ZE-38-82Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of June 10, 1982 (continued)
4) ZE- 27 -82, Agricultural to Residential Office: Wright
Location:
Proposal:
Action:
5) ,ZE- 38 -82, Residential Office to Commercial: Prinq Corporation
o^cat Generally located north of Sprague Avenue and adjacent and west of
Herald Road. Section 17- 25 -44.
Retail Store with site plan. Also, an application, VE- 99- 82,was
submitted for a request for no rear yard setback and a reduction
of required parking spaces heard by the Zoning Adjustor. This item
has been continued to June 28, 1982 at 1:15 p.m. at which time a
decision will be given. This date is the end of the appeal period.
Action: Denial. (Vote: 2 - 1)
DSA:anw
Proposal:
Generally located adjacent to and north of Mission Avenue and
approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of Mullan and
Mission. Section 8- 25 -44.
Office —No Site Plan.
Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0)
If further information is desired, contact the Planning Department office.
- 2
- t7
6) ZS- 24 -82, Agricultural Suburban to Agricultural: City of Spokane
Location: Generally located south of Crestline Street, extended and west of
existing .South Side Sanitary Landfill. Section 9- 24 -43.
Proposal: Sanitary Landfill Expansion. Also, an application, CUS- 99 -82, was
submitted for a Conditional Use Permit for Expansion of the existing
Sanitary Landfill which was approved by the Zoning Adjustor.
Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0)
i
82 0839
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER_OF .ON- E— RECLA5SI-
FICA Z 83 82;; RESIDENTIAL
OFF( CE TO COMME-RCr ,AND VE- 99 -82,
REQUEST FOR NO REAR YARD SETBACK
AND REDUCTION OF REQUIRED PARK-
ING. • APPLICANT/OWNER: PRING
CORPORATION
FINDINGS OF FACT
•
54
) FINDINGS OF FACT DECISION
) AND CONDITIONS
RECEIVED
- SPOKANE CORM Pro &IPEEQ
)
SEPO1 982
THIS MATTER Being the consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board" of
an appeal of Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of
June 10, 1982, denying in a 2 to 1 vote, the zone reclassification
(ZE- 38 -82), Residential Office to Commercial, for the purpose of developing a
retail store, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal ", and the Board of
County Commissioners of Spokane County having held a public hearing on
July 20, 1982, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat
and further having individually visited with the site and vicinity in
question, considering the Planning Department's file, and having rendered a
decision on the 10th day of August, 1982, APPROVING said proposal, does
hereby make the following:
1. That the proposal is generally located in the Spokane Valley,
more specifically, lying approximately 130 feet north of Sprague Avenue and
west of Herald Road.
2. That the proposal consists of the development of a 11,640
square foot retail store to be occupied by Fabricland, a fabric store,
•
3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive
Land Use Plan indicates Nlajor Commercial usage of the area encompassed by
the proposal.
4. That the provisions of RCW Chapter 43.21C, (State Environ-
mental Policy Act) have been complied with and the Board adopts a declara-
tion of non - significance for this proposal.
5. That the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee held a
public hearing on June 10, 1982, concerning the proposal, subsequent to
which by Findings of Fact, Decision and Order dated June 17, 1982, they
denied the proposal on a two to one vote.
:a
FINE 35 OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE -38-82 2
Y .
6. That the existing and uses in the area of proposal include
single family residences, multiple family, banks shops, and University City.
area.
7. That the proposal is compatible with existing uses in the
8. That the proposal is not detrimental or otherwise harmful to
the public health, safety and welfare.
1
9. That the applicant has demonstrated changed conditions since
the original zone change in 1977, warranting a zone change from Residential
Office to Commercial; namely, (1) adoption of the Generalized Comprehensive
Plan designating the site Major Commercial; (2) the encouragement by the
guidelines of the, Generalized Comprehensive Plan of fill -in and buffering•of
commercial uses; and (3) commercial rezoning within the immediate vicinity
since 1977.
10. That the proposal is not totally inconsistent with the sur-
rounding and use classifications and does not grant a special privilege or
rights to the applicant different than those enjoyed by adjacent property
owners.
11. That the Board finds that the proposal is located within the
recorded water service area of Modern Electric Water Company, and that the
District indicates there is an adequate system capacity, and that they are
desirous of serving the proposal for domestic, fire and irrigation purposes.
12. That the proposal is situated within the recorded fire service
area of Fire District #1.
13. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the
hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have
been met.
14. That on the 10th day of August, 1982, the Board or County
Commissioners of Spokane County at a regular meeting did APPROVE the
proposal subject to certain conditions.
From the foregoing Findings, a review of the Planning Department
Staff Report dated June 10, 1982, and the Staff presentation of File Nc.
ZE- 38 -82, the Board hereby in APPROVING the proposal does adopt the
following conditions:
1. That the conditions set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Hearing Examiner staff analysis dated June.17, 1982, on pages 2 through 6
are hereby adopted as conditions of approval.
Z4 /P -c
•
FINE 3S OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE -38 -82 3
DATED This
ATTEST:
74/P-c
WILLIAM E. DONAHUE
Clerk of tM oard
By:
Deput
day of
, 198d
BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE CHANGE )
ZE- 38 -82, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO COM- )
MERCIAL AND VE- 99 -82, request for ) NOTICE OF,
No Rear Yard Setback and Reduction of ) PUBLIC HEARING
Required Parking )
APPLICANT /OWNER: PRING CORPORATION )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Pring Corporation has filed a Notice
of Appeal of the denial by the Hearing Examiner Committee of the
above captioned zone change application.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of
Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M.
on July 13, 1982, at its office in the County Courthouse to consi-
der the above mentioned application on the following described
property:
Generally located north of Sprague Avenue and
adjacent and west of Herald Road. (17- 25 -44)
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at
said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition
to the denial by the Hearing Examiner Committee.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 22 day of June, 1982.
PUBLISH:
SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD
June 30, 1982
(map)
reverse side
WILLIAM E. 0NAHUE
CLERK OF.- H BOARD
-e 7
BY R Of MONTAGUE, D PUTY
Fire c �0
t c't on
SPRAGUE
2 1-38-82 S - ko a�D c s
VE99 -82 AV£
EIGH 8
PG .O G. w S•
114J Os.
!L. /99/
Z J .UliifSstr5P {y
J �
o � • . H1,9n Schoi:4
zr■EL. /98
NI*ON
J
h A 11 ` '
R IV fN SIDE
V
t •
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on
June 10, 1982, and the members of the Committee present being
Ronald L. McVicker, Chairman, Kathleen M. Carstens and Richard L. Skalstad.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Pring Corporation, is requesting approval of a zone reclassifica-
tion, File No. ZE- 38 -82, Residential Office to Commercial, for the purpose of
developing a Retail Store.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
1. That the existing land use in the area Is residential, University City and
vacant.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
Commercial development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is
Residential Office.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been Complied with.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use, or uses
within the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the applicant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially
changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the pro-
posed rezone is not justified.
8. That the proposed use is incompatible with existing uses in the area.
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed
use.
10. The Hearing Examiner Committee does not find the proposed use to be in
harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to
the public health, safety, and welfare.
1
File No. ZE -38 -82
C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued)
11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That the Residential Office zoning be retained to serve as a buffer for
the residential properties to the north, with especial consideration to
the existing residences along Walnut Road.
b) That sufficient parking has not been provided to meet Zoning Ordi-
nance standards, the proposed building exceeds site coverage over
that allowed by zoning standards, and the location of the building does
not comply with setback requirements of the proposed zone reclassifi-
cation.
c) The Zoning Adjustor continued the hearing for the advertised Variance
with regard to a request for deletion of the rear yard setback and
reduction of required parking spaces until June 28, 1982, at 1:15 p.m.
to render a decision. This date will be the end of the appeal period
after the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee signs the Findings and
Order which outlines the action taken at their public hearing.
D. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of Pring Corporation, for a zone reclassification as described in the
application should be denied.
Motion by: Skalstad
Vote: Deny ( 2 - 1
ATTEST:
WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning `oirectAr
By:
Date:
l /7-t
2
Seconded by: Carstens
File No. ZE -38-82
HEARING E MINER COMMITTEE
Name:
Address:
Home Phone: 924 -1150
Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed
Title: Denial of Zoning Change from Residential Office (RO) to Commercial (C)
Preliminary Subdivision Number: N/A
Zone Reclassification Number: zE - 38 - 82
Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: June 10. 1982
Signature:
Signatur: o Authorized Representative:
Address:
Copies to: Planning /l/
Norma Smith
Fee Received: Check /95
Hearing Date:
PPTMC PnPPORATTnN
(Please Print)
APPEAL RCUUESI FORM
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIONERS
Appeal Fee - $75.00
E. 8500 Sprague Avenue; Spokane, WA
Le ,
F_ %SOO Sprague Avenue: Spokane, Wh✓ 99206
YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL
This property is in the commercial overallA g czoning plane
plan adopted
January, 1981. It is also commercial zoning all around this site.
zoning on the Easterly portion of this property extends considerably deeper
Avenue, the major road fronting this commercial site.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Engineers
Cash
Business Phone:
Today's Date ,June 17, 1987
Zip Code: 99206
924 -1150
by Spokane County,
Environmental Health „,cU
Receipt Number /
In addition, commercial
from Sprague
AGENDA, JUNE 10, 1982 - 2 -
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane
(Continued from Page #1)
A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS (continued)
4. ZE -27 -82 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE
(Generally located adjacent to and north of Mission Avenue
and approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of
Mullan and Mission. Section 8- 25 -44) - 5 r8
Proposed Use: Office - No Site Plan.
Site Size: Approximately 1.09 Acres
Applicant: J. C. WRIGHT
East 9209 Mission Avenue
Spokane, WA 99206;
•
5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT
RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO COMMERCIAL AND .
Request for No Rear Yard Setback and Reduction of Required
Parking
(Generally located north of Sprague Avenue and adjacent and
west of Herald Road. 'Section 17- 25 -44)
Proposed Use: Retail Store with site plan.
Site Size: Zone Change, 12,545 Square Feet
Total Development, 31,980.Square Feet
Applicant /Owner: PRING CORPORATION
East 8500 Sprague'Avenue '
Spokane, WA ' 99206'
1:30 P.M:
6. ZS -24 -82 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN fo AGRICULTURAL AND
d.
CUS4. 7 -82
5 -11
TELEPHONE NO.: 456 - 2205
t
Conditional Use Permit for Sanitary Landfill Expansion
(Generally located south,, Crestline Street, extended and
west of existing South, Side Sanitary Landfill. 'Section 9-24-43)
Proposed Use: Sanitary Landfill .Expansion
Site Size: Approximately 15 Acres
Applicant: CITY OF SPOKANE
West 808 Spokane 'Falls Blvd.
Spokane, WA 99201
Except when an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared, a proposed
declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that
an EIS is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant
of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a
major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision .
makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact
upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus
resulting in the need for an EIS. However, most "change of conditions" are exempt from
the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff, if uncertainty exists.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
PROPOSED USE:
ZONING:
STAFF REPORT
JUNE 10, 1982
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -38 -R2 and
VARIANCE: VE -99 -82
APPLICANT:
STATUS OF APPLICANT:
REQUESTED ZONING:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROJECT LOCATION:
II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION
PRING CORPORATION
Owner
Commercial
Residential Office (established in 1977)
Retail Fabric Store.
This site is generally located in the Spokane
Valley, more specifically, tying approximately
130 feet north of Sprague Avenue and west
of Herald Road.
SITE SIZE: Approximately 12,400 square feet
49
54 -11
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is flat with scattered tree cover
and vacant of any structures. Access to the site will be from Herald
Road. This property is to be joined with the land to the south and to-
gether are to be used for a fabric store. (Note: Application for Variance
VE -99 -82 to be heard at the same time as rezone application.)
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Commercial zoning is commonly found
along Sprague Avenue at varying depths. This request is consistent with
past decisions and existing land uses.
AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: The site has been committed to an
"Urban Use" by the Soil Conservation Service.
North Two - Family Residential, established, 1965
East Commercial, established, 1979
West Residential Office, established, 1969
Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1969
South Commercial, established, 1957
. 1 y
II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued)
II BA /AN
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER:
LAND USE: Site Vacant
North Single Family Residential
East Vacant
West Single Family Residential and Multiple Family
Suburban
South Banks, Shops, University City
1981 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMERCIAL
NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: None
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 1
Total Square Feet Approximately 12,000 sq. ft.
Total Percent of Site Covered 37.5 % (Building Only)
Maximum Allowed Coverage 35.0 %
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 story
PARKING REQUIRED: 60 spaces
PROVIDED: 47 spaces
A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - The proposal is located within the
Commercial category along Sprague Avenue. The development of the
site into commercial uses would be encouraged by the guidelines of
the Comprehensive Plan which include a fill -in provision and buffer-
ing and compatibility provisions which could be satisfied by the site
plan.
B. SITE CONSIDERATIONS - The proposal is to rezone the northern
96.35 feet of the site plan to Commercial zoning in order that the site
development plan can be accomplished. The site plan includes the
southerly portions of the parcel to Sprague Avenue which is currently
zoned Commercial. The Planning Department in reviewing this applica-
tion divides this request into two major requests:
1) Should the northerly portion be rezoned to Commercial, and
2) Should development be allowed as requested on the site plan
(which includes a request for a "Variance" to the Zoning
Ordinance).
30
ZE -38 -82 &
VE-99-82
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER:
ZE -38 -82 &
VE-99-82
III. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS (continued)
B. SITE CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
The first request for rezoning would be a decision of the Hearing
Examiner Committee. The second would require the approval of a
variance, as the site plan does not meet parking requirements, set-
back requirements, or building coverage requirements of the
Commercial Zone classification; and, therefore, would require
approval by the Zoning Adjustor to be able to develop the site in this
way.
C. HISTORY OF OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS - As previously men-
tioned, the property to the south of the rezone request was zoned
Commercial in January, 1981. At that time the Board of County
Commissioners made a specific condition that the northerly 90 feet
would not be . rezoned and remain in its present zone classification
until further justification for development is submitted. (ZE- 136 -80).
The sponsor of the proposal is now submitting that justification now
exists and wishes to develop the site into a fabric store.
D. CONCLUSION - The Planning Department, based on the Comprehen-
sive Plan Guidelines and existing use proposal, would recommend that
the zone change be approved, subject to current standards of the
Commercial Zone or contingent upon an approval of the "Variance"
request by the Zoning Adjustor.
IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. All current standards of the Commercial Zone, as amended,
shall be complied with in the development of this site or as
allowed by the Zoning Adjustor.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accord-
ance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Com-
mittee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allow-
able uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to
regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. A 6 -foot sight- obscuring cyclone fence shall be provided along
the northern boundary of this proposal to provide a buffer for
the existing uses to the north of this site. A comparable
substitute to the cyclone fencing may be approved by the Zoning
Administrator.
3/
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER:
ZE -38 -82 &
VE -99 -82
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued)
4. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution 477 -1392 be initiated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on -site improvements.
5. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental
Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance
has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the
official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse
impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made
that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical
environment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a
final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Herald Road and a 20 foot
radius on Herald and Sprague for right -of -way prior to any use
of the property.
2. Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County
Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit or any use of
the property.
3. Applicant shall improve Herald Road in a manner consistent with
Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving
width Access Standard.
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit on the property.
5. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed com-
bined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan
for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building
permit on the property.
6. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accord-
ance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required
for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or
traveled by vehicles.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER:
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
7. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
8. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construc-
tion, and other applicable county standards and /or adopted reso-
lutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Manage-
ment in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commis-
sioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with
all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District
and is further conditioned and subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in
any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a
utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW,
Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and succes-
sors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal
assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID)
established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accord-
ance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County.
4. Each unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -
wide collection system.
LE -38 -82 &
VE-99-82
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER:
ZE -38 -82 &
VE -99 -82
1. The Health District has noted that a 35' x 86' area has been set
aside as a "landscaping and drainfield" area. This area may be
too small. Approval of this proposal will be subject to specific
application for a sewage disposal permit, and the method of
sewage disposal will be determined by the Spokane County
Utilities Department. It is noted that the proposed septic tank
and drainfield are about 200 feet apart. This could result in a
problem of the drainfield being too deep. Other than specific
design problems, the Health District does not object to the pro-
posed zone change.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1. The site is located in Fire District #1.
2. A plan for emergency equipment access is required to be sub -
mitted prior to any land development.
3. Recommend approval with condition that prior to development of
this property that an engineered water distribution system plan
shall be submitted to the Spokane County Department of Building
and Safety. This distribution plan shall include water main size,
flows, locations, fire hydrant type and locations, water storage
tanks size, and location and design criteria.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company.
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. That all parking areas be paved and kept clean.
2. That dust created by construction and excavation be controlled.
31-
TO: Spokane County Planning Department
FROM: Spokane County Engineer I9
RE: Conditions of Approval -Lone Change-- Number: ZG 3 s
Applicant's Name_ f ;,va (oiz 2ATi'on.)
Section /'7 Township ?s - N, Rang e y. y _ EWM
The following "conditions of approval" for the above - referenced zone change are sub-
mitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the staff
analysis and "findings and order" of the hearing scheduled (lMO in , 19 g'z.
I. Applicant shall dedicate,________ feet on "
for right -of -way prior to any use of the property.
2. Applicant shall dedicate feet on
for right -of -way and slope easements as necessary prior to any use of the proper-
ty
3. Applicant shall dedicate a __ foot radius on _
and prior to any use of the property.
0 //
Applicant shall dedicate __5 feet on N � eitcs Rop and a o j(yfoot
ll radius on � & LL and F_T p,o for right -of -way
prior to any use of the property.
Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit or any use of the property.
6. Access to Road shall be prohibited until such time as
specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer.
1. Access permits and improvements to must be
approved by the Washington Department of Transportation.
b. Access permits and improvements to must be
approved by the City of
(A) Applicant shall improve N /( ►f - in a manner consistent with
Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. _ minimum paving width
ACC e GtA -Ra .
*(B) Applicant shall irnprove in a manner consistent with
Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum paving width
*(C) Applicant shall improve_ in a manner consistent with
Spokane County TYPICAL_ roadway section No. minimum paving width
•
(E) Other specific improvements:
OFFICE of COUNTY ENGINEERS
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
*(D) Applicant shall improve in a manner consistent with
Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. _ __ minimum paving width
, 19_ S?
Applicant shall submit ror approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drain-
age, dnd .cress Hans ;mini to the 1,'.oanre ut a building permit nn the proper-
ty.
Iii' ;,plrt Jednt snail 7.ud rur approval by the Spokane County t:a;incer dnd the
Spokane County Health Uistr;ct d dclarled combined on -ciLe sewdye system plan and
surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior Lo the issuance of any
building permit on the property.
A parking place and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by
the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the
property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paviny or surfacing as
approved by the County Fngrneer, will be required for any portion of the project
which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles.
The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his
heirs, assigns, and successors.
14. Tu construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the
approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any
petition ur resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement
District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane
County will not participate in the cost of these improvements.
15. As an alternative method of constructing.the road improvement stated herein, the
applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road
improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project
(CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not
participate in the cost of these improvements.
The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Stand-
ard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable county
standards and or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by
the County Engineer.
18. Applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of
prior to any use of the property.
19. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated access approach(s) to meet the
existing pavement on
Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended.
• AGENDA, „dNE 10, 1982 - 2 -
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane
(Continued from Page N1)
A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS (continued)
4. ZE -27 -82 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE
(Generally located adjacent to and north of Mission Avenue
and approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of
Mullan and Mission. Section 8- 25 -44)
Proposed Use: Office - No Site Plan.
Site Size: Approximately 1.09 Acres
Applicant: J. C. WRIGHT
East 9209 Mission Avenue
Spokane, WA 99206
5. ZE -38 -82 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO COMMERCIAL AND
VE -99 -82 Request for No Rear Yard Setback and Reduction of Required
Parking
(Generally located north of Sprague Avenue and adjacent and
west of Herald Road. Section 17- 25 -44)
Proposed Use: Retail Store with site plan.
Site Size: Zone Change, 12,545 SquaresFeet
Total Development, 31,980 Square Feet
Applicant /Owner: PRING CORPORATION
East 8500 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA 99206
1:30 P.M.
6. ZS -24 -82 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO AGRICULTURAL AND
CUS -99 -82 Conditional Use Permit for Sanitary Landfill Expansion
(Generally located south of Crestline Street, extended and
west of existing South Side Sanitary Landfill. Section 9- 24 -43)
Proposed Use:
Site Size:
Applicant:
5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT
TELEPHONE NO.: 456 - 2205
Sanitary Landfill Expansion
Approximately 15 Acres
CITY OF SPOKANE
West 808 Spokane Falls Blvd.
Spokane, WA 99201
Except when an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared, a proposed
declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that
an EIS is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant
of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a
major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision
makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact
upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus
resulting in the need for an EIS. However, most "change of conditions" are exempt from
the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff, if uncertainty exists.
* * * * 1. 4 * .t -A.
:_- re I s s !IA
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Date: May 5, 1982 Application No: • 7/t -8 - 82-
Name of Applicant: 'BRING CORPORATION
Street Address of Applicant: E. 850rr : Avenue •
City: ; -okane State: WA. Zip Code: 00206 Tele. No. 92
Name of Property Owner(s): PRIMO CORPO:LITION
Authorized Agent representing Owner
(if other than owner):
Existing Zoning Classification:
Section: 1 '
Source of Legal:
Aonli.cant
Property .Size: " ''1'ro::. 12,526
John A. Pring, President
68
Residential Office
Date Existing Zone Classification Established:
Existing Use of Property: Vacant Lund
Proposed Zone Classification: Commercial
Proposed Use of Property: Retail Fabric Store
1'ag,: 15 situated in Spokane County, [ ftshington.
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement)
1977
17544 -2611
A / 3c -hoe
Ch ef' 1.-071witat4r
Township: 75 Range: 44 ' 1iN
Frontage: 96' Feet on: Harold road
the North 96.35 tt. o`
The East 130 feet ofpTract 5 of Block 6 in
Legal Description of Property:
OPl FLAT Ilo. 3, as per. Plat thereof, recorded in Volume S cf Plats,
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 61,320 sn.ft.
Not available until building permit is
Street Address of the Property: obtained.
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your
interest in it? NA
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: See
attached Findings of Fact, Spokane County Planning and Spokane County Commissioners.
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED:
1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this
proposal warranted? Area is designated as Commercial by thecomprehensi.ve Land
Tian adopted by Spokane County, also retail fabric store is adaptable with
surrounding property and Commercial gives highest and best use of property.
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on ' the "adjacent
properties? In our opinion, none.
Rev. 2/3/81
I
A, (CATION FOR ZONE RECLAS:". :,CATION -- continue -£a
This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat-
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department.
1."- COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
req irements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
f
6 - fl
(Date)
2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
A pr liminary consultation
requih�ments for sub Ytt'al
The/de ignated wa er . ury
Y(Signaturd)/
v
3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME) /
a) The proposal (is) (rey.wer) located within the boundary of our service
area
b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (haue --eet) been made to serve this
proposal.
c) (Are ( ' able to serve this site with adequate water.
(Signature)
4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
This .propgs is located in Fire District #
( {'Signature ,) /
z G �" U
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR,
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHA
NOTARY SEAL:
(Sign
(Address) E. 8500 Sprague Avenue
%1/4.6 } ez e crri.
has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
S%or for this site is /1 /i.dc/C_
rine Cr,rpnratio
Z
(Date)
S -7-77.
(Date)
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
S 7 /f Z
(Date
49.
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal.
appti ant has been informed of our requirements and standards
t
Date: V/ S/
Phone: / 924 - 1150
Zip: 99206
The
PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO -
IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
Date: �� / ( l�
Rev. 2/3/81
Date: May 5, 1992
Name of Applicant:
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /VARIANCE /WAIVER OF VIOLATION
Street Address of Applicant:
City: Spokand State: WA. Zip Code: 99206 Tele. No: (509)- 924 -1150
Name of Property Owner(s):
Requested Action (Cite Ordinance Section): Reduce the•rear vard set -back
15 ft. to 0 ft. to accomodate building and variance for 131ess parking
spaces (from 60 to 47): "
Existing Zoning Classification:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
the North 96.35 ft. of
Legal Description of Property: The East 130 feet ofATract 5 of Block 6 id
Opportunity Plat 3, as per Plat thereof, recorded in Volume S of Plats, Page 15
situated in Spokane County, Washington.
Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Section: 17 Towns 25 Range:
Source of Legal: Applicant
'Assessor's Parcel No. (See tax statement) 17544 -2611
Property Size: Approx. 12,526, so/ft Frontage: 96' Feet on: Harold Road
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 61._20 sa.ft.
Not available until building _permit is
ohtai and _
Street Address of the Property:
rum CORPORATION •
PRING CORPORATION
Vacant Land
Retail Fabric Store
Commercial
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is
your interest in it?
NA
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: See
attached Findings of Fact, Spokane County Planning and Spokane County Commissioners.
I SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE PROPOSED SITE. IF NOT THE OWNER,
ATTACHED HEREWITH I5 WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS
ON HIS OR HER BEHALF.
* * * * ** * * * * * * * * **
FOR PLANNING DEPARTME USE ONLY
Hearing Date:
Application No:
E. 8509 Sprague Avenue
Residential Office
c1 ;
sy fit( >s
_gar zoALESAivii_e
zE 38 -8 -
44
(Signe. r, Dist► Date: S d
(Addres . 8500 Sprague Avery Phone: 92 4-11 5 0
NOTARY
Spo:ane, Ua.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
Zip: 99206
Date: l) j
I. ,
Date: r s/ d _ 1'
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Fe Receipt #
Legal Checked by:
i
(SIGNATURE)
�; •
- B c7_ APPLICAT.ION;FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ONLY
This Section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff
�with-written,_v.erification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation
with the"- ag'enties identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should
% be ; ncorporated in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Deoart-
ent.
,� COUNT.Y ITIES DEPARTMENT
/ .- A pre Liriiinary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant has been informed of requirements and standards.
,A
3Zf
1 � .
ALL APPLICATIONS
1. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
app ant has beAn informed of requirements and standards.
6 3/7 /
/ (DAVE)
_,.— (SIGNATURE) (DATE)
2. WATER' PURVEYOR (NAME)
tea) The proposal (is) (is not) located within the boundary of our service
/ urea ,/°
- - b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve this
/ ,(proposal.
; f c),-We(•are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
C1 —." (SIGNATURE) (DATE)
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE ONLY
1. In vew of the above information, what special circumstance(s) (beyond your
control or actions) deprive you of the same general rights and privileges
of other property owners within the same zone and vicinity?
In order to get maximum utilization of our property not only for parking requirements of the
of the business that will be using the building, we are asking for a variance of 13 car
parking spaces and the rear yard set -back from 15' to 0'. In as much as we own the property
attached to the West on the rear yard line, it would be our intention to use the rear wall
as a common wall for future buildings, by so doing we would elliminate a 30' strip of ground
between the two buildings that would become useless and would attract an area
that would be a catch -all for weeds, debris, and garbage collection. If we can use
our common wall, it will give us maximum utilization of our property and future accomodate
the land for its highest and best use. Also we feel that with water available Lo this site
proper fire protection can be given. We also do not need access to the building from the
rear as merchandise and access to the building by the front is more adequate and feasible. —
2pi - OF VIOLATION ONLY •
)e How " -Why was the structure established outside the provisions of the
r , Sookan 'ounty Zoning Ordinance?
L.. '
2. What facts support the applicant that.a Waiver of Violation si'icula "be
,.granted?
Date:
May 5, 1982
Name of Applicant:
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
- APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Application No: Zt J8- —
Street Address of Applicant:
City: Spokane
Name of Property Owner(s):
Existing Zoning Classification:
Section: 17
Source of Legal:
2. What effect
properties?
.RING COIIORATIOi1
Township:
Annlicant
4
E. 8500 Sprague Avenue
State: WA. Zip Code:
PRING CORPORATION
99206
Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 1977,
Existing Use of Property: Vacant Land
Proposed . Zone Classification: Commercial
Proposed Use of Property: Retail Pabric Store
m Page 15 situated in Spokane County, Washington.
17544 -2611
Plan._ adopted by Spokane County, also retail fabric store is
Q�. ici' s/iUt-
0 13/✓
Tele. No. 924 -1150
Authorized Agent representing Owner
(if other than owner): John A. Pring, President
67 "`
Residential Office ` ari
iete
the North 96.3S tt. of
The East 130 feet of^Tract 5 of Block 6 in
Legal Description of Property:
OPPORTUNITY PLAT No. 3, as per Plat thereof, recorded in Volume S of Plats,
25 , Range: 44 EWM
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement)
Property Size: Approx. 12 Frontage: 96' Feet on: Harold Road
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 61.320 sa.ft.
Not available until building permit is
Street Address of the Property: obtained.
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your
interest in it? ' NA
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: See
attached Findings of Fact, Spokane County Planning and Spokane County Commissioners.
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED:
1. What' are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this
proposal warranted? Area is designated as Commercial by theComprehensive.Land
adaptable with
surrounding property and Commercial gives highest and best use of property.
will the proposed zone reclassification have on, the adjacent
•
In our opinion, none. . -
Rev. 2/3/81
AF NICATION FOR ZONE RECLASS - cony 4d -2 -,, •
This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff witti
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat-
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department.
1.� COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements fo submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
A pr urinary consulta
requ em nts for sub
Th igna
Signature)/
3 :- - WATER PURVEYOR
a)
The proposal (is) (is not) located within
area.
•
b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve
proposal.
c) We (are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
(Signature)
4. • BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary. consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements' for submittal of this proposal for rezone have . been satisfied..
This proposal Is located in Fire District #
(Signature)
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
A preliminary consultation
a ppliant has been inform
( ature)
•NOTARY SEAL:
•
(Sign
(Address)
on has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
al of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
or for this site is /0/7577A/ ,Efin JC-
(NAME)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE
ABOVE RESPONSES'ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER
POSED FOR ZONE' RECLASSIFICATION, OR,
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHA
(Date')'
(Date)
(Date)
has been held to discuss the proposal. The,
of our requirements and standards.
7 (Date
PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
'ring Corporatio
E. 8500 Sprague
pokane, Wa.
RY ,
NOTAGXc ,
•
( Dat 6 - (12d
Avenue
the boundary of our service
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO -
IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
Date: r /S /fl'
Phone: 924 -1150
Zip: 99206
.` \ tip -l1�te
Date:
this
s /S /re 2-
I' 1/
Rev. 2/3/81
Cant: PRING CORPORATION
Street Address of Applicant: E. 8500 Sprague Avenue
City: 'Spokane State: WA. Zip Code: 99206 Tele:.No: (509)- 924- 1L50
Name of Property Owner(s): PRING CORPOItATI0
. Req uested Action (Cite Ordinance Section) : Reduce; the- rear. ' ,ward set -hack
f rom 15 ft. to 0 ft.-to accomodate and variance for 9 parking
. spaces - '-(from 60 to 51.). •
: Existing Zoning Classification:
- Exi of Property::
Proposed Use of Property. Fabric, Store
•
L2ga1 Description of Property: The East 130. feet ofATract•5';of,Block. •
'Opportunity Plat :' as p er°Plat ,thereof, recorded: in Volume,S'of Plats, Page 15•.
•
situated - .in Spokane
Comprehensive Plan Designation:-:%- Commercial
Section: , 17 . Township:
-:Source Legal: , Ab 3ica %,
Assessor's Nb. (See tax statement)
Property Size: Approx. 12,52A. sq /ft Frontage:. 96' Feet: on:, Harold Roan'
Total amount of adjoining land.controlled by this owner'or Sponsor:. 320
Not available until'buildinw.'_oermit is•:,
"Street Address of the Property: obtaihnri 7.
If you do not hold title to the property affected by_,this app.l what
your interest in it? NA
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: See
attached Findings of Fact, Spokane County Planning and Spokane County Commissioners.
I SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE PROPOSED, SITE. 'IF NOT THE OWNER,:
ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WR1iiEN Ntki"ii5SiuN FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS
ON HIS OR HER BEHALF.
-_:NOTARY SEAL.
1* * * * *
FOR PLANNING DEPARTME
Hearing Date:
* * *
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
"...:ON FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /VARIANCE /WAIVER. OF VIOLATION
5, 1932 Application No: l/E 9
(Signe
(Addres
Residential Office .sCt.:400 r' 4:(/ j A,f/6Cr�t?d4
/�' ' 38 tS C°ovN/N.
Vacant Land
25
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
17544 =26II
USE ONLY Fe Receipt #
Legal Checked by:
the North =96.35 ft'. of
Range:- 44
•
0/ Date: 1,57/45///An l C
Phone: 924 -1150
Zip: 99206
q ) -- /fr -iv
Date:
* * * * * * */* *!* * * * *
.504c L /3gz
1 a4 n{npt(S�dol }eLoln to
•
(31t1a1 -
(JAW!)
f
1,pa3ueab<
aaALEM e 3ey3 3ueolidde - ay3 3aoddns floe; 3•eyM •
Aaoueulp,a0 "-6uuoZ IC3uno ueIo
ayv }o suolslnoadi ay3 • apls3no pays. ge3sa aan3ona3s ay3 sem -ati MoH'
AINO . NOI1Vl0IA j , ,3AIt1M" .W- ,
NIV1dX3 3SV31d lesn ieloaawwoo Jo aauap
A 'I
-lsaa we4- ai6uls to I ):AabuepeA a 3noy1lm kfluloln ay3 uL43lm sasn ay; .
.., aeilwls aauuew.e: ui pesn.aq.. -ueo JO 'pasn ALquasaad A'3aadoad a43 si; ::••
is2uawanoudwl uo`
. sa bulaoggbleu •,voa ;3e vi pNnom moy 'pa3uea6 •aoueiaeA ay; 3.I `._ •Z
r ` i'3tulol'n,'.pue auoz awes ay3 uly3lm s.aeumo A'3.aado:ia' .aay3o :40 '..
sabaiiniad pue s3ybp:Leaauab,awes ayv no'' anladap (suol}ee..40 io:a3uoo :
.anofi.puokaq)>(s)aoue2swno.ap Ieloads 3eym 'uolpew.ao4ul anoge a43 to man ul
AINO 30NVI8VA 2103 NOIIVOI iddV
•
(32if)1VN9IS) /"
,,�:aavgM;avenbape :.y4lm sas slip. ,aA.aas, 02 .aige'..(vou aJe,), ( a
•iesodoa
s ly3 anues'. o3 ape`w uaaq (3ou aney) (aney) s3uawabue:a.ae' £*03be3's S (q
aoinaas ano 30 p epun ay 3 - uly3lm pa3eooi (3ouws.y (sl) oaa ail!
(314A) 210A3A21f1d 1VM, •• ' "•`.•'';'
(Ray ) ✓ . .•
•spaepue.s pue s3uawaalnbaa-4o paw.aolul uaaq• "spy 3ueb
•iesodoad ay,.ssnosip o3 piay`ueaq sey uolpe31nsuoo A'aeu,
1N3W121Vd30 S3I1
•- 4aeaap 6uluueid 943 03: 1e24lwgns ieui4'.a.iolaq iesodoad ay3 ul pave
•-•pirioys uolve3insuoo'Aaeulwliaad a43 4o s3Lnsaa •pal41.3uapl sal
.uolvelinsuoo A'aeulwiiaad pey say vueol(dde 943 3ey3 uolfeolj pJ 'ivagvla 3Im
•, 44e3S s,3uawfaeda0 buluueid ayv apinoad 'Aim UOI3eolidde eq. }o u oL3 S
ONO IIW2i3d 3SN IVNOIIIQN00 2NOCNO lVOI
•spaepue3s pue s3uawaalnbaa 3o paGi.ao3ul u aq spy quo de
ay! •iesoaoao ay3 ssnoslp o3 play uaaq sey uoPPe3insuoo Aaeulwliaad v
10I211SI0 H11V3H A.N000 'I
SNOIIVOIlddV 11V
A.
PROPOSAL
lj]
Number ZE - 30 ' 8
S P O K A N E C O U N L Y E N G I N E E R B 1
- - -PREL I M I NAR Y C0NSULTAT 1 0 N--- V 9r
Project Name: _ FA 1 3RjC/ nr. C /o6P - Q
Number of Parcels:
Section_ j"?_ T. 7 ,Q ,_N.", R. yi E.W.M.; Quarter 17 - T - 4 -
DEVELOPER Name: ooh Pefe'S°x"` •
or Address: _�S_. V 2_ � e • 9 n(�
AGENT Phone: Bus iness_ qat/ -// fin Home ,SG -.., .Q
Name: ,S a p
OWNER ., Address:
Phone: Business // Home
f
' Name:_ t - 4aL �Ht4 c /l /
ENG INEER - Address: co A /c/ f-- /,pSTZ 4vr i
Phone: Business r - ) - y/ 7n Home
B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: $" / 1 / (fa- By: CT, Ye_ f S FI 11
Preliminary a) Right -of -Way NL.2aLr/ - /O' 4j - EP. /3' — 40 e9"4/ Ohs,
Conditions b) Curb
c) Sidewalk I •
d) Pave
e) Approaches 1
f) Drainage
g) State /City Review.. Yes ( ) No (✓r
Remarks: Vwr;w)try /gear E \/.5 1 — gry4t_fi1
& n 'f'a 4- /-S . rtin.r trim �'ia, r
-Sn P /0. - C9 Aar., r
n an hitt r, �l Z /= /26 - /P �l WAS mss? enh-I- /
NOTE: This proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap-
proach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution
No. 80 -1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in-
spection and review of County records.
C. INSPECTION Date: / / By:
Remarks:
D. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
Fee Paid: �[� No Amount S
Planning A. rcation Signed: Date / ./ By:
E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS
Fee Paid: Date Amount Check
Mathematical & Surveying Checks:
No. 1 Date By
No. 2 Date By
No. 3 Date By
Nat ,al; a 1" :ll aka hit; A.
At s,,; l
bask PAia P.M. 5.4 ?ld,. ,
Cas
Check
Cash
Additional ,mathematical and Surveying Checks:
No. 4 Date By Fee Amt.. &Dt.Pd.
No. 5 Date By Fee Amt. &Dt.Pd.
No. 6 Dat By Fee Amt. &Dt.Pd.
No. 7 D ate By ree Arnt. &Dt.Pd.
1/81
TO 1.1F
OROEP
OF
r
PRING CORPORATION
P 0 0.' +a SSG
E 8S00 30'aUu'
Sort \onr Washin:purl 99:14
PAY __.__. Two Hundred and 00 /100
L._
Spokane County Engineers
•1 SZA!TlE-FIAST NATIDNAL HANK
; nu,AbE .V.4}nNLtJM
11 L S 70911' I: 1 2 50000 24i: X 7096 90011•
80.808 P.mlj.n
ACCOUNT
AMT. OF
ACCOUNT
AMT. PAID
BALANCE
DUE
T
HOW PAID
CASH
CHECK
MONEY
ORDER
By
May 7, 19 82
DOLLARS $ 200.00
Ie.
No. 15709
19- 7(1250
RECEIPT Date__? 19-47! 5937
Received From T2 /
Ass
-gyp
1J"O 4 or7dae 1 an-zed ^ / lOCG6oll ars $all
For .."2 f 3 �- SS U