Loading...
ZE-43-81AGENDA, JUNE 4, 1981 - 2 - SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 5 TELEPHONE NO.: 456 - 2205 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT Except when an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared, a proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an EIS is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the • decision makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. (Continued from Page #1) pp A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS (Contd.) rAGE 5. ZE -37 -81 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL /9 (Generally located at the southeast corner of Augusta Avenue and Glenn Road and south of Augusta Court. Section 9- 25 -44) • Proposed Use: Construction of 13 duplexes. Site Size: 3.8 Acres Applicant: Vince Seipp South 717 Pines Road 6. "ZE -43 -81 AGRICULTURAL AND TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Generally located at the southwest corner of Willow Road and Valley Way Avenue. Section 17- 25 -44) Proposed Use: Establish an Accounting Office in existing structure. Site Size: .58 Acres Applicants: Donald Robins and John Albi North 124 Argonne Road 7. ZN -5 -81 AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME TO COMMERCIAL (Generally located on the east side of the Newport Highway and Market Street, 330 feet south of Walker Avenue. Section 34- 27 -43) Proposed Use: Commercial uses, including food store and restaurant. Site Size: 6 Acres Applicant: Lloyd Torgerson Route 2, Box 164, Mead 49 I SHARP MLCNIC 1.11 t EL A 20/0 _ BR t ¢ ALKI U u U 0 0 0 4 - 4 a' C ». , 44.- li ." 2 gC/iERY 9.1' A z M ISS ION FO UPTH S DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: I. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: STATUS OF APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: REQUESTED ZONING: EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED USE: PROJECT LOCATION: II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: SITE CHARACTERISTICS: ZONING: LAND USE: Site North East West South AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: Urban STAFF REPORT JUNE 4, 1981 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -43 -81 Approximately .58 acres NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The neighborhood is in a slow transition from undeveloped sites to office uses along Mullen Road. Along Willow Road are both undeveloped lots and single family uses. North Residential Office, established, 1980 Two Family Residential (R -2), established, 1972 East Two Family Residential (R -2), established, 1972 West Residential Office, established, 1974 South Agricultural, established, 1947 Two Family Residential (R -2), established, 1972 1981 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: Total Square Feet Total Percent of Site Covered MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: PARKING REQUIRED: PROVIDED: Don Robins and John Albi Purchasers Boyd Austin Residential Office Agricultural (established in 1948 & Two Family Residential (established in 1972) Accounting office This site is generally located at the southwest corner of Willow Road and Valley Way Avenue. The site contains a single family home, residential traits, is fairly flat and partially undeveloped. Single family, undeveloped Single family Single family Undeveloped, medical office Undeveloped Urban 1 0 Approximately 2,112 sq. ft. 35 2 stories 5 spaces 5 spaces ■ III. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The applicants have indicated that the Dishman House, a designated County historical cultural resource, is becoming run -down. They propose to re- furbish the two -story home into an accounting office and believe the impact will be positive on the neighborhood. The 1981 Comprehensive Plan indicates this site as appropriate for Urban development. The site is adjacent to commercially designated land along Mullen Road and could be considered in a transition area. The Hearing Examiner Committee has traditionally held zoning, other than residential, to 150 feet east of Mullan Road. Recent zoning at the northeast corner of Sinto Avenue and Mullen Road did extend Local Business Zoning a distance of 640 feet east of Mullen Road as approved by the Board of County Commissioners. IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-43 -81 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accord- ance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Admin- istrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 3. Direct tight from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 4. All current standards of the Residential Office Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 5. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 6. Applicant shall comply with all agency's regulations as amended prior to issuance of building permits. 7. This property has been identified as being historic on the Spokane County Cultural Resources Inventory. The developer of the proposed project is required to work with the Spokane City /County Office of Historic Preservation in order to develop methods of mitigating any potential negative impact to the identified Cultural Resource. b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -43 -81 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements. 9. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Willow Road and a 20 foot radius on Willow Road and Valley Way for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. 2. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and sidewalk and pave to the existing pavement adjacent to the property on Willow Road and Valley Way. 3. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 6. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 7. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 4? • 8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Con- struction, and other applicable county standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Manage- ment in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. Each unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future areawide collection system if any changes are required to the present system. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Recommendations a) A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Mains and hydrants to be installed, in accordance with the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. f) WATER PURVEYOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -43 -81 1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. A. PROPOSAL B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION C. D. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS INSPECTION SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: File Number 574 -lam SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER - - - P R E - Z O N I N G C O N S U L T A T I O N - -- Date: 2 Zoning Reclassification Number: Z -_4fl 4 ft aS/ Project Name: ,Q /h,' Q� ,' -, �. Address: 4' —.��- 1- cl, T. 2 N., R. 4 E.W.M.; Section 17 DEVELOPER Name: 12.o.h or Address: C �, AGENT Phone: Business q22 _ Home Date: 2 /24 /2/ By: Remarks: /23/10/ B a) Right -of -Way: b) Curb c) Sidewalk , , , d) Paving . e) Approaches . f Drainage : an c g) State /City Review: Yes h) Misc. . Remarks: ,. — _ - J No x 7/c/.1 ' /�o,..i at- 2 -t-Or7 P To construct the road improvements stated,herein,.:the applicant' niay, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be "a'willing participant in any . l petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of,a Road Improvement District (RID) .for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in th'e cost of these improvements. _--- -c6 i�e-i .rC - G 1 Fee Paid: Yes No Amount $ jp....r/s-Check • alanning Application Sic d: Date 2 /_Z5/,y By: 1/81 C AT A I. • 3 40 ♦ 3 45 ,4 E Boo NE K ? � �1 •..1- 3 Z I 1 1 1 .. F pp a . r� nW1. M .1111 s 5 ,el s e• LK. Nw Dec i1N4C 19 4 15 'GI E. IRoAD Na 1413 -4o'. a . 12 . r • • g • 0 i s • G3 lo' auw . v C.A.P. .0o• attatIPM /4Y -71 Is 4 ea .. 8 a 1 4suB- T V/S/Ot✓ 1 3 • '7 s 109 6 z 0 4 fi - 4o N'I 139 k . - A t Po t ie 1421 hui 3 PQ 144 POKAN a Da•ONSO Lit - WTII TNS 5. R/., L!N OS APO �.•.S `t CO Orc", L _.as. RT WH / uN ld t 13 1Q riVOLAd .2 ' t) 1 Vol lie LeJ cf A/ 0 r+' /1 ,3 VA ciey WMy " PA.ecet. "K 63, 835.2 ± 6 1, FT, Ro 20./G 38 , 4 / 3 .G { if). 'et 22 Zonea 25 ± Zet. /75 t�3' 0 4 J ;3 ea' 40 153.3' 1 76.5 PA6t:6L 34,Z4o.Z t Si, Fj 81 113G /7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF ZONE RECLASSI- FICATION, ZE- 43 -81, AGRICULTURAL AND TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: AUSTIN FINDINGS OF FACT ) FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION ) AND CONDITIONS THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board or County Commissioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board" of an appeal of Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of June 4, 1981, denying the zone reclassification (ZE- 43-81), Agricultural and Two - Family Residential to Residential Office, for the purpose of establishing an office use, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal ", and the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County having held a public hearing on August 4, 1981, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and further having individually visited with the site and vicinity in ques- tion, and having rendered a decision on the 25th day of August, 1981, approving said proposal, does hereby make the following: 1. That the proposal is generally located at the southwest corner of Willow Road and Valley Way Avenue in Spokane County, Washington. 2. That the proposal consists of approximately .58 Acres with an existing single family residence on the southerly portion of the site. 3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates Urban usage of the area encompassed by the proposal. 4. That the provisions of RCW Chapter 43.21C, (State Environ- mental Policy Act) have been complied with and the Board adopts a declara- tion of non - significance for this proposal. 5. That the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee held a public hearing on June 4, 1981, concerning the proposal, subsequent to which by Findings of Fact, Decision and Order dated June 5, 1981, they denied the proposal subject to certain conditions. 6. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal include single family residences, medical offices, and undeveloped land. area. 7. That the proposal is compatible with existing uses in the II FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE-43-81 2 8. That the proposal is not detrimental or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety and welfare. 9. That the applicant has demonstrated changed condilions since the original zone change warranting a zone change from Agricultural and Two - Family Residential to Residential Office. 10. That the proposal is consistent with the surrounding land use classifications and does not grant a special privilege or rights to the appli- cant different than those enjoyed by adjacent property owners. 11. That the .Board finds that the proposal is located within the recorded water service area of Modern Electric Water Company, and that the District indicates that they are desirous of serving the proposal for domestic, fire and irrigation purposes. 12. That the proposal is situated within the recorded fire service area of Fire District #1. 13. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have been met. 14. That on the 25th day of August, 1981, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County at a regular meeting did approve the proposal subject to certain conditions. From the foregoing Findings, a review of the Planning Department Staff Report dated June 4, 1981, and the Staff presentation of File No. ZE- 43 -81, the Board hereby in approving the proposal does make the follow- ing conditions: COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone'. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPAR.7 (continued) 3. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 4. All current standards. of the Residential Office Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 5. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping. for runoff. 6. Applicant shall comply with all agency's regulations as amended prior to issuance of building permits. 7. This property has been identified as being historic on the Spokane County Cultural Resources Inventory. The devel- oper of the proposed project is required to work with the Spokane City /County Office of Historic Preservation in order to develop methods of mitigating any potential negative impact to the identified Cultural Resource. 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements. 9. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environ- mental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment or the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 10. All access from this site shall be from Valley Way Avenue. Access to Willow Road is prohibited. u +w Ur I 1 , DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE-43 -81 4 COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Willow Road and a 20 foot radius on Willow Road and Valley Way for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. 2. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and sidwalk and pave to the existing pavement adjacent to the property on Willow Road and Valley Way. 3. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issu- ance of any building permit on the property. 4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 6. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 7. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge • Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Storm - water Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. NOINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE -43 -81 5 c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter'36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. Each unit shall be double- plumbed for connection to future areawide collection system if any changes are required to the present system. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot.' e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT ! . The site is located in Fire District 141. 2. Mains and hydrants Lo be installed, in accordance with the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE-43 -81 6 DATED This /I day of ATTEST: By: VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk ._al&? Board D -puty , 198 O/ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Date: ` qq '1 - ,) -c',. 5/ nn Application No: /� Z, 3 �'/ - 4- Name of Applicant: !/cr�n RriiP, S ,\Go AZ (\i.a 1 Street Adr of Applicant: . City: �l pl(ij Name of Property Owner(s): . B D 11 ust, A) lilrcit.r i al, < lm Authorized Agent representing Owner (if other than owner): �( Filin Existing Zoning Classification Proposed Zone Classification: Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Existing Use of Property: P6), A PQO0/1a +✓ State:4,'4 Zip Code: 1C1.' Tele. No CJ" , — VYy ? Ag (`i�)��� �7_(1 a r) rr nn Proposed Use of Property: ACCD(.1ATt1)UC (5'1 - 1-1C' -£•. Legal Description of Property: Tit l �:/'/�n, TuklI Ci C'G /C(C[c Y • /ACC` /,'C/tzc /',':F>r /49 �i,n k C'S[ /" gr.. / a /l r ;?e?.. ,^ , t - r' (lF -!' (e'2 i c Lb- .. 4i t "":71/027c>/- AM S- I � / ) Q � �. pG 1 . Section: 1r7 Township: Source of Legal: 7 7e-6 Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax / ( /(, Q 5 Range: tic. / `- statement) / 7 S`/ ._ / 3r) / Property Size: �s,rl P4 Frontage:: &9.3 Feet on: LC", QPr, -r., >- cf. Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Street Address of the Property: Ai._ :3 /6 (c , If you do not hold title „So the property affected by this application, what is your ld interest in it? )e ms } , L' ,s-�1< ,., -, ni „l r-�,, 4,, 4 )2 -t /, , 0 4 t 4 . .� t l t.� 41 CI X1/1 aI a r.!'/Atrt4`Ff.R ,�-(e f 94 lad' list previous s, ,Planning Department y a � ctionns involving thi<. property: - 7�-�t Vi t { I( l.2%�/f UniJ d�ceit Ui�( c'L'1 Ilftcelai /.-(./t;hat 2 / r� Jet, Ala 0) 0LL(.1.ui,W.*?,-ctLcc-j (' /'/cttc. >: ' a ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed nditions pf site area, which you feel make s t proposal warranted? FI �c �T.c_ k. , ; z�c unt c�.c, — CI e - L'e�•ky 2. What effect . 14./ill the proposed zone /''}eclassificatipp/ have on the - �/ prope U (k...1.(7)-(r(/ P }U of <t.i e ().c.('i �Aue G 1 )(5 - i -c tug) c'.c -1 Q t l e � �if r' nu e_ P I w at E, G� /kn �c.(.. :) (.0 cc .slit -Cc° c`. C).urru.. (Lida qk Y�)�/ tc ( r.'Wy /.cr'1.•t iL..i, ] 1,, u ;'C( 1 1�' . t .. k ' 0_ /.&. ri.4 -i-' C Cie 4c i.t �1'C C•�LC�C� . 1 r.Y c? Lc - 0 �. ' P j1, < ir' rtt'tit -E, I.(: / l1-l� . 'r _Gc ..a...( tcid, `c c4 a l _... . 0 ,7 f . .. . grit . I _ 9/ci Lra El:y A�7it,' Litt au (tett"b.'46 `a II ci C U I Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of June 4, 1981 (contd.) 4) ZE- 159 -80, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office: Aslin Location: Proposal: Action: 5) ZE -37 -81 , Single Fancily Residential to Two - Family Residential: Seipp Location: Generally located at the southeast corner of Augusta Avenue and Glenn Road and south of Augusta Court. Section 9- 25 -44. Proposal: Construction of 13 duplexes. Action: Approval. (Vote: 2 - 1) The approval was granted with the condition that the lots along Mission Avenue be retained as Single Family Residential (R -1) Zoning for single family residences. The remainder of the advertised lots were approved for Two - Family Residential (R -2) Zoning. 6) ZEZE�al, Agricultural and Two - Family Residential to Residential Office: Robins and Albi Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of Willow Road and Valley Way Avenue. Section 17- 25 -44. Proposal: Establish an Accounting Office in an existing structure. Action: Denial. (Vote: 3 - 0). The proposal was denied in the interest of protecting the existing residential neighborhood and holding commercial development to the frontage along Argonne and Mullan Roads. 7) ZN -5 -81, Agricultural and Residential Manufactured Horace to Commercial: Torgerson Location: Proposal: Action: DUE TO THE LENGTH OF THE AGENDA, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HERE ADVERTISED FOR AND HEARD ON JUNE 5, 1981: 8) PUDE -1 -80, Extension of Time /Agricultural Planned Unit Development: McCurdy Location: Reason: Action: Generally located at the southwest corner of Boone Avenue and Argonne Road. Section 18- 25 -4 Dental Office. Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0) Generally located on the east side of the Newport Highway and Market Street, 330 feet south of Walker Avenue. Section 34- 27 -43. Commercial uses, including food store and restaurant. Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0) Generally located at the southwest corner of Liberty Lake Road and Sprague Avenue. Section 22- 25 -45. Delay of sewer service to the site. Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0) The Extension of Time was approved to June 5, 1983. 9) ZE- 69 -81, Agricultural, Commercial, Freeway Commercial, Restricted Industrial, and Unclassified to Commercial and Restricted Industrial: McCurdy Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of the Interstate No. 90 Liberty Lake Exit and Liberty Lake Road. Sections 15 -25 -45 and 16- 25 -45. Proposal: No proposed use at this time. Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0) -2- A. INTRODUCTION SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on June 4, 1981, and the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Chairperson, Eldon Thomas and Ron McVicker. B. PROPOSAL File No. ZE -43 -81 The sponsors, Donald Robins and John Albi, are 'requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE- 43 -81, Agricultural and Two Family Residential to Residential Office for the purpose of establishing an accounting office in an existing structure. C. FINDINGS OF FACT D. ORDER 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, medical office and undeveloped. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Urban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural and Two Family Residential. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with -the Declaration of Non - Significance. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the proposal be denied in the interest of protecting the existing residential neighborhood and holding commercial development to the frontage along Argonne and MuIlan Roads. The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Donald Robins and John Albi, for a zone reclassification as describ- ed in the application should be denied. 1 Motion by: McVicker Seconded by: Thomas Vote: Unanimous to Deny (3-0) ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director By: 05:3</t,/ _'N -0,,C' /i Date: 4 . - -- ci 2 File No. ZE -43-81 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE chairperson ;%'