Loading...
ZE-7-83NUA, APR:! p983 ` COUNTY'HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. ITEMS NOT HEARD PRIOR TO THE 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE DATE AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE. EGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE. 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS TELE';c.J4E NO.: 456 -2205 5y i7 1. ZW -94 -R2 AGRICULTURAL (WITH AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE) TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (WITH AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE) (Generally located south of Thorpe Road, approximately 1/4 mile west of Grove Road in Section 4- 24 -42.) Proposed Use: Warehousing and Industrial Use Site Size: 10 Acres Owner /Applicant: PIONEER NO TILL DRILL CO:, INC. North 4305 University Road Spokane, WA 99206 2. ZE- 9 -83 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO COMMERCIAL (Generally located on the north side of Sprague Avenue, approximately 200 feet east of Blake Road and 200 feet west of Mayhew Road in Section 15- 25 -44.) Proposed Use: Real Estate Office and Retail Outlet Site Size: 9,100 Square Feet Owner /Applicant: MATT TONNING East 11322 - 8th Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 3. IZE- 7 -83 ? TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -2) TO LOCAL BUSINESS OR RESIDENTIAL OFFICE - and (VE -17 -83 I VARIANCE FOR SIDE YARD SETBACKS FOR PARKING PROVISION (Generally located on the north side of Main Avenue and west of Willow Road in Section 17- 25 -44.) Proposed Use: Medical Office Building Site Size: 27,020 Square Feet Owner /Applicant: JOE E. HUNT c/o Prokey G. Arger East 13808 Sprague Avenue, Suite B Spokane, WA 99216 note: this application is a request for two separate actions. The first, a zone change, will be heard by the Hearing Examiner Committee. The second, a Variance, for relaxation of parking setbacks, will be before the Zoning Adjustor. Tne two items will be heard corcurrently by both Boards. SPOKANE COUFii Lou Itt HOU 5 April 14, 1983 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Gentlemen: 1) Location: Proposal: Action: 2) ZE- 9 -83, Location: Proposal: Action: 3) ZE -7 -83, UTICA' VE- 17 -83, Location: Proposal: Action: Sr' O AT P JE GI o 1 t PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING PION 456.2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 Board of Spokane County Commissioners Steve P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator ai Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of April 7, 1983. N 721 JEFFERSON STREET RECEIVE.02, , IFOIANt tfONII ►N(,JNlt$,+, APR191983 On April 7, 1983, the Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. to consider four new zone reclassification applications, one change of conditions application, and one extension of time for a residential planned unit development. Members present: Mrs. Carstens, Chairperson; Mr. Williams and Mr. Skalstad. Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee. If not appealed, these decisions will become final on April 25, 1983. All Findings and Order for this hearing were signed on April 14, 1983. ZW-94-82. Agricultural (with Airport Overlay Zone) to Restricted Industrial (with Airport Overlay one): Pioneer No Till Drill Co., Inc. Generally located south of Thorpe Road, approximately 1/4 mile west of Grove Road in Section 4- 24 -42. Warehousing, Assembly, and Repair Uses. Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0). Residential Office to Commercial: Tonninq Generally located on the north side of Sprague Avenue, approxi- mately 200 feet east of Blake Road and 200 feet west of Mayhew Road in Section 15- 25 -44. Real Estate Office and Retail Outlet Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0) Two - Family Residential (R -2) to Local Business or Residential Office Variance for Side Yard Setbacks for Parking Provision: Hunt Generally located on the north side of Main Avenue and west of Willow Road in Section 17- 25 -44. Medical Office Building Approval to Residue Office Zone. (Vote: 3 - 0) (contd.) ' Zoning Hearing Exaniner Committee Actions of April 7, 1983 (continued 3) ZE -7 -83 and VE -17 -83 (continued) The Zoning Adjustor's decision was for Approval for the setbacks along Main Avenue and along Wil EXCEPTION that no parking stalls shall encroach "Clearview Triangle" at the northwest corner of per the Findings of Fact stated in the Findings file with ZE -7 -83. 4) ZE- 10 -83, and CUE -7 -83, Location: Proposal: Action: 5) PUDE -4 -80 and ZE -155 -80 Location: Proposal: Action: 6) ZE- 84 -81, Location: Proposal: Action: Multiple Family Suburban to Residential Office Conditional Use Permit for Beauty Salon: Loosmore, Jr. Generally located on the north side of Main Avenue and on the east side of Raymond Road in Section 17- 25=44. Beauty Salon. (A Conditional Use in the Residential Office Zone Continued to the May 6, 1983, hearing of the Hearing Examiner Committee as adjacent property owners to the site were not notified by Certified Mail of the proposed zoning reclassification: (Vote: 3 - 0) , Extension of Time - Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone of the Variance low, with the` beyond the Willow and Main and Order on , Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban: Liberty Lake Village, Ltd. Generally located on the south side of Sprague Avenue and on the . east side of Liberty Lake Road in Section 22- 25 -45. An Extension of Time for Submittal of a Final Development Plan fp i a residential Planned Unit Development. Extension of Time approved to May 1, 1985. (Vote: 3.- 0) Change of Conditions in Restricted Industrial Zone: Wilderman and Griswald (James Frank - representative) Generally located north of Mission Avenue, between Mamer, and Evergreen Roads and south of the Freeway, I -90, in Section 10- 25 -44. A Change of Conditions to Review a Specific Site Plan for a Proposed Water'Slide Recreation Area consisting of water slides, pools, picnic area, sunning area, with a gift shop, arcade and food concession. Denial. (Vote: 3 - 0). The Hearing Examiner Committee felt the proposal would be an intrustion to the current lifestyle of the residents in the immediate area, that there would be inadequate road circulation to the site for the proposed use, and that the approval on September 10, 1981 for the Restricted Industrial Zone,subject to a specific site development plan for a tool manufacturing site was felt to be a compatible use with the surrounding properties. If further information is desired, contact the Planning Department's office. SPH!rmw A. INTRODUCTION B. PROPOSAL SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER FILE NO.: ZE- 7 -83 & VE -17 -83 This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on April 7, 1983, and the members of the Committee present being Kathleen M. Carstens, Chairperson, Jerry Williams and Richard L. Skalstad. The sponsor, Joe E. Hunt, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE -7 -83, Two- Family Residential (R -2) to Local Business or Residential Office, for the purpose of developing a Medical Office Building. The applicant has also applied for a Variance, VE- 17 -83, for approval of relaxation of side yard setbacks for a parking area. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, and vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Major Commercial and Urban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Two- Family Residential (R -2). .4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Declaration of Non- Significance. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone classification. 1 (contd.) C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) FILE NO.: ZE- 7 -83 & VE -17 -83 7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed rezone is justified. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands and/or their representatives expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the approved Residential Office zoning will provide a suitable landscaping screen which will be compatible with the existing residences adjacent to the proposed site. b) That the design of this project is considerate of the character of the neighborhood. 2 (contd.) 4i ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS PROPOSAL a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and pro- visions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original in- tent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 5. All current standards of the Residential Office Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 6. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concern- ing stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 7. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. 8. That a dense -type landscaping scene be provided along the north,eastand south property lines not exceeding four (4) feet in height except said scene shall comply with the "clearview triangle"requiirements of Section 4.17.040. b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Applicant shall dedicate 6 feet on Willow Road for right of way prior to any use of the property. 2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 3 (contd.) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE =17 -83 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. Applicant shall improve Willow Road in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Access Standard. 4. Applicant shall improve Main Avenue in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving Access Standard. 5. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be sub- mitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 8. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 10. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of con- struction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and sub- ject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and partici- pate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. The project shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director, of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on -site sewage system may be authorized._ 4. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social R Health Services. 6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 7. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently Prohibited. 5 COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District 111. 2. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A water plan is required to he submitted for approval prior to any land development. 3. Premises Identification. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. f) WATER PURVEYOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 1. Modern Electric Water Company is able to serve this site with adequate water; however, arrangements have not been made as of this tine. g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. Air pollution regulations require that dust created as a result of excavation and construction of the proposed project be controlled. 2. All parking areas must be paved and kept clean. E. ORDER ATTEST: The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Joe E. Hunt for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be APPROVED TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE. For: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director ,4r/ • By STEVE HOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator / A99P3 Date Motion by: Williams Vote: Unanimous - ( 3 - 0 ) APPROVED TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONE. 7 FILE NO.: ZE- 7 -83 & VE -17 -83 Seconded by: Skalstad HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE haon F. ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION FINDINGS 1. That the applicant's proposed development focuses on Main Avenue away from Willow such that the primary impact of the requested Variances would not be detrimental to the resi- dential uses to the east and north of the project. 2. That the applicant will establish landscaping along the easterly and northerly sides of the development to reduce visual impacts of the parking lot and adjacent residential uses. 3. That there is currently a vacant lot across Main Avenue from the parking lot proposed to serve this project, and that the history of development in the immediate area is to office and commercial uses. b) DECISION To APPROVE the Variances for the setbacks along Main Avenue and along Willow, with the EXCEPTION that no parking stalls shall encroach beyond the "Clearview Triangle" at the northwest corner of Willow and Main. 1. That the applicant develop the parking lot fronting on Main consistent with the Planning Department's recommendations for landscape buffering as recommended with the Zone Change, ZE -7 -83. .,l1 2 / r , I � �fni i J DI GLAS S. orIAMS Zoning Adj tor for Spokane County Date: / fl 8 FILE NO.: ZE -7-83. & VE -17 -83 Pro k €t,( k\ve.cve\ _ c"i no S "z a " R'e JreSEN QY1 /r6; 4 esevi5 CGiilce eAf 7 agc4. � , rmircv e YY�evU S, / /Do cL tw -GC)— '(?rOF?CS --(2. 3 Z‘ 711 - ACLCA e ,j: _ P- Trc,u1)ec kJ, .22-4 W.1 Zdd - y Acctzoss �J'1'Ze eT C o nn C ■� e- , 1 �@S *o I [/l / S Z.cne ck Ct , )e)A C c) table_ w7 Act,.�Rc ' y DR\e. 1 a■rze1 F9313 YV\ - C o9ec an b1,e15 Oti /WA(- C°cnrpatnbfa 57? ' a7 pzo6/e/A,s/ f (A)\5 - ;( e,t) RI k en ( locc) , 7z4J7/c I -flows A cne 'UN ` Cons ; cle u i701X)$, STAFF REPORT DATE: April 7, 1983 TO: HEARING EXAMINER. COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -7 -83 VARIANCE NUMBER: VE -17 -83 I. GENERAL INFORMATION sy -l7 APPLICANT: PROKEY G. ARGER, PROPERTY OWNER: Joe E. Hunt REQUESTED ZONING: Local Business or Residential Office EXISTING ZONING: Two- Family Residential (R -2) est.in 1972 PROPOSED USE: One -Story Medical Office Building PROJECT LOCATION: The site is generally located on the north side of Main Avenue and west of Willow Road in Section 17- 25 -44. NOTE: This application is a request for two separate actions. The first, a zone change, will be heard by the Hearing Examiner Com- mittee. The second, a Variance, for relaxation of parking setbacks, will be before the Zoning Adjustor. The two items will be heard con- currently by both Boards. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 27,020 Square Feet SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Site contains trailer, outbuilding, and vacant slopes to the north; curbing and sidewalk to the west. AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: URBAN 17 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) ZONING: NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 North Two - Family Residential (R -2), established, 1972 Residential Office, established, 1974 East Two - Family Residential (R-2), established, 1972 West Agricultural, established, 1947 Local Business, established, 1981 Commercial, established, 1981 South Agricultural, established, 1948 Two- Family Residential (R -2), established, 1972 LAND USE: Site Trailer, Outbuilding and Vacant North Single Family Residential East Single Family Residential, and a Home Occupation West Office Building South Vacant 1981 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Portion MAJOR COMMERCIAL and portion URBAN 1 Trailer 1 Outbuilding NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 1 One -Story Building Total Square Feet Approximately 7,200 Square Feet Total Percent of Site Covered 26 % 18 (contd.) II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) PARKING REQUIRED: Section 4.17.061 -(k) of the Zoning Ordinance reads as follows: "Offices, banks: One (1) space for each four hundred (400) square feet of gross floor area provided that for medical offices, there shall be not less than six (6) spaces for each of the first three (.3) doctors plus four (4) spaces for each doctor in excess of three (3)." PROVIDED: 42 Spaces Note: VARIANCE REQUEST - Section 4.07A,110 -(a) of the Zoning Ordinance reads as follows: "An off - street parking area shall not occupy a required flanking street yard, the front twenty (20) feet of a required front yard or a five (5) foot space from the side property line of a required interior side yard." 1) Request to allow 4 parking stalls within the Flanking Street setback requirement. 1\ 2) Request to allow 13 parking stalls within the required 20 feet of front yard setback. \4.c 3) Request to allow 2 parking stalls within required 5 foot side yard setback, p �' t �o koca� P,ju \51\le`fi Z one ' BACKGROUND /ANALYSTS c) CONCLUSION - In light of the zoning may be more appropriate landscaping along Willow Road, north property line to provide adjacent properties. 1 9 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 a) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - Site is covered by two Comprehensive Plan categories - Major Commercial and Urban. If properly buffered by landscaping, a Residential Office zone change may provide a suitable buffer between those high intensity uses along Mullan and existing residences along Willow. b) HISTORY OF OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS - Site zoned Two - Family Residential (R -2) since 1972; recent zone change to Local Business, immediately west of this site in 1982. above, Residential Office for this site with dense -type Main Avenue, and along the a visual and noise barrier to IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and pro- visions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original in- tent of the development plans shall be maintained, 4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 5. All current standards of the Residential Office Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 6. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concern- ing stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 7. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. 8. That a dense -type landscaping scene be provided along the north,east and south property lines not exceeding four (4) feet in height except said scene shall comply with the "clearview triangle "requirements of Section 4.17.040. b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Applicant shall dedicate 6 feet on Willow Road for right of way prior to any use of the property. 2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 20 (contd.) 21. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. Applicant shall improve Willow Road in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Access Standard. 4. Applicant shall improve Main Avenue in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Access Standard. 5. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be sub- mitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 8. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 10. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of con- struction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and sub- ject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and partici- pate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. The project shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on -site sewage system may be authorized, 4. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 7. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. 22 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A water plan is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development. 3. Premises Identification. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Modern Electric Water Company is able to serve this site with adequate water; however, arrangements have not been made as of this time. g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. Air pollution regulations require that dust created as a result of excavation and construction of the proposed project be controlled. 2. All parking areas must be paved and kept clean. 23 L • .4.4 11 INNS 4 N. uJ z I c c 0 O • . 0 Ay • •. 3 3, I t. - 2 0 2 4 17 3- ) • • • 1 .4 r!" BA.- FOUR DE544ET DEAN 3:: • E-10-83 ...1A p AAIWEI. 1.4 I N Cr • l CUE-7-83 1 cc • I VALLEY WAY —• tit t h I NI XON . F3 • tal 1- 4 2 T T H 0011011fl1••• o. lab-DO I • men VF evEll • EA a rit • .1 • • 16 1 b 0 AT L 1../1 a I /.•4 cc 4 F.7 BOON E I LJ a F.c)LHars4 L M ISS ION N A V rs L "," • 14 - ..1,EL.Z00 • MAIN FC.:13:j COUNTY ; ROAD P 4 %re Cn f AV E 5 th I MILWAUKEE if 24 Li tLJ 6,H SIXTH 9 TH 5TH 10 Tb 14 IOT 12 7 14 N Z 312+ r AVEll ---- • RAI LROAD srfriliD4 are I = • SE v ENT. If 1 T I Ti-4 ■ 5134TO FOURTH AV a CD 1 A X ALK A L_L. Et z — - _ AIN ft Ivens/CA ; IC X a ei..1995 2. 15)AT H AVE a /2 A. INTRODUCTION B. PROPOSAL This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on April 7, 1983, and the members of the Committee present being Kathleen M. Carstens, Chairperson, Jerry Williams and Richard L. Skalstad. The sponsor, Joe E. Hunt, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE -7 -83, Two - Family Residential (R -2) to Local Business or Residential Office, for the purpose of developing a Medical Office Building. The applicant has also applied for a Variance, VE- 17 -83, for approval of relaxation of side yard setbacks for a parking area. C. FINDINGS OF FACT SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER FILE NO.: ZE- 7 -83 & VE -17 -83 w' Tmvstsv N 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, and vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Major Commercial and Urban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Two - Family Residential (R -2). 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Declaration of Non - Significance. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone classification. 1 (contd.) C. FINDINGS OF FACT' (continued) FILE NO.: ZE- 7 -83 & VE -17 -83 7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed rezone is justified. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands and /or their representatives expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the approved Residential Office zoning will provide a suitable landscaping screen which will be compatible with the existing residences adjacent to the proposed site. That the design of this project is considerate of the character of the neighborhood. 2 ^ (contd.) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS PROPOSAL a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and pro- visions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original in- tent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 5. All current standards of the Residential Office Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 6. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concern- ing stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 7. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. 8. That a dense -type landscaping scene be provided along the north,eastand south property lines not exceeding four (4) feet in height except said scene shall comply with the "clearview triangle "requirements of Section 4.17.040. b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Applicant shall dedicate 6 feet on Willnw Road for right of way prior to any use of the property. 2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 4,716, 3 ' '1/4S (contd.) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. Applicant shall improve 4.]4.w Road in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Access Standard 4. Applicant shall improve Main Avenue in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPIt7r?'oadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Access Standard. 5. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be sub- mitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 8. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 10. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of con- struction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended. 4 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and sub- ject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and partici- pate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. The project shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of utilities, Spokane County. 3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on -site sewage system may be authorized. 4. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 7 Disposal of sewage effluent b Heath paved surfaces is r currently prohibited. 5 f) WATER PURVEYOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -7 -83 VE -17 -83 e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A water plan is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development. 3. Premises Identification. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 1. Modern Electric Water Company is able to serve this site with adequate water; however, arrangements have not been made as of this time. g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 2. All parking areas must be paved and kept clean. 1. Air pollution regulations require that dust created as a result of excavation and construction of the proposed project be controlled. E. ORDER ATTEST: The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Joe E. Hunt for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be APPROVED TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE. For: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director / By STEVE P. HOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator 4;4 / -% taq s Date Motion by: Williams Seconded by: Skalstad Vote: Unanimous - ( 3 - 0 ) APPROVED TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONE. w 7 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE FILE NO.: ZE- 7 -83 & VE -17 -83 0 F. ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION a) FINDINGS Date: FILE NO.: ZE -7 -83 & VE -17 -83 1. That the applicant's proposed development focuses on Main Avenue away from Willow such that the primary impact of the requested Variances would not be detrimental to the resi- dential uses to_the east and north of the project. 2. That the applicant will establish landscaping along the easterly and northerly sides of the development to reduce visual impacts of the parking lot and adjacent residential uses. 3. That there is currently a vacant lot across Main Avenue from the parking lot proposed to serve this project, and that the history of development in the immediate area is to office and commercial uses. b) DECISION To APPROVE the Variances for the setbacks along Main Avenue and along Willow, with the EXCEPTION that no parking stalls shall encroach beyond the "Clearview Triangle" at the northwest corner of Willow and Main. 1. That the applicant develop the parking lot fronting on Main consistent with the Planning Department's recommendations for landscape buffering as recommended with the Zone Change, ZE -7 -83. e4V-i-dth—e--J4/ DOUGLAS S.ADAMS Zoning Adj for for Spokane County / / /9(3 8 • TO THE i uARD OF (:: :;N'fl CufL' ISSIONERS me: LARRY and IZA TROWER Please Print) 4 ,lies to: Planning Received: Check ,!;-;,/) :dress: North 224 Willow. Spokane. WA 99206 :ring Date: Appc,i 1 Fe - $75.00 Zip Code ECE;VED APR aS1983 Toda ' 6outror t 99206 c. Phone: 928. -820 business Phone: aring Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Arger Zone Reclassification and Variance Request - -One -Story Medical Office Building Preliminary Subdivision Number: Zone Reclassification Number: 7 =81; Variance No. VE -17 -83 Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: t ili t f f re kg n gnature: I$ ?Ot4Nf iMINf1.1.1169f11 ' gnature of Authorized Representative: APR 51983 dress: UR REASONS FOR APPEAL The Findings and Order of the Committee permit the zone reclassification frnm two - family residential to local business or residential office for the purpose of developing a medical office building. The Findings and Order of the Committee do not provide for a site plan prohibiting access to the medical office building via Willow Road. The Findings of the Committee do not comport with the existing factual situations surrounding opposition to the reclassification itself, and the access via Willow Road issues; nor have they bee substantiated by adequate evidence established at the April 7, 1983, hearing Tn narticular. Findings 6 7, 8, and 10 are wholly unsupported by adequate evidence brought forth .at t he hearing ana inconsistent anu contradictory .to the applicable law and the current and existing zoning �-, 1,a nn in tne area. ..BEE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF FOR REMAINDER.) OFFICE USE ONLY Engineers Environmental Health Cash Receipt Number,.? 7Y ( y (CONTINUED FROM FRONT SIDE HEREOF.) This appeal is also based upon the Committee's (1) failure to require specific site plan banning access by Willow Road; (2) illegal deferral of the access decision to the engineering permit procedures; (3) failure to make a finding that Willow Road access would be incompatible with the public health, safety, welfare, and existing . uses in the area; (4) failure to adequately protect neighboring property owners from disruptive use. - firing Date: ° MARRY and SRELDA TROWER (Please Print) TO THE itUAi <U OF ( CUM1SSIONERS Appeal Fe - $75.00 Today's Date 4/22/83 !dress: North 224 Willow. Spokane. WA 99206 Zip Code: 99206 Phone: 928 - -2820 Business Phone: wring Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Arger Znne Reclassification and Variance Request- -One -Story Medical Office Building Preliminary Subdivision Number: Zone Reclassification Number: ZE -7 -83; Variance No. cILE -= 3i Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: 'gnatur-e: 'gnature of Authorized Representative: :dress: JUR REt \SODS FOR APPEAL 4 /H /8 3 The Findings and Order of the Committee permit the zone reclassification from two - family residential to local business or residential office for the purpose of developing a medical office building. The Findings and Order of the Committee do not provide for a site plan prohibiting access to the medical office building via Willow Road. The Findings of, the Committee do not comport with the existing factual situations surrounding opposition to the reclassification itself, and the access via Willow Road issues; nor have they been substantiated by adequate evidence established at the April 7, 1983, hearin¢! Tn particular. Findings 6 7. 8, and 10 are wholly unsupported by adequate evidence brought forth at the nearing ana inconsiscenc anu contr ictory to the applicable law and the current and existing zoning qi na nn in the area. _S$EE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF FOR REMAINDER.) OFFICE USE ONLY pies to: Planning 2: _ Engineers . Environmental Health e Received: Check 7.5 !)0 Cash Receipt 7 0 ° 2 Number, (CONTINUED FROM FRONT SIDE HEREOF.) This appeal is also based upon the Committee's (1) failure to require specific site p]an banning access by Willow Road; (2) illegal deferral of the access decision to the engineering permit procedures; (3) failure to make a finding that Willow Road access would be incompatible with the public health, safety, welfare, and existing uses in the area; (4) failure to adequately protect neighboring property owners from disruptive use. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION pp Date: February 1 , . 19 8 3 Application No: ' 2 6-7 Name of Applicant: Prokey G. Arger Street Address of Applicant: E. 13808 Sprague Avenue, Suite B City: Spokane State: WA Zip Code: 99216 Tele. No. 926 - 5311 Name of Property Owner(s): Authorized Agent representing Owner (if other than owner): G. Arger Company, Inc, Realtors Existing Zoning Classification: Date Existing Zone Classification Established: /77 Existing " Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Zone Classification: Local Business or Residential Office Proposed Use of Property: One story medical office building, 7,000 Square Feet Legal Description of Property: The North 193 'Feet and the East 140 Feet of the South 400 Feet of the East iz of Tract 140 cf Opportunity recorded in Volume K of the Plat, Spokane, County, Washington except that portion conveyed to Spokane County for road purposes azZ MA/13 n.1 Section: 17 Township: 25 Source . of Legal: T- tl e Company Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statemen Property Size: 27,020 Joe E. Hunt R -2 Range: 44 17543 -130' Frontage: 14 I-eeon: Main Street ' / Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 28,178 S.F. Street Address of the Property: E. 9215 Main Street If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Upon acceptance of zoning, applicant will act as developer of proposed facility. Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: A / n,4 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? Commercial, local business and residential office zoning is now prevalent in the area. The site is currently vacant, but with the location of the site'bordering the Mullan corridor & fronting Main St, this use is appropriate and compatible. 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the ";:adjacent properties? The trend in the area is to the above listed zoning& ^ This, proposal should have little impact to the area. 7 /3 - 73/y 2/3/81 .4 APPLI TION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFIC 'ION -- continued -2 This secti...I of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat- ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. - 1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 2. A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss re•uir•„ent, for submittal of this proposal for rezone A r T ( Signatu COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE 3. WATER PURVEYOR a) The proposal area. c) We (Signature) 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held requir ents for submittal of this proposal Thi pro located in Fire District # re) 5. COUNTY HEA TH DISTRICT preliminary consultation has been held uirements for submittal of this proposal designated ater rveyor for this site nature natu NOTAR (Signed) X (Address) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT the proposal. Our have been satisfied. to discuss the proposal. Our for � rez � one have- been satisfied. l is c . 2-3-83 (Date) (.1 (NAME) - y12o- d-uot) uu Ulatt4 �. (is not) located within the boundary of our service b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve t is proposal. (] e 1 t r c -Azz rep nu - - Geivn)'i � (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water. �Q fucawy 3, 1983 (Date) a to discuss the proposal. Our for rezone have been satisfied. OA/6 (Date) ' A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The appli t has been inform d of our requirements and standards. (Date) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW- LEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO- POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMI ION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHA Date: ''' SPhone: Zip: /f8" J 9 "2c)6 Date: Feb. 1 /2 Date: Fri / Rev. 2/3/81 R tei, l drcii - n - ance .? '-.S tl ecti on I: {-43 1 rtt "A19, ir 1 . ' tUa x1,40 , • 44 - • ''••• SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING ' DEPARTMENT ':" APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE/WAIVER OF , V i0LAT ION: '• ' " ••' • • c ' ,s t'r • est 61,11:1:1`'1"." 1 ; 983 ' . - • n G A - c .C.‘ 'AV ' 5 • ' .„ Nametlof:. APO ,i can • C 11/4 A it : $. • - r , t••• 7 7 , ' ague' Avenue, Suite • v"*. 75 ■;art l y f 1 SteetlAddr i ii; s E . 13608 Sprague . f.• • 'T• , ' 71 . "../Ft 7•,.A :kt,"1 • ' •• • ; .„,.. r COUNTY HEALTF1 • , • t at. t: • :i .. ; e .. 2 2 , t i pre mi n ary cons ul tati on has' been held ?appl: v acthasi,bean.1nfora?ed . , :4) - f, : .•,regui remen •'3. ,. • : . .'- ‘,(.2L : 4 'I ; . • 't ' : • 14r' 17 ( S I GN ATU R E ) ••••7,k.:•••; stt; • • , 4., .• „•); ,,.... w m. I a f e:,:...a ;;', . L ,",..: . : 4 tt. nos al • The ; s to''discuss the .oro ts and•:,stapdardefri ,„ ••;:.:A --••• "L;;• 1 4.:••• , 1 * ••• r • =1 , 1 ,APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL • USE V.:' PERMIT' ONLY • '''• ••cc; '' '•01•,' i s•• on:I ofi•the! appl icati on will provide the : PI anrii nO . Department's Sit fiCalr• •A . „. • • . - • • .,- A . •,„ •• applicant • • . •• ,.. • (1•21;withiwritten verification that the . has had, prel iminary consultati , • with the7agenci es" identified. - ifResults' of \the preliMinarpiconSultation'•shouldf* "r' be i ncorporated1,11 the ,•: _proposal, before;final submittal .tonthejlanning rl Acl. me n t . ;....„.. :.•• ,:::••• .:-?,!„..- 'f). 4 -1 1,. f 11: o . u p,4„,..11,41;,„0„1.4 . .,, / ,., : •44,,,,„,,,s...• ,, jpt e..„, 4 4 - 1-,..„.) ,..... - iit f•- ' •-•1. • ' • . - - r•••:a.F;:- t .'•'i•ct's ' •cl 9 .',.,•:?;; •,:., 5, e., - ct • 4• N. • " ' • ,( 5 - Lel - r ( -' I ' 1 i %, C OU NT l' :UT I L IT I ES DEP ARTM ENT ,fr,;14 •",'• 'AL? • ' 7 1 *.MtS ,I TIV r, r j ji14 ;;T 7 q t i , „14,;:9 . s. -,,/ - -1. •,,. ,. • • 2. :: ' ' - 2 -- it .,:• ‘( • LI ' . ; ' i ; ' • • ( DAT E -. ' , • t •e: 3 -• --ii pi t "(SIGNATURE ) > -; , A ■,,, ' • . , • '..;;?,,_ •e , '.•z.'••;•," •.',•: . ,,-„ / , .., . • c 4- ( •••• rini:4•.” •••• F'rifb r4:* ;'). t 7 ft' ii- -1, 1,4 4 4, - r.: ,: "-z- :21rh-A4. - 4 I , • % .,-. ,-,-:- • ' '1' f 2-1 l ''' , ' . ' ./ s L( ' `: .., 1 :', ,:- - Li; L'..i. 2 .....).• 1( e t , : P:44 • C . , ' L : AP P L I C AT I ON FOR VARIANCE' ONLY JA :a A ), •,••• -Mr i• NIA‘-!2; 9 ..•,..., ..i,• v„: etc. N ,ti 3 i • 'it, 4 X iill . ' 1L • in theabove".Ai n formati on ,' what 't special ';'ci rcumstance .s • ( beyond . yourz'At4 J al' : control " or acti on s ),I the s ame'vgen,e raj ;•;: 4 2 . . r 4 1 1 1:: : '' rep. ,;( ofother:jorooertywnerswithin '..theisame zone , and 4 . vi si n lty . ;; A: , • • •?:. 1 4,,, ..4 ..is .. I N:. ;; c. -r ;1••••.- 1..•-•:NiPe w 1 •••:.*.ii •-Sei :.g, rid-ill • .,f ,1:4,....; t;rv-,- ,i9:9,... tH.c.., 0 ekv• Di ,f... ...A... A- .•-• c.4.. . 7t. r• a .., ; ”al. .. .... "as ' C+ thou t 4 the . v a i an c e? 'an a'd on u a te parking '' facility Would' not acc ;'• ' . il '- T- 'i ‘ - :: ' LI 4 ' :' :!icA".(;:: VI ilt• 'Pr:c ,, ' the proposed medical' building l•• '1: •!'i•• ' • 1. ' 1 "A'. '•••••• ' I: ."-";•-•/'''• ..." ; ;•cr'''''‘.''f",rs,,•"4Si.i:,. Ai ;-2 ..i.' 7 gs 4,:•143.47t.c.zs. it f ;,..;, , .. t : 4 • • ‘,,, , : 7 • i * P II 1 t • . : . i PP • : '.. • P• P , '. !. • " P ;f ''1.. A•If,tthejVariance' were•;gr,antedr how would it affect::,neighborinq• propertiestr41-4 '1'...,ortimprovements. „•;.It 'Wou 1 d' enho'nce the neighboring nroperties• because a' '-la ••• - .I.c.taq, yt .,,;, 4•••li , -• ' 6 ; -1 ;...i'vy ”•”: •v• -- 4 , :: .''-: ,••••ry • 4-1,-,' • ' •:•-•• • ".• ', - .0 .; . • • ..." ••t,,j,-- !'W,3•. ,,-., • ,_ .,•• - 9,,,,...„ • , concise andirefficient'office park would • be created With r the mosUcOmpatible %4 ,t4,.• 4.;;Cly...741 lk, `c,tii "?, 'w*--Zr • rir.F. 1 " -..'"• 41: :•q1-*; l'• ' •:,. ,W.42$•!,,"*.k iittita;;;.(4. `,..Q.' ( 4.. , :: ..way , to uti 1 'i ze the properti es and off street pirkirig ."].tr••••-• '• ' ', ."- " •"'"??-:,' '-',!-';'• , L,..„ a .., cz. ••• 1... - .. . , • • ,,,L • 1,, •i, ". td I ly.,-, i - ‘1 , , ( r . : nr ? .. , •'? ,: z....7.1.• A lik q....m n , ier , .1,..4-,.. it , i-4' P3 • • • :4.1. ,.1.,'• - .SI . T•,. ". ' V.4.. c V.4'• ..;:A • . ' " ' 0 / ' r' 11.” 4 • ' g 4 • 5 1 3 ,Is used ;'• or, can . it be ..used Ali n 1 a nan ne r•i,s i mi 1 ar to - ',"-: - f• • , Pt*: Litilpt within' the,vicinity without a Variance •F ,;- .4j(ti.e.single-familyiresir..4 idencei °nCome rci a 1 us e ) . ;t4 RLEASELEX P LAI N '42i,:' No,obac au se use 'of ,. the property- " vc•Ji.lrer..•Mx:-P-t V • ''' ' ":,:‘•••• .• 4L -A.' ) "'■ - :?•?!Fri:; ' ••••-• ,, -14 , - t-,,, • - 1- • ,• .4 4. t - jaciCia:ea •ri,- '2• ,,,-.,-• •,/l••• ..! ' - : • , LI, • .t' , - •• . • : -,, •-•1/4,1 • • v - • i• • t . 0- ; -'42 :for an bui 1 di ng would be restricted` diii t rto the,,inefficient'pa'rking•Vct I. t sa , •:.- 4 •••,>4.,„0 g.;•••• irlat-ri•ev:'• , ..;....-i 4-, i . - •;! ,-• -:: Ilrillt.'••••tg, : . . . 'ayout ±thUsPfOrc ng ' inany tars'. to park■rori' the ''street • 2 p a ' f. ert?, , q-1 .ti WA IVER OF VIOLATION 'ON LYNtfi Ec I .; " ' e .rikR Qi/Crtta 7. ' '' .. r • eiCt ' fai .p t 7, „ ...% ei" . r ‘': \ie.; 1 • • • •- 1..." If 1•1• LI P - r .. .: V. ',.,/ ',' I .P l •Iti•s4 ' kV: 4,4: it i", Holk Whywa sp tr,u,ctu rc 5,'es ta61 is hed ;outs i deatheOrovi sj op ofitth e 1W,1Spokane‘iCountyradning).\''Ordinan N7 ,;:li = ',1?,*)"5-F.CIPe .,.:. 4. 4' . , A kr: ' r :tar - . ,,I. - ' . •... .,- - s , ..; . ,., r v (-' - • ... PIP y i + • Pt P , /1 t‘rteleC'llil3t,).tnnS140gtffri,IT 7 ):iii it 4 1. i .a,,r •-. s'e • a'. ...tirf . .„ , a 0..,,14.h. .7. Jai it.- 4 • 41 14 1 71. ?• ,.? m...r., , a - : air " • i r..'.1 i': . . :ilrr , r VF '‘' . I ....I 0.... .A. 7 ' . " :';- •••• , “.• .., f' 'I L 0 :51. • 4 • • • I ,., • r . • ' la..e.yost,...... y ;-,,:.. " ..r...sA l a, •-, a ..i ," v r'l, •• 4 ; ••• • , I -„ :: I': tf +,(144/,. L be • AV:What;Afacts'itsuppontithellappl i can tr1/4thatia Nal vergotqj ol a "t i on tts kroUTd:i.ratql..-.1•?: ,•,.... ,- .g ran ted?Pc .4 *- 41 ` . 0 4 % Vhis.. k 5 l' • ' " , 11 i ':"Ilt -h' I t‘' , e- , .---:- -: $ s- - t'4'. A '..• ..1 -- "a'. ',:. VI ' : -. -4- xaT 1-.24 ;;I'a" 4 tt-ot :tic/4 .t z.i7. -7:''IaA.ze):";;<•-,:=4: " .1/4,. -;i1/2- liN 1 4. P "`• ".%:/, 11.44 ly -t... . :. k e-, • P P - • '.' P,L P; 4 .; .., .... . ...n. . 414 a , "? \ ;‘ - .. t • • Vs-;yet ...Vt. 4 , *1/4;t^r'sfirk3tn; • L ; ‘t.,{ I 7 #4 :2G,Varr„,' • T.; • -.v.% 'I b""drr ( A A " LIAL ,114 -?5,10.• 'Esirr414,, 1 :10# r. •••• ;ft 44:1" , 41.14 4.07A.090 #3 Flanking Street Request variance allowing 4 parking stalls to be within the 40 foot setback from the centerline of the Roadway (Willow Road) right of way 4.07A.110 #a. Request variance allowing 13 parking stalls to be within the front 20 feet of the required front yard. This will enable the parking facility of the N. 300 Mullan Building and the proposed medical building to be compatible, maximizing vehicle flow within the parking lots while enhancing the office park with the most effective way to utilize off - street parking. This will reduce the need for cars to park on Main Street. 4 d74.03 e d - pd^'`r' ��,L g, A. REQUESTED ACTION Ordinance Cm°1 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval -Zone Spokane County Planning Department County Engineer's Department eaJr- n- ) Change -- Number: Z E 7 - 8 3 Applicant's Name ProKEY AguiciE2 Section /7_TownshipsS N, Rangb qc/ EWM The following "conditions of approval" for the above - referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. "findings and order" of the hearing Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit 0 2. Applicant shall dedicate feet on for right -of -way and slope easements as necessary 3. :Applicant and 4. Applicant shall dedicate _ and L.J 6. 'r, Applicant shall dedicate feet on _ (011611.+ for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. shall dedicate a foot prior to Access permits for approaches to the Spokane County Engineer. Access permits and improvements to by the Washington Department of Transportation. 7. Access permits and improvements to by the City of SO. (a) Applicant shall improveiMp County TYPICAL roadway section (b) Applicant shall improve M91N County TYPICAL roadway section (c) Applicant shall improve County TYPICAL roadway section (d) Applicant shall improve_______ County TYPICAL roadway Section (e) Other specific improvements: OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Committee for inclusion in the staff analysis and scheduled QpRA l 7 , 19 83. County Road No. Zn ■cl prior radius on any use of the property. on and for right -of -way prior _ acso in a No. S minimum _ Q1(E •U.IE in a No. 1 minimum in a minimum _ _____ in a No. minimum to any use of the property. a foot radius on Mogch 19 83 to any use of the property. System shall be obtained from the must be approved must be approved manner consistent with Spokane paving width /juE55 9ea1 manner consistent with Spokane paving width Accec,S•5}RNdAQcQ manner consistent with Spokane paving width manner consistent with Spokane paving width 0 Applicant shall submit for approval by Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. • 10 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. r 0 . A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 12 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 13. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 14. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the appli- cant may with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 15 The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as ap- proved by the Spokane County Engineer. © All required improvements shall conform to the current State Of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable county standards and or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in • effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 17. Applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of__ prior to any use of the property. 18. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated access approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on 19. Access to Road shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. 20 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /VARIANCE /WAIVER OF VIOLATION Date: February 1, 1983 Application No: Name of Applicant: Prokey G. Arger Street Address of Applicant: E. 13808 Sprague Avenue, Suite City: Spokane State: WA Zip Code: "9216 Tele. No: 926 -5311 Name of Property Owner(s): Property Size: 27,020 N01ARv SEAL: NOTARY ,y Joe E. Hunt Requested Action (Cite Ordinance Section): Residential Office See attached sheet Existing Zoning Classification: . R -2 Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: One story medical.:,Ffice building - 7,000 S.F. Legal Description of Property (Include legal description of easement if applicable) The North 193' and the East 140' of the South 400' of ther East % of Tract 140 of Opportunity recorded in Volume K of the Plat, Spokane County, Washington except that portion conveyed to Spokane County for road purposes ' Comprehensive Plan Designation: Major Commercial and Urban Section: 17 Township: 25 Range: 44 Source of Legal: Title Company Assessor's Parcel. No. (See tax statement) 17543 -1309 Frontage: 140' Feet•on: Fain Street Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 23.178 S.F. Street Address of the Property: E. 9215 •"gain Street "If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Upon acceptance of zoning & variance, applicant will act as developer of proposed facility Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: None I SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE PROPOSED SITE. IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. (Signed) Sc .r -L.._ l Date: l - 3 h Y i'y f9 ; —' K y A . (Address) n ,.," a..._ r rn Phone: y zG .s 3 .i F Zip: 9 j Date: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT 1 .,: ( ": / /�;.�— Date: .9 . '5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * .* * * * * x * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * i. FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Fees Receipt II Hearing Date: Legal Checked by: ! ; J This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat- ed.in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. 1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held re uireme t for submittal of this proposal !'l � � - / Signature 2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE 3. a) A preliminary consultation has been held r uirements for submittal of this proposal T y designated xvaterveyor for this site nature) WATER PURVEYOR The proposal area. (Signature) APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION -- continued -2 b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) d ve) (have not) been m e to serve t proposal. t /� l ✓L0. tr1 r> AiR in.c awn - te) m c � . �a c) We (are) (are not) ( � able to serve this site with adequate water. a- 121 0 -6- 2u,s_h -q 3 19 8 3 (Signature) (Date) a 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. This proposal is located in Fire District # (Signature) (Date) 5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of our requirements and standards. I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY LEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, HEREWITH 15 WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHA(:F. • NOTARY SEAL: (is not) located within. the boundary of our (Signed) (Address) /4 NOTARY _ 2-0.1c . (NAME) 1/12e-dvuttl uvWale.iU • to discuss the proposal. Our for rezone have been satisfied. f/ s2, ( Date to discuss the proposal. Our for rezone have been satisfied. is Nast. a . -83 D ate (Date) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Date: service PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW- OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO - IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY h/ 4c :2 - Phone: Date: -i-' Zip: �.i 2 Date: r ', / 4_ Rev. 2/3/81 0 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION. FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Date: February 1, 1983 Application No: ? r �' ;), J Name of Applicant: Prokey G. Arger Street Address of Applicant: E. 13808 Sprague Avenue, Suite B City: Spokane • State: WA Zip Code: 99216 Tele. No. 926 -5311 Name of Property Owner(s): Joe E. Hunt Authorized Agent representing Owner Of other than owner): G. Arger Company, Inc, Realtors Existing Zoning Classification: R -2 Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Existing • Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Zone Classification: Local B'1siness or Residential Office Proposed Use of Property: One story medical office building, 7,000 Square Feet Legal Description of . Property: The North 193 Feet and the East 140 Feet of the South 400 Feet of the East 1 of Tract 140 of Opportunity recorded in Volume K of the Plat, Spokane, County, Washington except that portion conveyed to Spokane County for road purposes Section: 17 Township: 25 Range: 44 Source of Legal: Title Company Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement) 17543 - 1309 Property Size: 27,020 Frontage: Feet on: Main Street Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor:28,178 S.F. Street Address of the Property: E. 9215 Main Street If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Upon acceptance of zoning, applicant will act as developer of proposed facility. Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:. A /r ;iJ: ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? Commercial, local business and residential office zoning is now prevalent in the area. The site is currently vacant, but with the location of the site bordering the Mulian corridor & fronting Main St, this use is appropriate and compatible. 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? The trend in the area is to the above listed zonin - ihi s proposal should have little impact to the area. - 4 C -77.--- ---- --• RECEIPT Dote1_3 9 3_ 6812 i Received FroilL...Pcii_k_fq_._ Ag'frafit________ Address - 2_ C- --- 2 —g _ ---iire, a, Sri __Dollars For AM1 PAD bAtANCE DuF 8K808 _ FIOW PAID CHECK MON ORDEk IFETI Ogg( 1-!..rzOrg • A. Project Name: PROPOSAL Numher of Parcels: Section /� T. y N., R. E.W.M.•, Quarter T DEVELOPER Name: r/oyFr% or Address: AGENT Phone: Business OWNER Name: p/ C ENGINEER Address: Phone: Business Home Remarks: B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: �- /3 / Y3 By: .mil /� 44 ,1/ 14/; 74 Preliminary a) Right -of -Way Ain /o fir Conditions b) Curb 4/4 f'as c) Sidewalk 04-s 12? d) Pave "'Va YES e) Approaches Pew-oars 40t f) Drainage o *cr/ / -f g) State /City Review Ves ( ) - No (cai NOTE: This proposal roust comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap- proach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in- spection and review of County records. C. INSPECTION Date: / / By: Remarks: 0. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: Nnmbo- . S P O K A N E C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R - - -P R E L 1 M I N A R Y C O N S U L T A T I O N - - Name: Address: Phone: Business fiL2/ Fee Paid: /Yes/ No • Amount 5, • Planning Opp Cation Signed: Date 2-/ / fs3 By: E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS Fee Paid: Date Mathematical & Surveying Checks: No. 1 Date By No. 2 Data By No. 3 Doti Ry Add 1LlonaI mathemaE.i„aI and `urn -yinii Huaks: Nu. 3 1itr By . No. S flab. By Nn. 6 - I',r: • 11 ' No i let ''. Amount Check Home Home Cash Check Cash Fee Aml. &Dt.Pd. • Foe Amt. &Dt.Pcl. Fee Amt.&Dt.Pd. Fee Amt. &Dt.Pd.