.V _n, LI
Onve - ]tL ._.n.
i 71C
4_In❑
4l•.nn 52 --
" \F0 ill‘
/.an
d•
W
;•>' ' 4 -2 41vr1 1dY 12
- 4: 1 101.110 7 i 4 1L414?
— 7 ",..d v^.I.i _.)
o •. ) 'I a .rfY
I I
411 n❑ p340d Dyd__
411nn 314 'n%
52'7 c 476 • •w /1lInn f'>
7 NI d d Ohre
411rn SL'02 t :A3'j '^ Ynn09
• 22 • 04.' S115n 'Winn 3n37mo11Y
,51 z 77513 ' oI -,S ::OI' 'c • _rnda : 4 '1J491 , 917 10F7.9
01 .2 'LI • ?( 5'(f ; (4r9M C9n.d ')9 n),Weds 7300 i0 ef t .
- 84 nunnr 9(' S'I' 5-1PP 52 : q,b;b 477nd9 9MI70Yd JO Q>
9d Al 7 n 114tH my 7 rldW907d1 io 7414.
19 ' t §.42 7 S 91.411 - ° 5 LI. : 4 tldd O:CO7Y0ra'I
.41r ^n S "an r•iedobd _db _ any 17 '9.Lw;
:95n 7m711r7
1•5 Lt. 'ft [.rr , 5'4£ :;77B7An 9nicning po 4n4i17
: noileNh Oinl 'Nic, wg
a ° Itn'I. ')r E.4' I , ' 4 n30 4n nog 2t y _
>. _ 4 .307'7 I ;^.:7-
G I )nc 11719;
�-.9,n&• L. .
^
1.nvoe0 0.4'o.L x
r
r
OO /
N
1'
LID
N4
N4
• L
O
4—
Y
L
O
IZ
e
Lai
4-
m
U
M
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: - CURRENT PLANNING SECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 1993
SUBJECT: ZE- 6A -62; CHANGE OF CONDITIONS TO AN EXISTING
URBAN RESIDENTIAL -22 (UR -22) ZONE, WITHIN THE
AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA (ASA) OVERLAY ZONE
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
AGENT
Contact Planner:
Dr. Kenneth Gudgel
3718 South Ridgeview Drive
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 924 -1616
John Konen
Adams and Clark
1720 West 4th Avenue
Spokane, WA 99204 -1702
(509) 747-4600
Steve Davenport
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to Willow Road; approximately 250
feet north of Sprague Avenue in the SW 1/4 of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range
44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Proposal: Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone
to allow a four unit addition to an existing 21 unit apartment complex. The additional
units are applied for under the Bonus Density provisions of the Spokane County
Zoning Code, based on availability of sewer, mass transit, and shopping facilities as
specified in the Zoning Code.
II. SITE INFORMATION
A Site Size: Approximately 41,111 square feet
B . Comprehensive Plan:
1. Land Use Plan: The property is located within the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan and within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The
Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a
"city- like" environment which includes various land uses and intensive
residential development. Urban areas will have public water systems, sanitary
sewer systems, storm sewer systems and other public services available. This
category promotes "fill -in" within established development areas where utilities,
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -62 - Page 19
arterials, schools and community facilities are existing. The proposal is
consistent with the Urban category, specifically with Goal 1.1 which
encourages a variety of housing types and densities.
2 . Arterial Road Plan: The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies
Willow Road as a local access street, and the County Engineer has requested
dedication of an additional 5 feet of right -of -way along Willow Road. Sprague
Avenue, located approximately 250 feet to the south of the proposal, is
designated as a Principal Arterial.
3 . County Parks Plan: The Spokane County Parks Plan indicates existing
park facilities in the West Valley Suburban Area are inadequate to meet current
and projected needs. The Plan proposes the acquisition of new parks for the
West Valley Suburban Area and the development and expansion of existing
facilities. Balfour Park, approximately 1/2 mile east, is the nearest County park
facility.
The Spokane County Parks Department has indicated that they are currently in
the process of drafting an ordinance for a per lot park mitigation fee. Prior to
implementation of the ordinance, the Parks Department requests, as a condition
of zone change approval, that project applicants reach a voluntary mitigation
agreement, or present to the Parks Department a letter agreeing to abide by the
provisions of the mitigation ordinance once it is adopted.
A condition to provide voluntary mitigation measures, as requested by the Parks
Department, is included in the Planning Department's recommended conditions
of approval.
C . Site Characteristics: The site is relatively flat and is occupied by an existing two
story 21 unit apartment complex with asphalt parking and driveways. The site is
extensively landscaped. A full line of public services are available to the site
including paved roads, public sewer and water.
D. Neighborhood Characteristics: The proposal is located in a transition area
between the established single family residential neighborhood to the north and the
business and commercial uses to the south and west.
E. Zoning Analysis:
Proposal:
North
South:
East:
West:
Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) (ZE- 6 -62), established in 1991,
previously classified as Multi- family Suburban (MFS) (ZE- 6 -62).
Urban Residential 22 (UR -22) (ZE- 40 -83C) established in 1991,
previously classified as Multi - Family Suburban (MFS) (ZE- 40 -83C).
Regional Business (B -3) (LE -6 -62) established in 1991, previously
classified as Commercial (C) (ZE- 6 -62).
Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) (ZE- 6 -62), established in 1991,
previously classified as Multi - Family Suburban (MFS) (7F- 6 -62).
Community Business (B -2) (ZE- 39 -88C), established in 1988,
previously classified as Multi - Family Suburban (MFS) (7F- 6-62).
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62 Page 20
There are a variety of zoning categories in the general vicinity of the proposal,
ranging from Regional Business (B -3) to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5). The
existing business and high density residential zones are associated with the Sprague •
Avenue and MuIlan Road commercial corridors, while Urban Residential -3.5
(UR -3.5) zoning is found in the residential areas•to the north of the site. The existing
Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone for this proposal provides a transition zone
between intensive business uses to the south and the low density residential uses to
the north and is consistent with zoning trends in the area.
The Change of Conditions to allow increased residential density is also consistent
with the purpose and intent statement of the Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone
which defines the characteristics of the Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone to include
"...paved roads, public sewer and water, accessibility to schools and libraries, and a .
full line of public services including manned fire protection and public transit
accessibility:"
F . Land Use Analysis:
Site: 21 unit apartment complex.
North: Undeveloped.
South: Undeveloped.
East Undeveloped.
West: Commercial businesses including offices and convenience store.
The site is near the intersection of the Argonne -Mullan and the Sprague Avenue
commercial corridors to the south and west of the site, and a well established single
family residential neighborhood is found to the north. The vacant property to the
north with Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zoning, and the existing apartment building
serve as a transitional use between the businesses to the south and the single family
residential uses to the north. The Change of Conditions allowing 4 additional
dwelling units is compatible with existing land uses and land use trends in the area.
G . Circulation: Access to the proposal is provided by Willow Road which is a paved
local access road. Approximately 250 feet south of the site, Willow Road connects to
Sprague Avenue which is the principal east -west transportation route in the area.
Internal circulation for the development will be provided by private driveways.
H . Design: The Change of Conditions proposes the addition of a two story, four unit
apartment building located east of the existing 21 unit apartment. The site currently
has extensive landscaping around the existing building, with a 6 foot high wood
fence and Type III landscaping along the south boundary of the site. Proposed
improvements include paved parking areas, a fire department turnaround, and
additional landscaping and fencing. A six foot high sight obscuring fence is
proposed along the east boundary adjacent to the parking area.' Access for the new
units is provided by the existing driveway connection to Willow Road. The site plan
generally conforms to the development standards of the Urban Residential -22 (UR-
22) zone.
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62 Page 21
J.
Proposed Site Plan:
Development Standards
Lot Area:
Frontage:
Building Coverage:
Structure Height:
Landscaping:
Parking:
Building Setbacks:
Front yard (Willow Road)
Side Yard
Rear Yard
41,111 sq. ft.
130 feet
33.5% proposed
26 feet
20 Type III
adjacent to Willow
5' Type I adjacent
to parking
39 stalls
45'
10'
15'
Proposed
Required
6,000 sq. ft. minimum
60 feet minimum
65% maximum
50 feet maximum
20 feet per 14.806.040(2a)
5' Type I per 14.802.220
38 stalls (1.5 stalls per unit)
55'/25'
5' per story
15'
Other Site Plan Considerations: The site plan submitted for review by the
Hearing Examiner Committee is general in nature. Detailed review to determine
compliance with all Zoning Code regulations and conditions of approval is
recommended to be administrative and to occur at the Building Permit stage.
I. Density: The proposal requests a density of 26.5 dwelling units per acre. The
Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone allows 22 units per acre which may be increased
through bonus densities as allowed under Chapter 14.820 of the Zoning Code.
Under these provisions, the applicant has requested bonus densities for connection to
public sewer (3.5 units /acre), availability of transit (0.5 units /acre), and convenience
to off site shopping facilities. (0.5 units /acre), for a maximum allowable density of
26.5 units per acre. The Planning Department has determined that the proposal does
qualify for bonus densities as requested and is consistent with the criteria.
Power Transmission Lines /Other Known Easements: None identified.
K . Water Supply: The proposal is within the Modern Electric Water Company service
area. Appropriate provisions for connection to a public water system will be required
prior to the issuance of building permits.
L. Sewage Disposal: Connection to a public sewer system is required.
M. School: The proposal is in the West-Valley School District.
N . Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. The Fire District and
the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are requited to approve fire
protection provisions prior to issuance of building permits.
O. Cultural Resources: None identified.
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62 Page 22
P: Transit: The proposal is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA) and
public transit is available on Sprague Avenue.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the
County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal,
other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible
standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other
County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department has determined that "No
probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed
and has issued a Determination of Nonsianificance ( "DNS "). ,
The "DNS" was circulated to 12 other agencies of jurisdiction and other
agencies /departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The
"DNS" comment period ends November 16, 1993 and was advertised 15 calendar days
before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet
of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing
Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public
hearing.
. IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The Change of Conditions is consistent with the development standards of the Urban
Residential -22 (U -22) zone and the Bonus Density criteria as defined in Chapter 14.820
of the Zoning Code. The proposal is also consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and
Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan which encourages
fill - in development where public services and utilities are available. The proposal is
compatible with adjacent land uses, and the proximity to Mullan Road and Sprague Avenue
support the development of multi- family projects: Public services and utilities are available
to the site, including water, sewer, shopping and transit. The Planning Department
recommends approval as conditioned.
V . CONDITIONS OF . APPROVAL
i . All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be
binding on the "Applicant ", which terms shall include the owner or
owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
ii. The zone reclassification applies to the following real property:
Lot 3, Block 142, Opportunity in Section 17, Township 25 North,
Range 44 East, W.M., Spokane County, Washington
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62 Page 23
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT'
1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept
presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the Planning
Director /designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location,
landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original .
intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. Approval is required by the Planning Director /designee of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits.
4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable
to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and
maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired.
5. Direct Light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a
Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall
serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question.
The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an
appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The
Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of
a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative
Official on [ ], imposing a variety of special development
conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in
the Spokane County Planning Department.
7. The Owner shall negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a
recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public parks prior to
issuance of building permits. The agreement shall provide a written description of the
subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and
any other agreed to mitigating measures.
Voluntary agreements between the Owner and Spokane'County Parks Department
shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
Prior to issuance of a building permit of at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a
County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever action comes first:
1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Willow Road for right -of -way.
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62 Page 24
Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed:
2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer, drainage
arid access plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing
as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project
which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
4. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the
approval of the County Engineer, join in and be willing to participate in any petition or
resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for
said improvement, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not
participate in the cost of these improvements. This is applicable to Willow Road.
5. As ari alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the
applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road
improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project
(CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not participate
in the cost of these improvements. This is applicable to Willow Road.
6. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Local
Access standard for the improvement of Willow Road, which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 10 - 12 feet of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and
sidewalk is also required.
8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and other applicable County standards
and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management
in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and
•are applicable to this proposal.
10. No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public right -
.of -Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the
public road right -of -way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
11. Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 6 which
specifies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their •
name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the
petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s)
property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by
the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62 Page 25
owner(s) property. If an RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as
provided fof in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree:
-(a) that the improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is
feasible;
(b) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property
included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds
the cost and expense of formation of the RID; and
(c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed.
Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized
under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of the RID by either petition
or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW.
This requirement applies to Willow Road, from which the subject parcel takes access.
12. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition.
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility purveyor
and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or the utility is
responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any
necessary work.
SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
2. - Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is
required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities
Department.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of authorized on -site sewage disposal systems shall
not be authorized.
5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62 Page 26
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in
order to be informed of code requirements administered /enforced as authorized by the State
Building Code Act. Design /development concerns include: Addressing, fire apparatus
access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility,
construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, exterior wall protection, and energy
code regulations. (Note: The Department of Buildings reserves the right to confirm the
actual address at the time of building permit.) -
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met.
2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and
excavation projects be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should
be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen materials must be controlled as well as
emissions from all other construction related activities.
3. All traveled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) should be paved
and kept clean. •
4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces
onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken
immediately to clean these surfaces. -
5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.).
6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc...) must comply with local,
state, and federal rules and regulations.
11/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE -6A -62 Page 27
t rnito
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
November 2, 1993
To: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning
Administrator)
From:
Subject: Conditions of Approval Zone Change No:ZE_676A
Applicants Name Gungel
Section 17, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM
re: Zoning
Spokane County Engineer's Department 9
The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone
change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee
for inclusion in the "Planning Report" and "Findings and Order" for
the public hearing scheduled November 18, 1993.
E36A Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the
County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road
Improvement District whichever action comes first:
E36 Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Willow Road for right of way
purposes"
Prier to release of a building permit or use of the property as
proposed:
E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer drainage and access plans.
E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design,
location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required
for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or
traveled by vehicles
E46 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the
applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in
and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution
which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District
(RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36"88, as amended"
Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these
improvements" This provision is applicable to Willow Road.
E47 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements
stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the
County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein
by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to
the extent of the required improvement" Spokane County will not
participate in the cost of these improvements" This provision
is applicable to Willow Road.
E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall
be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
E50 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section
Number One Local Access standard for the improvement of Willow
Ropd which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will
require the addition of approximately 10-12 ft" of asphalt along
the frontage of the development" Curbing and sidewalk must also
be constructed"
E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction,
unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this
proposal.
E59 Applicant shall sion and record Spokane County Notice to the
Public No. 6 which specifies the following:
page 2
E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the
County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer"
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to
authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for
the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the
petition method pursuant to Chapter 36"88 RCW, which petition
includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the
petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88
RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the
improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID
is feasible, (2) that the benefits to he derived from the
formation of the RID by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost
and expense of formation of the RID. and (3) that the property
within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided,
further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as
authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment on
the property as a result of the improvements called for in
conjunction with the formation of the RID by either petition or
resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. This provision is
applicable to Willow Read.
E90 There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead,
affecting the subject property, including property to be
dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County
assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. Applicant should check with the
applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to
determine whether applicant or the utility is responsible for -
adjustment or 'relocation costs and to make arrangements for any
necessary work.
page 3
To Spokane - County Planning Department (Current Planning
Administrator)
Frc Spokane County Engineer's Department( "4.
Subject: Conditions of Approval Zone Change No: Unassigned
Applicants Name gunnel
Section 17, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM
re: Zoning
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
September 14, 1993
The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone
change are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the Design Review Meeting scheduled Septemher_15, 1993.
E36A Prier to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the
County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project /Road
Improvement District, whichever action comes first:
E36 Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Willow Road for right of way
purposes.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as
proposed:
E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer drainage and access plans.
E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design,
location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required
for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or
traveled by vehicles
E46 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the
applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in
and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution
which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District
(RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended.
Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these
improvements. This provision is applicable to Willow Road.
E47 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements
stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the
County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein
by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to
the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not
participate in the cost of these .improvements. This provision
is applicable to Willow Road.
E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall
be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
E50 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section
Number One Local Access standard for the improvement of Willow
Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will
require the addition of approximately 10_12 ft. of asphalt along
the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also
be constructed.
E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction,
unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this
proposal.
E59 Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the
Public No. 6 which specifies the following:
page
E58 No construction work is to he performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the
County Engineer. All wort: within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to
authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for
the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the
petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition
includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the
petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88
RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the
improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID
is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the
�1
formation of the RID by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost
and expense of formation of the RID. and (3) that the property
within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided,
further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as
authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment on
the property as a result of the improvements called for in
conjunction with the formation of the RID by either petition or
resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. This provision is
applicable to Willow Road.
E90 There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead,
affecting the subject property, including property to be
dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County
assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. Applicant should check with the
applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to
determine whether applicant or the utility is responsible for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any
necessary work.
page 3
iddededdeddededddeededdeddeddeddeCReport Viewerlldeddeddeddeedddedddeeeddedededd;
°PAGE 1 16:30:44 07 SEP 1993 °
°Road# Road Names MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
°05308 WILLOW LAKE RD 00.000 BMP of road R 09 GRAVEL 14°
O 00.370 MURPHY RD
°05304 WILLOW RD 00.000 CATALDO AV U 19 PAVED 32°
O 00.120 BOONE AV U 19 PAVED 32
0 053051WILLOW RD 00.000 MISSION AV U 19 GRAVEL 20°
°05306 WILLOW RD 00.000 BMP of road U 19 PAVED 32
o 00.030 1ST AV U 19 PAVED 18°
O 00.060 1ST AV U 19 PAVED 18
O 00.130 SPRAGUE AV U 19 PAVED 20°
o 00.250 MAIN AV U 19 PAVED 20
00.290 MAIN AV U 19 PAVED 20°
00.320 NIXON AV U 19 PAVED 20
O 00.380 VALLEYWAY AV U 19 PAVED 20°
• 0 00.500 ALKI AV U 19 PAVED 20
o 00.630 BROADWAY AV 0
°05307 WILLOW RD 00.000 MARINGO DR U 19 PAVED 20
O 00.390 UPRIVER DR U 19 PAVED 20°
°05366 WILLOW RD 00.000 THORPE RD U 19 GRAVEL 10
...................................................................................................................... ............................... ede
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef
°List 0 °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [Fi) for help) 0
fladAAAA& aaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaddAA9
°Esc -Exit Enter -Next Page 0
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAG;i -11 -970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-6A-62 •
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residential -22.
(UR -22) zone and request for bonus density to allow 4 additional multi family dwellings and
those uses allowed in the Urban Residential -22 (UR -22) zone.
APPLICANT: Dr. Kenneth Gudgel AGENT: John Konen
3718 South Ridgeview Drive Adams and Clark
Spokane, WA 99206 1720 West 4th Avenue
(509) 924 -9616 Spokane, WA 99204
(509) 747-4600
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located east of and adjacent to Willow Road and
approximately 250 feet north of Sprague Avenue in Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44
EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have
a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not. required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of
a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must
be submitted no later than 4:00 p.nt., November 16, 1993, if they are intended
to alter the DNS.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR
By: Steve Davenport
Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: Spokane County Planning Department
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
DATE ISSUED: , 1993 SIGNATURF/evc L
•
OCI1M EFTS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT THE HEARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA
99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10)
calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This
appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
## ######tt## #### # # ## ##### # ## ## # ## #####I##### ###
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. WA State Departmenfof Health
3. Spokane County Health District
4. Spokane County Division of Engineering
5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
6. Spokane County Parks Department
7. Spokane County Boundary Review Board
8. WA State Department of Transportation
9. Spokane Transit Authority
10. West Valley School District
11. Modem Electric Water District
12. Fire District No. 1
RECEIVELI
OCT 271993
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
(WAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.2IC RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the
environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared
for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist
is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts
from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required
Instructions for Applicants:
This envi ronmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use
this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an
EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able
to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts If you really do not
know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply " Complete
answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these
questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do then over a period of time or on different
parcels of and Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental e0ects. The agency
to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related
to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Environmental Checklist
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply."
IN ADDITION. complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D)
Z E
File No.?E -co 4 - ( c
For nonproject actions. the references in the checklist to the words "project." "applicant." and "property or site should be
rend as "proposal." "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
6R 62
7.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Four Unit Bonus Density for Sewer Hookup - N. 22 Willow Road
2 Name of Applicant
Dr. Kenneth Gnidgel
3. Address and phone number of Applicant or contact person:
S. 3718 Ridgevicw Drive
Spokane, WA 99206
Phone (509) 924-9616
Contact: John D. Konen
Adams & Clark, Inc.
1720 West Fourth Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99204 -1702
Phone. (509) 747-4600
d. Date checklist prepared.
August 5, 1993
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Spokane County Planning Department
6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)•
Spring 1993
a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
No
b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's If yes, explain.
No. Property is limit of applicant's ownership in vicinity.
tl ?e -4A -tot
Z i u 6 -62
S. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to
this proposal:
None.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the
property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain
None are known.
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee - Bonus Density for sewer hookup of 4 units, Spokane
County Building & Safety - building permit, Spokane County Engineers - drainage plan.
Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do
not need to repeat those answers on this page.
The applicant seeks to add a 2 -story, 4 -unit apartment budding to an existing 21 -unit apartment project
which is currently served by a public sewer system and is immediate to shopping and community
facilities. The ownership contains 41,111 sq. ft with 130.1 feet of frontage on Willow Road
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information to a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would
occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,
vicinity neap, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to
this checklist.
The request seeks to add a 4 -unit site to the east (rear) of an existing 21 -unit apartment project located at
N. 22 Willow Road in the Spokane Valley. A complete legal description with maps accompanies the
request. The property is located within Lot 3, Block 142, Opportunity ur Section 17, Township 25 North,
Range 44 East, W.M., Spokane County, Washington.
13. Does the proposed action lie within the .Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Arca? The
Priority Sewer Service Arca'? The Cm of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for
boundaries).
The property is within the ASA. the GSSA. the PSSA but outside the City of Spokane The site is served
by the Spokane County sewer s) stem.
ZED 6A-62
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS' Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other:
Flat
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Less than 2 %.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify than and note any prink farmland.
8
GgA, Garrison gravelly loam -a stony glacial outwash soil typical of
the floor of the Spokane Valley.
Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
No. The four additional units will occupy an area previously used as
the drainfield area for the existing 21 -unit apartment project.
e Describe the ptirpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed Indicate source of fill
Approximately 8,000 sq. ft. of the 0.93 -acre site will be disturbed to
accommodate the additional four units and eight new parking stalls.
f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
No the project area is less than 20% of the entire developed site
About what percent of the site will be covered with impenaous surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
The completed project (21 existing units + 4 bonus units and 33
existing + 8 new parking stalls) will cover Tess than 60% of the site.
2 m 6A-6
2. AIR
3. WATER
Proposed'measbres to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,
if any:
During construction the project will comply with Spokane County
Air Pollution Control Authority requirements.
a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e , dust,
automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known -
During construction, some dust will be generated by equipment
operation and excavation. The completed project will add
approximately 32 vehicular trips to the local street system
b. Are there any offsite sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so. generally descnbc.
a. Surface.
The project is on the floor of the Spokane Valley a block north of
Sprague Avenue, a major arterial serving the Spokane Valley.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any:
Conformance with SCAPCA requirements during construction,
paving of parking areas and driveways.
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it Mows into
No. The site is well removed from surface water bodies including
wetlands.
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. •
N o.
Z E 6 4 ,
No.
No.
b GROUND:
None.
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed
in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note
location on the site plan.
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume to
discharge.
No. The project.is connected to the Spokane County sewer system.
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities
if known.
No. The site is served by Modern Electric Water Company which
provides public water to the area
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility Describe the general
size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or the
number of persons the systcm(s) are expected to serve.
The existing 21 units are connected to the Spokane County sewer
system. The proposed addition of four units will stub into the
existing sewer line serving the existing units.
ZE-
�J
(3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of
sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the
ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of storm water
or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of
material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely
to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system
inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities).
Approximately 1,500 sq. ft of additional asphalt area will be added
to the existing parking area to provide eight new parking spaces.
Approximately 4,000 sq. ft. of impervious surface area will be added
to accommodate the project which may require additional provisions
for stormwater runoff.
(4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels)
be stored in above ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types
and quantities of materials will be stored?
No. This is a residential proposal.
(5) \Vhat protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills
of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to
ground water (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal.
systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
None. This is a residential proposal.
c Water Runoff (including storm water)'
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal if (include quantities, if known). Where will this
water now? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe
Approximately 4,000 sq ft. of impervious surface area will be added
to the east end of the properly which may require improvements to
the existing stormwater collection and disposal system.
(2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a
location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or ground water or to a
storm water disposal system discharging to surface or ground water?
No This is a residential project
Z E 64 6 2
4. PLANTS
(3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe. :
No. This is a residential project served by public water and sewer
systems.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aauifer Sensitive Area.
Be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Section
3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist).
The additional stormwater systems are required in conjunction with
building permit review, such new systems will need to comply with
"208" standards.
a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site.
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other.
X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other.
X shnibs.
X grass.
pasture.
crop or grain.
wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other.
other types of vegetation.
What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Approximately 8.000 sq. ft. of existing lawn, shrub. and tree
plantings will be removed to accommodate the expansion.
c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
None are known.
d Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
When construction is completed, the disturbed perimeters will be
landscaped, planted, and maintained to comply with Spokane County
landscape and buffer requirements.
Z E 6A
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site.or
are known to be on or near the site
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, (songbirds), other:
mammals: deer, bear elk, beaver, other: Small mammals.
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
None are known.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None The project is in the center of a heavily urbanized area.
6 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used
for heating. manufacturing, etc.
Electricity and natural gas will be used for lighting, mechanical
operation. and space heating
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe
No. Buildings will maintain a 10' setback from the north property
line.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,
if any:
The new construction will comply with applicable energy
conservation codes adopted by Spokane County.
ZE° PA -
6
I .
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards including exposure to toxic
' chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe
b. Noise:
No. This is a residential project.
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No. This is a residential project.
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any:
None
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
The project is a block from Sprague Avenue, a major arterial and
north and cast of commercial properties including the HICO
convenience store, car wash, and Laundromat.
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated
with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example. traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from
the site.
During construction, some noise will be produced by equipment
operation. The completed project will have noise levels
complimentary with adjoining residential uses.
(3) Proposcd measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any
-10-
Construction activities will be confined to normal working hours
The completed project will use fencing and perimeter landscaping to
buffer noise and activities.
ZE° 6Al2
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
g
N/A
No.
-II-
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site contains an existing 21 -unit apartment project with open
parking areas and carports. Surrounding uses include the I-IICO
complex to the southwest, commercial to the south and residential to
the north and east. The lot is the north is zoned UR -22.
b Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
The site has not been used for agriculture for at least 30 years.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The site is occupied by a 2 -story apartment building with 21 carport
bays.
d Will any structures be demolished? If so, which?
No.
e What is the current zoning classification of the site?
UR -22
f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Urban
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
The additional four units would allow approximately 10 more people
to live in the area.
J
HOUSING
10. AESTHETICS
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None.
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any
The proposal will comply with the provisions of the Spokane County
Zoning Code, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan of Spokane
County, and the Uniform Building Code. The 4 -unit structure will
maintain reasonable setbacks and provide perimeter landscaping and
adequate off street parking.
Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle. or low - income housing
The additional units will provide an additional inventory of middle
income housing.
Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low- income housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The new units will be limited to 2 stories or approximately 30 feet in
height.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None. The additional units will be placed at the rear of an
established multiple family project.
-12-
ZEn GA-
The completed project will provide generous landscape buffers,
adequate parking and quality architecture.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What type of day
would it mainly occur?
12. RECREATION
Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Some security lighting will be required for new carport and parking
areas as well as the building entry areas.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views?
No.
c. What existing offsite sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
The project is one block from Sprague Avenue, a major commercial
strip.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any?
The project will use downlighting of fixtures to reduce glare on
adjoining properties.
a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
Spokane County maintains a neighborhood park at Sprague and
Balfour.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
The expansion area is currently used as open space for the existing
apartment project
' -13-
Z E RA 62
c. - Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,
including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, ? �
if any: �/c I —
The completion of 4 additional units will still provide approximately �� 6 1 .
2,500 sq. ft. of open space area between the existing units and the Q] E
proposed units. /' 10" n Ai0 1
46 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL. PRESERVATION yx ^ 1/ y ' I ( 1(ifr /` �it.°
i
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, of ga0E0 T � /J 4,5 v
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, P FfTl
generally describe. liiietfk
14 TRANSPORTATION
None are known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None per Spokane County Data Atlas.
e Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any
If artifacts are discovered dunng construction the Historic
Preservation Office will be notified per County code.
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The project is served by Willcox Road. a residential access road
extending north from Sprague Avenue, a major arterial.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
Transit service is available in Sprague Avenue one block south of the
site.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
The completed project will require 38 o T street parking spaces with
39 spaces being provided.
-14-
d. ' Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or impro4ements, to
existing roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No. Approximately 1,500 sq. ft., of paving will be added to an
existing driveway to accommodate eight additional parking spaces
for the 4 -unit addition.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If know, indicate when peak would occur.
The addition will generate approximately 32 new vehicular trips on
local streets with normal peak hours for residential uses.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any.
None. An existing driveway provides access to Willow Road
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe.
16. UTILITIES
Although the project will create some incremental demands for
public services, the fill in nature of the project allows more efficient
utilization of services currently available to the area.
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if
any
The new budding will conform to applicable building, fire, and
safety codes. Additional tax revenues for the addition will help
offset demands for additional services.
Circle utilities currently available at the site: (electricity). (natural gas),
(water), (refuse service), (telephone), (sanitary sewers), septic system, other.
15-
oigo � ��tt)'61-
fE� cJ. E
Z E - AA-
b. - Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing
the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Electricity and water - Modern Electric, natural gas -
WWP, refuse - Valley Refuse, telephone - US West,
sewer - Spokane County Utilities.
-16-
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of
my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part, the agency may withdraw any determination of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this
checklist.
Date
- q3 Proponent:
(Please Print or
Proponen i li � S,4 �g •. (ress:
Phone: C 1 c)-t-( 947
1A ESL cua
Pe)
3 2/Y s, V
vff
Person completing form: J. D. Konen, Adams & Clark. Inc. Date: August 5. 1993
Phone: (509) 747 -4600
FOR STAFF USE ONLY / \
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Chccklis}r h v �) -, �2 J � /
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff:
A. v Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of
nonsignificance.
B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and
recommends a mitigated determination of nonsignificance with conditions.
C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a
determination of significance.
FILING FEE - $75.00
-16-
Z E ° 6A-62
2E, 60 ANCIC
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
J8 o waS be its, ry Foie c a ee Mogul) ,4 . S
2ECL A S IFIr A TIQN APPLICATION
•Shy Pf,N4 ¥ nekus, r a o f
Single family dwellings ( )
Manufactured homes ( )
Other ( ) - Describe:
PART I
A . GENERAL, INFORMATION:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Dr. Kenneth Gudael
MAILING ADDRESS: 3718 S. Ri dgevi ew Drive
CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99206
PHONE: (work) 924 - 9616 (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Dr. Kenneth Gudgel PHONE: 924 -9616
MAILING ADDRESS: 3718 S. Ri dgevi ew Drive
CITY: Snnkane STAT WA ZIP: 99206
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 0.93 acres or 41 , 111 sq. ft.
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) None
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 451 73.1 505
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED None
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N. 22 Willow Road
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATIONS) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR -
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY 21 -unit Apartment
PROPOSED ZONING UR -22. Bonus Densitv per 14.820
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban
SCHOOL DISTRICT West Val i ey No. 363
FIRE DISTRICT Spokane Valley Fire Dept. No. 1
WATER PURVEYOR Modern Electric Water Co.
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Duplexes ( )
Business ( )
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
LEGAL /ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: _liillnw Rnad anprnximatc 1 block north of Sprague Avenue.
SECTION 17
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Wi l low Road
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 130.1 ft.
Multifamily dwellings (x) 4 - unit apartment
Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
TOWNSHIP 25N RANGE 44 EWM
ZE 6A-6
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATkON• • Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ( ) YES (x) NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS
LEGAL DESCRIYPION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED.
Lot 3, Block 142, Opportunity in Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 4
East, W.M., Spokane County, Washington
EXISTING ZONE(S)
UR - TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) UR -
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPIION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW. See above.
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT?
Public sewers have been extended to serve the area. The site complies with
the bonus density criteria of Chapter 14.820 as follows: 3.5 units /acre -
sewer hookup, .5 units /acre - proximity to transit and .5 units /acre proximity
to shopping.
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Public sewer service has been extended to serve the
area. The existing 21 apartment units are currently connected to the
Spokane Valley sewer system.
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES? None. The addition of four units is situated at the rear
of the nwnarchin-
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? Chapter 14.820 al lows a
Chanoe of Condition request to seek bonus density if a direct hookup to
the sanitary sewer can be guaranteed. The ownership abuts an established
collector line.
WHAT SURROUNDING LANDU E? T hOad dlt lon T w ` iI l comp O ON
of the UR -22 zone including perimeter landscaping.
ZE° 6A-
2
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION; Page 3 of 4
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRI1 IEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL /FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.
13. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (t ) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: / BT-" OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME. •
D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
ccr PO
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
A . SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) A ( (HAVE (' OT) BEEN MADE. t 1
B. REQUIREMENTS /COMMENTS: Oct > �Y �c1 N ►h�� �Q - c-t
WATER DISTRICT
A. COMMENTS:
•
A. COMMENTS: )2G0
PART II
WATER PURVEYOR
r c) (,J� TITLE EwC I wi
SIGN � * I
91. IE
RE/TITLE DA
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
I NATUREATLE
SIGNATURE ITLE ji b A E
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN$ATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS /1.c�n -w r /e /4 C-
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/TITLE
HEALTH DISTRICT
DATE
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PL ND UE ' AL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) :EEN SATISFIED.
J/ SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: J� /C ✓e , - 1 ----
SIGNATURE/I'ITLE
F -G -23
DATE
ZE 6A l2
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ,
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
REQUESTED FOR THE ZONING i49P AND WRI11EN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
SIGNED:
ADDRESS: Adams R Clark. inn.
1720 W. 4th Ave., Spokane, WA 99204 - 1702
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE
MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OP MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE
PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS
WRI I 1 EN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF.
/.
SIGNED: nj
ADDRESS: J 3 7 / t cw - Pt /X S sk- e. ✓t ep0
NATURE OF APPLI ANT OR R RESE TIVE
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
NOTARY SEAL
) ss:
PART III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
attf
SI 'NED AND SWORN TO /AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS
J.l,ed.i.4 ,1993,BY 4 i!l'ilr)I7Y' /l ( (1(11
DATE: ?5 August, 1993
PHONE: (509) 747 -4600
ZIP:
DATE:
PHONE: Q
ZIP: q I G
el DATE
(i) DAY OF
-( o )7), On-
Notaf}• Public'ir( d for the State of Washington
Residing at: 1 /77;t,ofi
Nly appointment expires.
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
DATE SUB M [TIED: O / D /'L> FILE t!. - t e- Co -(et,
DATE ACCEPTED (0( 6 h BY • ��
TOTAL FEES: 4 C: ( -7 RECEIPT it: n 7 `x) •
Page 4 of 4
ZE GA-S2
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9301389 DATE: 08/06/93
APPLICANT: WILLOW APARTMENTS
ADDRESS: 3718 S RIDGEVIEW DR
SPOAKNE WA 99206
CONTACT NAME: WILLOW APARTMENTS PHONE= 509 924 9616
TRANSACTION: REZONE /LAND USE ACTION REVIEW
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
COMMENTS: CHECK NOS.1431 & 1432
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ZONING PERMIT
LAND USE ACTION REVW
PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
• • 1
RECEIPT SUMMARY
QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
TOTAL DUE =
TOTAL PAID=
BALANCE OWING=
PHONE= 509 924 9616
1 200.00
1 20.00
220.00
220.00
.0
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
08/06/93 00007811 1431 220.00
a
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** THANK YOU ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
September 15, 1993 at 3:00 p.m.
a
Apartment Addition at N. 22 Willow Road
Generally located east of and adjacent to Willow Road and approximately
250 feet north of Sprague Avenue in Section 17, Township 25 N., Range
44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban within Priority Sewer Service Area
(PSSA)
EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: Urban Residential (UR -7) and
Community Business (B -2).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 4 unit addition to an existing 21 unit
apartment complex. The additional units are applied for under the Bonus
Density provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code based on
availability of sewer and other public facilities specified in the Code.
PARCEL NUMBER: 45173.1505
SITE SIZE• 93 acres
APPLICANT: Dr. Kenneth Gudgel
3718 S. Ridgeview Drive
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 924-9616
AGENT:
John Konen
Adams & Clark
1720 W. 4th Avenue
Spokane, WA 99204 -1702
(509) 747-4600
ASSIGNED Tim Lawhead
TO:
S P 0 K f\ NT E
WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Steve P. Horobiowski, Current Planning Administrator
DATE: September 3, 1993
RE:
C 0 U IV T Y
PLANNL•G DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR
Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering
Bill Wedlake, Spokane County Utilities Department
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District •
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department
Ted Trepanier, Department of Transportation
Christina Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
West Valley School District No. 363
Modem Electric Water Company
Fire District No. 1
Historic Preservation
Department of Ecology
Application for Bonus Density within an existing Urban Residential -22
(UR -22) zone to allow a 4 unit addition to an existing 21 unit apartment
complex
APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING
SEPTEMBER 15_ 1993 AT 3;0Q n.m.
COUNTY PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM. 2ND FLOOR
Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANUE AND
DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department
encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been
invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the
attached form to Tim Lawhead for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION
ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and
included in the Planning Department file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks
for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Tim
Lawhead of the Planning Department at 456 -2205.
c: Dr. Kenneth Gudgel, 3718 S. Ridgeview Dr., Spokane, WA 99206
John Konen, Adams Clark, 1720 West 4th Avenue, Spokane, WA 99204 -1702
Attachments: Application Adceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan
RLLct vED
SEP 0 3 19
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • 8t lt� 6-2205
6
M pNNTY ENGINEER
S"<L