Loading...
ZE-35-83AGENDA .: OSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 16,1983 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA TELEPHONE NO.: 456 -2205 ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE WILL RECESS FROM 12:00 NOON TO 1:30 P.M. FOR LUNCH AT A PLACE TO BE ANNOUNCED. ITEMS NOT HEARD PRIOR TO THE 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT AVAIL- ABLE DATE AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE. 9:00 A.M. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS, 1. ZE -35 =83 . SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE and CUE -11 :83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BEAUTY SHOP IN THE RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONE (Generally located at the northwest corner of University Road and Valley Way in Section 17- 25 -44.) Comprehensive Plan: Proposed Use: Site Size: Owner /Applicant: Comprehensive Plan: Proposed Use: Site Size: Owner /Applicant: Urban Category within PSSA Beauty Shop Approximately 11,220 Square Feet RICHARD and JEANENNE VIGIL North 403 University Road Spokane, WA 99206 (NOTE: This application is a request for two separate actions The first, a zone change, will be heard by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. The second, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a beauty shop in the Residential Office Zone, will be before the Zoning Adjustor. The two items will be heard con- currently by both Boards.) 2. ZE -76 -83 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Generally located north of and adjacent to Baldwin Avenue and west of and adjacent to Barker Road in Section 7- 25 -45.) Urban Category within PSSA Apartment Complex Approximately 111,450 Square Feet (Approximately 2.56 Acres) ALLAN and PATRICIA SIMPSON South 3508 Adams Road Veradale, WA 99037 Th 1 (contd.) 1 ( R -1 / 1 N AY W E L. OE , 8i .•.E/_. /9E ROAD • M/LN%AUKEE a _ Pc• TALZQ � s SIATH SEVENTH FOuP T" rt G c oe o. o" N J LA DEAW COUNTY AVE 5th a T H z oIn 3 .......„.,..,,, r. _l or11. 4 � , � �.� ;� , Z E - 5 - 3 ..74:': ; Lit] ...�._ i.'..H 9h wl 9 r N CUE -11 -83 V S n AVE 2 1- M:.XV• E AYE $INTO 1:1000 EIGHTH AVM 0 IO nit 0 H IOTH •••.t....--,1 • • . r rr _ I LEI 1 I x f EL.1995 Z r l t H l _ I eI '31x U +f_javE EL 20/4 dl 0 4Arb- ! P 44a cAg C51444C meAgsv I f ' VIC la IKE IN% ou r r t ) 1 (/) A to-1 5rtacruff , c t Anwar. 20',,, • VALLEY \NAY Dope: 1. -(7> .0 v.. C !Ti DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 16, 1983 I. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT /OWNER: REQUESTED ZONING: EXISTING ZONING: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -35 -83 and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NUMBER; CUE -11 -83 Agricultural Suburban (Established in 1958) (with Airport Overlay 1980) Section 4.07A.140 -(g) requires a Conditional Use Permit for Barber and Beauty Shops. (See 4.24.420 of the Zoning Ordinance for the Conditional Standards.) note: This application requires two actions by the County; the first is a zone change to Residential Office to be heard by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. The second is a Conditional Use Permit to be heard by the Zoning Adjustor. In order for the barber or beauty shop to be located on this site, both requests need to be approved. PROPOSED USE: Beauty Salon EXISTING USE: Single Family Residence SITE SIZE: Approximately 11,220 Square Feet COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: URBAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: STAFF REPORT RICHARD VIGIL RESIDENTIAL OFFICE and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PRIORITY SEWER SERVICE AREA: Yes AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA: Yes PROJECT LOCATION: This site is generally located in the Spokane Valley, more specifically at the northwest corner of University and Valley Way in Section 17- 25 -44. 3 II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed zone change lies within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as all nearby surrounding areas. This category suggests that neighborhood commercial type uses will be located near the heavily traveled streets. Also, the Text states that due to the variety and mix of land uses and activities found in this category, screening or other performance standards may be necessary to make them compatible with one another. Staff suggests special consideration be given to the location of the parking area of this project. 2) ZONING: North Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1958 East Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1958 West Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1958 South Multiple Family Suburban, Est., 1939 Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1947 3) LAND USE: Site Single Family Residential North Single Family Residential East Single Family Residential South Single Family Residential and Apartments West Single Family Residential 4) HISTORY OF LAND USE ACTIONS: There have been no zone changes in this immediate area since 1958. Although some 600 feet south along University has experienced activity to the Residential Office, Local Business, and some Commercial zoning at and south of Main Avenue. 5) NEIGHBORHOOD CONSIDERATIONS: This immediate area has remained single family residential, although some of the housing stock has started to show its age. III. SITE ANALYSIS 1) SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSIDERATIONS: The site contains a residence with a detached garage and circular drive in the front yard. The circular drive has been indicated on the site plan to be used for customer parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of six off - street parking spaces, and that the parking areas not be within the front twenty (20) feet of the required front yard. In addition, the Ordinance further requires that parking areas exceeding a six car capacity shall provide an ornamental masonry fence 42 inches in height along the periphery of the parking area. The Planning Director may approve a planted screen or ornamental fence in lieu of said masonry wall. Staff, at this point, is concerned as to whether the site plan as submitted complies with the above requirements. A more detailed plan and review by the Zoning Administrator is required prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits for a barber or beauty shop. 2) AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: This area has been committed to "URBAN' type uses by the Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. 3) SITE PLAN INFORMATION: SITE SIZE: EXISTING BUILDINGS: PROPOSED BUILDINGS: Total Floor Area: Structure Height: PARKING AREA: Parking Required: 6 Spaces - Minimum Parking Provided: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 Approximately 11,110 Square Feet (2) Residence with Detached Garage Existing Residence to be Remodeled Approximately 1,000 Square Feet Existing 20 Feet Unknown III. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) BUFFERING TECHNIQUES: The existing residence contains some landscaping with a 5 foot fence along the north and west property lines. Customer parking and entrance to the facility along with advertising signs would be the major impact to adjacent properties. If properly located and screened, this project would have less effect to those properties. OTHER SITE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS: The County Engineer has required an additional 15 feet right of way for Valley Way and an additional 10 feet right of way for University Road. This condition would have a direct effect on the parking lot location with regards to not being allowed in the front twenty (20) feet of the front yard. A detailed site plan is necessary to determine how this issue is impacted. Relocation to the rear yard or a Variance to this requirement appear to be alternatives available to the sponsor. However, the Variance is a discretionary decision which could be denied, if applied for by the applicant. V. RECOMMENDED AGENCY CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED: a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties). 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant - shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 4. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All current standards of the Residential Office Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 6. Signs for the project shall conform to standards as set forth in Section 4.07A.130 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Landscaping shall be provided for this site, in conformance with Standards as identified in Section 4.07A.120 Landscaping. 8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 9. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. 10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners' Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982. 11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environ ment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 12. That a detailed site plan be submitted for review and approval by the Zoning Administrator, indicating compliance with the provisions of the Residential Office Zone with specific regard to the number of parking spaces required, the location of the parking area, and the masonry fence requirement. 7 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 15 feet on Valley Way for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on University Road for right -of -way. 3. Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Valley Way and University prior to any use of the property. 4. Applicant shall improve Valley Way in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Access Standard. 5. Applicant shall improve University Road in a manner consistent with Spokane TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Major Arterial Standard. 6. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 7. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 8. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners'Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. Each new unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems. 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated. 2. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the project is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 9 d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (continued) 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Social and Health Services. 6. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces prohibited. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # 1. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 supply when Department of is currently 2. Reclassification of an existing building shall require an application for change of occupancy permit, and subsequent inspection for approval. Installation of fire hydrant will be required to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. g) '208' STUDY 1. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 111 RP MAXWELL AV EL.2OOO N y '78 {NAY 187 188 1 89 190 191 r•N _ � p� F 1 92 133 1 ' h reenocres School Ctla►ntfitary) o a cr Snyics Re. J1 j') f( c ` •1 pN EL P� ,rt � O . ,L. A 1 - 7 6e8 3 ,., iAL00_Alfa, - - O Na VIP 1:l ..�Ey WAy f . 194 195 ly Le z FR October 24, 1983 Engineers Office from the desk of Please review this Zone Change - ZE -35 -83 from the County's position. This item will be heard by the Planning OomMission on November 3, 1983. GRANT C. PETERSON County Commissioner Telephone (509) 456 -2265 Spokane County Courthouse — W. 1118 Broadway — Spokane, Washington 99260 Inter- office Communication Spokane County Zoning Adjustor Tn From Subjer+ BMc /set Form 327 —C R Bob McCann, Land Development Coordinatori' ZE 35 -83 - Y Date OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER` SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON October 31 19 83 Please add the following Engineer's conditions at the public hearing for the above — referenced zone change. "that the applicant shall provide slope easements as may be deemed necessary by Spokane County for the improvement and construction of University Road in association with a County Road Project (CRP) or Road Improvement District (RID). SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE November 21, 1983 Gentlemen: A t� i 'CO 'A I Ay~irr PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 RECEIVED Nov 2 21983 TO: Board of Spokane County Commissioners FROM: la tt Steve P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of November 16, 1983. On November 16, 1983, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M., to con- sider six new zone reclassification applications. This date was a postponement from the original date set as November 3, 1983, due to errors in legal notification to property owners of the proposed zoning reclassifications. Members present: Mr. Skalstad, Chairman; Mrs. Myers, aid Mr. Williams. Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee. If not appealed, these decisions will become final on November 28, 1983. All Findings and Order for this hearing were signed on November 17, 1983. 1) ZE- 35 -83, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office and CUE-11-83, Conditional Use Permit for a Beauty Shop in the Residential Office Zone: Vigil Location: Generally located at the northwest corner of University Road and Valley Way in Section 17- 25 -44. Proposal: Beauty Shop Action: Denial. (Vote: 3 - 0) The Hearing Examiner Committee felt the proposed rezone would not preserve the residential character of the neighborhood and was not in the best interest of the general public. As a result of the denial of the zoning reclassification, the Zoning Adjustor did not have adequate zoning to allow consideration of the Con- ditional Use Permit request; therefore, stayed any action on the proposed request, pending a potential appeal to the Board of County Commissioners of the zone reclassification. (contd.) A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on November 16, 1983, and the members of the Committee present being Richard L. Skalstad, Chairman, Jane E. Myers and Jerry Williams. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Richard Vigil, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE- 35 -83, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office, for the purpose of developing a Beauty Salon; and a Conditional Use Permit request, CUE- 11 -83, to allow a Beauty Shop to be located in the Residential Office Zone in accordance with Section 4.07A.140 -(g) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance - (Section 4.24.420, Conditional Standards for Barber and Beauty Shops). C. FINDINGS OF FACT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER 1. That the existing land use in the area is single family residential and apartment uses. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Urban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural Suburban. 4. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 5. That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 6. That the applicant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed rezone is not justified. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 7. That the proposed use is incompatible ,with existing uses in the area. 8. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed use. 9. The Hearing Examiner Committee does not find the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 10. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the proposed rezone is not in the best interest of the general public. b) That the existing violation of a beauty salon is not sufficient reason to grant the requested rezone classification. c) That the character of the residential neighborhood should be preserved by the denial of this application. d) That the required parking facilities and drainfield requirement could not be accomplished without creating a serious alteration in appearance to the site, which would then be considered "spot" zoning. e) That the Zoning Adjustor cannot divest the Hearing Examiner Committee of its power to pass the zone change which was presented for their action with regard to the Conditional Use Permit and needed Variance for parking area setbacks. 2 D. ORDER Date: N 0 T E: ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Plannin. Director A.ai .f:_.._ ow Zoning Administrator AL_ /7/91Y ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Richard Vigil, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be DENIED. Motion by: Myers Seconded by: Williams Vote: Myers - Aye Williams - Aye Skalstad - Aye Unanimous to Deny the Zone Request to Residential Office (3 -0) 3 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDING ORDER AND V TE 7,7Q 2)441E-6/# '`tai rman See File CUE -11 -83 for Zoning Adjustor Decision on Conditional Use Permit request for approval of a Beauty Shop in the Residential Office Zone, as required in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. E. ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A BEAUTY SHOP TO BE LOCATED IN THE RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4.07A.140 -(g) OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. a ) F I N D I N G S 1. That there is not adequate zoning to allow consideration of the Conditional Use Permit request. Therefore, the Zoning Adjustor stays any action on the proposed request, pending a potential appeal to the Board of County Commissioners of the zone reclassification. DOUGLAS S. AM Zoning Adjustor for Spokane County Date: 7 17, X9(3 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 4 Name: Signature: QICHAec Vt 4i (Please P Print) Address: 'P'p 3 Urwszs.ry « Zip Code: rv20 Home Phone: n.osrr Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: (7IcMA.e4 U16. L Preliminary Subdivision Number: Zone Reclassification Number: Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Act Signature of Authorized Representative: Copies to: Planning >- Norma Smith Fee Received: Check ( 'a5 oc, Hearing Date: APPEAL R] QUEST FORM TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RECEIVED Appeal Fee - $75.00 Eusiness Phone: aitaC nk' /Sc; 2 � AD/1L., 4 cv,. 7) iv -A Address: ./ ?/; F YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL OFFICE USE ONLY Engineere?/ Cash NOV 22t9 i COMM COM,M SSIONERS Today's Date f%4//63 RECEIVED NOV 2 3 1383 SPUKANL CUUNTY'EN �KL 7,r.n7 Thd, 21∎Ab. 1 ern A.f41 r..-.r , .> ,(l n 7 ..c . 4 o c-'11)4 r.= /n., 1.�i/.��'iJ Ia -0,'J - nD emi Far A n/J -TM-etc..) "Oc.4GE .. 17-4< A2 Environmental Health / Receipt Number5,f /. Name: Address: Hearing Date: Home Phone: 4/ rJ -os APPEAL RCOUEST FORM TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COtINISSIONERS 204AR° M t 4,e (Please Print) 4'0:7 Jrwsazs: r7 &o. Appeal Fee - $75.00 Address: 2/r/ e- e 7,„ C G.vcr - = YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL OFFICE USE ONLY RECEIVED NOV 2 2 iS s COM!Y COMMISSIONERS Today's Date ,///2//613 Zip Code: nee Business Phone: CZW,q 72/7 -00 2 Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: PCHARa V1€' L 6R Preliminary Subdivision Number: /V -A - Zone Reclassification Number: 2r 3s- g 3 Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Act 'on: ////��_7 Signature: .da- 2/7.4/Y 3 Signature of Authorized Representative: .v .vr r .er -nn qi per A2k•2_,Cr..4 WI:Fr t-44 r h61,.F - rafrarc) pe p,- ) - Th4r: AZ-11 Copies to: Planning Y Engineeri7— Environmental Health Norma Smith Fee Received: Check l,soo, Cash Receipt Number 5cr /f I; cA g ccasic•C ArteoX 1!'##t Q4\ 0 ., . < \ I rn • VALLEY WAY latiCE 0 c.c• I 1.; A to-I 2 S TraCr \.) Amece. 'Hi kr) poor ik,PLI DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 16, 1983 I. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT /OWNER: REQUESTED ZONING: EXISTING ZONING: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -35 -83 and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NUMBER; CUE -11 -83 Agricultural Suburban (Established in 1958) (with Airport Overlay 1980) Section 4.07A.140 -(g) requires a Conditional Use Permit for Barber and Beauty Shops. (See 4.24.420 of the Zoning Ordinance for the Conditional Standards.) note: This application requires two actions by the County; the first is a zone change to Residential Office to be heard by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. The second is a Conditional Use Permit to be heard by the Zoning Adjustor. In order for the barber or beauty shop to be located on this site, both requests need to be approved. PROPOSED USE: Beauty Salon EXISTING USE: Single Family Residence SITE SIZE: Approximately 11,220 Square Feet COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: URBAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: STAFF REPORT RICHARD VIGIL RESIDENTIAL OFFICE and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PRIORITY SEWER SERVICE AREA: Yes AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA: Yes PROJECT LOCATION: This site is generally located in the Spokane Valley, more specifically at the northwest corner of University and Valley Way in Section 17- 25 -44. 3 II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed zone change lies within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as all nearby surrounding areas. This category suggests that neighborhood commercial type uses will be located near the heavily traveled streets. Also, the Text states that due to the variety and mix of land uses and activities found in this category, screening or other performance standards may be necessary to make them compatible with one another. Staff suggests special consideration be given to the location of the parking area of this project. 2) ZONING: North Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1958 East Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1958 West Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1958 South Multiple Family Suburban, Est., 1939 Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1947 3) LAND USE: Site Single Family Residential North Single Family Residential East Single Family Residential South Single Family Residential and Apartments West Single Family Residential 4) HISTORY OF LAND USE ACTIONS: There have been no zone changes in this immediate area since 1958. Although some 600 feet south along University has experienced activity to the Residential Office, Local Business, and some Commercial zoning at and south of Main Avenue. 5) NEIGHBORHOOD CONSIDERATIONS: This immediate area has remained single family residential, although some of the housing stock has started to show its age. III. SITE ANALYSIS 3) SITE PLAN INFORMATION: SITE SIZE: EXISTING BUILDINGS: PROPOSED BUILDINGS: Total Floor Area: Structure Height: PARKING AREA: Parking Required: Parking Provided: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 1) SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSIDERATIONS: The site contains a residence with a detached garage and circular drive in the front yard. The circular drive has been indicated on the site plan to be used for customer parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of six off - street parking spaces, and that the parking areas not be within the front twenty (20) feet of the required front yard. In addition, the Ordinance further requires that parking areas exceeding a six car capacity shall provide an ornamental masonry fence 42 inches in height along the periphery of the parking area. The Planning Director may approve a planted screen or ornamental fence in lieu of said masonry wall. Staff, at this point, is concerned as to whether the site plan as submitted complies with the above requirements. A more detailed plan and review by the Zoning Administrator is required prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits for a barber or beauty shop. 2) AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: This area has been committed to "URBAN' type uses by the Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Approximately 11,110 Square Feet (2) Residence with Detached Garage Existing Residence to be Remodeled Approximately 1,000 Square Feet Existing 20 Feet 6 Spaces - Minimum Unknown III. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) BUFFERING TECHNIQUES: The existing residence contains some landscaping with a 5 foot fence along the north and west property lines. Customer parking and entrance to the facility along with advertising signs would be the major impact to adjacent properties. If properly located and screened, this project would have less effect to those properties. OTHER SITE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS: The County Engineer has required an additional 15 feet right of way for Valley Way and an additional 10 feet right of way for University Road. This condition would have a direct effect on the parking lot location with regards to not being allowed in the front twenty (20) feet of the front yard. A detailed site plan is necessary to determine how this issue is impacted. Relocation to the rear yard or a Variance to this requirement appear to be alternatives available to the sponsor. However, the Variance is a discretionary decision which could be denied, if applied for by the applicant. V. RECOMMENDED AGENCY CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED: a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 1. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties). 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 6 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 4. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All current standards of the Residential Office Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 6. Signs for the project shall conform to standards as set forth in Section 4.07A.130 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Landscaping shall be provided for this site, in conformance with Standards as identified in Section 4.07A.120 Landscaping. 8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 9. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. 10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners' Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982. 11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environ ment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 12. That a detailed site plan be submitted for review and approval by the Zoning Administrator, indicating compliance with the provisions of the Residential Office Zone with specific regard to the number of parking spaces required, the location of the parking area, and the masonry fence requirement. 7 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 15 feet on Valley Way for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on University Road for right -of -way. 3. Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Valley Way and University prior to any use of the property. 4. Applicant shall improve Valley Way in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Access Standard. 5. Applicant shall improve University Road in a manner consistent with Spokane TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Major Arterial Standard. 6. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 7. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 8. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners'Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. Each new unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated. 2. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the project is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 9 a 4, e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # 1. 1f) WATER PURVEYOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -35 -83 Z: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.: CUE -11 -83 d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (continued) 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Social and Health Services. 6. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces prohibited. supply when Department of is currently 2. Reclassification of an existing building shall require an application for change of occupancy permit, and subsequent inspection for approval. Installation of fire hydrant will be required to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. 1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. g) '208' STUDY 1. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. The following "conditions of approval" for the above - referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion In the staff analysis and "findings and order" of the hearing scheduled l‘iovinm'oe✓ 3 19 Prior To The Issuance Of • Building Permit O TO: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: County Engineer's Department ( I'f.` ( 1) CA^1 SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval -Zone Change -- Number: z 3 5 _ 83 ______ Applicant's Name V i� Sect l our) _ Township � Range .-IY eld! Applicant shall dedicate 15 feet on Va \la_j for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on UN) ; o c2S.1' ♦( RA for right -of -way emi mope eesemence ens aseeeeesy prioi to any use of the property. Applicant shall dedicate a.20 foot radius on //A //6 _14.44,1/ and L�{/iiJee %r prior to any use of the property. / r 4. Applicant shall dedicate and S. Access permits for approaches to the County Road Spokane County Engineer. 6. Access permits and improvements to by the Washington Department of Transportation. 7. Access permits and improvements to by the City of (a) Applicant shall improve (other _ (.04f( 1n a County TYPICAL roadway section No. ,/ minimum (b) Applicant shall improve tiNit&P,:;; 4 Jfcl in a County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 / minimum (c) Applicant shall Improve in a County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum (d) Applicant shall improve County TYPICAL roadway Section No. (e) Other specific improvements: baiter, sue{ 60' R to OPFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON feet on and • foot radius on 10. The applicant shall submit for approval by County Health District a detailed combined disposal plan tor the entire project nriu! property. for right -of -way prior to any OG - obeC,- lo ... , 19 83 use of the property. System shall be obtained from the must be approved must be approved manner consistent with Spokane paving width Acce55. snl manner consistent with Spokane paving width m4/o.t.. aYFr /u/ 57 manner consistent with Spokane paving width in a manner consistent with Spokane minimum paving width 9. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane ,n-site sewage system plan. and surface water '.0 the issuance of any building permit on the r44:1 ezefeer 11. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shalt be submitted and approved by the • Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 13 14 The word "applicant" assigns, and successo To construct the road the County Engineer, which purpose is the pursuant to RCW 36.88 these improvement.. shall Include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, rs. improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of Join in and be a willing participant to any petition or resolution formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement , as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of . As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the appli- cant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements • stated herein by Joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 15. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as ap- proved by the Spokane County Engineer. 16 All required improvements shall conform to the current State Of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable county standards and or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 17. Applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of prior to any use of the property. 18. Applicant shall construct • paved and delineated access approach(.) to net the existing pavement on 19. Access to Road shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. k . 4" �k • SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Date: 0S /.f? Application No: 7 — 235 - - 6 '3 Name of Applicant: Ricr -iAR• g16/c._ Street Address of Applicant: ,City: <jn,ro„vo> State: Name of Property Owner(s): Authorized Agent representing Owner (if other than owner): Acy c,,,t. Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Existing ' Use of Property: Ofr,o �,cr Proposed Zone Classification: 2.4 - c /O= r'. n ,'1.=< Proposed Use of Property: /(',e. j , S1 / Ml Existing Zoning Classification: Legal Description of Property: pt�er. . t� ,>1.1„vS Su 14'c#*'aw R4,0c.c 1 F /n /n WA N //O 3' ay/ u. °LC/ Zip Code: rrZnc Tele. No. 22.4 - /Svz the 4_ Section: / 7S4'q. o4v / Township: 49/BQCZw /,/i Range: Source of Legal: lo. ,4rrerc&s= Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement) /7S'W /— (997/ Property Size: / /OA /DZ Frontage: /4 2 Feet on: / /0 Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Street Address of the Property: . i/. /<OS ()AA (ArV.r, r • If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? • Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: ,ijM,c ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? 1.1/6 / On iw r5 A7 /_ 7[X) (;),„4 . 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? 57 Cu % C o.>J /9, /LE/ 7.e / A" / = G !A.' OY I �CJ Jc i f ' / , Fi' r./r NOJc.L;.u(7 Oft / “yS7y , 'T rf-ih . f'' .'7 CSI f,k'.•7L - y Rev. 2/3/81 wit PROPOSAL DEVELOPER or AGENT Name: OWNER Address: Phone: Business Name: ENGINEER Address: Phone: Business B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: Remarks: Preliminary Conditions C. INSPECTION Fee Paid: Date Mathematical S No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 S P O K A N E - - - P R E L I M I N A R Y C O N S U L T A T I O N -- Project Name: - 'c - �r:_ Number of Parcels: Section a) b) c) d) e) f) g) D. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS Right -of -Way Curb Sidewalk Pave Approaches Drainage State /City C O U N T Y /7 T. - , N., R. [ /e/ E.W.M.; (quarter 1 2 3 4 Name: i C L't f ,, r 1 . ( } , Address: Ai 4! (.71(/ n!� t,,.,f.; ' / IF // Phone: Business /Home - come /4 f ?e 67 yc '� Yom tir.: YLwtitc, QIrip Review Yes ( ) Ps / (_k (' k. try/ 27; Pnt2 en - evict Tn / /.tll r S /r, r cr- LEA / /c;/^ U.J / 7 ( / / NOTE: This proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap- proach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in- spection and review of County records. Date: / / By: Remarks: (CC Fee Paid: Yes No Amount $ Planning Application Signed: Date / Surveying Checks: Date Date Date Amount By By By -'A 106 E N G I N E E R /C //1? r Ah,i / �l /V /ua/t T/ /a yes -5 ['as v.)1L4* Eo,G eci✓c77 By: Home Home No ( ) iC i9 \1�' }- \ol�4e C/t�c�11 Gash Check / By ju Check Cash Additional mathematical and Surveying Clucks: No. 4 Date By - - -Fec Amt. &Dt.I'd. __ No. 5 Date By_ Fee Amt.bDt.l'd.__ No. 6 Date By — _ -- - — Fee Amt .•SDt .I'd.__ - ___ No. 7 Date By _________F��r Amt.&Di.Pd. N um b e - - Jr) - (S3 1 /HI This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat- ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. U+1Ls Ej COUNTY- {44611NE€R'S OFFICE A p eijminary con Itation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our req r me t/ for bmittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. The dP<ig ted water purveyor for this site is Sighature/ (Date) WATER PURVEYOR (NAME) >0//r /'; -, The proposal (is) (is not) located within the boundary of our service area. b) Satisfactory arrangements have) (have not) been made to serve this proposal. c) We are) (are not) able t,, serve this site with adequate water. (Signature) z ` I BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held requirements for submittal of this proposal This •'•p• - located in Fire District # nature) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A _eliminary consultation ap 5 g APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION -- continued -2 I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY LEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. NOTARY SEAL: (Signed) (Address) NOTARY J SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT / % 3 r-ffe (t44; �- ay (Date / to discuss the proposal. Our for rezone have been satisfied. /E / (Date) • has been held to discuss the proposal. as be informed of our requirements and standards. iiS —_ (Da ) The PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW- OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO - IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY Date: Phone: Zip: Date: Date: Rev. 2/3/81 70'04'4, 35- 13 cua ii -g1 Cutt1i. r A L S�,J PM/a : f1(S . O,riricF Set 9', lJ: d / ".. 4?- 4c1a6r 6a 1'0 to /"CN Sft94t 1' s .' - .--- -- t Vivant " f Ape Qeitt Kan( c c .Pro.s.;■-; ' , i • It Q. • ' tn ; F r‘t, r• • • • • i'Ve • • 1)- I £ E • . •... .• , . 2:1thi , • , BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ZE- 35 -83, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE APPLICANT: VIGIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Richard Vigil, Applicant in the above captioned zone reclassification, has filed a Notice of Appeal of the denial of said application by the Hearing Examiner Committee; and NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will conduct a public hearing at 1:30 P.M. on TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 1984, at its office in the County Courthouse, West 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, to consider this application for a zone reclassification from Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office on property Generally located at the northwest corner of University Road and Valley Way -- Section 17- 25 -44. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition to this zone reclassification. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 29 day of November, 1983. PUBLISH: SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD DECEMBER 14, 1983 (map) WILLIAM E. IONAHUE CLERK OF BOARD BY: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROS'NNE MONTAGUE, DEPUTY Gary (Ken naly Engineers RECEIVED DEC 2 7 1983 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER IJ N.UfW[lL 06. /. NIXON Q Ri■ERS.D[". TALDo 1./ ELL I DE34.4f7 DEA G m .•.EL. 1959 Y 3 x L' A EC .199-5E COUNTY ., _*� .; r''.r•., ROAD •N 2 3 2gra SpRAG t _4 MIL WAUKEE RAILROAD rJ if O t D AvE 5th W f 1. 8 T H n L.11 ..1 J ,� cHo h ; -.- 7 T T ;.. H ter L.1 "WC re.r L1 F. zinc S; . 8 3i.E: Hi gh:: L cii... >I CUE- 11- 3 9 o f } FouPT S I X T H 9 TH f 9TH 1 i SEvENTH 5'NTD EIGHTH AV IO TH 1i H .XwE AvE 1 'r 7ne n tA1N • 1 :1000 EL.1995 (//7; vevs7 '7 4-Dr /95 9o00 _ / $'U . 757,5 /lfs' . G9so /977 3-87 /97c C2 7b / S S /fly GS 3 0 / o30 /77?. 497 - m( ' Si z( rye112 fr'7ra'n ?id 3 0ititi -2Ao itov W 84 0236 IN THE MATTER OF ZONE RECLASSI- ) FICATION, ZE- 35 -83, AGRICULTURAL ) SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: ) VIGIL ) BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON FINDINGS OF FACT FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION 1. That the proposal is generally located in the Spokane Valley, more specifically at the northwest corner of University Road and Valley Way. 2. That the proposal consists of an approximately 11,220 square foot lot with existing single family dwelling proposed to be converted to a Beauty /Barber Shop. 3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates Urban usage of the area encompassed by the proposal. 4. That the provisions of RCW Chapter 43.21C, (State Environmental Policy Act) have been met. Inasmuch as the Board denied the proposal, the Board does not enter any finding on the SEPA or issue any final declaration. 5. That the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee held a public hearing on November 16, 1983, concerning the proposal, subsequent to which by Findings of Fact, Decision and Order dated November 17, 1983, they unanimously Denied the proposal. 6. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal include single family residential and apartment uses. 7. That the proposal is not compatible at this point in time with existing uses in the area. 8. That the proposal is detrimental or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety and welfare. In particular, it would generate increased traffic and would conflict with the residential nature of the neighborhood. 9. That the applicant has not demonstrated sufficient or substantial changes in the area since the original zoning of the parcel to Agricultural Suburban in 1958 to warrant the proposed zone change to Residential Office. RECEIVED MAR 2 1 1984 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board" of an appeal of Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of November 17, 1983, unanimously Denying the zone reclassification (ZE- 35 -83), Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office for the purpose of developing a Beauty /Barber Shop, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal ", and the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County having held a public hearing on January 10, 1984, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and further having individually visited with the site and vicinity in question, and having rendered a decision on the 24th day of January, 1984, DENYING said proposal, does hereby make the following: It 84 0236 FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS - ZE -35 -83 Page #2 10. That the proposal at the present time is inconsistent with the surrounding land use classifications and would grant a special privilege or rights to the applicant different than those enjoyed by adjacent property owners. At the present time there is no non - residential land uses or Local Business and Residential Office Zones in the immediate vicinity of the proposal. However, some Local Business and Residential Office Zones exist along University Road to the south from Main Avenue. 11. That although evidence was presented at the public hearing indicating an increase in traffic along University Road, the increased traffic is not substantial enough to warrant a rezone to Residential Office for a non - residential use of the property. 12. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have been met. 13. That on the 24th day of January, 1984, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County at a regular meeting did DENY the proposal. From the foregoing Findings, a review of the Planning Department Staff Report dated November 16, 1983, and the Staff presentation of File No. ZE- 35 -83, the Board hereby DENIES the proposal. DATED This /D day of ATTEST: WILLIAM . DONAHUE Cler of the Board ¥putt' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON , 198 DATE (j cc / - __ - --- CRP /RID /PLAT /Z. C. No. - - - -, FEDERAL /STATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE QcLatta °IIG!c � r7r fZcZ-0K£ - ro PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING CONDITIONS: ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION Current PROJECT DESCRIPTION J/j jjce, 7'4 - Alstarer DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD INVOLVED a , / > ,� �l� ,- ggaac -/ PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION l.1 Atli nt o,= 261 c 4,vaJ/a • / JUSTIFICATION 6- ' ) / ,4M O» /eCC j n) rrS�,/T /AL(o lid / teal -, C,64= .54'fte, (, 4 J4 ,e /i... -ir At4_ -�0 1Sh g,' =' r 1 GA1V� / i7� 7M S /7c /k S41/1GC • i. ,/7i/ -1o, )/a r. CID w/* c... /A Gv_cA riO 'L (� 6) /A,<X F-v 7f jJA C7.4c!_C / /l, (li tt, //c/ 4t_ /1/ (-fit 7 1.-// 7N' / /iSLSl1F� C/= • . nJ r /,4,S7ACt Zns- etc: © Lit a,==tv Ai rf ROAD NAME PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT: Design Year ` J UL! 2 ± 1986 SPOKA CO'yq v EPJGINEER STAFF KEc:OMMF:NUAT[ONS S _ 0/,14_4S10a..771/5..PAoOQJp t _ W(TH fs. - NI , V- Mr f_QF P_ L 6�►/�I/ /_ N .617 . .9 A1 .. 8 //V /86 _ ..:' T,94 P. . /A/4q r 7 0/O'4/ t _ _ iT_A_ LLJ wen RE_¢vt_RiD _ , .T.2 [r2Trii t w/rN st4440ssel4/Nr. '15 .414.1100 T_N_�__,41e4__AS._S1.!OWN_ %n! Cr!eEe6A____Co114 __As ,e/sZO _ _DAA /.✓A6!t _ HoT__ -- !�l!T�.�f6 � - -- /TN_ !Ys 11✓Cs�. AA,PK/Nfr STAti t /S $ #T/f OP 7$S LD PN 6r " Approve Not Approved �. C� Approved Not Approved El Approved Not Approved n Approved Not Approved Approved Not r Approved Y -mil a n A 5 c- .J a,-J q - 774crlEn s, i E OL/-},✓ ,__/% aP!e925 - f� 12013 _ A./2.-EA ee _er- ouiaEo A, 7 - -1 Diur .4tJv Ap ✓F2ss o,✓ T,3_L ,7est 6 9 Pste NCO /Nc ?l-1� 20 LF A -.en T,taT rr�c DE-Lit prikorJ REaUESL No O E to.P rich/ G?. • ion Engineer n ivr roe zt . Date / Date 1 d ate Ave- L _ __dfri r du _f f2 A / ,�/i �eer